Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231795

First description of a herpesvirus infection in genus Lepus

F A Abade dos Santos 1,2,*, M Monteiro 1, A Pinto 3,4, C L Carvalho 1, M C Peleteiro 2, P Carvalho 1, P Mendonça 1, T Carvalho 3, M D Duarte 1,2
Editor: Binod Kumar5
PMCID: PMC7164596  PMID: 32302375

Abstract

During the necropsies of Iberian hares obtained in 2018/2019, along with signs of the nodular form of myxomatosis, other unexpected external lesions were also observed. Histopathology revealed nuclear inclusion bodies in stromal cells suggesting the additional presence of a nuclear replicating virus. Transmission electron microscopy further demonstrated the presence of herpesvirus particles in the tissues of affected hares. We confirmed the presence of herpesvirus in 13 MYXV-positive hares by PCR and sequencing analysis. Herpesvirus-DNA was also detected in seven healthy hares, suggesting its asymptomatic circulation. Phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated partial sequences of DNA polymerase gene and glycoprotein B gene enabled greater resolution than analysing the sequences individually. The hare’ virus was classified close to herpesviruses from rodents within the Rhadinovirus genus of the gammaherpesvirus subfamily. We propose to name this new virus Leporid gammaherpesvirus 5 (LeHV-5), according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses standards. The impact of herpesvirus infection on the reproduction and mortality of the Iberian hare is yet unknown but may aggravate the decline of wild populations caused by the recently emerged natural recombinant myxoma virus.

1. Introduction

The Iberian hare (Lepus granatensis), also known as Granada hare, is an endemic specie of the Iberian Peninsula whose populations are considered stable by the IUCN holding a ‘minor concern’ conservation status [1].

Lepus granatensis is the only hare species found in Portugal and the most widespread in the Iberia [2], therefore, highly relevant for biodiversity preservation and hunting activity in both countries, particularly for greyhound racing.

Contrarily to the wild rabbit, which drastic decline has been linked, among other factors, to viral epizooties, until recently, the Iberian hare was not affected by viral diseases. Environmental and anthropogenic factors, however, have had a negative impact on both hare and wild-rabbit populations.

Lepus granatensis was considered naturally resistant to myxomatosis, which is endemic in Iberian Peninsula since 1956 [3], despite very sporadic reports of the disease in the European brown hare (L. europaeus), namely in France and Ireland [46]. However, during the summer and autumn of 2018 outbreaks of myxomatosis in the Iberian hare were reported in Spain [7] and Portugal [8], respectively.

No other diseases of viral origin have been described in the Iberian hare, including those caused by herpesviruses, which may have a fatal outcome in rabbits [9].

Until now, four herpesviruses have been identified in leporids: Leporid herpesvirus 1 (LeHV-1), Leporid herpesvirus 2 (LeHV-2), Leporid herpesvirus 3 (LeHV-3) and Leporid herpesvirus 4 (LeHV-4) (Table 1). Of these, the most common naturally occurring herpesvirus infections identified in rabbits are LeHV-2 and LeHV-3 (reviewed by [9]), which alongside LeHV-1 belong to the Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily. Conversely, LeHV-4 is a member of the Alphaherpesvirinae subfamily. These distinct herpesviruses have a broadly variable impact on the European rabbit, with LeHV-2 and LeHV-3 infections usually passing unnoticed [10], while LeHV-4 is far more aggressive, causing fatal infections [9].

Table 1. Summary of the characteristics of the four herpesviruses identified in leporids.

Type Subfamily Common Name Host Physiopathology Isolation
LeHV-1 γ Not attributeda Cottontail herpesvirus Sylvilagus floridanus Isolated from primary kidney cells cultures of Sylvilagus floridanus [13].
No report of disease in domestic rabbits, since Oryctolagus cuniculus is not infected [10].
LeHV-2 γ Not attributeda Herpesvirus cuniculi Oryctolagus cuniculus Some evidences of a subclinical encephalitis in infected New Zealand white rabbits [30]. Isolated in 1968 from kidneys of apparently healthy Sylvilagus floridanus [31].
Oryctolagus cuniculus is the natural host where infection is asymptomatic[32]
LeHV-3 γ Not attributeda Herpesvirus sylvilagus Sylvilagus floridanus Lymphoproliferative disease and tumour-like lesions in the lymph nodes, kidney, spleen, and liver [31,33]. Isolated from primary kidney cells cultures of Sylvilagus floridanus [13].
Oryctolagus cuniculus is not infected
Not isolated in WI-38, HeLa, Chang’s conjunctiva, human amnion (FL), green monkey kidney (Vero), primary rhesus monkey kidney, primary hamster kidney, BHK-21, primary mouse embryo, and primary chick embryo [33]. Isolated in DRK-3 cells [33].
CPE appear after 10–15 days of inoculation. Infected cells show focal areas of round and distorted cells, and in 1–2 days, emerged syncytial masses containing 50 or more nuclei [31].
H&E coloration show typical type A intranuclear inclusions in the infected cells. Complete cell destruction occurred after a 5 to 7-days period [31].
LeHV-4 α Attributedb Oryctolagus cuniculus Lethargy, anorexia, conjunctivitis, fever, and abortion. Haemorrhagic dermatitis, splenic necrosis, hepatic necrosis, and multifocal pulmonary haemorrhage and oedema. Distinctive glassy eosinophilic herpetic intranuclear inclusion bodies were observed in the skin fibroblasts? And mesenchymal cells of the spleen and lung [9,34]. Isolated in rabbit skin (RS), RK13 and Vero cells [9]. CPE characterized by syncytium formation, cell enlargement, and cell lysis, similar to human herpesvirus type 1 (HHV-1). Jin et al. [9] verified that in rabbits inoculated with LHV-4, the appendix, sciatic nerve, kidney, adrenal gland, and many other organs were positive for the virus at the 5-days post infection(dpi), while at the 14 dpi only trigeminal ganglia eye and tonsil were positive.
LeHV-5 γ Not attributed Iberian hare herpesvirus Lepus granatensis Described in the results of this work

aNot attributed by the ICTV; Viruses which may be members of the genus Rhadinovirus [35] but have not been approved as species

bLeporid alphaherpesvirus //Leporid Herpesvirus 4

Herpesviruses are enveloped viruses, of 200–250 nm in diameter, organised in four concentric layers [11], 1) a core with the linear dsDNA genome, 2) T = 16 icosahedral capsid with about 125nm of diameter surrounded by a 3) proteinaceous tegument that contains many virus-coded proteins and enclosed in a 4) lipid envelope containing several viral glycoproteins. Morphologically, herpesviruses are distinct from all other viruses [12], and therefore easily recognised by electron microscopy.

Herpesviruses belong to order Herpesvirales that comprises three families, namely the Herpesviridae family, which includes more than 100 viruses of mammals, birds and reptiles and whose members have large genomes ranging from 125 to 290kb [13], the Alloherpesviridae family, which includes the fish and frog viruses, and the Malacoherpesviridae family, which contains the bivalve virus [12].

The Herpesviridae family includes the subfamilies Alphaherpesvirinae, Betaherpesvirinae and Gammaherpesvirinae. Their members have different biologic properties and distinct classification, supported by phylogeny. The Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily is divided into four genera, namely Macavirus, Percavirus, Lymphocryptovirus, and Rhadinovirus [12].

While the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae causes rapid lysis in cell culture, members of Betaherpesvirinae grow slowly inducing the formation of giant cells in culture, and Gammaherpesvirinae typically infect lymphoid tissue, meaning a primary tropism for lymphoid lineage cells [14], which can lead to lymphoproliferative diseases [9] and oncogenesis [13].

In this study, we investigated the presence of herpesvirus in myxoma virus (MYXV)-positive hares that alongside, the typical myxoma virus-induced skin lesions, presented other lesions in the genitalia, eyelids, lips and nose suggestive of herpesvirus infection.

To unveil the prevalence of herpesvirus in the hare populations, healthy hares were also investigated.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample

A total of 38 Iberian hares, none sacrificed for the purpose of this study, were investigated within the scope of a national surveillance program (Dispatch 4757/17, 31th may) [8] in action since August 2017. Of these, 16 were males, 20 were females, and two failed sex-determination. Eighteen hares were legally hunted by the Hunting Associations during the 2018/2019 season (October to December), authorized by permits from the National Forest Authority, the Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests (ICNF), while 20 were found dead in the field between October 2018 and June 2019. None of the authors were responsible for the death of the animals. Hunted and hares found dead were sampled in six Districts of mainland Portugal, namely Setúbal, Santarém, Beja, Évora, Portalegre and Faro, (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Map of Portugal showing the geographic origin of the 38 LeHV-5 positive hares over the total sampling per district.

Fig 1

White coloured Districts were not sampled. Darker shades correspond to higher positivity.

2.2. Necropsy and histopathology

Cadavers were necropsied and spleen, liver, lung, duodenum and skin samples (namely scrotum, lips and nose) were collected for virology, bacteriology and histopathology. The entire gastrointestinal tract was taken for parasitological analysis. From hunted hares, only spleen, liver and lung samples were received at the laboratory.

For histopathology, skin and genitalia fragments were fixated in 10% neutral buffered formalin, routinely paraffin embedded, sectioned at 4 μm, and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).

2.3. Transmission electron microscopy

The fragments selected for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were formalin fixated for 48h or on a solution 0.1M sodium cacodylate (Sigma©) containing 2.5% gluteraldehyde (Sigma©) for 72h. When the samples were already embebed in paraffin, the regions of interest were extracted from the block, sliced smaller than ~1mm3 with a scalpel blade into two separate viles, and washed thoroughly in xylene. After rehydration using decreasing concentrations of ethanol, fragments were washed in 0.1M cacodylate buffer [15]. Samples were then post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide (EMS) for 30min, and stained in block with 1% Millipore-filtered uranyl acetate (Agar Scientifics), after which they were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, infiltrated and embedded in EMBed-812 hard (EMS). Polymerization was performed at 60°C for 2 days. Ultrathin sections were cut either in a UC7 ultramicrotome or in a Reichert ultracut E ultramicrotome (Leica), collected to 1% formvar coated copper slot grids (Agar scientific), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Sigma) and examined in a H-7000 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi) at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV or Jeol 1400plus transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Digital images were obtained using a Megaview mid mount digital camera (Olympus) or using a AMT XR16 bottom mid mount digital camera (AMT©). The sections were systematically analysed using AMT© software and several high and low magnifications were acquired.

2.4. Bacteriological and parasitological examination

Liver, spleen and lung samples were analysed using standard bacteriological methods. Parasitological examination of the intestine was carried out resourcing to direct wet mount, sedimentation and filtration techniques.

To investigate the presence of Enterobacteriacea the ID 32E (Biomerieux®) was used, while for non-Enterobacteriaceaethe API 20NE kit (Biomerieux®) was utilised. To test the presence of Streptococcus and Staphylococcus, the ID 32 STREPT (Biomerieux®) and the ID 32 STAPH kits (Biomerieux®) were used, respectively. The API CORYNE (Biomerieux®) kit was utilized for the identification of Corynebacteria and coryne-like organisms. To investigate the presence of Salmonella, peptone water and Rappaport Vassiliadis semi solid culture media were used. The agarose SMID2 and XLD culture media were utilized, whenever there was a suspicion of Salmonella. Other culture media used for bacterial identification in the samples included the MacConkey agar and the Blood agar culture media.

2.5. Virological examination

For nucleic acid extraction, fresh samples of liver and spleen were homogenised at 20% with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and clarified at 3000g for 5 min. Total DNA and RNA were extracted from 200μl of the clarified supernatants, using the MagAttract 96 cador Pathogen Kit in a BioSprint 96 nucleic acid extractor (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

All the animals were tested for rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2) and MYXV by real time PCR systems described by Duarte et al (2015) [12] and Duarte et al (2014) [22], respectively. The presence of LEHV-4 was investigated by using the PCR described by Jin et al (2008) [9]. A generalist nested PCR directed to the herpesviral DNA polymerase that allows the detection of herpesviruses of different subfamilies by Van Devanter et al. (1996) [16] was also used.

The glycoprotein B gene was partially amplified using the GH1 system described previously [17].

Amplifications were carried out in a Bio-Rad CFX96 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Srl, Redmond, USA), using the One Step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for RHDV2, and the HighFidelity PCR Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), for MYXV and herpesvirus detection, respectively.

Information regarding these methods is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Molecular methods used for the detection of RHDV2 (Duarte et al, 2015), MYXV (Duarte et al, 2014), LeHV 4 [9] and a wide variety of herpesviral genomes from human and animal herpesviruses (Van Devanter, 1996).

Primer Sequence (5’-3’) Target gene Amplicon size (bp) Amplification conditions Reference
RHDV2-F TGGAACTTGGCTTGAGTGTTGA Vp60 127 50°C -45min 95°C-15min 50x (95°C-15s 60°C-30s 72°C-30s) [36]
RHDV2-R ACAAGCGTGCTTGTGGACGG
RHDV2-Probe [FAM]-TGTCAGAACTTGTTGACATCCGCCC-[TAMRA]
M000.5R/L-F CGACGTAGATTTATCGTATACC M000.5 125 95°C- 10min 45X (95°C-30s 50ºC-30s 60°C-30s) [37]
M000.5R/L-R GTCTGTCTATGTATTCTATCTCC4
MYXV-probe [FAM]-TCTATGTCTGCCCGAGGATAGA-[TAMRA]
LeHV-4 F1F ATGACGCCCACCAACGTCTC GCACAGTGTGTGTTAGACG TGTGGCCAAGAACAACGATA 1617 1162 945 95ºC-10min 35x (95º-15s 54ºC-20s 72ºC-3min) 72ºC-10min [34]
LeHV-4 F2F
LeHV-4 F3F
LeHV-4 F1R CATAGACCGTAGGCGGTTC
LeHV-4 F2R ACGTGAACAGGAACCGGTAG
LeHV-4 F3R CTAGAGGTCGTTCACCACCG
DFA (F 1st round) GAYT TYGCNAGYYTNTAYCC DNA polymerase 215 to 315 94ºC- 10min 35x (94ºC-60s 46ºC-60s 72ºC-3min) [16]
ILT (F1st round) TCCTGGACAAGCAGCARNYS GCNMTNAA
TGV (F1st round) TGTAACTCGGTGTAYGGNTTYACNGGNGT
KG1 (R 2ndround) GTCTTGCTCACC AGNTCNACNCCYTT
IYG (R 2nd round) CACAGAGTCCGTRTCNCCRTADAT
2759s CCTCCCAGGTTCARTWYGCMT AYGA gB 700 bp 94ºC- 10min 35x (94ºC-60s 46ºC-60s 72ºC-3min) [17]
2762as CCGTTGAGGTTCTGAGTGTAR TARTTRTAYTC
2760s AAGATCAACCCCAC(N/I)AG (N/I)GT(N/I)ATG 500bp
2761as GTGTAGTAGTTGTACTCCCTR AACAT(N/I)GTYTC

2.6. Sequencing analysis

The PCR products were visualised in 2% horizontal electrophoresis agarose gel, purified using the NZYGelpure kit (NZYTECH), and directly sequenced using the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle sequencing kit on a 3130 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A). Nucleotide sequences were analysed and assembled into consensus sequences using the BioEdit version 7.2.5 software, and submitted to GenBank. Nucleotide sequences were translated using Mega X 10.1 software.

2.7. Phylogenetic analysis

Partial nucleotide (171bp) sequences of the viral DNA polymerase gene were aligned using the Clustal W with gap opening penalty and a gap extend penalty of 30 and 15, respectively. A phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA X [18], using the model selected by Model function (MEGA X).

The evolutionary history of 28 partial DNA polymerase protein sequences of gammaherpesviruses was inferred by Maximum Likelihood. The Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano (HKY) model [19], which showed the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion corrected (AICc) values was used. A discrete Gamma distribution (G) was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites. The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable (I).

For more accurate phylogenetic analysis of the hare herpesvirus described is this manuscript, the partial nucleotide (171bp) sequences of the viral DNA polymerase gene catalytic subunit was concatenated with the partial (453bp) nucleotide sequences of the viral Glycoprotein B gene belonging to the same strain. The sequences were translated and aligned using the Clustal W with gap opening penalty and a gap extend penalty of 30 and 15, respectively. The final alignment was edited to include all the sequences, corresponding to 570 nucleotides and 190 amino acids of length.

The Le Gascuel model (2008) [20], Gamma distributed with invariant sites (LG+G+I) was selected for the protein-based trees, according to BIC (14177.4) and AICC (13542.9) criteria. The analysis involved 45 amino acid sequences.

2.8. Herpesvirus isolation

Isolation of herpesvirus was attempted from organs of hares coinfected with MYXV and LeHV-5, namely from liver and spleen, penile and vulva samples. In addition, liver and spleen samples from two hares with single herpesvirus infection, were also used.

Samples were homogenized at 20% in phosphate-buffered saline containing penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin B (antibiotic-antimycotic), used according to the manufacturer (Gibco, Life Technologies Corporation). Following centrifugation, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter (Millipore Express) and used to inoculate sub 70% confluent Candrel R Feline Kidney (CRFK) epithelial cells (ATCC-CCL-94), Vero cells (ATCC No. CRL-1986), Rabbit Kidney (RK13) cells (ATCC-CCL-37) and Hella cells (ATCCNo. CRM-CCL-2)- RK13 cells grown in Eagle medium and the others in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's Media was supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (Gibco), penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin B (antibiotic-antimycotic used at 1:100), 50μg/ml gentamicin (Gibco). Cells were maintained at 37°C under humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and observed daily for cytopathic effect (CPE) by phase contrast microscopy. Three passages were carried out. The supernatant and cell pellet of each passage were tested for the presence of herpesvirus by PCR [17].

3. Results

3.1. Necropsy showed lesions compatible with herpesvirus infection in Iberian hares with myxomatosis

Overall, MYXV-positive hares revealed good body condition and, alongside typical myxomatosis lesions, necrosis of the genitalia was noticed in more than 70% of the hares studied. This lesion was more evident in males, affecting the penile glans, but was also observed in females inthe vulva. Other lesions observed in these hares included the presence of herpetic-like skin vesicles, uncommon in rabbits with myxomatosis.

Further investigation of the macroscopic lesions and histopathological patterns was carried out in hares co-infected with LeHV-5 and MYXV. At this time, we disclose the macroscopic and histopathological findings from two male hares found dead in November 2018 (#38455/18, hereafter designated hare-1) and August 2019 (#25456/19, hereafter designated hare-2).

Hare-1 presented with eyelids thickened by the accumulation of mucopurulent exudate and marked enlargement of the penis measuring 1.3x1cm in diameter (normal diameter is less than 0.5cm) and irregular surface (Fig 2 and 2A) lined with light-yellow dry exudate.

Fig 2. Penis of hare-1.

Fig 2

2- H&E staining showing several necrotic areas in the epithelium (E) and multifocal heterophils aggregates in the stromal tissue (H). Corpus cavernosum (CC); penile uretra (U). 4x. 2A - Cross section of penis after fixation- exuberant thickening of the penis.

At the necropsy, hare-2 showed ulcerated multinodular thickening of the eyelids and lips. Accumulation of mucopurulent exudate in both eyes was also registered and a small vesicle was present in the lower lip (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Hare-2 –Oedema of lips and nose with ulcerated nodules in the upper lip.

Fig 3

A vesicle can be seen in the lower lip (arrow).

3.2. Histopathology

The dermis of hare-1 showed fusiform or stellate mesenchymal cell proliferation, surrounded by abundant extracellular matrix, scattered infiltration by lymphocytes and macrophages, and small aggregates of heterophiles, consistent with myxomatosis.

The penile epithelium of this hare was mostly necrotic and replaced by a thick band of necrotic cells, heterophils and red blood cells (Fig 2).

Severe heterophile infiltrations of the stroma, in either a diffuse pattern or multifocal aggregates, were also seen. In the stroma, there was also proliferation of pleomorphic spindle cells, with some nuclei almost filled with slightly eosinophilic inclusion bodies (Cowdry type A inclusions) (Fig 4), suggesting a nuclear replicating virus. These lesions, unexpected in myxomatosis, are compatible with herpesvirus.

Fig 4. Penis of hare-1.

Fig 4

Intranuclear inclusion bodies in mesenchymal cells (arrows) and moderate to severe infiltration by heterophils, H&E, 400x.

In the skin of hare-2, a ballooning degeneration of keratinocytes was registered. Coalescent intra-epidermal and subepidermal vesicopustules (Fig 5) filled with fibrin and necrotic cells debris and multifocal detachment of the eyelids, lips and foreskin epidermis were seen. In the underlying dermis, multifocal haemorrhages, intense infiltration by heterophils and necrotic cells with accumulation of chromatin debris were present (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Lip of hare-2.

Fig 5

Intraepidermal and subepidermal vesicopustules (V) that appear as “empty spaces” between the dermis and the epidermis, causing the detachment of the epidermis; mixomatous tissue (M) in the dermis characterized by abundant extracellular matrix pulling apart the fibroblasts; microhemorrhages (H) in the uppermost layer of the dermis;. H&E, 40x.

Below the dermis, accumulation of myxoid tissue with pleomorphic spindle cells, some of which showing rounded or oval and slightly eosinophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies, was observed (Fig 6). An infiltrate of mononucleated inflammatory cells and heterophils was present in skeletal muscle tissue.

Fig 6. Lip of hare-2.

Fig 6

Oedema and inflammatory cell infiltration with signs of necrosis. An intranuclear inclusion body in a mesenchymal cell can be seen (arrow). H&E, 400x.

3.3. Electron microscopy

Samples from hare-1 and hare-2 were further processed and analysed for TEM allowing the confirmation of the presence of herpesvirus in different tissues.

In the penile soft tissue of hare-1, spherical virions, with structure and dimensions compatible with herpesviruses, comprising an inner core packed into an icosahedral capsid, were observed in the nucleus of stromal cells (Fig 7), indicating nuclear replication (Fig 7B), which is an attribute of herpesviruses. The viral capsid contained a relatively small, asymmetrical, electron-dense region that probably represents the condensed DNA core. In this animal, also positive to myxomatosis, no MYXV particles were found in the samples processed.

Fig 7. Electron micrographs of penile soft tissue of hare-1.

Fig 7

a- Overview of a virus-infected cell (N, nucleus; n, nucleolus; nm, nuclear membrane; Cy, cytoplasm; arrowhead, viral particles); b- Naked capsids seen in areas of euchromatin in the nucleolus. c- DNA-loaded capsids close to the nuclear membrane in the process of budding into the perinuclear space; d Tegument assembly in the cytoplasm of the host cell. Photos obtained in a transmission electron microscope Hitachi H-7000 using iTEM software and Megaview III mid-mounted camera.

3.4. Virological, bacteriological and parasitological results

None of the 38 hares investigated in this study tested positive to RHDV, RHDV2 or LEHV-4. Fifty percent of the hares were positive to LeHV-5, of which 68.4% (13/19) were also positive to MYXV.

Herpesvirus-DNA was also detected by PCR in the liver, spleen and lung samples of 41.2% (7/17) of the apparently healthy hunted hares that tested negative for MYXV. From this group of hares, no genitalia/skin samples were available for histopathology.

Six hares showed doubtful results from which four were MYXV-negative. Parasitological and bacteriological examinations did not reveal any infections that could justify the death of these animals.

3.5. Molecular characterisation of Iberian hare herpesvirus

For 50% of the animals (19/38), an amplicon ~225 bp-long, compatible with herpesvirus, was obtained in the pan-herpesvirus PCR [17]. For six hare samples only a weak band was generated, therefore were not considered for further analysis. The presence of herpesvirus was confirmed by sequencing analysis in 16 hares. For 11 of these amplicons, the nucleotide sequences obtained were independently edited to remove the primer targeting sequences and assembled. The consensus sequences (171 bp) showed 100% similarity to each other. Five of the obtained sequences were submitted to the GenBank (MN557129-33).

NCBI blast analysis (28.02.2020) of the DNA polymerase nucleotide sequences confirmed homology with herpesvirus DNA polymerase coding sequence from other mammals. Though with a low query cover of 48%, 78.31% of similarity was observed with a Phocid herpesvirus 2 (NC_043062.1) and 77.11% with Megabat gammaherpesvirus (LC268920.1) and a Harp seal herpesvirus (KP136799.1).

Blast analysis of the hares’ DNA polymerase deduced aa sequences (28.02.2020), showed 52.63% identity over a query cover of 100% with bat herpesviruses (ALH21079.1, ALH21081.1 and ALH21071.1). Similarity was also found with Equid gammaherpesvirus 5 (AAD30141.1) showing 72.50% of identity and 62% of query cover, and with Asinine herpesvirus 4.1 (AAL14768.1), displaying 62% of identity over a query cover of 82%.

An amplicon ~500bp long, was obtained from three DNA polymerase positive hare samples, with the genus-specific glycoprotein B (gB) gene primers described by [17].The three gB consensus sequences (453 bp long) showed 100% similarity to each other. These sequences were submitted to the GenBank (MN557129-31).

Blast analysis (23.03.2020) of the MN557129 sequence confirmed homology with Glycoprotein B sequence of known herpesvirus, namely with wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) herpesvirus (GQ169129.1, EF495130.1 and EF128051.2, showing 67.69% to 70.72% similarity with a query cover of 88% to 92%), bank vole (Myodes glareolus) rhadinovirus (AY854169.2, 69.56% similarity and 92% query cover), field vole (Microtus agrestis) rhadinovirus (EF128052.1,, 67.69% similarity and 92% query cover), and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) rhadinovirus 1 and 2 (GQ995451.1 and EU085378.1, 65–67% similarity with 97–98% query cover).

3.6. Phylogenetic analysis

It has been shown that, despite reduced, the region amplified by the nested PCR has discriminatory power to allow phylogenetic inferences [16]. To investigate the phylogenetic relationship of the Iberian hare herpesviruses found in this study (represented by sequence MN557129), with other members of the Herpesviridae family, a set of 37 DNA polymerase protein sequences from alpha-, beta- and gammaherpesviruses, obtained from GenBank, were edited to span a 54 to 59 aa-residue region comprising the homologous regions encoded by sequence MN557129.

Despite many polytomies and low bootstrap values, the analysis of the DNA polymerase protein sequences by unrooted Maximum Likelihood method and LG+G+I model [20] corroborated that the herpesvirus sequence from Lepus granatensis grouped within the gammaherpesvirus cluster (Fig 8).

Fig 8. Phylogenetic analysis based on 37 partial DNA Polymerase amino acid sequences of herpesviruses from several vertebrate species.

Fig 8

The access number of the nucleotide sequences from which the amino acid sequences were deduced are given. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-2432.55) is shown. The LG+G+I model considering 5 categories, [+G] parameter of 0,9929 and [+I] of 11,47% sites was used. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. There were a total of 60 positions in the final dataset. Robustness of the tree nodes was assessed by bootstrapping 1000 times. Only bootstrap values ≥70 are shown. The evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [18] and the phylogenetic tree was edited in the Figtree software version 1.4.0.

To refine the phylogenetic inference within gammahespesviruses, the variability within the gB protein was explored in a set of 45 gammaherpesviruses using the clades described by [17] as reference. Two trees were constructed, the first based on the partial gB protein sequences alone, and the second based on concatenated DNA polymerase and gB sequences. Concatenation enabled greater phylogenetic resolution. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-3335,05) is shown in Fig 9. The accession numbers of the original sequences from which the DNA Polymerase and Glycoprotein B genes were edited, are indicated in the respective legend (Fig 9).

Fig 9. Phylogenetic tree based on 45 concatenated DNA polymerase and glycoprotein B protein sequences (190 aa long) of several gammaherpesviruses inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method.

Fig 9

The tree with the highest log likelihood (-6400.38) is shown. The L+G+I model [19] considering 5 categories, [+G] parameter of 0.85 and [+I] of 11.23% sites was used. There were a total of 188 positions in the final dataset. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Robustness of the tree nodes was assessed by bootstrapping 1000 times. The evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [18] and the phylogenetic tree was edited in the Figtree software version 1.4.0. Accession numbers: MuHV-68 (U08990.1), MuHV-4 (AF324455.1), MuHV-4.WUMS (NC_001826.2), MuHV (DQ424896.1), AflaRHV-1 (DQ821580.2), AsylRHV1 (EF128051.2), WHMV (GQ169129.1), BindRHV-4 (DQ821581.1), MagrRHV1 (EF128052.1), MglaRHV1 (AY854169.2), PtroRHV-2 (EU085378.1), RRV (AF029302.1), MfasRHV-1 (AY138583), HHV-8 (U75698), PtroRHV-1 (AY138585.2), GgorRHV-1 (AY177144), HVA (AF083424), HVS (X64346), BoHV-4 (AF318573), DbicGHV-1 (AY197560), BbabRHV-1 (AY177146), SbarRHV-1 (AY177147), TterGHV-1 (AF141887), SsciGHV-2 (AY138584), SaraGHV-1 (EU085380), EHV-2 (NC 001650), EzebGHV-1 (AY495965), CcroGHV-1 (DQ789371), McerRHV-1 (DQ821582), MmusRHV-1 (AY854167), BsavRHV-1 (DQ821581), BatGHV-5 (DQ788629), BatGHV-1 (DQ788623), CalHV-3 (AF319782), EBV (AY037858), EmaxGHV-1 (EU085379), PLHV-2 (AY170317), PLHV-1 (AF478169), PLHV-3 (AY170316), HlibGHV-1m (AY197559), AlHV-1 (AF005370), RrupGHV-1 (DQ789369), CpRHV-2 (AF283477), OvHV-2 (NC_007646).

This phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the leporid herpesvirus under study is more closely related with gammaherpesviruses from Murine rhadinovirus (MHV-68 and MuHV-4), Apodemus flavicollis rhadinovirus (AflaRHV-1), Apodemus sylvaticus rhadinovirus 1 (AsylRHV1), Apodemus sylvaticus herpesvirus (WMHV), Bandicota indica rhadinovirus 4 (BindRHV-4), Microtus agrestis rhadinovirus 1 (MagrRHV1) and Myodes glareolus rhadinovirus 1 (MglaRHV1), but clearly diverge from this group, forming a separate clade supported by a bootstrap value of 100 (Fig 9). In this tree, no polytomies were observed.

Despite more information on the genome of this herpesvirus is required, this preliminary analysis suggest that it may represent a specific replicating lineage within the rhadinovirus genus. In accordance, we propose to name this virus Leporid gammaherpesvirus 5 (LeHV-5), following the rabbit alphaherpesvirus 4 (LeHV-4), the only leporid herpesvirus recognised so far as a species by the ICTV.

3.7. Isolation of the viruses in cell cultures

The difficulties found in viral isolation in CRFK, Vero, RK13 and Hella cells may be explained by the fact that LeHV-5 is a gammaherpesvirus.

Despite LeHV-5 seems unable to multiply in human (Hela) and primate (Vero) cells, given the zoonotic potential of some animal herpesviruses, as the case of the cercopithecine alphaherpesvirus 1 [21] and the murine gamma herpesvirus 68 [22], all isolation attempts were carried out in BSL-2 conditions.

4. Discussion and conclusion

This study describes the detection of the first herpesvirus (Leporid gammaherpesvirus 5) in the genus Lepus that, according to the phylogenetic analysis based on DNA polymerase and gB concatenated sequences, is more similar to rodent gammaherpesviruses of the rhadinovirus genus.

Viral isolation was not successful in RK13, CRFK or Vero cells. The difficulty in growing the virus in vitro, an important step towards its characterisation, may be a consequence of the co-infection with MYXV. The greater ease in the multiplication of MYXV, which grows in many cell cultures [23,24], may have hampered herpesvirus isolation. Moreover, wild animal samples are frequently somewhat autolysed and usually frozen before reaching the laboratory, which may lead to herpesvirus inactivation. The complexity in isolating genital gammaherpesvirus in cell culture was also referred by [25]. The lack of cell cultures from Lepus species may pose further challenges.

During our investigation, we observed necrosis of the genitals and herpetic-like vesicles in the lips of hares co-infected with LeHV-5 and MYXV, which were attributed to herpesvirus. The presence of LeHV-5 in the penile of hare-1 was confirmed by PCR and TEM, as shown in Fig 7. Herpesvirus particles were also visualised in epithelial and stroma cells of the eyelid of hare-2.

Notwithstanding the sampling limitation, the fact that macroscopic lesions were only seen in animals with myxomatosis, suggests that MYXV may play a role on herpesvirus replication and/or reactivation by compromising the immune response of the host, leading to the subsequent development of clinical disease with exuberant lesions. Immunosuppression facilitates herpesvirus infections and virus reactivation and it was demonstrated that certain MYXV proteins, such as Serp-1, have strong immune suppressing effects [24]. MYXV infection may hence represent a stress and/or immunosuppressive triggering factor for herpesvirus infection. It is known that stress, disease and other factors such as extreme temperatures can lead to the resurgence of herpesviruses in other species [26]. It was observed that depressed T-cell immune function reduces the quality of immune surveillance resulting in the increase of viral activity [27].

Herpesviruses generally follow one of three distinct strategies [27] within the host, namely i) latency with occasional re-emergence, ii) hit-and-run’ approach and iii) slow-and-low’ tactic [27].In the case of LeHV-5, because it affects wildlife, specimens are mainly animals found dead or moribund, limiting the conclusions on the strategy of the virus.

In addition, herpesviruses are frequently found either in the absence of clinical signs or in association with very diverse clinical signs [28].This fact muddles the understanding of the true role and relative contribution of many herpesviruses in the courses of certain diseases, especially with regards to wild species that are often exposed to, and infected by, many pathogens. On the other hand, animal experimentation is complicated by the absence of available specific pathogen free (SPF) specimens, and by the difficulties in keeping hares in captivity, limiting cause-effect experiments. Moreover, during latency, herpesviruses may not be detected by current methods as it is the case of gammaherpesvirus in horses, resulting in an underestimated prevalence in the populations [28,,29]. Reports indicate that equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV-2) can be detected in immunocompetent animals in the absence of signs of disease (revised on [28]) meaning that healthy animals can be a potentially source of viral transmission.

According to our study, based on viral DNA amplification, around half of animals tested (63% symptomatic and 37% asymptomatic) were positive for LeHV-5. However, this value may be an underestimation given that the tropism of LeHV-5 is still unknown, and consequently the tissue samples used for diagnosis may have been inadequate. Thus, we cannot assure that PCR negative animals were not false negatives.

The fact that herpetic lesions were not observed in young, could mean that if the acquisition of LeHV-5 occurs at an early age, primary infection takes place with mild or no symptoms. In the absence of an unbalancing triggering factor such as MYXV infection, LeHV-5 may successfully establish a long-term relationship with the hare host, with subclinical disease and transient viremia. This would explain the detection of herpesvirus DNA in apparently healthy hares.

Interestingly, the gammaherpesvirus identified in external genitalia of the investigated hares was not associated with the development of papillary lesions as in other genital gammaherpesviruses’ infections [25]. However, given that hunters, hunting managers and landowners have the opinion that the reproduction of the Iberian hare has been declining in recent years, it is important to clarify if this reduction is also associated with the emergence or circulation of LeHV-5. Other important concern is the potential production of oncogenic proteins by this herpesvirus.

According to our findings, genital herpesvirus may have a critical effect on hares’ fertility and reproduction as well as in their survival. Hence, it is crucial to evaluate and understand the extent to which MYXV plays a role in the infection/reactivation of herpesvirus, as well as the putative role of herpesvirus in favouring infection of hares by MYXV or aggravating the severity of myxomatosis clinical forms.

The virological results obtained in this study also disclosed the infection of apparently healthy hares by LeHV-5, suggesting the possible circulation of this virus in the wild populations in a subclinical form. Because herpesvirus-DNA was detected in internal organs (liver and spleen), this asymptomatic infection may be systemic.

Although the Iberian hare populations are still considered stable, no census is available for the populations in Portugal. Presently, we continue monitoring apparently healthy and MYXV-positive hares in mainland Portugal to determine the extent of the geographic distribution of LeHV-5 among the wild hare populations, and the putative association of herpesviruses with the virulence of the recently emerged hare myxoma virus.

It is of paramount importance to evaluate the geographical distribution of the virus in the hare populations, the real extent and severity of the lesions induced in hares by LeHV-5, the persistence and latency of herpesvirus in the wild populations and the LEHV-5-MYXV associated pathology in order to predict the consequences of the LEHV-5 infection at population level and to evaluate its importance in the future of this iconic species.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sebastião Miguel (Hunting manager), João Carvalho (ANPC), Jacinto Amaro (FENCAÇA), Fernando Castanheira Pinto (CNCP) and Duarte Nuno (ICNF), for sample collection and organization of the sampling events. We are also grateful to Dr.Teresa Fagulha (INIAV, Virology Laboratory) for help with molecular characterization and to Maria João Teixeira (INIAV, Virology Laboratory) for technical assistance. Finally, we also thank to all the hunters who participated in fieldwork and sample collection.

Data Availability

All the data are on the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Most of the field and laboratory work referred to in this manuscript was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) (Grant SFRH/BD/137067/2018), Fundo Florestal Permanente (Government of Portugal) in the scope of the Action Plan for the Control of Rabbit Viral Haemorrhagic Disease (+COELHO, Dispatch no. 4757/2017 of 31 May) and by the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon (CIISA, FMV-UL) (Portugal) (Project UID/CVT/00276/2013). Funding bodies played no direct role in the design or conclusion of the study.

References

  • 1.Soriguer R, Carro F. Lepus granatensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T41306A2953195. 2019. 10.2305/IUCN.UK [DOI]
  • 2.Palacios F. On the taxonomic status of the genus Lepus in Spain. Acta Zool. 1983;Fennica 17: 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fenner F, Fantini B. History of Myxomatosis—an Experiment in Evolution CABI. Biological Control of Vertebrate Pests. CABI; New York, USA; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barlow A, Lawrence K, Everest D, Dastjerdi A, Finnegan C, Steinbach F. Confirmation of myxomatosis in a European brown hare in Great Britain. Vet Rec. 2014;175: 75–76. 10.1136/vr.g4621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collins JJ. Myxomatosis in the common hare. Ir Vet J. 1955;9, 268. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wibbelt G. Infectious Diseases in European Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus). 2014. 10.2461/wbp.2005.1.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bocanegra IG, Dalton KP, Gómez JC. First outbreak of myxomatosis in Iberian hares (Lepus granatensis). 2019; 1–5. 10.1111/tbed.13289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.OIE. Myxomatosis, Portugal. 2018. Available: https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=MapFullEventReport&reportid=28628
  • 9.Jin L, Löhr C V., Vanarsdall AL, Baker RJ, Moerdyk-Schauwecker M, Levine C, et al. Characterization of a novel alphaherpesvirus associated with fatal infections of domestic rabbits. Virology. 2008;378: 13–20. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barthold SW, Griffey SM, Percy DH. Rabbit. 4 th. Pathology of Laboratory Rodents and Rabbits. 4 th. 2016. p. 258.
  • 11.Brown J C., Newcomb W W. Herpesvirus Capsid Assembly: Insights from Structural Analysis. Curr Opin Virol. 2011;1: 142–149. 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davison AJ, Richard E, Bernhard E, Gary HS, Duncan MJ, Anthony MC, et al. The order of Herpesvirales. Arch Virol. 2009;154: 171–177. 10.1007/s00705-008-0278-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sunohara-Neilson JR, Brash M, Carman S, Nagy É, Turner P V. Experimental infection of New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculi) with leporid herpesvirus 4. Comp Med. 2013;63: 422–431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.David M. Knipe PM. Fields Virology. 6th Editio. In: Williams L, Wilkins, editors. Fields Virology. 6th Editio. Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2013.
  • 15.Graham L, Orenstein JM. Processing tissue and cells for transmission electron microscopy in diagnostic pathology and research. Nat Protoc. 2007;2: 2439–2450. 10.1038/nprot.2007.304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Devanter DRVAN, Warrener P, Bennett L, Schultz ER, Coulter S, Garber RL, et al. Detection and Analysis of Diverse Herpesviral Species by Consensus Primer PCR. 1996;34: 1666–1671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ehlers B, Dural G, Yasmum N, Lembo T, de Thoisy B, Ryser-Degiorgis M-P, et al. Novel Mammalian Herpesviruses and Lineages within the Gammaherpesvirinae: Cospeciation and Interspecies Transfer. J Virol. 2008;82: 3509–3516. 10.1128/JVI.02646-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.H M., K H., Y T. Dating the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22: 160–174. 10.1007/bf02101694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Le SQ, Gascuel O. An Improved General Amino Acid Replacement Matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25: 1307–1320. 10.1093/molbev/msn067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huff JL, Barry PA. Infection in Humans and Macaques: Potential for Zoonotic Disease. Emerg Infect Dis •. 2003;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hricová M, Mistríková J. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 serum antibodies in general human population. Acta Virol. 2007;51: 283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fenner F, Ratcliffe FN. Myxomatosis. Cambridge Univ Press; London, UK: 1965. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Spiesschaert B, Mcfadden G, Hermans K, Nauwynck H, Walle GR Van De. The current status and future directions of myxoma virus, a master in immune evasion. Vet Res. 2011;42: 76 10.1186/1297-9716-42-76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saliki JT, Cooper EJ, Rotstein DS, Caseltine SL, Pabst D., McLellan WA, et al. A Novel Gammaherpesvirus Associated with Genital Lesions in a Blainville’s Beaked Whale (Mesoplodon densirostris). J Wildl Dis. 2006;42: 142–148. 10.7589/0090-3558-42.1.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Izumi Y, Tsuduku S, Murakami K, Tsuboi T, Konishi M, Haritani M, et al. Characterization of bovine herpesvirus type 4 isolated from cattle with mastitis and subclinical infection by the virus among cattle. J Vet Med Sci. 2006;68: 189–193. 10.1292/jvms.68.189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grinde B. Herpesviruses: latency and reactivation? viral strategies and host response. J Oral Microbiol. 2013;5: 125–136. 10.3402/jom.v5i0.22766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Marenzoni M, Stefanetti V, Danzetta ML, Timoney PJ. Gammaherpesvirus infections in equids: a review. Vet Med Res Reports. 2015; 91 10.2147/vmrr.s39473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Williams KJ, Robinson NE, Lim A, Brandenberger C, Maes R, Behan A, et al. Experimental Induction of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Horses with the Gammaherpesvirus Equine Herpesvirus 5. PLoS One. 2013;8: 1–15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zygraich N, Berge E. Experimental Infection of Rabbits and Monkeys with Herpesvirus cuniculi. 1972;13: 241–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hesselton RM, Yang WC, Medveczky P, Sullivan JL. Pathogenesis of Herpesvirus sylvilagus infection in cottontail rabbits. Am J Pathol. 1988;133: 639–647. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Akatsuka K, Nii S. Tubular Structures Detected in the Nuclei of Human Embryonal Lung Fibroblasts Infected with Human Cytomegalovirus Kazuya AKATSUKA and Shiro NII * of Virology, Okayama Okayama (Accepted for publication, December Various viruses with icosahedral capsids. MicrobiolImmunol. 1986;30: 289–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hinze HC. New Member of the Herpesvirus Group Isolated from Wild Cottontail Rabbits. 1971;3: 350–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brash ML, Nagy É, Pei Y, Carman S, Emery S, Smith AE, et al. Acute hemorrhagic and necrotizing pneumonia, splenitis, and dermatitis in a pet rabbit caused by a novel herpesvirus (leporid herpesvirus-4). Can Vet J. 2010;51: 1383–1386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Roizman B, Pellett P. The family Herpesviridae: a brief introduction. 4th ed In: Knipe DM, Howley P., editors. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 2381–2397pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Duarte MD, Carvalho CL, Barros SC, Henriques AM, Ramos F, Fagulha T, et al. A real time Taqman RT-PCR for the detection of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2). J Virol Methods. 2015;219: 90–95. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Duarte MD, Barros SC, Henriques AM, Fagulha MT, Ramos F, Luís T, et al. Development and validation of a real time PCR for the detection of myxoma virus based on the diploid gene M000. 5L / R. J Virol Methods. 2014;196: 219–224. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Binod Kumar

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

18 Feb 2020

PONE-D-20-00203

First description of a herpesvirus infection in genus Lepus

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Santos,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I strongly believe that revising the manuscript with suggested changes will further enhance the quality of manuscript. The reviewers concerns regarding the phylogenetic analysis should be considered. One of the reviewers submitted their comments before the missing figures could be provided to reviewer and hence the comments related to missing figures has been taken care by me.  

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Apr 03 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Binod Kumar, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please give the sources of any cell lines used in your study.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information, including geographic coordinates for the sampling locations/data set if available.

4. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

5. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

6. Please include a copy of Table 2 which you refer to in your text on page 8-9.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Review comments for the manuscript number: PONE-D-20-00203

In the present manuscript, authors have identified a new herpesvirus Leporid gammaherpesvirus 5 (LeHV-5), in genus Lepus. They confirmed the presence of herpesvirus in 13 MYXV-positive hares by PCR and sequencing analysis.

However, I would like to suggest authors to pay attention to following points:

1. Table 1 has not been numbered correctly.

2. Table 2 is missing

3. Figure legend must be little more descriptive

4. Figures 6, 7, 8 are missing

5. Bacteriological and parasitological examination method should have had been described in detail under methodology section.

6. Description of figure 2 under the heading Electron microscopy is confusing.

7. Results for epithelial and stroma cell of the eyelid are not shown but discussed. Either show the results or don’t discuss.

8. There are few spelling mistakes .

Reviewer #2: Dos Santos et al describe the detection of a yet unknown gammaherpesvirus in the Iberian hare by pathology, electron microscopy, PCR, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. The manuscript is of interest for virologists and readers interested in hares and their diseases. The manuscript is well structured, but contains a number of mistakes, misleading phrases which should be eliminated (see accompanying word document).

The main criticism pertains the phylogenetic analysis. Many branches of the trees are not statistically well supported. This is not surprising as the authors could only use the sequence that was derived from the generic PCR, i.e., appr. 175 bp, without the primer binding sequences (these have to be removed). It is important to perform phylogenetic analysis with extended sequences that result in statistically well supported trees. Methods to extend gammaherpesvirus sequences from the region of generic DPOL PCR into the coding sequence of glycoprotein B were published in a number of papers (e.g. Journal of Virology, 82(7), 3509-3516.). In the revised manuscript the authors should include statistically well supported trees.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: review comments.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: POne_D-20-00203_review.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231795.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Mar 2020

Reviewer #1: Review comments for the manuscript number: PONE-D-20-00203 In the present manuscript, authors have identified a new herpesvirus Leporid gammaherpesvirus 5 (LeHV-5), in genus Lepus. They confirmed the presence of herpesvirus in 13 MYXV-positive hares by PCR and sequencing analysis.

However, I would like to suggest authors to pay attention to following

1. Table 1 has not been numbered correctly.

The content and format of Table 1 was revised. LeHV-5 also included to allow comparing all the leporid herpesvirus described so far.

2. Table 2 is missing.

Table 2 was included.

3. Figure legend must be little more descriptive 4.

Legend was re-written.

Figures 6, 7, 8 are missing 5.

All figures were included in this reviewed version of the manuscript.

Bacteriological and parasitological examination method should have had been described in detail under methodology section.

More detailed information was added to the manuscript as requested.

6. Description of figure 2 under the heading Electron microscopy is confusing.

Reference to Figure 2 was moved within the sentence.

7. Results for epithelial and stroma cell of the eyelid are not shown but discussed. Either show the results or don't discuss.

At this time, the figure has not enough quality to be include. If Reviewer #1 agrees, we would like to remove this sentence from the Results section and mentioned this finding in the Discussion.

8. There are few spelling mistakes .

We thank Reviewer #2 for correcting these mistakes.

Reviewer #2: Dos Santos et al describe the detection of a yet unknown gammaherpesvirus in the Iberian hare by pathology, electron microscopy, PCR, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. The manuscript is of interest for virologists and readers interested in hares and their diseases. The manuscript is well structured, but contains a number of mistakes, misleading phrases which should be eliminated (see accompanying word document).

Thank you for the time revising the language and content of our manuscript.

The main criticism pertains the phylogenetic analysis. Many branches of the trees are not statistically well supported. This is not surprising as the authors could only use the sequence that was derived from the generic PCR, i.e., appr. 175 bp, without the primer binding sequences (these have to be removed). It is important to perform phylogenetic analysis with extended sequences that result in statistically well supported trees. Methods to extend gammaherpesvirus sequences from the region of generic DPOL PCR into the coding sequence of glycoprotein B were published in a number of papers (e.g. Journal of Virology, 82(7), 3509-3516.). In the revised manuscript the authors should include statistically well supported trees.

Thank you for point out this mistake. When preparing the alignments, the primer sequences were quite useful for the splicing, and we forgot to remove then.

As indicated, the 5’ and 3’ ends of the sequences corresponding to the primers, were removed and the trees reconstructed. As expected no significant phylogeny changes were observed.

We agree with Reviewer#2, that the region is quite small and that extending the plylogenetic analysis to a wider region would produce more robust data. However, most of the sequences available in the GenBank are also very short, and refer exactly to this region. In fact, given the high variability found in herpesviruses, the nested PCR developed by Van Devanter et al, is commonly used by many researchers, limiting the sequences available to the size of the second PCR-amplicon (≤ 220 nt long). That is the case of the sequences KR261864 and KR261869, both from Scotophilus kuhlii, the herpesviruses more closely related with LeHV-5, but also KT591396 from Rattus norvegicus, and U97553 from Murine.

Consequently, for the purpose of our phylogenetic analysis, extending the sequence would also reduce tremendously the number of herpesvirus hosts included.

Also, as referred in the manuscript (Van Devanter et al, 1996), this small region has discriminatory power for phylogenetic inferences.

Responses to Reviewer #3

1. *** Sentence in yellow is misleading*** (Over the years, the Iberian hare has been unaffected by viral diseases that, alongside environmental and anthropogenic factors, led to the drastic decline of the wild rabbit).

Sentence was rephrased to “Contrarily to the wild rabbit, which drastic decline has been linked, among other factors, to viral epizooties, until recently, the Iberian hare was not affected by viral diseases. Environmental and anthropogenic factors, however, have had a negative impact on both hare and wild-rabbit populations.”

2. (revised on ***???*** Jin et al.,2008) Of these, the most common naturally occurring herpesvirus infections identified in rabbits are LHV-2 and LHV-3, which alongside LHV-1 belong to the Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily.

We rewrote to “Of these, the most common naturally occurring herpesvirus infections identified in rabbits are LeHV-2 and LeHV-3 (reviewed by [9]), which alongside LeHV-1 belong to the Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily.”

3. ***MHV68 is used as a model virus since many years***( The lack of a suitable animal model …)

Thank you for pointing out this mistake. The sentence was erased.

4. ***spell out*** (For histopathology, skin and genitalia fragments were fixated in 10% neutral buffered formalin, routinely paraffin embedded, sectioned at 4 μm, and stained with H&E)

Done

5. ***what is this?***(From these hunted specimens, no genitalia/skin samples were available for histopathology. Six hares showed doubtful results).

Sentence was changed to “Herpesvirus-DNA was also detected by PCR in the liver, spleen and lung samples of 41.2% (7/17) of the apparently healthy hunted hares that tested negative for MYXV. From this group of hares, no genitalia/skin samples were available for histopathology.”

6. ***The PCR products are of appr. 225 bp length. But after subtraction of the primer sequences, the novel sequence has a length of appr 175 bp only !*** (To refine the phylogenetic analysis with regards to gammahespesviruses (Figure 8), we explored the nucleotide variability among this group, using a second set of 25 herpesviruses sequences from orders Artiodactyla, Carnivora, Chiroptera, Lagomorpha, Perissodactyla, Primates and Rodentia. The accession numbers of the original sequences from which the DNA Polymerase 225 nt long sequences were edited, are indicated in Figure 8)

Thank you for point out this mistake. When preparing the alignments, the primer sequences were quite useful for the splicing, and we forgot to remove then.

As indicated, the 5’ and 3’ ends of the sequences corresponding to the primers, were removed and the trees reconstructed. As expected no significant phylogeny changes were observed.

7. ***None oft he LHVs is currrently classified as species by ICTV***( According with the most recent International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) guidelines for classification of viruses, we propose to name this virus species leporid gammaherpesvirus 5 (LeHV-5), following the rabbit alphaherpesvirus 4 (LHV-4), although we cannot suggest a genus for LeHV-5).

We rephrased the sentence. According to the 2018b Guidelines of ICTV, LHV-4 was included as a specie of an unclassified genus. Otherwise, LHV-1, LHV-2 and LHV-3 were not yet classified.

8. ***??? Cercopithecine herpesvirus-1 is in the Alphaherpesvirinae! There is no zoonotic murine gammaherpesvirus***, (Despite LeHV-5 not appearing to multiply in human (Hela) and primate (Vero) cells, because gammaherpesviruses may be zoonotic, as is the case of cercopithecine herpesvirus-1 and murine gamma herpesvirus13 isolation attempts was performed under BSL-2 conditions.)

Thank you for pointing out this mistake. According with what is available in the literature, we rephrased the sentence to “ Despite LeHV-5 seems unable to multiply in human (Hela) and primate (Vero) cells, given the zoonotic potential of some animal herpesviruses, as the case of the cercopithecine alphaherpesvirus 1 [20] and the murine gamma herpesvirus 68 [21], all isolation attempts were carried out in BSL-2 conditions.”

9. *** Please rephrase *** (This study describes the detection of a new gammaherpesvirus in the genus Lepus that, according tophylogenetic analysis, is most similar to bat and rodent gammaherpesviruses.)

Done

10. ***for what?***(However, this value may be an underestimation given that the tropism of LeHV-5 is still unknown, and consequently the tissue samples used for diagnosis may have been inadequate)

The sentence was rewritten

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses _to_the_Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Binod Kumar

23 Mar 2020

PONE-D-20-00203R1

First description of a herpesvirus infection in genus Lepus

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Santos,

Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

You will notice that one of the reviewers is still not very satisfied with the quality of the phylogenetic trees. Please address this concern and resubmit the manuscript. 

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 07 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Binod Kumar, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dos Santos et al detected a new gammaherpesvirus in the Iberian hare using pathological, microscopic, and phylogenetic analysis tools. In light of comments from reviewers, authors have done extensive revision and the current form of manuscript is suitable for acceptance for publication.

1. Authors have included all the figures that were missing in the original manuscript.

2. As suggested, the portion for epithelial and stroma cell of the eyelid has been removed from the result section. However, it can be discussed.

3. Bacteriological and parasitological examination has been explained in details.

Reviewer #2: I still criticize the quality of the phylogenetic trees, due to usage of extremely short sequences. Most parts of the gammaherpesvirus clades are without statistical significance. This is also highlighted by the fact that the sistervirus of the novel lepus HV is different in the 2 trees, either hipposideros HV or Scotophilus HV. All in all, the position of the lepus HV in the gammaherpesvirus clades is largely undefined. Therefore, these trees only show that the lepus HV is a gammaherpesvirus (which can be seen in simple BLAST analysis). So either, the tree analysis has to be improved with longer sequences, or the trees shouldn´t be shown at all.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231795.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 Mar 2020

Dear Editor

Dr. Binod Kumar

We were pleased to see that Reviewer#1 is satisfied with the corrections done in the second version of our manuscript.

We would like to emphasise that at the main outcome of our manuscript is the demonstration that a potentially pathogenic gammaherpesvirus is circulating the Iberian hare, which we believe we have fully accomplished through microscopic, molecular and histopathological evidences.

Regarding the characterisation of the new LeHV-5, besides sequencing and comparison to the HV presently known by BLAST analysis, we believe that presenting a phylogenetic analysis, even if preliminary, is important and relevant.

Therefore, to respond to Reviewer #2 concerns, we reformulated the phylogenetic analysis by obtaining the nucleotide sequence of the gB gene from 3 LeHV-5 strains. This 453 bp sequence was used to construct an aa phylogenetic tree and concatenated with the respective DNA polymerase sequences to produce an aa base tree.

Our results showed that the LeHV-5 clearly grouped inside the MuHV-68 like Rhadinovirus, despite presenting a divergence of herpesviruses from rodents, showing a clear phylogenetic separation, which better the quality and relevance of our work. The absence of available sequences from other leporid gammaherpesviruses made it impossible to compare them.

We hope to have now reached the quality standards for publication and hope to see our manuscript published soon in the Plos One Journal.

Kind regards

Fábio Abade dos Santos

Dear colleague

We really appreciate your comments and we understand that it has forced us to significantly improve the quality of our work

Response to Reviewer (#2).

I still criticize the quality of the phylogenetic trees, due to usage of extremely short sequences.

It is true that our analysis was based on a small region of viral DNA polymerase (171 bp). However, according to Van Devander described in the manuscript, this region harbours enough discriminatory power to differentiate alpha, beta and gammahespesvirus.

Due to the situation of COVID-19, we have serious problems in investigative work. So we decided to include a partial Gb sequence, and present a phylogenetic study based on the concatenated Gb and DNA polymerase sequences. In this way, we understand that our analysis is already robust enough.

Most parts of the gammaherpesvirus clades are without statistical significance.

It is also true that the bootstrap value for the LeHV-5 note in the DNA polymerase based phylogenetic tree was low. In accordance, the fragility of the analysis was clearly mentioned in the manuscript. At this moment, our clades are more significant and concordant with clades described previously by other manuscripts.

This is also highlighted by the fact that the sister virus of the novel lepus HV is different in the 2 trees, either hipposideros HV or Scotophilus HV.

This fact have changed with the new phylogenetic analysis.

All in all, the position of the lepus HV in the gammaherpesvirus clades is largely undefined. Therefore, these trees only show that the lepus HV is a gammaherpesvirus (which can be seen in simple BLAST analysis).

We evaluated the similarity of the query sequence with the nucleotide sequences available in the GenBank at the moment by BLAST analysis. However, we believe that a phylogenetic inference tree based on the optimal global alignment of the all the sequences represented provides additional important information with regards to the evolutionary phylogeny of our group of sequences, meaning that one analysis does not substitute the other.

So either, the tree analysis has to be improved with longer sequences, or the trees shouldn’t be shown at all.

Instead of extending the DNA polymerase sequences, given the limitation referred to above, we constructed new phylogenetic trees following two strategies;

1. Using the gB gene sequences, which was amplified using the system described by Ehlers.

2. Using concatenated DNA polymerase/gB sequences

Kind Regards

Fábio Abade dos Santos

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_Editor.pdf

Decision Letter 2

Binod Kumar

1 Apr 2020

First description of a herpesvirus infection in genus Lepus

PONE-D-20-00203R2

Dear Dr. Santos,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Binod Kumar, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Binod Kumar

3 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-00203R2

First description of a herpesvirus infection in genus Lepus

Dear Dr. Santos:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Binod Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: review comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: POne_D-20-00203_review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses _to_the_Reviewers.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_Editor.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All the data are on the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES