Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2020 Apr;158(5):1300–1312.e20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.020

Circulating Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 and Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 Associate With Risk of Colorectal Cancer Based on Serologic and Mendelian Randomization Analyses

Neil Murphy 1,, Robert Carreras-Torres 2, Mingyang Song 3,4,5,6, Andrew T Chan 3,4,7, Richard M Martin 8,9,10, Nikos Papadimitriou 1, Niki Dimou 1, Konstantinos K Tsilidis 11,12, Barbara Banbury 13, Kathryn E Bradbury 14, Jelena Besevic 12, Sabina Rinaldi 1, Elio Riboli 12, Amanda J Cross 12, Ruth C Travis 15, Claudia Agnoli 16, Demetrius Albanes 17, Sonja I Berndt 17, Stéphane Bézieau 18, D Timothy Bishop 19, Hermann Brenner 20,21,22, Daniel D Buchanan 23,24,25, N Charlotte Onland-Moret 26, Andrea Burnett-Hartman 27, Peter T Campbell 28, Graham Casey 29, Sergi Castellví-Bel 30, Jenny Chang-Claude 31, María-Dolores Chirlaque 32,33, Albert de la Chapelle 34, Dallas English 35,36, Jane C Figueiredo 37, Steven J Gallinger 38, Graham G Giles 35,36,39, Stephen B Gruber 40, Andrea Gsur 41, Jochen Hampe 42, Heather Hampel 43, Tabitha A Harrison 13, Michael Hoffmeister 20, Li Hsu 13,44, Wen-Yi Huang 17, Jeroen R Huyghe 13, Mark A Jenkins 36, Temitope O Keku 45, Tilman Kühn 31, Sun-Seog Kweon 46,47, Loic Le Marchand 48, Christopher I Li 13, Li Li 49, Annika Lindblom 50,51, Vicente Martín 33,52, Roger L Milne 35,36,39, Victor Moreno 2,33,53, Polly A Newcomb 13,54, Kenneth Offit 55,56, Shuji Ogino 5,57,58,59, Jennifer Ose 60, Vittorio Perduca 61,62,63, Amanda I Phipps 13,64, Elizabeth A Platz 65, John D Potter 13,66, Conghui Qu 13, Gad Rennert 67,68, Lori C Sakoda 13,69, Clemens Schafmayer 70, Robert E Schoen 71, Martha L Slattery 72, Catherine M Tangen 73, Cornelia M Ulrich 60, Franzel JB van Duijnhoven 74, Bethany Van Guelpen 75,76, Kala Visvanathan 65, Pavel Vodicka 77,78,79, Ludmila Vodickova 77,78,79, Veronika Vymetalkova 77,78,79, Hansong Wang 48, Emily White 13,64, Alicja Wolk 80, Michael O Woods 81, Anna H Wu 82, Wei Zheng 83, Ulrike Peters 13,64, Marc J Gunter 1
PMCID: PMC7152801  PMID: 31884074

Abstract

Background & Aims

Human studies examining associations between circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and colorectal cancer risk have reported inconsistent results. We conducted complementary serologic and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to determine whether alterations in circulating levels of IGF1 or IGFBP3 are associated with colorectal cancer development.

Methods

Serum levels of IGF1 were measured in blood samples collected from 397,380 participants from the UK Biobank, from 2006 through 2010. Incident cancer cases and cancer cases recorded first in death certificates were identified through linkage to national cancer and death registries. Complete follow-up was available through March 31, 2016. For the MR analyses, we identified genetic variants associated with circulating levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3. The association of these genetic variants with colorectal cancer was examined with 2-sample MR methods using genome-wide association study consortia data (52,865 cases with colorectal cancer and 46,287 individuals without [controls])

Results

After a median follow-up period of 7.1 years, 2665 cases of colorectal cancer were recorded. In a multivariable-adjusted model, circulating level of IGF1 associated with colorectal cancer risk (hazard ratio per 1 standard deviation increment of IGF1, 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.17). Similar associations were found by sex, follow-up time, and tumor subsite. In the MR analyses, a 1 standard deviation increment in IGF1 level, predicted based on genetic factors, was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer risk (odds ratio 1.08; 95% CI 1.03–1.12; P = 3.3 × 10–4). Level of IGFBP3, predicted based on genetic factors, was associated with colorectal cancer risk (odds ratio per 1 standard deviation increment, 1.12; 95% CI 1.06–1.18; P = 4.2 × 10–5). Colorectal cancer risk was associated with only 1 variant in the IGFBP3 gene region (rs11977526), which also associated with anthropometric traits and circulating level of IGF2.

Conclusions

In an analysis of blood samples from almost 400,000 participants in the UK Biobank, we found an association between circulating level of IGF1 and colorectal cancer. Using genetic data from 52,865 cases with colorectal cancer and 46,287 controls, a higher level of IGF1, determined by genetic factors, was associated with colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to determine how this signaling pathway might contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis.

Keywords: CRC, Risk Factors, Signal Transduction, GWAS

Abbreviations used in this paper: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; HbA1c, glycolated hemoglobin; HR, hazard ratio; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGFBP3, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3; MR, Mendelian randomization; MR-PRESSO, Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


What You Need to Know.

Background and Context

Human studies examining associations between circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and colorectal cancer risk have reported inconsistent results

New Findings

In an analysis of blood samples from almost 400,000 participants in the UK Biobank, we found an association between circulating level of IGF1 and colorectal cancer. Using genetic data on 52,865 persons with colorectal cancer and 46,287 persons without, a higher level of IGF1, determined by genetic factors, was also associated with colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to determine how this signaling pathway might contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis.

Limitations

This is an association study between measured and genetically determined blood levels of proteins and cancer incidence.

Impact

Changes in IGF signaling might contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis, but further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms of this process.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) has mitogenic and anti-apoptotic effects and has been implicated in the development and progression of several cancers.1,2 The bioactivity of IGF1 is partially regulated through insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs-), with approximately 80% bound to IGFBP3.3 In addition to its IGF-binding properties, IGFBP3 also has been shown to exhibit direct antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects.4,5 Multiple epidemiological studies have investigated the associations of circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels with colorectal cancer risk.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 However, most of these studies were of relatively small size (<500 colorectal cancer cases) and reported inconsistent results. As such, there is currently a lack of consensus as to whether higher circulating levels of IGF1 and lower levels of IGFBP3 are risk factors for colorectal cancer.

To address this, we conducted complementary serologic and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to examine the role of circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 in colorectal cancer development. We investigated how prediagnostic circulating levels of IGF1 are related to colorectal cancer risk in the UK Biobank study, a large prospective cohort. We then used a 2-sample MR approach to obtain causal estimates of the associations by combining genetic variants associated with circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and then assessing the association of these variants with colorectal cancer risk in a large consortium of 52,865 colorectal cancer cases and 46,287 controls.15

Methods

UK Biobank: Serologic Analysis

Study participants

The UK Biobank is a prospective cohort study that aims to investigate the genetic, lifestyle, and environmental causes of a range of diseases.16,17 This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 25897. Between 2006 and 2010, 502,656 adults aged between 40 and 69 years (229,182 men and 273,474 women) were recruited. All participants were registered with the UK National Health Service and lived within approximately 25 miles (40 km) of 1 of the 22 study assessment centers. The UK Biobank invited approximately 9.2 million people to participate through postal invitation with a telephone follow-up, with a response rate of 5.7%. The UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee, the National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care in England and Wales, and the Community Health Index Advisory Group in Scotland. In addition, an independent Ethics and Governance Council was formed in 2004 to oversee the UK Biobank’s continuous adherence to the Ethics and Governance Framework that was developed for the study (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ethics/). All participants provided written informed consent. During the baseline recruitment visit, participants were asked to complete a self-administered touchscreen questionnaire, which included questions on sociodemographics (including age, sex, education, and Townsend deprivation score), health and medical history, lifestyle exposures (including smoking habits, dietary intakes, and alcohol consumption), early life exposures, and medication use. At the baseline visit, participants also underwent physical measurements, including body weight, height, and waist circumference. Blood samples were collected from all participants at recruitment and from a subset of approximately 20,000 participants who re-attended the assessment center between 2012 and 2013 for a repeat assessment visit. Blood samples were labeled, centrifuged, and stored at −80°C.

Exclusions before the onset of analyses were participants with prevalent cancer at recruitment (n = 27,264); missing data on body size measurements (n = 3032); prevalent type-2 diabetes or unknown diabetes status at recruitment (as diabetes medications can affect circulating levels of IGF proteins18; n = 26,698); those who reported oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone use at recruitment (as oral estrogens exert a strong first-pass effect on the liver that alters hepatic protein production and changes circulating levels of multiple hormones, including IGF-system markers18; n = 19,802); and participants without an IGF1 measurement (n = 28,480). Our analysis therefore included 397,380 participants.

Blood collection and laboratory methods

As part of the UK Biobank Biomarker Project,19 serum levels of IGF1 (DiaSorin Liaison XL), testosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (all Beckman Coulter DXI 800) were determined by a chemiluminescent immunoassay. The Immuno-turbidimetric method (Beckman Coulter DXI 800) was used to assay serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were determined using the high-performance liquid chromatography Variant II Turbo 2.0 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Full details on assay performance have been published.19 In summary, average within-laboratory (total) coefficient of variation for low, medium, and high internal quality control level samples for each biomarker ranged from 1.7% to 15.3% (for IGF1, the coefficients of variation ranged from 5.3% to 6.2%).19 A total of 16,357 participants had IGF1 levels measured in blood samples collected at both the recruitment and repeat assessment visit (median of 4 years apart).

Assessment of outcome

Incident cancer cases and cancer cases recorded first in death certificates within the UK Biobank cohort were identified through linkage to national cancer and death registries. Complete follow-up was available through March 31, 2016, for England and Wales and October 31, 2015, for Scotland. Cancer incidence data were coded using the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Proximal colon cancers included those found within the cecum, appendix, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, and splenic flexure (C18.0–18.5). Distal colon cancers included those found within the descending (C18.6) and sigmoid (C18.7) colon. Overlapping (C18.8) and unspecified (C18.9) lesions of the colon were included in colon cancers only. Cancer of the rectum included cancers occurring at the recto-sigmoid junction (C19) and rectum (C20).

Statistical analysis

To assess reproducibility between the 2 measurements of IGF1 available in a subsample of participants, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) by dividing the between-person variance by the sum of the between-person and within-person variances.

Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Age was the primary time variable in all models. Time at entry was age at recruitment. Exit time was age at whichever of the following came first: colorectal cancer diagnosis, death, or the last date at which follow-up was considered complete. Models were stratified by age at recruitment in 5-year categories, Townsend deprivation index quintiles, and region of the recruitment assessment centre. Deviations from proportionality were assessed using an analysis of Schoenfeld residuals,20 with no evidence of nonproportionality detected. IGF1 was modeled on the continuous scale (per 1-standard deviation [SD] increment of log-IGF1) and with participants grouped into sex-specific quintiles of circulating levels. Continuous scale models were additionally corrected for regression dilution using regression dilution ratios obtained from participants with repeated IGF1 measurement.21,22 To obtain corrected HRs, the log HRs and their standard errors were divided by the regression dilution ratio for IGF1 (0.76) and then exponentiated.23

The multivariable model (model 1) was adjusted for a set of a priori–determined colorectal cancer risk factors, namely waist circumference, total physical activity, height, alcohol consumption frequency, smoking status and intensity, frequency of red and processed meat consumption, family history of colorectal cancer, educational level, regular aspirin/ibuprofen use, and ever use of hormone replacement therapy. We also additionally adjusted the multivariable models (model 2) for markers of inflammation, sex hormones, and glycemic pathways that are known to interrelate/cross talk with IGF-system markers,18 and have been linked to colorectal cancer risk in some studies,24, 25, 26, 27 namely CRP, testosterone, SHBG, and HbA1c. Statistical tests for trend were calculated using the ordinal quintile IGF1 entered into the model as a continuous variable. Analyses were also conducted by sex and anatomic subsite (colon, proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancer). Heterogeneity of associations by sex and across subsite was assessed by calculating χ2 statistics. Possible nonlinear effects were modeled using restricted cubic spline models with 5 knots placed at Harrell’s default percentiles of circulating IGF1 levels.28

The associations between circulating IGF1 and colorectal cancer were further assessed across subgroups of body mass index (BMI; <25, ≥25 kg/m2), height (below or above median), age at recruitment (<60 years, ≥60 years), follow-up time (<5 years, ≥5 years), smoking status (never, former, current), and circulating levels (below or above median) of CRP, HbA1c, testosterone, and SHBG. Interaction terms (multiplicative scale) between these variables and circulating IGF1 levels were included in separate models and the statistical significance of the cross-product terms were evaluated using the likelihood ratio test. In a sensitivity analysis, we excluded those participants with circulating levels of HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (or 6.5%, the cutoff for type-2 diabetes).

Statistical tests were all 2-sided and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Mendelian Randomization

We conducted 2-sample MR analyses, in which 2 different independent study samples (GWAS) were used to estimate the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-risk factor (circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels) and SNP-outcome (colorectal cancer) associations to allow causal effect estimates of risk factor-outcome association to be obtained.

Genetic determinants of IGF1 and IGFBP3

Genetic markers for circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels comprised SNPs that were identified (P <5 × 10–8) from the largest GWAS to date.29,30 For IGF1, this GWAS was of 358,072 participants from the UK Biobank.29 The GWAS analyses of IGFBP3 combined data on 18,995 individuals from 13 studies.30 All participants were of European ancestry. From the genome-wide significant variants identified in these GWAS, we excluded correlated SNPs based on a linkage disequilibrium level of R2 < 0.01. Consequently, the instruments for IGF1 (413 SNPs spanning 22 autosomes) and IGFBP3 (4 SNPs spanning 3 autosomes) explained 9.4% (F-statistic 89.9) and 6.1% (F-statistic 308.4) of variability in circulating levels, respectively. Summary information on the genetic instruments and the effect estimates for each individual SNP regarding their association with IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels are presented in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Data on colorectal cancer

Summary data for the associations of the IGF1- and IGFBP3-related genetic variants with colorectal cancer were obtained from a GWAS of 99,152 participants (52,865 colorectal cancer cases and 46,287 controls). The GWAS data were from a meta-analysis within the ColoRectal Transdisciplinary Study, the Colon Cancer Family Registry, and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer consortium.15 Imputation was performed using the Haplotype Reference Consortium r1.0 reference panel and the regression models were further adjusted for age, sex, genotyping platform (whenever appropriate), and genomic principal components as detailed here.31 Strength-of-association estimates for each individual SNP with colorectal cancer are presented in Supplementary Table 2.

Statistical power

The a priori statistical power was calculated using an online tool at http://cnsgenomics.com/shiny/mRnd/.32 Given a type 1 error of 5%, we had sufficient power (>80%) to detect an odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD for colorectal cancer risk of ≤0.94/≥1.06 for IGF1 and ≤0.93/≥1.08 for IGFBP3.

Statistical analysis

A 2-sample MR approach using summary data and a likelihood-based approach was implemented. Likelihood-based MR analyses are considered the most accurate method to estimate causal effects when there is a continuous log-linear association between risk factor and disease risk. The causal estimate of X on Y(β), assumed to be the same for all genetic variants (k), is obtained from the likelihood function of the following model33,34:

XkN(ξk,σXk2)
YkN(βLξk,σYk2)fork=1,.,K.

MR results correspond to an OR per 1-SD increment in genetically predicted circulating levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3. Heterogeneity of associations by sex and across colorectal anatomic subsites was assessed by calculating χ2 statistics. Cochran’s Q statistics quantified heterogeneity across the individual SNPs. Sensitivity analyses were used to check and correct for the presence of pleiotropy in the causal estimates. To evaluate the extent to which directional pleiotropy (nonbalanced horizontal pleiotropy in the MR risk estimates) may have affected the causal estimates for the IGF1 and colorectal cancer association, we used an MR-Egger regression approach.35 We also computed OR estimates using the complementary weighted-median method that can give valid MR estimates under the presence of horizontal pleiotropy when up to 50% of the included instruments are invalid.36 The MR-PRESSO (Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier) distortion test was used to estimate if horizontal pleiotropy caused by any identified outlier SNPs biased the effect estimates (P < .05).37 As a visual evaluation of pleiotropy, we also provided funnel plots depicting the weight exerted on the effect estimate along the y-axis and estimates of the effect on colorectal cancer along the x-axis for each SNP used in the corresponding instrumental variable. For the IGFBP3 instrument that had 4 SNPs, we conducted leave-one-out analyses to assess the influence of individual variants on the observed associations.

Results

UK Biobank: Serologic Analysis

After a median follow-up time of 7.1 years, 2665 cases of colorectal cancer (1539 in men and 1126 in women) were recorded. Compared with those in the lowest quintile, participants in the highest circulating IGF1 quintile were younger, taller, had lower BMI and waist circumference, were more likely to be never smokers, and less likely to be daily or almost daily consumers of alcohol and to be regular aspirin/ibuprofen users (Table 1). In addition, participants in the highest circulating IGF1 quintile had lower circulating CRP, testosterone, SHBG, and HbA1c levels.

Table 1.

Characteristics of UK Biobank Study Participants by Category of Circulating IGF1 levels (n = 397,380 participants

Baseline characteristic IGF1 levels
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
IGF1, nmol/La 14.3 (2.2) 18.6 (1.1) 21.4 (0.9) 24.1 (1.0) 29.5 (3.9)
Colorectal cancer (n cases) 595 586 528 475 481
Age at recruitment, ya 59.1 (7.2) 57.6 (7.6) 56.3 (7.9) 55.1 (8.2) 53.2 (8.3)
Women (%) 55.5 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5
Body mass index (kg/m2)a 28.3 (5.4) 27.4 (4.7) 27.1 (4.4) 26.8 (4.2) 26.6 (4.0)
Waist circumference (cm)a 92.7 (14.2) 90.4 (13.1) 89.5 (12.7) 88.9 (12.4) 88.2 (12.2)
Height (cm)a 167.7 (9.2) 168.4 (9.3) 168.9 (9.3) 169.2 (9.3) 169.8 (9.3)
Total physical activity (MET hours per wk) (%)
<10 23.8 21.8 21.1 21.2 21.0
≥60 22.8 23.1 22.7 22.1 21.3
Smoking status (%)
Never 50.3 53.3 55.5 57.2 59.5
Current 11.8 10.9 10.2 10 9.8
Alcohol consumption (%)
Never 9.7 7.4 6.9 6.6 6.7
Daily or almost daily 24.2 22.7 21.4 19.4 16.2
Socioeconomic status (Townsend deprivation index) (%)
Highest quintile 22.2 19.2 18 18 17.8
Family history (first degree relative) of colorectal cancer (%)
Yes 11.5 11.2 10.7 10.5 10.1
Regular aspirin/ibuprofen use (%)
Yes 26.8 25.6 24.8 24.8 24.8
Red and processed meat (%)
<1 occasion per week 10.3 10 9.9 9.9 10.2
≥3 occasions per week 23.4 22.3 21.8 21.2 20.7
Ever menopausal hormone use (%)b
Yes 43.8 38.1 33.8 30 24.9
CRP (mg/L)a 3.4 (5.1) 2.6 (4.1) 2.3 (3.8) 2.1 (3.7) 1.8 (3.8)
Testosterone (nmol/L)a 7.0 (6.3) 6.9 (6.2) 6.8 (6.1) 6.7 (6.1) 6.6 (6.0)
SHBG (nmol/L)a 55.4 (28.6) 52.2 (25.8) 50.5 (24.9) 49.1 (24.2) 46.5 (23.3)
HbA1c (mmol/mol)a 35.9 (5.3) 35.4 (4.5) 35.1 (4.4) 34.9 (4.2) 34.7 (4.5)

MET, metabolic equivalents.

a

Mean and SD.

b

Among women only.

The reproducibility (ICC) of IGF1 levels measured at both the recruitment and repeat assessment visit (n = 16,357 participants; median of 4 years apart) was 0.78 (95% CI 0.77–0.79).

Association between circulating IGF1 levels and colorectal cancer risk

For men and women combined, higher circulating IGF1 levels were associated with elevated colorectal cancer risk in the multivariable models (model 1, HR comparing quintile 5 vs 1 [q5 – q1] = 1.24, 95% CI 1.10–1.40; P-trend = .006) (Table 2). This positive association strengthened after additional adjustment for circulating levels of CRP, HbA1c, testosterone, and SHBG (model 2, HR[q5 – q1] = 1.34, 95% CI 1.18–1.52; P-trend < 0.0001). In the restricted cubic spline model, no deviation from linearity for the relationship between IGF1 and colorectal cancer was observed (P-nonlinear = 0.91). In the continuous multivariable model 2, adjusted for circulating levels of CRP, HbA1c, testosterone, and SHBG, a 1-SD increment of IGF1 was associated with an 8% higher colorectal cancer risk (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.04–1.13). Correction for regression dilution resulted in a stronger positive association (HR per 1-SD increment of IGF1, HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05–1.17) (Table 2; Figure 1). Similar magnitude positive associations were found for men and women (P-heterogeneity = .1), and across anatomic subsites (colon vs rectal, P-heterogeneity = 1; proximal colon vs distal colon, P-heterogeneity = 0.8) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk (HRs) of Colorectal Cancer Associated With Circulating IGF1 Levels in the UK Biobank

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P-trend HR per 1-SD increment HR per 1-SD increment (adjusted)a
Quintile cutpoints (nmol/L)
 Men <17.6 17.6-<20.6 20.6-<23.1 23.1-<26.1 ≥26.1
 Women <16.3 16.3-<19.5 19.5-<22.3 22.3-<25.5 ≥25.5
Colorectal cancer
Both sexes
 n cases 595 586 528 475 481
 Model 1 1 1.11 (0.99–1.24) 1.09 (0.97–1.23) 1.07 (0.95–1.21) 1.24 (1.10–1.40) 0.006 1.05 (1.01–1.10) 1.07 (1.02–1.13)
 Model 2 1 1.14 (1.01–1.28) 1.14 (1.01–1.28) 1.14 (1.00–1.29) 1.34 (1.18–1.52) <0.0001 1.08 (1.04–1.13) 1.11 (1.05–1.17)
Men
 Model 2 1 1.09 (0.94–1.27) 1.09 (0.93–1.27) 1.09 (0.93–1.28) 1.29 (1.09–1.51) 0.009 1.06 (1.01–1.12) 1.09 (1.01–1.17)
Women
 Model 2 1 1.20 (1.01–1.44) 1.21 (1.00–1.45) 1.20 (0.99–1.46) 1.41 (1.15–1.72) 0.003 1.11 (1.04–1.18) 1.14 (1.05–1.24)
Colon cancer
Both sexes
 n cases 411 378 342 306 322
 Model 1 1 1.05 (0.91–1.21) 1.04 (0.90–1.20) 1.02 (0.88–1.19) 1.24 (1.06–1.44) 0.03 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 1.07 (1.00–1.14)
 Model 2 1 1.08 (0.94–1.25) 1.09 (0.94–1.26) 1.09 (0.94–1.27) 1.35 (1.16–1.57) 0.001 1.09 (1.03–1.14) 1.11 (1.04–1.19)
Men
 Model 2 1 1.07 (0.88–1.29) 1.05 (0.86–1.28) 1.09 (0.88–1.34) 1.28 (1.04–1.57) 0.04 1.07 (1.00–1.14) 1.09 (0.99–1.19)
Women
 Model 2 1 1.10 (0.89–1.35) 1.13 (0.91–1.40) 1.09 (0.87–1.37) 1.42 (1.13–1.78) 0.01 1.10 (1.02–1.18) 1.13 (1.03–1.24)
Proximal colon cancer
Both sexes
 n cases 209 210 189 140 159
 Model 1 1 1.15 (0.95–1.39) 1.13 (0.93–1.38) 0.93 (0.75–1.16) 1.23 (1.00–1.52) 0.37 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 1.05 (0.96–1.15)
 Model 2 1 1.19 (0.98–1.45) 1.20 (0.98–1.47) 1.01 (0.81–1.26) 1.36 (1.10–1.69) 0.07 1.08 (1.00–1.15) 1.10 (1.01–1.21)
Men
 Model 2 1 1.18 (0.90–1.55) 1.05 (0.79–1.40) 0.99 (0.73–1.34) 1.27 (0.94–1.71) 0.4 1.06 (0.96–1.17) 1.07 (0.94–1.22)
Women
 Model 2 1 1.19 (0.90–1.58) 1.35 (1.02–1.79) 1.00 (0.73–1.39) 1.45 (1.05–1.99) 0.11 1.09 (0.99–1.20) 1.12 (0.98–1.27)
Distal colon cancer
Both sexes
 n cases 181 151 141 152 145
 Model 1 1 0.95 (0.77–1.18) 0.98 (0.78–1.22) 1.15 (0.92–1.44) 1.24 (0.99–1.55) 0.03 1.06 (0.99–1.15) 1.09 (0.99–1.20)
 Model 2 1 0.97 (0.78–1.21) 1.01 (0.81–1.27) 1.21 (0.97–1.51) 1.32 (1.05–1.67) 0.005 1.09 (1.01–1.18) 1.12 (1.01–1.24)
Men
 Model 2 1 0.99 (0.74–1.32) 1.06 (0.79–1.42) 1.21 (0.90–1.62) 1.21 (0.89–1.65) 0.1 1.05 (0.95–1.17) 1.07 (0.94–1.23)
Women
 Model 2 1 0.95 (0.68–1.34) 0.97 (0.68–1.38) 1.21 (0.85–1.71) 1.47 (1.03–2.09) 0.02 1.13 (1.01–1.27) 1.18 (1.01–1.37)
Rectal cancer
Both sexes
 n cases 184 208 186 169 159
 Model 1 1 1.23 (1.01–1.51) 1.20 (0.98–1.48) 1.18 (0.95–1.46) 1.26 (1.01–1.56) 0.09 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 1.08 (0.99–1.18)
 Model 2 1 1.26 (1.03–1.54) 1.24 (1.01–1.53) 1.23 (0.99–1.53) 1.33 (1.06–1.66) 0.03 1.08 (1.01–1.16) 1.11 (1.01–1.22)
Men
 Model 2 1 1.13 (0.89–1.44) 1.15 (0.90–1.48) 1.09 (0.84–1.42) 1.30 (1.00–1.69) 0.11 1.06 (0.97–1.16) 1.08 (0.96–1.21)
Women
 Model 2 1 1.58 (1.11–2.26) 1.48 (1.02–2.15) 1.58 (1.08–2.32) 1.43 (0.94–2.16) 0.12 1.13 (1.00–1.28) 1.18 (1.00–1.38)

NOTE. Model 1: Multivariable Cox regression model using age as the underlying time variable and stratified by sex, Townsend deprivation index (quintiles), region of the recruitment assessment center, and age at recruitment. Models adjusted for waist circumference (per 5 cm), total physical activity (<10, 10 to <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <60, ≥60 metabolic equivalent hours per week, unknown), height (per 10 cm), alcohol consumption frequency (never, special occasions only, 1–3 times per month, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, daily/almost daily, unknown), smoking status and intensity (never, former, current- <15 per day, current- ≥15 per day, current- intensity unknown, unknown), frequency of red and processed meat consumption (<2, 2 to <3, 3 to <4, ≥4 occasions per week, unknown), family history of colorectal cancer (no, yes, unknown), educational level (Certificates of secondary education [CSEs]/Ordinary [O]-levels/General Certificates of Secondary Education [GCSEs] or equivalent, National Vocational Qualification [NVQ]/Higher National Diploma [HND]/Higher National Certificate [HNC]/Advanced [A]-levels/Advanced Subsidiary [AS]-levels or equivalent, other professional qualifications, college/university degree, none of the above, unknown), regular aspirin/ibuprofen use (no, yes, unknown), ever use of hormone replacement therapy (no, yes, unknown).

Model 2: Model 1 plus additional adjustment for circulating levels (sex-specific quintiles, missing/unknown) of CRP (mg/L), HbA1c (mmol/mol), testosterone (nmol/L), and SHBG (nmol/L).

a

HRs per SD increment were additionally corrected for regression dilution using a regression dilution ratio (0.76) obtained from the subsample of participants with repeat IGF1 measurements.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Subgroup analyses of the association between circulating IGF1 levels and colorectal cancer risk in the UK Biobank. HR per 1-SD increment in circulating IGF1 levels. Multivariable Cox regression model using age as the underlying time variable and stratified by sex, Townsend deprivation index (quintiles), region of the recruitment assessment center, and age at recruitment. Models adjusted for waist circumference (per 5 cm), total physical activity (<10, 10 to <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <60, ≥60 metabolic equivalent hours per week, unknown), height (per 10 cm), alcohol consumption frequency (never, special occasions only, 1–3 times per month, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, daily/almost daily, unknown), smoking status and intensity (never, former, current- <15 per day, current- ≥15 per day, current- intensity unknown, unknown), frequency of red and processed meat consumption (<2, 2 to <3, 3 to <4, ≥4 occasions per week, unknown), family history of colorectal cancer (no, yes, unknown), educational level (Certificates of secondary education [CSEs]/Ordinary [O]-levels/General Certificates of Secondary Education [GCSEs] or equivalent, National Vocational Qualification [NVQ]/Higher National Diploma [HND]/Higher National Certificate [HNC]/Advanced [A]-levels/Advanced Subsidiary [AS]-levels or equivalent, other professional qualifications, college/university degree, none of the above, unknown), regular aspirin/ibuprofen use (no, yes, unknown), ever use of hormone replacement therapy (no, yes, unknown), and circulating levels (sex-specific quintiles, missing/unknown) of CRP (mg/L), HbA1c (mmol/mol), testosterone (nmol/L), and SHBG (nmol/L). aHRs per SD increment were corrected for regression dilution using a regression dilution ratio (0.76) obtained from the subsample of participants with repeat IGF1 measurements. Median values: height = 176 cm for men and 162 cm for women; CRP = 1.3 mg/L; HbA1c = 35 mmol/mol; testosterone = 1 nmol/L for women and 11.8 nmol/L for men; SHBG = 56.3 nmol/L for men and 37.2 nmol/L for women.

The positive association observed between circulating IGF1 levels and colorectal cancer was evident across subgroups of BMI, height, age at recruitment/blood collection, follow-up time, smoking status, and circulating levels of CRP, HbA1c, testosterone, and SHBG (all P-interactions ≥ .1) (Figure 1). In a sensitivity analysis, similar relationships for circulating IGF1 levels and colorectal cancer were found when participants with HbA1c levels ≥48 mmol/mol (or 6.5%, cutoff for type-2 diabetes), were excluded from the analyses (Supplementary Table 3).

Mendelian Randomization

Association between genetically determined circulating IGF1 levels and colorectal cancer risk

We estimated that a 1-SD increment in genetically determined IGF1 levels was associated with an 8% higher colorectal cancer risk (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03–1.12; P value = 3.3 × 10–4) (Table 3). Positive associations of similar magnitude were found for men and women when analyzed separately (P-heterogeneity = .24), and by anatomic subsite (colon vs rectal, P-heterogeneity = 1; proximal colon versus distal colon, P-heterogeneity = .55) (Table 3). Evidence of effect heterogeneity Cochran’s Q P values < .001) and horizontal pleiotropy (MR-PRESSO P values <1 × 10−4) were observed for each model (Supplementary Table 4), but there was little evidence of directional pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept P values >.20) for all models, except for distal colon cancer (MR-Egger intercept P value = .02). However, the corrected estimates for distal colon cancer and all other models from the MR-Egger and the weighted-median approach analyses replicated the initial positive effect estimates (Table 3; Supplementary Table 4), and the MR-PRESSO test identified a few outlier SNPs that did not distort the effect estimates (MR-PRESSO P values >.8). Finally, the funnel plot for the IGF1 instruments indicated a symmetric distribution of effect estimates (Supplementary Figure 1).

Table 3.

MR Estimates Between Circulating Levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3 and Risk of Colorectal Cancer (n = 52,865 Colorectal Cancer Cases and n = 46,287 Controls)

MR
Likelihood-based approach
Weighted median approach
MR-Egger test
OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment
IGF1
Colorectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.08 (1.03–1.12) 1.12 (1.04–1.20) 1.11 (0.98–1.27)
 Men 1.11 (1.05–1.17) 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 1.18 (1.00–1.38)
 Women 1.05 (0.99–1.11) 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 1.06 (0.89–1.25)
Colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.06 (1.01–1.11) 1.12 (1.03–1.23) 1.14 (0.98–1.32)
Proximal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 1.08 (0.97–1.21) 1.02 (0.84–1.23)
Distal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.07 (1.00–1.14) 1.10 (0.98–1.23) 1.26 (1.05–1.50)
Rectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.06 (1.00–1.14) 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 1.09 (0.91–1.30)
IGFBP3
Colorectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.12 (1.06–1.18) 1.14 (1.07–1.20) 1.18 (1.07–1.31)
 Men 1.12 (1.04–1.21) 1.13 (1.04–1.22) 1.14 (0.98–1.34)
 Women 1.12 (1.04–1.21) 1.13 (1.04–1.22) 1.25 (1.18–1.32)
Colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.11 (1.04–1.19) 1.13 (1.05–1.21) 1.27 (1.16–1.38)
Proximal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.12 (1.03–1.22) 1.12 (1.02–1.23) 1.25 (1.21–1.29)
Distal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.10 (1.01–1.20) 1.13 (1.03–1.24) 1.29 (1.01–1.65)
Rectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.12 (1.04–1.22) 1.14 (1.05–1.25) 1.18 (1.01–1.39)
Supplementary Figure 1.

Supplementary Figure 1

Funnel plots of risk estimates of (A) IGF1 and (B) IGFBP3 with colorectal cancer against instrumental strength. Instrumental strength is SNP to colorectal cancer effect corrected by SNP to IGF1 or IGFBP3 standard error of the effect. X-axis is in logarithmic scale. P values are 2-sided, MR test.

Association between genetically determined circulating IGFBP3 levels and colorectal cancer risk

A 1-SD increment in genetically determined IGFBP3 levels was associated with a 12% higher colorectal cancer risk (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.06–1.18; P = 4.2 × 10–5) (Table 3). Similar positive associations were found for men and women when analyzed separately (P-heterogeneity = 1), and by anatomic subsite (colon vs rectal, P-heterogeneity = .87; proximal colon vs distal colon, P-heterogeneity = .77) (Table 3). Evidence of effect heterogeneity was weak (P > .10) for all models except colon cancer and distal colon cancer models (P values .04 and .02, respectively). The MR-PRESSO test identified possible horizontal pleiotropy for colon cancer and distal colon cancer (P < .05). However, little evidence of directional pleiotropy was found for all models (MR-Egger intercept P > .15), and the estimates from the weighted-median approach and MR-Egger were consistent with those of likelihood-based approach (Table 3; Supplementary Table 4). The leave-one-out analysis revealed that the positive association between IGFBP3 and colorectal cancer was driven by 1 variant, rs11977526, located in the IGFBP3 gene region (OR per SD increment in IGFBP3 with rs11977526 excluded = 1.02; 95% CI 0.92–1.13; P = .7) (Supplementary Table 5).

Discussion

In serologic analyses of UK Biobank data, we found that higher prediagnostic levels of circulating IGF1 were associated with greater colorectal cancer risk, with similar-strength positive associations found by sex and colorectal anatomical subsite. Concordant with this, the MR analyses revealed a positive effect of IGF1 on colorectal cancer risk, suggesting that higher circulating IGF1 levels may have a causal role in the development of this malignancy. Collectively, these findings provide strong support for a role of the IGF-pathway in colorectal tumorigenesis.

Despite extensive experimental evidence indicating a role for IGF1 in colorectal tumorigenesis, results from previous epidemiological studies (most including <500 colorectal cancer cases) have been inconsistent, with null or weak positive associations found that did not meet the statistical significance threshold.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Our study, using UK Biobank data, is unique in that rather than following a nested study design including a subset of the cohort, IGF1 levels were measured in all study participants. Further, we were able to control statistically for other serologic risk factors that are related to both circulating IGF1 levels and colorectal cancer risk (CRP, testosterone, SHBG, and HbA1c). Our study was the largest to date to examine the IGF1 and colorectal cancer relationship (including >2600 incident cases) which meant we were sufficiently powered to study the IGF1 and colorectal cancer relationship by sex, anatomic subsite of tumor, and across subgroups of other risk factors. We found no heterogeneity for the positive association by sex, anatomic subsite, follow-up time, and other colorectal cancer risk factors.

Despite the robustness of this positive IGF1 and colorectal cancer association, as with all observational studies, these analyses are vulnerable to the inherent biases of this study design, namely residual confounding and reverse causality. MR analyses are less susceptible to such biases because alleles are randomly assigned during meiosis and germline genetic variants are unaffected by disease process.38 Our MR analyses yielded strikingly similar estimates of effect for IGF1 and colorectal cancer to our UK Biobank serologic analyses. Similar to the serologic analyses we found no heterogeneity by sex or anatomic subsite in our MR analyses. An important assumption of MR is that the genetic variants do not influence the outcome through a pathway independent of the main exposure of interest (horizontal pleiotropy). We conducted multiple sensitivity analyses to test for the influence of pleiotropy on our causal estimates, and our results for IGF1 were robust according to these various tests.

Experimental data support a role for IGF1 and its downstream signaling pathways in colorectal tumorigenesis. IGF1 can promote cellular proliferation through the activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathways.39 Colonocytes express IGF1-receptors and these are frequently overexpressed in neoplastic cells.40 IGF1 has been shown to promote cellular proliferation in colorectal tissue, and the blockade of the IGF1-receptor by a monoclonal antibody inhibits cell proliferation.41

Potentially modifiable determinants of circulating IGF1 levels include dietary protein intake,42, 43, 44 BMI,43 and physical activity.45 In addition, a number of pharmacologic agents targeting the IGF system have been developed, although, as of yet, they have not been successful in treating colorectal cancer patients in clinical trials.46 Although circulating IGF1 levels are modifiable, it is currently unknown how long an intervention aimed at altering IGF1 concentrations would have to be applied to have measurable effects. Our result provides possible evidence for a causal role of circulating IGF1 levels in colorectal cancer development and will hopefully reinvigorate efforts to develop and introduce interventions targeting the IGF system for colorectal cancer prevention in susceptible individuals.

The bioactivity of IGF1 is partially regulated through IGFBPs, with most bound to IGFBP3. Higher levels of IGFBP3 both increase the serologic binding capacity for IGF1, but also lower circulating IGF1 bioavailability.47 As well as IGF-binding properties, IGFBP3 has been shown to induce apoptosis and reduce proliferation in colon cancer cell lines.4,5 The positive association we found in our MR analyses for IGFBP3 and colorectal cancer is inconsistent with its anticipated anti-tumorigenic effects. Epidemiologic studies examining the IGFBP3 and colorectal cancer association have reported mixed findings, with inverse, positive, and null results all previously reported.6,7,10, 11, 12, 13, 14 The positive effect estimate in our MR analysis was driven solely by 1 variant, rs11977526, with a null result found when this variant was excluded. Although rs11977526 is located in close proximity to the IGFBP3 gene, this variant has also been associated with several anthropometric traits48 and circulating levels of IGF2,49 for which there is evidence of a role in colorectal cancer development. The IGF2 gene is imprinted and loss of imprinting has been detected in colorectal cancer tumor tissue.50 Stroma-induced IGF2 has been shown to promote colon cancer progression in a paracrine and autocrine manner.51 A meta-analysis of 3 prospective studies reported an almost 2-fold higher colorectal cancer risk when the highest and lowest groups of circulating IGF2 levels were compared.52 MR analyses for IGF2 are currently limited as a GWAS for circulating IGF2 has not been conducted. Similarly, for IGFBP3 and other IGF system components (including bioavailable IGF1 levels), more precise genetic instruments are now required to help disentangle the possible biological effects of specific ligands and binding proteins on colorectal cancer development.

This was the largest and most comprehensive study that used 2 complementary study designs to examine the role of IGF1 on colorectal cancer development. A limitation of our analysis is that IGF1 levels were measured only once at baseline in all participants, and it is possible that these measurements may not reflect exposure levels across time. However, our reproducibility analysis in a subset of the cohort found an ICC value of 0.78 between IGF1 measurements collected 4 years apart, indicating that a single measurement provides a good estimate of medium to longer-term exposures. The availability of repeat IGF1 measurements also allowed us to correct for regression dilution bias, and thus limiting the effects of measurement error and within-person variability on our risk estimates21; the positive associations we found were stronger after regression dilution correction. A limitation of our MR analyses is that our use of summary-level data precluded the investigation of nonlinear effects and subgroup analyses by other risk factors (eg, age, BMI, smoking). However, our serologic analysis, which yielded a similar overall risk estimate to our MR result, found no evidence of a nonlinear association for IGF1 and colorectal cancer and little heterogeneity across subgroups of other risk factors.

In conclusion, our complementary serologic and MR analyses provide strong support for a positive association of circulating IGF1 levels on colorectal cancer risk. This result suggests that diet/lifestyle42, 43, 44,53 or pharmacologic1 interventions targeting the IGF system may offer a promising strategy in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer.

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 25897 and we express our gratitude to the participants and those involved in building the resource. UK Biobank is an open access resource. Bona fide researchers can apply to use the UK Biobank dataset by registering and applying at http://ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply/. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization.

Author contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: NM, MJG. Analyzed the data: RCT, NM, MJG. This article was written by NM and MJG taking into account the comments and suggestions of the coauthors. All coauthors had the opportunity to comment on the analysis and interpretation of the findings and approved the final version for publication.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding RMM was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.

Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org, and at https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.020.

Funding (continued)

Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO): National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (U01 CA137088, R01 CA059045, R01201407). Genotyping/Sequencing services were provided by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) (X01-HG008596 and X-01-HG007585). CIDR is fully funded through a federal contract from the National Institutes of Health to The Johns Hopkins University, contract number HHSN268201200008I. This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA015704.

ASTERISK: a Hospital Clinical Research Program (PHRC-BRD09/C) from the University Hospital Center of Nantes (CHU de Nantes) and supported by the Regional Council of Pays de la Loire, the Groupement des Entreprises Françaises dans la Lutte contre le Cancer (GEFLUC), the Association Anne de Bretagne Génétique and the Ligue Régionale Contre le Cancer (LRCC).

The ATBC Study is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and by U.S. Public Health Service contract HHSN261201500005C from the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.

CLUE II: Funding to support CLUE II, for studies on colorectal cancer in the cohort, and for the investigators were from grants from the National Cancer Institute (U01 CA86308, Early Detection Research Network; P30 CA006973), National Institute on Aging (U01 AG18033), and the American Institute for Cancer Research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

COLO2&3: National Institutes of Health (R01 CA60987).

ColoCare: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R01 CA189184 (Li/Ulrich), U01 CA206110 (Ulrich/Li/Siegel/Figueireido/Colditz, 2P30CA015704- 40 (Gilliland), R01 CA207371 (Ulrich/Li)), the Matthias Lackas-Foundation, the German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research, and the EU TRANSCAN initiative.

The Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) Illumina GWAS was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant numbers U01 CA122839, R01 CA143247). The CCFR participant recruitment and collection of data and biospecimens used in this study were supported by the NCI/NIH (grant number U01 CA167551) and through NCI/NIH cooperative agreements with the following Colon CFR centers: Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (grant numbers U01 CA074778 and U01/U24 CA097735), USC Consortium Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (grant numbers U01/U24 CA074799), Mayo Clinic Cooperative Family Registry for Colon Cancer Studies (grant number U01/U24 CA074800), Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry (grant number U01/U24 CA074783), Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (grant number U01/U24 CA074794), and University of Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (grant number U01/U24 CA074806)’ The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the NCI, NIH or any of the collaborating centers in the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government, any cancer registry, or the CCFR.

COLON: The COLON study is sponsored by Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds, including funds from grant 2014/1179 as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International Regular Grant Programme, by Alpe d’Huzes and the Dutch Cancer Society (UM 2012–5653, UW 2013-5927, UW2015-7946), and by TRANSCAN (JTC2012-MetaboCCC, JTC2013-FOCUS). The Nqplus study is sponsored by a ZonMW investment grant (98-10030); by PREVIEW, the project PREVention of diabetes through lifestyle intervention and population studies in Europe and around the World (PREVIEW) project which received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant no. 312057; by funds from TI Food and Nutrition (cardiovascular health theme), a public–private partnership on precompetitive research in food and nutrition; and by FOODBALL, the Food Biomarker Alliance, a project from JPI Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life.

Colorectal Cancer Transdisciplinary (CORECT) Study: The CORECT Study was supported by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NCI/NIH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (grant numbers U19 CA148107, R01 CA81488, P30 CA014089, R01 CA197350,; P01 CA196569; R01 CA201407) and National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (grant number T32 ES013678).

CORSA: “Österreichische Nationalbank Jubiläumsfondsprojekt” (12511) and Austrian Research Funding Agency (FFG) grant 829675.

CPS-II: The American Cancer Society funds the creation, maintenance, and updating of the Cancer Prevention Study-II (CPS-II) cohort. This study was conducted with Institutional Review Board approval.

CRCGEN: Colorectal Cancer Genetics & Genomics, Spanish study was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, co-funded by FEDER funds –a way to build Europe– (grants PI14-613 and PI09-1286), Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) of the Catalan Government (grant 2017SGR723), and Junta de Castilla y León (grant LE22A10-2). Sample collection of this work was supported by the Xarxa de Bancs de Tumors de Catalunya sponsored by Pla Director d’Oncología de Catalunya (XBTC), Plataforma Biobancos PT13/0010/0013 and ICOBIOBANC, sponsored by the Catalan Institute of Oncology.

Czech Republic CCS: This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grants CZ GA CR: GAP304/10/1286 and 1585) and by the Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (grants AZV 15-27580A and AZV 17-30920A).

DACHS: This work was supported by the German Research Council (BR 1704/6-1, BR 1704/6-3, BR 1704/6-4, CH 117/1-1, HO 5117/2-1, HE 5998/2-1, KL 2354/3-1, RO 2270/8-1 and BR 1704/17-1), the Interdisciplinary Research Program of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Germany, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01KH0404, 01ER0814, 01ER0815, 01ER1505A and 01ER1505B).

DALS: National Institutes of Health (R01 CA48998 to M. L. Slattery).

EDRN: This work is funded and supported by the NCI, EDRN Grant (U01 CA 84968-06).

EPIC: The coordination of EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DGSANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by Danish Cancer Society (Denmark); Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) (France); German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRCItaly and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands); ERC-2009-AdG 232997 and Nordforsk, Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition and Health (Norway); Health Research Fund (FIS), PI13/00061 to Granada, PI13/01162 to EPIC-Murcia, Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020) (Spain); Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council and County Councils of Skåne and Västerbotten (Sweden); Cancer Research UK (14136 to EPIC-Norfolk; C570/A16491 and C8221/A19170 to EPIC-Oxford), Medical Research Council (1000143 to EPIC-Norfolk, MR/M012190/1 to EPICOxford) (United Kingdom).

Funding: (EPICOLON) This work was supported by grants from Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria/FEDER (PI08/0024, PI08/1276, PS09/02368, P111/00219, PI11/00681, PI14/00173, PI14/00230, PI17/00509, 17/00878, Acción Transversal de Cáncer), Xunta de Galicia (PGIDIT07PXIB9101209PR), Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (SAF07-64873, SAF 2010-19273, SAF2014-54453R), Fundación Científica de la Asociación Española contra el Cáncer (GCB13131592CAST), Beca Grupo de Trabajo “Oncología” AEG (Asociación Española de Gastroenterología), Fundación Privada Olga Torres, FP7 CHIBCHA Consortium, Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR, Generalitat de Catalunya, 2014SGR135, 2014SGR255, 2017SGR21, 2017SGR653), Catalan Tumour Bank Network (Pla Director d’Oncologia, Generalitat de Catalunya), PERIS (SLT002/16/00398, Generalitat de Catalunya), CERCA Programme (Generalitat de Catalunya) and COST Action CA17118. CIBERehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

ESTHER/VERDI. This work was supported by grants from the Baden-Württemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Arts and the German Cancer Aid.

Harvard cohorts (HPFS, NHS, PHS): HPFS is supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01 CA055075, UM1 CA167552, U01 CA167552, R01 CA137178, R01 CA151993, R35 CA197735, K07 CA190673, and P50 CA127003), NHS by the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA137178, P01 CA087969, UM1 CA186107, R01 CA151993, R35 CA197735, K07CA190673, and P50 CA127003) and PHS by the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA042182).

Hawaii Adenoma Study: NCI grants R01 CA72520.

HCES-CRC: the Hwasun Cancer Epidemiology Study–Colon and Rectum Cancer (HCES-CRC; grants from Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, HCRI18007-1).

Kentucky: This work was supported by the following grant support: Clinical Investigator Award from Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (CI-8); NCI R01CA136726.

LCCS: The Leeds Colorectal Cancer Study was funded by the Food Standards Agency and Cancer Research UK Programme Award (C588/A19167).

MCCS cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further supported by Australian NHMRC grants 509348, 209057, 251553 and 504711 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. Cases and their vital status were ascertained through the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), including the National Death Index and the Australian Cancer Database.

MEC: National Institutes of Health (R37 CA54281, P01 CA033619, and R01 CA063464).

MECC: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01 CA81488 to SBG and GR).

MSKCC: The work at Sloan Kettering in New York was supported by the Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics and the Romeo Milio Foundation. Moffitt: This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R01 CA189184, P30 CA076292), Florida Department of Health Bankhead-Coley Grant 09BN-13, and the University of South Florida Oehler Foundation. Moffitt contributions were supported in part by the Total Cancer Care Initiative, Collaborative Data Services Core, and Tissue Core at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (grant number P30 CA076292).

NCCCS I & II: We acknowledge funding support for this project from the National Institutes of Health, R01 CA66635 and P30 DK034987.

NFCCR: This work was supported by an Interdisciplinary Health Research Team award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CRT 43821); the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Serivces (U01 CA74783); and National Cancer Institute of Canada grants (18223 and 18226). The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of Alexandre Belisle and the genotyping team of the McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, Montréal, Canada, for genotyping the Sequenom panel in the NFCCR samples. Funding was provided to Michael O. Woods by the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

NSHDS: Swedish Cancer Society; Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden; Swedish Research Council; J C Kempe Memorial Fund; Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; and Cutting-Edge Research Grant from the County Council of Västerbotten, Sweden.

OFCCR: National Institutes of Health, through funding allocated to the Ontario Registry for Studies of Familial Colorectal Cancer (U01 CA074783); see CCFR section above. Additional funding toward genetic analyses of OFCCR includes the Ontario Research Fund, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, through generous support from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.

OSUMC: OCCPI funding was provided by Pelotonia and HNPCC funding was provided by the NCI (CA16058 and CA67941).

PLCO: Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and supported by contracts from the Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, NIH,

PMH-SCCFR: National Institutes of Health (R01 CA076366 to P. Newcomb) and U01CA074794 (to J. Potter).

SEARCH: The University of Cambridge has received salary support in respect of PDPP from the NHS in the East of England through the Clinical Academic Reserve. Cancer Research UK (C490/A16561); the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres at the University of Cambridge.

SELECT: Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U10 CA37429 (CD Blanke), and UM1 CA182883 (CM Tangen/IM Thompson). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

SMS and REACH: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (grant P01 CA074184 to J.D.P. and P.A.N., grants R01 CA097325, R03 CA153323, and K05 CA152715 to P.A.N., and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences at the National Institutes of Health (grant KL2 TR000421 to A.N.B.-H.)

The Swedish Low-risk Colorectal Cancer Study: The study was supported by grants from the Swedish research council; K2015-55X-22674-01-4, K2008-55X-20157-03-3, K2006-72X-20157-01-2 and the Stockholm County Council (ALF project).

Swedish Mammography Cohort and Cohort of Swedish Men: This work is supported by the Swedish Research Council /Infrastructure grant, the Swedish Cancer Foundation, and the Karolinska Institutés Distinguished Professor Award to Alicja Wolk.

UK Biobank: This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 8614

VITAL: National Institutes of Health (K05 CA154337).

WHI: The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services through contracts HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN268201100003C, HHSN268201100004C, and HHSN271201100004C.

Acknowledgements (continued)

ASTERISK: We are very grateful to Dr. Bruno Buecher without whom this project would not have existed. We also thank all those who agreed to participate in this study, including the patients and the healthy control persons, as well as all the physicians, technicians and students.

CLUE II: We appreciate the continued efforts of the staff members at the Johns Hopkins George W. Comstock Center for Public Health Research and Prevention in the conduct of the CLUE II study. Cancer incidence data for CLUE were provided by the Maryland Cancer Registry, Center for Cancer Surveillance and Control, Maryland Department of Health, 201 W. Preston Street, Room 400, Baltimore, MD 21201, http://phpa.dhmh.maryland.gov/cancer, 410-767-4055. We acknowledge the State of Maryland, the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund, and the National Program of Cancer Registries of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the funds that support the collection and availability of the cancer registry data.

COLON and NQplus: the authors would like to thank the COLON and NQplus investigators at Wageningen University & Research and the involved clinicians in the participating hospitals.

CORSA: We kindly thank all those who contributed to the screening project Burgenland against CRC. Furthermore, we are grateful to Doris Mejri and Monika Hunjadi for laboratory assistance.

CPS-II: The authors thank the CPS-II participants and Study Management Group for their invaluable contributions to this research. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution to this study from central cancer registries supported through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries, and cancer registries supported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program.

Czech Republic CCS: We are thankful to all clinicians in major hospitals in the Czech Republic, without whom the study would not be practicable. We are also sincerely grateful to all patients participating in this study.

DACHS: We thank all participants and cooperating clinicians, and Ute Handte-Daub, Utz Benscheid, Muhabbet Celik and Ursula Eilber for excellent technical assistance.

EDRN: We acknowledge all the following contributors to the development of the resource: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition: Lynda Dzubinski; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Pathology: Michelle Bisceglia; and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics.

EPIC: Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization.

EPICOLON: We are sincerely grateful to all patients participating in this study who were recruited as part of the EPICOLON project. We acknowledge the Spanish National DNA Bank and the Biobank of Hospital Clínic–IDIBAPS for the availability of the samples. The work was carried out (in part) at the Esther Koplowitz Centre, Barcelona.

Harvard cohorts (HPFS, NHS, PHS): The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and those of participating registries as required. We would like to thank the participants and staff of the HPFS, NHS and PHS for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.

Kentucky: We would like to acknowledge the staff at the Kentucky Cancer Registry.

LCCS: We acknowledge the contributions of Jennifer Barrett, Robin Waxman, Gillian Smith and Emma Northwood in conducting this study.

NCCCS I & II: We would like to thank the study participants, and the NC Colorectal Cancer Study staff.

NSHDS: We thank all participants in the NSHDS cohorts and the staff at the Department of Biobank Research, Umeå University, as well as Kerstin Näslund, formerly of the Department of Medical Biosciences, and Inger Cullman, Department of Chemistry, both at Umeå University for excellent technical assistance.

PLCO: The authors thank the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial screening center investigators and the staff from Information Management Services Inc and Westat Inc. Most importantly, we thank the study participants for their contributions that made this study possible.

PMH-SCCFR: The authors would like to thank the study participants and staff of the Hormones and Colon Cancer study.

SEARCH: We thank the SEARCH team.

SELECT: We thank the research and clinical staff at the sites that participated on SELECT study, without whom the trial would not have been successful. We are also grateful to the 35,533 dedicated men who participated in SELECT.

WHI: The authors thank the WHI investigators and staff for their dedication, and the study participants for making the program possible. A full listing of WHI investigators can be found at: http://www.whi.org/researchers/Documents%20%20Write%20a%20Paper/WHI%20Investigator%20Short%20List.pdf

Supplementary Table 1.

Summary Information on the IGF1 and IGFBP3 Genetic Instruments Used in the Mendelian Randomization Analyses

Exposure Source/Publication n SNPs Variance explained (%) Mean (SD)
IGF1 UK Biobank/Sinnott-Armstrong et al 20191 413 9.4 21.6 (5.6) nmol/L
IGFBP3 Meta-analysis/Teumer et al 20162 4 6.1 3340.4 (863.3) ng/mL

Supplementary Table 2.

Association Parameters of Instrumental SNPs Used in the IGF1 and IGFBP3 Genetic Instruments

SNP Chr Position Genea Effect allele Other allele Association parameters for the exposure
Association parameters for colorectal cancer
Association parameters for colorectal cancer men
Association parameters for colorectal cancer women
Association parameters for colon cancer
Association parameters for proximal colon cancer
Association parameters for distal colon cancer
Association parameters for rectal cancer
Effect SE Effect SE Effect SE Effect SE Effect SE Effect SE Effect SE Effect SE
IGF1 - n SNPs = 413
rs903908 1 2,202,967 SKI T C −0.016 0.003 −0.006 0.009 −0.014 0.013 0.003 0.013 −0.016 0.011 −0.006 0.014 −0.023 0.014 0.016 0.014
rs17393144 1 9,210,262 MIR34A G A −0.016 0.003 0.006 0.010 0.019 0.013 −0.007 0.014 0.005 0.011 0.012 0.015 −0.002 0.015 −0.005 0.015
rs112436634 1 10,637,709 PEX14 C T −0.016 0.003 0.001 0.009 −0.014 0.013 0.014 0.013 −0.002 0.011 −0.014 0.015 0.018 0.015 0.017 0.015
rs17037452 1 11,895,675 CLCN6 A G 0.023 0.003 0.000 0.012 −0.011 0.017 0.011 0.018 0.000 0.015 0.029 0.019 −0.029 0.019 −0.003 0.019
rs36086195 1 16,510,894 ARHGEF19−AS1 T C −0.019 0.003 0.018 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.028 0.013 0.020 0.011 0.003 0.014 0.043 0.014 0.010 0.014
rs12723255 1 21,233,570 EIF4G3 T C −0.017 0.003 0.002 0.009 0.004 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.003 0.011 −0.002 0.014 0.008 0.014 0.010 0.014
rs6701954 1 22,022,176 USP48 T G 0.014 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.007 0.012 −0.001 0.013 −0.008 0.011 0.007 0.014 −0.022 0.014 0.014 0.014
rs76914895 1 23,292,603 LACTBL1 T C −0.027 0.005 0.046 0.019 0.054 0.026 0.038 0.027 0.030 0.022 0.026 0.029 0.054 0.030 0.093 0.029
rs2075995 1 23,847,464 E2F2 A C −0.014 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.011 0.012 −0.003 0.013 0.008 0.011 −0.004 0.014 0.024 0.014 0.014 0.014
rs2802330 1 26,466,831 PDIK1L A G −0.031 0.003 0.003 0.012 −0.001 0.016 0.004 0.016 0.011 0.014 0.025 0.018 −0.009 0.018 −0.004 0.018
rs17360994 1 27,278,573 KDF1 C T −0.042 0.005 −0.012 0.017 −0.003 0.023 −0.023 0.024 −0.006 0.020 −0.012 0.026 0.022 0.026 −0.005 0.026
rs569356 1 29,136,686 OPRD1 A G −0.027 0.004 0.007 0.013 −0.016 0.018 0.035 0.019 0.005 0.016 0.019 0.020 −0.001 0.021 0.012 0.020
rs3131646 1 40,383,552 MYCL G T 0.016 0.003 −0.006 0.010 −0.006 0.013 −0.008 0.014 −0.013 0.012 −0.029 0.015 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.015
rs61780439 1 41,490,177 SLFNL1−AS1 G A 0.021 0.003 0.004 0.011 0.012 0.015 −0.001 0.015 −0.011 0.013 −0.013 0.017 −0.007 0.017 0.013 0.017
rs2819336 1 44,015,809 PTPRF C T −0.027 0.003 −0.004 0.009 −0.003 0.013 −0.006 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.019 0.014 0.001 0.015 0.008 0.014
rs7539178 1 65,383,002 JAK1 A C −0.026 0.004 −0.024 0.013 −0.026 0.018 −0.023 0.018 −0.036 0.016 −0.047 0.020 −0.008 0.021 −0.015 0.020
rs1046011 1 65,898,996 LEPR / LEPROT C T −0.021 0.003 0.011 0.010 0.006 0.014 0.017 0.014 0.005 0.012 −0.001 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.015
rs1430753 1 68,692,642 WLS G A −0.021 0.003 −0.011 0.011 −0.012 0.016 −0.010 0.016 −0.007 0.013 0.000 0.017 −0.020 0.018 −0.041 0.017
rs165316 1 91,533,297 RPL5P6 A G −0.073 0.003 −0.018 0.011 −0.045 0.015 0.009 0.016 −0.037 0.013 −0.035 0.017 −0.033 0.017 0.006 0.017
rs1825813 1 92,708,973 C1orf146 G A −0.023 0.003 −0.027 0.011 −0.044 0.016 −0.009 0.016 −0.037 0.013 −0.034 0.017 −0.040 0.018 −0.019 0.017
rs599839 1 109,822,166 PSRC1/CELSR2 A G −0.031 0.003 0.006 0.011 0.013 0.015 −0.002 0.015 0.009 0.013 −0.004 0.016 0.022 0.017 0.029 0.016
rs45505697 1 153,651,058 NPR1 C A 0.030 0.005 0.011 0.020 −0.009 0.028 0.037 0.029 0.021 0.024 0.015 0.031 0.023 0.032 0.022 0.031
rs1127313 1 154,556,425 ADAR G A 0.024 0.003 0.009 0.009 0.007 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.007 0.011 −0.001 0.014 0.017 0.014 0.019 0.014
rs77369503 1 163,027,266 RGS4 G A 0.045 0.007 −0.004 0.028 −0.002 0.038 −0.013 0.041 −0.027 0.033 −0.048 0.042 −0.051 0.043 0.012 0.042
rs75681856 1 174,916,323 RABGAP1L C T −0.023 0.004 0.006 0.013 0.016 0.019 −0.007 0.019 −0.004 0.016 −0.010 0.021 −0.007 0.021 0.015 0.021
rs12749024 1 176,522,365 PAPPA2 C T −0.075 0.004 −0.008 0.013 −0.019 0.018 0.000 0.018 −0.011 0.015 −0.008 0.020 −0.009 0.020 −0.013 0.020
rs10913351 1 177,447,742 AL122019.1 G A −0.032 0.005 0.021 0.018 0.028 0.026 0.017 0.026 0.020 0.022 0.022 0.028 0.023 0.029 0.004 0.028
rs11577063 1 179,341,999 AXDND1 G T −0.020 0.003 −0.011 0.011 0.007 0.015 −0.031 0.015 −0.011 0.013 −0.025 0.016 −0.002 0.017 −0.020 0.016
rs143885630 1 183,482,785 SMG7 G A 0.030 0.004 −0.013 0.014 −0.013 0.019 −0.008 0.020 −0.014 0.017 −0.045 0.022 0.016 0.022 0.019 0.022
rs940400 1 200,269,134 LINC00862 C A 0.025 0.004 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.019 0.007 0.020 0.023 0.017 0.001 0.021 0.014 0.022 −0.016 0.021
rs7545345 1 205,690,941 NUCKS1 T C −0.026 0.004 0.000 0.013 0.007 0.019 −0.007 0.019 0.002 0.016 −0.017 0.021 0.016 0.021 −0.013 0.021
rs2724373 1 207,999,200 C1orf132 C T 0.019 0.003 −0.014 0.009 −0.003 0.013 −0.030 0.013 −0.024 0.011 −0.024 0.014 −0.022 0.015 −0.011 0.014
rs10779509 1 209,728,370 AL023754.1 T C −0.014 0.003 −0.012 0.009 −0.024 0.013 0.000 0.013 −0.016 0.011 −0.013 0.014 −0.021 0.014 −0.017 0.014
rs340837 1 214,162,734 PROX1 T G −0.021 0.003 −0.025 0.009 −0.034 0.012 −0.011 0.013 −0.032 0.011 −0.029 0.014 −0.029 0.014 −0.019 0.014
rs12141189 1 221,053,545 HLX C T −0.045 0.003 0.023 0.010 0.015 0.015 0.033 0.015 0.031 0.013 0.033 0.016 0.027 0.017 0.000 0.016
rs4306136 1 221,608,720 AL360013.2 A G 0.017 0.003 0.014 0.009 0.001 0.013 0.029 0.013 0.010 0.011 0.026 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.022 0.014
rs708108 1 228,189,855 WNT3A C T −0.015 0.003 −0.007 0.009 −0.009 0.013 −0.009 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.013 0.014 −0.001 0.014 −0.011 0.014
rs684818 1 234,854,779 AL160408.6 T C 0.024 0.003 0.030 0.009 0.028 0.012 0.029 0.013 0.021 0.011 0.019 0.014 0.027 0.014 0.038 0.014
rs7517340 1 243,710,190 AKT3 C T 0.035 0.003 −0.001 0.011 0.018 0.016 −0.020 0.016 −0.009 0.014 −0.011 0.018 0.003 0.018 0.013 0.018
rs35135518 2 16,120,506 RN7SL104P T C 0.029 0.004 −0.006 0.015 −0.006 0.020 −0.006 0.021 0.004 0.018 −0.002 0.024 0.001 0.024 −0.004 0.024
rs12710648 2 17,989,500 SMC6 A G 0.017 0.003 −0.003 0.009 −0.003 0.013 0.000 0.013 −0.002 0.011 0.015 0.014 −0.015 0.014 0.004 0.014
rs6760135 2 26,088,769 ASXL2 C T −0.050 0.003 −0.002 0.011 0.001 0.016 −0.005 0.016 −0.010 0.013 −0.006 0.017 −0.015 0.017 0.004 0.017
rs1260326 2 27,730,940 GCKR C T 0.063 0.003 0.036 0.009 0.043 0.013 0.029 0.013 0.035 0.011 0.019 0.014 0.052 0.014 0.034 0.014
rs11677980 2 30,522,137 LBH A G −0.015 0.003 −0.014 0.010 0.002 0.014 −0.031 0.014 −0.011 0.012 −0.006 0.015 −0.014 0.015 −0.017 0.015
rs7574340 2 40,621,239 SLC8A1 C T −0.017 0.003 0.012 0.009 0.025 0.013 0.000 0.014 0.019 0.012 0.021 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.005 0.015
rs6544549 2 42,693,056 KCNG3 T C 0.024 0.004 0.026 0.013 0.022 0.018 0.027 0.018 0.025 0.016 0.041 0.020 0.007 0.020 0.039 0.020
rs62136965 2 44,347,953 snRNA T C −0.037 0.006 0.022 0.022 0.001 0.030 0.051 0.032 0.031 0.026 0.025 0.034 0.035 0.034 −0.012 0.033
rs3791679 2 56,096,892 EFEMP1 A G −0.018 0.003 0.020 0.010 0.031 0.014 0.011 0.015 0.021 0.012 0.013 0.016 0.032 0.016 0.023 0.016
rs12471768 2 64,928,603 SERTAD2 C T 0.022 0.003 −0.012 0.010 −0.004 0.014 −0.020 0.014 −0.021 0.012 −0.038 0.015 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.015
rs702878 2 65,702,609 AC007389.1 A G 0.014 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.020 0.012 0.003 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.014 0.009 0.014 0.015 0.014
rs35641591 2 70,323,994 PCBP1−AS1 C T 0.050 0.006 0.070 0.027 0.031 0.037 0.103 0.038 0.040 0.032 0.032 0.041 0.039 0.043 0.071 0.042
rs6749680 2 73,685,852 ALMS1 A G 0.015 0.003 −0.001 0.009 −0.001 0.013 −0.003 0.013 −0.004 0.011 0.009 0.014 −0.016 0.014 −0.004 0.014
rs73954943 2 111,890,432 BCL2L11 G A −0.031 0.005 −0.032 0.018 −0.069 0.025 −0.003 0.025 −0.036 0.022 −0.044 0.028 −0.047 0.029 −0.041 0.029
rs7578633 2 113,978,650 PAX8 C T −0.018 0.003 −0.017 0.009 −0.013 0.013 −0.021 0.013 −0.014 0.011 −0.035 0.014 −0.003 0.014 −0.021 0.014
rs17050272 2 121,306,440 AC073257.2 G A 0.024 0.003 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.007 0.013 0.003 0.011 −0.010 0.014 0.018 0.014 0.011 0.014
rs58387407 2 152,924,773 CACNB4 A G −0.018 0.003 −0.002 0.011 0.013 0.015 −0.017 0.016 −0.018 0.013 −0.022 0.017 −0.023 0.017 0.017 0.017
rs2674492 2 172,422,338 CYBRD1 G A −0.014 0.003 0.027 0.009 0.029 0.013 0.022 0.013 0.028 0.011 0.033 0.014 0.029 0.015 0.028 0.014
rs17400325 2 178,565,913 PDE11A C T 0.054 0.006 0.004 0.023 −0.004 0.031 0.011 0.033 0.016 0.027 0.003 0.035 0.052 0.035 0.011 0.034
rs6435156 2 203,425,475 BMPR2 C T 0.024 0.003 0.015 0.010 0.013 0.014 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.015 0.016 0.020 0.016 0.025 0.016
rs1427676 2 204,741,166 CTLA4 T C 0.015 0.003 0.025 0.009 0.026 0.013 0.022 0.013 0.025 0.011 0.008 0.015 0.035 0.015 0.030 0.015
rs13418037 2 218,314,141 DIRC3 C T −0.020 0.003 −0.006 0.011 −0.017 0.016 0.003 0.016 −0.002 0.014 0.002 0.018 −0.010 0.018 −0.036 0.018
rs62182127 2 219,279,588 VIL1 A G 0.019 0.003 0.017 0.009 0.005 0.013 0.029 0.013 0.019 0.011 0.012 0.014 0.024 0.014 0.027 0.014
rs11678946 2 222,302,730 EPHA4 C A −0.014 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.003 0.012 0.003 0.013 −0.007 0.011 0.005 0.014 −0.024 0.014 0.012 0.014
rs4402747 2 225,457,173 CUL3 G A −0.016 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.013 −0.004 0.011 −0.006 0.014 0.007 0.014 0.013 0.014
rs17323117 2 230,162,971 PID1 A G −0.029 0.005 −0.014 0.017 −0.022 0.024 0.000 0.025 −0.029 0.020 −0.064 0.026 0.001 0.027 0.035 0.027
rs1465529 2 231,039,037 SP110 T C 0.019 0.003 0.009 0.010 −0.003 0.014 0.018 0.014 0.017 0.012 0.017 0.015 0.020 0.015 0.007 0.015
rs6437249 2 242,175,331 HDLBP C T 0.019 0.003 −0.018 0.010 −0.014 0.014 −0.021 0.014 −0.010 0.012 −0.008 0.015 −0.016 0.015 −0.030 0.015
rs7625680 3 11,378,069 ATG7 A G 0.015 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.004 0.013 0.007 0.013 0.007 0.011 0.012 0.014 −0.004 0.014 −0.002 0.014
rs1822825 3 12,449,963 PPARG A G −0.014 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.014 0.012 −0.005 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.001 0.014 0.026 0.014 0.002 0.014
rs2607748 3 14,158,725 CHCHD4 T C −0.017 0.003 −0.007 0.009 0.002 0.012 −0.017 0.013 −0.005 0.011 0.000 0.014 −0.005 0.014 −0.020 0.014
rs11717397 3 23,368,583 UBE2E2 G A 0.015 0.003 −0.001 0.009 −0.027 0.012 0.027 0.013 −0.008 0.011 −0.017 0.014 −0.002 0.014 0.018 0.014
rs2362755 3 24,716,668 THRB−AS1 G T −0.016 0.003 0.006 0.009 −0.001 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.004 0.011 −0.016 0.014 0.026 0.014 −0.009 0.014
rs11928797 3 33,457,493 UBP1 A C 0.030 0.004 −0.003 0.015 0.003 0.021 −0.005 0.022 −0.017 0.018 −0.023 0.023 0.004 0.024 0.008 0.023
rs33969824 3 42,679,777 NKTR G T 0.020 0.004 0.002 0.013 0.014 0.018 −0.014 0.019 0.030 0.016 0.036 0.021 0.020 0.021 −0.011 0.021
rs12491473 3 46,989,904 CCDC12 G A 0.020 0.003 0.019 0.009 0.025 0.012 0.009 0.013 0.019 0.011 0.024 0.014 0.011 0.014 0.021 0.014
rs2228561 3 48,628,014 COL7A1 A G 0.020 0.004 0.005 0.014 0.007 0.019 0.004 0.020 0.007 0.017 −0.008 0.022 0.017 0.022 −0.003 0.022
rs4768 3 49,758,764 RNF123 A G −0.015 0.003 0.008 0.010 0.005 0.013 0.007 0.014 0.010 0.012 0.021 0.015 0.000 0.015 −0.006 0.015
rs9809209 3 51,281,664 DOCK3 G A −0.017 0.003 0.007 0.009 0.009 0.013 0.005 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.007 0.014 0.030 0.015 −0.026 0.014
rs112893170 3 57,211,863 IL17RD T C 0.020 0.003 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.017 0.012 0.017 0.019 0.014 −0.003 0.019 0.043 0.019 0.008 0.019
rs7628689 3 88,216,647 C3orf38 G A 0.029 0.003 0.014 0.013 0.016 0.017 0.010 0.018 0.009 0.015 0.000 0.020 0.026 0.020 0.023 0.020
rs3772102 3 98,502,628 ST3GAL6 T G −0.020 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.013 0.004 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.004 0.014 0.023 0.014 0.018 0.014
rs62280667 3 101,084,604 SENP7 T C −0.028 0.003 −0.006 0.009 −0.005 0.013 −0.008 0.013 −0.006 0.011 0.001 0.015 0.000 0.015 0.011 0.015
rs62263345 3 107,252,190 BBX A G 0.028 0.004 −0.002 0.014 −0.012 0.019 0.006 0.019 0.008 0.016 0.007 0.021 0.013 0.021 −0.011 0.021
rs13069961 3 124,358,715 KALRN A G −0.018 0.003 0.001 0.011 0.004 0.015 −0.002 0.015 −0.003 0.013 0.002 0.017 −0.008 0.017 0.002 0.017
rs687339 3 135,932,359 AC092991.1 T C 0.040 0.003 0.012 0.010 −0.003 0.015 0.027 0.015 0.014 0.013 −0.001 0.016 0.011 0.017 0.004 0.016
rs811332 3 138,078,348 MRAS C T 0.019 0.003 −0.021 0.011 −0.009 0.016 −0.035 0.016 −0.035 0.013 −0.039 0.017 −0.026 0.018 0.015 0.018
rs55717031 3 138,848,505 MRPS22 G T 0.032 0.003 −0.001 0.010 0.006 0.014 −0.003 0.014 0.012 0.012 0.019 0.015 0.005 0.015 −0.007 0.015
rs6440008 3 141,154,542 ZBTB38 T C 0.035 0.003 −0.007 0.009 −0.015 0.013 −0.002 0.013 −0.017 0.011 −0.026 0.014 −0.004 0.015 0.000 0.014
rs73238159 3 142,078,759 XRN1 T C −0.025 0.004 −0.010 0.013 −0.019 0.018 −0.003 0.019 −0.003 0.016 0.010 0.021 −0.003 0.021 −0.002 0.021
rs13073970 3 170,630,520 EIF5A2 G T −0.025 0.003 0.009 0.011 0.001 0.015 0.017 0.015 0.008 0.013 0.000 0.017 0.013 0.017 0.004 0.017
rs56062334 3 172,299,226 LINC02068 T C 0.017 0.003 −0.007 0.009 −0.017 0.013 0.004 0.013 −0.006 0.011 −0.007 0.015 −0.004 0.015 −0.021 0.015
rs9819762 3 178,914,879 PIK3CA T C 0.019 0.003 −0.030 0.011 −0.023 0.016 −0.038 0.016 −0.040 0.013 −0.053 0.017 −0.011 0.018 −0.031 0.017
rs66707192 3 186,382,065 HRG G A 0.018 0.003 0.012 0.010 0.025 0.014 0.000 0.014 0.007 0.012 0.003 0.016 0.005 0.016 0.001 0.016
rs13108218 4 3,443,931 HGFAC G A 0.017 0.003 0.002 0.009 −0.005 0.013 0.008 0.013 −0.009 0.011 −0.002 0.014 −0.002 0.015 0.011 0.014
rs1055582 4 39,700,173 UBE2K C T 0.027 0.003 −0.021 0.009 −0.016 0.012 −0.027 0.013 −0.027 0.011 −0.027 0.014 −0.020 0.014 −0.010 0.014
rs62302688 4 46,448,465 GABRA2 G A 0.039 0.004 −0.006 0.017 0.022 0.023 −0.033 0.024 0.017 0.020 −0.007 0.026 0.025 0.026 −0.035 0.025
rs115805235 4 69,764,890 AC021146.3 C T 0.039 0.006 −0.032 0.023 −0.080 0.032 0.022 0.033 −0.025 0.027 −0.032 0.035 −0.008 0.036 −0.037 0.035
rs16845929 4 72,017,058 SLC4A4 C T 0.032 0.005 0.003 0.019 0.018 0.027 −0.016 0.028 0.004 0.023 0.027 0.030 −0.019 0.030 0.012 0.030
rs2280099 4 90,035,549 TIGD2 G A 0.025 0.003 −0.006 0.011 −0.011 0.016 −0.004 0.016 0.012 0.014 0.037 0.018 −0.003 0.018 −0.017 0.018
rs35036084 4 97,552,791 LINC02267 T C 0.017 0.003 0.007 0.009 0.009 0.013 0.006 0.013 0.003 0.011 0.002 0.014 −0.004 0.014 0.017 0.014
rs6532798 4 100,054,827 ADH4 T C 0.037 0.003 0.003 0.010 −0.009 0.013 0.018 0.014 0.009 0.011 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.015 0.006 0.015
rs62342064 4 104,665,972 TACR3 C T 0.022 0.004 −0.011 0.014 −0.002 0.020 −0.021 0.021 0.002 0.017 0.017 0.022 −0.017 0.023 −0.009 0.022
rs17429745 4 106,038,169 AC096577.1 G T 0.026 0.003 0.022 0.010 0.043 0.013 −0.002 0.014 0.019 0.011 0.005 0.015 0.032 0.015 0.027 0.015
rs3804173 4 121,719,923 PRDM5 A G −0.020 0.003 −0.004 0.009 0.007 0.013 −0.020 0.013 −0.005 0.011 −0.023 0.015 0.007 0.015 −0.019 0.015
rs111443396 4 124,773,202 LINC01091 T C −0.026 0.004 0.014 0.014 0.020 0.019 0.008 0.020 −0.006 0.016 −0.011 0.021 0.004 0.021 0.048 0.021
rs7667562 4 129,133,826 LARP1B C A 0.016 0.003 0.017 0.010 0.007 0.014 0.032 0.014 0.029 0.012 0.036 0.016 0.020 0.016 0.006 0.016
rs6827641 4 145,653,694 GYPA/HHIP C T −0.014 0.003 −0.020 0.009 −0.032 0.012 −0.008 0.013 −0.023 0.011 −0.007 0.014 −0.037 0.014 −0.017 0.014
rs6853741 4 148,982,559 ARHGAP10 A G 0.024 0.003 −0.004 0.010 −0.014 0.014 0.008 0.015 −0.019 0.012 −0.023 0.016 −0.016 0.016 0.013 0.016
rs62334147 4 169,345,005 DDX60L T C −0.019 0.003 −0.006 0.012 0.003 0.016 −0.012 0.017 0.003 0.014 0.012 0.018 −0.009 0.018 −0.004 0.018
rs4394044 4 186,607,420 SORBS2 T C 0.014 0.003 −0.008 0.009 0.007 0.012 −0.024 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.010 0.014 −0.007 0.014 −0.007 0.014
rs9292578 5 35,230,075 PRLR C A 0.040 0.006 0.024 0.022 0.049 0.031 −0.002 0.032 0.022 0.027 −0.016 0.035 0.050 0.036 0.019 0.035
rs6895953 5 39,084,471 RICTOR G A 0.024 0.003 −0.026 0.009 −0.012 0.012 −0.041 0.013 −0.029 0.011 −0.042 0.014 −0.017 0.014 −0.009 0.014
rs72758321 5 41,464,841 PLCXD3 A G −0.047 0.006 0.003 0.025 0.002 0.035 −0.006 0.035 −0.037 0.029 −0.059 0.038 −0.004 0.039 0.037 0.039
rs6180 5 42,719,239 GHR C A −0.035 0.003 −0.005 0.009 −0.001 0.012 −0.007 0.013 −0.005 0.011 -0.019 0.014 0.010 0.014 0.003 0.014
rs12520263 5 44,122,508 RNU6−381P G T −0.017 0.003 0.010 0.010 0.004 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.016 0.012 0.035 0.016 −0.001 0.016 0.018 0.016
rs7719168 5 53,292,390 ARL15 A C −0.030 0.004 −0.024 0.014 −0.038 0.020 −0.008 0.021 −0.025 0.017 −0.023 0.022 −0.027 0.022 −0.023 0.022
rs28650790 5 55,861,464 C5orf67 C T −0.018 0.003 −0.008 0.011 0.016 0.016 −0.032 0.016 −0.019 0.014 −0.031 0.017 −0.009 0.018 0.014 0.018
rs1498603 5 58,333,125 PDE4D T G 0.031 0.005 0.032 0.019 0.055 0.026 0.009 0.026 0.035 0.023 0.056 0.030 0.009 0.030 0.010 0.029
rs11954036 5 59,028,853 PDE4D T C 0.037 0.003 0.006 0.009 −0.001 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.001 0.011 −0.004 0.015 0.011 0.015 −0.001 0.014
rs80170948 5 64,020,316 SREK1IP1 T G −0.039 0.006 0.007 0.025 0.034 0.034 −0.023 0.035 0.018 0.029 0.002 0.038 0.009 0.039 0.011 0.038
rs2227819 5 76,012,745 F2R C T −0.022 0.004 0.022 0.015 0.008 0.021 0.036 0.021 0.020 0.018 0.037 0.023 0.004 0.023 0.039 0.023
rs12108803 5 77,158,507 TBCA T G −0.033 0.006 −0.008 0.022 −0.021 0.031 0.008 0.031 −0.006 0.026 −0.020 0.034 0.009 0.035 −0.011 0.034
rs840809 5 87,173,927 TMEM161B A C 0.016 0.003 −0.022 0.010 −0.003 0.014 −0.044 0.014 −0.034 0.012 −0.029 0.015 −0.040 0.015 −0.002 0.015
rs13178887 5 88,355,993 MEF2C−AS1 T C 0.023 0.003 0.013 0.009 0.002 0.013 0.023 0.013 0.016 0.011 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.014 −0.002 0.014
rs2366398 5 89,437,963 LINC01339 G T −0.018 0.003 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.009 0.013 −0.006 0.016 0.032 0.017 0.013 0.016
rs26822 5 102,518,795 PPIP5K2 A G −0.017 0.003 −0.009 0.010 −0.007 0.013 −0.012 0.014 −0.014 0.012 −0.024 0.015 −0.002 0.015 −0.017 0.015
rs73271090 5 132,313,550 AC010240.1 G A 0.044 0.003 0.010 0.012 0.019 0.017 0.002 0.018 0.003 0.015 −0.008 0.019 0.003 0.020 −0.005 0.019
rs329122 5 133,864,599 JADE2 G A −0.018 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.003 0.012 0.002 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.018 0.014 −0.003 0.014 0.018 0.014
rs11242236 5 134,586,980 C5orf66 G A 0.025 0.003 0.013 0.009 0.021 0.012 0.006 0.013 0.018 0.011 0.025 0.014 0.018 0.014 0.005 0.014
rs2348604 5 136,809,831 SPOCK1 T C −0.016 0.003 −0.004 0.010 −0.008 0.014 −0.001 0.014 −0.011 0.012 −0.005 0.015 −0.020 0.016 0.004 0.015
rs3734166 5 137,665,323 CDC25C A G 0.028 0.003 0.004 0.010 0.014 0.014 −0.005 0.014 0.008 0.012 0.005 0.015 0.011 0.016 −0.008 0.015
rs2042253 5 143,059,433 MIR5197 T C 0.023 0.003 −0.023 0.010 −0.045 0.014 −0.001 0.014 −0.017 0.012 −0.027 0.016 −0.004 0.016 −0.021 0.016
rs35668185 5 168,256,455 SLIT3 T C 0.056 0.003 −0.002 0.011 −0.001 0.015 −0.001 0.015 0.003 0.013 0.012 0.017 −0.009 0.017 −0.008 0.017
rs13168379 5 173,382,761 CPEB4 G A −0.031 0.005 0.003 0.017 −0.003 0.024 0.011 0.024 0.022 0.021 0.024 0.028 0.018 0.028 −0.006 0.027
rs17714046 5 180,661,980 TRIM41 C T 0.042 0.006 0.026 0.024 −0.002 0.033 0.051 0.034 0.032 0.028 0.022 0.037 0.045 0.037 −0.009 0.037
rs584955 6 7,097,141 RREB1 A G 0.036 0.006 0.037 0.021 0.018 0.030 0.053 0.031 0.035 0.026 0.034 0.034 0.039 0.034 0.022 0.034
rs2296198 6 18,399,750 RNF144B C T 0.016 0.003 −0.001 0.010 −0.004 0.014 0.002 0.015 −0.021 0.012 −0.024 0.016 −0.017 0.016 −0.005 0.016
rs72828596 6 19,183,591 AL589647.1 G A −0.019 0.004 −0.012 0.014 −0.019 0.019 −0.006 0.019 −0.040 0.016 −0.038 0.021 −0.059 0.021 0.028 0.021
rs73382439 6 20,404,420 E2F3 C T 0.019 0.003 0.005 0.011 0.000 0.016 0.009 0.016 0.010 0.014 0.015 0.018 0.000 0.018 −0.003 0.018
rs17258904 6 21,928,131 CASC15 A G −0.017 0.003 −0.005 0.010 −0.011 0.014 0.004 0.014 0.002 0.012 −0.007 0.015 0.011 0.016 −0.008 0.015
rs1165196 6 25,813,150 SLC17A1 A G −0.029 0.003 −0.007 0.009 −0.022 0.012 0.010 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.010 0.014 0.005 0.014 −0.014 0.014
rs13195402 6 26,463,575 BTN2A1 T G −0.038 0.004 0.042 0.019 0.026 0.026 0.058 0.027 0.037 0.022 0.066 0.028 0.014 0.029 0.058 0.028
rs16897515 6 27,278,020 POM121L2 A C −0.023 0.003 0.036 0.012 0.022 0.017 0.051 0.017 0.038 0.014 0.051 0.018 0.036 0.019 0.058 0.018
rs33932084 6 28,268,824 PGBD1 G A −0.034 0.004 0.054 0.016 0.041 0.022 0.066 0.023 0.051 0.019 0.096 0.024 0.020 0.025 0.087 0.024
rs9267488 6 31,514,247 ATP6V1G2−DDX39B/ATP6V1G2 G A −0.031 0.004 0.051 0.014 0.059 0.020 0.044 0.020 0.048 0.017 0.057 0.022 0.037 0.022 0.092 0.022
rs1150752 6 32,064,726 TNXB C T −0.031 0.004 0.058 0.015 0.066 0.021 0.047 0.021 0.054 0.018 0.066 0.023 0.041 0.023 0.096 0.022
rs12194618 6 38,091,030 ZFAND3 G A −0.017 0.003 0.007 0.009 0.011 0.013 0.002 0.013 0.009 0.011 −0.003 0.014 0.016 0.015 −0.002 0.014
rs7740433 6 42,908,013 CNPY3 A G 0.017 0.003 0.003 0.011 −0.001 0.015 0.004 0.015 0.018 0.013 0.012 0.016 0.018 0.017 −0.021 0.016
rs998584 6 43,757,896 VEGFA A C 0.020 0.003 0.005 0.009 −0.020 0.012 0.033 0.013 0.009 0.011 0.012 0.014 0.008 0.014 0.007 0.014
rs6924225 6 45,584,732 RUNX2 G A 0.019 0.003 0.005 0.012 0.020 0.017 −0.011 0.017 −0.006 0.014 −0.019 0.019 −0.004 0.019 0.006 0.019
rs2397112 6 52,684,333 GSTA6P A G 0.019 0.003 0.002 0.009 0.008 0.013 −0.004 0.013 −0.003 0.011 −0.001 0.014 0.005 0.014 0.005 0.014
rs9361489 6 79,816,785 PHIP T C 0.022 0.003 0.008 0.009 −0.004 0.012 0.021 0.013 0.018 0.011 0.036 0.014 0.009 0.014 −0.003 0.014
rs6916994 6 87,991,236 GJB7 C T 0.029 0.003 −0.005 0.009 −0.001 0.012 −0.006 0.013 −0.008 0.011 −0.030 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.009 0.014
rs670049 6 100,087,024 PRDM13 A C 0.019 0.003 −0.005 0.009 0.002 0.013 −0.012 0.013 −0.003 0.011 −0.011 0.014 0.001 0.015 −0.004 0.014
rs9322822 6 105,369,598 LIN28B−AS1 C T 0.015 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.016 0.013 −0.011 0.014 0.007 0.011 0.006 0.015 0.006 0.015 0.001 0.015
rs4946810 6 107,420,270 BEND3 A C −0.016 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.004 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.016 0.011 0.012 0.015 0.020 0.015 −0.004 0.014
rs218291 6 108,467,024 OSTM1/OSTM1−AS1 G A 0.016 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.014 0.013 0.007 0.013 0.007 0.011 0.002 0.014 0.009 0.015 0.021 0.014
rs9398171 6 108,983,527 FOXO3 T C 0.050 0.003 0.012 0.010 0.023 0.013 −0.002 0.014 0.022 0.012 0.027 0.015 0.024 0.015 −0.001 0.015
rs41285260 6 126,661,502 CENPW T G 0.039 0.004 -0.007 0.017 -0.012 0.024 -0.005 0.024 -0.012 0.020 0.004 0.026 -0.039 0.027 0.008 0.026
rs9321106 6 128,355,316 PTPRK A G 0.018 0.003 0.016 0.012 0.018 0.017 0.014 0.018 0.004 0.015 0.008 0.019 0.001 0.019 0.030 0.019
rs9398891 6 129,314,749 LAMA2 C T −0.017 0.003 −0.001 0.010 −0.002 0.013 0.001 0.014 0.000 0.011 −0.002 0.015 0.005 0.015 0.007 0.015
rs3890746 6 130,371,055 L3MBTL3 T C −0.020 0.003 0.004 0.009 0.014 0.012 −0.004 0.013 −0.006 0.011 −0.033 0.014 0.020 0.014 0.017 0.014
rs2786185 6 147,595,554 STXBP5 G A 0.019 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.019 0.012 −0.008 0.013 0.004 0.011 −0.009 0.014 0.012 0.014 −0.001 0.014
rs7774230 6 152,164,239 ESR1 C T −0.026 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.012 0.016 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.004 0.014 0.010 0.014
rs790513 6 154,420,368 OPRM1 C A 0.025 0.003 0.006 0.010 −0.015 0.014 0.027 0.015 −0.001 0.012 −0.027 0.016 0.012 0.016 0.011 0.016
rs7758644 6 156,583,467 snoRNA C A −0.019 0.003 0.008 0.012 0.014 0.017 0.000 0.018 0.004 0.015 0.004 0.019 0.008 0.019 0.019 0.019
rs3127579 6 160,674,632 SLC22A2 G A −0.033 0.004 0.012 0.013 0.028 0.019 −0.008 0.019 −0.004 0.016 −0.016 0.021 0.005 0.021 0.028 0.021
rs12211977 6 161,252,770 lincRNA G A −0.023 0.004 0.010 0.016 0.040 0.022 −0.022 0.022 0.024 0.018 0.061 0.024 −0.004 0.024 −0.007 0.024
rs504371 6 165,724,052 C6orf118 C A −0.015 0.003 −0.015 0.009 −0.006 0.013 −0.023 0.013 −0.018 0.011 −0.027 0.014 −0.006 0.015 −0.015 0.014
rs4709995 6 166,313,447 PDE10A C T −0.042 0.003 −0.022 0.009 −0.023 0.013 −0.020 0.013 −0.026 0.011 −0.020 0.014 −0.041 0.014 −0.049 0.014
rs7802508 7 1,191,689 ZFAND2A G A −0.021 0.003 −0.006 0.009 −0.012 0.013 0.001 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.012 0.014 −0.001 0.014 −0.023 0.014
rs12699547 7 2,015,970 MAD1L1 C T 0.021 0.003 0.005 0.009 −0.009 0.013 0.022 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.004 0.014 0.010 0.015 0.016 0.014
rs1182174 7 2,875,420 GNA12 G A −0.021 0.003 0.028 0.010 0.029 0.014 0.026 0.014 0.037 0.012 0.036 0.015 0.031 0.015 0.003 0.015
rs2250243 7 6,690,240 ZNF316 T C −0.024 0.003 −0.011 0.010 −0.009 0.014 −0.015 0.015 −0.010 0.012 −0.008 0.016 −0.014 0.016 −0.016 0.016
rs4719393 7 14,219,213 DGKB T G 0.027 0.003 −0.008 0.010 −0.010 0.013 −0.005 0.014 −0.008 0.012 −0.013 0.015 −0.004 0.015 −0.009 0.015
rs10252510 7 31,023,108 GHRHR G A 0.020 0.003 0.001 0.010 −0.009 0.014 0.012 0.015 −0.001 0.012 −0.018 0.016 0.015 0.016 0.007 0.016
rs7790246 7 32,976,416 AVL9/RP9P C T −0.017 0.003 −0.007 0.010 0.000 0.014 −0.013 0.014 0.001 0.012 0.004 0.015 0.005 0.015 0.006 0.015
rs1050327 7 44,808,017 ZMIZ2 G A −0.017 0.003 −0.010 0.009 −0.008 0.012 −0.013 0.013 −0.005 0.011 −0.003 0.014 −0.007 0.014 −0.010 0.014
rs870796 7 45,426,435 ELK1P1 G A 0.017 0.003 −0.007 0.009 −0.006 0.013 −0.010 0.013 −0.004 0.011 0.002 0.014 −0.014 0.014 −0.014 0.014
rs2270628 7 45,949,570 IGFBP3 C T −0.033 0.003 0.023 0.011 0.030 0.015 0.019 0.016 0.024 0.013 0.017 0.017 0.043 0.018 0.048 0.017
rs74657816 7 46,670,682 HMGN1P19 T G 0.047 0.005 0.012 0.019 0.002 0.026 0.021 0.027 −0.004 0.022 0.004 0.029 −0.022 0.029 −0.006 0.029
rs12538762 7 47,264,328 TNS3 C T 0.026 0.004 0.001 0.014 0.002 0.020 −0.003 0.020 −0.004 0.017 −0.002 0.022 −0.006 0.023 −0.012 0.022
rs6974707 7 55,982,894 ZNF713 G A −0.019 0.003 0.009 0.011 0.024 0.015 −0.008 0.015 0.004 0.013 −0.008 0.016 0.023 0.017 0.012 0.017
rs35862187 7 69,625,029 AUTS2 A G 0.031 0.006 0.002 0.020 −0.030 0.028 0.038 0.029 −0.015 0.024 −0.036 0.031 −0.003 0.031 −0.012 0.031
rs17145738 7 72,982,874 TBL2 C T −0.034 0.004 −0.016 0.014 −0.018 0.019 −0.016 0.019 −0.021 0.016 −0.005 0.021 −0.030 0.022 −0.034 0.021
rs411717 7 94,033,031 COL1A2 C T −0.015 0.003 0.009 0.009 0.017 0.012 −0.001 0.013 0.001 0.011 −0.007 0.014 0.010 0.014 0.022 0.014
rs34670419 7 99,130,834 ZKSCAN5 G T −0.036 0.006 0.001 0.024 −0.020 0.033 0.022 0.034 −0.024 0.028 −0.028 0.036 −0.020 0.037 0.045 0.037
rs34312198 7 99,674,870 ZNF3 C A −0.024 0.004 −0.020 0.014 −0.021 0.020 −0.020 0.021 −0.026 0.017 −0.020 0.022 −0.021 0.023 −0.010 0.022
rs7783012 7 114,116,881 FOXP2 A G −0.016 0.003 0.010 0.009 0.017 0.012 0.004 0.013 0.011 0.011 0.018 0.014 0.005 0.014 0.015 0.014
rs12666306 7 115,082,406 AC073901.1 G A 0.017 0.003 −0.001 0.009 0.017 0.012 −0.020 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.003 0.014 −0.010 0.014 0.017 0.014
rs2896395 7 127,511,705 SND1 C T 0.015 0.003 −0.010 0.010 −0.016 0.014 −0.003 0.014 −0.018 0.012 −0.015 0.015 −0.021 0.015 −0.007 0.015
rs11556924 7 129,663,496 ZC3HC1 T C −0.016 0.003 0.037 0.009 0.032 0.013 0.043 0.013 0.043 0.011 0.030 0.015 0.047 0.015 0.033 0.015
rs207212 7 130,547,217 LINC00513 C T 0.028 0.004 0.058 0.016 0.075 0.022 0.045 0.022 0.068 0.019 0.057 0.024 0.063 0.025 0.049 0.024
rs1986692 7 133,743,393 EXOC4 A G −0.015 0.003 0.004 0.009 −0.003 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.012 0.014 0.003 0.014 −0.004 0.014
rs273956 7 137,603,188 CREB3L2 G A −0.021 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.013 0.016 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.016 0.014 0.023 0.015 0.021 0.014
rs114949263 7 150,498,245 TMEM176B/TMEM176A T C 0.027 0.004 −0.013 0.014 −0.004 0.020 −0.020 0.021 −0.027 0.017 −0.019 0.022 −0.044 0.022 −0.023 0.022
rs10246481 7 156,184,748 lincRNA A G −0.015 0.003 0.004 0.009 0.004 0.013 0.006 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.018 0.014 −0.020 0.014 0.002 0.014
rs9657541 8 10,643,164 SOX7/PINX1/PINX1 C T 0.020 0.003 −0.002 0.011 −0.010 0.016 0.007 0.016 −0.006 0.013 0.004 0.017 −0.015 0.017 −0.002 0.017
rs76393968 8 16,282,937 MSR1 G A 0.060 0.010 0.035 0.034 0.018 0.048 0.060 0.051 0.029 0.044 0.036 0.058 0.025 0.059 0.015 0.057
rs1495741 8 18,272,881 NAT2 A G −0.026 0.003 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.015 0.009 0.015 0.011 0.013 0.012 0.016 0.013 0.017 0.012 0.016
rs11782452 8 26,361,601 BNIP3L G A 0.015 0.003 −0.002 0.009 0.000 0.013 −0.005 0.013 −0.002 0.011 0.009 0.014 −0.009 0.014 −0.001 0.014
rs56352849 8 73,769,173 KCNB2 G A −0.016 0.003 −0.011 0.010 −0.012 0.014 −0.005 0.014 −0.017 0.012 −0.038 0.015 −0.002 0.016 −0.010 0.015
rs1431015 8 77,131,580 HNF4G C T 0.020 0.003 0.008 0.009 0.014 0.012 −0.001 0.013 0.003 0.011 0.008 0.014 −0.001 0.014 0.016 0.014
rs6473015 8 78,178,485 lincRNA A C −0.019 0.003 −0.028 0.010 −0.025 0.014 −0.034 0.014 −0.024 0.012 −0.031 0.015 −0.019 0.015 −0.035 0.015
rs445036 8 81,408,409 ZBTB10 T C 0.019 0.003 −0.007 0.010 −0.008 0.013 −0.007 0.014 0.004 0.011 0.015 0.015 −0.012 0.015 −0.029 0.015
rs1786342 8 101,676,363 SNX31 T C 0.017 0.003 0.022 0.009 0.030 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.023 0.011 0.014 0.014 0.032 0.014 0.016 0.014
rs60862542 8 109,275,071 EIF3E G A 0.017 0.003 −0.005 0.011 −0.018 0.015 0.008 0.015 −0.010 0.013 −0.007 0.016 −0.015 0.017 −0.010 0.016
rs2737205 8 116,610,180 TRPS1 C T −0.023 0.003 −0.013 0.009 −0.005 0.013 −0.021 0.013 −0.028 0.011 −0.023 0.014 −0.034 0.014 0.010 0.014
rs2978062 8 134,571,618 ST3GAL1 T G −0.019 0.003 −0.007 0.013 0.009 0.018 −0.023 0.018 −0.004 0.015 0.018 0.020 −0.035 0.020 0.019 0.020
rs716100 8 135,661,278 ZFAT G A −0.019 0.003 −0.017 0.009 −0.018 0.013 −0.013 0.013 0.002 0.011 −0.001 0.015 0.005 0.015 −0.039 0.015
rs12549853 8 145,020,636 PLEC G A −0.016 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.013 0.015 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.014 0.014 −0.004 0.014 0.009 0.014
rs10114121 9 19,440,136 ACER2 G A −0.020 0.004 −0.021 0.012 −0.025 0.017 −0.018 0.018 −0.019 0.015 −0.013 0.019 −0.023 0.019 −0.019 0.019
rs10757291 9 22,161,884 CDKN2B−AS1 A G −0.019 0.003 0.007 0.009 0.010 0.012 0.006 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.018 0.014 −0.008 0.014 0.011 0.014
rs10811787 9 22,871,816 AL391117.1 T C −0.015 0.003 −0.009 0.009 −0.011 0.012 −0.009 0.013 −0.010 0.011 −0.020 0.014 −0.008 0.014 −0.002 0.014
rs11557154 9 34,107,505 DCAF12 T C 0.024 0.004 0.036 0.013 0.038 0.018 0.029 0.018 0.045 0.016 0.051 0.020 0.041 0.021 0.050 0.020
rs10869022 9 74,057,313 TRPM3 C T 0.021 0.003 0.005 0.011 0.027 0.015 −0.016 0.015 0.020 0.013 0.019 0.017 0.024 0.017 −0.020 0.017
rs2378662 9 86,707,289 AL390838.1 A G −0.017 0.003 0.004 0.009 −0.007 0.012 0.019 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.020 0.014 −0.003 0.014 0.018 0.014
rs10908903 9 92,228,559 GADD45G T G 0.015 0.003 0.015 0.009 0.012 0.012 0.019 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.019 0.014 0.007 0.014 0.014 0.014
rs1055710 9 96,214,928 FAM120AOS A G −0.018 0.003 −0.013 0.009 −0.014 0.013 −0.011 0.013 −0.011 0.011 −0.039 0.015 0.017 0.015 0.000 0.015
rs75660441 9 97,662,448 C9orf3 A G 0.039 0.005 −0.029 0.018 −0.024 0.026 −0.030 0.026 −0.032 0.022 −0.049 0.028 −0.016 0.029 −0.038 0.028
rs28831479 9 98,254,526 PTCH1 C A 0.022 0.003 0.001 0.010 0.007 0.014 −0.002 0.014 0.002 0.012 −0.016 0.016 0.015 0.016 0.001 0.016
rs7034716 9 101,858,382 TGFBR1 C T 0.015 0.003 0.013 0.010 −0.030 0.014 0.006 0.014 −0.008 0.012 0.004 0.016 −0.024 0.016 −0.016 0.016
rs6479003 9 102,948,685 INVS G A 0.024 0.004 0.022 0.016 0.035 0.022 0.006 0.023 0.029 0.019 0.025 0.025 0.015 0.025 0.021 0.024
rs41277821 9 109,689,972 ZNF462 T C 0.062 0.009 0.005 0.038 0.013 0.054 −0.005 0.055 −0.018 0.046 −0.007 0.060 −0.021 0.062 0.021 0.058
rs7872812 9 119,341,544 ASTN2 C T −0.026 0.004 −0.007 0.013 −0.023 0.017 0.004 0.018 −0.003 0.015 0.019 0.019 −0.027 0.019 −0.017 0.019
rs13301073 9 128,284,378 MAPKAP1 G A 0.022 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.000 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.017 0.014 −0.005 0.015 −0.005 0.014
rs1832007 10 5,254,847 AKR1C4 A G −0.057 0.003 −0.034 0.012 −0.045 0.017 −0.023 0.018 −0.043 0.015 −0.043 0.019 −0.055 0.020 −0.009 0.019
rs2801482 10 12,459,773 CAMK1D A G −0.050 0.008 −0.026 0.026 −0.016 0.036 −0.037 0.037 0.003 0.032 −0.010 0.041 0.033 0.041 −0.021 0.040
rs7921105 10 13,535,398 BEND7 T C −0.016 0.003 −0.001 0.009 −0.003 0.012 0.002 0.013 0.008 0.011 −0.001 0.014 0.010 0.014 −0.003 0.014
rs11012712 10 21,760,015 C T 0.022 0.003 −0.026 0.011 −0.021 0.016 −0.032 0.016 −0.027 0.014 −0.039 0.017 −0.012 0.018 −0.035 0.017
rs10047326 10 22,839,463 PIP4K2A A C 0.017 0.003 −0.011 0.009 0.013 0.013 −0.034 0.013 −0.010 0.011 −0.019 0.014 −0.005 0.014 −0.026 0.014
rs293275 10 53,215,020 PRKG1 T C −0.014 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.009 0.012 −0.005 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.023 0.014 0.005 0.014 −0.008 0.014
rs10821713 10 62,055,781 ANK3 C T −0.017 0.003 −0.004 0.009 −0.004 0.012 −0.004 0.013 0.006 0.011 −0.007 0.014 0.018 0.014 −0.009 0.014
rs7910087 10 77,209,145 LRMDA C T −0.017 0.003 −0.009 0.009 −0.020 0.012 0.001 0.013 −0.002 0.011 −0.009 0.014 0.006 0.014 −0.020 0.014
rs4418728 10 94,839,724 CYP26A1 G T 0.024 0.003 −0.027 0.009 −0.029 0.012 −0.025 0.013 −0.029 0.011 −0.030 0.014 −0.028 0.014 −0.022 0.014
rs116454156 10 95,347,041 FFAR4 A G 0.078 0.010 −0.013 0.033 −0.007 0.047 −0.024 0.049 −0.006 0.040 −0.003 0.051 −0.015 0.053 −0.006 0.051
rs11187838 10 96,038,686 PLCE1 G A 0.024 0.003 −0.006 0.009 −0.002 0.012 −0.010 0.013 0.000 0.011 0.005 0.014 −0.004 0.014 −0.006 0.014
rs10509746 10 102,656,897 PAX2 C T 0.027 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.031 0.013 −0.021 0.013 0.000 0.011 −0.002 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.011 0.014
rs4917962 10 103,931,931 NOLC1 G T −0.024 0.004 −0.024 0.013 −0.008 0.018 −0.042 0.019 −0.017 0.016 0.004 0.021 −0.032 0.021 −0.021 0.021
rs12244851 10 114,773,926 TCF7L2 C T −0.015 0.003 −0.010 0.010 −0.004 0.013 −0.014 0.014 −0.009 0.011 0.008 0.015 −0.021 0.015 −0.005 0.015
rs3858325 10 117,988,795 GFRA1 C T −0.019 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.000 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.004 0.011 0.015 0.014 −0.007 0.014 0.011 0.014
rs61867536 11 1,513,700 MOB2 C T −0.018 0.003 −0.030 0.009 −0.019 0.012 −0.044 0.013 −0.023 0.011 −0.016 0.014 −0.025 0.014 −0.054 0.014
rs3213223 11 2,156,930 IGF2/INS−IGF−2 G A −0.076 0.003 0.007 0.011 0.011 0.015 0.004 0.016 0.021 0.013 0.028 0.017 0.012 0.017 −0.023 0.017
rs11029620 11 3,771,924 NUP98 C T 0.022 0.003 −0.004 0.011 −0.009 0.015 0.003 0.015 0.004 0.013 −0.012 0.017 0.010 0.017 −0.011 0.017
rs67257872 11 8,530,218 STK33 A G 0.014 0.003 −0.003 0.009 −0.003 0.012 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.011 0.000 0.014 0.010 0.014 0.000 0.014
rs7947951 11 13,356,030 ARNTL G A 0.020 0.003 −0.007 0.009 −0.008 0.013 −0.006 0.013 −0.016 0.011 −0.016 0.015 −0.015 0.015 −0.001 0.015
rs72858776 11 15,772,953 AC087379.1 G T 0.030 0.005 −0.010 0.016 −0.006 0.022 −0.010 0.023 −0.008 0.019 −0.014 0.025 −0.002 0.026 −0.010 0.025
rs11024614 11 18,326,758 HPS5 T C −0.023 0.003 −0.008 0.009 −0.013 0.013 −0.001 0.013 −0.004 0.011 −0.007 0.014 −0.001 0.014 −0.021 0.014
rs34452566 11 27,793,470 AC103796.1 G T −0.018 0.003 −0.010 0.012 0.004 0.016 −0.026 0.017 −0.004 0.014 −0.002 0.018 −0.010 0.018 −0.021 0.018
rs11031058 11 30,375,889 ARL14EP C T −0.022 0.003 0.015 0.012 0.019 0.017 0.008 0.017 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.018 0.018 0.019 0.007 0.018
rs117529631 11 46,159,633 AC024475.4 C T −0.041 0.006 −0.035 0.023 −0.058 0.031 −0.014 0.032 −0.024 0.027 −0.015 0.035 −0.037 0.036 −0.013 0.035
rs5896 11 46,745,003 F2 T C 0.036 0.004 −0.023 0.013 −0.022 0.018 −0.021 0.019 −0.023 0.016 −0.016 0.021 −0.028 0.021 −0.026 0.021
rs1051006 11 47,306,585 MADD A G 0.040 0.003 −0.009 0.012 −0.013 0.016 −0.004 0.017 −0.012 0.014 −0.011 0.018 −0.019 0.019 −0.017 0.018
rs1039481 11 48,182,237 PTPRJ A G −0.042 0.003 −0.013 0.010 0.000 0.014 −0.027 0.015 −0.010 0.012 −0.005 0.016 −0.013 0.016 −0.011 0.016
rs202676 11 49,227,620 FOLH1 G A 0.021 0.003 0.002 0.010 −0.005 0.015 0.008 0.015 0.003 0.013 0.008 0.016 0.001 0.017 −0.017 0.017
rs10769621 11 49,860,463 TRIM51FP T C 0.020 0.003 0.012 0.010 0.002 0.013 0.025 0.014 0.011 0.012 0.017 0.015 0.004 0.015 0.009 0.015
rs11230983 11 55,541,284 OR5D13 A G 0.035 0.004 0.009 0.014 −0.002 0.019 0.023 0.019 0.015 0.016 0.010 0.021 0.013 0.022 0.001 0.021
rs78460947 11 56,143,715 OR8U1 G A 0.042 0.006 −0.006 0.027 0.023 0.037 −0.035 0.038 −0.013 0.032 0.019 0.041 −0.020 0.043 −0.029 0.041
rs146345029 11 59,596,007 GIF G A −0.034 0.006 0.052 0.022 0.051 0.032 0.053 0.032 0.036 0.027 0.003 0.034 0.067 0.036 0.051 0.035
rs174554 11 61,579,463 FADS1/FADS2 A G 0.022 0.003 0.061 0.009 0.062 0.013 0.062 0.013 0.060 0.011 0.045 0.015 0.081 0.015 0.051 0.015
rs117104648 11 65,543,736 AP5B1 T C −0.036 0.005 0.001 0.019 0.008 0.027 0.000 0.027 −0.010 0.023 −0.012 0.029 −0.016 0.030 0.018 0.029
rs12790261 11 66,988,048 KDM2A C A −0.031 0.005 −0.013 0.019 −0.003 0.027 −0.016 0.028 −0.015 0.023 0.006 0.030 −0.024 0.031 −0.030 0.030
rs4980661 11 69,306,579 CCND1 A G 0.014 0.003 −0.012 0.009 −0.001 0.012 −0.024 0.013 −0.014 0.011 −0.010 0.014 −0.020 0.014 −0.002 0.014
rs2512525 11 77,923,019 USP35 T C 0.024 0.003 −0.012 0.012 −0.018 0.016 −0.005 0.017 −0.007 0.014 −0.017 0.018 −0.005 0.019 −0.032 0.018
rs61904289 11 85,994,731 AP003084.1 C T −0.016 0.003 −0.002 0.009 0.001 0.013 −0.004 0.014 −0.005 0.011 0.000 0.015 −0.010 0.015 0.006 0.015
rs625245 11 94,192,103 MRE11 T G −0.016 0.003 0.009 0.009 −0.005 0.013 0.025 0.013 0.016 0.011 0.022 0.015 0.005 0.015 0.006 0.014
rs35023999 11 113,266,411 ANKK1 C A 0.015 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.003 0.012 0.009 0.013 0.011 0.011 0.026 0.014 −0.006 0.014 −0.007 0.014
rs10892564 11 120,224,650 ARHGEF12 A G −0.017 0.003 0.012 0.009 −0.001 0.013 0.028 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.011 0.014 0.013 0.014 0.005 0.014
rs4936759 11 122,763,516 C11orf63 C T 0.016 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.015 0.013 −0.001 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.008 0.014 0.009 0.014 0.014 0.014
rs10893499 11 126,241,979 ST3GAL4 G A 0.022 0.004 0.025 0.013 0.001 0.018 0.050 0.018 0.022 0.016 0.024 0.020 0.018 0.020 0.046 0.020
rs11064536 12 905,582 WNK1 T C 0.020 0.003 −0.016 0.012 0.016 0.017 −0.051 0.017 −0.021 0.014 −0.022 0.019 −0.025 0.019 −0.024 0.019
rs2856321 12 11,855,773 ETV6 A G −0.026 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.022 0.013 −0.009 0.013 −0.003 0.011 0.001 0.015 −0.006 0.015 0.018 0.015
rs10841649 12 20,954,879 SLCO1B3 C T 0.021 0.004 −0.002 0.013 0.010 0.019 −0.011 0.019 −0.010 0.016 0.014 0.021 −0.017 0.021 0.016 0.021
rs9738365 12 31,997,635 C A −0.058 0.003 0.000 0.010 0.007 0.014 −0.009 0.014 −0.007 0.012 −0.001 0.016 −0.005 0.016 0.015 0.016
rs12231073 12 38,526,901 G T −0.017 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.022 0.012 0.001 0.013 0.010 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.012 0.014 0.008 0.014
rs11175935 12 40,693,806 LRRK2 G T 0.020 0.003 0.000 0.011 0.019 0.015 −0.020 0.016 −0.006 0.013 −0.016 0.017 0.006 0.018 −0.002 0.017
rs247917 12 46,265,916 ARID2 C T −0.015 0.003 0.000 0.009 0.010 0.012 −0.009 0.013 −0.001 0.011 −0.006 0.014 0.006 0.014 −0.007 0.014
rs117564283 12 52,300,110 ACVRL1 C T −0.029 0.005 0.037 0.018 0.026 0.025 0.046 0.026 0.045 0.022 0.053 0.028 0.024 0.028 −0.006 0.028
rs773116 12 56,486,159 ERBB3 G A 0.016 0.003 0.008 0.009 0.008 0.013 0.010 0.013 0.017 0.011 0.010 0.014 0.037 0.014 0.000 0.014
rs78607331 12 57,648,644 R3HDM2 T C −0.037 0.006 0.025 0.025 0.015 0.034 0.040 0.036 −0.001 0.030 −0.019 0.039 0.037 0.039 0.048 0.037
rs4547160 12 63,503,650 AVPR1A G T −0.018 0.003 −0.018 0.009 −0.014 0.013 −0.020 0.013 −0.015 0.011 −0.008 0.015 −0.031 0.015 −0.013 0.015
rs1351394 12 66,351,826 HMGA2 C T 0.024 0.003 0.018 0.009 0.018 0.012 0.015 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.018 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.023 0.014
rs2230281 12 89,917,518 GALNT4/POC1B−GALNT4 G A −0.016 0.003 −0.010 0.010 0.009 0.014 −0.033 0.014 −0.013 0.012 −0.021 0.015 −0.002 0.016 0.002 0.015
rs10777540 12 94,150,321 CRADD T G −0.018 0.003 −0.014 0.009 −0.023 0.012 −0.005 0.013 −0.016 0.011 −0.023 0.014 −0.012 0.014 −0.013 0.014
rs10860237 12 98,157,010 AC007424.1 G A −0.030 0.003 −0.003 0.009 −0.013 0.013 0.007 0.014 0.001 0.012 0.000 0.015 0.006 0.015 −0.007 0.015
rs11111274 12 102,838,128 IGF1 A G −0.080 0.003 −0.013 0.010 −0.019 0.014 −0.007 0.014 −0.015 0.012 0.002 0.016 −0.041 0.016 0.002 0.016
rs10745954 12 103,483,094 AC068643.1 G A 0.015 0.003 0.003 0.009 −0.003 0.012 0.008 0.013 0.005 0.011 0.010 0.014 0.008 0.014 0.000 0.014
rs7314285 12 111,522,026 CUX2 T G −0.052 0.005 0.011 0.017 −0.006 0.024 0.033 0.024 0.005 0.021 −0.019 0.027 0.029 0.028 0.002 0.027
rs1061657 12 115,108,136 TBX3 T C −0.022 0.003 −0.032 0.010 −0.018 0.014 −0.047 0.014 −0.029 0.012 −0.023 0.016 −0.029 0.016 −0.044 0.015
rs2460488 12 116,187,660 G A 0.026 0.003 0.008 0.012 0.008 0.016 0.008 0.017 0.009 0.014 0.005 0.018 0.009 0.019 0.004 0.018
rs1800574 12 121,416,864 HNF1A T C 0.145 0.007 0.003 0.027 −0.009 0.038 0.019 0.039 0.019 0.032 −0.013 0.042 0.071 0.041 0.050 0.041
rs11057265 12 123,805,950 SBNO1 G A 0.044 0.007 0.011 0.027 −0.013 0.037 0.035 0.038 0.005 0.032 −0.017 0.041 0.028 0.043 0.040 0.042
rs9532512 13 40,769,897 LINC00598 G A −0.043 0.003 −0.010 0.011 −0.004 0.016 −0.012 0.016 −0.015 0.013 −0.014 0.017 −0.027 0.018 −0.010 0.017
rs1170158 13 42,701,941 DGKH T G 0.021 0.003 −0.021 0.011 −0.036 0.015 −0.007 0.016 −0.034 0.013 −0.032 0.017 −0.038 0.017 −0.013 0.017
rs1535793 13 47,154,966 LRCH1 A G 0.024 0.003 0.033 0.010 0.024 0.014 0.042 0.015 0.036 0.012 0.031 0.016 0.045 0.016 0.028 0.016
rs118081390 13 49,671,053 FNDC3A G A 0.028 0.005 −0.018 0.018 −0.049 0.025 0.014 0.025 −0.020 0.021 −0.012 0.027 −0.041 0.027 −0.019 0.027
rs9573360 13 74,771,429 KLF12 A C 0.014 0.003 −0.010 0.009 0.003 0.012 −0.022 0.013 −0.011 0.011 −0.019 0.014 −0.004 0.014 −0.017 0.014
rs71432868 13 106,559,402 SNORA25 T C −0.028 0.005 0.016 0.022 0.023 0.030 0.009 0.031 0.032 0.026 0.038 0.034 0.020 0.034 0.011 0.034
rs9583151 13 107,666,257 C T 0.014 0.003 0.001 0.009 0.000 0.012 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.011 0.011 0.014 −0.012 0.014 −0.001 0.014
rs7323205 13 110,365,525 LINC00676 C T 0.015 0.003 −0.004 0.009 −0.014 0.013 0.004 0.013 −0.008 0.011 0.005 0.014 −0.022 0.015 0.002 0.014
rs6602909 13 114,551,993 GAS6 T C −0.020 0.003 −0.009 0.010 −0.001 0.014 −0.016 0.014 −0.009 0.012 −0.007 0.016 −0.004 0.016 0.006 0.015
rs8017377 14 24,883,887 NYNRIN A G −0.017 0.003 −0.010 0.009 −0.012 0.012 −0.007 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.011 0.014 −0.007 0.014 −0.028 0.014
rs28396553 14 36,673,392 lincRNA T C 0.015 0.003 0.021 0.009 0.018 0.013 0.025 0.013 0.015 0.011 0.036 0.014 −0.004 0.014 0.010 0.014
rs33912345 14 60,976,537 SIX6 A C −0.023 0.003 0.008 0.009 0.023 0.013 −0.009 0.013 0.007 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.028 0.014
rs79936318 14 64,315,556 SYNE2 G A −0.017 0.003 −0.007 0.012 −0.017 0.017 0.009 0.018 −0.010 0.015 −0.045 0.019 0.027 0.020 0.001 0.019
rs168961 14 69,282,930 ZFP36L1 A G −0.018 0.003 −0.004 0.009 −0.013 0.012 0.006 0.013 −0.004 0.011 −0.004 0.014 0.001 0.014 −0.016 0.014
rs75088740 14 69,819,101 GALNT16 G A −0.019 0.003 −0.021 0.012 −0.018 0.017 −0.020 0.017 −0.025 0.014 −0.030 0.018 −0.019 0.019 −0.010 0.019
rs13379043 14 74,250,126 ELMSAN1 T C 0.025 0.003 0.016 0.010 0.008 0.014 0.024 0.014 0.011 0.012 0.024 0.016 0.002 0.016 0.002 0.016
rs175043 14 75,471,803 EIF2B2 G A 0.018 0.003 −0.021 0.009 −0.026 0.012 −0.017 0.013 −0.023 0.011 −0.037 0.014 −0.005 0.014 −0.024 0.014
rs1061638 14 77,928,525 AHSA1 G A 0.018 0.003 0.008 0.010 0.013 0.013 0.007 0.014 0.008 0.011 0.013 0.015 −0.001 0.015 0.005 0.015
rs10145154 14 79,939,525 NRXN3 C T −0.018 0.003 −0.006 0.011 −0.002 0.016 −0.012 0.016 0.000 0.013 0.011 0.017 −0.009 0.017 −0.009 0.017
rs78598185 14 92,791,479 SLC24A4 A G −0.029 0.004 0.003 0.015 0.004 0.021 0.004 0.022 0.036 0.018 0.028 0.024 0.041 0.024 −0.023 0.023
rs1115897 14 93,910,816 UNC79 A C 0.021 0.003 0.012 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.008 0.014 0.002 0.012 0.017 0.015 −0.018 0.015 0.003 0.015
rs28929474 14 94,844,947 SERPINA1 T C −0.063 0.009 −0.097 0.035 −0.139 0.051 −0.033 0.050 −0.117 0.043 −0.116 0.055 −0.087 0.057 −0.069 0.055
rs10136874 14 101,202,022 DLK1 G T 0.023 0.003 −0.006 0.009 −0.017 0.013 0.007 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.011 0.014 −0.008 0.014 −0.021 0.014
rs17747633 15 40,916,237 KNL1 G A 0.015 0.003 0.026 0.009 0.029 0.013 0.022 0.013 0.026 0.011 0.037 0.014 0.019 0.014 0.028 0.014
rs62020698 15 43,237,414 UBR1 C T 0.047 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.011 0.023 −0.001 0.024 0.026 0.020 0.052 0.026 −0.005 0.026 −0.023 0.025
rs55707100 15 43,820,717 MAP1A T C −0.151 0.008 −0.007 0.026 −0.011 0.036 −0.006 0.037 −0.002 0.030 −0.067 0.040 0.071 0.039 −0.001 0.040
rs4273010 15 44,947,434 SPG11 T C 0.128 0.008 0.014 0.029 0.008 0.040 0.023 0.043 −0.016 0.035 0.024 0.046 −0.066 0.045 0.027 0.045
rs4545755 15 51,549,044 MIR4713HG/CYP19A1 G A 0.016 0.003 0.018 0.009 0.019 0.012 0.015 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.025 0.014 0.013 0.014 0.023 0.014
rs12442867 15 62,489,128 AC126323.2 C A −0.017 0.003 0.003 0.009 −0.020 0.013 0.027 0.013 0.004 0.011 0.010 0.014 −0.005 0.014 0.008 0.014
rs79076440 15 63,803,863 USP3 A G 0.019 0.003 −0.024 0.012 −0.023 0.017 −0.024 0.017 −0.023 0.014 −0.040 0.018 −0.017 0.019 −0.026 0.018
rs10851736 15 64,940,718 ZNF609 C T −0.027 0.005 0.013 0.015 −0.003 0.021 0.029 0.022 0.001 0.018 −0.010 0.024 0.000 0.024 0.011 0.024
rs8024330 15 67,443,926 SMAD3 C T 0.018 0.003 −0.015 0.010 −0.018 0.013 −0.013 0.014 −0.021 0.012 −0.014 0.015 −0.033 0.015 −0.019 0.015
rs8033075 15 68,353,652 PIAS1 A G 0.045 0.005 0.032 0.021 0.013 0.030 0.053 0.030 0.018 0.025 0.018 0.033 0.005 0.033 0.034 0.033
rs5742915 15 74,336,633 PML C T 0.025 0.003 −0.003 0.009 0.001 0.013 −0.007 0.013 −0.005 0.011 0.000 0.014 −0.002 0.014 0.002 0.014
rs12593755 15 89,111,712 AC013489.2 G T −0.016 0.003 −0.002 0.009 0.013 0.013 −0.019 0.013 −0.005 0.011 −0.018 0.014 0.017 0.014 −0.005 0.014
rs11856160 15 93,452,846 CHD2 A G 0.021 0.003 0.003 0.012 0.006 0.017 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.015 0.018 0.019 −0.011 0.020 0.013 0.019
rs12912439 15 95,828,705 LINC01197 C T −0.022 0.003 −0.005 0.010 −0.003 0.013 −0.006 0.014 −0.014 0.012 −0.020 0.015 −0.003 0.015 0.008 0.015
rs34040697 15 97,125,666 A G 0.016 0.003 −0.009 0.009 0.005 0.013 −0.022 0.013 −0.014 0.011 −0.012 0.014 −0.026 0.014 −0.009 0.014
rs142354201 15 99,524,022 PGPEP1L G A 0.034 0.006 −0.020 0.022 −0.037 0.031 −0.006 0.032 −0.025 0.026 −0.059 0.033 −0.001 0.034 0.005 0.034
rs4988483 16 1,129,010 SSTR5 A C −0.172 0.006 −0.048 0.026 −0.039 0.036 −0.054 0.037 −0.015 0.031 0.016 0.040 −0.041 0.041 −0.119 0.041
rs72761177 16 1,833,508 NUBP2 A G 0.077 0.004 −0.020 0.016 −0.018 0.022 −0.024 0.023 −0.027 0.019 −0.026 0.025 −0.030 0.026 −0.019 0.025
rs11077337 16 3,492,048 AC025283.2/ZNF597 T G 0.015 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.014 0.012 0.000 0.013 0.007 0.011 0.014 0.014 0.002 0.014 0.012 0.014
rs8182173 16 4,420,787 CORO7−PAM16 C T −0.018 0.003 −0.009 0.010 −0.017 0.015 0.001 0.015 −0.016 0.013 −0.046 0.016 0.009 0.017 0.000 0.016
rs74774288 16 5,922,263 RBFOX1 G T 0.027 0.003 0.020 0.012 0.003 0.017 0.036 0.017 0.011 0.014 0.005 0.018 0.015 0.019 0.001 0.018
rs4985062 16 8,996,636 USP7 T C 0.015 0.003 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.014 0.007 0.014 −0.009 0.014
rs1532824 16 10,532,211 ATF7IP2 C A −0.017 0.003 0.005 0.010 0.009 0.014 0.002 0.014 0.001 0.012 −0.012 0.015 0.015 0.016 0.011 0.015
rs12935465 16 17,476,853 XYLT1 T C 0.016 0.003 −0.002 0.009 −0.005 0.012 0.003 0.013 −0.001 0.011 0.007 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.008 0.014
rs2023762 16 19,276,597 SYT17 T C 0.015 0.003 −0.001 0.009 −0.020 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.000 0.011 0.002 0.015 −0.002 0.015 −0.005 0.015
rs12927172 16 27,325,021 IL4R G A −0.015 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.021 0.013 −0.013 0.013 0.015 0.011 0.002 0.014 0.033 0.015 0.012 0.014
rs7498665 16 28,883,241 SH2B1 G A 0.019 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.009 0.013 0.003 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.014 0.008 0.014
rs4788220 16 30,063,780 FAM57B A G −0.017 0.003 −0.003 0.009 −0.002 0.012 −0.003 0.013 −0.006 0.011 0.000 0.014 −0.008 0.014 0.004 0.014
rs750952 16 31,093,954 ZNF646 C T 0.032 0.003 −0.014 0.009 −0.012 0.013 −0.015 0.013 −0.015 0.011 −0.034 0.014 0.000 0.014 −0.008 0.014
rs116971887 16 51,170,026 SALL1 G T 0.036 0.006 −0.018 0.022 0.023 0.030 −0.047 0.031 −0.025 0.026 −0.034 0.033 −0.007 0.034 −0.009 0.034
rs12597502 16 53,170,069 CHD9 A G −0.015 0.003 −0.001 0.010 −0.002 0.014 −0.001 0.014 0.005 0.012 0.004 0.015 0.006 0.015 −0.018 0.015
rs1548917 16 56,109,333 CES5A C T −0.015 0.003 −0.010 0.009 −0.010 0.012 −0.010 0.013 −0.009 0.011 −0.021 0.014 0.003 0.014 −0.002 0.014
rs111792934 16 69,131,293 HAS3 C T 0.022 0.003 0.018 0.012 0.001 0.017 0.039 0.017 0.023 0.015 0.042 0.019 0.018 0.019 0.005 0.019
rs17299478 16 69,775,500 C T 0.032 0.003 −0.008 0.012 −0.009 0.017 −0.009 0.018 −0.021 0.015 −0.018 0.019 −0.014 0.020 0.003 0.019
rs12935091 16 71,525,208 ZNF19 A G −0.035 0.006 −0.022 0.023 −0.080 0.032 0.032 0.032 −0.022 0.027 0.001 0.036 −0.053 0.036 −0.061 0.035
rs147491123 16 72,567,795 LINC01572 C T 0.036 0.007 0.026 0.024 0.025 0.034 0.030 0.035 0.025 0.029 0.004 0.037 0.060 0.039 0.062 0.038
rs8059803 16 81,603,001 CMIP A G 0.031 0.003 0.005 0.010 −0.010 0.014 0.019 0.014 0.001 0.012 −0.005 0.015 0.003 0.015 −0.008 0.015
rs11149612 16 83,980,965 AC009119.2 C T 0.027 0.003 0.010 0.009 −0.001 0.013 0.022 0.014 0.002 0.011 0.003 0.015 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.015
rs8054322 16 85,201,405 GSE1 G A −0.015 0.003 −0.009 0.009 −0.009 0.013 −0.009 0.013 0.000 0.011 0.004 0.014 −0.002 0.014 −0.014 0.014
rs7502910 17 1,638,718 WDR81 A G 0.016 0.003 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.016 0.011 0.006 0.014 0.031 0.014 0.008 0.014
rs2309401 17 5,471,902 NLRP1 T G 0.015 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.019 0.013 −0.009 0.013 −0.001 0.011 −0.006 0.014 0.007 0.014 0.030 0.014
rs9892862 17 7,439,014 POLR2A G A 0.022 0.003 −0.002 0.010 −0.002 0.015 −0.006 0.015 0.008 0.013 0.007 0.017 0.014 0.017 −0.017 0.016
rs6416868 17 15,924,370 TTC19 G A −0.019 0.003 −0.010 0.009 −0.025 0.012 0.006 0.013 −0.007 0.011 −0.002 0.014 −0.013 0.014 −0.010 0.014
rs8075153 17 17,622,666 RAI1 C T 0.021 0.003 −0.020 0.009 −0.021 0.012 −0.017 0.013 −0.022 0.011 −0.034 0.014 −0.006 0.014 −0.004 0.014
rs8079923 17 19,869,544 AKAP10 C T 0.016 0.003 0.004 0.010 0.000 0.014 0.010 0.015 −0.007 0.012 −0.028 0.016 0.004 0.016 0.021 0.016
rs56030650 17 38,131,187 GSDMA A C −0.022 0.003 0.005 0.009 −0.007 0.012 0.022 0.013 0.004 0.011 −0.010 0.014 0.013 0.014 0.023 0.014
rs668799 17 40,716,235 COASY C T 0.018 0.003 −0.022 0.010 −0.038 0.014 −0.004 0.014 −0.032 0.012 −0.022 0.016 −0.036 0.016 −0.027 0.016
rs199525 17 44,847,834 WNT3 T G −0.020 0.003 0.014 0.011 −0.006 0.015 0.034 0.016 0.011 0.013 0.006 0.017 0.016 0.017 −0.002 0.017
rs11079157 17 53,360,799 HLF G T −0.020 0.003 0.003 0.011 −0.011 0.015 0.021 0.016 0.019 0.013 −0.001 0.017 0.039 0.018 −0.025 0.017
rs2250014 17 57,836,134 VMP1 T C −0.021 0.003 −0.029 0.012 −0.030 0.017 −0.022 0.017 −0.038 0.014 −0.056 0.018 −0.011 0.019 0.001 0.019
rs142377191 17 61,649,170 DCAF7 G A −0.125 0.009 0.028 0.036 0.012 0.050 0.049 0.052 0.059 0.043 0.110 0.057 0.004 0.056 −0.025 0.055
rs76708468 17 62,206,299 ERN1 T C −0.087 0.006 0.009 0.030 −0.013 0.042 0.028 0.043 0.023 0.036 0.002 0.047 0.013 0.048 −0.033 0.046
rs78357146 17 64,305,051 PRKCA A G −0.090 0.007 0.048 0.028 0.018 0.039 0.083 0.041 0.027 0.033 −0.002 0.043 0.072 0.044 0.100 0.044
rs77542162 17 67,081,278 ABCA6 G A 0.054 0.009 0.031 0.037 0.055 0.052 −0.008 0.054 0.025 0.044 0.024 0.057 0.055 0.058 0.049 0.057
rs6501601 17 71,124,903 SLC39A11 G A 0.015 0.003 −0.009 0.010 −0.025 0.013 0.006 0.014 −0.020 0.011 −0.029 0.015 −0.007 0.015 −0.007 0.015
rs4789227 17 73,794,354 UNK T C 0.015 0.003 0.004 0.009 0.018 0.013 −0.012 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.001 0.014 0.011 0.015 0.012 0.014
rs4075483 17 79,074,817 BAIAP2 C T 0.017 0.003 0.000 0.009 −0.015 0.013 0.015 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.001 0.014 0.018 0.015 −0.033 0.014
rs8095538 18 1,616,505 T G −0.020 0.003 0.003 0.010 0.011 0.013 −0.005 0.014 −0.004 0.011 −0.012 0.015 −0.005 0.015 0.009 0.015
rs8084351 18 50,726,559 DCC G A 0.015 0.003 −0.011 0.009 −0.008 0.012 −0.013 0.013 −0.014 0.011 −0.014 0.014 −0.022 0.014 −0.001 0.014
rs11152071 18 56,087,417 AC105105.3 C T 0.020 0.003 0.007 0.010 −0.003 0.014 0.016 0.015 0.007 0.012 −0.007 0.016 0.020 0.016 0.012 0.016
rs190102446 18 57,048,571 C T 0.041 0.007 −0.007 0.023 −0.018 0.032 0.011 0.034 −0.013 0.028 0.010 0.036 −0.044 0.036 0.002 0.036
rs585187 18 58,177,124 MRPS5P4 T G 0.015 0.003 −0.008 0.009 −0.010 0.012 −0.005 0.013 −0.013 0.011 −0.026 0.014 0.001 0.014 −0.006 0.014
rs12454712 18 60,845,884 BCL2 T C 0.018 0.003 0.003 0.009 −0.005 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.007 0.011 0.003 0.015 0.012 0.015 −0.003 0.015
rs8097893 18 74,983,055 GALR1 A G 0.058 0.006 −0.009 0.021 0.018 0.030 −0.034 0.031 −0.007 0.026 0.023 0.034 −0.020 0.034 0.041 0.034
rs67868323 19 4,048,561 ZBTB7A T G 0.016 0.003 −0.006 0.010 0.016 0.014 −0.028 0.014 0.007 0.012 0.032 0.016 −0.031 0.016 −0.033 0.015
rs2602717 19 4,902,950 UHRF1/ARRDC5 C T 0.019 0.003 0.024 0.011 0.034 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.030 0.014 0.019 0.018 0.033 0.018 0.033 0.018
rs8112883 19 7,179,320 INSR G T 0.017 0.003 0.007 0.010 0.011 0.014 0.005 0.014 0.006 0.012 0.004 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.028 0.015
rs8105174 19 10,347,032 DNMT1 C T 0.050 0.003 0.010 0.012 0.018 0.016 0.004 0.017 0.021 0.014 0.014 0.018 0.030 0.018 −0.003 0.018
rs6510033 19 30,710,785 AC005597.1 A G 0.020 0.003 0.007 0.010 0.001 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.012 0.000 0.015 0.022 0.016 0.002 0.015
rs6510177 19 31,211,647 ZNF536 C T −0.023 0.003 0.032 0.013 0.024 0.017 0.042 0.018 0.035 0.015 0.021 0.019 0.063 0.020 0.040 0.020
rs62102136 19 34,700,561 LSM14A C T 0.016 0.003 −0.007 0.010 0.008 0.014 −0.022 0.014 −0.014 0.012 −0.010 0.015 −0.011 0.015 −0.002 0.015
rs7254601 19 36,147,315 COX6B1 A G −0.016 0.003 0.017 0.010 0.027 0.014 0.005 0.015 0.014 0.012 0.005 0.016 0.022 0.016 −0.013 0.016
rs58560372 19 38,758,752 SPINT2 C T 0.020 0.003 0.011 0.013 0.023 0.018 −0.004 0.018 −0.012 0.015 −0.016 0.020 −0.023 0.020 0.016 0.020
rs15052 19 41,813,375 HNRNPUL1/TGFB1 T C −0.018 0.003 −0.014 0.013 −0.037 0.018 0.010 0.018 −0.001 0.015 −0.011 0.020 0.015 0.020 −0.039 0.020
rs11671304 19 47,564,643 ZC3H4 T C −0.018 0.003 0.007 0.010 −0.006 0.014 0.022 0.014 0.003 0.012 0.013 0.015 −0.012 0.015 0.009 0.015
rs296361 19 48,389,363 SULT2A1 G A −0.025 0.003 0.008 0.012 0.018 0.017 −0.005 0.017 0.016 0.014 −0.001 0.019 0.021 0.019 0.004 0.019
rs2287922 19 49,232,226 RASIP1 A G −0.030 0.003 0.022 0.009 0.020 0.013 0.025 0.013 0.034 0.011 0.044 0.014 0.023 0.014 −0.006 0.014
rs7256521 19 53,837,110 ZNF845 A G −0.015 0.003 −0.002 0.009 −0.005 0.013 0.001 0.013 −0.006 0.011 0.008 0.014 −0.013 0.015 −0.003 0.014
rs12975366 19 54,759,361 LILRB5 C T −0.020 0.003 −0.002 0.009 0.014 0.013 −0.021 0.013 −0.005 0.011 −0.002 0.014 −0.018 0.015 0.006 0.014
rs6037508 20 3,217,989 SLC4A11 T G −0.017 0.003 −0.020 0.011 −0.019 0.015 −0.022 0.016 −0.029 0.013 −0.045 0.017 −0.020 0.017 0.001 0.017
rs7267595 20 10,643,850 JAG1 A C 0.015 0.003 0.005 0.009 0.023 0.012 −0.012 0.013 −0.004 0.011 −0.015 0.014 0.006 0.014 0.012 0.014
rs2273058 20 20,033,319 CRNKL1 G A −0.022 0.003 −0.005 0.009 −0.002 0.012 −0.008 0.013 −0.011 0.011 −0.013 0.014 −0.009 0.014 −0.002 0.014
rs6106324 20 20,964,988 AL133465.1 T C 0.019 0.003 −0.011 0.009 −0.009 0.013 −0.012 0.013 −0.008 0.011 −0.011 0.014 −0.007 0.014 −0.010 0.014
rs2424396 20 21,630,280 LINC01726 A G −0.033 0.004 0.016 0.016 0.003 0.022 0.026 0.022 0.025 0.019 0.034 0.024 0.022 0.025 0.020 0.024
rs6088579 20 33,284,624 PIGU/NCOA6 G A 0.027 0.003 −0.016 0.012 −0.021 0.017 −0.011 0.017 −0.010 0.014 −0.016 0.019 −0.004 0.019 −0.045 0.019
rs2207132 20 39,142,516 MAFB G A 0.048 0.007 0.059 0.028 0.033 0.039 0.090 0.042 0.033 0.034 0.046 0.045 0.000 0.045 0.059 0.045
rs17265513 20 39,832,628 ZHX3 C T −0.022 0.003 −0.016 0.011 −0.029 0.016 −0.001 0.016 −0.018 0.014 −0.014 0.017 −0.017 0.018 −0.005 0.017
rs16995311 20 49,201,102 PTPN1 A C 0.040 0.005 0.024 0.018 0.036 0.024 0.010 0.025 0.015 0.021 0.006 0.027 0.027 0.028 0.032 0.027
rs2104476 20 54,852,856 A G −0.020 0.003 0.006 0.010 0.012 0.014 −0.001 0.014 0.003 0.012 0.006 0.015 0.003 0.016 −0.004 0.015
rs2738787 20 62,328,375 RTEL1−TNFRSF6B/RTEL1 G A −0.037 0.005 −0.028 0.017 −0.060 0.023 0.007 0.024 −0.005 0.020 0.001 0.026 0.000 0.026 −0.064 0.025
rs9978775 21 40,694,526 BRWD1−AS1 G A 0.019 0.003 0.009 0.009 0.021 0.012 −0.001 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.008 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.011 0.014
rs8138950 22 29,448,643 ZNRF3 C T 0.015 0.003 0.016 0.009 0.013 0.012 0.020 0.013 0.005 0.011 −0.004 0.014 0.010 0.014 0.032 0.014
rs2412973 22 30,529,631 HORMAD2 C A −0.014 0.003 0.024 0.009 0.011 0.012 0.035 0.013 0.028 0.011 0.037 0.014 0.022 0.014 0.016 0.014
rs12106594 22 31,885,316 DRG1/EIF4ENIF1/SFI1 C T −0.036 0.006 0.007 0.020 −0.017 0.028 0.030 0.029 0.008 0.024 0.010 0.031 −0.004 0.031 0.003 0.031
rs5755948 22 36,179,095 RBFOX2 G A −0.028 0.004 0.003 0.013 0.008 0.018 −0.005 0.019 0.011 0.016 0.028 0.020 −0.005 0.021 −0.001 0.020
rs6519133 22 39,096,602 JOSD1 T C 0.029 0.003 0.011 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.005 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.002 0.015 0.024 0.014
rs9611565 22 41,767,486 TEF T C 0.029 0.003 0.001 0.010 0.010 0.014 −0.010 0.015 0.006 0.012 −0.001 0.016 0.006 0.016 −0.015 0.016
rs4823324 22 46,238,123 ATXN10 T C 0.016 0.003 0.002 0.009 0.001 0.013 0.003 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.023 0.014 −0.013 0.014 0.000 0.014
IGFBP3 - n SNPs = 4
rs4234798 4 7,219,933 SORCS2 G T 0.095 0.011 0.012 0.009 0.020 0.013 0.003 0.013 0.005 0.011 −0.003 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.014
rs11977526 7 46,008,110 IGFBP3 A G 0.287 0.011 0.037 0.009 0.034 0.013 0.042 0.013 0.042 0.011 0.042 0.014 0.042 0.014 0.037 0.014
rs700753 7 46,753,684 TNS3 G C 0.158 0.011 −0.006 0.009 −0.006 0.013 −0.007 0.013 −0.009 0.011 0.001 0.014 −0.025 0.015 −0.010 0.014
rs1065656 16 1,838,836 NUBP2 G C 0.111 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.006 0.014 −0.003 0.012 0.004 0.015 −0.010 0.015 0.017 0.015

Chr, chromosome; SE, standard error.

a

Overlapped or nearest gene (sourced from: https://snp-nexus.org/index.html). Where blank, gene unknown.

Supplementary Table 3.

Risk (HRs) of Colorectal Cancer Associated With Circulating IGF1 Levels With Those Participants With Circulating HbA1c Levels ≥48 mmol/mol (or 6.5%, the Cutoff for Type 2 Diabetes) Excluded

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P-trend HR per 1-SD increment HR per 1-SD increment (adjusted)a
Colorectal cancer
Both sexes 1 1.13 (1.00–1.27) 1.14 (1.01–1.29) 1.12 (0.98–1.27) 1.34 (1.18–1.53) <0.0001 1.09 (1.04–1.14) 1.12 (1.06–1.18)
Colon cancer
Both sexes 1 1.06 (0.91–1.22) 1.09 (0.94–1.26) 1.06 (0.91–1.24) 1.34 (1.15–1.57) 0.002 1.08 (1.03–1.14) 1.11 (1.04–1.19)
Proximal colon cancer
Both sexes 1 1.15 (0.94–1.40) 1.22 (1.00–1.50) 0.97 (0.77–1.21) 1.35 (1.08–1.68) 0.09 1.08 (1.00–1.16) 1.10 (1.00–1.21)
Distal colon cancer
Both sexes 1 0.96 (0.77–1.20) 0.97 (0.77–1.23) 1.18 (0.94–1.48) 1.31 (1.03–1.65) 0.01 1.09 (1.00–1.18) 1.12 (1.01–1.24)
Rectal cancer
Both sexes 1 1.29 (1.05–1.59) 1.27 (1.02–1.57) 1.25 (1.00–1.56) 1.36 (1.08–1.72) 0.02 1.10 (1.02–1.19) 1.14 (1.03–1.25)

NOTE. Multivariable Cox regression model using age as the underlying time variable and stratified by sex, Townsend deprivation index (quintiles), region of the recruitment assessment center, and age at recruitment. Models adjusted for waist circumference (per 5 cm), total physical activity (<10, 10 to <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <60, ≥60 metabolic equivalent hours per week, unknown), height (per 10 cm), alcohol consumption frequency (never, special occasions only, 1–3 times per month, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, daily/almost daily, unknown), smoking status and intensity (never, former, current- <15 per day, current- ≥15 per day, current- intensity unknown, unknown), frequency of red and processed meat consumption (<2, 2 to <3, 3 to <4, ≥4 occasions per week, unknown), family history of colorectal cancer (no, yes, unknown), educational level (Certificates of secondary education [CSEs]/Ordinary [O]-levels/General Certificates of Secondary Education [GCSEs] or equivalent, National Vocational Qualification [NVQ]/Higher National Diploma [HND]/Higher National Certificate [HNC]/Advanced [A]-levels/Advanced Subsidiary [AS]-levels or equivalent, other professional qualifications, college/university degree, none of the above, unknown), regular aspirin/ibuprofen use (no, yes, unknown), ever use of hormone replacement therapy (no, yes, unknown), and circulating levels (sex-specific quintiles, missing/unknown) of CRP (mg/L), HbA1c (mmol/mol), testosterone (nmol/L), and SHBG (nmol/L).

a

HRs per SD increment were additionally corrected for regression dilution using a regression dilution ratio (0.76) obtained from the subsample of participants with repeat IGF1 measurements.

Supplementary Table 4.

MR Pleiotropy Sensitivity Tests for the Circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 Levels and Risk of Colorectal Cancer

n SNPs Group Weighted median approach
MR-Egger test
MR-PRESSO
OR LCI UCI P Intercept LCI UCI P OR LCI UCI P P Horizontal pleiotropy P distortion Outlier SNPs
IGF1 413 Colorectal cancer, both sexes 1.12 1.04 1.20 2.9E−03 −7.1E−04 −3.0E−03 1.6E−03 0.54 1.11 0.98 1.27 0.11 <1e−04 .91 rs1150752
rs174554
Colorectal cancer, men 1.07 0.97 1.18 0.15 −1.4E−03 −4.5E−03 1.8E−03 0.4 1.18 1.00 1.38 0.05 <1e−04
Colorectal cancer, women 1.07 0.97 1.18 0.2 −1.9E−05 −3.3E−03 3.3E−03 0.99 1.06 0.89 1.25 0.53 <1e−04 .82 rs174554
Colon cancer, both sexes 1.12 1.03 1.23 0.01 −1.7E−03 −4.5E−03 9.9E−04 0.21 1.14 0.98 1.32 0.09 <1e−04 .83 rs174554
Proximal colon cancer, both sexes 1.08 0.97 1.21 0.16 5.8E−04 −3.0E−03 4.1E−03 0.75 1.02 0.84 1.23 0.84 <1e−04 .90 rs33932084
Distal colon cancer, both sexes 1.10 0.98 1.23 0.11 −4.2E−03 −7.8E−03 −5.5E−04 0.02 1.26 1.05 1.50 0.01 <1e−04 .82 rs174554
Rectal cancer, both sexes 1.01 0.90 1.13 0.88 −4.2E−04 −4.0E−03 3.1E−03 0.82 1.09 0.91 1.30 0.36 <1e−04 .85 rs1150752
rs61867536
rs9267488
IGFBP3 4 Colorectal cancer, both sexes 1.14 1.07 1.20 1.1E−05 −0.01 −0.05 0.03 0.35 1.18 1.07 1.31 0.08 .29
Colorectal cancer, men 1.13 1.04 1.22 2.8E−03 0.00 −0.06 0.05 0.82 1.14 0.98 1.34 0.23 .72
Colorectal cancer, women 1.13 1.04 1.22 3.9E−03 −0.02 −0.08 0.04 0.26 1.25 1.18 1.32 0.02 .18
Colon cancer, both sexes 1.13 1.05 1.21 7.9E−04 −0.03 −0.07 0.02 0.16 1.27 1.16 1.38 0.03 .04
Proximal colon cancer, both sexes 1.12 1.02 1.23 0.01 −0.02 −0.08 0.04 0.28 1.25 1.21 1.29 0.01 .21
Distal colon cancer, both sexes 1.13 1.03 1.24 0.01 −0.03 −0.10 0.03 0.17 1.29 1.01 1.65 0.18 .03
Rectal cancer, both sexes 1.14 1.05 1.25 2.6E−03 −0.01 −0.07 0.05 0.57 1.18 1.01 1.39 0.18 .62

LCI, lower confidence interval; UCI, upper confidence interval.

Supplementary Table 5.

MR leave-one-out analysis for IGFBP3 Levels and Risk of Colorectal Cancer

MR
SNP excluded Likelihood-based approach OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment P value
rs11977526 1.02 (0.92–1.13) 0.7
rs4234798 1.11 (1.04–1.18) 1.E−03
rs700750 1.15 (1.08–1.23) 2.E−05
rs9923699 1.12 (1.05–1.19) 4.E−04

References

  • 1.Pollak M. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:915. doi: 10.1038/nrc2536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Samani A.A., Yakar S., LeRoith D. The role of the IGF System in Cancer growth and metastasis: overview and recent insights. Endocr Rev. 2007;28:20–47. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kelley K.M., Oh Y., Gargosky S.E. Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and their regulatory dynamics. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1996;28:619–637. doi: 10.1016/1357-2725(96)00005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oh Y., Muller H.L., Ng L. Transforming growth factor- beta-induced cell growth inhibition in human breast cancer cells is mediated through insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 action. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:13589–13592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.23.13589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baxter R.C. Signalling pathways involved in antiproliferative effects of IGFBP-3: a review. Mol Pathol. 2001;54:145–148. doi: 10.1136/mp.54.3.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma J., Pollak M.N., Giovannucci E. Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:620–625. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.7.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kaaks R., Toniolo P., Akhmedkhanov A. Serum C-Peptide, Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I, IGF-Binding Proteins, and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1592–1600. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.19.1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gunter M.J., Hoover D.R., Yu H. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-i, endogenous estradiol, and risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Res. 2008;68:329–337. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Otani T., Iwasaki M., Sasazuki S. Plasma C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and risk of colorectal cancer in a nested case-control study: the Japan public health center-based prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:2007–2012. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Palmqvist R., Stattin P., Rinaldi S. Plasma insulin, IGF-binding proteins-1 and -2 and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective study in northern Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:89–93. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rinaldi S., Cleveland R., Norat T. Serum levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and colorectal cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort, plus a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:1702–1715. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Probst-Hensch N.M., Yuan J.M., Stanczyk F.Z. IGF-1, IGF-2 and IGFBP-3 in prediagnostic serum: association with colorectal cancer in a cohort of Chinese men in Shanghai. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:1695–1699. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Giovannucci E., Pollak M.N., Platz E.A. A prospective study of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 and binding protein-3 and risk of colorectal neoplasia in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:345–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wei E.K., Ma J., Pollak M.N. A prospective study of C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:850–855. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) https://www.fredhutch.org/en/research/divisions/public-health-sciences-division/research/cancer-prevention/genetics-epidemiology-colorectal-cancer-consortium-gecco.html Available at:
  • 16.Allen N., Sudlow C., Downey P. UK Biobank: current status and what it means for epidemiology. Health Policy and Technology. 2012;1:123–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.UK-Biobank UK Biobank. Protocol for a large-scale prospective epidemiological resources. 2010. http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/UK-Biobank-Protocol.pdf Available at: Accessed April 1, 2018.
  • 18.Hosgood H.D., Gunter M.J., Murphy N. The relation of obesity-related hormonal and cytokine levels with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Front Oncol. 2018;8:103. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.UK-Biobank UK Biobank Biomarker Project - Companion Document to Accompany Serum Biomarker Data. Prepared for: UK Biobank Showcase. 2019;Volume 1 Available at: http://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/showcase/showcase/docs/serum_biochemistry.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schoenfeld D. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika. 1982;69:239–241. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clarke R., Shipley M., Lewington S. Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:341–353. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.MacMahon S., Peto R., Collins R. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990;335:765–774. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90878-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clarke R., Emberson J.R., Breeze E. Biomarkers of inflammation predict both vascular and non-vascular mortality in older men. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:800–809. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Murphy N., Strickler H.D., Stanczyk F.Z. A prospective evaluation of endogenous sex hormone levels and colorectal cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(10) doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aleksandrova K., Jenab M., Boeing H. Circulating C-reactive protein concentrations and risks of colon and rectal cancer: a nested case-control study within the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:407–418. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mori N., Sawada N., Iwasaki M. Circulating sex hormone levels and colorectal cancer risk in Japanese postmenopausal women: the JPHC nested case–control study. Int J Cancer. 2019;145:1238–1244. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rinaldi S., Rohrmann S., Jenab M. Glycosylated hemoglobin and risk of colorectal cancer in men and women, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3108–3115. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harrell F. Springer; New York: 2001. Regression Modeling Strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sinnott-Armstrong N., Tanigawa Y., Amar D. Genetics of 38 blood and urine biomarkers in the UK Biobank. bioRxiv. 2019:660506. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00757-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Teumer A., Qi Q., Nethander M. Genomewide meta-analysis identifies loci associated with IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels with impact on age-related traits. Aging Cell. 2016;15:811–824. doi: 10.1111/acel.12490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huyghe J.R., Bien S.A., Harrison T.A. Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2019;51:76–87. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0286-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brion M.-J.A., Shakhbazov K., Visscher P.M. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1497–1501. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Burgess S., Butterworth A., Thompson S.G. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genetic Epidemiol. 2013;37:658–665. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Burgess S., Scott R.A., Timpson N.J. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:543–552. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0011-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bowden J., Davey Smith G., Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:512–525. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bowden J., Davey Smith G., Haycock P.C. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40:304–314. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Verbanck M., Chen C.-Y., Neale B. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50:693–698. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Davey Smith G., Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:R89–R98. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Valentinis B., Baserga R. IGF-I receptor signalling in transformation and differentiation. Mol Pathol. 2001;54:133–137. doi: 10.1136/mp.54.3.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sekharam M., Zhao H., Sun M. Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor enhances invasion and induces resistance to apoptosis of colon cancer cells through the Akt/Bcl-xL Pathway. Cancer Res. 2003;63:7708–7716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lahm H., Amstad P., Wyniger J. Blockade of the insulin-like growth-factor-I receptor inhibits growth of human colorectal cancer cells: evidence of a functional IGF-II-mediated autocrine loop. Int J Cancer. 1994;58:452–459. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910580325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Levine Morgan E., Suarez Jorge A., Brandhorst S. Low protein intake is associated with a major reduction in IGF-1, cancer, and overall mortality in the 65 and younger but not older population. Cell Metab. 2014;19:407–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bradbury K.E., Balkwill A., Tipper S.J. The association of plasma IGF-I with dietary, lifestyle, anthropometric, and early life factors in postmenopausal women. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2015;25:90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhu K., Meng X., Kerr D.A. The effects of a two-year randomized, controlled trial of whey protein supplementation on bone structure, IGF-1, and urinary calcium excretion in older postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2298–2306. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nishida Y., Matsubara T., Tobina T. Effect of low-intensity aerobic exercise on insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in healthy men. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010:452820. doi: 10.1155/2010/452820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vigneri P.G., Tirrò E., Pennisi M.S. The insulin/IGF system in colorectal cancer development and resistance to therapy. Front Oncol. 2015;5:230. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Deal C., Ma J., Wilkin Fo. Novel promoter polymorphism in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3: correlation with serum levels and interaction with known regulators1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1274–1280. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kamat M.A., Blackshaw J.A., Young R. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4851–4853. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cui H., Cruz-Correa M., Giardiello F.M. Loss of IGF2 imprinting: a potential marker of colorectal cancer risk. Science. 2003;299:1753–1755. doi: 10.1126/science.1080902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cruz-Correa M., Cui H., Giardiello F.M. Loss of imprinting of insulin growth factor II gene: a potential heritable biomarker for colon neoplasia predisposition. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:964–970. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Unger C., Kramer N., Unterleuthner D. Stromal-derived IGF2 promotes colon cancer progression via paracrine and autocrine mechanisms. Oncogene. 2017;36:5341. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morris J.K., George L.M., Wu T. Insulin-like growth factors and cancer: no role in screening. Evidence from the BUPA study and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:112–117. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Young N.J., Metcalfe C., Gunnell D. A cross-sectional analysis of the association between diet and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-2, and IGFBP-3 in men in the United Kingdom. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:907–917. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9961-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References

  • 1.Sinnott−Armstrong N., Tanigawa Y., Amar D. Genetics of 38 blood and urine biomarkers in the UK Biobank. bioRxiv. 2019:660506. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00757-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Teumer A., Qi Q., Nethander M. Genomewide meta−analysis identifies loci associated with IGF−I and IGFBP3 levels with impact on age−related traits. Aging Cell. 2016;15:811–824. doi: 10.1111/acel.12490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES