Abstract
Road traffic accidents stand as one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity across the globe. The reasons for the high burden of road traffic injuries (RTIs) in developing countries are increasing in the number of motor vehicles, poor enforcement of traffic safety regulations, inadequacy of health infrastructure and poor transport facility. However, the systematic collection of road traffic data is not well developed in many developing countries including India and under-reporting of RTIs and deaths are common. Hence, surveillance of RTIs is recommended to assess the burden, to identify high-risk groups, to establish an association with probable risk factors and to plan interventions to control the RTIs. The broad objective of this study is to establish an electronic-based comprehensive and integrated RTI surveillance system, to assess the burden of RTIs, its risk factors and outcomes across rural and urban settings in India. This study with the support of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is progressing in three cities (Chennai, Delhi and Jaipur) and two rural areas (Chittoor and Tehri-Garhwal). At each centre, major sources of data can be categorized under two categories including health facilities and community. In urban areas, one trauma centre, one private hospital and a community of 10000-population are included in the study. In rural areas, a district hospital, a private nursing home and two sub-centres areas of different primary health centres at each site are included for the surveillance. Passive surveillance is done at the trauma centres/district hospitals, while active surveillance is done in private hospitals/nursing homes, sub-centres and communities. Before establishing the surveillance system, situational analysis has been undertaken. Surveillance-related software was developed during the preparatory stage. This electronic surveillance platform allowed to gather data electronically across multiple sites. This internet-enabled surveillance platform has several modules to capture and analyse the data. The present study provides a model of surveillance including both passive and active surveillance to cover maximum number of RTIs. This study further provides the first comprehensive epidemiology of RTIs. The results of these studies will contribute to the setting of research and investment priorities to tackle the burden of RTIs.
Keywords: Accidents, Traffic; India; Surveillance; Trauma
Introduction
Epidemiology
Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a large and growing public health burden and account for nearly 1.36 million deaths worldwide in 2015. RTI was ranked as the eighth leading cause of years of life lost (YLLs) (1). The burden of RTIs is projected to be the fourth leading cause of disease burden by 2030 (2, 3). The low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) account for a disproportionate share of RTIs worldwide (4). One-fifth of these deaths occurred in South Asia. Rapid urbanization and motorization associated with rapid economic growth are some of the reasons for the rising RTI related burden in South Asia (5). India is a nation of more than 1 billion people and is one of the fastest-growing economies with rapid motorization leading to increasing RTIs burden; It has one of the highest reported mortality rates from RTI in the world (6, 7). In 2015, 6.3 million persons injured and out of them, about 1.5 million died. It is further noted that remarkable interstate variations exist in both injury rates and death rates (8). The variations in injury rates are due to several reasons like conditions of roads and vehicles, and implementation of safety measures. However, the fatality rate amongst road traffic accident (RTA) victims is different and it depends on the health system’s response. Unfortunately, 50–60% of deaths occur either at the scene or in route to the hospital (9). These fatality rates (percentage of deaths out of total RTA victims) varied remarkably across Indian states and union territories. On average, 24% of RTA victims died in 2015. But this rate is as high as 52.6% in Punjab, and as low as 8.8% in Kerala (8). Previous studies have found traffic crashes to be under-reported in India by 5% for deaths and more than 50% for serious injuries (10). It is possible that most of the critical and immediately fatal cases may not get recorded in crowded urban areas of India. Therefore, it is likely that the fatality statistics for urban areas in India may be underestimated by say 10–20%. According to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 61% of the RTI fatalities occur in rural areas and it is possible that a larger number of cases go unreported on rural roads too. If we assume that a significant proportion of fatalities that occur many days after the crash in rural areas are missed (that would reduce the number by less than 30% of the total deaths) and a smaller proportion of deaths on the spot or on the way to the hospital are missed, then we can expect underreporting to be around 50% of rural deaths. Overall, this would imply that the underreporting of fatalities in India may not be less than 50%.
Risk factors
Rather than mechanical, its human factor that contributes significantly to the increasing number of road accidents in India. Alcohol’s involvement in various types of injuries, including RTIs is well-established among emergency department patients and has also been documented in India (11). The risk of being involved in a crash increases significantly above a blood alcohol concentration of 0.04 g/dl (12). Over speeding, refusal to follow traffic rules, and reckless driving are the main reasons for RTAs. Reckless driving like the use of mobile phones during driving, non-use of helmets and non-use of seat-belts are significant contributing factors for RTAs. Driver fatigue and sleepiness also contribute to crashes. Improper designing of roads and lack of pedestrian pavement are other contributing factors. Only 28 countries have comprehensive road safety laws on major key risk factors like drunken driving, speeding, and failing to use helmets, seat-belts and child restraints (13).
Economic impact
RTIs can also require expensive hospital-based treatment, including trauma care (14). High out of pocket (OOP) expenditures pose a major economic burden for the affected families with one of the prior studies showing average household OOP expenses ranging from 380–780 US$ in Bangalore (15). A study of 95 traffic accident cases in Chandigarh showed that OOP medical expenses averaged 100 US$ (16). One-half of the households with traffic injury cases, income and food consumption declined, and indebtedness increased (17, 18). A review of four studies in India estimated the cost of traffic crashes in the country to be between 0.29% and 0.69% of the gross domestic product (19).
Prevention and management
Road traffic deaths and injuries are preventable. Effective road safety interventions should address the traffic system as a whole and look into interactions between vehicle, road users, and road infrastructure to identify the solution. Many deaths and impact of injuries can be prevented with first aid if causalities are treated immediately and by taking victims at the earliest to appropriate trauma care centre. ‘Golden Hour’, the first hour after trauma, is vital from the health system’s perspective. If proper care is given during this period, the victims have a greater chance of survival and a reduction in the severity of their injury. Injuries occur due to a combination of agent, host, vector and environment factors (20). Understanding injuries using this model will help in identifying factors involved in an injury. This would help policymakers, professionals, product manufacturers and others to identify situations and target interventions to prevent such injuries from happening in the future or reduce the harm done when they happen.
Existing challenges
▪ Limited data exist addressing the problem of RTIs.
▪ Existing data is of poor quality, non-representative and difficult to access, and includes a limited number of relevant variables.
▪ The incidence and burden of RTI remains poorly measured in India.
▪ Various data sources exist in different parts of the country that capture information on RTIs. These data sources include that of hospital and police (for example, National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)). However, there is no digital RTI surveillance system that can integrate these various data sources to optimally use the information to predict etiological variables of RTI and predictors of poor outcomes due to RTI across diverse settings.
There is clearly a need for data on RTIs, which is essential for implementing preventive strategies. Strengthening and undertaking research on the public health burden and impact of RTIs, understanding of their risk factors, and studying the characteristics of trauma, using hospital and population-based studies are need of the hour. Most of the issues can be addressed by establishing a surveillance system. Hence, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has commissioned this multi-centric study to develop a model of passive surveillance at the higher health facility and active surveillance from health and non-health sectors and community.
Objectives of the study
• Broad objective
The broad objective of this study is to establish an electronic-based comprehensive and integrated RTI surveillance system, to assess the burden of RTI, its risk factors and outcomes across rural and urban settings in India.
• Specific objectives
▪ To design an online electronic-based RTI surveillance system (mobile app) that enables capture of RTI data from various sources.
▪ To conduct a situation analysis of data sources, systems and quality for RTIs.
▪ To assess the facilities available for pre-hospital and trauma care in the district including for emergency transport system and their utilization.
▪ To describe the availability and utilization pattern of existing facilities for post-crash emergency care at various levels of the health system in both urban and rural areas.
▪ To describe the burden of RTAs and its epidemiological factors including the outcome.
▪ To describe factors associated with RTI of serious nature.
METHODS
Definition of RTI
An RTI is a fatal or non-fatal injury incurred as a result of a collision on a public road involving at least one moving vehicle.
Study area
This study is progressing in three cities (Chennai, Delhi and Jaipur) and two rural areas (Chittoor and Tehri-Garhwal) located across the country. The RTI-related data given in this description is calculated based on the data given by India’s NCRB (21).
• Chennai
Chennai is the capital city of Tamil Nadu State. Tamil Nadu accounted for 10.5% of total accidental deaths in India in 2015. Chennai reported a total of 8206 RTI victims, of which 886 died in 2015.
• Chittoor
Chittoor is one of the district headquarters towns of Andhra Pradesh state. In 2015, the total number of RTAs in Andhra Pradesh were found to be 22,839 (about 5% of the country). Due to these RTAs, 29,439 injured and 8,297 died, these figures constitute 6.1% and 5.6% to the national totals, respectively.
• Delhi
Delhi is the second-largest metropolis by area and population in India. Delhi had reported the second-highest cases of RTAs after Chennai. The total number of persons killed in road accidents increased by 4.6% and road accident injuries by 1.4% between 2014 and 2015. Delhi city registered a total of 7,148 RTAs in 2015. Due to these RTAs, 7,385 had RTIs and 1,316 died.
• Tehri-Garhwal
It is a hilly area in the state of Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand reported 1,523 RTA in 2015. The RTIs and deaths due to these RTAs are 1,657 and 913, respectively.
• Jaipur
Jaipur is the capital city of Rajasthan. Rajasthan is the largest state in the country in terms of geographical area, which constitutes 10.4% area of the country and 5.7% of the national population. Jaipur registered a total of 3,151 RTAs in 2015. The RTIs and deaths reported due to these RTAs are 2,892 and 939, respectively.
Source of data
This study is progressing in 5 participating centres across the country. At each centre, major sources of data can be categorized under two categories including health facilities and community. In urban areas (Chennai, Delhi and Jaipur), one trauma centre, one private hospital and a community of 10000-population are included in the study. In rural areas (Chittoor and Tehri-Garhwal), a district hospital, a private nursing home and two subcentres areas of different primary health centres at each site are included for the surveillance. Passive surveillance is done at the trauma centres/district hospitals, while active surveillance is done in private hospitals/nursing homes, sub-centres and communities. Any individual brought to any surveillance points will be enrolled in the study. Before establishing the surveillance as described above, situational analysis has been undertaken (22). The tools used for this situational analysis and also surveillance tools are given as appendix 1 and 2, respectively.
Procedure for capturing data
Software is developed during the preparatory stage by the Foundation of Health Technology Society (FHTS). FHTS is a collaborating institute and supported all teams and ICMR in developing, testing and implementing the electronic surveillance platform. This electronic surveillance platform allowed individuals to gather data electronically across multiple sites. This internet-enabled surveillance platform has several modules including:
(i) User management module: Users can register their facility and create a site profile. The system will assign a unique ID to each site. Each site coordinator will have its own user profile. In case there is no internet, the system will still capture data as a standalone application and will be able to transmit the data to a central server once connected to the internet. The site coordinator will be able to approve multiple users at each site to use the system and will also provide user access control based on their roles.
(ii) Data collection module: The surveys will be electronically designed so that the surveillance platform is easy to use even if the users have limited technology literacy.
(iii) Data validation module: If there are any error/missing data, the system will generate alert and flag the variables to ensure data completeness and accuracy.
(iv) Data management module: The system will have import and export functions such that it can import the data files in Excel, CSV or other database formats into the system. This will facilitate to import the data from 108 services into our existing system. Further, the data from police records will also be captured into the system.
(v) Data visualization module: The data recorded will then be interactively visualized using a series of charts, and graphs.
All data will be secured using a database protected password or the data gathered will be stored in an encrypted format.
Intervention
• Alerting the district administration
Bi-monthly alerts/bulletins will be released based on the surveillance data of 2 months. These alerts will highlight the incidence of RTIs and its risk factors and provide appropriate actions to be taken by the district/local authorities including health, police and transport systems. The actions taken by the above authorities/systems will be documented by following different methods, including interviewing key officials and community members.
• Creating awareness
The research team will develop health awareness material on prevention of RTIs and on care to be taken immediately after an accident. It will highlight the importance of the golden hour. It will be similar to the training meant for first responders in trauma care.
Discussion
RTIs are a major issue in the world, especially in LMICs. India is experiencing a high burden of RTIs and the fatality rate is high compared to many countries (8). However, one of the main problems in developing strategies for preventing RTAs and injuries is the lack of actual and quality-related data (1, 23, 24). Hence, the establishment of RTI surveillance is an important step for a better understanding of the problem thus leasing to RTI prevention (25). There is substantial evidence that effective surveillance systems help in reducing the burden of RTIs and their impact (26). Hence, RTI surveillance is recommended to assess the burden of injuries, identify high-risk groups and probable risk factors, and plan interventions to control and monitor the impact (27).
Hence, this study aimed to establish an electronic-based comprehensive and integrated RTI surveillance system. After establishing the system and demonstrating the feasibility of establishment within the public health system, attempts will be made to handing over it to the government for scaling-up. It is the responsibility of the government health sector to ensure the establishment of necessary data systems through the surveillance system (28). Along with collecting qualified data; analysis, interpretation and dissemination of health information and getting feedback to the beneficiaries must be considered (29).
In India, RTAs are more common on urban roads and on roads connected to urban area and majority of the accident victims are referred to urban-based tertiary care hospitals. Hence a passive surveillance system in tertiary care hospitals is being established in this study. Most of the critical and immediately fatal cases are recorded and those who die in tertiary care hospitals also enter the official statistics through police network. It is reported that more than 60% of the fatalities occur in rural areas and usually these cases of injuries, particularly non-fatal and minor injuries, go unreported on rural roads (30). These non-fatal and minor injuries were treated in smaller nursing homes and clinics. Usually, these facilities are of private in nature, and they do not like to involve in medico-legal cases. In addition, a significant proportion of fatalities, which occur after the crash in rural areas are missed. Some deaths escape from police records as people involved in the road accidents settle the dispute out of the legal system. All these cases seldom get registered with the police. In view of these realities, the present study has integrated an active surveillance system to cover police stations, community-based health facilities like primary health centres, community health centres and private hospitals. Active surveillance is also placed in communities to track missing cases. Thus, this study is being established both passive and active surveillances comprehensively to capture all RTIs and related deaths in a particular geographical area.
Conclusions
RTIs have been recognized globally as an important public health problem, however, the deaths and injuries are preventable. The situation needs serious efforts through governmental policies, including establishing a surveillance system to capture RTIs occurred at all levels. The present study provides a model of surveillance including both passive and active surveillance to cover maximum number of RTIs. This study further provides the first comprehensive epidemiology of RTIs. The results of these studies will contribute to the setting of research and investment priorities to tackle the burden of RTIs.
Acknowledgements
None.
Appendix 1: Integrated Road Traffic Injuries Surveillance (IRIS)-India
Situational Assessment for understanding the RTI data systems
It is necessary and a pre-requisite to do a situation analysis to understand the strength and weakness of the data systems pertaining to RTI in Tamil Nadu. The analysis will identify gaps and help in building the existing system and integration with other data sources. WHO’s Data Systems: A road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners enumerates the following four steps for conducting a situational assessment:
Stakeholder analysis
Assessment of data sources and existing systems
End-user needs assessment
Environmental analysis
The following section details each step with its objectives and their corresponding checklists and questions for assessment.
Objectives | Checklist |
---|---|
Step: 1 Stakeholder Analysis | |
Identification of organizations, potential partners and individuals who have an interest in the collection and/or use of road safety data | Have you identified all stakeholders in the law enforcement, transport and health sectors? |
Have you identified other types of stakeholders (e.g. insurance industry, NGOs, academic institutions, automobile industry)? | |
Examine the roles and activities of all stakeholders | Have you identified the activities and roles of each stakeholder in relation to road safety data? |
Have you identified the stakeholders who will be key supporters or opponents? | |
How stakeholders should be involved in the process | What is the nature, mode and form of Participation? |
Have you convened a stakeholder meeting, including supporters and opponents, data collectors and data users? | |
Step: 2 Assessment of data sources and existing systems | |
Assess data sources | What are all organizations or individuals involved in collection of data pertaining to RTI? |
What information or variables are collected in the data sources? | |
What is the format used to collect data? | |
What is the system to store and process data? | |
Assess data systems | What population or geographical area (jurisdiction) is covered? |
Does it provide a census of incidents among a whole population, or does it include data from a sample of the population only? | |
Are there estimates of population coverage/completeness? | |
What events are captured (i.e. fatalities, non-fatal injuries, damage-only crashes)? | |
What definitions are used? | |
How are data transferred from the crash scene to the database (including reporting requirements)? | |
What are the existing and potential linkages with other databases? | |
What are the formal/informal data-sharing mechanisms with other agencies/sectors? | |
What format are data stored in (as case-level records, tabulations provided to customized specifications, or only as pre-tabulated results)? | |
What are training tools and training status of the staff in data systems? | |
How accessible are the data? | |
Assess data quality | Are there standard definitions available for inclusion and exclusion of crashes and injuries? |
Are there SOPs available for entire data flow management process? | |
Are there any under-reporting of crashes/Injuries to and by the authorities? | |
For the events captured, are the data complete and accurate? What validation procedures are in place? | |
What is the frequency with which missing data occurs? | |
Is that the missing data systematic for certain fields and crashes? | |
Are there any errors in recording data, coding data and data entry? | |
Step: 3 End user needs assessment | |
For setting up and expanding the Road safety information system to enhance the usability of the system | Who are the users of the data system for policy action? |
What are the circumstances or situations that lead to require road safety information? | |
What is the type of information different users requiring and expect from an information system? | |
What are the sources of information users currently relying? | |
What is the preferred format in which users would like to access information? | |
What are the factors that affect or determine their access to, and use of, road safety information? | |
Step: 4 Environmental Analysis | |
Overview of political environment | Is there a lead agency responsible for road safety? What is it and what is its main function? |
Which are the main government departments involved in road safety decision-making and what role does each department play? | |
What is the nature of inter-agency relationships? | |
Is there a road safety strategy, and does it include a data component? | |
What are the existing policies in transport, law enforcement, health and finance that are relevant to road safety? Do they have data components? Which factors in the political environment willdrive change, and which will oppose it? | |
Is there adequate capacity for implementation/improvement of data collection, data processing, data analysis, and dissemination and use of data? |
Questionnaire / Checklist for situational analysis
Step 1: Stakeholders Analysis:
List out all the existing stakeholders involved with road traffic injury surveillance system in your district/city? (Remember the list has to exhaustive including all the present organizations/Individuals involves in data collection and use of road safety data)
Identify potential organizations/Individuals or partners who might utilize or facilitate development of better road safety data systems and support in integration. (List has to add-on to the existing/current stakeholders involved)
What is the role and activity of each organization pertaining to road traffic injury surveillance systems?
Data collection | Data management | ||
Report generation | Policy makers | ||
Clinical management | Advocacy groups |
(The above functions are only indicative and may include many other roles and activity of the organizations)
3. List the stakeholders who will be supporting or opposing the establishment and integration of the road traffic injury surveillance system.
- 4. What would be the nature, mode and form of participation of the stakeholders in the proposed system?
- Advisers or consultants
- Collaborating partners
- As a member of a working group
- As an individual participant
- As a representative of a group
5. Plan a meeting involving all the stakeholders for discussion and dissemination of the proposed system.
Questionnaire / Checklist for situational analysis
Step 2: Assessment of data sources and existing systems
- What is the organization/individuals involved in the road traffic injury surveillance system?
- Police
- Roadways Department
- Transport Department
- Hospitals
- Emergency transport services
- Government Health Facility
- Private health facility
- What information or variables are collected in the data sources?
- Demographic details
- Vehicle related details
- Crash related details
- Road related details
- Person related details
- Pre hospital care
- Emergency transport details
- Medical care and management
- Outcome of the event
- What is the format used to collect data?
- Electronic
- Hard copy
- What is the system to store and process data?
- Electronic
- Hard copy
What population or geographical area (jurisdiction) is covered? (Describe)
Does it provide a census of incidents among a whole population, or does it include data from a sample of the population only?
Are there estimates of population coverage/completeness?
- What events are captured?
- Fatalities
- Non-fatal injuries
- Damage-only crashes
Are there definitions are used?
- How are data transferred from the crash scene to the database?
- Real time
- Delayed
- Manual
What are the existing and potential linkages with other databases?
- What are the data-sharing mechanisms with other agencies/sectors?
- Formal
- Informal
- What format are data stored?
- Case-level records
- Tabulations provided to customized specifications
- Pre-tabulated results
- What are training tools and training status of the staff in data systems? Describe…
- Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
- Definitions availability
- Training status of the data collectors
- Refresher training
- How accessible are the data?
- Open source
- Public domain
- Paid
- How data is analyzed?
- Variables analyzed
- Computerized or manual
- Periodicity of analysis
- Report generation
- Are there standard definitions available for inclusion and exclusion of crashes and injuries?
- Yes
- No
- Is there SOPs available for entire data flow management process?
- Yes
- No
- Is there any under-reporting of crashes/Injuries to and by the authorities?
- Crash not being reported
- Reported but not included for data collection
- Incomplete data collection
- Delayed or no data entry
- Data lost
- For the events captured, are the data complete and accurate? What validation procedures are in place?
- Completeness
- Accuracy
- Quality control mechanisms
What is the frequency with which missing data occurs?
Is that the missing data systematic for certain fields and crashes?
Are there any errors in recording data, coding data and data entry?
Questionnaire / Checklist for situational analysis
Step: 3 End user needs assessment
- Who are the users of the data system for policy action?
- Stakeholders feedback
- Policy decisions
What are the circumstances or situations that lead to require road safety information?
What is the type of information different users requiring and expect from an information system?
What are the sources of information users currently relying?
What is the preferred format in which users would like to access information?
What are the factors that affect or determine their access to, and use of, road safety information?
Questionnaire /Checklist for situational analysis
Step: 4 Environmental Analysis
Is there a lead agency responsible for road safety? What is it and what is its main function?
Which are the main government departments involved in road safety decision-making, and what role does each department play?
What is the nature of inter-agency relationships?
Is there a road safety strategy, and does it include a data component?
What are the existing policies in transport, law enforcement, health and finance that are relevant to road safety? Do they have data components? Which factors in the political environment will drive change, and which will oppose it?
Is there adequate capacity for implementation/improvement of data collection, data processing, data analysis, and dissemination and use of data?
Annexure 2-A: Integrated Road Traffic Injury Surveillance (IRIS), India
Q. No. | Question | Data entry rule | Values Assigned | Req | Skip Pattern | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FORM I | |||||||
A | PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION | ||||||
1 | Centre Code | Dropdown | Chennai | 1 | Yes | ||
Chitoor | 2 | ||||||
Jaipur | 3 | ||||||
Delhi | 4 | ||||||
TehriGarhwal | 5 | ||||||
2 | Hospital Code | Dropdown | Public sector health facility | 1 | Yes | ||
Private sector health facility | 2 | ||||||
3 | Serial number | Numeric Box | 0001–9999 | Yes | |||
4 | User code | Numeric Box | 01–99 | Yes | |||
5 | IRIS ID | Auto-generated. Should not allow entering or editing the field. | Will constitute the Centre code, Hospital code, User code and Serial No. | Yes | “Auto generated field” appears if we try to enter. | ||
For e.g. IRIS:ID:11010005 means case belongs to Chennai, Public hospital and 1st user and is in the fifth case in serial order | |||||||
Once IRIS ID is generated it should be displayed as the header of the form in display. One can save the form only after filling up to IRIS ID, before which the form cannot be saved and should be discarded. Every form should be saved with its IRISID as name. | |||||||
6 | Medical Record Number (Inpatient/Out Patient Number) | Text Box | Yes | ||||
7 | AR Number (Accident Register number) | Numeric box | |||||
8 | Admission Date | Calendar pick | dd/ mm/ yyyy | Yes | |||
9 | Admission Time | Time pick | hh:mm | ||||
10 | Respondent Name | Text Box (Alpha only) | Yes | ||||
11 | How are you related to the injured? | Dropdown | Self | 1 | Yes | If 1 is selected Skip Q12 to 14. If 997 go to Q12, else Skip Q12. | |
Family member | 2 | ||||||
Friend | 3 | ||||||
Driver | 4 | ||||||
Co-passenger | 5 | ||||||
Unknown passerby | 6 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
12 | Specify Relationship with injured | Text Box | |||||
13 | Do you have a mobile number? (Respondent) | Radio button | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 1 is selected go to Q14 else skip Q14. | |
No | 2 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
14 | Enter Mobile Number of the Respondent | Numeric Box | Add zero (0) before 10 digit mobile number | Yes | |||
15 | What is the name of the Injured? | Text Box (Alpha only) | Yes | ||||
16 | Do you have mobile number? (Injured) | Radio button | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 1 is selected go to Q17 else skip Q17. | |
No | 2 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
17 | Enter Mobile number of the injured | Numeric Box | Add zero (0) before 10 digit mobile number | Yes | |||
18 | Do you know the address of the injured? | Radio Button | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 1 is selected go to Q19 else skip Q 19 to 22. | |
No | 2 | ||||||
19 | State of Injured | Dropdown | All States Of India | Yes | |||
20 | District of Injured | Dropdown | Districts of selected state | Yes | |||
21 | Taluk of Injured | Dropdown | Taluk of selected District | Yes | |||
22 | Village/Area of Injured | Text Box | |||||
B | SOCIO DEMOGRAPHICAL DETAIL | ||||||
1 | Age of Injured | Radio button (Text box is enabled based on Q1. If 1 is selected Text box1and unknown is enabled, If 2 is selected Text box2 and unknown is enabled) | < 1year (In Months) – Text box1 | Yes | B01_AgeYr s is greater than or equal to 5 show Q4, Q5 or Skip Q4, Q5 | ||
>1 year (In Years) Text – box2 | |||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
2 | Gender of Injured | Dropdown | Male | 1 | Yes | ||
Female | 2 | ||||||
Transgender | 3 | ||||||
3 | Educational status of the Injured | Dropdown | Illiterate | 1 | Yes | ||
Primary | 2 | ||||||
High School | 3 | ||||||
Higher Secondary | 4 | ||||||
Diploma/Certified course | 5 | ||||||
Graduate and above | 6 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
4 | Occupation of the Injured | Dropdown | Business | 1 | Yes | If 997 go to Q5, else Skip Q5. | |
Self Employed/Medium Business | 2 | ||||||
Professional/Executive/Managers | 3 | ||||||
Employee (Govt./Private) | 4 | ||||||
Skilled Manual (Artisians, Agriculture, Fishery, Forestry) | 5 | ||||||
Unskilled Manual (Labour) | 6 | ||||||
Home maker | 7 | ||||||
Student | 8 | ||||||
Unemployed | 9 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
5 | Specify Occupation of the injured | Text Box | |||||
C | ACCIDENT IDENTIFICATION DETAILS | ||||||
1 | Date of accident | Date pick | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
2 | Time of accident | Time pick (Scroll) | hh:mm | Yes | |||
3 | State of accident | Dropdown | All States Of India | Yes | |||
4 | District of accident | Dropdown | District of selected state | Yes | |||
5 | Taluk of accident state | Dropdown | Taluk of Selected District | Yes | |||
6 | Village/Town of accident site | Text Box | Yes | ||||
7 | Nearest landmark of accident site | Text Box | (GIS mapping-insert map) | ||||
8 | What is the type of accident? | Dropdown | Self-fall/Skid | 1 | Yes | If 997 go to Q9, else Skip Q9. | |
Crash with pedestrian | 2 | ||||||
Crash with parked vehicle | 3 | ||||||
Crash with fixed obstacle | 4 | ||||||
Crash with non-fixed obstacle | 5 | ||||||
Crash between two | |||||||
vehicles | 6 | ||||||
Crash with two or more | |||||||
vehicles | 7 | ||||||
Crash with animal | 8 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
9 | Specify Type of Accident | Text Box | |||||
10 | What was the weather condition at the time of accident? | Dropdown | Clear | 1 | Yes | If 997 go to Q11, else Skip Q11. | |
Hot/dry weather | 2 | ||||||
Rainy | 3 | ||||||
Fog/Mist/Smoke/Smog | 4 | ||||||
Sever winds | 5 | ||||||
Landslide | 6 | ||||||
Snow | 7 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
11 | Specify weather condition | Text Box | Yes | ||||
12 | What was the light condition at the time of accident? | Dropdown | Excess Light | 1 | Yes | ||
Sufficient Light | 2 | ||||||
Partial light | 3 | ||||||
Insufficient Light | 4 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
13 | Has FIR been lodged | Dropdown | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 1 go to Q14 else Skip Q14 | |
No | 2 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
14 | FIR Number | Text box | |||||
D | ROAD RELATED DETAILS | ||||||
1 | What is the type of road of the accident site? | Dropdown | National highway | 1 | Yes | ||
State highway | 2 | ||||||
Major District Roads (MDR) | 3 | ||||||
Other District Roads(ODR) | 4 | ||||||
Village Roads (VR) | 5 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
2 | What is the sub-type of the accident site | Multiple Choice | One way road | 1 | Yes | If any 6,7,8,11,12 selected go to Q3 else Skip Q3 and Q4. | |
Two way road | 2 | ||||||
Single lane | 3 | ||||||
Two lane road | 4 | ||||||
Four or above lane road | 5 | ||||||
Cross Road | 6 | ||||||
Round about | 7 | ||||||
Railway crossing | 8 | ||||||
Curve road/Blind curve | 9 | ||||||
Gradient road | 10 | ||||||
T or Staggered junction | 11 | ||||||
Multiple Junction | 12 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
3 | Traffic Controlled by | Multiple choice | Traffic signal/Rail road barrier | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q4 else Skip Q4. | |
Traffic personnel/Railway personnel | 2 | ||||||
Concerned Institute/organization personnel | 3 | ||||||
Public Volunteer | 4 | ||||||
Uncontrolled | 5 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
4 | Specify Traffic Control | Text Box | |||||
5 | How were the road conditions at the accident site | Dropdown | Safe | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q6 else Skip Q6. | |
Slippery (Wet/Oily) | 2 | ||||||
Muddy | 3 | ||||||
Rutted/Pot holed | 4 | ||||||
Flooded | 5 | ||||||
Snow | 6 | ||||||
Work under progress | 7 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
6 | Specify Road Condition | Text Box | |||||
7 | Do you know the Speed limit of the Road? | Dropdown | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 1 is selected go to Q8 else Skip Q8. | |
No | 2 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
8 | Enter the Speed Limit | Numeric Box | Yes | ||||
E | VEHICLE INFORMATION | ||||||
1 | How many vehicles involved in the crash? | Numeric Box | Yes | ||||
The following Questions Q2 to Q13 should repeat based on the number entered in Q1. The variable name should change with the number. For example, if 3 is entered in Q1, 3 times the Questions 2 to 13 will be repeated each time variable name number will change (Eg: E02_TypeVehcl_1 first time, E02_TypeVehcl_2 Second time and E02_TypeVehcl_3 Third time). | |||||||
Each set should have the label “Vehicle (number-1) Details”, the number is based on the number of times the Question set is repeated. For example, first set will have the label “Vehicle 1 Detail”, Second set will have the label “Vehicle 2 Detail” and so on up to 5. | |||||||
2 | What was the type of vehicle involved in the accident? | Dropdown | Bicycle/Cycle rickshaw | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q3 else Skip Q3. | |
Bullock cart | 2 | ||||||
Two wheeler geared | 3 | ||||||
Two wheeler non-geared | 4 | ||||||
Auto rickshaw | 5 | ||||||
Car | 6 | ||||||
Tempo traveler/Van/City ride | 7 | ||||||
Bus/Mini Bus | 8 | ||||||
Trucks/Tra ctors | 9 | ||||||
Lorry | 10 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
3 | Specify Vehicle: | Text Box | |||||
4 | What is the special function of the vehicle? | Dropdown | Personnel private vehicle | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q5 else Skip Q5. | |
Public passenger vehicle | 2 | ||||||
Private passenger vehicle | 3 | ||||||
Goods vehicle (Public/Co mmercial) | 4 | ||||||
Govt. official vehicle | 5 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
5 | Specify vehicle function | Text Box | |||||
6 | Vehicle manoeuvre (action taken by vehicle immediately before it become involved in crash) | Dropdown | Normal straight driving | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q7 else Skip Q7. | |
Changing lane | 2 | ||||||
Reversing | 3 | ||||||
Turning | 4 | ||||||
Over taking | 5 | ||||||
Slowing/st opping/mo ving off | 6 | ||||||
Parked | 7 | ||||||
Driving off the lane/road | 8 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
7 | Specify vehicle manoeuvre | Text Box | |||||
8 | What is the driving licensure status of the vehicle driver? | Dropdown | Present Valid | 1 | Yes | ||
Present Invalid | 2 | ||||||
Absent | 3 | ||||||
Learners License | 4 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
9 | Was the vehicle over speeding at the time of accident? | Dropdown | Yes | 1 | Yes | ||
No | 2 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
10 | What was the driving quality of the vehicle at the time of accident? | Dropdown | Safe driving | 1 | Yes | ||
Distracted Driving | 2 | ||||||
Uncontrolle d Driving | 3 | ||||||
Sleepless/worn out driving | 4 | ||||||
Unsafe driving due to health | 5 | ||||||
Impairment Unknown | 998 | ||||||
F | PERSON RELATED DATA | ||||||
1 | What type of road user was the injured person? | Dropdown | Driver | 1 | Yes | If 1 and 998 is selected skip Q2 and Q3. If 2 is selected go to Q2 and skip Q3. If 3 is selected go to Q3 and skip Q2 | |
Passenger | 2 | ||||||
Pedestrian | 3 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
2 | What is the seating position of the passenger | Dropdown | Front | 1 | Yes | ||
Rear middle | 2 | ||||||
Rear side | 3 | ||||||
On the roof | 4 | ||||||
Standing inside/on vehicle | 5 | ||||||
Foot Board | 6 | ||||||
Pillion rider (sitting behind in two wheeler) | 7 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
3 | Pedestrian activity at the time of accident? | Dropdown | Crossing road | 1 | Yes | ||
Standing middle of the road | 2 | ||||||
Walking/standing along shoulder of the road | 3 | ||||||
Walking/standing in the footpath | 4 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
4 | What were the safety precautions taken by injured person at the time of accident? | Multiple choice | Seat belt worn | 1 | Yes | If 1 or 2 in Q1 in session F and 3 or 4 in Q2 in session E is selected enable only options 2, 4, 996 and 998 If 1 or 2 in Q1 in session F and 5, 6, 7 and 8 in Q2 in session E is selected then enable only options 1, 3, 4, 996and 998 If 3 is selected in Q1 in session F then enable only options 4, 5, 996 and 998. If 1 or 2 in Q1 in session F and 1, 2, 9, 10, 997 and 998 in Q2 in session E enable options only 4, 998 and 996. | |
Helmet worn | 2 | ||||||
Airbag present in vehicle | 3 | ||||||
Followed traffic signal | 4 | ||||||
Used Zebra crossing | 5 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
5 | Who were Drunken/consumed alcohol during accident? | Multiple choice | Driver of the injured vehicle | 1 | Yes | If 1 in Q5 and 1 in Q1 is selected or 2 in Q5 and 2 in Q1 is selected or 5 in Q5 and 3 in Q1 is selected Go to Q6 else skip Q6. | |
Passenger/Co-passenger of the injured vehicle | 2 | ||||||
Driver of the counterpart vehicle | 3 | ||||||
Passenger/Co-passenger of the counterpart vehicle | 4 | ||||||
Pedestrian | 5 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
6 | Blood Alcohol level of the injured | Numeric Box | |||||
7 | Who used Mobile phone during accident? | Multiple choice | Driver of the injured vehicle | 1 | Yes | ||
Driver of the counterpart vehicle | 2 | ||||||
Pedestrian | 3 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
G | PRE-HOSPITAL ADMISSION DATA | ||||||
1 | What was the time duration taken for rescue efforts after the accident happened? | Time Format | hh:mm | Yes | |||
2 | How was the injured person rescued? | Dropdown | Self | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q3 else skip Q3. | |
Known Person (Friends/Relatives) | 2 | ||||||
Driver/Passenger/Co-Passenger | 3 | ||||||
Local People/Passerby | 4 | ||||||
Police | 5 | ||||||
Army | 6 | ||||||
Disaster Response Force (State/National) | 7 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
3 | Specify how was the injured person rescued | Text Box | . | ||||
4 | What was the reason for delay in rescuing the injured person? | Dropdown | Noticed Late | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q5 else skip Q5. | |
Late Information given to rescue team/Emergency transport | 2 | ||||||
Access difficulty (Difficult terrain or difficult to access site) | 3 | ||||||
Weather conditions | 4 | ||||||
Emergency Transport Vehicle arrived late | 5 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
5 | Specify the reason for delay in rescuing the injured person | Text Box | |||||
6 | How was the injured person taken from the accident site to the transport vehicle? | Dropdown | Stretcher | 1 | Yes | ||
Sheets | 2 | ||||||
Hold by 2–4 peoples | 3 | ||||||
Carried by people on their back | 4 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
7 | Specify how was the injured person taken from the accident site to the transport vehicle | Text Box | |||||
8 | Was the injured person given first aid? | Dropdown | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 1 go to Q9 or skip Q9, Q10, Q11 and Q12. | |
No | 2 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
9 | Where was the first aid given? | Dropdown | At the accident site | 1 | Yes | If 997 go to Q10 else skip Q10. | |
Nearby Govt. Hospital | 2 | ||||||
Nearby Private clinic | 3 | ||||||
Ambulance | 4 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
10 | Specify where was the first aid given | Text Box | |||||
11 | Who gave the first aid? | Dropdown | Health worker/Nurse | 1 | Yes | If 2,3,4 is selected in Q9 disable options 4,5 and 6. If 997 go to Q12 else skip Q12 | |
Ambulance technician | 2 | ||||||
Doctor | 3 | ||||||
Public | 4 | ||||||
Police | 5 | ||||||
Family members | 6 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
12 | Specify who gave the first aid | Text Box | |||||
13 | How was the injured person transported to health facility? | Dropdown | Self | 1 | Yes | If 997 go to Q14 else skip Q14. | |
Government Ambulance | 2 | ||||||
Private Ambulance | 3 | ||||||
Commercial passenger vehicle | 4 | ||||||
Commercial goods vehicle | 5 | ||||||
Private vehicle | 6 | ||||||
Govt. Official vehicle | 7 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
14 | Specify how was the injured person transported to health facility | Text Box | |||||
15 | Number of hospitals/health facilities visited before attending the registering hospital | Numeric Box | Yes | If 0 skip Q16, Q 17, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23. If 1 Skip Q16 If >1 go to Q16. | |||
16 | What was the first referral hospital? | Dropdown | Primary health care facility | 1 | |||
District Government Hospitals | 2 | ||||||
Other Government Hospitals | 3 | ||||||
Private hospitals | 4 | ||||||
Private nursing home | 5 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
17 | What was the Last referral hospital? | Dropdown | Primary health care facility | 1 | Yes | ||
District Government Hospitals | 2 | ||||||
Other Government Hospitals | 3 | ||||||
Private hospitals | 4 | ||||||
Private nursing home | 5 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
18 | Last Referral hospital State | Dropdown | All States in India | Yes | |||
19 | Last Referral hospital District | Dropdown | District of selected state | Yes | |||
20 | Last Referral hospital Taluk | Dropdown | Taluk of Selected District | Yes | |||
21 | Last Referral hospital Village/Town/Area | Text Box | (GIS mapping-insert map) | Yes | |||
22 | Reason for shifting from the referral hospital? | Dropdown | Not equipped for the treatment required | 1 | Yes | If 997 go to Q23 else skip Q23. | |
Specialist doctors not available | 2 | ||||||
Bed not available | 3 | ||||||
Patient’s desire | 4 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
23 | Specify reason for shifting from the referral hospital | Text Box | |||||
H | AMBULACNE DETAILS (This section appears only if 1 or 2 is selected in Q12 of G section else skip) | ||||||
1 | Whether ambulance details available? | Radio button | Yes | 1 | Yes | If 2 is selected skip rest questions in this section else go to Q2. | |
No | 2 | ||||||
2 | Date of the call received by ambulance personnel regarding the accident? (Date) | Calendar Format | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
3 | Time of the call received by ambulance personnel regarding the accident? (Time) | Time Format (Scroll) | hh:mm | ||||
4 | Date - ambulance reached the accident site? (Date) | Calendar Format | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
5 | Time-ambulance reached the accident site? (Time) | Time Format (Scroll) | hh:mm | ||||
6 | Date patient dropped at the hospital? (Date) | Calendar Format | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
7 | Time patient dropped at the hospital? (Time) | Time Format (Scroll) | hh:mm | ||||
8 | How was the patient managed in the transport vehicle during the transport from accident site to hospital? | Multiple choice | CPR | 1 | If 997 go to Q9 else skip Q9. | ||
Electrical defibrillation | 2 | ||||||
Maintained airway | 3 | ||||||
Bleeding controlled | 4 | ||||||
IV Fluid | 5 | ||||||
IV Blood | 6 | ||||||
IV / IM Drugs | 7 | ||||||
Positioning of the patient | 8 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
9 | Specify how was the patient managed in the transport vehicle | Text Box | |||||
10 | Ambulance has the facility to record and monitor | Multiple choice | Pulse rate | 1 | Yes | If 994 or 998 skip rest questions. If 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 is yes showQ11, Q12 and Q13, Q14, Q15 and Q16 respectivel y. For Options not selected hide the respective questions. | |
BP | 2 | ||||||
Respiratory Rate | 3 | ||||||
Oxygen Saturation | 4 | ||||||
GCS | 5 | ||||||
None | 994 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
11 | Ambulance pulse rate | Numeric box1 (First) | |||||
Numeric box2 (Last) | |||||||
12 | Ambulance Systolic Blood Pressure | Numeric box1 (First) | |||||
Numeric box2 (Last) | |||||||
13 | Ambulance Diastolic Blood Pressure | Numeric box1 (First) | |||||
Numeric box2 (Last) | |||||||
14 | Ambulance Respiratory Rate | Numeric box1 (First) | |||||
Numeric box2 (Last) | |||||||
15 | Ambulance oxygen saturation | Numeric box1 (First) | |||||
Numeric box2 (Last) | |||||||
16 | Ambulance Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Numeric box1 (First) | |||||
Numeric box2 (Last) | |||||||
I | CLINICAL DETAILS (On the day of admission) | ||||||
1 | What was status of injured at the time of admission | Dropdown | Unconscious | 1 | Yes | ||
Conscious | 2 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
2 | Co morbidity Level | Dropdown | Healthy | 1 | |||
Non-Limiting | 2 | ||||||
Limiting | 3 | ||||||
Constant Threat to life | 4 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not documented | 999 | ||||||
3 | Pulse rate | Numeric box | |||||
4 | Systolic BP | Numeric box | |||||
5 | Diastolic BP | Numeric box | |||||
6 | Respiratory rate | Numeric box | |||||
7 | Oxygen Saturation | Numeric box | |||||
8 | Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Numeric box | |||||
FORM II | |||||||
J | CLINICAL, TREATMENT AND OUTCOME DETAILS discharge/ death/ abscond / referral of the patient) (Follow up-to be submitted during | ||||||
1 | User code | Numeric Box | Jan-99 | Yes | |||
2 | IRIS ID | Dropdown of the User code synced IRIS-ID | Yes | ||||
3 | What are the parts of the body injured | Dropdown | Head | 1 | |||
Neck | 2 | ||||||
Thorax | 3 | ||||||
Abdomen, lower back, lumbar spine and pelvis | 4 | ||||||
Shoulder and upper arm | 5 | ||||||
Elbow and forearm | 6 | ||||||
Wrist and hand | 7 | ||||||
Hip and thigh | 8 | ||||||
Knee and lower leg | 9 | ||||||
Ankle and foot | 10 | ||||||
Multiple body regions | 11 | ||||||
Injuries to unspecified part of trunk limb and body | 12 | ||||||
4 | What was the nature of injuries sustained | Dropdown | Superficial injury | 1 | |||
Open wound | 2 | ||||||
Fracture | 3 | ||||||
Dislocation, sprain and strain | 4 | ||||||
Injury to nerves and spinal cord | 5 | ||||||
Injury to blood vessels | 6 | ||||||
Muscles and Tendons | 7 | ||||||
Crushing Injury | 8 | ||||||
Traumatic amputation | 9 | ||||||
Injury to internal organs | 10 | ||||||
Foreign body in natural orifice | 11 | ||||||
Burns and corrosions | 12 | ||||||
Other unspecified Injurie | 13 | ||||||
5 | Type of fracture | Radio button | Open | 1 | |||
Closed | 2 | ||||||
6 | Describe the injury | Text Box | |||||
7 | Injury classification as per ICD_10 | Dropdown | Include only Chapter XIX up to Burns and corrosion, Certain early complications of trauma and Sequel of injuries. Cascade based on response from Q2 and Q5 | ||||
8 | How is the severity of injury | Dropdown | Minor | 1 | |||
Moderate | 2 | ||||||
Serious | 3 | ||||||
Severe | 4 | ||||||
Critical | 5 | ||||||
Maximum (Untreatable) | 6 | ||||||
9 | Abbreviated injury Scale (AIS) | Dropdown | AIS 2008 code set. Cased based on Q2, Q4, Q6 And Q7. | ||||
10 | FAST Result | Dropdown | Done-Positive | 1 | |||
Done-Negative | 2 | ||||||
Equivocal | 3 | ||||||
No Facility | 994 | ||||||
Not done | 996 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
Not recorded | 999 | ||||||
11 | What is the patient treatment status? | Dropdown | First Aid Provided | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q12 else skip Q12 | |
Stabilized | 2 | ||||||
Treated in emergency room | 3 | ||||||
Definitive care (Comprehensive care) | 4 | ||||||
LAMA | 5 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
12 | Specify Treatment status | Text Box | |||||
13 | What is the Patient admission status? | Referred | 1 | Yes | If 1 is selected show questions 17 to 26 or skip questions 20 to 26. If 2 is selected skip questions 20 to 26. If 3 is selected show questions 17, 18 and 19 and skip rest of the questions | ||
In hospital care (Shifted to IP/Remains admitted) | 2 | ||||||
Abscond/Left | 3 | ||||||
14 | What was the time taken to initiate treatment? (Time between admission and first aid/ stabilization/ treatment/ to declare brought dead based on options selected in Q18) | Date pick | Date format | ||||
Time pick | Time format | ||||||
15 | Reason for delay in treatment? | Dropdown | Delay to get investigation results | 1 | If 997 is selected go to Q16 else skip Q16 | ||
Doctors not available | 2 | ||||||
Delay in blood availability | 3 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Not applicable | 996 | ||||||
16 | Specify, reason for delay in treatment | Text box | |||||
17 | Outcome | Dropdown | Alive | 1 | If 2 is selected show Q27, show Q27, 28 and 29 and skip rest of the questions If 1 is selected Show Q18, 19 and skip rest of the questions | ||
Dead | 2 | ||||||
18 | Date of discharge | Calendar Format | dd/mm/yyyy | ||||
19 | Discharge summary | Text Box | |||||
20 | What is the centre referred? | Text | Primary health care facility | 1 | Yes | ||
District Government Hospitals | 2 | ||||||
Other Government Hospitals | 3 | ||||||
Private hospitals | 4 | ||||||
Private nursing home | 5 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
21 | What was mode of transport for shifting the patient to higher centre? | Dropdown | Government Ambulance | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q22 else skip Q22 | |
Private Ambulance | 2 | ||||||
Private vehicle | 3 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
22 | Specify mode of transport for shifting patient | Text Box | |||||
23 | Date of referral | Calendar Format | dd/mm/yyy | Yes | |||
24 | Time of referral | Time Format | hh:mm | ||||
25 | Reason for referral | Dropdown | Not equipped for the treatment required | 1 | Yes | If 997 is selected go to Q26 else skip Q26 | |
Specialist doctors not available | 2 | ||||||
Bed not available | 3 | ||||||
Patient’s desire | 4 | ||||||
Others | 997 | ||||||
Unknown | 998 | ||||||
26 | Specify reason for referral | Text Box | |||||
27 | Date of death | Calendar Format | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
28 | Time of death | Time format | Hh:mm | Yes | |||
29 | Cause of death | Text Box |
Annexure 2-B: Integrated Road Traffic Injury Surveillance (IRIS), India
Q. No. | Question | Data entry rule | Values Assigned | Req | Range | Skip Pattern | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | IDENTIFICATION | ||||||
1 | Centre Code | Dropdown | Chennai Chitoor Jaipur Delhi Tehri Garhwal |
1 2 3 4 5 |
Yes | ||
2 | Serial number | Numeric Box | Yes | 0001–9999 | |||
3 | User code | Numeric Box | Yes | 01–99 | |||
4 | IRIS ID | Auto-generated. Should not allow entering or editing the field. | Will constitute the Centre code, Hospital code, User code and Serial No. For e.g. IRIS:ID:11010005 means case belongs to Chennai, Public hospital and 1st user and is in the fifth case in serial order | Yes | “Auto generated field” appears if we try to enter. | ||
5 | Informant Name | Text Box | Yes | ||||
6 | Age of Injured | Radio button (Text box is enabled based on Q1. If 1 is selected Text box1and unknown is enabled, If 2 is selected Text box2 and unknown is enabled) | < 1year (In Months) – Text box1 >1 year (In Years) – Text box2 Unknown |
998 | Yes | In months-0 to 12 In years-1 to 150 998 | B01_AgeYrs is greater than or equal to 5 show question on education, occupation |
7 | Gender of Injured | Dropdown | Male Female Transgender |
1 2 3 |
Yes | ||
8 | Educational status of the Injured | Dropdown | Illiterate Primary High School Higher Secondary Diploma/Certified course Graduate and above Unknown |
1 2 3 4 5 6 998 |
Yes | ||
9 | Occupation of the Injured | Dropdown | Business Self Employed/Medium Business Professional/Executive/Managers Employee (Govt./Private) Skilled Manual (Artisians, Agriculture, Fishery, Forestry) Unskilled Manual (Labour) Home maker Student Unemployed Others Unknown |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 997 998 |
Yes | If 997 go to Q6, or Skip Q6. | |
10 | Specify Occupation of the injured | Text Box | |||||
11 | Outcome | Dropdown | Alive Dead |
1 2 |
|||
12 | Type of area where data is collected | Radio Button | Urban Rural Peri/sub urban Unknown |
1 2 3 4 |
Yes | ||
13 | Date of Data Collection | Date format | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
B | ACCIDENT DETAILS | ||||||
1 | Date of accident | Date format | dd/mm/yyyy | Yes | |||
2 | Time of accident | Time format | hh:mm | Yes | |||
3 | Place of accident | ||||||
4 | What is the type of accident? | Dropdown | Self-fall/Skid Crash with pedestrian Crash with parked vehicle Crash with fixed obstacle Crash with non-fixed obstacle Crash between two vehicles Crash with two or more vehicles Crash with animal Others Unknown |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 997 998 |
Yes | If 97 go to Q9, or Skip Q9. If 2 is selected show Q8 or skip Q8. | |
5 | Specify Type of Accident | Text Box | |||||
6 | Number of fatalities | Numeric Box | Yes | 0–200, 998 | |||
7 | Number of persons hospitalized | Numeric Box | Yes | 0–200, 998 | |||
8 | Number of pedestrians involved | Numeric Box | Yes | 1–100, 998 | |||
9 | Number of vehicles involved | Numeric Box | Yes | 1–5, 998 | |||
10 | Type of vehicle involved | Multiple choice | Bicycle/Cycle rickshaw Bullock cart Two wheeler geared Two wheeler non-geared Auto rickshaw Car Tempo traveler/Van/City ride Bus/Mini Bus Trucks/Tractors Lorry Others Unknown |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 997 998 |
Yes | If 97 is selected go to Q11 or Skip Q11. | |
11 | Specify type of vehicle |
Footnotes
Authors’ contribution
All the authors met the standards of authorship based on the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. KRJ, PM, JK, RS, DKM and AJ contributed equally to the research and should be considered as joint second author. Former five of these authors are corresponding to the sequence of cities shown in the paper and each of these authors is responsible for research in the corresponding city. AJ is responsible for surveillance platform. MB and YS contributed equally and should be considered as joint third authors, as these authors involved in the compilation of information and initial drafting of the manuscript. The first author (BVB) is the national coordinator of this research.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Funding
This National Task Force Study was supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India (Number: NTF/2017/HSR/02).
References
- 1.Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Carter A, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980±2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3(11): e442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kassebaum NJ, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown J, Carter A, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 Study. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1603–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, et al. editors. World report on road traffic injury prevention: summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Babu BV, Sharma Y. Health systems research initiative to tackle growing road traffic injuries in India. J Emerg Pract Trauma 2019;5(1):2–7. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grossman DC, Kim A, Macdonald SC, Klein P, Copass MK, Maier RV. Urban-rural differences in prehospital care of major trauma. J Trauma. 1997;42(4):723–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gururaj G. Road traffic deaths, injuries and disabilities in India: Current scenario. Natl Med J India; 2008;21(1):14–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Benegal V. India: alcohol and public health. Addiction. 2005;100(8):1051–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.World Health Organization (WHO). Global status report on alcohol and health, Geneva; 2014. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/Road_safety_media_brief_full_document.pdf [Accessed on 12 February 2019]. [Google Scholar]
- 13.World Health Organization [Internet]. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en/ [Accessed on 19 June 2018].
- 14.Wesson HK, Boikhutso N, Bachani AM, Hofman KJ, Hyder AA. The cost of injury and trauma care in low-and middle-income countries: a review of economic evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(6):795–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mashreky S, Rahman A, Khan T, Faruque M, Svanström L, Rahman F. Hospital burden of road traffic injury: major concern in primary and secondary level hospitals in Bangladesh. Public Health. 2010;124(4):185–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reddy G, Negandhi H, Singh D, Singh AJ. Extent and determinants of cost of road traffic injuries in an Indian city. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63(12):549–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Silcok BR. Guidelines for estimating the costs of road crashes in developing countries. London: Department for International Development, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Razzak JA, Bhatti JA, Ali M, Khan UR, Jooma R. Average out-of-pocket healthcare and work-loss costs of traffic injuries in Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2011;18(3):199–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mohan D. The road ahead: traffic injuries and fatalities in India. Delhi: Indian Institute of Technology, Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Program, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haddon W., Jr. Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy. Public Health Rep. 1980;95(5):411–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.National Crime Records Bureau. Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India – 2015. New Delhi: National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2017. Accessed at: https://ncrb.gov.in/accidental-deaths-suicides-india-adsi] [Accessed on 20 July 2019]. [Google Scholar]
- 22.World Health Organization. Data Systems – A Road Safety Manual for Decision-Makers and Practitioners. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khorshidi A, Ainy E, Soori H, Sabbagh MM. Iranian road traffic injury project: assessment of road traffic injuries in Iran in 2012. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(5):517–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shahbazi F, Hashemi Nazari SS, Soori H, Khodakarim S. Socioeconomic Inequality in Mortality from Road Traffic Accident in Iran. J Res Health Sci. 2019;19(1):e00437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Azami-Aghdash S, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Shabaninejad H, Abolghasem Gorji H. Injury epidemiology in Iran: a systematic review. J Inj Violence Res. 2017;9(1):27–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Razzak JA, Shamim MS, Mehmood A, Hussain SA, Ali MS, Jooma R. A successful model of road traffic injury surveillance in a developing country: process and lessons learnt. BMC Public Health; 2012;12:357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Holder Y, Peden M, Krug EG, Lund J, Gururaj G, Kobusingye O. Injury Surveillance Guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 28.World Health Organization. World report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Khorasani-Zavareh D, Sharifian S. Challenges of Establishing a Traffic Surveillance System in Iran: The Requirement of Providing a Unified Definition for “Traffic Surveillance System”. Safety Promot Inj Prev. 2017;5(2):59–60. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Singh D, Singh SP, Kumaran M, Goel S. Epidemiology of road traffic accident deaths in children in Chandigarh zone of North West India. Egypt J Forensic Sci 2016;6(3):255–60. [Google Scholar]