Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2020 Mar 27;14(3):e0008152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008152

Assessment of control strategies against Clonorchis sinensis infection based on a multi-group dynamic transmission model

Xiao-Hong Huang 1, Men-Bao Qian 2,3, Guang-Hu Zhu 4, Yue-Yi Fang 5, Yuan-Tao Hao 1,6, Ying-Si Lai 1,6,*
Editor: jong-Yil Chai7
PMCID: PMC7156112  PMID: 32218570

Abstract

Clonorchiasis is one of the most important food-borne trematodiases affecting millions of people. Strategies were recommended by different organizations and control programmes were implemented but mostly in short-time periods. It’s important to assess the long-term benefits and sustainability of possible control strategies on morbidity control of the disease. We developed a multi-group transmission model to describe the dynamics of C. sinensis transmission among different groups of people with different raw-fish-consumption behaviors, based on which, a full model with interventions was proposed and three common control measures (i.e., preventive chemotherapy, information, education, and communication (IEC) and environmental modification) and their possible combinations were considered. Under a typical setting of C. sinensis transmission, we simulated interventions according to different strategies and with a series of values of intervention parameters. We found that combinations of measures were much beneficial than those singly applied; higher coverages of measures had better effects; and strategies targeted on whole population performed better than that on at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors. The strategy recommended by the government of Guangdong Province, China shows good and sustainable effects, under which, the infection control (with human prevalence <5%) could be achieved within 7.84 years (95% CI: 5.78–12.16 years) in our study setting (with original observed prevalence 33.67%). Several sustainable strategies were provided, which could lead to infection control within 10 years. This study makes the effort to quantitatively assess the long-term effects of possible control strategies against C. sinensis infection under a typical transmission setting, with application of a multi-group dynamic transmission model. The proposed model is easily facilitated with other transmission settings and the simulation outputs provide useful information to support the decision-making of control strategies on clonorchiasis.

Author summary

Clonorchiasis is an important food-borne parasitic disease. People get infected mainly through eating raw and infected fish, thus different behaviors of raw-fish-consumption play an important role on transmission. It’s critical to find effective and sustainable control strategies for morbidity control of the disease. Control programmes have been implemented in endemic areas mostly in short periods, which is difficult to assess their long-term benefits and sustainability. We developed a multi-group model depicting transmission dynamics of the disease among different groups of people with different raw-fish-consumption behaviors, based on which, long-term effects of possible control strategies were simulated and assessed. Under a typical transmission setting, we found that combinations of control measures were much beneficial than those singly applied; higher coverages of measures had better effects; and strategies targeted on whole population performed better than that on at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors. The strategy recommended by the government of Guangdong Province, China shows good and sustainable effects. Besides, several sustainable strategies are provided under the study setting. The proposed transmission model is easily facilitated with other transmission settings. The simulation outputs can be considered together with actual practical situations to support decision making on selection of effective control strategies on clonorchiasis.

Introduction

Clonorchiasis is one of the most important food-borne trematodiases, caused by infection with Clonorchis sinensis [1]. About 15 million people are infected with C. sinensis worldwide, predominantly located in East Asia and over 85% of infected cases happened in China [2]. Chronic infection of C. sinensis can lead to complications in liver and biliary systems. Furthermore, C. sinensis is classified as a defined carcinogenic to humans [2,3]. The global disease burden was estimated to 522,863 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by WHO in 2010 [4]. Therefore, control of C. sinensis infection becomes one of the major health challenges in endemic society.

The life cycle of C. sinensis involves snails as the first intermediate hosts, fish or shrimp as the second, and humans or other piscivorous mammals as the definitive hosts [5]. The most common way of human getting infected with metacercariae of C. sinensis is eating the raw or insufficiently cooked infected fish/shrimp, the frequency and intensity of which can directly influence the probability of getting infection [6]. Moreover, people can get infected without reporting raw-fish consumption, probably due to poor hygiene habits, e.g., eating food contaminated by metacercariae of C. sinensis through tableware or chopping board previously used to prepare raw fish without effective cleaning [6,7]. Different behaviors of human in raw-fish consumption may show different transmission characteristics, which is important particularly when studying the dynamics of the transmission process.

The major control measures of clonorchiasis includes preventive chemotherapy, information, education, and communication (IEC), environmental modification and the possible combinations of the above [8]. Chemotherapy is the most important measure for the management of clonorchiasis, the targeted population of which can be all residents (i.e., mass drug administration, MDA) or selective population (e.g., infected individuals and at-risk groups with raw-fish-eating behavior) [8,9]. Repeated MDA or chemotherapy with selective population showed good morbidity control effects during short periods (e.g., 2 or 3 years) [9]. IEC combined with chemotherapy is suggested to enhance the control sustainability [10]. And environmental modification, an additional way of control measure by removing unimproved toilets built adjacent to fish ponds, can prevent the contamination of water by faeces and decrease the number of infected snails and fish [11].

Effective and sustainable control strategies on clonorchiasis are important, assisting local governments and policy makers to implement the interventions. WHO recommended a control strategy of clonorchiasis that advocates praziquantel administration for all residents every year in high endemic areas (with prevalence≥20%) and for all residents every two years or individuals regularly eating raw fish every year in moderate endemic areas (with prevalence <20%) [12]. The Chinese government set a goal in 2015 to reduce prevalence of clonorchiasis by 30% or more in areas with prevalence higher than 10% by 2020. Intervention strategy was developed, including chemotherapy every year for at-risk population with a coverage by 80%, improvement of sanitation toilets by 80% and increasing the awareness of key knowledge on clonorchiasis control among students by 95% [13]. The government of Guangdong Province, one of the most endemic provinces in China, set a more ambitious goal to reduce the prevalence by 40% in areas with prevalence higher than 20%. Stronger interventions were recommended, including coverage of chemotherapy by 80% on at-risk population every year, coverage of sanitation toilets by 90% and improvement of people’s healthy behaviors by 90% [14]. However, studies were absence on evaluation of the long-term (>10 years) effects of the above strategies. Several control programmes have been implemented in endemic areas, focusing on either chemotherapy only or interventions combined with several measures [9,1517]. But the study periods were short, mostly less than 5 years, thus it’s difficult to assess the long-term effects and the sustainability. There is an urgent need to explore long-term benefits and effectiveness of different potential strategies on morbidity control of clonorchiasis within a quantitative framework.

Mathematical models play important roles for understanding the transmission dynamics of parasitic diseases [18]. Furthermore, they test hypotheses about likely dynamics and epidemiology under proposed strategies, thus support control and elimination programmes [19]. Four papers have been published on mathematical models depicting the transmission dynamics of C. sinensis infection. Dai and colleagues proposed a deterministic SI compartmental model describing the transmission of C. sinensis infection between human, snail, and fish. The authors also verified the globally asymptotically stable of the model in both disease-free and endemic equilibria [20]. Yuan and colleagues applied a deterministic SEIR and a SIR model to describe the spread of clonorchiasis in Foshan and Guangzhou, China, respectively [21,22]. Compared to Dai’s model, the models developed by Yuan included recovered population as well as different status (e.g., eggs and cercariae) of the parasite. Gao and colleagues proposed a SIRS model to evaluate the effects of snail control and health education on clonorchiasis control in Foshan, China [23]. These papers analyzed relationships between model parameters and the basic production number (R0), giving insights to possible directions of intervention strategies. However, no further indicators (e.g., time to achieve transmission control or extinction, percentages of prevalence decreased through time), which are more applicable for selection of specific strategies, were used for assessment. Furthermore, the models assumed homogeneity of human population, yet people with different behaviors of raw-fish consumption show different transmission patterns, which should be considered when the transmission dynamics is depicted. And control strategies focus on population with raw fish consumption instead of whole population cannot be assessed under these models. Interestingly, Bürli and colleges [24,25] developed deterministic models of Opisthorchis viverrini transmission dynamics to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of different interventions (e.g., MDA, IEC, and environmental modification), by including the parameters of interventions inside the models and simulating different scenarios. O. viverrini, known as the other major species of liver fluke, have very similar life cycle as C. sinensis [26].

In this paper, with extension of Dai’s transmission model and reference of Bürli’s intervention model [20,24], we developed a multi-group deterministic SIS transmission model to: (1) describing the transmission dynamics among groups of population with different raw-fish-consumption behaviors and (2) quantitatively assessing the long-term effectiveness of different intervention strategies on control of C. sinensis infection through simulating scenarios. As a practical example, the model was applied in Fusha Town, a typical clonorchiasis endemic area with raw-fish-eating culture in Guangdong province, China. The model parameters were estimated by fitting the model with the epidemiological survey data collected in the town.

Methods

Method overview

We developed a basic model to describe the transmission of C. sinensis, with consideration of different groups of population with different raw-fish-consumption behaviors. Using the survey data in Fusha Town, Guangdong Province, we estimated the unknown model parameters under Bayesian melding approach. Validation and sensitivity analysis were undertaken afterwards. A full model with interventions were further developed by adapting the basic model with specific intervention parameters, and simulations were carried out to evaluate the long-term effects of different control strategies. In particular, we assessed: (1) the current strategies recommended by WHO, the Chinese government and the government of Guangdong Province; and (2) the three commonly used measures (i.e., preventive chemotherapy, IEC and environmental modification) when applied singly or combinedly, with different coverages, durations and frequencies of chemotherapy and improvement rates of IEC and environmental modification. The resulted sustainable intervention strategies were listed for practical application. A flow diagram of the methodology is show in Fig 1.

Fig 1. The flow diagram of methodology.

Fig 1

*The commonly used interventions included preventive chemotherapy, IEC and environmental modification. Assessment is done for strategies with different coverages, durations and frequencies of chemotherapy and different improvement rates of IEC and environmental modification.

The basic model

As individuals previous infected with C. sinensis show no apparent protective immunity after recovery from treatment [27] and re-infection is common in endemic areas [9,28], we proposed a deterministic Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) model to describe the transmission of C. sinensis among human-snail-fish populations, where infected human recovered from infection will instantly return to the susceptible state. According to different frequencies of raw-fish consumption, we classified the human population into four groups, that is seldom, moderately (less than 5 times per year), often (5–10 times per year) and very often (more than 10 times per year) eating of raw fish. We assumed each group of people get infection under different transmission rates. Fig 2A describes the model structure graphically, and Tables 1 and 2 list the descriptions of state variables and model parameters, respectively. We assumed each host has two states (i.e., susceptible S and infectious I) and the transmission dynamics were modeled by a system of twelve ordinary differential equations. More detailed description of the model is shown in S1 Text.

Fig 2. The multi-group dynamic transmission models of C. sinensis infection.

Fig 2

(A) and (B) indicate the basic model and the full model with interventions, respectively. Compartments represent the population of different human groups, snails and fish; for variables and parameters see text, Tables 1 and 2. The unfilled boxes in rectangle, ellipse and trapezoidal shapes in (B) indicate interventions of IEC, chemotherapy, and environmental modification, respectively.

Table 1. State variables used in the multi-group transmission models.

Variable Description
Sh,1 Number of susceptible humans who seldom eat raw or uncooked fish
Ih,1 Number of infected humans who seldom eat raw or uncooked fish
Sh,2 Number of susceptible humans who moderately eat raw or uncooked fish
Ih,2 Number of infected humans who moderately eat raw or uncooked fish
Sh,3 Number of susceptible humans who often eat raw or uncooked fish
Ih,3 Number of infected humans who often eat raw or uncooked fish
Sh,4 Number of susceptible humans who very often eat raw or uncooked fish
Ih,4 Number of infected humans who very often eat raw or uncooked fish
Ss Number of susceptible snails
Is Number of infected snails
Sf Number of susceptible fish
If Number of infected fish

Table 2. Description of model parameters and their values (unit: day-1).

Parameter Description Best set [95% CI] Source
λh,1 Recruitment of susceptible humans who seldom eat raw or uncooked fish 0.57 [0.56–0.59] fitting
λh,2 Recruitment of susceptible humans who moderately eat raw or uncooked fish 0.16 [0.14–0.17] fitting
λh,3 Recruitment of susceptible humans who often eat raw or uncooked fish 0.089 [0.076–0.101] fitting
λh,4 Recruitment of susceptible humans who very often eat raw or uncooked fish 0.045 [0.038–0.048] fitting
λs Recruitment of susceptible snails 3729.1 [2931]
λf Recruitment of susceptible fish 1993.2 [1264.9–3606.8] fitting
βh,1 Transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who seldom consumes raw fish 2.71×10−10 [1.73×10−10–4.20×10−10] fitting
c2 Ratio of transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who moderately consumes raw or uncooked fish to that who seldom 7.54 [6.00–10.42] fitting
c3 Ratio of transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who often consumes raw or uncooked fish to that who seldom 25.82 [18.77–28.48] fitting
c4 Ratio of transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who very often consumes raw or uncooked fish to that who seldom 333.70 [318.38–343.94] fitting
βh,2 The increased transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who moderately consumes raw fish, compared to that who seldom 1.77×10−9 [1.08×10−9–3.06×10−9] βh,1(c2−1)
βh,3 The increased transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who often consumes raw fish, compared to that who seldom 6.73×10−9 [3.51×10−9–9.70×10−9] βh,1(c3−1)
βh,4 The increased transmission rate from an infected fish to a susceptible human who very often consumes raw fish, compared to that who seldom 9.02×10−8 [5.76×10−8–1.43×10−7]
βh,1(c4−1)
βs Transmission rate from an infected human to a susceptible snail 3.31×10−9 [1.64×10−9–3.88×10−9] fitting
βf Transmission rate from an infected snail to a susceptible fish 1.53×10−8 [1.17×10−8–2.83×10−8] fitting
μh Birth and death rates of human hosts 1.49×10−5 [32]
μs Birth and death rates of snails 1/365 [31]
μf Birth and death rates of fish 1/(1.58×365) [1/(2.06×365)-1/(1.15×365)] fitting
γ1 Basic recovery rate of infected humans through individual treatment 0.137/365 [0.078/365-0.175/365)] fitting

The basic reproduction number R0 (i.e., the average number of new cases generated by a typical infected individual in an otherwise susceptible population) was derived by the next generation matrix approach (with details in S3 Text). The expression for R0 is as following:

R0=βh,1βsβfλsλf(c1λh,1+c2λh,2+c3λh,3+c4λh,4)μh(μh+γ1)μs2μf23

Data

As a practical example, we applied the model in Fusha Town (coordinates: 22°40'2.64''N, 113°20'58.2''E, area: 37 km2, and population: 59,593 in the year 2017), located at the northern part of Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province (S1 Fig), where C. sinensis infection is highly endemic [5]. Situated among the Pearl River Delta’s vast water network, the town is crisscrossed by rivers and the fishing industry is flourishing. Local residents like eating raw fish and have poor hygiene habits of using the same chopping blocks for both raw and cooked food [33]. All these geographical, environmental and socioeconomic factors make the town a typical place for the disease transmission. The prevalence data of human was obtained from a cross-sectional study done between October 2011 and June 2012 in the town, the detailed result of which is shown in Table 3 [33]. As no prevalence data of fish is available for Fusha town, we used the data from a cross-sectional survey between October 2008 to September 2009 in Zhongshan City instead, where the town belongs. The survey shows the prevalence of fish infected with cercariae of C. sinensis is 20.97% (39/186) [34]. Even though no survey data of snails is available for either Fusha Town or Zhongshan City, series of studies reported the prevalence of infected snail between 0.1% and 3.7% in different endemic areas of Guangdong province, with study period between 2004 to 2009 [34,35]. This interval was set as prior information for the following parameter estimation.

Table 3. Observed prevalence of C. sinensis infection among groups of people with different frequencies of raw fish consumption in Fusha Town [33].

Frequency of eating raw fish per year No. of samples No. of positive (%)
Seldom 802 121 (15.08)
<5 times 215 126 (58.60)
5–10 times 123 98 (79.67)
>10 times 60 59 (98.33)
Total 1200 404 (33.67)

Parameter estimation

In absence of time-series longitudinal data, we assumed the system of basic model on the endemic equilibrium point under the observed situation. In order to capture the local transmission dynamics, we applied Bayesian melding approach to estimate the unknown parameters based on the basic model and the survey data [36]. More details were described in the S4 Text.

Validation was undertaken by calculating the modeling efficiency statistic (EF) [37] and the coverage of observed data within 95% credible intervals of posterior estimations. Here, EF=1i=1n(OiEi)2i=1n(OiO¯)2, where Oi is the observed value, O¯ is the mean of the observed values, and Ei is the estimated value from the best set of estimated parameters. Chi-square test was used to see whether there is significant difference between observed and estimated prevalence [37,38]. Local sensitivity index [25] and partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCC) [39] were calculated to assess the influence of different parameters on R0, locally and globally, respectively.

Full model with interventions

We considered common types of interventions against C. sinensis infection, that is preventive chemotherapy, IEC, environmental modification, and possible combinations of the above measures. In particular, two kinds of improvement through IEC were considered: (1) improvement of hygiene habits and (2) changing the behavior of raw-fish-consumption. The improvements through IEC and environmental modification were assumed continuous, that is, once it happens, it will last through time in the same population. Intervention parameters were set as following: γ2,i the recovery rate of infected humans through preventive chemotherapy, Cm,i the coverage of chemotherapy, Ti the time interval of treatment, Ce1,i the improvement rate of hygiene habits, Ce2,i the rate of stopping raw-fish-eating behavior and Cd the coverage of sanitation toilets. i = 1,2,3,4 represent human groups who seldom, moderately, often and very often consume raw fish, respectively. A full model is show in Fig 2B, which describes transmission dynamics of C. sinensis infection under different control interventions. More details are shown in S2 Text.

The approach for calculation of control reproduction number (Rc) in the system with interventions is similar as that of R0. With the assumption that chemotherapy is distributed continuously [24], Rc is expressed as following:

Rc=λsλfβsβf(1Cd)μs2μf2μhi=14λh,i[(1Ce1,i)βh,1+(1Ce2,i)βh,i]μh+γ1+γ2,i3

Simulation of interventions

A baseline scenario was initiated at the endemic equilibrium state according to the situation of Fusha Town, which presents a typical high endemic setting. To access the current recommended strategies, we simulated the corresponding interventions recommended by WHO, the Chinese government and the government of Guangdong Province, respectively, with an intervention duration of 5 years and a further post-intervention period of 45 years. The values set for the corresponding intervention parameters are listed in Table 4. In addition, to explore the effects of intervention durations, coverage rates and frequencies of chemotherapy, improvement rates of the two kinds of healthy behaviors by IEC, improvement rates of environmental modification, and possible combinations of the three measures, we set a series of values for intervention parameters and simulated the corresponding scenarios. Indicators including control reproduction number Rc, prevalence and its reduced rates in 5, 10 and 15 years from the beginning of intervention, were calculated to evaluate the corresponding interventions. We considered the intervention sustainable if Rc<1 and the prevalence in the post-intervention period remain decreasing. In addition, with reference to the schistosomiasis control criteria in China [40], we defined areas with clonorchiasis prevalence less than 5% as infection control areas, and less than 1% as transmission control. We calculated the years from the beginning of intervention to infection control and transmission control status, respectively, for each scenario. We assumed the drug efficacy h to be 92% according to the median of the corresponding studies [16,4145].

Table 4. Values set for intervention parameters of the current recommended strategies*.

Parameter WHO The Chinese government The government of Guangdong Province
Cd 0 0.85 0.90
Ce1,1 0 0 0.90
Ce1,2 0 0 0.90
Ce1,3 0 0 0.90
Ce1,4 0 0 0.90
Ce2,2 0 0 0.90
Ce2,3 0 0 0.90
Ce2,4 0 0 0.90
Cm,1 1.00 0 0
Cm,2 1.00 0.80 0.80
Cm,3 1.00 0.80 0.80
Cm,4 1.00 0.80 0.80
F# 1 1 1
D## 5 5 5

*The Chinese government do have a strategy through IEC to increase the awareness of key knowledge on clonorchiasis control among students by 95%. However, such improvement does not have a direct effect on the system and is difficult to address. Thus, we set Ce1,i = 0 (i = 1,2,3,4) and Ce2,j = 0 (j = 2,3,4).

#The frequency of chemotherapy per year.

##The intervention duration of chemotherapy.

Results

Parameter estimation

The estimated results of unknown parameters are shown in Table 2. The transmission rates were much higher for people who regularly eat raw fish than that for people who seldom. Particularly, the rates were 7.5 (95% CI: 6.0–10.4), 25.8 (95% CI: 18.8–28.5) and 333.7 (95% CI: 318.4–343.9) times higher for those moderately, often and very often consuming raw fish than that for those seldom, respectively. We estimated that in the study area, around 13.7% (95% CI: 7.8%-17.5%) of infected people received individual treatment and recovered per year on the endemic equilibrium point. Besides, proportions of population who seldom, moderately, often and very often consume of raw fish were estimated to 65.9% (95% CI: 64.7%-68.8%), 18.6% (95% CI: 16.3%-20.0%), 10.3% (95% CI: 8.8%-11.7%) and 5.2% (95% CI: 4.4%-5.6%), respectively. The parameter estimation shows a good fitting capacity, as it was able to correctly estimate 100% of prevalence of different hosts within 95% CI (S2 Fig), the EF score was approximately equal to 1 (EF = 0.9998), and the Chi-square value was 20, with P-value equal to 0.22 (larger than the significant level 0.05). The basic reproduction number R0 was estimated to be 2.46 (95% CI: 2.31–2.56) (S3 Fig). Results for local and global sensitivity analysis of R0 are show in Fig 3.

Fig 3. Sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0.

Fig 3

(A) Local sensitivity analysis. (B) Global sensitivity analysis. In (B), parameter with * indicates the corresponding PRCC coefficients are significantly different from zero (with p-values<0.05); values for parameters with # were assumed fixed in this study, thus no PRCC coefficient was calculated.

Three recommended strategies

The three recommended strategies (i.e., strategies by WHO, the Chinese government and the government of Guangdong Province) could reduce significantly the prevalence of human by 73.56% (95% CI: 69.86%-82.56%), 57.39% (95% CI: 53.31%-62.79%) and 81.52% (95% CI: 77.16%-83.93), respectively, at the end of the 5-year interventions. The prevalence of snail and fish could be also decreased (Fig 4 and Table 5). However, the WHO recommended strategy, which only focus on chemotherapy of population, was not sustainable, as the prevalence increased after the intervention stopped (e.g., human prevalence increased by 104.15%, 95% CI: 96.68%-118.44% within 5 years of post-intervention, compared to the prevalence at the end of intervention). Strategies recommended by the Chinese government and the government of Guangdong Province, which combine chemotherapy with other measures such as environmental modification and/or IEC, performed better. Particularly, under the strategy of Guangdong Province, the study area could reach infection control and transmission control within 7.84 years (95% CI: 5.78–12.16) and 21.89 (95% CI: 17.80–33.81) years from the beginning of intervention, respectively. Hence this strategy could be more effective.

Fig 4. Numerical simulations under the three recommended strategies.

Fig 4

(A) prevalence of total population, (B) prevalence of population who originally seldom eat raw fish, (C) prevalence of population who originally moderately eat raw fish, (D) prevalence of population who originally often eat raw fish, (E) prevalence of population who originally very often eat raw fish, (F) prevalence of snails, (G) prevalence of fish.

Table 5. Simulation results under the scenarios of the three recommended strategies*.

Indicator# WHO The Chinese government The government of Guangdong Province
Rc 0.93 (0.77–1.00) 0.65 (0.57–0.69) 0.26 (0.23–0.28)
Ps5 (%) 8.99 (5.68–10.33) 14.48 (12.09–16.11) 6.28 (5.26–8.03)
Ps10 (%) 18.35 (11.98–20.93) 13.19 (11.00–14.76) 3.95 (3.04–5.89)
Ps15 (%) 24.71 (17.04–27.35) 11.11 (9.23–12.53) 2.21 (1.50–3.97)
rs5 (%) 73.56 (69.86–82.56) 57.39 (53.31–62.97) 81.52 (77.16–83.93)
rs10 (%) 46.01 (39.56–63.70) 61.17 (57.39–66.01) 88.38 (82.98–90.79)
rs15 (%) 27.27 (21.38–48.33) 67.31 (63.80–71.65) 93.48 (88.41–95.51)
Y5% Never >50 (49.71- >50) 7.84 (5.78–12.16)
Y1% Never >50 21.89 (17.80–33.81)

*Results were expressed based on the best set of parameter estimates and their 95% CI.

#Ps5, Ps10 and Ps15 indicate the prevalence in 5, 10 and 15 years from the beginning of intervention, respectively; rs5, rs10 and rs15 indicate the reduced rates in 5, 10 and 15 years from the beginning of intervention, compared with the baseline prevalence, respectively; Y5% and Y1% indicate the years to achieve infection control and transmission control from the beginning of intervention, respectively.

The three common measures when applied singly

Chemotherapy, when applied singly, were able to reduce human prevalence fast during the intervention, but it was not sustainable (S3 Table). Of noted, it performed better on whole population than at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors under the same frequencies, coverage rates and duration time of intervention (S4 Fig and S3 Table). Higher frequencies of treatment, higher coverage rates and longer duration of intervention could result in larger reduction of human prevalence at the end of intervention. However, even with twice treatment each year on whole population under 100% coverage and 20 years’ duration of intervention, the prevalence would still rebound after intervention stopped.

Under the assumption of continuation of the improvements, the IEC measure was sustainable when applied singly, if both kinds of improvement rates reached 93.29% (95% CI: 91.87%-94.06%) on whole population (S5 Fig and S4 Table). The effects increased when the improvement rates rose. To be noted, IEC only focus on improvement of hygiene habits of people or changing the behavior of raw-fish-consumption showed less effective than that focus on both. For example, even people achieve a 100% improvement of hygiene habits, the prevalence would remain at high level (22.08%, 95% CI: 19.50%-24.46%) after 20 years from the beginning of intervention, if no improvement was undertaken in changing people’s behavior of raw-fish-consumption. Similarly, the prevalence was not able to decrease below 9.33% (95% CI: 7.07%-14.16%) within 50 years without improvement of hygiene habits, even when 100% of at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors would not consume raw fish any more. We found the effects of IEC slow, as even with a 90% improvement of both kinds of healthy behaviors, the study area needed more than 33.87 years (95% CI: 24.65–50.27 years) to reach infection control, and was not able to reach transmission control within 50 years. Similar as IEC, environmental modification, when applied singly, showed slow effects on decreasing the prevalence (S5 Fig and S5 Table). For example, with a 90% coverage of sanitation toilets, the study areas needed 40.48 years (95% CI: 30.21–57.10) to reach infection control and was not able to reach transmission control within 50 years.

Measures when applied combinedly

Generally, interventions combined with two or three measures performed much better than that only applied singly, and higher coverages resulted in larger reductions of prevalence (S6 and S7 Tables and Fig 5). Table 6 lists several selected sustainable combinations, under which the study area could achieve infection control within 10 years from the beginning of intervention. With a high coverage (i.e., 90%) of chemotherapy on whole population (once per year for five years), the improvement of people’s healthy behaviors should reach 94%, or the improvement of people’s healthy behaviors and the coverage of sanitation toilets should both reach 70% to achieve the goal. If chemotherapy only focus on at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors, a higher improvement (85%) of both people’s healthy behaviors and coverage of sanitation toilets should be applied. Under a high coverage (90%) of sanitation toilets and high improvement (90%) of people’s healthy behaviors, chemotherapy (once per year for five years) with 20% coverage on whole population or 40% on at-risk groups with raw-fish-consumption behaviors could result in transmission control within 10 years. In addition, a coverage of chemotherapy targeted on whole population by 60% combined with improvements of people’s healthy behaviors and environmental modification by 70%, or a coverage of chemotherapy on at-risk population by 80% combined with improvements of people’s healthy behaviors and environmental modification by 85%, could also achieve the goal.

Fig 5. Numerical simulations under different control strategies combined with two or three measures.

Fig 5

The left and right columns indicate chemotherapy targeted on whole population and at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors, respectively. The simulation of chemotherapy was once per year for five years. The black dotted lines indicate the observed baseline prevalence from survey data. The dash dot line indicates the transmission control prevalence (i.e., 1%). The solid lines indicate results based on best set of estimated parameters and the areas with lighter colors represent the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. (A1-A2) with coverage of chemotherapy Cm = 0.90, coverage of sanitation toilets Cd = 0 and improvement rate of both kinds of healthy behaviors Ce = 0.30, 0.60, 0.90 (red, green, blue, respectively); (B1-B2) with Cm = 0.90, Ce= 0 and Cd = 0.30, 0.60, 0.90 (red, green, blue, respectively); (C1-C2) with Cm = 0.90, Ce = Cd = 0.30, 0.60, 0.90 (red, green, blue, respectively); (D1-D2) with Ce = 0.90, Cd = 0 and Cm = 0.40, 0.60, 0.80 (red, green, blue, respectively); (E1-E2) with Cd = 0.90, Ce = 0 and Cm = 0.40, 0.60, 0.80 (red, green, blue, respectively); and (F1-F2) with Ce = Cd = 0.90 and Cm = 0.40, 0.60, 0.80 (red, green, blue, respectively).

Table 6. Selected sustainable combined strategies to achieve infection control within 10 years*.

Pop# Strategy Effectiveness
Cd Ce Cm Rc Ps5 Ps10 Ps15 Y5% Y1%
whole 0.00 0.94 0.90 0.41 (0.34–0.44) 0.76 (0.37–1.03) 1.10 (0.53–1.52) 0.98 (0.47–1.29) 8.13 (7.46–9.17) 13.97 (7.46–27.08)
0.70 0.70 0.90 0.46 (0.39–0.50) 2.86 (1.48–3.62) 3.82 (2.10–4.68) 3.48 (2.03–4.13) 7.85 (7.22–10.82) >50
0.90 0.90 0.20 0.39 (0.35–0.42) 8.49 (7.47–9.95) 4.96 (3.75–6.87) 2.75 (1.82–4.72) 9.93 (8.05–14.22) 23.68 (19.11–36.16)
0.90 0.39 0.90 0.41 (0.34–0.44) 4.44 (2.42–5.46) 4.94 (2.94–5.99) 3.79 (2.36–4.55) 9.78 (6.66–13.23) >50 (37.73- >50)
0.70 0.70 0.60 0.59 (0.50–0.63) 4.54 (2.99–5.21) 4.92 (3.35–5.66) 4.29 (3.00–4.80) 9.49 (6.67–13.66) >50
At-risk 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.33 (0.29–0.35) 6.79 (5.70–8.44) 4.83 (3.80–6.63) 3.02 (2.20–4.88) 9.64 (7.26–14.66) 27.33 (22.22–40.89)
0.90 0.90 0.40 0.34 (0.30–0.36) 8.34 (7.23–10.22) 4.97 (3.85–7.24) 2.77 (1.85–4.95) 9.96 (8.13–14.86) 23.78 (19.36–36.71)
0.90 0.82 0.90 0.30 (0.27–0.32) 7.02 (5.92–8.63) 4.90 (3.84–6.67) 2.95 (2.12–4.83) 9.80 (7.46–14.53) 25.96 (21.28–38.93)
0.85 0.85 0.80 0.35 (0.30–0.37) 7.03 (5.93–8.64) 4.95 (3.91–6.76) 3.09 (2.24–4.96) 9.89 (7.58–14.88) 27.55 (22.42–41.16)

*Results were expressed based on the best set of parameter estimates and their 95% CI; the duration of chemotherapy was 5 years; Cd, Ce and Cm indicate the coverage of sanitation toilets, the improvement rate of both kinds of healthy behaviors by IEC, and the coverage of chemotherapy on targeted population, respectively; chemotherapy is applied once per year for five years; RcY1% have the same meanings as that in Table 5.

#The targeted population of chemotherapy; “at-risk” means at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors.

Discussion

Advantages of the methodology

In this study, we developed a multi-group transmission model to describe the dynamics of C. sinensis transmission among people with different raw-fish-consumption behaviors. Based on the above model, we proposed a comprehensive model with interventions and simulated the long-term dynamics under various control strategies. The intervention model also allows us to investigate the control effectiveness among different raw-fish-consumption human population and with different improvements of IEC.

To our knowledge, it is the first time that a multi-group model was proposed for transmission dynamics of C. sinensis infection. Values of many parameter could not be obtained from existing studies. Data-driven approaches, integrating survey data into models to estimate parameters that capture the local transmission dynamics [46], are most suitable approaches of parameter estimation for our study setting. Bayesian melding approach is one of the most common data-driven approaches [36,47,48]. It has important advantages compared to the maximum likelihood approach, including the ability to produce probability distributions of the estimated parameters and model outputs which can be used for inference and projection, and the good computational efficiency when a large number of parameters are estimated simultaneously [49]. The performance of our model estimation seems good, as the outputs were able to capture the 100% of the observed data within 95% CI, the EF score was close to 1, and the Chi-square test show there was no significant difference between observed and estimated prevalence.

Three recommended strategies

Based on a typical setting of C. sinensis transmission (Fusha Town), we simulated scenarios according to strategies recommended by WHO, the Chinese government and the government of Guangdong Province, with intervention duration of five years. On one hand, the WHO strategy, mainly focusing on chemotherapy of whole population, could decrease the human prevalence rapidly but were not sustainable (Fig 4), even with an extension of intervention duration to 30 years (S4 Fig), which may due to the high reinfection of the disease [9,28]. On the other hand, strategies recommended by the Chinese government and the government of Guangdong Province could reach their setting goals within 5 years of intervention (Fig 4). However, the former strategy, combined with chemotherapy and environmental modification, showed slower effects and human prevalence won’t reduce to the transmission control level within 50 years. This effect might be slightly underestimated, as we ignored one component of the strategy (i.e., increasing the awareness of key knowledge on clonorchiasis control among students through IEC by 95%). Students are not among the high-risk groups of transmission [50], and it’s difficult to assess how much improvement of healthy behaviors the increase of knowledge will result in. The latter strategy, even though showed the best control effects, is quite strong and ambitious, as a 90% coverage should be reached for the improvements of both environmental modification and healthy behaviors, and an 80% coverage for chemotherapy on at-risk population, which may be hard to achieve in practice, especially the one for improvements of people’s behaviors [51]. From a practical implementation perspective, we might overestimate this strategy.

Measures when applied singly or combinedly

In order to find more applicable strategies, we set a series of values for intervention parameters and assessed the corresponding simulated results. We found that when applied singly, IEC or environmental modification showed slow and moderate control effects but kept decreasing the prevalence of C. sinensis infection within 50 years, while chemotherapy indicated much quicker and stronger effects but prevalence was easy to rebound after intervention stopped. Only with very strong chemotherapy (e.g., 5 times per year for 33 years, or 2 times per year for 70 years) on whole population could lead to sustainable transmission control (S4 Fig). Besides, IEC only focus on improvement of hygiene habits of people or changing the behavior of raw-fish-consumption showed less effective than that focus on both. The higher coverages of measures resulted in better effects, which is similar as previous studies on other parasitic diseases [52]. Combinations of measures were much beneficial than those singly applied; and particularly, chemotherapy combined with both IEC and environmental modification showed much better effects than that combined with only one measure. Chemotherapy could reduce the number of infected people but could not prevent reinfections or new infections [9], while IEC helps to reduce the transmission rate from infected fish to susceptible human [25], and environmental modification decreases the chance of the transmission from infected human to snails [25]. Thus, all of the three measures implemented together will effectively control the transmission, which is strongly recommended for morbidity control of the disease. We also listed several sustainable combined strategies leading to infection control within 10 years in our current setting, with chemotherapy on either whole or at-risk population under coverages from low to high (Table 6). To be noted, durations, levels of coverage and kinds of targeted population (e.g., whole or selective) may influence the compliance of chemotherapy [9,17,53], thus both simulated effects and compliance in practice should be considered before selection of strategies.

Insights from sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis, characterizing the response of model outputs to parameter variation, shows strength and direction of the influence of different parameters on the outcomes of interest, thus provides insights on possible intervention strategies [54]. Results from sensitivity analysis (Fig 3) should be considered together with simulated outputs of transmission models and actual practical challenges, for finding better interventions. In our basic transmission model, the death rates (μh, μs and μf), the transmission rates (βh,1, βs and βf), the recruitments of fish and snail (λs and λf), and the basic recovery rate γ1 showed relatively strong influence on R0. The three common measures, that is chemotherapy, IEC and environmental modification, could influence recovery rate, βh,1 and βf, respectively, which is quite reasonable to consider for interventions. Application of molluscicides may decrease λs and increase μs. However, due to the wide distribution of snails, their low prevalence of C. sinensis infection, and the potential toxic effects of molluscicides to fish, this measure is not recommended in endemic areas [8,55]. βf could be decreased by developing vaccines targeting the intermediate hosts, which is still under investigation [56]. Interestingly, parameters related to the group of people who very often consume raw fish have much stronger influence on R0 compared to that of other human groups, but chemotherapy or IEC focusing only on this group showed much softer effects (S3 and S4 Tables), which may be explained by the small proportion of population in the group. On one hand, people who very often consume raw fish play an important role in transmission and need to pay more special attention to. On the other hand, measures should be taken on wider range of people instead of just on this particular group for a better morbidity control of the disease.

Limitations

This study is subject to some limitations. First of all, we made simplifying assumptions to several potential heterogeneities. We assumed IEC and environmental modification equally efficacious and continuous over the simulation period; however, the effects may change along with social and economic development, while it’s difficult to assess how those effects might change. We ignored the impact of seasonality on the transmission, whilst temperature and rainfall, showing close relationships with seasonality, may influence the egg hatching, activities and distributions of intermediate hosts [57], thus affect the transmission of the disease. As our studied area is relatively independent from surroundings and the population are stable (S1 Table), we assumed the transmission of the disease was influenced very little by nearby areas and did not considered the interactions of disease transmission between areas. However, the distance between Fusha Town and Zhangshan City is quite close (around 29 km) and migration of population may happen, which could have an impact on the transmission. We didn’t consider diversity of compliance with preventive chemotherapy on different groups of people, however, people who seldom consume raw fish may show less compliant than those very often consume. We assumed the basic transmission rate βh,1 influenced mainly by improvement of hygiene habits and ignored the effect of changing raw-fish-eating behavior of people. The latter may decrease the chance of tableware or chopping board being contaminated by metacercariae of C. sinensis as fewer people would prepare the raw-fish-dish, thus may reduce βh,1. We may underestimate the effect of this improvement. Due to unavailability of the corresponding data, we didn’t address the potential heterogeneities mentioned above to avoid large uncertainties, as the performance of models with increased complexity is critically conditional on an increase of available data for parameterization [58].

Besides, we assumed human the major definitive host and ignored the contributions of reservoir hosts (e.g., dogs and cats), which may lead to slightly over-estimation of effects of the studied strategies, as they mainly focus on human. We made the parsimonious assumption that the system was at an endemic equilibrium and fitted and validated the basic model using the cross-sectional survey data, based on which parameters pertaining to the transmission process were estimated. However, we could not validate the intervention model due to lack of longitudinal data on different intervention scenarios. Preventive chemotherapy recommended by WHO is praziquantel at a dosage of 40mg/kg in one single day [45], with drug efficacy of 87% [43], while control programs in China applied different modes, commonly with praziquantel at a dosage of 75mg/kg/day for 2 days [16] or albendazole 0.8g/day for 4 days [44], the corresponding efficacies of which were around 98%-100% or 83%-92%, respectively [41,42]. Different administration modes of chemotherapy may result in different efficacies and for convenience, we used the median efficacy (92%) of the above studies. To be noted, the simulation results may have minor changes with varied drug efficacies (e.g., the simulated prevalence after five years of preventive chemotherapy under the WHO strategy would increase or decrease by around 5% if drug efficacy was set to 87% or 98%, respectively). In addition, we assessed different intervention strategies under conditions on Fusha Town, a typical setting of C. sinensis transmission in Guangdong Province, China, the results of which can be generalized to other endemic areas with similar epidemic and under similar socioeconomic and environmental conditions. However, for areas far away the generalization should be taken very cautiously. Nevertheless, the multi-group model can be facilitated with epidemiological data from those areas and produce assessment results fit to their local dynamics. Besides, this study didn’t consider economic factors for implementation of the interventions. We are currently extending this work to cost-effective analysis of different strategies and developing models adjusting spatial disparities to provide more comprehensive and generalized assessments.

Conclusions

In summary, under the typical transmission setting we applied, our simulated results suggested that combinations of measures were much beneficial; higher coverages of measures had better effects; and strategies targeted on whole population performed better than that on at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors. The strategy of Guangdong Province performed best among the three recommended ones. Sustainable strategies, such as combined measures of preventive chemotherapy (once per year for five years) with 60% coverage on whole population, IEC and environmental modification with improvement rates of 70%, or combined measures of the above preventive chemotherapy with 80% coverage on at-risk population, IEC and environmental modification with improvement rates of 85%, could achieve infection control within 10 years. In conclusion, this study makes the effort to quantitatively assess the long-term effects of possible control strategies against C. sinensis infection. The model we proposed is facilitated to other transmission settings and the simulation outputs provide useful information that supports the selection of control strategies on clonorchiasis by researchers and decision makers.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The location of Fusha Town in Pearl River Delta, Guangdong Province, China.

The red star indicates the location of the town, and the green areas indicates the Pearl River Delta. Data for boundaries of the administrative divisions were downloaded from the GADM (https://gadm.org/). The coordinates of Fusha Town and other cities was obtained through the USGS LandsatLook (https://landsatlook.usgs.gov/). Based on the above data, the maps were produced using ArcGIS 10.2.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Fitted and observed prevalence of different hosts.

Human1, Human2, Human3 and Human4 in X-axis indicate human groups who seldom, moderately, often and very often eat raw or uncooked fish, respectively.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Posterior Distribution of R0 calculated by using the resampled 500 parameter vectors.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Numerical simulations under applied single chemotherapy strategies with different coverages, frequencies and durations.

The parameters were set to the best set of parameter estimates. Red lines indicate chemotherapy focus on whole population while blue lines on at-risk groups with raw-fish-eating behaviors. (A) F = 1, D = 5, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.4, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.4; (B) F = 1, D = 5, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8; (C) F = 0.5, D = 5, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8; (D) F = 1, D = 10, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8; (E) F = 1, D = 30, Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 1.0. (F) F = 0.2, D = 33, Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 1.0. (G) F = 0.5, D = 70, Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 1.0. Cm,i, F and D indicate the coverage in the ith group of population, treatment times per year and duration years of intervention, respectively.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Numerical simulations under single strategies of IEC or environmental modification with different improvement rates.

The parameters were set to the best set of parameter estimates. The improvement rates were set to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0. (A)-(D) represent the simulations under different improvement rates of IEC: (A) IEC focus both on improvement of hygiene habits and stopping people’s behavior of raw-fish-consumption; (B) IEC only focus on improvement of hygiene habits; (C) IEC only focus on stopping people’s behavior of raw-fish-consumption; (D) IEC only focus on changing the behavior of raw-fish-consumption on special groups, with red line indicates people who previous ate raw fish very often changed their behavior to eat often, with green line indicates people who previous ate raw fish very often or often changed their behavior to eat moderately, and with blue line indicates people who previous have raw-fish-eating behavior stopped eat raw fish. (E) represent the simulations under different improvement rates of environmental modification.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Resident population of Fusha Town from 2010 to 2017.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Prior triangular distributions for unknown parameters and their sources (unit: day-1).

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Results of simulations applied single chemotherapy strategies with different coverages, frequencies and durations targeted on different populations.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Results of simulations applied single IEC with different coverages.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Results of simulations applied single environmental modification with different coverages.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Results of simulations applied combined strategies with different coverages and durations targeted on whole population.

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Results of simulations applied combined strategies with different coverages and durations targeted on at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. The basic transmission model.

(DOCX)

S2 Text. The full model with interventions.

(DOCX)

S3 Text. The basic reproduction number R0.

(DOCX)

S4 Text. The prior information, the likelihood function and posterior distributions of parameter estimation.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

YSL received financial support of the Sun Yat-Sen University One Hundred Talent Grant (http://rcb.sysu.edu.cn/). This study received financial support from the CMB Open Competition Program (project no. 17-274, https://chinamedicalboard.org/), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (project no. 2017A030313704, http://gdstc.gd.gov.cn/) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 81703320, http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Qian MB. Clonorchiasis control: starting from awareness. Infect Dis Poverty. 2014;3(1):33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qian MB, Chen YD, Liang S, Yang GJ, Zhou XN. The global epidemiology of clonorchiasis and its relation with cholangiocarcinoma. Infect Dis Poverty. 2012;1(1):4 10.1186/2049-9957-1-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al. A review of human carcinogens—Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(4):321–2. 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70096-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization [Internet]. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases; c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/foodborne_disease/fergreport/en/.
  • 5.Lai YS, Zhou XN, Pan ZH, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P. Risk mapping of clonorchiasis in the People's Republic of China: A systematic review and Bayesian geostatistical analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(3):e0005239 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dang TC, Yajima A, Nguyen VK, Montresor A. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors for clonorchiasis and possible use of questionnaires to detect individuals at risk in northern Vietnam. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(12):1263–8. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qj Qin, Tan HQ. [Investigation on Clonorchis sinensis infection among students in Liangjiang Town]. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2001;14(1):71. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qian MB, Utzinger J, Keiser J, Zhou XN. Clonorchiasis. Lancet. 2016;387(10020):800–10. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60313-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Choi MH, Park SK, Li Z, Ji Z, Yu G, Feng Z, et al. Effect of control strategies on prevalence, incidence and re-infection of clonorchiasis in endemic areas of China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(2):e601 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oh JK, Lim MK, Yun EH, Cho H, Park EY, Choi MH, et al. Control of clonorchiasis in Korea: effectiveness of health education for community leaders and individuals in an endemic area. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(9):1096–104. 10.1111/tmi.12338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang QW, Huang FY, Geng YJ, Huang DN, Li XH, Gao ST, et al. [Relationship between propagation of Clonorchis sinensis and ecology cultivation]. China Trop. Med. 2009;9(6):1012–3,1125. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Health Organization [Internet]. Sustaining the drive to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: second WHO report on neglected tropcal diseases; c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/9789241564540/en/.
  • 13.National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China [Internet]. National control plan on echinococcosis and other important parasitic diseases in China (2016–2020); c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s5873/201702/dda5ffe3f50941a29fb0aba6233bb497.shtml. Chinese.
  • 14.Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangdong Province [Internet]. Control plan on the important parasitic diseases in Guangdong Province, China (2016–2020); c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: http://zwgk.gd.gov.cn/006940132/201701/t20170120_690891.html. Chinese.
  • 15.Tang ZL, Huang Y, Yu XB. Current status and perspectives of Clonorchis sinensis and clonorchiasis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, omics, prevention and control. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016;5(1):71 10.1186/s40249-016-0166-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ji Z, Ge T, Yuan S, Li XZ, Liu GH, Tang L. [Effect of community intervention model of clonorchiasis in Zhaoyuan County]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2012. February;24(1):113,115. Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fang YY, Ruan CW, Gao XX, Tan T, Chen RR, Hao Y. [Research on chemotherapy measures in different Clonorchis sinensis infectiosity endemic areas]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2014;26(3):300–2. Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Basanez MG, Anderson RM. Mathematical Models for Neglected Tropical Diseases: Essential Tools for Control and Elimination, Part A. Adv Parasitol. 2015;87:xiii–xvii. 10.1016/s0065-308x(15)00023-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hollingsworth TD. Counting Down the 2020 Goals for 9 Neglected Tropical Diseases: What Have We Learned From Quantitative Analysis and Transmission Modeling? Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(suppl_4):S237–s44. 10.1093/cid/ciy284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dai YF, Gao SJ, Zhang FM, Luo YL. Threshold and Stability Results for Clonorchiasis Epidemic Model. J Sci Technol Environ. 2013;2(2):13. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yuan RX, Gao SJ, Huang JC, Zhang XN. Mathematical modeling the dynamics of Clonorchiasis in Guangzhou City of China. Math Biosci Eng. 2019;16(2):881–897. 10.3934/mbe.2019041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yuan RX, Huang JC, Zhang XN, Ruan SG. Modeling the Transmission Dynamics of Clonorchiasis in Foshan, China. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15176 10.1038/s41598-018-33431-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gao SJ, Yuan RX, Liu YJ, Meng XZ. Modelling the Effects of Snail Control and Health Education in Clonorchiasis Infection in Foshan, China. Complexity. 2019;2019 10.1155/2019/4203158 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bürli C, Harbrecht H, Odermatt P, Sayasone S, Chitnis N. Analysis of interventions against the liver fluke, opisthorchis viverrini. Math Biosci. 2018;(303):115–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bürli C, Harbrecht H, Odermatt P, Sayasone S, Chitnis N. Mathematical analysis of the transmission dynamics of the liver fluke, Opisthorchis viverrini. J Theor Biol. 2018;(439):181–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Upatham ES, Viyanant V. Opisthorchis viverrini and opisthorchiasis: a historical review and future perspective. Acta Trop. 2003;88(3):171–6. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Choi BI, Han JK, Hong ST, Lee KH. Clonorchiasis and cholangiocarcinoma: etiologic relationship and imaging diagnosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(3):540–52. 10.1128/CMR.17.3.540-552.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lier T, Do DT, Johansen MV, Nguyen TH, Dalsgaard A, Asfeldt AM. High Reinfection Rate after Preventive Chemotherapy for Fishborne Zoonotic Trematodes in Vietnam. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(6):e2958 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang JQ, Zhou J, Lyu WG, Zhang HL, LI SX, Zheng XQ, et al. [Effect of aquatic plant coverage and water depth on the diversity of large aquatic animals: A study based on ponds in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River]. Shanghai Nong Ye Xue Bao. 2017;33(3):65–70. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xie XQ [Internet]. [The rent of fish pond in Zhongshan, Guangdong Province is up to 4750 yuan per mu, which breaking the record ] (author’s tranl). Nan Fang Nong Cun Bao. c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.bbwfish.com/article.asp?artid=86551. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen ZM, Zou L, Shen DW, Zhang WN, Ruan SG. Mathematical modelling and control of Schistosomiasis in Hubei Province, China. Acta Trop. 2010;115(1–2):119–25. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhongshan Statistical Bureau [Internet]. [Zhongshan Statistical Yearbook 2013]. c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: http://stats.zs.gov.cn/tjzl/tjnj/2013nj/index.htm. Chinese.
  • 33.Du SR, Huang JX, Li HW. [Epidemiology of clonorchiasis in the towns near the Pearl River Delta] (author’s tranl). South China J Prev Med. 2015;41(3):273–5. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang XC, Pei FQ, Zhang QM, Lin RX, Huang SY, Wang JL, et al. [Current status of environmental sanitation and clonorchis sinensis intermediate host infection of freshwater aquaculture in partial areas of Guangdong Province]. South China J Prev Med. 2010;36(3):9–13. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li FL, Lin RX, Huang BM, Zhou YL, Ou BW, Luo CH, et al. [Epidemiological investigation on clonorchiasis and exploration of treatment measures in urban district of jiangmen city]. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2005;18(3):214–6. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Singh BK, Michael E. Bayesian calibration of simulation models for supporting management of the elimination of the macroparasitic disease, Lymphatic Filariasis. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8(1):522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li JH, Gilmour S, Zhang HQ, Koyanagi A, Shibuya K. The epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of HIV testing, antiretroviral treatment and harm reduction programs. AIDS. 2012;26(16):2069–78. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283574e54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li Y, Zhang J, Zhang X. Modeling and preventive measures of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(3):3108–17. 10.3390/ijerph110303108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marino S, Hogue IB, Ray CJ, Kirschner DE. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J Theor Biol. 2008;254(1):178–96. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. [Control and elimination of schistosomiasis]. Standards Press of China; 2015. Chinese.
  • 41.Yangco BG, Lerma C, De, Lyman GH, Price DL. Clinical study evaluating efficacy of praziquantel in clonorchiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31(2):135–8. 10.1128/aac.31.2.135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Feng Q, Luo L, Xia SL, Zhang RH, Hai-Dong WU, Fan MG, et al. [Compare the Efficacy of Two Antiparasitic Drugs against Clonorchiasis]. Re Dai Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;12(6):1291–2. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee SH. Large scale treatment of Clonorchis sinensis infections with praziquantel under field conditions. Arzneimittelforschung. 1984;34(9B):1227–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fang YY. [A study of the epidemiology and the control measurements of Clonorchis Sinensis in Guangdong Province] [dissertation]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.World Health Organization [Internet]. WHO: Foodborne trematode infections. c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/foodborne_trematode_infections/clonorchiasis/clonorchiasis_more/en/.
  • 46.Michael E, Smith ME, Katabarwa MN, Byamukama E, Griswold E, Habomugisha P, et al. Substantiating freedom from parasitic infection by combining transmission model predictions with disease surveys. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4324 10.1038/s41467-018-06657-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ševčíková H, Raftery AE, Waddell PA. Assessing uncertainty in urban simulations using Bayesian melding. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2007;41(6):652–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alkema L, Raftery AE, Brown T. Bayesian melding for estimating uncertainty in national HIV prevalence estimates. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;(84 Suppl 1):i11–i6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Clark SJ, Thomas JR, Bao L. Estimates of age-specific reductions in HIV prevalence in Uganda: Bayesian melding estimation and probabilistic population forecast with an HIV-enabled cohort component projection model. Demogr Res. 2012;27(27):743–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Duan JH, Tang XY, Wang QZ, Tang Y, Zhang ZS, Zheng-Xiang LI, et al. [Epidemiological Survey on Clonorchiasis sinensis in an Endemic Area of South Hunan Province]. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 2009. December;27(6):467–71. Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yu YH, Wu K. [Retrospective analysis of epidemiological investigations of clonorchiasis conducted within the past 20 years in Shunde of Guangdong]. Xian dai Yu fang Yi xue. 2015;42(22):4050–2,80. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhu T, Jiang T, Chao N, Zhang XZ, Fei JH. [Effect of soil-transmitted helminthes control through mass deworming and latrine improvement]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2015;27(5):510–2. Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shuford KV, Turner HC, Anderson RM. Compliance with anthelmintic treatment in the neglected tropical diseases control programmes: a systematic review. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu JY, Dhingra R, Gambhir M, Remais JV. Sensitivity analysis of infectious disease models: methods, advances and their application. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10(86):20121018 10.1098/rsif.2012.1018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sithithaworn P, Andrews RH, Nguyen VD, Wongsaroj T, Sinuon M, Odermatt P, et al. The current status of opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis in the Mekong Basin. Parasitol Int. 2012;61(1):10–6. 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tang ZL, Sun HC, Chen TJ, Lin ZP, Jiang HY, Zhou XY, et al. Oral delivery of Bacillus subtilis spores expressing cysteine protease of Clonorchis sinensis to grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus): Induces immune responses and has no damage on liver and intestine function. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;(64):287–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li TG, Yang ZC, Wang M. Correlation between clonorchiasis incidences and climatic factors in Guangzhou, China. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Winskill P, Harrison WE, French MD, Dixon MA, Abela-Ridder B, Basáñez MG. Assessing the impact of intervention strategies against Taenia solium cysticercosis using the EPICYST transmission model. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):73 10.1186/s13071-017-1988-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008152.r001

Decision Letter 0

Banchob Sripa, jong-Yil Chai

20 Dec 2019

Dear Dr. Lai:

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Assessment of control strategies against Clonorchis sinensis infection based on a multi-group dynamic transmission model" (#PNTD-D-19-01903) for review by PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the manuscript as it currently stands. These issues must be addressed before we would be willing to consider a revised version of your study. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

When you are ready to resubmit, please be prepared to upload the following:

(1) A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

(2) Two versions of the manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed (uploaded as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted" file); the other a clean version (uploaded as the article file).

(3) If available, a striking still image (a new image if one is available or an existing one from within your manuscript). If your manuscript is accepted for publication, this image may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel images; where one is available, please use 'add file' at the time of resubmission and select 'striking image' as the file type.

Please provide a short caption, including credits, uploaded as a separate "Other" file. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License at http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/content-license (NOTE: we cannot publish copyrighted images).

(4) If applicable, we encourage you to add a list of accession numbers/ID numbers for genes and proteins mentioned in the text (these should be listed as a paragraph at the end of the manuscript). You can supply accession numbers for any database, so long as the database is publicly accessible and stable. Examples include LocusLink and SwissProt.

(5) To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript by Feb 18 2020 11:59PM. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we ask that you let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

To submit a revision, go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pntd/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item call Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.

Sincerely,

jong-Yil Chai

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Banchob Sripa

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

This manuscript describes about control strategies of clonorchiasis in China. It is interesting but needs some revisions before finally accepted. Please read carefully the reviewers' comments and properly address the points. Perhaps something like a flow diagram of the control measure(s) can be added for better understanding of the study. Please consider reducing unnecessary statements throughout the manuscript. The figure quality needs to be improved.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The objectives are clear, and the methods of statistical analysis seems to be good enough.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript described deterministic compartment control model for clonorchiasis by aiming for a long term outcome. Overall the objective is clear and by simulation of the model, the long term out comes can be assessed. The field data from an endemic area was used to validate the model prediction but there is no statistical support for that?.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The result was described clearly.

Reviewer #2: I think for general reader who are not statistician, the results presented should be improved in a way that readers can easily follow the results. Perhaps something like a flow diagram of the control measure(s) can be added. Also for example the data in Figure 2 for human 1 ,2 and 3 in X-axis needed more clarification whether it means 3 human cases or not. I am not sure the quality of Figure 1 is adequate.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The conclusions are definite and fine. However, it is a prediction, so the true figures will be know far later. Anyway, it is an interesting data and conclusion.

Reviewer #2: The current conclusion is wake and a more explicit conclusion is needed such that the actual outcomes from different intervention measures can be appreciated and think about utility and their effectiveness.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: No, it is fine.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This is very well designed study and also well written, and a kind of innovative way of controlling clonorchiasis in China for a long term. It may be applied to other neighboring countries having clonorchiasis/ opisthorchiasis endemic area. I suppose this mathematical model is useful to implement the control measures, although in nature it may not be achieved easily. There is human food habit, which is not easily changeable by education or knowledge.

Few questions:

1) At the end of abstract: Several sustainable strategies were provided, which could lead to infection control within 10 years. -> By any strategies, clonorchiasis can be controlled down to infection control level within 10 years? Looks too simple or some additional explanations are needed.

2) Too long introduction with well know facts, and too many references are there. Hope to reduce the length and numbers of references.

3) Maybe a map to show Fusha Town’s location is recommended. There is not significant moving in/out people from the Town. The Town seems to be close to the big city, not sure though. Is it not an important variable for this kind of analysis to predict the future?

Thank you!

Reviewer #2: The manuscript provided insightful modelling for design and choosing the right control strategy but overall the flow of the manuscript is difficult to follow for general reader. To increase clarity regarding the control measures and their effectiveness will be helpful.

Reviewer #3: It is recommended to reduce the length by deleting unnecessary sentences.

Line 91, 96; It is not directly infected by C. sinenesis, but by metacercariae of C. sinenesis.

Lines 237-240; Even though a part of the results is based on the studies reported findings, the survey period in references should be described.

Finally, I thought it would be better to publish it in local journals.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008152.r003

Decision Letter 1

Banchob Sripa, jong-Yil Chai

18 Feb 2020

Dear Dr. Lai,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Assessment of control strategies against Clonorchis sinensis infection based on a multi-group dynamic transmission model' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch within two working days with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

jong-Yil Chai

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Banchob Sripa

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

The revised manuscipt has been much improved according to the reviewers' comments. It seems now to be acceptable by PLoS NTD.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: Methods are all adquately described.

Reviewer #2: The authors have made considerable improvement in the revised version.

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Results are all adquately described, much more clear than before.

Reviewer #2: There are additional calrification and figure.

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Conclusions are fine, not skewed.

Reviewer #2: OK.

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: It is fine to accept as it is.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The manuscipt is good although not very innovative. It is enough for publicaion at Plos NTD, I believe.

Now I would like to say only one thing. Before submiting the original paper, it would be better to check the paper thoroughly including the length of introducion, discussions or references. Revision should be minimized according to only reviewers' recommendations and comments. I suppose authors changed the whole paper more than indications given by the reviewers. I do not know the situation well, however, the authors seemed to refer the paper to someone who is more professional to prepare a revision. It is at least small violation, I suppose. Next time, hope to remind.

Thank you, and good luck!

Reviewer #2: The revised ms is still rather difficult to follow by general readers in Tropical Medicine and Parasitology.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Tai-Soon Yong

Reviewer #2: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008152.r004

Acceptance letter

Banchob Sripa, jong-Yil Chai

19 Mar 2020

Dear Dr. Lai,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Assessment of control strategies against Clonorchis sinensis infection based on a multi-group dynamic transmission model," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Serap Aksoy

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The location of Fusha Town in Pearl River Delta, Guangdong Province, China.

    The red star indicates the location of the town, and the green areas indicates the Pearl River Delta. Data for boundaries of the administrative divisions were downloaded from the GADM (https://gadm.org/). The coordinates of Fusha Town and other cities was obtained through the USGS LandsatLook (https://landsatlook.usgs.gov/). Based on the above data, the maps were produced using ArcGIS 10.2.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Fitted and observed prevalence of different hosts.

    Human1, Human2, Human3 and Human4 in X-axis indicate human groups who seldom, moderately, often and very often eat raw or uncooked fish, respectively.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Posterior Distribution of R0 calculated by using the resampled 500 parameter vectors.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Numerical simulations under applied single chemotherapy strategies with different coverages, frequencies and durations.

    The parameters were set to the best set of parameter estimates. Red lines indicate chemotherapy focus on whole population while blue lines on at-risk groups with raw-fish-eating behaviors. (A) F = 1, D = 5, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.4, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.4; (B) F = 1, D = 5, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8; (C) F = 0.5, D = 5, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8; (D) F = 1, D = 10, red line: Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8, and blue line: Cm,1 = 0, Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 0.8; (E) F = 1, D = 30, Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 1.0. (F) F = 0.2, D = 33, Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 1.0. (G) F = 0.5, D = 70, Cm,1 = Cm,2 = Cm,3 = Cm,4 = 1.0. Cm,i, F and D indicate the coverage in the ith group of population, treatment times per year and duration years of intervention, respectively.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Numerical simulations under single strategies of IEC or environmental modification with different improvement rates.

    The parameters were set to the best set of parameter estimates. The improvement rates were set to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0. (A)-(D) represent the simulations under different improvement rates of IEC: (A) IEC focus both on improvement of hygiene habits and stopping people’s behavior of raw-fish-consumption; (B) IEC only focus on improvement of hygiene habits; (C) IEC only focus on stopping people’s behavior of raw-fish-consumption; (D) IEC only focus on changing the behavior of raw-fish-consumption on special groups, with red line indicates people who previous ate raw fish very often changed their behavior to eat often, with green line indicates people who previous ate raw fish very often or often changed their behavior to eat moderately, and with blue line indicates people who previous have raw-fish-eating behavior stopped eat raw fish. (E) represent the simulations under different improvement rates of environmental modification.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Resident population of Fusha Town from 2010 to 2017.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Prior triangular distributions for unknown parameters and their sources (unit: day-1).

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Results of simulations applied single chemotherapy strategies with different coverages, frequencies and durations targeted on different populations.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Results of simulations applied single IEC with different coverages.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Results of simulations applied single environmental modification with different coverages.

    (DOCX)

    S6 Table. Results of simulations applied combined strategies with different coverages and durations targeted on whole population.

    (DOCX)

    S7 Table. Results of simulations applied combined strategies with different coverages and durations targeted on at-risk population with raw-fish-consumption behaviors.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Text. The basic transmission model.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Text. The full model with interventions.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Text. The basic reproduction number R0.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Text. The prior information, the likelihood function and posterior distributions of parameter estimation.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: point-to-point response.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES