Correction to: BMC Public Health (2020) 20:327
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8391-8
It was highlighted that the original article [1] contained an ambiguity in the citation of Reference 2 in the Results section. This Correction article shows the incorrect and correct sentence that includes this reference.
Incorrect sentence.
The literature review conducted in Phase 1 (Fig. 1) found eight different theoretical models for work ability [2] and two models for functioning.
Correct sentence.
In the literature review conducted in Phase 1 (Fig. 1) we found several different theoretical models for work ability and two models for functioning. In a recent Finnish review [2], eight models of work ability related to rehabilitation were identified. They are briefly described in the following.
References
- 1.Wikström M, et al. Development and content validity of the Abilitator: a self-report questionnaire on work ability and functioning aimed at the population in a weak labour market position. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8391-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Järvikoski A, Takala E-P, Juvonen-Posti P, Härkäpää K. The concept of work ability in the research and practice of rehabilitation. Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Social security and health reports, vol. 13; 2018. Available from: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2018121050326.