Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2020 Apr 20;11:1860. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15248-2

Wnt-PLC-IP3-Connexin-Ca2+ axis maintains ependymal motile cilia in zebrafish spinal cord

Jun Zhang 1,2,#, Gopalakrishnan Chandrasekaran 1,2,#, Wenting Li 1,3,#, Dong-Young Kim 4,#, In Young Jeong 5, So-Hyun Lee 1,2, Ting Liang 1,2, Jin Young Bae 6, Isaac Choi 7, Hyuno Kang 8, Jin-Soo Maeng 9,10, Myeong-Kyu Kim 11, Taewon Lee 12, Seung Woo Park 13, Min Jung Kim 14, Hyung-Seok Kim 15, Hyunju Ro 7, Yong Chul Bae 6, Hae-Chul Park 5, Eun Young Choi 4,, Seok-Yong Choi 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7170879  PMID: 32312952

Abstract

Ependymal cells (ECs) are multiciliated neuroepithelial cells that line the ventricles of the brain and the central canal of the spinal cord (SC). How ependymal motile cilia are maintained remains largely unexplored. Here we show that zebrafish embryos deficient in Wnt signaling have defective motile cilia, yet harbor intact basal bodies. With respect to maintenance of ependymal motile cilia, plcδ3a is a target gene of Wnt signaling. Lack of Connexin43 (Cx43), especially its channel function, decreases motile cilia and intercellular Ca2+ wave (ICW) propagation. Genetic ablation of cx43 in zebrafish and mice diminished motile cilia. Finally, Cx43 is also expressed in ECs of the human SC. Taken together, our findings indicate that gap junction mediated ICWs play an important role in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia, and suggest that the enhancement of functional gap junctions by pharmacological or genetic manipulations may be adopted to ameliorate motile ciliopathy.

Subject terms: Ciliogenesis, Differentiation


Ependymal cells are supporting cells in the central nervous system. Here the authors elucidate a signalling axis in zebrafish spinal cord ependymal cells that is important for motile cilia assembly and maintenance, demonstrating that it depends on intercellular propagation of calcium ions via connexin 43.

Introduction

Cilia are a highly conserved organelle that projects from the cell body and classified into motile and nonmotile cilia (also called sensory or primary cilia). Motile cilia move the overlying fluid by coordinated beating and are found in ECs, respiratory epithelial cells, oviduct cells, and node cells. Dysfunctional motile cilia can cause primary ciliary dyskinesia that features chronic recurrent respiratory infections, hydrocephalus, laterality defect, and infertility13.

Motile ciliated cells have been reported to play an important role in the neurodevelopment of the vertebrates including zebrafish. Knockdown of genes implicated in intraflagellar transport (IFT) impairs flow of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in zebrafish4. Motile cilia in the zebrafish otic vesicles are required for proper otolith formation5. The CSF flow generated by motile cilia in the zebrafish ventricles is crucial in ventricular development6.

Several reports have provided insights into the molecular mechanism underlying EC development. First, adult ECs in the mouse SC are derived from Nkx6.1 expressing ventral neural progenitor cells7. Second, ECs are derived from radial glial cells in the developing mouse forebrain8. Third, the homeobox gene Six3 is required for the maturation of brain ECs9. Fourth, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling is required for the development of ECs in the developing mouse SC10. ECs feature motile cilia on the apical surface and zonula adherens on the lateral surface, and the coordinated beating of these motile cilia circulates the CSF11. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the maintenance of motile cilia in ECs remains unclear. Hence, we set out to determine the molecular mechanism using zebrafish as a primary model organism.

Our findings show that the Wnt-PLC-IP3-Connexin-Ca2+ axis is very likely to be required for the maintenance of the ependymal motile cilia in the zebrafish SC.

Results

Wnt signaling is involved in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia in zebrafish embryos

We first confirmed the presence of motile cilia in the SC of developing zebrafish by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining. TEM revealed the 9 + 2 microtubule configurations, a signature structure of motile cilia, from 2 days post-fertilization (dpf) onward (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, IF staining of 1-dpf zebrafish embryos with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody, which decorates motile cilia, displayed signals in the central SC in which ECs are located (Fig. 1b). To confirm the identity and location of ECs, we carried out IF staining on 2-dpf wild-type (WT) embryos with anti-GFAP antibody (a marker for radial glial cells [RGCs]12) and anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody or on Tg(foxj1a:egfp) embryos with anti-GFAP antibody. foxj1a is a marker for motile ciliated cells and a master transcription factor of motile ciliogenesis13,14. ECs abutted on the ventral central canal (CC) and were distinct from GFAP+ RGCs (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Wnt signaling is involved in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia in zebrafish embryos.

Fig. 1

a Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the spinal cords (SCs) of zebrafish embryos at 2 dpf. Arrowhead indicates a motile cilium with the 9 + 2 microtubule configuration, which is magnified to the right. Scale bar = 1 μm. b Immunofluorescence (IF) staining of an embryo at 1 dpf with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Scale bar = 20 μm. c, d IF staining of sonic-you (syut4) mutant embryos at 2 dpf with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Dorsal view anterior to the left (c). d The cross-section image of the SC ventral to the bottom. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Scale bars = 20 μm. e Embryos were treated with DAPT (50 μM) at 34–48 hpf and IF stained with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Scale bar = 20 μm. f Embryos were co-microinjected with wnt4b MO and wnt11 MO (wnt4b/11 MO) alone or along with wnt4b mRNA and wnt11 mRNA (wnt4b/11 mRNA), and IF stained at 2 dpf with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. CO: Control. g Quantification of the number of cilia per frame in embryos in f. Data are presented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc test (control morphants: n = 12 embryos; wnt4b/11 double morphants: n = 9 embryos; wnt4b/11 double morphants + wnt4b/11 mRNA: n = 9 embryos; one frame per embryo). h A cross-section images of the SCs of control morphants and wnt4b/11 double morphants at 2 dpf probed with foxj1a riboprobes ventral to the bottom. Arrowheads represent ECs. Scale bar = 20 μm. CO: Control. i RNAs were extracted from each group (20 embryos in h) at 2 dpf and levels of foxj1a mRNAs were assessed by qPCR. Mean ± SD. ****P < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test from four biological replicates (three technical replicates each). j A cross-section image of the SC of a WT embryo at 2 dpf probed with fzd7b riboprobes ventral to the bottom. Arrowhead represents ECs. Scale bar = 15 μm. k Embryos were microinjected with control MO, fzd7b MO or fzd7b MO + fzd7b mRNA, and IF stained at 2 dpf with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. CO: Control. l Quantification of the number of cilia per frame in embryos in k. Mean ± SD. ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (control morphants: n = 21 embryos; fzd7b morphants: n = 21 embryos; fzd7b morphants + fzd7b mRNA: n = 18 embryos; one frame per embryo). m Tg(hsp70l:dkk1b-GFP) embryos at 24 hpf were subjected to heat shock at 39 °C for 1 h, and IF stained at 2 dpf with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. n, o Embryos were treated with IWR-1 (10 μM) at 8–48 hpf and IF stained with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody only (n) or double immunostained with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody and anti-γ-tubulin antibody (o) at 2 dpf. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. The boxed areas in o are magnified in the respective lower panels. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Shh, Notch and Wnt signaling pathways are involved in the development of motile cilia15. IF staining of sonic-you (syut4) mutant embryos, which harbor a null mutation in the shh gene16, with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody exhibited no noticeable change in cilia staining compared to WT embryos (Fig. 1c, d). Inhibition of Notch signaling in embryos with DAPT, a Notch signaling inhibitor17, elicited no obvious change in cilia staining compared to untreated controls (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 3). These findings suggest that Shh and Notch signaling may not be implicated in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia. Data available in the literature suggested that of the many wnt genes, wnt4b, wnt5b and wnt11 (previously called wnt11r) may be expressed in ECs18,19, which was confirmed by whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) with respective riboprobes (data not shown). wnt4b single morphants (embryos injected with antisense oligonucleotides morpholino (MO)) and wnt11 single morphants, but not wnt5b single morphants, showed decreased ependymal motile cilia as revealed by IF staining with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody. Moreover, wnt4b/11 double morphants displayed the least number of ependymal motile cilia, which was partially rescued by co-microinjection of wnt4b/11 mRNAs. However, neither wnt4b/5b nor wnt5b/11 double morphants showed decreased ependymal motile cilia (Fig. 1f, g, Supplementary Figs. 4, 5). WISH on the wnt4b/11 double morphants with foxj1a riboprobes showed increase in the levels of foxj1a expression compared to WT embryos (Fig. 1h), which may be a compensatory response. This result was confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Fig. 1i). Taken together, these findings indicate that the double morphants have intact ECs with decreased spinal motile cilia. We next examined by WISH the mRNA expression of various frizzled (fzd) genes that encode receptors for Wnt ligands20, and found fzd7b expression in the ECs (Fig. 1j and Supplementary Fig. 6). Knockdown of fzd7b with MO21 diminished ependymal cilia in zebrafish embryos, which was rescued by co-injection of fzd7b mRNA (Fig. 1k, l and Supplementary Fig. 7). Furthermore, suppression of Wnt signaling in WT embryos using either Tg(hsp70l:dkk1b-GFP)19 or IWR-1, an Axin stabilizer22, diminished ependymal motile cilia (Fig. 1m, n). However, double IF staining of IWR-1 treated embryos with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody and anti-γ-tubulin antibody, which stains basal bodies23 that are a platform for ciliogenesis24, illuminated that IWR-1 did not markedly repress basal bodies in EC (Fig. 1o), suggesting that IWR-1 treatment affects the assembly of motile cilia, but not that of basal bodies. Taken together, these outcomes indicate that Wnt signaling is implicated in the development and/or maintenance of ependymal motile cilia in zebrafish embryos.

plcδ3a is a target gene of Wnt signaling and plays an important role in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia

As Wnt signaling is involved in Ca2+ dynamics25, we checked whether its alteration by thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase26, affects ependymal motile cilia. Microinjection of thapsigargin into the hindbrain ventricles of larvae significantly decreased motile cilia compared to larvae microinjected with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), vehicle control. However, significant change in the number of basal bodies was not noted (Fig. 2a, b), demonstrating an important role for Ca2+ dynamics in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia. As Phospholipase C (PLC) is critical to Ca2+ dynamics27, we investigated the expression of various plc genes with WISH and found expression of plcβ4 and plcδ3a in ECs (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 8). Inhibition of PLC by U-73122, a PLC inhibitor28, reduced ependymal cilia (Fig. 2d). In addition, microinjection of plcδ3a mRNA into wnt4b/11 double morphants restored ependymal motile cilia, but microinjection of plcβ4 RNA did not (Fig. 2e, f). Furthermore, the levels of plcδ3a mRNA were diminished in wnt4b/11 double morphants compared to control morphants as assessed by WISH and qPCR (Fig. 2g, h). We next tested if plcδ3a is a target gene of the Wnt signaling by WISH upon treatment with BIO (6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime), a Wnt signaling activator that inhibits GSK-329. BIO treatment enhanced expression of plcδ3a in embryos at 1-3 h post-treatment (hpt) in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2i, j). In addition, luciferase activity in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 T cells transfected with the plcδ3a promoter region fused to the luciferase gene increased upon co-transfection with β-catenin expression plasmid compared to co-transfection with the respective control plasmid. However, this increase was blunted by a 5-bp deletion of the predicted TCF/LEF binding sites (C/GTTTG/CA/T)30 in the promoter region (Fig. 2k, l and Supplementary Fig. 9). Collectively, these findings suggest that plcδ3a is a target gene of the Wnt signaling and plays an important role in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia.

Fig. 2. plcδ3a is a target gene of Wnt signaling and plays an important role in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia.

Fig. 2

a DMSO (vehicle control) or thapsigargin (4 nl at 5 μM) was microinjected into the hindbrain ventricles of zebrafish larvae at 4 dpf and the larvae were double immunostained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody (red) and anti-γ-tubulin antibody (green) 4 h after injection. Arrowheads indicate motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. b Quantification of the number of cilia and basal bodies per frame in embryos in a. Mean ± SD. ****P < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (n = 4 embryos per group; one frame per embryo). ns, not significant. c Embryos at 2 dpf were probed with plcβ4 or plcδ3a riboprobes and their SCs were cross-sectioned. Images are oriented ventral to the bottom. Arrowheads represent ECs. Scale bar = 20 μm. d DMSO (vehicle control) or U-73122 (4 nl at 10 μM) was microinjected into the hindbrain ventricles of zebrafish larvae at 4 dpf and the larvae were IF stained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody 4 h after microinjection. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. e Control morphants or wnt4b/11 double morphants were microinjected with plcβ4 or plcδ3a mRNA and immunostained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody at 2 dpf. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. f Quantification of the number of motile cilia per frame in embryos in e. Mean ± SD. **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (control morphants: n = 12 embryos; wnt4b/11 double morphants: n = 9 embryos; control morphants + plcβ4 mRNA: n = 4 embryos; control morphants + plcδ3a mRNA: n = 3 embryos; wnt4b/11 double morphants + plcβ4 mRNA: n = 9 embryos; wnt4b/11 double morphants + plcδ3a mRNA: n = 5 embryos; one frame per embryo). ns: not significant. g Control morphants or wnt4b/11 double morphants at 2 dpf were probed with plcδ3a riboprobes and their SCs were cross-sectioned. Images are oriented ventral to the bottom. Arrowheads point to ECs. Scale bar = 20 μm. h RNAs were extracted from each group (20 embryos in g) at 2 dpf and levels of plcδ3a mRNA were assessed by qPCR. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test from four biological replicates (three technical replicates each). CO: Control. i Embryos at 45 hpf were treated with DMSO or BIO (5 μM) for 1–3 h and probed with plcδ3a riboprobes, and their SCs were sectioned. Images are oriented ventral to the bottom. hpt: hours post-treatment. Arrowhead indicates ECs. Scale bar = 20 μm. j Upon BIO treatment, RNAs were extracted from each group (20 embryos in (i)) and levels of plcδ3a mRNAs were assessed by qPCR. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 and ****P < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test from three biological replicates (eight technical replicates each). k Schematic of the plcδ3a promoter-firefly luciferase construct used in the luciferase reporter assay. Black rectangles represent three (1–3) Tcf binding elements (TBEs) and red rectangles TBEs with deletions. l HEK 293T cells were transfected with WT or mutant plcδ3a promoter-firefly luciferase constructs and Renilla luciferase plasmid with or without β-catenin plasmid, and processed for dual luciferase assay. Relative Light Units: firefly luciferase activity/Renilla luciferase activity. **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (n = 3 culture replicates per group; each culture was assayed three times).

Cx43 is implicated in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia

Gap junctions are critical to intercellular Ca2+ waves (ICWs)3134. A gap junction is a specialized pore-like intercellular connection that directly links the cytoplasm of neighboring animal cells, thereby coupling them electrochemically, and consists of two connexons (also called hemichannels) on opposing cells. Each connexon is composed of homo- or hetero-hexamers of connexins (Cxs). As previous reports uncovered expression of Cx43 in ECs35,36, we probed zebrafish embryos for cx43 expression. cx43 was expressed in embryos from one-cell stage onwards and its expression in ECs (ventral SC cells abutting the CC) began from about 42 h post-fertilization (hpf) onwards (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 10). To check whether Cx43 affects motile cilia, we microinjected cx43 MO (Supplementary Fig. 11) into embryos and found that at 2 dpf, 38% of embryos showed curved trunks, 48% were morphologically normal (Fig. 3b) and 14% were disintegrated possibly due to injury caused by the microinjection (data not shown). Morphologically normal cx43 morphants were used in subsequent studies. cx43 morphants were immunostained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody and displayed reduced cilia, which was recovered by co-microinjection of mouse Cx43 RNA (Fig. 3c). At stages when cx43 is not expressed in the SC (24 and 36 hfp), cx43 MO did not reduce cilia (Supplementary Fig. 12a, b). Furthermore, in cx43 morphants at 2 dpf, motile cilia were lost in the rostral SC in which cx43 was expressed, but were relatively spared in the caudal SC where cx43 was expressed very weakly (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 12c), suggesting that Cx43 is implicated in the maintenance of cilia rather than ciliogenesis per se.

Fig. 3. Cx43 is implicated in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia.

Fig. 3

a WISH of a WT embryo at 2 dpf with cx43 riboprobes (left). Lateral view anterior to the left. Right panel shows the cross-section image of the SC ventral to the bottom. Arrowhead indicates ECs. Scale bars = left: 650 μm; right: 20 μm. b Embryos at one-cell stage were microinjected with cx43 MO and imaged at 2 dpf. Lateral view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 650 μm. c Embryos at one-cell stage were microinjected with either control MO or cx43 MO or cx43 MO + mouse Cx43 mRNA, and IF stained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody at 2 dpf. Arrowheads represent spinal motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. d Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP) embryos expressing GFP in motile cilia were microinjected at one-cell stage with either control (CO) MO or cx43 MO and subjected to time-lapse imaging for 2 min (6.7 frames s−1) with an intravital multiphoton microscope. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 7.5 μm. e Embryos at one-cell stage were microinjected with control MO or cx43 MO and Qdots were microinjected into the hindbrain ventricles of larvae at 4 dpf, which were then imaged at 10 min and 60 min after the microinjection. Dashed lines indicate migration of Qdots. Arrowheads mark the caudal end of Qdot flow. Lateral view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 650 μm. Insets represent magnifications of the dotted areas. CO: Control. f Quantification of Qdot migration distance in the larvae shown in d. Mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (n = 3 larvae per group). g Embryos at one-cell stage were microinjected with either control MO or cx43 MO and immunostained with anti-γ-tubulin antibody at 2 dpf. Arrowheads indicate motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. h Tg(foxj1a:eGFP) embryos expressing GFP in ECs were microinjected with either control MO or cx43 MO and imaged at 2 dpf. Arrowheads represent spinal ECs. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 650 μm.

To visualize the beating of motile cilia in cx43 morphants, we used Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP) embryos37, in which murine Arl13b fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) is localized to the ciliary axoneme. Multiphoton imaging of ependymal cilia in live Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP) embryos microinjected with cx43 MO revealed decreased beating compared to that in control embryos (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Movies 1, 2). Kupffer’s vesicle (KV) has motile cilia38 and cx43.4 (not related to cx43) is expressed in KV39. As such, we wished to test if cx43 is expressed in KV. WISH with cx43 riboprobes revealed that cx43 is not expressed in KV (Supplementary Fig. 13).

CSF flow moves dyes injected into the hindbrain ventricle of larvae, which can be used as a functional readout of ependymal motile cilia40. To assess the functional consequences of reduced cilia, we microinjected Qdots into the zebrafish hindbrain ventricle and tracked passive migration of Qdots for 60 min. Passive migration of Qdots in cx43 morphants was practically absent, whereas significant passive migration was observed in control embryos (Fig. 3e, f). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that diminished cilia in cx43 morphants have decreased function. Meanwhile, cx43 morphants did not exhibit a decrease in basal bodies, a cilia organizing center found at the base of cilia, as revealed by IF staining with anti-γ-tubulin antibody (Fig. 3g). In addition, microinjection of cx43 MO into Tg(foxj1a:eGFP) embryos13, in which expression of eGFP (enhanced GFP) is driven by a promoter of foxj1a, did not alter eGFP expression in ECs (Fig. 3h). These results indicate that Cx43 affects ependymal motile cilia, but not ECs per se. As Foxj1, Rfx2 and Rfx3 transcription factors are implicated in motile ciliogenesis15, we wished to check whether Cx43 affects the expression of these three transcription factors in spinal ECs. WISH and qPCR revealed no significant changes in rfx2 mRNA levels between control and cx43 morphants, yet uncovered an increase in foxj1 and rfx3 levels in cx43 morphants (Supplementary Fig. 14), which may be a compensatory response. These findings indicate that decreased cilia in cx43 morphants do not ensue from suppression of the three ciliogenic transcription factors.

Cx consists of an N-terminal domain, four transmembrane domains and a C-terminal domain. Both N- and C-termini are located in the cytosol (Fig. 4a), and the four transmembrane domains are responsible for the electrochemical coupling of neighboring cells. The C-terminal domain of Cx possesses regulatory and signaling roles41,42. To determine which of the Cx43 domain is associated with the maintenance of motile cilia, we co-microinjected into embryos cx43 MO and mRNA encoding mouse Cx43 lacking the C-terminal domain43 and observed that the ciliary phenotype was rescued (Fig. 4b, c). However, mouse Cx43 T154A, a mutant Cx43 allele that has a missense mutation in the third transmembrane domain resulting in closed gap junctions44, did not rescue the ciliary phenotype (Fig. 4d, e). Moreover, treatment of WT embryos with carbenoxolone, a gap junction uncoupler45, diminished motile cilia compared to those in DMSO-treated larvae (Fig. 4f). To investigate whether carbenoxolone may be toxic to ECs, we exposed Tg(foxj1a:egfp) embryos to carbenoxolone and found no discernible decrease in the number of GFP+ cells compared to that in control embryos, ruling out the possibility (Supplementary Fig. 15). These findings indicate that the electrochemical coupling function of Cx43, rather than the regulatory and signaling or hemichannel function, plays a more important role in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia. To test if the ciliary phenotype in cx43 morphants is associated with changes in Wnt signaling, we treated cx43 morphants with BIO and noted the rescue of the phenotype (Fig. 4g, h), implying that augmentation of Wnt signaling can maintain motile cilia, at least in part.

Fig. 4. The electrochemical coupling function of Cx43 plays an important role in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia.

Fig. 4

a Domain structure of Cx43. TM, transmembrane. b, d Embryos at one-cell stage were microinjected with control MO, cx43 MO or cx43 MO + mRNA encoding mouse Cx43 lacking the C-terminal domain (b) or cx43 MO + mRNA that encodes mouse mutant Cx43 lacking the channel function (d), and IF stained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody at 2 dpf. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. c, e Quantification of the number of ependymal motile cilia in b, d, respectively. Mean ± SD. **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc test: c n = 20 embryos per each group; e n = 10 embryos per each group except cx43 MO + cx43 T154A mRNA (n = 7 embryos). ns, not significant. f Embryos were treated with carbenoxolone (1 μM) at 18–48 hpf and immunostained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody at 2 dpf. Arrowheads point to motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. g Embryos at one-cell stage were microinjected with cx43 MO, treated with either DMSO (vehicle control) or BIO (5 μM) at 12–48 hpf, and IF stained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody at 2 dpf. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. h Quantification of the number of ependymal motile cilia per frame in embryos in g. Mean ± SD. ****P < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (cx43 MO + DMSO: n = 18 embryos; cx43 MO + BIO: n = 20 embryos; one frame per embryo). i Tg(foxj1a:GCaMP6s) embryos expressing a calcium indicator (GCaMP6s) in ECs were microinjected at one-cell stage with control MO or cx43 MO, and cx43 morphants were treated with BIO (5 μM) at 12–48 hpf. Subsequently, they were subjected to time-lapse imaging for 3 min (20 frames/min) with a confocal microscope. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. j The GFP fluorescence intensity in ten cells (1–10) in each embryo in i was individually assessed at 0 (F0), 60 (F60), 120 (F120) and 180 s (F180), and presented as F60/F0, F120/F0 and F180/F0.

As Ca2+ is a regulator of motile ciliary beating46 and propagates between adjacent cells through gap junctions3234, we wanted to assess Ca2+ levels in spinal ECs of cx43 morphants. To this end, we generated transgenic zebrafish expressing GCaMP647, a Ca2+ indicator, driven by foxj1a promoter (referred to as Tg(foxj1a:gcamp6s)). In WT embryos, Ca2+ firing in one ependymal cell appeared to propagate to adjacent cells. In cx43 morphants, however, Ca2+ levels in resting ECs were lower than those in WT embryos and the propagation of Ca2+ firing was not observed, which was restored to that in WT embryos by BIO treatment (Fig. 4i, j, Supplementary Fig. 16 and Supplementary Movies 3, 4). Collectively, these findings point to a role for Cx43 gap junctions in Ca2+ propagation among spinal ECs. ATPs are released from cells through hemichannels (connexons)48 that may form in ECs with Cx43, and then could affect Ca2+ dynamics in the neighboring cells. As such, we sought to test whether ATP in CSF could regulate motile cilia in ECs. To this end, we microinjected apyrase, which degrades ATP49, into the hindbrain ventricles of zebrafish larvae, immunostained them with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody, and found no manifest change in ependymal motile cilia (Supplementary Fig. 17). This result implies that Cx43 hemichannels, if formed in ECs, might not be implicated in the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia.

cx43 null zebrafish have reduced motile cilia in ECs

To genetically confirm the ciliary phenotype of cx43 morphants, we introduced one base pair deletion to the coding sequence of Cx43 using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, yielding a premature stop codon (c.601delT, p.Ser201LeufsTer14; referred to as cx43−/−) (Fig. 5a). Most of cx43 −/− zebrafish died at 10–14 dpf, especially at 13-14 dpf, and surviving cx43−/− zebrafish (less than 4%) were sterile and small in body length compared to WT and cx43+/− siblings (Fig. 5b, c). As we observed a decrease in ependymal motile cilia in cx43 morphants at 2 dpf, we expected the same decrease in cx43−/− embryos at 2 dpf. To our surprise, however, we did not see any decrease (Fig. 5d). As zebrafish have many cx isoforms, we first suspected that this discrepancy might come from genetic redundancy. To rule out the possibility that the cx43 MO we used may target other cx genes in addition to cx43, we examined the 5’ untranslated region (UTR) of all cx genes, but we did not find any sequences similar to cx43 target sequences. We next checked the expression of other cx genes in spinal ECs, yet did not observe any other cx gene with substantial expression (Supplementary Fig. 18). Finally, this discrepancy could be caused by maternal expression of cx43. To avoid maternal effect, we probed cx43−/− embryos with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody at a later stage (8 dpf) and indeed observed decrease in ependymal motile cilia (Fig. 5e, f). Moreover, TEM of 10-dpf zebrafish SCs revealed a decrease in ependymal motile cilia in cx43−/− embryos with normal morphology and heart beating compared to WT siblings (Supplementary Fig. 19). To assess the functional consequences of reduced cilia, we microinjected Qdots into the hindbrain ventricle of 10-dpf zebrafish and found almost no passive migration of Qdots in cx43−/− larvae as opposed to significant passive migration in WT siblings (Fig. 5g).

Fig. 5. cx43 null zebrafish have reduced motile cilia in ECs.

Fig. 5

a Electropherograms of the target sequences of the cx43 gDNA in WT and cx43−/− zebrafish. Arrow indicates the deletion of the T nucleotide. b Zebrafish (n = 71) at 2 months post-fertilization (mpf) from mating of cx43+/− zebrafish were genotyped for cx43. c Images of 3 mpf zebrafish with the indicated cx43 genotype. d WT or cx43−/− embryos at 2 dpf were immunostained with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody, imaged with a confocal microscope and genotyped for cx43. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 20 μm. e Larvae at 8 dpf from mating of cx43+/− zebrafish were cut into cranial and caudal halves. The cranial half was used for cx43 genotyping, and the caudal half was coronally sectioned at a thickness of 14 μm and then processed for IF staining with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody. Arrowheads represent motile cilia. Dorsal view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 30 μm. f Quantification of the number of cilia per frame in embryos in e. Mean ± SD. ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (cx43+/+ = 7 embryos; cx43+/− = 7 embryos; cx43−/− = 13 embryos; one frame per embryo). g Qdots were microinjected into the hindbrain ventricles of WT or cx43−/− zebrafish larvae at 10 dpf and then imaged at 5 and 60 min after the microinjection. Dashed lines indicate passive migration of Qdots. Arrowheads mark the caudal end of Qdot flow. Lateral view anterior to the left. Scale bar = 1 mm. Insets represent magnifications of the dotted areas.

Cx43 null mice have reduced motile cilia in ECs

To investigate whether the ciliary phenotype in cx43−/− zebrafish recapitulates in Cx43 knockout (Cx43−/−) mice, we probed the SCs of Cx43−/− mice pups, which die perinatally50, with anti-Cx43 antibody and anti-Arl13b antibody or anti-Phospho-Cx43 (Ser368) antibody, and observed a significant decrease in ependymal motile cilia in Cx43−/− mice compared to WT and Cx43+/− siblings. Of note, expansion of the CC was noted in Cx43−/− mice (Fig. 6a–d). Furthermore, TEM of the SCs in WT and Cx43+/− mice showed many cross-sectioned motile cilia protruding to the CC, yet no motile cilia protruding to the CC were observed in Cx43−/− mice. Rarely noted in Cx43−/− mice were cilia-like structures embedded in ECs (Fig. 6e). Collectively, these findings indicate that Cx43 is required for the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia in mice as well. Finally, immunohistochemistry of the SC from a human cadaver with anti-Cx43 and anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibodies revealed the expression of Cx43 in human ECs (Fig. 6f), demonstrating the conservation of Cx43 expression in ECs from zebrafish to humans.

Fig. 6. Cx43 null mice have reduced motile cilia in ECs.

Fig. 6

a, b The SCs of P1 pups with the indicated Cx43 genotype were cross-sectioned, double immunostained with anti-Cx43 and anti-ARL13B antibodies (a) or anti-Phospho-Cx43 (Ser386) antibody (b), and counterstained with DAPI. Asterisks indicate the central canal (CC). Images are oriented ventral to the bottom. Scale bars = 20 μm. c, d Quantifications of motile cilia per section in embryos in a and Cx43 signals per section in embyos in b. Mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (n = 3 mice per group; one frame per mouse). ns, not significant. e TEM of the SCs of P1 pups with the indicated Cx43 genotype. Arrowheads indicate cross-sectioned motile cilia protruding to the CC and arrow marks a cilium-like structure embedded in an EC. Regions marked by arrowheads or arrow are magnified in the respective lower panels. f The human spinal cord at C1 level from a cadaver was stained with anti-Cx43 and anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibodies. The boxed areas are magnified in the respective lower panels. Arrowhead denotes staining of Cx43 and arrow motile cilia. Scale bar = 100 μm. g A proposed model for the maintenance of ependymal motile cilia by the Wnt-PLC-IP3-Connexin-Ca2+ axis.

Discussion

Here, we show that the Wnt-PLC-IP3-Connexin-Ca2+ axis is very likely to be required for the maintenance of the ependymal motile cilia in the zebrafish SC (Fig. 6g).

What is the mechanism by which this axis maintains the ependymal motile cilia? Ca2+ is the most prevalent cation in vertebrates and is involved in gene expression, muscle contraction, cell motility, apoptosis, synaptic plasticity, and exocytosis5153. Cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations have been reported to regulate various biological processes including gene expression54. For instance, Lewis and colleagues reported that Ca2+ oscillations regulate gene expression mediated by nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), Oct/OAP and NF-kB55. Cullen and colleagues demonstrated that the optimized frequency of Ca2+ oscillations activates Ras and its downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade in HeLa cells56. Spitzer and colleagues showed that the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations can regulate the expression of neurotransmitters in embryonic spinal neurons of Xenopus laevis57. We showed that the concentration of cytosolic Ca2+ in ECs oscillates using Tg(foxj1a:egfp) embryos and that gap junctions play an important role in the coordination of Ca2+ oscillations in adjacent cells and in the generation of Ca2+ oscillations. As such, it is tempting to speculate that the propagation of Ca2+ oscillations in ECs may be implicated in the expression of genes that are critical to the assembly of motile cilia.

How are Wnt signaling and Cx43 connected to maintain ependymal motile cilia? We come up with two possibilities that are not mutually exclusive. First, Wnt signaling may enhance expression of cx43. Fishman and colleagues argued that Wnt1 increases Cx43 mRNA expression and ICW propagation in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes58. We also found that BIO treatment restored number of motile cilia and ICW propagation in cx43 morphants (Fig. 4g, h, j, Supplementary Fig. 16). Second, Wnt signaling keeps the ECs chemically excitable by maintaining the basal level of ependymal Ca2+, which may be required for the ICW propagation through Cx43 gap junctions. Barria and colleagues demonstrated that Wnt signaling controls electrophysiological intrinsic properties of neurons in rat via Ca2+ mobilization59. As described above, it may be the ICW propagation that induces expression of genes required for motile ciliogenesis. Iovine and colleagues reported that zebrafish homozygous for cx43 (short fin [sof]) mutation, but not cx43+/− zebrafish, showed skeletal phenotypes during zebrafish fin regeneration and that cx43+/− zebrafish treated with IWR-1 exhibited the skeletal phenotypes60, indicating that Cx43 may act upstream of Wnt signaling during the zebrafish fin regeneration. This finding raises the possibility of a positive feedback loop between Wnt signaling and Cx43 in our proposed model (Fig. 6g).

This study focuses on the maintenance of spinal motile cilia at developmental stages after cx43 is expressed in the SC. Some players in the Wnt-PLC-IP3-Connexin-Ca2+ axis, especially Wnt signaling and PLC, may be also involved in the initial ciliogenesis. As motile cilia are maintained by balance between cilia assembly (ciliogenesis) and disassembly61, it is likely that a possible role for the Wnt signaling and/or PLC in the initial ciliogenesis also contributes to the maintenance of motile cilia after cx43 is expressed in the SC.

What would be the teleonomic relevance of gap junctions in the maintenance of motile cilia? Motile cilia should beat coordinately to efficiently and unidirectionally move mucus in the respiratory tract and CSF in the brain ventricles and CC, and gap junctions are required for this coordinated beating15. Therefore, it is conceivable that beating of motile cilia would become uncoordinated without gap junctions. From a teleonomic perspective, the presence of motile cilia that beat uncoordinatedly does not stand to reason. It does stand to reason, however, that motile cilia are disassembled when coordinated beating is not implemented. Thus, further study is warranted to delineate the mechanism by which the lack of functional gap junctions disassembles motile cilia.

Are all cilia in the CC motile? Two experimental approaches used in this study (IF staining with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody and imaging of Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP) embryos) could not differentiate motile cilia from primary cilia because anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody labels both primary and motile cilia62 and Arl13b exists in both primary and motile cilia37. Although analysis of the movie taken from WT Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP) embryos (Supplementary Movie 1) did not reveal any immotile cilia, this does not necessarily mean that all spinal EC cilia are motile.

CSF-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs; Kolmer–Agduhr (KA) cells in zebrafish) express foxj1a and have a kinocilium63,64. As such, immunostaining with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody cannot tell EC motile cilia from CSF-cNs’ kinocilia. However, the majority of cells surrounding the CC are ECs in zebrafish63. Hatler and colleagues argued that a functional leftward fluid flow, which is required for KV to direct L–R asymmetry, entails coordinated ciliary beating and elevated Ca2+ within cells. They suggested that communication via gap junctions may coordinate ciliary beating39. However, cx43.4 is not expressed in the zebrafish spinal cord (Supplementary Fig. 18).

Finally, this report underscores the importance of gap junctions in the maintenance of motile cilia and proposes that the augmentation of functional gap junctions by pharmacological or genetic manipulations could mitigate motile ciliopathy.

Methods

Reagets

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, unless indicated otherwise.

Ethics

Zebrafish experiments were approved by the Chonnam National University Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; project number: 2017-7). Mouse studies were approved by the Asan Institute for Life Sciences IACUC (project number: 2015-12-158). All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of the Republic of Korea. Written informed consent for the use of tissue from the deceased were obtained from the family of the deceased.

Zebrafish strains

WT zebrafish (AB strain) were obtained from the Zebrafish International Resource Center, raised in a fish facility under the standard procedures65, and staged in dpf or hpf as per standard criteria at 28.5 °C66. Zebrafish younger than 1.5 year of age were used in this study and were not selected for gender. The transgenic and mutant lines used in this study were Tg(hsp70l:dkk1b-GFP)19, Tg(βactin2::Arl13b-GFP)37, Tg(foxj1a:eGFP)13 and sonic-you (syut4)16.

DNA manipulation

The plasmid encoding mouse Cx43 (GenBank Accession Number NM_010288.3) was provided by Dr. Myung-Kwan Han and the gene was subcloned into the EcoRI/ClaI sites of the pCS4 + plasmid67. To construct a plasmid encoding the mouse Cx43 lacking a C-terminal domain, two DNA fragments (I and II) were PCR-amplified from the mouse Cx43 plasmid with specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and the two resulting PCR products were cloned simultaneously into the XmaI/Acc65I sites of the mouse Cx43 plasmid. The mouse Cx43 T154A plasmid was generated by site-directed mutagenesis with specific primers (Supplementary Table 1). To generate riboprobes, cx30.3 (NM_212825), cx31.7 (XM_001921588), cx32.2 (NM_001030210), cx32.3 (NM_199612), cx34.4 (NM_001130636), cx34.5 (NM_001030200), cx35.4 (NM_001017685), cx40.8 (XM_688906.7), cx43 (NM_131038), wnt4b (NM_131500.1), wnt11 (NM_131076.2), plcβ1 (CK146034), pplcβ4 (XM_002667849.5), plcδ1a (NM_001109700.1), plcδ3a (NM_001099423.1), plcδ3b (XM_005156129.2), plcδ4a (XM_688936.5), plcδ4b (XM_684872.6), plch2a (AW422385.1), plcl2 (CK706546.1), plcxd1 (XM_686850), and plcxd2 (XM_683331.5) were PCR-amplified from zebrafish cDNA with specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and cloned into pCS2+68 or pCS4+67 plasmids.

To generate the plcδ3a promoter plasmid, the upstream region of the plcδ3a coding sequence was PCR-amplified from zebrafish genomic DNA with specific primers (Supplementary Table 2) and cloned into the XhoI/NcoI sites of the pGL3-Basic vector (Promega). Deletion mutants of the plcδ3a promoter were generated by site-directed mutagenesis with specific primers (Supplementary Table 2). All plasmids constructed were verified by DNA sequencing analysis (Macrogen).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

TEM on zebrafish larvae was performed in the Electron Microscopy Facility at the Biomedical Research Institute at Yonsei University College of Medicine as described previously69. For TEM of the mice spinal cords (SCs), 16 P1 pups (four WT, nine Cx43 +/− and three Cx43−/−) were cryoanesthetized by placing in crushed ice for 5 min and perfused transcardially with 2 ml of heparinized normal saline (0.9% NaCl), followed by 10 ml freshly prepared fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and 0.1% picric acid in phosphate buffer [PB; 0.1 M, pH 7.4]). Cervical spinal cord (C1 level) was removed and postfixed in the fixative for 2 h at 4 °C. After fixation, tissues were placed in 1% osmium tetroxide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS [137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 2 mM KH2PO4]) for 1 h, dehydrated in graded alcohols, embedded in Durcupan ACM (Fluka), and cured for 48 h at 60 °C. Thin sections were cut with a diamond knife and collected on formvar-coated single-slot nickel grids. The grids were counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined on an H-7500 electron microscope (Hitachi) at 80 kV accelerating voltage. Images were acquired using the DigitalMicrograph software driving a SC1000 camera (Gatan) attached to the microscope. Images were saved as TIFF files, and brightness and contrast were adjusted in Photoshop (Adobe Systems).

Immunohistochemistry of whole-mount zebrafish embryos

Embryos without morphological defect were dechorionated, fixed in 4% PFA for 2 h at room temperature (RT), treated with bleaching solution (3% hydrogen peroxide and 1% KOH in H2O) to remove the pigment in the embryos and to permeabilize the tissue, and treated with proteinase K (10 mg ml−1; Roche) for 10 min at RT and acetone for 20 min at −20 °C. The embryos were then rinsed in blocking buffer (2.5% bovine serum albumin [BSA] and 2.5% goat serum [Thermo Fisher Scientific] in 1 x PBS), and incubated with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody (1:500; catalog number T6793, Sigma), or anti-γ-tubulin antibody (1:200; T6557, Sigma) at 4 °C overnight. After several washes with PBS containing Tween 20 (PBST [PBS in 0.1% Tween 20]), embryos were incubated overnight in the dark at 4 °C with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1,000; R37120, Life Technologies).

Synthesis of antisense riboprobes and capped mRNA

Plasmids encoding the indicated genes were linearized with a restriction endonuclease (New England Biolabs) and then used as templates to synthesize antisense riboprobes using the T7 RNA polymerase (Roche) and a DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Roche) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Capped mRNAs were synthesized from plasmids linearized with a restriction endonuclease using an mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH)

Embryos without morphological defect were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS at the indicated developmental stages at 4 °C overnight, rinsed with PBST at least three times for 5 min each, transferred to 100% methanol and then stored at −20 °C until further use. The fixed embryos were rehydrated with PBST and treated with proteinase K (10 mg ml−1) for 5–30 min depending on the embryo stages. Subsequently, the embryos were postfixed with 4% PFA for 20 min, pre-hybridized with hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5x saline sodium citrate [SSC] buffer [750 mM NaCl, 75 mM trisodium citrate, pH 7.0; Biosesang], yeast tRNA [500 μg ml−1], heparin [50 μg ml−1] and 0.1% Tween 20) at 68 °C for 1 h, and then hybridized with DIG-labeled riboprobes at 68 °C overnight with shaking. After washing at 68 °C with 75%, 50%, and 25% formamide in 2x SSC-Tween 20 for 30 min each, 2x SSC-Tween 20 once and 0.2x SSC-Tween 20 four times, the embryos were washed with PBST several times for 5 min each at RT, incubated in 1% blocking buffer (Roche) for at least 1 h on the shaker, and then in anti-digoxigenin antibody (1:2,000; 11277073910, Roche) in 1% blocking buffer overnight. After an extensive wash with PBST, embryos were treated with BM purple AP substrate (Roche) diluted in staining buffer (5 M NaCl, 1 M Tris [pH 9.5], 2 M MgCl2 and 0.1% Tween 20) until signal appears. The reaction was stopped by washing with PBST, and the embryos were fixed again with 4% PFA at 4 °C overnight and stored in methanol at −20 °C before imaging.

Morpholino injections

MOs targeting the start codon of the indicated genes were obtained from Gene Tools and microinjected into one-cell stage zebrafish embryos. The efficiency of MOs targeting the start codon was assessed by the intensity of GFP fluorescence from embryos co-microinjected with MOs and RNAs encoding the MO target N-terminally fused to GFP. To test the efficiency of the MOs, two complementary oligonucleotides harboring the target sequence of the MOs (See below) were annealed and cloned into the BamHI/NcoI sites of the pCS2+-EGFP vector. Upon MO microinjection, embryos with abnormal morphology, if any, were excluded from subsequent experiments.

The following MOs were used:

wnt4b MO: 5′-TGGCATCAGATTGCCTGTCTGTC-3′ (translation blocking MO; dose: 4 or 8 ng)

wnt5b MO: 5′-GTCCTTGGTTCATTCTCACATCCAT-3′ (translation blocking MO; dose: 4 or 8 ng)

wnt11 MO: 5′-GGAAGGTTCGCTTCATGCTGTACAA-3′ (translation blocking MO; dose: 4 or 8 ng)

cx43 MO: 5′-TCCCAACGCACTCCAGTCACCCATC-3′ (translation blocking MO; standard dose: 5 ng)

fzd7b MO21: 5′-TCGGCTTGTGCTTCGCTGCTATTCC-3′ (translation blocking MO; dose: 5 ng)

plcδ3a MO: 5′-GGATTCTTCTTTACCCCAGCATGT-3′ (translation blocking MO; dose: 8 ng)

Standard control MO: 5′-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3′

Microscopy

For bright-field imaging, a SteREO Discovery V20 stereomicroscope (Zeiss) or a BX50 microscope (Olympus) was used. For confocal imaging, embryos were mounted in 1% low melting temperature agarose (Lonza) on confocal dishes (SPL Life Sciences) and imaged under an LSM 510 Pascal, or an LSM 700 confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss). Images were acquired by Zen Black (version 8.1, Zeiss) and assembled using Adobe Photoshop (version CS6). An SP8 intravital multiphoton microscope (Leica) at Korea Basic Science Institute was used to image beating motile cilia in zebrafish embryos, and images were captured using LAS X (Leica)

Chemical treatment

Carbenoxolone was dissolved in DMSO and administered to embryos at a final concentration of 1.0 μM at 18–48 hpf. BIO (5 μM) and IWR-1 (10 μM), both dissolved in DMSO, were delivered to dechorionated embryos at 12–48 hpf and 8–48 hpf, respectively, in E3 embryo media (5 mM Na Cl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4 and 0.0003% methylene blue). DAPT was dissolved in DMSO, diluted in E3 embryo media to 100 μM, and administered to the dechorionated embryos at 34–48 hpf. Upon chemical treatment, embryos with abnormal morphology, if any, were excluded from subsequent experiments.

Microinjection into the hindbrain ventricles of zebrafish larvae

Zebrafish larvae at 4 dpf were anesthetized with 1.5 mg ml−1 tricaine (3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt) dissolved in blue water (0.0003% methylene blue) and positioned in methyl cellulose (3% in H2O). Qdot (4 nl, Thermo Fisher Scientific), thapsigargin (4 nl of 5 μM), apyrase (0.175 U) or U-73122 (4 nl of 40 μM) was microinjected into the hindbrain ventricles of zebrafish larvae. The microinjection was implemented at 4 dpf due to difficulty in ventricle microinjection at 2 dpf.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Total RNAs were extracted from 2-dpf embryos using TRIzol (Molecular Research Center). cDNAs were synthesized from the extracted RNAs using SuperiorScript III Master Mix (Enzynomics) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and then mixed with the indicated primers and TOPreal qPCR 2x PreMIX (Enzynomics). Subsequently, qPCR was performed on a Rotor-Gene Q Real-Time PCR cycler (Corbett Research). Primers for 18S rRNA, actb1 or gapdh were used for normalization. The sequences of the primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 3.

Luciferase reporter assay

HEK 293T cells were maintained in RPMI1640 media (Welgene) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Welgene) and 1x Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere and regularly passaged once they reached >80% confluency. HEK 293 T cells were seeded onto 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. When the cells reached about 60% confluency, they were transfected with the pGL3-Basic plasmids (50 ng), pCS2+ plasmid (50 ng), WT or mutant reporter plasmids (50 ng), or plasmids encoding β-catenin70 (25 ng) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The pEGFP-C1 plasmid (Clontech) was used to monitor the transfection efficiency. At 24 h post-transfection, the media was removed, and the cells were rinsed with 500 µl of Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS) thoroughly, treated with 100 µl of 1× Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega) and rocked for 15–20 min. The dual luciferase assay was carried out using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) and an Orion L Microplate Luminometer (Titertek-Berthold). The cell lysate (20 µl) was mixed with the Luciferase Assay Buffer II plus Luciferase Assay Substrate (100 µl), and the firefly luciferase activity was measured for 10 s after a 3-sec delay. Subsequently, Stop & Glo Buffer plus Stop & Glo Buffer Substrate (100 µl) was added and the Renilla luciferase activity was measured for 10 s after a 3-s delay. The ratio of firefly luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase activity was expressed as relative light unit.

Serial sectioning of zebrafish embryos and larvae

Embryos and larvae were fixed with AB fix solution (8% PFA and 2× fix solution [8% sucrose and 0.03% 1 M CaCl2 in PBS]) overnight, embedded in 1.5% agarose dissolved in 5% sucrose, and kept in a sealed 15-ml tube with 30% sucrose in PBS overnight. Subsequently, agarose blocks were frozen in butanol (Junsei Chemical) chilled with liquid nitrogen and then serially sectioned into slices using a CM3000 S microtome (Leica).

Immunohistochemistry of sectioned zebrafish tissues

Slides with sectioned tissues were dried for at least 2 h at RT and then soaked in PBS for 1 h in a glass jar. The slides were mounted on a tray, washed three times with PBS for 5 min each, blocked with blocking buffer (2.5% BSA and 2.5% goat serum in PBS) for 1–2 h, and treated with anti-acetylated-α-tubulin antibody (1:500), or anti-GFAP antibody (1:200, GTX128741, GeneTex) at 4 °C overnight. The sections were then washed 10 times with PBS for 5 min each, blocked for 1 h, and then incubated in the dark with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1,000) at 4 °C overnight. After five washes with PBS, the sections were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 10.9 μM) for 1 min at RT and washed with PBS three times for 5 min each.

Generation of Tg(foxj1a:GCaMP6s) zebrafish

Tg(foxj1a:GCaMP6s) construct was generated using a Gateway cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. GCaMP6s was PCR-amplified from the pGP-CMV-GCaMP6s plasmid71 with specific primers harboring attB sequences (fwd: 5′-GGG GAC AAG TTT GTA CAA AAA AGC AGG CTC CAT GGG TTC TCA TCA TCA TC-3′; rev: 5′-GGG GAC CAC TTT GTA CAA GAA AGC TGG GTG TCA CTT CGC TGT CAT CAT TTG-3′). The resulting PCR product was recombined with the donor vector, pDONR 211 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using BP Clonase II Enzyme Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The resulting entry clone, 5′ element plasmid (the foxj1a promoter plasmid provided by Dr. Brian Ciruna)13 and p3E-polyA were simultaneously transferred to the destination vector pDestTol2pA272 using LR Clonase II Enzyme Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The final construct, Tg(foxj1a:GCaMP6s), was microinjected into one-cell stage embryos, which were raised to adulthood.

Real-time imaging of Ca2+ and motile cilia in spinal ECs of zebrafish

Tg(foxj1a:GCaMP6s) embryos at 2 dpf were mounted onto confocal dishes in 1% low-melting temperature agarose, and time series images were taken with an LSM 700 confocal microscope for 3 min (20 frames/min). The Ca2+ change in each EC was measured by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health). Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP)37 embryos at 2 dpf were mounted onto confocal dishes in 1% low-melting temperature agarose and then imaged under an intravital multiphoton microscope for 2 min (6.7 frames s−1).

Generation of cx43−/− zebrafish

cx43−/− were generated via CRISPR/Cas9 technology73,74. The cx43 guide RNA targeting the second exon was designed with ZiFiT Targeter (http://zifit.partners.org). To generate the cx43 guide RNA, oligonucleotides were annealed (fwd: 5′-TAG GGT GGA CTG TTT CCT TTC T-3′; rev: 5′-AAA CAG AAA GGA AAC AGT CCA C-3′), cloned into the pT7-gRNA vector75, and in vitro transcribed with an mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The plasmid encoding Cas9 optimized for zebrafish codon76 was digested with XbaI, and cas9 RNA was synthesized using an mMESSAGE mMACHINE T3 transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Finally, the cx43 guide RNA (12.5 ng) and the cas9 RNA (300 ng) were co-microinjected into one-cell stage zebrafish embryos.

Genotyping

For zebrafish genotyping, genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated as described previously77. In brief, tail fins of adult zebrafish were clipped upon anesthetization with tricaine. The clipped fin or embryos were incubated with 50 mM NaOH (50–200 μl), heated to 95 °C until tissues were dissolved, and cooled down to 4 °C. Subsequently, 1/10 volume of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was added to neutralize the basic solution. After centrifugation at 16,363 × g for 10 min, the resulting supernatant was used for PCR. The primer pair used to PCR-amplify zebrafish cx43 was 5′-CGC ACC TAC ATC TTC AGC ATC AT-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACG CGG TCC TTG ATT CGT TTG A-3′ (reverse). For mice genotyping, gDNA was extracted from mice ear punches using a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). The primer pair to detect WT mice Cx43 was 5′-AGG TGG TGT CCA GAG CCT TA -3′ (forward) and 5′- CAC GTG AGC CAA GTA CAG GA-3′ (reverse), and the resulting PCR product size was 600 bp. The primer pair to detect mutant mice Cx43 was 5′- AGG TGG TGT CCA GAG CCT TA -3′ (forward) and 5′- AAT CCA TCT TGT TCA ATG GCC GAT C -3′ (reverse), and the resulting PCR product size was 320 bp.

Immunohistochemistry of the zebrafish SCs

Zebrafish larvae were anesthetized by 200 μg ml−1 of tricaine until movement ceased and were then fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C. Fixed embryos were embedded in 1.5% agar blocks containing 5% sucrose and equilibrated in 30% sucrose solution. Frozen blocks were sliced into horizontal sections at a thickness of 14-µm using a cryostat microtome (Microm HM 525, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and mounted on glass slides. The resulting sections were rinsed with PBS several times and then blocked in 5% BSA (Biosesang) with sheep serum (Jackson ImmnoResearch). Subsequently, the sections were treated with anti-acetylated α-tubulin (1:500) antibody overnight at 4 °C, washed for 1 h with PBS and treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000) overnight at 4 °C followed by treatment with DAPI (1:1,000) for 15 min and washing for 1 h with PBS. Images were obtained from the sections of cx43−/− larvae and their siblings.

Immunohistochemistry of the mice spinal cords (SCs)

The SCs were separated from P1 WT, Cx43+/− and Cx43−/− mice, embedded into paraffin after rinse in 30% sucrose in PBS, and sectioned at a thickness of 4 μm. The resulting sections were incubated at RT with mouse anti-CX43 antibody (1:10; 13-8300, Life Technologies), rabbit anti-Phospho-Cx 43 (Ser368) antibody (1:100; 3511, Cell Signaling Technology) or rabbit anti-ARL13B antibody78 (1:800, a gift from Dr. Hyuk Wan Ko) overnight, overnight or for two hr, respectively, washed three times with PBS for 30 min each and blocked with the blocking buffer for two hr. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with mouse Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated (1:1000) or rabbit Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000; A32732, Life Technologies), respectively, for 1 h at RT in the dark. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (10.9 μM) for 1 min at RT. Subsequently, the sections were washed three times in TBST (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20), mounted in Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories) and imaged under a microscope.

Immunohistochemistry of the human SC

The SC from a cadaver (22-year-old Korean male) was embedded in paraffin, deparaffinized and pre-treated with citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6.0) to retrieve antigen. After blocking the endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2 and 3% horse serum albumin [Thermo Fisher Scientific]), tissue sections were consecutively incubated with anti-Cx43 antibody (1:500) or anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody (1:1,000) overnight at 48 °C, biotinylated secondary antibodies (Agilent Technologies), streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (Vector Laboratories) and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) until the desired stain intensity appeared. The sections were finally counterstained with hematoxylin.

Statistics and reproducibility

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Error bars indicate SD. The P value was determined by either the one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc test or the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. Microsoft Excel (version 2013) and GraphPad Prism (version 5.01) were used for statistical analysis. All experiments in this study were repeated independently at least twice with similar results.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

41467_2020_15248_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (379.4KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (61.6MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 2 (38.6MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 3 (1.3MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 4 (2.5MB, mov)
Reporting Summary (128.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Myung-Kwan Han for mouse Cx43 cDNA, Robert Kelsh for fzd3, fzd4, fzd6 and fzd8a plasmids, Vladimir Korzh for fzd7b plasmid, Ichiro Matsumoto for plcβ2 plasmid, Brian Ciruna for p5E-foxJ1aP and Tg(bactin2:Arl13b-GFP), Zebrafish International Resource Center for Tg(hsp70l:dkk1b-GFP), Hyuk Wan Ko for anti-ARL13B antibody, Jeffrey Essner for zebrafish cx43.4 plasmid, Eun Jin Kim for zebrafish TEM, Nan-Hee Choi and Do Won Jang for technical assistance, Hueng-Sik Choi, Richard Dorsky, Masahiko Hibi, Sudipto Roy and Masakatsu Watanabe for critical discussions, Tae-Lin Huh, Joon Haeng Rhee and Hiroki Teraoka for support, and Suk-Won Jin, Jeong-Soo Lee, and Ji Eun Lee for critical read of the manuscript. This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2015-R1D1A1A01056877), and the NRF grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of the government of Korea (2016R1E1A1A01943329). J.Z., G.C., and T.Liang. thank the Enam Fellowship Foundation for a graduate fellowship.

Source data

Source Data (32.6KB, xlsx)

Author contributions

S.Y.C. conceived the project. J.Z., G.C., W.L., D.Y.K., I.Y.J., S.H.L., T.Liang., J.Y.B., I.C., H.K., M.J.K., and H.S.K. performed the experiments. J.S.M., M.K.K., S.W.P., H.R., Y.C.B., H.C.P., E.Y.C., and S.Y.C. analyzed the data. T.Lee. performed the statistical analysis. E.Y.C. and S.Y.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Reagents are available upon request. The source data underlying all figures in which statistics are represented are provided as a Source Data file.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Jun Zhang, Gopalakrishnan Chandrasekaran, Wenting Li, Dong-Young Kim.

These authors jointly supervised this work: Eun Young Choi, Seok-Yong Choi.

Contributor Information

Eun Young Choi, Email: choieun@ulsan.ac.kr.

Seok-Yong Choi, Email: zebrafish@chonnam.ac.kr.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-15248-2.

References

  • 1.Lucas, J. S., Davis, S. D., Omran, H. & Shoemark, A. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in the genomics age. Lancet Respir. Med.8, 202–216 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Mitchison HM, Valente EM. Motile and non-motile cilia in human pathology: from function to phenotypes. J. Pathol. 2017;241:294–309. doi: 10.1002/path.4843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reiter JF, Leroux MR. Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;18:533–547. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kramer-Zucker AG, et al. Cilia-driven fluid flow in the zebrafish pronephros, brain and Kupffer’s vesicle is required for normal organogenesis. Development. 2005;132:1907–1921. doi: 10.1242/dev.01772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yu X, Lau D, Ng CP, Roy S. Cilia-driven fluid flow as an epigenetic cue for otolith biomineralization on sensory hair cells of the inner ear. Development. 2011;138:487–494. doi: 10.1242/dev.057752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Olstad EW, et al. Ciliary beating compartmentalizes cerebrospinal fluid flow in the brain and regulates ventricular development. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fu H, et al. Molecular mapping of the origin of postnatal spinal cord ependymal cells: evidence that adult ependymal cells are derived from Nkx6.1+ ventral neural progenitor cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003;456:237–244. doi: 10.1002/cne.10481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Spassky N, et al. Adult ependymal cells are postmitotic and are derived from radial glial cells during embryogenesis. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:10–18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1108-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lavado A, Oliver G. Six3 is required for ependymal cell maturation. Development. 2011;138:5291–5300. doi: 10.1242/dev.067470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yu K, McGlynn S, Matise MP. Floor plate-derived sonic hedgehog regulates glial and ependymal cell fates in the developing spinal cord. Development. 2013;140:1594–1604. doi: 10.1242/dev.090845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Del Bigio MR. Ependymal cells: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:55–73. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0624-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lyons DA, Guy AT, Clarke JD. Monitoring neural progenitor fate through multiple rounds of division in an intact vertebrate brain. Development. 2003;130:3427–3436. doi: 10.1242/dev.00569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grimes DT, et al. Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature. Science. 2016;352:1341–1344. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu X, Ng CP, Habacher H, Roy S. Foxj1 transcription factors are master regulators of the motile ciliogenic program. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:1445–1453. doi: 10.1038/ng.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Choksi SP, Lauter G, Swoboda P, Roy S. Switching on cilia: transcriptional networks regulating ciliogenesis. Development. 2014;141:1427–1441. doi: 10.1242/dev.074666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schauerte HE, et al. Sonic hedgehog is not required for the induction of medial floor plate cells in the zebrafish. Development. 1998;125:2983–2993. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.15.2983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Geling A, Steiner H, Willem M, Bally-Cuif L, Haass C. A gamma-secretase inhibitor blocks Notch signaling in vivo and causes a severe neurogenic phenotype in zebrafish. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:688–694. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Duncan RN, Panahi S, Piotrowski T, Dorsky RI. Identification of Wnt genes expressed in neural progenitor zones during Zebrafish brain development. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0145810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Howe DG, et al. ZFIN, the Zebrafish Model Organism Database: increased support for mutants and transgenics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D854–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149:1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nikaido M, Law EW, Kelsh RN. A systematic survey of expression and function of zebrafish frizzled genes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen B, et al. Small molecule-mediated disruption of Wnt-dependent signaling in tissue regeneration and cancer. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009;5:100–107. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ramsey M, Perkins BD. Basal bodies exhibit polarized positioning in zebrafish cone photoreceptors. J. Comp. Neurol. 2013;521:1803–1816. doi: 10.1002/cne.23260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marshall WF. Basal bodies platforms for building cilia. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2008;85:1–22. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00801-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thrasivoulou C, Millar M, Ahmed A. Activation of intracellular calcium by multiple Wnt ligands and translocation of beta-catenin into the nucleus: a convergent model of Wnt/Ca2+ and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:35651–35659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.437913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thastrup O, Cullen PJ, Drobak BK, Hanley MR, Dawson AP. Thapsigargin, a tumor promoter, discharges intracellular Ca2+ stores by specific inhibition of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2(+)-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:2466–2470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuhl M, Sheldahl LC, Park M, Miller JR, Moon RT. The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway: a new vertebrate Wnt signaling pathway takes shape. Trends Genet. 2000;16:279–283. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02028-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bleasdale JE, et al. Inhibition of phospholipase C dependent processes by U-73, 122. Adv. Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot. Res. 1989;19:590–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meijer L, et al. GSK-3-selective inhibitors derived from Tyrian purple indirubins. Chem. Biol. 2003;10:1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cadigan, K. M. & Waterman, M. L. TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.4, a007906 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Esseltine JL, Laird DW. Next-generation connexin and pannexin cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:944–955. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Gap junctions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009;1:a002576. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Prochnow N, Dermietzel R. Connexons and cell adhesion: a romantic phase. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;130:71–77. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0434-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vinken M. Introduction: connexins, pannexins and their channels as gatekeepers of organ physiology. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015;72:2775–2778. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1958-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Theofilas P, Steinhauser C, Theis M, Derouiche A. Morphological study of a connexin 43-GFP reporter mouse highlights glial heterogeneity, amacrine cells, and olfactory ensheathing cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 2017;95:2182–2194. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yamamoto T, Ochalski A, Hertzberg EL, Nagy JI. LM and EM immunolocalization of the gap junctional protein connexin 43 in rat brain. Brain Res. 1990;508:313–319. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90415-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Borovina A, Superina S, Voskas D, Ciruna B. Vangl2 directs the posterior tilting and asymmetric localization of motile primary cilia. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:407–412. doi: 10.1038/ncb2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Essner JJ, Amack JD, Nyholm MK, Harris EB, Yost HJ. Kupffer’s vesicle is a ciliated organ of asymmetry in the zebrafish embryo that initiates left-right development of the brain, heart and gut. Development. 2005;132:1247–1260. doi: 10.1242/dev.01663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hatler JM, Essner JJ, Johnson RG. A gap junction connexin is required in the vertebrate left-right organizer. Dev. Biol. 2009;336:183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang X, et al. Cilia-driven cerebrospinal fluid flow directs expression of urotensin neuropeptides to straighten the vertebrate body axis. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:1666–1673. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0260-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Palatinus JA, Rhett JM, Gourdie RG. The connexin43 carboxyl terminus and cardiac gap junction organization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1818:1831–1843. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cina C, et al. Involvement of the cytoplasmic C-terminal domain of connexin43 in neuronal migration. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:2009–2021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5025-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maass K, et al. Defective epidermal barrier in neonatal mice lacking the C-terminal region of connexin43. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:4597–4608. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-04-0324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beahm DL, et al. Mutation of a conserved threonine in the third transmembrane helix of alpha- and beta-connexins creates a dominant-negative closed gap junction channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:7994–8009. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506533200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Davidson JS, Baumgarten IM. Glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives: a novel class of inhibitors of gap-junctional intercellular communication. Struct.-Act. Relatsh. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1988;246:1104–1107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Salathe M. Regulation of mammalian ciliary beating. Annu Rev. Physiol. 2007;69:401–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.040705.141253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ohkura M, et al. Genetically encoded green fluorescent Ca2+ indicators with improved detectability for neuronal Ca2+ signals. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Leybaert L, Sanderson MJ. Intercellular Ca(2+) waves: mechanisms and function. Physiol. Rev. 2012;92:1359–1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gallagher CJ, Salter MW. Differential properties of astrocyte calcium waves mediated by P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:6728–6739. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06728.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reaume AG, et al. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995;267:1831–1834. doi: 10.1126/science.7892609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Berridge MJ. Calcium microdomains: organization and function. Cell Calcium. 2006;40:405–412. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bootman MD. Calcium signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012;4:a011171. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Clapham DE. Calcium signaling. Cell. 2007;131:1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Uhlen P, Fritz N. Biochemistry of calcium oscillations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;396:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dolmetsch RE, Xu K, Lewis RS. Calcium oscillations increase the efficiency and specificity of gene expression. Nature. 1998;392:933–936. doi: 10.1038/31960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kupzig S, Walker SA, Cullen PJ. The frequencies of calcium oscillations are optimized for efficient calcium-mediated activation of Ras and the ERK/MAPK cascade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:7577–7582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409611102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Borodinsky LN, et al. Activity-dependent homeostatic specification of transmitter expression in embryonic neurons. Nature. 2004;429:523–530. doi: 10.1038/nature02518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ai Z, Fischer A, Spray DC, Brown AM, Fishman GI. Wnt-1 regulation of connexin43 in cardiac myocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 2000;105:161–171. doi: 10.1172/JCI7798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McQuate A, Latorre-Esteves E, Barria A. A Wnt/calcium signaling cascade regulates neuronal excitability and trafficking of NMDARs. Cell Rep. 2017;21:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bhattacharya, S., Gargiulo, D. & Iovine, M. K. Simplet-dependent regulation of beta-catenin signaling influences skeletal patterning downstream of Cx43. Development145, dev166975 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Ishikawa, H. & Marshall, W. F. Intraflagellar transport and ciliary dynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a021998 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Piperno G, Fuller MT. Monoclonal antibodies specific for an acetylated form of alpha-tubulin recognize the antigen in cilia and flagella from a variety of organisms. J. Cell Biol. 1985;101:2085–2094. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.6.2085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ribeiro, A., Monteiro, J. F., Certal, A. C., Cristovao, A. M. & Saude, L. Foxj1a is expressed in ependymal precursors, controls central canal position and is activated in new ependymal cells during regeneration in zebrafish. Open Biol. 7, 170139 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Bohm UL, et al. CSF-contacting neurons regulate locomotion by relaying mechanical stimuli to spinal circuits. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10866. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Westerfield, M. THE ZEBRAFISH BOOK: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio), 5th edn (University of Oregon Press, 2007).
  • 66.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 1995;203:253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jin YH, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates p300-dependent RUNX3 acetylation, which inhibits ubiquitination-mediated degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:29409–29417. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313120200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Turner DL, Weintraub H. Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1434–1447. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.12.1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lee SH, et al. Aggregation-prone GFAP mutation in Alexander disease validated using a zebrafish model. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:175. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0938-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ro H, Dawid IB. Modulation of Tcf3 repressor complex composition regulates cdx4 expression in zebrafish. EMBO J. 2011;30:2894–2907. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chen TW, et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 2013;499:295–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kwan KM, et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev. Dyn. 2007;236:3088–3099. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ran FA, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:2281–2308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Larson MH, et al. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:2180–2196. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hwang WY, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:227–229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:13904–13909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308335110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Meeker, N. D., Hutchinson, S. A., Ho, L. & Trede, N. S. Method for isolation of PCR-ready genomic DNA from zebrafish tissues. Biotechniques43, 610, 612, 614 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 78.Kim YK, Kim JH, Yu YS, Ko HW, Kim JH. Localization of primary cilia in mouse retina. Acta Histochem. 2013;115:789–794. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41467_2020_15248_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (379.4KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (61.6MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 2 (38.6MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 3 (1.3MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 4 (2.5MB, mov)
Reporting Summary (128.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Reagents are available upon request. The source data underlying all figures in which statistics are represented are provided as a Source Data file.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES