Virus factories: associations of cell organelles for viral replication and morphogenesis

Abstract

Genome replication and assembly of viruses often takes place in specific intracellular compartments where viral components concentrate, thereby increasing the efficiency of the processes. For a number of viruses the formation of ‘factories’ has been described, which consist of perinuclear or cytoplasmic foci that mostly exclude host proteins and organelles but recruit specific cell organelles, building a unique structure. The formation of the viral factory involves a number of complex interactions and signalling events between viral and cell factors. Mitochondria, cytoplasmic membranes and cytoskeletal components frequently participate in the formation of viral factories, supplying basic and common needs for key steps in the viral replication cycle.

Abbreviations used:

ASFV

African swine fever virus

BUNV

bunyamwera virus

CPV

cytopathic vacuole

EEV

extracellular enveloped virus

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

ERGIC

ER‐Golgi intermediate compartment

HHV

human herpesvirus

HSV

herpes simplex virus

IEV

intracellular enveloped virus

IF

intermediate filament

IMV

intracellular mature virion

IV

immature virus

NS protein

non‐structural protein

RER

rough ER

RUBV

rubella virus

SFV

Semliki Forest virus

SINV

sindbis virus

VV

vaccinia virus

Introduction

When a virus enters a cell, the subsequent steps in its replication cycle involve interactions between different types of viral components and much more complex pools of host factors. Nowadays much effort is being dedicated to the identification of such host factors, whose characterization is an important field in virology and cell biology. Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites, depending on cell functions for their morphogenesis and propagation (Freed, 2004; van Regenmortel, 2000; Weiss, 2002). The high rates of spontaneous mutation of viral genomes, particularly for RNA viruses (Domingo and Holland, 1997), have created continuous new interactions between viral and cellular elements, some of them rendering useful solutions for efficient viral morphogenesis and propagation. Among the most complex interactions are the signals for formation of structures known as ‘viral factories’. A variety of non‐related viruses have been reported to induce a recruitment of organelles, usually to the perinuclear area, and build a new structure that functions in viral replication, assembly, or both. Well known for complex viruses, such as members of the Poxviridae, Iridoviridae, and Asfarviridae, structures with similar functions are also formed during replication of Herpesviridae, Togaviridae, Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, Reoviridae, and potentially also by Coronaviridae, Arteriviridae, and Polioviridae (Table 1). Late in infection, many viruses induce the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions, usually by aggregation of viral structural proteins and/or nucleocapsids. These aggregates accumulate as dead‐end material in inclusion bodies. In contrast, the viral factory is an early functional structure that dramatically alters large areas of the infected cells (Figure 1) and induces changes in composition and organization of cellular compartments depending on the step of the virus replication cycle. Ultrastructural analysis shows that some factories occupy very large regions of the infected cell (Figures 1A–1D) while others are confined to a restricted area (Figure 1E). Viruses use different strategies to create these macro‐structures. It has been suggested that viral factories could form passively as a consequence of localized accumulation of large quantities of protein which is produced in excess during infection. However, there is growing evidence that the generation of particular replication and assembly sites within cells also occurs actively by targeting viral proteins into specific cellular compartments. For example, Pox‐, Irido‐ and Asfar‐like viruses seem to take advantage of a cellular defence mechanism known as the formation of ‘aggresomes’ to concentrate structural components around the microtubule organizing centre (Heath et al., 2001). RNA viruses frequently modify membranes, usually from the secretory pathway, where they anchor their replication complexes and establish assembly sites (Griffiths and Rottier, 1992; Risco and Carrascosa, 1999). We have selected several virus families to describe the best characterized viral factories (Table 1). Members of other families not included in this review probably follow similar principles to build and coordinate the centres of viral replication and assembly inside infected cells.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the virus families included in this reviewIIV‐6, invertebrate iridescent virus 6; FV‐3, frog virus 3; VZV, varicella zoster virus; YFV, yellow fever virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; BVDV, bovine viral diarrhoea virus; RVFV, Rift valley fever virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; BEV, equine torovirus; MHV, mouse hepatitis virus; EAV, equine arteritis virus; PRRSV, porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus; ds, double‐stranded; ss, single‐stranded; S, M and L denote small, medium and large respectively.

Virus family (number of members in parentheses)	Representative viruses	Associated diseases	Genome structure	Number of proteins	Virion structure	Replication site	Assembly site
Poxviridae (>100)	Vaccinia* Variola	encephalitis smallpox	dsDNA (130–375 kbp)	150–300 (∼100 in virions)	enveloped, brick‐shaped (>300 nm)	predominantly cytoplasmic (RER‐associated)	cytoplasmic membranes
Asfarviridae (1)	ASFV*	severe illness in pigs	dsDNA (170–190 kbp)	∼150 (∼50 in virions)	enveloped, icosahedral (175–215 nm)	nuclear and cytoplasmic	cytoplasmic membranes
Iridoviridae (>20)	IIV‐6* FV‐3	infections in aquatic animals	dsDNA (140–303 kbp)	>100 (∼36 in virions)	enveloped, icosahedral (120–350 nm)	nuclear	cytoplasmic
Herpesviridae (>130)	HHV‐1* VZV	congenital disease, genital infections chicken pox	dsDNA (125–>240 kbp)	70–>200 (>30 in virions)	enveloped, icosahedral, capsid (125 nm)	nuclear	nuclear and cytoplasmic
Togaviridae (25)	SINV* RUBV*	encephalitis polyarthritis, congenital rubella syndrome	ssRNA+(9–11.8 kb)	7–8 (3–4 in virions)	enveloped, icosahedral (70 nm)	lysosomes endosomes	cytoplasmic Golgi (RUBV)
Flaviviridae (∼80)	YFV* HCV* BVDV*	encephalitis hepatitis haemorrhagic fevers	ssRNA+(9.6–11.3 kb)	9–12 (3–4 in virions)	enveloped, icosahedral (50 nm)	cytoplasmic membranes	RER
Bunyaviridae (>350)	BUNV* RVFV* Hantaan*	haemorrhagic fevers, encephalitis	3 ssRNA− (S=0.9–2.9 kb M=3.6–4.8 kb L=6.4–12.2 kb)	6 (4 in virions)	enveloped, spherical (80–120 nm)	cytoplasmic membranes	Golgi
Coronaviridae (∼18)	IBV* BEV* MHV	gastroenteritis hepatitis respiratory infections	ssRNA+(27.6–31 kb)	7–10 (4–5 in virions)	enveloped, spherical isometric capsid (120–160 nm)	autophagosomes	pre‐Golgi
Arteriviridae (4)	EAV* PRRSV	respiratory disease, abortion, haemorrhagic fever	ssRNA+(12.7–15.7 kb)	8–9 (6–7 in virions)	enveloped, spherical isometric capsid (45–60 nm)	cytoplasmic double membranes	Golgi

^* Type species

Figure 1.

Structural changes in virus‐infected cells during formation of viral factories

Confocal microscopy of uninfected BHK‐21 cells (A) shows normal distribution of mitochondria (green). (B) In bunyavirus‐infected cells, mitochondria (green) have moved to the perinuclear area and surround the Golgi region (red) where the viral factory (vf) is built. Golgi complex was labelled with an anti‐giantin antibody (kindly provided by Dr. M. Renz, Institute of Immunology and Molecular Genetics, Karlsruhe, Germany) while mitochondria were labelled with Mitotracker green (Molecular Probes, Inc.). Ultrastructural analysis shows that the characteristic distribution of organelles in control cells (C) changes completely in infected cells (D) where organelles move to the perinuclear region (arrows), building a large factory and leaving the peripheral areas almost empty (asterisks). (E) In reovirus‐infected cells the vf occupies a large, but apparently more restricted area (marked with arrows) where empty (e) and full (f) viral particles are seen. N, nucleus; mi, mitochondria. Bar=0.5 μm (C) or 1 μm (D and E).

Factories of large DNA viruses I: viral factories resemble aggresomes

The cytoplasm is the site of assembly for several large DNA viruses such as poxviruses, iridoviruses, and the closely related African swine fever virus (ASFV, Asfarviridae). Early in infection there is an exclusion of host proteins and organelles from the region where the factory will be assembled. This creates a rather electronlucent ‘empty’ area close to the nucleus. At the same time large amounts of viral structural proteins and viral DNA accumulate, as well as mitochondria, cytoskeletal filaments and different types of membranous structures. Some of these membranes are used for viral replication while some others will be modified to produce viral envelopes.

Poxviridae

Vaccinia virus (VV) is the best‐characterized member of the Poxviridae family and, due to its complexity, one of the most challenging viruses (Moss, 2001). VV contains a double‐stranded DNA genome of approx. 190 kb encoding for more than 200 proteins (more than 100 are actually incorporated into the infectious virion). This is in contrast with many viruses, which usually encode for approx. 5–12 polypeptides (Flint et al., 2000). A large number of virus‐encoded enzymes and factors are packaged into the virus particle. Poxviruses also encode multiple proteins that interfere with the induction and activity of complement and cytokines (Moss, 2001). Poxviruses are large viruses that can be visualized by light microscopy. VV particles, their largest dimensions reaching 300 nm, are the size of small bacteria. To date, a detailed characterization of VV structure has not been possible due to its size and complexity. Used as an efficient vaccine that eradicated smallpox (caused by the related variola virus) in 1977, and today for designing new vectors and vaccines (Earl et al., 2004; Bisht et al., 2004), this virus has also become the focus of cell biologists, due to the complex interactions that the virus establishes with cellular components (Cudmore et al., 1995; Ploubidou et al., 2000; Sodeik et al., 1993). The replication cycle of VV can be divided into virion entry, early transcription, DNA replication, virus assembly, and egress (Mallardo et al., 2002). All these steps occur in the cytoplasm of the host cell (Figure 2). When VV enters a cell, the viral core is released into the cytoplasm. Early mRNAs are produced inside the core, and subsequently released, by an unknown mechanism. Translation of these mRNAs is required to initiate viral DNA replication. Recent data suggest that core uncoating and the release of the parental DNA occurs close to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes (Welsch et al., 2003). VV replication complexes are then established in distinct cytoplasmic sites that are enclosed by membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER; Tolonen et al., 2001). The sites become entirely surrounded by RER membranes until virus assembly is initiated (Figures 2A and 2B). This wrapping, which seems to promote efficient VV replication (Mallardo et al., 2002), could be mediated by a VV protein, the product of the E8R gene. The process shows several interesting analogies to nuclear envelope assembly/disassembly during the cell cycle. VV replication induces the expression of late genes that are required for virion assembly. At that moment the organization of the factory changes completely. RER membranes dissociate from the replication sites and new structures are observed in those areas (Figure 2C). The first characteristic structures are the typical crescent‐shaped membranes that attach to the surface of dense granular aggregations (named viroplasm foci) to form the spherical immature viruses (IVs). Structure and composition of the viroplasm are not completely characterized, but it is known that a number of VV proteins concentrate there (Vanslyke and Hruby, 1994) and membranous structures have sometimes been distinguished inside (Cudmore et al., 1996; Risco et al., 1999). VV morphogenesis occurs in different steps through a series of intermediate structures. Important controversy has traditionally surrounded the origin of the primary membrane that forms VV crescents and IVs. The initial idea of a ‘de novo’ synthesis (Dales and Mosbach, 1968; Hollinshead et al., 1999) has been generally disfavoured and it has been suggested that viral crescents could originate from the transitional elements operating between the ER and the Golgi complex (also known as ERGIC, from ‘ER‐Golgi intermediate compartment’) that are massively recruited to the areas of VV assembly (Krijnse‐Locker et al., 1996; Risco et al., 2002; Rodríguez et al., 1997; Sodeik et al., 1993). Alternatively, it has been recently proposed that viral crescents could directly derive from the ER by a novel mechanism (Husain and Moss, 2003). Approaches to three‐dimensional visualization of IVs strongly suggest that VV builds its first envelope using a unique jigsaw puzzle‐like mechanism, in which individual crescents are put together to build spheres (Risco et al., 2002). This is in contrast with the general processes of budding or wrapping for acquisition of viral envelopes (Garoff et al., 1998; Pornillos et al., 2002; Rouiller et al., 1998).

Figure 2.

Structural changes in viral factories of VV‐infected cells

(A and B) Replication complexes (stars) are rapidly formed in the perinuclear region at early times post‐infection. They are enclosed by elements of the RER. Mitochondria (mi) attach to these membranes, which start to open up (arrowheads in B) at the end of the replication phase. (C) When assembly starts, the viral factory (vf) looks like a wide area of low electron density where viral crescents (c) and immature viruses (IV) start to be distinguished. (D) Higher magnification of the area marked in (C), that has been rotated by 90°. Tubular elements of unknown identity (arrows) and IFs surround the factory. (E) At late times post‐infection the factory is filled with both IVs and IMVs, as well as mitochondria. Arrows point to mature virions that have abandoned the perinuclear region to reach the cell periphery before exit. (F and G) Higher magnification electron micrographs showing the two vaccinia infectious forms: the IMV and the EEV, respectively. V V‐infected HeLa cells were kindly provided by Dr. M. Esteban (Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CSIC, Madrid). (A) and (B) reprinted from Molecular Biology of the Cell (Mol. Biol. Cell 2001 12: 2031–2046) with permission by the American Society for Cell Biology. N, nucleus. Bars=200 nm in A, B, D, F and G; 0.5 μm in C and E.

Vimentin intermediate filaments (IFs) are also recruited to VV factories during the assembly of viroplasm foci. Confocal microscopy shows that these filaments change their distribution in infected cells, building a cage around the VV factory (Risco et al., 2002). A collapse of vimentin IFs around viral factories has also been observed for reoviruses (Sharpe et al., 1982), picornaviruses (Nédellec et al., 1998), iridoviruses (Murti and Goorha, 1983), ASFV (Heath et al., 2001) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Karczewski and Strebel, 1996). This collapse of vimentin resembles a constitutive cellular process known as aggresome formation that cells use to encapsulate potentially toxic aggregates of misfolded proteins (see below). In addition, ultrastructural characterization of the viroplasm foci within VV factories also suggest that vimentin can participate in the assembly of immature viruses. In fact, vimentin has been localized in viroplasm foci and inside immature viruses. The pattern of immunogold labelling in these structures suggests that vimentin filaments could participate in organizing the interior of the viroplasm foci, facilitating egress of viral crescents and incorporation of viral proteins into immature viral particles (Risco et al., 2002).

Several VV proteins have been found to participate in recruitment and modification of membranes that form the crescents, or in their attachment to viroplasm before formation of IVs (Rodríguez et al., 1997; Wolffe et al., 1996; Traktman et al., 2000). DNA encapsidation seems to trigger IV‐particle maturation, a process that later transforms IVs into infectious, brick‐shaped intracellular mature virions (IMVs) (Sodeik and Krijnse‐Locker, 2002). Particular VV proteins participate in this process (Heljasvaara et al., 2001).

Mitochondria are important elements of the VV factory since they are observed near VV replication sites and in contact with assembling and maturing VV (Risco et al., 2002; Tolonen et al., 2001) (Figures 2A–2C). Since actin has been localized in the viral factories after fowlpox virus infection, a role of actin filaments in morphogenesis of orthopoxvirus has been suggested (Boulanger et al., 2000). In addition, several studies have shown the recruitment of transcription factors, cyclophilins, and chaperonins to viral factories (Broyles et al., 1999; Castro et al., 2003; Hung et al., 2002) pointing to a participation of these factors in viral replication and/or morphogenesis. Ultrastructural analysis shows that when high preservation cryomethods are applied, some elements of unknown identity accumulate in VV factories. These include different types of f ilaments as well as rigid tubes (Figure 2D). These tubular structures exhibit a random distribution in normal, non‐infected cells (C. Risco, unpublished results). Their molecular composition and potential function in the factory remain to be established.

The organization of the VV factory changes again at times late post‐infection. It becomes f illed with viral intermediates and mature virions (Figure 2E). The IV particle transforms into the fully infectious IMV (Figure 2F). A percentage of the IMVs leave the factory along microtubules and travel to the trans‐Golgi network, where virions become enwrapped by a double membrane to form the intracellular enveloped virus (IEV). IEVs move towards the plasma membrane on microtubular tracks and, like some intracellular bacteria, are capable of polymerizing actin tails, which facilitates the release of the extracellular enveloped virus (EEV) into the extracellular space (Rietdorf et al., 2001) (Figure 2G). The process of actin tail formation, first identified for VV and several intracellular bacteria, was later discovered to operate constitutively for vesicular transport in normal cells (Merrifield et al., 1999; Orth et al., 2002; Taunton et al., 2000). The second infectious form of VV, the EEV, contains an additional membrane compared with IMVs and also some additional proteins (Moss, 2001).

In conclusion, the VV factory is a very dynamic structure, where viral and cell factors move in and out depending on the step of the viral life cycle. During the replication phase mitochondria and RER cisternae are recruited and form ‘mini‐nuclei’, that later dissociate when assembly foci and vimentin cages are formed. Assembled infectious virions move along microtubular tracks to the Golgi area, where secondary wrapping takes place, before transport to the plasma membrane and release occurs. These movements probably imply a disruption of the vimentin cage when viruses move en masse to the cell periphery before release into the extracellular medium.

Asfarviridae and Iridoviridae

The only member of the Asfarviridae family, ASFV is the causative agent of a severe disease of pigs. ASFV is an icosahedral double‐stranded DNA virus that replicates in the cytoplasm of porcine monocytic cells where it induces the formation of large virus factories (Brookes et al., 1996). ASFV combines the genomic organization of poxviruses with the striking icosahedral symmetry of the iridoviruses, suggesting an evolutionary connection to both virus families. In fact there are similarities in the organization of the viral factories built by these three virus families. ASFV is a complex virus that encodes approx. 150 potential proteins. Mature virions incorporate more than 50 proteins, including a number of enzymes and factors needed for early mRNA processing (Salas, 1999). Extracellular virions are large enveloped structures of 175–215 nm in diameter. Replication of viral DNA seems to be initiated in the nucleus (Garcia‐Beato et al., 1992), and is followed by a second phase of replication in the cytoplasm, where distinctive viral factories form.

Iridoviruses have only been isolated from poikilothermic animals, usually associated with aquatic environments including marine habitats. Transmission mechanisms are poorly understood for the majority of these viruses (Williams, 1996). Iridoviruses are structurally complex, with up to 36 polypeptides in mature virions, including a number of virion‐associated enzymes. Virions have icosahedral symmetry and are usually 120–200 nm in diameter but may be up to 350 nm. The virion core, which contains a single linear double‐stranded DNA molecule of between 140 to 303 kb, is surrounded by a lipid membrane acquired by budding through the host plasma membrane. Capsid shell is a precise and highly symmetric structure (Yan et al., 2000). Early replication and transcription start inside the nucleus (Schetter et al., 1993). DNA is transported to the cytoplasm in the form of a large branched concatemer whose processing into mature viral DNA could take place during packaging into the virion. Transcription continues in the cytoplasm, where virions assemble in close association with virogenic stroma (Qin et al., 2001).

Figure 3 shows common characteristic features of viral factories formed by ASFV and iridoviruses: in contrast with VV factories, for these viruses there is no description of the specific structure that anchors the viral replication complexes. ASFV factories are distinct from the surrounding cytoplasm (Figure 3), they exclude cellular organelles, but contain ribosomes and polysomes, membranous material, and cytoskeletal elements. Immunofluorescence studies (de Matos and Carvalho, 1993) showed a movement of viral inclusions from a peripheral to a perinuclear location where they fuse to give a single large perinuclear factory enclosed in a vimentin cage (Heath et al., 2001) (Figure 3A). Many mitochondria also accumulate around factories (Figure 3B). Reorganization of other cytoskeletal elements was also demonstrated: microtubules decreased in number and microfilaments were reorganized in association with the plasma membrane (Carvalho et al., 1988). It has been proposed that phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of vimentin could be the mechanism for regulating cage formation during ASFV infection (Heath et al., 2001). The virus factories accumulate immature virus particles, some with and others without a dense nucleoprotein core (Figure 3C). It has been proposed that the nucleoprotein core may be formed in association with a virus factory membrane component and then inserted into a partly formed ‘empty’ particle just before it is completely sealed (Brookes et al., 1996). In the case of ASFV it has been observed that viral particles are formed from precursor membranes that are thought to be cisternal structures derived from the ER (Figures 3D and 3E) (Andrés et al., 1998; Rouiller et al., 1998). Hexagons (200‐nm‐diameter in cross section) and a series of one‐ to six‐sided assembly intermediates are seen in the factories. Morphological evidence indicates that viral membranes become icosahedral by the progressive construction of the outer capsid layer, which is composed mainly of viral protein (Andrés et al., 2002). It has been reported recently that the transmembrane ASFV structural protein p54 is critical for the recruitment and transformation of the ER membranes into the precursors of the viral envelope (Rodríguez et al., 2004).

Figure 3.

Factories of asfarviruses and iridoviruses

Confocal microscopy shows the factories of ASFV (A) surrounded by a vimentin cage (red) that encloses viral proteins (green; nuclei are stained in blue). (B) Transmission electron microscopy shows the ultrastructure of factories for the related iridoviruses. Numerous mitochondria (mi) accumulate around the factory (vf), where viral particles start to be seen (arrows). (C) Higher magnification shows viral particles at different stages, such as empty capsids (arrowhead) and full viral particles (arrow), the latter containing the viral DNA. (D and E) show modified membranes that accumulate in viral factories (vf) induced by ASFV. These membranes come from the RER and originate the icosahedral viral core (c) and the inner envelope (ie). Extracellular virions (F and G) have an additional outer envelope (oe) taken from the plasma membrane. (A) Reproduced from The Journal of Cell Biology, 2001, 153, 449–455 with copyright permission of the Rockefeller University Press. (D–G) Reproduced from Andrés et al. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 8988–9001 with copyright permission of the American Society for Microbiology. N, nucleus. Bars=1 μm in B; 250 nm in C; 0.5 μm in D; 100 nm in E; 50 nm in F and G.

The complex morphogenesis of these viruses may require a considerable amount of energy. Mitochondria surrounding viroplasm have been described in cells infected with the iridovirus, frog virus 3 (Kelly, 1975). In ASFV it has been demonstrated that the large clusters of mitochondria around the factories are not the result of an increased biogenesis of mitochondria in the infected cell but are due to a mass migration of pre‐existing organelles to the periphery of the viral assembly areas (Rojo et al., 1998). Interestingly, a dramatic shift in the ultrastructure of the mitochondria is detected for those mitochondria surrounding the factories that contain virus particles: condensed ultrastructure, with a marked condensation of the cristae. This has been described as the characteristic state of actively respiring mitochondria (Hackenbrock, 1966; Rojo et al., 1998; Valcarce et al., 1988). However, most of the mitochondria in cells where the viral factories contain only precursor membranes presented the morphology of ‘resting’ mitochondria. Microtubules are probably involved in the transport of the mitochondria to the proximity of the viral factories, as suggested by nocodazole treatment, which prevented their clustering around the viral assembly sites. Mitochondria in viral factories seem to provide the necessary energy for the virus morphogenetic processes; in fact, envelopment and capsid formation depend on calcium gradients and ATP (Cobbold et al., 2000). Intracellular ASFV particles associate with microtubules to reach the plasma membrane (de Matos and Carvalho, 1993). The final product of assembly, the mature extracellular virions, possess an additional envelope derived from the plasma membrane (Figures 3F and 3G).

The described rearrangement of vimentin around the factories, as well as recruitment of mitochondria and chaperons in infected cells, show important similarities with aggresome formation (Heath et al., 2001; Risco et al., 2002). It has been shown that cells respond to the production of high levels of misfolded proteins by transporting them to perinuclear sites known as ‘aggresomes’. In fact, although protein folding and assembly are highly chaperoned processes, their success rate is rather low; overall, up to 30$ of nascent proteins are defective and readily destroyed (Schubert et al., 2000). For wild‐type secretory and membrane proteins synthesized in the ER failure rates of 10–70$ have been reported (Cohen and Taraboulos, 2003). Once formed, aggregates tend to be refractory to proteolysis and may lead to the intracellular deposition of potentially toxic aggregates. Aggregated proteins are specifically delivered to inclusion bodies by dynein‐dependent retrograde transport on microtubules (Kawaguchi et al., 2003; Kopito, 2000). Intracellular and extracellular accumulation of aggregated protein are linked to many diseases, including aging‐related neurodegeneration and systemic amyloidosis.

Aggresomes are located close to centrosomes and are surrounded by a characteristic vimentin cage. It has been proposed that aggresomes recruit mitochondria as an energy source for protein folding and protein degradation. These complexes contain chaperones and the 20 S proteasome, all of which need ATP (García‐Mata et al., 2002; Wigley et al., 1999). The ability of aggresomes to concentrate proteins and cellular chaperones make them highly suitable for facilitating virus assembly. It is possible that a cellular defence mechanism originally designed to reduce the potential toxicity of misfolded proteins is exploited by ASFV, VV and iridoviruses as a means of concentrating structural proteins at sites of virus assembly.

Factories of large DNA viruses II: herpesviruses form nuclear and cytoplasmic factories

Viruses included in the Herpesviridae family encompass enveloped DNA viruses of high complexity which are grouped together based on common biological characteristics and morphology (Roizman and Knipe, 2001). Herpesviruses are widely distributed in nature. Presently, more than 130 virus species are known. One of the important human pathogens and type species of the genus simplexvirus, the human herpesvirus‐1 (HHV‐1), herpes simplex virus‐1 (HSV‐1), infects neonates, children and adults. It produces a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from mild illness to severe and life‐threatening disease (Roizman and Pellett, 2001). The genome of herpesviruses is composed of linear double‐stranded DNA from 125 to more than 240 kb in size. The number of open reading frames contained within herpesvirus genomes ranges from about 70 to more than 200. The polypeptide composition of the mature virion varies greatly among different herpesviruses. HHV‐1, pseudorabies virus, HHV‐3 and varizella zoster virus are the best studied alphaherpesviruses and more than 30 virion proteins have been identified. Virions comprise a complex and characteristic ultrastructure consisting of both symmetric and nonsymmetric components (Homa and Brown, 1997). The virion can be differentiated into a DNA‐containing core, an icosahedral capsid (162 capsomers, 100–110 nm in diameter), the tegument (which surrounds the nucleocapsid), and the envelope. The core consists mainly of the viral genome which is packaged into a preformed capsid. The mature capsid is composed of five proteins, while the tegument contains at least 15 different polypeptides, many of which are not strictly required for virion assembly. The viral envelope contains at least 10 integral membrane glycoproteins, a subset of which is required for adsorption and penetration in the host cell (Spear, 1993). All herpesviruses specify a number of enzymes involved in DNA synthesis and processing of proteins, although the exact array of enzymes may vary among different herpesviruses.

The replication of herpesviruses is a very complex sequence of events that includes the construction of a nuclear factory followed by a cytoplasmic factory (Figure 4). After adsorption and penetration, the incoming nucleocapsids are transported along microtubules to the nuclear pore where the DNA is released into the nucleus (Granzow et al., 1997; Sodeik et al., 1997), while tegument proteins, although many of their functions are unknown, are thought to modify cellular metabolism. Viral transcription, synthesis of viral DNA and capsid assembly occur in the nucleus. Specific viral proteins localize in the nucleus and assemble onto the parental viral DNA molecules in punctate structures called ‘prereplicative sites’ (Figure 4A) located near Nuclear Domain 10 structures (Ishov and Maul, 1996; Uprichard and Knipe, 1996, 1997). As viral DNA synthesis progresses, the progeny DNA molecules and replication complexes accumulate in nuclear globular structures called ‘replication compartments’ (Figure 4B). Viral DNA synthesis, late gene transcription, capsid assembly, and DNA encapsidation all occur within these nuclear factories. The replication structures are dynamic and replication proteins rearrange reversibly to give different patterns, depending on the status of viral DNA replication (Quinlan et al., 1984). The spatial organization of replication structures within the cell nucleus has been studied for HSV‐infected cells by confocal microscopy and three‐dimensional reconstruction of optical series (de Bruyn Kops and Knipe, 1994). Replication structures were shown to extend throughout the nuclear interior in a highly ordered arrangement which appears to be independent of the nuclear lamina. Furthermore, viral DNA replication compartments are assembled within a pre‐existing spatial framework in the cell nucleus, consistent with the view of a highly organized nuclear interior (Baxter et al., 2002; Chubb and Bickmore, 2003). This may reflect targeting of the viral proteins to specific structures in the nucleus or, alternatively, viral proteins may localize to areas where formation of replication complexes is not impeded by existing host structures. Specialized machinery for late gene expression has been detected within replication compartments (McNamee et al., 2000). After synthesis of the capsid proteins, they move into the nucleus, where capsid assembly occurs (Figure 4C). Empty shells containing an internal scaffolding are assembled first, and the scaffolding protein is lost or disassembled upon insertion of viral DNA into the capsid via vertices (Figure 4C, inset).

Figure 4.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic factories of herpesviruses

(A) and (B) show the intranuclear location of herpesvirus prereplicative and replicative compartments, respectively, as visualized by immunofluorescence of the viral protein ICP8. (A) Vero cell infected with wild‐type virus in the presence of the viral polymerase inhibitor PAA. (B) Vero cell infected with the wild‐type virus in the absence of PAA. (C) At the ultrastructural level intranuclear empty capsids (arrowheads), as well as capsids packaging DNA (inset), are seen at later times post‐infection. (D) Release of the primary enveloped viral particle from inside the perinuclear space (arrowhead) into the cytoplasm (cy) by fusion of the primary envelope with the outer lamella of the nuclear membrane. (E) Secondary envelopment of nucleocapsids (arrows) in the trans‐Golgi area. (F) Tegumentation adds a layer of viral proteins (arrowheads) to the capsid that acquire an envelope from trans‐Golgi membranes. (G) Extracellular virions after release from cells. (A and B) reproduced from Liptak et al. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 1759–1767 with copyright permission of the American Society for Microbiology. Inset in (C) reproduced from Granzow et al. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 2072–2082, with copyright permission of the American Society for Microbiology. N, nucleus; Go, Golgi. Bars=200 nm in C, D, F, and G; 100 nm in the inset of C; 500 nm in E.

The organization and dynamics of the cytoplasmic factory is not completely understood. While the process of capsid formation has been characterized for HSV in detail (Newcomb and Brown, 1991, 1994; Newcomb et al., 1996; Trus et al., 1996), the following steps of tegumentation and envelopment have been controversial. It is now widely accepted that capsids acquire a primary envelope by budding at the inner leaflet of the nuclear membrane. This primary envelope is lost by fusion with the outer leaflet of the nuclear membrane. Thus, nucleocapsids are released (Figure 4D) by a two‐step process of envelopment/de‐envelopment at different cell compartments (Granzow et al., 1997, 2001; Mettenleiter, 2002; Skepper et al., 2001). The cellular compartment in which tegumentation and secondary envelopment takes place has been identified for pseudorabies virus (Granzow et al., 1997). Tegumentation involves an intricate network of protein—protein interactions and occurs in the cytoplasm during secondary envelopment at membranes of the trans‐Golgi network (Figures 4E and 4F), although some tegument components may be retained or apposed when the capsid exits the nucleus. The first layer of tegument around the capsid seems to be composed of the UL36 protein and a second layer could be made of the UL37 gene product (Mettenleiter, 2002). Subsequent steps in tegumentation are still largely unknown, but it has been proposed that the UL48 protein, a major component of the HSV‐1 and pseudorabies virus tegument, may play a key role in tegument formation (Fuchs et al., 2003; Mossman et al., 2000). Cryo‐electron microscopy analysis showed that at least the innermost part of the tegument adjacent to the icosahedral capsid may also exhibit icosahedral symmetry (Zhou et al., 1999). The three‐dimensional structure of mature HSV‐1 particles has been analysed recently by cryo‐electron tomography (Grünewald et al., 2003). The tegument shows a particulate substructure with short actin‐like filaments. This suggests that actin microfilaments could participate in recruitment of tegument proteins. Interestingly, it has been observed that many tegument proteins are phosphorylated, and therefore protein phosphorylation may play an important role in tegument assembly and function (Mettenleiter, 2002). Secondary envelopment takes place at a Golgi‐derived compartment, the trans‐Golgi network (Figure 4F). Tegumented capsids bud into trans‐Golgi vesicles, where viral glycoproteins accumulate. Re‐envelopment is triggered by interaction of the nucleocapsid and/or attached tegument proteins with glycoprotein cytoplasmic domains of viral membrane glycoproteins. Virions are finally released (Figure 4G) by fusion of the Golgi‐derived vesicle membrane with the cell membrane (Granzow et al., 1997, 2001).

Factories of RNA viruses I: togaviruses induce factories around lysosomes

The association of RNA synthesis with intracellular membranes is a typical feature of positive‐stranded RNA viruses replicating in animal, plant, or insect cells. Many different membranous organelles are used by different RNA viruses to anchor their replication complexes. The family Togaviridae contains two genera, genus Alphavirus and genus Rubivirus (Weaver et al., 2000). The alphaviruses, composed of at least 24 members, are arboviruses (transmitted by arthropods), with a linear positive sense single‐stranded RNA (ssRNA) genome of approx. 9–11.8 kb (Strauss and Strauss, 1994). Rubella virus (RUBV), the only member of the genus Rubivirus, is a human pathogen and has a genome of 10 kb (Frey, 1994). Alphaviruses are transmitted between vertebrates by mosquitoes and other haematophagous arthropods. The type‐specific member of the alphaviruses is sindbis virus (SINV) whose structure and replication have been studied in great detail. In addition, both SINV and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) have provided valuable models for examining synthesis, posttranslational modifications, and localization of membrane glycoproteins. Alphaviruses have a wide host range and nearly worldwide distribution. Neither SINV nor SFV are serious pathogens for adult vertebrates unless virus is injected directly into the brain. In rare infections in humans, SINV and SFV produce arthralgia, rash and fever. Human polyarthritis can result from infection by some SINV strains (Schlesinger, 1999). The infection of cells of vertebrate origin is cytolytic and involves the shutdown of host cell macromolecular synthesis. In mosquito cells, alphaviruses usually establish a noncytolytic infection in which the cells survive and become persistently infected (Schlesinger and Schlesinger, 2001). RUBV, the causative agent of rubella (German measles), is only found in humans and does not replicate in insect cells. This virus is highly teratogenic during the first trimester of pregnancy. Although congenital rubella syndrome is controlled by vaccination in most developed countries, it remains endemic in the developing world and parts of Eastern Europe (Chantler et al., 2001). Apart from the genomic coding strategy, alphaviruses and RUBV are quite dissimilar (Frey, 1994). It has been proposed that RUBV originated by a complicated event including recombination with progenitors of the current alphaviruses, human hepatitis E virus, and possibly plant viruses (Frey and Wolinsky, 1999).

The virions of the two genera are roughly similar in size and structure, they are 70 nm in diameter, spherical, and contain icosahedral nucleocapsids surrounded by a lipid envelope containing heterodimeric glycoprotein spikes composed of two virus glycoproteins. Alphavirus structure has been characterized by cryo‐electron microscopy in combination with X‐ray crystallographic structures (Cheng et al., 1995; Mancini et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2002). The envelope is tightly organized around an icosahedral nucleocapsid that is 40 nm in diameter. The nucleocapsid is composed of the capsid protein, organized in a T=4 icosahedral symmetry, and the genomic RNA (Kuhn and Strauss, 2003). The three‐dimensional structure of rubella virions has not yet been determined. Particles of RUBV are pleomorphic in nature, indicating that the capsid—glycoprotein interaction is not as tight as it is in virions of alphaviruses (Murphy, 1980).

Factories of togaviruses are organized around endosomes and lysosomes (Figure 5). These components of the endocytic pathway have been shown to be involved in the entry and uncoating of many enveloped viruses (Helenius et al., 1989). However, the use of endosomes and lysosomes as sites of viral replication appears to be unique to the togaviruses (Magliano et al., 1998). In infected cells, modified endosomes and lysosomes constitute a special vesicular structure known as cytopathic vacuole (CPV). Similar virus‐induced vesicles have been reported as replication complexes for flaviviruses and picornaviruses (Bienz et al., 1990; Ng et al., 1983). However, the replication complexes of these viruses appear to be derived from the ER rather than from endosomes or lysosomes. Similar vesicular structures support replication of nodaviruses but in this case they assemble in the outer mitochondrial membrane (Miller et al., 2001). For togaviruses CPVs serve as sites of RNA replication and perhaps as sites of RNA translation and nucleocapsid assembly. Immunocytochemistry showed that the majority of CPVs are lysosomal and endosomal and stain positively for a number of specific marker antigens, such as lgp120, lgp110, lgp96, cathepsin L, Rab7, Lamp‐1, and Lamp‐2 (Froshauer et al., 1988; Kujala et al., 2001; Lee et al., 1994). CPVs are 0.6 to 2 μm in diameter and have 50 nm membrane spherules lining the vacuole membrane at regular intervals (Figures 5A and 5B). The viral induced double membrane‐bound vesicles that line the vacuoles of RUBV and alphavirus replication complexes most likely represent the precise sites of viral RNA replication (Kujala et al., 2001; Lee et al., 1994; Zhao et al., 1994). In the case of RUBV the size of spherules varies depending on the cell type, being smaller in Vero cells (Figure 5B) (Magliano et al., 1998; Risco et al., 2003). Viral nonstructural proteins have been localized to the limiting membranes of CPVs and are associated with the cytoplasmic face of the CPVs. Moreover, thread‐like ribonucleoprotein structures extend from the base of the spherules to the cytoplasmic face of the CPVs and form connections with the RER. The viral RNA polymerase is present in large branching granular and thread‐like structures anchored to the cytoplasmic surface of CPVs at the spherules. Antibodies specific for double‐stranded RNA also labelled the CPVs (Lee et al., 1994). The association with the RER suggested that the CPVs are replication factories that constitute sites for RNA replication as well as containing sites for translation of structural proteins and assembly of nucleocapsids. In addition, a number of host‐cell proteins (calreticulin, La antigen, Ro/SS‐A antigen, and the cellular retinoblastoma antigen) have been identified as factors involved in RUBV replication (Lee and Bowden, 2000). They are probably recruited to the CPVs where the membranous structure of the replication complexes could provide a structural framework for the assembly of all the components of replication. Large surface areas in membranes could allow a more rapid synthesis of viral progeny RNA and protect the nascent single‐stranded viral genomic RNA from degradation by cellular RNases (Lyle et al., 2002; Lee and Bowden, 2000).

Figure 5.

Factories of togaviruses

Replication complexes of alphaviruses (A) and RUBV (B) are anchored (arrows) in the internal membrane of modified lysosomes and endosomes known as CPVs surrounded by RER cisternae. (C) Mitochondria (arrows) are seen around CPVs (asterisks) in RUBV‐infected cells. (D) Golgi stacks (Go) containing viruses (V) are seen in contact (arrows) with CPVs of RUBV‐infected cells. (E) Capsids of alphaviruses (arrows) are assembled in the cytoplasm and transported to the plasma membrane before envelopment and release to the extracellular medium (F) where extracellular virions have an homogeneously dense interior (arrows). (G and H) show extracellular mature RUBV particles that exhibit a central core separated from the envelope. (A and F) reproduced from Zhao et al. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4204–4211, with copyright permission of EMBO J.; (B) Reprinted from Virology, 240, Magliano, Marshall, Bowden, Vardaxis, Meanger and Lee, Rubella virus replication complexes are virus modified lysosomes, pp. 57–63, Copyright (1998), with permission from Elsevier. (C, D, G and H) Reprinted from Virology, 312, Risco, Carrascosa and Frey, Structural maturation of rubella virus in the Golgi complex, pp. 261–269, Copyright (2003), with permission from Elsevier. (E) Reprinted from Virology, 265, Lee, Marshall and Bowden, Localization of rubella virus core particles in Vero cells, pp. 110–119, Copyright (1999), with permission from Elsevier. N, nucleus; mi, mitochondria. Bars=100 nm in A, B, E and F; 1 μm in C; 200 nm in D; 60 nm in G and H.

Mitochondria are seen around CPVs in RUBV‐infected cells (Magliano et al., 1998; Risco et al., 2003) (Figure 5C); this was observed similarly with the SFV replication complexes (Lee et al., 1996). Overexpression of RUBV structural proteins also resulted in clustering of the mitochondria to the perinuclear region (Beatch and Hobman, 2000). Electron‐dense zones associated with mitochondria have been detected in RUBV‐infected cells, findings that were not present in SFV‐infected cells (Lee et al., 1996). RUBV capsid protein has been found to associate with mitochondria in infected Vero cells (Lee et al., 1999). RUBV capsid is in fact a multifunctional protein that has roles in virus—host interactions as well as replication (Chen and Icenogle, 2004; Tzeng and Frey, 2003). It has been reported that RUBV capsid protein interacts with p32, a multi‐compartmental cellular protein capable of binding to a wide range of cellular proteins, which has a putative role in apoptosis through regulation of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (Jiang et al., 1999). In addition, p32 binds to a variety of virus phosphoproteins that complex with nucleic acids. Rubella capsid protein and p32 interact at the mitochondria (Beatch and Hobman, 2000). The potential role of this interaction in RUBV biology has not been determined.

In RUBV‐infected cells, CPVs establish contacts with the Golgi complex, the site of virus assembly and maturation (Figure 5D). These contacts could facilitate the transfer of replicated genomes from the replication complexes to the assembly sites. On the other hand, the nucleocapsids of alphaviruses appear in the cytoplasm of infected cells well before budding occurs (Figure 5E; Lee et al., 1999; Strauss and Strauss, 1994). Images in which CPVs appeared to fuse with the plasma membrane suggest that nucleocapsids could be transferred directly from the surroundings of CPV to the cell surface for budding and exit (Froshauer et al., 1988), to generate the extracellular mature virions (Figure 5F). Coming from the Golgi, where the virus matures and changes its internal structure (Risco et al., 2003), RUBV mature particles (Figures 5G and 5H) exit the cells inside secretory vesicles. When compared with the alphavirus virions, the core of RUBV particles is clearly separated from the envelope to which it connects with visible stripes (Figure 5H).

Factories of RNA viruses II: flaviviruses

The family Flaviviridae consists of three genera: Flavivirus, Pestivirus, and Hepacivirus. Members of the different genera are only distantly related but share a similar gene order and conserved nonstructural protein motifs (Lindenbach and Rice, 2003). The Flavivirus genus consists of nearly 80 viruses, many of which are arthropod‐borne human pathogens. Flaviviruses cause a variety of diseases including fever, encephalitis, and haemorrhagic fevers. Yellow fever, Dengue, and West Nile viruses are well known pathogens within this group (Lindenbach and Rice, 2003). The positive sense single stranded RNA genome of 11 kb has one long open reading frame giving rise to a single polyprotein comprising three structural proteins and seven nonstructural proteins (Rice et al., 1985). Flaviviruses are spherical enveloped viruses with a diameter of approx. 50 nm, and an electron‐dense core of 30 nm. Virions contain only three structural proteins: E (envelope), prM/M (membrane), and C (capsid). Cryo‐electron microscopy data have shown that the virion envelope and capsid have icosahedral symmetry and that interactions between E proteins are responsible for this structure (Kuhn et al., 2002).

Following translation and processing of the viral proteins, a viral replicase is assembled from non‐structural (NS) proteins, the viral RNA, and presumably some host factors. The replicase associates with membranes, probably through interactions involving the small hydrophobic NS proteins. In fact, flavivirus infection induces rearrangement of cytoplasmic membranes in the perinuclear region, where a factory‐like structure is formed (Figure 6). The earliest of these visible events is proliferation of the RER followed by the appearance of smooth membrane structures around the time of early logarithmic virus production (Ng and Hong, 1989). Smooth membrane vesicles appear as clustered vesicles of 100 to 200 nm (Leary and Blair, 1980; Lindenbach and Rice, 2003; Mackenzie et al., 1999) (Figure 6A). Later after infection, smooth convoluted membranes are found adjacent to vesicle packets. Flavivirus replication is thought to take place in these vesicles, which may be synonymous with ‘smooth membrane vesicle‐like structures’ (SMS) (Mackenzie et al., 2001). These structures appear as randomly folded or ordered membranes (sometimes associated with paracrystalline arrays) that are contiguous with the RER (Figure 6B). Recent work has provided biochemical evidence for a double membrane compartment enclosing the flavivirus replication complexes (Uchil and Satchidanandam, 2003). One study showed that 1,4‐galactosyltransferase, a marker of the trans‐Golgi, was localized to vesicle packets, whereas the RER‐Golgi intermediate compartment‐53 protein was localized within the convoluted membranes, suggesting distinct pathways for the formation of these two structures (Lindenbach and Rice, 2003; Mackenzie et al., 1999). The close physical connections of these structures, RER‐enclosing virions and nearby RER, supports the interpretation that perinuclear foci observed by immunofluorescence microscopy represent virus factories in which translation, RNA replication and virus assembly occur (Westaway et al., 2003). The nonstructural viral proteins NS1, NS2A, NS3, NS4A, and NS5 have all been shown to localize to these vesicles, although only a small proportion of NS3 and NS5 is apparently required for RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase activity. Thus, it appears that along with double‐stranded RNA, proteins implicated in RNA replication associate with vesicle packets. In contrast, the components of the viral serine proteases, NS2B and NS3, colocalized with convoluted membranes. The membrane reorganization that occurs in infected cells might therefore give rise to adjacent, but distinct, subcellular structures where viral polyprotein processing or RNA replication take place (Westaway et al., 2003).

Figure 6.

Factories of flaviviruses

Rearrangement of membranes in the perinuclear region of a Vero cell infected by Kunjin virus. (A) Ordered membranes (referred to as paracrystalline arrays or Pc) and numerous vesicles (arrowheads) are surrounded by distended ER (arrows) and frequently associated with mitochondria (mi). (B) Kunjin virus‐induced Pcs in infected Vero cells are found associated with smooth convoluted membranes (CM) and smooth membrane vesicle‐like structures (SMS). Potential mature virus particles (v) are observed close to these virus‐induced membranous structures. (C) West Nile (Sarafend) virus‐induced paracrystals (Pc) and vesicles (Ve) (sample processed by cryofixation and cryosubstitution). Vesicles containing dense cores are observed around Pc membranes. Membrane bags (arrowheads) have potential nucleocapsids (Nc) associated. (D) Recombinant subviral particles of Tick‐borne encephalitis virus (formed by budding of envelope proteins in the absence of core) observed in the lumen of the RER (arrows) before their transport along the secretory pathway. (E) Extracellular mature particles of West Nile (Sarafend) virus released by infected Vero cells. (A) Reprinted from Hong and Ng (1987) Arch. Virol. 97, 115–121, with permission from Springer—Verlag. (B) Reproduced from Westaway et al. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 6650–6661, with copyright permission of the American Society for Microbiology. (C and E) Reproduced from J. Virol. Methods, 49, Ng, Teong and Tan, Cryosubstitution technique reveals new morphology of flavivirus‐induced structures, pp. 305–314, Copyright (1994), with permission from Elsevier. (D) Reproduced from Lorenz et al. (2003) J. Virol. 77, 4370–4382, with copyright permission of the American Society for Microbiology (original image by Jürgen Kartenbeck). Bars=200 nm in A, C, D; 0.5 μm in B; 50 nm in E.

Studies with Kunjin‐virus‐infected Vero cells showed that perinuclear foci representing virus factories remained largely intact after treatment of cells with cytoskeletal‐disrupting agents that caused only relatively minor reductions in yields of infectious virus (Ng et al., 1983). Mitochondria are frequently seen around flavivirus‐induced membranous structures (Figure 6A) (Mackenzie et al., 1999; Mackenzie and Westaway 2001; Westaway et al., 1997). High preservation methods based on cryofixation followed by cryosubstitution have shown potential nucleocapsids within the membranous bags that surround paracrystals and vesicles (Ng et al., 1994) (Figure 6C). However, because virion particles first become visible in the lumen of the RER (Figure 6D), it is generally believed that particle formation occurs by a still undefined assembly and budding process at the RER membrane (Brinton, 2002; Ng et al., 1994). Confirmation of such a mechanism has been hard to establish because of the difficulty of demonstrating distinct budding processes or of identifying and isolating free core particles from infected cells. However, recent studies with virus‐like particles obtained by expressing the structural proteins of hepatitis C virus have demonstrated budding at the RER membrane (Roingeard et al., 2004). Nascent virus particles pass through the host secretory pathway, where virus maturation occurs, and are released by fusion at the cell membrane (Lindenbach and Rice, 2003). Cryo‐immunoelectron microscopy studies performed with the Kunjin virus, using drugs that inhibit intracellular protein and/or membrane transport, support a maturation model that involves virion assembly in the RER, transport of individual particles to the Golgi apparatus, movement into the trans‐Golgi region, accumulation within secretory vesicles, and release by exocytosis. The carbohydrate side chains in extracellular virions have been shown by endo H digestion or lectin binding to be at least partially of the high mannose type. This incomplete processing could be due to an overloading of the sugar‐modifying enzymes by the large number of glycoproteins on the virion surface and/or their rapid transport through the secretory pathway (Heinz and Allison, 2003). The prM glycoprotein, which is present in immature virions, is cleaved late in the maturation process by a cellular protease to yield fully infectious mature virions. This maturation cleavage of prM is apparently mediated by furin in the trans‐Golgi network (Stadler et al., 1997). Viruses reach the plasma membrane inside secretory vesicles shortly before egress of mature virions (Figure 6E).

Factories of RNA viruses III: bunyaviruses, coronaviruses, and arteriviruses

The capacity of building a viral factory is probably a property of many other enveloped RNA viruses. Evidence found in the bibliography point to that possibility for members of the families Bunyaviridae, Arteriviridae and Coronaviridae.

The family Bunyaviridae contains more than 350 viruses classified in five genera: Bunyavirus, Hantavirus, Nairovirus, Phlebovirus, and Tospovirus (Schmaljohn and Hooper, 2001). Several viruses of the family are considered ‘emerging viruses’ that exhibit a worldwide distribution and cause severe disease in humans, including haemorrhagic fevers and encephalitis (e.g., Rift Valley fever, Hantaan, Oropouche, and Crimean‐Congo haemorrhagic fever viruses) (Elliott, 1997). Virions are spherical, 80 to 120 nm in diameter, and display surface glycoprotein projections of 5 to 10 nm in length anchored in a lipid bilayer (Schmaljohn and Hooper, 2001). Virions contain three single‐stranded RNA genome segments designated large (L), medium (M), and small (S) single‐stranded RNA of negative polarity. Four structural proteins are inserted into mature virions: nucleocapsid (N), polymerase (L), and two glycoproteins (G1 and G2). Bunyamwera virus (BUNV), the prototype of the family, is one of the bunyaviruses that encodes two additional nonstructural proteins synthesized early in infection, named NSs and NSm. NSs acts as a virulence factor and controls the activity of the viral polymerase (Bridgen et al., 2001; Weber et al., 2001). The role of NSm, a protein that accumulates in the Golgi complex (Nakitare and Elliott, 1993) is unknown.

Most bunyaviruses assemble in the Golgi complex and use the secretory pathway to exit the cell. It has been recently observed that a large structure is formed in the perinuclear area of infected cells (Figures 1 and 7). Recruitment of mitochondria to the perinuclear area and establishment of contacts between mitochondria and Golgi stacks have been detected early in infection in BUNV‐infected cells (Figures 1A–1D, 7A, 7C and 7D) (Salanueva et al., 2003). A new viral structure, represented by tubular elements that assemble in Golgi membranes (Figure 7B), often connects with recruited mitochondria (Figure 7C). Preliminary data from in situ molecular detection (Novoa, Calderita and Risco, unpublished results) strongly suggest that these tubular structures represent the replication complexes of the virus, and that they could participate in recruitment and association of mitochondria to the Golgi stacks. Virus assembly takes place in the Golgi complex, where viral immature precursors (Figure 7E) transform into a second viral form (Figure 7F). A functional trans‐Golgi is required for this transformation (Salanueva et al., 2003), which is reminiscent of a similar intra‐Golgi process described for coronaviruses (Salanueva et al., 1999). A second maturation step takes place when the virus exits the cell and the final structure of the coat of spikes is acquired (Figure 7G). The spatial relationships between all these viral and cellular elements and the potential participation of cytoskeletal components in the ‘viral factory’ is under investigation. In particular, three‐dimensional analysis of these large structures will provide insights on the pattern of connections between replication complexes, assembly sites and maturation sites in these perinuclear structures.

Figure 7.

Factories of bunyaviruses

Factories are assembled in the perinuclear area (A), where Golgi stacks (Go) and mitochondria (mi) are seen together. RER cisternae, that are mainly excluded from the factory, are seen in peripheral areas. (B and C) Low and high‐magnification views of viral tubes (T) built in Golgi membranes and frequently seen in contact with mitochondria (arrow in C). (D) Direct contacts between mitochondria and Golgi membranes are also seen (arrows), even after Golgi disruption by monensin treatment. (E–G) Viral forms assembled in infected cells. The immature precursor (shown in E) transforms into the second viral form (F) in a trans‐Golgi dependent manner. Infectious extracellular virion is shown in (G). It acquires the final structure during exit from the cell. (C and E–F) reproduced from Salanueva et al. (2003) J. Virol. 77, 1368–1381, with copyright permission of the American Society for Microbiology. N, nucleus. Bars=0.5 μm in A; 200 nm in B and D; 100 nm in C, and E–G.

Coronaviruses and arteriviruses have been classified as separate families in the order Nidovirales (Lai and Holmes, 2001), whose members share a unique feature: they all synthesize a nested set of multiple subgenomic mRNAs (Cavanagh, 1997). Coronaviruses are enveloped, single‐stranded positive‐sense RNA viruses that replicate in the cytoplasm of infected cells. The coronavirus genome (27 to 31.5 kb) is the largest among known RNA viruses. It encodes for four structural proteins (the nucleocapsid N, and the envelope proteins M, E and S), as well as nonstructural proteins required for virus replication and transcription, that are encoded within gene 1. Coronaviruses cause severe diseases in many domestic animals and are a common cause of human colds. A new human coronavirus has been recently identified as the causative agent of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (Drosten et al., 2003; Peiris et al., 2003). The family Arteriviridae comprises four enveloped, positive‐stranded RNA viruses that infect only animals. The replicase genes of coronaviruses and arteriviruses are assumed to share common ancestry. The consequences of arterivirus infection can range from an asymptomatic persistent or acute infection to abortion or lethal haemorrhagic fever (Snijder and Muelenberg, 2001). Arteriviruses are spherical, 40 to 60 nm in diameter, that contain an isometric, possibly icosahedral nucleocapsid of 25 to 35 nm composed of the 12.7 to 15.7 kb RNA genome and the nucleocapsid protein N. The envelope contains five or six envelope proteins, an unusually large number compared with other positive‐stranded RNA viruses. The replicase gene of members of the order Nidovirales encodes two polyproteins of extraordinary size and complexity. Arterivirus replication was found to be associated with RER or intermediate compartment membranes, which are modified into vesicular structures with a double membrane (van der Meer et al., 1998). These structures (Figures 8A and 8B) have been suggested to originate in cellular autophagosomes (Pedersen et al., 1999), similarly to poliovirus replication complexes (Suhy et al., 2000). Recent data for coronaviruses strongly suggest that their replication also occurs on autophagosomes. It has been reported that autophagy, a cellular stress response that functions to recycle proteins and organelles (Klionsky and Emr, 2000), is required for formation of double‐membrane bound murine hepatitis virus replication complexes, and that RER is implicated as the possible source of membranes for replication complexes (Prentice et al., 2004).

Figure 8.

Factories of arteriviruses

Cells infected with arteriviruses (A and B) contain large amounts of double‐membranes vesicles (arrows) that represent the replication complexes of the virus and derive from the ER. (C) Replication sites are close to assembly sites in Golgi stacks (Go), where viral particles are distinguished (V). These areas are also surrounded by mitochondria (mi). Bars=1 μm in (A); 100 nm in (B); 200 nm in (C).

Components of the coronavirus replication complex, the helicase and N proteins, translocate between 6 and 8 h post‐infection from sites of RNA replication to sites of viral assembly in the RER—Golgi intermediate compartment (Bost et al., 2000). Arteriviruses acquire their envelope by budding of preformed nucleocapsids into the lumen of the Golgi (Stueckemann et al., 1982). Most arterivirus envelope proteins are retained in intracellular membranes, but their specific roles in assembly have not yet been established. Genome encapsidation may occur or begin at the site of viral RNA synthesis (Molenkamp et al., 2000). Assembling viruses are seen in pre‐Golgi and Golgi membranes, near replication complexes. Both replication complexes and Golgi stacks with assembling viruses are seen surrounded by mitochondria (Figures 8A and 8C) which suggests, as with other viruses described in this review, a specific recruitment of this organelle to supply the energy needed for replication and/or assembly. After budding, coronaviruses and arteriviruses use vesicles from the secretory pathway to reach the plasma membrane before release. For coronaviruses, it has been reported that immature precursors change their structure and mature when reaching the trans‐Golgi subcompartment (Salanueva et al., 1999).

Conclusion and perspective

The study of the viral life cycle has traditionally provided unique information about cellular functions, including signalling. The characterization of viral factories demonstrates that different, non‐related viruses are able to interfere with cell processes to recruit and form a new complex structure where replication complexes and assembly sites are established. A number of viruses not described in this review most probably form factories as well. Picorna‐, rhabdo‐, reo‐ and birna‐viruses are all good candidates. New tools will help to understand the signals and mechanisms involved in the construction of viral factories. Among them, the analysis of cells expressing viral structural and non‐structural proteins, replicons, virus‐like particles, and infectious clones will help to identify key viral factors (Johnson and Chiu, 2000; Tzeng et al., 2001; Yount et al., 2003). On the other hand, the use of fluorescent tags in living cells and small interfering RNA technology (Lippincott‐Schwartz et al., 2003; Fraile‐Ramos et al., 2003; Déctor et al., 2002) will be very useful to characterize signals acting in recruitment and interaction between cellular and viral components. New methods for three‐dimensional analysis of cellular structures, such as electron tomography (Medalia et al., 2002; Grünewald et al., 2003) will help us to understand the architecture and dynamics of these unique structures, and to clarify key aspects such as how replication and assembly get functionally connected.