Skip to main content
ESC Heart Failure logoLink to ESC Heart Failure
. 2020 Jan 29;7(2):400–406. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12603

Takotsubo syndrome in Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019: highlights from the experts

Kalliopi Keramida 1,2,, Johannes Backs 3,4, Eduardo Bossone 5, Rodolfo Citro 6, Dana Dawson 7, Elmir Omerovic 8,9, Guido Parodi 10, Birke Schneider 11, Jelena R Ghadri 12, Linda W Van Laake 13, Alexander R Lyon 14
PMCID: PMC7160490  PMID: 31994355

Introduction

Heart Failure 2019 Congress, the largest congress worldwide about heart failure (HF) with more than 5400 attendees this year in Athens, covered almost every modern topic in HF, justifying the title: Heart failure from Alpha to Omega. Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), a relatively recently described clinical entity, included in the differential diagnosis of the causes of acute HF, is an important medical condition discussed at the congress. The growing understanding of its pathophysiology, the numerous challenges in its treatment but also its research interest, made TTS sessions (Table S1) popular for attendees. A range of new information and expert opinions were presented at the meeting, which we summarize in this article.

Epidemiology

Data from the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty registry confirm the preponderance of women in TTS population with a percentage of 73%.1 Men with TTS have disproportionally worse prognosis than women. From the same registry, it is obvious that TTS differs between different health care regions within Sweden with the highest reported incidence in the Western health care region, whereas mortality is higher in the Southern region.2 The temporal pattern of TTS is similar to that of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with peak during winter, while the least cases of TTS appear in spring and of ACS in summer.3

Definition

The definition of TTS according to the two most recent position papers4, 5 involves several diagnostic criteria (Figure 1 ), most of which are common and include transient regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) of the left ventricle (LV) and/or the right ventricle (RV) after a stressful trigger (emotional, physical, or combined, neurologic disorders, or pheochromocytoma), RWMAs extend beyond the distribution of a single coronary artery, new and reversible electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, elevated serum natriuretic peptides, and relatively small troponin elevation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Similarities and differences between Heart Failure Association and International Takotsubo Diagnostic Criteria.

The InterTAK diagnostic score6 includes seven criteria (female sex, physical trigger, emotional trigger, absence of ST depression, psychiatric disorder, neurologic disorders, and QTc prolongation). A score > 70 increases significantly the possibility of TTS, but as Dr Di Vece underlined, the predicted probability of TTS depends on the prevalence of the disease in the population applied and in clinical practice, coronary imaging is essential to exclude other diagnoses. LV end‐diastolic pressure may be normal, near normal, or elevated in TTS whereas it is usually elevated in ACS.7

Although transient myocardial dysfunction is considered a prerequisite in the definition of TTS, there is evidence that myocardial recovery is not full 4 months after the acute phase of TTS, demonstrated by deformation indices8 and also cardiac energetic status and intense myocardial oedema.9 Professor Dana Dawson presented the results of HEROIC study10 and even a year after the acute episode, there is persistent subclinical cardiac dysfunction. Unremitting symptoms compatible with HF, cardiac limitation on exercise testing, significantly impaired deformation mechanics, and cardiac energetic status reaffirm the long‐term structural, functional, and metabolic changes in TTS patients.

Professor Omerovic and Dr Di Vece presented two cases that proved that TTS and coronary artery disease can co‐exist. Approximately 15% of patients with TTS have concomitant coronary artery disease with significant impact upon outcomes. Another issue is that in one third of patients, there is no trigger—physical or emotional according to International Takotsubo Registry.11

RWMAs define the type of TTS with apical TTS (typical type) being the most common (~80%). Atypical types of TTS (midventricular, reversed, and focal) have distinct patterns in echocardiographic images or in ventriculography. Diagnosis of focal TTS can be challenging. Apical TTS presents with the lowest LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in the acute phase, while after 60 days, there is no significant difference in LV systolic function between the different types. There is some controversy in the literature concerning long‐term prognosis. Ghadri et al.12 reported that all TTS types have similar prognosis after 1‐year follow‐up from the large InterTak registry, while another study suggests that apical TTS is associated with higher mortality within the first 6 months but after complete recovery of LV systolic function, prognosis is the same.13 Dr Di Vece reported that patients with TTS enrolled in an Italian registry with LVEF ≤ 35% at presentation are at higher risk not only in the acute phase but also at long‐term follow‐up.14

Diagnosis

ECG changes comprising of ST segment elevation, T wave inversion, QT prolongation and less frequently left bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation, and ST depression are typical of TTS, but a normal ECG does not exclude the diagnosis.11 Dr Yoshihiru Akashi reviewed the ECG changes observed in TTS patients. Dr Akashi explained that ST depression in aVR and absence of ST elevation in V1 suggest TTS with sensitivity and specificity > 90%.15 Troponin elevation is usually disproportionally low to the extent of myocardium involved, while NT‐proBNP levels are higher at admission compared with ACS.16 Echocardiography17 and cardiac magnetic resonance18 are the main imaging modalities used in the diagnosis of TTS, and its complications provide significant prognostic information. A comprehensive diagnostic algorithm in the emergency department can be used to differentiate TTS vs. ACS or myocarditis.19

Pathophysiological insights

Several clinical and preclinical studies support the central role of sympathetic nervous system and catecholamines in TTS by inducing myocardial stunning. Dr Ciccarelli described how catecholamine levels are markedly higher in patients with TTS compared with matched controls and patients with left anterior descending artery occlusion and ST elevation myocardial infarction.20 Nonetheless, the central role of catecholamines in TTS is demonstrated by intravenous study administration of catecholamines, and beta‐receptor agonists led immediately to the development of TTS.21 Another interesting observation from preclinical studies is that norepinephrine predominately is released in basal myocardial regions where sympathetic innervation is highest, while epinephrine has the greatest effect in apical regions where β‐adrenoceptor density is highest. Norepinephrine is the main catecholamine released from sympathetic nerve endings, whereas epinephrine among circulating catecholamines. These heterogeneities may explain the RWMAs in TTS because of changes in adrenoceptor density and/or sensitivity, as well as alterations in downstream signalling pathways.22

G protein‐coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are tightly related to the adrenergic system through mechanisms of desensitization and down‐regulation, and they also seem to play a role in the pathophysiology of TTS. Specifically, L41Q polymorphism of GRK5, one of the two isoforms predominant in the heart, makes patients susceptible to TTS.23, 24 An interesting study showed that GRK2 and β‐arrestin 2 expression in the myocardium was higher in TTS than in dilated cardiomyopathy or controls in the acute phase, supporting the concept that β‐adrenergic receptors on the cell membrane are modified by GRK2 and β‐arrestin 2, confirming their role in the development of LV dysfunction in TTS.25

Risk assessment—prognosis

Professor Elmir Omerovic highlighted that TTS is not a benign condition as it is associated with significant complications such as acute HF, mitral regurgitation (MR), cardiogenic shock, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias that can impact on prognosis.4 RV involvement is present in 15% of TTS patients with increased in‐hospital rate of major adverse cardiovascular events.26 Risk stratification of patients with TTS should take into account numerous variables including age, systolic blood pressure, presence of pulmonary oedema, MR, apical thrombus, new ventricular septal defect or LV rupture and LVEF and LV outflow track obstruction (LVOTO).4 TTS has substantial morbidity and mortality, with rate of major adverse cardiovascular events 9.9% per patient‐year and rate of death 5.6% per patient‐year in the International Takotsubo Registry with long‐term follow‐up.11

Arrhythmias

In the risk stratification of patients with TTS, certain arrhythmias/ECG characteristics should be taken in account; ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, QTc >500 ms, abnormal Q wave, and prolonged ST elevation are considered factors of high‐risk patients.4 QTc prolongation is also included in the diagnostic criteria of InterTAK Diagnostic Score, adding six points to the total score.5 QRS duration on admission has significant prognostic impact, with prolonged duration associated with higher incidence of all‐cause death, cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias, atrioventricular block, use of catecholamines, and various circulatory support devices.27 Recently Jesel et al.28 showed that 105 ms is the optimal cut‐off value of QRS duration for predicting the risk of life‐threatening arrhythmias. The presence of J wave is another factor that is associated with increased risk of cardiac death and cardiac arrhythmia in TTS patients.29 Negative prognostic risk factors are also high heart rate on admission and atrial arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

Dr Olivier Morel delivered his lecture focusing on the arrhythmias seen in TTS patients and the underlying cardiac electrophysiology. The prevalence of atrial arrhythmias in TTS is 18–25%, and they are associated with higher in‐hospital mortality, 30‐day mortality, all‐cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality.30 Supraventricular arrhythmias could be related to atrial stretch/impairment, but inflammation has possibly a role too.31

The prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias is 2–10%, and the prevalence of all life‐threatening arrhythmias including torsades de pointes, ventricular fibrillation, complete heart block, sinoatrial block, asystole, and pulseless electrical activity is 13.5%.28 Most ventricular arrhythmias occur within the first 24 h and are associated with significantly worse short‐term and long‐term prognosis. Catecholamine surge, inflammation/oedema, ischaemia, and lack of estrogens are the main pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for electrical instability in TTS. Therapeutically, implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation is not indicated as the arrhythmic risk is generally transient, while there is an indication for pacemaker implantation, if atrioventricular conduction abnormalities persist.

Management

Dr Alexander Lyon reviewed the clinical management of TTS and emphasized that currently there have been no trials to guide management decisions and therefore current pathways of care are based on expert opinion and depend upon the type of TTS (primary or secondary) and the level of risk. In case of secondary TTS where there is also another medical or surgical emergency, it is important to optimize treatment of the underlying condition to lower sympathetic drive.

Lower risk patients with LVEF > 45% do not need any treatment, while if LVEF is 35–45%, an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor and a beta‐blocker are recommended in the recent Heart Failure Association (HFA) position statement.4 Dr Lyon explained that in his opinion, carvedilol is the preferred choice if there is no LVOTO, while β1 adrenergic receptor specific blockers are preferred in cases of severe LVOTO.4 Higher risk patients with TTS should be treated in coronary care unit or high dependency units setting for at least 72 h. Additionally, if there is an apical thrombus, low‐molecular‐weight heparin should be administered and then oral anticoagulation for at least 3 months. The role of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin needs to be defined.

In the advanced cases of cardiogenic shock, extra‐corporeal membrane oxygenation or left ventricular assist device should be considered, but if not available, then levosimendan can be used, starting at low dose and up‐titrating slowly. Avoidance of nebulized β2 agonists, iatrogenic catecholamines, and QTc prolonging drugs and stopping selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are also important.

Dr Lyon argued that long‐term follow‐up and care are needed in cases with ongoing cardiac symptoms and recurrent TTS. Chronic chest pain, exertional dyspnoea, and arrhythmias are the main chronic symptoms. In his experience, carvedilol, ranolazine, and diltiazem may be helpful, while non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors should be avoided. Electrophysiology review and ablation of refractory atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are the suggested treatments if symptomatic and refractory to medical therapy in patients with TTS.

Psychological support and stress management counselling are considered to play key roles in the chronic treatment of TTS patients, and support groups on Facebook or patient support websites (http://www.takotsubo.net) provide patient‐centred support. Special reference must be made to spontaneous and recurrent TTS cases where it is recommended to screen these patients for pheochromocytoma.

Case reports

Interesting cases were presented as posters or moderated posters illuminating the co‐existence of TTS with other clinical entities, such as Guillain–Barre syndrome,32 pathology of the coronary arteries (spontaneous dissection),33 or as a phenocopy of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).34 Typical TTS in the acute phase can mimic apical HCM because of ECG changes and apical RWMAs, making the diagnosis of HCM or TTS possible only after recovery. Another instructive case presented by Zaw et al.35 demonstrated a possible association of HCM with TTS, suggesting that the responsible pathophysiologic mechanism could be basal septal hypertrophy and catecholamine driven LVOTO. Treatment of TTS in patients with severe MR and LVOTO, if complicated with acute pulmonary oedema, should be cautious with regards to diuretics and nitrates, as they can increase LVOT gradient.36

A unique case of cardiotoxicity was presented by Belarte Tornero et al.37 with TTS evolving to cardiogenic shock in a patient with BRAF‐mutated metastatic lung cancer under treatment with trametinib.37 Suppression of MEK and ERK1/2 activation in the heart is the suggested underlying mechanism, and periodic cardiac screening may be necessary in patients treated with trametinib.

A case of successful cardiac transplantation from a donor with TTS was presented by Professor Omerovic E. The donor was a 59‐year‐old woman with subarachnoid haemorrhage, mid‐ventricular akinesia, and LVEF ~35% who met the ESC Takotsubo working group criteria for secondary TTS. The recipient was a middle‐aged man with biventricular congestive HF because of dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiac function of the transplanted heart recovered within 2 weeks. This case belongs to a cohort of donors with TTS (n = 42) from the same group. New onset of left ventricular dysfunction in organ donors is frequent and considered as a contraindication for utilization of the heart. However, such dysfunction is often caused by TTS and is therefore transient. The Gothenburg group has recently shown (38) that transplantation of hearts from donors with TTS has similar long‐term survival as from donors with normal heart function. If proven true by randomized clinical trial, this strategy could lead to increase organ availability by ~25% and therefore improved survival and quality of life in patients with terminal HF.

Gaps in knowledge

There are several issues concerning pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis that require further research to improve our understanding of the syndrome and patients' outcome. What is the cause of akinesia with the characteristic pattern in LV and/or RV? Why do some individuals develop TTS while others with the same triggers do not? Is there a genetic or environmental substrate? Why there is such a preponderance of postmenopausal women? What is the endocrine–cardiac specific interaction in women that makes them susceptible to this syndrome? How do patients with TTS and extensive LV dysfunction survive while patients with myocardial infarctions of comparable extent of affected myocardium do not? What are the responsible mechanisms for LV recovery? What are the predisposing risk factors for life‐threatening arrhythmias? Is inflammation a causative factor or an effect of TTS? What is the best treatment strategy in this population in the acute phase but also long term? What should be the duration of medical treatment of patients with TTS in case of complete and/or incomplete LV recovery?

Conclusions

Interesting research and expert opinion regarding the management of TTS was presented in HFA 2019 Congress. Many more questions were also discussed, highlighting the need for additional research and clinical trials. The next HFA Congress will be hosted in Barcelona in May 2020 and will review the clinical management of TTS, new insights into pathophysiology, and hopefully provide the answers to many of the questions raised at the recent 2019 HFA Summer Congress.

Conflict of interest

For Linda W. Van Laake: The UMCU, which employs Dr. Van Laake has received speaker, advisory board or consultancy fees and/or research grants from Abbott, Vifor, Novartis, Medtronic, Roche and Sopachem. Alexander R. Lyon reports receiving speaker, advisory board or consultancy fees and/or research grants from Pfizer, Novartis, Servier, Amgen, Clinigen Group, Takeda, Roche, Eli Lily, Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim

Supporting information

Table S1. Takotsubo syndrome sessions during ‘Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019’.

Keramida, K. , Backs, J. , Bossone, E. , Citro, R. , Dawson, D. , Omerovic, E. , Parodi, G. , Schneider, B. , Ghadri, J. R. , Van Laake, L. W. , and Lyon, A. R. (2020) Takotsubo syndrome in Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019: highlights from the experts. ESC Heart Failure, 7: 400–406. 10.1002/ehf2.12603.

References

  • 1. Redfors BJS, Tholeifsson S, Jernberg T, Angeras O, Frobert O, Petursson P, Tornvall P, Sarno G, Ravn‐Fischer A, Lyon A, James S, Erlinge D, Omerovic E., editor. Incidence and outcome of Takotsubo syndrome compared to acute myocardial infarcton in men versus women. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; 2019; Athens.
  • 2. Redfors BJS, Tholeifsson S, Angeras O, Sarno G, Ravn‐Fischer A, Frobert O, Jernberg T, Tornvall P, Lyon A, James S, Erlinge D, Omerovic E., editor. Regional differences in the incidence and prognosis of the takotsubo syndrome. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; 2019; Athens.
  • 3. Hu JR, Florido R, Lipson EJ, Naidoo J, Ardehali R, Tocchetti CG, Lyon AR, Padera RF, Johnson DB, Moslehi J. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 115: 854–868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lyon AR, Bossone E, Schneider B, Sechtem U, Citro R, Underwood SR, Sheppard MN, Figtree GA, Parodi G, Akashi YJ, Ruschitzka F, Filippatos G, Mebazaa A, Omerovic E. Current state of knowledge on Takotsubo syndrome: a position statement from the taskforce on Takotsubo syndrome of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18: 8–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ghadri JR, Wittstein IS, Prasad A, Sharkey S, Dote K, Akashi YJ, Cammann VL, Crea F, Galiuto L, Desmet W, Yoshida T, Manfredini R, Eitel I, Kosuge M, Nef HM, Deshmukh A, Lerman A, Bossone E, Citro R, Ueyama T, Corrado D, Kurisu S, Ruschitzka F, Winchester D, Lyon AR, Omerovic E, Bax JJ, Meimoun P, Tarantini G, Rihal C, Y‐Hassan S, Migliore F, Horowitz JD, Shimokawa H, Lüscher TF, Templin C. International expert consensus document on Takotsubo syndrome (Part I): clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and pathophysiology. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2032–2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ghadri JR, Cammann VL, Jurisic S, Seifert B, Napp LC, Diekmann J, Bataiosu DR, D'Ascenzo F, Ding KJ, Sarcon A, Kazemian E, Birri T, Ruschitzka F, Lüscher TF, Templin C, InterTAK co‐investigators . A novel clinical score (InterTAK Diagnostic Score) to differentiate Takotsubo syndrome from acute coronary syndrome: results from the International Takotsubo Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2017; 19: 1036–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Redfors B, Shao Y, Ali A, Sun B, Omerovic E. Rat models reveal differences in cardiocirculatory profile between Takotsubo syndrome and acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2015; 16: 632–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schwarz K, Ahearn T, Srinivasan J, Neil CJ, Scally C, Rudd A, Jagpal B, Frenneaux MP, Pislaru C, Horowitz JD, Dawson DK. Alterations in cardiac deformation, timing of contraction and relaxation, and early myocardial fibrosis accompany the apparent recovery of acute stress‐induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy: an end to the concept of transience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017; 30: 745–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dawson DK, Neil CJ, Henning A, Cameron D, Jagpal B, Bruce M, Horowitz J, Frenneaux MP. Tako‐tsubo cardiomyopathy: a heart stressed out of energy? J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2015; 8: 985–987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Scally C, Rudd A, Mezincescu A, Wilson H, Srivanasan J, Horgan G, Broadhurst P, Newby DE, Henning A, Dawson DK. Persistent long‐term structural, functional, and metabolic changes after stress‐induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2018; 137: 1039–1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Templin C, Ghadri JR, Diekmann J, Napp LC, Bataiosu DR, Jaguszewski M, Cammann VL, Sarcon A, Geyer V, Neumann CA, Seifert B, Hellermann J, Schwyzer M, Eisenhardt K, Jenewein J, Franke J, Katus HA, Burgdorf C, Schunkert H, Moeller C, Thiele H, Bauersachs J, Tschöpe C, Schultheiss HP, Laney CA, Rajan L, Michels G, Pfister R, Ukena C, Böhm M, Erbel R, Cuneo A, Kuck KH, Jacobshagen C, Hasenfuss G, Karakas M, Koenig W, Rottbauer W, Said SM, Braun‐Dullaeus RC, Cuculi F, Banning A, Fischer TA, Vasankari T, Airaksinen KE, Fijalkowski M, Rynkiewicz A, Pawlak M, Opolski G, Dworakowski R, MacCarthy P, Kaiser C, Osswald S, Galiuto L, Crea F, Dichtl W, Franz WM, Empen K, Felix SB, Delmas C, Lairez O, Erne P, Bax JJ, Ford I, Ruschitzka F, Prasad A, Lüscher TF. Clinical features and outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 929–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ghadri JR, Cammann VL, Napp LC, Jurisic S, Diekmann J, Bataiosu DR, Seifert B, Jaguszewski M, Sarcon A, Neumann CA, Geyer V, Prasad A, Bax JJ, Ruschitzka F, Lüscher TF, Templin C, for the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Registry . Differences in the clinical profile and outcomes of typical and atypical Takotsubo syndrome: data from the International Takotsubo Registry. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1: 335–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stiermaier T, Moller C, Graf T, Eitel C, Desch S, Thiele H, Eitel I. Prognostic usefulness of the ballooning pattern in patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2016; 118: 1737–1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Citro R, Radano I, Parodi G, Di Vece D, Zito C, Novo G, Provenza G, Bellino M, Prota C, Silverio A, Antonini‐Canterin F. Long‐term outcome in patients with Takotsubo syndrome presenting with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 781–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kosuge M, Ebina T, Hibi K, Morita S, Okuda J, Iwahashi N, Tsukahara K, Nakachi T, Kiyokuni M, Ishikawa T, Umemura S, Kimura K. Simple and accurate electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate takotsubo cardiomyopathy from anterior acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2514–2516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Frohlich GM, Schoch B, Schmid F, Keller P, Sudano I, Luscher TF, Noll G, Ruschitzka F, Enseleit F. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy has a unique cardiac biomarker profile: NT‐proBNP/myoglobin and NT‐proBNP/troponin T ratios for the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes and stress induced cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2012; 154: 328–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Citro R, Lyon AR, Meimoun P, Omerovic E, Redfors B, Buck T, Lerakis S, Parodi G, Silverio A, Eitel I, Schneider B, Prasad A, Bossone E. Standard and advanced echocardiography in Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy: clinical and prognostic implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28: 57–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Eitel I, von Knobelsdorff‐Brenkenhoff F, Bernhardt P, Carbone I, Muellerleile K, Aldrovandi A, Francone M, Desch S, Gutberlet M, Strohm O, Schuler G, Schulz‐Menger J, Thiele H, Friedrich MG. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JAMA 2011; 306: 277–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ghadri JR, Wittstein IS, Prasad A, Sharkey S, Dote K, Akashi YJ, Cammann VL, Crea F, Galiuto L, Desmet W, Yoshida T, Manfredini R, Eitel I, Kosuge M, Nef HM, Deshmukh A, Lerman A, Bossone E, Citro R, Ueyama T, Corrado D, Kurisu S, Ruschitzka F, Winchester D, Lyon AR, Omerovic E, Bax JJ, Meimoun P, Tarantini G, Rihal C, Y.‐Hassan S, Migliore F, Horowitz JD, Shimokawa H, Lüscher TF, Templin C. International expert consensus document on Takotsubo syndrome (Part II): diagnostic workup, outcome, and management. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2047–2062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wittstein IS, Thiemann DR, Lima JA, Baughman KL, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, Wu KC, Rade JJ, Bivalacqua TJ, Champion HC. Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 539–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Abraham J, Mudd JO, Kapur NK, Klein K, Champion HC, Wittstein IS. Stress cardiomyopathy after intravenous administration of catecholamines and beta‐receptor agonists. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1320–1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Redfors B, Shao Y, Ali A, Omerovic E. Current hypotheses regarding the pathophysiology behind the takotsubo syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2014; 177: 771–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liggett SB, Cresci S, Kelly RJ, Syed FM, Matkovich SJ, Hahn HS, Diwan A, Martini JS, Sparks L, Parekh RR, Spertus JA, Koch WJ, Kardia SL, Dorn GW 2nd. A GRK5 polymorphism that inhibits beta‐adrenergic receptor signaling is protective in heart failure. Nat Med 2008; 14: 510–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Spinelli L, Trimarco V, Di Marino S, Marino M, Iaccarino G, Trimarco B. L41Q polymorphism of the G protein coupled receptor kinase 5 is associated with left ventricular apical ballooning syndrome. Eur J Heart Fail 2010; 12: 13–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nakano T, Onoue K, Nakada Y, Nakagawa H, Kumazawa T, Ueda T, Nishida T, Soeda T, Okayama S, Watanabe M, Kawata H, Kawakami R, Horii M, Okura H, Uemura S, Hatakeyama K, Sakaguchi Y, Saito Y. Alteration of beta‐adrenoceptor signaling in left ventricle of acute phase Takotsubo syndrome: a human study. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 12731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Citro R, Rigo F, D'Andrea A, Ciampi Q, Parodi G, Provenza G, Piccolo R, Mirra M, Zito C, Giudice R, Patella MM, Antonini‐Canterin F, Bossone E, Piscione F, Salerno‐Uriarte J, Tako‐Tsubo Italian Network Investigators . Echocardiographic correlates of acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and in‐hospital mortality in Tako‐tsubo cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2014; 7: 119–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yamaguchi T, Yoshikawa T, Isogai T, Miyamoto T, Maekawa Y, Ueda T, Sakata K, Murakami T, Yamamoto T, Nagao K, Takayama M. Predictive value of QRS duration at admission for in‐hospital clinical outcome of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Circ J 2016; 81: 62–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jesel L, Berthon C, Messas N, Lim HS, Girardey M, Marzak H, Marchandot B, Trinh A, Ohlmann P, Morel O. Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac arrest in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications. Heart Rhythm 2018; 15: 1171–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Shimizu M, Nishizaki M, Yamawake N, Fujii H, Sakurada H, Isobe M, Hiraoka M. J wave and fragmented QRS formation during the hyperacute phase in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Circ J 2014; 78: 943–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Jesel L, Berthon C, Messas N, Lim HS, Girardey M, Marzak H, Marchandot B, Trinh A, Ohlmann P, Morel O. Atrial arrhythmias in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis. Europace: European Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Electrophysiology: Journal of the Working Groups on Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2019; 21: 298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wilson HM, Cheyne L, Brown PAJ, Kerr K, Hannah A, Srinivasan J, Duniak N, Horgan G, Dawson DK. Characterization of the myocardial inflammatory response in acute stress‐induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JACC Basic Trans Sci 2018; 3: 766–778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Stopar RRB, Mahne B, Ravnikar T, Cernic‐Suligoj N, Kupresan A, Kariz S, editor Takotsubo cardiomyopathy as a rare complication of Guillain‐Barre syndrome. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; 2019; Athens.
  • 33. Jogani STPS, Koopman P, Timmermans P JR., editor Chicken or egg? A case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and spontaneous coronary dissection. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; 2019; Athens.
  • 34. Lypovetska SSM, Gurskyi V, editor Takotsubo syndrome masking apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; 2019; Athens.
  • 35. Zaw HFS, Dhillon O. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dynamic left venticular outflow tract obsruction, a possible pathophysiological mechanism of injury in takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; Athens 2019.
  • 36. Garau GCD, Soro C, Centorbi CS, Craba L, Montisci R, Meloni L, editor. Takotsubo syndrome complicated by left ventricular outflow track obstruction in a woman with chronic beta‐blocker therapy. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019; 2019; Athens.
  • 37. Belarte Tornero LCTGA, Ble Gimero M, Martos Gardenas T, Servitjia Tormo S, Gimeno Vasquez E, Salar Silvestre A, Sanz Latiesas X, Martinez Medina F, Miguel Gutierre A, Sole Gonzalez E, Ruis Bustillo S, Farre Lopez N, Marti Almor J. Takotsubo like syndrome in a patient with BRAF mutated metastatic lung cancer. Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Takotsubo syndrome sessions during ‘Heart Failure and World Congress on Acute Heart Failure 2019’.


Articles from ESC Heart Failure are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES