Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Apr 4;30:105479. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105479

Experimental 3D fibre data for tissue papers applications

Flávia P Morais a,⁎⁎, Ana MMS Carta b, Maria E Amaral a, Joana MR Curto a,c,
PMCID: PMC7152708  PMID: 32300628

Abstract

Tissue paper consumption has been growing for the past years, with a forecasted increase in demand for premium products. Premium tissue paper products are obtained with a balance among softness, strength, and absorption properties, optimized for each kind of tissue paper. These properties are influenced by the three-dimensional structure, made from the spatial distribution of cellulose fibres. To our knowledge, the efforts made to date to improve the softness, strength and absorption properties have overlooked the 3D structure. There is an absence of 3D experimental data in the literature for the simultaneous characterization of individual eucalyptus fibres and the paper structure made from these fibres. The 2D fibre morphology determination, including fibre length and fibre width, was obtained by an image analysis method for pulp fibre suspensions, using the MorFi equipment. The third fibre dimension, the fibre thickness morphology in the out-of-plane direction, was obtained using SEM images of non-pressed isotropic laboratory-made paper sheets. The effective fibre thickness morphology, consisting of the fibre wall and lumen, was measured in the paper structure, as this is precisely the key fibre parameter, influencing not only the structure-related properties, such as paper thickness, bulk, and porosity, but also the final end-use properties. The paper structures were produced using an ISO standard adapted method, for tissue paper structures, without pressing, with a basis weight range from 20 to 150 g/m2. These data are important, among other possible uses, for paper property optimization and simulation studies with 3D fibre based simulators.

Keywords: 3D paper structure, Cellulose fibre, Eucalyptus fibre morphology, Effective fibre thickness, Tissue paper


Specifications table

Subject Materials Science (General)
Specific subject area Tissue Paper Materials
Type of data Tables and Figures
How data were acquired MorFi analyser, SEM analysis, ISO standards methods
Data format Raw and Analysed
Parameters for data collection Hardwood isotropic handsheets for different basis weights were obtained using an adaptation of the paper ISO standard (ISO 5269) without the pressing operation, adapted for tissue papers.
Description of data collection MorFi analysis was performed to determine the 2D fibre morphology of eucalyptus pulp fibre suspensions.
Modified ISO 5269 was used to produce isotropic paper handsheets, dried under tension at 23ªC and 50% humidity (ISO 187).
SEM image analysis was performed on paper laboratory-made handsheets to measure the fibre thickness morphology.
Paper thickness was measured using paper tissue standard (ISO 12625-3) in a conditioned room (ISO 187).
Mass determination was done at 23ªC and 50% humidity (ISO 187).
Data source location FibEnTech, University of Beira Interior (UBI), Covilhã, Portugal
RAIZ- Forest and Paper Research Institute, Eixo, Aveiro, Portugal
Data accessibility With the article

Value of the Data

  • The eucalyptus fibres and the paper structure 3D data are important for paper property optimization and simulation studies with 3D morphology fibre based simulators.

  • The data can be used in computational simulation studies to optimize the 3D paper structure-related properties.

  • The data is suitable for the calibration process of a computational model for 3D tissue paper [1,2].

  • The data is relevant in tissue paper materials research to obtain premium tissue paper materials.

1. Data

A compilation of 3D eucalyptus fibres experimental data, including the 2D fibres morphology characterization (around 15 million fibre per gram), is presented in this article. The 2D eucalyptus fibre morphology is available in Table 1. The key fibre dimension, the effective fibre thickness, was measured using SEM images of eucalyptus paper laboratory-made handsheets, obtained with an adaptation of the ISO standard 5269, without the pressing stage, to better represent tissue paper structure. The fibre thickness measurements, 322 measurements, were performed in nine images (Table 2; Fig. 1). Fig. 1 presents SEM images at different locations in the handsheet cross-section, where the fibre thickness is visible. These measurements were made along the entire handsheet cross-section using the vector placement method. All fibres were identified, numbered and measured, to ensure that each fibre was measured only once, without repetition. A systematic image analysis methodology approach was developed in order to identify the key features and image analysis criteria to obtain fibre thickness dimensions (wall thickness plus lumen) in the handsheet. An image fraction can only be used if it is representative of the original image. The criterium used to ensure the statistical representativeness is the threshold value for the number of fibres above which the mean value of a property becomes stable. Mass and thickness of eucalyptus handsheets for different basis weights are presented in Table 3.

Table 1.

2D fibres morphology analysis of eucalyptus pulp suspension using the fibre analyser MorFi.

R1 R2 R3 Mean Standard deviation
Fibres (million/g) 15.657 15.127 15.191 15.325 0.289
Length arithmetic (mm) 0.684 0.689 0.687 0.687 0.003
Length weighted in length (mm) 0.797 0.801 0.799 0.799 0.002
Width (µm) 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 0.0
Coarseness (mg/m) 0.0938 0.0965 0.0964 0.0956 0.0015
Kink angle (°) 128 128 128 128 0
Kinked fibres (%) 37.1 37.2 37.2 37.2 0.1
Curl (%) 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 0.0
Rate in length of MacroFibrills (%) 0.429 0.426 0.405 0.420 0.013
Broken Ends (%) 22.33 22.49 22.53 22.45 0.11
Fine elements (% in length) 43.2 44.9 44.2 44.1 0.9
Percentage of fine elements (% in area) 16.17 16.52 16.74 16.48 0.29

R = number of replicates (1, 2 and 3) used to perform the morphological assays

Table 2.

Measurements of the third fibre dimension, the effective fibre thickness in the isotropic handsheet cross-section of the SEM images.

N Fibre Thickness (µm) N Fibre Thickness (µm) N Fibre Thickness (µm)
1 1.061 108 3.085 215 4.278
2 1.186 109 3.085 216 4.363
3 1.186 110 3.085 217 4.376
4 1.210 111 3.094 218 4.414
5 1.210 112 3.094 219 4.414
6 1.278 113 3.094 220 4.414
7 1.384 114 3.121 221 4.458
8 1.424 115 3.121 222 4.458
9 1.443 116 3.121 223 4.477
10 1.501 117 3.166 224 4.477
11 1.661 118 3.166 225 4.477
12 1.678 119 3.192 226 4.502
13 1.711 120 3.192 227 4.509
14 1.853 121 3.192 228 4.509
15 1.853 122 3.228 229 4.515
16 1.853 123 3.297 230 4.515
17 1.898 124 3.297 231 4.515
18 1.898 125 3.305 232 4.515
19 1.913 126 3.305 233 4.534
20 1.913 127 3.305 234 4.564
21 1.913 128 3.356 235 4.583
22 1.913 129 3.373 236 4.583
23 1.913 130 3.373 237 4.607
24 1.913 131 3.398 238 4.607
25 2.014 132 3.422 239 4.662
26 2.014 133 3.455 240 4.680
27 2.027 134 3.455 241 4.746
28 2.027 135 3.504 242 4.746
29 2.027 136 3.504 243 4.746
30 2.027 137 3.504 244 4.775
31 2.027 138 3.528 245 4.775
32 2.041 139 3.528 246 4.805
33 2.041 140 3.528 247 4.805
34 2.149 141 3.528 248 4.869
35 2.239 142 3.528 249 4.886
36 2.251 143 3.559 250 4.886
37 2.251 144 3.559 251 4.892
38 2.337 145 3.559 252 4.892
39 2.349 146 3.559 253 4.938
40 2.349 147 3.559 254 4.955
41 2.373 148 3.559 255 4.989
42 2.373 149 3.559 256 4.989
43 2.443 150 3.567 257 4.989
44 2.443 151 3.614 258 5.006
45 2.443 152 3.614 259 5.028
46 2.443 153 3.622 260 5.034
47 2.443 154 3.622 261 5.204
48 2.477 155 3.622 262 5.210
49 2.477 156 3.622 263 5.221
50 2.477 157 3.630 264 5.242
51 2.522 158 3.630 265 5.253
52 2.522 159 3.630 266 5.269
53 2.522 160 3.630 267 5.269
54 2.522 161 3.684 268 5.306
55 2.522 162 3.691 269 5.354
56 2.556 163 3.707 270 5.380
57 2.556 164 3.707 271 5.411
58 2.556 165 3.707 272 5.416
59 2.556 166 3.707 273 5.422
60 2.567 167 3.752 274 5.463
61 2.567 168 3.752 275 5.463
62 2.621 169 3.797 276 5.519
63 2.621 170 3.804 277 5.540
64 2.621 171 3.826 278 5.640
65 2.621 172 3.826 279 5.695
66 2.653 173 3.834 280 5.700
67 2.653 174 3.834 281 5.715
68 2.653 175 3.863 282 5.715
69 2.706 176 3.892 283 5.715
70 2.706 177 3.892 284 5.715
71 2.706 178 3.892 285 5.735
72 2.706 179 3.892 286 5.774
73 2.706 180 3.914 287 5.779
74 2.706 181 3.949 288 5.793
75 2.767 182 3.949 289 5.837
76 2.767 183 3.949 290 5.870
77 2.767 184 3.949 291 5.932
78 2.767 185 3.978 292 5.932
79 2.767 186 3.978 293 5.937
80 2.777 187 3.978 294 5.989
81 2.777 188 4.034 295 6.050
82 2.848 189 4.034 296 6.050
83 2.848 190 4.034 297 6.050
84 2.857 191 4.041 298 6.064
85 2.857 192 4.041 299 6.124
86 2.857 193 4.041 300 6.188
87 2.857 194 4.041 301 6.211
88 2.857 195 4.041 302 6.211
89 2.867 196 4.041 303 6.318
90 2.897 197 4.041 304 6.367
91 2.897 198 4.083 305 6.425
92 2.897 199 4.083 306 6.563
93 2.935 200 4.096 307 6.649
94 2.935 201 4.144 308 6.882
95 2.935 202 4.151 309 6.979
96 2.973 203 4.151 310 7.356
97 2.973 204 4.198 311 7.356
98 2.973 205 4.198 312 7.360
99 3.002 206 4.198 313 7.582
100 3.002 207 4.205 314 8.072
101 3.002 208 4.245 315 8.546
102 3.002 209 4.245 316 8.546
103 3.020 210 4.245 317 8.546
104 3.020 211 4.271 318 8.595
105 3.039 212 4.278 319 9.255
106 3.039 213 4.278 320 9.255
107 3.039 214 4.278 321 9.267
322 10.939

N = number of fibre measurements using the different SEM images

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Out-of-plane handsheets SEM images cross-section (z direction) were taken scanning the paper structure from left to right (x direction) with the same depth (Y direction). Measurements of 322 fibre thicknesses (Table 2) were performed in nine SEM images. The vectors used to measure each fibre thickness are visible in each SEM image. The cross-section (a) represents the measurements of 1–20 fibre’ thickness described in Table 2; (b) of 21–41; (c) of 42–73; (d) of 74–103; (e) of 104–138; (f) of 139–174; (g) of 175–219; (h) of 220–264; and (i) of 265–322.

Table 3.

Mass and thickness (tissue ISO 12625–3) of laboratory isotropic handsheets (adaptation of ISO 5629, without pressing) made from Kraft pulp eucalyptus fibres in a conditioned room at 23ªC and 50% humidity (ISO 187) with basis weights in the range of 20–150 g/m2.

10 handsheets average Eucalyptus handsheets basis weights (g/m2)
21.1 42.4 63.9 87.0 109.1 129.0 150.9
Mass (g) 0.437 0.911 1.354 1.862 2.323 2.747 3.254
Mass (g) 0.444 0.911 1.369 1.864 2.343 2.764 3.238
Mass (g) 0.456 0.911 1.337 1.870 2.350 2.745 3.242
Mass (g) 0.458 0.912 1.364 1.878 2.344 2.725 3.252
Mass (g) 0.468 0.902 1.370 1.925 2.289 2.730 3.187
Mass (g) 0.452 0.907 1.378 1.880 2.350 2.774 3.172
Mass (g) 0.441 0.883 1.368 1.858 2.339 2.748 3.227
Mass (g) 0.461 1.022 1.376 1.802 2.308 2.756 3.242
Mass (g) 0.465 0.740 1.381 1.841 2.339 2.817 3.227
Mass (g) 0.437 0.968 1.374 1.830 2.347 2.773 3.218
Thickness 1 (µm) 109 175 269 323 422 492 613
Thickness 2 (µm) 104 174 265 309 425 459 544
Thickness 3 (µm) 113 185 257 326 408 474 573
Thickness 4 (µm) 104 185 258 341 409 512 540
Thickness 5 (µm) 113 176 247 315 419 496 593
Thickness 6 (µm) 112 181 238 328 405 475 517
Thickness7 (µm) 107 168 233 312 416 484 566
Thickness 8 (µm) 110 191 239 313 427 474 549
Thickness 9 (µm) 115 157 228 323 427 497 566
Thickness 10 (µm) 111 195 235 322 416 494 568

Commercial tissue products, such as napkins, toilet papers, towels papers, facial papers, have total paper thicknesses between 50 and 90 µm, for basis weight between 16 and 22 g/m2 [3]. These materials are usually produced with an arrangement of one to five individual paper sheets (or more), increasing their basis weight and thickness. Therefore, a variety of thickness and basis weight data of isotropic handsheets that mimic tissue papers (without the pressing operation) is considered a highly relevant subject of research.

The analysis of these different 3D fibres data of tissue paper has great relevance, for example, for a computational calibration process of heterogeneous material models, required for the identification of problems and evaluation of possible optimization solutions for these premium papers. The analysis of this data is performed as follows:

  • 1.

    The morphological properties of the eucalyptus pulp fibres were analysed, using a fibre analyser (MorFi);

  • 2.

    The unpressed isotropic handsheets were produced with a basis weights range of 20 to 151 g/m2, using an adaptation of an ISO standard;

  • 3.

    The fibre thickness morphology (wall thickness plus lumen) in handsheet cross-section was analysed, using the vector placement method in the SEM images (fibres morphological analysis is essential to promote more real computational representations);

  • 4.

    The ticknesses (out-of-plane paper dimension) and basis weights of isotropic handsheets were measured, according to a tissue ISO standard (these measurements are essential to understand and quantify the structural changes in the paper).

  • 5.

    From these data, an analysis of the structures’ apparent density can be made, being related to the structures’ effective porosity [4].

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Pulp samples

A kraft bleached eucalyptus pulp was selected. Laboratory isotropic handsheets were produced from an adaptation of ISO 5269-1 (without the pressing process), to mimic tissue paper materials. A sheet former with a circular shape surface of 0.02138 m2 was used to made handsheets with different basis weights (between 20 and 151 g m−2) with replicates of 10 times. The samples were conditioned at 23 ± 1°C and 50 ± 2% relative humidity, according to ISO 187.

2.2. Fibres properties analysis

2.2.1. MorFi analysis

The pulp sample was disintegrated according to ISO 5263. Diluted suspensions of 20 mg L−1 was tested using a MorFi equipment, to obtain the biometric and morphological properties of eucalyptus kraft bleached pulp. This equipment includes a digital camera and 2D image analysis software for the automatic measurement of suspended fibres. The assays were performed in triplicate.

2.2.2. Fibre thickness morphology analysis

The morphology of each effective fibre thickness (wall thickness plus lumen) was evaluated by SEM (Hitachi S2700, with a Bruker detector operating at +20 kV and different magnifications). Previously, the handsheet samples were cuted transversely and placed on an aluminum support with double-side adhesive tape, so that the plane in the handsheet z-direction was analysed. Then, the samples were gold plated using a Sputter Quorum Q 15 OR ES equipment. Throughout this cross-section it was possible to measure 322 fibre thicknesses, using the vector placement method.

2.3. Paper properties analysis

Basis weight or grammage is the mass per unit area (g/m2) is the structure property of the paper. The paper handsheet thickness was determined using a micrometre (FRANK-PTI GMBH, Birkenau, Germany), according to ISO 1262-3, for tissue paper.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Project InPaCTus – Innovative Products and Technologies from eucalyptus. Project N° 21 874 funded by Portugal 2020 through European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the frame of COMPETE 2020 n° 246/AXIS II/2017.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105479.

Contributor Information

Flávia P. Morais, Email: flavia.morais@ubi.pt.

Joana M.R. Curto, Email: jmrc@ubi.pt.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (367B, xml)

References

  • 1.Conceição E.L.T., Curto J.M.R., Simões R.M.S., Portugal A.T.G. Coding a Simulation Model of the 3D Structure of Paper. In: Barneva R.P., Brimkov V.E., Hauptman H.A., Natal Jorge R.M., Tavares J.M.R.S., editors. Computational Modeling of Objects Represented in Images, CompIMAGE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2010. pp. 299–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Curto J.M.R., Conceição E.L.T., Portugal A.T.G., Simões R.M.S. Three dimensional modelling of fibrous materials and experimental validation. Mat. Wiss. u.Werkstofftech. 2011;42:370–374. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tutuş A., Çiçekler M., Çali A. Tissue Papers in Turkey and Some Physical and Optical Properties. J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2016;20:98–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.W.W. Sampson, The structural characterisation of fibre networks in papermaking processes - A review, in: C.F. Baker (Ed.), The Science of Papermaking, Oxford, 2001, pp. 1205-1288.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (367B, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES