Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: NanoImpact. 2019 Mar 21;14:100152. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2019.100152

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes inhibit estrogen receptor expression in vivo and in vitro through transforming growth factor beta1

L Cody Smith a,b, Santiago Moreno b, Sarah Robinson b,e, Marlene Orandle c, Dale W Porter c, Dipesh Das d, Navid B Saleh d, Tara Sabo-Attwood b,e,*
PMCID: PMC7169977  NIHMSID: NIHMS1527815  PMID: 32313843

Abstract

Exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) is suspected to contribute to pulmonary fibrosis through modulation of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1). There is growing evidence that estrogen signaling is important in pulmonary function and modulates pro-fibrogenic signaling in multiple models of pulmonary fibrosis, however an interaction between MWCNT exposure and estrogen signaling in the lung is not known. The purpose of this work was to determine whether estrogen signaling in the lung is a target for MWCNTs and to identify potential signaling mechanisms mediating MWCNT-induced responses using a whole-body inhalation mouse model and an in vitro human lung cell model. Mice exposed to MWCNTs had reduced mRNA expression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta (Esr1 and Esr2, respectively) in lung tissue at multiple time-points post-exposure, whereas expression of g-protein coupled estrogen receptor1 (Gper1) was more variable. We localized ESR1 protein expression as primarily associated with bronchioles and within inflammatory macrophages. The reduction in estrogen receptor expression was concomitant to an increase in TGF-β1 levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of MWCNT-exposed animals. We confirmed a role for TGF-β1 in mediating MWCNT-induced repression of ESR1 mRNA expression using a TGF-β type-I receptor inhibitor in bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. Overall these results highlight a novel mechanism of MWCNT-induced signaling where MWCNT-induced regulation of TGF-β1 represses estrogen receptor expression. Dysregulated estrogen signaling through altered receptor expression may have potential consequences on lung function.

Keywords: Multi-walled carbon nanotube, transforming growth factor beta1, estrogen receptor, lung

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1527815-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are concentric graphene tubes with a diameter less than 100 nm, high aspect ratio, and unique physiochemical and electro-conductive properties (De Volder, Tawfick et al. 2013). The unique properties of MWCNTs make them appealing for a variety of applications in electronics, engineering, manufacturing and medicine (Endo, Strano et al. 2008). Their widespread application and increased use each year enhances the potential for human exposure through occupational, environmental, medical, and consumer routes (Vietti, Lison et al. 2016). There is concern for adverse pulmonary effects occurring through inhalation due to the high aspect ratio of MWCNTs (Donaldson, Poland et al. 2013).

Animal studies have indicated that MWCNTs cause respiratory toxicity including inflammatory changes, lung remodeling and fibrosis, mesothelioma, and promotion of lung adenocarcinoma (Muller, Huaux et al. 2005, Poland, Duffin et al. 2008, Ryman-Rasmussen, Cesta et al. 2009, Sargent, Porter et al. 2014). The pro-fibrotic potential of MWCNTs is underscored by the measurement of fibrotic biomarkers in the blood of workers in MWCNT manufacturing plants (Fatkhutdinova, Khaliullin et al. 2016). In animals, MWCNTs have been shown to cause acute dose-dependent fibrotic-like changes in the lung, evidenced by excess collagen deposition in foci of inflammation, upregulation of the pro-fibrogenic cytokine, transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), and induction of fibrotic marker gene expression such as collagen 1 (Col1a1), collagen2 (Col1a2), and fibronectin (Fn1) in mice (Porter, Hubbs et al. 2012, Dong, Porter et al. 2015, Wang, Duch et al. 2015). MWCNT-induced pulmonary fibrosis has been observed to persist up to 336 days post-exposure in mice (Mercer, Scabilloni et al. 2013).

There is growing evidence supporting a role for sex hormones, particularly estrogen (E2) in lung function and disease (Carey, Card et al. 2007, Tam, Morrish et al. 2011, Townsend, Miller et al. 2012, Shim, Pacheco-Rodriguez et al. 2013, Sathish, Martin et al. 2015). While a link between MWCNTs and other particles and fibers to pulmonary fibrosis has been documented, few studies have investigated whether estrogen-mediated pathways through cognate receptors are targets of MWCNT exposure in the lung. One mechanism could be through altering the expression of estrogen receptors yet only a handful of studies have investigated such changes in response to particulates. For example, one study found that intratracheal instillation of silica nanoparticles to male and female mice significantly reduced mRNA expression of the nuclear estrogen receptors (Esr1 and Esr2) but not the membrane-bound G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (Gper1) in the lung after 14 days (Brass, McGee et al. 2010). A more recent study by our group reported that exogenous administration of the profibrogenic protein, TGF-β1, caused reduced expression of ESR1, ESR2, and GPER1 mRNA expression in bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2Bs) (Smith, Moreno et al. 2018) highlighting the potential link between ESRs and pro-fibrotic signaling pathways. It is possible that such mechanisms contribute to noted sex differences in the incidence and severity of pulmonary fibrosis. Data from epidemiological studies indicate that pulmonary fibrosis is more common in men, and that women have better survival rates (Gribbin, Hubbard et al. 2006, Han, Murray et al. 2008) however, results from studies investigating a role for sex steroid signaling in animal models have been mixed. For example, male mice exhibited greater fibrosis than female mice after treatment with the chemotherapeutic bleomycin (Voltz, Card et al. 2008, Redente, Jacobsen et al. 2011), whereas estrogen (17β-Estradiol, E2) supplementation exacerbated bleomycin-induced fibrosis in female rats (Gharaee-Kermani, Hatano et al. 2005). These discrepancies highlight a need for foundational data that improve our understanding of how known fibrogenic and sex steroid signaling mechanisms may interface and influence each other (or not).

To determine whether estrogen signaling is modulated in particulate-induced lung disease, we sought to probe interactions between pro-fibrogenic and estrogen receptor signaling mechanisms using both in vivo and in vitro models of MWCNT exposure. E2 exerts its effects by binding and activating several receptors including the nuclear transcription factors ESR1 ESR2, and several variants thereof (Gruber, Tschugguel et al. 2002), and the membrane-bound GPER1 (Filardo, Quinn et al. 2002, Prossnitz, Arterburn et al. 2008). Herein, we investigated the effect of MWCNT exposure on estrogen receptor expression in the lung as a surrogate for E2 signaling in human lung epithelial cells in vitro and mouse lung tissues that show inflammation and pro-fibrotic histopathological changes.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Two types of MWCNTs were used in this study including MWCNT-7 from Mitsui & Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan referred to here as Mitsui MWCNTs and another particle from Helix Materials Solutions, Inc., Richardson, Texas, USA referred to as Helix MWCNTs. The Selective inhibitor of TGF-β type-I receptor, LY 364947 (purity: > 99%) was purchased from Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK (Cat. No. 2718) and dissolved in Corning™ cellgro™ dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Corning™ 25950CQC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), final solvent concentration < 0.1%. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Fisher Scientific Co LLC (BP1605, Pittsburgh, PA) and 1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (purity: ≥ 99%) (DPPC) was purchased from Sigma (P0163, Saint Louis, MO).

Animal exposure

The mouse inhalation exposure study was performed at NIOSH and has been described previously (Porter, Hubbs et al. 2012). Briefly, Male C57BL/6J mice (6 weeks old) were exposed to a Mitsui MWCNT aerosol (10 mg/m3, 5 h/day) for either 2, 4, 8, or 12 days. At one day post-exposure, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was collected by inserting a cannula into the trachea and instilling 1 mL ice-cold Ca2+ and Mg2+-free PBS, pH 7.4, supplemented with 5.5 mM D-glucose. Recovered BAL was subsequently stored at −80°C. From separate sets of mice, lungs were removed and fixed for histopathology.

Histopathology

At necropsy, lungs were inflated with 6 cc of 10% formalin and processed into paraffin blocks. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut at 5 μm and mounted on non-coverslipped slides. H&E staining, Masson’s Trichrome staining, and Alcian-Blue/PAS staining was performed by Histology Tech Services (Gainesville, FL).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Bronchoalveolar lavage samples (BALF) from mice exposed to clean air or Mitsui MWCNT aerosol (5 mg/m3, 5 h/day) for 4 days were centrifuged for 20 minutes at 14,000 × g at 4°C, and 100 μL of the supernatant was removed for TGF-β1 quantification using the Quantikine® ELISA kit from R&D Systems (MB100B, Minneapolis, MN). Latent TGF-β1 was activated by adding 20 μL of 1 N HCl to 100 μL supernatant, vortexing, and incubating for 10 minutes at room temperature. The reaction was neutralized by adding 20 μL of 1.2 N NaOH/0.5 M HEPES and vortexing. Active TGF-β1 was quantified per manufacturer’s recommendations.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 microns and placed on charged slides. Prepared slides were then deparaffinized in xylenes and rehydrated through graded concentrations of ethanol. Antigen Masking Solution (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) was used to regain antigenicity. Slides were blocked for 30 minutes (Dako Serum Free Block, (Dako, Santa Clara, CA) and then incubated in primary antibody, Anti-Estrogen Receptor alpha (AB75635, ABCAM Cambridge, MA) for one hour. The primary antibody was diluted 1:100 with Dako Diluent (Dako, Santa Clara, CA). Negative and positive control slides were included. Negative control slides were incubated in diluent. Slides were rinsed with PBS (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and incubated for 30 minutes with biotinylated goat anti rabbit secondary antibody diluted 1:200 (Vector, Burlingame, CA). Slides were rinsed and then incubated for 30 minutes with Elite ABC Kit (Vector, Burlingame, CA). Slides were developed with DAB substrate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 90 seconds and counterstained in Mayer’s Hematoxylin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). All incubations were performed in a humidity chamber at room temperature.

Cell culture

Human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2Bs, CRL-9609™) were purchased from ATCC and cultured per the manufacturer’s specifications. Cells were cultured in bronchial epithelial growth medium (BEGM) consisting of bronchial epithelial basal medium (BEBM, Lonza CC-3171, Walkersville, MD) and the BEGM SingleQuot Kit Supplements & Growth Factors (Lonza CC-4175), replacing gentamicin with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin-Neomycin (PSN) Antibiotic Mixture (Gibco 15640, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.). Cells were cultured in T75 Corning U-Shaped Cell Culture Flasks (Corning 430641U, Fisher Scientific Co LLC) coated with a matrix (4.5 mL per 75 cm2) consisting of 0.01 mg/mL fibronectin (Akron AK8350, Boca Raton, FL), 0.03 mg/mL bovine collagen (Gibco A10644–01, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.), and 0.01 mg/mL BSA (Fisher BP1605, Fisher Scientific Co LLC) in BEBM. All exposures were performed in BEGM without the supplied bovine pituitary extract (BPE) aliquot because its composition is not defined. For the gene expression experiments, BEAS-2Bs were plated at 40,000 cells/mL on matrix-coated 12-well Nunc Cell-Culture Treated Multidishes (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., 150628), allowed to adhere overnight, and subsequently exposed for 48 hours to the indicated concentrations of MWCNTs.

Nanotube dispersion and characterization in vitro

For in vitro experiments, stock solutions of Mitsui MWCNTs were dispersed based on the method described by Porter et al. (Porter, Sriram et al. 2008). Briefly, Mitsui MWCNTs were suspended in dispersion media (Ca2+- and Mg2+-free phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, supplemented with 0.6 mg/mL BSA and 0.01 mg/mL DPPC) at2 mg/mL. The MWCNT stock was sonicated in a water bath sonicator (Branson B-220) for 10 minutes, then sonicated using a Branson 450 Sonifier fitted with a 1/8-inch tip in an ice bath at 50% amplitude for 10 minutes with an 8 second pulse and 10 second rest between pulses. Stock solutions of Helix MWCNTs were prepared based on the method described by Wang et al. (Wang, Xia et al. 2010). Briefly, Helix MWCNTs were suspended in ultrapure water at 5 mg/mL and sonicated using the same parameters as for the Mitsui MWCNT dispersion. Both MWCNT stock solutions were dispersed at the concentrations indicated in the manuscript in BEGM without BPE supplemented with 0.6 mg/mL BSA and 0.01 mg/mL DPPC.

Time dependent hydrodynamic radii (HDR) of both Helix (Supplementary Figure 3A) and Mitsui (Supplementary Figure 3B) MWCNTs were monitored with time resolved dynamic light scattering (TRDLS). A 22 mW 632 nm HeNe laser incorporated ALV/CGS-3 compact goniometer system (ALV-Laser GmbH, Langen/Hessen, Germany) with QE APD detector (photomultipliers of 1:25 sensitivity) was employed to monitor size evolution every 15 seconds for 48 hours. The TRDLS experiments were performed at 37°C for both samples with 2 mL of sample in a borosilicate glass vial, which was cleaned thoroughly with 2% Dextran solution. These vials were vortexed for 10 seconds before inserting in the toluene-filled sample vat of the goniometer system. The scattered light was collected at 90° and analyzed using an auto cross-correlator to calculate average HDR.

The electrophoretic mobility (EPM) of both MWCNT suspensions were measured using a Mobius (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA) at 25°C and 30 psi (Supplementary Figure 3C). For each measurement, 1 mL of the MWCNT suspension was introduced into a flow-through cell using a 1 mL syringe. Five EPM values were collected for each of the MWCNT suspensions. The cells were washed with deionized water and ethanol between measurements.

Total RNA extraction and purification

Total RNA was extracted from whole lung and cell lysates using RNA STAT-60™ Reagent (Tel-Test, Inc. Cs-502, Friendswood, TX). Cell lysates were vortexed and whole lung tissue was mechanically disrupted. Total RNA was extracted per manufacturer’s specifications. RNA was precipitated overnight at −20°C in 100% molecular biology grade isopropanol (Fisher BioReagents™ BP26184, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.) containing 0.067% GlycoBlue™ Coprecipitant (Ambion® AM9515, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.) and purified by washing 2X with 75% molecular biology grade absolute ethanol (Fisher BioReagents™ BP28184, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.). RNA pellets were reconstituted in 15 μL RNAsecure™ (Ambion® AM7010, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.). RNA was quantified using a Synergy™ H1 plate reader (BioTek Instrument, Inc., Winooski, VT) and RNA integrity was spot-checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was DNase-treated using the PerfeCTa DNase I Kit (Quanta BioSciences 95150–01k, VWR International LLC, Suwanee, GA) and DNase-treated RNA was subsequently reverse transcribed using the qScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta BioSciences 95047, VWR International LLC). cDNA was diluted 1:20 in RNase-DNase free water. Each 10 μL qPCR reaction contained 1× SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad 172–5270, Hercules, CA), 850 nM forward and reverse primers, and 3.3 μL of the cDNA dilution. Gene specific primers and cycling parameters are displayed in Table 1. Each qPCR reaction was followed by melt curve analysis to verify primer specificity. Cq values were determined by regression method using the CFX Manager 2.1 software and quantified using the relative ΔΔCq method (Hellemans, Mortier et al. 2007) or the ratio method (Pfaffl 2001) where indicated. Target gene expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression.

Table 1.

Primer details for qPCR

Gene Forward (5′−3′) Reverse (5′−3′) Protocol Efficiency (%) Source
GAPDH GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 60C 30s, x40 93.9 (Beck, Tancowny et al. 2006)
ESR1 CCACCAACCAGTGCACCATT GGTCTTTTCGTATCCCACCTTTC 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 60C 30s, x40 100.7 (Spizzo, Nicoloso et al. 2010)
ESR2 Proprietary Proprietary 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 60C 30s, x40 102.9 Bio-Rad
GPER1 GCTCCCTGCAAGCAGTCTTT GAAGGTCTCCCCGAGAAAGC 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 60C 30s, x40 97.2 (Ye, Coulouris et al. 2012)
Gapdh AGGTCATCCCAGAGCTGAACG CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCGTAT 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 58C 10s, 72C 30S, x40 91.9 (Ha, Choi et al. 2010)
Esr1 GGAAGCTCCTGTTTGCTCCT AACCGACTTGACGTAGCCAG 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 62C 30s, x40 95.1 (Ye, Coulouris et al. 2012)
Esr2 CGCAGACGAAGAGTGCTGT AGCCAAGGGGTACATACTGG 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 60C 30s, x40 98.7 (Ye, Coulouris et al. 2012)
Gper1 CAGTCTTTCCGTCACGCCTA GCTCGTCTTCTGCTCCACAT 95C 3m; 95C 10s, 60C 30s, x40 91.8 (Ye, Coulouris et al. 2012)

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) measurement

Intracellular ROS was measured using the DCFDA Cellular ROS Detection Assay kit (abcam®ab113851, Cambridge, UK). BEAS-2Bs were plated at 30,000 cells per well on matrix-coated black wall, clear bottom 96-well plates (Corning 3603, Fisher Scientific Co LLC) and allowed to adhere overnight. Once cells reached 90% confluency, they were washed with 1X Buffer, then stained with 20 mM DCFDA dye for 45 minutes at 37°C in the dark. Thereafter, DCFDA solution was removed, and the cells were washed with 1X PBS. The washed cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of MWCNTs for 6 hours and fluorescence was measured at Ex/Em = 485/535 nm.

Statistics

Normality of experimental data was determined by D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test, Shapiro-Wilk normality test, and KS normality test using GraphPad Prism software (Version 5.01, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Data were determined to be normal by passing at least one normality test (p < 0.05). If the data were normal, significant differences (p < 0.05) in means were determined by oneway ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test or one-tailed unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism 5.01 software. Outliers were identified using Grubbs’ test using the following website: https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/grubbs2/.

Results

Mitsui MWCNTs cause histopathological alterations in the lungs of mice

The histopathological alterations observed in this study were reported in full detail elsewhere (Porter, Hubbs et al. 2012) and re-evaluated here in independent samples. Briefly, the lungs of exposed animals exhibited inflammation centered at the bronchioalveolar duct junction, hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the bronchiolar epithelium, airway mucous metaplasia, fibrosis, and vascular changes (Porter, Hubbs et al. 2012). For the present study, new slides from the same MWCNT inhalation study were prepared and confirmed that bronchiolar epithelial cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia was present in all Mitsui MWCNT-exposed mice at all time points (Supplementary Figure 1BD). Lung fibrosis was minimal to mild in severity as indicated by a subtle increase in collagen staining in the lungs of mice exposed to Mitsui MWCNTs for 8 and 12 days (Supplementary Figure 1GH). Prominent mucous metaplasia was apparent in mice exposed to Mitsui MWCNTs for 8 and 12 days and was primarily seen in small bronchioles as evidenced by heavy magenta staining of the airway epithelium (Supplementary Figure 1KL).

Measurement of TGF-β1 levels in BALF of mice exposed to Mitsui MWCNTs

MWCNTs have been shown to increase total TGF-β1 levels in the BALF of mice (Wang, Xia et al. 2011, Ronzani, Spiegelhalter et al. 2012, Li, Wang et al. 2013, Wang, Nie et al. 2013, Chen, Nie et al. 2014, Dong, Porter et al. 2015), so we investigated whether a similar response occurred in our model. It should be noted that that we were not able to obtain BALF samples from mice exposed to 10 mg/m3 MWCNTs, but were able to quantify total TGF-β1 in the BALF of mice exposed to clean air or 5 mg/m3 Mitsui MWCNTs for 5 hours per day at 4 days post exposure that were collected from a parallel study. TGF-β1 levels were quantified by ELISA. The mean ± SEM of TGF-β1 levels in control and Mitsui MWCNT-exposed mice were 86.67 ± 14.92 (n = 6) and 110.5 ± 6.83 (n = 7), respectively. There was an increased trend in levels of TGF-β1 however these levels were not quite statistically significant from controls as determined by one-tailed, unpaired t test (p = 0.0776) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mitsui MWCNTs upregulate TGF-β1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Mice were exposed to clean air or 5 mg/m3 aerosolized MWCNTs for 5 hours per day for 4 days and TGF-β1 levels were determined in BALF by ELISA. Each point represents TGF-β1 level in one mouse. Lines indicate mean ± SEM. Asterisk (*) indicates statistically significant differences between means (p = 0.0776) as determined by one-tailed, unpaired t test.

Mitsui MWCNTs Reduce Estrogen Receptor mRNA Expression in Mouse Lungs

Previous data has shown that TGF-β1 reduces ESR1 mRNA and protein expression in vitro in bronchial epithelial cells (Smith, Moreno et al. 2018), so we questioned whether the increased trend of BALF TGF-β1 levels were associated with changes in estrogen receptor expression in vivo in the lungs of mice exposed to Mitsui MWCNTs. In an effort to reuse and reduce the use of animals in our research, we began investigations on male mice exposed to MWCNTs in a former study. These studies are relevant in light of previous studies which indicated that exposure to another particulate (silica) resulted in reduced expression of Esr1 and Esr2 in lungs of male mice (Brass, McGee et al. 2010). Furthermore, the goal of this study was to observe the connection between pro-fibrotic and steroid pathways, not to perform a comparison in injury between males and females at this point. We evaluated mRNA expression of Esr1, Esr2, and Gper1 by qPCR in whole lung lysates of mice obtained 1 day after exposure for 2, 4, 8, or 12 days to clean air or 10 mg/m3 Mitsui MWCNTs by whole-body inhalation for 5 hours per day. The expression levels of Esr1, Esr2, and Gper1 in lungs of mice exposed to clean air for 2 days were expressed as a ratio to Esr2 based on the method described by Pfaffl et al. (Pfaffl 2001) to determine relative baseline expression. The relative basal expression level of each receptor subtype was Gper1 > Esr1 > Esr2 (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mitsui MWCNTs reduce estrogen receptor expression in mouse lungs. A) Esr gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA expression and calculated as a ratio to Esr2 mRNA expression as described in (Pfaffl 2001). Relative baseline expression levels of each estrogen receptor in whole lung tissue of mice exposed to clean air for two days (n = 8) was Gper1 > Esr1 > Esr2. Mice were exposed by whole body inhalation to clean air for 2, 4, 8, or 12 days (n = 8, 8, 6, 8, respectively) or 10 mg/m3 aerosolized Mitsui MWCNTs for 5 hours per day for 2, 4, 8, or 12 days (n = 9, 7, 5, and 6, respectively) and expression of B) Esr1, C) Esr2, and D) Gper1 was determined by qPCR, normalized to Gapdh, and fold change calculated by relative ΔΔCq method. Data are mean ± SEM of mRNA expression relative to day 2 control mice. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences from control at each time-point as determined by two-tailed, unpaired t test.

For the time-course analysis, fold changes for all samples were calculated relative to expression levels in lungs of mice exposed to clean air for 2 days. The relative expression of each receptor subtype varied over the time-course in both clean air- and Mitsui MWCNT-exposed mice (Figure 2BD). The expression of Esr1 was significantly reduced in Mitsui MWCNT-exposed mice compared to time-point matched control mice after 4 and 12 days of exposure. Expression of Esr1 was reduced compared to controls after 2 and 8 days of exposure but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05, Figure 2B). The expression of Esr2 was significantly reduced compared to controls after 2 and 4 days and there was a trend of reduced expression at 8- and 12-days post exposure, but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05, Figure 2). Gper1 mRNA expression varied the most and the relative expression levels inverted over the time-course and were only significantly different (p < 0.05) after 4 days of exposure (Figure 2D).

ESR1 is expressed in hyperplastic and hypertrophic bronchiolar epithelial cells and inflammatory macrophages in vivo

Next, we sought to localize ESR1 antigen expression in lungs of animals exposed to MWCNTs by immunohistochemistry. We focused on ESR1 because we observed the largest change in Esr1 mRNA expression in the lungs of mice exposed to MWCNTs and its baseline mRNA expression was greater than Esr2 (Figure 2). Results showed nuclear expression of ESR1 antigen in hyperplastic/hypertrophic bronchiolar epithelial cells, but staining was also prominent in inflammatory macrophages that were often associated with engulfed deposits of particles (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Photomicrographs (20× magnification) of lung sections from mice exposed to air or MWCNT for 8 days that were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor-1 (ESR-1). Epithelial hyperplasia and hypertrophy are seen at terminal bronchioles (TB) in MWCNT-exposed mice. Increased numbers of inflammatory macrophages often containing black particles (arrows), are present at the alveolar duct (AD) extending into adjacent alveoli. IHC for ESR-1 demonstrated nuclear staining of hyperplastic/hypertrophic bronchiolar epithelial cells and inflammatory macrophages. Air-exposed murine lung shows normal pulmonary architecture.

Mitsui MWCNTs reduce ESR1 mRNA expression in BEAS-2Bs

To begin mechanistic evaluations of a role for TGF-β1 in MWCNT-induced repression of estrogen receptor mRNA expression, we characterized the response in bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2Bs) in vitro. First, we measured the relative baseline expression levels of ESR1, ESR2, and GPER1 in control cells as a ratio to ESR2 using the method described previously (Pfaffl 2001). The expression pattern for each receptor subtype in vitro was GPER1 > ESR1 > ESR2 which matched the relative pattern observed in mouse lungs in vivo (Figure 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Mitsui MWCNTs reduce expression of ESR1 but not ESR2 or GPER1 mRNA expression in BEAS-2Bs. A) ESR gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression and calculated as a ratio to ESR2 mRNA expression as described in (Pfaffl 2001). Relative baseline expression levels of each receptor in control cells was GPER1 > ESR1 > ESR2. (B-D) BEAS-2Bs were exposed to increasing concentrations of Mitsui MWCNTs for 48 hours and expression of B) ESR1, C) ESR2, and D) GPER1 was measured by qPCR, normalized to GAPDH, and fold change calculated by relative ΔΔCq method. Data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Letters indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test.

Similar to results observed in vivo, exposure of BEAS-2Bs to Mitsui MWCNTs (0.2, 2, and 20 μg/mL) for 48 hours significantly reduced ESR1 mRNA expression (Figure 4B) but did not significantly impact GPER1 mRNA expression (Figure 4D). In contrast to the in vivo results, in vitro exposure to Mitsui MWCNTs did not affect ESR2 expression (Figure 4C). Interestingly, exposure to Helix MWCNTs which are also pristine (non-surface functionalized) did not reduce ESR1 mRNA expression in vitro in BEAS-2Bs (Supplementary Figure 2) despite similar physiochemical properties (i.e. width, HDR, Supplementary Figure 3) and ROS production (Supplementary Figure 4).

Mitsui MWCNTs reduce ESR1 mRNA expression in a TGF-β1-dependent manner in BEAS-2Bs

To determine whether TGF-β1 mediated the Mitsui MWCNT-induced reduction in ESR1 mRNA expression in vitro, we used a selective inhibitor of TGF-β type-I receptor (TBRI), LY 364947, to block TGF-β1-mediated signaling. Cells were pre-treated with 20 μM LY 364947 for 2 hours, then exposed to 20 μg/mL Mitsui MWCNTs for 48 hours in the presence or absence of 20 μM LY 364947. As before, exposure of cells to Mitsui MWCNTs significantly reduced ESR1 mRNA expression, and treatment with LY 364947 inhibited this response (Figure 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Mitsui MWCNT-induced reduction of ESR1 mRNA expression is partly dependent on TGF-β1 signaling. BEAS-2B cells were exposed to TGF-β1 inhibitor (20 μM LY 364947) for two hours, then exposed to 20 μg/mL Mitsui MWCNTs in the presence or absence of 20 μM LY 364947 for 48 hours. ESR1 mRNA expression was measured by qPCR, normalized to GAPDH, and fold change calculated by relative ΔΔCq method. Data are mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) compared to control as determined by a two-tailed, unpaired t test.

Discussion

MWCNT use is rapidly growing which raises concern for potential adverse health effects through inhalation exposures, including the development of pulmonary fibrosis. There is extensive evidence in small animal models that MWCNTs cause fibrotic like changes in the lung (Vietti, Lison et al. 2016), but limited studies have probed a role for steroid signaling despite epidemiological data indicating sex-specific trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival rates of IPF (Han, Murray et al. 2008) and studies in animal models indicating sex-specific differences in pulmonary fibrotic responses (Gharaee-Kermani, Hatano et al. 2005, Lekgabe, Royce et al. 2006, Voltz, Card et al. 2008, Redente, Jacobsen et al. 2011). As such, the purpose of this work was to begin investigations into interactions between pro-fibrogenic signaling and estrogen receptors in a model of MWCNT-induced fibrosis, to highlight a potential role for estrogen signaling in the fibrogenic response, which could be used to direct more extensive studies to probe sex differences and molecular mechanisms of action that involve ESRs. Through a combination of in vivo and in vitro exposure studies, we highlight Esr1 and Esr2 mRNA expression as targets of Mitsui MWCNT-induced signaling in mouse lungs in vivo, and ESR1 mRNA expression as a target in human lung cells in vitro. We proceed to show that the inhibitory effect of MWCNTs on ESR1 expression is mediated by TGF-β1. This work is the first to support estrogen receptors as targets of profibrogenic signaling induced by MWCNT which may influence lung function regulated by E2.

As TGF-β1 is a well-established driver of extracellular matrix deposition and fibrosis in the lung, particularly in MWCNT-induced fibrogenesis (Wang, Nie et al. 2013, Mishra, Stueckle et al. 2015), we measured TGF-β1 levels in the BALF of Mitsui MWCNT-exposed mice. Similar to previous studies (Wang, Xia et al. 2011, Ronzani, Spiegelhalter et al. 2012, Li, Wang et al. 2013, Wang, Nie et al. 2013, Chen, Nie et al. 2014, Dong, Porter et al. 2015), exposure to MWCNTs resulted in a trend of increased TGF-β1 levels in the BALF of mice exposed to Mitsui MWCNTs in this study (Figure 1). The lower induction of TGF-β1 in our study is likely due t the time-point analyzed. A previous study reported induction of TGF-β1 in the BALF of mice exposed to a similar dose (4 mg/m3) and type (rigid) of MWCNT although their levels were higher (and significant), but the time point was 21 days post exposure (Duke, Taylor-Just et al. 2017). Our increased trend of TGF-β1 at 4 days post exposure is possibly capturing the initial response. Future studies should include a comprehensive time-course analysis of TGF-β1 in the BALF of mice exposed to 10 mg/m3 for 5 hours per day to better correlate BALF TGF-β1 levels with reduced estrogen receptor expression in the lung observed in this study. Importantly, the dose of MWCNTs used in the studies described herein (5–10 mg/m3 for 5 hours per day) is occupationally-relevant given that mice exposed for four days to 10 mg/m3 MWCNTs for 5 hours per day approximates human deposition for a person performing light work for approximately 27–103 months based on analysis of total lung burden (Porter, Hubbs et al. 2012).

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that carbon-based nanoparticles are capable of interfering with endocrine signaling in reproductive tissues [reviewed by Iavicoli et al. (Iavicoli, Fontana et al. 2013)]. However, few studies have focused on effects of particulate exposure on sex hormone regulation and signaling in nonreproductive organs and vice versa. This is despite evidence suggesting that sex hormones, particularly estrogen, play a role in lung physiology and disease (Carey, Card et al. 2007, Tam, Morrish et al. 2011, Shim, Pacheco-Rodriguez et al. 2013). We characterized the effect of Mitsui MWCNT exposure on Esr1, Esr2, and Gper1 mRNA expression in the mouse lung to infer a role for Mitsui MWCNTs in modulating E2 signaling in the lung. We found that Esr1 and Esr2 mRNA expression was reduced in the lungs of Mitsui MWCNT-exposed mice compared to controls at all time points, although the greatest reduction was for Esr1 (Figure 2BC), whereas expression of Gper1 was less affected (Figure 2D). These data are consistent with a study which found that intratracheal instillation of silica nanoparticles to male and female mice significantly reduced Esr1 and Esr2 but not Gper1 mRNA expression in lung tissue after 14 days (Brass, McGee et al. 2010). Using immunohistochemistry we were able to localize ESR1 in epithelial cells but also noted positive staining in macrophages (Figure 3). The levels of ESR1 protein was difficult to quantify but the expression in macrophages is consistent with previous reports detailing estrogenic responses of lung macrophages in the lung that are ESR1 specific (Keselman, Fang et al. 2017). We focused on ESR1 protein detection since this receptor type showed the most significant change at the mRNA level and good working antibodies were available (positive staining on reproductive tissues – data not shown). Certainly, a more detailed time-course may shed additional opportunities to improve our quantitative ability but these results do show that several cell types, including epithelial cells, express ESR1.

To begin mechanistic investigations into pathways contributing to the MWCNT-induced repression of estrogen receptor mRNA, we sought to develop an in vitro system that would allow us to more easily probe potential signaling pathways. We chose BEAS-2Bs because we observed positive immunostaining of ESR1 in bronchial cells in the mouse lung (Figure 3) and they exhibited a similar estrogen receptor expression profile (Figure 4A). We determined that only ESR1 mRNA expression exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in expression following MWCNT exposure (Figure 4BD) contrary to the in vivo results where all the receptor’s mRNA levels were reduced. Based on alveolar surface area of mice (0.05 m2) the calculated dose to the alveolar surface in vivo is between the comparable low and medium doses we employed in the in vitro studies and therefore differences in dosimetry do not seem like a major contributing factor. However, it is important to note that the in vivo responses were observed in whole lung tissue and therefore we cannot determine which cell types are driving the response in vivo. This is supported by our immunohistochemistry data which clearly show other cells types are contributing.

It is well known that subtle differences in nanoparticle dimension and structure can drastically influence their behavior in biological systems and their ability to alter biological responses (Grabinski, Hussain et al. 2007, Manke, Wang et al. 2013). As such, we questioned whether the responses observed in our study were specific to Mitsui MWCNTs. We chose to focus our studies primarily on exposure to Mitsui nanotubes because they are considered ‘more pathogenic’ than other types – which is a major reason for their declining manufacture and use – although conflicting data still exists. Data generated from exposure to these particular nanotubes allows us to benchmark our estrogen responses against a well published type of nanotube with respect to pulmonary injury and disease (i.e. fibrosis). Helix MWCNTs are similar to Mitsui MWCNTs with respect to surface chemistry (pristine non-surface functionalized) individual nanotube width (~40–50 nm) and length (range 1–13 um; average 5 um) and both show a consistent ability to produce ROS (Supplementary Figure 4). Yet Helix MWCNTs did not reduce ESR1 mRNA expression (Supplementary Figure 2). This suggests other properties or behavior is driving the varied repression of ESR1. The evolution of HDR in cell culture media was measured for 48 hours and did not differ drastically although the mean HDR for Helix were smaller (469 nm) compared to Mitsui (546 nm) nanotubes. The overall range was large which can be attributed to heterogeneous dispersion of the MWNTs in the cell culture media. Both types of nanotubes were dispersed in the media in their pristine form and the high van der Waals attraction force between MWNT bundles is a primary reason for such heterogeneity. Interestingly, Mitsui nanotubes seemed more unstable over time (Supplementary Figure 3). Of note, the variable responses are likely not due to surface properties as a recent report showed that changing the surface chemistry of Helix tubes (coating with AL2O3) had little effect on pulmonary responses including inflammation and proteomic changes compared to the same uncoated particles (Hilton, Taylor et al. 2015, Rahman, Jacobsen et al. 2017). The most striking differences between the two nanotubes is in their reported rigidity; Mitsui MWCNTs are known as extremely rigid nanotubes and are described as having high crystallinity (Nagai, Okazaki et al. 2011). It is possible that the slight differences in stability, agglomerate size and rigidity between the MWCNTs influence the dichotomous effects on ESR1 mRNA expression.

We questioned whether TGF-β1 induction could drive Mitsui MWCNT-induced inhibition of ESR1 mRNA expression. We found that LY 364947, the TBR1 inhibitor, rescued ESR1 expression in the presence of Mitsui MWCNTs suggesting that the inhibitory effects were at least partly mediated through TGF-β1 (Figure 5). It has been previously shown that Mitsui MWCNTs increase TGF-β1 production in lung epithelial and fibroblast cells in vitro while helical types (like Helix) failed to do so (Vietti, Ibouraadaten et al. 2013). These data collectively suggest that Mitsui MWCNTs specifically influence ESR1 expression through modulation of TGF-β1. Direct interactions between TGF-β1 and estrogen receptor signaling have been previously reported by a few studies, however most of these have focused on reproductive cancer models (Stoica, Saceda et al. 1997, Petrel and Brueggemeier 2003, Mak, Leav et al. 2010, Fridriksdottir, Kim et al. 2015). Only two studies have examined interactions between TGF-β1 and estrogen receptor signaling in the lung, including one which showed that E2 exposure increased TGF-β1 expression in lung fibroblasts isolated from rats exposed to bleomycin (Gharaee-Kermani, Hatano et al. 2005), a result that would seem to contribute to fibrosis rather than repress related signaling. Another study found that exogenous TGF-β1 administration resulted in reduced estrogen receptor expression in bronchial epithelial cells (Smith, Moreno et al. 2018). Furthermore, TGF-β1 is known to be produced by several cell types (Pociask, Sime et al. 2004, Fernandez and Eickelberg 2012) that we also now show to contain detectable levels of ESR1, including epithelial cells and macrophages. How these cell types, steroids and profibrotic pathways influence particle-induced lung injury is a next logical step of investigation.

The novel observation that Mitsui MWCNT-induced reduction in Esr1 and Esr2 mRNA expression in vivo and ESR1 mRNA expression in vitro begs the question of whether there are potential adverse biological effects associated with this phenomenon. ERs are known to influence lung development (Patrone, Cassel et al. 2003, Massaro and Massaro 2004, Massaro and Massaro 2006), but perhaps more relevant to this study, are the effects of E2 through ESR1 on a variety of respiratory parameters in adult mice including breathing and respiratory rhythmogenesis (Carey, Card et al. 2007). A recent study reported that E2 regulated the expression of genes involved in chromatin remodeling, epigenetic modification of histones, and vasodilation in lung cells (Smith, Moreno et al. 2018). Further, transgenic mice lacking ESR1 exhibited increased airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine compared to wildtype mice (Carey, Card et al. 2007), and another study using transgenic mice lacking ESR2 found that the protective effects of E2 on lung injury after trauma-hemorrhage were mediated by ESR2 (Toth, Schwacha et al. 2003). In addition, a role for sex steroids in lung function, including response to stressors, is now recognized and is postulated to be an important player in the sex differences observed for several other lung diseases (asthma, COPD, cancer) (Fuseini and Newcomb 2017, Keselman, Fang et al. 2017, Słowikowski, Lianeri et al. 2017). However, the consequence of reduced estrogen receptor expression on the development or progression of fibrosis is less defined.

In conclusion, we observed a previously unreported interaction between Mitsui MWCNT-induced signaling and estrogen receptors that was at least partially mediated through induction of TGF-β1. Collectively this work suggests Mitsui MWCNTs disrupt estrogen signaling in the lung; however, it remains to be determined whether the reduced estrogen receptor mRNA expression influences the fibrotic response to MWCNTs or whether this represents an off-target effect with added consequences on lung function.

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights.

  • Exposure of mice to MWCNTs by whole-body inhalation caused a significant increase of TGF-β1 levels in BALF and a significant decrease in estrogen receptor expression in lung tissue

  • Exposure of BEAS-2Bs to MWCNTs in vitro significantly reduced ESR1 mRNA expression

  • MWCNT-induced reduction of ESR1 mRNA expression in BEAS-2Bs in vitro is mediated by TGF-β1

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (R01HL114907 to TSA)

List of Abbreviations

ACTB

Beta-actin

BALF

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

BEAS-2Bs

Bronchial epithelial cells

BEBM

Bronchial epithelial basal medium

BEGM

Bronchial epithelial growth medium

BPE

Bovine pituitary extract

Col1a1

Collagen type 1 alpha 1 chain

Col1a2

Collagen type 1 alpha 2 chain

DCFDA 2’

7’ –dichlorofluorescin diacetate

DMSO

Dimethyl sulfoxide

DPPC

Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine

E2

17β-Estradiol

ECM

Extracellular matrix

ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ESR1

Estrogen receptor alpha

ESR2

Estrogen receptor beta

Fn1

Fibronectin

GAPDH

Glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase

GPER1

G-protein coupled estrogen receptor

HDR

Hydrodynamic radius

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

IPF

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

MIQE

Minimum information for publication of qPCR experiments

MWCNT

Multi-walled carbon nanotube

PAS

Periodic acid-Schiff

PSN

Penicillin-Streptomycin-Neomycin

qPCR

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

TBRI

Transforming growth factor beta receptor type 1

TGF-β1

Transforming growth factor beta1

TRDLS

Time-resolved dynamic light scattering

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Beck LA, Tancowny B, Brummet ME, Asaki SY, Curry SL, Penno MB, Foster M, Bahl A and Stellato C (2006). “Functional analysis of the chemokine receptor CCR3 on airway epithelial cells.” J Immunol 177(5): 3342–3354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brass DM, McGee SP, Dunkel MK, Reilly SM, Tobolewski JM, Sabo-Attwood T and Fattman CL (2010). “Gender influences the response to experimental silica-induced lung fibrosis in mice.” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 299(5): L664–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey MA, Card JW, Voltz JW, Arbes SJ, Germolec DR, Korach KS and Zeldin DC (2007). “It’s all about sex: gender, lung development and lung disease.” Trends Endocrinol Metab 18(8): 308–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carey MA, Card JW, Voltz JW, Germolec DR, Korach KS and Zeldin DC (2007). “The impact of sex and sex hormones on lung physiology and disease: lessons from animal studies.” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 293(2): L272–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen T, Nie H, Gao X, Yang J, Pu J, Chen Z, Cui X, Wang Y, Wang H and Jia G (2014). “Epithelial–mesenchymal transition involved in pulmonary fibrosis induced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes via TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway.” Toxicol Lett 226(2): 150–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH and Hart AJ (2013). “Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications.” Science 339(6119): 535–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donaldson K, Poland CA, Murphy FA, MacFarlane M, Chernova T and Schinwald A (2013). “Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes and asbestos - similarities and differences.” Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong J, Porter DW, Batteli LA, Wolfarth MG, Richardson DL and Ma Q (2015). “Pathologic and molecular profiling of rapid-onset fibrosis and inflammation induced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Arch Toxicol 89(4): 621–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duke KS, Taylor-Just AJ, Ihrie MD, Shipkowski KA, Thompson EA, Dandley EC, Parsons GN and Bonner JC (2017). “STAT1-dependent and-independent pulmonary allergic and fibrogenic responses in mice after exposure to tangled versus rod-like multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Part Fibre Toxicol 14(1): 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Endo M, Strano M and Ajayan P (2008). “Potential applications of carbon nanotubes.” Carbon nanotubes: 13–61. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fatkhutdinova LM, Khaliullin TO, Vasil’yeva OL, Zalyalov RR, Mustafin IG, Kisin ER, Birch ME, Yanamala N and Shvedova AA (2016). “Fibrosis biomarkers in workers exposed to MWCNTs.” Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 299: 125–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernandez IE and Eickelberg O (2012). “The impact of TGF-β on lung fibrosis: from targeting to biomarkers.” Proc Am Thorac Soc 9(3): 111–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Filardo EJ, Quinn JA, Frackelton AR Jr and Bland KI (2002). “Estrogen action via the G protein-coupled receptor, GPR30: stimulation of adenylyl cyclase and cAMP-mediated attenuation of the epidermal growth factor receptor-to-MAPK signaling axis.” Mol Endocrinol 16(1): 70–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fridriksdottir AJ, Kim J, Villadsen R, Klitgaard MC, Hopkinson BM, Petersen OW and Rønnov-Jessen L (2015). “Propagation of oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen-responsive normal human breast cells in culture.” Nat Commun 6: 8786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuseini H and Newcomb DC (2017). “Mechanisms driving gender differences in asthma.” Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 17(3): 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gharaee-Kermani M, Hatano K, Nozaki Y and Phan SH (2005). “Gender-based differences in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis.” Am J Pathol 166(6): 1593–1606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grabinski C, Hussain S, Lafdi K, Braydich-Stolle L and Schlager J (2007). “Effect of particle dimension on biocompatibility of carbon nanomaterials.” Carbon 45(14): 2828–2835. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gribbin J, Hubbard RB, Le Jeune I, Smith CJ, West J and Tata LJ (2006). “Incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis in the UK.” Thorax 61(11): 980–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gruber CJ, Tschugguel W, Schneeberger C and Huber JC (2002). “Production and actions of estrogens.” New Engl J Med 346(5): 340–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ha J, Choi HS, Lee Y, Kwon HJ, Song YW and Kim HH (2010). “CXC chemokine ligand 2 induced by receptor activator of NF-κB ligand enhances osteoclastogenesis.” J Immunol 184(9): 4717–4724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Han MK, Murray S, Fell CD, Flaherty KR, Toews GB, Myers J, Colby TV, Travis WD, Kazerooni EA, Gross BH and Martinez FJ (2008). “Sex differences in physiological progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.” Eur Respir J 31(6): 1183–1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F and Vandesompele J (2007). “qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data.” Genome Biol 8(2): R19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hilton GM, Taylor AJ, McClure CD, Parsons GN, Bonner JC and Bereman MS (2015). “Toxicoproteomic analysis of pulmonary carbon nanotube exposure using LC-MS/MS.” Toxicology 329: 80–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Iavicoli I, Fontana L, Leso V and Bergamaschi A (2013). “The effects of nanomaterials as endocrine disruptors.” Int J Mol Sci 14(8): 16732–16801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Keselman A, Fang X, White PB and Heller NM (2017). “Estrogen signaling contributes to sex differences in macrophage polarization during asthma.” J Immunol 199(5): 1573–1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lekgabe ED, Royce SG, Hewitson TD, Tang MLK, Zhao C, Moore XL, Tregear GW, Bathgate RA, Du XJ and Samuel CS (2006). “The effects of relaxin and estrogen deficiency on collagen deposition and hypertrophy of nonreproductive organs.” Endocrinology 147(12): 5575–5583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li R, Wang X, Ji Z, Sun B, Zhang H, Chang CH, Lin S, Meng H, Liao YP and Wang M (2013). “Surface charge and cellular processing of covalently functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes determine pulmonary toxicity.” ACS Nano 7(3): 2352–2368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mak P, Leav I, Pursell B, Bae D, Yang X, Taglienti CA, Gouvin LM, Sharma VM and Mercurio AM (2010). “ERβ impedes prostate cancer EMT by destabilizing HIF-1α and inhibiting VEGF-mediated snail nuclear localization: implications for Gleason grading.” Cancer Cell 17(4): 319–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Manke A, Wang L and Rojanasakul Y (2013). “Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity.” BioMed Res Int 2013: 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Massaro D and Massaro GD (2004). “Estrogen regulates pulmonary alveolar formation, loss, and regeneration in mice.” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 287(6): L1154–L1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Massaro D and Massaro GD (2006). “Estrogen receptor regulation of pulmonary alveolar dimensions: alveolar sexual dimorphism in mice.” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 290(5): L866–L870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mercer RR, Scabilloni JF, Hubbs AF, Battelli LA, McKinney W, Friend S, Wolfarth MG, Andrew M, Castranova V and Porter DW (2013). “Distribution and fibrotic response following inhalation exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Part Fibre Toxicol 10(1): 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mishra A, Stueckle TA, Mercer RR, Derk R, Rojanasakul Y, Castranova V and Wang L (2015). “Identification of TGF-β receptor-1 as a key regulator of carbon nanotube-induced fibrogenesis.” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 309(8): L821–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Muller J, Huaux F, Moreau N, Misson P, Heilier JF, Delos M, Arras M, Fonseca A, Nagy JB and Lison D (2005). “Respiratory toxicity of multi-wall carbon nanotubes.” Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207(3): 221–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nagai H, Okazaki Y, Chew SH, Misawa N, Yamashita Y, Akatsuka S, Ishihara T, Yamashita K, Yoshikawa Y and Yasui H (2011). “Diameter and rigidity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes are critical factors in mesothelial injury and carcinogenesis.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(49): E1330–E1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Patrone C, Cassel TN, Pettersson K, Piao YS, Cheng G, Ciana P, Maggi A, Warner M, Gustafsson JÅ and Nord M (2003). “Regulation of postnatal lung development and homeostasis by estrogen receptor β.” Mol Cell Biol 23(23): 8542–8552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Petrel TA and Brueggemeier RW (2003). “Increased proteasome-dependent degradation of estrogen receptor-alpha by TGF-β1 in breast cancer cell lines.” J Cell Biochem 88(1): 181–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pfaffl MW (2001). “A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR.” Nucleic Acids Res 29(9): e45–e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pociask DA, Sime PJ and Brody AR (2004). “Asbestos-derived reactive oxygen species activate TGF-β1.” Lab Invest 84(8): 1013–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, MacNee W and Donaldson K (2008). “Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.” Nat Nanotechnol 3(7): 423–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Porter D, Sriram K, Wolfarth M, Jefferson A, Schwegler-Berry D, Andrew ME and Castranova V (2008). “A biocompatible medium for nanoparticle dispersion.” Nanotoxicology 2(3): 144–154. [Google Scholar]
  42. Porter DW, Hubbs AF, Chen BT, McKinney W, Mercer RR, Wolfarth MG, Battelli L, Wu N, Sriram K and Leonard S (2012). “Acute pulmonary dose–responses to inhaled multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Nanotoxicology 7(7): 1179–1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Porter DW, Hubbs AF, Mercer RR, Wu N, Wolfarth MG, Sriram K, Leonard S, Battelli L, Schwegler-Berry D and Friend S (2010). “Mouse pulmonary dose-and time course-responses induced by exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Toxicology 269(2): 136–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Prossnitz ER, Arterburn JB, Smith HO, Oprea TI, Sklar LA and Hathaway HJ (2008). “Estrogen signaling through the transmembrane G protein–coupled receptor GPR30.” Annu Rev Physiol 70: 165–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rahman L, Jacobsen NR, Aziz SA, Wu D, Williams A, Yauk CL, White P, Wallin H, Vogel U and Halappanavar S (2017). “Multi-walled carbon nanotube-induced genotoxic, inflammatory and pro-fibrotic responses in mice: Investigating the mechanisms of pulmonary carcinogenesis.” Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 823: 28–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Redente EF, Jacobsen KM, Solomon JJ, Lara AR, Faubel S, Keith RC, Henson PM, Downey GP and Riches DW (2011). “Age and sex dimorphisms contribute to the severity of bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis.” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 301(4): L510–L518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ronzani C, Spiegelhalter C, Vonesch J-L, Lebeau L and Pons F (2012). “Lung deposition and toxicological responses evoked by multi-walled carbon nanotubes dispersed in a synthetic lung surfactant in the mouse.” Arch Toxicol 86(1): 137–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ryman-Rasmussen JP, Cesta MF, Brody AR, Shipley-Phillips JK, Everitt JI, Tewksbury EW, Moss OR, Wong BA, Dodd DE and Andersen ME (2009). “Inhaled carbon nanotubes reach the subpleural tissue in mice.” Nat Nanotechnol 4(11): 747–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ryman-Rasmussen JP, Tewksbury EW, Moss OR, Cesta MF, Wong BA and Bonner JC (2009). “Inhaled multiwalled carbon nanotubes potentiate airway fibrosis in murine allergic asthma.” Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 40(3): 349–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sargent LM, Porter DW, Staska LM, Hubbs AF, Lowry DT and Battelli L (2014). “Promotion of lung adenocarcinoma following inhalation exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.” Part Fibre Toxicol 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sathish V, Martin YN and Prakash YS (2015). “Sex steroid signaling: implications for lung diseases.” Pharmacol Ther 150: 94–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shim B, Pacheco-Rodriguez G, Kato J, Darling TN, Vaughan M and Moss J (2013). “Sex-specific lung diseases: effect of oestrogen on cultured cells and in animal models.” Eur Respir Rev 22(129): 302–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Słowikowski BK, Lianeri M and Jagodziński PP (2017). “Exploring estrogenic activity in lung cancer.” Mol Biol Rep 44(1): 35–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Smith LC, Moreno S, Robertson L, Robinson S, Gant K, Bryant AJ and Sabo-Attwood T (2018). “Transforming growth factor beta1 targets estrogen receptor signaling in bronchial epithelial cells.” Respir Res 19(1): 160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Spizzo R, Nicoloso M, Lupini L, Lu Y, Fogarty J, Rossi S, Zagatti B, Fabbri M, Veronese A and Liu X (2010). “miR-145 participates with TP53 in a death-promoting regulatory loop and targets estrogen receptor-α in human breast cancer cells.” Cell Death Differ 17(2): 246–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stoica A, Saceda M, Fakhro A, Solomon HB, Fenster BD and Martin MB (1997). “The role of transforming growth factor-β in the regulation of estrogen receptor expression in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line.” Endocrinology 138(4): 1498–1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tam A, Morrish D, Wadsworth S, Dorscheid D, Man SF and Sin DD (2011). “The role of female hormones on lung function in chronic lung diseases.” BMC Womens Health 11: 24-6874-6811-6824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tam A, Morrish D, Wadsworth S, Dorscheid D, Man SP and Sin DD (2011). “The role of female hormones on lung function in chronic lung diseases.” BMC Womens Health 11(1): 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Toth B, Schwacha MG, Kuebler JF, Bland KI, Wang P and Chaudrya IH (2003). “Gender dimorphism in neutrophil priming and activation following trauma-hemorrhagic shock.” Int J Mol Med 11(3): 357–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Townsend EA, Miller VM and Prakash Y (2012). “Sex differences and sex steroids in lung health and disease.” Endocr Rev 33(1): 1–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vietti G, Ibouraadaten S, Palmai-Pallag M, Yakoub Y, Bailly C, Fenoglio I, Marbaix E, Lison D and van den Brule S (2013). “Towards predicting the lung fibrogenic activity of nanomaterials: experimental validation of an in vitro fibroblast proliferation assay.” Part Fibre Toxicol 10(1): 52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vietti G, Lison D and van den Brule S (2016). “Mechanisms of lung fibrosis induced by carbon nanotubes: towards an Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP).” Part Fibre Toxicol 13(1): 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Voltz JW, Card JW, Carey MA, DeGraff LM, Ferguson CD, Flake GP, Bonner JC, Korach KS and Zeldin DC (2008). “Male sex hormones exacerbate lung function impairment after bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis.” Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 39(1): 45–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang P, Nie X, Wang Y, Li Y, Ge C, Zhang L, Wang L, Bai R, Chen Z and Zhao Y (2013). “Multiwall carbon nanotubes mediate macrophage activation and promote pulmonary fibrosis through TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway.” Small 9(22): 3799–3811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang X, Duch MC, Mansukhani N, Ji Z, Liao Y-P, Wang M, Zhang H, Sun B, Chang CH and Li R (2015). “Use of a pro-fibrogenic mechanism-based predictive toxicological approach for tiered testing and decision analysis of carbonaceous nanomaterials.” ACS Nano 9(3): 3032–3043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang X, Xia T, Addo Ntim S, Ji Z, Lin S, Meng H, Chung CH, George S, Zhang H and Wang M (2011). “Dispersal state of multiwalled carbon nanotubes elicits profibrogenic cellular responses that correlate with fibrogenesis biomarkers and fibrosis in the murine lung.” ACS Nano 5(12): 9772–9787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang X, Xia T, Ntim SA, Ji Z, George S, Meng H, Zhang H, Castranova V, Mitra S and Nel AE (2010). “Quantitative techniques for assessing and controlling the dispersion and biological effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in mammalian tissue culture cells.” ACS Nano 4(12): 7241–7252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S and Madden TL (2012). “Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction.” BMC Bioinformatics 13(1): 134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES