Abstract
Background:
Identification of liver flukes, Fasciola hepatica, and Fasciola gigantica by morphometric parameters is not always reliable due to the overlapping measurements. This study aimed to characterize the liver flukes of animals from different parts of Iran by the genetic markers, ITS1, and COXI.
Methods:
We collected flukes from infected livestock in six provinces of Iran from Sep to Nov 2016. The flukes were identified by amplification of a 680 bp sequence of ITS1 locus followed by a restriction fragment polymorphism (RFLP) assay. The genetic diversity among isolates was evaluated by amplification and sequencing of a 493 bp fragment of the COXI gene.
Results:
We obtained 38 specimens from Khuzestan, 22 from Tehran, 10 from Isfahan, 10 from Mazandaran, 4 from Kurdistan, and 3 from Ardabil provinces. PCR-RFLP analysis revealed two patterns, representing F. hepatica, and F. gigantica. Fifty specimens from cattle and sheep exhibited F. hepatica pattern and 37 from the cattle, sheep, buffalo, and goat that of F. gigantica. The phylogeny based on COXI revealed two distinct clades separating F. hepatica from F. gigantica. In our phylogeny, the Iranian F. gigantica isolates showed a distinct separation from the African flukes, while grouped with the East Asia specimens demonstrating a common ancestor. The F. hepatica isolates clustered with the flukes from different parts of the world, including East Asia, Europe, and South America.
Conclusion:
The present study revealed a substantial genetic difference between F. gigantica populations of Asia and Africa, while F. hepatica isolates from different parts of the world shared high similarities.
Keywords: Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica, Iran
Introduction
Fascioliasis is a significant food-borne zoonotic disease worldwide, affecting various mammals, and humans (1). About 180 million of the world population are at the risk of this infection (2), and 2.4 to 17 million or even higher numbers depending upon the hitherto unknown situations in many countries are estimated to be infected (3). In the animal husbandry industry, the economic losses associated with this disease are at around two billion US dollars (1). Two flukes, Fasciola hepatica, and Fasciola gigantica are responsible for fascioliasis in humans and animals (1, 4, 5) with a higher severity for the latter species due to its bigger size and the greater body mass (6). In Iran, fascioliasis is an endemic disease of herbivores with prevalence ranging from 1.18% to 50% in different geographical regions (7–10). The infection is of the higher rates among animals in the south of the country, while most human cases occur along the Caspian Sea littoral in the north. During 1988–1998, two significant outbreaks struck Gilan Province, infecting ≈15000 people (11, 12). The Caspian Sea littoral has remained a hot spot for the disease. In the west and northwest, in Kermanshah and Ardabil provinces, human fascioliasis appears sporadically with limited outbreaks in the former one (13–15). Moreover, in the areas with high rates of the infection among local livestock, e.g., Lorestan, and Kohgiloye and Boyer-Ahmad, serology detected anti-Fasciola antibodies in humans (16, 17). The flukes, F. hepatica, and F. gigantica are commonly identified based on morphologic and morphometric parameters (11). However, intermediate forms, presumably hybridizations of the two species, are hardly distinguishable by this approach (2). Reports of intermediate forms are available from different Asian countries, including China (18), Korea (19), Japan (20), Vietnam (21), and Iran (11, 22), as well as Egypt in Africa.
Today, various molecular markers, e.g., ITS1, ITS2, 28S rRNA, COXI, and NADI, are available for molecular identification of Fasciola spp. (2, 4, 18). Due to the conserved and variable regions and high copy numbers, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) has proved as a discriminating tool for identification of Fasciola species (2), whereas mtDNA sequences with higher mutation rates, lack of recombination and maternal inheritance serve as biomarkers for phylogenetic studies and genetic variability (23). In this study, by using the molecular markers, ITS1, and COXI, we characterized the liver flukes of livestock from different regions of Iran.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The samples were collected from six provinces of Iran with different geological and weather features including Ardebil in the northwest, Tehran in the north center, Isfahan in the center, Mazandaran in the north, Kurdistan in the west, and Khuzestan in the southwest during Sep to Nov 2016 (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the climatological features in different regions of the study area.
Fig. 1:
The localities from which Fasciola spp. Specimens were obtained
Table 1:
Data of Fasciola spp. isolates obtained from different regions of Iran and the climate profiles
Locality | Number of samples | Host | Altitude (m) | Average temperature (°C) | Precipitation (mm) | DNA type (Species)2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Climate1 | ITS1 COX1 | ||||||
Ardabil | 2 | Sheep | 1351 | 9.5 | 325 | BSk | F.h F.h |
Tehran | 4 | Cattle | 1168 | 16.4 | 220 | BSk | F.h F.h |
Tehran | 3 | Sheep | 1168 | 16.4 | 220 | BSk | F.h F.h |
Isfahan | 2 | Cattle | 1578 | 15.6 | 125 | BWk | F.h F.h |
Mazandaran | 4 | Sheep | 43 | 16.7 | 690 | Csa | F.h F.h |
Khuzestan | 2 | Goat | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g F.g |
Khuzestan | 2 | Buffalo | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g F.g |
Kurdistan | 3 | Cattle | 1499 | 12.8 | 492 | Csa | F.h F.h |
Khuzestan | 2 | Sheep | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g F.g |
Khuzestan | 1 | Sheep | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.h F.h |
Ardabil | 1 | Sheep | 1351 | 9.5 | 325 | BSk | F.h NP |
Mazandaran | 6 | Sheep | 43 | 16.7 | 690 | Csa | F.h NP |
Isfahan | 8 | Cattle | 1578 | 15.6 | 125 | BWk | F.h NP |
Tehran | 8 | Cattle | 1168 | 16.4 | 220 | BSk | F.h NP |
Tehran | 7 | Sheep | 1168 | 16.4 | 220 | BSk | F.h NP |
Kurdistan | 1 | Cattle | 1499 | 12.8 | 492 | Csa | F.h NP |
Khuzestan | 1 | Sheep | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g NP |
Khuzestan | 9 | Goat | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g NP |
Khuzestan | 3 | Cattle | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g NP |
Khuzestan | 18 | Buffalo | 19 | 24.9 | 345 | BWh | F.g NP |
BSk, Cold semi-arid climates; Csa, Mediterranean climate; BWh, Desert climate
Fh, Fasciola hepatica; Fg, Fasciola gigantica; NP, Not performed
Sample collection
We obtained 87 Fasciola flukes from different infected livestock, including sheep (n=29), goat (n=11), cattle (n=27), and Buffalo (n=20) slaughtered in the six provinces. The flukes were transferred to the Laboratory of Helminthology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, extensively washed with PBS and preserved in 70% alcohol, and kept at room temperature until used.
DNA extraction
Genomic DNA was extracted from a portion of the apical zone of the flukes. The tissue was ground using a surgical blade, and DNA extraction was performed by a commercial DNA extraction kit (Bioneer Corporation, Daejeon, South Korea) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNAs were stored at −20 °C until used.
ITS1-PCR and RFLP analysis
A 680 bp fragment of ITS1 locus was targeted by using the primers (Table 2) designed by others (19) and synthesized in a commercial company (Macrogen Corporation, Seoul, South Korea). The 25 μl reactions contained 1 μl of the template DNA, 10 μl of master mix (0.2 U Taq DNA polymerase, 2 mM MgCl2, 400 pM dNTPs and the buffer system (Ampliqon, Skovlunde, Denmark), 200 pM each of forward and reverse primer, and double-distilled water (DDW) to the final volume. The PCR amplification programmed for an initial denaturation of 10 min at 94 °C followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 90 sec, 58 °C for 90 sec, and 72 °C for 90 sec with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. Amounts of 3 μl from amplicons were run on 1.5% gels at 90 V for 90 min, stained with 2% DNA safe stain® (Pishgam Biotech Co., Tehran, Iran) and visualized under UV (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). In all amplifications, DNA from a previously identified F. hepatica fluke (24) and DDW were included as positive and negative controls, respectively.
Table 2:
Primers used for amplification of ITS1 and COXI fragments in this study
Target gene | Primers | Sequence (5′-3′) | expected band (bp) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITS1 | ITS1-Forward | TTGCGCTGATTACGTCCCTG | 680 | (19) |
ITS1-Reverse | TTGGCTGCGCTCTTCATCGAC | |||
COX1 | Ita8-Forward | ACGTTGGATCATAAGCGTGT | 493 | (20) |
Ita9-Reverse | CCTCATCCAACATAACCTCT |
ITS1, Internal transcribed spacer 1; COX1, Cytochrome oxidase subunit I
Identification of F. hepatica and F. gigantica species was performed by a restriction fragment polymorphism (RFLP) assay using the RsaI enzyme (Fermentas, Waltham, United States) as described elsewhere (25). The reactions contained 5 μl of PCR product, 5 μl of the enzyme, 2 μl of the buffer, and DDW to a final volume of 22 μl. The mixture incubated overnight at 37 °C followed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels and staining with 2% DNA safe stain. The ITS1 types were identified according to the generated patterns reported in other studies (25).
COXI amplification and phylogenetic analysis
The genetic diversity among Fasciola species was evaluated by amplification of a 493 bp sequence of COXI (20) of F. hepatica (n=19), and F. gigantica (n=6) flukes obtained from different animals including cattle, sheep, buffalo, and the goat (Table 1). The 25 μl reactions contained, 10 μl of master mix (0.2 U Taq DNA polymerase, 2 mM MgCl2, 400 pM of each dNTPs and buffer system) (Ampliqon, Skovlunde, Denmark), 200 pM each of forward and reverse primer, 1 μl DNA template, and DDW to the final volume. The PCR amplification program included an initial denaturation of 10 min at 94 °C followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 90 sec, 56 °C for 90 sec, and 72 °C for 90 sec with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The amplicons were sequenced in the forward direction using the same primer used for amplification by a 23 ABI 3730XLs sequencer. (Macrogen Corporation, Seoul, South Korea).
Blast analysis
The generated sequences were manually corrected and compared with similar sequences of the F. hepatica and F. gigantica available in GenBank database by the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch)
Phylogeny
The COXI sequences generated in this study were aligned with similar sequences belonging to various Fasciola spp. isolates from Iran and other countries, including those representing the intermediate form. The distance between the sequences was calculated, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the Jukes-Cantor option of the neighbor-joining method in a pairwise deletion procedure using MEGA 7 software (26). The robustness of the topologies was estimated through 1,000 bootstrap replications.
Geographical analysis
ArcGIS 10.2 GIS software was used to draw maps of Iran and show the weather conditions, altitude, and average temperature.
Results
ITS1-PCR and RFLP analysis
In PCR amplification, all the specimens and positive controls yielded the expected ≈680 bp amplicon. In RFLP analysis, the digestion generated two patterns: one comprised three bands of approximately 60 bp, 170 bp and 370 bp representing F. gigantica, and the other three bands of 60 bp, 100 bp, and 370 bp indicating F. hepatica (25). Of the 87 specimens, 50 (57.4%) from the cattle and sheep revealed the F. hepatica pattern, and 37 (42.6%) from the cattle, sheep, buffalo, and goat showed that of F. gigantica. No intermediate pattern was detected by this approach (Table 1 and Fig. 2).
Fig. 2:
RFLP analysis of ITS1-PCR products using RsaI. Lane M, a 100-bp size marker (Jena Bioscience, Jena, Germany); lanes 1 to 6, F. gigantica; lanes 7 to 10 F. hepatica
BLAST analysis
In BLAST analysis, the F. hepatica COXI sequences generated here showed 98%–99% identity (97%–100% coverage) with similar sequences from the center (Acc. No. KU946983), northwest (Acc. No. KX021278) and northeast (Acc. No. KX021290) of Iran and other countries, e.g., Poland (Acc. No. KR422380), and Australia (Acc. No. AF216697). The F. gigantica COXI sequences exhibited 98%–99% similarity with the isolates from the southwest (Acc. No.Q398050), southeast (Acc. No. KX036349), center (Acc. No. KX712305) and northwest (Acc. No. KX063835.1) of Iran. The sequences had a 98% similarity over 98%–100% coverage with the isolates from China (Acc. No. KF543343), India (Acc. No. KX656877), Vietnam (Acc. No. MF287791).
Similarity and Phylogenetic analysis
The intraspecies variation (within-group mean distance) among F. hepatica and F. gigantica COXI sequences were 3.44% and 11.99%, respectively. Much of the intraspecies variation in the F. gigantica cluster was due to Zambia sequences showing a considerable distance from the rest of Africa (20.10%) and other parts of the world (≈22.2%). The variations among Iranian F. hepatica and F. gigantica COXI sequences generated herein were 2.74% and 5.16%, respectively.
In phylogeny, the COXI sequences clustered in two groups with distinct separation of two species. In the F. gigantica group, the sequences from Zambia grouped in a clade separate from other sequences. Besides, the sequences of African countries, i.e., Mauritania, Nigeria, and Egypt, and a sequence from Turkey grouped close together distinct from those of other countries, including Iran. The intermediate forms of Vietnam and China made a separate cluster close to other sequences from Vietnam and a sequence from Iran, while the intermediate from Egypt grouped with sequences from Mauritania and Nigeria, and close to other F. gigantica sequences from Egypt. In the F. hepatica group, the sequences from Europe (Poland) and two sequences of South America (Argentina and Uruguay) clustered close near two sequences obtained in this study. Moreover, the two Japanese and South Korea intermediated forms grouped close to F. hepatica sequences from Peru, Japan, and Iran (Fig. 3). Different phylogenetic approaches demonstrated almost the same topology.
Fig. 3:
Phylogeny of Fasciola sp. based on the COXI gene constructed by Neighbor-joining method with the Jukes-Cantor option of the neighbor-joining method in a pairwise deletion procedure using MEGA 7 software. The scale bar corresponds to a 5% distance. The accession numbers of sequences used for the construction of the tree are shown in parentheses and the sequences generated in this study by an asterisk
Discussion
We investigated the presence of Fasciola species in some parts of Iran using the molecular markers ITS1 and COXI. Many reports on the identification and distribution of the Fasciola spp. are available from Iran. In the absence of molecular analysis, a morphometric comparison of the specimens from Gilan Province with the standard allopatric populations of F. hepatica and F. gigantica revealed two distinct types with some overlapping specific measurements indicating the intermediate form (11). Later, ITS sequencing of specimens from the neighboring province, Mazandaran, identified three genotypes, including F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and the intermediate forms, while no agreement between morphometric and molecular analysis was demonstrated (22). In Zanjan Province, Midwest of the Iran, morphometry identified both species and the intermediate forms, while ITS2 revealed only one genotype representing F. hepatica (27). In eastern Iran, ITS2-RFLP and ND1 sequencing elucidated the occurrence of F. gigantica in southern regions, while at the upper latitudes, most cattle harbored both species (28). In Khuzestan Province, southwest of the country, the 28S marker revealed F. gigantica and F. hepatica, with the former one as the dominant species (29). Our present study identified F. hepatica in Ardebil, Tehran, Isfahan, Mazandaran, and Kurdistan, and F. gigantica in Khuzestan, as the primary species (Fig. 1). These data are in agreement with the previous works exhibiting F. gigantica as the dominant species in the south, southwest, and southwest of Iran and F. hepatica as the more widespread species in north and northwest of Iran (9, 22, 30). In areas with a temperature gradient resulting from various altitudes, the two species exhibit distinct distributions. In Gilan Province, northern Iran, F. hepatica commonly occurs in the highlands while F. gigantica is more prevalent in the herbivores of the lowlands (11). We obtained F. hepatica flukes from areas with a mean elevation of 1127±80 m above sea level. In Khuzestan Province, a subtropical region with 19±00 m elevation, F. gigantica, was the dominant species, and F. hepatica was detected only in one sheep (Table 1, Fig. 4).
Fig. 4:
Distribution of Fasciola spp. in sampling localities and their relevant hosts according to A) altitude B) temperature C) precipitation and D) climate
Our phylogeny clustered the specimens into two distinct clades. The intermediate forms (Fasciola sp.) grouped with either F. hepatica or F. gigantica clade demonstrating the difference in maternal mtDNA. The emergence of these forms, presumably hybrids of two species in different geographical areas is a matter of controversy. In Egypt, mixed infections of spermic species in animals indicate cross-hybridization of the two species as reflected by codominant inheritance of ITS alleles (4), while in East Asian countries like Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, and China, intermediate forms appear as aspermic usually triploid flukes with parthenogenetic reproduction (31). In our phylogeny, the Iranian F. gigantica isolates showed a distinct separation from the African fluke and grouped with the East Asia specimens demonstrating a common ancestor. Our F. hepatica isolates clustered with the isolates from different parts of the world, including East Asia, Europe, and South America (Fig. 3). In our phylogenetic tree, a fluke from Japan previously reported a heterozygote with F. gigantica mtDNA background (20) grouped with F. hepatica clade reflecting the genuine maternal inheritance of this specimen (Fig. 3). The PCR-PFLP has shown a reliable and precise method for the detection of Fasciola species (25). In this study, PCR-PFLP detected no overlapping pattern indicating the intermediate forms. One flaw in our study was the lack of specimens from Gilan Province, where morphometry previously identified the intermediate form.
Further studies with specimens from areas where two species co-occur (11) might reveal with more precision the molecular identity of Fasciola species in Iran and the possible occurrence of the intermediate form. Our study revealed F. hepatica as the primary cause of animal fascioliasis in Ardebil, Tehran, Isfahan, Mazandaran, and Kurdistan provinces, and F. gigantica as the common species in Khuzestan Province.
Conclusion
The present study revealed a substantial genetic difference between F. gigantica populations of Asia and Africa, and high genetic similarities between F. hepatica isolates from different parts of the world.
Ethical considerations
Ethical issues (including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (grant No. 950-02-27-31275). We thank Dr. Zahra Asadgol from Iran University of Medical Sciences for preparing GIS maps and data analysis.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there are no issues to be perceived as a conflict of interest with this article.
References
- 1.Huang W, He B, Wang C, Zhu X. (2004). Characterization of Fasciola species from Mainland China by ITS-2 ribosomal DNA sequence. Vet Parasitol, 120(1–2):75–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ai L, Chen M-X, Alasaad S, et al. (2011). Genetic characterization, species differentiation and detection of Fasciola spp. by molecular approaches. Parasit Vectors, 4:101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mas-Coma S, Bargues MD, Valero M. (2005). Fascioliasis and other plant-borne trematode zoonoses. Int J Parasitol, 35:1255–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amer S, Dar Y, Ichikawa M, et al. (2011). Identification of Fasciola species isolated from Egypt based on sequence analysis of genomic (ITS1 and ITS2) and mitochondrial (NDI and COI) gene markers. Parasitol Int, 60(1):5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu G-H, Gasser RB, Young ND, et al. (2014). Complete mitochondrial genomes of the ‘intermediate form’ of Fasciola and Fasciola gigantica, and their comparison with F. hepatica. Parasit Vectors, 7:150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Valero MA, Bargues MD, Khoubbane M, et al. (2016). Higher physiopathogenicity by Fasciola gigantica than by the genetically close F. hepatica: experimental long-term follow-up of biochemical markers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 110(1):55–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eslami A, Hosseini S, Meshgi B. (2009). Animal fasciolosis in north of Iran. Iran. Iranian J Publ Health, 132–135. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hosseini S, Meshgi B, Abbassi A, Eslami A. (2012). Animal fascioliasis in coastal regions of the Caspian Sea, Iran (2006–2007). Iran J Vet Med, 13(1):64–7. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shafiei R, Sarkari B, Sadjjadi SM, et al. (2014). Molecular and morphological characterization of Fasciola spp. isolated from different host species in a newly emerging focus of human fascioliasis in Iran. Vet Med Int, 2014:405740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sayadi M, Mohammad-Pourfard I, Yahyaei M, Esmaeili R. (2015). The prevalence of fascioliasis in slaughtered animals of the industrial slaughterhouse of arak, Iran (2007–2010). Iran J Health Sci, 3(4):59–64. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ashrafi K, Valero M, Panova M, et al. (2006). Phenotypic analysis of adults of Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica and intermediate forms from the endemic region of Gilan, Iran. Parasitol Int, 55(4):249–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ashrafi K. (2015). The status of human and animal fascioliasis in Iran:A narrative review article. Iran J Parasitol, 10(3):306–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hatami H, Asmar M, Masoud J, et al. (2012). The first epidemic and new-emerging human fascioliasis in Kermanshah (western Iran) and a ten-year follow up, 1998–2008. Int J Prev Med, 3(4):266–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heydarian P, Ashrafi K, Mohebali M, et al. (2017). Seroprevalence of human fasciolosis in Lorestan Province, western Iran, in 2015–16. Iran J Parasitol, 12(3):389–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bozorgomid A, Nazari N, Eshrat Beigom K, et al. (2018). Epidemiology of fascioliasis in Kermanshah Province, western Iran. J Public Health, 47(7):967–972. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sarkari B, Ghobakhloo N, Moshfea A, Eilami O. (2012). Seroprevalence of human fasciolosis in a new-emerging focus of fasciolosis in Yasuj district, southwest of Iran. Iran J Parasitol, 7(2):15–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kheirandish F, Kayedi MH, Ezatpour B, et al. (2016). Seroprevalence of human fasciolosis in Pirabad, Lorestan province, Western Iran. Iran J Parasitol, 11(1):24–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peng M, Ichinomiya M, Ohtori M, et al. (2009). Molecular characterization of Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica, and aspermic Fasciola sp. in China based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Parasitol Res,105(3):809–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Itagaki T, Kikawa M, Terasaki K, shibahara T, Fukuda K. (2005). Molecular characterization of parthenogenic Fasciola sp. in Korea on the basis of DNA sequences of ribosomal ITS1 and mitochondrial NDI gene. J Vet Med Sci, 67(11):1115–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Itagaki T, Kikawa M, Sakaguchi K, et al. (2005). Genetic characterization of parthenogenic Fasciola sp. in Japan on the basis of the sequences of ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology, 131(5):679–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Le TH, Van De N, Agatsuma T, et al. (2008). Human fascioliasis and the presence of hybrid/introgressed forms of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica in Vietnam. Int J Parasitol, 38(6):725–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amor N, Halajian A, Farjallah S, et al. (2011). Molecular characterization of Fasciola spp. from the endemic area of northern Iran based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Exp Parasitol, 128(3):196–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gupta A, Bhardwaj A, Sharma P, Pal Y. (2015). Mitochondrial DNA-a tool for phylogenetic and biodiversity search in equines. J Biodivers Endanger Species, 2015. S1:S1006. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aryaeipour M, Rouhani S, Bandehpour M, et al. (2014). Genotyping and phylogenetic analysis of Fasciola spp. isolated from sheep and cattle using PCR-RFLP in Ardabil province, northwestern Iran. Iran J Public Health, 43(10):1364–1371. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ichikawa M, Itagaki T. (2010). Discrimination of the ITS1 types of Fasciola spp. based on a PCR–RFLP method. Parasitol Res, 106(3):757–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. (2007). MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol, 24(8):1596–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghavami M, Rahimi P, Haniloo A, Mosavinasab S. (2009). Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of Fasciola isolates. Iran J Parasitol, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reaghi S, Haghighi A, Harandi MF, Spotin A, Arzamani K, Rouhani S. (2016). Molecular characterization of Fasciola hepatica and phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial (nicotiamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit I and cytochrome oxidase subunit I) genes from the North-East of Iran. Vet World, 9(9):1034–1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saki J, Khademvatan S, Yousefi E. (2011). Molecular identification of animal Fasciola isolates in southwest of Iran. Aust J Basic Appl Sci, 5(11):1878–83. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bozorgomid A, Nazari N, Rahimi H, et al. (2016). Molecular characterization of animal Fasciola spp. isolates from Kermanshah, Western Iran. Iran. Iran J Public Health, 45(10):1315–1321. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nguyen S, Amer S, Ichikawa M, et al. (2012). Molecular identification of Fasciola spp.(Digenea: Platyhelminthes) in cattle from Vietnam. Parasite, 19(1):85–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]