Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2005 Oct 19;8(3):243–258. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250080304

Reproduction and development in rats chronologically exposed to 60‐Hz electric fields

D N Rommereim 1,✉, W T Kaune 1, R L Buschbom 1, R D Phillips 1,2, M R Sikov 1
PMCID: PMC7161901  PMID: 3663249

Abstract

Previous studies have raised the possibility of reproductive and developmental changes in miniature swine chronically exposed to a strong 60‐Hz electric field. Two replicate experiments on rats were performed to determine if similar changes could be detected in animals exposed under a comparable regime, which was based on average, induced‐current densities and on the chronology of reproductive development, as dosimetrically and biologically scaled. Beginning at three months of age, female rats of the F0 generation and their subsequent offspring were chronically exposed to a 60‐Hz electric field (100 kV/ m unperturbed) for 19 h/day for the duration of experimentation.

After four weeks of exposure, F0 female rats were mated to unexposed male rats during the field‐off period. No significant developmental effects were detected in their litters, confirming our previous results with swine and rats. The F0 females were mated for a second time at 7.2 months of age, and the fetuses were evaluated shortly before term. In the first experiments, the incidence of intrauterine mortality was significantly less in exposed than in sham‐exposed litters, and there was a tendency (P = 0.12) for an increased incidence of malformed fetuses in exposed litters. Neither end point was significantly affected in the second experiment.

Copulatory behavior of the female F1 offspring, which were bred at three months of age, was not affected in either experiment. There was a statistically significant decrease in the fertility of F1 exposed females and a significant increase in the fraction of exposed litters with malformed fetuses in the first experiment; both end points were essentially the same in the sham and exposed groups of the second experiment.

That the significant effects detected in the first experiment were not seen in the second may be attributed to random or biological variation. Alternatively, the finding may indicate that the response threshold for induction of malformations lies near 100 kV/m.

Keywords: chronic exposure, teratology, reproduction, growth, embryotoxicity

References

  1. Breslow N (1970): A generalized Kruskal‐Wallis test for comparing k samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika 57:579–594. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cutler SJ, Ederer F (1958): Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chron Dis 8:699–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Free MJ, Kaune WT, Phillips RD, Cheng H‐C (1981): Endocrinological effects of high‐strength electric fields on rats. Bioelectromagnetics 2:105–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holson JR, Scott WJ, Gaylor DW, Wilson JG (1976): Reduced interlitter variability in rats resulting from a restricted mating period and reassessment of the “litter effect”. Teratology 14:135–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaune WT, Phillips RD (1980): Comparison of the coupling of grounded humans, swine and rats to vertical 60‐Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 1:117–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knickerbocker GG, Kouwenhoven WB, Barnes HC (1967): Exposure of mice to a strong ac field: An experimental study. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 86:498–505. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kopf R, Lorenz D, Salewski E (1964): Der Einflus von Thalidomid auf die Fertilitat von Ratten in Generations versuch uber zwei Generationen, Nauanyn Schmiedebergs. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmacol 247:121–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lindgren BW (1963): “Statistical Theory.” New York: The MacMillian Co. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mantel N (1963): Chi‐square tests with one degree of freedom: Extensions of the Mantel‐Haenzel procedure. J Am Statist Assoc 58:690–700. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959): Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marino AA, Becker RO, Ulrich B (1976): The effects of continuous exposure to low frequency electric fields on three generations of mice: A pilot study. Experientia 32:565–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marino AA, Reichmanis M, Becker RO, Ulrich B, Cullen JM (1980): Power frequency electric field induces biological changes in successive generations of mice. Experientia 36:309–311. [Google Scholar]
  13. McLaren A, Michie D (1960): Congenital runts In Wolsterholine GE, O'Connor GM. (eds) “Congenital Malformations.” London: Churchill Publishing Company, pp 178–193. [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer AK (1977): Incidence of sporadic malformations, anomalies and variations in random bred laboratory animals In Neubert D, Merker HJ, Kwasigroch TE. (eds) “Methods in Prenatal Toxicology.” Littletown, MA: PSG Publishing Company, Inc. pp 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  15. Peraud J (1976): Levels of spontaneous malformations in the CD rat and the CD‐1 mouse. Lab Anim Sci 26:293–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Phillips RD, Kaune WT (1977): “Biological Effects of High‐Strength Electric Fields.” CONS/1830‐2, Conservation Division, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, DC. Springfield, VA: NTIS. [Google Scholar]
  17. Phillips RD, Kaune WT, Decker JR, Hjeresen DL (1976): “Biological Effects of High‐Strength Electric Fields on Small Laboratory Animals.” CONS/1830‐1, Conservation Division, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, DC. Springfield, VA: NTIS. [Google Scholar]
  18. Siegel S (1956): “Non‐Parametric Statistics for Behavioral Sciences.” New York: McGraw‐Hill. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sikov MR, Beamer LJ, Rommereim DN, Buschbom RL, Kaune WT, Phillips RD (1987a): Evaluation of reproduction and development in Hanford Miniature Swine exposed to 60‐Hz electric fields In Anderson LE, Kelman BJ, Weigel RJ. (eds): “Interaction of Biological Systems with Static and ELF Electric and Magnetic Fields.” 23rd Annual Hanford Life Sciences Symposium, October 2‐4, 1984, Richland, WA. Springfield, WA: NTIS; 379–383. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sikov MR, Montgomery LD, Smith LG, Phillips RD (1984): Studies on prenatal and postnatal development in rats exposed to 60‐Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 5:101–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sikov MR, Rommereim DN, Beamer LJ, Buschbom RL, Kaune WT, Phillips RD (1987b): Developmental studies of Hanford miniature swine exposed to 60‐Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 8:229–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Staples RE (1974): Detection of visceral alterations in mammalian fetuses. Teratology 9:A‐37. [Google Scholar]
  23. Staples RE, Schnell VL (1964): Refinements in rapid clearing technic in the KOH‐alizarin red S method for fetal bone. Stain Technol 39:62–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Steel RDG, Torrie JH (1960): Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw‐Hill. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson JG (1965): Embryological considerations in teratology In Wilson JG, Warkany J. (eds) “Teratology.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 251–261. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioelectromagnetics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES