Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2015 Apr 3:699–712.e2. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3383-5.00040-3

Bioterrorism

Christian Sandrock
Editors: V Courtney Broaddus1,2, Robert J Mason3,4, Joel D Ernst5, Talmadge E King Jr6, Stephen C Lazarus7,8, John F Murray9, Jay A Nadel10, Arthur S Slutsky11,12, Michael B Gotway13,14,15,16
PMCID: PMC7151932

Introduction

Bioterrorism, once limited to military-directed biowarfare, has developed considerable prominence due to increasing world threats and the anthrax outbreak in the United States in 2001. Clinicians and public health officials have become more aware of these rare diseases as local, state, and national programs increase detection, therapeutic options, and responses to the causative agents.

Early recognition of bioterrorism agents can be difficult since the early prodromal phase of most agents is similar and often indistinguishable from other causes of febrile respiratory illnesses. Febrile respiratory illnesses and respiratory failure can signify a natural outbreak (e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome, plague, tularemia, or a novel strain of influenza) or a bioterrorism event.1, 2 Most cases of febrile respiratory illnesses admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are caused by community-acquired pneumonia, and respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subsequently develop in up to 11% of these community-acquired pneumonia cases.3, 4 Although most cases of community-acquired pneumonia are recognizable, the rare and contagious causes (e.g., plague) can have a large impact on the health care and public health systems.2, 5 Thus, early recognition of these infections becomes important for two reasons. First, early infection control and public health preparedness strategies must be implemented to reduce spread to health care workers and the public, particularly in the acute stages of disease when patients are most contagious and most likely to undergo aerosol-generating diagnostic procedures. Second, intentional release of these agents is a bioterrorism event, and public health and law enforcement authorities are now trained to provide immediate investigation and support. Therefore, early suspicion of a bioterrorism or outbreak event, along with early protective measures and public health contact, will reduce the likelihood of transmission to health care workers, visitors, patients, and the community.

Bioterrorism involves the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or their products (e.g., toxins) to cause morbidity and mortality in humans, animals, or plants.6, 7 All bioterrorism agents are naturally occurring organisms or toxins that can cause sporadic disease under ordinary circumstances, but on occasion, an agent has been manipulated to increase resistance to antibiotics or increase organism virulence.7 This chapter provides an overview of the major agents of bioterrorism and highly lethal disease outbreaks along with clues for detection, steps for public health response, and infection control interventions.

Bioterrorism: A Historical Perspective

Bioterrorism has existed for centuries, from ancient Mesopotamia to current times.7, 8 The initial goal was to incapacitate the enemy through death or stir panic in the population, leading to surrender. For example, in the 14th century, the Tartars catapulted plague-infected corpses into Kaffa, leading to disease spread and defeat of the city (also starting the second wave of the Black Death in Europe).9 In the New World, smallpox-contaminated blankets may have been distributed by early settlers to natives in an effort to overcome the siege of Fort Pitt. However, bioterrorism took form in the last 100 years with extensive biowarfare units in World War I and II.7, 8 Notably, Unit 731 of the Japanese army in World War II used anthrax, plague, cholera, and typhoid on Chinese prisoners with high mortality, but the transition to the battlefield was less successful.7, 8, 9 The Cold War saw both the United States and the former Soviet Union develop bioweapon stockpiles that have since been dismantled. However, over the past 25 years, there has been an increase in individual-initiated bioterrorism, culminating in the anthrax outbreak in 2001 that used the postal service for distribution, causing 22 cases.7, 8, 10

Basics of Bioterrorism

The route of transmission of bioterrorism agents can be by air (e.g., aerosol generation), food (e.g., botulism), or water (e.g., gastroenteritis agents). Delivery can mimic naturally occurring disease, especially if the food or water supply to the public has been targeted. However, with aerosol generation, rapid increases in new cases are seen in low-risk populations, as seen with the anthrax cases in 2001.11

Because most bioterrorism agents are infectious diseases, presentation of disease is usually covert, with health care workers seeing the initial cases. Particularly with contagious diseases such as plague pneumonia, smallpox, and viral hemorrhagic fevers, secondary infections may propagate the event, allowing it to last weeks to months, stressing the capacity of the health care system.2, 7 Chemical and explosive forms of terrorism, however, are often overt and immediately known, with first responders in the field evaluating the initial cases and subsequent cases rarely following the initial event. Therefore, epidemiologic evidence (e.g., an increase in pneumonia or a specific rash) may be the initial clue that there has been a bioterrorism event.12

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has separated bioterrorism agents into three broad categories (A, B, and C) based on ease of spread and severity of illness.7, 8, 13, 14 Category A agents are considered the highest risk to the public and national security for the following reasons: (1) easy person-to-person spread; (2) high mortality; (3) major public health impact causing panic and social disruption; (4) requirement for specific and specialized public health emergency response (e.g., public prophylaxis or protective equipment) 7, 8, 13, 14 (Table 40-1 ).Category B agents are moderately easy to spread and result in moderate morbidity but low mortality in those affected. Fewer specific public health responses are required (Table 40-2 ).7 Category C agents are considered future or potential threats because they are easily available and can have a high mortality, but they have not been documented or engineered successfully (Table 40-3 ).14 Although all of these agents can potentially cause serious disease, the category A agents, along with select category B agents, would be seen by clinicians and have the greatest impact on the public and health care system. These agents present initially with a nonspecific prodromal phase but with epidemiologic clues that may separate them from other less threatening causes of a febrile respiratory illness. Table 40-4, Table 40-5, Table 40-6, Table 40-7, Table 40-8 list the unique features associated with category A agents: clinical syndromes, preferred diagnostic methods, radiologic features, treatment, and infection control and respiratory protection.

Table 40-1.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Category A Agents of Bioterrorism

Definition: Category A agents have the potential to be easily disseminated, have higher contagiousness, have high morbidity and mortality, and require increased public health preparedness
Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis)
Smallpox (variola major)
Plague (Yersinia pestis)
Tularemia (Francisella tularensis)
Botulism (Clostridium botulinum toxin)
Viral hemorrhagic fevers (filoviruses [e.g., Ebola, Marburg] and arenaviruses [e.g., Lassa, Machupo])

Table 40-2.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Category B Agents of Bioterrorism

Definition: Category B agents are moderately easy to disseminate, carry a high morbidity but low mortality, and require public health laboratory and surveillance enhancements
PULMONARY AGENTS
Glanders (Burkholderia mallei)
Melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei)
Psittacosis (Chlamydophila psittaci)
Q fever (Coxiella burnetii)
Ricin toxin from Ricinus communis (castor beans)
NONPULMONARY AGENTS
Brucellosis (Brucella species)
Epsilon toxin of Clostridium perfringens
Food safety threats (e.g., Salmonella species, Escherichia coli O157: H7, Shigella)
Staphylococcal enterotoxin B

Table 40-3.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Category C Agents of Bioterrorism

Definition: Category C agents have the future potential for engineering for easy dissemination or high mortality
Influenza (novel strain)
Nipah virus
Typhus disease (Rickettsia prowazekii)
Viral encephalitis (alphaviruses [e.g., Venezuelan equine encephalitis, eastern equine encephalitis, western equine encephalitis])
Water safety threats (e.g., Vibrio cholerae, Cryptosporidium parvum)

Table 40-4.

Unique Clinical Syndromes Associated with the CDC Category A Agents of Bioterrorism

Agent Unique Clinical Finding/Syndrome
Anthrax Hemorrhagic mediastinitis
Smallpox Poxlike rash with systemic inflammatory response syndrome leading to septic shock
Plague Sudden acute respiratory failure and sepsis
Tularemia Patchy alveolar pneumonia with sepsis
Botulism Descending flaccid paralysis
Viral hemorrhagic fevers (e.g., Ebola) Sepsis with bleeding diathesis, massive fluid loss from diarrhea and vomiting

Table 40-5.

Preferred Diagnostic Methods for CDC Category A Agents

Agent Laboratory Diagnostic Method
Anthrax Culture of organism from blood or body fluid. Serology for uncultured cases. BSL 3 required at state and regional public health laboratory.
Smallpox* PCR of pox lesion. EM confirmation, viral isolation from skin/fluid in BSL 4 laboratory (CDC only).
Plague Culture of organism from blood or sputum. Serology for uncultured cases. BSL 3+ at state or regional public health laboratory.
Tularemia PCR. Difficult to culture. Performed at local, state, and regional public health laboratories.
Botulism Detection of toxin in blood or stool. Toxin identification (A-E) performed at state or regional public health laboratories.
Viral hemorrhagic fevers (e.g., Ebola)* Nucleic acid detection by RT-PCR. Viral culture from blood/body fluid only performed under BSL 4 containment.

BSL, biosafety level; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; EM, electron microscopy; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

*

Culture and/or species identification is performed at the CDC only.

Table 40-6.

Radiologic Features of CDC Category A Agents of Bioterrorism

Agent Radiologic Pulmonary Findings
Anthrax Widening of mediastinum (rapid enlargement on serial imaging), unilateral or bilateral hilar node enlargement. Peribronchovascular thickening and pleural effusion. May also have patchy alveolar opacities, but extensive consolidation uncommon. CT may show hyperattenuating lymphadenopathy
Smallpox Patchy alveolar opacities
Plague Patchy, potentially nodular bilateral opacities that may coalesce to more diffuse alveolar disease resembling ARDS. Cavitation uncommon. Lymph node enlargement possible, but inconsistent
Tularemia Multifocal bronchopneumonia that may cavitate, or lobar pneumonia. Pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy not uncommon
Botulism Normal to lower lung volumes
Viral hemorrhagic fevers (e.g., Ebola) Few available data. Chest radiography may be normal. Diffuse alveolar opacities with areas of dense consolidation; widened mediastinum, pleural effusions also reported. American hantavirus-pulmonary edema pattern with interlobular septal thickening despite hypovolemia; may progress to bilateral air space opacities

Table 40-7.

Treatment of Select CDC Category A Agents

Agent Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment
Anthrax Ciprofloxacin 15 mg/kg IV twice daily
Raxibacumab 40 mg/kg IV, one dose
Clindamycin 900 mg IV three times daily
Plague Gentamicin 5 mg/kg IV/IM daily
Streptomycin 1 g IM daily
Ciprofloxacin 15 mg/kg IV twice daily
Chloramphenicol 15 mg/kg IV four times daily
Smallpox Supportive care
Vaccinia Immune Globulin (unproven in smallpox; approved for use in vaccine recipients with progressive vaccinia infection)
Cidofovir*
Tularemia Gentamicin 5 mg/kg IV/IM daily
Streptomycin 1 g IM daily
Doxycycline 100 mg IV twice daily
Ciprofloxacin 15 mg/kg IV twice daily
Chloramphenicol 15 mg/kg IV four times daily
Viral hemorrhagic fevers Supportive care
Ribavirin for Lassa fever
Investigational agents: Monoclonal antibodies, convalescent serum, antiviral agents
Botulism Trivalent antitoxin (A, B, E)
Supportive care
None

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; IM, intramuscularly; IV, intravenously.

*

Obtained through the CDC only (see http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/vaccination/vig.asp).

Table 40-8.

Infection Control and Respiratory Protection for CDC Category A Agents

Agent Isolation Baseline Protection Protection in Higher Risk Procedures
Viral hemorrhagic fever Contact N95 mask with full face shield or PAPR; full skin coverage with fluid-resistant or impermeable gown or coveralls Current CDC guidelines available at http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/hcp/procedures-for-ppe.html
Smallpox Airborne and contact N95 mask N95 mask or PAPR
Botulism None None Surgical
Plague* Droplet and contact N95 mask N95 mask or PAPR
Tularemia None None Surgical
Anthrax None None Surgical

PAPR, powered air-purifying respirator.

*

Isolation can be stopped after 48 hours of appropriate antibacterial therapy.

CDC Category A Agents

Anthrax

General

Anthrax is caused by Bacillus anthracis, a spore-forming gram-positive rod. B. anthracis is a normal soil inhabitant; the organism can multiply if soil conditions are favorable. Otherwise, B. anthracis persists for long periods in a spore form, resistant to decontamination and environmental extremes. From the soil, B. anthracis spreads to herbivores, such as cattle, as they come into contact with spore-containing soil through grazing.15, 16

Human anthrax largely arises through contact with animal products, such as animal skins, where B. anthracis persists as spores. In 2001 in the United States, 22 cases of anthrax were due to an act of bioterrorism through the postal system, placing anthrax on the forefront of bioterrorism.10 Apart from this outbreak in 2001, anthrax remains rare in the United States, with most endemic and epizootic cases seen in the Middle East. Most cases in the United States arise through the handling of animal products, such as the 2006 cases associated with animal hide drum skins imported from Africa.16

Disease begins when B. anthracis spores are introduced subcutaneously or via ingestion or inhalation. After introduction to oxygen and a protein-rich environment, the spores convert to the vegetative (bacillus) form and initiate replication.15, 16 Exotoxin secretion leads to local spread, edema, hemorrhage, and tissue necrosis. The anthrax capsule, edema factor toxin, and lethal factor toxin act in concert to drive disease.15, 16

Clinical Presentation

Three clinical disease syndromes are seen with anthrax: cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and inhalational.15, 16, 17 Cutaneous anthrax is the most common form worldwide and has an incubation period of 7 to 14 days after inoculation of spores into the subcutaneous space. This is followed by a small, painless papule that can be pruritic. The papule enlarges and develops a central vesicle, followed by erosion into a painless black eschar (Fig. 40-1 ). Marked edema (mediated by anthrax edema toxin) characteristically surrounds the lesions, and there may be regional lymphadenopathy, with systemic symptoms of fever and malaise. The hands, arms, face, and neck are the areas most commonly affected.

Figure 40-1.

Figure 40-1

Anthrax.

The anthrax lesion on the skin of the forearm is caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis. The cutaneous ulceration has begun to turn black, hence the origin of the name “anthrax,” after the Greek word for coal.

(Courtesy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/#2033; James H. Steele.)

With inhalational anthrax, spores that reach the distal airways are transported by inflammatory monocytes or dendritic cells to the mediastinal lymph nodes, with replication followed by onset of disease.15 The incubation period averages 1 to 7 days, followed by clinical symptoms of a nonspecific febrile illness, often mimicking influenza. However, within 24 hours, disease rapidly progresses with the development of respiratory failure, hemorrhagic mediastinitis, necrotizing pneumonia, shock, multiorgan failure, and death (see Table 40-4).17 Shock and multiorgan failure can develop rapidly, and along with hemorrhagic mediastinitis (Fig. 40-2), are the clinical hallmark of anthrax.

Figure 40-2.

Figure 40-2

Imaging findings in inhalation anthrax: chest radiography.

A, Frontal chest radiograph in a 61-year-old man with a 3-day history of productive cough, fever, and exertional dyspnea shows poorly defined medial right upper lobe ground-glass opacity associated with a markedly widened right mediastinum (arrows). During recent travel through parks in the western United States, he had been exposed to animal antlers and hides, wild bison, and donkeys. B, Axial enhanced chest CT displayed in soft tissue windows shows right upper lobe consolidation (arrows) and a small right pleural effusion (*) and trace left pleural liquid associated with right paratracheal lymphadenopathy (arrowhead). Bacillus anthracis was isolated from blood culture.

(Images courtesy Mark D. Sprenkle, MD, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN. Reprinted with permission from Sprenkle MD, Griffith J, Marinelli W, et. al: Lethal factor and anti-protective antigen IgG levels associated with inhalation anthrax, Minnesota, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 20:310–314, 2014.)

Gastrointestinal anthrax is rare and is usually seen in family clusters following the consumption of undercooked meats of infected animals. The disease begins with development of bowel edema, followed by mesenteric lymphadenitis and necrosis, and then rapid progression to shock and death.17

Mortality for cutaneous anthrax is low (<1% in treated patients; approximately 20% in untreated), while inhalational anthrax can carry a mortality of 89%.15, 16, 17 The inhalational cases from 2001 in the United States had a lower mortality of 45%.10

Diagnosis

Although the initial symptoms of inhalational anthrax are nonspecific, some early findings distinguish inhalational anthrax from influenza-like illness or community-acquired pneumonia. Compared with patients who presented with community-acquired pneumonia in a retrospective study, patients with inhalational anthrax were more likely to have nausea or vomiting, tachycardia, elevated transaminases, hyponatremia, and normal white blood cell counts.18 From these observations, a scoring system was devised that had approximately 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity for distinguishing inhalation anthrax cases.18

Diagnosis of anthrax is best performed by isolation of B. anthracis from cultures of blood, sputum, pleural fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, or skin16, 19 (see Table 40-5). Clinicians should notify the laboratory of suspected anthrax, because spores can form during culture, leading to spread to laboratory workers if not properly handled. Additionally, any suspect case of anthrax should involve the public health laboratories for confirmation and strain typing. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are available and have good sensitivity and specificity.16, 19

The radiographic imaging findings associated with anthrax include a widened mediastinum consistent with hemorrhagic mediastinitis, the hallmark of inhalation anthrax15, 16 (see Fig. 40-2 ) (see Table 40-6). However, during the 2001 outbreak, other findings, including patchy alveolar opacities, lobar consolidation, and pleural effusions, were also reported.16 In each of these cases, a widened mediastinum was present on chest radiograph, with follow-up confirmation performed by computed tomography scan.

Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Prognosis

Treatment includes supportive therapy and antibiotics17, 19 (see Table 40-7). Intensive care management with early and appropriate volume resuscitation and lung-protective low tidal volume ventilation should be used if indicated.2 Antibacterial treatment includes ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, or if the isolate is susceptible, penicillin.17, 19, 20 In 2001, rifampin, clindamycin, or vancomycin in combination with ciprofloxacin was used, because the isolate was resistant to penicillin.17, 19, 20 Pleural drainage or a central nervous ventriculoperitoneal shunt may also be used in individual cases. Corticosteroids are widely used to reduce edema and hemorrhage, especially when cutaneous anthrax affects the head and neck, threatening airway integrity, but there are very limited data on their efficacy.17

Raxibacumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against B. anthracis protective antigen (whose role is to bind host cells and deliver anthrax edema factor and lethal factor to the host cell cytoplasm), has been effective for the treatment of anthrax in animal models, with improved survival at 14 and 28 days.21, 22 In 2012, raxibacumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of inhalation anthrax and, as such, should be used in combination with antibiotics and initiated when the diagnosis of inhalation anthrax is suspected or confirmed. An anthrax vaccine, prepared from the culture filtrate of an attenuated strain of B. anthracis, is approved for humans by the FDA, but its use has been limited, due to the need for multiple doses, local side effects, and efficacy concerns, and it is currently reserved for military personnel.23 Exposure to aerosolized spores requires prophylaxis with either ciprofloxacin or doxycycline in adults; amoxicillin is a second-line agent in children and pregnant women.16, 19 The recommended duration of postexposure prophylaxis is 60 days, because none of the antibiotics eradicate spores, which may germinate weeks after exposure.

Infection Control

Anthrax is not transmitted from an infected person, because B. anthracis is in the vegetative form during clinical infection, and only spores are transmissible7, 16 (see Table 40-8). Contact with infected animal carcasses and animal products (especially hides) can result in infection; wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) is indicated when handling these materials or when exposed to other suspected contaminated objects.

Smallpox

General

Variola virus is the causative agent of smallpox and is a member of the Poxviridae family.24 Smallpox was eradicated worldwide in 1977, but now has regained interest because of its potential as a bioterrorism agent.24, 25 Smallpox was widely endemic and at one point accounted for more than 10% of all deaths worldwide. Smallpox is very contagious; approximately half of all unvaccinated household contacts contract disease.24, 25 After global eradication of smallpox was declared in 1977, routine vaccination for smallpox ceased worldwide.26 Due to an increasing unvaccinated population, along with its contagiousness and ability to be transmitted by aerosol, smallpox is a CDC category A bioterrorism agent. Only two stockpiles of the virus are known to remain (at the CDC and the Russian State Research Center).27, 28

Smallpox exists in two forms, variola major and variola minor.24, 25 Variola major is the most common form of smallpox, has more severe disease with an extensive rash and fever, and carries a higher mortality (around 20% in the unvaccinated). Variola minor is less common and less severe, with mortality estimated at less than 1%. Variola minor has a genetic sequence very similar to that of variola major; quantitative differences in gene expression are thought to account for the variable mortality between the major and minor forms.

Clinical Presentation

Smallpox infection begins when the virus enters the respiratory tract, replicates locally, and is transported to regional lymph nodes.24, 25 Viremia follows with spread to lymphoid organs, followed by further viral replication and progressive symptoms. Variola major presents in five major clinical categories: ordinary, modified, flat, hemorrhagic, and variola sine eruptione.24, 25

Ordinary type infection accounted for more than 70% of cases when smallpox was endemic. After an incubation period of 10 to 14 days, disease (pre-eruptive phase) manifests with high temperature, severe headache, and malaise. The pre-eruptive phase can last 2 to 4 days and is followed by the eruptive phase, which is characterized by rash. The lesions first appear as small erythematous macules on the mucous membranes, tongue, and face (herald spots).24, 25, 29 The lesions spread in a centrifugal fashion, with macules evolving into papules, then vesicles, and finally the classic pustules (pox) (Fig. 40-3 ) by day 5 to 7 of the rash (see Table 40-4). Fever usually resolves during the eruptive phase but may persist after the pustules develop. Crusting and healing begin by day 14 of the rash.

Figure 40-3.

Figure 40-3

Smallpox.

The maculopapular lesions on this patient's arm were caused by the smallpox virus, variola major. These lesions were in their pustular phase of development.

(Courtesy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/#10495; Dr. John Noble, Jr.)

The modified type of variola major is similar to the ordinary type except that the rash is more rapid but less severe; this type was common in vaccinated individuals.24, 25, 29 The flat type had pustules that remained flat and confluent and often was seen in children.

The hemorrhagic type was rare but severe, with the lesions and mucous membranes becoming hemorrhagic.24, 25, 29 This type was more common in pregnant women and led to multiorgan failure within a few days.

The variola sine eruptione type is associated with fever but no rash; this type was often seen in previously vaccinated individuals.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis is largely clinical, with the acute onset of fever followed by the characteristic rash of deep-seated vesicles or pustules24, 30 (see Table 40-5). For laboratory diagnosis, variola- and orthopox-specific PCR assays are performed at the CDC or World Health Organization–sponsored labora­tories.24, 30 If a case of smallpox is suspected, information on diagnosis, infection control, and public health measures are available at http://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/response-plan/index.asp.

Radiographic imaging findings in smallpox are limited largely to diffuse alveolar opacities from an inflammatory response associated with the primary infection24, 31 (see Table 40-6). Lobar opacities may be seen and are most often associated with secondary bacterial pneumonia.

Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Prognosis

Treatment is largely supportive, with some evidence that cidofovir, an antiviral with activity against cytomegalovirus, has activity in animal models24, 31, 32 (see Table 40-7). Aggressive ICU support, including volume resuscitation, vasopressor support, and low tidal volume ventilation should be used for severe cases.1 Vaccination as soon as possible after exposure may reduce the severity of illness and is the mainstay for reducing spread and controlling disease in the community.26 Vaccination administered within 4 days of exposure can still provide protection. Passive immunization with vaccinia immune globulin is FDA approved for patients suffering progressive vaccinia infection after vaccination; whether it has efficacy in treating smallpox has not been determined.

Mortality varies with the clinical category. The ordinary type carries a mortality from multiorgan failure and hypotension of around 20%, with the flat and hemorrhagic types carrying a higher mortality and the modified and sine eruptione types carrying a much lower mortality. Complications include secondary bacterial skin infections and pneumonia, along with encephalitis, orchitis, and extensive scarring of the skin and corneas.24, 25

Infection Control

Spread is through contact with infected lesions or respiratory secretions and thus full PPE, including respiratory protection, gown, gloves, and face shield, is required.32 CDC guidelines recommend airborne isolation with use of an N95 particulate respirator or a powered air-purifying respirator for respiratory protection, and all health care workers involved in care of a smallpox patient must be vaccinated against smallpox32 (see Table 40-8). If smallpox is suspected, public health officials must be contacted immediately.

Plague

General

Yersinia pestis is the etiologic agent of plague and has caused multiple pandemics, despite being a recently evolved pathogen.9 Plague is a zoonosis, primarily affecting rodents; humans and other animals (especially domestic cats) are accidental hosts.33, 34 The natural ecosystem of Y. pestis depends largely on the flea-rodent interaction, with seasonal variation based on environmental conditions that favor large rodent populations. Infected fleas bite their rodent hosts, inoculating the rodent. Mortality in these animals is lower than in nonrodent mammals, and disease is passed from infected rodent to flea and the life cycle continues. Y. pestis is transmitted to humans by bites from rodent-infected fleas, scratches or bites from infected animals, exposure to infected humans, or bioterrorism.33, 34 Bites by infected fleas are the most common mode of transmission; squirrels, rabbits, domestic and wild cats, and prairie dogs are the most common sources of infected fleas. Large rodent or other animal die-offs, particularly in more susceptible species, may herald a large epidemic in nature.33, 34 Plague is found worldwide; in the United States endemic disease is concentrated in the western states; most likely because of introduction of Y. pestis–infected rats through the ports of San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Seattle in the late 19th century.35

Clinical Presentation

Three clinical syndromes are associated with plague: bubonic plague (80% to 90% of cases), septicemic plague (10% of cases), and pneumonic plague (very rare).33, 34 After an incubation period of 2 to 7 days, symptoms usually arise, which differ depending on the clinical syndrome. The incubation period is prolonged and asymptomatic, due to multiple mechanisms used by Y. pestis to minimize early innate immune responses and inflammation, including specific inhibition of inflammasome activation.36

In bubonic plague, a sudden onset of fevers, chills, and headache is followed by pain and swelling in the regional lymph nodes proximal to the site of the bite or scratch.33, 34 This lymph node (bubo) is characterized by intense tenderness with erythema and edema but without fluctuation (Fig. 40-4 ). Without treatment, disease disseminates, leading to pneumonia, meningitis, sepsis, and multiorgan failure. The development of secondary plague pneumonia is important to detect, because such patients are highly contagious.

Figure 40-4.

Figure 40-4

Plague.

An axillary bubo and edema exhibited by a patient with plague.

(Courtesy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/#2061; Margaret Parsons, Dr. Karl F. Meyer.)

In septicemic plague, acute fever is followed by sepsis without a bubo.33, 34 Additional symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea also complicate septicemic plague. Sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and multiorgan failure develop quickly.

In pneumonic plague, most cases are secondary (hematogenous) from bubonic or septicemic plague, but primary pneumonic plague can also develop after exposure to infected humans, animals, or aerosols in an intentional bioterror attack.33, 34 Initial cases in outbreaks of primary pneumonic plague have a very short incubation period of hours to a few days, followed by sudden onset of fever and cough, rapid onset of respiratory failure with ARDS, and death (see Table 40-4).

Diagnosis

The clinical diagnosis of plague can be difficult, but exposure to animals in an endemic area is an important clue to seek.33, 34, 37 (see Table 40-5). During intentional dissemination, multiple cases of severe, rapidly progressive pneumonia may be the first sign of an attack. Laboratory diagnosis is primarily by culture of the sputum or blood because Y. pestis grows well on routine laboratory media. Serology and rapid diagnostic testing by ELISA or PCR is also available but is used primarily in field testing.33, 34, 37

On chest radiographs, a sudden and diffuse alveolar filling process is seen consistent with acute lung injury33, 34 (see Table 40-6). Additional mediastinal lymphadenopathy may be present, as may pleural effusion in later stages. Lobar opacities are less common.

Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Prognosis

The primary agent for antibacterial therapy of plague has long been considered streptomycin but, based on its limited availability, gentamicin or doxycycline is preferred33, 34 (see Table 40-7). Most isolates are susceptible to gentamicin and doxycycline; most are also susceptible to ciprofloxacin, although there is less clinical experience with this drug in plague.38 Chloramphenicol is preferred for cases of meningitis due to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Because most cases of primary pneumonia lead to multiorgan failure and acute lung injury, volume resuscitation, vasopressor support, and low tidal volume ventilation are indicated.2 There is no evidence of benefit from corticosteroids. Postexposure prophylaxis includes ciprofloxacin and doxycycline orally, with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (if the isolate from the index case is susceptible) or gentamicin for children and pregnant individuals.38

Infection Control

Due to the high rate of transmission of plague via aerosols, all patients should be on strict airborne isolation until at least 48 hours of antibiotics have been given34 (see Table 40-8). Infection control measures include airborne isolation, including negative-pressure ventilation. Appropriate PPE, including an N95 mask or powered air-purifying respirator, should be worn by all personnel in contact with a patient with suspected or confirmed pneumonic plague.

Tularemia

General

Tularemia is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Francisella tularensis and is a zoonotic disease; humans are accidental hosts.39 F. tularensis is found throughout the Northern Hemisphere in a wide variety of wild and domesticated species and the organism persists in nature. Humans become infected by the bites from infected vectors (ticks and flies), the handling of infected animals, ingestion of improperly prepared animal meat, animal scratches and bites, the drinking of contaminated water, or inhalation of an aerosol of the organism from the environment or in a bioterrorism event.39, 40, 41 Human-to-human transmission has not been described.

Clinical Presentation

Six distinct clinical syndromes have been observed with tularemia: ulceroglandular, glandular, typhoidal, pneumonic, oropharyngeal, and oculoglandular.42, 43 Ulceroglandular disease accounts for approximately 60% to 70% of cases.42, 43 After an incubation period of 2 to 10 days, there is an abrupt onset of fevers, chills, headache, and malaise. Most patients have a single papuloulcerative lesion with a central eschar and associated tender lymphadenopathy (Fig. 40-5 ). In glandular disease, lymph nodes enlarge without the characteristic lesion (about 15% of cases).42, 43

Figure 40-5.

Figure 40-5

Tularemia.

A tularemia lesion is shown on the dorsal skin of the right hand caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis.

(Courtesy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/#2032; Dr. Brachman.)

Pneumonic tularemia results from primary inhalation or hematogenous spread from typhoidal tularemia, and this is expected to be the main clinical presentation in a bioterrorism event with tularemia.40 The incubation period tends to be shorter in these cases, with the rapid onset of pneumonia. Respiratory failure and ARDS develop rapidly (see Table 40-4).

Typhoidal tularemia is rare and is seen with or without pneumonia; patients present with a febrile illness followed by sepsis without the glandular disease.43 Oropharyngeal tularemia results when undercooked infected meat or water is ingested and is associated with fever, pharyngitis, and cervical lymphadenopathy.43

Oculoglandular tularemia results from direct inoculation from contaminated fingers or accidental exposure. Conjunctival swelling and erythema, and regional lymphadenopathy may be present.

Diagnosis

Culturing F. tularensis is suboptimal in a few respects: specific culture media (with cysteine) is required, growth is slow, and cultures are hazardous to laboratory personnel44, 45 (see Table 40-5 and Chapter 17, Table 17-5). PCR detection of F. tularensis is rapid, is not hazardous, and has a reported sensitivity of approximately 75% and high specificity (see Table 17-5). PCR-positive fresh samples should be submitted to a reference or public health laboratory for confirmation.

Radiographic imaging studies show patchy opacities bilaterally, lobar disease, and hilar adenopathy46 (see Table 40-6). There can also be pleural effusions and a miliary pattern, and hilar and mediastinal adenopathy.

Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Prognosis

Similar to the treatment for plague, gentamicin is the treatment of choice for tularemia45, 47 (see Table 40-7); doxycycline or ciprofloxacin may be used as second-line therapy. For meningitis, chloramphenicol is preferred. Postexposure prophylaxis with doxycycline or ciprofloxacin may be efficacious, with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or amoxicillin for children and pregnant patients.45, 47 ICU management of tularemia includes supportive care and low tidal volume ventilation for ARDS. The overall mortality for tularemia is around 4%, but is thought to be higher in aerosolized disease that causes pneumonia or typhoidal tularemia.42, 43

Infection Control

Tularemia is not spread by human-to-human contact, so once the diagnosis is confirmed, respiratory isolation can be discontinued43, 47 (see Table 40-8). Rules about reporting tularemia to public health officials varies across North America but pneumonic or typhoidal cases, particularly if thought to be secondary to a bioterrorism event, must be reported.

Botulism

General

Clostridium botulinum, a gram-positive, spore-forming, obligate anaerobe, is the bacterium that produces and excretes botulinum toxin.48, 49 This neurotoxin is responsible for the clinical disease known as botulism and is the only category A agent that is a toxin. Seven serotypes of botulinum toxin exist, A through G, and are produced by different strains of C. botulinum. All botulinum neurotoxins act as proteases that cleave proteins on synaptic vesicles or the presynaptic plasma membrane of the neuromuscular junction and cholinergic autonomic synapses. The resulting inability to release neurotransmitters and disruption of neurotransmission account for the clinical findings. Serotypes A, B, and E predominate in human disease, although any serotype can cause disease.48, 49 Serotypes C and D are predominately found in animal populations. Botulinum toxin is extremely potent, with the median lethal oral dose estimated to be 1 ng/kg, although the lethal dose may be two to three times higher if exposure is by inhalation.48, 49

Disease presents from four potential sources: food-borne, wound, infant, and intentional.48, 49 Food-borne disease presents in outbreaks and is often associated with home-canned foods, such as fruits, vegetables, and fermented fish. Wound botulism has been associated with intravenous and subcutaneous injection of black tar heroin, mostly of Mexican origin. Infant botulism is seen sporadically in some western states, likely from spore acquisition from soil or raw honey, with toxin production in the gastrointestinal tract. Finally, intentional release during a bioterrorism event may lead to oral ingestion or inhalation of the toxin.

Clinical Presentation

Botulism begins with the acute onset of bilateral cranial neuropathies with rapidly descending weakness (see Table 40-4). No fever is present and mental status is not affected.48, 49 The cranial neuropathies are usually symmetrical and often begin with oculomotor dysfunction. However, asymmetrical cranial nerve dysfunction has been reported.50 Diplopia, dysphagia, ptosis, and facial weakness are the most common early complaints.48, 49 In food-borne exposure, there may also be gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea and vomiting. In infant botulism, poor feeding and lethargy may be the only symptoms. Food-borne botulism usually has an onset of symptoms 12 to 36 hours after exposure; symptoms rapidly progress over the next 12 hours. If botulism is not suspected and treatment is not started rapidly, weakness and paralysis of respiratory muscles ensues, requiring mechanical ventilatory support.50 Once the muscles of respiration are involved, mechanical support may be required from 1 to 3 months.50 Since the toxin-mediated blockade of neuromuscular transmission is reversible, full recovery can be expected although recovery may be prolonged.

Diagnosis

Early and prompt diagnosis is essential because respiratory support is often required and early treatment may alter the extent of progression of weakness. Thus the clinical findings of cranial nerve palsies, particularly in the appropriate clinical setting (e.g., heroin use, or ingestion of the same food as another person with botulism) should prompt consideration of botulism (see Table 40-5). Laboratory diagnosis is by toxin detection or organism isolation.45 Detection of toxin in blood or stool is most reliable.51 The growth of C. botulinum from a stool or wound sample with the corresponding clinical findings can also confirm the diagnosis. Electromyography will also support the diagnosis if toxin and organism isolation is unsuccessful. There are no specific radiologic changes seen with botulism. Low lung volumes on chest radiographs may be seen but are not specific (see Table 40-6).

Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Prognosis

Supportive care is the cornerstone of management of botulism. Monitoring for impending respiratory failure and providing mechanical ventilation when needed are the highest priorities. An equine trivalent antitoxin (against serotypes A, B, and E) is available from state public health departments and the CDC, and is directed at neutralization of toxin that has not yet entered cells. Botulinum antitoxin cannot reverse botulinum intoxication48, 49, 52 (see Table 40-7). While the antitoxin is widely used in cases of botulism, its efficacy has only been inferred and, since the available antitoxin is derived from immunized horses, anaphylaxis and/or serum sickness can develop in 9% to 20% of recipients. A human-derived antitoxin is available but only for infant botulism. Human monoclonal antibodies have been prepared that neutralize multiple types of botulinum toxins, and these provide the potential for use in adults with a lower risk of adverse effects than the equine antiserum.53 In wound botulism, after wound drainage, antibiotic administration is useful; penicillin or clindamycin are the drugs of choice.48, 49 In food-borne and inhalation botulism, because the disease results from exposure to the toxin and not from infection, antibiotics are not efficacious. In all cases of botulism, routine monitoring of forced vital capacity is recommended, with early intubation if the vital capacity falls below 10 mL/kg (approximately 30% predicted). There is no direct prophylaxis for exposure, but in the setting of high-risk threats, a vaccine directed against serotypes A and E is available and has been largely used in the military.52 Patients die of botulism due to respiratory failure without ventilatory support or from complications during critical care.

Infection Control

Because botulism is a toxin-based disease, no specific infection control measures are required48 (see Table 40-8). An exposure to spores or toxin should be followed by decontamination, although secondary infections or intoxication in medical personnel have not been reported.

Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers

General

The hemorrhagic fever viruses include multiple geographically distributed viruses, including Ebola and Marburg viruses, and the viruses causing Rift Valley fever, Bolivian, Argentine, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fevers, Lassa fever, yellow fever, and dengue fever.54, 55, 56 Ebola and Marburg viruses are in the family Filoviridae; Lassa virus and the viruses causing Bolivian (Machupo virus) and Argentine (Junin virus) hemorrhagic fever are in the family Arenaviridae. The Crimean-Congo and Rift Valley fever viruses belong to the Bunyaviridae family. Only the Filoviridae (Ebola and Marburg viruses) and Arenaviridae are listed as category A agents. The Filoviridae family serves as a classic template for viral hemorrhagic fevers and is largely discussed here.54 Marburg virus has a single species, while Ebola virus has five different species that vary in virulence in humans.55, 56 Transmission appears to be through contact with blood or secretions of nonhuman primates and infected individuals. People have become infected after handling primate products, after consuming nonhuman primate meat, or after exposure to symptomatic patients, including in hospitals. Several cases have presented due to exposure in laboratories. The use of hemorrhagic fever viruses as bioterrorism agents has also been postulated, largely based on their high contagiousness in aerosolized primate models.55, 56 The animal reservoir for these viruses was initially thought to be wild primates, but has recently been tentatively identified to be bats, which transmit the infection to nonhuman primates in the wild.

Clinical Presentation

The clinical manifestations of both Marburg and Ebola viruses are similar in presentation and pathophysiology.56, 57 The incubation period after exposure to either virus is usually 5 to 10 days, but may be as long as 19 days. Clinical disease begins with the abrupt onset of fever, chills, malaise, severe headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain.56, 57 Over the next few days, symptoms worsen to include prostration, stupor, and hypotension. In some patients, coagulation becomes impaired with the appearance of increased conjunctival and soft tissue bleeding. In some of the reported outbreaks, hemorrhage can be massive in the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts and, in rare instances, the lung.56, 57 In the outbreak of Ebola virus disease centered in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone in 2014, hemorrhage was not prominent; instead, the clinical picture was dominated by voluminous diarrhea.57a, 57b The onset of maculopapular rash on the arms and trunk may be a very distinctive sign (Fig. 40-6 ). Along with volume depletion and hypotension, multiorgan failure can develop and often leads to death (see Table 40-4). Outbreaks and cases have largely been described in developing countries where critical care resources are limited, thus experience with mechanical ventilation and the development of ARDS is not well documented. Case-fatality rates have ranged from 40% to 90%.54, 56, 57, 57b, 58

Figure 40-6.

Figure 40-6

Marburg virus.

This posterior-oblique view of the back of a patient shows the measles-like maculopapular rash, which can appear on patients with the Marburg virus infection around the fifth day after the onset of symptoms, and usually may be found on the patient's chest, back, and stomach. This patient's skin blanched under pressure, which is a common characteristic of a Marburg virus rash.

(Courtesy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/#6571; Dr. J. Lyle Conrad.)

Diagnosis

It is important to suspect the diagnosis of a viral hemorrhagic fever in order to initiate supportive care before the onset of shock, to involve the public health department, and to implement infection control measures. Viral hemorrhagic fevers should be suspected in cases of an exposed laboratory worker or an acutely ill traveler from an endemic area (i.e., central or west Africa), or in the presence of characteristic clinical findings in the context of other cases in the community, suggesting a bioterrorism attack.56 The presence of high temperature, malaise and joint pain, conjunctival bleeding and bruising, vomiting and diarrhea, confusion, and progression to shock and multiorgan failure should raise suspicion of a viral hemorrhagic fever. Laboratory diagnosis consists of viral nucleic acid detection by PCR56 (see Table 40-5).

Radiologic changes include a diffuse alveolar process consistent with acute lung injury56, 57 (see Table 40-6). As the disease progresses, the alveolar process can become dense as alveolar hemorrhage develops. Pleural effusions may also be present.

Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Prognosis

Current patient management includes supportive care, including agressive volume resuscitation, and a lung-protective strategy with low tidal volume ventilation if ARDS is part of the disease course55, 56, 57 (see Table 40-7). Recent experiments in nonhuman primates have established therapeutic efficacy of a combination of three monoclonal antibodies to the Ebola glycoprotein.59 This provides proof of principle that specific treatment of Ebola infection is possible, and the humanized monoclonal antibodies may progress to availability for human use. With the arenavirus group (Lassa, Junin, and Machupo viruses) and the Bunyaviridae (Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever and Rift Valley fever viruses), ribavirin is recommended.55, 56, 57 The recent finding that Ebola replication requires the Abelson tyrosine kinase (C-abl), and that C-abl kinase inhibitors (currently used for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and certain other malignancies) block Ebola replication in vitro suggests an additional potential treatment approach.60

If a health care worker is exposed, there is no approved postexposure prophylaxis; infection control and occupational health personnel should be involved immediately. Two distinct vaccines protect nonhuman primates against Ebola challenge and are entering initial trials in humans.61, 62

Infection Control

Transmission is by the droplet route, and the very high viral loads found in blood, diarrhea, and secretions in Ebola patients mandate stringent precautions to protect personnel. Placement of the patient in an isolation room with strict procedures for handling waste is essential to protect healthcare and other personnel55, 56, 57 (see Table 40-8). Equipment should be dedicated to that individual, and all higher risk procedures must be done with full PPE. Any suspected case of viral hemorrhagic fever should immediately involve the public health officials and infection control department, because public health interventions and outbreak investigation are essential to reduce spread of disease within the community and to investigate any potential bioterrorism attack.

Select CDC Category B Agents

Direct Pulmonary Agents

Glanders (Burkholderia mallei)

Glanders is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia mallei. 63 It is primarily a disease of horses; humans become infected through broken skin or droplet inhalation. Naturally occurring human infection is rare, but occupational cases (principally in horse veterinarians) are seen sporadically. In bioterrorism, aerosolization is the anticipated method of exposure. Glanders can present as an acute or chronic skin infection, but with aerosolization, rapid pneumonia and/or sepsis can result.63 Diagnosis is by culture, but B. mallei can be misclassified by some automated systems as a Pseudomonas species. Treatment includes supportive care as well as systemic antibiotics such as a third-generation cephalosporin, imipenem, or ciprofloxacin.63 Human-to-human transmission has not been detected, but universal precautions with droplet isolation for respiratory cases are recommended. Any suspect case should prompt immediate notification of the public health department.

Melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei)

Melioidosis is caused by the gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. 63, 64 Unlike B. mallei, this bacterium has a natural reservoir in the soil and contaminated water and is spread through direct contact or inhalation. Thus disease predominates during the rainy season. In bioterrorism, aerosolization would lead to a clinical picture of pneumonia or melioidosis sepsis.63, 64 With melioidosis, the incubation period can be highly variable, with some cases presenting acutely, some having extended incubation periods, and others remaining asymptomatic.63, 64, 65 Sepsis with multiple metastatic foci develops in most symptomatic cases, eventually progressing to multiorgan failure. Diagnosis is by culture using routine methods. Treatment involves imipenem or a third-generation cephalosporin, followed by a 20-week treatment with doxycycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for eradication of metastatic foci.63, 64

Psittacosis (Chlamydophila psittaci)

Psittacosis is caused by Chlamydophila psittaci, an intracellular bacterium routinely associated with birds such as parrots, cockatiels, and canaries. Psittacosis presents nonspecifically, and most cases go undiagnosed.66, 67 As a category B bioterrorism agent, C. psittaci can cause morbidity with low mortality. Intentional aerosolization would lead to multiple cases of nonspecific “atypical pneumonia” with cough, fever, and headache.66, 67 Diagnosis has historically been difficult, but sensitive PCR techniques offer the potential for rapid, specific diagnosis (see Chapter 17; Table 17-1). Treatment is with doxycycline, a macrolide, or ciprofloxacin. Mortality is low at 1% in treated cases.66, 67 Universal precautions are required for patient care, although an N95 mask and coveralls are recommended for environmental decontamination.

Q Fever (Coxiella burnetii)

Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by Coxiella burnetii. Cattle, sheep, and goats are the primary reservoirs of C. burnetii; this disease is found worldwide.68 Coxiella burnetii usually does not cause clinical disease in animals, but organisms are found in milk, urine, feces, amniotic fluids, and placenta. The organisms are resistant to heat and drying, and can cause infection by inhalation of environmental dust contaminated with dried placental material, birth fluids, and excrement. The incubation time is 1 to 2 weeks, after which clinical illness develops in approximately 50% of infected persons.68 Q fever is characterized by high temperatures (often greater than 40°C/104°F), severe headache, myalgia, sore throat, nonproductive cough, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and chest pain.68, 69 Pneumonia develops in 30% to 50% of patients with symptomatic infection.

One percent to 2% of people with acute Q fever die of the disease.68, 69 In a small percentage of those infected, chronic Q fever (infection that persists for more than 6 months), including endocarditis, develops; up to 65% of persons with chronic Q fever die of the disease. Diagnosis of Q fever depends on serologic testing, most commonly using the indirect immunofluorescence assay (see Chapter 17; Table 17-5).68, 69 The antibiotic treatment of choice for acute Q fever is doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 15 to 21 days.68, 69 Fluoroquinolones may be effective alternatives.

Ricin Toxin

Ricin is a potent biologic toxin (toxic protein) derived from castor beans (Ricinus communis) during manufacture of castor oil.70 Ricin acts as a toxin by the inhibition of protein synthesis; 0.2 mg (1/5000th of a gram) is thought to be the lethal dose. Symptoms begin within 4 to 12 hours after exposure. Systemic effects of ricin poisoning depend on route of exposure and exposure dosage. Signs and symptoms from oral ingestions include vomiting and profuse diarrhea; in addition, there may be fever, myalgia and arthralgia, hallucinations, and seizures.70 Hypovolemic shock and multiorgan failure may intervene, and represent the likely cause of death.70 Based on animal experiments, after an inhalational exposure, symptoms in humans are expected to include cough, respiratory distress, and bronchoconstriction. Influenza-like symptoms (fever, myalgia, and arthralgia) may be seen, as can hypotension, respiratory failure, and multiorgan failure.70 Few symptoms and signs exist to separate ricin intoxication from other causes of respiratory failure, although excessive diaphoresis has been reported and would be unusual in other causes. No specific treatment or antitoxin exists. Treatment consists of decontamination and supportive therapy.70

Nonpulmonary Agents (Gastrointestinal and Toxin)

Brucellosis (Brucella Species)

Brucellosis is caused by a number of species within the genus Brucella. Disease is common in livestock workers, particularly in areas of poor sanitation, where Brucella is found in domesticated animals.71 Brucella is a category B agent due to its low mortality and prolonged incubation period.72 After exposure through ingestion of contaminated food or intentional aerosolization, symptoms develop after a few weeks to months. Initially fevers persist irregularly over weeks to months, followed by arthralgias, gastrointestinal symptoms, and possibly endocarditis.71 Diagnosis is suspected with a plausible history of exposure, with isolation of the organism by blood culture. However, growth is slow, so all cultures should be kept for 4 weeks if the diagnosis is suspected. Treatment is with doxycycline for up to 6 weeks, for children, treatment is with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for children.71

Epsilon Toxin of Clostridium perfringens

The Clostridium species produce multiple toxins; epsilon toxin is produced by Clostridium perfringens types B and D.73 The toxin acts on host cell membranes, producing pores that cause nonselective permeability. Clostridium perfringens uses the toxin to gain access into the bloodstream from the gut. However, in bioterrorism, intentional release via ingestion or inhalation of the toxin alone is most likely.74 Based on data from animals, rapid ingestion or inhalation would cause diffuse tissue edema and be manifested as central nervous system dysfunction (weakness, ataxia, confusion), pulmonary edema (shortness of breath, cough, bronchospasm, respiratory failure), nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, and hypotension.73 Diagnosis requires clinical suspicion consistent with a bioterrorism attack; the toxin can be detected by ELISA. Treatment is supportive, with penicillin if C. perfringens is present in addition to the toxin.73

Food Safety Threats (e.g., Salmonella Species, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Shigella)

Enteropathogenic gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Shigella, constitute a large group of agents that make up food supply threats.75 Public health officials are familiar with these bacteria from numerous episodes of food contamination that lead to localized outbreaks and large product recalls. In an intentional release, these agents would produce widespread gastrointestinal symptoms leading to significant morbidity but with low mortality. After an incubation period of 3 to 7 days, there would be abdominal cramping, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The diarrhea may be voluminous and bloody.75 Diagnosis is by stool culture of the agents. An aggressive public health investigation usually yields the initial agent, because bioterrorism resembles a point-source outbreak.76 Treatment is intravenous hydration as needed and, with some agents (Salmonella, Shigella), antibacterial therapy with ciprofloxacin.76

Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B

Staphylococcal enterotoxin B is a toxin produced by Staphylococcus aureus commonly associated with food poisoning. Symptoms of food poisoning include vomiting and diarrhea several hours after ingesting food.77 Naturally occurring, it is rarely lethal. The clinical presentation would depend on the route of administration. Oral administration (poisoning of food or water supplies) would present as vomiting and diarrhea.77 If inhaled, respiratory failure with neurotoxic effects may be seen.77

Impact of H1N1 Influenza Pandemic of 2009 on Bioterrorism Response

In 2009–2010, a new variant of H1N1 influenza A virus emerged and caused a global influenza pandemic.78 Treatment strategies and interventions used in this H1N1 pandemic have impacted the planning for responses to highly infectious agents, including agents of potential bioterrorism. The administration of antivirals, particularly oseltamivir, reduced hospitalizations and death when administered within 48 hours of symptom onset.79, 80, 81, 82 In critically ill patients with pandemic H1N1 influenza, oseltamivir was associated with increased survival compared with no treatment (75% versus 58%) with a median time of treatment initiation 4 days from symptom onset.79 However, treatment initiated within 5 days after symptom onset was still associated with increased survival compared with no therapy.80, 81 Similar findings were seen in children and other at-risk individuals, including immunocompromised and pregnant women.82 Therefore the importance of early distribution and administration of therapy, including the rapid dissemination of therapy guidelines for practitioners, must be a cornerstone of any bioterrorism response.

Additional adjunctive therapies during the H1N1 pandemic also became a cornerstone of response, including the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which was used in some patients with ARDS (predominately single organ failure) resulting from pandemic H1N1 influenza. Small observational studies suggested a mortality benefit in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.83, 84 However, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is only performed at specialized centers and is resource intensive, thus requiring regional and statewide coordination in order to ensure success. Additional therapies, such as corticosteroids, inhaled nitric oxide, N-acetyl cysteine, and proning were also administered without established benefit.85

Recognition and Response to a Bioterrorism Event

The recognition of a case of a disease related to a bioterrorism event relies on a high index of suspicion by the clinician. However, recognition may be difficult in the early stages of disease, in that many of the category A agents present with nonspecific symptoms.86 Figure 40-7 outlines an approach to early isolation, testing, and involvement of institutional infection control and public health officials in cases of acute febrile illness. Upon admission, cases of acute febrile illness and respiratory failure should undergo initial diagnostic testing, including pretreatment Gram stain, respiratory culture, and urine antigen testing for Legionella. If an etiologic agent is identified on initial screening and clinical findings (i.e., gram-positive diplococci with a lobar pneumonia on radiograph), targeted treatment should be initiated, with appropriate isolation precautions based on the pathogen. However, if an agent is not easily identified, patients should be placed in isolation and further diagnostic testing should be performed. If multiple cases with similar symptoms or a case with an uncommon epidemiologic link is determined, patients should be isolated and public health officials should be contacted. If specific clinical features subsequently arise, then directed diagnostic testing should be performed. If no clear etiology is detected, further evaluation is warranted with invasive and expanded testing. Although bronchoscopy generates aerosols that increase the risk of transmission, bronchoscopy should be performed with appropriate protection of personnel in these cases, because identification of the etiology of illness is an essential component of an appropriate public health response. The public health authorities and the institutional infection control should be contacted as early as possible when clinical suspicion of bioterrorism arises or when diagnostic tests do not yield results.

Figure 40-7.

Figure 40-7

Schema of response to acute febrile illness with respiratory failure.

A coordinated response to an acute febrile illness with respiratory failure is outlined involving diagnosis and treatment, respiratory precautions for hospital staff, and involvement of hospital infection control and public health officials.

Once a bioterrorism agent is suspected, the diagnosis is confirmed by specialized public health laboratories. Initial cases must meet a case definition for the suspected agent (see http://emergency.cdc.gov/bioterrorism/casedef.asp) before there is further evaluation. In order to meet the case definition, at least one critical distinguishing feature must be met along with other clinical and laboratory features.

Infection Control

Involvement of institutional infection control, microbiology, and public health experts must be initiated as early as possible. They should be notified when there is one of four conditions: (1) a clinical or epidemiologic feature suggestive of bioterrorism (see Table 40-4), (2) an unexpected clinical link or increase in number of cases (e.g., pneumonia with respiratory failure), (3) an extensive workup of a febrile respiratory illness fails to reveal an organism and an infectious disease is suspected, or (4) transmission of disease to health care workers. Hospital infection control will assist in isolation and health care worker protection, and the hospital microbiology laboratory should be notified of suspected pathogens, allowing for worker protection and targeted testing of samples.1, 87 Finally, public health involvement allows a broader diagnostic testing, including subtyping and resistance testing. If the agent is a novel or emerging pathogen, as seen with severe acute respiratory syndrome or avian influenza, early public health involvement allows for rapid laboratory testing, epidemiologic investigation, case definition, and community prevention.

The basic infection control requirements are outlined in Table 40-8. Anthrax and botulism are the only category A agents that are not contagious and do not require respiratory protection for caregivers. If the number of cases exceeds the health care capacity for isolation, patient cohorting and accessory isolation measures can be used. Finally, higher risk procedures should be limited in these cases (Table 40-9 ). Aerosol-generating procedures are most common in ICU patients, and reducing unnecessary risky procedures reduces patient and health care worker risk. However, these procedures should be performed if needed. Appropriate PPE should be worn by health care workers at all times and, if worn properly, reduces the risk of disease transmission.88

Table 40-9.

Respiratory Care Procedures That Carry a Higher Risk for Disease Transmission in Patients with a CDC Category A Agent

Nebulization of medication
Endotracheal intubation
Nasotracheal suctioning
Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation
Bag-valve-mask ventilation
Bronchoscopy
Humidified oxygen delivery
Non-rebreather mask without expiratory filter

Public Health and Critical Care Response

Acts of conventional terrorism, such as with explosive devices or chemical attacks, result in a single point of mass casualties with an immediate critical area response. In contrast, because some of the category A agents are spread by contact and respiratory transmission, new cases will be seen after the initial outbreak. As these cases progress, the cumulative number of cases with severe respiratory illness will increase, potentially stressing the critical care system and leading to a sustained need for emergency mass critical care (EMCC) for weeks to months. Sustained EMCC can lead to depletion of critical care resources, such as mechanical ventilators, specially trained staff, antibiotics and antivirals, and ICU beds.5 Thus, the unique issues associated with sustained EMCC have led to improved planning for a response to a bioterrorism or emerging infectious diseases outbreak.89, 90

Recent consensus statements have recommended special critical care preparedness to include ICU capacity expansion, critical care resource storage, and the coordination of critical care across communities to a regional and statewide level.89, 90 Capacity for critical care should be approximately three times normal ICU capacity, with all critically ill patients to be located in acute care hospitals (less severely ill patients will be diverted to alternative sites within the community). Each hospital should have enough supplies for 10 days for each critically ill patient along with plans to have expanded care by noncritical care specialists in the case of a shortage.91 ICU admission should be limited to the most severely ill. Most importantly, establishment of a triage mechanism is required for the allocation of scarce resources in sustained EMCC, with the most identified critical resource being mechanical ventilation and medical oxygen.92 This triage mechanism shifts the focus of critical care from optimal care of the individual to optimal care for the population and would identify critically ill patients who may not get specific scarce resources during a period of limited supply in an outbreak. It would include inclusion and exclusion criteria for ICU admission along with a triage scoring mechanism for patient assessment. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score is valuable, due to its value in sequential assessments and its ease of use given its lower reliance on laboratory data. Additional triage scoring systems may be warranted in future outbreaks as disease and outbreak conditions change.

Key Points.

  • Bioterrorism and emerging infectious diseases present unique and different diagnostic and treatment challenges.

  • Category A agents are considered the highest risk to the public and national security for the following reasons: (1) easy person-to-person spread; (2) high mortality; (3) major public health impact causing panic and social disruption; and (4) requirement for specific and specialized public health emergency response (e.g., public prophylaxis or protective equipment). Diseases caused by these agents initially present with a nonspecific prodrome that develops into severe disease with specific epidemiologic hallmarks.

  • Category A agents are anthrax, smallpox, plague, tularemia, botulism, and viral hemorrhagic fevers (e.g. Ebola, Lassa).

  • Category B agents are diverse but carry lower morbidity and mortality, with some having few to no pulmonary manifestations.

  • Category C agents have the potential for future use as bioterrorism agents.

  • Early recognition relies on the astute clinician, with early involvement of public health and institutional infection control personnel to reduce spread to health care workers and the community.

  • Aggressive supportive care is the mainstay for all critically ill patients infected with a bioterrorism agent. Targeted therapy is under development.

  • For inhalational anthrax, raxibacumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against B. anthracis protective antigen, has been approved for use and should be used in combination with antibiotics when the diagnosis of inhalation anthrax is suspected or confirmed.

  • During an outbreak of a category A agent, emergency mass critical care for a sustained period may be required, leading to depletion of critical patient care resources. With emergency mass critical care, the focus of critical care shifts from optimal care of the individual to optimal care for the population. Predictive mortality scores are recommended for appropriate triage of the critically ill.

Complete reference list available at ExpertConsult.

Key Readings

  1. Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators. Davies A, Jones D. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302:1888–1895. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Devereaux A, Christian MD, Dichter JR. Summary of suggestions from the Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit, January 26–27, 2007. Chest. 2008;133:1S–7S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Devereaux AV, Dichter JR, Christian MD. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: a framework for allocation of scarce resources in mass critical care. Chest. 2008;133:51S–66S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moran GJ, Talan DA, Abrahamian FM. Biological terrorism. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22:145–187. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2007.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muller MP, McGeer A. Febrile respiratory illness in the intensive care unit setting: an infection control perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:37–42. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000198056.58083.a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rubinson L, Hick JL, Curtis JR. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: medical resources for surge capacity. Chest. 2008;133:32S–50S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sandrock CE. Severe febrile respiratory illnesses as a cause of mass critical care. Respir Care. 2008;53:40–53. 57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandrock C, Stollenwerk N. Acute febrile respiratory illness in the ICU: reducing disease transmission. Chest. 2008;133:1221–1231. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References

  • 1.Sandrock C, Stollenwerk N. Acute febrile respiratory illness in the ICU: reducing disease transmission. Chest. 2008;133:1221–1231. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sandrock CE. Severe febrile respiratory illnesses as a cause of mass critical care. Respir Care. 2008;53:40–53. discussion 53–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bauer TT, Ewig S, Rodloff AC, Muller EE. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia: a comprehensive review of clinical data. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:748–756. doi: 10.1086/506430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kao KC, Tsai YH, Wu YK. Open lung biopsy in early-stage acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2006;10:R106. doi: 10.1186/cc4981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rubinson L, O'Toole T. Critical care during epidemics. Crit Care. 2005;9:311–313. doi: 10.1186/cc3533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hepburn MJ, Purcell BK, Paragas J. Pathogenesis and sepsis caused by organisms potentially utilized as biologic weapons: opportunities for targeted intervention. Curr Drug Targets. 2007;8:519–532. doi: 10.2174/138945007780362728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moran GJ, Talan DA, Abrahamian FM. Biological terrorism. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22:145–187. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2007.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kman NE, Nelson RN. Infectious agents of bioterrorism: a review for emergency physicians. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2008;26:517–547. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ligon BL. Plague: a review of its history and potential as a biological weapon. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006;17:161–170. doi: 10.1053/j.spid.2006.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Update: investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:1008–1010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Frazier AA, Franks TJ, Galvin JR. Inhalational anthrax. J Thorac Imaging. 2006;21:252–258. doi: 10.1097/01.rti.0000213570.71161.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Persell DJ, Robinson CH. Detection and early identification in bioterrorism events. Fam Community Health. 2008;31:4–16. doi: 10.1097/01.FCH.0000304063.94829.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daya M, Nakamura Y. Pulmonary disease from biological agents: anthrax, plague, Q fever, and tularemia. Crit Care Clin. 2005;21:747–763. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2005.06.009. vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mushtaq A, El-Azizi M, Khardori N. Category C potential bioterrorism agents and emerging pathogens. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006;20:423–441. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2006.03.003. x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. Anthrax. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:815–826. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909093411107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kyriacou DN, Adamski A, Khardori N. Anthrax: from antiquity and obscurity to a front-runner in bioterrorism. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006;20:227–251. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goldman DL, Casadevall A. Anthrax-associated shock. Front Biosci. 2008;13:4009–4014. doi: 10.2741/2988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuehnert MJ, Doyle TJ, Hill HA. Clinical features that discriminate inhalational anthrax from other acute respiratory illnesses. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(3):328–336. doi: 10.1086/346035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Swartz MN. Recognition and management of anthrax—an update. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1621–1626. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra012892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Center for Disease Control and Prevention Update: adverse events associated with anthrax prophylaxis among postal employees—New Jersey, New York City, and the District of Columbia metropolitan area, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:1051–1054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rubin GJ, Dickmann P. How to reduce the impact of “low-risk patients” following a bioterrorist incident: lessons from SARS, anthrax, and pneumonic plague. Biosecur Bioterror. 2010;8:37. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Migone TS, Subramanian GM, Zhong J. Raxibacumab for the treatment of inhalational anthrax. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):135–144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Friedlander AM, Grabenstein JD, Brachman PS. Anthrax vaccines. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, editors. Vaccines. ed 6. Elsevier Saunders; Philadelphia: 2013. p. xix. 1550 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moore ZS, Seward JF, Lane JM. Smallpox. Lancet. 2006;367:425–435. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68143-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Henderson DA. Smallpox: clinical and epidemiologic features. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:537–539. doi: 10.3201/eid0504.990415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Metzger W, Mordmueller BG. Vaccines for preventing smallpox. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004913.pub2. CD004913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cleri DJ, Porwancher RB, Ricketti AJ. Smallpox as a bioterrorist weapon: myth or menace? Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006;20:329–357. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Henderson DA. The looming threat of bioterrorism. Science. 1999;283:1279–1282. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5406.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Slifka MK, Hanifin JM. Smallpox: the basics. Dermatol Clin. 2004;22:263–274. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seward JF, Galil K, Damon I. Development and experience with an algorithm to evaluate suspected smallpox cases in the United States, 2002–2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1477–1483. doi: 10.1086/425500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nafziger SD. Smallpox. Crit Care Clin. 2005;21:739–746. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Henderson DA, Inglesby TV, Bartlett JG. Smallpox as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA. 1999;281:2127–2137. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.22.2127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Inglesby TV, Dennis DT, Henderson DA. Plague as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA. 2000;283:2281–2290. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.17.2281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prentice MB, Rahalison L. Plague. Lancet. 2007;369:1196–1207. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60566-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Touchman JW, Wagner DM, Hao J. A North American Yersinia pestis Draft Genome Sequence: SNPs and phylogenetic analysis. PLoS One. 2007;2(2):e220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.LaRock CN, Cookson BT. The Yersinia virulence effector YopM binds caspase-1 to arrest inflammasome assembly and processing. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12(6):799–805. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Butler T. Plague gives surprises in the first decade of the 21st century in the United States and worldwide. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89(4):788–793. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Galimand M, Carniel E, Courvalin P. Resistance of Yersinia pestis to antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3233–3236. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00306-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Evans ME. Francisella tularensis. Infect Control. 1985;6:381–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jones CL, Napier BA, Sampson TR. Subversion of host recognition and defense systems by Francisella spp. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(2):383–404. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05027-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tarnvik A, Priebe HS, Grunow R. Tularaemia in Europe: an epidemiological overview. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36:350–355. doi: 10.1080/00365540410020442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Evans ME, Gregory DW, Schaffner W, McGee ZA. Tularemia: a 30-year experience with 88 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985;64:251–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sjostedt A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1105:1–29. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hepburn MJ, Simpson AJ. Tularemia: current diagnosis and treatment options. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:231–240. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tarnvik A, Chu MC. New approaches to diagnosis and therapy of tularemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1105:378–404. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rubin SA. Radiographic spectrum of pleuropulmonary tularemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;131:277–281. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.2.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001;285:2763–2773. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.21.2763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dembek ZF, Smith LA, Rusnak JM. Botulism: cause, effects, diagnosis, clinical and laboratory identification, and treatment modalities. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007;1:122–134. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318158c5fd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sobel J. Botulism. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1167–1173. doi: 10.1086/444507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sandrock CE, Murin S. Clinical predictors of respiratory failure and long-term outcome in black tar heroin-associated wound botulism. Chest. 2001;120:562–566. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.2.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cai S, Singh BR, Sharma S. Botulism diagnostics: from clinical symptoms to in vitro assays. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2007;33:109–125. doi: 10.1080/10408410701364562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Villar RG, Elliott SP, Davenport KM. Botulism: the many faces of botulinum toxin and its potential for bioterrorism. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006;20:313–327. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2006.02.003. ix. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Garcia-Rodriguez C, Geren IN, Lou J. Neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies binding multiple serotypes of botulinum neurotoxin. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2011;24(3):321–331. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzq111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ebola The virus and the disease. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1999;74:89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Borio L, Inglesby T, Peters CJ. Hemorrhagic fever viruses as biological weapons: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2002;287:2391–2405. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Curtis N. Viral haemorrhagic fevers caused by Lassa, Ebola and Marburg viruses. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;582:35–44. doi: 10.1007/0-387-33026-7_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gonzalez JP, Pourrut X, Leroy E. Ebolavirus and other filoviruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2007;315:363–387. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70962-6_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamontagne F, Clément C, Fletcher T. Doing Ttoday's work superbly well—treating ebola with current tools. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1565–1566. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1411310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bah EI, Lamah MC, Fletcher T. Clinical presentation of patients with ebola virus disease in Conakry, Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 5 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411249. 25372658 Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Marburg haemorrhagic fever, Angola—update. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2005;80:125–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Qiu X, Wong G, Audet J. Reversion of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhuman primates with ZMapp. Nature. 2014;514(7520):47–53. doi: 10.1038/nature13777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.García M, Cooper A, Shi W. Productive replication of Ebola virus is regulated by the c-Abl1 tyrosine kinase. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(123):123ra24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Stanley DA, Honko AN, Asiedu C. Chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine generates acute and durable protective immunity against ebolavirus challenge. Nat Med. 2014;20(10):1126–1129. doi: 10.1038/nm.3702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Marzi A, Engelmann F, Feldmann F. Antibodies are necessary for rVSV/ZEBOV-GP-mediated protection against lethal Ebola virus challenge in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(5):1893–1898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209591110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gilad J. Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei: the causative micro-organisms of glanders and melioidosis. Recent Patents Anti-Infect Drug Disc. 2007;2:233–241. doi: 10.2174/157489107782497335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Peacock SJ. Melioidosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006;19:421–428. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000244046.31135.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chan KP, Low JG, Raghuram J. Clinical characteristics and outcome of severe melioidosis requiring intensive care. Chest. 2005;128:3674–3678. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cunha BA. The atypical pneumonias: clinical diagnosis and importance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(Suppl 3):12–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01393.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Elliott JH. Psittacosis: a flu like syndrome. Aust Fam Physician. 2001;30:739–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hartzell JD, Wood-Morris RN, Martinez LJ, Trotta RF. Q fever: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:574–579. doi: 10.4065/83.5.574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Terheggen U, Leggat PA. Clinical manifestations of Q fever in adults and children. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007;5:159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Audi J, Belson M, Patel M. Ricin poisoning: a comprehensive review. JAMA. 2005;294:2342–2351. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.18.2342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Franco MP, Mulder M, Gilman RH, Smits HL. Human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:775–786. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70286-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pappas G, Panagopoulou P, Christou L, Akritidis N. Brucella as a biological weapon. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:2229–2236. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6311-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Smedley JG, 3rd, Fisher DJ, Sayeed S. The enteric toxins of Clostridium perfringens. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;152:183–204. doi: 10.1007/s10254-004-0036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Blazes DL, Lawler JV, Lazarus AA. When biotoxins are tools of terror: early recognition of intentional poisoning can attenuate effects. Postgrad Med. 2002;112:89–92. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2002.08.1278. 95–96, 98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Khan AS, Swerdlow DL, Juranek DD. Precautions against biological and chemical terrorism directed at food and water supplies. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50017-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Crum NF, Wallace MR, Oldfield EC., 3rd New issues in infectious diarrhea. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2005;5(Suppl 3):S16–S25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Salzman M, Madsen JM, Greenberg MI. Toxins: bacterial and marine toxins. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:397–419. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2006.04.003. ix. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Update: novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infections—worldwide, May 6, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Louie JK, Yang S, Acosta M. Treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors for critically ill patients with influenza A (H1N1)pdm09. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1198. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Domínguez-Cherit G, Lapinsky SE, Macias AE. Critically Ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA. 2009;302:1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rodríguez A, Díaz E, Martín-Loeches I. Impact of early oseltamivir treatment on outcome in critically ill patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1140. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lee N, Chan PK, Lui GC. Complications and outcomes of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in hospitalized adults: how do they differ from those in seasonal influenza? J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1739. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators. Davies A, Jones D. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302:1888. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zangrillo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Landoni G. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with H1N1 influenza infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 8 studies and 266 patients receiving ECMO. Crit Care. 2013;17(1):R30. doi: 10.1186/cc12512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Han K, Ma H, An X. Early use of glucocorticoids was a risk factor for critical disease and death from pH1N1 infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:326. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Saks MA, Karras D. Emergency medicine and the public's health: emerging infectious diseases. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006;24:1019–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2006.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Muller MP, McGeer A. Febrile respiratory illness in the intensive care unit setting: an infection control perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:37–42. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000198056.58083.a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Interim recommendations for facemask and respirator use to reduce 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus transmission. 2009. www.cdc.gov/h1n1/masks Available at. Accessed November 5, 2009.
  • 89.Branson RD, Rubinson L. Mechanical ventilation in mass casualty scenarios. Respir Care. 2008;53:38–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Devereaux A, Christian MD, Dichter JR. Summary of suggestions from the Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit, January 26–27, 2007. Chest. 2008;133:1S–7S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rubinson L, Hick JL, Curtis JR. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: medical resources for surge capacity. Chest. 2008;133:32S–50S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Devereaux AV, Dichter JR, Christian MD. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: a framework for allocation of scarce resources in mass critical care. Chest. 2008;133:51S–66S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES