Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2020 Apr 8;8:e8897. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8897

Proteomic variations after short-term heat shock treatment reveal differentially expressed proteins involved in early microspore embryogenesis in cabbage (Brassica oleracea)

Henan Su 1,2,#, Guo Chen 1,2,#, Limei Yang 2, Yangyong Zhang 2, Yong Wang 2, Zhiyuan Fang 1,2,, Honghao Lv 2,
Editor: Robert Winkler
PMCID: PMC7169393  PMID: 32337101

Abstract

Microspore embryogenesis (ME), a widely used haploid breeding method that can considerably shorten the breeding cycle, provides an efficient mean of cultivating many important Brassica crops, such as cabbage, Chinese cabbage, and oilseed rape. For cabbage, in many cases, short-term heat shock treatment can strongly increase the embryogenesis rate, however, the underlying mechanism of this effect has not been elucidated. In this study, we compared the proteomics of isolated microspores with samples pretreated at 32 °C for 24 h and 25 °C for 24 h using two cabbage accessions (Zhonggan 628 and 87–534) showing highly different embryogenic rates. The embryo yield was 19.7 embryos/bud in Zhonggan 628 after 32 °C treatment, while no embryoid was observed in Zhonggan 628 after 25 °C treatment as well as in 87–534 at both temperatures. We identified a total of 363 and 282 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) for Zhonggan 628 and 87–534 via a label-free proteomics technology. There were 97 DEPs specifically identified only in Zhonggan 628 but not in 87–534 after 32 °C heat-shock treatment that may be related to heat shock-induced embryogenesis in vitro culture. These DEPs were primarily enriched in carbon metabolic process, protein synthesis and degradation process, and signal transduction. Based on protein-protein interaction and pathway enrichment analyses, we proposed that SGT1 homolog A and B(SGT1), heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 (HSP70), cell division control protein 48 homolog A (CDC48) and fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR) might play important roles in microspore embryogenesis. This proteomic study may contribute to our molecular understanding of cabbage microspore embryogenesis and help to build a high-efficiency haploid breeding system.

Keywords: Cabbage, Microspore culture, Embryogenesis, Heat shock treatment, Proteomics

Introduction

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.) is one of the most economically important cruciferous vegetables in the world, providing both nutrients and health promoting substances in human diets. The production of cabbage and other Brassica crops throughout the world was 71.26 million tons in 2016, with China producing nearly one third of them (http://faostat.fao.org/) (Ji et al., 2018). Most commercial cultivars are F1 hybrids that utilize heterosis, such as Zhonggan 21, Jingfeng 1, and Zhonggan 628 released in China (Lv et al., 2014). To produce the hybrids, we first need to cultivate high-generation inbred lines. In a traditional inbred line breeding method, the work is labor-intensive and normally requires 7–8 years; at the same time, microspore culture, a widely used method of haploid breeding, provides an effective technique to produce homozygous doubled haploid (DH) parental lines in only one or two years, which significantly accelerates the breeding process (Abercrombie, Farnham & Rushing, 2005; Ahmadi et al., 2014; Ferrie & Caswell, 2011; Maraschin et al., 2005). In addition, doubled haploid (DH) populations are ideal materials for genetic analysis, linkage map construction and gene mapping (Germana, 2011).

Microspore embryogenesis is a process in which microspores at the optimum period are isolated from the flower buds and induced in vitro to form haploids (Hosp et al., 2007; Ahmadi, Ahmadi & Silva, 2018). The chromosomes of the haploids can be doubled by colchicine treatment or subcluture, and the double haploids (DHs) are genetically homozygous and can be used as breeding lines directly. To date, more than hundreds of plant species have been reported and are especially widely used in Brassica crop breeding programs (Telmer, Newcomb & Simmonds, 1995; Shmykova, Shumilina & Suprunova, 2016; Shumilina, Shmykova & Bondareva, 2015). In recent years, many researchers have studied isolated microspore culture technology in Brassica and strongly improved the microspore embryogenesis rate (Yuan et al., 2011; Shumilina, Shmykova & Bondareva, 2015). In particular, extensive studies have shown that pretreatment, usually performed under heat or cold treatment, is essential for Brassica embryo induction (Joosen et al., 2007; Yuan et al., 2011; Yuan et al., 2012). In B. napus, embryogenesis could be induced after incubation at 32 °C or 18 °C for least 8 h (Pechan et al., 1991; Custers et al., 1994). In broccoli (B. oleracea L. var. italica L.), the optimum pretreatment was cold (4 °C) treatment for 24 or 48 h and then heat shock (32 °C) for 24 h (Yuan et al., 2011). However, in cabbage, microspore embryogenesis was efficiently induced after heat shock (32 °C) for 24 h (Yuan et al., 2012; Takahata & Keller, 1991). Although heat shock treatment plays an important role in cabbage during in vitro microspore embryogenesis, its underlying molecular mechanism has not been fully elucidated.

The omics method is now providing new opportunities for identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying plant growth and development, such as transcriptomics and proteomics (Xing et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2013). A number of studies have investigated the genes responsible for microspore embryogenesis in many important plant species, including rapeseed (Soriano, Li & Boutilier, 2013; Boutilier et al., 2002), tobacco (Zarsky et al., 1992; Touraev et al., 1996a) and wheat (Indrianto et al., 2001). These studies have identified some key genes whose expression is responsible for stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. However, examining mRNA in transcriptomics studies cannot fully represent the true level of protein expression, and the molecular changes under certain conditions can be more directly clarified by analyzing the protein profiles, as proteins are the executors of physiological functions (Kaspar-Schoenefeld et al., 2016; Domzalska et al., 2017). Therefore, proteomics technology has been widely used to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying a variety of plant growth and development (Balbuena, Jo & Pieruzzi, 2011; Balbuena et al., 2009; Rode et al., 2012).

Protein identification by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrum (MS) is a commonly used method in plant proteomics. To date, the combined use of 2-DE and MS has enabled us to identify a number of proteins related to somatic embryogenesis (Almeida et al., 2012; Correia et al., 2012; Sharifi et al., 2012). In comparison, only a limited number of studies have investigated proteome changes associated with microspore embryogenesis in Brassica (Pechan et al., 1991; Cordewener, Bergervoet & Liu, 2000; Joosen et al., 2007). Pechan et al. (1991) identified some heat-shock proteins induced by heat treatment of B. napus microspores and pollen. In addition, Joosen et al. (2007) identified 32 upregulated proteins associated with such processes as carbohydrate metabolism, redox reactions, and protein synthesis in B. napus during the development process of microspore-derived embryos. However, 2-DE offers a low resolution and cannot detect low-abundance proteins (Patel et al., 2009; Zhu, Smith & Huang, 2010). At the same time, the label-free quantification method, which evaluates the total number of allocated MS/MS spectra for peptides from a given protein, can greatly improve the detection efficiency (Lee & Koh, 2011). Therefore, it is desirable to identify a number of key proteins related to microspore embryogenesis by using a label-free quantification method.

Currently, microspore culture is widely applied in cabbage breeding, while short-term heat shock treatment is important for embryogenesis. However, the underlying molecular mechanism governing this phenomenon remains largely uncharacterized. In this work, we identified differentially expressed proteins after 32 °C and 25 °C treatments for 24 h in isolated cultured microspores of cabbage accessions Zhonggan 628 (high embryo yield of 19.7 embryos/bud) and 87–534 (low embryo yield of 0 embryo/bud) by using a label-free proteomic approach. Our study focused on the development process between the non-embryo and embryo microspores, identifying proteins that are differentially expressed. The information obtained from protein profile analysis will broaden our understanding of the molecular regulation of microspore embryogenesis induced by short-term heat shock treatment.

Material and Methods

Plant materials, treatment, and sample collection

Cabbage accessions Zhonggan 628 (excellent in the embryo yield of microspore culture) and 87–534 (exhibiting a low yield in microspore-derived embryos) were used in this study. They were cultivated in a greenhouse (20−25 °C with a 16 h/day photoperiod of natural light) of the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. The microspore isolation and culture process was carried out from mid-March to early May in their flowering stage, as previously described by Lv et al. (2014). Briefly, seventy-eight buds for each accession with a length of 3–3.5 mm were selected for cultivation after sterilization and microspore isolation. According to our previous study, this length represented the premium sampling stage that provided the highest embryo rate for these cabbage accessions, with 60%–70% of the micropores being at the mid- to late-uninucleate stage (Su et al., 2018). NLN-13 was used as the liquid microspore culture medium, and the microspores was adjusted to a density of 1 ×105/ml in the liquid medium containing 1 ml suspension and 1 ml NLN-13 in each petri dish. Then, they were induced at 32 °C and 25 °C (as an untreated control) for 24 h, respectively, and finally incubated at 25 °C in the dark. Three weeks later, the microspore embryogenesis rates were counted. Six petri dishes of each sample were randomly chosen to determine embryogenesis statistics, with three replicates. For molecular analysis, after 32 °C and 25 °C treatments for 24 h, twenty petri dishes of the isolated microspores for Zhonggan 628 and 87–534 were collected by centrifugation (5 min at 100× g), respectively, with three replicates. These collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent extraction of protein and total RNA.

Plant sample collection and protein extraction

The collected microspore samples were ground into powder under liquid nitrogen and then dissolved in 1 ml of extraction solution (150 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 8 M urea, 0.5% SDS, 1.2% Triton X-100, 20 mM EDTA, 20 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 1% glycerol, and 5 mM DTT, PI). The samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 1 h at 4 °C to collect the supernatants, which were then mixed with precooled acetone/methanol solution for three times the supernatants’s volume and incubated for 1 h at −20 °C. The mixed samples were centrifuged at 15,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the precipitated proteins were rinsed 1–2 times with precooled acetone. Subsequently, the supernatants were discarded after 15,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The precipitated proteins were naturally air-dried at room temperature and redissolved in 100 µL of lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 8 M urea, 5 mM DTT, 1% SDS, and 10 mM EDTA. The protein precipitation and resuspension cycles were repeated twice. The resulting total proteins were measured using the Bradford assay method (Bradford, 1976). Then, 60 µg of the protein solution were transferred to a centrifuge tube, mixed with 5 µl of 1 M DTT solution, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, 20 µl of 1 M IAM solution was added, mixed and reacted at room temperature for 1 h in the dark. After that, all samples were pipetted into an ultrafiltration tube; the collection solution was discarded after centrifugation, and 100 µl UA (8 M urea, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) was added to the tube; this step was repeated twice. Then, 100 µl of 50 mM NH4HCO3 was added, and the collection solution was discarded after centrifugation; this step was repeated for three times. Finally, the collected samples were digested with trypsin, with the ratio of 50:1 (protein vs. enzyme) in an ultrafiltration tube at 37 °C for 16 h. The digested samples were stored at −80 °C until MS analysis (Zhu et al., 2013).

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis

The digested peptide mixtures were transferred to a fused silica capillary column packed with 3-µm Dionex C18 material (Dionex, Sunnyvale, USA). The 15-cm RP column sections were washed with buffer A (H2O and 0.1% formic acid) and buffer B (acetonitrile and 0.08% formic acid). A C18 capture tip (five mm, 0.3 mm) was laid up in an Agilent 1100 quaternary high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent Technology Co. Ltd., Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a straight line after desalting; subsequently, a 12-step separation method was used for analysis (Pang et al., 2016). Gradient elution was carried out as follows: buffer B started at 2% to 40% in 45 min, followed by a 13-min gradient to 80% buffer B; next, the buffer B flowed from 80% to 2% until 2 min. The separated peptides were examined in a micrOTOF-Q II mass spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) with a source temperature of 180 °C. The mass spectrometer was run in automatic mode: survey MS scans were performed with a resolution setting of 20,000 followed closely behind by five data-dependent tandem mass (MS / MS) scans at 2 Hz normalized scan speed (Pang et al., 2016).

Data processing for proteomics

The MS data were searched against the B. oleracea genome (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html) and were processed using Proteome Discover software (Version 1.3, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA), with the parameters as follows: carbamidomethylation (C), oxidation (M), and acetylation (Protein N-term) were set to immutable and variable compositions, respectively; 15 ppm and 20 mmu were peptide mass tolerance and fragment mass tolerance, respectively; max missed cleavages was 2. A cutoff of 1% for peptide false discovery rate (FDR) was used for peptide and protein identification, and peptides with Z score <4 or Delta-Mass >5 ppm were discarded. In addition, proteins with at least one unique peptide were characterized. These proteins with fold-change ≥ 1.5 and p-value (p- FDR) ≤ 0.05 was deemed as differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between the experimental groups (Ji et al., 2018).

Bioinformatic analysis

A bioinformatic analysis was conducted to categorize the proteins based on biological processes, cellular competence and molecular function by using the Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) database v6.1 (http://www.pantherdb.org), following the gene ontology (GO) standards (Thomas et al., 2003). Moreover, pathway analyses were carried out on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) database (http://www.Genome.jp/kegg) for biological interpretation of systemic functions (Cho & Campbell, 2000). Protein-protein interactions were analyzed on the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database (http://string-db.org) including known and predicted protein-protein systemic functions (Jensen et al., 2009).

Total RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis

The transcript levels of genes involved in DEPs were identified using quantitative real-time- polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was isolated separately from Zhonggan 628 isolated microspores under 32 °C and 25 °C treatments for 24 h, using a TaKaRa MiniBEST Plant RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, Liaoning, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol (https://www.takarabiomed.com.cn). A RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa) was used to reversely transcribe RNA to cDNA. The qRT-PCR reactions were conducted as previously described (Su et al., 2019). Actin was used as the internal reference gene in cabbage. The relative expression levels of the target genes (Bo5g021500, Bo8g066630, Bo2g023100, Bo6g031300, Bo3g045210, Bo2g165560, Bo1g050780, Bo5g138000, and Bo5g139630) were calculated by using the 2△△Ct method (Schmittgen & Livak, 2008), and the test was repeated three times. The cDNA was amplified using specific primers (Table S1).

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 17.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NewYork, USA). One-way ANOVA and Tukey test were performed at 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) to assess whether the data of the treatments were significantly different.

Results

Microspore collection and culture

The results showed that after three weeks, 19.7 embryos/bud were produced from the isolated microspores in Zhonggan 628 after 32 °C treatment (Fig. 1A), while no embryoid was observed in Zhonggan 628 after 25 °C treatment (Fig. 1B) as well as in 87–534 after both 32 °C and 25 °C treatment (Figs. 1C, 1D), and the difference in the embryo rates between the 32 °C and 25 °C treatments for 24 h in Zhonggan 628 was significant (** p < 0.01) (Fig. 1E). This result was similar to previous studies showing that 32 °C heat treatment could significantly improve the embryogenesis rate of cabbage (Yuan et al., 2012; Takahata & Keller, 1991).

Figure 1. Embryoid observation and statistical analysis of embryoid rate under heat shock treatment of Zhonggan 628 and 87–534 microspores in vitro.

Figure 1

(A) The embryoids of Zhonggan 628 after 32 °C treatment for 24 h. (B) The embryoids of Zhonggan 628 under 25 °C for 24 h. (C) The embryoids of 87–534 after 32 °C treatment for 24 h. (D) The embryoids of 87–534 under 25 °C for 24 h. (E) The rate of embryoid for Zhonggan 628 and 87–534 under 32 °C and 25 °C treatment for 24 h. (** P < 0.01).

Identification of differentially expressed proteins in embryogenesis caused by high temperature

To decipher the proteomic variations after treatments at 32 °C and 25 °C for 24 h in cultured microspores, highly embryogenic cultivar Zhonggan 628 (A) and 87–534 (low yield in microspore-derived embryos, B) after treatments at 32 °C and 25 °C (as untreated control), respectively, for 24 h were chosen for the proteomic comparisons. Using label-free analysis, we identified a total of 33434 peptides and 5961 protein species among the 12 samples. A clear separation between A and B was found from the principal component analysis (Fig. 2). Proteins with more than 1.5-fold changes in abundance (p ≤ 0.05) between the HS treatment (32 °C) and CK (25 °C) were selected as differentially expressed (Ji et al., 2018). We identified a total of 363 proteins showing expression differences in mass spectrometry from Zhonggan 628 (A) between 32 °C and 25 °C; among these proteins, 115 were downregulated, and 248 were upregulated (Table S2). In 87–534, a total of 282 proteins showing expression differences in mass spectrometry were identified between 32 °C and 25 °C; among these proteins, 162 were downregulated, and 120 were upregulated (Table S2). The results indicated that Y1 (Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C for 24 h) and Y3 (Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C for 24 h vs. 87–534 under 32 °C for 24 h) had 134 DEPs in common; among those 134 DEPs, there were 37 DEPs in Y2 (87–534 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C for 24 h) (Fig. 3); therefore, there were only 97 DEPs specifically identified only in Zhonggan 628 but not in 87–534 after 32 °C heat-shock treatment (Table S2), which might be the key proteins that warrant further investigation.

Figure 2. Principal component analysis at the proteome level.

Figure 2

(A1) Zhonggan 628 under 25 °C for 24 h. (A2) Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C for 24 h. (B1) 87–534 under 25 °C for 24 h. (B2) 87–534 under 32 °C for 24 h.

Figure 3. Venn diagrams showing numbers of distinct and common proteins in each of the three groups.

Figure 3

(Y1) Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C for 24 h. (Y2) 87–534 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C for 24 h. (Y3) Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C for 24 h vs. 87–534 under 32 °C for 24 h.

GO function classification of differentially expressed proteins

To further understand the function of the differentially expressed proteins, 97 key DEPs were searched in the database to obtain their functional information. The DEPs could be divided into three categories: cellular component, biological process, and molecular function (Fig. 4, Table S3). Based on cellular component, 97 key DEPs were classified into eleven categories, and the largest functional category included proteins involved in cell (GO:0005623), followed by those participating in cell parts (GO:0044464). Based on biological process, 97 key DEPs were classified into fourteen categories, and the largest functional category included proteins involved in metabolic process (GO:0008152). Based on putative molecular functions, the identified proteins were classified into five categories, and the largest functional category included proteins involved in catalytic activity (GO:0003824).

Figure 4. GO function classification of DEPs during embryogenesis caused by high temperature.

Figure 4

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins

Metabolic pathways corresponding to the proteins could be found in the KEGG ORTHOLOGY (KO) (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/ko.html) database according to their KO numbers. 24 proteins had KO numbers among the 97 key DEPs, and they were enriched in carbon metabolism, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, plant-pathogen interaction, and cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis. The results of the KEGG pathway analysis of the DEPs after HS-responsive embryogenesis (Fig. 5, Table S3) showed that carbon metabolism included nine DEPs, protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum included eight DEPs, plant-pathogen interaction included two DEPs, and cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis included one DEP.

Figure 5. KEGG pathway of DEPs during embryogenesis caused by high temperature.

Figure 5

The pathways of the DEPs were primarily involved in protein process and carbon metabolism, while some proteins were also enriched in a different pathway. There were a number of proteins involved in multiple pathways; for example, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain (RBCS) was involved in three different pathways (glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, carbon metabolism, and carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms), while sugar isomerase family protein (SIS) and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) also participated in more than two pathways.

Interaction of differentially expressed proteins in embryogenesis caused by high temperature

We used the STRING database to construct the interaction networks of the 97 DEPs (64 upregulated proteins and 33 downregulated ones) by using an Arabidopsis association model. The results showed that 64 upregulated and 33 downregulated proteins were interacted with 32 and 14 target proteins, respectively (Fig. 6, Table S4). As expected, the network showed general and complex interactions among the 97 proteins. For example, among those 64 upregulated proteins, hsp21 description (HSP21, corresponding to Bo1g050780.1), putative ankyrin repeat protein RF (TPR10, corresponding to Bo1g151900.1), heat stress transcription factor B-4b-like (HSFA7A, corresponding to Bo2g165560.1), SGT1 homolog B (SGT1, corresponding to Bo3g045210.1), chaperone protein ClpB1 (HSP101, corresponding to Bo6g118620.1), and cell division control protein 48 homolog A (CDC48, corresponding to Bo5g138000.1) were closely interacted with heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 (HSP70, corresponding to Bo5g021500.1, Bo8g066630.1). In addition, 20 kDa chaperonin (CPN20, corresponding to Bo2g023100.1), malate dehydrogenase (mMDH, corresponding to Bo6g031300.1), and protein SCO1 homolog 1 (HCC, corresponding to Bo5g139630.1) showed highly positive interactions with protein disulfide-isomerase (PDIL1-1, corresponding to Bo8g071060.1). For those 33 downregulated proteins, cytochrome P450, family 86, subfamily C (CYP86C2, corresponding to Bo9g076040.1), nonspecific lipid-transfer protein (LTP12, corresponding to Bo1g059070.1), polygalacturonase QRT3 (QRT3, corresponding to Bo1g022160.1), and AT1G06260 (corresponding to Bo1g055000.1) were closely interacted with AT1G20120 (corresponding to Bo5g029180.1, Bo7g061770.1, and Bo7g061790.1). Although these estimated interaction networks require verification, they may provide a brief protein-protein interaction model in cabbage embryogenesis induced by high temperature, which might deserve further investigations.

Figure 6. Protein–protein interaction analysis between DEPs.

Figure 6

(A) The upregulated proteins. (B) The downregulated proteins.

Correlation of protein fold changes with transcripts

The protein and mRNA expression levels were correlated to further examine the relative abundance of proteins involved in embryogenesis caused by high-temperature treatment. The mRNA expression levels were acquired by using qRT-PCR analysis of the corresponding nine genes with more nodes in the interaction network. In the selected proteins, four genes showed similar change trends as the result of label-free proteomics. As was shown in Fig. 7, heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 (Bo5g021500, Bo8g066630), one of the most abundant proteins isolated from the microspore at 32 °C, was chosen for test, and as expected, a significant increase in two HSP70 genes and one gene encoding SCO1 homolog 1 (HCC) expression was observed at high temperatures (** p < 0.01). One gene encoding heat stress transcription factor B-4b-like (HSF) showed a relatively increased abundance in Zhonggan 628 under high temperature. However, a significant decrease in two genes encoding mMDH and SGT1 expression was observed at high temperatures (** p < 0.01), the genes encoding proteins HSP21, CPN20, and CDC48 showed a relatively decreased abundance in Zhonggan 628 under high temperature, which displayed differences between label-free proteomics and qRT-PCR. This finding could be due to the transcription level changes from the genes to the proteins, such as translation regulation and posttranslational modifications.

Figure 7. mRNA expression level analysis using a qRT-PCR approach on candidate proteins of embryogenesis caused by high temperature.

Figure 7

(A) Bo5g021500. (B) Bo8g066630. (C) Bo5g139630. (D) Bo2g165560. (E) Bo1g050780. (F) Bo2g023100. (G) Bo5g138000. (H) Bo3g045210. (I) Bo6g031300 (** P < 0.01).

Discussion

In this work, we performed a comparative label-free proteomic analysis to analyze the dynamic protein profiles concerning microspore embryogenesis. Our results showed that the DEPs related to embryogenetic ability induced by high temperature were primarily enriched in carbohydrate metabolism, protein synthesis and degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum, signal transduction, and cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis.

Carbohydrate metabolic process

The induction of cabbage embryogenesis by high temperature may be associated with the carbohydrate metabolic process. In this study, a total of nine proteins were involved in carbohydrate metabolic process. Among the nine proteins, seven were related to the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), and two participated in glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism (Fig. 8, Table S5). Previous studies have indicated that carbohydrate metabolism is associated with the interruption of male gamete development (Mascarenhas, 1990; Maraschin et al., 2005). The comparative analysis between non-embryogenic and embryogenic callus indicated that most DEPs were involved in carbohydrate metabolism in maize (Varhaníková et al., 2014) and sugarcane (Heringer et al., 2015). In addition, the genes involved in sucrose-starch metabolism have also been described in barley microspore embryogenesis (Maraschin et al., 2006). Furthermore, the suppressed genes participating in starch biosynthesis have been reported to prevent pollen development in vivo (Datta, Chamusco & Chourey, 2002).

Figure 8. Abundance patterns of protein species involved in the carbohydrate metabolism.

Figure 8

The expression value was log10 transformed. Yellow box (A2/A1): The expression levels of proteins from Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C; Blue box (A2/B2): The expression levels of proteins from Zhonggan 628 vs. 87–534 under 32 °C.

Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI),sugar isomerase (SIS) family protein, and transaldolase-like protein (E2) (Fig. 8) participated in the PPP and provided both nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and pentose. Moreover, malate dehydrogenase (MD), isocitrate dehydrogenase subunit 2 (IDH), and succinate-CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta, mitochondrial LSC2 (LSC2) were linked to the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), which were all upregulated in the 32 °C microspores. In addition to the cytoplasmic GPI, the chloroplasts of land plants harbor a nuclear-encoded isoenzyme of cyanobacteria for plastid starch accumulation (Grauvogel, Brinkmann & Petersen, 2007). MD can catalyze the reversible conversion between malate and oxaloacetate (Taylor et al., 1990). The high energy requirements were associated with the rearrangement of metabolism, cellular organization and regulation, and cell divisions, which explained why proteins related to carbohydrate metabolic process were most strongly expressed during early embryogenesis in vitro. This finding suggested that those upregulated proteins during heat shock treatment were activated to provide the energy needed for early microspore embryogenesis.

Protein synthesis and degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum

Protein synthesis and degradation are the basis of life and the link between genetic information storage in DNA and protein. In this study, we discovered eight DEPs in protein synthesis and degradation process in the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 9, Table S5). The endoplasmic reticulum plays a key role in the protein folding of plant cells, while this process is vulnerable to environmental stresses. Moreover, eight ER-associated proteins including glycosyl hydrolase family 31 protein (RSW3), protein disulfide-isomerase (PDI), ERO2 description (ERO2), probable mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 37c (MED), HSP21 description (HSP21), HSP70, and cell division control protein 48 homolog A (CDC48) were identified in our study (Fig. 9).

Figure 9. Abundance patterns of protein species involved in protein synthesis and degradation.

Figure 9

The expression value was log10 transformed. Yellow box (A2/A1): The expression levels of proteins from Zhonggan 628 32 °C vs. 25 °C; Blue box (A2/B2): The expression levels of proteins from Zhonggan 628 vs. 87–534 under 32 °C.

The oxidation and isomerization of disulfide bonds are necessary for the growth of all organisms, and PDI and ERO1 form disulfide bonds, all of which undergo protein oxidation with redox reactions (Yudina, 2012). In maize, the primary PDI accumulated in seeds that produced mutant storage proteins and triggered the induction of the ER stress response (Geng et al., 2018). In barley, proteins involved in the ubiquitin-26S proteasomal pathway are induced in stressed enlarged barley microspores (Maraschin et al., 2006). In this work, CDC48 was involved in the ubiquitin-26S proteasomal pathway, and the expression ratios of CDC48 in Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C and Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 87–534 under 32 °C were 1.71 and 2.02, respectively. HSP70 in the cytosolic HSP family accumulates rapidly to regulate plant growth and development under various environmental stresses (Park & Seo, 2015). In addition, during transient stress, the expression of sHSPs (HSP18, HSP21, HSP22, and HSP23) was constantly increased by stress, and after upregulation they may become the most abundant cellular proteins (Wang et al., 2004; Haslbeck et al., 2005; Segu-Simarro, Testillano & Risuenn, 2003). Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are known to protect proteins by assisting in refolding, preventing aggregation or by acting as a cochaperone (Jan et al., 1995; Bélanger et al., 2018). Due to the chaperone activity, HSPs may play an indirect role in triggering androgenesis by controlling the subcellular localization of other key regulatory proteins or providing higher levels of heat resistance (Maraschin et al., 2005). In previous studies, members of the heat shock protein family have been reported to be highly expressed during the induction of microspore embryogenesis by heatshock and starvation treatment: HSP90 and HSP70 in Brassica (Cordewener, Bergervoet & Liu, 2000; Segu-Simarro, Testillano & Risuenn, 2003), as well as HSP20 in tobacco (Zarsky et al., 1995). In this study, the HSPs, such as HSP70 and HSP21 (Fig. 9), were all increasingly accumulated in 32 °C microspores, indicating their probable roles in stress induction of microspore embryogenesis process during in vitro culture.

Signal transduction

In this study, we found SGT1 homolog B (Bo3g045210) and SGT1 homolog A (Bo7g108890) in Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C and Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 87–534 under 32 °C, and their expression ratios were 2.0 and 2.2 and 1.58 and 1.76, respectively. In Arabidopsis, SGT1 contains SGT1a and SGT1b, and a double mutant could cause lethal embryos, suggesting that the SGT1a and SGT1b proteins are indispensable for plant development (Azevedo et al., 2006). In addition, SGT1 is also an indispensable resistance-related protein that has been shown to be a co-factor for HSP90 and HSP70. In Arabidopsis, the mutation of cochaperone SGT1b and HSP90 impairs responses to plant hormones, including auxin, gibberellic acid, and jasmonate (Zhang et al., 2015). In this study, the expression ratios of the two SGT1 proteins in the critical period of in vitro microspore development were found to be higher at 32 °C than at 25 °C. Moreover, SGT1 closely interacted with heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 (HSP70) (Fig. 6); although there has been no report describing SGT in traditional models such as barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), rapeseed (B. napus L.), tobacco (Nicotiana spp.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in microspore embryogenesis, there has been some reports about SGT1 in Arabidopsis in somatic embryogenesis, and we deduced that SGT1 may participate in early microspore embryogenesis by signal transduction.

Cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis

Cutin and waxes serve several functions, such as energy storage and protection of exposed surfaces from desiccation (Lardizabal et al., 2000). In this study, fatty acyl-CoA reductase (Bo1g139700, FAR) was involved in cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis. In Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 25 °C for 24 h and Zhonggan 628 under 32 °C vs. 87–534 under 32 °C for 24 h, the expression ratios were 3.12 and 4.33, respectively. Although there have been no report about FAR in traditional models of microspore embryogenesis, we could speculate that FAR may be involved in embryo induction.

Proposed model of microspore embryogenesis induced by heat shock in cabbage

Based on the above discussion, we proposed a model that might help to explain the regulatory networks governing microspore embryogenesis in cabbage (Fig. 10). First, in the protein synthesis and degradation process, the CDC48 and heat shock proteins (HSPs) in the isolated microspores responded to heat shock treatment. Then, CDC48 removed toxic waste from the ER, and HSPs were associated with the folding and unfolding of other proteins, as CDC48 and HSPs expression was higher at 32 °C than at 25 °C. At the same time, in the signal transduction process, SGT1, a cofactor of HSP70, stabilized microspore cellular signal transduction. Additionally, in cutin, suberine, and wax biosynthesis, FAR had higher expression at 32 °C, suggesting a potential role in microspore embryogenesis. Moreover, carbohydrate metabolism was involved in all these pathways by energy supply. Finally, the above mentioned regulatory interactions might lead to microspore embryogenesis. This model may help us to explore the mechanism of microspore embryogenesis induced by heatshock treatment. In the future, more functional analyses are needed to clarify this complex morphogenesis pathway.

Figure 10. Proposed model of microspore embryogenesis induced by heat shock in cabbage.

Figure 10

Conclusions

We investigated the molecular mechanisms of embryogenesis in vitro culture by proteomic profiles obtained by a label-free method in Zhonggan 628 and 87–534 after heat-shock treatment. 97 DEPs specifically identified only in Zhonggan 628 were primarily related to energy metabolism, protein synthesis and degradation, activation of the signal transduction pathway, and cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis. SGT1 homolog B and A (SGT1), heat shock 70 kDa protein 5 (HSP70), cell division control protein 48 homolog A (CDC48), and fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR), identified based on protein-protein interaction and pathway enrichment analyses, might play important roles in cabbage microspore embryogenesis. This information will broaden our understandings of the molecular regulation of microspore embryogenesis induced by high-temperature treatment.

Supplemental Information

Table S1. The primer sequences of 9 key proteins used for qRT-PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-1
Table S2. Differentially expressed proteins in all treatment groups.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-2
Table S3. GO and KEGG analysis between 97 key DEPs.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-3
Table S4. Protein-protein interaction analysis between DEPs.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-4
Table S5. Carbohydrate metabolism and protein synthesis and degradation of key proteins.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-5

Abbreviations

DEPs

differentially expressed proteins

D H

doubled haploid

LC-MS

liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction

E R

endoplasmic reticulum

sHSP

small heat shock proteins

TCA

tricarboxylic acid cycle

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0101804), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-IVFCAAS), and the earmarked fund for the Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System of China (CARS-23). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Zhiyuan Fang, Email: fangzhiyuan@caas.cn.

Honghao Lv, Email: lvhonghao@caas.cn.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Henan Su conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Guo Chen performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Limei Yang, Yangyong Zhang and Zhiyuan Fang analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Yong Wang analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Honghao Lv conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Abercrombie, Farnham & Rushing (2005).Abercrombie J, Farnham M, Rushing J. Genetic combining ability of glucoraphanin level and other horticultural traits of broccoli. Euphytica. 2005;143:145–151. doi: 10.1007/s10681-005-3059-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmadi, Ahmadi & Silva (2018).Ahmadi B, Ahmadi M, Silva JA. Microspore embryogenesis in Brassica: calcium signaling, epigenetic modifcation, and programmed cell death. Planta. 2018;248:1339–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2996-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmadi et al. (2014).Ahmadi B, Shariatpanahi M, Ojaghkandi M, Heydari A. Improve microspore embryogenesis induction and plantlet regeneration using putrescine, cefotaxime and vancomycin in Brassica napu s L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2014;118:497–505. doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0501-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Almeida et al. (2012).Almeida A, Parreira J, Santos R, Duque A, Francisco R, Tomé D, Ricardo C, Coelho A, Fevereiro P. A proteomics study of the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula using 2DE and MALDI-TOF/TOF. Physiologia Plantarum. 2012;146:236–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Azevedo et al. (2006).Azevedo C, Betsuyaku S, Peart J, Takahashi A, Noël L, Sadanandom A, Casais C, Parker J, Shirasu K. Role of SGT1 in resistance protein accumulation in plant immunity. EMBO Journal. 2006;25:2007–2016. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Balbuena, Jo & Pieruzzi (2011).Balbuena T, Jo L, Pieruzzi F. Differential proteome analysis of mature and germinated embryos of Araucaria angustifolia. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:302–311. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Balbuena et al. (2009).Balbuena T, Silveira V, Junqueira M, Dias L, Catarina C, Shevchenko A. Changes in the 2-DE protein profile during zygotic embryogenesis in the Brazilian Pine (Araucaria angustifolia) Journal of Proteomics. 2009;72:337–352. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bélanger et al. (2018).Bélanger S, Marchand S, Jacques P, Meyers B, Belzile F. Differential Expression Profiling of Microspores During the Early Stages of Isolated Microspore Culture Using the Responsive Barley Cultivar Gobernadora. Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2018;8:1603–1614. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boutilier et al. (2002).Boutilier K, Offringa R, Sharma V, Kieft H, Ouellet T, Zhang L, Hattori J, Liu C, Lammeren A, Miki B, Custers J, Campagne V. Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. The Plant Cell. 2002;14:1737–1749. doi: 10.1005/Tpc.001941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bradford (1976).Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cho & Campbell (2000).Cho RJ, Campbell M. Transcription, genomes, function. Trends in Genetics. 2000;16:409–415. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cordewener, Bergervoet & Liu (2000).Cordewener J, Bergervoet J, Liu CM. Changes in protein synthesis and phosphorylation during microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2000;156:156–163. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80300-4.. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Correia et al. (2012).Correia S, Vinhas R, Manadas B, Lourenço A, Veríssimo P, Canhoto J. Comparative proteomic analysis of auxin-induced embryogenic and non-embryogenic tissues of the solanaceous tree Cyphomandra betacea (Tamarillo) Journal of Proteome Research. 2012;11:1666–1675. doi: 10.1021/pr200856w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Custers et al. (1994).Custers J, Cordewener J, Nöllen Y, Dons H, Campagne M. Temperature controls both gametophytic and sporophytic development in microspore cultures of Brassica napus. Plant Cell Reports. 1994;13:267–271. doi: 10.1007/bf00233317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Datta, Chamusco & Chourey (2002).Datta R, Chamusco K, Chourey P. Starch biosynthesis during pollen maturation is associated with altered patterns of gene expression in maize. Plant Physiology. 2002;130:1645–1656. doi: 10.1104/pp.006908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Domzalska et al. (2017).Domzalska L, Kedracka-Krok S, Jankowska U, Grzyb M, Sobczak M, Rybczynski JJ, Mikula A. Proteomic analysis of Cyathea delgadii Sternb. Stipe explants reveals differentially expressed proteins involved in fern somatic embryogenesis. Plant Science. 2017;258:1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrie & Caswell (2011).Ferrie A, Caswell K. Isolated microspore culture techniques and recent progress for haploid and doubled haploid plant production. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2011;104:301–309. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9800-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Geng et al. (2018).Geng X, Ye J, Yang X, Li S, Zhang L, Song X. Identification of proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism and energy metabolism pathways and their regulation of cytoplasmic male sterility in wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19:1–19. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Germana (2011).Germana M. Anther culture for haploid and doubled haploid production. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2011;104:283–300. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9852-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Grauvogel, Brinkmann & Petersen (2007).Grauvogel C, Brinkmann H, Petersen J. Evolution of the glucose-6-phosphate isomerase: the plasticity of primary metabolism in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24:1611–1621. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haslbeck et al. (2005).Haslbeck M, Franzmann T, Weinfurtner D, Buchner J. Some like it hot: the structure and function of small heat-shock proteins. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2005;12:842–846. doi: 10.1038/nsmb993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Heringer et al. (2015).Heringer AS, Barroso T, Macedo AF, Santa-Catarina C, Souza GHMF, Floh EIS, Silveira V. Label-Free quantitative proteomics of embryogenicand non-Embryogenic callus during sugarcane somatic embryogenesis. PLOS ONE. 2015;6:e0127803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hosp et al. (2007).Hosp J, Maraschin SF, Touraev A, Boutilier K. Functional genomics of microspore embryogenesis. Euphytica. 2007;158:275–285. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9238-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Indrianto et al. (2001).Indrianto A, Barinova I, Touraev A, Heberle-Bors E. Tracking individual wheat microspores in vitro: identification of embryogenic microspores and body axis formation in the embryo. Planta. 2001;212:163–174. doi: 10.1007/s004250000375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jan et al. (1995).Jan C, Cordewener G, Gerd H, Eike G. Changes in synthesis and localization of members of the 70-kDa class of heat-shock proteins accompany the induction of embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. microspores. Planta. 1995;196:747–755. doi: 10.1007/bf01106770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen et al. (2009).Jensen L, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron M, Creevey C. String 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37:412–416. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ji et al. (2018).Ji JL, Yang LM, Fang ZY, Zhuang M, Zhang YY, Lv HH, Liu YM, Li ZS. Complementary transcriptome and proteome profiling in cabbage buds of a recessive male sterile mutant provides new insights into male reproductive development. Journal of Proteomics. 2018;179:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Joosen et al. (2007).Joosen R, Cordewener J, Supena E, Vorst O, Lammers M, Maliepaard C, Zeilmaker T, Miki B, America T, Custers J, Boutilier K. Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis identifies pathways and markers associated with the establishment of rapeseed microspore-derived embryo development. Plant Physiology. 2007;144:155–172. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.098723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaspar-Schoenefeld et al. (2016).Kaspar-Schoenefeld S, Merx K, Maria JA, Hartmann A, Seiffert U, Weschke W, Matros A, Mock H. Label-free proteome profiling reveals developmental-dependent patterns in young barley grains. Journal of Proteomics. 2016;143:106–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lardizabal et al. (2000).Lardizabal KD, Metz JG, Sakamoto T, Hutton WC, Pollard MR, Lassner MW. Purification of a jojoba embryo wax synthase, cloning of its cDNA, and production of high levels of wax in seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2000;122:645–655. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee & Koh (2011).Lee J, Koh H. A label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics analysis of rice grain development. Proteome Science. 2011;9:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-9-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lv et al. (2014).Lv HH, Wang QB, Yang LM, Fang ZY, Zhuang M, Zhang YY, Sun PT. Breeding of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) with fusarium wilt resistance based on microspore culture and marker-assisted selection. Euphytica. 2014;200:465–473. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1197-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Maraschin et al. (2006).Maraschin S, Caspers M, Potokina E, Wülfert F, Graner A. DNA array analysis of stress-induced gene expression in barley androgenesis. Physiologia Plantarum. 2006;127:535–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00673.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Maraschin et al. (2005).Maraschin SF, Priester W, Spaink H, Wang M. Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005;56:1711–1726. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mascarenhas (1990).Mascarenhas J. Gene activity during pollen development. Annual Review Plant Physiology. 1990;41:317–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.41.060190.001533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Pang et al. (2016).Pang M, Bai XY, Li Y, Bai JZ, Yuan LR, Ren SA, Hu XY, Zhang XR, Yu BF, Guo R, Wang HL. Label-free LC-MS/MS shotgun proteomics to investigate the anti-inflammatory effect of rCC16. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2016;14:4496–4504. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Park & Seo (2015).Park C, Seo Y. Heat shock proteins: a review of the molecular chaperones for plant immunity. The Plant Pathology Journal. 2015;31:323–333. doi: 10.5423/ppj.rw.08.2015.0150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Patel et al. (2009).Patel V, Thalassinos K, Slade S, Connolly J, Crombie A, Murrell J, Scrivens J. A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches. Journal of Proteome Research. 2009;8:3752–3759. doi: 10.1021/pr900080y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pechan et al. (1991).Pechan P, Bartels D, Brown D, Schell J. Messenger-RNA and protein changes associated with induction of Brassica microspore embryogenesis. Planta. 1991;184:161–165. doi: 10.1007/bf01102414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rode et al. (2012).Rode C, Lindhorst K, Braun H, Winkelmann T. From callus to embryo-a proteomic view on the development and maturation of somatic embryos in Cyclamen persicum. Planta. 2012;235:995–1011. doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1554-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmittgen & Livak (2008).Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nature Protocol. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Segu-Simarro, Testillano & Risuenn (2003).Segu-Simarro J, Testillano P, Risuenn M. Hsp70 and Hsp90 change their expression and subcellular localization after microspore embryogenesis induction in Brassica napus L. Journal of Structural Biology. 2003;142:379–391. doi: 10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharifi et al. (2012).Sharifi G, Ebrahimzadeh H, Ghareyazie B, Gharechahi J, Vatankhah E. Identification of differentially accumulated proteins associated with embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) Proteome Science. 2012;10:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shmykova, Shumilina & Suprunova (2016).Shmykova E, Shumilina T, Suprunova P. Doubled haploid production in Brassica L. Species. Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research. 2016;6:68–77. doi: 10.1134/s2079059716010123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Shumilina, Shmykova & Bondareva (2015).Shumilina N, Shmykova LL, Bondareva TT. Effect of genotype and medium culture content on microspore-derived embryo formation in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. Chinensis) cv. Lastochka. Biology Bulletin. 2015;42:302–309. doi: 10.1134/S1062359015040135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soriano, Li & Boutilier (2013).Soriano M, Li H, Boutilier K. Microspore embryogenesis: establishment of embryo identity and pattern in culture. Plant Reproduction. 2013;26:181–196. doi: 10.1007/s00497-013-0226-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su et al. (2019).Su HN, Xing MM, Liu X, Fang ZY, Yang LM, Zhuang M, Zhang YY, Wang Y, Lv HH. Genome-wide analysis of HSP70 family genes in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) reveals their involvement in floral development. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5757-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su et al. (2018).Su HN, Yang LM, Fang ZY, Zhuang M, Zhang YY, Lv HH. Studies on optimization of cabbage isolated microspore culture conditions and generation of embryoids from high-generation inbred lines. China Vegetables. 2018;4:30–36. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2013).Sun L, Wu Y, Zou H, Su D, Li S, Shan X, Xi J, Yuan Y. Comparative proteomic analysis of the H99 inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2013;113:103–119. doi: 10.1007/s11240-012-0255-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Takahata & Keller (1991).Takahata Y, Keller WA. High frequency embryogenesis and plant regeneration in isolated microspore culture of Brassica oleracea L. Plant Science. 1991;74:235–242. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(91)90051-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor et al. (1990).Taylor D, Weber N, Underhill E, Pomeroy M, Keller W, Scowcroft W, Wilen R, Moloney M, Holbrook L. Storage-protein regulation and lipid accumulation in microspore embryos of Brassica napus L. Planta. 1990;181:18–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00202320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Telmer, Newcomb & Simmonds (1995).Telmer CA, Newcomb W, Simmonds DH. Cellular changes during heat shock induction and embryo development of cultured microspores of Brassica napus cv. Topas. Protoplasma. 1995;185:106–112. doi: 10.1007/bf01272758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas et al. (2003).Thomas P, Campbell M, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Research. 2003;13:2129–2141. doi: 10.1101/gr.772403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Touraev et al. (1996a).Touraev A, Ilham A, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E. Stress induced microspore embryogenesis from tobacco microspores: an optimized system for molecular studies. Plant Cell Report. 1996a;15:561–565. doi: 10.1007/BF00232453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Varhaníková et al. (2014).Varhaníková M, Uvackova L, Skultety L, Pretova A, Obert B, Hajduch M. Comparative quantitative proteomic analysis of embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli in maize suggests the role of oxylipins in plant totipotency. Journal of Proteomics. 2014;104:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2004).Wang WX, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altm A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Science. 2004;9:244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xing et al. (2019).Xing MM, Su HN, Liu X, Yang LM, Zhang YY, Wang Y, Fang ZY, Lv HH. Morphological, transcriptomics and phytohormone analysis shed light on the development of a novel dwarf mutant of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) Plant Science. 2019;290:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuan et al. (2011).Yuan SX, Liu YM, Fang ZY, Zhuang M, Zhang YY. Effect of combined cold pretreatment and heat shock on microspore cultures in broccoli. Plant Breeding. 2011;130:80–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01754.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuan et al. (2012).Yuan SX, Sun Y, Liu YM, Fang ZY, Zhuang M, Zhang YY. Effects of pH, MES, arabinogalactan-proteins on microspore cultures in white cabbage. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2012;110:69–76. doi: 10.1007/s11240-012-0131-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Yudina (2012).Yudina R. Malate dehydrogenase in plants: its genetics, structure, localization and use as a marker. Advances in Bioscience & Biotechnology. 2012;4:370–377. doi: 10.4236/abb.2012.34053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zarsky et al. (1995).Zarsky V, Garrido D, Eller N, Tupy J, Vicente O. The expression of a small heat shock gene is activated during inductionof tobacco pollen embryogenesis by starvation. Plant Cell Environment. 1995;2:139–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00347.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zarsky et al. (1992).Zarsky V, Garrido D, Rihova L, Tupy J, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E. Depression of the cell cycle by starvation is involved in the induction of tobacco pollen embryogenesis. Sex Plant Reproduction. 1992;5:189–194. doi: 10.1007/bf00189810. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2015).Zhang XC, Millet YA, Cheng ZY, Bush J, Ausubel FM. Jasmonate signalling in Arabidopsis involves SGT1b-HSP70-HSP90 chaperone complexes. Nature Plants. 2015;1:1–8. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu, Smith & Huang (2010).Zhu W, Smith J, Huang C. Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2010;1:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2010/840518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu et al. (2013).Zhu Y, Guo G, Zhang M, Claire Y, Hu Q, Lam H, Cheng H, Xue Y, Li J, Li N. Stable isotope metabolic labeling-based quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of Arabidopsis mutants reveals ethylene regulated time-dependent phosphoproteins and putative substrates of constitutive triple response 1 kinase. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2013;12:3559–3582. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m113.031633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. The primer sequences of 9 key proteins used for qRT-PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-1
Table S2. Differentially expressed proteins in all treatment groups.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-2
Table S3. GO and KEGG analysis between 97 key DEPs.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-3
Table S4. Protein-protein interaction analysis between DEPs.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-4
Table S5. Carbohydrate metabolism and protein synthesis and degradation of key proteins.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8897/supp-5

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES