Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Apr 15;44(9):583–585. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.04.007

Novel coronavirus (2019-nCov): do you have enough intensive care units?

Nuevo coronavirus (2019-nCov): ¿tiene suficientes unidades de cuidados intensivos?

G Melegari a,, E Giuliani b, G Maini b, L Barbieri b, P Baffoni a, E Bertellini a, A Barbieri c
PMCID: PMC7158803  PMID: 32475608

Recently, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) a global health emergency due to its global implications for the health care system and its economic impact. Italy was one of the first European countries with registered clustered cases of acute pneumonia. On February 23, 2020, the Italian government declared the first set of quarantine measures to slow the spread of the virus.1 Estimations show that 2019-nCoV is a high-diffusion virus with a 2% fatality rate; approximately 20% all hospital admissions were directly to the ICU.2 National health care systems could collapse if this spread of pneumonia continues at the current rate. This study aims to analyze official Italian data to build a predictive model.3 From February 23, 2020 to March 15, 2020, daily data from the cumulative reports of the Protezione Civile Italiana (Italian Civil Protection) were collected, including the number of positive subjects, hospital admissions, ICU admissions, deaths, and full recovery. Statistical programs were used for the analysis. Different models were tested, and forecast values were calculated, and the best model, with a p-value <0.05, was considered to calculate the predicted values. The number of positive subjects (PS) follows a non-linear regression with p  < 0.001 for the number of PS and hospital admissions, PS and ICU admissions, PS and deaths, and PS and recovered subjects. Simultaneously, the number of people admitted to hospitals follows a non-linear regression with p  < 0.001 (Table 1 ). Among the 46.7% of PS admitted in hospitals, 10.0% were admitted to the ICU. The ratio of hospitalized patients to those admitted to the ICU is 22.3%, the death rate is 5%, and the recovery rate is 8%. The relationship between hospital admissions and ICU admissions follows a linear regression, with p  < 0.001. Recent data on 2019-n CoV present different non-linear growth patterns, besides the rapidly increasing number of PS, which are very susceptible to public health rules. It is fascinating to observe the constant ratio of hospitalized and ICU admissions. If, in the next few weeks, infections reach 1% of the Italian population, over 60.000 ICU beds will be required, which may be the breaking point for the system. These results could be confirmed and highlighted by the increasing trend of ICU admissions, and the relationship between hospitalized patients and ICU admitted subjects. The national health care system needs more time to adapt to and deal with this challenge. The 2019 n-CoV transmission probability presents the following relationship. y=ax3bx2+cx+d. Here, y indicates infected subjects, x is the intrinsic potential reproducing number, and the constants a,b,c and d are the intercepts. With environmental strategies and adequate medical treatments, infection and death rates reduced, while recovery rates increased (Fig. 1 a and b). Observing Italy's data, this equation is applicable to hospital and ICU admission, and to the rate of death and recovery. As in China, quarantine and environmental strategies have a positive, but slow effect. They can reduce the rate of infection, admissions to ICU, and death, and can change the model.4 Furthermore, this is a preliminary interpretation, and not the end of this phenomenon. It will be possible to analyze, customize, and fit the best model.5 However, in this context, it is important not to forget the emergency; necessary medical and surgical procedures should be guaranteed. A possible solution is to try to re-organize the mission of the hospital as happened in different and less dramatic events.6 This model has the potential to predict the worst-case scenario. With this knowledge, we are ready to do the best to prevent the system from reaching the breaking point and to change the 2019 nCoV curve now!

Table 1.

Data from February 23 until March 15, 2020. Left panel: number of 2019-nCov positive subjects, number of hospital admissions and ICU admissions, number of deaths, and recovery. Right panel: predicted mean value calculated using non- linear regression. R2 describes the goodness of fit, where 1 indicates a complete fit.

Day Number of patients
Predicted number
2019-nCov positive Hospital admission ICU Admission Death Recovery 2019-nCov positive Hospital admission ICU Admission Death Recovery
1 132 54 26 5 0 39 51 28 0 17
2 229 101 27 6 1 224 89 27 8 0
3 322 114 35 10 1 386 125 31 12 −7
4 400 128 36 12 3 541 169 39 15 −4
5 650 248 56 12 45 705 228 52 17 9
6 888 345 64 21 46 892 312 72 20 32
7 1049 401 105 29 50 1118 427 99 25 64
8 1694 639 140 34 83 1399 583 133 35 106
9 1835 742 166 52 149 1750 787 177 50 159
10 2263 1034 229 79 160 2187 1048 229 73 220
11 2706 1346 295 107 276 2725 1374 292 104 292
12 3296 1790 351 148 414 3380 1774 366 145 373
13 3916 2394 462 197 523 4168 2255 452 198 464
14 5061 2651 567 233 589 5103 2826 550 264 564
15 6378 3557 650 366 622 6202 3496 662 345 674
16 7985 4316 733 463 733 7.495 4.151 757 474 773
17 8514 5038 877 631 1004 9.026 4.878 881 627 940
18 10590 5838 1028 827 1045 10789 5.675 1017 811 1134
19 12839 6650 1153 1016 1258 12802 6.543 1165 1031 1357
20 14995 7246 1328 1266 1439 15084 7.484 1326 1288 1610
21 17750 8372 1518 1441 1966 17653 8.500 1498 1586 1897
22 20603 9663 1672 2063 2335 20528 9.593 1684 1929 2218



R2 0.999 0.998 0.999 0.993 0.988
p 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Reports the model curve and its fitting curve of positive subjects of 2019-nCov, hospital and ICU admissions, death, and recovery. (b) Reports the ICU admission trend with a moving averages relation.

Funding

None declared.

The Study follows Strobe Guidelines.

Database: data are available on http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/attivita-rischi/rischio-sanitario/emergenze/coronavirus.

Statistic calculate were performed using Microsoft Excel® and STATA 16® program (STATA Corp LP 4905 Lakeway Drive TX 77845 USA by a physician (with statistic competence) and by an engineer: all calculate were attached as supplementary file.

Author contributions

Melegari G and Barbieri A: concept design of the study, statistic calculate, Maini G: statistic calculate and control, Giuliani E: writing of the paper, Barbieri L: graphical aspects, Baffoni P and Bertellini E: manuscript revision and final approval.

Keypoints

The study analyzes the Italian Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCov) outbreaks, searching possible predicting model, underlining the risk of the trend of phenomena.

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Dr. Giuliano Carrozzi, Epidemiology Azienda AUSL Modena, Italy.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.medin.2020.04.007

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data to this article:

mmc1.pdf (293.1KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Spina S., Marrazzo F., Migliari M., Stucchi R., Sforza A., Fumagalli R. The response of Milan's Emergency Medical System to the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Lancet. 2020;395 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30493-1. PE49-E50 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 28] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wax R.S., Christian M.D. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can J Anesth. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 12] doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01591-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/attivita-rischi/rischio-sanitario/emergenze/coronavirus [accessed 23.03.20]
  • 4.Roosa K., Lee Y., Luo R., Kirpich A., Rothenberg R., Hyman J.M. Real-time forecasts of the COVID-19 epidemic in China from February 5th to February 24th, 2020. Infect Dis Model. 2020;5:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.002. Published 2020 Feb 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowell G. Fitting dynamic models to epidemic outbreaks with quantified uncertainty: a primer for parameter uncertainty, identifiability, and forecasts. Infect Dis Model. 2017;2:379–398. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barbieri A., Melegari G., Lob V., Mazzali L. Response by twin Italian hub hospitals in a double seismic event: a retrospective observational investigation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22:353–360. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1394406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.pdf (293.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Medicina Intensiva are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES