Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2010 Sep 2:73–81. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-5476-4.00012-2

Do Nonventilatory Strategies for Acute Lung Injury and ARDS Work?

Rob Mac Sweeney, Danny F McAuley
Editors: Clifford S Deutschman1, Patrick J Neligan2
PMCID: PMC7151787

The inflammatory injury suffered by the alveolar epithelium-endothelium complex provides multiple potential therapeutic targets. The inflammatory process could be inhibited at any stage from the genome to inflammatory signaling to leukocyte activation. Similarly, the various pathophysiologic consequences of alveolar injury could be amenable to pharmacologic intervention. The injurious process affects local alveolar ventilation, gas diffusion, and perfusion leading to reduced compliance, ventilation-perfusion mismatch, and respiratory failure. This chapter reviews the evidence for past, present, and potential future pharmacologic therapies for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS). Therapies can be classified as aiming to improve the pathophysiologic consequences of ALI/ARDS or as anti-inflammatory, although a large degree of overlap exists.

Therapies to treat pathophysiologic consequences of ALI/ARDS

Surfactant Deficiency

Surfactant is an endogenous mixture of phospholipids and proteins A to D produced by type 2 alveolar cells. It reduces alveolar surface tension, preventing alveolar collapse, and has anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. Exogenous surfactant administration has been successfully used in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, a condition of reduced surfactant production. Early trials in ARDS demonstrated physiologic improvements1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7; however, later phase 3 trials failed to show an improvement in mortality.8, 9 A meta-analysis of surfactant trials in ALI/ARDS reported an increase in oxygenation without an improvement in duration of ventilation or mortality.10

Various reasons have been proposed for these results. Although the neonatal syndrome is due to reduced production, the situation is more complex in ALI/ARDS. Surfactant is affected by increased removal, altered composition, reduced efficacy, and reduced production. Potential limitations of these phase 3 studies include the use of suboptimal surfactant formulation, dose and duration of therapy, inadequate alveolar delivery, and late initiation of therapy. The effect of calfactant (a calf protein B and C–based surfactant) in ALI/ARDS is currently being studied (NCT00682500), whereas trials of Surfaxin (a synthetic protein B–based surfactant) (NCT00215553) and HL-10 (a pig protein B and C–based surfactant) (NCT00742482) have recently been terminated, and results are awaited. Pending new research, surfactant therapy is not recommended (Table 12-1 ).

Table 12-1.

Summary of Nonventilatory Strategies for ALI/ARDS*

Recommended Not Recommended as Routine Therapy Investigational
Restrictive fluid strategy Surfactant Extravascular lung water–guided fluid strategy
 Diuretics Intravenous vasodilators Renal replacement therapy
 Low central venous pressure Pulmonary artery catheter Albumin
β-Agonists
Insulin
Gene therapy
Growth factors
Stem cells
Inhaled NO Inhaled prostacyclin
Activated protein C Endothelin antagonists
Antithrombin III Almitrine
Tissue factor pathway inhibitor
Factor VIIai
Heparin
Thrombomodulin
Steroids (for established ALI/ARDS) Steroids (for early ALI/ARDS)
Ketoconazole Complement antagonism
Ibuprofen Interferon-β
N-acetylcysteine Anti-CD14 antibody
Procysteine Anti-CD18 antibody
Lisofylline Pentoxifylline
Sivelestat Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
Depelestat
Vitamins C and E
Statins
Renin-angiotensin system modulation
Omega-3 fatty acids
Induced hypothermia
*

Therapies with mixed results in clinical studies (e.g., steroids) require further evaluation before a specific recommendation can be made.

Limitation of Generation of Alveolar Edema

Alveolar flooding is primarily dependent on three factors: capillary hydrostatic pressure, oncotic pressure, and alveolar-capillary permeability. Capillary permeability is increased in ALI/ARDS. Reducing hydrostatic pressure and increasing oncotic pressure may ameliorate the development of pulmonary edema.

Reducing capillary hydrostatic pressure targeted to pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP)11 and central venous pressure (CVP)12 may be associated with improved outcome in ALI/ARDS, although fluid management guided by a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) compared with a central venous catheter offers no advantage in ALI/ARDS.13 Both a positive fluid balance14, 15, 16, 17 and increased extravascular lung water (EVLW)18 are associated with poor outcomes in ARDS. Guiding fluid therapy with EVLW measurement rather than PAOP may be better.19

Hydrostatic pressure may be reduced by restricting fluid intake, increasing fluid output with either diuretics or renal replacement therapy (RRT), or decreasing vasomotor tone with vasodilators. The phase 3 Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) study demonstrated improvements in secondary outcomes such as duration of ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay with a restrictive fluid strategy. Fluid balance was dictated by a protocol of diuretic administration based on filling pressures.12 Total 7-day fluid balance was about 0 mL, compared with about 7000 mL in the liberal fluid strategy. Although there was no difference in mortality, importantly there was no increase in renal failure or organ hypoperfusion with fluid restriction.

Animal models have demonstrated reduced pulmonary edema through reductions in pulmonary vascular pressures and permeability with RRT. Two small observational studies in humans have provided mixed results. Ten children with ALI/ARDS after bone marrow transplantation or chemotherapy treated with RRT had an 80% survival rate, in contrast to a historical survival rate of 15%.20 Thirty-seven adults with renal failure and ALI/ARDS treated with RRT and a zero fluid balance had no pulmonary improvements within the first 24 hours of treatment.21 The role of RRT in the management of ALI/ARDS remains uncertain.

The choice of fluid for resuscitation in ALI/ARDS remains unclear. Theoretically, a colloid with higher oncotic pressure would be more suitable than a crystalloid, but this has not been borne out in a large trial of albumin versus saline in critical illness.22

Hypoproteinemia is associated with the development of lung injury and is a marker of weight gain and death. Two small studies have investigated the use of furosemide with albumin infusions in hypoproteinemic patients with ALI. Both showed increases in total serum protein and more negative fluid balances with furosemide and albumin administration. This was associated with improved oxygenation, but there was no mortality benefit.23, 24

Albumin also exerts antioxidant effects through its thiol group. Nonsurvivors of ALI/ARDS have reduced thiol values.25 The infusion of albumin is associated with increased plasma thiol levels in sepsis26 and ALI/ARDS27 and decreased markers of oxidant injury.

A study is presently ongoing to investigate whether minimizing EVLW, measured by transpulmonary thermal indicator dilution using the Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO) and directed by the FACTT diuretic algorithm, is superior to CVP-guided therapy (NCT00624650). A phase 2 study investigating the role of recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide (Carperitide) in minimizing pulmonary edema in ARDS has recently been completed, and results are awaited (NCT00030121).

Lung injury is often heralded by a rise in pulmonary vascular resistance, with an imbalance between pulmonary vasoconstrictors and vasodilators being seen in animal endotoxin shock models. Intravenous adenosine reduces EVLW, whereas intravenous nitroprusside and nitroglycerin also reduce pulmonary edema generation, but at the expense of increasing ventilation-perfusion mismatch. To date, there is no clear evidence to support the role of vasodilator treatment in ALI/ARDS.

Maximizing Alveolar Fluid Clearance

Alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) is impaired in more than 50% of patients with ALI/ARDS, with this group having higher mortality rates.28 β-Agonists upregulate AFC by increasing sodium ion transport from the alveolar space. A clinical trial of intravenous salbutamol in ALI/ARDS demonstrated reduced EVLW and a trend toward increased survival.29 A retrospective study of salbutamol exposure in ALI suggested an association between higher exposure and improved outcome.30 β2-Agonists may exert several other beneficial effects in ALI/ARDS, including increased surfactant secretion, decreased lung endothelial permeability, decreased airway resistance, and decreased airway pressures. A large United Kingdom multicenter study is in progress examining the effects of intravenous salbutamol on outcome in ALI/ARDS (ISRCTN38366450), whereas an Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSNet) inhaled β-agonist study has recently been terminated, and results are awaited (NCT00434993). β-Agonists are not currently recommended for treatment of ALI/ARDS.

Another potential future treatment is gene therapy to increase the expression of the ion channels and pumps needed for AFC. An animal study investigating overexpression of the β1-subunit of the sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) pump demonstrated increased rates of AFC and improved survival.31 If the alveolar epithelium is severely injured, cellular regeneration may be required before a functioning epithelial layer can be manipulated.

Epithelial and Endothelial Repair

Stem cells have the capacity for limitless self-renewal and differentiation. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent and have the ability to differentiate into any cell type in the body, whereas adult stem cells are multipotent and have the ability to differentiate into several cell types, including cell types of other organ systems.

Stem cells provide three therapeutic opportunities.32 First, endogenous stem cells may be stimulated by exogenously administered growth factors. Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), hepatocyte growth factor, and transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α) have all been shown to reduce the effects of ALI in animal models. Epidermal growth factor, TGF-α, and KGF can all upregulate AFC. KGF has other potentially useful effects, including cytoprotection, augmented surfactant secretion, and an antioxidant effect. The administration of exogenous growth factors has not yet been directly studied in human trials of ALI/ARDS. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and regulates vascular permeability. Genetic polymorphisms of the VEGF gene are associated with lower levels of VEGF and increased mortality in ALI/ARDS.33 Although VEGF increases alveolar permeability in ALI/ARDS,34 its administration enhances alveola repair in vitro and in animal models. The role of VEGF in ALI/ARDS is being studied (NCT00319631).

Secondly, administration of exogenous stem cells, either embryonic or adult, can provide repair to an injured alveolus. Animal studies have been promising. In a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI/ARDS model, bone marrow progenitor cells localized to the site of injury and differentiated into endothelial and epithelial cells. Autologous transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells preserves endothelial function and maintains the integrity of the pulmonary alveolar-capillary barrier, whereas administration of mesenchymal stem cells reduces the severity of ALI/ARDS in mice.35 Patients with pneumonia36 and ALI/ARDS37 have higher levels of endothelial progenitor cells, and these higher levels correlate with improved outcome. Mesenchymal stem cells were originally thought to act as a source of regenerative cells by differentiating into, and locally replacing, lethally injured cells. However, their primary mechanism of action may be through the secretion of growth factors, cytokines, and other signaling molecules to cause the trophic modulation of inflammation, cell death, fibrosis, and tissue repair.38

The third role of stem cells is their ability to deliver gene therapy to the injured lung. Endothelial progenitor cells have been used to deliver vasodilatory genes to the pulmonary vasculature with resultant decreases in PAOPs in experimental pulmonary hypertension. In one study, nontransfected mesenchymal stem cells reduced the severity of ALI/ARDS in a mouse LPS model, whereas administration of mesenchymal stem cells transfected with the human angiopoietin-1 gene only demonstrated a small additional improvement.35 Human studies are awaited.

Vasodilators

Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenous vasodilator produced by the endothelium. When administered by inhalation, it vasodilates the circulation of ventilated alveoli, thus potentially reducing shunt and pulmonary hypertension. Early studies demonstrated physiologic improvements with NO in ARDS39, 40, 41, 42, 43; however, mortality remained unchanged. Two meta-analyses showed no mortality benefit44, 45 and reported possible harm due to methemoglobinemia, toxic nitrogen compounds, increased pulmonary edema, rebound pulmonary hypertension, and renal failure. Because NO is expensive, possibly harmful, and without a mortality benefit, its routine use is not recommended, although it may have a place as salvage therapy for severe hypoxemia given its ability to increase oxygenation.46

Prostacylins are derivatives of arachidonic acid and have potentially beneficial effects, including vasodilation, inhibition of platelet aggregation, reduction of neutrophil adhesion, and inhibition of both macrophage and neutrophil activation. Inhaled prostaglandin I2 (PGI2; prostacyclin) has been compared with inhaled NO in ARDS.47, 48, 49 PGI2 has similar efficacy and some advantages, including minimal systemic effects, absence of platelet dysfunction, easy administration, harmless metabolites, and no requirement for monitoring. No placebo-controlled randomized trial has yet studied PGI2 in ARDS, but an ongoing study aims to show that nebulized PGI2 (iloprost) decreases pulmonary hypertension selectively and improves oxygenation in ARDS (NCT00314548).

Intravenous prostacyclin in the form of PGE1 has also been investigated in ARDS. Although vasodilatory effects can cause hypotension and increase pulmonary shunting, prostacyclin is anti-inflammatory and can increase both cardiac output and oxygen delivery and improve oxygen extraction during reduced oxygen delivery. Early studies50, 51, 52 in ARDS showed no significant benefit, although the dose delivered was questioned.53 PGE1 was reformulated as liposomal PGE1 to increase pulmonary drug delivery and minimize side effects. Again, despite a promising preclinical study,54 subsequent studies were negative.55, 56

Endothelin-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor that has been implicated in the pathophysiology of lung injury. Tezosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, has been investigated in animal models of lung injury and with mixed results thus far.

Vasoconstrictors

Almitrine is a pulmonary vasoconstrictor that may increase hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and reduce shunt. In a small ARDS study, oxygenation was improved, with minimal increase in pulmonary vascular pressures.57 The combination of intravenous almitrine to decrease blood flow to hypoxic lung units and inhaled NO, to increase blood flow to ventilated lung units, has been investigated in both experimental lung injury and a small clinical study.58 Both found the combination superior than either therapy alone at increasing Pao 2, with a minimal rise in pulmonary artery pressure. Further research is required.

Coagulation

An imbalance between fibrinogenesis and fibrinolysis in ARDS results in widespread fibrin deposition in the alveolar airspace, interstitium, and blood vessels. Pulmonary intravascular thrombosis and vasoconstriction can lead to the development of increased pulmonary vascular dead space, a known independent predictor of mortality in ALI/ARDS. Several anticoagulants have been proposed as potential therapies in ALI/ARDS and have undergone investigation in animal models. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), factor VIIai, heparin, antithrombin III, activated protein C (APC), and thrombomodulin have all been shown to have beneficial effects at this level of investigation.59

Protein C levels are lower in patients with ALI/ARDS than normal controls, and the level of protein C correlates with clinical outcome.60 However, a small randomized controlled trial of APC in ALI/ARDS did not reduce either duration of ventilation or mortality, although pulmonary vascular dead space was decreased.61 A further study investigating APC in inflammatory and infectious ALI/ARDS is in progress (ISRCTN52566874). A phase 2 trial of recombinant TFPI demonstrated improvements in lung dysfunction score and survival.62 Therapeutic modulation of the coagulation system is not recommended in ALI/ARDS.

Anti-inflammatory therapy

Glucocorticoids

Steroids possess a myriad of anti-inflammatory properties stretching from the genome to the macrophage. In the 1980s, several trials unsuccessfully examined the role of short-course, high-dose methylprednisolone in preventing the development of ARDS in high-risk patients.63, 64, 65, 66 A trial of high-dose steroids early in the course of ARDS was negative,67 but a recent study in 91 patients with prolonged low-dose methylprednisolone showed reduced inflammation and organ dysfunction, plus reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.68

Excessive alveolar fibrosis is a feature of established ARDS, and the antifibrotic properties of steroids have been investigated in this setting. Observational studies69, 70, 71, 72 showed promising results and were followed by a small randomized controlled trial that suggested a beneficial effect on outcome.73 However, the ARDSNet Late Steroid Rescue Study demonstrated no overall effect on mortality, with increased mortality when steroids were commenced 7 days after the onset of ALI/ARDS.74 A recent meta-analysis75 and systematic review76 concluded that steroids have no role in preventing ARDS but may have a role in treating ARDS. Further studies are required to definitively answer this question, and studies of low-dose steroids in early ARDS are planned (NCT00562835 and NCT00773058). Corticosteroid therapy is covered in detail in Chapter 22.

Proinflammatory Mediator Inhibition

Eicosanoids are derivatives of arachidonic acid and act as proinflammatory mediators. They are produced through the activity of either 5-lipoxygenase to produce the leukotrienes or cyclooxygenase to produce prostanoids.

Ketoconazole is an imidazole antifungal agent with anti-inflammatory properties, specifically an ability to block leukotriene and thromboxane A2 synthesis, and an antimacrophage effect whereby proinflammatory cytokine secretion is reduced. Small studies reported positive results for the prevention of ARDS in high-risk patients.77, 78, 79 A large subsequent study by the ARDSNet group of ketoconazole in 234 patients with ARDS demonstrated no beneficial effects.80

Ibuprofen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent that inhibits cyclooxygenase. In a large sepsis study of 448 patients, ibuprofen diminished prostanoid production and was associated with a trend toward decreased duration of pulmonary dysfunction and ARDS, but this did not reach statistical significance.81 Modulation of other inflammatory mediators has also been investigated, but to date, no treatment has been shown to effectively reduce mortality.

Complement can contribute to ALI/ARDS by the generation of C3a and C5a, which attract neutrophils to the lungs and activate them. Complement can also cause cellular injury through the production of the membrane attack complex, C5b-9. Complement receptor-1 is a cell surface receptor on erythrocytes and leukocytes that can inhibit both classic and alternative complement pathways. Animal studies have provided a basis for further investigation, and a human phase 1 study in 24 patients with ARDS has demonstrated the safety of recombinant soluble cytokine receptor-1 and its ability to inhibit the complement cascade.82 Further studies are awaited.

Insulin has anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of the proinflammatory transcription factor NFkB. In a rat model of endotoxin-induced ALI/ARDS, tight glycemic control to 90 to 110 mg/dL reduced the severity of lung injury.83 The role of intensive insulin therapy in preventing ALI/ARDS by maintaining tight glycemic control (80 to 110 mg/dL) is being studied in a phase 2 trial (NCT00605696).

Other current studies of potential anti-inflammatory treatments include a trial investigating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of recombinant human interferon-β in ALI/ARDS (NCT00789685) and a phase 2 trial of IC14, a recombinant chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD14, to block CD14-medicated cellular activation in patients with sepsis-induced ALI (NCT00233207). This trial has recently been terminated, and results are awaited. Anti-inflammatory therapy for ALI/ARDS is not recommended.

Immunonutrition

Nutrition plays various roles in the management of ALI/ARDS. The use of a feed high in fat and low in carbohydrate can reduce carbon dioxide production and thus ventilatory requirements.84 Enteral nutrition can stimulate gut and lung immunoglobulin A (IgA) defense mechanisms.85 The omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids found in fish oil, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), γ-linolenic acid (GLA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) can reduce the production of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids.

Clinical studies in ALI/ARDS have demonstrated the benefit of fish oil supplementation with reductions in pulmonary neutrophil infiltration, microvascular permeability, pulmonary vascular resistance, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, and improved mortality.86, 87, 88, 89, 90 This benefit from fish oil supplementation in ARDS has been supported in a recent systematic review on immunonutrition.91 Further studies of fish oils in ALI/ARDS are in progress in Spain (ISRCTN63673813) and the United States (NCT00351533) (NCT00609180). This latter ARDSNet study will also investigate early versus late feeding as well as antioxidants in ARDS. These studies will inform the use of immunonutrition in ALI/ARDS. Omega-3 fatty acid–based nutrition may have a role to play in the management of ALI/ARDS (Table 12-2 ).

Table 12-2.

Summary of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA) Supplementation Studies in ALI/ARDS

Study Omega-3 PUFA Other Antioxidants Number in Trial Setting Nonmortality Benefits Absolute Mortality Reduction
Singer et al, 198686 EPA and GLA Yes 100 ALI Yes No
Pontes-Arruda et al, 200687 EPA and GLA Yes 156 Sepsis and ARDS Yes 19%
Pacht et al, 200388 EPA and GLA Yes 43 ALI/ARDS Yes Not reported
Gadek et al, 199989 EPA and GLA Yes 146 ARDS Yes No
Elamin et al, 200590 EPA and GLA Yes 16 ARDS Yes Not reported

EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; GLA, γ-linolenic acid.

Anti–Adhesion Molecule Therapy

The adhesion of immune cells to the endothelium to facilitate diapedesis is a vital step in the accumulation of neutrophils in the alveolus. The blockage of adhesion molecules is a potential therapeutic target in ALI/ARDS. Blockage of CD18, a neutrophil adhesion molecule, has been shown to attenuate the development of experimental lung injury. To date, there are no human studies.

Effector Cell Inhibition

Pentoxifylline is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor with anti-inflammatory effects, acting against both neutrophils and macrophages. A small phase 1 study of pentoxifylline in six ARDS patients did not show any advantage in either gas exchange or hemodynamic parameters.92

Lisofylline is a pentoxifylline derivative with slightly differing anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Although it also inhibits neutrophil accumulation and downregulates proinflammatory cytokines, it additionally has an effect on reducing levels of oxidized free fatty acids. Animal studies of lisofylline in the treatment of ARDS were promising, but again, a large multicenter study by the ARDSNet group in 235 patients with ALI/ARDS was negative.93

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is involved in the development and homeostasis of alveolar macrophages. It also plays a role in the prevention of alveolar epithelial apoptosis. A small study of 10 patients with ALI demonstrated an improvement in oxygenation with GM-CSF over a 5-day period.94 A further study of GM-CSF in ARDS is under way in the United States (NCT00201409)

Activated neutrophils release neutrophil elastase, which plays a key role in alveolar injury, leading to increased vascular permeability and alveolar flooding. EPI-hNE-4 is a neutrophil elastase inhibitor that improved pulmonary compliance without affecting immune function during Pseudomonas aeruginosa–induced pneumonia in rats. A phase 3 multicenter trial of Depelestat (EPI-hNE-4) in ARDS has completed and is awaiting publication (NCT00455767). Sivelestat is a reversible, competitive inhibitor of neutrophil elastase. After promising animal studies, sivelestat underwent a phase 3 study, in which it improved pulmonary function and reduced duration of ICU stay, with trends toward a reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality.95 However, the international Sivelestat Trial in ALI Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation (STRIVE) study in 492 ALI patients was stopped prematurely after an increase in the 180-day all-cause mortality rate was noted. No pulmonary improvements occurred, and the 28-day mortality rate was not reduced.96

Antioxidant Therapy

Activated neutrophils and macrophages partly exert their injurious effects through the generation of reactive oxygen species. Pulmonary glutathione, an antioxidant, is reduced in ARDS. N-acetylcysteine and procysteine are precursors for glutathione, and their administration can replete pulmonary glutathione levels in ARDS. Small studies of N-acetylcysteine in ALI/ARDS reported mixed results,97, 98, 99, 100 whereas a study of procysteine in ARDS was halted in 1998 owing to increased mortality (unpublished data). N-acetylcysteine can also downregulate NFkB, with resultant reduction in neutrophil chemoattractant messenger RNA (mRNA) and alveolitis in a rat model of lung injury.

Vitamin C and E administration in the critically ill reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay without decreasing the incidence of ARDS.101

Statins

Statins were introduced into clinical practice as cholesterol-lowering agents through inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase and have since been shown to possess pleiotropic actions both dependent and independent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition. Statins exert beneficial effects on inflammation and coagulation as well as epithelial, endothelial, and immune cells function.102 Several retrospective studies have demonstrated that prior statin therapy is associated with improved survival in sepsis, including pneumonia.103, 104, 105, 106, 107 Patients with ALI/ARDS receiving treatment with a statin during admission had a 73% lower odds of death, although this failed to reach statistical significance (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 1.21; P = .09).108 In contrast, another study suggested no benefit.109 A recent study has shown pretreatment with a statin110 reduces pulmonary markers of inflammation in an inhaled LPS-induced model of lung injury in healthy volunteers. The ongoing phase 2 HARP-prevention (ISRCTN56543987) and Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition in Acute lung injury to Reduce Pulmonary oedema and inflammation (HARP) (ISRCTN70127774) studies are investigating the effect of simvastatin in the prevention and treatment of ALI/ARDS and will further inform this area. Several groups, including the ARDSNet and the Irish Critical Care Trials group are currently considering undertaking multicenter studies to address the role of statins in ALI/ARDS.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

The SARS epidemic led to the discovery of a novel coronavirus, the receptor for which is a variant of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) implicating the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in ALI/ARDS. ACE converts angiotensin I into angiotensin II, and angiotensin II acting through the angiotensin I receptor mediates vasoconstriction, alveolar permeability, and lung injury. ACE2 degrades angiotensin II, and therefore excessive ACE activity or ACE2 deletion is associated with worse lung injury.

Genetic observational studies in humans have supported the concept that the RAS system is important in the development and outcome of ALI/ARDS. ACE DD genotype is associated with increased ACE activity and worse outcome in ALI/ARDS.111, 112, 113 A retrospective study has shown that prior treatment with an ACE inhibitor was associated with decreased mortality in patients requiring hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia.107 Therapeutic modulation of the RAS with recombinant ACE2, ACE inhibition, and angiotensin I receptor blockade with losartan attenuate pulmonary inflammation in rodent models of LPS-induced ALI/ARDS and ventilator-induced lung injury. Human studies are awaited.

Induced Hypothermia

Hypothermia decreases metabolism by 25% at 33°C, reducing oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production and thus ventilatory demand. It also decreases proinflammatory gene transcription and exerts an anti-inflammatory effect. In animal models, induced hypothermia reduces the expression of intracellular adhesion molecule-1, interleukin-1β levels, the pulmonary accumulation of neutrophils, and histologic lung damage. Several case reports have documented the successful use of hypothermia (33° to 34°C) for severe ALI/ARDS.114, 115, 116 To date, there has been only one small study of 19 patients with sepsis-associated severe ALI/ARDS treated with induced hypothermia. The mortality rate was reduced by 33% at a mean temperature of 33.7 °C. The reduction in body temperature was associated with a reduction in alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, heart rate, and cardiac index and an increase in oxygen extraction, although interestingly, oxygen consumption remained unchanged.117 Further research is required.

Reasons that pharmacologic therapy is ineffective in ALI/ARDS

Despite repeated promising preclinical and clinical phase 1 and 2 studies of therapies for ALI/ARDS, no nonventilatory strategy has yet convincingly been shown to improve outcome. The many reasons for the scientific failure of translation from bench to bedside include limitations of animal models, poorly understood human factors, study methodologic flaws, and the use of oxygenation as an outcome measure in a condition in which only a small minority die from refractory hypoxemia.118, 119 The use of pharmacologic agents as adjuncts to increase oxygenation allowing the limitation of injurious ventilation may be associated with improved outcomes, but this remains to be tested.

Authors' Recommendations.

  • Despite promising scientific advances, nonventilatory strategies for ALI/ARDS remain elusive.

  • The best evidence we have is for minimizing pulmonary edema through fluid restriction when appropriate.

  • Other therapies may occasionally be justified as salvage therapy in severe ALI/ARDS, but with the knowledge that their risk-to-benefit ratio remains unclear.

References

  • 1.Reines H.D., Silverman H., Hurst J. Effects of two concentrations of nebulized surfactant (Exosurf) in sepsis-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Crit Care Med. 1992;20:S61. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Spragg R.G., Gilliard N., Richman P. Acute effects of a single dose of porcine surfactant on patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest. 1994;105:195–202. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weg J.G., Balk R.A., Tharratt R.S. Safety and potential efficacy of an aerosolized surfactant in human sepsis-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 1994;272:1433–1438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Walmrath D., Gunther A., Ghofrani H.A. Bronchoscopic surfactant administration in patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:57–62. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walmrath D., Grimminger F., Pappert D. Bronchoscopic administration of bovine natural surfactant in ARDS and septic shock: Impact on gas exchange and haemodynamics. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:805–810. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00243402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wiswell T.E., Smith R.M., Katz L.B. Bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with Surfaxin (KL4-Surfactant) for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1188–1195. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9808118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gregory T.J., Steinberg K.P., Spragg R. Bovine surfactant therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:1309–1315. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anzueto A., Baughman R.P., Guntupalli K.K. Aerosolized surfactant in adults with sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1417–1422. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605303342201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Spragg R.G., Lewis J.F., Wurst W. Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome with recombinant surfactant protein C surfactant. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1562–1566. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200207-782OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davidson W.J., Dorscheid D., Spragg R.G. Exogenous pulmonary surfactant for the treatment of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: Results of a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10:R41. doi: 10.1186/cc4851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Humphrey H., Hall J., Sznajder I. Improved survival in ARDS patients associated with a reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Chest. 1990;97:1176–1180. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.5.1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2564–2575. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2213–2224. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosenberg A.L., Dechert R.E., Park P.K. Review of a large clinical series. Association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: A retrospective review of the ARDSNet Tidal Volume Study Cohort. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24:35–46. doi: 10.1177/0885066608329850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schuller D., Mitchell J.P., Calandrino F.S. Fluid balance during pulmonary edema: Is fluid gain a marker or a cause of poor outcome? Chest. 1991;100:1068–1075. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.4.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sakr Y., Vincent J.-L., Reinhart K. High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest. 2005;128:3098–3108. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simmons R.S., Berdine C.C., Seidenfeld J.J. Fluid balance and the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;135:924–929. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.4.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davey-Quinn A., Gedney J., Whiteley S. Extravascular lung water and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Oxygenation and outcome. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999;27:357–362. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9902700404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mitchell J.P., Schuster D., Calandrino F. Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:1229–1233. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.DiCarlo J.V., Alexander S.R., Agarwal R. Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration may improve survival from acute respiratory distress syndrome after bone marrow transplantation or chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25:801–805. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200310000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoste E.A.J., Vanholder R.C., Lameire N.H. No early respiratory benefit with CVVHDF in patients with acute renal failure and acute lung injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:2153–2158. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.12.2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Safe Study Investigators A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2247–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martin G.S., Mangialardi R.J., Wheeler A.P. Albumin and furosemide therapy in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2175–2182. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200210000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin G.S., Moss M., Wheeler A.P. A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1681–1687. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000171539.47006.02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Quinlan G.J., Evans T.W., Gutteridge J.M. Oxidative damage to plasma proteins in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Free Radic Res. 1994;20:289–298. doi: 10.3109/10715769409145628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quinlan G.J., Mumby S., Martin G.S. Albumin influences total plasma antioxidant capacity favorably in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:755–759. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114574.18641.5d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Quinlan G.J., Margarson M.P., Mumby S. Administration of albumin to patients with sepsis syndrome: A possible beneficial role in plasma thiol repletion. Clin Sci. 1998;95:459–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ware L.B., Matthay M.A. Alveolar fluid clearance is impaired in the majority of patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1376–1383. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.2004035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Perkins G.D., McAuley D.F., Richter A. Bench-to-bedside review: beta2-Agonists and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2004;8:25–32. doi: 10.1186/cc2417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manocha S., Gordon A., Salehifar E. Inhaled beta-2 agonist salbutamol and acute lung injury: An association with improvement in acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2006;10:R12. doi: 10.1186/cc3971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Factor P., Dumasius V., Saldias F. Adenovirus-Mediated Transfer of an Na+/K+-ATPase β1 Subunit Gene Improves Alveolar Fluid Clearance and Survival in Hyperoxic Rats. Hum Gene Ther. 2000;11:2231–2242. doi: 10.1089/104303400750035753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yen C.C., Yang S.H., Lin C.Y. Stem cells in the lung parenchyma and prospects for lung injury therapy. Eur J Clin Invest. 2006;36:310–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhai R., Gong M.N., Zhou W. Genotypes and haplotypes of the VEGF gene are associated with higher mortality and lower VEGF plasma levels in patients with ARDS. Thorax. 2007;62:718–722. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.069393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thickett D.R., Armstrong L., Christie S.J. Vascular endothelial growth factor may contribute to increased vascular permeability in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1601–1605. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2011071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mei S.H.J., McCarter S.D., Deng Y. Prevention of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing angiopoietin 1. PLoS Med. 2007:e269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yamada M., Kubo H., Ishizawa K. Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with bacterial pneumonia: Evidence that bone marrow derived cells contribute to lung repair. Thorax. 2005;60:410–413. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.034058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burnham E.L., Taylor W.R., Quyyumi A.A. Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells are associated with survival in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:854–860. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1325OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van Poll D., Parekkadan B., Borel Rinkes I.H.M. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for protection and repair of injured vital organs. Cell Mol Bioengineer. 2008;1:42–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dellinger R.P., Zimmerman J.L., Taylor R.W. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: Results of a randomized phase II trial. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:15–23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Michael John R., Barton Richard G., Saffle Jeffrey R. Inhaled nitric oxide versus conventional therapy: Effect on oxygenation in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:1372–1380. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.5.96-10089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Troncy E., Collet J.-P., Shapiro S. Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A pilot randomized controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:1483–1488. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.5.9707090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dobyns E.L., Cornfield D.N., Anas N.G. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the effects of inhaled nitric oxide therapy on gas exchange in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. J Pediatr. 1999;134:406–412. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70196-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lundin S., Mang H., Smithies M. Inhalation of nitric oxide in acute lung injury: Results of a European Multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:911–919. doi: 10.1007/s001340050982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sokol J., Jacobs S.E., Bohn D. Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxic respiratory failure in children and adults: A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:989–998. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000078819.48523.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Adhikari N., Granton J.T. Inhaled nitric oxide for acute lung injury: No place for NO? JAMA. 2004;291:1629–1631. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.13.1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ferguson N.D. Inhaled nitric oxide for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. BMJ. 2007;334:757–758. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39168.568692.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zwissler B., Kemming G., Habler O. Inhaled prostacyclin (PGI2) versus inhaled nitric oxide in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1671–1677. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Walmrath D., Schneider T., Schermuly R. Direct comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and aerosolized prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:991–996. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Van Heerden P.V., Blythe D., Webb S.A. Inhaled aerosolized prostacyclin and nitric oxide as selective pulmonary vasodilators in ARDS-a pilot study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24:564–568. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Holcroft J.W., Vassar M.J., Weber C.J. Prostaglandin E1 and survival in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective trial. Ann Surg. 1986;203:371–378. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198604000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bone R.C., Slotman G., Maunder R. Randomized double-blind, multicenter study of prostaglandin E1 in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Prostaglandin E1 Study Group. Chest. 1989;96:114–119. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.1.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Slotman G.J., Kerstein M.D., Bone R.C. The effects of prostaglandin E1 on non-pulmonary organ function during clinical acute respiratory failure. Prostaglandin E1 Study Group. J Trauma. 1992;32:480–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rossignon M.D., Khayat D., Royer C. Functional and metabolic activity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes from patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome: Results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study on the activity of prostaglandin E1. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:276–281. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199002000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Leff J.A., Baer J.W., Kirkman J.M. Liposome-entrapped PGE1 posttreatment decreases IL-1 alpha-induced neutrophil accumulation and lung leak in rats. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:151–157. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.1.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abraham E., Baughman R., Fletcher E. Liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1478–1485. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vincent J.L., Brase R., Santman F. A multi-centre, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study of liposomal prostaglandin E1 (TLC C-53) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1578–1583. doi: 10.1007/s001340101077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Reyes A., Roca J., Rodriquez-Roisin R. Effect of almitrine on ventilation-perfusion distribution in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:1062–1067. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gallart L., Lu Q., Puybasset L. Intravenous almitrine combined with inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1770–1777. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9804066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Laterre P.F., Wittebole X., Dhainaut J.F. Anticoagulant therapy in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(suppl):S329–S336. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057912.71499.A5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ware L.B., Fang X., Matthay M.A. Protein C and thrombomodulin in human acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003;285:L514–L521. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00442.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liu K.D., Levitt J., Zhuo H. Randomized clinical trial of activated protein C for the treatment of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:618–623. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200803-419OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Abraham E., Reinhart K., Svoboda P. Assessment of the safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:2081–2089. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200111000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Weigelt J.A., Norcross J.F., Borman K.R. Early steroid therapy for respiratory failure. Arch Surg. 1985;120:536–540. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390290018003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sprung C.L., Caralis P.V., Marcial E.H. The effects of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with septic shock: A prospective, controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1137–1143. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411013111801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bone R.C., Fisher C.J., Jr, Clemmer T.P. Early methylprednisolone treatment for septic syndrome and the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest. Chest. 1987;1988;9294:1032–1036. 448. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.6.1032. (published erratum appears in. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Luce J.M., Montgomery A.B., Marks J.D. Ineffectiveness of high-dose methylprednisolone in preventing parenchymal lung injury and improving mortality in patients with septic shock. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138:62–68. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bernard G.R., Luce J.M., Sprung C.L. High-dose corticosteroids in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1565–1570. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712173172504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Meduri G.U., Golden E., Freire A.X. Methylprednisolone infusion in early severe ARDS: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2007;131:954–963. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hooper R.G., Kearl R.A. Established ARDS treated with a sustained course of adrenocortical steroids. Chest. 1990;97:138–143. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.1.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hooper R.G., Kearl R.A. Established adult respiratory distress syndrome successfully treated with corticosteroids. South Med J. 1996;89:359–364. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199604000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Meduri G.U., Belenchia J.M., Estes R.J. Fibroproliferative phase of ARDS: Clinical findings and effects of corticosteroids. Chest. 1991;100:943–952. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.4.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Meduri G.U., Chinn A.J., Leeper K.V. Corticosteroid rescue treatment of progressive fibroproliferation in late ARDS: Patterns of response and predictors of outcome. Chest. 1994;105:1516–1527. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.5.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Meduri G.U., Headley A.S., Golden E. Effect of prolonged methylprednisolone therapy in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:159–165. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1671–1684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Peter J.V., John P., Graham P.L. Corticosteroids in the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults: Meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;336:1006–1009. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39537.939039.BE. (7651) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Deal E.N., Holland J.M., Schramm G.E. Role of corticosteroids in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Ther. 2008;30:787–799. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Slotman G.J., Burchard K.W., D'Arezzo A. Ketoconazole prevents acute respiratory failure in critically ill surgical patients. J Trauma. 1988;28:648–654. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198805000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yu M., Tomasa G. A double blind prospective randomized trial of ketoconazole, a thromboxane synthetase inhibitor, in the prophylaxis of adult respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:1635–1642. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199311000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sinuff T., Cook D.J., Peterson J.C. Development, implementation, and evaluation of ketoconazole practice guidelines for ARDS prophylaxis. J Crit Care. 1999;14:1–6. doi: 10.1016/s0883-9441(99)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.ARDS Network Authors for the ARDS Network Ketoconazole for early treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:1995–2002. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bernard G.R., Wheeler A.P., Russell J.A. The effects of ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of patients with sepsis. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:912–918. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703273361303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zimmerman J.L., Dellinger R.P., Straube R.C. Phase 1 trial of the recombinant soluble complement receptor 1 in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3149–3154. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200009000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chen H.I., Yeh D.Y., Liou H.-L. Insulin attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in conscious rats. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:758–764. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201902.37115.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Al-Saady N.M., Blackmore C.M., Bennett E.D. High fat, low carbohydrate, enteral feeding lowers PaCO2 and reduces the period of ventilation in artificially ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 1989;15:290–295. doi: 10.1007/BF00263863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.King B.K., Kudsk K.A., Li J. Route and type of nutrition influence mucosal immunity to bacterial pneumonia. Ann Surg. 1999;229:272–278. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Singer P., Theilla M., Fisher H. Benefit of an enteral diet enriched with eicosapentaenoic acid and gamma-linolenic acid in ventilated patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1033–1038. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206111.23629.0A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pontes-Arruda A., Aragão A.M.A., Albuquerque J.D. The effects of enteral feeding with eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and antioxidants in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2325–2333. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000234033.65657.B6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pacht E.R., DeMichele S.J., Nelson J.L. Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and antioxidants reduces alveolar inflammatory mediators and protein influx in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:491–500. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049952.96496.3E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Gadek J.E., DeMichele S.J., Karlstad M.D. Effect of enteral feeding with eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and antioxidants in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Enteral Nutrition in ARDS Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1409–1420. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Elamin E.M., Hughes L.F., Drew D. Effect of enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), and antioxidants reduces alveolar inflammatory mediators and protein influx in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Chest. 2005;128:225S. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049952.96496.3E. Abstract. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Marik P.E., Zaloga G.P. Immunonutrition in critically ill patients: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1980–1990. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1213-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Montravers P., Fagon J.Y., Gilbert C. Pilot study of cardiopulmonary risk from pentoxifylline in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest. 1993;103:1017–1022. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.4.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Acute Respiratory Disease Syndrome Network Randomized controlled placebo controlled trial of lisofylline for early treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1–6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Presneill J.J., Harris T., Stewart A.G. A randomized phase II trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy in severe sepsis with respiratory dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:138–143. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tamakuma S., Shiba T., Hirasawa H. A phase III clinical study of neutrophil elastase inhibitor ONO-5046 Na in SIRS patients. J Clin Ther Med. 1998;14:289–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zeiher B.G., Artigas A., Vincent J.L. Neutrophil elastase inhibition in acute lung injury: Results of the strive study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1695–1702. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000133332.48386.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ortolani O., Conti A., De Gaudio A.R. Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine and rutin on the lipid peroxidation of the lung epithelium during the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Shock. 2000;13:14–18. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200013010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jepsen S., Herlevsen P., Knudsen P. Antioxidant treatment with N-acetylcysteine during adult respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective randomized placebo controlled study. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:819–923. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199207000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Suter P.M., Domenighetti G., Schaller M.D. N-acetylcysteine enhances recovery from acute lung injury in man: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Chest. 1994;105:190–194. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bernard G.R., Wheeler A.P., Arons M.M. A trial of antioxidants N-acetylcysteine and procysteine in ARDS. Chest. 1997;112:164–172. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nathens A.B., Neff M.J., Jurkovich G.J. Randomized, prospective trial of antioxidant supplementation in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg. 2002;236:814–822. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200212000-00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Craig T., O'Kane C.M., McAuley D.F. Potential mechanisms by which statins modulate pathogenic mechanisms important in the development of acute lung injury. In: Vincent J.L., editor. 27th Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 2007. pp. 287–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Almog Y., Shefer A., Novack V. Prior statin therapy is associated with a decreased rate of severe sepsis. Circulation. 2004;110:880–885. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138932.17956.F1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Liappis A.P., Kan V.L., Rochester C.G. The effect of statins on mortality in patients with bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1352–1357. doi: 10.1086/323334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kruger P., Fitzsimmons K., Cook D. Statin therapy is associated with fewer deaths in patients with bacteraemia. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:75–79. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2859-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hackam D.G., Mamdani M., Li P. Statins and sepsis in patients with cardiovascular disease: A population-based cohort analysis. Lancet. 2006;367:413–418. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mortensen E.M., Pugh M.J., Copeland L.A. Impact of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality of subjects hospitalised with pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:611–617. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00162006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Group TICCT Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome in Ireland: a prospective audit of epidemiology and management. Crit Care. 2008:R30. doi: 10.1186/cc6808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kor D.J., Iscimen R., Yilmaz M. Statin administration did not influence the progression of lung injury or associated organ failures in a cohort of patients with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1039–1046. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1421-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Shyamsundar M., McKeown S.T., O'Kane C.M. Simvastatin decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation in healthy volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(12):1107–1114. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200810-1584OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Marshall R.P., Webb S., Bellingan G.J. Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is associated with susceptibility and outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:646–650. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2108086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Jerng J.S., Yu C.J., Wang H.C. Polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene affects the outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1001–1006. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206107.92476.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Orfanos S.E., Armaganidis A., Glynos C. Pulmonary capillary endothelium-bound angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in acute lung injury. Circulation. 2000;102:2011–2018. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.16.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Gilston A. A hypothermic regime for acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 1983;9:37–39. doi: 10.1007/BF01693705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hurst J.M., DeHaven B., Branson R. Combined use of high-frequency jet ventilation and induced hypothermia in the treatment of refractory respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:771–772. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198509000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wetterberg T., Steen S. Combined use of hypothermia and buffering in the treatment of critical respiratory failure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992;36:490–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Villar J., Slutsky A.S. Effects of induced hypothermia in patients with septic adult respiratory distress syndrome. Resuscitation. 1993;26:183–192. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(93)90178-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Montgomery A.B., Stager M.A., Carrico C.J. Causes of mortality in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985;132:485–489. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.132.3.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Stapleton R.D., Wang B.M., Hudson L.D. Causes and timing of death in patients with ARDS. Chest. 2005;128:525–532. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES