Skip to main content
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders logoLink to BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
. 2020 Apr 15;21:243. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03278-2

Active ankylosing spondylitis increases blood loss during total hip arthroplasty for a stiff hip joint

Yong Hu 1,2,, Wei-Zhou Jiang 2, Cheng-Long Pan 1, Tao Wang 1
PMCID: PMC7158031  PMID: 32293393

Abstract

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been highlighted as the best treatment option for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with advanced hip involvement. The huge blood loss associated with THA is a common concern of postoperative complications. Disease activity is a specific reflection of systematic inflammation of AS. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of disease activity on blood loss during THA in patients with AS.

Methods

Forty-nine patients with AS who underwent unilateral THAs were retrospectively studied. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) was employed to evaluate the disease activity. Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) formula was used to assess the surgical blood loss. The patients were divided into active group (ASDAS≥1.3; n = 32) and stable groups (ASDAS< 1.3; n = 17) based on the ASDAS. Peri-operative laboratory values, plain radiographs, intra-operative data, transfusion volume, and use of hemostatic agents were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results

The ASDAS, pre-operative C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fibrinogen concentration in the active group were higher than the stable group (all P < 0.05); however, the pre-operative hemoglobin concentration and albumin level were higher in the stable group (both P < 0.05). The total blood loss during THA in stable patients was 1415.31 mL and 2035.04 mL in active patients (P = 0.006). The difference between the two groups was shown to be consistent after excluding the gender difference (P = 0.030). A high transfusion rate existed in both groups (stable group, 76.47% with an average of 1.53 units; active group, 84.37% with an average of 2.31 units), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Compensated blood loss, corresponding to transfusion, was noted significantly more in the active group compared to the stable group (P = 0.027). There was no significant difference with regard to functional recovery (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Active AS patients are at high risk for increased blood loss during THA compared to stable patients. The underlying mechanism includes disorders of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, poor nutrition status, osteoporosis, imbalance of oxidative–antioxidative status and local inflammatory reaction. It is strongly recommended to perform THA in AS patients with stable disease.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis, Blood loss, Disease activity, Total hip arthroplasty

Background

Hip involvement is frequently reported in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), with a prevalence rates between 19 and 36% [1, 2]. For advanced ankylosis hip, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been recommended as the best treatment option to correct deformities and improve joint function [3]. One study showed that the 10-year risks of THA was 2.6% for AS patients [4]. Another study reported that after more than 30 years’ disease 12–25% of patients had at least one replaced hip [1]. However, THA is usually associated with significant blood loss and high transfusion rate [5]. A systematic review of blood transfusion studies revealed that the allogenic transfusion rates ranged from 11 to 69% in THA surgery [6]. Moreover, AS leads to a bony ankylosis hip joint in the end stage. The operation will be much more difficult because the identification and exposure of the femoral neck and acetabulum are always complicated [7]. To reduce blood loss, most surgeons pay close attention to the surgical technique and use tranexamic acid, but rarely care the feature of disease [810].

Disease activity pointing to a feature of inflammation is believed to potentially affect the multi-system functions in AS. Significant correlations were found between work productivity, daily activity, psychological status and disease activity [11, 12]. Furthermore, disease activity was suggested as an increased risk of mortality [13], which might be associated with the impairment of cardiovascular system, coagulation-fibrinolytic system and microvascular function [1416]. Abnormal bone metabolism was also common in AS [17, 18], and low bone mineral density was found to be associated with disease activity [19]. Generally, disease activity is deemed as a manifestation of underlying inflammation, which is closely correlated with vascular reaction, including angiotelectasis, accelerated flow, hyperemia, and exudation. Therefore, disease activity of AS may also influence the surgical blood loss of THA, which remains uncertain.

This retrospective cohort study is conducted to determine the effect of AS’s disease activity on the blood loss of THA. The current study aims to provide effective strategy to reduce the blood loss and make the operation safer.

Methods

Patients

Sixty-eight AS patients who underwent unilateral THAs between 2014 and 2018 in our department were retrospectively studied. The collected data included gender, age, height, weight, and disease duration. The exclusion criteria were as follows: other rheumatic diseases; active infection; tumors; and hematologic diseases, such as blood coagulation disorders, thrombocytopenia, and other hemorrhagic disorders. Patients with long-term use of anti-coagulants were also excluded.

Forty-nine patients (6 females and 33 males) were eligible for this study. The demographic characteristic are shown in Table 1. In 10 cases, biologics were used for patients with intolerable back pain until remission before THA [20]. No statistically significant differences existed between the stable and active disease groups with respect to age, gender, BMI, disease duration and biologics usage.

Table 1.

Demographics and anthropometry of the study patients

Stable disease group Active disease group P
Number of patients 17 32
age (years) 31.65 ± 8.70 33.72 ± 11.92 0.531
Disease duration (years) 8.23 ± 2.86 12.41 ± 8.98 0.180*
BMI (kg/m2) 21.30 ± 2.40 21.33 ± 3.77 0.900*
Sex (female/male) 4/13 2/30 0.164
Involved hip (left/right) 7/10 21/11 0.134
Application of biologics (Y/N) 1/16 9/23 0.133

* non-parametric rank sum test, chi-square test with continuity correction, the rest- Student t-test

Surgical protocol

Indications of THA among AS patients are refractory pain or disability and radiographic evidence of structural damage in the hips, regardless of age. All of the operations were performed using a standardized method by the same experienced team. Antibiotics were routinely administered intra-operatively and 24 h post-operatively. The hemostatic agents included hemocoagulase agkistrodon (HCA) and tranexamic acid (TXA). Combined intravenous and topical TXA were used during THA. Based on the guideline, combined venous thrombosis embolism (VTE) prophylaxis with mechanical and pharmacological methods were performed during hospitalization. Mechanical VTE prophylaxis was commenced at the same day after surgery. Anticoagulation drug was added at the first day after surgery when the patient’s risk of bleeding had been established as low. Extended-duration anticoagulation drug was used for up to 35 days following THA.

Assessment

The following data were collected from patients: pre-operative indices, including C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, hematocrit (Hct), platelet (Plt) count, and albumin (ALB) concentration; coagulation test indices (prothrombin time [PT], prothrombin activity [PT%], prothrombin time international ratio [PT-INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], thrombin time [TT], and fibrinogen concentration (Fbgc); post-operative Hct concentration; imaging feature; operative time; allogenic transfusion; autologous transfusion; and the strategy of hemostatic agent use. The preoperative plain radiograph of pelvis were collected to assess the bone quality of hip. The diagnosis of osteoporosis was determined by the classic grading of Singh’ index [21].

Transfusion protocol

The transfusion triggers were based on the British guidelines [22] and clinical judgement. The traditional view on transfusion triggers was a Hb < 70 g/L and a hematocrit < 25%. A Hb < 80 g/L was a transfusion trigger for patients with cardiovascular and respiratory problems or patients > 65 years of age. Acute anemia, a drop in blood pressure (< 90/60 mmHg), dizziness, pale lips, weakness, and shortness of breath were also regarded as transfusion triggers.

Calculation of blood loss

The intra-operative blood loss was estimated by weighing sterile cotton gauze pads and mostly by analysis of aspirated blood volume. However, in consideration the significant difference between estimated and calculated blood loss, the latter one was the main evaluation indicator [23]. Peri-operative blood loss was calcultaed by means of the Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) formula [23, 24], as follows: total RBC loss (mL) = [uncompensated RBC loss (mL) + compensated RBC loss (mL)] / 0.35, uncompensated RBC loss (mL) = estimated blood volume (EBV) × (pre-operative Hct levels – post-operative Hct levels); EBV = (0.0235 × height (cm)^0.42246 × weight (kg)^0.51456) × k, where k = 2430 for women and 2530 for men; compensated RBC loss (mL) = allogenic erythrocyte units × 150 + autologous transfusion volume × 0.3.

Post-operative Hct levels were collected from the laboratory test that was carried out at 6 am 1 day after surgery. Only transfusions that were executed before phlebotomy for laboratory testing were included in the study.

Evaluation of disease activity

AS disease activity was evaluated by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-CRP (ASDAS-CRP), a highly discriminatory index recommended by The Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis [25], as follows: ASDAS-CRP = 0.121 × back pain + 0.058 × duration morning stiffness + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.579 × Ln (CRP + 1). The following was suggested regarding ASDAS-CRP classification: ASDAS< 1.3, stable; 1.3 ≤ ASDAS< 2.1, moderately active; 2.1 ≤ ASDAS≤3.5, highly active; and ASDAS> 3.5, very highly active. In the present study, ASDAS< 1.3 was defined as stable disease and ASDAS≥1.3 was defined as active disease.

According to the classification of disease activity as we defined, more patients were assigned to the active group. Seventeen patients (35%) were in the stable group and 32 (65%) were in the active group. The average ASDAS in the stable group was 0.97 and 2.55 in the active group (P < 0.001)

Complications

Five cases had post-operative complications during the 1st year after THA, and they were all in active disease group. Three patients suffered periprosthetic fracture, caused by accidentally fell down. The other 2 cases had dislocation. Other complications such as implant loosening, prosthetic joint infection, and deep venous thrombosis were not found.

Statistical methods

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 23.0). Continuous data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons of quantitative variables were performed using an unpaired Student t-test. In the case of heteroscedasticity, the non-parametric rank sum test was used. A chi-square test was executed for comparisons of qualitative variables. Differences at a level of P < 0.05 were identified statistically significant.

Results

Laboratory values, radiographs, operative time, and the use of hemostatic agents

The pre-operative laboratory values, including CRP, ESR, and Fbgc in the active group, were significantly higher than the stable group (all P < 0.05); however, Hb and ALB were higher in the stable group (both P < 0.05). The coagulation indices, including PT, PT%, PT-INR, APTT, and TT, showed no statistical difference between the two groups. With respect to the operative time and the use of hemostatic agents, no significant difference was found between the two groups. The main results are shown in Table 2. The prevalence of osteoporosis assessed by imaging show no significant difference between the two groups. The typical radiographs were presented in Fig. 1.

Table 2.

Laboratory values, ASDAS, operation time and hemostatic

Stable disease group Active disease group P
ASDAS 0.97 ± 0.20 2.55 ± 0.90 < 0.001*
Preoperative CRP (mg/L) 3.04 ± 1.30 16.59 ± 11.91 < 0.001*
Preoperative ESR (mm/1 h) 10.82 ± 5.92 30.37 ± 20.16 < 0.001*
Preoperative Hb(g/L) 142.18 ± 13.03 132.41 ± 16.50 0.040
Preoperative Fbgc(g/L) 3.29 ± 8.18 3.77 ± 0.74 0.045
Preoperative ALB (g/L) 40.40 ± 2.68 38.59 ± 4.06 0.048*
Preoperative Hct (L/L) 0.421 ± 0.033 0.406 ± 0.041 0.200
Preoperative Plt(× 109/L) 246.00 ± 67.86 277.62 ± 80.79 0.176
Preoperative PT(s) 12.48 ± 0.97 11.90 ± 1.07 0.071
Preoperative PT% 85.04 ± 13.03 92.65 ± 17.45 0.122
Preoperative PT-INR() 1.08 ± 0.10 1.03 ± 0.10 0.083
Preoperative APTT(s) 33.63 ± 3.09 32.61 ± 3.19 0.122
Preoperative TT(s) 17.22 ± 1.51 16.97 ± 1.95 0.651
Operation time (min) 93.53 ± 18.83 97.47 ± 32.80 0.925*
Osteoporosis in imaging (Y/N) 11/6 28/4 0.067
The strategy of using hemostatic(a/b/c/d) 7/3/4/3 14/8/3/7 0.585

* non-parametric rank sum test, chi-square test with Fisher’s exact test, the rest- Student t-test;

a- “neither of HCA or TXA was used” b- “only HCA was used”,

c- “only TXA was used” d- “both of HCA and TXA were used”

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Radiograph features of patients with advanced hip lesions in ankylosing spondylitis who underwent primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (a and c for stable disease; b and d for active disease). For A and B, near complete fusion of the sacroiliac joints with erosive changes at the pubic symphysis were observed. Hip involvement is generally bilateral and symmetric, with significant joint space narrowing, reduced density of trabecular bone, cortical thinning and osteophytes

Blood loss and transfusion

The active group had approximately 600 mL more blood loss compared to the stable group, which was statistically significant (P = 0.006). The blood loss was 1415.31 ± 552.37 mL when AS was at the stable disease stage, while blood loss reached 2035.04 ± 791.35 mL at the active disease stage. The error potentially brought by the gender difference was also compared with the blood loss in males of both groups. We found that more blood loss was present in the active group consisting of all males than in the stable group with all males (P = 0.030). The change in Hct and uncompensated blood loss were not statistically different between the two groups.

The active group needed an additional 0.8 units of allogenic blood volume than the stable group, although no significant difference was found between the two groups (P = 0.066). Compensated blood loss, corresponding to transfusion, was noted significantly more often in the active group compared to the stable group (P = 0.027). A high ratio of transfusion was found in both groups (76.74% in the stable group and 84.37% in the active group); there was no statistically significant difference between the stable and active groups. Table 3 shows the results.

Table 3.

Estimation of blood loss and allogenic transfusion

Stable disease group Active disease group P
Change of Hct (L/L) 0.062 ± 0.035 0.081 ± 0.034 0.076
Uncompensated RBC loss (mL) 255.89 ± 149.08 327.32 ± 151.28 0.121
Compensated RBC loss (mL) 239.47 ± 169.92 384.94 ± 230.94 0.027
Total blood loss (mL) 1415.31 ± 552.37 2035.04 ± 791.35 0.006
Total blood loss (mL) (males) 1497.44 ± 570.95 2058.69 ± 811.94 0.030
Allogenic transfusion rate 13/17 (76.47%) 27/32 (84.37%) 0.700
RBC transfusion(u) 1.53 ± 1.07 2.31 ± 1.53 0.066

chi-square test, the rest- Student t-test;

Post-operative functional recovery

Significant improvement in terms of symptoms and function was noted in both groups at one-year follow-up. However, there was no significant difference between the stable and active group. The results were showed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Comparison between the two groups with regard to one-year functional recovery

Stable disease group (n = 17) Active disease group (n = 32) P
Preoperative VAS 5.34 ± 1.72 6.30 ± 2.08 0.110
Postoperative VAS 2.34 ± 1.53 2.51 ± 1.69 0.724
Preoperative ROM
 Hip ankylosis 13 (76%) 25 (78%) 0.582
 The rest ROM in flexion(°) 33.75 ± 7.5 39.36 ± 6.82 N
 The rest ROM in extension(°) 8.75 ± 4.78 9.71 ± 2.98 N
Postoperative ROM
 ROM in flexion(°) 79.41 ± 12.85 81.41 ± 12.52 0.601
 ROM in extension(°) 14.71 ± 3.29 14.38 ± 4.35 0.785
 Preoperative HHS 32.90 ± 7.98 29.59 ± 8.96 0.208
 Postoperative HHS 88.68 ± 3.62 88.03 ± 4.39 0.604

VAS visual analog scale, ROM range of motion, HHS Harris hip score

chi-square test, the rest- Student t-test;

Discussion

As expected, we found more than 600 mL on average was found in the active disease group than the stable disease group (P = 0.006). The blood loss volume was 1415.31 mL at stable disease status, which even reached 2035.04 mL with disease activation. Jia et al. [5] reported that the average blood loss during THA reached 1517 mL for AS with bony ankylosis of the hips (ASB), which was exactly in the range between the volume of the stable and active groups in our study. Influential factors, such as surgical technique, bipolar electrocoagulation hemostasis technique, and the severity of hip ankylosis, might have affected the outcome. We suggested that the disease activity of AS might be another important influential factor correlated with the surgical blood loss because disease activity is easily ignored by surgeons. This issue was not considered by Jia et al. [5] and Zhao et al. [26].

In addition, the high transfusion rate in both groups (76.47% in the stable group and 84.37% in the active group) attracted our attention, which was consistent with the previous study [5]. It demanded a greater need to receive transfusion for AS patients undergoing THA. Averagely 2.31 units allogenic RBC was needed for active AS patients. Besides, the compensated blood loss that was positively correlated with allogenic transfusion was found more when AS was at the active disease status. The risk of transfusion reaction increases with the high allogenic transfusion rate; e.g., infection, alloimmunization and transfusion-related acute lung injury [27]. Therefore, disease activity of AS should be raised enough concern before surgery.

Our study discovered the emerging of Fbgc with disease activation, suggesting the influence of fibrinolysis system. Beinsberger et al. [28] proposed that the combined activation of platelets, leukocytes and endothelium affected the coagulation, fibrinolysis and immunity-induced procoagulation in the plasma. The plasma levels of key inflammatory mediators (ESR, CRP. TNF-α, IL-6) played an important role in the above activation [28]. In the synovial fluid, So et al. [15] also suggested the activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis system at active disease status of AS. We hypothesized an unbalance of coagulation and fibrinolysis activation locally with active disease, thereby clotting factors consuming and fibrinogen accumulation. A shortage of clotting factors might be attributed to the constant activation of the endogenous coagulation cascade reaction and the subsequent fibrinolysis reaction. The study of Pratic et al. proved a correlation between the delay of thrombin generation and disease activity in AS [29]. In that occasion, invasive operation was likely to increase blood loss.

Unlike the rise of Fbgc, we noticed that the pre-operative Hb and ALB concentrations were lower in the active group. It suggested that the poor nutrition status might be partially responsible for increased blood loss. Anemia and hypoproteinemia are common complications of chronic disease, and anemia is proven to be related to disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis [30]. Some researchers have reported that the morbidity of anemia in AS is 6% ~ 25%. Braun et al. [31] declared that the occurrence of anemia was associated with TNF-α in AS patients. Therefore, the immune inflammatory reaction might be responsible for the poor nutrition status. TNF-α, with an intensive biological effect, is regarded as the most important factor in the development of AS and proven to be positively associated with disease activity [32, 33]. We suggested the poor nutrition might also attributed to psychological disorders [12, 34]. The global function might be affected after long-term low nutritional condition and inflammatory cytokine activation. For example, the poor nutrition status is closely correlated with weak capability of repair, which might partially account for the increase in blood loss.

A high prevalence of osteopenia or osteoporosis in total hip was reported in AS [3537]. Capaci et al. [35] found that 91.7% AS patients with advanced hip involvement suffered from osteoporosis. Limited by a retrospective study design, the current study employed the plain radiograph rather than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess the bone mass in total hip. The result was consistent with the previous report [3537], with 64.7% patients who were diagnosis as osteoporosis in stable group and 87.5% patients in active group. Maillefert et al. [38] suggested that persistent inflammation might be an etiologic factor of bone loss in AS. Grazio et al. [39] and Wang et al. [40] further proposed that active disease accelerated bone loss in AS. However, our result denied the relationship between the disease activity and the prevalence of osteoporosis. The inconsistence might be attributed to the low sensitivity of plain radiographs to assess bone mass. During THA, the acetabula were more likely to be over-reamed and the risk of proximal femur fracture increased because of osteoporosis [7]. Zhao et al. [26] suggested that the osteoporosis might contribute to more blood loss due to periprosthetic microfracture. The impact of osteoporosis on surgical blood loss needs further discussion.

The study reported by Karakoc et al. [41] proposed a much higher level of total oxidative status level and oxidative stress index values, while the total antioxidative status level was lower in patients with AS. They further proved that some of the oxidants, such as nitric oxide and superoxide anion, from activated polymorphonuclear leucocytes were correlated to disease activity [41]. One of the most important biological effects of these oxidants is local hemangiectasis and accelerated blood flow. Therefore, the imbalance of oxidative–antioxidative status might also contribute to the increased blood loss.

In addition, local vascular damage may have been caused by oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation with disease activation, which leads to increased capillary permeability. It has been shown by Azevedo et al. [42] that interleukin-8, one of the biomarkers of endothelial damage, was higher in AS patients and the levels were clearly correlated with disease activity. Except for damage, angiogenesis also plays an important role in periarthritis of hip. Higher serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels was found in AS patients and positively correlated with disease activity [43]. Taken together, the periarthritis of hip includes acute and chronic inflammatory reaction when AS is in an active state, being featured with local hemangiectasis, accelerated blood flow, capillary permeation and angiogenesis. The consecutive reaction caused by active disease could be the main mechanism underlying increased blood loss. In our clinical practice, the inner incision was obviously observed much more errhysis during THA for AS patients.

The main limitations of this research are as follows: first, the number of cases might be small (49 hips) and the current study only enrolled Chinese population as the research cohorts. Racial difference might exist because AS was associated with various major histocompatibility complex genes, such as HLA-B27, HLA-B60 and HLA-DRB1 [44, 45]. Second, our findings should be further validated using a well powered prospective study with larger samples.

Conclusion

In conclusion, active AS patients are at high risk for increased blood loss during THA compared to stable AS patients. The active group had approximately 600 mL more blood loss on average compared to the stable group. The underlying mechanism includes disorders of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, poor nutrition status, osteoporosis, imbalance of oxidative–antioxidative status and local inflammatory reaction. As blood loss increases, the length of hospital stay, post-operative rehabilitation, and the risk of incision infection might be affected. Thus, in consideration of blood loss, AS patients are recommended to undergo THA when in the stable disease stage. For active AS patients, efficient therapies should be applied to reduce disease activity to the stable level, of which TNF inhibitors, including adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, and infliximab, are the first choices [46].

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely appreciate Dr. Candy Kuang’s selfless help for revising the spelling and grammar errors of the manuscript.

Abbreviations

THA

Total hip arthroplasty

AS

Ankylosing spondylitis

HCA

Heamocoagulase agkistrodon injection

TXA

Tranexamic acid injection

ASDAS

Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score

CRP

C-Reactive protein

ESR

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Fbgc

Fibrinogen concentration

BMI

Body Mass Index

ALB

Albumin

PT

Prothrombin Time

PT%

Prothrombin activity

PT-INR

Prothrombin time international ratio

APTT

Activated partial thromboplastin time

TT

Thrombin time

Hb

Hemoglobin

Plt

Platelet

Hct

Hematocrit

Authors’ contributions

YH was responsible for the design of the study, proposing the hypothesis, drafting the manuscript and making major revision. WZJ and TW was responsible for collecting data, calculation and making contributions on revision. CLP made important contributions in revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has gotten approval from Medical Ethics Committee of Nanfang hospital. Consent to participate is not applicable for this retrospective study.

Consent for publication

This section is not applicable for our study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Vander CB, Muñoz-Gomariz E, Font P, Mulero J, De VK, Boonen A, et al. Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis: epidemiology and risk factors associated with hip replacement surgery. Rheumatology. 2010;49(1):73–81. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wink F, Arends S, Maas F, Bootsma H, Griep EN, Bruyn GAW, et al. High prevalence of hip involvement and decrease in inflammatory ultrasound lesions during tumour necrosis factor-alpha blocking therapy in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2019;58(6):1040–1046. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ward MM, Deodhar A, Akl EA, Lui A, Ermann J, Gensler LS, et al. American College of Rheumatology/spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis research and treatment network 2015 recommendations for the treatment of Ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(2):282–298. doi: 10.1002/art.39298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hawley S, Sacks S, Bowness P, Prieto-Alhambra D. Incidence of Total hip and knee replacement in UK patients with Ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(9):1334–1336. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jia L, Zhao J, He C, Tong W, Zou Y, Xu W. Comparison of blood loss after Total hip Arthroplasty between Ankylosing spondylitis and osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(7):1504–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spahn DR. Anemia and patient blood management in hip and knee surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(2):482–495. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e08e97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guan M, Wang J, Zhao L, Xiao J, Li Z, Shi Z. Management of hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(8):1115–1120. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2278-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fraval A, Effeney P, Fiddelaers L, Smith B, Towell B, Tran P. OBTAIN A: outcome benefits of Tranexamic acid in hip Arthroplasty. A randomized double-blinded controlled trial. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(5):1516–1519. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kayupov E, Fillingham YA, Okroj K, Plummer DR, Moric M, Gerlinger TL, et al. Oral and intravenous Tranexamic acid are equivalent at reducing blood loss following Total hip Arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(5):373–378. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meermans G, Konan S, Das R, Volpin A, Haddad FS. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(6):732–740. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.38053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aissaoui N, Rostom S, Hakkou J, Berrada Ghziouel K, Bahiri R, Abouqal R, et al. Fatigue in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: prevalence and relationships with disease-specific variables, psychological status, and sleep disturbance. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(7):2117–2124. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1928-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sağ S, Nas K, Serdar Sağ M, Tekeoğlu I, Kamanli A. Relationship of work disability between the disease activity, depression and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. 2018. pp. 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bakland G, Gran JT, Nossent JC. Increased mortality in ankylosing spondylitis is related to disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):1921–1925. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.151191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peters MJ, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Dijkmans BA, Nurmohamed MT. Cardiovascular risk profile of patients with spondylarthropathies, particularly ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004;34(3):585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.So AK, Varisco PA, Kemkesmatthes B, Herkennemorard C, Chobazpéclat V, Gerster JC, et al. Arthritis is linked to local and systemic activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis pathways. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(12):2510–2515. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2003.00462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van Eijk IC, Peters MJ, Serne EH, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Dijkmans BA, Smulders YM, et al. Microvascular function is impaired in ankylosing spondylitis and improves after tumour necrosis factor alpha blockade. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(3):362–366. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.086777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arends S, Spoorenberg A, Brouwer E, van der Veer E. Clinical studies on bone-related outcome and the effect of TNF-alpha blocking therapy in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(3):259–268. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Geusens P, Vosse D, van der Linden S. Osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19(4):335–339. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328133f5b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Klingberg E, Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Geijer M, Gothlin J, Hilme E, et al. Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis - prevalence, risk factors and methods of assessment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(3):R108. doi: 10.1186/ar3833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.George MD, Baker JF, Hsu JY, Wu Q, Xie F, Chen L, et al. Perioperative timing of infliximab and the risk of serious infection after elective hip and knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69(12):1845–1854. doi: 10.1002/acr.23209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini P. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. JBJS. 1970;52(3):457–467. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197052030-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murphy M, Wallington T, Kelsey P, Boulton F, Bruce M, Cohen H, et al. Guidelines for the clinical use of red cell transfusions. Br J Haematol. 2001;113(1):24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rosencher N, Kerkkamp HE, Macheras G, Munuera LM, Menichella G, Barton DM, et al. Orthopedic surgery transfusion hemoglobin European overview (OSTHEO) study: blood management in elective knee and hip arthroplasty in Europe. Transfusion. 2003;43(4):459–469. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martinez V, Monsaingeonlion A, Cherif K, Judet T, Chauvin M, Fletcher D. Transfusion strategy for primary knee and hip arthroplasty: impact of an algorithm to lower transfusion rates and hospital costs. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(7):1297–1299. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Van der Heijde D, Lie E, Kvien TK, Sieper J, Van den Bosch F, Listing J, et al. ASDAS, a highly discriminatory ASAS-endorsed disease activity score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(12):1811–1818. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.100826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao J, Li J, Zheng W, Liu D, Sun X, Xu W. Low body mass index and blood loss in primary Total hip Arthroplasty: results from 236 consecutive Ankylosing spondylitis patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014(1):971–975. doi: 10.1155/2014/742393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Madjdpour C, Spahn DR. Allogeneic red blood cell transfusions: efficacy, risks, alternatives and indications. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(1):33–42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beinsberger J, Heemskerk JW, Cosemans JM. Chronic arthritis and cardiovascular disease: altered blood parameters give rise to a prothrombotic propensity. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(3):345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prati C, Racadot E, Cedoz JP, Wendling D. Thrombin generation in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(4):511–514. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1552-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wolfe F, Michaud K. Anemia and renal function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(8):1516–1522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Braun J. Van dHD, Doyle MK, Han C, Deodhar a, Inman R, et al. improvement in hemoglobin levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with infliximab. Arthritis Care Res. 2009;61(8):1032–1036. doi: 10.1002/art.24865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bal A, Unlu E, Bahar G, Aydog E, Eksioglu E, Yorgancioglu R. Comparison of serum IL-1 beta, sIL-2R, IL-6, and TNF-alpha levels with disease activity parameters in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(2):211–215. doi: 10.1007/s10067-006-0283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heilig B, Pezzutto A, Lukoschek M, Hunstein W. Expression of TNF receptors in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Z Rheumatol. 1993;52(6):383–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martindale J, Smith J, Sutton CJ, Grennan D, Goodacre L, Goodacre JA. Disease and psychological status in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2006;45(10):1288–1293. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Capaci K, Hepguler S, Argin M, Tas I. Bone mineral density in mild and advanced ankylosing spondylitis. Yonsei Med J. 2003;44(3):379–384. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.3.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van der Weijden MA, Claushuis TA, Nazari T, Lems WF, Dijkmans BA, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE. High prevalence of low bone mineral density in patients within 10 years of onset of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31(11):1529–1535. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2018-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.El Maghraoui A, Borderie D, Cherruau B, Edouard R, Dougados M, Roux C. Osteoporosis, body composition, and bone turnover in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(10):2205–2209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maillefert JF, Aho LS, El Maghraoui A, Dougados M, Roux C. Changes in bone density in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a two-year follow-up study. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(7):605–609. doi: 10.1007/s001980170084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grazio S, Kusić Z, Cvijetić S, Grubišić F, Balenović A, Nemčić T, et al. Relationship of bone mineral density with disease activity and functional ability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A cross-sectional study. 2011. pp. 2801–2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang DM, Zeng QY, Chen SB, Gong Y, Hou ZD, Xiao ZY. Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a 5-year follow-up study of 504 cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(4):465–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karakoc M, Altindag O, Keles H, Soran N, Selek S. Serum oxidative–antioxidative status in patients with ankylosing spondilitis. Rheumatol Int. 2007;27(12):1131–1134. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0352-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Azevedo VF, Faria-Neto JR, Stinghen A, Lorencetti PG, Miller WP, Gonçalves BP, et al. IL-8 but not other biomarkers of endothelial damage is associated with disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis without treatment with anti-TNF agents. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(7):1779–1783. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2631-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Drouart M, Saas P, Billot M, Cedoz JP, Tiberghien P, Wendling D, et al. High serum vascular endothelial growth factor correlates with disease activity of spondylarthropathies. Clin Experimental Immunol. 2003;132(1):158–162. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02101.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet (London, England) 2007;369(9570):1379–1390. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60635-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown MA, Crane AM, Wordsworth BP. Genetic aspects of susceptibility, severity, and clinical expression in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14(4):354–360. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200207000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maxwell LJ, Zochling J, Boonen A, Singh JA, Veras M, Tanjong Ghogomu E, et al. TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis. The Cochrane Library. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES