Abstract
Study Objectives:
There are few studies evaluating (1) exercise capacity as assessed by the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test in large populations with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); and (2) correlations with patients’ comorbidities.
Methods:
This study presents a cluster analysis performed on the data of 1,228 patients. Severity of exercise limitation was defined on the basis of 6MWD.
Results:
Sixty-one percent showed exercise limitation (29.2% and 31.9% mild and severe exercise limitation, respectively). About 60% and 40% of patients were included in cluster 1 (CL1) and 2 (CL2), respectively. CL1 included younger patients with high prevalence of apneas, desaturations, and hypertension with better exercise tolerance. CL2 included older patients, all with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), high prevalence of chronic respiratory failure (CRF), fewer apneas but severe mean desaturation, daytime hypoxemia, more severe exercise limitation, and exercise-induced desaturations. Only CRF and COPD significantly (P < .001) correlated with 6MWD < 85% of predicted value. 6MWD correlated positively with apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, nocturnal pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), resting arterial oxygen tension, mean SpO2 on exercise, and negatively with age, body mass index, time spent during night with SpO2 < 90%, mean nocturnal desaturation, arterial carbon dioxide tension, and number of comorbidities. Patients without severe comorbidities had higher exercise capacity than those with severe comorbidities, (P < .001). Exercise limitation was significantly worse in OSA severity class I when compared to other classes (P < .001).
Conclusions:
A large number of patients with OSA experience exercise limitation. Older age, comorbidities such as COPD and CRF, OSA severity class I, severe mean nocturnal desaturation, and daytime hypoxemia are associated with worse exercise tolerance.
Citation:
Vitacca M, Paneroni M, Braghiroli A, et al. Exercise capacity and comorbidities in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020;16(4):531–538.
Keywords: chronic respiratory failure, COPD, exercise test, 6-minute walking distance
BRIEF SUMMARY
Current Knowledge/Study Rationale: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea have reduced maximal aerobic capacity, which can be associated with increased cardiovascular risks and reduced survival. Most studies of exercise capacity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea were performed in relatively small sample sizes and did not include patients with comorbidities known to reduce exercise tolerance.
Study Impact: We evaluated exercise capacity in a large cohort of patients, as assessed by the 6-minute walking distance test, and tested whether patients could be included in different clusters explaining differences in exercise capacity. We found that a high percentage of patients with obstructive sleep apnea had exercise limitation. Older age, comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea severity class I, severe mean nocturnal desaturation and daytime hypoxemia were associated with worse exercise tolerance.
INTRODUCTION
The estimated prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is 13% in males and 6% in females.1,2 Patients with OSA have reduced maximal aerobic capacity, which can be associated with increased cardiovascular risks and reduced survival.3 Most of studies of exercise capacity in OSA patients were performed in relatively small sample sizes, the largest accounting 111 patients4,5 and did not include patients with comorbidities known to reduce exercise tolerance.3 Furthermore, there are few studies on large OSA populations evaluating exercise capacity by means of the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test and the correlations with comorbidities.6 However, further research is necessary to explore the relationships between physical activity, exercise, and OSA and to examine the synergic efficacy of exercise and gold standard therapy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
Therefore, the aims of this study in a large cohort of patients were to evaluate exercise capacity, as assessed by the 6MWD; to test whether patients could be included in different clusters explaining differences in exercise capacity; and to investigate the correlations between sleep characteristics and exercise capacity.
METHODS
The protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Istituti Clinici Scientifici (ICS) Maugeri, Pavia, Italy (CEC 2239 October 9, 2018). All patients provided informed consent for the scientific use of their data.
Study participants
This retrospective study was conducted on prospectively collected data of a database available from January 1, 2015 to December, 31, 2018 of outpatients and inpatients with OSA of 12 Institutes of ICS Maugeri, referral centers for pulmonary rehabilitation, diagnosis, and management of OSA including CPAP, and care of patients with chronic OSA.7–9 Patients in stable condition undergoing evaluation and first treatment with CPAP were included. In Italy evaluation and first prescription of CPAP of patients with OSA is possible also on an in-patient basis.
Clinical definitions
OSA was defined on the basis of home or in-hospital polysomnography for outpatients and inpatients, respectively. According to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders,10 OSA was defined as the presence of 5 or more obstructive respiratory events (apnea, hypopnea or respiratory effort-related arousal) per hour of sleep plus daytime or nighttime symptoms of OSA; alternatively, as the presence of 15 or more obstructive respiratory events per hour of sleep. The severity of OSA was defined according to guidelines (class I, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5–15; class II, AHI > 15 to < 30; and class III, AHI > 30 events/h respectively).10
Comorbidities were defined according to the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision code. Reported comorbidities were confirmed by assessment of clinical and functional records and of currently prescribed drugs. In brief: hypertension and diabetes were defined according to the patients’ clinical history and drug use; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to the Global Strategy for Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of COPD (GOLD) guidelines11; overlap syndrome by the association of OSA with COPD12; chronic respiratory failure (CRF) by the prescription of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT)13; chronic heart failure, valvulopathy, and ischemic heart disease were defined according to the clinical history, drug use, and echocardiography when available14; metabolic syndrome was diagnosed by at least three conditions including large waist, high triglyceride level, reduced “good” or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increased arterial blood pressure, and elevated fasting blood sugar.15 Patients with associated oncologic comorbidities, orthopedic limitations, and neurologic and neuromuscular diseases were excluded.
Measurements
The following data were reported: demographics (age, sex), anthropometrics (body mass index [BMI]16), Epworth Sleepiness Scale score,17 and reported number and diagnosis of comorbidities according to the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale.18
As part of the evaluation protocol sleep and arterial blood gas assessments were performed. Standard sleep evaluation was performed with home respiratory polygraphy or in-hospital full polysomnography analyzed and scored according to accepted guidelines.10 Pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) and rate, nasal flow, thoracic-abdominal movements, and body position were monitored in all cases. Arterial blood gases were assessed on samples from the radial artery with the patients breathing air or oxygen in the sitting position for at least 1 hour. Patients under LTOT were assessed under their prescribed usual inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2). Data on arterial blood gases were available in 920 patients.
According to our clinical protocol, within 2 months of a sleep study, exercise tolerance was assessed by means of the 6MWD, according to accepted technical standards,19 regardless of the presence of any self-reported complaint of dyspnea or exercise limitation. Patients under LTOT performed the test under their prescribed usual FiO2. At the beginning and at the end of walking, self-reported sensations of dyspnea and leg fatigue were assessed, but not reported in the database, by means of a modified Borg scale.20 Predicted values were according to the Enright equation.21 The lower limit of normality (LLN) was defined as the value at fifth percentile of 6MWD in Enright’s study sample by the following calculations: male = 6MWD predicted value – 153; female = 6MWD predicted value – 139.21 Patients were defined as having (1) no exercise limitation: 6MWD ≥ 85% of predicted value; (2) mild limitation: 6MWD < 85% of predicted value and ≥ LLN; and (3) severe limitation: 6MWD < LLN. Exercise–induced desaturation was defined as a 4% drop in SpO2 to < 90% during the test.19
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics are reported as mean, standard deviation, and median for continuous variables and as numbers (n) and percentage frequency (%) for discrete variables. Percentage frequency of excluded patients among centers was calculated. For continuous variables, the differences between groups (patients with versus without severe comorbidities as COPD, CRF, chronic heart failure, diabetes, and ischemic disease) and among OSA severity classes10 were evaluated by analysis of variance and, if Fisher exact test was significant, a post hoc evaluation with Bonferroni correction was performed using the t test. For discrete variables, differences between groups and subgroups were evaluated by chi-square analysis (Pearson chi-square test). The correlations between the demographic, anthropometric, clinical, physiological, and sleep variables and 6MWD were studied by Spearman correlation evaluation. We evaluated the risk of walk < 85% of predicted 6MWD value by odds ratio analysis using as dependent variables all baseline characteristics and presence/absence of comorbidities.
Clusters were identified by the Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) method, on a matrix of Gower distances between subjects using a subset of variables showing missing data fraction < 30%. The optimal number of clusters to be imposed to the clustering algorithm was identified as the one guaranteeing the highest silhouette coefficient.
The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Fisher exact test were applied to test the presence of statistically significant differences in terms of variables’ distribution between clusters for continuous and categorical variables respectively. The distribution of variables by cluster was described by median (25th – 75th percentiles) or by counts (frequency, %) based on their characteristics. The choice of nonparametric statistics was due to nongaussian distribution characterizing most of the continuous variables included in the analysis. The multivariate random forests classifier was applied on a subset of cases with no missing values to estimate the importance of each variable in discriminating between the two clusters.
Clustering functions are implemented in the R (www.r-project.org) package “cluster”; the random forest method implemented in the package “random forest,” whereas Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, and stepwise selection algorithm are implemented in the package “stats.” Details on statistical methodology are described in the supplemental material.
The statistical significance was set for all statistical test to P < .05. All analyses were carried out using STATA software package (release 11, Stata Corp LP) except when specified.
RESULTS
The data of 2,800 patients with OSA were found. Two hundred forty patients with neurologic and neuromuscular diseases and 1,332 patients lacking the 6MWD data were excluded. Table S1 and Table S2 in the supplemental material show missing data and characteristics of excluded patients, respectively. Exclusion rate among centers ranged from 48% to 61% of all patients.
Data of 1,228 patients were fully available and analyzed. Demographic, anthropometric, and physiologic clinical characteristics and sleep parameters of patients included are shown in Table 1. Most of the patients were male and had obesity, with hypertension and COPD, of a range of ages and with daytime arterial blood gases, had high numbers of apneas and desaturations, long-time nocturnal desaturation, and exercise tolerance limitation. Only 1.5% of patients were free from any comorbidity.
Table 1.
Demographic, anthropometric, physiologic, and clinical characteristics of patients in the study.

OSA severity
As expected, AHI was statistically different among the OSA severity classes (8.8 ± 4.0, 22.4 ± 5.3, and 53.7 ± 17.7 events/h for class I, II, and III, respectively: P < .001). Exercise capacity as assessed by the 6MWD (328.2 ± 124.8, 361.0 ± 134.5, and 360.8 ± 136.4 meters for class I, II, and III, respectively, P < .012,) and prevalence of severe exercise limitation (46.3%, 28.7%, and 29.9% respectively, P < .001) were statistically worse for severity class I as compared to classes II and III. COPD was more prevalent in class I (58.3%, P = .001), whereas hypertension was more prevalent in class III (63.1%, P = .001). No difference was found for other comorbidities. For further details see also Table S3 in the supplemental material.
Table 2 shows the distribution of clinical data and comorbidities according to the levels of exercise limitation. The patients were equally distributed in the three classes of limitation; AHI was greater in patients without exercise limitation who were mainly hypertensive and had diabetes along with metabolic syndrome. Older age, CRF, and COPD were more prevalent in patients with exercise limitation.
Table 2.
Demographic, anthropometric, physiologic, and clinical characteristics of patients according to the three levels of exercise limitation.
A total of 16 variables with missing data fraction < 30% (sex, age, BMI, AHI, oxygen desaturation index [ODI], time spent in bed with SpO2 < 90% [T90], PaCO2, PaO2, mean SpO2 during 6MWD, 6MWD % of predicted value, CRF, COPD, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, chronic heart failure) were used for clustering analysis as described in Table S1. Table 3 shows variables’ distribution by identified cluster. Out of the 1,228 patients analyzed, 740 (60.3%) were assigned to cluster 1, and 448 (39.7%) to cluster 2. Results from the random forest multivariate ranking (Figure S1 and Figure S2 in the supplemental material) showed that the five variables with the strongest influence on clusters definition were: (1) presence of COPD and (2) CRF, (3) T90, (4) AHI, and (5) ODI. Cluster 1 included younger patients with high number of nocturnal apneas and desaturations and high prevalence of hypertension with mild exercise limitation. Cluster 2 included older patients, all with COPD, with fewer nocturnal apneas but with more severe mean nocturnal desaturations, daytime hypoxemia, high prevalence of CRF, severe exercise limitation, and high exercise-induced desaturations. Details on cluster results are described in the supplemental material.
Table 3.
Distribution of variables used for clustering by cluster.
Figure 1 shows the distribution of levels of exercise limitation among clusters: approximately 60% of patients showed exercise limitation, 32% with severe limitation. As expected, cluster 2 included 75% of patients with exercise limitation, (44% severe) whereas cluster 1 showed exercise limitation in 49% of the cases with a lower prevalence of severe limitation (24%): all differences among clusters were statistically significant (P < .001).
Figure 1. Stratification of patients with different levels of exercise limitation among clusters.
Limitation defined as: no = 6MWD ≥ 85% of predicted value, mild = 6MWD < 85% of predicted value and ≥ LLN, and severe = 6MWD < LLN. 6MWD = 6-minute walking distance, CL1 = cluster 1, CL2 = cluster 2, LLN = lower limit of normality.
Distance walked < 85% of predicted value was explained mainly by the presence of CRF (odds ratio: 2.871; standard error = 0.426, 95% confidence interval = 2.145–3.842; P < .0001) and COPD (odds ratio 2.8851; standard error = 0.365, 95% confidence interval = 2.251–3.698; P < .001). The few patients (7.7% of all sample) experiencing exercise-induced desaturations showed shorter 6MWD than those without (311 ± 135 versus 360 ± 134 meters, respectively: P = .008).
Detailed results of correlation analysis are reported in Table 4. Age, BMI, T90, mean night SpO2 showed the highest significant, albeit modest negative correlations, whereas levels of resting and exercise oxygenation were positively correlated with 6MWD.
Table 4.
Significant correlations (Spearman correlation) between 6MWD and patients’ characteristics.

Comorbidities
Severity of OSA was similar for patients without and with comorbidities (AHI: 39.4 ± 22.6 versus 37.6 ± 22.9 events/h, P = .239; and ODI: 38.0 ± 23.4 versus 35.5 ± 24.3 events/h, P = .126). As shown in Table 2, numbers of comorbidities as assessed by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale18 were not different among levels of exercise capacity. Patients without comorbidities were significantly younger, more oxygenated, and showed higher exercise tolerance than patients with severe comorbidities (age: 60.8 ± 13.1 versus 67.9 ± 9.9 years; P < .001); PaO2: 75.8 ± 11.7 versus 71.8 ± 10.4 mm Hg; P < .001; 6MWD: 413.1 ± 143.6 versus 338.0 ± 125.0 meters; P < .001, 6MWD % of predicted value: 78.8 ± 22.2 versus 75.0 ± 26.1; P = .02). Figure 2 shows the distribution of levels of exercise capacity according to the presence of severe comorbidities. Approximately 65% of patients with as well as almost half patients without severe comorbidities had exercise limitation.
Figure 2. Stratification of patients with different levels of exercise limitation according to the presence of comorbidities.
Limitation defined as: no = 6MWD ≥ 85% of predicted value, mild = 6MWD < 85% of predicted value and ≥ LLN, and severe = 6MWD < LLN. 6MWD = 6-minute walking distance, CO = comorbidities, LLN = lower limit of normality.
DISCUSSION
This study compared the exercise capacity in patients with OSA with or without common comorbidities in the largest population studied thus far, and confirms that more than 60% of patients experience exercise limitation as assessed by the 6MWD. As original findings this study adds that patients could be distributed between two clusters: one included younger patients with more severe OSA, high prevalence of hypertension, and mild exercise intolerance; the second cluster included older patients, all with COPD, with daytime, nighttime, and exercise desaturations and severe exercise limitation. Age and BMI were slightly but significantly negatively correlated with 6MWD.
The occurrence of comorbidities in our patients are those commonly reported for patients with OSA.6,22 There is evidence that the combination of OSA and COPD, also known as overlap syndrome, is not common in the general hospital population (1.0% to 3.6%), whereas it is highly prevalent in patients with either OSA (7.6% to 55.7%) or COPD (2.9% to 65.9%). Our data analysis showed that 45.6% of our patients with OSA had a diagnosis of COPD and the cluster analysis showed that exercise limitation was explained by the presence of CRF and COPD. Overlap syndrome is associated with more frequent cardiovascular morbidity, poorer health-related quality of life, more frequent acute exacerbations of COPD, and increased medical costs.2 Patients with overlap syndrome also have been shown to have lower night mean SpO2, longer T90, and worse sleep quality than patients with OSA only.2,22 Our results seem to confirm longer T90 but not worse ODI or night SpO2 mean, whereas no data are available for sleep quality.
In our study exercise capacity was assessed by the 6MWD. Assessment of peak oxygen consumption (V′O2peak) during the cardiopulmonary exercise test is considered the gold standard for evaluation of exercise capacity.3,4 However the cardiopulmonary exercise test requires human and organizational resources and may be unavailable in many real-life conditions. The 6MWD is an accepted tool for evaluation of submaximal exercise capacity in patients with cardiorespiratory diseases and is useful for studies on large populations.19,23 A systematic review found that mean V′O2peak was significantly lower (89.9% of predicted value) in patients with OSA than in control patients. This reduction was larger in patients without obesity.3 In our study the mean 6MWD in patients with OSA without severe comorbidities was 81.5% of predicted value, consistent with the reported values of mean V′O2peak,3 and showed significant differences according to the associated comorbidities. Therefore, we are confident that the 6MWD we used in our study was sensitive enough to evaluate exercise capacity in these patients.
The effect of OSA on exercise tolerance is still discussed. Previous studies have given conflicting results, some24–29 but not all30–32 showing reduction in cardiorespiratory fitness. The reasons for exercise limitation in patients with OSA are not clear. Studies have reported different physiologic adaptations during exercise such as excessive blood pressure, delayed heart rate recovery, chronotropic incompetence, and respiratory and skeletal muscle changes.4,25,28,33,34 These studies report data without evaluation of the effect of comorbidities; therefore, our study contributes to clarify this issue in a very large population. In our study approximately 65% of patients with as well as almost half patients without severe comorbidities experienced exercise limitation.
Severe exercise limitation was more prevalent in patients in the mildest OSA severity class I than those in more severe classes II and III, and we found only modest, albeit significant relationships between severity of OSA and 6MWD. Furthermore, patients with high numbers of nocturnal apneas and desaturations were included in cluster 1. Alameri et al24 found no correlations between the 6MWD and the severity of OSA or other polysomnographic parameters. Beitler et al26 found that AHI alone explained 16.1% of the variability observed in percent predicted V′O2peak. We also found a negative relationship between BMI and 6MWD. A study by Rizzi et al28 suggests that obesity alone and sex, when associated with diabetes but not OSA, influence cardiorespiratory function on exercise.
The goal of our study was not to evaluate the effect of OSA on physical activity. At what extent does the observed reduced exercise capacity translate in physical activity? A systematic review reported that the mean number of daily steps across studies was lower than the recommended threshold of 10,000 daily steps and exercise training is associated with improved outcomes.34 It is plausible that patients with OSA are neither physically capable nor psychologically motivated to exercise, in part due to daytime sleepiness and fatigue, which reduce the stimulus and time for physical activity. Insufficient physical activity on the other hand is probably associated with the risk factors contributing to OSA, such as obesity and metabolic syndrome, and increases OSA severity.4
Clinical implications
These results have clinical implications. The reduced exercise capacity and the influence of comorbidities highlights the importance of careful clinical history and of exercise training and suggests also that the 6MWD may be used in routine evaluation of exercise capacity of these patients.
Continuous positive airway pressure remains the first-line therapy for OSA; however, it has limited effect on cardiometabolic risk factors and body weight and a few observational studies have shown that patients treated with CPAP do not increase spontaneous levels of physical activity.2 Exercise training not only reduces the severity of OSA and improves daytime symptoms of sleepiness, but also significantly improves exercise capacity.6,35–37 These results might be even more evident in patients with those comorbidities assessed in our study due to the recognized effect of exercise training in those conditions.38,39
Limitations of the study
Our study has limitations. Although as all retrospective analyses of large populations our study describes the real life of health services, it is missing data such as that for arterial blood gases, and is affected by a huge number of exclusions. Despite the lack of data of 6MWD of excluded patients due to organizational and not to clinical reasons, and severity of OSA was not different between included and excluded patients, we cannot exclude that these exclusions might have affected the findings in a significant way. Therefore, our data must be interpreted with caution.
We did not study a control population; however, we are confident that the comparison with predicted values of 6MWD allowed an unbiased evaluation of results.
Given the modality of data recording (according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) we were unable to score the severity of comorbidities such as COPD or heart failure. Furthermore, the reported comorbidity occurrence must not be considered as “prevalence,” because patients did not undergo specific diagnostic tests. However, the reported comorbidity occurrence was defined also by evaluation of patients’ clinical records and documentation of drug consumption.
CONCLUSIONS
This study in a vast population shows that exercise capacity is impaired in a large percentage of patients with OSA. The reduction in exercise capacity and more severe exercise desaturation is more evident in older patients, with severe mean nocturnal desaturations and daytime hypoxemia and with associated comorbidities such as COPD and CRF and in OSA severity class I. 6MWD may be used to characterize patients and to evaluate the effects of treatment.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
All authors approved the definitive version of the manuscript and declare that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of it have been appropriately investigated and resolved. MV has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Work for this study was performed at Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS. This work was supported by the “Ricerca Corrente” Funding scheme of the Ministry of Health, Italy. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Laura Comini and Adriana Olivares for technical assistance. Author contributions: All the authors contributed substantially to the study design, data analysis and interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. MV, as corresponding author, has been identified as guarantor of the paper, taking responsibility for the integrity of the work, from inception to published article.
ABBREVIATIONS
- 6MWD
6-minute walking distance
- AHI
apnea-hypopneas index
- BMI
body mass index
- COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases
- CPAP
continuous positive airway pressure
- CRF
chronic respiratory failure
- LTOT
long-term oxygen therapy
- ODI
oxygen desaturation index
- OSA
obstructive sleep apnea
- SpO2
pulse oxygen saturation
- T90
total sleep time spent with SpO2 < 90%
REFERENCES
- 1.Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(9):1006–1014. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zampogna E, Spanevello A, Lucioni AM, et al. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. A ten year real life study. Respir Med. 2019;150:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mendelson M, Marillier M, Bailly S, et al. Maximal exercise capacity in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(6):1702697. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02697-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Van Offenwert E, Vrijsen B, Belge C, Troosters T, Buyse B, Testelmans D. Physical activity and exercise in obstructive sleep apnea. Acta Clin Belg. 2019;74(2):92–101. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1467587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Przybylowski T, Bielicki P, Kumor M, et al. Exercise capacity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;58(Suppl 5Pt 2:):563–574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maestri R, Bruschi C, Fracchia C, Pinna GD, Fanfulla F, Ambrosino N. Physiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COPD admitted to an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program: a real-life study. Pulmonology. 2019;25(2):71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schreiber A, Cemmi F, Ambrosino N, Ceriana P, Lastoria C, Carlucci A. Prevalence and predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation. COPD. 2018;15(3):265–270. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2018.1500533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fanfulla F, Grassi M, Taurino AE, D’Artavilla Lupo N, Trentin R. The relationship of daytime hypoxemia and nocturnal hypoxia in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2008;31(2):249–255. doi: 10.1093/sleep/31.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vitacca M, Nava S, Confalonieri M, et al. The appropriate setting of noninvasive pressure support ventilation in stable COPD patients. Chest. 2000;118(5):1286–1293. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.American Academy of Sleep Medicine . International Classification of Sleep Disorders. 3rd ed. Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Global Strategy for Prevention Diagnosis and Management of COPD. 2019 Report. https://goldcopd.org/gold-reports/. Accessed June 12, 2019.
- 12.Chaouat A, Weitzenblum E, Krieger J, Ifoundza T, Oswald M, Kessler R. Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(1):82–86. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hardinge M, Suntharalingam J, Wilkinson T. Guideline update: the British Thoracic Society guidelines on home oxygen use in adults. Thorax. 2015;70(6):589–591. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-206918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Somers VK, White DP, Amin R, et al. Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease: an American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research Professional Education Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke Council, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. In collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Center on Sleep Disorders Research (National Institutes of Health) Circulation. 2008;118(10):1080–1111. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.189375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Després JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444(7121):881–887. doi: 10.1038/nature05488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heart, Lung and Blood Institute U.S. National Institutes of Health The Practical Guide: Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. (NIH Publication 25 No. 00-4084). https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/prctgd_c.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2019.
- 17.Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–545. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L. Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1968;16(5):622–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1968.tb02103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1428–1446. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Borg G. Psychophysical basis of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(5):1384–1387. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shawon MSR, Perret JL, Senaratna CV, Lodge C, Hamilton GS, Dharmage SC. Current evidence on prevalence and clinical outcome of co-morbid obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Sleep Med. Rev. 2017;32:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lacedonia D, Carpagnano GE, Aliani M, et al. Daytime PaO2 in OSAS, COPD and the combination of the two (overlap syndrome) Respir Med. 2013;107(2):310–316. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alameri H, Al-Kabab Y, BaHammam A. Submaximal exercise in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2010;14(2):145–151. doi: 10.1007/s11325-009-0300-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alonso-Fernández A, García-Río F, Arias MA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypoapnea syndrome reversibly depresses cardiac response to exercise. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(2):207–215. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beitler JR, Awad KM, Bakker JP, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with impaired exercise capacity: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10(11):1199–1204. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hargens TA, Guill SG, Zedalis D, Gregg JM, Nickols-Richardson SM, Herbert WG. Attenuated heart rate recovery following exercise testing in overweight young men with untreated obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2008;31(1):104–110. doi: 10.1093/sleep/31.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rizzi CF, Cintra F, Mello-Fujita L, et al. Does obstructive sleep apnea impair the cardiopulmonary response to exercise? Sleep. 2013;36(4):547–553. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Berger M, Kline CE, Cepeda FX, et al. Does obstructive sleep apnea affect exercise capacity and the hemodynamic response to exercise? An individual patient data and aggregate meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2019;45:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lin CC, Hsieh WY, Chou CS, Liaw SF. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2006;150(1):27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ucok K, Aycicek A, Sezer M, et al. Aerobic and anaerobic exercise capacities in obstructive sleep apnea and associations with subcutaneous fat distributions. Lung. 2009;187(1):29–36. doi: 10.1007/s00408-008-9128-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vanhecke TE, Franklin BA, Zalesin KC, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in morbidly obese patients. Chest. 2008;134(3):539–545. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hudgel DW, Patel SR, Ahasic AM, et al. The role of weight management in the treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(6):e70–e87. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1326ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sauleda J, Garcia-Palmer FJ, Tarraga S, Maimo A, Palou A, Agusti AG. Skeletal muscle changes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Respir Med. 2003;97(7):804–810. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(03)00034-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mendelson M, Bailly S, Marillier M, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, objectively measured physical activity and exercise training interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:73. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Iftikhar IH, Kline CE, Youngstedt SD. Effects of exercise training on sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Lung. 2014;192(1):175–184. doi: 10.1007/s00408-013-9511-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Edwards BA, Bristow C, O’Driscoll DM, et al. Assessing the impact of diet, exercise and the combination of the two as a treatment for OSA: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology. 2019;24(8):740–751. doi: 10.1111/resp.13580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):e13–e64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Berger M, Raffin J, Pichot V, et al. Effect of exercise training on heart rate variability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29(8):1254–1262. doi: 10.1111/sms.13447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




