Abstract
Rat sarcoma (RAS) is a well‐known oncogene that plays important roles in cancer proliferation, cell survival and cell invasion. RAS exists as three major isoforms, Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS), Harvey rat sarcoma (HRAS) and neuroblastoma rat sarcoma (NRAS). Mutations of these genes account for approximately 30% of all cancers. Among them, KRAS mutations are the most common, responsible for 85%, followed by NRAS (12%) and HRAS (3%). Although the development of RAS inhibitors has been explored for over the past decade, so far, no effective inhibitor has been found. MicroRNA (miRNA) are a class of small non–coding RNA that control the gene expression of pleural target genes at the post–transcriptional level. MiRNA play critical roles in the physiological and pathological processes at work in cancers, such as cell proliferation, cell death, cell invasion and metastasis. MicroRNA‐143 (MIR143) is known to function as a tumor suppressor in a variety of cancers. One of its known mechanisms is suppression of RAS expression and its effector signaling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK. Within the last five years, we developed a potent chemically modified MIR143‐3p that enabled us to elucidate the details of the KRAS signaling networks at play in colon and other cancer cells. In this review, we will discuss the role of MIR143‐3p in those RAS signaling networks that are related to various biological processes of cancer cells. In addition, we will discuss the possibility of the use of MIR143 as a therapeutic drug for targeting RAS signaling networks.
Keywords: AKT, ERK, KRAS positive circuit, MAPK, MIR143, PI3K, RAS
In this review, we will discuss the role of MIR143 in those Rat sarcoma (RAS) signaling networks that are related to various biological processes of cancer cells. In addition, we will discuss the possibility of the use of MIR143 as a therapeutic drug for targeting RAS signaling networks.

1. INTRODUCTION
MicroRNA (miRNA) are endogenous small non–coding RNA molecules that have been recognized as key players in carcinogenesis, cell proliferation, differentiation and migration. 1 For the last ten years, microRNA have attracted attention because of their functions as predictive and prognostic markers and their potential as a therapeutic agent. 2 , 3
MicroRNA function as post–transcriptional regulators by binding to the 3′UTR of the target mRNA, whereby they repress protein expression. 4 Each microRNA targets multiple genes or pathways to regulate at the post–transcriptional levels. Consequently, certain miRNA associate with the tumorigenesis of most cancers and regulate the biological processes, such as cell proliferation, metastasis and cell death in cancer cells. 5
MicroRNA that suppress the tumor suppressor gene promote cancer progression and are called onco‐miR. 6 , 7 In contrast, miRNA that inhibit the oncogenes are called tumor suppressor miRNA. MIR143‐3p is one of the best known of the tumor suppressor miRNA. It is downregulated in various human cancers, such as breast cancer, 8 gastric cancer (GC), 9 colorectal cancer, 10 bladder cancer 11 and renal cell cancer. 12 From previous studies, we learned that MIR143‐3p functions as a tumor suppressor by modulating rat sarcoma (RAS) signaling networks, which are critical for cell proliferation, cell growth and apoptosis.
In this review, we discuss the roles of MIR143, mainly MIR143‐3p, in RAS signaling networks in various cancers and its potential as a therapeutic agent.
2. FUNCTIONS OF MIR143
MIR143 is located at chromosome 5q32 and the expression of MIR143 is regulated by p53 protein and hypoxia inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α). 13 MIR143 is co–transcribed with MIR145 in the same primary miRNA, and is thereby downregulated in the same fashion in various kinds of cancers. 14 MIR143‐3p (the guide strand) and MIR143‐5p (the passenger strand) are the two isoforms of MIR143, with MIR143‐3p being a common isoform in normal tissues. In normal cells, it is highly expressed in mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. 15 Despite the existence of a few reports regarding the suppressive function of MIR143‐5p, knowledge on the function of MIR143‐5p remains limited. 16
3. THE ASSOCIATION OF RAS SIGNALING NETWORKS WITH CANCER AND MICRORNA REGULATING RAT SARCOMA
The RAS gene is one of the best understood of the oncogenes. Its main function is to transduce diverse signals from the cell membrane to the downstream effector signaling pathways related to the proliferation of cancer cells. 17
Rat sarcoma occurs in activated and inactivated forms. RAS is inactivated when coupled with GDP, and is activated when it bound to GTP by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF; Figure 1). In contrast, the activated RAS becomes inactivated by GTPase‐activating proteins (GAP). 18 Continuous activation of RAS is mainly caused by gene mutations. Amplification and overexpression of RAS or upregulated stimulation from tyrosine kinase receptors such as EGFR and HER2 result in the continuous activation of RAS in cancer cells. 19 , 20 This dysregulation results in the stimulation of its effectors, MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT and RalGEF/RAL signaling pathways, which are the crucial pathways for tumorigenesis, cell proliferation, survival of cancer cells, differentiation and cell invasion. 21 , 22
Figure 1.

Signaling pathways of rat sarcoma (RAS) in cancer. RAS transduces various stimulations from the cell surface to effector signaling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, MAPK and Ral/GEF pathways
Rat sarcoma is categorized into three major isoforms: Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS), Harvey rat sarcoma (HRAS) and neuroblastoma rat sarcoma (NRAS). KRAS is further sub‐classified into KRAS 4A and KRAS 4B. 23 Dysregulation of these RAS isoforms leads to the aberrant activation of downstream effector signaling pathways in various cancers, and their mutation rates found in human cancers differ among these isoforms. Approximately 98% of RAS mutations are observed at codons 12, 13 or 61. The frequency of mutation site differs by tumor type. KRAS mutations are most observed at codon 12 (72.4%‐83%), whereas NRAS most frequently harbors a mutation at codon 61 (63%‐68.5%). 24 , 25 Mutations of these isoform genes are observed in approximately 30% of human cancers; and in those cancers, KRAS is the most frequently altered, accounting for 63%‐85%, followed by 12%‐25% for NRAS and 3%‐12% for HRAS. 25 , 26
There are several microRNA that regulate RAS expression. In 2005, MIRLET7 became the first tumor suppressive miRNA reported to downregulate RAS expression in lung tumors. 27 Later, numerous other miRNA were discovered to target RAS or its effector molecules in numerous cancers. 28 There are several miRNA reported to target KRAS other than MIRLET7. 29 MIR96, MIR126 and MIR206 were downregulated in pancreatic cancer and functioned as tumor suppressors. 30 , 31 , 32 Regarding gastrointestinal cancers, MIR27A targets KRAS in esophageal cancer, 33 MIR181C 34 and MIR433 35 target KRAS in GC, and MIR30B targets KRAS in colorectal cancer. 36 For breast cancer, MIR30C and MIR200C target KRAS and exhibit anti–tumor effects. 37 , 38 MIR200C functions as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer by negatively regulating KRAS expression. 38 However, these miRNA do not decrease the expression levels of KRAS‐related SOS1, AKT and ERK, as they are silenced MIR143‐3p. Importantly, p53 functions as a transcription factor of MIR143. 39 Thus, MIR143‐3p could be a major miRNA against RAS networks because of its contribution to the p53/MIR143/RAS cascade.
4. THE ROLE OF MIR143‐3P ON RAT SARCOMA SIGNALING NETWORKS IN VARIOUS CANCERS
Regarding RAS signaling networks, MIR143‐3p exerts its anti–tumor effects in various human cancers by targeting RAS and its effector signaling genes, such as AKT and ERK 12 , 40 , 41 , 42 (Figure 2, Table 1). MAPK/ERK pathways and PI3K/AKT pathways are critical pathways for the survival and proliferation of cancer cells. Therefore, the regulation of these pathways is a very important strategy for treating RAS‐mutant cancers. Therefore, in this section, we introduce the role of MIR143‐3p on RAS signaling networks.
Figure 2.

The suppressive role of MIR143‐3p in rat sarcoma (RAS) signaling pathway. MIR143‐3p targets RAS, AKT, ERK and Musashi2 and exhibits synergic effect with EGFR inhibitor. In addition, the schema demonstrates “positive circuit” of KRAS expression
Table 1.
The functions of MIR143 in variety types of cancers
| Types of cancer | Target genes | Functions | Reference | Genomic location of miRNA‐target interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic cancer | KRAS | Inhibition of cell invasion and migration | 44 |
<Genomic location of MIR143 a > chromosome 5:149428918‐149429023 <Location of target interaction> KRAS 3ʹUTR: 109‐115 RREB1 3ʹUTR: 1528‐1534 AKT 3ʹUTR: 1029‐1035 ERK (MAPK1) 3ʹUTR: 1059‐1065 SOS1 3ʹUTR: 3438‐3444 ERK5 3ʹUTR: 120‐127 NRAS 3ʹUTR: 3080‐3086 |
| KRAS, RREB1 | Inhibition of tumor growth through Ras‐responsive element‐binding protein (RREB1) | 45 | ||
| Colorectal cancer | KRAS | Inhibition of cancer cell growth | 47 | |
| KRAS | Inhibition of cancer cell proliferation | 48 | ||
| KRAS | Inhibition of tumor growth | 49 | ||
| KRAS | Inhibition of cell growth and enhancement of sensitivity to cetuximab | 42 | ||
| KRAS | Increasing the sensitivity to paclitaxel | 50 | ||
| KRAS | Enhancement of sensitivity to cetuximab and antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) | 51 | ||
| Gastric cancer | KRAS | Inhibition of tumor growth. Downregulation of expression levels of HER2 | 52 | |
| Lung cancer | KRAS | Suppression of cancer progression through TGF‐β | 40 | |
| EGFR, AKT, ERK | Inhibition of cell proliferation | 53 | ||
| Renal cell carcinoma | KRAS | Suppression of tumor growth | 12 | |
| Bladder cancer | KRAS, SOS1, AKT, ERK | Inhibition of tumor growth | 54 | |
| AKT,ERK | Inhibition of cell growth | 11 | ||
| KRAS | Inhibition of cell growth. Negative regulation of Musashi‐2 | 55 | ||
| Prostate cancer | KRAS | Enhancement of chemosensitivity to docetaxel | 56 | |
| Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma | KRAS | Inhibition of tumor growth | 57 | |
| Nasopharyngeal cancer | KRAS | Suppression of cell growth | 58 | |
| Cervical cancer | ERK5 | The inhibition of cell proliferation | 59 | |
| Breast cancer | KRAS | Inhibition of cell invasion and metastasis | 61 | |
| ERK5 | Inhibition of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) | 8 | ||
| AKT | Inhibition of cell proliferation | 62 | ||
| Endometrial cancer | MAPK1 (ERK) | Inhibition of cell invasion and cell migration | 63 | |
| Brain tumor | NRAS | Suppression of tumor growth. Increasing chemosensitivity to temozolomide | 65 |
Genomic location of MIR143 was presented according to Ensemble Release 98 (September 2019).
4.1. Pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is very aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis, and, as mentioned above, a KRAS mutation is frequently observed in PC. 41 , 43 The downregulation of MIR143‐3p results in the activation of KRAS signaling networks, which implies an association between MIR143‐3p and RAS in PC cells. 41 Hu et al showed that the ectopic expression of MIR143 reduces the expression level of KRAS in PC cell lines and, consequently, inhibits the cell invasion, migration and metastasis. 44 They demonstrated that the inhibition of KRAS led to the low activity of RhoA, which is associated with tumor migration and invasion. Hu et al also demonstrated the anti–tumor effect of MIR143‐3p in a xenograft tumor model of PC cancer cells. 44 Kent et al 45 showed that a KRAS mutation in PC cells suppresses the expression levels of MIR143/145 through the inhibition of Ras‐responsive element‐binding protein (RREB1).
4.2. Gastrointestinal cancer
Colorectal cancer is one of the four major causes of cancer death. 46 The growth‐suppressive effect of MIR143‐3p in colorectal cancer cells by targeting KRAS was first reported in 2009. 47 Chen et al 47 demonstrated that MIR143‐3p inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo by silencing KRAS expression. They validated the growth‐suppressive function of MIR143‐3p by silencing KRAS, which led to the stimulation of cell proliferation. In addition, they found that the downregulation of KRAS led to the inhibition of phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in colorectal cancer cells. Luo et al 48 reported that restoration of MIR143‐3p expression through use of an MIR143‐3p‐bearing vector demonstrated an anti–tumor effect in colorectal cancer cell lines. Pagliuca reported that overexpression of MIR143‐3p and MIR145 reduces tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo and that the anti–tumor effect was mediated by profound inactivation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. 49
MIR143 is also associated with the chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells. Fei et al 50 revealed that transfection with MIR143‐3p increases the sensitivity to paclitaxel in a KRAS mutant cell line. We reported the synergistic effect of MIR143‐3p with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, cetuximab, in KRAS mutant colon cancer cells; it was demonstrated that MIR143‐3p systematically suppresses KRAS signaling networks, including MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT, and synergizes with cetuximab for growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo. 42 In agreement, Gomes et al 51 reported that ectopic expression of MIR143‐3p and MIR‐145 increases the sensitivity to cetuximab in both KRAS wild‐type and KRAS mutant colon cancer cells. They demonstrated that MIR143‐3p exhibits its anti–tumor effect through cetuximab‐mediated antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity in colon cancer cells.
Recently, we found that the expression level of MIR143‐3p is also downregulated in HER2‐positive GC cells and that ectopic expression of MIR143 induced cell growth suppression in those cells. 52 In that same study we demonstrated that MIR143‐3p targets KRAS effector signaling genes such as KRAS, AKT and ERK, leading to suppression of GC cell growth, and clarified that MIR143‐3p indirectly silences human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), resulting in suppression of KRAS activation and its effector signaling pathways. 52
4.3. Lung cancer
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer‐related deaths in both males and females worldwide. 46 Chen et al identified the suppressive effect of MIR143‐3p in non–small cell lung cancer cell progression. They also demonstrated that MIR143 expression is modulated by TGF‐β and that MIR143‐3p suppresses lung cancer progression through the silencing of KRAS. 40 EGFR is highly expressed in over 60% of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), implying that EGFR, RAS, MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways are potential therapeutic targets for NSCLC. 53 Dong and Hu demonstrated the cell growth suppression of exogenous MIR143 through the downregulation of the expression levels of EGFR, AKT and ERK1/2 and the phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and ERK1/2 in NSCLC in vitro. They also found that the overexpression of MIR143 resulted in the promotion of the apoptosis of lung cancer cells. 53
4.4. Urinary system cancer
We demonstrated that MIR143‐3p silences KRAS and its effector molecules, such as AKT and ERK, in renal cell carcinoma and bladder cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. 12 Yoshikawa et al demonstrated that the ectopic expression of MIR143 led to the downregulation of the expression levels of SOS1, which switches inactivated RAS to the activated RAS, KRAS, AKT and ERK. 54 Noguchi et al demonstrated the combination therapy with the ectopic expression of MIR143 and MIR145 showed the synergistic inhibition of bladder cancer cells through modulating PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. 11 Recently, we discovered that MIR143‐3p negatively regulated the KRAS/Musashi‐2 cascade and, consequently, suppressed the cell growth in bladder cancer through downregulation of the KRAS protein expression level at the translational step. 55 Xu et al 56 demonstrated that MIR143 overexpression inhibits KRAS expression and its effector MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, which results in enhanced chemosensitivity to docetaxel in prostate cancer.
4.5. Head and neck cancer
Zhang et al 57 reported that MIR143‐3p exhibits an anti–tumor effect on laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, the most frequent cancer of the head and neck cancers, by targeting KRAS and its effector MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. In addition, Xu’s group demonstrated that the MIR143 overexpression inhibits the cell growth of nasopharyngeal cancer both in vitro and in vivo. 58 Zheng et al demonstrated that the overexpression of MIR143 suppressed the cell proliferation of cervical cancer cells in vitro. 59 They found that MIR143‐3p negatively regulated ERK5 expression, which led to the suppression of cervical cancer cell lines.
4.6. Breast cancer
Even though KRAS mutations are detected in <5% of breast cancer patients, the mutation rate is reported to be 10%‐12% in the case of metastatic breast cancer. 60 The ectopic expression of MIR143 inhibits cell growth and cell invasion by silencing KRAS and the epithelial–mesenchymal transition, which is one of the key processes involved in metastasis. 61 The MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, which is the effector signaling pathway of RAS, plays a critical role in metastasis as well as cell proliferation. ERK5 is the essential molecule for the activation of MAPK/ERK signaling pathways. 8 MIR143‐3p strongly suppressed the function of ERK5, which modulated a key molecule for EMT, and, consequently, led to the inhibition of metastasis in breast cancer. 8 Garcia Vazquez et al reported that ectopic restoration of MIR143 inhibited cell proliferation through targeting AKT and its phosphorylation in breast cancer cells. 62
4.7. Female genital system tumors
As mentioned above, the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway is a key signaling pathway of RAS networks, which play a role in metastasis. In endometrial cancer (EC), the downregulation of MAPK1 was observed with the ectopic expression of MIR143 and the suppression of invasion and migration was observed. 63
4.8. Brain tumor
Glioma is an aggressive type of brain tumor with a poor prognosis. 64 Wang et al 65 demonstrated that the overexpression of MIR143 inhibits the tumor growth of glioma in vitro and in vivo through silencing NRAS. In addition, they demonstrated that the restoration of MIR143 enhances the chemosensitivity to temozolomide, which is the standard initial drug for the treatment of glioma. 65
5. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: CM‐MIR143‐3P AS A CANDIDATE OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS THAT TARGET RAT SARCOMA SIGNALING NETWORKS
The aberrant activation of PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways is often seen in many kinds of cancers, and many therapeutic agents targeting molecules related to these pathways have been developed. 66 , 67 The regulation of these pathways is a very important strategy for treating RAS‐mutant cancers. In fact, numerous inhibitors targeting these pathways have been clinically evaluated. For instance, for the MAPK pathway, the inhibitors for RAF, MEK and ERK have been clinically evaluated, as well as the inhibitors for the PI3K/AKT pathway. 26 , 68 However, the challenge of suppressing RAS‐driven cancers remains. Global suppression of these signaling pathways is crucial for a durable effect on cancers, because inhibition of only a single pathway will result in resistance to the agent through activation of alternative signaling pathways. For instance, a PI3K inhibitor will cause the upregulation of HER2 or HER3, which induces the upregulation of the MAPK signaling pathway in breast cancer. 69 , 70 In addition, a MEK inhibitor will lead to the upregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in colorectal cancer. 71 For these reasons, another strategy to attack RAS‐driven cancers is necessary. One potential approach is to downregulate KRAS expression with small interfering RNA or miRNA. Numerous microRNA, such as MIRLET7 and MIR200C, have been reported in preclinical models to function as tumor suppressors in various types of cancer. 27 , 38 However, these miRNA cannot possess the function to suppress KRAS networks systematically. Therefore, we developed and reported on a chemically modified MIR143‐3p (CM‐MIR143‐3p). We developed more than 120 different MIR143 derivatives for two main reasons. The first reason is to make MIR143 RNase resistant. The other reason is to enhance the ability to bind the target genes of MIR143 and the ability to suppress the translation of those genes. Among the derivatives, CM‐MIR143‐3p, which is chemically modified only in the passenger strand (Figure 3), showed strikingly potent anti–proliferative activity. The CM‐MIR143‐3p systemically inhibits the KRAS signaling networks, which include RAS‐MAPK and PI3K‐AKT effector signaling pathways, by silencing KRAS, SOS1, AKT and ERK both in vitro and in vivo in colon cancer cells. 42 In the same study, we further demonstrated the synergistic effect of an EGFR inhibitor and CM‐MIR143‐3p in KRAS mutant cells. 51 In line with this result, Gomes et al 51 reported that MIR143 increases the sensitivity to cetuximab in both KRAS wild‐type and KRAS mutant colon cancer cells. These results suggest the potential combinational therapy of MIR143 and EGFR inhibitors. Other than colorectal cancer, MIR143‐3p displayed tumor suppressor effects on various types of cancers, such as PC, head and neck cancers, lung cancers and breast cancers. 45 , 53 , 58 , 62 Our group also found that CM‐MIR143‐3p exerts efficient suppression of KRAS networks in renal cell cancer 12 and bladder cancer 54 by systematically suppressing the KRAS networks, including PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways. Importantly, we demonstrated that the silencing of KRAS alone induces a “positive circuit” of KRAS expression; that is, the downregulation of KRAS is transient, finally leading to re–upregulation of KRAS expression, because KRAS is one of the target genes of each KRAS effector signaling pathway (Figure 2). Thus, CM‐MIR143‐3p enabled us to understand the detailed networks and KRAS positive circuit in KRAS‐driven colon cancers.
Figure 3.

Sequence of CM‐MIR143‐3p and its chemical modification. F RNA, Fluoro‐RNA; Ome RNA, O‐Methyl RNA; PS, phosphorothioate
Despite the remarkable effects of CM‐MIR143‐3p, there is a limitation to its use as a therapeutic agent in clinical practice. The main issue is the mode of its delivery to the target organs. A stable mode of delivery of miRNA is essential, because miRNA is degraded by RNA nuclease, which exists in abundance throughout the circulation. Thus, virus and non–virus methods are being developed as delivery vehicles. Retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno‐associated virus and herpes virus have been used as vectors for overexpressing or suppressing miRNA. 72 Non–viral delivery vehicles that are positively charged form a complex with the negatively charged miRNA or other nucleic acids. 73
6. CONCLUSION
In this review, we discussed the anti–cancer effects of MIR143‐3p on different types of cancers, with suppression realized by targeting the genes related to RAS signaling networks. Recent translational research has revealed the importance of suppressing multiple signaling pathways to treat cancers. Our CM‐MIR143‐3p has enabled us to understand the detailed signaling networks of KRAS and related signaling cascades. Given the critical effects of CM‐MIR143‐3p in suppressing the expression of both RAS and its effector signaling genes, we cannot help but speculate that CM‐MIR143‐3p efficiently functions as a therapeutic agent to impair the KRAS signaling networks.
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was performed with the support of SHIONOGI.
Tokumaru Y, Takabe K, Yoshida K, Akao Y. Effects of MIR143 on rat sarcoma signaling networks in solid tumors: A brief overview. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:1076–1083. 10.1111/cas.14357
REFERENCES
- 1. Drusco A, Croce CM. MicroRNAs and cancer: a long story for short RNAs. Adv Cancer Res. 2017;135:1‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Beg MS, Brenner AJ, Sachdev J, et al. Phase I study of MRX34, a liposomal miR‐34a mimic, administered twice weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors. Investig New Drugs. 2017;35:180‐188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kawaguchi T, Yan L, Qi Q, et al. Novel MicroRNA‐based risk score identified by integrated analyses to predict metastasis and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:4037‐4046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Croce CM. Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:704‐714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Di Leva G, Garofalo M, Croce CM. MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2014;9:287‐314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kawaguchi T, Yan L, Qi Q, et al. Overexpression of suppressive microRNAs, miR‐30a and miR‐200c are associated with improved survival of breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Oliveto S, Mancino M, Manfrini N, Biffo S. Role of microRNAs in translation regulation and cancer. World J Biol Chem. 2017;8:45‐56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhai L, Ma C, Li W, Yang S, Liu Z. miR‐143 suppresses epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and inhibits tumor growth of breast cancer through down‐regulation of ERK5. Mol Carcinog. 2016;55:1990‐2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhang Q, Feng Y, Liu P, Yang J. MiR‐143 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion by targeting DNMT3A in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(7):1010428317711312 10.1177/1010428317711312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ak S, Tunca B, Tezcan G, et al. MicroRNA expression patterns of tumors in early‐onset colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Res. 2014;191:113‐122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Noguchi S, Yasui Y, Iwasaki J, et al. Replacement treatment with microRNA‐143 and ‐145 induces synergistic inhibition of the growth of human bladder cancer cells by regulating PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways. Cancer Lett. 2013;328:353‐361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Takai T, Tsujino T, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Synthetic miR‐143 exhibited an anti–cancer effect via the downregulation of K‐RAS networks of renal cell cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther. 2019;27:1017‐1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Karimi L, Mansoori B, Shanebandi D, Mohammadi A, Aghapour M, Baradaran B. Function of microRNA‐143 in different signal pathways in cancer: new insights into cancer therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:121‐131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Iio A, Nakagawa Y, Hirata I, Naoe T, Akao Y. Identification of non–coding RNAs embracing microRNA‐143/145 cluster. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kent OA, McCall MN, Cornish TC, Halushka MK. Lessons from miR‐143/145: the importance of cell‐type localization of miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:7528‐7538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sanada H, Seki N, Mizuno K, et al. Involvement of dual strands of miR‐143 (miR‐143‐5p and miR‐143‐3p) and their target oncogenes in the molecular pathogenesis of lung adenocarcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Haigis KM. KRAS alleles: the devil is in the detail. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:686‐697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Simanshu DK, Nissley DV, McCormick F. RAS proteins and their regulators in human disease. Cell. 2017;170:17‐33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Valtorta E, Misale S, Sartore‐Bianchi A, et al. KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR‐targeted therapy. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:1259‐1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mármol I, Sánchez‐de‐Diego C, Pradilla Dieste A, Cerrada E, Rodriguez Yoldi MJ. Colorectal carcinoma: a general overview and future perspectives in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Martin TD, Chen XW, Kaplan RE, et al. Ral and Rheb GTPase activating proteins integrate mTOR and GTPase signaling in aging, autophagy, and tumor cell invasion. Mol Cell. 2014;53:209‐220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Temraz S, Mukherji D, Shamseddine A. Dual inhibition of MEK and PI3K pathway in KRAS and BRAF mutated colorectal cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:22976‐22988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hobbs GA, Der CJ, Rossman KL. RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:1287‐1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhou B, Der CJ, Cox AD. The role of wild type RAS isoforms in cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;58:60‐69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401‐404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Papke B, Der CJ. Drugging RAS: know the enemy. Science. 2017;355:1158‐1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, et al. RAS is regulated by the let‐7 microRNA family. Cell. 2005;120:635‐647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sharma SB, Ruppert JM. MicroRNA‐based therapeutic strategies for targeting mutant and wild type RAS in cancer. Drug Dev Res. 2015;76:328‐342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Masliah‐Planchon J, Garinet S, Pasmant E. RAS‐MAPK pathway epigenetic activation in cancer: miRNAs in action. Oncotarget. 2016;7:38892‐38907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yu S, Lu Z, Liu C, et al. miRNA‐96 suppresses KRAS and functions as a tumor suppressor gene in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:6015‐6025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jiao LR, Frampton AE, Jacob J, et al. MicroRNAs targeting oncogenes are down‐regulated in pancreatic malignant transformation from benign tumors. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Keklikoglou I, Hosaka K, Bender C, et al. MicroRNA‐206 functions as a pleiotropic modulator of cell proliferation, invasion and lymphangiogenesis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma by targeting ANXA2 and KRAS genes. Oncogene. 2015;34:4867‐4878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhu L, Wang Z, Fan Q, Wang R, Sun Y. microRNA‐27a functions as a tumor suppressor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by targeting KRAS. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:280‐286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hashimoto Y, Akiyama Y, Otsubo T, Shimada S, Yuasa Y. Involvement of epigenetically silenced microRNA‐181c in gastric carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:777‐784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Guo LH, Li H, Wang F, Yu J, He JS. The tumor suppressor roles of miR‐433 and miR‐127 in gastric cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:14171‐14184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Liao WT, Ye YP, Zhang NJ, et al. MicroRNA‐30b functions as a tumour suppressor in human colorectal cancer by targeting KRAS, PIK3CD and BCL2. J Pathol. 2014;232:415‐427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tanic M, Yanowsky K, Rodriguez‐Antona C, et al. Deregulated miRNAs in hereditary breast cancer revealed a role for miR‐30c in regulating KRAS oncogene. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kopp F, Wagner E, Roidl A. The proto‐oncogene KRAS is targeted by miR‐200c. Oncotarget. 2014;5:185‐195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cabrita MA, Vanzyl EJ, Hamill JD, et al. A Temperature sensitive variant of p53 Drives p53‐dependent MicroRNA expression without evidence of widespread post–transcriptional gene silencing. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cheng T, Hu C, Yang H, Cao L, An J. Transforming growth factor‐beta‐induced miR143 expression in regulation of non–small cell lung cancer cell viability and invasion capacity in vitro and in vivo. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:1977‐1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Karmakar S, Kaushik G, Nimmakayala R, Rachagani S, Ponnusamy MP, Batra SK. MicroRNA regulation of K‐Ras in pancreatic cancer and opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;54:63‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Akao Y, Kumazaki M, Shinohara H, et al. Impairment of K‐Ras signaling networks and increased efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors by a novel synthetic miR‐143. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:1455‐1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hawa Z, Haque I, Ghosh A, Banerjee S, Harris L, Banerjee SK. The miRacle in pancreatic cancer by miRNAs: tiny angels or devils in disease progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hu Y, Ou Y, Wu K, Chen Y, Sun W. miR‐143 inhibits the metastasis of pancreatic cancer and an associated signaling pathway. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:1863‐1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kent OA, Fox‐Talbot K, Halushka MK. RREB1 repressed miR‐143/145 modulates KRAS signaling through downregulation of multiple targets. Oncogene. 2013;32:2576‐2585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Chen X, Guo X, Zhang H, et al. Role of miR‐143 targeting KRAS in colorectal tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2009;28:1385‐1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Luo Q, Basnet S, Dai Z, Li S, Zhang Z, Ge H. A novel E1B55kDa‐deleted oncolytic adenovirus carrying microRNA‐143 exerts specific antitumor efficacy on colorectal cancer cells. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8:3822‐3830. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Pagliuca A, Valvo C, Fabrizi E, et al. Analysis of the combined action of miR‐143 and miR‐145 on oncogenic pathways in colorectal cancer cells reveals a coordinate program of gene repression. Oncogene. 2013;32:4806‐4813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Fei BY, Wang XY, Fang XD. MicroRNA‐143 replenishment re‐sensitizes colorectal cancer cells harboring mutant, but not wild‐type, KRAS to paclitaxel treatment. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:5829‐5835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gomes SE, Simoes AE, Pereira DM, Castro RE, Rodrigues CM, Borralho PM. miR‐143 or miR‐145 overexpression increases cetuximab‐mediated antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity in human colon cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:9368‐9387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Tokumaru Y, Tajirika T, Sugito N, et al. Synthetic miR‐143 inhibits growth of HER2‐positive gastric cancer cells by suppressing KRAS networks including DDX6 RNA helicase. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dong YZ, Hu T. Effects of miR‐143 overexpression on proliferation, apoptosis, EGFR and downstream signaling pathways in PC9/GR cell line. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:1709‐1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Yoshikawa Y, Taniguchi K, Tsujino T, et al. Anti–cancer effects of a chemically modified miR‐143 on bladder cancer by either systemic or intravesical treatment. Mol Ther Method Clin Dev. 2019;13:290‐302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Tsujino T, Sugito N, Taniguchi K, et al. MicroRNA‐143/Musashi‐2/KRAS cascade contributes positively to carcinogenesis in human bladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:2189‐2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Xu B, Niu X, Zhang X, et al. miR‐143 decreases prostate cancer cells proliferation and migration and enhances their sensitivity to docetaxel through suppression of KRAS. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;350:207‐213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhang F, Cao H. MicroRNA1433p suppresses cell growth and invasion in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma via targeting the kRas/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2019;54:689‐701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Xu YF, Li YQ, Guo R, et al. Identification of miR‐143 as a tumour suppressor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on microRNA expression profiling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;61:120‐128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zheng F, Zhang J, Luo S, et al. miR‐143 is associated with proliferation and apoptosis involving ERK5 in HeLa cells. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:3021‐3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Cejalvo JM, Perez‐Fidalgo JA, Ribas G, et al. Clinical implications of routine genomic mutation sequencing in PIK3CA/AKT1 and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF in metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160:69‐77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Tavanafar F, Safaralizadeh R, Hosseinpour‐Feizi MA, et al. Restoration of miR‐143 expression could inhibit migration and growth of MDA‐MB‐468 cells through down‐regulating the expression of invasion‐related factors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:920‐924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Garcia‐Vazquez R, Marchat LA, Ruiz‐Garcia E, et al. MicroRNA‐143 is associated with pathological complete response and regulates multiple signaling proteins in breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:84384‐84395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Chang L, Zhang D, Shi H, Bian Y, Guo R. MiR‐143 inhibits endometrial cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by targeting MAPK1. Oncotarget. 2017;8:84384‐84395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Seliger C, Hau P. Drug repurposing of metabolic agents in malignant glioma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Wang L, Shi ZM, Jiang CF, et al. MiR‐143 acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting N‐RAS and enhances temozolomide‐induced apoptosis in glioma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:5416‐5427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Samatar AA, Poulikakos PI. Targeting RAS‐ERK signalling in cancer: promises and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:928‐942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Yang J, Nie J, Ma X, Wei Y, Peng Y, Wei X. Targeting PI3K in cancer: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Cox AD, Fesik SW, Kimmelman AC, Luo J, Der CJ. Drugging the undruggable RAS: mission possible? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:828‐851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Serra V, Scaltriti M, Prudkin L, et al. PI3K inhibition results in enhanced HER signaling and acquired ERK dependency in HER2‐overexpressing breast cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30:2547‐2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Chakrabarty A, Sanchez V, Kuba MG, Rinehart C, Arteaga CL. Feedback upregulation of HER3 (ErbB3) expression and activity attenuates antitumor effect of PI3K inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:2718‐2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Balmanno K, Chell SD, Gillings AS, Hayat S, Cook SJ. Intrinsic resistance to the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY‐142886) is associated with weak ERK1/2 signalling and/or strong PI3K signalling in colorectal cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:2332‐2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Abba ML, Patil N, Leupold JH, et al. MicroRNAs as novel targets and tools in cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2017;387:84‐94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hayashi K, Chaya H, Fukushima S, et al. Influence of RNA strand rigidity on polyion complex formation with block catiomers. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2016;37:486‐493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
