Bacteriophage ΦXaF18 infects Xanthomonas vesicatoria, which is the causal agent of bacterial spot in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). In this announcement, we present the complete genome of X. vesicatoria bacteriophage ΦXaF18, a 47,407-bp genome with 67 protein-coding genes.
ABSTRACT
Bacteriophage ΦXaF18 infects Xanthomonas vesicatoria, which is the causal agent of bacterial spot in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). In this announcement, we present the complete genome of X. vesicatoria bacteriophage ΦXaF18, a 47,407-bp genome with 67 protein-coding genes.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Bacteriophage ΦXaF18 was isolated from a soil sample collected in Yurécuaro, Michoacán, México, from a pepper field affected with bacterial spot disease. A soil sample was suspended in peptone yeast glycerol medium, inoculated with Xanthomonas vesicatoria (laboratory strain BV824), and incubated for 24 h at 28°C. The resulting slurry was centrifuged (8,000 × g, 20 min), and the supernatant was filtered (0.22 μm). Phages in the supernatant were isolated in double-layer plaque assays (0.7% agar) (1). Single plaques (∼1 mm) were isolated and purified two times.
The phage morphology was visualized using negative staining with uranyl acetate (2) and observed under a transmission electron microscope (FEI/Philips Morgagni 268) at 80 kV (Fig. 1).
FIG 1.
Electron micrograph of bacteriophage ΦXaF18. Measurements are as follows: 62.5 nm from vertex to vertex of the capsid, 57 nm from side to side of the capsid, 85.7-nm tail length, and 157.5-nm total length.
The genomic DNA of the phage was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method (3). The ΦXaF18 genomic library was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, USA). The quality of the library was verified using a Bioanalyzer 2010 (Agilent Technologies). High-performance sequencing was done using a synthesis protocol (MiSeq, Illumina) with a 2 × 300-bp paired-end format. The sequencing was performed in the sequencing laboratory of the Unidad de Ciencias Biológicas of the Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas (UCB-UAZ). De novo assembly was performed using SPAdes v. 3.12.0 (4), and the quality of the assembly was analyzed using QUAST v. 5.0.0 (5). Protein-coding genes were predicted using the EasyGene 1.2b server, BASys (Bacterial Annotation System), PHASTER (Phage Search Tool Enhanced Release), SMS (Sequence Manipulation Suite) open reading frame (ORF) finder, PHANOTATE v. 0.13.0 (6–10), and the NCBI ORFfinder. Comparison with the NCBI database was performed using BLASTx to determine the coding ORFs (11). In addition, we searched for conserved domains using PROSITE and the NCBI Conserved Domain Search Service (CD Search) (12, 13). Promoters and operators were predicted using phiSITE; rho-independent terminators were predicted using ARNold and phiSITE (14, 15). The search for tRNA and rRNA genes was performed using tRNAscan-SE, RNAmmer, and Rfam (16–18). The type of viral DNA ends and the packing mode were determined using the PhageTerm program (19). Phylogenetic analysis of the terminase large subunit was performed using MEGA7 (neighbor joining, gamma distribution of 10 and 1,000 bootstrap replicates) (20). Default parameters were used for all software except for MEGA7.
Bacteriophage ΦXaF18 has a 47,407-bp genome, with a coding density of 91.2% and a GC content of 63%. A total of 706,362 reads were obtained, and the genome of ΦXaF18 was assembled into a single contig with a median coverage of 8,940×. The genome comprises double-stranded DNA. The analysis predicted 67 protein-coding genes, 16 of which have a predicted function. Twenty hypothetical promoter sequences and 13 rho-independent terminators were found. No tRNA or rRNA genes were found.
The genome of ΦXaF18 was circularly permuted and terminally redundant; the genome was predicted to be packed through a headful packaging mechanism (19). The phylogenetic analysis showed that ΦXaF18 is close to Xanthomonas phage OP2, in the Myoviridae family, which was confirmed by the morphological results obtained under the microscope (Fig. 1). Bacteriophage ΦXaF18 had an approximate total length of 157.5 nm.
Data availability.
The genome sequence of bacteriophage ΦXaF18 was deposited under GenBank accession number MN461279. The raw sequence reads are available in the SRA database with the accession number SRX6866383 (BioProject accession number PRJNA566170).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by a CONACYT grant (APN-2015-01-338) to G.R.-E. We thank CONACYT for the master’s scholarship (612630) granted to M.R.-S.
E.E.Q.-A. and G.A.S.-S. participated as director and co-director of this research project, respectively. We also acknowledge the Unidad de Ciencias Biológicas of the Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas for providing sequencing services.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kropinski AM, Mazzocco A, Waddell TE, Lingohr E, Johnson RP. 2009. Enumeration of bacteriophages by double agar overlay plaque assay, p 69–76. In Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM (ed), Bacteriophages: methods and protocols, vol 1 Humana Press, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ohi M, Li Y, Cheng Y, Walz T. 2004. Negative staining and image classification—powerful tools in modern electron microscopy. Biol Proced Online 6:23–34. doi: 10.1251/bpo70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sambrook JF, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Larsen TS, Krogh A. 2003. EasyGene—a prokaryotic gene finder that ranks ORFs by statistical significance. BMC Bioinformatics 4:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Van Domselaar GH, Stothard P, Shrivastava S, Cruz JA, Guo A, Dong X, Lu P, Szafron D, Greiner R, Wishart DS. 2005. BASys: a Web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W455–W459. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stothard P. 2000. The Sequence Manipulation Suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 28:1102–1104. doi: 10.2144/00286ir01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McNair K, Zhou C, Dinsdale EA, Souza B, Edwards RA. 2019. PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes. Bioinformatics 35:4537–4542. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ye J, McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2006. BLAST: improvements for better sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W6–W9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Bryant SH. 2015. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D222–D226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sigrist CJA, Cerutti L, de Castro E, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Bulliard V, Bairoch A, Hulo N. 2010. PROSITE, a protein domain database for functional characterization and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D161–D166. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Klucar L, Stano M, Hajduk M. 2010. phiSITE: database of gene regulation in bacteriophages. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D366–D370. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Naville M, Ghuillot-Gaudeffroy A, Marchais A, Gautheret D. 2011. ARNold: a Web tool for the prediction of rho-independent transcription terminators. RNA Biol 8:11–13. doi: 10.4161/rna.8.1.13346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Stærfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR. 2003. Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res 31:439–441. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequence of bacteriophage ΦXaF18 was deposited under GenBank accession number MN461279. The raw sequence reads are available in the SRA database with the accession number SRX6866383 (BioProject accession number PRJNA566170).

