Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology logoLink to Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
. 2020 Apr 5;13:267–274. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S239667

Expert Consensus on Injection Technique and Area-Specific Recommendations for the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-12L to Treat Fine Cutaneous Lines

Patricia Ogilvie 1,✉, Jesper Thulesen 2, Christophe Leys 3, Dimitris Sykianakis 4, Jonquille Chantrey 5, Marva Safa 6, Vitor Figueiredo 7, Izolda Heydenrych 8, Maurizio Cavallini 9, Elin Kringen Langeland 10, Anne Wetter 11
PMCID: PMC7152505  PMID: 32308460

Abstract

Background

VYC-12L is a hyaluronic acid (HA) injectable gel designed to treat fine cutaneous lines and improve skin quality attributes such as hydration and elasticity.

Objective

Expert consensus was sought on VYC-12L injection technique and primary treatment target areas.

Methods

A multinational group of aesthetic medicine clinicians (n = 128) attended product training and each identified ~10 patients for VYC-12L. After treating their first and last patients, the clinicians completed a survey on preferred injection methodology/technique, including injection angle, volume, and spacing. An expert panel (n = 12) discussed survey results and their clinical experiences to obtain consensus on VYC-12L technique and appropriate treatment areas.

Results

Recommendations included micro-depot injections of VYC-12L into the deep dermis with a 32G ½ inch needle inserted at <45º to the skin, spaced 0.5‒1.0 cm apart, with 0.01‒0.05 mL volume per injection (full-face total volume: ~2 mL). Recommended primary treatment areas were the malar, perioral, neck, and décolletage regions. Injection techniques for different treatment areas/demographic characteristics were similar, with some variability in treatment approach. Patient selection criteria, pre- and post-treatment guidelines, and managing patient expectations are important components of treatment.

Conclusion

These consensus recommendations may assist clinicians in optimizing the treatment of fine lines with VYC-12L.

Keywords: consensus, hyaluronic acid, injectable dermal filler, dermis, skin aging, Juvéderm Volite

Introduction

The topographic appearance of facial skin can influence judgments of age, physical health and fitness, and psychological factors such as self-esteem and well-being.1–4 Skin smoothness, hydration, firmness, and texture are just a few of the attributes that contribute to overall skin appearance or skin quality.5–9 Poor skin quality results from a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as age- and hormone-related structural changes and environmental stressors (eg, ultraviolet, infrared A, and ozone exposure); effects on the skin may include roughness, surface irregularities, and wrinkling.6,10–15 Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures to improve skin appearance, such as chemical peels, laser skin resurfacing, and microdermabrasion, have increased in popularity over the last 2 decades, exceeding 3.1 million procedures in the United States in 2017.16,17

VYC-12 with lidocaine (VYC-12L [Juvéderm Volite]; Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland) is a crosslinked HA injectable gel that was developed using the Vycross technology platform (Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland) and was designed to treat superficial cutaneous depressions such as fine lines and to improve skin quality attributes such as hydration and elasticity.18 A prospective, single-center, single-arm study in 131 subjects with moderate to severe cheek skin roughness at baseline showed that a single treatment with VYC-12 without lidocaine was safe and effective for reducing skin roughness and fine lines up to 6 months and improving skin hydration up to 9 months.19 Most subjects (76.4–90.8%) reported significant improvements in satisfaction with skin at all time points through month 9 on the FACE‐Q Satisfaction With Skin scale, a validated patient-reported outcome measure, and more than 80% said they would recommend the treatment to a friend.20 A prospective, open-label, 2-center study also demonstrated that VYC-12 improved skin quality and texture for up to 6 months, based on both objective and subjective analysis methods, in 40 women aged 35 to 60 years presenting with facial lines, low skin hydration or brightness, and signs of chrono- or photoaging.21 This article provides consensus-based guidance and direction on VYC-12L injection technique, ideal treatment areas, and pre- and post-treatment management based on clinical experiences of aesthetic medicine clinicians and the author group.

Consensus Methodology

Experience Phase

A multinational group of 128 European aesthetic medicine clinicians participated in an initiative to gather real-world clinical experience on the use of VYC-12L. After attending a product training event, participants identified approximately 10 patient candidates for VYC-12L treatment. The clinicians each completed a survey after treating their first and last patients. The clinicians were asked to indicate their preferred injection methodology, including technique, depth and angle of injection, volume per injection, and spacing between injection sites; primary target areas of treatment; and pre- and post-injection advice. Survey questions and results from the experience phase are summarized in the Supplemental Table.

Consensus Phase

An expert panel of 12 international advisors convened in Paris, France, in January 2017 and reviewed the results of the survey (Supplemental Table). The advisors were selected and invited by Allergan to participate in this initiative based on their positive reputation in the aesthetic community and extensive clinical practice and/or clinical trial experience with VYC-12L. During the meeting, the advisors discussed their individual experiences using VYC-12L and established consensus on general injection technique; area-specific recommendations for the forehead, malar, perioral, neck, hands, and décolletage regions; and pre- and post-treatment management.

Consensus Recommendations

Injection Technique

Key recommendations for VYC-12L injection technique were to use micro-depot injections, inject into the deep dermis at an angle less than 45 degrees from the skin surface, and space injections approximately 0.5 to 1.0 cm apart (Table 1).22–25 The depth and spacing of the injection may be individualized to the patient and the treatment area based on the severity level of the skin lines, roughness, and photodamage.

Table 1.

Expert Panel Consensus on VYC-12L Injection Technique

General Recommendations
Technique Micro-depot
Needle ● Use 32G 1/2 inch needle provided with product (larger needles, such as 30G, will make small-volume dosing more difficult)
● Do not use a cannula, which cannot deliver into deep dermis
● Blunting of needle may occur with repeated injections; may need to use 2–4 needles per syringe
Angle ● <45º between needle and skin
Depth ● Target deep dermis; injection is too superficial if tip of needle is visible and skin whitens during injection
● Injecting too deeply is preferable to injecting too superficially because overly superficial injections may cause skin surface irregularities22,23
● Immediately mold/massage for 10 mins any areas that were unintentionally too superficially injected
● Author experience suggests that initial surface irregularities with VYC-12L will settle within a day
● Areas with greater photodamage may require deeper injections, but care must be taken to avoid increased bruising
● Be attentive to differences in skin thickness across injection sites; for example, neck skin tends to be thinner, but solar elastosis may cause thickened dermal layer24,25
Spacing of injections ● 0.5−1.0 cm
● To guide spacing, use standardized grid or pattern individualized to patient
● Adapt spacing to patient or facial area or to target specific lines; spacing may be wider in younger patients or those with less severe skin roughness/fine lines whereas spacing may be more narrow in areas with more severe skin roughness/fine lines
Volume ● 0.01−0.05 mL per injection
Accurate delivery of 0.01−0.05 mL may be difficult with the gradations provided on the syringe but will improve with training/practice
● Total volume of ~2 mL is typically required for the full face, excluding the forehead
● Slightly greater total volume (≤2.5 mL) may be needed for more severe photodamage or when the neck and décolletage are included in treatment
Open in a new tab

Anatomical Region

The malar, perioral, neck, and décolletage regions were identified as primary target areas for VYC-12L treatment with area-specific injection techniques based on skin characteristics in the respective regions (Table 2).

Table 2.

Area-Specific Recommendations for VYC-12L Injection Technique

Area-Specific Recommendations*
Malar region ● Initially, use grid for spacing, then target specific areas of concern (eg, radial cheek lines or fine radial lip lines)
● Begin injections laterally and progress medially
∘ Lateral areas may require less volume because the skin is thinner and less visible than in medial areas; these less visible areas also allow for gaining familiarity with the skin
∘ To increase patient comfort in sensitive patients, diffuse anesthetic from the lateral region as injections progress
Perioral region ● Sensitive patients may require additional anesthesia
Neck ● Target specific areas of concern as needed (eg, horizontal neck lines)
● Stretch skin while injecting to help clarify depth of injection and to reduce injection discomfort and bruising
● If injections are too superficial, “cobblestoning” may occur; either massage the area for 10 mins with a cotton swab or use fingers to squeeze the nodules to help disperse these lumps
● Neck may be more prone to complications and bruising because of increased vascularity
● Volume per injection should be the smallest injectable aliquot (~0.05 mL), and total volume should be ~1 mL
● Do not treat if patient is extremely thin
Décolletage ● Stretch skin to help clarify depth of injection
Open in a new tab

Note: *Follow general recommendations (Table 1) for each area.

The panel did not identify the forehead as a primary indication for injection in otherwise treatment-naïve patients. Forehead skin has different sebaceous properties than the other areas identified for treatment; specifically, greater sebum production in the forehead results in increased skin surface hydration and a better skin appearance. Further, patient concerns about the forehead generally relate to dynamic lines, typically addressed with a neuromodulator.22,26,27 However, clinical data have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of VYC-12 without lidocaine for the treatment of forehead lines, and there is clinical practice experience in this facial area.

The dorsum of the hands was not considered a primary target for VYC-12L treatment; visible or protruding tendons or veins in the hands would be best addressed by other HA-based products with greater lift capacity,28 such as VYC-17.5L (Juvéderm Vollure XC/Juvéderm Volift XC; Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland). Based on the clinical experience of some members of the panel, however, VYC-12L may be used to improve the appearance of the skin on the hands without producing an excessive volumizing effect.

Pre- and Post-treatment Management

Specific recommendations for both patients and clinicians to observe before and after treatment with VYC-12L (Table 3)29 are largely consistent with pre- and post-treatment guidance for other HA-based dermal fillers.23,30,31 Specific training on the use of VYC-12L is essential in order to avoid potential side effects associated with HA dermal fillers.

Table 3.

Pre- and Post-treatment Recommendations

Pretreatment Post-treatment Pre-/Post-treatment
Patient should:
● Avoid use of makeup and/or cosmeceuticals
● Avoid NSAID or aspirin intake within 7−10 days of treatment or as approved by treating physician
● Avoid alcoholic beverage intake the night before
● Increase water intake
Clinician should:
● Obtain patient consent for procedure
● Warn patients of risks associated with the procedure, such as inflammatory skin reactions and bruising
● Educate patients on realistic expectations for treatment, emphasizing tangible, long-lasting effects on overall skin appearance and improved moisture retention vs instant visibility of results
● Clean skin with antiseptic
● Apply topical anesthetic, cold compress/ice pack, or contact cooling device to target areas, especially to sensitive areas such as the neck or perioral region, to make injections more comfortable and minimize bruising, for up to 30−45 mins before injection according to patient sensitivity
● Prescribe antiviral prophylaxis several days prior to treatment in patients with a history of facial herpes simplex virus29 		Patient should:
● Avoid direct sun, sunbeds, or saunas for 2 weeks
● Use sunblock
● Avoid makeup for 12 hrs
●Avoid exercise for 24 hrs
● Avoid radiofrequency procedures for 2 weeks
● Expect limited downtime
● Massage nondispersed filler (bumps/cobblestones) if visible after 10 days
Clinician should:
● Perform vibration massage on treated areas before patient leaves clinic
● Apply anesthetic cream, if necessary		 Patient should:
● Avoid nonsterile topical agents
● Increase water intake for 48 hrs
● Avoid aspirin, NSAIDs, medications, or supplements that affect coagulation time (eg, herbal supplements with garlic and ginkgo biloba)
●Avoid microneedling, peels, or laser treatments for 2−4 weeks
● Apply disinfecting cream (eg, Fucidin cream)
● Apply sunblock daily
● Avoid dental procedures for 2−4 weeks
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Demographic-Based Treatment Considerations

Improvements in skin appearance with VYC-12L treatment are expected regardless of age, skin phototype, and ethnicity (Table 4).32–36 However, there are specific considerations for treatment with VYC-12L in each group. For example, older individuals whose skin is highly damaged may require more volume or closely spaced injections compared with younger individuals. Further, VYC-12L would not typically be the first aesthetic treatment for older patients, who may have previously received neuromodulating or volumizing treatments, or may have undergone cosmetic procedures that involve greater downtime, such as laser skin resurfacing.37 Therefore, older patients (or patients with a previous history of aesthetic and/or cosmetic procedures) should be advised that VYC-12L involves minimal downtime in addition to other distinguishing treatment considerations.

Table 4.

Demographic-Based Treatment Considerations

Sex ● Males and females require similar injection depth in target areas
● Males may require a lower total volume of VYC-12L for the face because of wider injection spacing in the male beard area
∘ Strong scaffold of terminal hair makes skin in this area physiologically different and less prone to skin-quality issues than the same area in females32
Skin phototype and ethnicity ● Recommended injection techniques do not differ
● Injection angle may need to be adjusted in Asian patients because Asian skin is thicker than Caucasian skin,33 but Asian patients’ response to treatment will likely be positive and durable, possibly because of heightened barrier function in the skin33–36
● Benefits of VYC-12L treatment comprise both visual improvements in skin roughness and fine lines and tangible improvements in hydration and texture; the visual effects may be harder to see in darker skin, but all ethnic skin types are expected to have equally palpable improvements in skin quality, including improved moisture retention
Age ● Recommended injection techniques do not differ
● Patients in all age groups can benefit from VYC-12L treatment; it has a versatile effect on overall skin quality regardless of the severity of extrinsic or intrinsic damage
● Some older patients may need a multimodal treatment approach to address their skin quality concerns, in contrast to young patients who may require only VYC-12L; for example, older patients might combine treatment with VYC-12L in the neck or décolletage with a volumizing treatment in the face
● Older and more damaged skin may require more volume and closely spaced injections
● Older skin may be thinner due to atrophy, and skin stretching may make needle penetration into the deep dermis easier
Open in a new tab

Patient Selection

A broad range of patients are appropriate for VYC-12L treatment (Table 5).18,38 Younger patients who have sun damage or concerns about the texture or lackluster appearance of their skin may be good candidates for VYC-12L as an early or initial aesthetic treatment. Based on personal observation, the panel commented that skin with low-grade acne scars also responds well to VYC-12L.

Table 5.

Recommendations for Selecting Patients

Selection Criteria

  • Patients with first signs of aging, low-grade acne scars, or dry, rough, or flaky skin and who have realistic expectations for treatment with VYC-12L

  • Patients who do not show signs of active skin infection/inflammation (eg, acne, herpes, common warts, etc.)18,38 in the areas to be treated

  • Younger patients with photodamage and concerns about skin appearance

  • Older patients who have had initial aesthetic treatments with neurotoxins or volumizers

  • Patients with minimal sagging of the neck skin

  • Patients with mild photodamage in the décolletage area
Open in a new tab

Patient Expectations

In setting appropriate treatment expectations, patients may be counseled to expect visible results approximately 5 to 10 days after treatment, rather than immediately, and to experience effects for about 4 to 6 months. Increased, prolonged internal cutaneous moisturization was identified as a major driver of patient satisfaction with VYC-12L, and it was recommended that patient management and communication efforts emphasize such tangible effects more than the instant visibility of results. Clinicians might communicate anticipated results to patients using words such as luminosity, radiance, glow, and freshness, which may be easier for patients to visualize than improved skin quality. Clinicians may also share with patients that improvements in horizontal neck lines and décolletage skin may be particularly satisfying, as these results, in the opinion of the panel, may last the longest. Patients should also be made aware that some skin characteristics, such as uneven pigment and large pores, will not improve significantly.

Representative images of results before and after treatment with VYC-12L are presented in Figures 1–4. These figures demonstrate the effectiveness of VYC-12L for fine lines and skin appearance at 1-month post-treatment in patients who had no prior experience with the product.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Representative images of décolletage (A) before treatment and (B) 1 month after 1.5-mL injection of VYC-12L. Images courtesy of Patricia Ogilvie, MD.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Representative images of neck (A) before treatment and (B) 1 month after 1.0-mL injection of VYC-12L. Images courtesy of Patricia Ogilvie, MD.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Representative images of facial area (A) before treatment and (B) 1 month after injection of VYC-12L into cheek, jawline, and perioral area, 1.0 mL per side. Images courtesy of Jesper Thulesen, MD.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Representative images of cheek (A) before treatment, (B) 1 month after initial injection of VYC-12L, 0.5 mL per side, and (C) 2 weeks after second treatment with VYC-12L, 0.5 mL per side. Images courtesy of Izolda Heydenrych, MD.

Role of VYC-12L in an Aesthetic Treatment Plan

Treatment with VYC-12L may be performed in the same session as injection of neurotoxins or other facial rejuvenation procedures. For example, a study conducted in 45 patients aged 35 to 52 years demonstrated high patient satisfaction and multiple skin quality and texture improvements, including smoothness, brightness, hydration, elasticity, and tightness, when VYC-12L was combined with microinjections of onabotulinumtoxinA and fractional resurfacing laser treatments.39 However, the initial treatment with VYC-12L in the face may be best administered without facial volumizing treatments in the same session. This approach will allow the injector to gain experience with VYC-12L and its distinct effects on a patient’s skin independent of any changes in skin appearance resulting directly from the volumizer. It may be appropriate to combine VYC-12L and volumizing treatment in the face once clinical experience has been gained and clear expectations of the results of this combination can be determined. The use of VYC-12L in the neck or décolletage during the same session as a facial volumizing treatment is supported, because these treatment areas are distant from the face and results are more likely to be complementary.

Conclusions

These consensus recommendations provide important information to guide clinicians in the use of VYC-12L. They support clinicians in optimizing aesthetic outcomes for patients who are seeking enhancement of their skin appearance, whether because of extrinsic effects, such as photodamage, or intrinsic changes, such as skin aging. The expert panel concluded that VYC-12L is especially appropriate for treatment of the malar, perioral, neck, and décolletage regions using the same general injection technique, with some modifications based on region-specific skin and patient characteristics. Patients may expect skin appearance improvements with VYC-12L regardless of their age, sex, or ethnicity. VYC-12L can be part of a comprehensive aesthetic treatment plan for patients of any age.

VYC-12L has several features that differentiate it from other treatments intended to improve the appearance of the skin. For example, topical retinoids,40,41 photodynamic therapy,42 chemical peels,8,43 laser skin resurfacing,37 and nonablative skin rejuvenation devices44 are applied to the surface of the skin, whereas VYC-12L is injected intradermally, with the objective being long-term improvements in skin appearance.18 Treatment with injectable HA-based fillers has been shown to temporarily improve attributes of skin quality, by hydrating the dermis and stabilizing the structure of the extracellular matrix–supporting fibroblasts.45,46

Unlike targeted volumizing treatments, VYC-12L treatment involves covering the whole topographical area with evenly spaced intradermal injections followed by targeted injections to correct lines, depressions, and other modalities of concern in the skin. VYC-12L also requires strategic and systematic intradermal injections, unlike mesotherapy, which consists of random microinjections of noncrosslinked HA, vitamins, minerals, and amino acids into the superficial part of the dermis.27,47,48

Setting patient expectations is an important component of treatment with VYC-12L. VYC-12L is a reasonable option for patients who want more subtle improvements in the appearance of their skin. To this end, physician-patient communication is key; patient education should be focused on the palpable, rather than instantly visible, effects of the treatment (eg, increased, prolonged moisturization). As with other aesthetic treatment options, high-quality, standardized, and reproducible medical photography showing patients’ skin before and after treatment may be useful in helping patients to detect and appreciate the effects of treatment with VYC-12L.

Funding Statement

This initiative was funded by Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland. The consensus recommendations reached were not influenced by Allergan plc. Medical writing support for this article was provided by Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, Parsippany, New Jersey, and was funded by Allergan plc.

Prior Presentation

A poster based on this paper was presented at the 13th Aesthetic and Anti-aging Medicine European Congress, September 15−17, 2017, Monte Carlo, Monaco. The poster’s abstract was made available to meeting attendees in the congress’ on-site abstract book.

Disclosure

P Ogilvie is a consultant, trainer, and principal investigator for Allergan plc, participated in an Allergan Juvéderm Volite advisory board, and received research funding for the clinical registration trial of VYC-12L. M Cavallini, J Chantrey, V Figueiredo, I Heydenrych, E Langeland, M Safa, D Sykianakis, J Thulesen, and A Wetter are investigators for Allergan plc and have participated in an Allergan Juvéderm Volite advisory board. J Chantrey received honorarium from Allergan, during the conduct of the study; honorarium for teaching from Allergan, outside the submitted work. V Figueiredo and E Langeland report personal fees, non-financial support from Allergan, outside the submitted work. I Heydenrych reports personal fees from Allergan, during the conduct of the study; personal fees, non-financial support from Allergan, personal fees from SkinCeuticals, outside the submitted work. C Leys is an investigator for Allergan plc, participated in an Allergan Juvéderm Volite advisory board, and received research funding for the clinical registration trial of VYC-12L. J Thulesen is a consultant for Allergan plc, participated in an Allergan Juvéderm Volite advisory board, and is a faculty member of the Allergan Medical Institute. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Lai M, Oruc I, Barton JJ. The role of skin texture and facial shape in representations of age and identity. Cortex. 2013;49(1):252–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsankova E, Kappas A. Facial skin smoothness as an indicator of perceived trustworthiness and related traits. Perception. 2016;45(4):400–408. doi: 10.1177/0301006615616748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sutherland CA, Rowley LE, Amoaku UT, et al. Personality judgments from everyday images of faces. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1616. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jones AL, Kramer RS, Ward R. Signals of personality and health: the contributions of facial shape, skin texture, and viewing angle. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012;38(6):1353–1361. doi: 10.1037/a0027078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Donofrio L, Carruthers A, Hardas B, et al. Development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of facial skin texture. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(suppl 1):S219–S226. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Trojahn C, Dobos G, Lichterfeld A, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J. Characterizing facial skin ageing in humans: disentangling extrinsic from intrinsic biological phenomena. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:318586. doi: 10.1155/2015/318586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nkengne A, Bertin C. Aging and facial changes–documenting clinical signs, part 1: clinical changes of the aging face. Skinmed. 2013;11(5):281–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berardesca E, Cameli N, Primavera G, Carrera M. Clinical and instrumental evaluation of skin improvement after treatment with a new 50% pyruvic acid peel. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(4):526–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32106.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carruthers J, Donofrio L, Hardas B, et al. Development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of facial fine lines. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(suppl 1):S227–S234. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fisher GJ, Wang ZQ, Datta SC, Varani J, Kang S, Voorhees JJ. Pathophysiology of premature skin aging induced by ultraviolet light. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(20):1419–1428. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711133372003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Callaghan TM, Wilhelm KP. A review of ageing and an examination of clinical methods in the assessment of ageing skin. Part 2: clinical perspectives and clinical methods in the evaluation of ageing skin. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30(5):323–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00455.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fisher GJ, Varani J, Voorhees JJ. Looking older: fibroblast collapse and therapeutic implications. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(5):666–672. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.5.666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Le Louarn C, Buthiau D, Buis J. Structural aging: the facial recurve concept. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(3):213–218. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0024-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schroeder P, Krutmann J. Infared A-induced skin aging In: Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI, editors. Textbook of Aging Skin. Berlin, Germany: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2010:421–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Valacchi G, Sticozzi C, Pecorelli A, Cervellati F, Cervellati C, Maioli E. Cutaneous responses to environmental stressors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1271:75–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06724.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Plastic surgery statistics report 2016; 2017. Available from: https://d2wirczt3b6wjm.cloudfront.net/News/Statistics/2016/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2016.pdf. Accessed June15, 2017.
  • 17.American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2017 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2018. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2017.pdf. Accessed June27, 2018.
  • 18.Juvederm Volite B [direction for use]. Pringy, France: Allergan; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Niforos F, Ogilvie P, Cavallini M, et al. VYC-12 injectable gel is safe and effective for improvement of facial skin topography: a prospective study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019;12:791–798. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S216222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ogilvie P, Safa M, Chantrey J, et al. Improvements in satisfaction with skin after treatment of facial fine lines with VYC-12 injectable gel: patient-reported outcomes from a prospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cavallini M, Papagni M, Ryder TJ, Patalano M. Skin quality improvement with VYC-12, a new injectable hyaluronic acid: objective results using digital analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45:1598–1604. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.de Maio M, Swift A, Signorini M, Fagien S. Facial assessment and injection guide for botulinum toxin and injectable hyaluronic acid fillers: focus on the upper face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(2):265e–276e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:295–316. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S50546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ha RY, Nojima K, Adams WP Jr., Brown SA. Analysis of facial skin thickness: defining the relative thickness index. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(6):1769–1773. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000161682.63535.9B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bilac C, Sahin MT, Ozturkcan S. Chronic actinic damage of facial skin. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32(6):752–762. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tagami H. Location-related differences in structure and function of the stratum corneum with special emphasis on those of the facial skin. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30(6):413–434. doi: 10.1111/ics.2008.30.issue-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andre P. New trends in face rejuvenation by hyaluronic acid injections. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7(4):251–258. doi: 10.1111/jcd.2008.7.issue-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bass LS. Injectable filler techniques for facial rejuvenation, volumization, and augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(4):479–488. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2015.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gazzola R, Pasini L, Cavallini M. Herpes virus outbreaks after dermal hyaluronic acid filler injections. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(6):770–772. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12452293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Signorini M, Liew S, Sundaram H, et al. Global aesthetics consensus: avoidance and management of complications from hyaluronic acid fillers—evidence- and opinion-based review and consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(6):961e–971e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Urdiales-Galvez F, Delgado NE, Figueiredo V, et al. Preventing the complications associated with the use of dermal fillers in facial aesthetic procedures: an expert group consensus report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(3):667–677. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0798-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Keaney TC. Aging in the male face: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(7):797–803. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vashi NA, de Castro Maymone MB, Kundu RV. Aging differences in ethnic skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(1):31–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee BM, Han DG, Choi WS. Rejuvenating effects of facial hydrofilling using Restylane Vital. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):282–287. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Roh NK, Kim MJ, Lee YW, Choe YB, Ahn KJ. A split-face study of the effects of a stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of nonanimal origin for facial skin rejuvenation using a stamp-type multineedle injector: a randomized clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):809–816. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000480686.68275.60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Seok J, Hong JY, Choi SY, Park KY, Kim BJ. A potential relationship between skin hydration and stamp-type microneedle intradermal hyaluronic acid injection in middle-aged male face. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(4):578–582. doi: 10.1111/jocd.2016.15.issue-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rhie JW, Shim JS, Choi WS. A pilot study of skin resurfacing using the 2,790-nm erbium:YSGG laser system. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(1):52–58. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:205–214. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bertossi D, Giampaoli G, Lucchese A, et al. The skin rejuvenation associated treatment-Fraxel laser, Microbotox, and low G prime hyaluronic acid: preliminary results. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(7):1449–1455. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02738-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ho ET, Trookman NS, Sperber BR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled comparative trial of the anti-aging properties of non-prescription tri-retinol 1.1% vs. prescription tretinoin 0.025%. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(1):64–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ogden S, Samuel M, Griffiths CE. A review of tazarotene in the treatment of photodamaged skin. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(1):71–76. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S1101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Karrer S, Kohl E, Feise K, et al. Photodynamic therapy for skin rejuvenation: review and summary of the literature–results of a consensus conference of an expert group for aesthetic photodynamic therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013;11(2):137–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ghersetich I, Brazzini B, Peris K, Cotellessa C, Manunta T, Lotti T. Pyruvic acid peels for the treatment of photoaging. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(1):32–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30002.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abraham MT, Vic RE. Current concepts in nonablative radiofrequency rejuvenation of the lower face and neck. Facial Plast Surg. 2005;21(1):65–73. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Landau M, Fagien S. Science of hyaluronic acid beyond filling: fibroblasts and their response to the extracellular matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5 Suppl):188s–195s. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Streker M, Reuther T, Krueger N, Kerscher M. Stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin for skin rejuvenation: face, hand, and decolletage. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(9):990–994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Savoia A, Landi S, Baldi A. A new minimally invasive mesotherapy technique for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2013;3(1):83–93. doi: 10.1007/s13555-012-0018-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Baspeyras M, Rouvrais C, Liegard L, et al. Clinical and biometrological efficacy of a hyaluronic acid-based mesotherapy product: a randomised controlled study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013;305(8):673–682. doi: 10.1007/s00403-013-1360-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Plastic surgery statistics report 2016; 2017. Available from: https://d2wirczt3b6wjm.cloudfront.net/News/Statistics/2016/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2016.pdf. Accessed June15, 2017.
  2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2017 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2018. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2017.pdf. Accessed June27, 2018.

Articles from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES