Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Mar 5;9(10):e00038-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00038-20

Metagenome Sequences from Tidal Marsh and Marine Sediment from the Great Bay Estuary of New Hampshire

Brian M Moore a, Sinéad M Ní Chadhain b, Jarrett L Miller a, Stephen H Jones c, Loren A Launen a,
Editor: Frank J Stewartd
PMCID: PMC7171204  PMID: 32139581

Tidal marsh and estuarine marine microbial sediment metagenomes from the Great Bay Estuary of New Hampshire were sequenced and found to be dominated by Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Both types of sediment contained many unclassified bacterial sequences, including the mollusk pathogen Perkinsus marinus, and detectable xenobiotic degradation and nitrogen transformation genes.

ABSTRACT

Tidal marsh and estuarine marine microbial sediment metagenomes from the Great Bay Estuary of New Hampshire were sequenced and found to be dominated by Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Both types of sediment contained many unclassified bacterial sequences, including the mollusk pathogen Perkinsus marinus, and detectable xenobiotic degradation and nitrogen transformation genes.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The Great Bay Estuary (GBE) of New Hampshire is a 2,600-km2 recessed estuary in the Gulf of Maine experiencing declining eelgrass, oyster, and clam populations and nutrient loading and contamination from a variety of pollutants (1). The sediment microbial communities in the GBE have not yet been well studied, even though others have shown that estuarine microbial communities are important in estuarine health (26). Using a metagenomic approach, we characterized two sediment microbial communities from the GBE, an urban brackish fringing marsh (Coco) contaminated with xenobiotics (Coco [7]; 43.197444 N, 70.867556 W) and a marine sediment adjacent to a natural oyster bed off Nannie Island, distant from pollution sources (43.068472 N, 70.863333 W).

At each site, several sediment grab samples were collected from the entire top 25 cm within a 2- by 4-m area and transported on ice to the lab, and all grab samples from each site (surface through to 25-cm depth) were composited immediately as described previously (7). Composite samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (Eastern Analytical, Inc.), which were present at 320 mg/kg (Coco) and <40 mg/kg (nondetectable; NI). Genomic DNA was extracted using the Mo Bio PowerSoil DNA kit. Library preparation (TruSeq) and metagenome shotgun sequencing (100-bp paired ends) of DNA were performed by the Advanced Genome Technology Core, Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, using an Illumina HiSeq 1000 instrument. Reads were analyzed using the Metagenomics Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (MG-RAST; Table 1) server version 4.0.2 using default parameters (8).

TABLE 1.

Basic sequence statistics and quality information (MG-RAST)

Sample No. of sequences
Initial (raw) Passed QCa rRNA Known predicted proteins Unknown predicted proteins
Coco 146,686,138 117,206,079 133,533 23,876,157 84,318,919
NI 405,221,636 329,228,599 456,991 62,960,339 240,245,010
a

QC, quality control.

Taxonomic profiling at the domain level showed predominantly bacterial sequences (95.64% and 96.07% for Coco and NI, respectively). The dominant bacterial phyla in both sediments were Proteobacteria (54.15% and 64.17%, respectively) and Bacteroidetes (9.28% and 10.33%, respectively) for Coco and NI. Following these, the Coco data set contained Chloroflexi (5.66%), Firmicutes (5.08%), Actinobacteria (4.66%), Verrucomicrobia (4.43%), Planctomycetes (2.65%), and Acidobacteria (2.09%), with Chlorobi, Spirochaetes, and Nitrospirae present at <1% each and 0.84% of sequences not classified at the phylum level. The NI data set contained Firmicutes (3.90%), Planctomycetales (3.37%), Actinobacteria (2.83%), and Chloroflexi (2.65%), with Verrucomicrobia, Cyanobacteria, and Acidobacteria each amounting to 1 to 2% of the sequences. Sequences matching the archaeal phylum Euryarchaeota were abundant in both sediments (3.04% in Coco and 1.26% in NI). The mollusk alveolate pathogen Perkinsus marinus was present at both sites (<0.01%). NI contained 0.97% reads mapping to the diatom phylum Bacillariophyta.

Functional analysis mapped 12.4% (Coco) and 10.8% (NI) of the reads to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Orthology database. Of these, 0.8% (both Coco and NI) were assigned to xenobiotic degradation, including nitrotoluene, toluene, chlorocyclohexane, chlorobenzene, atrazine, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzoate and aminobenzoate, xylene, ethylbenzene, dioxin, alkanes, chloroalkanes, chloroalkenes, atrazine, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), caprolactam, and styrene degradation. Nitrogen metabolism-associated reads were found at the same level in both samples (0.6%).

Data availability.

The raw data are in the NCBI database under the Sequence Read Archive accession numbers SRX4149050 (Coco) and SRX4150484 (NI). Quality-filtered and annotated data are in MG-RAST at mgm4815836.3 (Coco) and mgm4816434.3 (NI).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by (i) the New Hampshire IDeA Network of Biological Research Excellence (NH-INBRE, grant number 5P20RR030360-03) and (ii) the Vermont IDeA Network (grant number 8P20GM103449), both from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

We gratefully acknowledge Kelley Thomas, Jordan Ramsdell, and Kazufusa Okamoto of the Hubbard Genome Center, University of New Hampshire, for bioinformatics support, as well as Mahesh Vangala of the Vermont Genetics Network. We thank Scott Tighe (Vermont Genetics Network) for technical support in the sequencing and handling of samples. We thank John P. Dustin and Somer Matar for wet laboratory support in the conduct of DNA extractions. Marianne O’Brien, Katie Featherston, Audrey Arsenault, Penny Micele, and Gordon Leversee are gratefully acknowledged for support in the administration of this project.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Piscataqua River Estuaries Partnership (PREP). 2018. State of our estuaries, p 52 University of New Hampshire, Dover, NH: https://www.stateofourestuaries.org/2018-reports/sooe-full-report/. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baker BJ, Lazar CS, Teske AP, Dick GJ. 2015. Genomic resolution of linkages in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling among widespread estuary sediment bacteria. Microbiome 3:14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0077-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reed H, Martiny J. 2013. Microbial composition affects the functioning of estuarine sediments. ISME J 7:868–879. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Song B, Lisa JA, Tobias CR. 2014. Linking DNRA community structure and activity in a shallow lagoonal estuarine system. Front Microbiol 5:460. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Almeida R, Mucha AP, Teixeira C, Bordalo AA, Almeida CMR. 2013. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in estuarine sediments: metal influence. Biodegradation 24:111–123. doi: 10.1007/s10532-012-9562-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coulon F, Chronopoulou P-M, Fahy A, Païssé S, Goñi-Urriza M, Peperzak L, Acuña Alvarez L, McKew BA, Brussaard CPD, Underwood GJC, Timmis KN, Duran R, McGenity TJ. 2012. Central role of dynamic tidal biofilms dominated by aerobic hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria and diatoms in the biodegradation of hydrocarbons in coastal mudflats. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3638–3648. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00072-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ní Chadhain SM, Miller JL, Dustin JP, Trethewey JP, Jones SH, Launen LA. 2018. An assessment of the microbial community in an urban fringing tidal marsh with an emphasis on petroleum hydrocarbon degradative genes. Mar Pollut Bull 136:351–364. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A, Wilkening J, Edwards RA. 2008. The metagenomics RAST server: a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9:386. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data are in the NCBI database under the Sequence Read Archive accession numbers SRX4149050 (Coco) and SRX4150484 (NI). Quality-filtered and annotated data are in MG-RAST at mgm4815836.3 (Coco) and mgm4816434.3 (NI).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES