Skip to main content
NCBI home page
JBRA Assisted Reproduction logoLink to JBRA Assisted Reproduction
. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):170–172. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190090

Expansion and herniation: evaluation of the best pregnancy rate predictor after quarter laser assisted hatching in frozen blastocyst transfers

Caroline Brogliato 1, Janaína Romanini 1, Caroline Z Berton 1, Claudia H Suganuma 1, Laura T Vellez 1, Ivan H Yoshida 1,✉, Caio P Barbosa 1
PMCID: PMC7169924  PMID: 32159314

Abstract

Objective

To assess the recovery of thawed blastocysts submitted to quarter laser assisted hatching and examine potential correlations between the procedure and pregnancy rates.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included only single-blastocyst transfers performed from July 2017 to December 2018. A total of 765 blastocysts were thawed and immediately submitted to quarter laser assisted hatching in the zona pellucida; they were subsequently incubated for three hours until transfer time, at which time they were examined for collapse or expansion; expanded blastocysts were further evaluated for herniation. The Chi-square test was used in statistical analysis.

Results

627 blastocysts expanded (81.9%) and yielded a pregnancy rate of 40% (251/627). 138 blastocysts collapsed after thawing (18.0%) and yielded a pregnancy rate of 25.4% (35/138) (p=0.001). Additional analysis of the subgroup of expanded blastocysts revealed that the 385 herniated blastocysts (61.4%) yielded a pregnancy rate of 43.9% (169/385). The remaining 242 non-herniated blastocysts (38.6%) yielded a pregnancy rate of 33.9% (82/242) (p=0.013). Statistical significance was attributed to events with a p<0.05.

Conclusion

Quarter laser assisted hatching is a safe, valid, and relatively easy-to-use procedure for thawed blastocysts. Blastocysts that expanded and herniated after quarter laser assisted hatching presented statistically superior results.

Keywords: hatching, blastocyst, thaw, expansion, pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Considered a major breakthrough in assisted human reproduction, embryo vitrification followed by frozen embryo transfer (FET) became widely disseminated and yielded positive effects in the form of increased pregnancy rates (Veleva et al., 2013). This technique may be an effective alternative for future embryo transfers, since the procedure, unlike the slow freezing process, avoids the formation of intra- and extracellular ice crystals, which may damage cell membranes and organelles. High concentration cryoprotectants and ultra-fast embryo freezing were developed to avoid possible cell damage (Liang & Montan, 2016; Papadopoulos et al., 2002). Despite some variability in results, survival rates after thawing have been acceptable, since the technique is a simple and effective procedure (Dobrinsky, 2002).

Embryo morphology (Ziebe et al., 2003), advanced maternal age, and cryopreservation technique have been linked to adverse effects on the hatching of the zona pellucida (Cohen et al., 1992) and impaired endometrium receptivity (Ewards et al., 1984; Simon & Laufer, 2012), which combined or alone affect embryo implantation.

Opening the zona pellucida is an intentional rupture event designed to facilitate the implantation of the embryo onto the endometrium (Cohen et al., 1992). There are different ways to open the zona pellucida, which include mechanical, chemical, and laser-based methods (Antinori et al., 1996). Laser has advantages over chemical and mechanical procedures, since it provides objective access to the target via the light beam and precise control to open the zona pellucida without thermal or mutagenic side effects (Germond et al., 1995). Lasers, too, are more accessible and adaptable to inverted microscopes (Mantoudis et al., 2001).

Assisted laser hatching can be divided into three methods, according to the degree of invasiveness. Perforation may cross the zona pellucida completely, be partial, or not reach the inner membrane. Laser can also be used to thin a large portion of the outside part of the zona pellucida to facilitate hatching, in a procedure known as quarter laser assisted hatching (Davidson et al., 2018).

Older patients may benefit from assisted hatching. According to Kilani et al. (2006), patients aged 38+ years have denser egg coats. The procedure may also be indicated to individuals with high FSH levels; patients with a history of implantation failure (Cohen et al., 1990; 1992); and women undergoing thawed embryo transfers, since cryopreservation induces a microstructural change in the zona pellucida (Moreira da Silva & Metelo, 2010) and adversely affects hatching (Kanyo et al., 2016). Balaban et al. (2002) and Ng et al. (2005) also suggested that opening the zona pellucida of thawed embryos improves embryo implantation since it facilitates the hatching of the zona pellucida.

This study aimed to evaluate the recovery of thawed blastocysts submitted to quarter laser assisted hatching and examine potential correlations with pregnancy rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included only single cryopreserved blastocyst transfers performed from July 2017 to December 2018 at the Instituto Ideia Fértil de Saúde Reprodutiva.

A total of 765 blastocysts were thawed and immediately submitted to quarter laser assisted hatching of the zona pellucida. The blastocysts were cultured for three hours, at the end of which they were assessed for expansion and herniation, and transferred. The blastocysts were categorized as collapsed or expanded; expanded blastocysts were further divided into herniated and non-herniated blastocysts.

Patients given thawed euploid embryos submitted to pre-implantation genetic testing and patients given embryos thawed on the third day of development were excluded.

Laboratory Reproductive Variables

The following laboratory reproductive variables were considered for thawed embryos:

  • Blastocyst expansion;

  • Blastocyst herniation (yes/no);

  • Morphology grading.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Our study looked into the performance of quarter laser assisted hatching in thawed blastocysts. A total of 765 blastocysts were thawed. More than four in five (627/765) expanded after the procedure and yielded a pregnancy rate of 40% (251/627). The remaining 138 blastocysts collapsed after thawing (18%), and yielded a pregnancy rate of 25.4% (35/138) (p=0.001).

In the group of expanded blastocysts, 385 herniated (61.4%) and yielded a pregnancy rate of 43.9% (169/385). The 242 blastocysts that did not herniate (38.6%) yielded a pregnancy rate of 33.9% (82/242) (p=0.013).

In terms of age groups, the expanded blastocysts of women aged 35 years or younger did not yield significantly different pregnancy rates whether they herniated (46.05%) or not (41.3%) (p=0.381). Expanded herniated blastocysts of patients aged 36 or older outperformed non-herniated blastocysts (41.2% vs. 24%) (p=0.004).

Surviving blastocysts that remained collapsed after three hours yielded a pregnancy rate of 25.4%, regardless of patient age. However, embryo morphology proved relevant at delivering higher pregnancy rates. Patients whose blastocysts were graded as top quality according to the classification described by Gardner et al. (2000) yielded a pregnancy rate of 55.0% (11/20), while lower grade blastocysts yielded a pregnancy rate of 20.3% (24/118) (p=0.001).

DISCUSSION

The zona pellucida is a glycoprotein coat that surrounds the embryo (Zeng et al., 2018). It may undergo biochemical changes induced by factors such as advanced maternal age, cryopreservation, and in vitro culture, which may make it harder and hamper implantation (Kanyo et al., 2016).

Vitrification is considered one of the most significant achievements in assisted human reproduction of the last decade (De Munk & Vajta, 2017). It is a safe method that preserves the quality of embryos after thawing. The stiffening of the zona pellucida after thawing hinders blastocyst hatching, in itself an important process for implantation to occur (Cohen et al., 1990). Artificial rupture of the zona pellucida is known as assisted hatching. Most assisted reproduction centers have used the laser-based method because it is a fast, safe, and accurate procedure (Lu et al., 2019).

The implantation window is a critical moment when the endometrium reaches optimal receptivity for implantation. Precise synchronization between embryo and endometrium is decisive. The purpose of opening the zona pellucida is to allow the molecules of the endometrium to get in early contact with the embryo, to improve the communication between the two, and increase implantation and pregnancy rates (Mantoudis et al., 2001). This study verified that blastocysts that were expanded and herniated after the thawing process attained higher pregnancy rates, corroborating the findings of Edi-Osagie et al. (2003). The authors found that assisted hatching presented significant benefit by improving the pregnancy rates of women with a history of implantation failure in particular. They suggested that assisted hatching might increase the chances of pregnancy for these patients.

The study by Elnahas et al. (2018) also reported statistically superior results in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates from thawed embryos submitted to assisted hatching. Lu et al. (2019) performed a retrospective analysis involving 415 thawed embryo transfers, in which 225 underwent assisted hatching and 190 were in the control group (without assisted hatching). Assisted hatching led to statistically superior results, particularly in terms of clinical pregnancy and implantation rates. The meta-analysis by Zeng et al. (2018) included 12 randomized controlled trials (over 2574 participants) and demonstrated that assisted hatching was associated with higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, in addition to a higher incidence of multiple pregnancies in women receiving thawed embryos. Mantoudis et al. (2001) found higher implantation and pregnancy rates using the quarter laser assisted hatching technique in comparison with embryos in which total assisted hatching was offered to patients meeting at least one of the following criteria: advanced age, prior implantation failure, poor response, or frozen embryos. Corroborating this study, Petersen et al. (2005) observed that quarter laser assisted hatching was a good strategy to improve implantation rates in patients with history of implantation failure.

Assisted hatching improved the implantation and pregnancy rates of thawed embryo transfers. However, factors such as embryo morphology grading; hatching potential; endometrial quality; and patient intrinsic traits including anxiety, stress, thrombophilia, endometriosis, adenomyosis, hydrosalpinx and others, are pivotal to treatment success and must be considered during the course of treatment, so that, together with the procedures performed inside and outside the IVF laboratory, we may help our patients achieve pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Quarter laser assisted hatching is a safe, valid, and relatively easy-to-use procedure for thawed blastocysts. Blastocysts that expanded and herniated after quarter laser assisted hatching presented statistically superior results.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  1. Antinori S, Selman HA, Caffa B, Panci C, Dani GL, Versaci C. Fertilization and early embryology: Zona opening of human embryos using a non-contact UV laser for assisted hatching in patients with poor prognosis of pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2488–2492. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balaban B, Urman B, Alatas C, Mercan R, Mumcu A, Isiklar A. A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1239–1243. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:685–691. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, Wiemer K. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:7–13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davidson LM, Liu Y, Griffiths T, Jones C, Coward K. Laser Technology in the assisted reproductive technology laboratory: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;38:725–739. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Munk N, Vajta G. Safety and efficiency of oocyte vitrification. Cryobiology. 2017;78:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dobrinsky JR. Advancements in cryopreservation of domestic animal embryos. Theriogenology. 2002;57:285–302. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00672-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edi-Osagie E, Hooper L, Seif MW. The impact of assisted hatching on live birth rates and outcomes of assisted conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1828–1835. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elnahas A, Elnahas T, Azmy O, Elnoury A, Abdelhalim A, Aboelghar M, Alhassani S, Noureldin R. The use of laser assisted hatching of frozen/thawed embryos versus laser assisted hatching of fresh embryos in human intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38:729–729. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1444392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ewards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J, Fehilly CG, Purdy JM, Slater JM, Steptoe PC, Webster JM. Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1984;1:3–23. doi: 10.1007/BF01129615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–1158. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Germond M, Nocera D, Senn A, Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Fakan S. Microdissection of mouse and human zona pellucida using a 1.48µm diode laser beam: efficacy and safety of the procedure. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:604–611. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57800-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kanyo K, Zeke J, Kriston R, Szucs Z, Cseh S, Somoskoi B, Konc J. The impact of laser-assisted hatching on the outcome of frozen human embryo transfer cycles. Zygote. 2016;24:742–747. doi: 10.1017/S0967199416000058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kilani SS, Cooke S, Kan AK, Chapman MG. Do age and extended culture affect the architecture of the zona pellucida of human oocytes and embryos? Zygote. 2006;14:39–44. doi: 10.1017/S0967199406003625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liang T, Motan T. Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation for Fertility Preservation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;951:155–161. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45457-3_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu X, Liu Y, Cao X, Liu SY, Dong X. Laser-assisted hatching and clinical outcomes in frozen-thawed cleavage-embryo transfers of patients with previous repeated failure. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34:1137–1145. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-02702-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mantoudis E, Podsiadly BT, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft IL. A comparison between quarter, partial and total laser assisted hatching in selected infertility patients. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2182–2186. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moreira da Silva F, Metelo R. Relation between physical properties of the zona pellucida and viability of bovine embryos after slow-freezing and vitrification. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;40:205–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ng EH, Naveed F, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Chan CC, Tang OS, Ho PC. A randomized double-blind controlled study of the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching on implantation and pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:979–985. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Papadopoulos S, Rizos D, Duffy P, Wade M, Quinn K, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Embryo survival and recipient pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh or vitrified, in vivo or in vitro produced ovine blastocysts. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002;74:35–44. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00162-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Elder K, Franco JG Jr. Implantation failures: success of assisted hatching with quarter-laser zona thinning. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:224–229. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60944-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simon A, Laufer N. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF) J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:1227–1239. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9861-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2425–2431. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeng M, Su S, Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33:655–666. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C, Nyboe Andersen A, Selleskog U, Nielsen D, Grøndahl C, Kim H, Arce JC, CEMAS II and Study Group FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2575–2581. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBRA Assisted Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction

RESOURCES