Smart et. al. (1) expressed concern we made no conclusions about the antihypertensive benefits of isometric resistance training (IRT) in the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Pronouncement on the role of physical activity (PA) to prevent and treat hypertension (2). At the time of publication of the Pronouncement there were two meta-analyses on this topic (3, 4); we included Carlson et al. (3) which led Smart et al. to believe that we missed Inder et al. (1).
The ACSM Pronouncement (2) on PA and hypertension contained seminal portions of the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report (PAGACSR) (5). In the PAGACSR, we performed a comprehensive search of the literature from 2006, the publication of the first Report, until February 2018. We also conducted a methodological study quality assessment of potentially qualifying reviews and graded the evidence. The magnitude of the blood pressure (BP) response to PA is strongly and positively related to resting BP so that we reported our findings separately among adults with normal BP, prehypertension, and hypertension rather than combining them.
Of the two potentially qualifying meta-analyses on IRT and hypertension (3, 4), we retained Carlson et al. (3) for the following reasons. There was significant overlap between the two meta-analyses. Inder et al. (4) reported the systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) BP reductions among the combined sample, and only reported the MAP reductions among adults with hypertension versus normal BP, stating no significance was found for SBP and DBP (data not reported). Carlson et al. (3) reported the SBP, DBP, and MAP reductions among the combined sample and adults with hypertension versus normal BP, all of which were statistically significant. The overall methodological study quality rating was higher for Carlson et al. (3) than Inder et al. (4). Carlson et al. (3) did not disclose the resting BP of the 61 adults with hypertension in the sample, all of whom were on medication, so that it was not possible to comment on regression to the mean as they may or may not have been controlled. After thoughtful consideration, we were unable to make any conclusions about the antihypertensive benefits of IRT.
At the time of the publication of the Pronouncement, we were aware of the statement (not the endorsement) of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology that the meta-analyses of Cornelissen and Smart (6), Carlson et al. (3), and Inder et al. (4) suggested IRT resulted in substantial lowering of BP (7). The Exercise and Sport Science Australia position stand (8) now recommends IRT for the management of hypertension based on these same reviews, and the Canadian hypertension guidelines state that the use of resistance exercise that includes handgrip isometric exercise is safe (9). However, until a large, well-designed randomized controlled trial is done among adults with hypertension comparing IRT (the alternative) to aerobic exercise training (the recommended standard), any conclusions that can be made about the use of IRT in the treatment of hypertension should be made with caution.
Contributor Information
Linda S. Pescatello, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
David M. Buchner, Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
John M. Jakicic, Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Ken E. Powell, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (Retired)
William E. Kraus, Department and School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard, ICF Next, Fairfax, VA.
Wayne W. Campbell, Departments of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sondra Dietz, ICF Next, Fairfax, VA.
Loretta DiPietro, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Milken Institute of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Stephanie M. George, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Anne McTiernan, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Russell R. Pate, Department of Exercise Science and School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Katrina L. Piercy, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
References
- 1.Smart NA, Howden R, Cornelissen V, Brook R, McGowan C, Millar PJ, Ritti-Dias R, Baroos A, Carlson DJ, Wiles JD, Swaine I Physical Activity to Prevent and Treat Hypertension: A Systematic Review Med Sci Sports Exerc. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pescatello LS, Buchner DM, Jakicic JM, et al. Physical Activity to Prevent and Treat Hypertension: A Systematic Review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 51(6):1314–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carlson DJ, Dieberg G, Hess NC, Millar PJ, Smart NA. Isometric exercise training for blood pressure management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014; 89(3):327–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Inder JD, Carlson DJ, Dieberg G, McFarlane JR, Hess NC, Smart NA. Isometric exercise training for blood pressure management: a systematic review and meta-analysis to optimize benefit. Hypertens Res. 2016; 39(2):88–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. 2018: Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cornelissen VA, Buys R, Smart NA. Endurance exercise beneficially affects ambulatory blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2013; 31(4):639–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharman JE, Smart NA, Coombes JS, Stowasser M. Exercise and sport science australia position stand update on exercise and hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2019. 10.1038/s41371-019-0266z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nerenberg KA, Zarnke KB, Leung AA, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children. Can J Cardiol. 2018; 34(5):506–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]