Thoracic ultrasound and SARS-COVID-19: a pictorial essay

Abstract

Thoracic ultrasound seems to adapt to the screening for lung involvement of patients with suspected or ascertained SARS-COVID-19 infection due to its characteristics of easy applicability. It can be also a relevant method in monitoring patients. B lines are early finding of COVID-19, even in mild-symptomatic subjects; in the most serious cases such as pre-ARDS or ARDS, the B lines end up filling the ultrasound image almost completely, until it merges, so as to create a single hyperechoic image named as “white lung”, with distortion and irregularity of the pleural line. In advanced stage, lung consolidations are present, representing pulmonary pathological areas that are no longer normally ventilated.

A novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was identified in hospitalized patients in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and January 2020 [1]. Coronaviruses are enveloped, non-segmented positive-sense RNA viruses belonging to the family Coronaviridae and the order Nidovirales. They are broadly distributed in humans and other mammals [2]. The number of patients affected by COVID-19 is rapidly increasing almost all over the world.

The following procedure has been suggested for diagnosis of patients with suspected infection: performing real-time fluorescence (RT-PCR) to detect the positive nucleic acid of SARS-CoV-2 in sputum, throat swabs, and secretions of the lower respiratory tract samples [3].

Preliminary data have shown that once infected, patients display an extremely variable clinical course, from mild symptoms (fever and cough) to bilateral interstitial pneumonia. In the most serious cases, infection progresses into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with diffuse alveolar consolidations (diffuse patchy-like lesions) [4]. Furthermore, recent reports have classified patients into different clinical phenotypes from 1 to 5, with increasing clinical severity up to pre-ARDS (phenotype 4) and ARDS (phenotype 5).

Symptoms are very not specific, especially at an early stage, since they are common to most upper and lower airway diseases. The specific etiological diagnosis is performed through laboratory methods, but the main concern is to direct the patient to the best care setting (home observation, medical department/infectious disease clinic, sub-intensive ward or ICU).

Imaging methods are employed to assess the degree of lung involvement. The typical computed tomography (CT) feature of a patient with acute COVID-19 infection is that of ground-glass opacities (GGO) or mixed GGO, consolidation and vascular enlargement [5, 6]; lesions are more likely to display a peripheral distribution and bilateral involvement, and to be lower lung predominant [5, 6]. Although chest CT seems to be the method of choice, it is burdened by the risk of radiation exposure and concerns related to infection risk and the transport of the critical patient.

Thoracic ultrasound is an easy-to-learn and reliable method [7–13]. No advanced machinery or software is required. In an emergency setting or at bedside, the use of pocket-size ultrasound seems to be optimal. It is essential for the clinician to know and implement personal safety procedures before starting the examination. In particular, the physician performing the ultrasound must wear appropriate PPE. In case of a COVID-19 + patient with respiratory symptoms, these items are a surgical mask, gloves, a waterproof gown, and goggles or a visor; in the case of high risk of exposure to aerosols (patients subjected to continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation), the use of a FFP2/3 mask, a double pair of gloves, goggles or a visor and boots is recommended. Ultrasound machine and probes must be disinfected with alcohol-based disinfectants before and after ultrasound, and thus equipped with disposable protective materials (probe cover).

The probe can be used as a stethoscope to auscultate/scan any portion of the lung not covered by bones. In practice, there are ultrasound scan protocols in emergency settings that provide for a minimum of 6–8 scans per hemithorax on a patient on supine position (2/4 anterior, 2 lateral and 2 posterior) [8, 12, 13]. One of the main limitations of thoracic ultrasound is that it cannot be used to examine the deep fields of the lung due to air interface and artifacts, but the physiopathology of COVID-19 disease provides for a predominant involvement of the pulmonary periphery [5, 6], thus favoring the application of the method.

The main ultrasound finding in COVID-19 pneumonia is that of an acute interstitial disease, which is represented by vertical hyperechoic artifacts that depart from the pleural line directed in depth. These are called B lines [14, 15]. If ≤ 3 B lines on a scan are physiological, especially in the middle-basal fields, the presence of a greater number is pathological, and the number of B lines correlates with disease severity (Figs. 1, 2, 3).

Fig. 1.

Lateral chest scan. Single vertical hyperechoic artifact originating from the pleural line, called “B line”

Fig. 2.

Posterior chest area scan. Vertical artifacts (“B lines”), isolated and non-confluent

Fig. 3–4.

Lateral chest scans. Vertical artifacts (“B lines”), numerous and coalescent at a stretch of pleural line of increased thickness

Indeed, the presence of some B lines spread over several scans seems to be an early finding of COVID-19, even in mildly symptomatic subjects; in the most serious cases such as those that are pre-ARDS or ARDS, the B lines end up filling the ultrasound image almost completely, until they merge, creating a single hyperechoic image identified as “white lung” and distortion and irregularity of the pleural line (Figs. 4, 5).

Fig. 5.

Postero-basal chest scan. Lung field is occupied by numerous B lines that come together to form a single hyperechoic image. This aspect is named “white lung,” referring to the ground-glass opacities found in the computed chest tomography

Initially, those ultrasound findings were related to cardiogenic pulmonary edema, in which the B lines are present bilaterally, with a base-apex gradient and with progressive involvement depending on the severity of the disease [7]. Moreover, B lines are also found in other diseases such as bruises, chronic fibrotic lung diseases and ARDS. ARDS can be distinguished from cardiogenic pulmonary edema by the presence of multifocal and diffuse lung alterations, without a base–apex gradient, while chronic interstitial diseases differ by an extreme irregularity of the pleural line, which can be thickened and distorted, with the presence of focal subpleural interruptions (consolidations), and by the presence of uneven and irregular vertical artifacts (B lines) [7, 16, 17].

The difference between the features of B lines found in cardiogenic interstitial edema and chronic fibrosing pathologies has recently led to new proposals for reclassification of the types of artifacts [18, 19]. The ultrasound pattern of COVID-19 pneumonia seems to be very similar to that found in patients suffering from chronic pulmonary fibrosis; both are based on a prevalent interstitial involvement. In the most severe and advanced forms, lung consolidations are present, representing pulmonary pathological areas that are no longer normally ventilated (Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9).

Fig. 6.

Longitudinal posterior chest scan. Coarse subpleural thickening with very irregular margins

Fig. 7.

Lateral chest scan. Coarse supleural thickening with thin aerial bronchograms

Fig. 8.

Anterior chest longitudinal scan. Minute subpleural parenchymal thickening

Fig. 9.

Posterior chest longitudinal scan. Small basal pleural effusion

In the early stage of COVID-19, lung changes are more localized, and mainly detected in the subpleural regions of one or both lungs (corresponding to patchy or segmental GGOs) (Figs. 2, 4). Later, viral infection and inflammatory response involve multiple lobes, leading to air loss and consolidations of some lesions surrounded by several B lines (Figs. 6, 7, 8). In more advanced and critical cases, ultrasound findings resemble other pneumonia features, such as diffuse consolidations in both lungs, multiple and diffuse B lines (white lung), and occasionally by small amounts of pleural effusion (Fig. 5; Table 1) [20].

Table 1.

Suggested clinical and sonographic classification of COVID-19 pneumonia

Clinical stage	Clinical findings	Ultrasound findings
I stage: simple disease	Patients with viral upper respiratory tract infection not complicated	Normal ultrasound pattern: A lines
II stage: mild pneumonia	Patient with pneumonia and no signs of severe pneumonia	Focal B lines
III stage: severe pneumonia	Fever or suspected respiratory infection, and at least one of the following: respiratory rate > 30 acts/min, severe breathing difficulties or SpO2 < 90% in ambient air	Diffuse and multifocal B lines Initial subpleuric consolidations
IV stage: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)	Respiratory failure that is not related to heart failure or overloaded with liquids. 200 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 ≤  300 mmHg (with PEEP or CPAP ≥ 5 cmH2O or not ventilated)	Diffuse and multifocal B lines Lung consolidations White lung pattern

Adapted from https://www.siaarti.it/SiteAssets/News/COVID19%20-%20documenti%20SIAARTI/Percorso%20COVID-19%20-%20Sezione%201%20%20-%20Procedura%20Area%20Critica.pdf

Therefore, thoracic ultrasound seems suitable for screening for lung involvement of patients with suspected or ascertained SARS-COVID-19 infection due to its easy applicability. It can be also a relevant method for monitoring patients. Indeed, follow-up of the previously described ultrasound findings according to the pre-established scan scheme can document improvements in or the worsening of the disease. It can thus, together with clinical-laboratory data, prompt therapeutic modifications. In an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, ultrasound can be a support for lung recruitment maneuvers, by assisting clinicians in ascertaining the possible re-expansion of the atelectasis areas (from consolidation to aerial artifacts).

Furthermore, the ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm excursion can provide relevant information about the patient's ventilatory capacity and, indirectly, about lung compliance [17, 21–23]. In this context, an ultrasound follow-up of the degree of diaphragmatic excursion could identify a worsening of the pneumonia requiring non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support, or on the contrary, an improvement, prompting a subsequent attempt to wean the patient off or downgrade the respiratory support (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm excursion. An oblique subcostal scan should be performed by convex probe (scan for the gallbladder), by adjusting the depth of the image so as to completely highlight the liver margins, with the diaphragm represented as a hyperechoic line surrounding the liver. The M-mode option is activated by centering the line on the bed of the gallbladder and evaluating the degree of excursion of the diaphragm

In conclusion, thoracic ultrasound can be used as a screening method for lung involvement in any care setting, even at the patient’s home. The pathological characteristics (B lines and consolidations) revealed by ultrasound and their extent correlate with the severity of the disease, and can be employed as a monitoring method. Ultrasound is a useful tool to support the ventilated patient in terms of assessing diaphragm mobility and supporting recruitment maneuvers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest and no funding sources.

Informed consent

Informed consent to publish figures was obtained from patients.