Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Feb 27;20(4):400–402. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30132-8

COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments

Justin Stebbing a, Anne Phelan b, Ivan Griffin b, Catherine Tucker b, Olly Oechsle b, Dan Smith b, Peter Richardson b
PMCID: PMC7158903  PMID: 32113509

Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) are characterised by an overexuberant inflammatory response and, for SARS, viral load is not correlated with the worsening of symptoms.1, 2 In our previous Correspondence to The Lancet,3 we described how BenevolentAI's proprietary artificial intelligence (AI)-derived knowledge graph,4 queried by a suite of algorithms, enabled identification of a target and a potential therapeutic against SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; the causative organism in COVID-19). We identified a group of approved drugs that could inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis and thereby inhibit viral infection of cells (appendix). The drug targets are members of the numb-associated kinase (NAK) family—including AAK1 and GAK—the inhibition of which has been shown to reduce viral infection in vitro.5, 6 Baricitinib was identified as a NAK inhibitor, with a particularly high affinity for AAK1, a pivotal regulator of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We suggested that this drug could be of use in countering SARS-CoV-2 infections, subject to appropriate clinical testing.

To take this work further in a short timescale, a necessity when dealing with a new human pathogen, we re-examined the affinity and selectivity of all the approved drugs in our knowledge graph to identify those with both antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Such drugs are predicted to be of particular importance in the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19, when the host inflammatory response becomes a major cause of lung damage and subsequent mortality. Comparison of the properties of the three best candidates are shown in the table . Baricitinib, fedratinib, and ruxolitinib are potent and selective JAK inhibitors approved for indications such as rheumatoid arthritis and myelofibrosis. All three are powerful anti-inflammatories that, as JAK–STAT signalling inhibitors, are likely to be effective against the consequences of the elevated levels of cytokines (including interferon-γ) typically observed in people with COVID-19·2 Although the three candidates have similar JAK inhibitor potencies, a high affinity for AAK1 suggests baricitinib is the best of the group, especially given its once-daily oral dosing and acceptable side-effect profile.7 The most significant side-effect seen over 4214 patient-years in the clinical trial programmes used for European Medicines Agency registration was a small increase in upper respiratory tract infections (similar to that observed with methotrexate), but the incidence of serious infections (eg, herpes zoster) over 52 weeks' dosing was small (3·2 per 100 patient-years), and similar to placebo.7 Use of this agent in patients with COVID-19 over 7–14 days, for example, suggests side-effects would be trivial.

Table.

Properties of three antiviral and anti-inflammatory candidate drugs

Baricitinib Ruxolitinib Fedratinib
Daily dose, mg 2–10 25 400
Affinity and efficacy: Kd or IC50, nM*
AAK1
Cell free 17 100 32
Cell 34 700 960
GAK
Cell free 136 120 1
Cell 272 840 30
BIKE
Cell free 40 210 32
Cell 80 1470 960
JAK1
Cell free 6 3 20
Cell 12 20 600
JAK2
Cell free 6 3 3
Cell 11 21 100
JAK3
Cell free >400 2 79
Cell >800 14 2370
TYK2
Cell free 53 1 20
Cell 106 7 600
Pharmacokinetics
Plasma protein binding 50% 97% 95%
Cmax (unbound), nM 103 117 170
Safety: tolerated dose ≤10 mg/day ≤20 mg twice daily ≤400 mg/day

See regulatory approval documents for further information on these drugs. Kd=dissociation constant. IC50=half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Cmax=maximum serum concentration.

*

All values are IC50 except the cell free values for AAK1, GAK, and BIKE; “cell free” values indicate inhibitory activity against purified protein in biochemical assay; “cell” values indicate enzyme-inhibitory activity inside a cell.

In the absence of direct measurements of drug inhibition in cells, the predicted cell affinity and efficacy values are derived from the ratio of each compound for their primary target; for example, for baricitinib, IC50 AAK1[cell] = (IC50AK1[cell] / IC50AK1[cell free]) × IC50AAK1[cell free].

At a 10 mg dose.

Other AI-algorithm-predicted NAK inhibitors include a combination of the oncology drugs sunitinib and erlotinib, shown to reduce the infectivity of a wide range of viruses, including hepatitis C virus, dengue virus, Ebola virus, and respiratory syncytial virus.5, 6 However, sunitinib and erlotinib would be difficult for patients to tolerate at the doses required to inhibit AAK1 and GAK. By contrast, at therapeutic doses used for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the free plasma concentrations of baricitinib are predicted to be sufficient to inhibit AAK1, and potentially GAK, in cell-based assays.

The predicted inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by baricitinib is unlikely to be observed with other anti-arthritic drugs or JAK inhibitors. Our analysis of the closely related JAK inhibitors ruxolitinib and fedratinib (table) illustrates that the predicted unbound plasma exposure required to inhibit the enzymes needed for clathrin-mediated endocytosis greatly exceeds the currently tolerated exposures used therapeutically. These drugs are, therefore, unlikely to reduce viral infectivity at tolerated doses, although they might reduce the host inflammatory response through JAK inhibition. Intriguingly, another JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, shows no detectable inhibition of AAK1. The high affinity of baricitinib for NAKs, its anti-inflammatory properties, and its ability to ameliorate associated chronic inflammation in interferonopathies,8 together with its advantageous pharmacokinetic properties, appear to make it a special case among the approved drugs.

In addition, the potential for combination therapy with baracitinib is high because of its low plasma protein binding and minimal interaction with CYP enzymes and drug transporters. Furthermore, there is the potential for combining baricitinib with the direct-acting antivirals (lopinavir or ritonavir and remdesivir) currently being used in the COVID-19 outbreak, since it has a minimal interaction with the relevant CYP drug-metabolising enzymes. Combinations of baricitinib with these direct-acting antivirals could reduce viral infectivity, viral replication, and the aberrant host inflammatory response. This work demonstrates that the use of an AI-driven knowledge graph can facilitate rapid drug development.

Acknowledgments

JS is editor-in-chief of Oncogene. JS has previously sat on a number of scientific advisory boards, including BenevolentAI, and consults with Lansdowne partners and Vitruvian; he now sits on the Board of Directors for BB Biotech Healthcare Trust and chairs Xerion Healthcare. All other authors are employees of BenevolentAI. Events in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak are evolving rapidly, and we make our initial thoughts available in this Comment in good faith and to assist in the global response. Our early investigations and suggestions require further detailed work and analysis and should not be relied on as constituting any kind of medical or other advice or recommendation.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (391.4KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Peiris JSM, Chu CM, Cheng VCC, et al. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak or coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet. 2003;361:1767–1772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13412-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richardson P, Griffin I, Tucker C, et al. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30304-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Segler MHS, Preuss M, Waller P. Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature. 2018;555:604–610. doi: 10.1038/nature25978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bekerman E, Neveu G, Shulla A, et al. Anticancer kinase inhibitors impair intracellular viral trafficking and exert broad-spectrum antiviral effects. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1338–1352. doi: 10.1172/JCI89857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pu S-Y, Xiao F, Schor S, et al. Feasibility and biological rationale of repurposing sunitinib and erlotinib for dengue treatment. Antiviral Res. 2018;155:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.European Medicines Agency Olumiant: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/olumiant-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  • 8.Sanchez GAM, Reinhardt A, Ramsey S, et al. JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in the treatment of autoinflammatory interferonopathies. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:3041–3052. doi: 10.1172/JCI98814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (391.4KB, pdf)

Articles from The Lancet. Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES