Abstract
Background
Keratoconus (KTCN) is a protrusion and thinning of the cornea, resulting in loss of visual acuity. The etiology of KTCN remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential involvement of new genetic variants in KTCN etiology based on both the genomic and transcriptomic findings recognized in the same corneal tissues.
Methods
Corneal tissues derived from five unrelated Polish individuals with KTCN were examined using exome sequencing (ES), followed by enrichment analyses. For comparison purposes, the datasets comprising ES data of five randomly selected Polish individuals without ocular abnormalities and five Polish patients with high myopia were used. Expression levels of selected genes from the overrepresented pathways were obtained from the previous RNA-Seq study.
Results
Exome capture discovered 117 potentially relevant variants that were further narrowed by gene overrepresentation analyses. In each of five patients, the assessment of functional interactions revealed rare (MAF ≤ 0.01) DNA variants in at least one gene from Wnt signaling (VANGL1, WNT1, PPP3CC, LRP6, FZD2) and focal adhesion (BIRC2, PAK6, COL4A4, PPP1R12A, PTK6) pathways. No genes involved in pathways enriched in KTCN corneas were overrepresented in our control sample sets.
Conclusions
The results of this first pilot ES profiling of human KTCN corneas emphasized that accumulation of sequence variants in several genes from Wnt signaling and/or focal adhesion pathways might cause the phenotypic effect and further points to a complex etiology of KTCN.
Keywords: Candidate keratoconus gene, Overrepresentation analysis, Corneal disease, Keratoconus genetics, WNT signaling, Focal adhesion, WNT1, LRP6, COL4A4, Exome sequencing
Introduction
Keratoconus (KTCN) is an eye disease characterized by progressive thinning and conical protrusion of the cornea (Karolak & Gajecka, 2017). The structural abnormalities in different layers of corneal tissue result in altered refractive powers and a loss of visual function (Rabinowitz, 1998). The first symptoms of KTCN usually appear during puberty or early in the third decade of life (Rabinowitz, 1998). The management of this condition depends on the disease stage and includes visual correction by contact lenses, corneal collagen cross-linking, or corneal transplant surgery (Sarezky et al., 2017; Vazirani & Basu, 2013). The incidence of KTCN is one in 2,000 individuals in the general population (Rabinowitz, 1998). However, the incidence may vary depending on the geographic location and ethnicity of the studied population. The estimated incidence of KTCN is higher in Indians, Chinese, Pacific, and Maori ethnicities compared with Caucasians (Pearson et al., 2000; Georgiou et al., 2004; Kok, Tan & Loon, 2012; Patel & McGhee, 2013; Gokhale, 2013; Godefrooij et al., 2016). The environmental factors, such as eye rubbing or contact lens wear, influence disease development (Hashemi et al., 2019). However, genetic triggers also play an important role in KTCN (Karolak & Gajecka, 2017; Abu-Amero, Al-Muammar & Kondkar, 2014). Several genomic strategies have been implemented for finding candidate genes, including both simple molecular techniques and high-throughput technologies (Karolak & Gajecka, 2017; Abu-Amero, Al-Muammar & Kondkar, 2014; Bykhovskaya, Margines & Rabinowitz, 2016; Mas Tur et al., 2017; Valgaeren, Koppen & Van Camp, 2018; Loukovitis et al., 2018).
Linkage studies, performed in KTCN families, have led to the identification of multiple chromosomal regions linked to KTCN, including two replicated loci at 5q (Tang et al., 2005; Li et al., 2006; Bisceglia et al., 2009; Rosenfeld et al., 2011; Bykhovskaya et al., 2016). The genome-wide association studies have detected variants mapped near HGF, COL5A1, FOXO1, RAB3GAP1, or ZNF469, associated with KTCN risk (Li et al., 2012; Burdon et al., 2011; Hoehn et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2013). However, their contribution to KTCN needs to be clarified. Several candidate genes for KTCN have also been identified using Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing including VSX1, SOD1 and DOCK9 or SKP1, MPDZ, FLG, PPIP5K2, and PCSK1, respectively (Héon et al., 2002; Karolak et al., 2015, 2017; Udar et al., 2006; Lucas et al., 2018; Khaled et al., 2019; Magalhães et al., 2019). However, variants detected in those genes were present in a small fraction of KTCN patients or particular populations only.
Analysis of transcriptome profiles of human KTCN and non-KTCN corneas by a high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) showed the deregulation of numerous genes in KTCN corneas (Kabza et al., 2017). The significant downregulation was observed among genes in collagen synthesis and maturation pathways, as well as in the TGF-β, Hippo and Wnt signaling pathways (Kabza et al., 2017). The results of subsequent RNA studies further support the potential role of genes involved in the extracellular matrix, TGF-β and Wnt molecular cascades in KTCN pathogenesis (Khaled et al., 2018; You et al., 2018; Sharif et al., 2019). Since these signaling pathways influence the corneal organization and play a role in the regulation of extracellular matrix components, the genes encoding the core elements of the mentioned pathways were proposed as novel candidate genes for KTCN.
To assess the involvement of new genetic variants in KTCN etiology, we performed a further molecular investigation of corneas of Polish patients with KTCN, previously tested by RNA-Seq, using exome sequencing (ES) approach.
Materials and Methods
Patients
All patients with KTCN underwent a complete ophthalmic evaluation in the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. The KTCN diagnosis was made based on the criteria previously described (Kabza et al., 2017; Karolak et al., 2016). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Poznan University of Medical Sciences (453/14; 755/19). All individuals provided informed consent after the possible consequences of the study were explained, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Material collection and DNA extraction
The pairs of whole corneal tissues and blood samples were obtained from previously evaluated five KTCN patients (KC15, KC16, KC17, KC18, and KC19) (Kabza et al., 2017) undergoing a penetrating keratoplasty procedure. The clinical characteristics of these patients are presented in Table S1. Genomic DNA samples from the corneas were extracted using the Cells and Tissue DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Genomic DNA samples were isolated from the blood lymphocytes using the Gentra Puregene Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), as previously described (Karolak et al., 2016).
Exome sequencing
This pilot ES study was conducted with 50 ng of genomic DNA of whole corneal tissues (KC15, KC16, KC17, KC18, and KC19) using the SureSelectQXT Reagent Kit combined with the SureSelectXT Human All Exon V5 (Agilent Technologies, Cedar Creek, TX, USA) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Prepared libraries were paired-end sequenced (2 × 100 bp) on an Illumina HiSeq1500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). For each cornea sample > 80 million read pairs were generated resulted in >100× of mean coverage. Sequence readouts were initially analyzed with bcl2fastq software to generate reads in fastq format. These reads were mapped against a human genome reference sequence (GRCh37) using the Burrows–Wheeler Alignment (BWA), which was followed by BAM post-processing and variant calling using HaplotypeCaller and the GATK suite (McKenna et al., 2010). Finally, ANNOVAR (Wang, Li & Hakonarson, 2010) was used to annotate relevant information about gene names, predicted variant pathogenicity, reference allele frequencies and metadata from external resources and then to add these to the variant call format (VCF) file.
Variants selection
Sequence variants identified in KTCN corneas were filtered in a step-wise manner to exclude synonymous variants and variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.01 in our internal exome database (DMG) consisting of 3,000 Polish individuals, ExAC Browser (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), GnomAD database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), and the 1,000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000genomes.org). Moreover, variants predicted as neutral by MutationTaster (Schwarz et al., 2010), PolyPhen-2 (Adzhubei, Jordan & Sunyaev, 2013), LRT (Chun & Fay, 2009) and SIFT (Kumar, Henikoff & Ng, 2009) tools were filtered out. The additional exclusion criterion was negative conservation scores in PhyloP (Pollard et al., 2010) analysis.
Sanger sequencing
To confirm variants detected by ES in five KTCN corneas, Sanger sequencing of DNA in matching blood samples was performed. Briefly, fragments of genes containing particular variants were amplified using Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). Following purifications with the use of FastAP Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase and Exonuclease I (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA), the amplicons were sequenced using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Samples were analyzed on the ABI Prism 3730xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences were assembled using Sequencher 5.0. Software (GeneCodes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
Pathway overrepresentation analysis
The overrepresentation analysis of molecular pathways among genes with identified sequence variants, which met the filtering criteria, was performed using the ConsensusPathDB tool (Kamburov et al., 2013). Only pathways with p-value ≤ 0.01 and sharing at least two genes with our gene set were analyzed.
Ethnically-matched control datasets
For comparison purposes, the datasets comprising ES data of five randomly selected Polish individuals without ocular abnormalities and five Polish patients with high myopia (HM) were used. Variants from control ES data were selected using the same filtering criteria as we used for the KTCN study, followed by enrichment analyses.
Expression analysis
Expression levels of selected genes from overrepresented pathways, given in the gene-level transcripts per million (TPM), were obtained from the RNA-Seq study, which has been previously performed in the same corneal material (Kabza et al., 2017). The expression values of the particular genes were compared between corneal samples in which variant(s) was identified and in samples without the analyzed variant.
Results
This pilot ES screening of KTCN corneas revealed 117 potentially relevant variants with MAF ≤ 0.01 in our internal DMG cohort and public databases and fulfilling all of the remaining filtering criteria (Table S2). Genes with identified rare nucleotide variants were enriched in 14 molecular pathways, including Wnt signaling (VANGL1, WNT1, PPP3CC, LRP6, FZD2) and focal adhesion (BIRC2, PAK6, COL4A4, PPP1R12A, PTK6) pathways (Table 1). The analysis of functional interactions between genes from overrepresented molecular pathways allowed for further narrowing the number of candidate KTCN variants (Table 2).
Table 1. Top pathways overrepresented across the genes with identified sequence variants in KTCN corneas detected by ConsensusPathDB server (p-value cutoff 0.01).
Pathway name | Source | Genesa | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Disassembly of the destruction complex and recruitment of AXIN to the membrane | Reactome | FZD2, LRP6, WNT1 | 0.000873181 |
Wnt signaling | Wikipathways | VANGL1, WNT1, PPP3CC, LRP6, FZD2 | 0.000893629 |
Type I hemidesmosome assembly | Reactome | PLEC, COL17A1 | 0.001477943 |
Wnt signaling in kidney disease | Wikipathways | WNT1, LRP6, FZD2 | 0.001788119 |
Wnt signaling pathway - Homo sapiens (human) | KEGG | VANGL1, WNT1, PPP3CC, LRP6, FZD2 | 0.002830193 |
RAB GEFs exchange GTP for GDP on RABs | Reactome | ANKRD27, DENND1A, RABGEF1, DENND4C | 0.002959219 |
The activation of arylsulfatases | Reactome | ARSD, ARSB | 0.003148218 |
Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer | Wikipathways | WNT1, COL4A4, LRP6, FZD2, MEF2D | 0.003952926 |
cGMP-PKG signaling pathway - Homo sapiens (human) | KEGG | ATP2A1, PIK3CG, PPP1R12A, PPP3CC, MEF2D | 0.004277236 |
MicroRNAs in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy | Wikipathways | HDAC9, FZD2, LRP6, PIK3CG | 0.004456905 |
Wnt-beta-catenin signaling pathway in Leukemia | Wikipathways | WNT1, LRP6 | 0.008974682 |
Rab regulation of trafficking | Reactome | ANKRD27, DENND1A, RABGEF1, DENND4C | 0.009329868 |
Focal adhesion | Wikipathways | BIRC2, PAK6, COL4A4, PPP1R12A, PTK6 | 0.009582658 |
Regulation of RAS by GAPs | Reactome | NF1, SPRED2 | 0.009787951 |
Note:
Analyzes were performed in genes with variants fulfilling the filtering criteria: (i) MAF ≤ 0.01 in our internal database, the ExAC Browser, GnomAD database and the 1,000 Genomes Project Variants; (ii) positive conservation scores in PhyloP; (iii) pathogenic/damaging in MutationTaster, PolyPhen2, LRT and SIFT tools.
Table 2. The list of nonsynonymous sequence variants in genes from Wnt signaling and focal adhesion pathways, identified in KTCN corneas in ES.
Identifier | Gene | Acession number | Positiona | cDNA | Protein | DMGb | GnomADc | Rs_idd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KC15 | WNT1 | NM_005430.3 | chr12:49375373G>T | c.1063G>T | p.(V355F) | 0 | NAe | rs387907358 |
PTK6 | NM_005975.3 | chr20:62161533G>T | c.1066C>A | p.(P356T) | 0 | NA | NA | |
KC16 | FZD2 | NM_001466.3 | chr17:42636294G>A | c.1238G>A | p.(R413Q) | 0 | 0.00002396 | rs758351214 |
VANGL1 | NM_001172411.1 | chr1:116194075C>T | c.41C>T | p.(S14L) | 0 | NA | NA | |
COL4A4 | NM_000092.4 | chr2:227924157C>T | c.2347G>A | p.(G783R) | 0.000333 | NA | rs1202230056 | |
KC17 | LRP6 | NM_002336.2 | chr12:12274080G>A | c.4822C>T | p.(P1608S) | 0 | NA | NA |
PPP3CC | NM_001243975.1 | chr8:22389795T>C | c.1199T>C | p.(M400T) | 0 | NA | NA | |
KC18 | BIRC2 | NM_001166.4 | chr11:102248388A>G | c.1528A>G | p.(I510V) | 0.001 | 0.00002148 | rs749829698 |
KC19 | PPP1R12A | NM_001244992.1 | chr12:80266702T>C | c.254A>G | p.(N85S) | 0.000667 | 0.00002422 | rs370959842 |
PAK6 | NM_001276717.1 | chr15:40566454C>A | c.1855C>A | p.(P619T) | 0 | NA | NA |
Notes:
Human Genome Browser—hg19 assembly (GRCh37).
Minor allele frequency based on internal control exome database covering of 3,000 Polish individuals; Department of Medical Genetics (DMG), Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Minor allele frequency based on GnomAD database v2.1.2.
NCBI dbSNP Build 151.
Not available.
Sanger sequencing performed in blood samples derived from the five studied individuals confirmed all variants identified with the use of ES in matched corneas.
The overrepresentation analysis performed among genes filtered in a step-wise manner in control datasets revealed an enrichment in 16 (i.e., O-linked glycosylation, C-type lectin receptors, termination of O-glycan biosynthesis, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain) and nine (i.e., cargo recognition for clathrin-mediated endocytosis VLDL clearance, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, statin pathway DNA damage recognition in GG-NER) pathways in HM patients and individuals without ocular disease, respectively. No genes involved in pathways enriched in KTCN corneas were overrepresented in our control sample sets containing randomly selected Polish individuals without ocular abnormalities (n = 5) and Polish patients with HM (n = 5).
The TPM values of genes from overrepresented pathways in corneas of patients carrying particular gene variants and in KTCN individuals without the analyzed gene variation were calculated based on our previous RNA-Seq study data (Kabza et al., 2017). The expression values of the genes varied between patients with particular variants and the mean expression values of the same genes in the KTCN individuals without these variants. The expression profile of genes from overrepresented pathways in KTCN corneas is presented in Table 3.
Table 3. The expression of genes with rare variants identified in ES analysis.
Pathway | Gene symbol/ variant |
KC_15 | KC_16 | KC_17 | KC_18 | KC_19 | Mean expression |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wnt Signaling |
WNT1 c.1063G>T |
0.051 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.018 | 0.023 | 0.0103 |
Focal Adhesion |
PTK6 c.1066C>A |
27.705 | 31.413 | 22.991 | 25.809 | 26.031 | 26.5610 |
Wnt Signaling |
FZD2 c.1238G>A |
1.254 | 0.151 | 2.988 | 0.453 | 0.544 | 1.3098 |
Wnt Signaling |
VANGL1 c.41C>T |
4.655 | 3.581 | 4.129 | 3.132 | 5.074 | 4.2475 |
Focal Adhesion |
COL4A4 c.2347G>A |
8.802 | 8.487 | 15.100 | 5.863 | 7.398 | 9.2908 |
Wnt Signaling |
LRP6 c.4822C>T |
14.144 | 13.303 | 11.900 | 11.515 | 12.581 | 12.8858 |
Wnt Signaling |
PPP3CC c.1199T>C |
12.523 | 14.479 | 9.580 | 8.556 | 10.525 | 11.5208 |
Focal Adhesion |
BIRC2 c.1528A>G |
42.675 | 45.517 | 32.853 | 30.261 | 40.725 | 40.4425 |
Focal Adhesion |
PPP1R12A c.254A>G |
83.939 | 83.438 | 61.009 | 55.103 | 76.460 | 70.8723 |
Focal Adhesion |
PAK6 c.1855C>A |
8.818 | 7.144 | 5.704 | 4.970 | 6.011 | 6.6590 |
Note:
Grey color indicates the expression level in samples in which variant was present, and white color indicates the expression level of genes in samples without the presence of the analyzed variant.
The data were deposited in the freely accessible ClinVar database (submission ID: SUB3758236 and SUB4926771).
Discussion
The rapid development of next-generation DNA sequencing methods has greatly improved the ability to detect genetic variations (Koboldt et al., 2013). However, KTCN, like many other ophthalmic diseases, displays genetic heterogeneity hindering the identification of a factor unambiguously influencing its development (Karolak & Gajecka, 2017; Stone et al., 2004).
The results of this pilot ES study of corneas obtained from five KTCN patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty revealed various rare possibly pathogenic variants in genes that were overrepresented in several molecular pathways, including the Wnt signaling and focal adhesion. Interestingly, these pathways have been proposed as involved in KTCN etiology based on our previous RNA-Seq study, performed in experimental material derived from the same KTCN patients, as well as other experiments (Kabza et al., 2017; Khaled et al., 2018; You et al., 2018; Sharif et al., 2019). In addition, each of five patients had at least one variant in genes from these particular pathways. Among genes from overrepresentation gene sets were LRP6, FZD2, COL4A4, and WNT1.
Ocular cells, including corneal epithelial stem cells, express components of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway during eye development (Nakatsu et al., 2011). The LRP6 gene encodes the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, which is a component of a Wnt receptor complex. This complex is involved in Wnt ligands binding resulting in the nuclear translocation of β-catenin and regulation of the transcription of target genes (Zhang et al., 2015). Knock-out of β-catenin or its both co-receptors (Lrp5 and Lrp6) in mouse corneal stromal cells resulted in premature stratification of the corneal epithelium, suggesting these genes play a role in the regulation of corneal morphogenesis (Zhang et al., 2015). In this study, the expression of LRP6 in the cornea of the carrier of variant c.4822C>T (KC17) was unchanged compared to the other four KTCN individuals. However, since this variant was identified in KC17 patient in combination with another variant in the gene of Wnt signaling pathway (PPP3CC), we suggest that this variant might be a part of the specific combination of KTCN variants and its identification is not incidental.
The FZD2 gene encodes frizzled class receptor 2, another protein functioning as Wnt ligands receptor and regulating the eye development through Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Xenopus frizzled-2, a homolog of the human frizzled receptor, is highly expressed in the embryo, including the developing eye (Deardorff & Klein, 1999). Interestingly, a significant increase of mRNA and protein expression of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1), which is a Wnt antagonist, has been detected in KTCN corneal epithelium and corneal buttons (Sutton et al., 2010; You et al., 2013a). In contrast, tear SFRP1 level has been significantly decreased in KTCN patients compared to control individuals (You et al., 2013b). The c.1238G>A variant in FZD2 was identified in the cornea of KC16 patient in combination with c.41C>T variant in VANGL1 (Wnt signaling) and c.2347G>A variant in COL4A4 (focal adhesion). It is known that collagens are major components of human corneas and the thinning of corneal stroma in KTCN may be the final effect of a disorganized collagen lamellae arrangement (Meek et al., 2005; Mathew et al., 2015). The COL4A4 gene is expressed in human cornea (Kabza et al., 2017) and based on several studies it has been reported as a candidate gene for KTCN (Stabuc-Silih et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2013; Kokolakis et al., 2014; Saravani et al., 2015). However, genetic analyses of this gene in different populations have given ambiguous results about the role of COL4A4 in KTCN development (Stabuc-Silih et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2013; Kokolakis et al., 2014; Saravani et al., 2015). While there was no difference in expression of COL4A4 and VANGL1 in the patient’s cornea, the expression value of FZD2 in the patient KC16 was lower compared to the expression observed in the other four KTCN individuals. However, further research should be performed to interpret the obtained data.
The combination of variants in WNT1 and PTK6 was revealed in the patient KC15. PTK6 encodes tyrosine kinase 6 protein, which is involved in focal adhesion, as well as in GTPases and MAP kinases regulation. Signaling by PTK6 is implicated in controlling the differentiation of normal epithelium and tumor growth (Brauer & Tyner, 2010). However, there is no report about the role of PTK6 in the maintenance of corneal epithelium.
Also, in KC18 and KC19 patients, variants in other elements (BIRC2 and PAK6 with PPP1R12A, respectively) of Wnt signaling and/or focal adhesion pathways were observed. These results further suggest that the alteration of genes regulating these signaling pathways might be an important risk factor for KTCN.
To determine the likelihood of seeing the overrepresentation of genes from Wnt signaling and focal adhesion in KTCN samples by chance, we performed analyses of exome data of five randomly selected Polish individuals without eye disease, as well as five Polish individuals with HM. Variants from control ES data were selected using the same filtering criteria as we used for the KTCN study, followed by enrichment analyses. No genes involved in Wnt signaling or focal adhesion pathways were overrepresented in our control sample sets, confirming that enrichment of variants in genes from these pathways in KTCN individuals was not incidental.
The small sample size disabled a reliable statistical analysis and due to this limitation, the general conclusions could not be made. However, the results of this pilot study gave additional insight into the role of the Wnt signaling and/or focal adhesion pathways in KTCN development and showed the possible indications for further KTCN research. The identification of rare variants in different genes further supports the heterogeneity of KTCN with multiple genes underlying its pathogenesis (Karolak & Gajecka, 2017; Abu-Amero, Al-Muammar & Kondkar, 2014; Bykhovskaya, Margines & Rabinowitz, 2016; Mas Tur et al., 2017; Valgaeren, Koppen & Van Camp, 2018).
Conclusions
Summarizing, this first pilot ES profiling of human KTCN corneas indicates that the accumulation of variants in several genes from Wnt signaling and/or focal adhesion pathways might cause the phenotypic effect and further explain the involvement of these pathways in KTCN. Moreover, it also supports the hypothesis about the complex basis of KTCN. Since five patients were evaluated, the role of variants in genes of these overrepresented pathways in KTCN etiology should be further elucidated in a larger group of patients using high throughput methods.
Supplemental Information
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Science Centre in Poland, Grants 2013/10/M/NZ2/00283 and 2018/31/B/NZ5/03280. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Justyna A. Karolak conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Tomasz Gambin analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Malgorzata Rydzanicz performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Piotr Polakowski analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Rafal Ploski analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Jacek P. Szaflik analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Marzena Gajecka conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Human Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Poznan University of Medical Sciences (453/14 and 755/19).
DNA Deposition
The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:
The data are available in the ClinVar database: SUB3758236 and SUB4926771.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are provided in Table S2.
References
- Abu-Amero, Al-Muammar & Kondkar (2014).Abu-Amero KK, Al-Muammar AM, Kondkar AA. Genetics of keratoconus: where do we stand? Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014;2014(2):641708. doi: 10.1155/2014/641708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adzhubei, Jordan & Sunyaev (2013).Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Current Protocol in Human Genetics. 2013;76(1):7.20.1–7.20.41. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bisceglia et al. (2009).Bisceglia L, De Bonis P, Pizzicoli C, Fischetti L, Laborante A, Di Perna M, Giuliani F, Delle Noci N, Buzzonetti L, Zelante L. Linkage analysis in keratoconus: replication of locus 5q21.2 and identification of other suggestive loci. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50(3):1081–1086. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brauer & Tyner (2010).Brauer PM, Tyner AL. Building a better understanding of the intracellular tyrosine kinase PTK6 – BRK by BRK. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer. 2010;1806(1):66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdon et al. (2011).Burdon KP, Macgregor S, Bykhovskaya Y, Javadiyan S, Li X, Laurie KJ, Muszynska D, Lindsay R, Lechner J, Haritunians T, Henders AK, Dash D, Siscovick D, Anand S, Aldave A, Coster DJ, Szczotka-Flynn L, Mills RA, Iyengar SK, Taylor KD, Phillips T, Montgomery GW, Rotter JI, Hewitt AW, Sharma S, Rabinowitz YS, Willoughby C, Craig JE. Association of polymorphisms in the hepatocyte growth factor gene promoter with keratoconus. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(11):8514–8519. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bykhovskaya et al. (2016).Bykhovskaya Y, Li X, Taylor KD, Haritunians T, Rotter JI, Rabinowitz YS. Linkage analysis of high-density SNPs confirms keratoconus locus at 5q chromosomal region. Ophthalmic Genetics. 2016;37:109–110. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2014.889172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bykhovskaya, Margines & Rabinowitz (2016).Bykhovskaya Y, Margines B, Rabinowitz YS. Genetics in Keratoconus: where are we? Eye and Vision. 2016;3(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0047-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chun & Fay (2009).Chun S, Fay JC. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Research. 2009;19(9):1553–1561. doi: 10.1101/gr.092619.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deardorff & Klein (1999).Deardorff MA, Klein PS. Xenopus frizzled-2 is expressed highly in the developing eye, otic vesicle and somites. Mechanisms of Development. 1999;87(1–2):229–233. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georgiou et al. (2004).Georgiou T, Funnell CL, Cassels-Brown A, O’Conor R. Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and white patients. Eye. 2004;18(4):379–383. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godefrooij et al. (2016).Godefrooij DA, De Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RPL. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;175:169–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gokhale (2013).Gokhale NS. Epidemiology of keratoconus. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;61(8):382–383. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.116054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hashemi et al. (2019).Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, Saatchi M, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Valadkhan M, Mortazavi M, Hashemi A, Khabazkhoob M. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea. 2019;39(2):263–270. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoehn et al. (2012).Hoehn R, Zeller T, Verhoeven VJM, Grus F, Adler M, Wolf RC, Uitterlinden AG, Castagne R, Schillert A, Klaver CC, Pfeiffer N, Mirshahi A. Population-based meta-analysis in Caucasians confirms association with COL5A1 and ZNF469 but not COL8A2 with central corneal thickness. Human Genetics. 2012;131(11):1783–1793. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Héon et al. (2002).Héon E, Greenberg A, Kopp KK, Rootman D, Vincent AL, Billingsley G, Priston M, Dorval KM, Chow RL, McInnes RR, Heathcote G, Westall C, Sutphin JE, Semina E, Bremner R, Stone EM. VSX1: a gene for posterior polymorphous dystrophy and keratoconus. Human Molecular Genetics. 2002;11(9):1029–1036. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.9.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabza et al. (2017).Kabza M, Karolak JA, Rydzanicz M, Szcześniak MW, Nowak DM, Ginter-Matuszewska B, Polakowski P, Ploski R, Szaflik JP, Gajecka M. Collagen synthesis disruption and downregulation of core elements of TGF-β, Hippo, and Wnt pathways in keratoconus corneas. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2017;25(5):582–590. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamburov et al. (2013).Kamburov A, Stelzl U, Lehrach H, Herwig R. The consensusPathDB interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(D1):D793–800. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karolak & Gajecka (2017).Karolak JA, Gajecka M. Genomic strategies to understand causes of keratoconus. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2017;292(2):251–269. doi: 10.1007/s00438-016-1283-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karolak et al. (2017).Karolak JA, Gambin T, Pitarque JA, Molinari A, Jhangiani S, Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR, Gajecka M. Variants in SKP1, PROB1, and IL17B genes at keratoconus 5q31.1–q35.3 susceptibility locus identified by whole-exome sequencing. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2017;25(1):73–78. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karolak et al. (2016).Karolak JA, Gambin T, Rydzanicz M, Szaflik JP, Polakowski P, Frajdenberg A, Mrugacz M, Podfigurna-Musielak M, Stankiewicz P, Gajecka M. Evidence against ZNF469 being causative for keratoconus in polish patients. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2016;94(3):289–294. doi: 10.1111/aos.12968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karolak et al. (2015).Karolak JA, Rydzanicz M, Ginter-Matuszewska B, Pitarque JA, Molinari A, Bejjani BA, Gajecka M. Variant c.2262A>C in DOCK9 leads to exon skipping in keratoconus family. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2015;56(13):7687–7690. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khaled et al. (2019).Khaled ML, Bykhovskaya Y, Gu C, Liu A, Drewry MD, Chen Z, Mysona BA, Parker E, McNabb RB, Yu H, Lu X, Wang J, Li X, Al-Muammar A, Rotter JI, Porter LF, Estes A, Watsky MA, Smith SB, Xu H, Abu-Amero KK, Kuo A, Shears SB, Rabinowitz YS, Liu Y. PPIP5K2 and PCSK1 are candidate genetic contributors to familial keratoconus. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):19406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55866-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khaled et al. (2018).Khaled ML, Bykhovskaya Y, Yablonski SER, Li H, Drewry MD, Aboobakar IF, Estes A, Gao XR, Stamer WD, Xu H, Allingham RR, Hauser MA, Rabinowitz YS, Liu Y. Differential expression of coding and long noncoding RNAs in keratoconus-affected corneas. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2018;59(7):2717–2728. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koboldt et al. (2013).Koboldt D C, Steinberg K Meltz, Larson D E, Wilson R K, Mardis ER. The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell. 2013;155(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kok, Tan & Loon (2012).Kok YO, Tan GFL, Loon SC. Review: keratoconus in Asia. Cornea. 2012;31(5):581–593. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820cd61d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokolakis et al. (2014).Kokolakis NS, Gazouli M, Chatziralli IP, Koutsandrea C, Gatzioufas Z, Peponis VG, Droutsas KD, Kalogeropoulos C, Anagnou N, Miltsakakis D, Moschos MM. Polymorphism analysis of COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes in Greek patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Genetics. 2014;35(4):226–228. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2014.946055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, Henikoff & Ng (2009).Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nature Protocols. 2009;4(7):1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2012).Li X, Bykhovskaya Y, Haritunians T, Siscovick D, Aldave A, Szczotka-Flynn L, Iyengar SK, Rotter JI, Taylor KD, Rabinowitz YS. A genome-wide association study identifies a potential novel gene locus for keratoconus, one of the commonest causes for corneal transplantation in developed countries. Human Molecular Genetics. 2012;21(2):421–429. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2006).Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Tang YG, Picornell Y, Taylor KD, Hu M, Yang H. Two-stage genome-wide linkage scan in keratoconus sib pair families. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2006;47(9):3791–3795. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loukovitis et al. (2018).Loukovitis E, Sfakianakis K, Syrmakesi P, Tsotridou E, Orfanidou M, Bakaloudi DR, Stoila M, Kozei A, Koronis S, Zachariadis Z, Tranos P, Kozeis N, Balidis M, Gatzioufas Z, Fiska A, Anogeianakis G. Genetic aspects of keratoconus: a literature review exploring potential genetic contributions and possible genetic relationships with comorbidities. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2018;7(2):263–292. doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0144-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu et al. (2013).Lu Y, Vitart V, Burdon KP, Khor CC, Bykhovskaya Y, Mirshahi A, Hewitt AW, Koehn D, Hysi PG, Ramdas WD, Zeller T, Vithana EN, Cornes BK, Tay W-T, Tai ES, Cheng C-Y, Liu J, Foo J-N, Saw SM, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson K, Dimasi DP, Mills RA, Mountain J, Ang W, Hoehn Ré, Verhoeven VJM, Grus F, Wolfs R, Castagne Rële, Lackner KJ, Springelkamp Hët, Yang J, Jonasson F, Leung DYL, Chen LJ, Tham CCY, Rudan I, Vatavuk Z, Hayward C, Gibson J, Cree AJ, MacLeod A, Ennis S, Polasek O, Campbell H, Wilson JF, Viswanathan AC, Fleck B, Li X, Siscovick D, Taylor KD, Rotter JI, Yazar S, Ulmer M, Li J, Yaspan BL, Ozel AB, Richards JE, Moroi SE, Haines JL, Kang JH, Pasquale LR, Allingham RR, Ashley-Koch A, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Wright AF, Pennell C, Spector TD, Young TL, Klaver CCW, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, Anderson MG, Aung T, Willoughby CE, Wiggs JL, Pang CP, Thorsteinsdottir U, Lotery AJ, Hammond CJ, van Duijn CM, Hauser MA, Rabinowitz YS, Pfeiffer N, Mackey DA, Craig JE, Macgregor S, Wong TY. Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nature Genetics. 2013;45(2):155–163. doi: 10.1038/ng.2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucas et al. (2018).Lucas SEM, Zhou T, Blackburn NB, Mills RA, Ellis J, Leo P, Souzeau E, Ridge B, Charlesworth JC, Lindsay R, Craig JE, Burdon KP. Rare, potentially pathogenic variants in 21 keratoconus candidate genes are not enriched in cases in a large Australian cohort of European descent. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0199178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magalhães et al. (2019).Magalhães OA, Kowalski TW, Wachholz GE, Schuler-Faccini L. Whole-exome sequencing in familial keratoconus: the challenges of a genetically complex disorder. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. 2019;82(6):453–459. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20190087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mas Tur et al. (2017).Mas Tur V, MacGregor C, Jayaswal R, O’Brart D, Maycock N. A review of keratoconus: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2017;62(6):770–783. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathew et al. (2015).Mathew JH, Goosey JD, Söderberg PG, Bergmanson JPG. Lamellar changes in the keratoconic cornea. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2015;93(8):767–773. doi: 10.1111/aos.12811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKenna et al. (2010).McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research. 2010;20(9):1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meek et al. (2005).Meek KM, Tuft SJ, Huang Y, Gill PS, Hayes S, Newton RH, Bron AJ. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(6):1948–1956. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakatsu et al. (2011).Nakatsu MN, Ding Z, Ng MY, Truong TT, Yu F, Deng SX. Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates proliferation of human cornea epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(7):4734–4741. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel & McGhee (2013).Patel D, McGhee C. Understanding keratoconus: what have we learned from the New Zealand perspective? Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2013;96(2):183–187. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson et al. (2000).Pearson AR, Soneji B, Sarvananthan N, Sandford-Smith JH. Does ethnic origin influence the incidence or severity of keratoconus? Eye. 2000;14(4):625–628. doi: 10.1038/eye.2000.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollard et al. (2010).Pollard KS, Hubisz MJ, Rosenbloom KR, Siepel A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Research. 2010;20(1):110–121. doi: 10.1101/gr.097857.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabinowitz (1998).Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Survey of Ophthalmology. 1998;42(4):297–319. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenfeld et al. (2011).Rosenfeld JA, Drautz JM, Clericuzio CL, Cushing T, Raskin S, Martin J, Tervo RC, Pitarque JA, Nowak DM, Karolak JA, Lamb AN, Schultz RA, Ballif BC, Bejjani BA, Gajecka M, Shaffer LG. Deletions and duplications of developmental pathway genes in 5q31 contribute to abnormal phenotypes. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2011;155A(8):1906–1916. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saravani et al. (2015).Saravani R, Hasanian-Langroudi F, Validad M-H, Yari D, Bahari G, Faramarzi M, Khateri M, Bahadoram S. Evaluation of possible relationship between COL4A4 gene polymorphisms and risk of keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(3):318–322. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarezky et al. (2017).Sarezky D, Orlin SE, Pan W, VanderBeek BL. Trends in corneal transplantation in keratoconus. Cornea. 2017;36(2):131–137. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz et al. (2010).Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nature Methods. 2010;7(8):575–576. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0810-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharif et al. (2019).Sharif R, Khaled ML, McKay TB, Liu Y, Karamichos D. Transcriptional profiling of corneal stromal cells derived from patients with keratoconus. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):12567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48983-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stabuc-Silih et al. (2009).Stabuc-Silih M, Ravnik-Glavac M, Glavac D, Hawlina M, Strazisar M. Polymorphisms in COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes associated with keratoconus. Molecular Vision. 2009;15:2848–2860. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stone et al. (2004).Stone EM, Braun TA, Russell SR, Kuehn MH, Lotery AJ, Moore PA, Eastman CG, Casavant TL, Sheffield VC. Missense variations in the fibulin 5 gene and age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(4):346–353. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutton et al. (2010).Sutton G, Madigan M, Roufas A, McAvoy J. Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) is highly upregulated in keratoconus epithelium: a novel finding highlighting a new potential focus for keratoconus research and treatment. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2010;38(1):43–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang et al. (2005).Tang YG, Rabinowitz YS, Taylor KD, Li X, Hu M, Picornell Y, Yang H. Genomewide linkage scan in a multigeneration Caucasian pedigree identifies a novel locus for keratoconus on chromosome 5q14.3-q21.1. Genetics in Medicine. 2005;7(6):397–405. doi: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000170772.41860.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Udar et al. (2006).Udar N, Atilano SR, Brown DJ, Holguin B, Small K, Nesburn AB, Kenney MC. SOD1: a candidate gene for keratoconus. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2006;47(8):3345–3351. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valgaeren, Koppen & Van Camp (2018).Valgaeren H, Koppen C, Van Camp G. A new perspective on the genetics of keratoconus: why have we not been more successful? Ophthalmic Genetics. 2018;39(2):158–174. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2017.1393831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vazirani & Basu (2013).Vazirani J, Basu S. Keratoconus: current perspectives. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2013;7:2019–2030. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S50119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2013).Wang Y, Jin T, Zhang X, Wei W, Cui Y, Gao J, Liu M, Chen C, Zhang C, Zhu X. Common single nucleotide polymorphisms and keratoconus in the Han Chinese population. Ophthalmic Genetics. 2013;34(3):160–166. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2012.743569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Li & Hakonarson (2010).Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38(16):e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- You et al. (2018).You J, Corley SM, Wen L, Hodge C, Höllhumer R, Madigan MC, Wilkins MR, Sutton G. RNA-Seq analysis and comparison of corneal epithelium in keratoconus and myopia patients. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18480-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- You et al. (2013a).You J, Hodge C, Wen L, McAvoy JW, Madigan MC, Sutton G. Tear levels of SFRP1 are significantly reduced in keratoconus patients. Molecular Vision. 2013a;19:509. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- You et al. (2013b).You J, Wen L, Roufas A, Madigan MC, Sutton G, Shukla D. Expression of SFRP family proteins in human keratoconus corneas. PLOS ONE. 2013b;8(6):e66770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang et al. (2015).Zhang Y, Yeh L-K, Zhang S, Call M, Yuan Y, Yasunaga M, Kao WW-Y, Liu C-Y. Wnt/β-catenin signaling modulates corneal epithelium stratification via inhibition of Bmp4 during mouse development. Development. 2015;142(19):3383–3393. doi: 10.1242/dev.125393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are provided in Table S2.