Skip to main content
Antibiotics logoLink to Antibiotics
. 2020 Feb 18;9(2):89. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020089

Staphylococcus aureus Epidemiology in Wildlife: A Systematic Review

Christina J Heaton 1, Gracen R Gerbig 1, Lucas D Sensius 1, Vishwash Patel 1, Tara C Smith 1,*
PMCID: PMC7168057  PMID: 32085586

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacterial colonizer of humans and a variety of animal species. Many strains have zoonotic potential, moving between humans and animals, including livestock, pets, and wildlife. We examined publications reporting on S. aureus presence in a variety of wildlife species in order to more cohesively review distribution of strains and antibiotic resistance in wildlife. Fifty-one studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The most common types documented included ST398, ST425, ST1, ST133, ST130, and ST15. A mix of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains were noted. A number of molecular types were identified that were likely to be found in wildlife species, including those that are commonly found in humans or other animal species (including livestock). Additional research should include follow-up in geographic areas that are under-sampled in this study, which is dominated by European studies.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance, molecular typing, environment, zoonosis

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a common commensal bacterium that lives within the nares, throat, and on the skin of humans and a wide variety of animal species. S. aureus can spread via person-to-person contact (directly or mediated by fomites) and can be transmitted zoonotically via direct contact with animals or animal products, including raw meats [1]. It can also be maintained in the environment in manure, water, or the air [2].

Because of its frequency in various environments and species, it is critical to understand movement within and between communities. S. aureus is frequently resistant to one or more classes of antibiotics, and the continued spread of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) over the past several decades in both human and animal species has increased the risk of acquiring a resistant infection that makes treatment more difficult and costly [3].

The epidemiology of MRSA in particular has changed over the past 30 years [4]. Once primarily a hospital-associated pathogen, the rise of novel strains of MRSA in the 1990s outside of the nosocomial environment led to the recognition of “community-associated MRSA” (CA-MRSA), in contrast with the historic hospital-associated (HA-MRSA) strains [5]. In the mid-2000s, a third genre of MRSA was recognized, as colonization and infection of livestock and livestock workers led to the designation of livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) [6]. It should be noted that we know less about the changes in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus during this period (MSSA), as the bulk of surveillance is dedicated to MRSA and does not always capture MSSA epidemiology.

Wildlife are a special case and often under-studied in the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in the community and environment. Wildlife can act as reservoirs for intrinsic resistance elements or organisms (those that are naturally occurring in the environment, including environmental bacteria and fungi living in soil and water) and may also be exposed to resistant organisms or resistance genes in the environment amplified via human activity. This may be via treated humans who excrete resistant bacteria, antimicrobials that eventually end up in sewage effluent dispersed into the environment, or from sludge or waste from humans or livestock dispersed on fields as fertilizer. This may lead to further dissemination into streams, rivers, and larger waterways and also allow for airborne transmission of dried materials. Resistance may also be generated in the environment due to spraying of antibiotics on citrus groves and other plants [7] as well as by use in aquaculture [8].

S. aureus is a commensal organism that is able to effectively colonize a wide variety of host species, including many mammalian species but also birds and fish. As such, animals besides human have the potential to harbor novel strains of S. aureus, which could enter the human population, or conversely, humans may also transmit strains of S. aureus to other animal species [9], which can then acquire additional resistance genes.

The clearest evidence of zoonotic transmission of S. aureus has been in livestock. Isolates of clonal complex 398 appear to have originated as a human-adapted lineage but were transmitted to livestock including pigs and cattle and have become both more antibiotic-resistant (including MRSA strains) and have also typically lost some human virulence factors [9]. A similar situation appears to have happened with CC5 in poultry [10]. Recent research also suggests an emerging lineage in humans, strains of CC130, originated in cattle, and typically carry a novel methicillin resistance gene (mecC, originally called mecALGA251) [11]. The role other animals may play in such cross-species transmission is less defined. Systematic collection and molecular typing of S. aureus from animal species has not been a priority; as such, cross-species transmission events from such animals to humans or wildlife to better-studied animal populations (including livestock and poultry) have likely been missed. This review examines the epidemiology of S. aureus in wildlife, including molecular typing and antibiotic resistance data where available.

2. Results

2.1. Search Results

Searching within Pubmed resulted in 856 hits, Web of Science in 58, and peer-reviewed materials within ProQuest in 918, for a total of 1832 publications. Upon searching references for additional studies that had been missed by our search terms, another nine were added. Titles and abstracts were examined to exclude duplicates (956); this left 885 remaining. Additional publications were excluded if they used animals only as an experimental model rather than examined epidemiology in wild species (such as rats, guinea pigs, and rabbits) and those that only mentioned S. aureus within the discussion or otherwise rather than consisted of a study focused on S. aureus epidemiology in wildlife. This left 69 for analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of search strategy.

2.2. Full-Text Articles Excluded

Eighteen studies were included within the initial analysis but excluded from further analysis Table 1 due to lack of detail reported regarding the S. aureus detected. These studies included the identification of S. aureus in a white ibis in Egypt [12], captive bustards in the United Arab Emirates [13], a peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) in Spain [14], from “free living insectivores” including the common shrew, lesser shrew, bank vole, root vole, and field mouse [15]; S. aureus was reported in this study but were not typed nor reported which species were positive. In Brazil, an opossum with mastitis was described but neither molecular typing nor antibiotic resistance phenotype was provided [16]. Similarly, a systemic S. aureus infection in a raccoon was also reported but not further characterized [17]. A 2013 study suggests that S. aureus infection is an important skin disease of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in Great Britain [18], and a Canadian publication determined that S. aureus was a common organism found in bite wounds from Norway and Black rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus, respectively) [19], but no details were provided in either paper. S. aureus was also found along with other mecA-positive staphylococci in foxes in the United Kingdom, but samples were not typed [20]. S. aureus-positive Spanish Ibex (Capra pyrenaica hispanica) were identified in Spain but not typed or examined phenotypically [21]. A black rhinocerous (Diceros bicornis) in Kenya was reported to have an S. aureus infection (a possible cause of mortality) but also lacks details [22]. Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelson and Ovis canadensis mexicana) in Arizona were found to be colonized with S. aureus [23], but it was not characterized. S. aureus was identified in fecal samples taken from red deer in Poland [24] and from fecal samples from slaughtered reindeer in Finland and Norway [25] but was not further characterized. Finally, S. aureus was isolated from bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the southeastern United States, but it was not further characterized [26,27]. Multiple zoo animals in Belgium were tested for MRSA, but no positive samples were reported [28]. Schaumburg [29] was not included in Table 1 because species are not specific (monkey, goat, etc. rather than exact species types) but demonstrates some sharing of spa types between humans, domestic animals, and wildlife (more for the former than the latter).

Table 1.

Summary of wildlife data.

Animal Molecular Types Identified Antibiotic Resistance Identified Geographic Location Reference
(Species or Common Name +)
Small mammals Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) t034/ST398 OXA Canada [30,31,32,33]
Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) t008/ST8; t034/ST398; AMP, CEF, LEV, MOX, OXA, PEN, Q-D, RIF, TET, Canada [34]
t(new)/ST8;
t267/ST97;
t002/ST105
European rabbit t843/ST130 PEN, FOX * Spain [35]
t645/ST121, t738/ST121, t741/ST121, t272/ST121, t742/ST425, t745/ST425, t181/ST425 ND Europe (individual countries not provided) [36]
European hedgehog t386/ST1 PEN, FOX, ERY, CLII, STR Spain [35]
European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) t3256/ST130 OXA *, FOX, BLA Austria [37]
European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) t843/ST130 OXA * Sweden [38]
NT/ST130
Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) t843, t10751, t10893, t11015, t3391, t15312, t9111, t978 PEN, CEF *, FOX, OXA, GEN, TET, ERY, CLI, FUS, GEN Sweden [39]
Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) CC130, CC599 MRSA Germany, Austria [40]
Wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) t1535/ST1945 PEN, OXA *, FOX Spain [41]
NT/ST1956 none
t9303/ST2328 none
Common vole (Microtus arvalis) t120/ST15 PEN Spain [41]
NT/ST1956 none
t12365/ST1956 none
t12752/ST1956 none
t3750/ST2328 none
t12363/ST2328 none
t12364/ST2766 none
Brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) t12863/ST2767 Spain [41]
Brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) CC130 MSSA Germany [40]
Yellow-necked mouse t208/ST49, t4189/ST49, t1773/ST890, t843/ST130 ND Germany [42]
House mouse t843/ST130 ND Germany [42]
Bank vole t208/ST49, t4189/ST49 ND Germany [42]
Bank vole (Myodes glareolus) CC49, ST890, ST1959 MSSA Germany [40]
Common vole t1773/ST890, t15027/ST3252, t3058/ST3252, t3830/ST1956 ND Germany, Czech Republic [42]
Field vole t1736/ST890, t2311/ST88, t3830/ST1956 ND Germany [42]
Common shrew t9909/ST3033 ND Germany [42]
Rodents and shrews (various) ND OXA, RIF, AMP Slovakia [43]
European marmot (Marmota marmota) CC8, CC30 MSSA Austria [40]
Naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) t084/ST15 PEN, TET Germany [44]
Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) t208/ST49; t307/ST4286; t528/ST4310 PEN, CHL, FQ [44]
European beaver (Castor fiber) t3058/ST4614 Germany [44]
European pine marten (Martes martes), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), northern white-breasted hedgehog (Erinaceus roumanicus) t1635/ST8 (MRSA, marten) AMP, CTX, TET, FOX, ERY, OXA, CLI Poland [45]
European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) t843/ST130 OXA *, FOX, BLA Germany [37]
t10513/ST130 OXA *, FOX, BLA
European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) CC5, CC130, CC398, ST2425 MSSA (CC5, ST2425), MRSA (CC130, CC398) Germany, Sweden [40]
European otter (Lutra lutra) t4335/ST2620 OXA *, FOX, BLA Austria [37]
Fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) t1166 None United States (Iowa) [46]
Eastern cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus) t008 OXA, TET, ERY United States (Iowa) [46]
European beaver (Castor fiber) t4368/ST1959 none United States (Iowa) [46]
Black-flanked rock wallaby (Petrogale lateralis) CC15 AMP, PEN Australia [47]
CC49 none
Yellow-footed rock wallaby (Petrogale xanthopus) CC49 none Australia [47]
CC692
Mara (Dolichotis patagonum) t528/ST130 AMP, FOX * Denmark [48]
Mara t528/ST130, t1166/ST133, t7103/ST133 Denmark [49]
Banded mongoose t084/ST15, t984/ST1 Denmark [49]
Capybara t1166/ST133 Denmark [49]
European badger (Meles meles) CC25, ST425 MSSA Germany, Sweden [40]
Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) CC1, CC22, ST425, CC130, CC6, CC7, CC8 MSSA except for CC130 (MRSA) Germany, Austria, Sweden [40]
Lynx (Lynx lynx) CC2767 MSSA Sweden [40]
Wild cat (Felix silvestris) CC49, ST2693 MSSA Germany [40]
Bats Straw-colored fruit bat (Eidolon helvum) ST15, ST1725, ST1726, ST1727, ST2463, ST2464, ST2465, ST2466, ST2467, ST2470 PEN, ERY, CLI, CIP, FUS Nigeria [50]
Straw-colored fruit bat (Eidolon helvum) t16686/ST1725, t16693/ST1726, t16697/ST1726, t16701/ST1726, t16703/ST1726, t16704/ST1726, t16733/ST1726, t16696/ST1726, NT/ST3958, t16681/ST3958, t16696/ST3958, t16700/ST3959, t16687/ST3959, t16702/ST3959, t16695/ST4013, t16685/ST4043, t16756/ST4043, t15966/ST4047, t16683/ST3964 TET, PEN Nigeria [51]
Indian flying fox (Pteropus giganteus) t843/ST1245; t15865/ST4288 BLA * Germany [44]
Nathusius pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii) t164/ST389 Germany [44]
Egyptian fruit bat t084/ST15 Not reported Denmark [49]
Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) t15196/ST2984; t15197/ST3259; t15197/ST3301 None Gabon [52]
Peters’s dwarf epauletted fruit bat (Micropteropus pusillus) t15197/ST3302 None Gabon [52]
Large mammals Wild boar t1535/CC130, t7174/CC5, Spain [35]
t1534/CC522, t6386/CC425, t3750/ST2328, t11230/ST2328
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) t098/ST1, t127/ST1, t607/ST1, t1401/ST1, t2601/ST1, t11223/ST1, t548/ST5, t2516/ST5, t7174/ST5, t11210/ST5, t11214/ST5, t11219/ST5, t084/ST15, t11218/ST96, t6220/ST130, t3583/ST133, t10476/ST133, t11220/ST133, t189/ST188, t034/ST398, t742/ST425, t6909/ST425, t11222/ST425, t11225/ST425, t11232/ST425, t10712/ST1643, t3750/ST2328, t11227/ST2328, t11230/ST2328, t11229/ST2641, t359/ST2672, t11209/ST2675, t11502/ST2678, t015/ST2681, t6384/ST2682, t011/ST2729 PEN, CHL, TET, STR, TMP Spain [53]
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) t011/ST398, t127/ST1 OXA, TET, ERY, CLI Spain [54]
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) t11212/ST425 PEN, FOX * Spain [55]
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) t3750/ST3220, t1533/ST1, t1533/not identified, t298/not identified, not identified/ST3224, t14312/ST3223, t4311/ST3222, t10668/not identified, t3583/ST133, t3750/not identified, t1230/ST2328, t10712/ST1643, t11230/not identified, t899/ST398, t3750/ST2328, t1533/ST1 PEN, CLI, GEN, FUS, CIP, TET, FOX, OXA, LIN Portugal [56]
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) t127/ST1, t091/ST7, t14149/ST30, t021/ST30, t1773/ST890, t11226/ST3237, t1181/ST3369, t7674/ST425, t12042/ST425, t10855/ST425, t3389/ST425, t15002/ST425, t6092/ST425, t14149/ST425, t15001/ST425, t15000/ST3255, t1181/ST133, t3583/ST133, t742/ST425, t14999/ST425, t571/ST804 AMP, PEN, ERY Germany [57]
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) t6386/ST425, t1181/ST133, t6384/ST133, t6385/ST1643, t6386/ST425, t6782/ST425 None Germany [58]
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) CC59, CC133, ST425, CC9, CC97 MSSA Germany, Austria [40]
Red deer t1535/CC130, t1125/CC5, NT/ST130, t11225/CC425 PEN Spain [35]
Red deer (Cervus elaphus) t098/ST1, t127/ST1, t11223/ST1, t548/ST5, t11210/ST5, t342/ST30, t2678/ST133, t11215/ST350, t571/ST398, t1077/ST425, t6386/ST425, t6909/ST425, t11208/ST425, t11212/ST425, t11228/ST425, t11231/ST425, t528/ST522, t1534/ST522, t3576/ST522, t742/ST2640, t11211/ST2671, t11226/ST2671, t11233/ST2671, t015/ST2681, t11217/ST2681 PEN, SMX Spain [53]
Red deer (Cervus elaphus) t011/ST398 OXA, TET Spain [54]
Red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) t843/ST1945; PEN, OXA *, FOX Spain [59]
t1535/ST1945; PEN, OXA *, FOX
t2420/ST133 None
Red deer (Cervus elaphus) ST425 MSSA Germany, Austria [40]
Fallow deer t11212/ST425 PEN, FOX * Spain [55]
European mouflon t6056/ST133, t11233/ST3237 Spain [35]
Mouflon (Ovis orientalis) CC1, CC8 MSSA Germany, Austria [40]
Mongolian sheep (Ovis ammon f. aries) t1773/ST700 Germany [44]
Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) t032/ST22 BLA, FQ Germany [44]
Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) t15473/ST425 Germany [44]
African elephant (Loxodonta africana) t15467/ST4287 Germany [44]
African elephant (Loxodonta africana) USA300 OXA United States (California) [60]
African wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica) t011/ST4289 Germany [44]
Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica) t002/ST5, t1736/ST130, t3369/ST425, t528/ST581, t843/ST581, t1535/ST581, t3750/ST2328, t11501/ST2328, t11221/ST2637, t7229/ST2639, t11216/ST2639, t528/ST2673 PEN T1773/ST2712, SMX Spain [53]
Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica) t011/ST398, t1451/ST398 OXA, TET Spain [54]
Alpine chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) t1523/ST45, t1328/ST22, t1773/ST700 PEN, AMP, AMX, FOX, CIP, FQ, OXA Italy [61]
Chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) CC133 MSSA Sweden [40]
Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) t1773/ST2712 None Italy [61]
Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) ST425, ST133, CC97 MSSA Germany, Austria, Sweden [40]
Silka deer (Cervus nippon) ST3227 MSSA Germany [40]
Fallow deer (Dama dama) CC1, CC130 MSSA (CC1), MRSA (CC130) Germany [40]
Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) CC707, CC2767 MSSA Sweden [40]
Moose (Alces alces) CC15, CC97, ST2691 MSSA Sweden [40]
Dromedary camel (Camelus dromedaries) ST1755/CC152, CC6, CC30, CC188 ND United Arab Emirates [62]
Malayan tapir t3583/ST133 Not reported Denmark [49]
Pygmy goat t304/ST6, t2678/ST133 Not reported Denmark [49]
Lion t3583/ST133, t7104/ST133, t7355/ST133 Not reported Denmark [49]
Non-human primates Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) ST22, ST239 CIP, ERY, GEN, SXT, TET Nepal [63]
Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) OXA, PEN, TET, LVX, CIP South Korea [64]
Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) t189/ST188 PEN, CLI, ERY, GEN, CIP, SXT, MUP United States (New York) [65]
t4167/ST3862 PEN, FOX, GEN, CIP, TET, SXT, MUP
t4167/ST3862 PEN, FOX, GEN, CIP, TET, SXT
t16708/ST3862 PEN, FOX, GEN, CIP, TET, SXT
t16709/ST3862 PEN, FOX, GEN, CIP, SXT
t8397/ST3884 None
Rhesus macaque t15469/ST3268 PEN, OXA, TET, CIP United States (Washington) [66]
(Macaca mulatta)
Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) t091/ST7 Germany [44]
Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) t091/ST7 Germany [44]
Pooled samples from macaque species (Macaca fascicularis, M. mulatta, M. nemestrina) ST188 MRSA: No additional phenotypic testing United States (Washington) [67]
ST3268
ST226
Southern pig-tailed macaque t189/ST188 PEN, OXA, ERY, CLI, GEN, KAN, CIP United States (Washington) [66]
(Macaca nemestrina) t189/ST188 PEN, OXA, ERY, CLI, GEN, KAN, TET, CIP, BAC
t3887/ST188 PEN, OXA, ERY, CLI, GEN, CAN, CIP
t13638/ST3268 PEN, OXA, GEN, KAN, TET, CIP
t13638/ST3268 PEN, OXA, GEN, KAN, TET, CIP, BAC
Singaporean long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) t13638/ST3268 PEN, OXA, GEN, KAN, TET, CIP, BAC United States (Washington) [66]
Singaporean long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) ST3268 CIP, GEN, TET Singapore [68]
ST22 CIP, CLI, ERY
Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) Cameroon [69], molecular detection only
Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) t148/ST72 PEN, AMP Gabon [70]
Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) t6886/ST2074 Gabon [71]
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) t148/ST72 PEN, AMP Gabon [70]
t56/ND Pan-susceptible
t5017/ND
Chimpanzee t008, t818, t024, t197, t2030, t9141, t682, t6172 (all USA300/ST8); t116, t1754 Only MRSA collected United States (Texas) [72]
Chimpanzee t7099/ST188 Not reported Denmark [49]
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) t6962/ST9; t127/ST1; t6963/ST1; t6960/ST601; t7821/ST1782; t6961/ST1856; t6964/ST1928; & Côte d’Ivoire [71]
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) t934/ST80; t189/ST188; t084/ST2126; t1247/ST2168; t2864/ST2178; t2360/ST6; t355/ST152; t11391/ST1292 TET, PEN, SXT Uganda [73]
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) t127/ST1; t1931/ST1; t6963/ST1; t015/ST45; t11388/ST601; t6960/ST601; t6964/ST1928; t11390/ST2603; t11389/ST2621 PEN Côte d’Ivoire [73]
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) t304/ST2020; PEN Zambia, Uganda [74]
t279/ST15; PEN, TET
t7723/ST15; PEN
t084/ST2126; PEN
t1247/ST2168; PEN
t2864/ST2178; PEN, ERY, CLI, SXT, TET
t934/ST80; TET
t7722/ST101; PEN, TET
t224/ST1948 PEN, TET
King colobus (Colobus polykomos) t127/ST1 & Côte d’Ivoire [71]
Western red colobus (Piliocolobus badius) t6623/ST2023; t6626/ST2058; NT/ST2059; t6622/ST2072; t6621/NT; t6624/NT; t6625/NT & Côte d’Ivoire [71]
Greater spot-nose monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans) t3636/ST1; t934/ST1855; t6531/ST1854; t6533/ST1872; t6696/ST1873; t6697/ST1874; t7393/ST2067; t6715/ST2071; t6331/NT; t6529/NT; t6747/NT & Gabon [71]
Grey-cheeked mangabey (Lophocebus albigena) t6530/ST1838; t6534/ST1851; t2768/ST1852 & Gabon [71]
Gabon talapoin (Miopithecus ogouensis) t6532/ST1853 & Gabon [71]
Red-tailed monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius) t6695/ST1857; t6705/ST2022; & Gabon [71]
Moustached guenon (Cercopithecus cephus) t6533/ST1872 & Gabon [71]
Mandrillus sp. t6747/NT & Gabon [71]
Red-fronted lemur (Eulemur rufifrons) and Verraux’s sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi) t10694/ST1; t127/ST1; t493/ST182; t189/ST188; t10695/ST2435; t1429/ST2436 PEN Madagascar [73]
Birds Cinereous vulture t011/ST398, t843/ST1945, t843/ST1571, t1535/ST1945, t267/ST97, t5998/ST425 PEN, FOX, ERY, CLI, TET Spain [75]
Magpie t843/ST1583, t843/ST1945, t843/ST1581 PEN, FOX Spain [75]
Common magpie (Pica pica) CC692 MSSA Sweden [40]
Rook (Corvus frugilegus) CC15, CC88, ST1, ST22 MSSA (CC15, CC88), MRSA (ST1, ST22) Austria [40]
Great tit (Parus major) CC692 MSSA Sweden [40]
Blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) t1535/ST130 Germany [44]
Black swan (Cygnus atratus) t1166/ST3269 Germany [44]
Mute swan (Cygnus olor) CC133 MSSA Sweden [40]
White-face whistling duck (Dendrocygna viduata) t1166/ST3269; t15307/ST133 Germany [44]
TET
Baikal teal (Sibirionetta formosa) t15307/ST133 [44]
White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) t1422/ST692 Germany [44]
Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) CC97, CC692 MSSA Sweden [40]
White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) CC692 MSSA Sweden [40]
Red kite (Milvus milvus) t14745/ST692 Germany [44]
White stork (Ciconia ciconia) t1818/ST5; t1166/ST133; t6384/ST2682; t6606/ST2377; t571/ST398; t012/ST667; t002/ST5; t688/CC5; t126/CC5; t209/CC5; t045/CC5; t015/ST3060; t843/ST3061; t091/ST7; t011/ST398; t3625/ST398; t774/CC5; t005/CC22; t012/CC30; t216/CC59; t14445/ST22 PEN, TET, CHL, ERY, STR, CLII, FUS, OXA *, FOX (various isolates) Spain [76]
Common buzzard (Buteo buteo) t012/ST30 PEN, TET, CHL Portugal [77]
Common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) t6293 OXA * Scotland [78]
Lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes) t002 OXA, ERY, CLI, LEV United States (Iowa) [46]
Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) t4735 none United States (Iowa) [46]
Tawny owl (Strix aluco) CC692 MSSA Sweden [40]
Great blue heron (Ardea herodias) t2603 none United States (Iowa) [46]
Rock pigeon (Columba livia) t4634/ST2018 TET, hGISA United States (Iowa) [46]
t1059 none
Screech owl (Megascops spp.) t094 TET United States (Iowa) [46]
Eurasian griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) t7304/ST133 none Spain [53]
Eurasian griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) t011/ST398 OXA, TET Spain [54]
Grey partridge (Perdix perdix) CC5 MSSA Sweden [40]
Green woodpecker (Picus viridis) CC692 MSSA Sweden [40]
Canada goose (Branta canadensis) t002/ST5; PEN United States (Ohio) [79]
t688/ST5 PEN
too8/ST8; PEN, OXA, ERY
t127/ST8 PEN, OXA, ERY
t008/ST8; PEN
t2595/ST8; PEN, OXA, ERY
t1149/ST291; PEN
t1451/ST398; PEN, ERY, CLI
t15031/ST2111 PEN
Fish and marine mammals Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) OXA Malaysia [80]
Dolphin t002/USA100 OXA North America [81]
Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) CC12 MSSA Sweden [40]
Walrus t002/USA100 OXA North America [81]

Table 1: Abbreviations: PEN: penicillin; OXA: oxacillin; FOX: cefoxitin; ERY: erythromycin; CLI: clindamycin; STR: streptomycin; KAN: kanamycin; BAC: benzalkonium chloride; RIF: rifampicin; AMP: ampicillin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; GEN: gentamicin; SXT: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxalzole; TMP: trimethoprim; SMX: sulfamethoxazole, LVX: levofloxacin; AMX: amoxicillin; IPM: imipenem; CFZ: cefazolin; FUS: fusidic acid; BLA: β-lactams; CHL: chloramphenicol; Q-D: quinupristin-dalfopristin; FQ: fluroquinolones; hGISA: heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus. I: inducible resistance. *: resistance due to mecC gene ND: not determined. NT: non-typeable. +: species name only provided if listed in publication. & All isolates noted to be susceptible to penicillin, methicillin, aminoglycosides, fluroquinolones, macrolides, lincosamides, nitrofurantoin, Fosfomycin, rifampicin, tetracycline, cotrimoxazole, vancomycin.

2.3. Molecular Types

An examination of the molecular types found in wildlife demonstrates an extensive diversity of types of S. aureus. However, some broad conclusions can be suggested. Though comparisons across publications are difficult due to divergent methodology of sampling, testing, and geography, Figure 2 illustrates the most common molecular types, according to the total count publications identifying them. These molecular types include a mix of human pandemic types (ST5, ST8, ST1, ST30, ST22) [82] and molecular types that have been more commonly described in animals or at the animal–human interface (ST398, ST130, ST133, ST425) [83,84].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Molecular types identified in multiple papers and associated species. Sources of photos are included in Appendix A.

3. Discussion

This review demonstrates a significant amount of diversity in Staphylococcus aureus sampled from a wide variety of wildlife species across several continents. Populations of S. aureus present in wildlife may serve as reservoirs that could be transmitted to nearby domestic livestock or poultry or directly or indirectly to humans. Such a reservoir of S. aureus in the environment may also contribute to the exchange of antibiotic resistance or virulence genes among human or animal S. aureus, potentially leading to novel strains.

The continuing encroachment of humans into animal spaces due to agriculture, deforestation, climate change can lead to “spillovers” of pathogens from one species to another [85]. Most commonly we examine this with wildlife as a reservoir and humans as the affected species (e.g., Ebola, Nipah, MERS, SARS). However, transmission may also occur in reverse, with humans seeding wildlife with pathogens [86,87]. In the case of S. aureus, it appears both may be occurring, as has been previously documented among livestock [9]. In the case of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, such bidirectional transmission may be direct, via contact between human and animal species. More likely in the case of wildlife species, transmission may be indirect, such as via environmental reservoirs of pathogens including water sources, soil, exposure to manure, air, and contact with contaminated fomites [88,89]. Transmission may also occur due to consumption of meat products contaminated with S. aureus, but sampling wildlife meat products is exceedingly difficult and has not been done in a systematic manner. Meat products from livestock are a potential way that livestock-associated strains of S. aureus may spread from farms to communities [1,89], but the impact of meat from wildlife sources (including various deer species and wild boar) which may play a role in transmission of S. aureus bacteria or resistant genes is less clear.

While few studies reviewed here examine the environment and wildlife at the same time, a study by Porrero et al. [90] found mecC-positive S. aureus in river water after the area had been found to be positive for ST425-mecC in wild boar and fallow deer at the same location [54], suggesting a shared source of exposure or transmission between the various animal species and/or the environment.

Indeed, ST425 is a dominant molecular type that was found in wildlife papers. It does not appear to have a particular host specificity, with isolation reported from mammals including rabbits [35], boar [35,40,53,55,57,58], red deer [35,40,54], and roe deer [40,44] and from vultures [75] (see also Table 1 and Figure 1); these were found exclusively in European countries. The significance of this finding is currently unknown. ST425 isolates are known to be zoonotic, and have been described as a human colonizer as well, and its ability to cross species barriers may facilitate transmission of resistance genes, including mecC [11]. Other key molecular types present in a wide variety of species included ST398 in Norway rats [30,31,32,33,34], brown hare [40], boar [53,54,56], red deer [53,54], Iberian ibex [54], vulture [75], white stork [76], Eurasian griffon vulture [54], and Canada goose [79] and ST130/CC130, found in a rabbit [35], hedgehog [37,38,40], wood mouse [41], brown rat [40], yellow-necked mouse [42], house mouse [42], brown hare [37,40], mara [48,49], red fox [40], boar [35,55], red deer [35,59], Iberian ibex [53], fallow deer [40], and blue-winged teal [44]. The latter includes a large number of small animals and rodents, suggesting these may be an important reservoir in addition to livestock [91], and ST398 is a known colonizer of humans, particularly those with livestock contact [84]. Colonization may result in transmission of antibiotic resistance genes between species, while ST398 is also capable of causing a wide range of infections in humans [92].

Interestingly, bats and non-human primates seem to have little overlap with other animal strains. Bat molecular types consisted primarily of newly identified spa and/or MLST, though ST15 was reported twice—in a straw-colored fruit bat in Nigeria, and a captive Egyptian fruit bat sampled in Denmark [49,50].

For primate S. aureus, the papers reviewed here represent a mix of primates raised in captivity (including zoos and research facilities) and those sampled in sanctuaries and parks. As such, intensity of contact with humans who may be carrying typical human strains of S. aureus varies widely, and the importance of cross-species transmission remains in debate. Human-to-primate transmission was suggested in a study of wild primates MRSA in Nepal [63] and primates in Gabon [70]. The reverse was suggested by examination of an ST3268 strain found in macaques in primate research facilities in Singapore [68] and the United States [66,67]; this molecular type was also found in macaques in a New York research facility [65], suggesting the need for screening of animals prior to export/import. While most reports suggest preponderance of primate-associated strains, testing in a Texas facility found that their animals were colonized primarily with USA300/ST8 strains, which are common in humans and suggestive of human-to-animal transmission. However, workers at the facility were not tested for carriage [72].

Though S. aureus strains were typically taken as colonizers from healthy animals, several primates were actively infected with S. aureus. A gorilla in a primate center in Gabon was found to have a large lesion on his back; the gorilla died suddenly, and autopsy also found S. aureus in tissue samples; all were spa type t148 [70]. Though this is a human-associated strain, sampling of caretakers did not show any colonized humans involved in the animal’s care. In the Washington state facility, S. aureus was cultured from the wounds of two macaques, but both were likely primate strains (t15469/ST3268 and t13638/ST3268) [66]. Another publication from Korea documented a macaque with an acute necrotic lesion caused by MRSA, but molecular typing was not carried out [64].

How may exposure to human pathogens, including S. aureus, in great ape populations affect release of them back into wild from captivity? This is addressed in several publications, suggesting that primates from captivity may pose a risk to their wild brethren [74] due to carriage of organisms such as drug-resistant S. aureus. Others argue release still should be possible but caregivers should be screened, and those positive for S. aureus carriage should not have contact with infant apes, and post-release monitoring of animals should include screening for this bacterium [93]. This may be difficult given the high level of carriage found in wild primates (up to 100% of chimpanzees tested and 72% of lemurs) [73].

While most studies examined asymptomatic colonization of wildlife, in some reports, such as those from captive zoo animals ([44]), a number of clinical infections could be examined. These infections included abscesses, bacteremia, bite wounds, and dermatitis, among other conditions. Common animal-associated lineages were found, including CC130, CC133, and bacteremia caused by CC398 in an African wildcat. There was considerable diversity among the infection isolates, though a few did share spa or ST/CC types including two cases of t208/ST49/CC49 infections in red squirrels, two cases of t1166/ST3269/CC133 infections in a black swan and white-face whistling duck, and two cases of t15307/ST133/CC133 in another white-face whistling duck and a Baikal teal. This again suggests the potential for exposure to a contaminated environmental source for some of these animals, including water or other shared habitats within the facility.

Other captivity-based studies document the potential for bidirectional transmission between humans and animals in these facilities. In the San Diego zoo, a MRSA outbreak was noted in 2008, with pustules documented on both an elephant calf and three caretakers. Twenty total caretakers were infected over the next month, and the calf was euthanized. Investigation determined that the calf’s infection with MRSA type USA300 likely came from a colonized caretaker, as the other elephants tested were colonization-negative [60].

Isolates examined in collected studies include methicillin-resistant and methicillin -susceptibile S. aureus. This testing included a mix of phenotypic and molecular methods, with some studies employing both. With the discovery of mecC [11,94], some early papers examining phenotypic testing alone should be looked at with some skepticism, as mecC-positive S. aureus isolates do not always show up as MRSA phenotypically, which can hinder the detection of mecC-carrying isolates [55]. Indeed, wildlife may be a key reservoir for mecC, as its presence was noted in a number of European reports (see Table 1). Interestingly, mecC has not been reported in any isolates originating in the United States to date.

There are a number of limitations to this review. Sampling was concentrated in a small number of countries and a relatively limited number of animal species have been sampled in different geographic areas, making large-scale comparisons difficult. Sampling techniques and anatomical locations tested within animal species vary among research groups. Most studies employed some sort of live animal swabbing (of noses, throats, skin, cloaca, etc.), but several used feces or scat instead of live animal testing. The studies also differed significantly in molecular and antibiotic resistance testing reported, making generalizations across publications difficult. Access to many animal species is also likely a function of convenience rather than a systematic sampling of all organisms in a particular environment, leading to over-representation of some animals relative to their abundance and an under-representation of others. Additional sampling should be carried out in order to examine the continued evolution of S. aureus in wildlife, and to track any strains that may have an increased propensity for zoonotic spread and threat to human health.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Eligibility Criteria

Studies that reported the presence of S. aureus (methicillin-resistant or susceptible) in any species of wildlife were eligible for inclusion.

4.2. Information Sources and Search Strategies

PubMed, Web of Science, and peer-reviewed materials within ProQuest databases were searched in May 2019 to identify eligible studies. The following search terms were used “MRSA OR Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus OR Staphylococcus aureus AND wildlife.” Reference lists of the identified studies were also checked for additional studies. “Wildlife” was defined as wild animals but also captive animals who would typically be wild (such as zoo elephants) and those on nature preserves. Captive animals used as livestock or poultry or otherwise farmed or used as pets or work animals were also excluded. Articles were limited to English language only. Articles were examined and duplicate articles were removed.

Titles and abstracts were examined and articles were retained when there was evidence of S. aureus colonization or infection reported within wildlife species as defined above. Citations which included information on S. aureus antibiotic resistance and/or molecular typing were included in Table 1 and were grouped by animal species type.

Appendix A

Table A1.

Picture credits.

Norway Rat: Wikipedia Commons
Wild Boar: Michael Gäbler, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=18023043
Iberian Ibex: Juan Lacruz-Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=23442996
Cinereous Vulture: Petr Hamerník-Zoo Praha, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=81533005
White Stork: Richard Bartz-Own work, CC BY-SA 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6587475
Eurasian Griffon: Arindam Aditya—Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=49792446
European Marten: Green Yoshi-Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=20147023
Red Fox: normalityrelief—https://www.flickr.com/photos/normalityrelief/5301299623/in/faves-137790805@N06/, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79116814
European Marmot: Böhringer Friedrich-Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0 at, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=22314301
Mouflon: Alexandre Prévot- Flickr: Mouflon de Corse, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=21965145
City Hedgehog: Hedera.baltica from Wrocław, Poland—City hedgehog, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=43379464
Yellow-Necked Mouse: Donald Hobern from Copenhagen, Denmark—Apodemus flavicollis, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=74666734
House Mouse: Bolid74-Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=44601165
Fallow Deer: Johann-Nikolaus Andreae-originally posted to Flickr as p9036717.jpg, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=46563187
Blue-Winged Teal: Mike’s Birds from Riverside, CA, US-Blue-winged teal, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=81471841
European Badger: Kallerna-Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=20438656
Roe Deer: Bobspicturebox-Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9384844
Moose: XAlexandraS-Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=45694439
Egyptian Fruit Bat: Eggybird-https://www.flickr.com/photos/eggybird/103161513/, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79181194
Capybara: By VigilancePrime at English Wikipedia, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3240452

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.C.S.; Data extraction: T.C.S., C.J.H., G.R.G., L.D.S., and V.P.; Formal analysis: T.C.S.; Original draft preparation: T.C.S.; Writing—review and editing: T.C.S., C.J.H., G.R.G., L.D.S., and V.P.; Visualization: T.C.S. and C.J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Kadariya J., Smith T.C., Thapaliya D. Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: An ongoing challenge in public health. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:827965. doi: 10.1155/2014/827965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith T.C., Moritz E.D., Leedom Larson K.R., Ferguson D.D. The environment as a factor in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Rev. Environ. Health. 2010;25:121–134. doi: 10.1515/REVEH.2010.25.2.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haag A.F., Fitzgerald J.R., Penades J.R. Staphylococcus aureus in Animals. Gram-Posit. Pathog. 2019;7:731–746. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0060-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chambers H.F., Deleo F.R. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:629–641. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chambers H.F. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001;7:178–182. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fluit A.C. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012;18:735–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03846.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sundin G.W., Wang N. Antibiotic Resistance in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018;56:161–180. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cabello F.C. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;8:1137–1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Price L.B., Stegger M., Hasman H., Aziz M., Larsen J., Andersen P.S., Pearson, Waters A.E., Foster J.T., Schupp J., et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio. 2012;3:e00305. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lowder B.V., Guinane C.M., Ben Zakour N.L., Weinert L.A., Conway-Morris A., Cartwright R.A., Simpson A.J., Rambaut A., Nübel U., Fitzgerald J.R. Recent human-to-poultry host jump, adaptation, and pandemic spread of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:19545–19550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909285106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garcia-Alvarez L., Holden M.T., Lindsay H., Webb C.R., Brown D.F., Curran M.D., Walpole E., Brooks K., Pickard D.J., Teale C., et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: A descriptive study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011;11:595–603. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Awad-Alla M.E., Abdien H.M., Dessouki A.A. Prevalence of bacteria and parasites in White Ibis in Egypt. Vet. Ital. 2010;46:277–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Silvanose C.D., Bailey T.A., Naldo J.L., Howlett J.C. Bacterial flora of the conjunctiva and nasal cavity in normal and diseased captive bustards. Avian Dis. 2001;45:447–451. doi: 10.2307/1592986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vidal A., Baldoma L., Molina-Lopez R.A., Martin M., Darwich L. Microbiological diagnosis and antimicrobial sensitivity profiles in diseased free-living raptors. Avian Pathol. 2017;46:442–450. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2017.1304529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hauschild T., Slizewski P., Masiewicz P. Species distribution of staphylococci from small wild mammals. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;33:457–460. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Siqueira D.B., Aessio F.M., Mota R.A., Marvulo M.F., Mauffrey J.F., Monteiro S.R., Farias R.C., Cunha R.C., Oliveira R.L., Souza T.C., et al. Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in a white-eared opossum (Didelphis albiventris) in the Atlantic Forest of northeast Brazil. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2010;41:526–529. doi: 10.1638/2009-0079.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hamir A.N. Systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a free-ranging raccoon (Procyon lotor) J. Wildl. Dis. 2010;46:665–668. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-46.2.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Simpson V.R., Hargreaves J., Butler H.M., Davison N.J., Everest D.J. Causes of mortality and pathological lesions observed post-mortem in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in Great Britain. BMC Vet. Res. 2013;9:229. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Himsworth C.G., Zabek E., Tang P., Parsons K.L., Koehn M., Jardine C.M., Patrick D.M. Bacteria isolated from conspecific bite wounds in Norway and black rats: Implications for rat bite-associated infections in people. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:94–100. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carson M., Meredith A.L., Shaw D.J., Giotis E.S., Lloyd D.H., Loeffler A. Foxes as a potential wildlife reservoir for mecA-positive Staphylococci. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:583–587. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gonzalez-Candela M., Cubero-Pablo M.J., Martin-Atance P., Leon-Vizcaino L. Potential pathogens carried by Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica hispanica) in southern Spain. J. Wildl. Dis. 2006;42:325–334. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-42.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clausen B., Ashford W.A. Bacteriologic survey of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) J. Wildl. Dis. 1980;16:475–480. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-16.4.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marshall M.M., Songer J.G., Chilelli C.J., deVos J.C. Isolations of aerobic bacteria from wild desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni and, O. c. mexicana) in Arizona. J. Wildl. Dis. 1983;19:98–100. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-19.2.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gnat S., Troscianczyk A., Nowakiewicz A., Majer-Dziedzic B., Ziolkowska G., Dziedzic R., Ziółkowska G., Dziedzic R., Zięba P., Teodorowski O. Experimental studies of microbial populations and incidence of zoonotic pathogens in the faeces of red deer (Cervus elaphus) Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;61:446–452. doi: 10.1111/lam.12471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Laaksonen S., Oksanen A., Julmi J., Zweifel C., Fredriksson-Ahomaa M., Stephan R. Presence of foodborne pathogens, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase -producing Enterobacteriaceae, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in slaughtered reindeer in northern Finland and Norway. Acta Vet. Scand. 2017;59:2. doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0272-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stewart J.R., Townsend F.I., Lane S.M., Dyar E., Hohn A.A., Rowles T.K., Staggs L.A., Wells R.S., Balmer B.C., Schwacke L.H. Survey of antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in the southeastern USA. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2014;108:91–102. doi: 10.3354/dao02705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morris P.J., Johnson W.R., Pisani J., Bossart G.D., Adams J., Reif J.S., Fair P.A. Isolation of culturable microorganisms from free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the southeastern United States. Vet. Microbiol. 2010;148:440–447. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vercammen F., Bauwens L., De Deken R., Brandt J. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in mammals of the Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Belgium. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2012;43:159–161. doi: 10.1638/2010-0107.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schaumburg F., Pauly M., Anoh E., Mossoun A., Wiersma L., Schubert G., Flammen A., Alabi A.S., Muyembe-Tamfum J.J., Grobusch M.P., et al. Staphylococcus aureus complex from animals and humans in three remote African regions. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015;21:345. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rothenburger J.L., Himsworth C.G., Nemeth N.M., Pearl D.L., Jardine C.M. Environmental Factors Associated with the Carriage of Bacterial Pathogens in Norway Rats. EcoHealth. 2018;15:82–95. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1313-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rothenburger J.L., Rousseau J.D., Weese J.S., Jardine C.M. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from Ontario swine farms. Can. J. Vet. Res. Rev. Can. Rech. Vet. 2018;82:66–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rothenburger J.L., Himsworth C.G., La Perle K.M.D., Leighton F.A., Nemeth N.M., Treuting P.M., Jardine C.M. Pathology of wild Norway rats in Vancouver, Canada. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2019;31:184–199. doi: 10.1177/1040638719833436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lee M.J., Byers K.A., Donovan C.M., Zabek E., Stephen C., Patrick D.M., Himsworth C.G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in urban Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) populations: Epidemiology and the impacts of kill-trapping. Zoonoses Public Health. 2019;66:343–348. doi: 10.1111/zph.12546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Himsworth C.G., Miller R.R., Montoya V., Hoang L., Romney M.G., Al-Rawahi G.N., Kerr T., Jardine C.M., Patrick D.M., Tang P., et al. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by wild urban Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e87983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ruiz-Ripa L., Alcala L., Simon C., Gomez P., Mama O.M., Rezusta A., Zarazaga M., Torres C. Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus clones in wild mammals in Aragon, Spain, with detection of MRSA ST130-mecC in wild rabbits. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019;127:284–291. doi: 10.1111/jam.14301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vancraeynest D., Haesebrouck F., Deplano A., Denis O., Godard C., Wildemauwe C., Hermans K. International dissemination of a high virulence rabbit Staphylococcus aureus clone. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health. 2006;53:418–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00977.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Loncaric I., Kubber-Heiss A., Posautz A., Stalder G.L., Hoffmann D., Rosengarten R., Walzer C. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. carrying the mecC gene, isolated from wildlife. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013;68:2222–2225. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Monecke S., Gavier-Widen D., Mattsson R., Rangstrup-Christensen L., Lazaris A., Coleman D.C., Shore A.C., Ehricht R. Detection of mecC-positive Staphylococcus aureus (CC130-MRSA-XI) in diseased European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in Sweden. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bengtsson B., Persson L., Ekstrom K., Unnerstad H.E., Uhlhorn H., Borjesson S. High occurrence of mecC-MRSA in wild hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in Sweden. Vet. Microbiol. 2017;207:103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Monecke S., Gavier-Widen D., Hotzel H., Peters M., Guenther S., Lazaris A., Loncaric I., Muller E., Reissig A., Ruppelt-Lorz A., et al. Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in European Wildlife. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0168433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gomez P., Gonzalez-Barrio D., Benito D., Garcia J.T., Vinuela J., Zarazaga M., Ruiz-Fons F., Torres C. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying the mecC gene in wild small mammals in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014;69:2061–2064. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mrochen D.M., Schulz D., Fischer S., Jeske K., El Gohary H., Reil D., Imholt C., Trube P., Suchomel J., Tricaud E., et al. Wild rodents and shrews are natural hosts of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018;308:590–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kmet V., Cuvalova A., Stanko M. Small mammals as sentinels of antimicrobial-resistant staphylococci. Folia Microbiol. 2018;63:665–668. doi: 10.1007/s12223-018-0594-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fessler A.T., Thomas P., Muhldorfer K., Grobbel M., Brombach J., Eichhorn I., Monecke S., Ehricht R., Shwartz S. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from zoo and wild animals. Vet. Microbiol. 2018;218:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nowakiewicz A., Ziolkowska G., Zieba P., Gnat S., Wojtanowicz-Markiewicz K., Troscianczyk A. Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus isolated from wildlife: Identification, molecular characterization and evaluation of resistance profiles with focus on a methicillin-resistant strain. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016;44:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wardyn S.E., Kauffman L.K., Smith T.C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in central Iowa wildlife. J. Wildl. Dis. 2012;48:1069–1073. doi: 10.7589/2011-10-295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen M.M.S., Monecke S., Brown M.H. Clonal diversity of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus from South Australian wallabies. One Health. 2016;2:31–32. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Espinosa-Gongora C., Harrison E.M., Moodley A., Guardabassi L., Holmes M.A. MRSA carrying mecC in captive mara. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015;70:1622–1624. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Espinosa-Gongora C., Chrobak D., Moodley A., Bertelsen M.F., Guardabassi L. Occurrence and distribution of Staphylococcus aureus lineages among zoo animals. Vet. Microbiol. 2012;158:228–231. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Akobi B., Aboderin O., Sasaki T., Shittu A. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from faecal samples of the Straw-Coloured Fruit Bat (Eidolon helvum) in Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Olatimehin A., Shittu A.O., Onwugamba F.C., Mellmann A., Becker K., Schaumburg F. Staphylococcus aureus Complex in the Straw-Colored Fruit Bat (Eidolon helvum) in Nigeria. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:162. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Held J., Gmeiner M., Mordmuller B., Matsiegui P.B., Schaer J., Eckerle I., Weber N., Matuschewski K., Bletz S., Schaumburg F. Bats are rare reservoirs of Staphylococcus aureus complex in Gabon. Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 2017;47:118–120. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Porrero M.C., Mentaberre G., Sanchez S., Fernandez-Llario P., Casas-Diaz E., Mateos A., Vidal D., Lavin S., Fernández-Garayzábal J.-F., Dominguez L. Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus by free-living wild animals in Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80:4865–4870. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00647-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Porrero M.C., Mentaberre G., Sanchez S., Fernandez-Llario P., Gomez-Barrero S., Navarro-Gonzalez N., Serrano E., Casas-Diaz E., Marco I., Fernández-Garayzabal J.-F., et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in different free-living wild animal species in Spain. Vet. J. 2013;198:127–130. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Porrero M.C., Valverde A., Fernandez-Llario P., Diez-Guerrier A., Mateos A., Lavin S., Canton R., Fernández-Garayzabal J.-F., Dominguez L. Staphylococcus aureus carrying mecC gene in animals and urban wastewater, Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:899–901. doi: 10.3201/eid2005.130426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sousa M., Silva N., Manageiro V., Ramos S., Coelho A., Goncalves D., Caniça M., Torres C., Igrejas G., Poeta P. First report on MRSA CC398 recovered from wild boars in the north of Portugal. Are we facing a problem? Sci. Total Environ. 2017;596–597:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Seinige D., Von Altrock A., Kehrenberg C. Genetic diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from wild boars. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017;54:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Meemken D., Blaha T., Hotzel H., Strommenger B., Klein G., Ehricht R., Monecke S., Kehrenberg Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from wild boars. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:1739–1742. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03189-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gomez P., Lozano C., Gonzalez-Barrio D., Zarazaga M., Ruiz-Fons F., Torres C. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying the mecC gene in a semi-extensive red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) farm in Southern Spain. Vet. Microbiol. 2015;177:326–331. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.CDC Prevention. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections from an elephant calf-San Diego, California, 2008. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2009;58:194–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Luzzago C., Locatelli C., Franco A., Scaccabarozzi L., Gualdi V., Vigano R., Sironi G., Besozzi M., Castiglioni B., Lanfranchi P., et al. Clonal diversity, virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from nasal cavities and soft tissue infections in wild ruminants in Italian Alps. Vet. Microbiol. 2014;170:157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Monecke S., Ehricht R., Slickers P., Wernery R., Johnson B., Jose S., Wernery U. Microarray-based genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from camels. Vet. Microbiol. 2011;150:309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Roberts M.C., Joshi P.R., Greninger A.L., Melendez D., Paudel S., Acharya M., Kishor Bimali N., Koju N.P., No D., Chalise M., et al. The human clone ST22 SCCmec IV methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from swine herds and wild primates in Nepal: Is man the common source? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018;94:fiy052. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lee J.I., Kim K.S., Oh B.C., Kim N.A., Kim I.H., Park C.G., Kim S.J. Acute necrotic stomatitis (noma) associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a newly acquired rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) J. Med. Primatol. 2011;40:188–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2011.00470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pardos de la Gandara M., Diaz L., Euler C.W., Chung M., Gonzalez A., Cheleuitte C., Freiwald W., Tomasz A., Fischetti V.A., de Lencastre H., et al. Staphylococcus aureus Infecting and Colonizing Experimental Animals, Macaques, in a Research Animal Facility. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019;25:54–62. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Roberts M.C., Fessler A.T., Monecke S., Ehricht R., No D., Schwarz S. Molecular Analysis of Two Different MRSA Clones ST188 and ST3268 From Primates (Macaca spp.) in a United States Primate Center. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2199. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Soge O.O., No D., Michael K.E., Dankoff J., Lane J., Vogel K., Smedley J., Roberts M.C. Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016;71:2798–2803. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hsu L.Y., Holden M.T.G., Koh T.H., Pettigrew K.A., Cao D., Hon P.Y., Sergio D.M., Pena E., Ogden B.E. ST3268: A geographically widespread primate MRSA clone. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72:2401–2403. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bittar F., Keita M.B., Lagier J.C., Peeters M., Delaporte E., Raoult D. Gorilla gorilla gorilla gut: A potential reservoir of pathogenic bacteria as revealed using culturomics and molecular tools. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:7174. doi: 10.1038/srep07174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nagel M., Dischinger J., Turck M., Verrier D., Oedenkoven M., Ngoubangoye B., Le Flohic G., Drexler J.F., Bierbaum G., Goonzalez J.P. Human-associated Staphylococcus aureus strains within great ape populations in Central Africa (Gabon) Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013;19:1072–1077. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schaumburg F., Alabi A.S., Kock R., Mellmann A., Kremsner P.G., Boesch C., Becker K., Leendertz F.H., Peters G. Highly divergent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from African non-human primates. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2012;4:141–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hanley P.W., Barnhart K.F., Abee C.R., Lambeth S.P., Weese J.S. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prevalence among Captive Chimpanzees. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;21:2158–2160. doi: 10.3201/eid2112.142004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schaumburg F., Mugisha L., Kappeller P., Fichtel C., Kock R., Kondgen S., Becker K., Boesch C., Peters G., Leendertz F. Evaluation of non-invasive biological samples to monitor Staphylococcus aureus colonization in great apes and lemurs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78046. doi: 10.1371/annotation/c2148f4d-866d-479a-b0e6-97aa6ab931f6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Schaumburg F., Mugisha L., Peck B., Becker K., Gillespie T.R., Peters G., Leendertz F.H. Drug-resistant human Staphylococcus aureus in sanctuary apes pose a threat to endangered wild ape populations. Am. J. Primatol. 2012;74:1071–1075. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ruiz-Ripa L., Gomez P., Alonso C.A., Camacho M.C., de la Puente J., Fernandez-Fernandez R., Ramiro Y., Quivedo M.A., Blanco J.M., Zarazaga M., et al. Detection of MRSA of Lineages CC130-mecC and CC398-mecA and Staphylococcus delphini-lnu(A) in Magpies and Cinereous Vultures in Spain. Microb. Ecol. 2019;78:409–415. doi: 10.1007/s00248-019-01328-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gomez P., Lozano C., Camacho M.C., Lima-Barbero J.F., Hernandez J.M., Zarazaga M., Hofle U., Torres C. Detection of MRSA ST3061-t843-mecC and ST398-t011-mecA in white stork nestlings exposed to human residues. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016;71:53–57. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sousa M., Silva N., Igrejas G., Silva F., Sargo R., Alegria N., Benito D., Gomez P., Lozano C., Gomez-Sanz E., et al. Antimicrobial resistance determinants in Staphylococcus spp. recovered from birds of prey in Portugal. Vet. Microbiol. 2014;171:436–440. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Robb A., Pennycott T., Duncan G., Foster G. Staphylococcus aureus carrying divergent mecA homologue (mecA LGA251) isolated from a free-ranging wild bird. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;162:300–301. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Thapaliya D., Dalman M., Kadariya J., Little K., Mansell V., Taha M.Y., Grenier D., Smith T.C. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in Goose Feces from State Parks in Northeast Ohio. Ecohealth. 2017;14:303–309. doi: 10.1007/s10393-017-1227-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Atyah M.A., Zamri-Saad M., Siti-Zahrah A. First report of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from cage-cultured tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Vet. Microbiol. 2010;144:502–504. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Faires M., Gehring E., Mergl J., Weese J. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Marine Mammals. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009;15:2071–2072. doi: 10.3201/eid1512.090220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Monecke S., Coombs G., Shore A.C., Coleman D.C., Akpaka P., Borg M., Chow H., Ip M., Jatzwauk L., Jonas D., et al. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Holmes M.A., Zadoks R.N. Methicillin resistant, S. aureus in human and bovine mastitis. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2011;16:373–382. doi: 10.1007/s10911-011-9237-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Smith T.C., Pearson N. The Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;11:327–339. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kruse H., kirkemo A.M., Handeland K. Wildlife as source of zoonotic infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004;10:2067–2072. doi: 10.3201/eid1012.040707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Messenger A.M., Barnes A.N., Gray G.C. Reverse zoonotic disease transmission (zooanthroponosis): A systematic review of seldom-documented human biological threats to animals. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Epstein J.H., Price J.T. The significant but understudied impact of pathogen transmission from humans to animals. Mt. Sinai J. Med. J. Transl. Pers. Med. 2009;76:448–455. doi: 10.1002/msj.20140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Huijbers P.M., Blaak H., de Jong M.C., Graat E.A., Vandenbroucke-Grauls C.M., de Roda Husman A.M. Role of the Environment in the Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance to Humans: A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49:11993–12004. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hiltunen T., Virta M., Laine A.L. Antibiotic resistance in the wild: An eco-evolutionary perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2017;372:20160039. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Concepcion Porrero M., Harrison E.M., Fernandez-Garayzabal J.F., Paterson G.K., Diez-Guerrier A., Holmes M.A., Dominguez L. Detection of mecC-Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in river water: A potential role for water in the environmental dissemination. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2014;6:705–708. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Harrison E.M., Paterson G.K., Holden M.T., Larsen J., Stegger M., Larsen A.R., Petersen A., Skov R.L., Christensen J.M., Bak Zeuthen A., et al. Whole genome sequencing identifies zoonotic transmission of MRSA isolates with the novel mecA homologue mecC. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013;5:509–515. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201202413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Smith T.C., Wardyn S.E. Human Infections with Staphylococcus aureus CC398. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015;2:41–51. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Unwin S., Robinson I., Schmidt V., Colin C., Ford L., Humle T. Does confirmed pathogen transfer between sanctuary workers and great apes mean that reintroduction should not occur? Commentary on “Drug-resistant human Staphylococcus aureus findings in sanctuary apes and its threat to wild ape populations”. Am. J. Primatol. 2012;74:1076–1083. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Shore A.C., Deasy E.C., Slickers P., Brennan G., O’Connell B., Monecke S., Ehricht R., Coleman D.C. Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type XI carrying highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr genes in human clinical isolates of clonal complex 130 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3765–3773. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00187-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antibiotics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES