Skip to main content
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research logoLink to Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
. 2020 Apr 6;15(2):138–148. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6730

Screening for Novel LOX and SOD1 Variants in Keratoconus Patients from Brazil

Diego Nery Benevides Gadelha 1, Alex Felipe Barbosa Feitosa 1, Rafaela Gomes da Silva 1, Luana Talita Antunes 1, Matheus Cavalcanti Muniz 1, Matheus Alencar de Oliveira 1, Dáfine de Oliveira Andrade 1, Nathalia Mayanna da Paz Silva 1, Sebastião Cronemberger 2, Bruno Luiz Fonseca Schamber-Reis 1
PMCID: PMC7151510  PMID: 32308947

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the presence of the variants of lysyl oxygenase (LOX) and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) genes in Brazilian patients with advanced keratoconus.

Methods

Donor genomic DNA extracted from blood samples was screened for 5'UTR, exonic LOX, and SOD1 variants in a subset of 26 patients presenting with advanced keratoconus (KISA > 1000% and I–S > 2.0) by Sanger sequencing. The impact of non-synonymous amino acid changes was evaluated by SIFT, PMUT, and PolyPhen algorithms. The Mutation Taster tool was used to evaluate the potential impact of formation of new donor and acceptor splice sites in the promoter region of affected volunteers carrying sequence variants. A 7-base SOD1 deletion (IVS2 + 50del7bp) previously associated with keratoconus was screened in 140 patients presenting classical keratoconus by gel fragment analysis, and positive samples were sequenced for confirmation.

Results

We found an unreported missense variant in LOX exon 6 in one heterozygous patient, leading to substitution of proline with threonine at residue 392 (p. Thr392Pro) of LOX protein sequence. This mutation was predicted to be potentially damaging to LOX protein. Another LOX variant, Arg158Gln, was also detected in another patient but predicted to be non-pathogenic. Two additional new polymorphisms in LOX 5'UTR region (–116C > T and –58C > T) were found in two patients presenting with advanced keratoconus and were predicted to modulate or create donor/acceptor splice sites in LOX transcripts. Additionally, SOD1 deletion was detected in one patient presenting with severe keratoconus, not in control samples.

Conclusion

We described three novel LOX polymorphisms identified for the first time in Brazilian patients with advanced keratoconus, as well as a previously described SOD1 deletion strongly associated with keratoconus. A possible role of these variants in modulating transcript levels in the cornea of affected individual requires further investigation.

Keywords: Keratoconus, Mutation, LOX, SOD1

INTRODUCTION

Keratoplasty is the most frequent tissue transplantation in Brazil, comprising 60% of all organ and tissue transplantations in the country.[1] Among these, around 50% of all performed keratoplasties are due to keratoconus (KC), which is characterized by corneal ectasia and stromal protrusion in a conical shape. Clinical signs of KC usually manifest first at puberty and in young adults leading to visual deterioration due to irregular astigmatism, myopia, and corneal scarring in about 20% of patients.[2,3] Although KC manifests in only one eye in most patients, the disease can progress to bilaterality in severely affected individuals.[4] Histologically, KC is characterized by impaired collagen secretion resulting from degeneration of keratocytes as well as by epithelial and stromal changes leading to disorganization of fibers involved in tissue resistance and stability.[5] KC incidence is estimated at 1/2,000 individuals in the general population, with a prevalence of 50 to 230 cases/100,000 in Western countries.[6] Diagnosis is usually based on qualitative corneal topography and quantitative videokeratography of posterior corneal surface confirmed by a KISA index > 100%.[7] Refractive error in KC can be corrected with glasses or contact lenses. About 20% of patients have more advanced disease, for which Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments (Ferrara rings) are recommended, along with penetrating keratoplasty in most cases.[6,8]

The etiology of KC is not completely understood. The disorder has been described as multifactorial and polygenic.[9,10,11] Most cases are sporadic suggesting the role of environmental factors in susceptible individuals, including atopic factors, mechanical trauma, and ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, which may promote corneal thinning and tissue degradation. However, a strong association of isolated environmental factors with KC has not been effectively demonstrated.[4,10,12] Twins[13] and family-based studies,[14] candidate gene strategies, and genomic association studies have shown the influence of DNA variants on KC development. Many candidate genes regulating production or arrangement of collagen fibers,[15,16,17] keratocyte proliferation/apoptosis,[12] morphogenesis, and regulation of oxidative stress,[18,19] as well as chromosomal loci bearing specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been described in KC patients. The LOX gene, located at 5q23.1, is among the most investigated genes in KC.[15,16,20] LOX encodes a copper-dependent, oxido-deaminase lysyl oxidase enzyme, which plays a role in extracellular matrix maintenance by oxidizing lysine residues and promoting the formation of covalent cross-links of collagens and elastin,[16] making them insoluble in the extracellular environment.[21] Reduced LOX activity has been detected in the cornea of patients with KC, suggesting a significant role of this gene in the pathogenesis of disease.[15,22,23] Two of the main missense mutations, Arg158Gln (rs1800449) and Pro159Gln (rs41407546), have been described in both Italian and Iranian populations[16,20]. A role of the Arg158Gln mutation in KC has been demonstrated in a genome-wide association study that also identified an SNP associated with the 5'UTR region.[20] These data suggest a likely role of the LOX gene in the development of KC. Another candidate gene is SOD1 (superoxide dismutase 1), which has a direct involvement in antioxidative processes associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) elimination and reduction of oxidative stress that is increased in the corneal cells of patients with KC.[24] Located at 21q22.11, SOD1 encodes a copper and zinc-dependent cytoplasmic enzyme associated with dismutation of ROS such as superoxide radicals.[25] There is evidence of a correlation between SOD1 variations and the development of KC, given the presence of high levels of oxidative stress markers and/or accumulation of these markers in the cornea of affected individuals.[26] Several studies have described a heterozygous genomic 7-base deletion in the intron 2 of the SOD1 gene (IVS2 + 50del7bp) in the US population which significantly affected the conformation and function leading to an increase in oxidative stress in the cornea.[27,28,29] Two sporadic carriers of this deletion were also detected in the Italian population,[30] and nine in the Greek population.[29] The involvement of SOD1 in other ocular diseases such as primary open-angle glaucoma has also been described.[31]

Although already well studied,[32,33] the genetic basis of KC is still poorly understood.[34] Despite the availability of data on the involvement of SOD1 and LOX mutations in the development of KC in specific cohorts, little information is available regarding Brazilian patients. A single study, using a gene candidate approach, showed three non-synonymous substitutions (Leu68His, Arg131Ser, and Asp105Glu) in VSX1 gene segregating with the phenotype in patients from the Northeast of Brazil who presented with sporadic KC, suggesting a role for this gene in KC development.[35] However, no additional studies are available in Brazil regarding polymorphisms in other genes whose involvement in KC has already been described. The implication of SOD1 and LOX mutations on KC development may be important risk factors for the disease and their involvement in disease pathogenesis depends on additional studies on different ethnicities.[25,33] Considering that this pathology is considered a major public health issue in Brazil, the aim of this study was to investigate the presence of genetic variants in SOD1 and LOX genes in individuals affected by advanced KC.

METHODS

Study Protocol and Participants

The research protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Unifacisa (CAAE 98902918.6.0000.5175) as determined by Resolution 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council and the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed an informed consent form prior to their enrolment.

Volunteer participants were recruited at an ophthalmology outpatient clinic (UNIFACISA/Campina Grande) in the state of Paraiba, Brazil. The sample included residents of Campina Grande and neighboring cities (Lagoa Seca, Queimadas, Esperança and Massaranduba). At the time of enrolment, 10 mL of whole blood were collected for later DNA extraction and stored in a –80°C freezer at the Unifacisa Medical Genetics Core Laboratory (NUGEM). Participants were included if they met minimal topographic criteria for the diagnosis of KC: KISA > 100% and inferior–superior asymmetry (I–S) ratio > 1.4 diopters (D) in at least one eye.[4] Diagnostic confirmation was based on keratometry, performed in an Eyetech CT2000 SLE topographer (Eyetech Equipment, São Paulo, Brazil) and Schwind Sirius Scheimpflug (Eye-tech-Solutions, GmbH&Co. Kleinostheim, Germany) tomograph. Patients with other eye disorders (glaucoma or cataract) or those undergoing corneal transplantation were excluded.

Of the overall group consisting of 140 patients, 26 patients had KISA > 1000% and I–S > 2.0; these were included in an advanced KC subgroup. To maximize the chance of detecting the variables with the highest pathogenic potential, DNA sequencing for LOX gene was performed specifically for this subgroup. A control group of 50 healthy subjects was also screened.

DNA Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples. All SOD1 and LOX gene exons were sequenced after amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For that, appropriate forward and reverse primers were used as previously described [29,36, Supplementary Table 1] . The primers used for amplification of SOD1 exon 1 also spanned the proximal 5' untranslated region (UTR), corresponding to approximately 150 base pairs (bp) upstream from SOD1 start codon.

PCR was run in 25 µL volumes containing 12.5 μL GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, USA), 5 pmol of each oligonucleotide primer, and 1 μL resuspended DNA solution at an approximate concentration of 200 ng/μL. Reactions were performed in a thermocycler as follows: 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles (1 min at 95°C for DNA denaturation, 1 min for primer annealing, and 1 min at 72°C for extension), and a final 5 min extension step at 72°C. Specificity and quality of the amplicons were assessed in agarose gel at 0.8% containing ethidium bromide (0.5µg/mL). Fragments were visualized by UV light using a LPIX transilluminator (Loccus Biotecnologia, Brazil).

To sequence PCR products, amplified exon segments were purified using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega, USA). Purity was assessed using a Nano-volume spectrophotometer (NanoVue Plus, GE), considering a 260 nm/280 nm absorbance ratio of 1.7 to 2.0 as the purity standard. Each sequencing reaction (7.5 μL final volume) contained 10 ng per 100 bp of specific exons and 10 pmoles of each individual primer. Reactions were submitted to Myleus Biotechnology (Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil) for Sanger sequencing on an ABI3130 platform. Analysis of the electropherograms was performed using Sequence Scanner 2 v.2.0 (Applied Biosystems, EUA) and Sequence Viewer v.7.0.2 (CLCBio, Denmark) software. Gene sequence readings were compared to ancestral SOD1 (ENSG00000142168) and LOX (ENSG00000113083) sequences downloaded from the Ensemble genome browser (www.ensembl.org). All variations detected in samples were reconfirmed by a new DNA extraction and sequencing.

To test for the presence of the intronic 7-base deletion IVS2 + 50del7bp (c.169+50delTAAACAG) in SOD1, samples were tested by PCR in 140 KC positive patients and 120 controls, using previously described amplification conditions.[29] Detection of this deletion in patients involved direct visualization of a 211 bp amplicon in a 20 x 20 cm PAGE (5%) electrophoresis, followed by confirmatory DNA sequencing of positive samples.

Prediction of Pathogenic Potential of Gene Variants

To predict the impact of nonsynonymous substitutions in LOX protein variants, we used SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/),[37] PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and PMUT (http://mmb.pcb.ub.es/PMut/) tools.[38] These algorithms assigned scores (i.e., probability of the substitution being damaging) ranging from 0 to 1. Scores are generated through comparison between the ancestral amino acid sequence and the variant sequence (missense mutation). In the SIFT platform, a score up to 0.5 indicates a potentially pathogenic variant, whereas higher scores indicate a benign substitution. Conversely, the PMUT and PolyPhen2 platforms use values close to zero indicating a benign variant, with values closer to 1 suggesting a pathogenic variant.

To predict the impact of 5'-UTR LOX polymorphisms as pathogenic or neutral, the web-based Mutation Taster application (www.mutationtaster.org) was used. PhyloP and phastCons tools were also used to verify the grade of conservation of SNPs. Briefly, phastCons values range from 0 to 1 and reflect the probability that each nucleotide belongs to a conserved regulatory element, based on multiple alignment of genome sequences of 46 different species, as well as alterations in neighboring nucleotides. Values closer to 1 indicate high residue conservation. For phyloP (values ranging from –14 to +6), the same method is used without considering neighboring nucleotides. Positive values are attributed to conserved sites. Additionally, the application predicts the expected impact of altering or creating non-canonical splice sites (including those detected in the 5'-UTR region of the gene) using an integrated version of the NNSplice software. Changes in typical splice sites may become stronger or weaker. New splices are indicated by a confidence score higher than 0.3. Information is also provided on the genomic position of the splice site, the prediction scores for reference and mutated sites, and a short sequence indicating the intron/exon border.

In addition, to assess the amino acid conservation, primary amino acid sequences coded for human SOD1 and LOX genes were aligned to multiple ortholog gene sequences in phylogenetically close organisms downloaded from Ensembl (www.ensembl.org), using the ClustalW Omega software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/).

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients with advanced KC selected for the present study, 16 (61.5%) were female. Mean age was 28.5 years (SD ± 10.6), and mean KISA% index was 921.5 ( ± 1153.17) for the right eye and 1,451.5 ( ± 607.6) for the left eye. Mean I–S was 6.60 D ( ± 3.13) for the right eye and 6.83D ( ± 3.35) for the left eye. Topography data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Mean KISA and I–S indexes in Brazilian patients with keratoconus


Eye KISA (%) I–S
Mean SD Mean SD
Right 921.52 607.6 6.6 3.13
Left 1,451.48 1,153.17 6.83 3.35
KISA, keratoconus percentage index; I-S, inferior-superior value; SD, standard deviation

Table 2.

Predicted variant impact on LOX protein conformation analyzed by PMUT, SIFT, and PolyPhen2 algorithms. Allelic frequencies are indicated.


Residue PMUT PolyPhen2 SIFT TGP frequency
R158Q 0.11 0.000 0.21 0.157 (16%)
T392P 0.68 0.087 0.02 ND
TGP, 1000 Genome project; ND, not described

Table 3.

Mutation Taster analysis of SOD1 promoter nucleotide variations


Variant Effect WT score Variant score Position phyloP phastCons
–58 C > T Acc increased 0.43 0.52 g.90 0.216 0.015
–58 C > T Acc increased 0.24 0.32 g.97 0.216 0.015
–58 C > T Donor gained NA 0.38 g.84 0.216 0.015
(–116 C > T) Acceptor gained NA 0.32 g.44 1.383 0.058
–58 C > T Acc increased 0.43 0.52 g.90 0.216 0.015
–58 C > T Acc increased 0.24 0.32 g.97 0.216 0.015
–58 C > T Donor gained NA 0.38 g.84 0.216 0.015
(–116 C > T) Acceptor gained NA 0.32 g.44 1.383 0.058

Table 4.

Supporting Material - PCR Primers and annealing conditions used in this work


Primer Forward (5'-3') Reverse (5'-3') Tf (bp) Tm (°C)
LOX – P1a GAGACTGAGATACCCGTGCT AGCGGTGACTCCAGATGA 474 58
LOX – P1b TCACAGTACCAGCCTCAGC ATAGCTGGGGACCAGGTG 500 60
LOX– P2 TTTTCACATTGCTTTGCAGT GCTCTTGTCCCACTTCCTAA 398 58
LOX – P3 TAGTTGGGAAAGGAGGATTG GCAATTTTCTCCCTTCAGGT 355 58
LOX – P4 GACTTATGTCCTGGGGAAAA GATAAAAATGTGTGTGCTCTTCA 441 58
LOX – P5 GGAGGTGCTATAAGGCTGAG TTGCTTCCAATACCATGATT 370 58
LOX – P6 TTCAGGGGAAAATATGCAGT TGCTTACAAGAAAGCTGCTG 394 58
LOX - P7 CTTAGGTGGAGGGAAACTGT AAGTCATTTTGGCTCATTCA 485 58
SOD1 - P1 CTCCACATTTCGGGGTTCT ACCCGCTCCTAGCAAAGGT 450 58
SOD1 - P2 CCATCTCCCTTTTGAGGACA CGACAGAGCAAGACCCTTTC 426 58
SOD1 - P3 TGATGCAGGTCAGCACTTTC AAAAGCATTCCAGCATTTGG 344 58
SOD1 - P4 CCATCTTTCTTCCCAGAGCA GAAACCGCGACTAACAATCAA 386 58
SOD1 - P5 TTTGGGTATTGTTGGGAGGA TCTGTTCCACTGAAGCTGTTT 675 59
SOD1 del CAGAAACTCTCTCCAACTTTGC GAGGGGTTTTAACGTTTAGGG 218 59
PCR, polymerase chain reaction

The sequencing of LOX coding region revealed two SNPs. The first variant is a cytosine to thymine transition at position 773 (c.773 C > T) [Figure 1A], observed in three patients – two heterozygotes (C/T) and one homozygote (T/T). This variant leads to replacement of arginine with glutamine at residue 158 (p. Arg158Gln) of the primary LOX amino acid sequence. The second variant is an adenine to thymine substitution at position 1474 (c.1474T > A) of LOX exon 6 [Figure 1B]. This variant leads to a threonine to proline substitution at residue 392 (p. Thr392Pro) of the primary LOX protein sequence. Thr392Pro is a previously unreported mutation of the LOX gene. None of these variants were found in control samples.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Electropherograms showing R158Q (c.773 C > T) (A) and T392P (c.1474T > A) (B) variants. Genotypes are indicated, and dotted vertical lines indicate peak location for each alteration. Sequencing of T392P variant was obtained using reverse primer.

The assessment of the Thr392Pro mutation using the PMUT and PolyPhen platforms yielded scores of 0.68 and 0.087, respectively, with 85% probability of pathogenicity [Table 2]. For the Arg158Gln variant, the PMUT score was 0.11, indicating a 95% likelihood of this being a neutral mutation, which was confirmed by a low PolyPhen score. The results obtained with SIFT analysis produced scores of 0.02 and 0.21 for Arg158Gln and Thr392Pro, respectively, confirming a deleterious effect of Thr392Pro and a neutral impact of Arg158Gln.

Regarding the comparison with ancestral residues to determine amino acid conservation across different species through ClustalW Omega alignment, the two amino acids were found to be relatively conserved. Threonine at position 392 is greatly conserved in hominids, but not in more phylogenetically distant species [Figure 2].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Conservation of LOX primary amino acid sequence in several species. Positions of residues R158 and T392 relative to Homo sapiens LOX protein are indicated.

SOD1 intronic 7-base deletion was detected in one patient [Figure 3A]. The patient was diagnosed with advanced KC, presenting KISA values of 4,083 and 3,574 diopters and I–S values of 8,14 and 9,92, for right and left eyes, respectively. This variant was not detected in any of the non-affected individuals. The sequencing of this region in the carrier showed an electropherogram pattern that suggests a concatenated overlapping of the wild-type and deleted alleles, a typical pattern observed in individuals who are heterozygote for deletion [Figure 3B].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Detection of the IVS2 + 50del7bp deletion in SOD1 gene in one patient affected with advanced keratoconus. (A) PAGE electrophoresis showing a subset of patients tested for the deletion (numbers indicated above). Amplicons of 218 pb (normal) and 211 pb (deleted) fragments are indicated by black arrows. A 1 kb DNA ladder shows the 300 pb reference fragment (smaller fragments are not shown). (B) Electropherograms of the deletion region from normal and affected patients. (C) Corneal topographies of KC patient carrying the SOD1 deletion. PB, base pairs; KB, kilobases; OD, right eye; OE, left eye.

In addition, we observed the presence of two base polymorphisms at the untranslated 5' region (5'-UTR) of SOD1 in two affected individuals. The two variants involved replacement of thymine with cytosine, one at position –116 (–116C > T) and the second at position –58 (–58C > T), both located at the SOD1 promoter region. Electropherograms for these variants showed heterozygous point mutations in both patients [Figure 4]. Variant –58C > T had already been described in the dbSNP (rs906695375) databank, but not in 1000 Genomes. In the present work, this variant was detected in a proband with KISA score of 1,294% and I–S of 4.68 in the right eye and KISA of 2,592% and I–S score of 7.24 in the left eye. No other variants were found in SOD1 coding region in the 26 patients analyzed. The alignment of the human SOD1 promoter region sequence with that of other hominids show conservation of these residues over evolution [Figure 5].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Electropherograms showing 5'UTR polymorphisms located at positions –116C > T (A) and –58C > T (B) relative to SOD1 ATG start site. Sequencing was performed using reverse primer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

DNA sequence alignment of SOD1 5'UTR sequences from different species. Conserved positions of residues –116 and –58 relative to Homo sapiens sequence are indicated.

An analysis of the impact of variants in the SOD1 gene promoter region showed a significant conservation score (0.216) with phyloP analysis for the –58C > T variant, as well as for the upstream (0.5) and downstream (1.771) flanking region phastCons analysis, which also showed significance for this variant, with values slightly higher than zero [Table 3]. A positive modulation by variant –58C > T of the splice acceptor sites predicted at positions 90 and 97 of the gene, with scores of 0.52 and 0.32, respectively, was suggested. In addition, the analysis suggests the creation of a new ectopic splice donor site at position 84, with a score of 0.38. Analysis of variant –116C > T showed a new splice acceptor site at position 44, with a score of 0.32. Significant conservation scores were also observed for phyloP (1.383) and phastCons (0.058).

DISCUSSION

Cornea has been the most transplanted tissue in Brazil since the late 1990s, with KC among the main etiologies.[39,40] Molecular and linkage studies have suggested multiple candidate genes that might underlie the development of KC.[32] In the present work, we found two non-synonymous mutations in LOX, namely Arg158Gln and Thr392Pro, and an intronic SOD1 deletion previously associated with KC development. Variant Thr392Pro in the LOX gene is a novel missense mutation that has not been previously described; this mutation was found in 1 out of 26 patients with advanced KC. The scores obtained with computational algorithms suggest a deleterious impact of this substitution on protein stability resulting from the replacement of threonine (aliphatic open side chain) with proline. Proline is an amino acid with non-polar side chain, therefore not capable of ionization and hydrogen bonding, and featuring a secondary rather than a primary amino group. This suggests that the substitution may possibly affect protein folding and compromise cellular function. In addition, threonine was conserved in hominids, which supports the notion that this residue is important for normal LOX function. Nevertheless, the non-conserved amino acid in Felis catus and Bos taurus is a serine, which presents a side chain with similar biochemical properties (both containing aliphatic hydroxyl groups), indicating an essential role in the secondary LOX structure of all species considered.

We found the missense Arg158Gln variant in LOX gene, detected in 3 of the 26 patients analyzed, with one being homozygous and two heterozygous for this mutation. This substitution has also been described (rs1800449) in other ethnic groups.[16,20] However, a meta-analysis did not find sufficient evidence in the literature to associate this SNP with the development of KC.[15] In fact, in silico assessments performed with PMUT, SIFT, and PolyPhen-2 algorithms produced scores indicating this as a neutral, non-pathogenic substitution. This finding is confirmed by the high frequency of the T allele, found in 16% of the world population according to the 1000 Genome Project database. In addition, the glutamine for arginine (both of which have open chains of similar size) substitution is well-tolerated because of the similar physicochemical characteristics of these amino acids and does not substantially interfere with LOX protein folding. The alignment of LOX sequences of phylogenetically close species also revealed non-conservation of this arginine. Therefore, the present findings suggest low impact of the Arg158Gln variant on LOX function.

For the first time, we identified the IVS2 + 50del7bp deletion in SOD1 gene in the Brazilian population. This variant was detected in 1 patient with severe KC out of 140 KC affected volunteers, which was absent in 120 healthy controls. The literature has described significant association of this deletion with KC development both in familial and sporadic cases of various ethnicities. A study conducted by Udar et al reported a haplotype-independent segregation of this deletion in two non-related American families presenting an autosomal dominant form of KC.[27] This finding suggests a likely autonomous effect of SOD1 IVS2 + 50del7bp on KC pathogenesis. An mRNA analysis of SOD1 carrying this deletion showed, in addition of the wild-type transcript, two splice variants lacking exon 2, or both exon 2 and 3 simultaneously, which exclude SOD1 protein active site and lead to a loss of function protein.[27] Another study with 33 Greek patients found that homozygote carriers for this deletion were significantly overrepresented among KC patients compared to healthy subjects.[29] We also verified a similar frequency of IVS2 + 50del7bp allele found with other studies.[30] We believe that this specific SOD1 deletion, yet with a low frequency in all cohorts studied, reinforces IVS2 + 50del7bp deletion as a key genetic alteration highly associated with KC in different populations.

We also detected two SNPs in the untranslated 5' region of SOD1, both characterized by replacements of cytosine with thymine at positions –58 and –116 in two different patients. There have been no reports in the literature of any of the two variants described in the present work. In silico analysis showed scores indicating increased activity of splice acceptors in the presence of variant –58C > T. In addition, these scores also showed high probability of these variations having a pathological impact on SOD1 activity because of the creation of donor (–58C > T) and acceptor (–116C > T) splice sites. This is a noteworthy finding, since alterations in the SOD1 promoter region sequence may cause a decrease in protein expression, as shown for other disorders.[41,42] The SOD1 protein neutralizes excess ROS in the cell, and ROS levels are increased in patients with KC.[43,44,45] Low levels of SOD1 enzyme can also result from gene mutations.[28] It is possible that these variants may be related to changes in the function of this gene in patients with KC, considering that these are highly conserved residues and the predicted splice sites may influence the normal processing points at the exon–intron boundaries in the gene. We believe that these 5'-UTR variants may modulate SOD1 gene expression in KC patients, although additional in vitro studies involving cloning of the SOD1 gene, with a focus on the variants described in the present study and analysis of the impact of these variants on transcription rates, are essential to confirm the involvement of these polymorphisms in the pathophysiology of KC.

In conclusion, we report a novel Thr392Pro with potential damaging effect to LOX protein in a Brazilian patient presenting advanced KC, as well as a previously described Arg158Gln variant. We also detected a previously KC associated SOD1 IVS2 + 50del7bp deletion in another patient with severe KC, and two SNPs located in SOD1 5'UTR with still unclear involvement in KC pathogenesis. SOD1 and LOX variants found in Brazilian unrelated KC patients suggests a genetic contribution to disease onset and progression, although further studies will be key to validate their impact on gene transcription and protein function. In addition, variant screening in larger samples will be essential to evaluate the real contribution of these polymorphisms to KC pathophysiology in Brazilian population.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Iracema Freitas da Silva for technical support and Fabio Mendes da Silva for blood sampling and topography imaging. The equipment and reagents acquisition were funded by CESED/UNIFACISA institutional resources.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Abto Brazilian Association of Organ and Tissue Transplantation. Report on performed transplants - Jan/Dec 2018 [Internet]; 2019. Available from: abto.org.br .
  • 2.J Lechner, Ha Bae, J Guduric-Fuchs, A Rice, G Govindarajan, S Siddiqui, et al. Mutational analysis of MIR184 in sporadic keratoconus and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:5266–5272. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Moussa Sarah, Grabner Günther, Ruckhofer Josef, Dietrich Marie, Reitsamer Herbert. Genetics in Keratoconus – What is New? The Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2017;11(Suppl-1, M4):201–210. doi: 10.2174/1874364101711010201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rabinowitz Yaron S. Keratoconus. Survey of Ophthalmology. 1998;42(4):297–319. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Araujo Aline Lütz. Corneal stem cells and tissue engineering: Current advances and future perspectives. World Journal of Stem Cells. 2015;7(5):806. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i5.806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gordon-Shaag Ariela, Millodot Michel, Shneor Einat, Liu Yutao. The Genetic and Environmental Factors for Keratoconus. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:1–19. doi: 10.1155/2015/795738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gordon-Shaag Ariela, Millodot Michel, Kaiserman Igor, Sela Tzahi, Barnett Itzhaki Guy, Zerbib Yaffa, Matityahu Efrat, Shkedi Shira, Miroshnichenko Svetlana, Shneor Einat. Risk factors for keratoconus in Israel: a case-control study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2015;35(6):673–681. doi: 10.1111/opo.12237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Basu Sayan, Vazirani Jayesh. Keratoconus: current perspectives. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2013:2019. doi: 10.2147/opth.s50119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sugar Joel, Macsai Marian S. What Causes Keratoconus? Cornea. 2012;31(6):716–719. doi: 10.1097/ico.0b013e31823f8c72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davidson A E, Hayes S, Hardcastle A J, Tuft S J. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye. 2013;28(2):189–195. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, Merayo J, Barrera R, Acera A. Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder? Eye. 2015;29(7):843–859. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang Y., Rabinowitz Y.S., Rotter J.I., Yang H. Genetic epidemiological study of keratoconus: Evidence for major gene determination. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2000;93(5):403–409. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20000828)93:5<403::aid-ajmg11>3.3.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tuft Stephen J., Hassan Hala, George Sonia, Frazer David G., Willoughby Colin E., Liskova Petra. Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012;90(6):e482–e486. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burdon Kathryn P, Vincent Andrea L. Insights into keratoconus from a genetic perspective. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2013;96(2):146–154. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang Jing, Zhang Lu, Hong Jiaxu, Wu Dan, Xu Jianjiang. Association of Common Variants in LOX with Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hasanian-Langroudi Farzaneh, Saravani Ramin, Validad Mohammad-Hosein, Bahari Gholamreza, Yari Davood. Association ofLysyl oxidase (LOX)Polymorphisms with the Risk of Keratoconus in an Iranian Population. Ophthalmic Genetics. 2014;36(4):309–314. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2014.881507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saravani Ramin, Hasanian-Langroudi Farzaneh, Validad Mohammad-Hosein, Yari Davood, Bahari Gholamreza, Faramarzi Mahmood, Khateri Mehdi, Bahadoram Somayeh. Evaluation of Possible Relationship Between COL4A4 Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(3):318–322. doi: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wojcik Katarzyna, Kaminska Anna, Blasiak Janusz, Szaflik Jerzy, Szaflik Jacek. Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Keratoconus and Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013;14(9):19294–19308. doi: 10.3390/ijms140919294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vallabh Neeru A., Romano Vito, Willoughby Colin E. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in corneal disease. Mitochondrion. 2017;36:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2017.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bykhovskaya Yelena, Li Xiaohui, Epifantseva Irina, Haritunians Talin, Siscovick David, Aldave Anthony, Szczotka-Flynn Loretta, Iyengar Sudha K., Taylor Kent D., Rotter Jerome I., Rabinowitz Yaron S. Variation in the Lysyl Oxidase (LOX) Gene Is Associated with Keratoconus in Family-Based and Case-Control Studies. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2012;53(7):4152. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lucero H. A., Kagan H. M. Lysyl oxidase: an oxidative enzyme and effector of cell function. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2006;63(19-20):2304–2316. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6149-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dudakova Lubica, Jirsova Katerina. The impairment of lysyl oxidase in keratoconus and in keratoconus-associated disorders. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2013;120(6):977–982. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-0993-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.R Shetty, A Sathyanarayanamoorthy, Ra Ramachandra, V Arora, A Ghosh, Pr Srivatsa, et al. Attenuation of lysyl oxidase and collagen gene expression in keratoconus patient corneal epithelium corresponds to disease severity. Mol Vis 2015;21:12–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.A Behndig, K Karlsson, Bo Johansson, T Brännström, Sl Marklund. Superoxide dismutase isoenzymes in the normal and diseased human cornea. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:2293–2296. [PubMed]
  • 25.J Wheeler, M Hauser, N Afshari, Rr Allingham, Y Liu. The genetics of keratoconus: a review. Reprod Syst Sex Disord Curr Res 2012;6:1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Atilano Shari R., Coskun Pinar, Chwa Marilyn, Jordan Nicole, Reddy Vinitha, Le Khoi, Wallace Douglas C., Kenney M. Cristina. Accumulation of Mitochondrial DNA Damage in Keratoconus Corneas. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(4):1256. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Udar Nitin, Atilano Shari R., Brown Donald J., Holguin Bret, Small Kent, Nesburn Anthony B., Kenney M. Cristina. SOD1: A Candidate Gene for Keratoconus. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2006;47(8):3345. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Udar Nitin, Atilano Shari R, Small Kent, Nesburn Anthony B, Kenney M Cristina. SOD1 Haplotypes in Familial Keratoconus. Cornea. 2009;28(8):902–907. doi: 10.1097/ico.0b013e3181983a0c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moschos Marilita M., Kokolakis Nikolaos, Gazouli Maria, Chatziralli Irini P., Droutsas Dimitrios, Anagnou Nicholas P., Ladas Ioannis D. Polymorphism Analysis ofVSX1andSOD1Genes in Greek Patients with Keratoconus. Ophthalmic Genetics. 2013;36(3):213–217. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2013.843712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.P De Bonis, A Laborante, C Pizzicoli, R Stallone, R Barbano, C Longo, et al. Mutational screening of VSX1, SPARC, SOD1, LOX, and TIMP3 in keratoconus. Mol Vision 2011;1:2482–2494. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Canizales Licelly, Rodriguez Laura, Rivera Carlos, Martinez Alexander, Mendez Fabián, Castillo Andres. Low-level expression of SOD1 in peripheral blood samples of patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma. Biomarkers in Medicine. 2016;10(12):1218–1223. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2016-0167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Loukovitis Eleftherios, Sfakianakis Konstantinos, Syrmakesi Panagiota, Tsotridou Eleni, Orfanidou Myrsini, Bakaloudi Dimitra Rafailia, Stoila Maria, Kozei Athina, Koronis Spyridon, Zachariadis Zachos, Tranos Paris, Kozeis Nikos, Balidis Miltos, Gatzioufas Zisis, Fiska Aliki, Anogeianakis George. Genetic Aspects of Keratoconus: A Literature Review Exploring Potential Genetic Contributions and Possible Genetic Relationships with Comorbidities. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0144-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Y Panahi, A Azimi, M Naderi, K Jadidi, A Sahebkar. An analytical enrichment-based review of structural genetic studies on keratoconus. J Cell Biochem 2018;9:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Valgaeren Hanne, Koppen Carina, Van Camp Guy. A new perspective on the genetics of keratoconus: why have we not been more successful? Ophthalmic Genetics. 2017;39(2):158–174. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2017.1393831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fonseca Schamber-Reis Brunoluiz, Silva Dulceriacosta Da, Gadelha Biancanery Benevides, Feitosa Alexfelipe Barbosa, Silva Rafaelagomes Da, Albuquerque Tarsilalivia Paz E, Santos Déborachristina Pereira Fernandes, Gadelha Diegonery Benevides. Analysis of VSX1 variations in Brazilian subjects with keratoconus. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2018;13(3):266. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_116_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.S Saee-Rad, H Hashemi, M Miraftab, Noori-Daloii , Mh Chaleshtori, R Raoofian, et al. Mutation analysis of VSX1 and SOD1 in Iranian patients with keratoconus. Mol Vis 2011;17:3128–3136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Kumar Prateek, Henikoff Steven, Ng Pauline C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nature Protocols. 2009;4(7):1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ferrer-Costa C., Gelpi J. L., Zamakola L., Parraga I., De La Cruz X., Orozco M. PMUT: a web-based tool for the annotation of pathological mutations on proteins. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(14):3176–3178. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.A Zeschau, Ig Balestrin, Ra Stock, El Bonamigo. Indications of keratoplasty: a retrospective study in a University Hospital. Brazilian J Ophthalmol 2013;72:316–320.
  • 40.Almeida Hg, Hida Ry, Kara-Junior N. Review of developments in corneal transplantation in the regions of Brazil - Evaluation of corneal transplants in Brazil. Clinics. 2016;71(9):537–543. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(09)09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ingre Caroline, Wuolikainen Anna, Marklund Stefan L., Birve Anna, Press Rayomand, Andersen Peter M. A 50 bp deletion in the SOD1 promoter lowers enzyme expression but is not associated with ALS in Sweden. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2016;17(5-6):452–457. doi: 10.3109/21678421.2016.1159223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Saify Khyber, Saadat Mostafa. Influence of a 50bp Ins/Del polymorphism at promoter of the superoxide dismutase-1 on gene expression and risk of heroin dependency. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2017;22(1) doi: 10.1186/s12199-017-0617-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abu-Amero Khaled K., Al-Muammar Abdulrahman M., Kondkar Altaf A. Genetics of Keratoconus: Where Do We Stand? Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014;2014:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/641708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hao Xiao-Dan, Chen Zhao-Li, Qu Ming-Li, Zhao Xiao-Wen, Li Su-Xia, Chen Peng. Decreased Integrity, Content, and Increased Transcript Level of Mitochondrial DNA Are Associated with Keratoconus. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nita Małgorzata, Grzybowski Andrzej. The Role of the Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Stress in the Pathomechanism of the Age-Related Ocular Diseases and Other Pathologies of the Anterior and Posterior Eye Segments in Adults. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016:1–23. doi: 10.1155/2016/3164734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research are provided here courtesy of Ophthalmic Research Center

RESOURCES