Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2017 May 31;36(5):877–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05460.x

DISCONTINUOUS DNA VARIATION IN THE EVOLUTION OF PLANT SPECIES: THE GENUS LATHYRUS

R K J Narayan 1
PMCID: PMC7163567  PMID: 28567831

The content is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Literature Cited

  1. Gams, H. 1926. Leguminosae. In Hegi's Illustrierte Flora Von Mittel‐Europa 4: 3 Munich. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodspeed, T.H. 1954. The genus Nicotiana . Chronica Botanica 16:1–536. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hazarika, M.H. 1969. The cytogenetics of diploid and autotetraploid plant populations. Ph.D. thesis. University College of Wales, Aberystwyth. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hotelling, H. 1931. The generalisation of Student's ratio. Ann. Math. Stat. 2:360–378. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hutchinson, J. , Narayan R. K. J., and Rees H.. 1980. Constraints upon the composition of supplementary DNA. Chromosoma 78:137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones, K.W. 1973, p. 29–66. In Pain H. and Smith B.J. (eds.), New Techniques in Biophysics and Cell Biology, vol. 1. Wiley, N.Y.. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewis, H. 1962. Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Evolution 16:257–271. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lewis, H. , and Lewis M. E. 1955. The genus Clarkia . Univ. California Publ. Bot. 20:241–392. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mahalanobis, P.C. 1936. On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India 2:49–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Martin, P.G. , and Shank R. 1966. Does Vicia faba have multistranded chromosomes? Nature 211:658.4961308 [Google Scholar]
  11. McLeish, J. , and Sunderland N.. 1961. Measurements of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in higher plants by Feulgen photometry and chemical methods. Exp. Cell Res. 24:527–540. [Google Scholar]
  12. Murty, B.R. , Mathur J. B. L., and Arunachalam V.. 1965. Self incompatibility and genetic divergence in Brassica campestris, Var. brown sarson. Sankhya 27:272–278. [Google Scholar]
  13. Murty, B.R. , and Arunachalam V. 1967. Computer programmes for some problems in biometrical genetics—1. Use of Mahalanobis D2 in classificatory problems. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 27:60–69. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nair, K.R. , and Mukherjee H. K. 1960. Classification of natural and plantation teak (Tectona grandis) grown at different locations of India and Burma with respect to physical and mechanical properties. Sankhya 22:1–20. [Google Scholar]
  15. Narayan, R. K. J. , and Macefield A. J.. 1976. Adaptive responses and genetic divergence in a world germplasm collection of chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoret. Appl. Genet. 47:179–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Narayan, R. K. J. , and Rees H.. 1974. Nuclear DNA heterochromatin and phylogeny of Nicotiana amphidiploids. Chromosoma 47:75–83. [Google Scholar]
  17. Narayan, R. K. J. , and Rees H.. 1976. Nuclear DNA variation in Lathyrus . Chromosoma 54:141–154. [Google Scholar]
  18. Narayan, R. K. J. , and Rees H.. 1977. Nuclear DNA divergence among Lathyrus species. Chromosoma 63:101–107. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nei, M. 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. North‐Holland Research Monographs. Frontiers of Biology, vol. 40. Amsterdam, Oxford. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pardue, M.L. , and Gall J. G. 1969. Molecular hybridization of radioactive DNA to the DNA of cytological preparations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash. 64:600–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rao, C.R. 1952. Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rees, H. , and Narayan R. K. J. 1977. Evolutionary DNA variation in Lathyrus . Chrom. Today 6:131–139. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rothfels, K. , Sexsmith E., Heimburger M., and Krause M. O.. 1966. Chromosome size and DNA content of species of Anemone L. and related genera. Chromosoma 20:54–74. [Google Scholar]
  24. Senn, H.A. 1936. A cytogenetic study of the genus Lathyrus. Proc. Virginia Acad. Sci., Richmond: 31 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Senn, H.A. 1938. Experimental data for the revision of the genus Lathyrus . Amer. J. Bot. 25:67–78. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sokal, R.R. , and Rohlf F. J. 1969. Biometry, the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sparrow, A.H. , and Nauman A. F. 1973. Evolutionary changes in chromosome size and DNA content in grasses. In Basic Mechanisms in Plant Morphogenesis. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 25:367–389. [Google Scholar]
  28. Teoh, S.B. , and Rees H. 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in populations of Picea and Pinus species. Heredity 36:123–137. [Google Scholar]
  29. Thompson, W.F. , and Murray M. G. 1980. Sequence organisation in pea and mung bean DNA and a model for genome evolution, p. 51–45. In Davies D. R. and Hopwood D. A. (eds.), Plant Genome. The John Innes Charity, England. [Google Scholar]
  30. Watson, J.D. 1965. Molecular Biology of the Gene. Benjamin, N.Y. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 4. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES