Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2020 Apr 20;88(5):e00050-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00050-20

Putative β-Barrel Outer Membrane Proteins of the Bovine Digital Dermatitis-Associated Treponemes: Identification, Functional Characterization, and Immunogenicity

G J Staton a, S D Carter a, S Ainsworth a,*, J Mullin a, R F Smith b, N J Evans a,
Editor: Guy H Palmerc
PMCID: PMC7171239  PMID: 32122940

Bovine digital dermatitis (BDD), an infectious disease of the bovine foot with a predominant treponemal etiology, is a leading cause of lameness in dairy and beef herds worldwide. BDD is poorly responsive to antimicrobial therapy and exhibits a relapsing clinical course; an effective vaccine is therefore urgently sought. Using a reverse vaccinology approach, the present study surveyed the genomes of the three BDD-associated Treponema phylogroups for putative β-barrel outer membrane proteins and considered their potential as vaccine candidates.

KEYWORDS: Treponema, bovine digital dermatitis, outer membrane proteins, reverse vaccinology

ABSTRACT

Bovine digital dermatitis (BDD), an infectious disease of the bovine foot with a predominant treponemal etiology, is a leading cause of lameness in dairy and beef herds worldwide. BDD is poorly responsive to antimicrobial therapy and exhibits a relapsing clinical course; an effective vaccine is therefore urgently sought. Using a reverse vaccinology approach, the present study surveyed the genomes of the three BDD-associated Treponema phylogroups for putative β-barrel outer membrane proteins and considered their potential as vaccine candidates. Selection criteria included the presence of a signal peptidase I cleavage site, a predicted β-barrel fold, and cross-phylogroup homology. Four candidate genes were overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), refolded, and purified. Consistent with their classification as β-barrel OMPs, circular-dichroism spectroscopy revealed the adoption of a predominantly β-sheet secondary structure. These recombinant proteins, when screened for their ability to adhere to immobilized extracellular matrix (ECM) components, exhibited a diverse range of ligand specificities. All four proteins specifically and dose dependently adhered to bovine fibrinogen. One recombinant protein was identified as a candidate diagnostic antigen (disease specificity, 75%). Finally, when adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide and administered to BDD-naive calves using a prime-boost vaccination protocol, these proteins were immunogenic, eliciting specific IgG antibodies. In summary, we present the description of four putative treponemal β-barrel OMPs that exhibit the characteristics of multispecific adhesins. The observed interactions with fibrinogen may be critical to host colonization and it is hypothesized that vaccination-induced antibody blockade of these interactions will impede treponemal virulence and thus be of therapeutic value.

INTRODUCTION

Bovine digital dermatitis (BDD) is a painful, ulcerative disease of the bovine foot and a significant cause of lameness in dairy cattle. Clinically, BDD presents as a malodorous, focally inflamed, circumscribed lesion of raised hyperkeratotic skin localized to the plantar/palmar aspect of the interdigital cleft, on or adjacent to the coronary band (1, 2). BDD is now considered the most common infectious cause of lameness in dairy cattle herds in the Northern Hemisphere and one of the most significant challenges to farm animal welfare. Moreover, the economic burden to the dairy industry resulting from production losses is considerable (3). In the United Kingdom, BDD is endemic, affecting an estimated 79% of dairy farms (4), and emergence of BDD in beef herds has also been recently described (5, 6). In addition, a new variant (contagious ovine digital dermatitis), noted for its particularly severe presentation in sheep, continues to spread through the United Kingdom’s national flock (7, 8). This disease therefore represents an additional and growing challenge to global food security.

A substantial body of evidence supports the involvement of multiple Treponema spp. at various stages of BDD lesion development (912). Three treponeme taxa in particular have been consistently isolated from lesion biopsy material from cases in the United States and the United Kingdom, namely, the Treponema medium phylogroup, the Treponema phagedenis phylogroup, and Treponema pedis (13, 14). The presence of these organisms deep within the lesion (15, 16), their clear association with necrotic changes in infected tissue (17), a failure to isolate these organisms from the feet of healthy animals (12, 18), and a disease-associated, specific IgG antibody response to these organisms (1923) strongly imply an etiopathogenic role in BDD.

Treponemes are Gram-stain-negative bacteria exhibiting a spiral morphology and consist of an outer membrane (OM) that surrounds the axial filaments and the protoplasmic cylinder (24). The OM of these extracellular pathogens is a feature of considerable interest, given its surface exposure and the subsequent involvement of its components in host-pathogen interactions. Adhesins embedded in the OM play a critical role in bacterial cytoadherence to the host during colonization. The host extracellular matrix (ECM) is an important adherence target for pathogenic microorganisms during the primary stages of infection. Previous studies investigating the ECM binding capacity of the two most relevant human-pathogenic species, Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, the causative agent of syphilis, and Treponema denticola, a key member of the polymicrobial consortium implicated in periodontal disease, reported specific treponemal cell adherence to a range of immobilized ECM components, including fibronectin, laminin, fibrinogen, and collagen (25, 26). A growing number of adhesins are being identified and investigated to characterize the molecular basis of physical host-pathogen interactions (2735). However, the fastidious nature of the BDD-associated treponemes has precluded any detailed characterization of the OM components likely to promote such interactions. Employing recently available BDD-associated treponeme genome sequences, we sought to identify novel β-barrel OM protein (OMP)-encoding genes and characterize the function and immunogenicity of the recombinantly expressed OMPs.

RESULTS

In silico detection of putative treponemal OMPs.

SignalP 4.1 analysis identified 182 T. medium T19 putative coding sequence (CDS) features predicted to contain an N-terminal peptidase I cleavage site. These features were further analyzed by three β-barrel prediction programs: BOMP, PRED-TMBB, and TMBETA-NET. CDS features predicted to encode β-barrel proteins by at least one these programs were selected for cross-phylogroup homology detection. In total, 15 CDS features identified in the T. medium T19 genome matched the following selection criteria precisely: (i) the presence of a signal peptidase I cleavage site, (ii) a predicted β-barrel topology, and (iii) cross-phylogroup homology (Table 1). Four CDS features, two from the T. medium genome and two from the T. pedis genome (including one homologous pair: C5N99_10335 and DYQ05_13425; amino acid sequence identity, 31.87%), were subsequently selected to evaluate the ability to bind to selected ECM components and to induce an IgG antibody response in calves.

TABLE 1.

Bioinformatic analysis of four putative treponemal OMPsa

Putative OMP Treponema phylogroup Signal peptide cleavage site β-Barrel and adhesin prediction
Homologous domain search
BOMP PRED-TMBB TMBETA-NET SPAAN PDB top hit (% probability; E value) Function Reference(s)
C5N99_02965 T. medium Yes (20/21; LSA/QE) Yes No Yes Yes OmpU (57.16; 120) OM porin 87
C5N99_10335 T. medium Yes (21/22; VFS/DG) Yes Yes Yes Yes OmpA (97.71; 6.1e−5) OM porin/adhesin 88, 89
DYQ05_13425 T. pedis Yes (21/22; AFN/LS) No Yes Yes Yes OmpA (98.07; 4.9e−6) OM porin/adhesin 88, 89
DYQ05_06810 T. pedis Yes (221/22; LSA/QT) Yes Yes Yes Yes OprF (97.32; 0.0014) OM porin 90
a

Each putative treponemal OMP was selected on the basis of predicted β-barrel topology by at least one of the β-barrel prediction programs. The results generated by BOMP, PRED-TMBB, TMBETA-NET, and SPAAN were interpreted in accordance with default cutoff values. All four CDS features were predicted to share domain homology with known bacterial OMPs.

Prediction of 3D tertiary structure.

To generate predicted 3-dimensional (3D) structural models, each protein sequence was submitted to the I-TASSER server. The highest-ranking model for each protein is shown in Fig. 1. The four putative OMPs were each predicted to contain a typical β-barrel domain, consistent with localization to the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

The four putative β barrel-outer membrane proteins (a to d) were structurally modeled using I-TASSER. A lateral view of the top-ranking ribbon model, as determined by the C score, is shown, with the β-sheet depicted in blue and α-helix depicted in red.

Typical β-barrel structures were predicted for C5N99_10335, DYQ05_13425, and DYQ05_06810, whereas C5N99_02965 was predicted to adopt a β-solenoid fold (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

I-TASSER structural modeling of the treponemal OMPs: a summary of resultsa

Putative OMP C scoreb Predicted topology PDB structural analog (bacterial species) Structural analog function Reference
C5N99_10335 3.98 8-Stranded β-barrel OmpT (E. coli) Protease 91
C5N99_02965 2.73 β-Solenoid barrel Serine-rich repeat protein (Lactobacillus reuteri) Cell adhesion 92
DYQ05_13425 4.07 8-Stranded β-barrel OprG (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) Porin 93
DYQ05_06810 2.73 8-Stranded β-barrel OmpA (E. coli) Porin 94
a

The amino acid sequence of each putative OMP was submitted to I-TASSER for 3D structural modeling and Protein Databank (PDB) structural analogue detection.

b

C score: confidence score for estimating the quality of predicted models.

Heat modifiability assay.

Three of the proteins exhibited a heat-modifiable electrophoretic mobility, consistent with the stability of a protein comprised predominantly of a β-structure (36). Figure 2 shows the change in electrophoretic mobility observed under unheated versus heated conditions for C5N99_10335, C5N99_02965, and DYQ05_06810.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

(A) C5N99_02965; (B) C5N99_10335; (C) DYQ05_06810. Lanes 1, wide-range MW marker (values are in kilodaltons); lanes 2, unheated sample; lanes 3, heated sample. The heat-modified (unfolded) forms of the proteins are distinguished from the unmodified (folded) forms by the addition of an asterisk. In panels A and C, the lane between marker and sample contained a wash fraction and has been removed for brevity.

Heat modification of C5N99_02965 (Fig. 2A) led to a change in electrophoretic mobility and a change in the apparent molecular weight (MW), from ∼30 to ∼36 kDa. Similar changes in mobility were observed for C5N99_10335 (∼22 to ∼24 kDa [Fig. 2B]) and DYQ05_06810 (∼21 to 23 kDa [Fig. 2C]). Heat modifiability was not identified for DYQ05_13425 (data not shown).

CD spectroscopic analysis of the treponemal recombinant OMP secondary structure.

Far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was employed to provide further evidence of the secondary structure fold of these proteins (Fig. 3). Consistent with a predicted β-barrel tertiary structure state, analysis of the four putative OMPs yielded spectral signatures typical of a predominantly β-sheet secondary structure, with spectral minima occurring at approximately 218 nm for C5N99_10335, C5N99_02965, DYQ05_06810, and DYQ05_13425 as well as the recombinant control protein, OmpL1.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

CD spectra of proteins encoded by C5N99_10335 (A), C5N99_02965 (B), DYQ05_06810 (C), DYQ05_13425 (D), and L. interrogans OmpL1 (E) are shown. Far-UV CD spectra are presented as an average of three scans recorded from 190 to 260 nm. φ, molar ellipticity.

Serological response to putative OMPs during natural BDD infection.

As demonstrated in Fig. 4, IgG2 seroreactivity to DYQ05_06810 was detected in BDD-infected Holstein Friesian cows (n = 12; 75%) relative to healthy control animals, with no apparent IgG2 response observed against the remaining three putative OMPs. No IgG1 response against any of the putative OMPs under investigation was identified. A statistically significant decrease in the IgG1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical densities (ODs) was observed in the sera of BDD-exposed animals, relative to controls, in the T. medium T19 putative OMP analyses (P < 0.05).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Serological assessment of the IgG1 and IgG2 responses to putative treponemal OMPs by ELISA. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Non-exp., nonexposed; DD exp., digital dermatitis exposed. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in IgG seroreactivity relative to control sera as determined by Mann-Whitney U test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005).

Binding of the treponemal OMPs to ECM components.

Statistically significant (P < 0.05) adherence to fibrinogen, elastin, and heparan sulfate was observed for both C5N99_10335 and C5N99_02965, with C5N99_10335 additionally adhering to fibronectin (Fig. 5).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Immobilized ECM component binding screens of four putative β-barrel OMPs and the positive-control protein (OmpL1). Bars represent the mean OD of three independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in binding compared to the negative-control protein, BSA, as determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Dunnett posttest (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.001).

The T. pedis homologue of C5N99_10335, namely, DYQ05_13425, exhibited a binding profile similar to that of C5N99_10335 but was found to additionally bind to chondroitin. DYQ05_06810 bound to fibronectin, fibrinogen, elastin, chondroitin, and heparan sulfate.

Next, given the ubiquitous fibrinogen binding among these putative treponemal OMPs (P < 0.01), we sought to further characterize this interaction across a concentration range. The results of these analyses are shown in Fig. 6.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Binding affinity curves of the four putative β-barrel OMPs to bovine fibrinogen. (A) Putative OMPs from T. medium; (B) putative OMPs from T. pedis. Data points represent the mean ODs of replicate readings. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.

The binding interactions between fibrinogen and C5N99_10335, C5N99_02965, DYQ05_06810, and DYQ05_13425 were observed to be concentration dependent. Binding saturation levels were achieved with recombinant protein concentrations of ∼1 μM, ∼1.5 μM, and ∼2.0 μM for C5N99_02965, DYQ05_13425, and DYQ05_06810, respectively. Conversely, C5N99_10335, although showing a tendency toward reaching saturation, failed to do so up to a concentration of 2 μM. Further examination of this interaction was precluded by insufficient protein yield. Dissociation constant (Kd) values were estimated by nonlinear regression analysis of the binding curves. Table 3 summarizes the Kd values calculated from these experiments. The positive-control protein, OmpL1, was similarly observed to adhere to bovine fibrinogen in a dose-dependent and saturable manner, as previously reported (37) (data not shown).

TABLE 3.

Binding interactions between the putative recombinant OMPs and bovine fibrinogen

OMP Dissociation constant
C5N99_02965 0.3370 ± 0.09753
DYQ05_13425 0.7180 ± 0.08743
DYQ05_16810 1.024 ± 0.2946
OmpL1 0.3669 ± 0.04328 (0.223 ± 0.063) (47))

Far Western blotting.

Far Western blotting identified interactions between the putative OMPs and individual chains of the fibrinogen molecule. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 7.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Specific binding interactions between the recombinant proteins and the α, β, and γ chains of bovine fibrinogen, using monoclonal anti-polyhistidine antibody as the probe.

The results of the far Western analysis revealed that DYQ05_13425 and DYQ05_06810 interacted with all three chains of the fibrinogen molecule, similarly to OmpL1. Conversely, C5N99_10335 and C5N99_02965 were observed to interact with the β and γ chains of fibrinogen only.

Immunogenicity.

The immunogenic properties of these four fibrinogen-binding proteins were investigated following inoculation into two naive bull calves as part of a multivalent antigen cocktail. ELISA analysis of prevaccination sera yielded broadly comparable ELISA ODs between calves.

This pilot immunogenicity trial demonstrated that this subcutaneous prime-boost vaccination protocol, involving an aluminum hydroxide-adjuvanted 100-μg dose of each treponemal recombinant OMP, was capable of eliciting IgG antibodies in BDD-naive bull calves (Fig. 8). All animals vaccinated with the recombinant protein cocktail seroconverted rapidly, permitting treponemal OMP-specific IgG antibody detection by day 14. A second booster vaccination on day 14 enhanced the IgG response further, and specific antibody titers peaked at day 28. No seroconversion was detected in the control animals up to day 56 (the last day of the trial; data not shown). The fold change, calculated as the mean OD change on day 28 from preimmunization baseline (Table 4), was used to account for varying baseline ELISA ODs.

FIG 8.

FIG 8

The serological IgG1 and IgG2 responses to four treponemal putative OMPs were assessed in BDD-naive calves (n = 2). The mean ODs of both immunized calves are shown. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.

TABLE 4.

Fold change in calf seroreactivity to the inoculated treponemal recombinant putative OMPs

Antigen IgG1 fold change (day 28 postimmunization) IgG2 fold change (day 28 postimmunization)
C5N99_10335 2.37 1.66
C5N99_02965 4.34 3.58
DYQ05_13425 7.44 9.10
DYQ05_06810 5.42 6.00

While all recombinant proteins were shown to be immunogenic under the conditions of this trial, C5N99_10335 was found to be the weakest driver of both IgG1 and IgG2 antibody responses, with ELISA OD fold changes calculated to be 2.37 and 1.66 from baseline, respectively. DYQ05_13425, conversely, was found to be the most potent immunogen, with ELISA OD fold changes from baseline calculated to be 7.44 and 9.10, for IgG1 and IgG2, respectively. The specificity of the antisera was confirmed using Western blotting and revealed the presence of treponemal putative OMP-specific IgG1 and IgG2 serum antibodies in immunized animals only (data not shown). Serological analysis on day 42 of the trial revealed a slight waning of the IgG antibody response in all cases. The trial vaccine was well tolerated in vaccinated calves.

DISCUSSION

Using a bioinformatics-based approach, the present study sought to identify and characterize novel BDD-associated treponemal OMPs, bearing in mind the potential value of these molecules as BDD vaccine candidates. Postpurification analysis of the four refolded proteins by CD spectroscopy yielded spectra indicative of a predominantly β-strand secondary structure with three of the proteins (C5N99_10335, C5N99_02965, and DYQ05_06810) additionally being demonstrated to be heat modifiable. These findings are consistent with the characteristics of proteins with a β-barrel tertiary structure. Conversely, DYQ05_13425 was found to not be heat modifiable. Owing to a highly resistant tertiary structure, some bacterial OMPs exhibit an unusual stability to heat in the presence of SDS and an extended heating period may be required to convert such proteins to their denatured form, as reported for protein F from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (38) and OmpL1 from Leptospira interrogans (36).

Examination by ELISA of IgG seroreactivity in animals naturally infected with BDD revealed that only one protein (DYQ05_06810) was capable of discriminating clearly between the sera of animals with recent or active BDD infection and cattle presumed not to have been exposed to the BDD treponemes. In identifying a disease-specific IgG2 antibody response to DYQ05_06810, these findings are in concordance with the findings of a number of previous studies that demonstrated a strong antitreponemal IgG2 bias in the antibody response of animals naturally infected with BDD (23, 39, 40). These data suggest that while DYQ05_06810 is accessible to the immune system during treponemal infection (and thus capable of eliciting IgG2 antibodies), the remaining three putative treponemal OMPs may be expressed as subdominant antigens or their expression may be immunosubversive in nature. Unexpectedly, a reduction in OD was observed when comparing the IgG1 responses to the two T. medium T19 putative OMPs in cows exposed to BDD, relative to healthy controls. The reason for this is unclear, although treponemes exhibit a number of immunosuppressive functions capable of interfering with both innate (41) and adaptive (42) immune activities, the utilization of which likely contribute to infection chronicity. In this case, it is speculated that whereas previous colonization with bacteria expressing orthologues of C5N99_10335 and C5N99_02965 leads to the production of cross-reactive antibodies (which are detectable in control animals), subsequent infection with T. medium leads to a reduction in the serotiters of these antibodies via immunosuppressive mechanisms. Crucially, both C5N99_10335 and C5N99_02965 have been detected in the transcriptome of BDD lesions (43), and studies are required to investigate their capacity to modulate host immunity.

Presently, no serological assay to detect BDD treponemes is commercially available for field diagnostics, and immunoassay-based serological assessment of BDD in research settings is currently dependent on the use of whole-cell lysates. The T. phagedenis putative proline-rich repeat lipoprotein PrrA was previously identified as an immunogenic protein of T. phagedenis-like strain V1 (isolated from a BDD lesion) and as an antigenic target capable of discriminating between animals acutely infected with BDD (n = 8) and BDD-naive animals (n = 7) (44). An ELISA capable of detecting bovine anti-PrrA antibodies in serum and milk has been available to the research community for some time, although there are currently no reports detailing postmarketing experience. In addition, the PrrA gene and its product are from several T. phagedenis-like BDD lesion isolates (44, 45), potentially limiting the value of this ELISA as a means of determining herd infection status. It is therefore proposed that the IgG2 antibody response to DYQ05_06810 be further evaluated as a potential antigenic marker of seroconversion in BDD-infected animals. The diagnosis of BDD currently remains restricted to clinical examination of the lifted foot by means of individual restraint (46), and specificity and sensitivity are limited by subjectivity and observer bias (47). A quantitative diagnostic ELISA is less labor-intensive, is less time-consuming, and is a more reproducible indicator of biological infection (48). Since these recombinant molecules can be readily synthesized in E. coli expression systems, the difficulties in cultivating BDD-associated Treponema spp. for whole-cell antigen preparations are bypassed.

An initial ECM binding screen demonstrated that the putative treponemal β-barrel OMPs identified in this study exhibited ECM-adhesive properties, supporting their role in bacterial cytoadherence to host tissues. Interestingly, these proteins exhibited multispecific ECM binding profiles. One of the most striking properties of the putative treponemal OMPs was an ability to adhere to immobilized bovine fibrinogen. Because of the highly statistically significant nature of this interaction, these fibrinogen binding activities were investigated further and found to be concentration dependent and saturable, suggesting the existence of fibrinogen-specific binding sites. The estimated dissociation constants (Kds) (0.34 and 0.72 for C5N99_02965 and DYQ05_13425, respectively) broadly align with those calculated for other spirochetal fibrinogen binding proteins, including the leptospiral proteins OmpL1 (0.223 μM) (37), OmpL37 (0.244 μM) (49), and Lsa33 (0.12 μM) (50), supporting the relevance of these interactions in vivo. DYQ05_06810 exhibited a higher estimated Kd, 1.0 μM, which is of a magnitude similar to those of other biologically relevant ECM binding interactions, including those reported for OmpL1 interactions with laminin (Kd = 2.10 μM) and fibronectin (Kd = 1.24 μM) (51).

Bovine fibrinogen is a 340-kDa dimeric glycoprotein comprising of three pairs of nonidentical Aα (∼67 kDa), Bβ (∼55 kDa), and γ (∼48 kDa) peptide chains. Fibrinogen is a major clotting factor and performs an essential role in preventing hemorrhage and facilitating vascular repair. At sites of tissue damage, fibrinogen is found embedded with the extracellular matrix (52). It has previously been demonstrated that successful and consistent experimental transmission of BDD requires abrasion of the skin (53). Abrasive trauma would be expected to lead to enhanced fibrinogen deposition, and it is therefore hypothesized that ECM-associated fibrinogen represents an adherence target during the initial stage of host colonization. In support of this hypothesis, it has been demonstrated previously that two T. medium-like treponemal strains, UB1467 and UB1090, isolated from a bovine and an ovine DD lesion, and a T. pedis-like strain, UB1466, isolated from an ovine DD lesion, were all capable of adhering to immobilized fibrinogen (54). Thus, adhesin-mediated treponemal adherence to the host via such interactions may be central to the treponemal infection, in which abrasive trauma may be necessary point of entry.

Soluble host proteins, including plasma fibrinogen, may act as a diffuse peptide nutrient source within inflamed tissues. However, fibrinogen additionally plays a direct role in antimicrobial host defense. First, thrombin-catalyzed conversion to insoluble fibrin clots leads to the formation of a structural protective barrier capable of containing bacteria and preventing dissemination (55). Second, this conversion to thrombin leads to the release of potent chemotactic elements, including fibrinopeptide B, which drives an influx of phagocytes (56). Among the treponemal OMPs, chymotrypsin-like protease (CTLP) from T. denticola and Tp0751 (Pallilysin) from T. pallidum subsp. pallidum, are both capable of adhering to fibrinogen while additionally exhibiting fibrinogenolytic protease activity, with important deleterious consequences for platelet homeostasis and clot formation (29, 57). BDD lesions tend to bleed readily upon palpation (58), and a disturbance in the coagulation pathway arising from treponemal fibrinogen targeting is suspected. The interactions observed between the recombinant proteins and specific chains of the fibrinogen molecule identified in the present study may support this hypothesis, since the four recombinant proteins exhibited the capacity to adhere to all three fibrinogen chains or the Bβ and γ chains only. Crucially, platelet aggregation is dependent on the binding of platelet membrane glycoprotein IIa/IIIb to the fibrinogen Aα and γ chains (59), and previous studies have identified selective fibrinogen chain targeting by pathogenic bacterial OMPs. For instance, targeting of the γ chain of fibrinogen has been previously reported for Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A (60); this targeting leads to disturbances in platelet aggregation, fibrin clot formation, and platelet-mediated clot retraction (61).

The mechanisms that underpin the observed interactions with fibrinogen are unknown and require further investigation. Further studies, using gene mutagenesis and critical binding domain mapping, are required to fully understand the molecular basis for these interactions. It is noteworthy that these proteins appear to adhere to a number of other ECM components, demonstrating the apparent multispecificity of these putative treponemal adhesins. Although we have not yet explored these interactions further, this suggests that these molecules may be functionally similar to a number of other spirochaetal OMPs capable of adhering to multiple ligands, including Tp0751 (29) and OmpL1 (51). This presumably represents an evolutionary adaptation that minimizes bacterial surface immunogenicity while preserving adhesive function.

Given the apparent importance of these putative OMPs to fibrinogen (and other ligands), and their potential roles in host colonization and pathogenicity, we sought to assess their immunogenic properties. Previous studies have shown that anti-adhesin antibodies, elicited by vaccination, have the potential to protect the host (62, 63), and it is hypothesized that blockade of these putative OMPs would impede host colonization and/or virulence. Previous attempts at designing a BDD vaccine have been limited to the use of treponemal whole-cell lysate “bacterin” formulations of a single phylotype, and field trials have been disappointing (64). The subcutaneous vaccine formulation evaluated in the present study was designed specifically to induce an IgG response against putative treponemal fibrinogen-binding OMPs, which may be critical to host colonization yet exist as subdominant antigens with little or no immunogenic capacity in natural infection.

Since recombinant proteins tend to be relatively weak antigens (65), aluminum hydroxide was employed as an adjuvant. Both IgG1 and IgG2 responses to the putative OMP antigens were generated for the four proteins tested. Moreover, fold change in the ELISA ODs generated for IgG1, relative to IgG2, was generally greater. Aluminum compounds are considered to be principally promoters of Th2 polarization, at least in humans and mice (66, 67), and may explain the IgG1 subclass bias observed in this study. A mixed IgG1/IgG2 or IgG1-polarized host response may prove to be an important correlate of protection against an infection that is usually considered to induce a nonprotective, yet robust, IgG2 response (23, 39, 40). However, because a later study identified IgG1 as the predominant IgG subclass in cattle both naturally exposed to BDD and experimentally infected with BDD-associated treponemes (20), there exists considerable uncertainty of the nature of the bovine immune response in BDD and, consequently, its potential for manipulation.

When adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide, the four proteins under investigation were found to be immunogenic, although C5N99_10335 was found to be a comparatively weak immunogen, highlighting the heterogeneity of the immune response. Whether this apparent variation in immunogenicity has arisen from intrinsic differences in the molecular structures of these recombinant proteins, host-specific variations in immune response, or potential contamination with endogenous endotoxin has yet to be established. Moreover, while the immunogenic potential of these putative OMPs has been demonstrated in this study, neither the duration of the IgG response nor its magnitude (in terms of absolute antibody titer) was quantified. Since the immunized calves were not assessed for postvaccination susceptibility to BDD, it is unknown whether high titers of the IgG antibodies generated during this study correlate with protection against disease, and future studies are warranted. However, these data indicate successful B cell priming after the initial vaccination and a boost effect following the second vaccination, both of which are important characteristics of a vaccine component.

Given the difficulties associated with the isolation, cultivation, and purification of the BDD treponemes, the development of a vaccine against BDD has previously been substantially hindered. This in silico approach to novel OMP identification overcomes the challenges of traditional vaccine design methods. To this end, we report on the identification and characterization of four putative adhesins, selected from the sequenced genomes of T. medium and T. pedis phylogroups, two of the principal treponeme taxa associated with BDD. Further studies are justified to establish their value as BDD vaccine components.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical approval.

All experimental work involving animals was covered by UK Home Office Project License PPL 70/8330.

In silico identification of OMPs.

Previously generated and annotated representative genomes of the three BDD treponemes, T. medium T19 (accession number CP027017), T. phagedenis T320A (accession number CP027018) and T. pedis T3552BT (accession number CP045670) were subjected to in silico analysis to identify putative OMPs via prediction of encoded β-barrel structural motifs. Putative coding sequence (CDS) features for each genome were translated to their amino acid sequences using Artemis (68). All translated T. medium T19 CDS features were analyzed for the presence of a signal peptidase I cleavage site using SignalP 4.1 (69). Sequences predicted to harbor a signal peptide were further scrutinized for signatures of β-barrel tertiary structure using three β-barrel prediction programs (BOMP [70], TMBETA-NET [71], and PRED-TMBB [72]). All T. medium T19 CDS features which were predicted to code a β-barrel tertiary-structured protein by at least one of the β-barrel prediction programs were retained. Homologues of putative T. medium T19 OMPs were identified in T. phagedenis T320A and T. pedis T3552BT genomes using a combination of a Markov cluster algorithm (73) and BLAST (74) and their OMP predictions verified independently. Putative OMP sequences which were conserved in all three genomes were examined for predicted adhesin functionality using SPAAN (75) and their tertiary structures modeled using I-TASSER (76).

Cloning and expression of candidate antigens.

T. medium T19, T. phagedenis T320A, and T. pedis T3552BT, isolated previously from BDD lesion biopsy specimens (12, 14) and cryopreserved in 10% (vol/vol) glycerol at –80°C, were cultured as described previously (12). Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the treponeme cultures at late exponential phase using Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK) according to a previously described method (77). The Gateway system (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) was utilized for gene cloning and expression. Putative OMP sequences, lacking their signal peptide sequences, were amplified from the gDNA using high-fidelity Phusion polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK) in accordance with manufacturer instructions. Primers (Table 5) for amplification contained CACC overhangs to facilitate entry cloning. A well-characterized OMP (OmpL1) from Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni strain M20 was selected (37, 51, 78) and produced as a recombinant protein control.

TABLE 5.

Primers used to amply putative OMP genes for recombinant expression

Putative OMP locus tag Treponema phylogroup Primer sequence (5′–3′) Predicted band size (kb) Predicted mass (kDa)
C5N99_10335 T. medium Forward: CACCGATGGGGTCGATTTTTCG 0.7 27.1
Reverse: CTACAGCTTAAAAGCGATCC
C5N99_02965 T. medium Forward: CACCCAGGAAGAAGGAGCAGAGG 0.9 35.0
Reverse: AGAGATACCCATTAGTTGTTG
DYQ05_13425 T. pedis Forward: CACCTTAAGCGATATTTCAGGCGATG 0.8 29.8
Reverse: TTACAGCTTCCATGCAATACC
DYQ05_06810 T. pedis Forward: CACCGCAAAGACTATCGGTCTTAATTTG 0.9 22.1
Reverse: TTAAAAATAAACTCTTAAACCCGC
OmpL1 L. interrogans Forward: CACCAAAACATATGCAATTGTAGGATTTG 0.9 31.0
Reverse: TTAGAGTTCGTGTTTATAACCG

Amplified putative OMPs were inserted into the Gateway entry plasmid pENTR/d-TOPO (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions prior to chemical transformation into Escherichia coli Top10 cells. Positive transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and plasmid DNA from successful transformants isolated using the Qiagen plasmid miniprep kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). Successful amplicon insertion was confirmed using EcoRV restriction digest analysis (Thermo Fisher, Horsham, UK). Inserts were thereafter cloned into the Gateway expression vector pDEST17, using a site-directed integration reaction in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) prior to chemical transformation into E. coli DH5α. Positive transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and the plasmid DNA isolated as previously described. pDEST17-gene constructs verified by EcoRI endonuclease restriction digest analysis and Sanger sequencing (Source Bioscience, Nottingham, UK).

Protein expression, refolding, and purification.

All protein expression was performed in E. coli BL21(DE3) (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). E. coli BL21(DE3) cultures were grown at 37°C with shaking in LB medium (2 liters) containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml), until the OD at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.8 to 1. Protein expression was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK). Cultures were grown for a further 4 to 5 h and cells harvested by centrifugation (3,500 × g, 4°C, and 10 min). E. coli BL21(DE3) cell pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) (20 ml per 10 g [wet weight] of cells) containing lysozyme (5 mg/g [wet weight] of cells; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) and incubated on ice for 30 min prior to cellular disruption using a microsonicator tip (Soniprep-150, MSE, London, UK). Inclusion bodies (IB) containing recombinant proteins were subsequently harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 4°C, and 30 min). IB pellets were resuspended in 150 ml of IB detergent buffer (4% [vol/vol] Tergitol 15-S-9 [Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK], 50 mM Tris HCl [pH 7.9]) with rapid stirring for a minimum of 2 h, washed twice in 150 ml of IB wash buffer (50 mM Tris HCl [pH 7.9]), and resuspended in solubilization buffer (6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], and 1 mM EDTA; 40 ml per 500 mg of IB) for 1 h with constant agitation. The suspension was centrifuged (10,000 × g, 4°C, and 30 min) to remove insoluble material. Recombinant protein refolding was performed by rapid dilution (79) into a refolding buffer (250 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 5% N,N-dimethyldodecylamine N-oxide solution [LDAO; Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK]) which was subsequently dialyzed against 10 volumes of dialysis buffer (250 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 0.1% LDAO). Refolded, recombinant proteins were purified by standard immobilized metal affinity chromatography (80), sterilized through a 0.2-μm filter, and stored at –80°C. The purity of the recombinant proteins was assessed by SDS-PAGE.

Evaluation of secondary structure.

(i) Heat modifiability. The sensitivity of the recombinant proteins to denaturation upon heating was determined by comparing the electrophoretic mobilities of the refolded recombinant proteins prepared in SDS sample buffer without reducing agent (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 4% [wt/vol] SDS, 0.2% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue, 20% [vol/vol] glycerol) and either incubated at ambient temperature for 10 min or heated to 100°C for 10 min prior to SDS-PAGE analysis, as described previously (81).

(ii) CD spectroscopy. Far-UV circular-dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was performed using a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter (Japan Spectrocopic, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Peltier unit for temperature control. Spectra were measured from 190 to 260 nm using a 1-mm path length cell at intervals of 0.5 nm and presented as an average of three scans. Spectra were analyzed by Beta Structure Selection (BestSel) software (http://bestsel.elte.hu/) (82) to calculate the percent secondary-structure content from the ellipticity experimental data.

Evaluation of immunogenicity during natural infection.

(i) Cattle sera. An ELISA was performed to investigate systemic IgG seroreactivity to the putative OMPs in blood samples collected from cows naturally infected with BDD. Sera from 16 adult Holstein-Friesian cows with a recent (<6-month) history of BBD were collected from a dairy herd situated in Cheshire, UK. Similarly, sera from 5 healthy adult Holstein-Friesian cows were collected from a closed dairy herd situated in Monmouthshire, UK, and were included as a control group. In all cases, whole blood was collected from the coccygeal vein. Following clotting and centrifugation, the serum fraction was harvested and stored at –20°C for serological assessment.

(ii) Serological ELISA. Nonactivated, 96-well microtiter plates (Microplate Immulon 2HB; Thermo Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK) were coated with a single recombinant protein (5 μg/ml) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2) and incubated for 1 h (37°C) and overnight (4°C). Unbound antigen was removed by washing with PBST (PBS-Tween 20; 0.05%). All sera were diluted 1/100 in PBST, pipetted into ELISA plate wells in duplicate, and incubated for 1 h (37°C). Wells were washed as before and incubated for 1 h (37°C) with 100 μl of monoclonal mouse anti-bovine immunoglobulin class G subclass 1 (IgG1) antibody, clone IL-A60 (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK), or monoclonal mouse anti-bovine immunoglobulin class G subclass 2 (IgG2) antibody, clone IL-A2 (Bio-Rad), diluted 1:1000. To ensure adherence of the antigen to the plate, 100 μl of mouse monoclonal anti-polyhistidine antibody, clone HIS-1 (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), diluted 1:2,000 in PBST, was added to recombinant control wells. Following a washing, wells were incubated with 100 μl of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich), diluted 1:10,000 in PBST for 1 h (37°C). Following washing, the presence of HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies was detected by the addition of 100 μl of the HRP substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB; Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction was terminated after ∼20 min by the addition of 100 μl of 0.5 M hydrochloric acid. The optical density (OD) of each well was read at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan EX; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). All data were processed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). In order to classify results as positive or negative, an ELISA OD value of less than or equal to the mean plus 3 standard deviations of the control sera was considered to be nonreactive (83).

Evaluation of adhesin function.

(i) ECM macromolecules. All ECM macromolecules were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK) and prepared from the following sources: collagen I from bovine skin, elastin from bovine neck filament, fibrinogen from bovine plasma, heparan sulfate from bovine kidney, chondroitin sulfate from bovine cartilage, and laminin-1 from the basement membrane of Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm mouse sarcoma.

(ii) ECM binding ELISA. An ELISA was performed to screen the recombinant proteins for the ability to attach to individual ECM macromolecules using a previously described method (31). Briefly, Immulon 2HB plates (Thermo Fisher, Horsham, UK) were coated with 5 μg/ml of the ECM component or the negative-control protein (bovine serum albumin [BSA]) by incubation for 1 h at 37°C and overnight at 4°C, washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), and blocked with a 1% (wt/vol) BSA solution. Recombinant proteins, diluted in PBST, were added at 10 μg/ml to screen for ECM binding activity, and a range of concentrations (from 0 to 6 μM) was used to determine the dose dependency of these binding interactions. Following incubation, bound recombinant proteins were detected by addition of mouse monoclonal anti-polyhistidine IgG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), diluted 1:2,000, before proceeding as described before. Kd values were estimated from curves fitted by nonlinear regression analysis in GraphPad Prism v. 5, using the following equation: Kd = (Amax [protein])/A) – [protein], where A is the absorbance at a given protein concentration, Amax is the maximum plate reader absorbance (when the equilibrium is reached), [protein] is the protein concentration, and Kd is the dissociation equilibrium constant (84, 85).

Far-Western blotting.

A far-Western blotting technique was employed to further characterize the specific binding interactions between the recombinant proteins and bovine fibrinogen (86). To dissociate native bovine fibrinogen into its constituent polypeptide chains (Aα, Bβ, and γ), 60 μl of bovine fibrinogen stock solution (1 mg/ml) was mixed with 350 μl of gel loading buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl [pH 6.8], 4% SDS, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 20% glycerol, 200 mM dithiothreitol), heated at 95°C for 5 min, and separated in Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gels by SDS-PAGE (4 to 20% gradient gel) at a constant voltage of 180 V for 50 min. The fibrinogen chains were electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (100 V, 240 mA, and 120 min), and the membrane was blocked with 5% (wt/vol) skimmed milk. Membranes were subsequently incubated with 30 μg/ml of recombinant protein. Any bound protein was detected by incubation of the membrane with mouse anti-polyhistidine antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), diluted 1:2,000, followed by goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and development in 3,3′-diaminobenzidine membrane substrate (Sigma-Aldrich).

Immunogenicity trial in calves.

(i) Calves. The immunogenicity of the recombinant proteins was evaluated in two Holstein-Friesian calves. A control group of two additional calves was used to verify that any serological response did not result from environmental exposure to BDD-associated treponemes or to ubiquitous antigens.

The four calves were reared and maintained according to routine agricultural practice at the university’s farm, with housing conditions having increased biosecurity to reduce the risk of exposure to the BDD-associated Treponema spp. Calves were bedded on straw and quarantined for 4 weeks before vaccine administration. Calves were bled immediately prior to vaccine administration to ascertain preimmunization antibody status.

(ii) Formulation of the vaccine. The multivalent vaccine was formulated to deliver the four recombinant proteins simultaneously and comprised of 100 μg of each recombinant protein and 40 μl of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Rehydragel, Chemtrade Logistics, Toronto, Ontario), adjusted to a final volume of 2 ml using PBS. All vaccines were administered subcutaneously to the left flank. Calves received an initial 2-ml dose of the vaccine followed by a 2-ml booster dose 2 weeks later. Concurrently, control animals (n = 2) received a 2-ml dose of the vehicle only. Blood samples, obtained by jugular venepuncture, were collected at 2-week intervals for 4 weeks beginning with a preimmunization draw at day zero. Serum was retained for serological studies.

(iii) Detection of serum IgG antibodies by ELISA. Vaccinee IgG1 and IgG2 antibody seroreactivity to the recombinant proteins was determined as described above. All data were processed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). ELISA reactivity was confirmed by Western blotting using previously described methods (23).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a BBSRC New Investigator Award (BB/K009443/1) awarded to Nicholas Evans and an industrial research grant from Zoetis Inc. awarded to Stuart Carter and Nicholas Evans.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blowey RW, Sharp MW. 1988. Digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 122:505–508. doi: 10.1136/vr.122.21.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Read DH, Walker RL. 1998. Papillomatous digital dermatitis (footwarts) in California dairy cattle: clinical and gross pathologic findings. J Vet Diagn Invest 10:67–76. doi: 10.1177/104063879801000112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zinicola M, Lima F, Lima S, Machado V, Gomez M, Döpfer D, Guard C, Bicalho R. 2015. Altered microbiomes in bovine digital dermatitis lesions, and the gut as a pathogen reservoir. PLoS One 10:e0120504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barker ZE, Leach KA, Whay HR, Bell NJ, Main D. 2010. Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. J Dairy Sci 93:932–941. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sullivan LE, Carter SD, Blowey R, Duncan JS, Grove-White D, Evans NJ. 2013. Digital dermatitis in beef cattle. Vet Rec 173:582. doi: 10.1136/vr.101802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sullivan LE, Evans NJ, Blowey RW, Grove-White DH, Clegg SR, Duncan JS, Carter SD. 2015. A molecular epidemiology of treponemes in beef cattle digital dermatitis lesions and comparative analyses with sheep contagious ovine digital dermatitis and dairy cattle digital dermatitis lesions. Vet Microbiol 178:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davies IH, Naylor RD, Martin PK. 1999. Severe ovine foot disease. Vet Rec 145:646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harwood DG, Cattell JH, Lewis CJ, Naylor R. 1997. Virulent foot rot in sheep. Vet Rec 140:687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Walker RL, Read DH, Loretz KJ, Nordhausen RW. 1995. Spirochetes isolated from dairy cattle with papillomatous digital dermatitis and interdigital dermatitis. Vet Microbiol 47:343–355. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Krull AC, Shearer JK, Gorden PJ, Cooper VL, Phillips GJ, Plummer PJ. 2014. Deep sequencing analysis reveals temporal microbiota changes associated with development of bovine digital dermatitis. Infect Immun 82:3359–3373. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02077-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nielsen MW, Strube ML, Isbrand A, Al-Medrasi WD, Boye M, Jensen TK, Klitgaard K. 2016. Potential bacterial core species associated with digital dermatitis in cattle herds identified by molecular profiling of interdigital skin samples. Vet Microbiol 186:139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evans NJ, Brown JM, Demirkan I, Singh P, Getty B, Timofte D, Vink WD, Murray RD, Blowey RW, Birtles RJ, Hart CA, Carter SD. 2009. Association of unique, isolated treponemes with bovine digital dermatitis lesions. J Clin Microbiol 47:689–696. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01914-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Evans NJ, Brown JM, Demirkan I, Murray RD, Birtles RJ, Hart CA, Carter SD. 2009. Treponema pedis sp. nov., a spirochaete isolated from bovine digital dermatitis lesions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:987–991. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.002287-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Evans NJ, Brown JM, Demirkan I, Murray RD, Vink WD, Blowey RW, Hart CA, Carter SD. 2008. Three unique groups of spirochetes isolated from digital dermatitis lesions in UK cattle. Vet Microbiol 130:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rasmussen M, Capion N, Klitgaard K, Rogdo T, Fjeldaas T, Boye M, Jensen TK. 2012. Bovine digital dermatitis: possible pathogenic consortium consisting of Dichelobacter nodosus and multiple Treponema species. Vet Microbiol 160:151–161. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moter A, Leist G, Rudolph R, Schrank K, Choi B-K, Wagner M, Gobel UB. 1998. Fluorescence in situ hybridization shows spatial distribution of as yet uncultured treponemes in biopsies from digital dermatitis lesions. Microbiology 144:2459–2467. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-9-2459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Choi B-K, Natterman H, Grund S, Haider W, Gobel UB. 1997. Spirochetes from digital dermatitis lesions in cattle are closely related to treponemes associated with human periodontitis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:175–181. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-1-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Evans NJ, Timofte D, Isherwood DR, Brown JM, Williams JM, Sherlock K, Lehane MJ, Murray RD, Birtles RJ, Anthony Hart C, Carter SD. 2012. Host and environmental reservoirs of infection for bovine digital dermatitis treponemes. Vet Microbiol 156:102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gomez A, Anklam KS, Cook NB, Rieman J, Dunbar KA, Cooley KE, Socha MT, Döpfer D. 2014. Immune response against Treponema spp. and ELISA detection of digital dermatitis. J Dairy Sci 97:4864–4875. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Elliott MK, Alt DP. 2009. Bovine immune response to papillomatous digital dermatitis (PDD)-associated spirochetes is skewed in isolate reactivity and subclass elicitation. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 130:256–261. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trott DJ, Moeller MR, Zuerner RL, Goff JP, Waters WR, Alt DP, Walker RL, Wannemuehler MJ. 2003. Characterization of Treponema phagedenis-like spirochetes isolated from papillomatous digital dermatitis lesions in dairy cattle. J Clin Microbiol 41:2522–2529. doi: 10.1128/jcm.41.6.2522-2529.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moe KK, Yano T, Misumi K, Kubota C, Yamazaki W, Muguruma M, Misawa N. 2010. Analysis of the IgG immune response to Treponema phagedenis-like spirochetes in individual dairy cattle with papillomatous digital dermatitis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17:376–383. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00464-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Demirkan I, Walker RL, Murray RD, Blowey RW, Carter SD. 1999. Serological evidence of spirochaetal infections associated with digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Vet J 157:69–77. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smirbert RM. 1984. Genus III Treponema, p 49–57. In Krieg NR, Holt JG (ed), Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dawson JR, Ellen RP. 1990. Tip-oriented adherence of Treponema denticola to fibronectin. Infect Immun 58:3924–3928. doi: 10.1128/IAI.58.12.3924-3928.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fitzgerald TJ, Repesh LA, Blanco DR, Miller JN. 1984. Attachment of Treponema pallidum to fibronectin, laminin, collagen IV, and collagen I, and blockage of attachment by immune rabbit IgG. Br J Vener Dis 60:357–363. doi: 10.1136/sti.60.6.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brinkman MB, McGill MA, Pettersson J, Rogers A, Matejková P, Smajs D, Weinstock GM, Norris SJ, Palzkill T. 2008. A novel Treponema pallidum antigen, TP0136, is an outer membrane protein that binds human fibronectin. Infect Immun 76:1848–1857. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01424-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Parker ML, Houston S, Pětroš Ová H, Lithgow KV, Hof R, Wetherell C, Kao W-C, Lin Y-P, Moriarty TJ, Ebady R, Cameron CE, Boulanger MJ. 2016. The structure of Treponema pallidum Tp0751 (Pallilysin) reveals a non-canonical lipocalin fold that mediates adhesion to extracellular matrix components and interactions with host cells. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005919. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Houston S, Hof R, Francescutti T, Hawkes A, Boulanger MJ, Cameron CE. 2011. Bifunctional role of the Treponema pallidum extracellular matrix binding adhesin Tp0751. Infect Immun 79:1386–1398. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01083-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cameron CE, Brouwer NL, Tisch LM, Kuroiwa J. 2005. Defining the interaction of the Treponema pallidum adhesin Tp0751 with laminin. Infect Immun 73:7485–7494. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7485-7494.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cameron CE. 2003. Identification of a Treponema pallidum laminin-binding protein. Infect Immun 71:2525–2533. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.5.2525-2533.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haapasalo M, Müller KH, Uitto VJ, Leung WK, McBride BC. 1992. Characterization, cloning, and binding properties of the major 53-kilodalton Treponema denticola surface antigen. Infect Immun 60:2058–2065. doi: 10.1128/IAI.60.5.2058-2065.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fenno JC, Müller KH, McBride BC. 1996. Sequence analysis, expression, and binding activity of recombinant major outer sheath protein (Msp) of Treponema denticola. J Bacteriol 178:2489–2497. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.9.2489-2497.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anand A, Luthra A, Edmond ME, Ledoyt M, Caimano MJ, Radolf JD. 2013. The major outer sheath protein (Msp) of Treponema denticola has a bipartite domain architecture and exists as periplasmic and outer membrane-spanning conformers. J Bacteriol 195:2060–2071. doi: 10.1128/JB.00078-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gaibani P, Pellegrino MT, Rossini G, Alvisi G, Miragliotta L, Prati C, Sambri V. 2010. The central region of the msp gene of Treponema denticola has sequence heterogeneity among clinical samples, obtained from patients with periodontitis. BMC Infect Dis 10:345. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shang ES, Exner MM, Summers TA, Martinich C, Champion CI, Hancock RE, Haake DA. 1995. The rare outer membrane protein, OmpL1, of pathogenic Leptospira species is a heat-modifiable porin. Infect Immun 63:3174–3181. doi: 10.1128/IAI.63.8.3174-3181.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Robbins GT, Hahn BL, Evangelista KV, Padmore L, Aranda PS, Coburn J. 2015. Evaluation of cell binding activities of Leptospira ECM adhesins. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0003712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mizuno T, Kageyama M. 1978. Separation and characterization of the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biochem 84:179–191. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a132106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Murray RD, Downham DY, Demirkan I, Carter SD. 2002. Some relationships between spirochaete infections and digital dermatitis in four UK dairy herds. Res Vet Sci 73:223–230. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5288(02)00027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dhawi A, Hart CA, Demirkan I, Davies IH, Carter SD. 2005. Bovine digital dermatitis and severe virulent ovine foot rot: a common spirochaetal pathogenesis. Vet J 169:232–241. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hashimoto M, Asai Y, Ogawa T. 2003. Treponemal phospholipids inhibit innate immune responses induced by pathogen-associated molecular patterns. J Biol Chem 278:44205–44213. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306735200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shenker BJ, Listgarten MA, Taichman NS. 1984. Suppression of human lymphocyte responses by oral spirochetes: a monocyte-dependent phenomenon. J Immunol 132:2039–2045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marcatili P, Nielsen MW, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Jensen TK, Schafer-Nielsen C, Boye M, Nielsen M, Klitgaard K. 2016. A novel approach to probe host-pathogen interactions of bovine digital dermatitis, a model of a complex polymicrobial infection. BMC Genomics 17:987. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3341-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosander A, Guss B, Frykberg L, Björkman C, Näslund K, Pringle MM. 2011. Identification of immunogenic proteins in Treponema phagedenis-like strain V1 from digital dermatitis lesions by phage display. Vet Microbiol 153:315–322. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pringle M, Bergsten C, Fernström L-L, Höök H, Johansson K-E. 2008. Isolation and characterization of Treponema phagedenis-like spirochetes from digital dermatitis lesions in Swedish dairy cattle. Acta Vet Scand 50:40. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-50-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stokes JE, Leach KA, Main DCJ, Whay HR. 2012. The reliability of detecting digital dermatitis in the milking parlour. Vet J 193:679–684. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rodriguez-Lainz A, Melendez-Retamal P, Hird DW, Read DH. 1998. Papillomatous digital dermatitis in Chilean dairies and evaluation of a screening method. Prev Vet Med 37:197–207. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00091-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vink WD, Jones G, Johnson WO, Brown J, Demirkan I, Carter SD, French NP. 2009. Diagnostic assessment without cut-offs: application of serology for the modelling of bovine digital dermatitis infection. Prev Vet Med 92:235–248. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pinne M, Choy HA, Haake DA. 2010. The OmpL37 surface-exposed protein is expressed by pathogenic Leptospira during infection and binds skin and vascular elastin. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oliveira R, Domingos RF, Siqueira GH, Fernandes LG, Souza NM, Vieira ML, de Morais ZM, Vasconcellos SA, Nascimento A. 2013. Adhesins of Leptospira interrogans mediate the interaction to fibrinogen and inhibit fibrin clot formation in vitro. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fernandes L, Vieira ML, Kirchgatter K, Alves IJ, Morais ZM, de Vasconcellos SA, Romero EC, Nascimento A. 2012. OmpL1 is an extracellular matrix- and plasminogen-interacting protein of Leptospira spp. Infect Immun 80:3679–3692. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00474-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rybarczyk BJ, Lawrence SO, Simpson-Haidaris PJ. 2003. Matrix-fibrinogen enhances wound closure by increasing both cell proliferation and migration. Blood 102:4035–4043. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Krull AC, Cooper VL, Coatney JW, Shearer JK, Gorden PJ, Plummer PJ. 2016. A highly effective protocol for the rapid and consistent induction of digital dermatitis in Holstein calves. PLoS One 11:e0154481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Edwards AM, Dymock D, Woodward MJ, Jenkinson HF. 2003. Genetic relatedness and phenotypic characteristics of Treponema associated with human periodontal tissues and ruminant foot disease. Microbiology 149:1083–1093. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Levi M, van der Poll T, Büller HR. 2004. Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation. Circulation 109:2698–2704. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131660.51520.9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ponnuraj K, Bowden MG, Davis S, Gurusiddappa S, Moore D, Choe D, Xu Y, Hook M, Narayana S. 2003. A “dock, lock, and latch” structural model for a staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell 115:217–228. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00809-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bamford CV, Fenno JC, Jenkinson HF, Dymock D. 2007. The chymotrypsin-like protease complex of Treponema denticola ATCC 35405 mediates fibrinogen adherence and degradation. Infect Immun 75:4364–4372. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00258-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Berry SL, Read DH, Famula TR, Mongini A, Döpfer D. 2012. Long-term observations on the dynamics of bovine digital dermatitis lesions on a California dairy after topical treatment with lincomycin HCl. Vet J 193:654–658. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Farrell DH, Thiagarajan P, Chung DW, Davie EW. 1992. Role of fibrinogen alpha and gamma chain sites in platelet aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:10729–10732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hawiger J, Timmons S, Strong DD, Cottrell BA, Riley M, Doolittle RF. 1982. Identification of a region of human fibrinogen interacting with staphylococcal clumping factor. Biochemistry 21:1407–1413. doi: 10.1021/bi00535a047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liu C-Z, Shih M-H, Tsai P-J. 2005. ClfA221-550, a fibrinogen-binding segment of Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A, disrupts fibrinogen function. Thromb Haemost 94:286–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ghosh S, Chakraborty K, Nagaraja T, Basak S, Koley H, Dutta S, Mitra U, Das S. 2011. An adhesion protein of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi is required for pathogenesis and potential target for vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3348–3353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016180108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lithgow KV, Hof R, Wetherell C, Phillips D, Houston S, Cameron CE. 2017. A defined syphilis vaccine candidate inhibits dissemination of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum. Nat Commun 8:14273. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Berry SL, Ertze RA, Read DHHD. 2003. Field evaluation of prophylactic and therapeutic effects of a vaccine against (papillomatous) digital dermatitis of dairy cattle in two California dairies. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Ruminant Lameness, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • 65.O’Hagan DT, MacKichan ML, Singh M. 2001. Recent developments in adjuvants for vaccines against infectious diseases. Biomol Eng 18:69–85. doi: 10.1016/s1389-0344(01)00101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Grun JL, Maurer PH. 1989. Different T helper cell subsets elicited in mice utilizing two different adjuvant vehicles: the role of endogenous interleukin 1 in proliferative responses. Cell Immunol 121:134–145. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(89)90011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Brewer JM, Conacher M, Hunter CA, Mohrs M, Brombacher F, Alexander J. 1999. Aluminium hydroxide adjuvant initiates strong antigen-specific Th2 responses in the absence of IL-4- or IL-13-mediated signaling. J Immunol 163:6448–6454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Berven FS, Flikka K, Jensen HB, Eidhammer I. 2004. BOMP: a program to predict integral β-barrel outer membrane proteins encoded within genomes of Gram-negative bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W394–W399. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gromiha MM, Ahmad S, Suwa M. 2005. TMBETA-NET: discrimination and prediction of membrane spanning β-strands in outer membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W164–W167. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bagos PG, Liakopoulos TD, Spyropoulos IC, Hamodrakas SJ. 2004. PRED-TMBB: a web server for predicting the topology of β-barrel outer membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W400–W404. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. 2002. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1575–1584. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sachdeva G, Kumar K, Jain P, Ramachandran S. 2005. SPAAN: a software program for prediction of adhesins and adhesin-like proteins using neural networks. Bioinformatics 21:483–491. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang Y. 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chua PKB, Corkill JE, Hooi PS, Cheng SC, Winstanley C, Hart CA. 2005. Isolation of Waddlia malaysiensis, a novel intracellular bacterium, from fruit bat (Eonycteris spelaea). Emerg Infect Dis 11:271–277. doi: 10.3201/eid1102.040746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Haake DA, Champion CI, Martinich C, Shang ES, Blanco DR, Miller JN, Lovett MA. 1993. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the gene encoding OmpL1, a transmembrane outer membrane protein of pathogenic Leptospira spp. J Bacteriol 175:4225–4234. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.13.4225-4234.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Prince SM, Feron C, Janssens D, Lobet Y, Achtman M, Kusecek B, Bullough PA, Derrick JP. 2001. Expression, refolding and crystallization of the OpcA invasin from Neisseria meningitidis. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 57:1164–1166. doi: 10.1107/s0907444901009416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Porath J, Carlsson J, Olsson I, Belfrage G. 1975. Metal chelate affinity chromatography, a new approach to protein fractionation. Nature 258:598–599. doi: 10.1038/258598a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Schweizer M, Hindennach I, Garten W, Henning U. 1978. Major proteins of the Escherichia coli outer cell envelope membrane. Interaction of protein II with lipopolysaccharide. Eur J Biochem 82:211–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Micsonai A, Wien F, Kernya L, Lee Y-H, Goto Y, Réfrégiers M, Kardos J. 2015. Accurate secondary structure prediction and fold recognition for circular dichroism spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E3095–E3103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500851112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ji B, Collins MT. 1994. Seroepidemiologic survey of Borrelia burgdorferi exposure of dairy cattle in Wisconsin. Am J Vet Res 55:1228–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Pathirana RD, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Veith PD, Riley PF, Reynolds EC. 2006. Characterization of proteinase-adhesin complexes of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiology 152:2381–2394. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28787-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lin Y-P, Lee D-W, McDonough SP, Nicholson LK, Sharma Y, Chang Y-F. 2009. Repeated domains of Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins interact with elastin and tropoelastin. J Biol Chem 284:19380–19391. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.004531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wu Y, Li Q, Chen X-Z. 2007. Detecting protein-protein interactions by far Western blotting. Nat Protoc 2:3278–3284. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Li H, Zhang W, Dong C. 2018. Crystal structure of the outer membrane protein OmpU from Vibrio cholerae at 2.2 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74:21–29. doi: 10.1107/S2059798317017697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhao H, Sequeira RD, Galeva NA, Tang L. 2011. The host outer membrane proteins OmpA and OmpC are associated with the Shigella phage Sf6 virion. Virology 409:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Torres AG, Kaper JB. 2003. Multiple elements controlling adherence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 to HeLa cells. Infect Immun 71:4985–4995. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.9.4985-4995.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zahn M, D’Agostino T, Eren E, Baslé A, Ceccarelli M, van den Berg B. 2015. Small-molecule transport by CarO, an abundant eight-stranded β-barrel outer membrane protein from Acinetobacter baumannii. J Mol Biol 427:2329–2339. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Vandeputte-Rutten L, Kramer RA, Kroon J, Dekker N, Egmond MR, Gros P. 2001. Crystal structure of the outer membrane protease OmpT from Escherichia coli suggests a novel catalytic site. EMBO J 20:5033–5039. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sequeira S, Kavanaugh D, MacKenzie DA, Šuligoj T, Walpole S, Leclaire C, Gunning AP, Latousakis D, Willats WGT, Angulo J, Dong C, Juge N. 2018. Structural basis for the role of serine-rich repeat proteins from Lactobacillus reuteri in gut microbe-host interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E2706–E2715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715016115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Touw DS, Patel DR, van den Berg B. 2010. The crystal structure of OprG from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a potential channel for transport of hydrophobic molecules across the outer membrane. PLoS One 5:e15016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bushell SR, Mainprize IL, Wear MA, Lou H, Whitfield C, Naismith JH. 2013. Wzi is an outer membrane lectin that underpins group 1 capsule assembly in Escherichia coli. Structure 21:844–853. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES