Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2005 Dec 7;62(12):936–940. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621203

The efficiency of surgical masks of varying design and composition

Louis B Quesnel 1
PMCID: PMC7161878  PMID: 1203649

Abstract

Five different types of surgical mask of varying design and composition of natural and synthetic fibres were tested for their efficiency in vivo by means of a special test chamber. Contaminated particles escaping through or around the mask during speech by the wearer could be collected and sized. Analysis of the data showed that the gross efficiency of all the masks was high, but that some masks were distinctly better at small particle “filtration” than others. There was a significant difference in efficiency between the best and worst masks. The best masks contained more fabric, were softer and were pleated, while the worst were stiffer, smaller and not pleated. Reusable cotton fabric masks were as effective as synthetic fabric masks when made to a good design.

References

  1. Andersen A. A. (1958) New sampler for the collection, sizing and enumeration of viable airborne particles. J. Bacteriol. 76, 471–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Churchill E. and Truett B. (1957) WADC Technical Report. No. 56–261. Astia Document No. 110629.
  3. Garrow C., Stephens L. J. and Ewing M. R. (1971) Evaluation of surgical masks: the potential of resin treated wool. Surgery 69, 881–883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greene W. and Vesley D. (1962) Method for evaluating effectiveness of surgical masks. J. Bacteriol. 83, 663–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirshfield J. W. and Laube P. J. (1941) Surgical masks, an experimental study. Surgery 9, 720–730. [Google Scholar]
  6. Madsen P. O. and Madsen R. E. (1967) A study of disposable surgical masks. Am. J. Surg. 114, 431–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paine C. J. (1935) The aetiology of puerperal infection with special reference to droplet infection. Br. Med. J. 1, 243–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peto S. and Powell E. O. (1970) The assessment of aerosol concentration by means of the Andersen sampler. J. Appl. Bacterial. 33, 582–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rubbo S. D. and Abbott L. R. (1968) Filtration efficiency of surgical masks: a new method of evaluation. Aust. NZ J. Surg. 38, 80–83 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shooter R. A., Smith M. A. and Hunter J. W. (1959) A study of surgical masks. Br. J. Surg. 47, 246–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomas C. G. A. (1961) Efficiency of surgical masks in use in hospital wards. Guys Hosp. Rep. 110, 157–167. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES