Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Mar 5;9(10):e00041-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00041-20

Complete Genome Sequence of Burkholderia sp. Strain THE68, a Bacterial Symbiont Isolated from Midgut Crypts of the Seed Bug Togo hemipterus

Kazutaka Takeshita a, Seonghan Jang b, Yoshitomo Kikuchi b,c,d,
Editor: Irene L G Newtone
PMCID: PMC7171205  PMID: 32139565

Burkholderia sp. strain THE68 is a bacterial symbiont isolated from the midgut crypts of a phytophagous stink bug, Togo hemipterus. Here, we report the complete 7.98-Mb genome of this symbiont, which consists of six circular replicons containing 7,238 protein coding genes.

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia sp. strain THE68 is a bacterial symbiont isolated from the midgut crypts of a phytophagous stink bug, Togo hemipterus. Here, we report the complete 7.98-Mb genome of this symbiont, which consists of six circular replicons containing 7,238 protein coding genes.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Many species of phytophagous stink bugs belonging to the superfamilies Coreoidea and Lygaeoidea, and members of the family Largidae in the superfamily Pyrrhocoroidea, develop specialized crypts at the posterior region of the midgut, the lumen of which is densely colonized by beneficial bacterial symbionts of the genus Burkholderia sensu lato (1, 2). We have reported the two complete genomes of Burkholderia symbionts isolated from the bean bug Riptortus pedestris (Coreoidea: Alydidae) (3, 4). Here, we report a newly sequenced complete genome of a Burkholderia symbiont, strain THE68, whose host stink bug is phylogenetically different from the bean bug.

The Burkholderia symbiont strain THE68 was isolated from the midgut crypts of a wild-captured Togo hemipterus (Lygaeoidea: Rhyparochromidae) in our previous study (5). Genomic DNA was extracted from an overnight culture in yeast-glucose medium (0.5% yeast extract, 0.4% glucose, and 0.1% NaCl) at 28°C using the phenol-chloroform method. A DNA library for Illumina short reads (mean insert size, 500 bp) was constructed by using a Covaris S2 instrument and a HyperPrep kit (Kapa Biosystems). A g-TUBE (Covaris) and a ligation sequencing kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) were used for the library construction for Nanopore long reads (mean insert size, 10 kbp). The genome sequencing was performed with NextSeq (Illumina) using the 2 × 151-bp protocol and GridION using an R9.4.1 flow cell (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). The Illumina short reads were processed with Sickle v1.33 (6) to remove the low-quality bases (quality value [QV], <20) and shorter reads (<127 bp). After processing the Nanopore long reads with Porechop v0.2.3 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop) and Filtlong v0.2.0 (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong) with the options “–min_length 1000 –target_bases 800000000,” error correction was performed by using fmlrc v1.0.0 (7) with the processed Illumina short reads. These processed short and long reads (1.1 Gb and 0.8 Gb, respectively) were assembled by using Unicycler v0.4.7 (8), resulting in six circular replicons. The quality of the assembly was assessed with CheckM v1.0.12 (9) and Bandage v.0.8.1 (10). Each replicon was assigned as a chromosome or plasmid based on comparison with the genomes of B. insecticola RPE64 (3, 11) and B. cordobensis RPE67 (4). The assembled genome was annotated by using DFAST v1.2.4 (12). The value of pairwise digital DNA-DNA hybridization was calculated with GGDC v2.1 (13). All bioinformatic analyses were performed with default parameters unless otherwise indicated.

The complete genome of strain THE68 is 7,982,451 bp (coverage, 234×; GC content, 63.1%; completeness, 99.60%; contamination, 2.03%) and consists of six circular replicons containing 7,238 protein coding genes, 16 rRNAs, and 68 tRNAs. Genome comparisons with other Burkholderia symbionts (3, 4) suggested that four replicons are chromosomes and two are plasmids, although the assignments should be carefully confirmed in further studies. The values of pairwise digital DNA-DNA hybridization against other Burkholderia symbionts were 31.3% for B. insecticola RPE64 (3) and 33.3% for B. cordobensis RPE67 (4). According to the proposed criterion based on genomic data (14), strain THE68 isolated from T. hemipterus is a different species than the two Burkholderia symbionts isolated from R. pedetris. More detailed comparisons between these Burkholderia symbionts, as well as nonsymbiotic environmental species, enable us to genetically characterize the beneficial Burkholderia symbionts of phytophagous stink bugs.

Data availability.

The genome sequence of Burkholderia sp. THE68 has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession no. AP022315 through AP022320. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, AP022315.1 through AP022320.1. The raw sequences have been deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive under accession no. DRA009416.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. 18KK0211 (to Y.K.).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Takeshita K, Kikuchi Y. 2017. Riptortus pedestris and Burkholderia symbiont: an ideal model system for insect–microbe symbiotic associations. Res Microbiol 168:175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaltenpoth M, Flórez LV. 2020. Versatile and dynamic symbioses between insects and Burkholderia bacteria. Annu Rev Entomol 65:145–170. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shibata TF, Maeda T, Nikoh N, Yamaguchi K, Oshima K, Hattori M, Nishiyama T, Hasebe M, Fukatsu T, Kikuchi Y, Shigenobu S. 2013. Complete genome sequence of Burkholderia sp. strain RPE64, bacterial symbiont of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Genome Announc 1:e00441-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00441-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Takeshita K, Shibata TF, Nikoh N, Nishiyama T, Hasebe M, Fukatsu T, Shigenobu S, Kikuchi Y. 2014. Whole-genome sequence of Burkholderia sp. strain RPE67, a bacterial gut symbiont of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Genome Announc 2:e00556-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00556-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T. 2011. An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J 5:446–460. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joshi N, Fass J. 2011. Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (version 1.33). https://github.com/najoshi/sickle.
  • 7.Wang JR, Holt J, McMillan L, Jones CD. 2018. FMLRC: hybrid long read error correction using an FM-index. BMC Bioinformatics 19:50. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2051-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takeshita K, Tamaki H, Ohbayashi T, Meng XY, Sone T, Mitani Y, Peeters C, Kikuchi Y, Vandamme P. 2018. Burkholderia insecticola sp. nov., a gut symbiotic bacterium of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:2370–2374. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. 2018. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 34:1037–1039. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu X-W, De Meyer S, Trujillo ME. 2018. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence of Burkholderia sp. THE68 has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession no. AP022315 through AP022320. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, AP022315.1 through AP022320.1. The raw sequences have been deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive under accession no. DRA009416.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES