Abstract
Background:
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and white matter lesion (WML) severity are associated with higher rates of death and disability in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A prior report identified an increased risk of IVH with greater WML burden but did not control for location of ICH. We sought to determine whether a higher degree of WML is associated with a higher risk of IVH after controlling for ICH location.
Methods:
Utilizing the patient population from two large ICH studies; the Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Hemorrhagic Stroke (GERFHS III) Study and the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) Study, we graded WML using the Van Swieten Scale (0-1 for mild, 2 for moderate, and 3-4 for severe WML) and presence or absence of IVH in baseline CT scans. We used multivariable regression models to adjust for relevant covariates.
Results:
Among 3023 ICH patients, 1260 (41.7%) had presence of IVH. In patients with IVH, the proportion of severe WML (28.6%) was higher compared with patients without IVH (21.8%) (p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that moderate-severe WML, deep ICH, and increasing ICH volume were independently associated with presence of IVH. We found an increased risk of IVH with moderate-severe WML (OR=1.38; 95% Cl 1.03-1.86, p = 0.0328) in the subset of lobar hemorrhages.
Conclusion:
Moderate to severe WML is a risk for IVH. Even in lobar ICH hemorrhages, severe WML leads to an independent increased risk for ventricular rupture.
Keywords: Imaging, Intracerebral hemorrhage, White matter disease, Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Introduction:
Hemorrhagic stroke affects approximately 100,000 persons annually in the United States, with a 30 day mortality rate of 40-50%.1 An estimated 66% of all hemorrhagic strokes are classified as intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) which is the most devastating form of stroke resulting in high mortality and disability.2 Despite substantial improvement in acute ischemic stroke treatment in recent years, progress in ICH therapeutics has remained limited.
Multiple prognostic factors contributing to outcome after ICH including age, ICH location, hematoma size, hemorrhage expansion, anticoagulant use, baseline GCS score, and presence and extent of intraventricular hemorrhage have been identified and are included in current prediction models such as ICH and FUNC scores.3–5 Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is caused by the hemorrhage rupturing into the ventricles and is an important predictor of outcome, increasing mortality by up to 80%.6–8 The burden of white matter lesion (WML) or leukoariaosis has been identified as a predictor of worse ICH outcomes.9
Although both IVH and WML severity are associated with higher rates of death and disability among patients with ICH,6, 10 there is uncertainty regarding the association between the two.10 Prior studies have suggested an increased risk of IVH with higher WML burden in patients with ICH.11 However, hypertension is a major risk factor for both IVH and WML and the prior analyses were not stratified by location of ICH.11 If WML is weakening the ventricular wall or permits ICH to track more easily through the brain tissue into the ventricles, then the association should also be true for lobar ICH. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that a higher degree of WML is associated with a higher risk of IVH after controlling for ICH location.
Materials & Methods:
Study Population
We utilized the patient population from two large ICH studies; the Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Hemorrhagic Stroke (GERFHS III) study and the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) study.12, 13 GERFHS III is a population-based study of ICH patients residing in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky (GCNK) region and ERICH is a prospective, multi-center, case-control study of ICH epidemiology among 1,000 whites, 1,000 blacks, and 1,000 Hispanics matched to 3,000 controls.12, 13 The study was carried out in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP). Investigators responsible for the conduct of this study have completed Human Subjects Protection and ICH GCP Training. Institutional Board Review approval was required and obtained for the GERFHS and ERICH studies from each participating hospital system and study site prior to the enrollment of participants.12, 13
Detailed methods for the GERFHS III and ERICH studies have been published previously.12, 13 Out of the entire GERFHS III and ERICH population, we analyzed patients from the interviewed cohort comprised of enrolled participants that underwent an interview and had baseline demographics, clinical, discharge status, and outcome data available per study protocol (Figure 1).
Figure 1:

Flowchart of Included Patients.
Imaging Analysis
We analyzed baseline head CT scans of the interviewed cohort of both GERFHS III and ERICH. The baseline CT scans were non-contrast standard of care imaging and obtained at minimum, 5mm sections. These CT scans were analyzed by trained investigators who graded WML using the Van Swieten scale.14 This scale ranges from 0-4; a score of 0 indicates no WML and a score of 4 indicates severe WML.14 For our study we defined mild WML having a score of 0-1, moderate WML having a score of 2, and severe WML having a score of 3-4. We also analyzed the CT scans for presence or absence of IVH. Presence of IVH was defined as Graeb score >0 or IVH volume > 0 for ERICH dataset and Graeb score >0 or IVH score > 0 for GERFHS dataset.15 The Graeb score is a semiquantitative scaling system for IVH extension of ICH, ranges from 0 to 12 points and is based on blood filling and expanding the third, fourth and lateral ventricles.16 The IVH score grades each lateral ventricle with a score of 0-3, third and fourth ventricles with score of 0-1 and hydrocephalus is scored as present (1) or absent (0).17
Statistical Analysis:
The data were managed and analyzed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Descriptive statistics are presented as means, standard deviations and medians for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. Those with presence of IVH were compared with those without on the various risk factors using two-sample t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test or chi-square test as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression model for presence of IVH was constructed by initially including all factors with p<0.2 and backward eliminated to include only those that were p<0.05. A similar multivariable logistic regression model for presence of IVH was constructed using only those with lobar ICH. Initial analysis revealed a non-linear distribution of hematoma volume; thus, hematoma volumes were fitted in the multivariable model as the natural logarithm of volume plus one. We also tested for WML interactions between location, hypertension, and ICH volume.
Results:
Baseline characteristics
A total of 3023 patients were included using both GERFHS III and ERICH cohorts. Among these ICH patients (mean± SD age 63.1± 14.8; 41.3% females), 1260 (41.7%) had presence of IVH. Table 1 presents the demographic variables for the combined cohorts divided by presence of IVH.
Table 1:
Demographic and clinical characteristics of GERFHS III and ERICH
| Variables | Overall N=3023 | No IVH N=1763 | Presence of IVH N=1260 | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age: Mean (SD) | 63.1 (14.8) | 63.0 (14.8) | 63.1 (14.7) | 0.8643 |
| Gender: Females | 1249 (41.3) | 730 (41.4) | 519 (41.2) | 0.9053 |
| Race: | ||||
| Black | 914 (30.2) | 504 (28.6) | 410 (32.5) | |
| Hispanic | 877 (29.0) | 527 (29.9) | 350 (27.8) | |
| White | 1232 (40.8) | 732 (41.5) | 500 (39.7) | 0.0627 |
| Hypertension | 2541 (84.3) | 1464 (83.1) | 1077 (86.0) | 0.0290 |
| Diabetes | 866 (28.7) | 517 (29.3) | 349 (27.7) | 0.3430 |
| High Cholesterol | 1422 (47.8) | 828 (47.4) | 594 (48.3) | 0.6146 |
| History of Ischemic stroke | 375 (12.4) | 213 (12.1) | 162 (12.9) | 0.5237 |
| History of Hemorrhagic stroke | 193 (6.4) | 122 (6.9) | 71 (5.6) | 0.1542 |
| Smoking: | ||||
| Ever Smoker | 1476 (49.1) | 846 (48.2) | 630 (50.5) | |
| Never Smoker | 1528 (50.9) | 910 (51.8) | 618 (49.5) | 0.2134 |
| Heavy Alcohol Use | 289 (9.9) | 156 (9.1) | 133 (11.0) | 0.1046 |
| Location of ICH: | ||||
| Lobar | 930 (30.8) | 643 (36.5) | 287 (22.8) | |
| Deep/Pure IVH | 1685 (55.7) | 870 (49.4) | 815 (64.7) | |
| Brainstem/Cerebellum | 408 (13.5) | 250 (14.2) | 158 (12.5) | <0.0001 |
| WML Score: | ||||
| Mild (0-1) | 1728 (57.2) | 1069 (60.6) | 659 (52.3) | |
| Moderate (2) | 550 (18.2) | 310 (17.6) | 240 (19.0) | |
| Severe (3-4) | 745 (24.6) | 384 (21.8) | 361 (28.6) | <0.0001 |
| ICH Volume: Median (IQR) | 10.3 (3.7, 25.2) | 8.6 (2.9, 20.7) | 12.7 (5.4, 31.6) | <0.0001 |
In patients with IVH, the proportion of severe WML (28.6%) was significantly higher compared with patients without IVH (21.8%) (p<0.0001). The median volume of ICH was 12.7 mL (IQR, 5.4-31.6) in patients with IVH as compared with 8.6 ml (IQR, 2.9-20.7) in patients without IVH (p <0.0001). Compared with patients without IVH, those with IVH had greater percentage of hypertensive patients and included less brainstem/cerebellar hemorrhages (Table 1).
Multivariate analysis
Multivariable analysis (Table 2) demonstrated that moderate WML (OR=1.39; 95% Cl 1.14-1.71, p = 0.0015), severe WML (OR=1.68; 95% Cl 1.40-2.02, p <0.0001), deep ICH (OR=3.36; 95% Cl 2.77-4.07, p <0.0001), infratentorial location (OR=2.47; 95% Cl 1.89-3.23, p<0.0001), and increasing ICH volume (OR=1.61; 95% Cl 1.50-1.74, p<0.0001) were independently associated with presence of IVH. There was no significant interaction between WML and ICH location (p=0.3186), WML and hypertension (p=0.3188), and WML and ICH Volume (p=0.3686).
Table 2:
Multivariable Logistic Regression Model for Presence of IVH in GERFHS and ERICH Patients
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 (Full model) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR (Cl) | P-value | OR (Cl) | P-value | OR (Cl) | P-value |
| WML score (Van Swieten): | ||||||
| Mild/None (0-1) | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Moderate (2) | 1.30 (1.06,1.58) | 0.0114 | 1.30 (1.06,1.59) | 0.0105 | 1.39 (1.14,1.71) | 0.0015 |
| Severe (3-4) | 1.61 (1.33,1.95) | <0.0001 | 1.61 (1.33,1.95) | <0.0001 | 1.68 (1.40,2.02) | <0.0001 |
| Age | 1.00 (0.99,1.00) | 0.195 | 1.00 (0.99,1.00) | 0.132 | ||
| Race: | ||||||
| White | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Black | 1.16 (0.97,1.40) | 0.1078 | 1.12 (0.92,1.35) | 0.2577 | ||
| Hispanic | 1.00 (0.83,1.20) | 0.9598 | 0.97 (0.81,1.18) | 0.7854 | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Male | 1.02 (0.88,1.18) | 0.8014 | 1.01 (0.87,1.18) | 0.8806 | ||
| Hypertension | 1.20 (0.97,1.47) | 0.0923 | ||||
| Location of ICH: | ||||||
| Lobar | Reference | |||||
| Deep | 3.36 (2.77,4.07) | <0.0001 | ||||
| Infratentorial | 2.47 (1.89,3.23) | <0.0001 | ||||
| ICH Volume | 1.61 (1.50,1.74) | <0.0001 | ||||
Abbreviations: OR= Odds Ratio, 95% CI 95% Confidence Interval, ICH = Intracerebral Hemorrhage, IVH = Intraventricular Hemorrhage, WML=White matter lesions
Additional variables included in the full model (model 3) were prior hemorrhage, and heavy alcohol use.
Subset Analysis of Lobar Hemorrhages
Since most deep ICH have little WML between the source of hemorrhage and ventricle, we sought to validate our hypothesis that greater WML weakens the ventricle wall in lobar ICH. Multivariate analysis for lobar only ICH cases was performed using both GERFHS III and ERICH data. After controlling for important risk factors, WML was independently associated with IVH in lobar ICH and moderate to severe WML increased the probability of IVH (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% Cl 1.03-1.86; p=0.0328). (Table 3)
Table 3:
Multivariate Model for Presence of IVH in GERFHS and ERICH Lobar ICH Patients
| Variable | OR (95% Cl) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| WML Score (Van Swieten): | ||
| None-Mild (0-1) | Reference | |
| Moderate – Severe (2-4) | 1.38 (1.03, 1.86) | 0.0328 |
| In (ICH volume) | 2.12(1.80, 2.49) | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: OR= Odds Ratio 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval, ICH = Intracerebral Hemorrhage, IVH = Intraventricular Hemorrhage, WML=White matter lesions, In = natural logarithm. Additional variables included in the model were race, hypertension, prior hemorrhage, and heavy alcohol use.
Discussion:
In this combined dataset of two large ICH cohorts, we found that higher proportion of those with IVH have moderate to severe WML compared to those without IVH. Further supporting this finding is that in lobar ICH, where the physical distance from the hemorrhage to the ventricle is greater than for deep caudate or thalamic ICH, greater WML burden was associated with presence of IVH. Our study had the advantages of sufficient power to control for risk factors for IVH such as hypertension to identify an independent relationship. This finding suggests that in addition to its association with risk factors for ICH, white matter lesions or leukoariaosis may lead to less resistance from the hemorrhage.
Although it is well known that IVH is an important variable for poor outcomes in ICH, our knowledge about the vessel and ventricular wall injury in an ICH event is very limited.18 The exact mechanisms to predict which hemorrhages will and will not dissect into the ventricular system are poorly understood. Hematoma extension into the ventricles is not only dependent on the deep locations and volume of ICH but may also be related to blood pressure fluctuations and abnormalities in coagulation cascade.19
Preexisting white matter disease could be an additional important link in understanding the hematoma rupture into the ventricular system. Studies have demonstrated that white matter disease increases risk of brain damage in the presence of acute injury, for example, severe WML are associated with infarct growth and worse outcome after ischemic stroke.20
Greater white matter disease may weaken the ventricular wall. There are a multitude of histopathological changes in white matter disease including demyelination, gliosis, ependymal discontinuity, vacuolation, and tissue loss.21 Furthermore, different mechanisms of white matter disease including endothelial injury, abnormalities in blood brain barrier permeability and neurovascular unit disruption have been proposed.22 It is well recognized that WML are associated with changes at a microstructural level resulting in reduced white matter integrity, which can also be demonstrated by imaging using Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)23. In addition, histopathological correlates of MRI white matter changes in Alzheimer’s disease versus controls have shown denudation in the ventricular lining correlating with loss of myelinated axons in the deep white matter.24 These wider pathophysiologic alterations in white matter could possibly lead to ventricular wall alterations and weakening.25
Only a few studies have investigated the association of WML and IVH in ICH patients. A post hoc analysis of a nationwide cohort in South Korea found similar associations like our study demonstrating that severity of WML on CT scans is related to the occurrence and amount of IVH in spontaneous ICH cases.11 However, this study did not assess this relationship by hematoma location. In contrast to our findings, a study using the placebo group of the Factor Seven for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke (FAST) trial found an association of WML with poor outcomes in ICH but not with intraventricular extension; however, the sample size (n=262) was smaller than our study.26
Our study has important future clinical implications. As IVH is the most significant predictor of outcomes, preventing extension of the hematoma into the ventricles is a key target to prevent worse outcomes. If white matter disease makes the brain vulnerable to pathological insults such as ICH, then moderate to severe WML may be a new target for preventive and prognostication strategies.
Our study has several important limitations. We used CT scans rather than MRI scans for grading of WMH. While CTs were uniformly available at stroke onset, MRI is more accurate for visualizing the extent of WMH. However, a recent study showed substantial agreement between CT and MRI for visual rating scales of white matter disease.27 Additionally, advanced imaging such as DTI to study the microstructural alterations in white matter were not included. Another limitation is that we did not perform volumetric analysis of WML. Volumetric assessments, although more accurate, are not practical in real life settings and visual rating of WML is a close substitute.
Summary & Conclusion
In conclusion, moderate to severe burden of WML is a risk for intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with ICH. Even in lobar ICH where hemorrhages are more remote from the ventricles, more severe WML leads to an independent increased risk for ventricular rupture. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanistic effects of white matter disease and associated microstructural damage resulting in intraventricular hemorrhage.
Figure 2.

Baseline CT head demonstrating lobar ICH with IVH and moderate to severe WML.
Acknowledgments:
Sources of Funding: NIH Grant Funding: NS036695 and NS069763
Grant Support: NIH/NINDS R01 NS 36695; NIH/NINDS R01 U-01-NS069763
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures: Consultant, Janssen (M.F); Speaker’s Bureau: Janssen (M.F); CSL Behring, Portola (M.F); NIH/NINDS R01 NS 36695 (M.F, D.W); NIH/NINDS R01 U-01-NS069763 (M.F, D.W)
All Work Performed At: University of Cincinnati, Department of Neurology
Contributor Information
Vaibhav Vagal, High School Diploma, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH- 45267.
Simone U. Venema, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Tyler P. Behymer, University of Cincinnati.
Eva A. Mistry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Padmini Sekar, University of Cincinnati.
Russell P. Sawyer, University of Cincinnati.
Lee Gilkerson, University of Cincinnati.
Charles J. Moomaw, University of Cincinnati.
Mary Haverbusch, University of Cincinnati.
Elisheva R. Coleman, University of Cincinnati.
Matthew L. Flaherty, University of Cincinnati.
Carson Van Sanford, University of Cincinnati.
Robert J. Stanton, University of Cincinnati.
Christopher Anderson, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Jonathan Rosand, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Daniel Woo, University of Cincinnati.
References
- 1.Kissela B, Schneider A, Kleindorfer D, Khoury J, Miller R, Alwell K, et al. Stroke in a biracial population: The excess burden of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 2004;35:426–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Caplan LR. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet (London, England). 1992;339:656–658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ich score: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:891–897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barton CW, Hemphill JC 3rd. Cumulative dose of hypertension predicts outcome in intracranial hemorrhage better than american heart association guidelines. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14:695–701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zahuranec DB, Brown DL, Lisabeth LD, Gonzales NR, Longwell PJ, Smith MA, et al. Early care limitations independently predict mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2007;68:1651–1657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hinson HE, Hanley DF, Ziai WC. Management of intraventricular hemorrhage. Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2010;10:73–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Coplin WM, Vinas FC, Agris JM, Buciuc R, Michael DB, Diaz FG, et al. A cohort study of the safety and feasibility of intraventricular urokinase for nonaneurysmal spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage. Stroke. 1998;29:1573–1579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Newell DW, Shah MM, Wilcox R, Hansmann DR, Melnychuk E, Muschelli J, et al. Minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using sonothrombolysis. Journal of neurosurgery. 2011;115:592–601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Briley DP, Haroon S, Sergent SM, Thomas S. Does leukoaraiosis predict morbidity and mortality? Neurology. 2000;54:90–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sato S, Delcourt C, Heeley E, Arima H, Zhang S, Al-Shahi Salman R, et al. Significance of cerebral small-vessel disease in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:701–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim BJ, Lee SH, Ryu WS, Kim CK, Chung JW, Kim D, et al. Extents of white matter lesions and increased intraventricular extension of intracerebral hemorrhage. Critical care medicine. 2013;41:1325–1331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Woo D, Sauerbeck LR, Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Szaflarski JP, Gebel J, et al. Genetic and environmental risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage: Preliminary results of a population-based study. Stroke. 2002;33:1190–1195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Woo D, Rosand J, Kidwell C, McCauley JL, Osborne J, Brown MW, et al. The ethnic/racial variations of intracerebral hemorrhage (erich) study protocol. Stroke. 2013;44:e120–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Swieten JC, Hijdra A, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J. Grading white matter lesions on ct and mri: A simple scale. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 1990;53:1080–1083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Morgan TC, Dawson J, Spengler D, Lees KR, Aldrich C, Mishra NK, et al. The modified graeb score: An enhanced tool for intraventricular hemorrhage measurement and prediction of functional outcome. Stroke. 2013;44:635–641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Graeb DA, Robertson WD, Lapointe JS, Nugent RA, Harrison PB. Computed tomographic diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage. Etiology and prognosis. Radiology. 1982;143:91–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hallevi H, Dar NS, Barreto AD, Morales MM, Martin-Schild S, Abraham AT, et al. The ivh score: A novel tool for estimating intraventricular hemorrhage volume: Clinical and research implications. Critical care medicine. 2009;37:969–974, e961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Broderick JP, Diringer MN, Hill MD, Brun NC, Mayer SA, Steiner T, et al. Determinants of intracerebral hemorrhage growth: An exploratory analysis. Stroke. 2007;38:1072–1075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burchell SR, Tang J, Zhang JH. Hematoma expansion following intracerebral hemorrhage: Mechanisms targeting the coagulation cascade and platelet activation. Current drug targets. 2017;18:1329–1344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ay H, Arsava EM, Rosand J, Furie KL, Singhal AB, Schaefer PW, et al. Severity of leukoaraiosis and susceptibility to infarct growth in acute stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1409–1413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gouw AA, Seewann A, van der Flier WM, Barkhof F, Rozemuller AM, Scheltens P, et al. Heterogeneity of small vessel disease: A systematic review of mri and histopathology correlations. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2011;82:126–135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Groot M, Verhaaren BF, de Boer R, Klein S, Hofman A, van der Lugt A, et al. Changes in normal-appearing white matter precede development of white matter lesions. Stroke. 2013;44:1037–1042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chanraud S, Zahr N, Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A. Mr diffusion tensor imaging: A window into white matter integrity of the working brain. Neuropsychology review. 2010;20:209–225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Leys D, Wolters EC, Ravid R, Kamphorst W. Histopathologic correlates of white matter changes on mri in alzheimer’s disease and normal aging. Neurology. 1995;45:883–888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maniega SM, Valdes Hernandez MC, Clayden JD, Royle NA, Murray C, Morris Z, et al. White matter hyperintensities and normal-appearing white matter integrity in the aging brain. Neurobiology of aging. 2015;36:909–918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sykora M, Herweh C, Steiner T. The association between leukoaraiosis and poor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage is not mediated by hematoma growth. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26:1328–1333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ferguson KJ, Cvoro V, MacLullich AMJ, Shenkin SD, Sandercock PAG, Sakka E, et al. Visual rating scales of white matter hyperintensities and atrophy: Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27:1815–1821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
