4.1 Methods
The PubMed database was searched under the following headings: HIV or AIDS and diarrhoea, oesophagitis, candida, Clostridium difficile, cryptosporidium, cyclospora, cytomegalovirus, entamoeba, giardia, herpes, isospora, microsporidia, mycobacteria, parasites, salmonella, shigella, strongyloides.
4.2 General overview
Gastrointestinal symptoms are among the most frequent problems in patients with HIV disease, and diarrhoea may be caused by a wide variety of organisms (Table 4.1). Symptoms may arise from any part of the GI tract including the mouth, throat, oesophagus, stomach, small and large intestine, liver, gall bladder, rectum and anus. The spectrum of disease has changed with the introduction of HAART with a fall in the overall incidence of opportunistic infections and an increase in medicine related side‐effects and of conditions found in the HIV‐seronegative population. If a cause is not apparent consultation with a gastroenterologist with an interest in HIV related disease of the GI tract is indicated since HIV‐seropositive individuals are also susceptible to many of the same conditions as the HIV‐seronegative population. Coinfection with hepatitis B or C virus is not covered in these guidelines as it is the subject of separate guidelines [1].
Table 4.1.
Major causes of HIV‐related diarrhoea

4.3 Oesophagitis
-
•
Oesophagitis should be treated empirically with fluconazole and oesophagoscopy should be performed if symptoms fail to settle initially (category Ib recommendation).
-
•
Specific treatment for oesophagitis in cases that fail to settle with empirical therapy should be directed at the cause identified by biopsy, culture and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (category III recommendation).
Oesophagitis should be suspected in patients who experience pain on swallowing, with or without symptoms of reflux or dysphagia. The most common causative organisms are Candida spp. Persistent or recurrent oesophageal candidiasis has decreased in the HAART era and most often indicates failing or poor HIV viral control [2, 3]. Treatment and prophylaxis with fluconazole and alternative agents have been subjects of a recent Cochrane review [4]. This review showed that fluconazole was superior to nystatin in terms of clinical cure and to clotrimazole in terms of mycological cure, while also showing that itraconazole was similar to fluconazole in its efficacy. Fluconazole should not be used in pregnancy.
The other major HIV‐related infectious causes of oesophagitis include herpes simplex and cytomegalovirus infections, which cause ulceration and may coexist with candidiasis, especially if CD4 counts are <100 cells/μL. Idiopathic ulcers are also common. Other causes of oesophageal symptoms include pill‐associated ulcers. These have been associated with a number of medications, most commonly in the mid oesophagus. Doxycycline and related antimicrobials, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, potassium supplementation and iron tablets are the commonest causes likely to be encountered in HIV‐seropositive patients [5, 6].
A randomised trial has demonstrated that initial empirical therapy for candidiasis is a reasonable initial approach in uncomplicated oesophagitis [7]. Oesophagoscopy should be performed if symptoms have failed to resolve after an empirical trial of azoles. Adequate and appropriate specimens must be taken to enable histological and virological diagnoses, together with cultures and anti‐fungal susceptibility testing for the identification of azole‐resistant Candida strains.
Azole‐sensitive strains should be treated with fluconazole 50–100 mg po for 7–14 days (category Ib recommendation), which is the preferred azole due to experience and superior bioavailability in comparison to itraconazole [8]. Alternatives include caspofungin, 70 mg loading dose then 50 mg once a day iv [9], or liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg once a day iv [10, 11], used for the same duration as fluconazole. Of these, the side‐effect profile of caspofungin and its efficacy in clinical trials make it the preferred agent when azole therapy cannot be used (category III recommendation).
In most cases primary and secondary prophylaxis for oropharyngeal and oesophageal candidiasis has been largely abandoned due to the rapid emergence of resistance [7]. One randomized clinical trial suggests that for individuals with very frequent symptomatic relapses, continuous fluconazole treatment (at 200 mg per day) is more effective than intermittent treatment at preventing relapses and reducing colonization [12]. In this study the intermittent treatment group required a median of four treatment courses per year and had a high incidence of azole resistance, which was comparable to the group on continuous treatment. Intermittent self treatment with fluconazole may be appropriate for individuals with persistently low CD4 cell counts and less frequent relapses and is likely to be the most appropriate strategy for most individuals with a history of relapsing oropharyngeal candidiasis in the HAART era where secondary prophylaxis should be reserved for select cases (category IV recommendation) [7, 13].
CMV oesophagitis is treated with ganciclovir 5 mg/kg bd iv for 2–4 weeks, or until symptoms/signs have resolved (category III recommendation) [14, 15]. Valganciclovir may be substituted for iv ganciclovir at 900 mg bd orally for some or all of the duration if symptoms are not severe enough to interfere with oral absorption on the basis of studies showing efficacy for CMV disease in transplant patients [16] but there is a paucity of data in HIV‐related CMV disease of the gastrointestinal tract (category IV recommendation). Secondary CMV prophylaxis for oesophageal disease is not routinely indicated, unless there is concomitant ophthalmological disease. Herpes simplex oesophagitis is treated with aciclovir 5–10 mg/kg tid iv, followed by 400 mg five times a day orally for a total of 14 days (category III recommendation) [17] or oral valaciclovir 1 g bd orally (see 6 Herpes viruses for a discussion of prophylaxis of HSV). Foscarnet 90 mg/kg bd iv has been used in cases of ganciclovir‐resistant CMV or 40 mg/kg bd or tid for aciclovir‐resistant HSV [15].
-
•
After presentation with infectious oesophagitis, early initiation of HAART should be considered (category IV recommendation) [18].
As elsewhere in these guidelines, early initiation of HAART is favoured on the basis that improved survival without AIDS progression or death has been seen when HAART is initiated within the first two weeks of treatment of the opportunistic infection [18]. This recommendation is extrapolated from a series in which most cases were not related to oesophageal opportunistic infection but is also supported by evidence of functional immunological benefits of antiretrovirals against organisms such as Candida spp. [19].
4.4 Diarrhoea
Diarrhoea is a common problem for people with HIV in both resource‐poor and resource‐rich settings, regardless of antiretroviral exposure. In the pre‐HAART era, 30–70% of HIV‐seropositive individuals experienced diarrhoea, and among European patients with CD4 counts <50 cells/μL, 49% would expect to develop diarrhoea within 1 year and 96% within 3 years [20]. In resource‐poor areas, incidence and severity continue to be higher. Early clinical observations confirmed that diarrhoeal illness was linked to reduced quality of life and poorer survival [21]. Diarrhoea may be the presenting symptom of lymphoma and Kaposi's sarcoma, may affect up to 40–50% of those taking antiretroviral therapy (ART), can be induced by other medications and may be the result of an incompletely defined direct effect of HIV on the gut mucosa termed HIV‐associated enteropathy [22, 23, 24, 25]. For a list of some causes of diarrhoea in HIV‐seropositive individuals see Table 4.1.
-
•
Every effort should be made to confirm a specific diagnosis in patients with significant immunosuppression (category IV recommendation).
Various algorithms have been proposed for the investigation and/or empirical management of chronic HIV‐related diarrhoea (three or more loose stools for 28 or more days) in Western [26, 27, 28, 29, 30] and tropical settings [31, 32, 33]. Parasitic causes are more likely in those with prolonged diarrhoea, considerable weight loss and CD4 count <100 cells/μL, and may coexist with CMV, mycobacterial or other infections.
4.4.1 Acute diarrhoea due to bacteria and viruses
4.4.1.1 Background and epidemiology. Acute diarrhoea is more common in people living with HIV, especially in those who are older and have lower CD4 cell counts. Evidence to confirm increased carriage and pathogenicity of many of the causative viral and bacterial pathogens is sparse, once risk factors such as socioeconomic circumstances, travel and sexual behaviour are controlled for.
Few studies of HIV‐related diarrhoea include investigation for viruses other than cytomegalovirus (CMV) and there is only anecdotal evidence of increased severity or frequency of most viruses associated with gastroenteritis in HIV, including noroviruses and rotavirus [20, 21]. There have been reports implicating coronavirus, which may coexist with bacterial pathogens [26] in acute diarrhoea, and adenovirus, which may coexist with CMV in patients with chronic diarrhoea [27]. Herpes simplex infections (HSV‐2 and HSV‐1) cause relapsing and severe proctocolitis and should be treated with aciclovir 400 mg five times daily po or valaciclovir 1 g bd po for 7–14 days, while severe infection may necessitate aciclovir iv 5 mg/kg tid for the initial part of therapy [34]. Prophylaxis should be considered for recurrent disease [see 6.3 Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection]. CMV colitis can present with acute diarrhoea and is specifically addressed later as a major opportunistic infection of the gastrointestinal tract. Sexually transmitted agents such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (including lymphogranuloma venereum) should be considered in susceptible individuals.
Invasive non‐typhoidal salmonellosis (NTS) was recognized early in the HIV epidemic to be strongly associated with immunosuppression in Western [29, 30, 31, 35, 36] and tropical [32, 33] settings, but there is no association between HIV and typhoid or paratyphoid. Patients with HIV and NTS infections present with febrile illness or sepsis syndromes and diarrhoea may be absent or a less prominent feature [37, 38]. As in HIV negative individuals, other bacterial pathogens include Clostridium difficile, Campylobacter spp and Shigella spp.
C. difficile was the most common cause of diarrhoea in a US cohort study [28] and has been described in British and resource‐poor settings [39, 40, 41]. It has been implicated in over 50% of cases of acute diarrhoea in studies spanning both the pre‐ and post‐HAART eras. It is more common in those with AIDS‐defining illness and, this is likely to reflect greater exposure to risk factors: hospitalization, broad‐spectrum antimicrobial use, treatment for toxoplasmosis specifically and use of acid‐lowering therapy, and attention to modifying these risk factors is likely to be essential to control of the infection in HIV‐seropositive individuals [42, 43].
4.4.1.2 Presentation. The clinical spectrum for other causes of acute diarrhoea ranges from asymptomatic infection to severe dehydration and death. Viral gastroenteritis typically presents with a short prodrome with mild fever and vomiting, followed by 1–4 days of non‐bloody, watery diarrhoea. Viral gastroenteritis is usually self‐limiting. Bacteria causing gastroenteritis may cause bloody diarrhoea and abdominal pain. Bacteraemia is more common, but still unusual, in HIV‐related campylobacter [44] and shigella [45] infections.
Presenting symptoms of Clostridium difficile infection are similar to HIV‐seronegative individuals [46]. Case series show that C. difficile infection is no more severe in HIV‐seropositive individuals though case reports of complications such as toxic megacolon and leukaemoid reactions exist as in other populations [46, 47, 48, 49].
-
•
Stool and blood cultures should be included in the routine diagnostic work‐up of diarrhoea in HIV (category IV recommendation).
-
•
In the UK, C. difficile toxin assessment and/or culture should be carried out in all HIV‐seropositive individuals presenting with acute diarrhoea (category IV recommendation).
4.4.1.3 Treatment. Supportive measures are the mainstay for viral gastroenteritis.
If a bacterial cause is suspected from the history, antimicrobial therapy may be indicated. Principles of therapy are as for HIV‐seronegative individuals and acute bacterial diarrhoea in individuals with preserved CD4 counts (>200 cells/μL) does not usually require treatment (category IV recommendation). In general, when individuals present with acute bacterial diarrhoea and a CD4 count <200 cells/μL, therapy will be indicated (category IV recommendation). When indicated, the choice should be guided by in vitro sensitivity patterns and antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be requested if not routine. Whilst the majority of isolates will be sensitive to ciprofloxacin 500 mg bd po for 5 days there are increasing reports of resistance, in both Campylobacter spp and Salmonella spp. In addition, the relationships between fluoroquinolones and C. difficile infection and MRSA colonization are resulting in less empirical use of this agent. Treatment should therefore be reserved for confirmed cases, as guided by sensitivity testing. In exceptional cases where the patient presents with signs of sepsis or severe symptoms the benefits of empirical treatment may outweigh the potential risks (category IV recommendation).
For C. difficile infection the first step is to stop the aetiological antibiotic. The response to specific therapy with metronidazole 400 mg tid po for 10 days or to vancomycin 125 mg po qid for 7–10 days is similar in HIV‐seropositive and HIV‐seronegative individuals and complications do not appear to be more or less common in HIV [46]. First episodes of C. difficile infection should be treated with metronidazole with consideration of vancomycin for fulminant disease, relapsing disease or non‐responsive infection (category IV recommendation), following the recommendations for treatment in HIV‐seronegative populations outlined in Department of Health guidelines [50]. Therapy is indicated for C. difficile infection regardless of the CD4 cell count.
-
•
Acute bacterial diarrhoea in HIV‐seropositive individuals with CD4 counts >200 cells/μL usually does not require treatment, but should be treated when the CD4 count is <200 cells/μL (category IV recommendation).
-
•
Acute bacterial diarrhoea should be treated as per susceptibility tests and local guidance (category IV recommendation).
-
•
C. difficile infection should be treated with metronidazole 400 mg tid po for 10 days with vancomycin reserved for severe, relapsing or metronidazole nonresponsive infection (category IV recommendation).
4.4.1.4 Impact of HAART. Trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX, co‐trimoxazole) reduced the incidence of infectious diarrhoea in the pre‐HAART era [51]. Retrospective studies suggest that introduction of antiretroviral therapy, including zidovudine monotherapy, has been more effective than targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis in preventing recurrence of nontyphoidal salmonella [52], and that duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis, with agents such as fluoroquinolones need not exceed 30 days in patients established on HAART [53]. The incidence of bacterial diarrhoea declined steadily after the introduction of HAART [28], therefore HAART is the mainstay of preventing bacterial diarrhoea (category III recommendation).
4.4.2 Cytomegalovirus
4.4.2.1 Background and epidemiology. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a member of the herpes family of viruses, usually acquired during childhood. CMV infection remains dormant unless an individual becomes immunosuppressed, when reactivation of latent infection may occur [54, 55]. In the pre‐HAART era, retinitis was the most common presentation of CMV [56], followed by gastrointestinal disease (see Table 4.2 for a list potential clinical manifestations of CMV in the GI tract). Most of the data about incidence of CMV were obtained from populations with retinitis. The majority of affected individuals had CD4 counts <100 cells/μL, with 80% of episodes occurring in those with CD4 counts <50 cells/μL. Since the advent of HAART, CMV infection may occasionally occur as part of immune reconstitution syndromes, but the overall incidence of CMV in individuals living with HIV has dramatically reduced [57].
Table 4.2.
Gastrointestinal presentations of CMV disease
| Mouth | Visible ulcers |
| Odynophagia | |
| Fever | |
| Malaise | |
| Oesophagus | Dysphagia |
| Retrosternal pain | |
| Odynophagia | |
| Anorexia | |
| Nausea | |
| Weight loss | |
| OGD may reveal classic large, shallow ulcers affecting the distal third of the oesophagus | |
| Fever | |
| Malaise | |
| Gallbladder | Right upper quadrant pain |
| Raised alkaline phosphatase level | |
| Sclerosing cholangitis seen at ERCP | |
| Colon | Bloody diarrhoea |
| Abdominal pain | |
| Anorexia | |
| Weight loss | |
| Haemorrhage | |
| Perforation | |
| Sigmoidoscopy may reveal ulceration | |
| Fever | |
| Malaise | |
| Rectum | Blood‐stained stool |
| Rectal pain | |
| Ulceration may be seen on proctoscopy | |
| Fever | |
| Malaise |
OGD, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangio‐pancreatography.
4.4.2.2 Presentation. CMV may affect all sections of the gut. Table 4.2 illustrates clinical presentation according to area affected.
4.4.2.3 Diagnosis. CMV viraemia, detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), may be positive in the absence of end‐organ disease and several studies have shown this to be of negligible diagnostic use [58, 59]. As indicated in Table 4.2, endoscopy may reveal classical CMV ulceration of the gut mucosa and biopsy with histopathological review may identify characteristic intranuclear and intracytoplasmic ‘owl's eye’ inclusions [60]. The absence of ulceration makes a diagnosis of CMV colitis very unlikely [61].
The culture of CMV from biopsy material is not sufficient for the diagnosis of gut infection as immunosuppressed individuals may shed the virus without intestinal disease.
4.4.2.4 Treatment.
-
•
First line treatment for CMV colitis is intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice daily) for 14–28 days (category Ib recommendation).
-
•
Immediate optimization of HAART should be considered (category IV recommendation).
CMV colitis has traditionally been treated with ganciclovir 5 mg/kg bd iv for 14–28 days [62]. Caution should be used in initiating treatment with the oral medication valganciclovir as there is a theoretical concern of decreased absorption, but HIV and non‐HIV‐related cases of CMV colitis have been successfully treated [63]. Intravenous foscarnet (90 mg/kg twice daily) for 14–28 days is used as an alternative [64, 65].
Therapeutic drug monitoring may be required to ensure adequate HAART absorption (category IV recommendation).
Chronic maintenance therapy is not routinely recommended in gastrointestinal disease unless patients relapse after induction therapy ceases [64]. All individuals with CMV involving the gastrointestinal tract should have prompt ophthalmological evaluation to exclude concomitant CMV retinitis and if this is present treatment and secondary prophylaxis should be initiated as recommended (see section 5.1 CMV retinitis).
4.4.2.5 Impact of HAART. Continuous use of effective HAART is required to prevent relapse.
4.4.3 Cryptosporidium spp
4.4.3.1 Background and epidemiology. Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite, was the most common pathogen in HIV‐antibody‐positive individuals with chronic diarrhoea in the pre‐HAART era. Those at greatest risk of infection are individuals with a CD4 count <100 cells/μL [66]. It predominantly infects the small bowel mucosa, but in the immunocompromised patient, the large bowel and extraintestinal sites may be involved. The most common species infecting humans in the UK are C. hominis and the zoonotic species C. parvum and C. meleagridis [67]. In areas with a low rate of environmental contamination and where HAART is widely available, cryptosporidiosis has an incidence of<1 per 100 person‐years among HIV‐seropositive individuals. Ingestion of cryptosporidium oocysts leads to transmission of the parasite. Faeces from infected animals, including humans, can contaminate the water supply with viable oocysts, which are highly resistant to chlorination. Transmission may also occur during sex, particularly via the faecal–oral route [68].
4.4.3.2 Presentation. Cryptosporidiosis should be considered in any individual with an acute or subacute history of profuse, non‐bloody watery diarrhoea. In immunocompetent individuals, cryptosporidiosis presents as an acute, self‐limiting diarrhoeal illness, which may be accompanied by nausea, abdominal cramps and low‐grade pyrexia, lasting up to 14 days. In HIV‐seropositive individuals with a CD4 count <50 cells/μL there is a worsening of these symptoms, and stool volumes of up to 24 litres per day have been described, although more commonly, 2–3 litres per day are passed [69]. Malabsorption may be present.
As the epithelium of both the pancreatic duct and biliary tract can be infected, cholangitis and pancreatitis may occur in individuals with prolonged infection [70]. Sclerosing cholangitis presents with right upper quadrant pain, vomiting and raised alkaline phosphatase levels.
4.4.3.3 Diagnosis. The diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is made by a stool flotation method with subsequent Ziehl–Neelsen, auramine phenol or acid‐fast trichrome staining to differentiate oocysts from yeasts [71]. Oocysts may be detected more easily by direct immunofluorescence or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay [72], which have a similar sensitivity to PCR techniques [73]. In individuals with profuse diarrhoea, cryptosporidiosis may be detected in a single stool sample, but multiple samples may be required in those with less severe infection as oocyst excretion may be intermittent.
Small bowel and rectal histology may be useful although the latter has a low sensitivity for diagnosis. In individuals with abdominal pain, endoscopic retrograde cholangio‐pancreatography (ERCP) may reveal ampullary stenosis and sclerosing cholangitis with associated thickening of the gall bladder wall.
4.4.3.4 Treatment. There is no specific treatment targeting cryptosporidium directly. Early HAART is imperative and is associated with complete resolution of infection following restoration of immune function [74, 75]. In individuals with profuse diarrhoea, therapeutic drug monitoring may be required to confirm adequate absorption of antiretroviral agents.
Paromomycin is active in animal models [76], although a recent meta‐analysis has shown no evidence for clinical effectiveness [77]. A study combining paromomycin with azithromycin reported substantial reduction in stool frequency and volume, together with diminished oocyst shedding [78]. Paromomycin was given orally as 500 mg four times daily or 1 g twice daily for up to 12 weeks. The dose of azithryomycin was 500 mg daily. However the small numbers in this study and the limited experience of this combination preclude its choice as a front line therapy. Nitazoxanide has been approved for use in immunocompetent individuals but has not been shown to be superior to placebo in the severely immunocompromised [79]. If used, nitazoxanide is given at a dose of 500 mg twice daily for 3 days, but may be required for up to 12 weeks. Trials have also investigated a larger dose of 1 g bd po [80]. When an anti‐cryptosporidial agent is chosen nitazoxanide is the preferred agent but its efficacy is limited in more immunocompromised patients.
Supportive therapy with iv fluid replacement/antimotility agents is essential.
-
•
First‐line treatment for cryptosporidiosis is with effective antiretroviral therapy (category recommendation III).
-
•
Nitazoxanide is effective in adults and children who are not severely immunosuppressed (category IIb recommendation).
4.4.3.5 Impact of HAART. The use of optimized HAART should be continued to prevent relapse
4.4.3.6 Prevention. Standard drinking water chlorination techniques are not sufficient to eradicate the parasite. Specific filtration employing an ‘absolute’ 1‐micron filter is required [81]. Bottled water is not necessarily a safer option. Boiling of water should be advocated.
4.4.4 Microsporidiosis
4.4.4.1 Background and epidemiology. Microsporidiosis, due to obligate intracellular parasites related to fungi, occurs in severely immunocompromised individuals, most commonly in those with a CD4 count <100 cells/μL [82, 83]. Some species cause gastrointestinal disturbance, such as diarrhoea and cholangitis, and other genera are associated with upper respiratory and ophthalmic infections.
The microsporidia most commonly linked to gastrointestinal illness are Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon (formerly Septata) intestinalis. Gut infection is acquired by swallowing cysts, usually in water [82]. Pre‐HAART studies showed variability in the prevalence of microsporidiosis (2–70%) in the immunosuppressed HIV population with diarrhoea [82, 83]. The incidence has decreased with the introduction of HAART.
4.4.4.2 Presentation. Watery, non‐bloody diarrhoea, with associated malabsorption, is the commonest presentation of gastrointestinal infection. Sclerosing cholangitis may occur. Encephalitis, sinusitis, myositis, renal, ocular and disseminated infection have also been described.
4.4.4.3 Diagnosis. Examination of three stools with chromotrope and chemofluorescent stains is often sufficient for diagnosis. If stool samples are consistently negative, a small bowel biopsy should be performed [84]. Stains such as Giemsa, acid‐fast or haematoxylin and eosin can be used to visualize microsporidia in biopsy specimens [85]. In disseminated infections due to Encephalitozoon spp, organisms may also be found in the deposit of spun urine samples.
Electron microscopy remains the gold standard for confirmation and speciation [86]. PCR may be used to identify to species level.
4.4.4.4 Treatment. There is no specific treatment for microsporidial infection. Early HAART is imperative and associated with complete resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms following restoration of immune function [74, 87]. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be required to confirm adequate absorption of antiretroviral agents. Thalidomide may be effective for symptom control in some individuals [88].
E. bieneusi may respond to oral fumagillin (20 mg three times daily for 14 days) [89], but with significant haematological toxicity [91]. This agent is not currently widely available. Nitazoxanide, albendazole and itraconazole have also been studied. Of these agents, albendazole (400 mg twice daily for 21 days) is recommended for initial therapy, particularly for E. intestinalis (category III recommendation) [91, 92].
4.4.4.5 Impact of HAART. Optimized HAART should be used to maintain CD4 cell counts and prevent relapse.
4.4.4.6 Prevention. As for Cryptosporidium.
4.4.5 Other parasites and helminths causing diarrhoea (usually chronic)
4.4.5.1 Background. Faecal carriage and clinical illness due to parasites such as Giardia lamblia (intestinalis) and Entamoeba histolytica/dispar were described in homosexual men before the HIV epidemic, reflecting increased risk behaviour [93, 94, 95], see Table 4.3.
Table 4.3.
Treatment for selected parasites in association with HIV
| Parasite | Diagnosis | Treatment | Impact of HAART |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclospora cayetanensis | ZN or auramine staining of faeces. Oocysts can also be seen using phase contrast microscopy, and PCR‐based diagnostic methods have been developed | TMP‐SMX 960 mg bd for 7 days Alternatives include ciprofloxacin 500 mg bd but response slower and incomplete | Antibiotic prophylaxis required until effective response to ART [91, 92] |
| Entamoeba histolytica | Faecal microscopy with or without faecal antigen/PCR or colonic biopsy. Serology and imaging for extraintestinal disease | Metronidazole 800 mg tid for 10 days or tinidazole 2 g once a day for 3 days followed by either diloxanide fuorate 500 mg tid po for 10 days or paromomycin 30 mg/kg/day in three divided doses po for 10 days | Nil |
| Giardia lamblia | Faecal microscopy or faecal antigen detection ELISA. Rarely, duodenal biopsy or duodenal fluid sample for microscopy | Metronidazole 400 mg tid for 7 days or 1 g daily po for 3 days Alternative is tinidazole 2 g po once only or 500 mg bd for 7 days | Nil |
| Isospora belli | Direct microscopy of iodine‐stained faecal smears or fluorescence microscopy, but most laboratories rely on faecal stains including ZN, auramine or safranin‐methylene blue | TMP‐SMX 960 mg bd for 7 days Alternatives include TMP‐SMX 960 mg qid for 10 days or ciprofloxacin 500 mg bd but response is slower and incomplete with ciprofloxacin | Antibiotic prophylaxis required until effective response to ART |
| Strongyloides stercoralis | Stool culture to detect larvae in faeces. It may be found in duodenal biopsies or by string test | Preferred choice is oral ivermectin (200 μg/kg once or twice only). Alternatives include albendazole 400 mg bd for 3 days |
ZN, Ziehl–Neelsen.
4.4.5.2 Giardiasis. Giardiasis usually presents with chronic diarrhoea with constitutional symptoms. GI symptoms include nausea, bloating, crampy abdominal pain, indigestion and belching. Prolonged diarrhoea may result in a malabsorptive state. Giardiasis is treated with metronidazole 400 mg tid po for 7 days or 1 g daily for 3 days, or tinidazole 500 mg bd po for 7 days or 2 g once only po (category III recommendation) [96], see Table 4.3. Alternatives include albendazole, paromomycin or nitazoxanide [79, 97, 98, 99, 100].
4.4.5.3 Amoebiasis. Entamoeba histolytica is a protozoan that causes intestinal infection including colitis and extra‐intestinal invasive disease, most commonly liver abscesses. Entamoeba infection is most commonly seen in men who have sex with men [101]. Fever, abdominal pain and either watery or bloody diarrhoea are the most frequent symptoms and amoebic colitis occurs at a range of CD4 counts and is not limited to individuals with CD4 T‐cell counts <200 cells/μL [102]. Hepatic abscesses are the commonest extra‐intestinal manifestation. Diagnosis involves microscopy of at least three stool samples for the detection of trophozoites or cysts. Antigen detection or PCR of stool may also be performed and endoscopy with biopsy can aid diagnosis if stool analysis fails to confirm the diagnosis or diagnostic uncertainty remains. Serology can be employed but remains positive for years after exposure and therefore direct identification of entamoeba is desirable. Extra‐intestinal lesions are diagnosed in the appropriate clinical setting by imaging combined with serology. Treatment is most often with metronidazole 800 mg tid po for 10 days although tinidazole 2 g once a day po for three days may be used as an alternative. These agents are followed by diloxanide fuorate 500 mg tid po or paromomycin 30 mg/kg/day in three divided doses po, both administered for 10 days, to eradicate luminal infection. Good responses to metronidazole‐based therapy are described for HIV‐seropositive individuals [102].
4.4.5.4 Cyclospora Cayetanensis. Cyclospora cayetanensis, a coccidian parasite of the small bowel, is widespread throughout the tropics and has caused large outbreaks of food‐borne illness in the USA in imported foods. It causes prolonged watery diarrhoea that may last for months in patients with HIV, in whom biliary involvement has also been reported [103, 104].
The diagnosis involves the microscopic detection of oocysts but fluorescence microscopy and real‐time PCR may be used, where available [104]. The clinical and parasitological response to standard doses of TMP‐SMX (960 mg twice daily) is rapid and 7 days is usually sufficient [105]. Ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily is an alternative but response is slower and incomplete (category IIb) [105]. Relapses are described in over 40% of HIV‐seropositive patients and secondary prophylaxis with TMP‐SMX (960 mg three times a week) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg three times a week) is needed in the absence of effective ART [103, 105].
4.4.5.5 Isospora belli. Isospora belli has no known animal host but is widespread geographically, causing self‐limiting small bowel diarrhoea in HIV‐seronegative individuals. It is implicated in 10–20% of cases of chronic HIV‐related diarrhoea in the tropics and is an occasional cause of biliary disease. Treatment traditionally has been with TMP‐SMX 960 mg qid po for 10 days though 960 mg bd appears also to be effective (category III recommendation) [105, 106] and secondary prophylaxis with the same antibiotic (960 mg three times a week) is essential as relapse is common and there is indirect [107] and direct evidence for efficacy [105, 106]. Ciprofloxacin is a less effective alternative for both treatment and prophylaxis [105]. Anecdotal reports suggest possible roles for pyrimethamine 75 mg/day for treatment and 25 mg/day for secondary prophylaxis in patients who are allergic to sulphonamides [108].
4.4.5.6 Strongyloides stercoralis. Strongyloides stercoralis is a gut nematode that causes chronic gastrointestinal and skin problems due to its autoinfective life‐cycle, and can disseminate to cause life‐threatening hyperinfection syndromes in the immunosuppressed [99, 109, 110, 111]. Despite anecdotal reports, there is no conclusive evidence that infection or hyperinfection is more common in patients with HIV, although it may be implicated in immune reconstitution syndromes [112]. Corticosteroid use remains a major factor in case reports of hyperinfection syndrome of HIV‐seropositive individuals [113]. Eosinophilia is present in most but not all patients. Uncomplicated infection is treated with ivermectin 200 μg/kg once a day po for 1 or 2 days, which is more effective than the alternative treatment of albendazole 400 mg bd po for 3 days [114, 115, 116] (category III recommendation). Case reports in HIV‐seropositive individuals highlight the importance of following stool specimens and repeating treatment when parasites are apparent again. Some physicians repeat the initial 2 days of ivermectin treatment after 2 weeks [117]. Hyperinfection is treated with 14 days' therapy or longer until larvae clear. The basis of these recommendations, however, is largely from studies in non‐HIV‐related cases, although case reports of treatment in HIV exist [98]. Serology and stool examination should be checked at intervals over the first 2 years after treatment as autoinfective migrating larvae may not be eradicated by initial treatment.
4.5 References
- 1. Brook G, Main J, Nelson M et al BHIVA Viral Hepatitis Working Group British HIV Association guidelines for the management of coinfection with HIV‐1 and hepatitis B or C virus 2010. HIV Med 2010; 11: 1–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gaitán‐Cepeda LA, Martínez‐González M, Ceballos‐Salobreña A. Oral candidosis as a clinical marker of immune failure in patients with HIV/AIDS on HAART. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2005; 19: 70–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ramírez‐Amador V, Ponce‐de‐León S, Anaya‐Saavedra G, Crabtree Ramírez B, Sierra‐Madero J. Oral lesions as clinical markers of highly active antiretroviral therapy failure: a nested case-control study in Mexico City. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 925–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pienaar ED, Young T, Holmes H. Interventions for the prevention and management of oropharyngeal candidiasis associated with HIV infection in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 3: CD003940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yap I, Guan R, Kang JY, Gwee KA, Tan CC. Pill‐induced esophageal ulcer. Singapore Med J 1993; 34: 257–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kadayifci A, Gulsen MT, Koruk M, Savas MC. Doxycycline‐induced pill esophagitis. Dis Esophagus 2004; 17: 168–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wilcox CM, Alexander LN, Clark WS, Thompson SE. Fluconazole compared with endoscopy for human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients with esophageal symptoms. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 1803–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Barbaro G, Barbarini G, Calderon W, Grisorio B, Alcini P, Di Lorenzo G. Fluconazole versus itraconazole for candida esophagitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Candida Esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 1169–1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Villanueva A, Gotuzzo E, Arathoon EG et al A randomized double‐blind study of caspofungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Am J Med 2002; 113: 294–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Arathoon EG, Gotuzzo E, Noriega LM, Berman RS, DiNubile MJ, Sable CA. Randomized, double‐blind, multicenter study of caspofungin versus amphotericin B for treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 451–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dieterich CT, Wilcox CM. Diagnosis and treatment of esophageal diseases associated with HIV infection. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2265–2269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Revankar SG, Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK et al A randomized trial of continuous or intermittent therapy with fluconazole for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV‐infected patients: clinical outcomes and development of fluconazole resistance. Am J Med 1998; 105: 7–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pagani JL, Chave JP, Casjka C, Glauser MP, Bille J. Efficacy, tolerability and development of resistance in HIV‐positive patients treated with fluconazole for secondary prevention of oropharyngeal candidiasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 50: 231–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wilcox CM, Schwartz DA, Clark WS. Esophageal ulceration in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Causes, response to therapy, and long‐term outcome. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 143–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wilcox CM, Straub RF, Schwartz DA. Cytomegalovirus esophagitis in AIDS: a prospective evaluation of clinical response to ganciclovir therapy, relapse rate, and long-term outcome. Am J Med 1995; 98: 169–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Singh N, Wannstedt C, Keyes L et al Valganciclovir as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus in cytomegalovirus‐seronegative liver transplant recipients of cytomegalovirus‐seropositive donor allografts. Liver Transpl 2008; 14: 240–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wilcox CM, Monkemuller KE. Review article: the therapy of gastrointestinal infections associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997; 11: 425–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zolopa A, Andersen J, Powderly W et al Early antiretroviral therapy reduces AIDS progression/death in individuals with acute opportunistic infections: a multicenter randomized strategy trial. PLoS One 2009; 4: e5575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cauda R, Tacconelli E, Tumbarello M et al Role of protease inhibitors in preventing recurrent oral candidosis in patients with HIV infection: a prospective case-control study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1999; 21: 20–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cunningham AL, Grohman GS, Harkness J et al Gastrointestinal viral infections in homosexual men who were symptomatic and seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 1988; 158: 386–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cunliffe NA, Gondwe JS, Kirkwood CD et al Effect of concomitant HIV infection on presentation and outcome of rotavirus gastroenteritis in Malawian children. Lancet 2001; 358: 550–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wanke CA, Mayer H, Weber R, Zbinden R, Watson DA, Acheson D. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as a potential cause of diarrheal disease in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 1998; 178: 185–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Huang DB, Mohanty A, DuPont HL, Okhuysen PC, Chiang T. A review of an emerging enteric pathogen: enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55: 1303–1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bartlett JG, Belitsos PC, Sears CL. AIDS enteropathy. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 15: 726–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Carlson S, Yokoo H, Craig RM. Small intestinal HIV‐associated enteropathy: evidence for panintestinal enterocyte dysfunction. J Lab Clin Med 1994; 124: 652–659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Schmidt W, Schneider T, Heise W et al Stool viruses, coinfections, and diarrhea in HIV‐infected patients. Berlin Diarrhea/Wasting Syndrome Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996; 13: 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Thomas PD, Pollok RC, Gazzard BG. Enteric viral infections as a cause of diarrhoea in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV Med 1999; 1: 19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sanchez TH, Brooks JT, Sullivan PS et al Bacterial diarrhea in persons with HIV infection, United States, 1992–2002. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41: 1621–1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jacobs JL, Gold JW, Murray HW, Roberts RB, Armstrong D. Salmonella infections in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 186–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Smith PD, Macher AM, Bookman MA et al Salmonella typhimurium enteritis and bacteremia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 207–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Tocalli L, Nardi G, Mammino A, Salvaggio A, Salvaggio L. Salmonellosis diagnosed by the laboratory of the ‘L. Sacco’ Hospital of Milan (Italy) in patients with HIV disease. Eur J Epidemiol 1991; 7: 690–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Conlon CP, Pinching AJ, Perera CU, Moody A, Luo NP, Lucas SB. HIV‐related enteropathy in Zambia: a clinical, microbiological and histological study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1990; 42: 83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gilks CF, Brindle RJ, Otieno LS et al Life‐threatening bacteraemia in HIV seropositive adults admitted to hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. Lancet 1990; 336: 545–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Drew WL, Buhles W, Erlich KS. Herpesvirus infections (cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, varicella‐zoster virus). How to use ganciclovir (DHPG) and acyclovir. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1988; 2: 495–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nelson MR, Shanson DC, Hawkins DA, Gazzard BG. Salmonella, campylobacter and shigella in HIV‐seropositive patients. AIDS 1992; 6: 1495–1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bottone EJ, Wormser GP, Duncanson FP. Nontyphoidal Salmonella bacteremia as an early infection in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1984; 2: 247–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Peters RP, Zijlstra EE, Schijffelen MJ et al A prospective study of bloodstream infections as cause of fever in Malawi: clinical predictors and implications for management. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9: 928–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Chierakul W, Rajanuwong A, Wuthiekanun V et al The changing pattern of bloodstream infections associated with the rise in HIV prevalence in northeastern Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2004; 98: 678–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Blanshard C, Francis N, Gazzard BG. Investigation of chronic diarrhoea in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. A prospective study of 155 patients. Gut 1996; 39: 824–832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zulu I, Kelly P, Mwansa J, Veitch A, Farthing MJ. Contrasting incidence of Clostridium difficile and other enteropathogens in AIDS patients in London and Lusaka. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000; 94: 167–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wongwanich S, Ramsiri S, Kusum M, Warachit P. Clostridium difficile infections in HIV‐positive patients. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2000; 31: 537–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Pulvirenti JJ, Mehra T, Hafiz I et al Epidemiology and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection and diarrhea in HIV infected inpatients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 44: 325–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hutin Y, Casin I, Lesprit P et al Prevalence of and risk factors for Clostridium difficile colonization at admission to an infectious diseases ward. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 920–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Molina J, Casin I, Hausfater P et al Campylobacter infections in HIV‐infected patients: clinical and bacteriological features. AIDS 1995; 9: 881–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Baer JT, Vugia DJ, Reingold AL et al HIV infection as a risk factor for shigellosis. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 820–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lu SS, Schwartz JM, Simon DM, Brandt LJ. Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in patients with HIV positivity and AIDS: a prospective controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 1226–1229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bartlett JG. Changing trends in bacterial infections: Staphylococcus aureus, bacterial pneumonia, Clostridium difficile. Top HIV Med 2007; 15: 94–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Cozart JC, Kalangi SS, Clench MH et al Clostridium difficile diarrhea in patients with AIDS versus non‐AIDS controls. Methods of treatment and clinical response to treatment. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993; 16: 192–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. De Toledo FG, Symes SN. Leukemoid reaction due to Clostridium difficile infection in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: two case reports and a review of the literature. South Med J 2004; 97: 388–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Department of Health and Health Protection Agency. . Clostridium difficile infection: how to deal with the problem. Department of Health 2009. Available from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_093220 (last accessed 12 August 2009).
- 51. DiRienzo AG, van Der Horst C, Finkelstein DM, Frame P, Bozzette SA, Tashima KT. Efficacy of trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of bacterial infections in a randomized prophylaxis trial of patients with advanced HIV infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2002; 18: 89–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Casado JL, Valdezate S, Calderon C et al Zidovudine therapy protects against Salmonella bacteremia recurrence in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients. J Infect Dis 1999; 179: 1553–1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hung CC, Hung MN, Hsueh PR et al Risk of recurrent nontyphoid Salmonella bacteremia in HIV‐infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy and an increasing trend of fluoroquinolone resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: e60–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Sia IG, Patel R. New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid‐organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13: 83–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Gallant JE, Moore RD, Richman DD, Chaisson RE. Incidence and natural history of cytomegalovirus disease in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease treated with zidovudine. The Zidovudine Epidemiology Study Group. J Infect Dis 1992; 166: 1223–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Shepp DH, Moses JE, Kaplan MH. Seroepidemiology of cytomegalovirus in patients with advanced HIV disease: influence on disease expression and survival. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996; 11: 460–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Jacobson MA, Stanley H, Holtzer C, Margolis TP, Cunningham ET. Natural history and outcome of new AIDS‐related cytomegalovirus retinitis diagnosed in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30: 231–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zurlo JJ, O'Neill D, Polis MA et al Lack of clinical utility of cytomegalovirus blood and urine cultures in patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 12–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Edwards S, Grover D, Scott C et al Cytomegalovirus viral load testing of blood using quantitative polymerase chain reaction in acutely unwell HIV‐1 positive patients lacks diagnostic utility. Int J STD AIDS 2007; 18: 321–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Dieterich DT, Rahmin M. Cytomegalovirus colitis in AIDS: presentation in 44 patients and a review of the literature. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr 1991; 4 (Suppl. 1): 29–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Mentec H, Leport C, Leport J et al Cytomegalovirus colitis in HIV‐1‐infected patients: a prospective research in 55 patients. AIDS 1994; 8: 461–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Dieterich DT, Kotler DP, Busch DF et al Ganciclovir treatment of cytomegalovirus colitis in AIDS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. J Infect Dis 1993; 167: 278–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Siegal DS, Hamid N, Cunha BA. Cytomegalovirus colitis mimicking ischemic colitis in an immunocompetent host. Heart Lung 2005; 34: 291–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Blanshard C, Benhamou Y, Dohin E, Lernestedt JO, Gazzard BG, Katlama C. Treatment of AIDS‐associated gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus infection with foscarnet and ganciclovir: a randomized comparison. J Infect Dis 1995; 172: 622–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Nelson MR, Connolly GM, Hawkins DA, Gazzard BG. Foscarnet in the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection of the esophagus and colon in patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 876–881. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Flanigan T, Whalen C, Turner J et al Cryptosporidium infection and CD4 counts. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 840–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. McLauchlin J, Amar C, Pedraza‐Diaz S, Nichols GL. Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1,705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 3984–3990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Stark D, Fotedar R, van Hal S et al Prevalence of enteric protozoa in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive and HIV‐negative men who have sex with men from Sydney, Australia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007; 76: 549–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Pitlik SD, Fainstein V, Garza D et al Human cryptosporidiosis: spectrum of disease. Report of six cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143: 2269–2275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Ducreux M, Buffet C, Lamy P et al Diagnosis and prognosis of AIDS‐related cholangitis. AIDS 1995; 9: 875–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Ignatius R, Lehmann M, Miksits K et al A new acid‐fast trichrome stain for the simultaneous detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and microsporidial species in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 446–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY. Evaluation of nine immunoassay kits (enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence) for detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 1526–1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bialek R, Binder N, Dietz K, Joachim A, Knobloch J, Zelck UE. Comparison of fluorescence, antigen and PCR assays to detect Cryptosporidium parvum in fecal specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 43: 283–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Carr A, Marriott D, Field A, Vasak E, Cooper DA. Treatment of HIV‐1‐associated microsporidiosis and cryptosporidiosis with combination antiretroviral therapy. Lancet 1998; 351: 256–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Miao YM, Awad‐El‐Kariem FM, Franzen C et al Eradication of cryptosporidia and microsporidia following successful antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000; 25: 124–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Tzipori S, Rand W, Griffiths J, Widmer G, Crabb J. Evaluation of an animal model system for cryptosporidiosis: therapeutic efficacy of paromomycin and hyperimmune bovine colustrum-immunoglobulin. Clin Diag Lab Immunol 1994; 1: 450–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Abubakar I, Aliyu S, Arumugam C, Usman NK, Hunter PR. Treatment of cryptosporidiosis in immunocompromised individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: 387–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Smith NH, Cron S, Valdez LM, Chappell CL, White AC Jr Combination drug therapy for cryptosporidiosis in AIDS. J Infect Dis 1998; 178: 900–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Fox LM, Saravolatz LD. Nitazoxanide: a new thiazolide antiparasitic agent. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40: 1173–1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Rossignol JF, Hidalgo H, Feregrino M et al A double‐‘blind’ placebo‐controlled study of nitazoxanide in the treatment of cryptosporidial diarrhoea in AIDS patients in Mexico. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92: 663–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Addiss DG, Pond RS, Remshak M, Juranek DD, Stokes S, Davis JP. Reduction of risk of watery diarrhea with point‐of‐use water filters during a massive outbreak of waterborne Cryptosporidium infection in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1993. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1996; 54: 549–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Mathis A, Weber R, Deplazes P. Zoonotic potential of the microsporidia. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18: 423–445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Didier ES. Microsporidiosis: an emerging and opportunistic infection in humans and animals. Acta Trop 2005; 94: 61–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Oldfield EC. Evaluation of chronic diarrhoea in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2002; 2: 176–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Weiss LM, Vossbrinck CR. Microsporidiosis: molecular and diagnostic aspects. Adv Parasitol 1998; 40: 351–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Curry A. Electron microscopy and the investigation of new infectious diseases. Int J Infect Dis 2003; 7: 251–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Maggi P, Larocca AM, Quarto M et al Effect of antiretroviral therapy on cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 19: 213–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Sharpstone D, Rowbottom A, Francis N et al Thalidomide: a novel therapy for microsporidiosis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1823–1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Molina JM, Goguel J, Sarfati C et al Trial of oral fumagillin for the treatment of intestinal microsporidiosis in patients with HIV infection. AIDS 2000; 14: 1341–1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Molina JM, Tourneur M, Sarfati C et al Fumagillin treatment of intestinal microsporidiosis. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1963–1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Dietrerich DT, Lew EA, Kotler DP, Poles MA, Orenstein JM. Treatment with albendazole for intestinal disease due to Enterocytozoon bieneusi in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis 1994; 169: 178–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Molina JM, Chastang C, Goguel J et al Albendazole for treatment and prophylaxis of microsporidiosis due to Encephalitozoon intestinalis in patients with AIDS: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. J Infect Dis 1998; 177: 1373–1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Babb RR. Sexually transmitted infections in homosexual men. Postgrad Med 1979; 65: 215–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Keystone JS, Keystone DL, Proctor EM. Intestinal parasitic infections in homosexual men: prevalence, symptoms and factors in transmission. Can Med Assoc J 1980; 123: 512–514. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Phillips SC, Mildvan D, William DC, Gelb AM, White MC. Sexual transmission of enteric protozoa and helminths in a venereal‐disease‐clinic population. N Engl J Med 1981; 305: 603–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Gardner TB, Hill DR. Treatment of giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14: 114–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Farthing MJ. Treatment options for the eradication of intestinal protozoa. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 3: 436–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Lewthwaite P, Gill GV, Hart CA, Beeching NJ. Gastrointestinal parasites in the immunocompromised. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2005; 18: 427–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Lean S, Pollok RC. Management of protozoa‐related diarrhea in HIV infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2003; 1: 455–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Lowther SA, Dworkin MS, Hanson DL. Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar infections in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30: 955–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Hung CC, Ji DD, Sun HY et al Increased risk for Entamoeba histolytica infection and invasive amebiasis in HIV seropositive men who have sex with men in Taiwan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008; 2: e175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Pape JW, Verdier RI, Boncy M, Boncy J, Johnson WD Jr Cyclospora infection in adults infected with HIV: clinical manifestations, treatment, and prophylaxis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 654–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Sifuentes‐Osornio J, Porras‐Cortes G, Bendall RP, Morales‐Villareal F, Reyes‐Teran G, Ruiz‐Palacios GM. Cyclospora cayetanensis infection in patients with and without AIDS: biliary disease as another clinical manifestation. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21: 1092–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Verweij JJ, Laeijendecker D, Brienen EA, van Lieshout L, Polderman AM. Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in travellers returning from the tropics and subtropics using microscopy and real‐time PCR. Int J Med Microbiol 2003; 293: 199–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Verdier RI, Fitzgerald DW, Johnson WD Jr, Pape JW. Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole compared with ciprofloxacin for treatment and prophylaxis of Isospora belli and Cyclospora cayetanensis infection in HIV‐infected patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 885–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Pape JW, Verdier RI, Johnson WD Jr Treatment and prophylaxis of Isospora belli infections in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. New Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1044–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Sorvillo FJ, Leib LE, Seidel J, Kerndt P, Turner J, Ash LR. Epidemiology of isosporiasis among persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Los Angeles County. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 53: 656–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Weiss LM, Perlman DC, Sherman J, Tanowitz H, Wittner M. Isospora belli infection: treatment with pyrimethamine. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 474–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Lim S, Katz K, Krajden S, Fuksa M, Keystone JS, Kain KC. Complicated and fatal strongyloides infection in Canadians: risk factors, diagnosis and management. CMAJ 2004; 171: 479–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Keiser PB, Nutman TB. Strongyloides stercoralis in the immunocompromised population. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004; 17: 208–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Concha R, Harrington W Jr, Rogers AI. Intestinal strongyloidiasis: recognition, management and determinants of outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39: 203–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Viney ME, Brown M, Omoding NE et al Why does HIV infection not lead to disseminated strongyloidiasis? J Infect Dis 2004; 190: 2175–2180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Currie BJ, McCarthy JS. Strongyloides stercoralis infection as a manifestation of immune restoration syndrome? Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40: 635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Zaha O, Hirata T, Uchima N, Kinjo F, Saito A. Comparison of anthelmintic effects of two doses of ivermectin on intestinal strongyloidiasis in patients negative or positive for anti‐HTLV‐1 antibody. J Infect Chemother 2004; 10: 348–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Johnston FH, Morris PS, Speare R et al Strongyloidiasis: a review of the evidence for Australian practitioners. Aust J Rural Health 2005; 13: 247–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Suputtamongkol Y, Kungpanichkul N, Silpasakorn S, Beeching NJ. Efficacy and safety of a single‐dose veterinary preparation of ivermectin versus 7‐day high‐dose albendazole for chronic strongyloidiasis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 31: 46–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Heath T, Riminton S, Garsia R, MacLeod C. Systemic strongyloidiasis complicating HIV: a promising response to ivermectin. Int J STD AIDS 1996; 7: 294–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
