Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2020 Feb 19;139:104810. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104810

Cerebrospinal fluid ceruloplasmin levels predict cognitive decline and brain atrophy in people with underlying β-amyloid pathology

Ibrahima Diouf 1,2, Ashley I Bush 1, Scott Ayton 1,*, Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative
PMCID: PMC7150625  NIHMSID: NIHMS1571410  PMID: 32087292

Abstract

Objectives:

The mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may involve oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a circulating protein that intersects both these pathways, since its expression is increased during the acute phase response, and the protein acts to lower pro-oxidant iron in cells. Since the role of Cp in AD, and its potential for use as a biomarker is not established, we investigated CSF Cp and its association with longitudinal outcome measures related to AD.

Methods:

This was an observational study of 268 people from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging (ADNI) cohort. Subjects were classified clinically as having AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or were cognitively normal (CN), and were also classified as being positive for β-amyloid using established thresholds in the CSF t-tau/Aβ42 ratio. Subjects underwent cognitive tests and MRI studies every 6 months for 2 years, then yearly thereafter for up to 6 years.

Results:

At baseline, CSF Cp was not associated with clinical or pathological diagnosis, but we found an unexpected association between CSF Cp and levels of CSF apolipoprotein E. In longitudinal analysis, high level of CSF Cp was associated with accelerated cognitive decline (as assessed by ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB, and MMSE) and ventricular volume enlargement in people classified as MCI and who had underlying β-amyloid pathology.

Conclusion:

These results raise new questions into the role of Cp in neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and APOE pathways involved in AD, and reveal the potential for this protein to be used as a biomarker in disease prognostication.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, biomarkers, ceruloplasmin, inflammation, oxidative stress

Introduction

Cognitive decline begins in the years prior to the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as a clinical manifestation of insidious neurodegeneration. While β-amyloid (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangle proteinopathy accumulate in this prodromal phase, the toxic mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration remain unknown. One third of cognitively normal people over the age of 65 have elevated plaque pathology as measured by Aβ PET or a ratio of total tau (t-tau) to Aβ42 in the CSF [1, 2]; these people are likely to undergo cognitively decline in the ensuing years, but with large degree of variability between people [3]. The discovery of biomarkers that predict decline upon pathology has been prioritised for their clinical value in disease prognostication, and also for the potential insight into the disease mechanism that may be gleaned from the association of a biomarker with disease outcomes.

Furthermore, since lowering Aβ pathology has proven unsuccessful in halting disease progression in many large-scale clinical trials [4], there is renewed impetus to investigate other components of the disease mechanism, such as neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a protein that intersects these pathways, given that it is an acute phase protein whose expression is induced during inflammation [5], and is a protein that acts to lower iron-induced oxidative damage. This function may be important since elevated brain iron in AD (measured using ferritin in CSF, MRI, and directly in post mortem tissue) predicts accelerated disease progression [611]. But the role of Cp in AD pathophysiology, or its potential for use as a biomarker is not established.

Cp is the major copper binding protein of plasma, but it is not involved in copper metabolism, rather Cp functions to promote iron export from cells via the iron exporting protein, ferroportin [12]. Ferroportin is a membrane channel that presents ferrous (Fe2+) iron to the extracellular surface where it is oxidized by Cp so that the extracellular ferric (Fe3+) transporting protein, transferrin, can bind and remove iron from the cell [13].

Two isoforms of Cp exist, a soluble form, and a glycosylphophatidylinositol (GPI)-linked form that has alternative splice sites for exon 19 and 20. The GPI-linked Cp is expressed in astrocytes in the brain [14], and also the testis [15]. In the brain, Cp is additionally present in soluble form in CSF [1618]. It is not known whether this soluble Cp is supplied by the blood, released by another cell type, or the result of GPI cleavage [19]. The level of Cp in CSF is however (~1.6 ng/ml [18]) much lower than that of plasma (0.2 mg/ml [20]).

Loss or impaired Cp activity is damaging to the brain, indeed aceruloplasminemia, a genetic disease where mutations in Cp lead to low levels of the protein, is one cause of Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation (NBIA). This disease is characterized by iron elevation and progressive neurological symptoms that may include (but are not limited to) cognitive decline, parkinsonism, ataxia, and chorea [21]. In mice, loss of Cp protein causes iron-mediated neurodegeneration accompanying motor and cognitive impairments [22], and elevation of Cp by supplementation has been reported to improve animal models of iron overload [2326]. In an animal model of AD, loss of Cp exacerbated the phenotype [27].

Low activity of Cp may therefore promote iron retention and contribute to neurodegeneration, whereas elevated Cp may be a reporter of an inflammatory state. In AD patients, decreased Cp activity has been reported in serum [28, 29], whereas the level of Cp protein in serum has been inconsistently reported as elevated [30], decreased [31], or unchanged [32]. Cp was shown to be increased in CSF of 17 non-pathologically confirmed AD patients [16], whereas another paper reported unchanged levels but decreased specific activity of CSF Cp in 10 non-pathologically confirmed AD patients [17]. Here, we investigated the level of Cp in CSF of a well-characterized AD cohort, and investigated its association with longitudinal disease progression.

Methods

Study design and participants

Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu) on 16/8/2018. The data files include ADNIMERGE and “Biomarkers Consortium ADNI CSF Multiplex Raw”. The ADNI study has been previously described in detail [33]. The ADNI study was launched in 2003 as a public-private partnership, led by Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary goal of ADNI has been to test whether serial MRI PET, other biological markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessment can be combined to measure the progression of MCI and early AD. For up-to-date information, see www.adni-info.org.

Recruitment inclusion and exclusion criteria

Consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Committees of each Institution in which the work was performed approved the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Hachinski Ischemic Score ≤4; 2) Permitted medications stable for 4 weeks prior to screening; 3) Geriatric Depression Scale score < 6; 4) visual and auditory acuity adequate for neuropsychological testing; good general health with no diseases precluding enrollment; 5) 6 grades of education or work history equivalent; 6) Ability to speak English or Spanish fluently; 7) A study partner with 10 hours per week of contact either in person or on the telephone who could accompany the participant to the clinic visits. Cognitively normal (CN) subjects must have no significant cognitive impairment or impaired activities of daily living. Clinical diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease patients (AD) must have had mild AD and had to meet the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria for probable AD [34], whereas mild cognitive impairment subjects (MCI) should not meet these criteria, have largely intact general cognition as well as functional performance, but meet defined criteria for MCI.

CSF biomarkers

CSF was collected on a sample of the ADNI cohort at baseline. CSF samples were frozen within one hour of collection and stored at −80°C without prior centrifugation. Ferritin and apolipoprotein E levels were measured with the Rules Based Medicine (RBM) multiplex platform [35], while levels of CSF Aβ42 and total tau (t-tau) were measured with the Elecsys immunoassay platform, as previously described [36].

Cp was measured using multi-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (peptides IYHSHIDAPK and NNEGTYYSPNYNPQSR). Prior to MS analysis, high abundant serum proteins (excluding Cp) were depleted in the CSF using a MARS-14 immunoaffinity resin, run in batches of 12, 20, or 21 over 15 days, using two separate MARS-14 columns. Details of run order and column usage have been previously described [34]. Three in-run QC samples (HGS-CSF, human gold standard CSF (Bioreclamation, lot BRH631340)) were included per depletion day (beginning, middle and end). These QC samples were processed at the same time and the same manner as the study samples and were used to assess the reproducibility of the sample processing and mass spectrometry analysis. The depleted samples, containing the remaining lower abundance proteins, were stored at −80°C. After all samples were depleted, the frozen samples were lyophilized over 72 hrs. The lyophilized samples were digested overnight with trypsin (Promega) at 1:10 protease-to-protein ratio, based on the protein amount determined by BCA. The digested samples were lyophilized and desalted using an Empore C18 96-well plate (3M). Two sets of replicate mass spectrometry (MS) plates were prepared for each sample. The plates were dried by vacuum evaporation and stored at −20°C prior to MS analysis. Peptide quantification was then conducted using a LC/MRM-MS system (NanoAcquity UPLC [Waters] coupled to a 5500 QTRAP mass spectrometer [AB Sciex]), as previously described [34].

The raw mass spectrometer data files (WIFF) were converted to mzXML format and loaded into the Elucidator software (version 3.3.0.1 SP4.25, Rosetta Biosciences) and processed using the “PeakTeller” processing pipeline for chromatogram alignment, noise filtering, data smoothing, peak detection and quantitation. The peak alignment was then manually reviewed. If more than 20% of the peaks of a sample were not well aligned with the others, the sample was excluded. The following set of 5 additional peptide verification criteria were implemented to using Perl scripts developed in-house and orchestrated using Elucidator’s “visual scripts” plug-in interface (for further details see [34]). Peptides with one or more flags were manually reviewed and were either kept or discarded, depending on the overall peak shape, the quality of the alignment and the presence of a neighboring interference. Once the final set of transitions was validated, the peak area data were transformed on the natural log scale. The amount of Cp was calculated by the summation of the peptides and expressed in relative units, since heavy-isotope labelled internal standard peptides were not used to allow for absolute quantitation.

Cognitive assessments

Cognitive assessment protocol has been previously described in detail (See www.loni.ucla.edu/ADNI, and for detail [37]). Assessments were undertaken by a trained ratter in site visits every 6 months for 2 years, then yearly for up to 6 years. Only CN and MCI subjects were included in the cognitive analysis because of low follow up numbers for AD subjects. Subjects were only included in the analysis if they had more than 1 cognitive assessment. The cognitive tests utilized were the ADAS-Cog (Alzheimer’s disease assessment Scale-cognitive subscale), CDR-SB (clinical dementia rating scale, sum of boxes) and MMSE (mini mental state exam) obtained in the ADNIMERGE primary table as part of the ADNIMERGE R package, downloaded on the 16/8/2018.

Structural MRI acquisition and processing

Subjects with a 1·5-T MRI and a sagittal volumetric 3D MPRAGE with variable resolution around the target of 1·2 mm isotropically were included in the analysis. See (www.loni.ucla.edu/ADNI), and for detail [38]. The hippocampal and ventral volumes utilized were those in the ADNIMERGE primary table as part of the ADNIMERGE R package, downloaded on the 16/8/2018. Only CN and MCI subjects were included in the MRI analysis because of low follow up numbers for AD subjects. Subjects were only included in the analysis if they had more than one MRI scan. MRI scans were performed at baseline, six months, one year, and then yearly for six years.

Statistical analysis

Baseline demographics of participants included in this study were described in strata of Aβ pathology, based on previously published CSF t-tau/Aβ42 ratio threshold: t-tau/Aβ42 ratio < 0.27 for low pathology and ≥0.27 for high pathology [36]. Factors associated with baseline CSF Cp were analysed in a linear regression model of Cp, with the following covariates: age, gender, APOE ε4 genotype, diagnosis (NC, MCI), CSF levels of apolipoprotein E, ferritin and t-tau/Aβ42 (included as a continuous variable in each of the high/low t-tau/Aβ42 groups) as independent variables. To assess associations between longitudinal changes in cognition and brain volume with bassline CSF Cp, participants were stratified by diagnosis and t-tau/Aβ42 ratio. Data were modelled with mixed effects linear models including age, sex, APOE ε4, apolipoprotein E levels, and t-tau/Aβ42 (included as a continuous variable in each of the high/low t-tau/Aβ42 groups) as covariates. Models were performed with R (version 3.5.0) and tested for multicollinearity and normal distribution of residuals. Bonferroni adjustment was used to correct for multiple comparisons of the cognitive tests (α=0.05, m=3: adjusted α= 0.017) and volumetric analysis (α=0.05, m=2: adjusted α= 0.025).

Results

We identified 268 ANDI subjects with complete data for biomarkers (CSF values of Cp, tau, Aβ42, ferritin, and apolipoprotein E) to perform cross-sectional analysis (Table 1). To determine whether AD-related clinical variables were associated with CSF Cp levels, we stratified the cohort based on previously described threshold in the CSF t-tau/Aβ42 ratio (0.27), indicating underlying amyloid deposition [36], and performed separate multiple regressions of CSF Cp (Table 2). This pathology stratification is important since AD is frequently misdiagnosed clinically, and MCI may be due to another pathological change (e.g. vascular dementia). Furthermore, there are many people with prodromal AD, who have the pathology of AD but are cognitive normal; these people are at high risk of future cognitive decline [3] and therefore shouldn’t be considered as normal controls. In people with high t-tau/Aβ42, Cp levels were not associated with diagnosis, sex, t-tau/Aβ42 or CSF ferritin levels, or APOE ε4 genotype (Table 2), but was unexpectedly associated levels of CSF apolipoprotein E (β[S.E.]= 2.51 [0.65]; P=0.0002; Figure 1A) and age (β[S.E.]= 0.036 [0.01]; P=0.002). In participants with low t-tau/Aβ1-42, there was no significant association between Cp levels and the different independent variables (Table 2). In this group, the association between CSF apoE levels and CSF Cp levels was similar to what we observed in the high t-tau/Aβ42 but did not reach statistical significance (β[S.E.]= 3.275 [1.662]; P=0.054; Figure 1B). The higher p value in this group might reflect the lower N compared to the high t-tau/Aβ42 group (72 vs 196).

Table 1.

Baseline clinical variables.

Low t-tau/Aβ42 High t-tau/Aβ42

N 72 196
Age (mean, S.E.) 75.4 (6.69) 75.0 (7.10)
Male Sex (N, %) 45 (62.5%) 118 (60.2%)
Dx – CN (N, %) 45 (62.5%) 23 (11.7%)
Dx – MCI (N, %) 24 (33.3%) 109 (55.6%)
Dx – AD (N, %) 3 (4.2%) 64 (32.7%)
APOE ε4 +ve (N, %) 7 (9.7%) 130 (66.3%)

S.E. : Standard error. Dx : Diasnosis

Table 2.

Association between baseline clinical variables and CSF Cp levels in people with low and high t-tau/Aβ42. Data are from a multiple regression model of CSF Cp levels including the variables indicated in the table (CSF t-tau/Aβ42 was additionally included as a continuous variable in the seperate models stratified by this biomarker). β for the CSF values represent standard deviation shift of each analyte. β for age is in years.

Covariate Low t-tau/Aβ42 High t-tau/Aβ42

β S.E. P β S.E. P
Age (years) −0.003 (0.024) 0.915 0.036 (0.011) 0.002*
Male Sex 0.269 (0.327) 0.414 0.171 (0.163) 0.294
Dx – MCI 0.271 (0.344) 0.434 0.227 (0.242) 0.349
Dx – AD NA NA NA 0.473 (0.263) 0.075
APOE ε4 +ve 0.244 (0.551) 0.660 0.278 (0.170) 0.103
CSF apolipoprotein E 3.275 (1.662) 0.054 2.51 (0.650) 0.0002*
CSF ferritin −1.57 (1.30) 0.377 0.094 (0.613) 0.879
CSF t-tau/Aβ42 −3.37 (3.75) 0.373 −0.380 (0.311) 0.223

S.E.: Standard Error. Dx: diagnosis.

*

represents significant P values.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Association between CSF apolipoprotein E levels and CSF Cp levels in people with (A) high and (B) low CSF t-tau/Aβ42.

The associations between baseline Cp and disease progression over 6 years (see Table 3 for N) were investigated in pathology strata (t-tau/Aβ42 < 0.27 and t-tau/Aβ42 > 0.27) and disease category (CN and MCI). In CN subjects, Cp was not associated with longitudinal change in any of the cognitive tests regardless of t-tau/Aβ42 status. Similarly, Cp was not associated with change in cognition in MCI subjects with low t-tau/Aβ42 (Table 4). However, in MCI subjects with high t-tau/Aβ42, elevated baseline CSF Cp levels were associated with declining cognitive performance measured by CDR-SB (β[S.E.]= 0.149 [0.041]; P= 3 x 10−4; Figure 2A), ADAS-Cog (β[S.E.]= 0.744 [0.145]; P=3 x 10−7; Figure 2B), and MMSE (β[S.E.]= −0.153 [0.069]; P=0.027; Figure 2C). This association between baseline Cp levels and changes in MMSE score was not significant when correction for multiple testing was applied.

Table 3.

Number of subjects who underwent cognitive and MRI assessments at each timepoint, for each disease category.

Clinical
Dx
t-tau/Aβ42
Dx
Years
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 4 5 6
Cognition CN Low 45 45 45 0 42 43 31 25 28
CN High 23 23 21 0 22 17 13 11 12
MCI Low 24 24 24 24 22 18 12 10 7
MCI High 108 107 108 102 93 74 39 30 29

MRI CN Low 40 40 35 0 31 28 22 14 17
CN High 21 21 21 0 19 12 11 7 10
MCI Low 20 18 17 19 15 13 7 7 4
MCI High 83 78 76 70 61 47 27 18 13

Table 4.

Association between baseline CSF Cp levels and t-tau/Aβ42 ratio with change in longitudinal cognitive and MRI-volumetric outcomes. Data are from separate mixed effects linear models of outcome (either CDR-SB, ADAS-Cog, MMSE, Hippocampal Volume or Lateral ventricular volume) and include the following covariates: age, sex, APOE ε4, and CSF levels of Cp, t-tau/Aβ42 (CSF t-tau/Aβ42 was additionally included as a continuous variable in the separate models stratified by this biomarker), apolipoprotein E, and ferritin, and all of these interacted with time, β represent interaction with time with either CSF Cp levels or t-tau/Aβ42 levels. α was set at 0.05, and a Bonferroni adjustment was used to correct for multiple comparisons for cognitive and volumetric studies.

Outcome Clinical
Dx
t-tau/Aβ42
Dx
CSF Cp levels CSF t-tau/Aβ42 levels
β S.E. P β S.E. P
CDR-SB CN Low 0.004 (0.009) 0.630 0.616 (0.258) 0.018#

CN High 0.001 (0.042) 0.987 0.121 (0.210) 0.564

MCI Low 0.047 (0.039) 0.233 3.304 (1.141) 0.004*

MCI High 0.149 (0.041) 3 x 10−4* 0.473 (0.178) 0.008*

ADAS-Cog CN Low −0.036 (0.085) 0.676 −4.01 (2.56) 0.118

CN High 0.287 (0.848) 0.249 0.979 (0.848) 0.249

MCI Low −0.066 (0.162) 0.685 10.05 (4.71) 0.033#

MCI High 0.744 (0.145) 3 x 10−7* 1.40 (0.647) 0.031#

MMSE CN Low 0.017 (0.028) 0.537 −0.966 (0.825) 0.242

CN High −0.061 (0.065) 0.348 0.008 (0.325) 0.980

MCI Low −0.072 (0.074) 0.336 −5.410 (2.147) 0.012#

MCI High −0.153 (0.069) 0.027# −1.130 (0.297) 2 x 10−4*

Hippocampal volume CN Low −8.29 (6.22) 0.184 −321.4 (207.3) 0.122

CN High −5.23 (8.11) 0.519 −281.5 (44.4) 9 x 10−9*

MCI Low 13.8 (12.0) 0.253 552.3 (433.9) 0.203

MCI High −9.02 (9.64) 0.350 −18.5 (32.8) 0.572

Ventricular volume CN Low 106.9 (53.7) 0.063 −11.2 (146.4) 0.940

CN High 424.6 (133.8) 0.002* −231.7 (627.6) 0.712

MCI Low −3022 (1898) 0.112 −2562 (4691) 0.585

MCI High 479.2 (112.6) 4 x 10−5* −479.1 (477.0) 0.316
#:

indicates nominally significant P values.

*

indicates significant P values after Bonferroni correction.

S.E.: Standard Error. Dx: diagnosis.

The number of subjects who underwent cognitive and MRI assessments at each timepoint, and for each disease category is presented in Table 3.

Figure 2. Association between baseline CSF Cp levels and longitudinal change in (A-C) cognition and (D-E) lateral ventricular volume.

Figure 2.

In MCI subjects with high t-tau/Aβ42, baseline CSF Cp was associated with longitudinal change in (A) CDR-SB, (B) ADAS-Cog13 and (C) MMSE. Baseline CSF was associated with accelerated enlargement of the lateral ventricular area in people with high t-tau/Aβ42 who were classified at baseline as (D) CN or (E) MCI. Data are mean +/− S.E.

In a similar analysis series, we investigated whether CSF Cp levels were associated with longitudinal brain atrophy, as measured by MRI-determined hippocampal and lateral ventricular volumes. Baseline CSF Cp levels were not associated with longitudinal change in hippocampal volume regardless of clinical or pathological status (Table 4). Similarly, CSF Cp levels were not associated with changes in lateral ventricular volume in MCI subjects with low t-tau/Aβ1-42. However, increased CSF Cp levels were associated with accelerated enlargement of lateral ventricular in high t-tau/Aβ42 subjects classified as CN (β[S.E.]= 424.6 [133.8]; P=0.002; Figure 2D) or MCI (β[S.E.]= 479.2 [112.6]; P = 4 x 10−5; Figure 2E). Baseline CSF t-tau/Aβ42 was associated with changes in hippocampal volume in CN subjects with underlying Aβ pathology (β[S.E.]= −281.5 [44.4]; P = 9 x 10−9), but was not associated with volume changes in any other model.

Discussion

Neurodegeneration in AD may involve oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory mechanisms, and efforts to identify biomarkers of these processes may be clinically useful in disease prognostication, as well as to help shine light on therapeutic targets to slow down these processes. Cp is an acute phase protein whose expression is induced during inflammation [5], and it is a protein that functions to lower iron burden [12], which may promote neurodegeneration in AD [611]. Cp expression is also dependent on copper availability, and since low brain copper is also a feature of AD [39], it is possible that this may further affect the levels of Cp in CSF. While Cp is linked to these neurochemical changes occurring in AD, we could only find 2 prior papers that investigated CSF Cp levels in a total of 27 AD patients, studied cross sectionally [16, 17]. Here, in a cohort of 268 along the spectrum of AD clinical and pathological diagnosis, we found that CSF Cp levels were not elevated in AD, however, relatively high levels of Cp were associated with accelerated disease progression in people with MCI and underlying Aβ-pathology (confirmed with CSF tau/Aβ42).

Cp functions to lower cellular iron burden, which has been reported to be elevated in AD cortex, with a degree of variably between areas and studies [9, 40, 41], so it may seem surprising that higher level of this protein is associated with accelerated disease progression toward AD. A similar observation was reported in HIV patients, where elevated Cp levels (and other acute phase proteins) were associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment [18]. Since elevation of Cp levels have been shown to be protective against brain iron overload in animal models [2326], it is likely that higher Cp levels are not damaging to the brain, but rather might reflect neuroinflammation (since Cp is an acute phase protein that increases during inflammation). It is possible that Cp functions to limit the toxicity of iron in this pro-inflammatory state. However, another possibility is that Cp acts to exacerbate neuroinflammation, since Cp has been shown to promote an inflammatory response in microglial cells in vitro [42, 43].

This first report on the associations between CSF Cp levels and longitudinal AD outcomes highlights that CSF Cp was more informative for prognostication than for cross-sectional changes. In the three prior longitudinal studies that measured blood Cp in the context of AD, we identified one paper that shown no change in Cp levels in serum [32], while another showed that plasma Cp levels (and other acute phase proteins) predicted MCI conversion to AD [44], which was not replicated in another cohort [45]. It is unclear how Cp levels in the serum relate to Cp levels in the CSF (although experiments in mice demonstrate evidence of a communication of Cp between these biofluid pools [2326]), but it is possible that Cp in both the serum and CSF reflect an increased state of inflammation, which drives disease progression.

Finally, we report a novel association between CSF Cp and CSF apolipoprotein E, but CSF Cp was not associated with APOE genotype. It is not known whether Cp promotes apolipoprotein E secretion (or vice versa), or whether they have a common mechanism that affects their expression (and are therefore not causally related to each other). A prior GWAS on 570 subjects did not identify the Cp gene as a significant predictor of CSF apoE [46]; while this is evidence against a role for Cp in causing changes in apoE levels, a study with higher power may yet reveal a significant result. We previously showed that CSF ferritin was associated with apoE and also APOE genotype [6], but in the current study we found no association between CSF Cp and CSF ferritin. So, both CSF Cp and CSF ferritin have shared variance with CSF apoE, but they do not correlate with each other. This is surprising since ferritin is also an acute phase protein, and we may also expect that CSF Cp would impact CSF ferritin levels by affecting cellular iron load (and in turn secretion of ferritin).

In contrast to ferritin, which is mainly produced by microglia in the brain [47]. Cp and apoE are both produced by astrocytes [14, 48]. The correlation we observe between CSF Cp and apoE may therefore relate to the abundance and/or activation of astrocytes. However, CSF apoE (regardless of genotype) has been previously reported to be negatively associated with disease progression (i.e. low CSF apoE is associated with worse outcomes) [6, 49], whereas we report that Cp is positively associated with disease progression (i.e. high CSF apoe is associated with worse outcomes). So, these proteins may reveal different aspects of astrocyte pathobiology in AD and/or different activation states of these cells, which warrants future experimental investigation.

The results from this study raise new questions into the role of Cp in AD, and associated pathways including oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. It is presently unclear whether Cp levels report inflammatory changes, copper metabolism, or impact on iron biochemistry. But regardless, our results show that CSF Cp could be useful in predicting near-term disease progression (cognitive decline and neurodegeneration) in MCI people who are positive for Aβ. Future work should focus on Cp specific activity (which can be affected by ATP7B pump dysfunction [50] or oxidation of Cp [51]), and non-Cp bound copper in CSF, which has shown to be informative biomarker in serum [45].

Highlights.

  • CSF ceruloplasmin is correlated with CSF apolipoprotein E levels

  • In people with Aβ pathology, CSF ceruloplasmin predicts future cognitive decline

  • CSF ceruloplasmin predicts future brain atrophy upon high Aβ pathology

Acknowledgments

Funding

Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by ADNI (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12– 2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen Idee Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; GE Healthcare; Innogenetics, N. V.; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Medpace, Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Synarc Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.finih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California. Analysis was supported by funds from the Australian Research Council, the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the CRC for Mental Health (the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) program is an Australian Government Initiative). The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health acknowledges support from the Victorian Government, in particular funding from the Operational Infrastructure Support Grant. No funder of this study had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author Disclosures

Dr. Bush is a shareholder in Prana Biotechnology Pty Ltd., Cogstate Pty Ltd, Eucalyptus Pty Ltd., Mesoblast Pty Ltd., Brighton Biotech LLC, Nextvet Ltd, Grunbiotics Pty Ltd, Collaborative Medicinal Development LLC, and a paid consultant for Collaborative Medicinal Development. Drs Ayton and Bush have received funding relevant to this study from the NHMRC, Alzheimer’s Association, Alzheimer’s Research UK, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, and Weston Brain Institute.

Abbreviations:

beta amyloid

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ADAS-Cog

Alzheimer’s disease assessment Scale-cognitive subscale

ADNI

Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

CDR-SB

clinical dementia rating scale, sum of boxes

CN

cognitively normal

Cp

ceruloplasmin

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

Dx

diagnosis

MCI

mild cognitive impairment

MMSE

mini mental state exam

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

S.E.

standard error

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Rowe CC, Bourgeat P, Ellis KA, Brown B, Lim YY, Mulligan R, Jones G, Maruff P, Woodward M, Price R, Robins P, Tochon-Danguy H, O’Keefe G, Pike KE, Yates P, Szoeke C, Salvado O, Macaulay SL, O’Meara T, Head R, Cobiac L, Savage G, Martins R, Masters CL, Ames D, Villemagne VL, Predicting Alzheimer disease with beta-amyloid imaging: results from the Australian imaging, biomarkers, and lifestyle study of ageing, Annals of neurology 74(6) (2013) 905–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Schindler SE, Gray JD, Gordon BA, Xiong C, Batrla-Utermann R, Quan M, Wahl S, Benzinger TLS, Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Fagan AM, Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers measured by Elecsys assays compared to amyloid imaging, Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 14(11) (2018) 1460–1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Lim YY, Maruff P, Pietrzak RH, Ames D, Ellis KA, Harrington K, Lautenschlager NT, Szoeke C, Martins RN, Masters CL, Villemagne VL, Rowe CC, Group AR, Effect of amyloid on memory and non-memory decline from preclinical to clinical Alzheimer’s disease, Brain : a journal of neurology 137(Pt 1) (2014) 221–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Nikseresht S, Bush AI, Ayton S, Treating Alzheimer’s disease by targeting iron, British journal of pharmacology (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Mackiewicz A, Ganapathi MK, Schultz D, Samols D, Reese J, Kushner I, Regulation of rabbit acute phase protein biosynthesis by monokines, The Biochemical journal 253(3) (1988) 851–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Ayton S, Faux NG, Bush AI, I. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer’s disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE, Nature communications 6 (2015) 6760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Ayton S, Faux NG, Bush AI, Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Ferritin Level With Preclinical Cognitive Decline in APOE-epsilon4 Carriers, JAMA neurology 74(1) (2017) 122–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Ayton S, Fazlollahi A, Bourgeat P, Raniga P, Ng A, Lim YY, Diouf I, Farquharson S, Fripp J, Ames D, Doecke J, Desmond P, Ordidge R, Masters CL, Rowe CC, Maruff P, Villemagne VL, B. Australian Imaging, G. Lifestyle Research, Salvado O, Bush AI, Cerebral quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts amyloid-beta-related cognitive decline, Brain : a journal of neurology 140(8) (2017) 2112–2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Ayton S, Wang Y, Diouf I, Schneider JA, Brockman J, Morris MC, Bush AI, Brain iron is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer pathology, Molecular psychiatry (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Ayton S, Diouf I, Bush AI, I. Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging, Evidence that iron accelerates Alzheimer’s pathology: a CSF biomarker study, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 89(5) (2018) 456–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Diouf I, Fazlollahi A, Bush AI, Ayton S, I. Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging, Cerebrospinal fluid ferritin levels predict brain hypometabolism in people with underlying beta-amyloid pathology, Neurobiology of disease 124 (2019) 335–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Harris ZL, Durley AP, Man TK, Gitlin JD, Targeted gene disruption reveals an essential role for ceruloplasmin in cellular iron efflux, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(19) (1999) 10812–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Eid C, Hemadi M, Ha-Duong NT, El Hage Chahine JM, Iron uptake and transfer from ceruloplasmin to transferrin, Biochimica et biophysica acta (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Patel BN, David S, A novel glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored form of ceruloplasmin is expressed by mammalian astrocytes, The Journal of biological chemistry 272(32) (1997) 20185–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Fortna RR, Watson HA, Nyquist SE, Glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored ceruloplasmin is expressed by rat Sertoli cells and is concentrated in detergent-insoluble membrane fractions, Biol Reprod 61(4) (1999) 1042–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Loeffler DA, DeMaggio AJ, Juneau PL, Brickman CM, Mashour GA, Finkelman JH, Pomara N, LeWitt PA, Ceruloplasmin is increased in cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer’s disease but not Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders 8(3) (1994) 190–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Capo CR, Arciello M, Squitti R, Cassetta E, Rossini PM, Calabrese L, Rossi L, Features of ceruloplasmin in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s disease patients, Biometals 21(3) (2008) 367–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Kallianpur AR, Gittleman H, Letendre S, Ellis R, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bush WS, Heaton R, Samuels DC, Franklin DR Jr., Rosario-Cookson D, Clifford DB, Collier AC, Gelman B, Marra CM, McArthur JC, McCutchan JA, Morgello S, Grant I, Simpson D, Connor JR, Hulgan T, Group CS, Cerebrospinal Fluid Ceruloplasmin, Haptoglobin, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Are Associated with Neurocognitive Impairment in Adults with HIV Infection, Molecular neurobiology 56(5) (2019) 3808–3818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Kondoh G, Tojo H, Nakatani Y, Komazawa N, Murata C, Yamagata K, Maeda Y, Kinoshita T, Okabe M, Taguchi R, Takeda J, Angiotensin-converting enzyme is a GPI-anchored protein releasing factor crucial for fertilization, Nature medicine 11(2) (2005) 160–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Mak CM, Lam CW, Tam S, Diagnostic accuracy of serum ceruloplasmin in Wilson disease: determination of sensitivity and specificity by ROC curve analysis among ATP7B-genotyped subjects, Clinical chemistry 54(8) (2008) 1356–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].McNeill A, Pandolfo M, Kuhn J, Shang H, Miyajima H, The neurological presentation of ceruloplasmin gene mutations, European neurology 60(4) (2008) 200–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Zheng J, Jiang R, Chen M, Maimaitiming Z, Wang J, Anderson GJ, Vulpe CD, Dunaief JL, Chen H, Multi-Copper Ferroxidase-Deficient Mice Have Increased Brain Iron Concentrations and Learning and Memory Deficits, The Journal of nutrition 148(4) (2018) 643–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Ayton S, Lei P, Duce JA, Wong BX, Sedjahtera A, Adlard PA, Bush AI, Finkelstein DI, Ceruloplasmin dysfunction and therapeutic potential for Parkinson disease, Annals of neurology 73(4) (2013) 554–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Ayton S, Lei P, Adlard PA, Volitakis I, Cherny RA, Bush AI, Finkelstein DI, Iron accumulation confers neurotoxicity to a vulnerable population of nigral neurons: implications for Parkinson’s disease, Molecular neurodegeneration 9(1) (2014) 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Tuo QZ, Lei P, Jackman KA, Li XL, Xiong H, Li XL, Liuyang ZY, Roisman L, Zhang ST, Ayton S, Wang Q, Crouch PJ, Ganio K, Wang XC, Pei L, Adlard PA, Lu YM, Cappai R, Wang JZ, Liu R, Bush AI, Tau-mediated iron export prevents ferroptotic damage after ischemic stroke, Molecular psychiatry 22(11) (2017) 1520–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zanardi A, Conti A, Cremonesi M, D’Adamo P, Gilberti E, Apostoli P, Cannistraci CV, Piperno A, David S, Alessio M, Ceruloplasmin replacement therapy ameliorates neurological symptoms in a preclinical model of aceruloplasminemia, EMBO molecular medicine (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Zhao YS, Zhang LH, Yu PP, Gou YJ, Zhao J, You LH, Wang ZY, Zheng X, Yan LJ, Yu P, Chang YZ, Ceruloplasmin, a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Alzheimer’s Disease, Antioxidants & redox signaling (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Siotto M, Simonelli I, Pasqualetti P, Mariani S, Caprara D, Bucossi S, Ventriglia M, Molinario R, Antenucci M, Rongioletti M, Rossini PM, Squitti R, Association Between Serum Ceruloplasmin Specific Activity and Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease, Journal of Alzheimer’s disease : JAD 50(4) (2016) 1181–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Torsdottir G, Kristinsson J, Snaedal J, Johannesson T, Ceruloplasmin and iron proteins in the serum of patients with Alzheimer’s disease, Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra 1(1) (2011) 366–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Giometto B, Argentiero V, Sanson F, Ongaro G, Tavolato B, Acute-phase proteins in Alzheimer’s disease, European neurology 28(1) (1988) 30–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Kessler H, Pajonk FG, Meisser P, Schneider-Axmann T, Hoffmann KH, Supprian T, Herrmann W, Obeid R, Multhaup G, Falkai P, Bayer TA, Cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic markers correlate with lower plasma copper and ceruloplasmin in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, Journal of neural transmission 113(11) (2006) 1763–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Rembach A, Doecke JD, Roberts BR, Watt AD, Faux NG, Volitakis I, Pertile KK, Rumble RL, Trounson BO, Fowler CJ, Wilson W, Ellis KA, Martins RN, Rowe CC, Villemagne VL, Ames D, Masters CL, A.r. group, Bush AI, Longitudinal analysis of serum copper and ceruloplasmin in Alzheimer’s disease, Journal of Alzheimer’s disease : JAD 34(1) (2013)171–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Green RC, Harvey D, Jack CR, Jagust W, Liu E, Morris JC, Petersen RC, Saykin AJ, Schmidt ME, Shaw L, Siuciak JA, Soares H, Toga AW, Trojanowski JQ, The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception, Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 8(1 Suppl) (2012) S1–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM, Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease, Neurology 34(7) (1984) 939–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Trojanowski JQ, Vandeerstichele H, Korecka M, Clark CM, Aisen PS, Petersen RC, Blennow K, Soares H, Simon A, Lewczuk P, Dean R, Siemers E, Potter WZ, Weiner MW, Jack CR Jr., Jagust W, Toga AW, Lee VM, Shaw LM, I. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects, Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 6(3) (2010) 230–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Shaw LM, Waligorska T, Fields L, Korecka M, Figurski M, Trojanowski JQ, Eichenlaub U, Wahl S, Quan M, Pontecorvo MJ, Lachno DR, Talbot JA, Andersen SW, Siemers ER, Dean RA, Derivation of cutoffs for the Elecsys((R)) amyloid beta (1–42) assay in Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 10 (2018) 698–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Aisen PS, Petersen RC, Donohue MC, Gamst A, Raman R, Thomas RG, Walter S, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, Beckett LA, Jack CR Jr., Jagust W, Toga AW, Saykin AJ, Morris JC, Green RC, Weiner MW, I. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Clinical Core of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: progress and plans, Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 6(3) (2010) 239–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Jack CR Jr., Bernstein MA, Fox NC, Thompson P, Alexander G, Harvey D, Borowski B, Britson PJ, J LW, Ward C, Dale AM, Felmlee JP, Gunter JL, Hill DL, Killiany R, Schuff N, Fox-Bosetti S, Lin C, Studholme C, DeCarli CS, Krueger G, Ward HA, Metzger GJ, Scott KT, Mallozzi R, Blezek D, Levy J, Debbins JP, Fleisher AS, Albert M, Green R, Bartzokis G, Glover G, Mugler J, Weiner MW, The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 27(4) (2008) 685–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Deibel MA, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR, Copper, iron, and zinc imbalances in severely degenerated brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease: possible relation to oxidative stress, Journal of the neurological sciences 143(1–2) (1996) 137–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Kenkhuis B, Jonkman LE, Bulk M, Buijs M, Boon BDC, Bouwman FH, Geurts JJG, van de Berg WDJ, van der Weerd L, 7T MRI allows detection of disturbed cortical lamination of the medial temporal lobe in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, NeuroImage. Clinical (2019) 101665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Tao Y, Wang Y, Rogers JT, Wang F, Perturbed iron distribution in Alzheimer’s disease serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and selected brain regions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Alzheimer’s disease : JAD 42(2) (2014) 679–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Lee KH, Yun SJ, Nam KN, Gho YS, Lee EH, Activation of microglial cells by ceruloplasmin, Brain research 1171 (2007) 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Lazzaro M, Bettegazzi B, Barbariga M, Codazzi F, Zacchetti D, Alessio M, Ceruloplasmin potentiates nitric oxide synthase activity and cytokine secretion in activated microglia, Journal of neuroinflammation 11(1) (2014) 164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Westwood S, Baird AL, Hye A, Ashton NJ, Nevado-Holgado AJ, Anand SN, Liu B, Newby D, Bazenet C, Kiddle SJ, Ward M, Newton B, Desai K, Tan Hehir C, Zanette M, Galimberti D, Parnetti L, Lleo A, Baker S, Narayan VA, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Teunissen CE, Visser PJ, Lovestone S, Plasma Protein Biomarkers for the Prediction of CSF Amyloid and Tau and [(18)F]-Flutemetamol PET Scan Result, Frontiers in aging neuroscience 10 (2018) 409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Squitti R, Ghidoni R, Siotto M, Ventriglia M, Benussi L, Paterlini A, Magri M, Binetti G, Cassetta E, Caprara D, Vernieri F, Rossini PM, Pasqualetti P, Value of serum nonceruloplasmin copper for prediction of mild cognitive impairment conversion to Alzheimer disease, Annals of neurology 75(4) (2014) 574–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Cruchaga C, Kauwe JSK, Nowotny P, Bales K, Pickering EH, Mayo K, Bertelsen S, Hinrichs A, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM, Cerebrospinal fluid APOE levels: an endophenotype for genetic studies for Alzheimer’s disease, 21(20) (2012) 4558–4571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Kaneko Y, Kitamoto T, Tateishi J, Yamaguchi K, Ferritin immunohistochemistry as a marker for microglia, Acta neuropathologica 79(2) (1989) 129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Harris FM, Tesseur I, Brecht WJ, Xu Q, Mullendorff K, Chang S, Wyss-Coray T, Mahley RW, Huang Y, Astroglial regulation of apolipoprotein E expression in neuronal cells. Implications for Alzheimer’s disease, The Journal of biological chemistry 279(5) (2004) 3862–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Toledo JB, Da X, Weiner MW, Wolk DA, Xie SX, Arnold SE, Davatzikos C, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, CSF Apo-E levels associate with cognitive decline and MRI changes, Acta neuropathologica 127(5) (2014) 621–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Yamada T, Agui T, Suzuki Y, Sato M, Matsumoto K, Inhibition of the copper incorporation into ceruloplasmin leads to the deficiency in serum ceruloplasmin activity in Long-Evans cinnamon mutant rat, The Journal of biological chemistry 268(12) (1993) 8965–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Olivieri S, Conti A, Iannaccone S, Cannistraci CV, Campanella A, Barbariga M, Codazzi F, Pelizzoni I, Magnani G, Pesca M, Franciotta D, Cappa SF, Alessio M, Ceruloplasmin oxidation, a feature of Parkinson’s disease CSF, inhibits ferroxidase activity and promotes cellular iron retention, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31(50) (2011) 18568–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES