Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Apr 14;10:6418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63502-w

Effect of short-term high-temperatures on the growth, development and reproduction in the fruit fly, Bactrocera tau (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Yuyu Huang 1,#, Xiangpeng Gu 1,#, Xiaoqin Peng 1, Mei Tao 1, Guohua Chen 1,, Xiaoming Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC7156735  PMID: 32286472

Abstract

Bactrocera tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is an economically important invasive pest, that is capable of seriously reducing the quality and yield of vegetables and fruits, it was first recorded from Fujian province in 1849 and later introduced to Yunnan province in 1912 as a result in trade fruits and vegetables of China. In recent years, with the onset of global climate change and the accompanying increase in the greenhouse effect, elevated climatic temperatures have become one of the main environmental factors affecting growth and reproduction in insects, and the optimal developmental temperature of B. tau was found to be from 25 °C to 31 °C, the growth, development and reproduction of B. tau are normal under the optimal temperature conditions. In order to determine the repercussions that elevated temperature have on B. tau, we assessed the effects that short-term (12 h) high-temperature exposures (34 °C, 36 °C, 38 °C, 40 °C, 42 °C, 44 °C, 46 °C, and 48 °C) had on the growth, development and reproduction of B. tau at different developmental stages of the fly. The results showed that the survival rate of B. tau gradually decreased in all stages following exposure to short-term high-temperatures. The pupal stage was the least sensitive to increased temperatures. The pupae withstood the highest lethal temperature, having an LT50 of 42.060 °C, followed by female adults (40.447 °C), male adults (40.013 °C), and larvae (36.740 °C). The egg stage, which was the most susceptible to heat increases, had the lowest LT50 (38.310 °C). No significant effects were observed in the developmental stages of B. tau at temperatures from 24 °C to 38 °C. The development duration was significantly prolonged at 40 °C (P < 0.05) in the eggs (2.830d), larvae (7.330d), and pupae (8.170d) (P < 0.05). B. tau was unable to survive at temperatures above 42 °C. The pre-oviposition of female adults was extended, the average egg number per female showed a downward trend, the longevity of adults gradually shortened, and the ratio of female to male offspring increased as temperature increments were increased. In summary, short-term high-temperatures over 42 °C were not suitable for successful development of B. tau, while short-term high-temperatures over 40 °C were not suitable for successful reproduction in B. tau.

Subject terms: Plant sciences, Zoology

Introduction

The fruit fly Bactrocera tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major economic pest on cucurbitaceous plants, tomatoes, and other fleshy fruits1. B. tau was first recorded from China from Fujian province in 1849 by Walker2. The species was subsequently discovered in Yunnan, Guangdong, and Sichuan provinces from 1912 to 191335, and has since dispersed rapidly through much of southern China. From 2000 to 2004, B. tau has been reported from much of south Asia, southeastern Asia as well as the Solomon Islands69. In these countries, the B. tau has severely reduced quality and yield of vegetables and fruits. The B. tau has caused 21–34% and 21–32% yield losses of Siraitia grosvenorii and Cucurbita moschata respectively in Taiwan10, and approximately 5.6% infestations of ripen Luffa acutangula in Thailand have been damaged by B. tau11, etc. The larvae cause the bulk of the damage by their feeding inside of the host plants, while the female adults who unsuccessfully lays eggs are responsible for secondary damage to the plants by physically puncturing. Feeding by the larvae causes the pulp to rot, making the fruit unsuitable for human consumption and almost worthless commercially. Because B. tau has been very adaptable to changes in its environment, maintaining its ability to feed and oviposit in many diverse situations, it is regarded as a major economic pest and included on the quarantine lists of many countries and regions1214.

Average global temperatures have risen for the past several decades, accompanying the documented changes in the world’s climate15. The range, frequency, and duration of higher temperatures have continued to increase under the climatatic warming trend1618. This is demonstrable in several regions of southern China where the maximum daily temperatures during summer often reaches 40 °C or higher for an extended period of several hours each day, compared to the daily high-temperatures in previous decades. It also appears that the daily high-temperatures are continuing to increase in these areas19,20. Because insects are typical ectothermic organisms they are significantly affected by changes in their ambient temperature21,22. Higher temperatures may have either positive or negative effects on oviposition23, mating24, and thermostatic behavior25. Insects are typically unable to recover from thermal damage because they lack sufficient time or adequate resources when affected by extreme heat26. Extreme heat may also affect the reproductive, nervous, endocrine, and immune systems as well as biomacromolecular synthesis in insects27,28. The neurally-based clock and development of Sarcophaga crassipalpis (Macquart) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) were in effect broken and retarded by being subjected to heat shock and to cold shock29. The normal development of reproductive organs were inhibited by high-temperature treatment (≥ 46 °C) in Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)30; the reproductive ability and offspring survival rate declined in Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)31 and declined in Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)32 after short-term heat treatment (≥ 37 °C); the survival rate, longevity, and reproduction of adult Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) decreased after exposure to short-term high-temperatures (≥ 40 °C)33. Liu’s34 study found that high-temperature significantly effected the behavior, growth, survival, and mating of B. tau. under laboratory conditions, the optimal developmental temperature of B. tau was found to be from 25 °C to 31 °C. When the ambient temperature exceeded 34 °C, the pupation rate was extremely low, and the adult emergence rate of those that did succeed in pupating was also exceptionally low. These temperatures were also not suitable for the growth and reproduction of B. tau34. It is inevitable for B. tau to experience short-term heat stress during the summer in the southern regions of China. Our previous study only focused on rapid death caused by exposure to long-term high-temperature; however, short-term high-temperature can also have major detrimental effects on growth, development and reproduction. In effect, insects may slowly die after being subjected to short-term high-temperature21. Thus, the heat stress effect can potentially cause a sustainable impact on adult insects35,36, which may even be carried over into the next generation37. The present study was conducted in response to the progressively more extreme summer temperatures that are becoming commonplace in southern China, to investigate the effects of the warming environment on the development of the eggs, larvae, and pupae of B. tau, and then to determine how disruptive the expected increases in environmental temperatures will be on the life history of the fly, including its reproduction, survival, and potential changes in the sex ratio of adults. It is also hoped that the information obtained in the study will provide a scientific basis for further exploration of the temperature adaptation mechanism and eventually to help in formulating a comprehensive control program for B. tau.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing

B. tau were initially collected from a pumpkin field (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne) in Mengzi City (103°23′E, 23°23′N), Yunnan Province, south China. A stable experimental population of B. tau was established in our lab and cultured under constant conditions in an environmental chamber set at 24 ± 1  °C; 14: 10 h (light: dark) photoperiod, and 50 ± 5% RH. The B. tau culture has been reared for more than five generations. Adult B. tau were fed on yeast extract (Beijing Aoboxing, China) and water. Larvae were fed on artificial diet consisting of wheat bran, yeast powder, sugar, agar powder, water, and other microelements38.

Variable thermal treatments and materials used

Short-term high-temperature treatments were set at a range of temperature increments including 34 °C, 36 °C, 38 °C, 40 °C, 42 °C, 44 °C, 46 °C, 48 °C, and 24 °C (control). Eggs, larvae, pupae, and adults were placed in environmental chambers, under a 14: 10 h (light: dark) photoperiod and: 50 ± 5% RH after being exposed for 12 h in a separate environmental chamber set to one of the above temperatures, the details of the experimental treatment are as follows. Each temperature was a separate treatment and each treatment was replicated four times.

Organic marrow (Cucurbita pepo L.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne) were purchased from a Walmart supermarket and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C.

Effects of short-term high-temperature on egg, larval, and pupal development

Female adults oviposited in pumpkins and we get eggs from pumpkins. Eggs produced within a 24 h period were selected for each treatment and divided into groups of 10. Each group of 10 eggs were transferred using a fine bristled brush to pieces of 1 cm thick C. pepo in a 7.5 cm culture dish. The culture dishes containing the eggs were placed in an environmental chamber and heat-shocked at one of the above treatment temperatures for 12 h. The eggs were then transferred to a separate environmental chamber (24 °C) and allowed to hatch. The development and survival of the eggs were inspected by stereoscope and recorded every 24 hours until all eggs were either black-colored or had died (dehydrated eggs were considered to be inviable).

One-day-old larvae were selected using a special disposable paper cup, with 10 larvae comprising a group. The size of the disposable paper cup was 75 mm top × 53 mm bottom × 90 mm deep. The larvae that hatches from egg to larva within 24 hours were called one day-old larvae, the larvae were obtained from the standard colony. Larvae were feed on 4 cm slices of C. pepo and artificial diet in special disposable paper cups. The paper cups were placed in a clear glass jar (12 cm long × 9 cm width × 12 cm deep) and the opening covered with gauze. The clear glass jars containing the larvae and paper cups were then placed in an environmental chamber that had been set in advance at the predetermined heat shock temperature and treated for 12 h. The larvae were then placed in another environmental chamber (24 °C) and allowed to feed. Additional C. pepo was added as needed. After pupation, the paper cups were placed in pots (36 cm top × 28 cm bottom × 11 cm deep), containing a 3 cm deep layer of sand. The top of the paper cup was covered with three layers of gauze that was moistened by watering can to replenish moisture. The development and survival of larvae were recorded every 24 hours until pupation or death.

One-day-old pupae were selected as test materials, and each set of 10 pupae was placed in a 7.5 cm culture dish containing immersed by water filter paper. The culture dishes were placed in clear glass jars and enclosed with gauze sleeves. The jars containing the pupae were then placed in an environmental chamber at the predetermined temperature and heat-stressed for 12 h. Immediately afterwards, the pupae were removed and placed in another environmental chamber (24 °C), and then pupae will wait to emerged and do not need to be fed. Water was sprayed regularly as needed. The development and survival of the pupae were recorded every 24 hours until all pupae had emerged or died (discolored or desiccated pupae were considered to have died). Each different temperature was a treatment, and each treatment was replicated four times38.

Effect of short-term high-temperature on adult survival, reproduction, longevity, and offspring ratio

One-day-old adults were selected, with each pair of females and males placed in a clear glass jar containing two 7.5 cm culture dishes used to hold water and yeast extract. Glass jars were enclosed with gauze allowing for addition of water and food as needed. Ten pairs of B. tau were considered as one treatment. The clear glass jars containing adult insects were placed in an environmental chamber set up in advance and heat-shocked for 12 h. After the heat shock, adults were removed and placed in separate jars containing a fresh 1 cm3 cube of C. moschata for oviposition which was changed every 24 hours. The pre-oviposition duration, the number of eggs oviposited per day, and the average egg numbers per female were recorded until the death of all adults. The eggs were collected daily and were grouped by different laying times into a cage for feeding insects, where they were placed in C. moschata and C. pepo. The offspring of B. tau were recorded after the adults emerged for ratio of female to male offspring.

Data analyses

The heat resistance test data for B. tau was analyzed using SPSS 22.0 for One-Way ANOVA. Tukey’s multiple comparison method was used to compare significant differences among different temperatures of B. tau of the same stage. The bar graphs were drawn using Origin 2018.

Computational formula

  1. The corrected survival rate was the survival rate of the treatment group corrected by the natural survival rate of the control group. The survival rate percentages in the Table 1 were calculated using computational formula of corrected survival rates.

    Corrected survival rates: Corrected survival rate (%) = (the number of viable insects in the treatment group / the number of initial insects in the test group + the number of dead insects in the control group / the total number of insects in the test)33.

  2. LT50 (lethal temperature) was defined as the temperature at which half of the tested animals will die within a specified time period. The LT50 reflects the insect’s resistance to high or low temperatures.

Table 1.

Percent survival of different development stages and sexes of Bactrocera tau at different temperatures.

Temperature Development stage
Egg Larva Pupae Male Female
24 96.67 ± 3.33a 93.33 ± 3.33a 100.00 ± 0.00a 100.00 ± 0.00a 100.00 ± 0.00a
34 80.00 ± 5.77ab 70.00 ± 5.77ab 100.00 ± 0.00a 100.00 ± 0.00a 100.00 ± 0.00a
36 66.67 ± 6.67b 53.33 ± 8.82bc 100.00 ± 0.00a 100.00 ± 0.00a 100.00 ± 0.00a
38 56.67 ± 8.82b 46.67 ± 8.82bc 96.67 ± 3.33a 90.00 ± 5.77a 93.33 ± 3.33ab
40 53.33 ± 8.82b 30.00 ± 5.77 cd 93.33 ± 3.33a 56.67 ± 8.82b 76.67 ± 8.82b
42 10.00 ± 0.00c 13.33 ± 3.33de 70.00 ± 11.55b 6.67 ± 3.33c 6.67 ± 6.67c
44 3.33 ± 3.33c 0.00 ± 0.00e 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00c
46 6.67 ± 6.67c 0.00 ± 0.00e 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00c
48 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00e 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.00 ± 0.00c
df 8.18 8.18 8.18 8.18 8.18
F 40.93 42.63 130.98 170.48 163.58
P 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

Note: Data are means ± SE. Different lowercase letters in each column (stage) denote significant difference in percent survival at different temperatures within that stage after analysis using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). The F value is an indicator of ANOVA analysis, which usually compares the differences between groups. When the value of F is larger and the value of P is smaller, the result is more reliable. When P < 0.05, there was a significant difference between groups, when P > 0.05 or P = 0.05, there was no significant difference between groups. The letters df denote degrees of freedom.

Equation:

S(x)=[exp(abx)]/[1+exp(abx)]

S(x) is the mortality (%) of the population at a given time or low temperature; a and b are model parameters. When the mortality “S(x)” is at 50%, i.e. a-bx = 0, x = a/b, the value of x is the lethal temperature (LT50)39.

Results

Survival rates of different stages exposed to different short-term high-temperatures

The corrected survival rates of different stages of B. tau were shown to be significantly affected by short-term high-temperature stress (at 34 °C, 36 °C, 38 °C, 40 °C, 42 °C, 44 °C, 46 °C, 48 °C and 24 °C for 12 h). The values for the different development stages were: eggs (F8,18 = 40.93, P = 0.0001), larvae (F8,18 = 42.63, P = 0.0001), pupae (F8,18 = 130.98, P = 0.0001), adult males (F8,18 = 170.48, P = 0.0001), and adult females (F8,18 = 163.58, P = 0.0001) (Table 1). When the treatment temperature reached 36 °C, the corrected survival rate of eggs and larvae was significantly lower than that of the control temperature, however, when the treatment temperature reached 40 °C, the corrected survival rate of adult males and females was significantly lower than that of the control temperature, the corrected survival rate of only the pupae was significantly lower than the corrected survival rate at the control temperature when the temperature reached 42 °C. The pupae were the most heat tolerant to high-temperatures with a corrected survival rate of 70.00% at 42 °C (Table 1). Adults, however, were the least tolerant of higher heat regimes, having a corrected survival rates of only 6.67% at 42 °C, and with a 0% corrected survival rate at temperatures above that, indicating that they were extremely sensitive to high-temperature stress (Temperatures > 40 °C) (Table 1). The survival rate of all stages (from eggs through adults) decreased sharply with increases in all of the tested temperatures. All of the developmental stages, with the exception of eggs, were unable to tolerate temperatures above 44 °C. The eggs were able to survive until temperature reached 46 °C (Table 1). The corrected survival rates of adult males were similar to those of the females, with both survival rates shown to decrease with increases in temperature. The heat-tolerance of adults female were slightly higher than that of males (Table 1).

LT50of different stages exposed to different short-term high-temperatures

Pupae, with an LT50 of 42.06 °C, exhibited the greatest heat tolerance among all of the development stages (Table 2). The LT50 values for the different stages and sexes of B. tau were: pupae (42.06 °C) > adult females (40.447 °C) > adult males (40.013 °C) > larvae (36.74 °C) > eggs (38.31 °C) (Table 2).

Table 2.

LT50 temperatures of different stages and sexes of Bactrocera tau after 12 hr exposure.

Stage Hours after treatment LT50 (95%FL) Regression equation R2
Egg 12 38.31 (37.433–39.104) Y = 18.68X−29.61 0.743
Larva 12 36.74 (35.712–37.580) Y = 17.28X−27.04 0.786
Pupae 12 42.06 (41.057–43.189) Y = 18.71X−31.04 0.358
Male 12 40.013 (39.550–40.480) Y = 53.75X−86.11 0.904
female 12 40.447 (40.009–40.901) Y = 43.67X−70.47 0.714

Note: 95% fiducial limits in parentheses, LT50 units are in degrees celsius (°C). R2 is the correlation coefficient. Temperature levels are 24 °C (control), 34 °C, 36 °C, 38 °C, 40 °C, 42 °C, 44 °C, 46 °C, and 48 °C.

Lengths of developmental periods of different stages ofB. tauexposed to different short-term high-temperatures

The egg, larval, and pupal developmental periods of B. tau exhibited significant differences after 12 h exposure to short-term high-temperature stress (Table 3). The developmental periods of the eggs, larvae, and pupae were significant longer than those from the control temperature when the temperature was over 40 °C (Table 3). At 40 °C, the development periods of the eggs and larvae were significantly longer than those in the control insects (eggs: F1,10 = 16.2000, P = 0.0024; larvae: F1,10 = 22.8380, P = 0.0007), however, the development periods of the pupae were significantly longer than those at the control temperature when the treatment temperature reached 38 °C (F1,10 = 10.9460, P = 0.0079). Increases in the developmental duration of B. tau reflected the increases in the treatment temperatures, reaching their maximum length when stressed at 42 °C.

Table 3.

Lengths of the egg, larval, and pupal developmental periods of Bactrocera tau after 12 h exposure to short-term high-temperature stress.

Temperature Egg Larva Pupae
24 1.33 ± 0.21c 5.17 ± 0.31c 6.17 ± 0.31c
34 1.67 ± 0.21bc 5.33 ± 0.33c 6.67 ± 0.33bc
36 2.00 ± 0.37abc 5.83 ± 0.31bc 7.17 ± 0.31abc
38 2.33 ± 0.33abc 6.33 ± 0.49bc 7.67 ± 0.33ab
40 2.83 ± 0.31ab 7.33 ± 0.33ab 8.17 ± 0.31a
42 3.17 ± 0.31a 8.17 ± 0.48a 8.33 ± 0.33a
df 5,30 5,30 5,30
F 5.57 9.47 7.07
P 0.0010 0.0001 0.0002

Note: Data are means ± SE. Different lowercase letters in each column (stage) denote significant difference in developmental time at different temperatures within that stage after analysis using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

Preoviposition ofB. taufemales after exposure to short-term high-temperature

Compared to the control, the preoviposition duration was significantly effected by short-term high-temperature (F4,10 = 8.53, P = 0.0029). Specifically, the preoviposition time was significantly prolonged at 36 °C compare to flies at the control temperature (F1,4 = 43.0690, P = 0.0028) (Fig. 1). The preoviposition time period was the longest at 40 °C. Overall, the preoviposition duration gradually lengthened as temperatures increased (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preoviposition durations of Bactrocera tau (mean + SE) females exposed for 12 h to different short-term high-temperatures (24 (control), 34, 36, 38, and 40 °C). Different lowercase letters denote significant difference among different temperatures after analysis using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). All adults had died before reaching sexual maturity after exposure to temperatures of 42 °C (or greater).

Egg production in femaleB. tauafter exposure to short-term high-temperature

Female egg production was significantly affected by exposed to high-temperature for 12 h (F4,10 = 73.35, P = 0.0001). Egg production was significantly reduced at 34 °C compared to the control temperature (F1,4 = 26.8490, P = 0.0066), and reached its lowest level when the treatment temperature reached 40 °C (Fig. 2). Overall, female egg production was gradually reduced as temperatures rose from 34 °C to 40 °C.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Egg production in Bactrocera tau (mean + SE) females exposed for 12 h to different short-term high-temperatures (24 (control), 34, 36, 38, and 40 °C). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences among different temperature after analysis using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). All female adults had died before temperatures reached 42 °C.

Logevity ofB. tauafter exposure to short-term high-temperature

The longevity of the adults was also significantly affected by short-term high-temperature exposure (Fig. 3). Adults of both sexes reached their longest longevity at 34 °C, with longevity decreasing as temperatures rose from 36 °C to 42 °C. Adult longevity was significantly higher in flies raised at the control temperature than in those raised at temperatures above 40 °C (male: F1,4 = 15.3900, P = 0.0172; female: F1,4 = 18.6450, P = 0.0125). The longevity of the adults male and female was the longest at 34 °C, however, there were no significant differences in the longevity of females and males exposed to the same temperature treatments (control: F1,4 = 1.753, P = 0.2561; 34 °C: F1,4 = 5.144, P = 0.0859; 36 °C: F1,4 = 0.820, P = 0.4163; 38 °C: F1,4 = 0.7180, P = 0.4446; 40 °C: F1,4 = 0.0430, P = 0.8459; 42 °C: F1,4 = 2.6180, P = 0.1809). Overall, the longevity of the adults male and female slightly increased when the treatment temperature went from 24 °C to 34 °C, and then gradually shortened with further increases in temperature from 34 °C to 42 °C. Adult females had a greater heat tolerance than adult males. Adult females in the control were longer lived than the males (F1,4 = 1.753, P = 0.2561).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Longevity of Bactrocera tau (mean + SE) adults exposed for 12 h to different short-term high-temperatures (24 (control), 34, 36, 38, 40, and 42 °C). Different upper-case and lower-case letters denote significant differences among different temperatures in adult females and males after analysis using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). Since all adults had died before reaching sexual maturity when temperatures reached 44 °C the 44 °C, 46 °C, and 48 °C treatments were omitted. The letters “ns” signify that there were no significant differences between adult females and males at the same temperature (P < 0.05) using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

Female to male sex ratios inB. tauoffspring after exposure to short-term high-temperature

There was a significant difference in the female sex ratio favoring females in the offspring of B. tau after short-term high-temperature treatment compared to B. tau in the control temperature (F4,10 = 19.25, P = 0.0001). The ratio of females in the offspring was highest at 38 °C and lowest at 34 °C with ratios of 60.57% (F1,4 = 56.433, P = 0.0017) and 53.47% (F1,4 = 9.829, P = 0.0350), respectively, both significantly higher than in the controls. (Fig. 4). In general, the female ratio of B. tau offspring gradually increased as the treatment temperature increased, reaching its highest point at 38 °C.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Female ratio of offspring of B. tau (mean + SE) exposed to different short-term high-temperatures (24 (control), 34, 36, 38, and 40 °C) for 12 h. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among different temperature using Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). All adults had died prior to reaching sexual maturity before temperatures reached 42 °C.

Discussion

Average temperatures have been gradually rising as a result of global climatic changes, with the frequency of extreme high-temperature events affected by small increases in average temperature17. In some regions of China today, the maximum daily summer temperature will reach or exceed 40 °C for periods of several hours, while the average daily temperatures have continued to increase in the last few years19,20. The intensity and duration of temperature change can have either a negative or positive effect on the growth and metabolism of insects, which, in turn, can affect the life activities of insects within a given temperature range. Therefore, temperature plays a critical role in insect growth, reproduction, and life history, affecting their adaptability, behavior, and distribution. In China, B. tau may be affected by the short-term high-temperature periods that have become increasingly common during the summer, causing changes in their growth and metabolism. In order to closely simulate the external temperature effects, we selected a range of treatment temperatures to treat B. tau in the laboratory. Our results showed that short-term high-temperatures do have a significant effect on the growth and reproduction of different stages of the fly.

Increasing temperatures beyond a given threshold are detrimental to the development of insects. Excessive temperature are harmful if not lethal to most insects4042. When exposed to the higher temperature treatments between 34 °C to 48 °C, the corrected survival rate of each developmental stage of B. tau gradually decreased with each incremental increase of temperature. After 12 hours of treatment, the LC50 of B. tau at different high-temperatures was the highest in pupae, lowest in eggs, and slightly higher in adult females than in adult males [pupae (42.06 °C)> adult females (40.447 °C)> adult males (40.013 °C)> eggs (38.31 °C)> larvae (36.74 °C)]. In other words, at high-temperatures, pupae were able to survive the longest, while the eggs were the most susceptible of the stages, and adult females were slightly more resistant to the heat than adult males. The high heat tolerance seen in the pupae may be explained by the Bogert effect43. According to this principle, the different stages of insects can be divided into mobile and non-mobile stages. The adult and larva are mobile stages, and the eggs and pupae are non-mobile stages. Insect are capable of changing their behavior as well as their physiological metabolism to avoid the damage caused by high-temperature stress when the ambient temperature rises. Insects that are in the mobile stage (adults and larvae), may have the potential to escape their current detrimental environment and avoid high-temperature damage. However, insects that are in non-mobile stages (eggs and pupae) in similar situations can withstand the adverse effects only by improving their innate heat resistance. As a result, the heat resistance of non-mobile insect stages is normally higher than it is during their mobile stages44,45. In Drosophila buzzatii (Patterson & Wheeler) and Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (both Diptera: Drosophilidae) the pupae have been shown to be the most heat resistant stage, and have a wider temperatures range for survival than the other life stages46,47. Therefore, short-term high-temperatures do have a significant effect on every developmental stage of the fruit flies. These results are similar to those of other studies. For instance, Ma et al. (2010) noted that the longevity and fecundity of the aphid Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were significantly decreased when the temperature was increased from 29 °C to 34 °C48. The survival pattern, longevity, and fecundity of Corythucha ciliata (Say) (Hemiptera: Tingidae)were reduced when they were heat shocked at 43 °C and 45 °C49; It has also been reported that survival rate decreased in the whiteflies Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) B-biotype as temperatures rose50. Another study demonstrated that the locust Calliptamus italicus (L.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) was able to survive higher temperatures by regulating the contents of stress-resistant substances and a protective enzyme at certain temperature ranges, but due to differences in the contents of the stress-resistant substances and the protective enzyme and it was shown in a growth rate comparison that the females were capable of a faster response rate and had a greater high-temperature resistance51.

Temperature affects the growth and reproduction of insects. Within a given range, the growth rate of insects will increase incrementally corresponding to gradual temperature increases, but as the damaging period is prolonged, the amount of damage inflicted can increase algebraically52. If the temperature continues to rise, it becomes detrimental to the development of the insect, with excessive temperatures adversely affecting their development5355. The developmental duration of B. tau was prolonged as the high-temperature treatment was increased from 34 °C to 42 °C. The growth periods of the egg, larval, and pupal stages of B. tau were significantly extended over that of the control temperature when they were stressed at 42 °C. Within the above range of higher temperature then, the developmental period increases with increasing temperature. Studies have reported that in the suitable temperature range, the length of the immature stage will gradually shorten as the temperature increases56. Conversely, the developmental duration of the insect was prolonged when the ambient temperature was elevated to an unsuitable temperature. Similar results were found in other stresses; for instance, increased atmospheric CO2 concentration significantly prolonged the development period of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)57. In B. tau the ideal developmental temperature regime was found to be relatively narrow and at temperatures less than 34 °C. Because temperature ultimately determines the geographical distribution58,59, phenology60, and population richness61,62by affecting the growth and development rate, behavior, survival, and reproduction of a species, it is important that we identify the effects that predicted higher temperature will have on insects, particularly pest species.

In the natural environment insects are often stressed by adverse factors. Of these, temperature is one of the most important factors because insects are directly affected by this variable-considerably more so than their response to man’s attempts to control them. In their long-term survival strategy, insects possess the adaptability and evasion ability to adapt to a multitude of external factors. In the present study, when temperatures were increased from 24 °C to 42 °C, the longevity of adults initially increased and then decreased, with females surviving longer than the males. The female egg production showed a downward trend as temperatures were raised from 24 °C to 40 °C. Adult longevity were gradually prolonged as temperatures increased. After treatment at different temperatures from 24 °C to 42 °C, the ratio of the female offspring initially increased and then decreased, attaining a maximum at 38 °C, and then exhibited a gradual decline in production. When the ambient temperature exceeded 34 °C, the developmental period of B.tau was prolonged and the reproduction of B.tau was reduced34. It is extremely unlikely that B. tau would be capable of survival as a viable species at tempertures in excess of 40 °C based on the offspring exhibiting a distinct downward trend at this temperature. When treatment temperatures were between 24 °C and 38 °C, B. tau showed a trend favoring females in the ratio of female/male offspring, producing an excess of females which would allow the reproduction rate to increase in order to maintain or increase the size of the population. When an insect experiences adverse temperature stimuli, it can resist the high and low-temperature threats by synthesizing stress-resistant proteins or other metabolites63. These substances can reduce the damage caused by the unfavorable environment to insect growth and may have corresponding compensation effects, i.e., the increase in longevity of insects after experiencing injurious temperature stimulation may be related to compensation64. However, the synthesis of these substances requires the addition of additional substances and energy. If the resources and energy are not supplemented, the life of the insects may be shortened. In this study, the adult lifespan increased after treatment at a temperature of 34 °C, but at the expense of fertility.

In summary, short-term high-temperature stress adversely affects the survival rate, developmental duration and adult longevity, single female egg production, and the female ratio of B. tau offspring.

Conclusion

Short-term high temperatures over 42 °C are not suitable for the growth and development of B. tau. A short-term high-temperature of 40 °C is not suitable for successful reproduction in B. tau. Therefore, in programs aimed at prevention and control of the insects during the warmer weather season, attention should be concentrated on the number of visible oviposition sites to guide the timing of pesticide applications. At the quarantine port, when B. tau infestations are subjected to short-time high-temperature, the temperature should exceed 48 °C for 12 hours to insure that all B. tau have been killed.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms. Qin Yang, Mr. Jinyong Zhang, Mr. Changxiong Hu, and Mr. Shaowu Yang (Yunnan agricultural university) for their help with the experiment, we also thank Dr. Cecil L. Smith (University of Georgia) to help us in edit of English writing in our paper, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This study was funded by Major Science and Technology Projects in Yunnan Province (2019ZG00907-01), the 17th Batch of Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technical Candidates of Kunming Municipal Government (KZF[2019]No. 43), and Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province (No.2013EG019).

Author contributions

Y.H., X.Z. and X.G. edited the English of the manuscript and conceived of the idea for the project, X.G., X.Z., M.T. and G.C. conceived of the idea for project. X.P. helped the experiments. Y.H. and X.G. analysed data. X.Z. and G.C. revising the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yuyu Huang and Xiangpeng Gu.

Contributor Information

Guohua Chen, Email: chenghkm@126.com.

Xiaoming Zhang, Email: zxmalex@126.com.

References

  • 1.Singh SK, Kumar D, Ramamurthy VV. Biology of Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Entomol. Res. 2010;40:259–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5967.2010.00296.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walker, F. List of the specimens of dipterous insects in collection of the British Museum, part4. London: British Museum. 689–1172 (1849).
  • 3.Freidberg A. CABIKEY to the Indo-Australian Dacini fruit flies (CD-ROM). By White I. M. & Hancock D. L. (Wallingford, CAB International, 1997) £ 195/US $320. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1999;89:109–109. doi: 10.1017/S0007485399000164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang XJ. The fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of the East Asian region. Acta Zootaxon Sin. 1996;21:1–338. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yang P, Carey J, Dowell R. Host-specific demographic studies of wild Bactrocera tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Pan. Pac. Entomol. 1994;70:253–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akhtaruzzaman M, Alam M, Ali Sardar M. Suppressing fruit fly infestation by bagging cucumber at different days after anthesis. Bangladesh. J. Entomol. 1999;9:103–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hossain MA, Hallman JG, Khan AS, Islam MS. Phytosanitary irradiation in South Asia. J. Entomol. Nematol. 2011;3:44–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu F, et al. Morphological characterization and distribution of antennal sensilla of six fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2010;103:661–670. doi: 10.1603/AN09170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang S, Kerdelhué C, Ye H. Genetic Structure and Colonization History of the Fruit Fly Bactrocera tau (Diptera: Tephritidae) in China and Southeast Asia. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014;107:1257–1265. doi: 10.1603/ec13266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu L, Liu Y, Zhou B, Zhang YQ. Studies on damage and quantity dynamics of Bactrocera tau (Walker) in different host fields. J. Southwest. Agric. Univ (Nat Sci). 2005;27:176–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramadan MM, Messing RH. A survey for potential biocontrol agents of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand. Proc. Hawaiian. Entomol. Soc. 2003;36:115–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou SK, et al. Observation and control of biological characteristics of the fruit fly, Bactrocera tau (Walker) Plant Protection. 1993;5:11–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang KH, et al. Risk analysis of the Bactrocera tau (Walker) J. Wuyi Sci. 2005;21:77–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hasyim A, Muryati M, Kogel WJ. Population fluctuation of adult males of the fruit fly, Bactrocera tau Walker (Diptera: Tephritidae) in passion fruit orchards in relation to abiotic factors and sanitation. Indonesian. J. Agric. Sci. 2008;9:29–33. doi: 10.21082/ijas.v9n1.2008.p29-33. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Easterling DR, et al. Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Sci. 2000;289:2068–2074. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meehl GA, Tebaldi C. More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Sci. 2004;305:994–997. doi: 10.1126/science.1098704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R. Perception of climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:2415–2423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205276109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seneviratne SI, et al. No pause in the increase of hot temperature extremes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014;4:161–163. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang W, et al. Impact of hot events at different developmental stages of a moth: the closer to adult stage, the less reproductive output. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:10436. doi: 10.1038/srep10436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen HS, et al. Effects of high temperature on body size and weight of Ophraella communa. Biocont. Sci. Technol. 2014;24:882–890. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2014.902426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen Y, Chun-Sen MA. Effect of global warming on insect: a literature review. Acta. Ecologica. Sinica. 2010;30:2159–2172. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ma CS, MA G, Zhao F. Impact of global warming on cereal aphids. Chinese. J. Appl. Entomol. 2014;51:1435–1443. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kurz WA, et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nat. 2008;452:987–990. doi: 10.1038/nature06777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bale JS, et al. Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Global. Change. Boil. 2002;8:1–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.BjÖrkman C, et al. High temperature triggers latent variation among individuals: oviposition rate and probability for outbreaks. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Colinet H, et al. Insects in fluctuating thermal environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015;60:123–140. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Du Y, et al. Effects of heat stress on physiological and biochem icalmechanism s of insects: a literature review. Acta. Ecologica. Sinica. 2007;27:1565–1572. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60013-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karl I, et al. Temperature extremes and butterfly fitness: conflicting evidence from life history and immune function. Global Change Biol. 2011;17:676–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02277.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yocum GD, et al. Alteration of the eclosion rhythm and eclosion behavior in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga crassipalpis, by low and high temperature stress. J. Insect Physiol. 1994;40:13–21. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(94)90107-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang HS, Xu HF, Cui F. Effect of high temperature on fecundity and ovary development of beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) Southwest. China. J. Agric. Sci. 2006;19:916–919. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cui XH, Xie M, Wan FH. Effects of brief exposure to high temperature on survival and fecundity of two whitefly species: Bemisia tabaci B-biotype and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Scientia. Agric. Sinica. 2008;2:424–430. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guo JY, Wan FH. Effect of heat shock temperature and duration of exposure on the survival and fecundity of Bemisia tabaci B-biotype (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Acta. Phytophylacica. Sinica. 2010;37:347–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fan XJ, et al. Effects of brief exposure to high temperatures on the development, reproduction and feeding behavior of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Acta. Entomologica. Sinica. 2014;57:1188–1197. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu, Y. H. Effects of temperature and supplementary nutrition on population growth of Bactrocera tau (Walker). Southwest Agricultural University (2005).
  • 35.Zhang W, Rudolf VHW, Ma CS. Stage-specific heat effects: timing and duration of heat waves alter demographic rates of a global insect pest. Oecologia. 2015;179:947–957. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3409-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hoffmann, A. A. & Parsons, P. A. Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. New York: Oxford University Press (1991).
  • 37.Cheng J, et al. Effects of Heat Shock on the Bradysia odoriphaga (Diptera: Sciaridae) J. Econ. Entomol. 2017;110:1630–1638. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gu, X. P., Huang, Y. Y., Zhang, J. Y., Zhang, X. M. & Chen, G. H. Effects of short-term high-temperature stress on growth, development and reproduction of melon fly. J. Environ. Entomol. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1640.Q.20190821.1826.002.html (2019).
  • 39.Ou YF, Ge F. Methodology of measuring and analyzing insect cold hardiness. Chin. Bull. Entomol. 2014;6:1646–1652. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wright EJ, Sinclair EA, Annis PC. Laboratory determination of the requirements for control of Trogoder mavariabile (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) by heat. J. Stored. Products. Res. 2001;38:147–155. doi: 10.1016/S0022-474X(01)00011-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang S, Yin X, Tang J, Hansen JD. Thermal resistance of different life stages of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) J. Stored. Products. Res. 2004;40:565–574. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2003.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boina D, Subramanyam B. Relative susceptibility of Tribolum confusum life stages exposed to elevated temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004;97:2147–2168. doi: 10.1093/jee/97.6.2168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huey RB, Hertz PE, Sinervo B. Behavioral drive versus behavioural inertia in evolution: a null model approach. The American Naturalist. 2003;161:357–366. doi: 10.1086/346135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marais E, Chown SL. Beneficial acclimation and the Bogert effect. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:1027–1036. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mitchell KA, Sinclair BJ, Terblanche JS. Ontogenetic variation in cold tolerance plasticity in Drosophila: is the Bogert effect bogus. Naturwissenschaften. 2013;100:281–248. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Enriquez T, Hervé C. Basal tolerance to heat and cold exposure of the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Peerj. 2017;5:e3112. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Krebs RA, Loeschcke V. Resistance to thermal stress in adult Drosophila buzzatii: acclimation and variation among populations. Biol. J. Linnean. Soc. 1995;56:505–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01107.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ma CS, Hau B, Poehling HM. Effects of pattern and timing of high temperature exposure on reproduction of the rose grain aphid, Metopolophium dirhodum. Entomologia. Experimentalis. Et. Applicata. 2010;110:65–71. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00123.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ju RT, et al. Tolerance to High Temperature Extremes in an Invasive Lace Bug, Corythucha ciliata (Hemiptera: Tingidae), in Subtropical China. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e54372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cui XH, Xie M, Wan FH. Effects of brief exposure to high temperature on survival and fecundity of two whitefly species: Bemisia tabaci B-biotype and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Scientia. Agric. Sinica. 2008;2:424–430. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li, S. Differences in heat tolerance and physio-biochemical mechanisms between female and male Calliptamus italicus adults (Orthopera:Acrididae). Xinjiang Normal University (2016).
  • 52.Cai, W. Z. et al. General Entomology (2nd edition). (China Agricultural University Press, 2011).
  • 53.Butler GD, Wilson LT, Henneberry TJ. Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Initiation of summer diapause. J. Econ. Entomol. 1985;78:320–324. doi: 10.1093/jee/78.2.320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nibouche S. High temperature induced diapause in the cotton boll worm shape Helicoverpa armigera. Entomologia. Experimentalis. Et. Applicate. 1998;87:271–274. doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00331.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Elletier Y. Determination of the lethal high temperature for the colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Canadian. Agric. Eng. 1998;40:185–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li YT, et al. Effects of temperature on development and reproduction of Neoseiulus bicaudus (Phytoseiidae) feeding on Tetranychus turkestani (Tetranychidae) Systematic. Appl. Acarology. 2015;20:478–490. doi: 10.11158/saa.20.5.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhao WJ, et al. Direct effects of elevated CO2 concentration on development of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith) J. Environ. Entomol. 2019;41:736–741. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Battisti A, et al. A rapid altitudinal range expansion in the pine processionary moth produced by the 2003 climatic anomaly. Global Change Biology. 2006;12:662–671. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01124.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Umina PA, et al. A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change. Sci. 2005;308:691–693. doi: 10.1126/science.1109523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dingemanse NJ, Kalkman VJ. Changing temperature regimes have advanced the phenology of Odonata in the Netherlands. Ecol. Entomol. 2008;33:394–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00982.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yamamura K, Yokozawa M. Prediction of a geographical shift in the prevalence of rice stripe virus disease transmitted by the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallen) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), under global warming. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2002;37:181–190. doi: 10.1303/aez.2002.181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yamamura K, et al. How to analyze long-term insect population dynamics under climate change: 50-year data of three insect pests in paddy fields. Population Eco l. 2005;48:31–48. doi: 10.1007/s10144-005-0239-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hendrix DL, Salvucci ME. Polyol metabolism in homopterans at high temperatures: accumulation of mannitol in aphids (Aphididae: Homoptera) and sorbitol in whiteflies (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera) Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Mol. Integrative. Physiol. 1998;120:487–494. doi: 10.1016/S1095-6433(98)10058-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Morrow G, Samson M, Michaud S, Tanguay RM. Overexpression of the small mitochondrial Hsp22 extends Drosophila life span and increases resistance to oxidative stress. The. FASEB. J. 2004;18:598–599. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0860fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES