Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2020 Apr 20;88(5):e00104-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00104-20

De Novo Purine Biosynthesis Is Required for Intracellular Growth of Staphylococcus aureus and for the Hypervirulence Phenotype of a purR Mutant

Mariya I Goncheva a, Ronald S Flannagan a, David E Heinrichs a,
Editor: Andreas J Bäumlerb
PMCID: PMC7171247  PMID: 32094249

Staphylococcus aureus is a noted human and animal pathogen. Despite decades of research on this important bacterium, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the pathogenic mechanisms it uses to infect the mammalian host. This can be attributed to it possessing a plethora of virulence factors and complex virulence factor and metabolic regulation. PurR, the purine biosynthesis regulator, was recently also shown to regulate virulence factors in S. aureus, and mutations in purR result in derepression of fibronectin binding proteins (FnBPs) and extracellular toxins, required for a so-called hypervirulent phenotype.

KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, intracellular pathogen, pathogenesis, purines

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a noted human and animal pathogen. Despite decades of research on this important bacterium, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the pathogenic mechanisms it uses to infect the mammalian host. This can be attributed to it possessing a plethora of virulence factors and complex virulence factor and metabolic regulation. PurR, the purine biosynthesis regulator, was recently also shown to regulate virulence factors in S. aureus, and mutations in purR result in derepression of fibronectin binding proteins (FnBPs) and extracellular toxins, required for a so-called hypervirulent phenotype. Here, we show that hypervirulent strains containing purR mutations can be attenuated with the addition of purine biosynthesis mutations, implicating the necessity for de novo purine biosynthesis in this phenotype and indicating that S. aureus in the mammalian host experiences purine limitation. Using cell culture, we showed that while purR mutants are not altered in epithelial cell binding, compared to that of wild-type (WT) S. aureus, purR mutants have enhanced invasion of these nonprofessional phagocytes, consistent with the requirement of FnBPs for invasion of these cells. This correlates with purR mutants having increased transcription of fnb genes, resulting in higher levels of surface-exposed FnBPs to promote invasion. These data provide important contributions to our understanding of how the pathogenesis of S. aureus is affected by sensing of purine levels during infection of the mammalian host.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that is found as a commensal in about a third of the human population (1). However, S. aureus can also be pathogenic, causing a wide array of diseases, ranging from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening infections such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and bacteremia (2). Data demonstrating that morbidity and mortality due to invasive S. aureus infection in the United States cause more deaths than HIV (3) lend further support to the burden that S. aureus infections place on society.

Purines are essential to life. All organisms, except for some parasitic worms, can synthesize purines de novo. In S. aureus, de novo purine biosynthesis is accomplished by the activity of 11 enzymes that convert phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) to IMP (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). IMP can then be converted to ATP or GTP by the PurA and PurB or the GuaA and GuaB proteins, respectively. Previous reports have shown that de novo purine biosynthesis is required for full virulence of Francisella tularensis (4), Brucella abortus (5), Escherichia coli (6), and many other pathogens. In S. aureus strain Newman, purA and purH mutants are attenuated in vivo (7). Furthermore, S. aureus with mutations in guaA or guaB cannot grow in serum and fail to establish infection in a murine model (8). A purF mutant of USA300 was shown to have a modest defect in a rabbit endocarditis model, but the purF mutation did render the bacterium highly susceptible to vancomycin treatment (9).

Recently, it was demonstrated that inactivation of the transcriptional repressor of purine biosynthesis, PurR, results in hypervirulent S. aureus in a mouse bacteremia model (10, 11). In purR-deficient S. aureus, transcription of purine biosynthesis genes and known virulence factor genes, including those encoding fibronectin binding proteins (FnBPs), is increased (10, 11). This purR mutant-dependent hypervirulent state was found to be mediated by aberrant upregulation of FnBPs, whose expression is normally repressed by PurR. Since several known virulence factors, including exotoxins (11), are controlled by PurR, it is unclear whether FnBP expression alone is sufficient for hypervirulence of purR S. aureus or whether the concurrent substantial increase in pur gene transcription is also required. Moreover, the specific events that occur in vivo that lead to increased virulence are unknown.

As FnBPs are required for the invasion of nonphagocytic cells by S. aureus (1214), we sought to determine if purR mutants demonstrate increased invasion, which could in part account for their increased pathogenesis. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the increase in de novo purine biosynthesis may confer a growth advantage during intracellular replication in macrophages, allowing faster escape of purR mutant S. aureus from Kupffer cells and quicker dissemination to other organs. Here, we demonstrate that purR-deficient S. aureus has an increased capacity to invade epithelial cells and concurrently requires de novo purine biosynthesis for intracellular replication in the absence of exogenous purines. Moreover, a systemic murine infection model mirrors these findings and demonstrates that the ability to synthesize purines de novo is essential for the pathogenesis of purR-deficient S. aureus, regardless of increased FnBP expression.

RESULTS

De novo purine biosynthesis is required for S. aureus replication and pathogenesis in vivo.

Previously, we showed that FnBPs are essential for the hypervirulence of a purR mutant (10). However, it was not known whether FnBP expression is sufficient for this phenotype or whether the concurrent increase in pur gene expression contributes to rapid lethality in mice. In an attempt to address this at the outset of this study, we assessed the virulence of an S. aureus USA300 purK::ΦNΣ mutant (15) (the mutation results in a block in the purine biosynthesis pathway [Fig. S1]), along with a purK::ΦNΣ ΔpurR double mutant (see below), in relation to those of the wild type (WT) and a ΔpurR mutant. To do this, we infected mice intravenously (i.v.) with each of the four strains using a well-established model of murine bacteremia. While WT-infected animals steadily lost weight over the course of the 4 days of infection, animals infected with the purR mutant required sacrifice at 24 h postinfection (hpi), as previously demonstrated (10) (Fig. 1a), and this correlated with significant increases in bacterial burden, versus those of the WT, in the heart and kidneys at 24 hpi (Fig. 1b). In contrast, animals infected with the purK mutant did not lose weight (Fig. 1a) or show outward signs of disease, even by 96 hpi, and had significantly lower bacterial burdens in the heart and kidneys (Fig. 1c). Most importantly, we found that including the purK::ΦNΣ mutation in the ΔpurR strain converted what was a hypervirulent purR mutant strain into an attenuated strain (Fig. 1). In fact, not only was removal of de novo purine biosynthesis sufficient to eliminate the hypervirulence of a purR mutant, but also it reduced bacterial virulence, as evidenced by weight loss and bacterial burdens, to levels lower than those of the WT. Together, these data demonstrate that de novo purine biosynthesis is required for the pathogenesis of S. aureus, as well as for the hypervirulence associated with purR inactivation during systemic disease.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

De novo purine biosynthesis is required for S. aureus pathogenesis in vivo. Groups of 6 to 8 8-week-old female BALB/c mice were infected with 1 × 107 CFU of S. aureus via tail vein injection. (a) Animal weight was recorded daily and is shown as percentage of weight loss from initial weight. Data are means ± SEMs from 2 experiments with a total of 14 animals. (b) At 24 hpi animals were sacrificed, organs harvested, and CFU per organ determined. Data are means ± SEMs for 8 animals per group. The dotted line represents the limit of accurate detection. (c) At 96 hpi animals were sacrificed, organs harvested, and CFU per organ determined. Data are means ± SEMs from 2 experiments with a total of 14 animals. The dotted line represents the limit of accurate detection. Animals infected with the ΔpurR mutant met early euthanasia criteria at 24 hpi. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni posttest.

Lack of de novo purine biosynthesis is without effect on serum- and FnBP-dependent hyperclumping of S. aureus.

Given that the purK mutation completely abrogated the hypervirulence of the purR mutation, we next investigated whether this may be due simply to effects on growth in the absence of purines or whether the inability to synthesize purines affected FnBP-dependent bacterial clumping in serum, which we previously correlated with hypervirulence (10). The purK mutant, irrespective of whether it also contained a purR mutation, demonstrated attenuated growth in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Fig. 2a). Provision of purK in trans partially restored the growth defect of the single purK mutant, and we attribute this to the facts that purK is the second gene in the 11-gene operon and the transposon insertion exerts a polar effect on downstream gene transcription. Consistent with this notion, when the double mutant was complemented with the same purK expression plasmid, we observed full restoration of growth, ostensibly because the purR mutation results in significantly increased transcription of the complete pur operon (10).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Lack of de novo purine biosynthesis limits growth of S. aureus but not FnBP-dependent serum clumping of ΔpurR S. aureus. (a) S. aureus strains were grown in TSB with 200 ng/ml of tetracycline O/N at 37°C. Endpoint growth was determined by measuring OD600. Data are means ± SEMs from 3 independent experiments, with 3 biological replicates per experiment. (b) Strains were grown in TSB O/N, diluted to an OD600 of 0.01, and grown in DMEM for 24 h. Data are means ± SEMs from 3 independent experiments, with 3 biological replicates per experiment. The horizontal dotted line represents the limit of accurate detection. (c) Strains were grown in TSB O/N, diluted to an OD600 of 0.01, and grown in DMEM supplemented with various concentrations of IMP for 24 h. Data are means ± SEMs from 3 independent experiments, with 3 biological replicates per experiment. The horizontal dotted line represents the limit of accurate detection. (d) Strains were grown in TSB or TSB with 10% (vol/vol) horse serum (TSB-S) for 3.5 h at 37°C. Optical density of the center of the tube was measured after static incubation for 5 min. Data are means ± SEMs from 3 independent experiments, with 3 biological samples per experiment. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest.

To further investigate the requirement of de novo purine biosynthesis for S. aureus growth, we analyzed growth of the WT and four different purine biosynthesis gene mutants, obtained from the Nebraska transposon library (15), in a chemically defined medium lacking purines. While no differences in endpoint growth were evident between the WT and a purR mutant, none of the mutants that are deficient for purine biosynthesis were able to grow under identical conditions (Fig. 2b). In agreement with the idea that disruption of the purine biosynthesis pathway was the only reason for significantly diminished growth, provision of IMP restored growth of each mutant to WT levels, in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2c). The only exception to this was the purA mutant, which has a defect in the biosynthetic pathway at a step after IMP (Fig. S1) and therefore should not be supported by the presence of the metabolite. Overall, these findings demonstrate the importance of the pur operon for S. aureus growth. Moreover, these results demonstrate that the purK mutant, which is complemented by both purK in trans and by the metabolite IMP, serves as a useful mutant to study the role of purine biosynthesis in further detail, especially in the context of a purR mutation. Therefore, this mutant was used throughout the remainder of this study.

We next assessed whether the inability to synthesize purines inhibited the serum- and FnBP-dependent clumping phenotype of a purR mutant (10). As demonstrated in Fig. 2d, purR S. aureus displayed the characteristic hyperclumping phenotype when cultured in the presence of serum; this is characterized by a drop in culture optical density at 600 nm (OD600) as bacteria settle to the bottom of the culture tube within minutes. Cultures of the WT and the purK mutant in serum resulted in modest clumping that is characteristic of S. aureus with WT FnBP expression. In contrast, the purR purK S. aureus strain displayed archetypal purR-dependent hyperclumping, despite displaying an overall reduction in growth (Fig. 2d). This phenotype was strictly due to inactivation of purR, as provision of purR in trans eliminated hyperclumping, whereas provision of purK in trans did not (Fig. 2d). Taken together, these data show that in the context of a purR mutation, disruption of purine biosynthesis does not abrogate FnBP-dependent hyperclumping, indicating that elevated FnBP expression due to loss of purR is without effect.

An S. aureus purR mutant demonstrates enhanced invasion of nonprofessional phagocytes.

As a way to explain the hypervirulence, we hypothesized that purR mutants have an increased capacity to invade nonprofessional phagocytes, since it is well established that S. aureus uses FnBPs as a means to invade these cells (1214). We have demonstrated purR mutants overexpress FnBPs, at least transiently, in early stages of growth (10). To define this, we performed an invasion assay using the human lung epithelial cell line A549.

Using this system, we assessed the ability of WT or purR-deficient S. aureus to adhere to and invade A549 cells. Bacteria were grown to two different growth phases: an OD600 of 0.6, at which FnBP expression is elevated in the purR mutant compared to that in the WT, and an OD600 of 2.0, at which no transcriptional differences in fnb genes were previously reported (10). We observed no obvious trends in bacterial adhesion outside of a small decrease in the adhesive capacity of strains lacking FnBPs (Fig. 3a). When bacteria were grown to an OD600 of 0.6, mutants lacking FnBPs showed no invasion, confirming that entry into epithelial cells absolutely depends on FnBP expression. At this growth phase, we observed no significant increase in the ability of the purR mutant to invade epithelial cell (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, we also observed similar levels of invasion between the WT and each of the purK and purR purK mutants, further supporting our contention that the inability to synthesize purines does not affect levels of FnBP expression and, consequently, the invasive capacity of these bacteria. In contrast, when the bacteria were grown to an OD600 of 2.0, purR mutants demonstrated a significantly higher capacity to invade host cells than that of the WT (Fig. 3b, right). Furthermore, even though purK mutants invaded host cells similarly to the WT, the mutant lacking both purR and purK showed increased invasion over that of the WT. To confirm these data, we visualized infected A549 cells by fluorescence microscopy, using bacteria expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) from a plasmid. We were able to determine the frequency with which each of the aforementioned strains was found inside epithelial cells (Fig. 3c and Fig. S2), using antibody-based staining to differentiate intracellular from extracellular bacteria. This analysis corroborated the results from bacterial counts, with WT and purK mutants demonstrating similar levels of invasion (Fig. 3d). In contrast, bacteria lacking purR, irrespective of the purK mutation, display enhanced invasion of A549 cells. Moreover, this analysis revealed that purR mutants are more invasive at both growth phases tested (Fig. 3d), likely because this technique is more sensitive than counting CFU. There is an apparent discordance between the growth phase-dependent transcriptional upregulation of FnBPs in purR-deficient S. aureus and the growth phase during which we saw increased invasion. This could be due to the effect of purR deficiency on other proteins that may affect FnBP expression. In S. aureus FnBPs have been shown to be posttranslationally targeted and removed from the bacterial cell surface by the action of secreted proteases, including aureolysin (16) and V8 (17). Interestingly, secreted proteases have decreased transcription in a purR mutant of S. aureus (10, 11), indicating that differential posttranslational regulation of surface-exposed FnBPs may occur in purR mutants. Together, these data demonstrate that the hyperinvasive phenotype of a purR mutant is due to an early transcriptional increase in FnBP expression, followed by an effect on proteins that decrease the levels of FnBPs on the bacterial cell surface.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

A purR mutant demonstrates enhanced invasion of epithelial cells. (a) Bacteria were grown to different ODs as indicated and used in gentamicin protection assays. Adhesion is shown as the total number of bacteria recovered at 30 min postinfection, prior to gentamicin treatment. Data are means ± SEMs from 5 to 8 independent experiments, with 2 biological replicates per experiment. (b) Invasion is shown as the total number of bacteria recovered at 1 h postinfection, immediately after the removal of gentamicin. Data are means ± SEMs from 5 to 8 independent experiments, with 2 biological replicates per experiment. (c) Coverslips of cells were infected with bacteria as for panel a and stained after gentamicin treatment. At onset of infection, cells were stained with eFluor 670 dye and prior to fixation were incubated with a Cy3-conjugated rabbit anti-sheep IgG to detect extracellular bacteria. Representative images of WT bacteria are shown. White arrowheads indicate intracellular bacteria; yellow arrowheads indicate extracellular bacteria. Scale bar equals 20 μm. (d) Cells in images from panel c were analyzed, and the number of epithelial cells containing bacteria was counted. Cells with extracellular bacteria were excluded. The percentage of cells with intracellular bacteria per field of view was calculated. A total of 35 to 40 fields of view of 3 or 4 independent experiments were analyzed per group. Data are means ± SEMs. *, P value < 0.05; ***, P value < 0.001; ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest.

Purine biosynthesis mutants demonstrate decreased replication in epithelial cells.

The invasive capacity of S. aureus is strictly dependent on FnBPs, but the ability to replicate intracellularly is a multifactorial process. We speculated that the increased pool of purines in a purR mutant may provide an advantage in the restricted intracellular environment. Therefore, we sought to determine the ability of S. aureus to replicate in epithelial cells. Examination of bacterial burden at different times postinfection demonstrated that replication began by approximately 8 hpi; thus, we routinely measured intracellular replication at 10 hpi for the most reliable data (Fig. S3). Replication of the purR mutant showed trends similar to those observed for invasion, with purR-deficient bacteria showing increased levels of replication when the inoculum was grown to an OD600 of 2.0 (Fig. 4a). To test the dependence of intracellular replication on de novo purine biosynthesis, we also examined the replication of the purK and purR purK mutants. We observed a marked defect in intracellular replication for both the purK and purR purK mutants (Fig. 4a), demonstrating a strict reliance on purine biosynthesis for this intracellular replication.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Purine biosynthesis mutants are defective for intracellular replication. A549 cells were infected as for Fig. 3 and the infection was allowed to proceed for 9 h after gentamicin removal. (a) Fold increase in bacterial numbers was calculated by dividing the number of bacteria recovered at 10 h postinfection by the number of bacteria recovered at 1 h (post-gentamicin removal). Data are means ± SEMs from 5 to 8 independent experiments, with 2 biological replicates per experiment. (b) Coverslips of cells were infected with bacteria as for Fig. 2 and were stained at 10 hpi. At onset of infection, cells were stained with eFluor 670 dye and prior to fixing were incubated with TRITC-conjugated rabbit anti-sheep IgG to detect extracellular bacteria. Representative images of WT bacteria are shown. White arrowheads indicate bacteria that have not replicated; yellow arrowheads indicate bacteria that have replicated intracellularly (extracellular bacteria are stained red). Scale bar equals 20 μm. (c) Cells in images from panel b were analyzed, and the number of epithelial cells containing bacteria was counted. Cells with eFluor 670-negative bacteria (white arrowheads in panel b), indicating intracellular replication, were also counted, and the percentage of cells with intracellular replicating bacteria per field of view was calculated. A total of 35 to 40 fields of view of 3 or 4 independent experiments were analyzed per group. Data are means ± SEMs. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ***, P value < 0.001; ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest.

We sought to examine this in further detail using fluorescence microscopy. Our lab has established a fluorescence-based proliferation assay (18) in which bacteria are surface labeled with eFluor 670 at the outset of infection and lose the dye as they undergo replication. We used this system to examine intracellular replication at a single-cell level, where bacteria that have proliferated will be GFP positive and eFluor 670 negative (Fig. 4b and Fig. S4). Analysis of images acquired at 10 hpi demonstrated that more replication occurred in purR-infected cells than in WT-infected cells (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, despite the low-level increase in CFU, the purK and purR purK mutants were still capable of some intracellular replication (Fig. 4c). In fact, the numbers of cells containing replicating bacteria were not very different (Fig. 4c), suggesting that replication occurs for the purK mutant bacteria but to levels significantly lower than those seen with the WT. Overall, these data demonstrate that mutations in the pur pathway hinder but do not prevent the ability of S. aureus to replicate intracellularly and that a purR mutant shows improved intracellular replication compared to that of the WT.

The effect of a purR mutation on intracellular replication is due to increased invasion.

In addition to increased invasion of purR mutants, we also saw increased intracellular replication in epithelial cells. To determine whether purR bacteria truly proliferate more efficiently within host cells or whether this was simply due to increased host cell invasion, we devised an experiment to circumvent FnBP-dependent bacterial uptake. To do this, we employed COS7 fibroblasts stably expressing human FcγIIa receptor (COSIIA cells), which confers on these cells the ability to phagocytose IgG-bearing targets (19) (Fig. 5a). As this cellular model requires opsonization (Fig. 5a), the bacteria employed in this study carried deletions of the spa and sbi genes, to eliminate nonspecific IgG binding. Furthermore, to eliminate any confounding effect of FnBP expression, the bacterial strains also carried deletions of the fnbAB genes.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

The intracellular replication of a purR mutant is equivalent to that of the WT when differences in cell invasion capacity are removed. (a) Schematic representation of the experiments performed with COSIIA cells. (b) Beads (0.3 μm) were opsonized with human IgG and added to COSIIA cells for 30 min. Extracellular beads were then stained with Cy5-conjugated anti-human IgG, and cells were fixed and imaged on a wide-field microscope. Representative images are shown. Scale bar equals 20 μm. (c) Indicated strains were treated according to the schematic shown in panel a and added to confluent COSIIA cells for 30 min, followed by treatment with gentamicin for 30 min. At 9 h post-gentamicin treatment, cells were lysed and plated and CFU were counted. Data are fold increase in CFU at 10 h compared to the value 1 h (immediately after gentamicin removal). Data are means ± SEMs from 5 experiments, with 2 or 3 biological replicates per experiment. ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest.

At the outset, we showed that the COSIIA cells were indeed capable of phagocytosing IgG-coated beads, verifying their ability to phagocytose in an IgG-dependent manner (Fig. 5b). In order to opsonize bacteria with IgG, we performed a biotinylation step to coat the bacteria and followed that with opsonization using an antibiotin antibody. We were able to confirm biotinylation of the bacterial cell surface through fluorescent avidin staining, and IgG opsonization was confirmed via staining with a specific fluorescent secondary antibody (data not shown). Having verified opsonization of the bacteria, we then sought to examine the ability of these strains to grow intracellularly. Examination of the replicative capacity of S. aureus in these cells demonstrated that there was no appreciable difference between the replication of WT and purR mutant cells (Fig. 5c). In contrast, little to no replication was observed for the purK or purR purK double mutant, in agreement with the findings for epithelial cells (Fig. 5c). Taken together, these data demonstrate that purR mutants do not grow at an accelerated rate within host cells but rather suggest that the replicative advantage displayed by purR S. aureus within epithelia is due to their enhanced ability to invade more host cells.

De novo purine biosynthesis is required for S. aureus replication in macrophages.

The above-described findings demonstrate a defect of pur biosynthesis mutants in the ability to replicate in nonprofessional phagocytes. However, it is well established that S. aureus must replicate in Kupffer cells, the resident liver macrophages, in order to establish infection in murine systemic models (20, 21). Therefore, as we have seen a growth defect of pur pathway mutants in vitro and in epithelial cells, we were interested to study their replication in macrophages, which are the bottleneck to systemic infection in mice. Our lab has a well-established gentamicin protection assay in RAW 264.7 macrophages (22), which we utilized to interrogate the ability of purK and purR purK bacteria to grow in macrophages.

At 18 hpi intracellular replication of both WT and purR mutant bacteria could be seen, with no obvious differences between the two strains (Fig. 6a). In contrast, the purK and purR purK mutants showed no replication even at 24 hpi, a time by which WT and purR S. aureus had killed the host cells and were freely replicating in the culture medium (Fig. 6a). These data suggest that mutants unable to synthesize purines are severely restricted within professional phagocytes.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Purine biosynthesis mutants are completely attenuated in macrophages. (a) RAW 264.7 macrophages were infected with the indicated strains for 30 min, treated with gentamicin for 1 h, and maintained in RPMI 1640 plus 5% FBS. At the indicated times, cells were lysed and CFU determined. Data shown are fold increase in CFU over values recovered at 1.5 h (immediately after gentamicin treatment). Data are means ± SEMs from 5 or 6 experiments, with 2 or 3 biological replicates per experiment. (b) RAW 264.7 macrophages were infected as for panel a and lysed at 18 hpi, and CFU were determined. Data are fold increase in CFU at 18 h over values recovered at 1.5 h. Data are means ± SEMs from 4 to 6 experiments, with 2 or 3 biological replicates per experiment. (c) Bacteria were labeled with eFluor 670 and used to infect cells as for panel a. At 18 hpi the macrophage membrane was labeled with TMR wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) for 5 min and the cells were fixed. Coverslips were imaged on a wide-field microscope. Representative images are shown. Yellow arrowheads indicate bacteria that have not replicated; white arrowheads indicate bacteria that have replicated intracellularly (extracellular bacteria stain red). Scale bar equals 20 μm. (d) Cells in images from panel c were analyzed, and the cells containing bacteria and replicating bacteria were counted. The percentage of cells containing replicating bacteria was calculated by dividing the number of cells with replicating bacteria by the number of cells with bacteria. At least 10 fields of view of 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Data are means ± SEMs from. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest.

We chose the intermediate point of 18 hpi, at which intracellular replication of the WT and purR mutant could be reliably detected, and investigated the behavior of the purine biosynthesis mutants in more detail. To determine whether this growth impairment is specific to purK or if it is a general response of mutants of the pur pathway, we performed similar infections using purA and purF mutants. As demonstrated in Fig. 6b, intracellular growth of purF and purA mutants was also inhibited, indicating that general defects in purine biosynthesis compromise bacterial growth within macrophages. This conclusion was further supported by fluorescence imaging, which revealed that the purK and purR purK mutants failed to grow despite being phagocytosed (Fig. 6c and d and Fig. S5).

Our findings indicate that the growth defect of purine biosynthesis mutants can be restored through the addition of exogenous purines (Fig. 2c). As we detected no replication of pur mutants in macrophages, we chose to assess if intracellular growth could also be rescued by supplying IMP exogenously. Indeed, the addition of 100 μM IMP to the culture medium fully restored the growth of the purK, purR purK, and purF mutants but not of the purA mutant (Fig. 7a); the purA mutation affects the pathway after the IMP step (Fig. S1). Analysis of fluorescence images supported these data, with replication of the purK and purR purK mutants being readily detectable in RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence of IMP (Fig. 7 and Fig. S6). Importantly, the addition of IMP did not compromise RAW 264.7 cell viability (Fig. S7), and therefore, the observed replication was due to availability of purines, not sudden macrophage death. Indeed, exogenous IMP allowed the purK and purR purK mutants to replicate to levels higher than those of the WT (Fig. 7b and c). Together, these findings demonstrate that de novo purine biosynthesis is required for replication of S. aureus in macrophages.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Intracellular growth defects of purine biosynthesis mutants are restored by the addition of exogenous purines. (a) RAW 264.7 macrophages were infected with the indicated strains for 30 min, treated with gentamicin for 1 h, and maintained in RPMI 1640 plus 5% FBS, with or without the indicated concentrations of IMP. At 18 hpi, cells were lysed and CFU determined. Data are fold increase in CFU over values recovered at 1.5 h. Data are means ± SEMs from 4 to 6 experiments, with 2 or 3 biological replicates per experiment. (b) Bacteria were labeled with eFluor 670 and used to infect cells as for panel a. At 18 hpi the macrophage membrane was labeled with TMR wheat germ agglutinin for 5 min, and the cells were fixed. Coverslips were imaged on a wide-field microscope. Representative images are shown. Yellow arrowheads indicate bacteria that have not replicated; white arrowheads indicate bacteria that have replicated intracellularly (extracellular bacteria stain red). Scale bar equals 20 μm. (c) Cells in images from panel b were analyzed, and the cells containing bacteria and replicating bacteria were counted. The percentage of cells containing replicating bacteria was calculated by dividing the number of cells with replicating bacteria by the number of cells with bacteria. At least 10 fields of view of 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Data are means ± SEMs. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ***, P value < 0.001; ****, P value < 0.0001, based on one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest.

DISCUSSION

The ability of pathogenic bacteria to synthesize and/or acquire nutrients is integral to their survival and capacity to cause disease. Purines are essential components of life, and the importance of these macromolecules is highlighted by the fact that most free-living organisms are capable of de novo purine biosynthesis. Here, we demonstrate that in S. aureus, de novo purine biosynthesis is essential for in vitro and in vivo virulence, including hypervirulence associated with inactivation of the purine biosynthesis repressor PurR.

We report the inability of a number of pur mutants to grow in a chemically defined medium, which can be alleviated by the addition of exogenous purines (Fig. 2). This is consistent with previous reports for S. aureus (23), but we were interested to note that exogenous purines, while required for pur mutants, did not enhance the growth of WT S. aureus. Dependence on purines has also been demonstrated for Francisella tularensis (4), Brucella abortus (5), and E. coli (6), among other bacteria. S. aureus has been shown to replicate in macrophages (22, 24) and osteoclasts (25), but little is known about the nutritional requirements of S. aureus in the intracellular environment. Studies on S. aureus metabolism have identified that mutations affecting in glycolysis (pfkA and pyk) (26) and lactate dehydrogenase (27) result in reduced survival in RAW 264.7 macrophages, but no data are available on nucleotide biosynthesis. We observed decreased intracellular replication of S. aureus pur biosynthesis mutants in epithelial cells (Fig. 4) and virtually no replication in macrophages (Fig. 6). Interestingly, WT S. aureus has been shown to inhibit nucleotide biosynthesis of A549 cells (28), but it is presently unclear if that can influence the levels of purines in the phagosome. This is the first report demonstrating that intracellular growth of S. aureus requires purine biosynthesis, although similar findings have been reported for a number of intracellular pathogens. Indeed, purL, purH, and purE mutants of B. abortus have been shown to be attenuated in macrophages (5), and purD and purF mutants of the same bacterium have reported defects during replication in RAW 264.7 macrophages and HeLa cells (29). All these findings suggest the requirement for purine synthesis to grow within the intracellular environment and indicate that purines are unavailable for bacterial utilization.

Mutations in purR lead to hypervirulence through overexpression of the FnBPs. Nevertheless, these mutants also display upregulation of a number of other genes, including the purine biosynthesis operon (10, 11). In order to gain a better appreciation of S. aureus pathogenesis, it is critical to know whether upregulation of FnBPs alone is sufficient for this hypervirulence or whether concurrent upregulation of purine biosynthesis is also needed. We observed severe attenuation of individual purine biosynthesis mutants during murine infections, congruent with previous reports (7, 30). However, we also demonstrated similar findings for a purR purK mutant, which behaved like an attenuated pur mutant rather than the hypervirulent purR mutant (Fig. 1). This was further reflected in disease progression, where a purR purK mutant did not have improved bacterial replication later in disease.

To date, only one study has examined S. aureus with mutations in the purine biosynthetic operon and purR. The authors demonstrated that purR purA and purR purH mutants were more virulent than purA and purH single mutants, respectively (11). Nevertheless, in both cases, the purR pur mutants were still attenuated compared to WT bacteria, indicating an overall reduction in bacterial pathogenesis. Moreover, that study only examined the bacterial burden in the kidneys of infected mice at 20 hpi. We saw a similar trend in kidney samples at 24 hpi (Fig. 1b) and 96 hpi (Fig. 1c), although our data did not reach statistical significance. Therefore, our data consistently show that de novo purine biosynthesis is required for the establishment and progression of S. aureus bacteremia. Indeed, this fits well with our findings from macrophage infections, as replication in the resident liver macrophages (Kupffer cells) is required for the systemic spread of S. aureus from the liver (20, 21).

S. aureus is not alone in the requirement for de novo purine biosynthesis for full pathogenesis. There are reports of purine biosynthetic mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, E. coli, and Bacillus anthracis having decreased growth in human serum (31), and S. aureus purA and purB mutants have been shown to have the same defect (23). Furthermore, animal models have demonstrated that purF and purA mutants of F. tularensis are also severely attenuated in mice (4), purD and purF mutants of B. abortus have decreased persistence (29), and a purF mutant of uropathogenic E. coli was attenuated in a mouse bladder colonization model (6). Overall, these findings suggest that purine availability is significantly limited during infection, and purine biosynthesis inhibitors could potentially be used in combination therapy with antibiotics to increase bacterial clearance. This is of particular importance in bacteria such as S. aureus, in which antibiotic resistance is rampant.

The ability of S. aureus to acquire nutrients is paramount to its replication and subsequent success as a pathogen. Here, we further demonstrate the essential role that de novo purine biosynthesis plays in the pathogenesis of S. aureus. Furthermore, we decouple the elevated expression of FnBPs and pur biosynthesis genes in a purR mutant and demonstrate their individual roles in virulence. These findings represent an important step toward the understanding of S. aureus biology during infection and the interplay between nutrient acquisition, virulence factor expression, and disease severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue culture.

Human lung epithelial A549 cells were purchased from the ATCC and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C and 5% CO2 and passaged twice a week. RAW 264.7 macrophages were purchased from the ATCC and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium with 5% (vol/vol) FBS at 37°C and 5% CO2 and passaged every 2 days. COSIIA cells (19), stably transfected with FcγIIa receptor, were a gift from Sergio Grinstein and were maintained in DMEM with 10% (vol/vol) FBS and 500 μg/ml of G418 at 37°C and 5% CO2 and passaged twice a week.

Bacterial growth.

Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth, and S. aureus was grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 37°C, shaken at 200 rpm, unless otherwise stated. Where appropriate, media were supplemented with erythromycin (3 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (12 μg/ml), lincomycin (10 μg/ml), ampicillin (100 μg/ml), or tetracycline (3 μg/ml). Solid media were supplemented with 1.5% (wt/vol) Bacto agar. For induction of complementation plasmids, bacteria were grown in TSB to an OD600 of 0.3 and induced with 300 ng/μl of tetracycline overnight (O/N). For growth in DMEM, bacteria were grown O/N in TSB, diluted to an OD600 equivalent of 0.01, and grown in 2 ml of DMEM in a 13-ml snap cap tube O/N.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Strain Description Source or reference
USA300, WT USA300 LAC, cured of resistance plasmids Lab stock
WT pGFP USA300 carrying superfolder GFP in plasmid pCM29 (pGFP) This study
ΔpurR mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR This study
ΔfnbAB mutant USA300 with a deletion of fnbAB 10
ΔpurR ΔfnbAB mutant USA300 with deletions of purR and fnbAB This study
ΔpurR pGFP USA300 with a deletion of purR carrying pGFP This study
ΔfnbAB pGFP mutant USA300 with a deletion of fnbAB carrying pGFP This study
ΔpurR ΔfnbAB pGFP mutant USA300 with deletions of purR and fnbAB carrying pGFP This study
purK::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purK This study
purK::ΦΝΣ pGFP mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purK carrying superfolder GFP in plasmid pCM29 This study
ΔpurR purK::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR and a transposon insertion in purK This study
ΔpurR purK::ΦΝΣ pGFP mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR and a transposon insertion in purK carrying pGFP This study
WT pALC WT carrying pALC2073 10
ΔpurR pALC mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR carrying pALC2073 This study
purK::ΦΝΣ pALC mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purK carrying pALC2073 This study
ΔpurR purK::ΦΝΣ pALC USA300 with a deletion of purR and a transposon insertion in purK carrying pALC2073 This study
ΔpurR ppurR mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR carrying a copy of purR in pALC2073 This study
purK::ΦΝΣ ppurR mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purK carrying a copy of purR in pALC2073 This study
ΔpurR purK::ΦΝΣ ppurR mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR and a transposon insertion in purK carrying a copy of purR in pALC2073 This study
purK::ΦΝΣ ppurK mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purK carrying a copy of purK in pALC2073 This study
ΔpurR purK::ΦΝΣ ppurK mutant USA300 with a deletion of purR and a transposon insertion in purK carrying a copy of purK in pALC2073 This study
purA::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purA 15
purF::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purF 15
purM::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a transposon insertion in purM 15
Δspa Δsbi ΔfnbAB USA300 with a deletion of spa, sbi, and fnbAB 10
Δspa Δsbi ΔfnbAB ΔpurR mutant USA300 with a deletion of spa, sbi, fnbAB, and purR This study
Δspa Δsbi ΔfnbAB purK::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a deletion of spa, sbi, and fnbAB, and a transposon insertion in purK This study
Δspa Δsbi ΔfnbAB ΔpurR purK::ΦΝΣ mutant USA300 with a deletion of spa, sbi, fnbAB, and purR and a transposon insertion in purK This study

Invasion of epithelial cells.

All invasion and infection experiments were performed at a multiplicity of infection of 10. For invasion, confluent A549 cells in 12-well tissue culture plates were used. Cells were maintained in DMEM plus 10% (vol/vol) FBS until the day of infection. On the day of infection, cells were washed with PBS and maintained in serum-free (SF) DMEM for at least 1 h prior to infection. Bacterial strains of interest were grown O/N in TSB with appropriate antibiotics. Bacteria were then subcultured at an OD600 of 0.1 and grown in TSB with appropriate antibiotics to the desired density, as indicated throughout. Where necessary, bacteria were incubated with eFluor 670 dye (0.5 μg/ml) in PBS for 5 min, followed by the addition of TSB (18). Cells were then pelleted, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended in PBS to a density of 2 × 107 CFU/ml. Fifty microliters of that suspension was added to a well of confluent A549 cells containing 700 μl of SF DMEM. Plates were pelleted at 1,000 rpm for 1 min and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 15 min. Cells were then washed once with PBS and fresh SF medium was added for a further 15 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were then treated with 150 μg/ml of gentamicin for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2, extensively washed to remove the gentamicin, and kept in SF DMEM for the desired duration of infection, as indicated throughout. At specific times postinfection, medium was removed, and cells were lysed in PBS plus 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, scraped from the well, and plated for CFU counting. For fluorescence analysis, extracellular bacteria were stained with a rabbit anti-sheep IgG conjugated to tetramethyl rhodamine isocyanate (TRITC; Jackson ImmunoResearch) (0.75 μg/ml) for 5 min, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min.

For infection of COSIIA cells, cells in 12-well tissue culture plates were maintained in DMEM plus 10% (vol/vol) FBS in the absence of antibiotics. On the day of the infection, cells were washed with PBS and maintained in SF DMEM for at least 1 h prior to infection. S. aureus lacking spa, sbi, and fnbAB were grown in TSB O/N, and 500 μl was pelleted and washed 4 times with PBS (pH 8.0). Bacteria were then resuspended in PBS (pH 8.0) with succinimidyl ester biotin and incubated at room temperature (RT) for 45 min. Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with mouse anti-biotin antibody (5 μg/ml; Jackson ImmunoResearch) at RT for 30 min. Cells were pelleted, washed twice with PBS, and normalized to a density of 2 × 107 CFU/ml. A total of 50 μl of that suspension was added to a well of confluent COSIIA cells containing 700 μl of serum-free DMEM. Plates were pelleted at 1,000 rpm for 1 min and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 30 min. Cells were then treated with 150 μg/ml of gentamicin for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2, extensively washed to remove the gentamicin, and kept in SF DMEM for the desired duration of infection, as indicated throughout. At the desired times, medium was removed and cells lysed in PBS plus 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, scraped from the well, and plated for CFU determination.

IgG bead opsonization.

Silica beads (3.14 μm; Bangs Laboratories) were opsonized with human IgG (0.8 mg/ml) for 1 h. IgG‐opsonized beads were added to individual wells containing COSIIA cells and then centrifuged at 277 × g for 1 min to synchronize binding of targets to the cells. After phagocytosis for 30 min, cells were washed vigorously to remove unbound silica beads. Beads remaining extracellular were detected by staining for 3 min with anti‐human fluorophore‐conjugated secondary antibodies (0.75 μg/ml) prior to fixation with 4% (vol/vol) PFA.

Macrophage infections.

For infection of RAW 264.7 macrophages, the protocol as established by Flannagan et al. (22) was used. Where necessary, cells were supplemented with IMP after the removal of gentamicin. For propidium iodide (PI) stains, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml of PI in RPMI 1640 for 5 min prior to live-cell imaging (22). Where necessary, bacterial cells were incubated with eFluor 670 dye (0.5 μg/ml) in PBS for 5 min, followed by the addition of TSB (18). For fluorescence analysis, cells were stained with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR)-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) (1 μg/ml) for 5 min, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4% (vol/vol) PFA for 20 min.

Fluorescence microscopy.

Wide-field fluorescence and differential inference contrast (DIC) microscopy was performed on a Leica DMI6000 B inverted microscope equipped with 40× (numerical aperture [NA], 1.3), 63× (NA, 1.4) and 100× (NA, 1.4) oil immersion PL‐Apo objectives, a Leica 100-W Hg high-pressure light source, and Hammamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 and Photometrics Evolve 512 Delta electron-multiplying charge-coupled-device (EMCCD) cameras. All images were analyzed and contrast enhanced using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

Clumping assays.

Clumping assays were performed as previously described (10). Briefly, O/N cultures grown in TSB were diluted to an OD600 equivalent of 0.01 and grown in TSB or TSB with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated horse serum for 3.5 h at 37°C. Tubes were then allowed to sit for 5 min on the bench, and the optical density of the center of the culture was measured.

PCR and construct generation.

S. aureus strain USA300 LAC, cured of the 27-kb plasmid that confers antibiotic resistance, was used as the WT strain for mutant generation, unless otherwise stated. Primers used in this study are listed in Table 2. For mobilizing transposon insertion mutations into various genetic backgrounds, phage transduction was performed according to standard techniques. Phage lysate was prepared from the donor strain using phage 80α, recipient strains were infected, and transductants were selected using appropriate antibiotics (10). Insertions were confirmed by PCR. Markerless deletions were constructed using the pIMAY system, as previously described (32). For complementation, the full-length genes were amplified using primers listed in Table 2, ligated into pALC2073, and transformed into E. coli. All plasmids were passaged through RN4220 prior to transfer to the strain of interest.

TABLE 2.

Primers used in this studya

Function Primer name Primer sequencea
Amplifying whole-length purK for complementation purK F GGGGAGCTCCAAAAAGTGGAGGACATGCAAAATG
purK R GGGGAATTCTGTCATGCTTTAATTACTCCCCTCA
Generating an upstream fragment for purR deletion purR Up F GGGGTCGACTTTTTGATATAGGGGCGAGTT
purR Up R CTTTTCAACCCTTCTATCCTA
Generating an downstream fragment for purR deletion purR downF TAGGATAGAAGGGTTGAAAAGAAGGAGTTTTAGTATTATGA
purR downR GGGGGTACCGTATATATCTCTCTGTTTTAT
a

Underlined sequences indicate restriction sites.

Mouse infections.

All animal experiments were performed in compliance with guidelines set out by the Canadian Council on Animal Care. All animal protocols (protocol 2017-028) were reviewed and approved by the University of Western Ontario Animal Use Subcommittee, a subcommittee of the University Council on Animal Care. Six- to 8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories) were injected via tail vein with 100 μl of bacterial culture containing 1 × 107 CFU of bacteria. To prepare the bacteria, strains were grown to an OD600 2 to 2.5 in TSB, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended to the desired numbers in PBS. Infections were allowed to proceed for up to 96 h before animals were euthanized or when they met guidelines for early euthanasia. Organs were harvested in PBS plus 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and homogenized in a Bullet Blender Storm (Next Advance, Troy, NY), using 2 runs of 5 min at setting 10 and metal beads. Dilutions of organ homogenates were plated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) for CFU enumeration.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00104-20-s0001.pdf (294KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00104-20-s0002.pdf (6.7MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00104-20-s0003.pdf (17.4KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 4
IAI.00104-20-s0004.pdf (7.4MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 5
IAI.00104-20-s0005.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 6
IAI.00104-20-s0006.pdf (6.1MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 7
IAI.00104-20-s0007.pdf (7.6MB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant to D.E.H.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gorwitz RJJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SKK, McQuillan G, McDougal LKK, Fosheim GEE, Jensen BJJ, Killgore G, Tenover FCC, Kuehnert M. 2008. Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001–2004. J Infect Dis 197:1226–1234. doi: 10.1086/533494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klevens RM, Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) MRSA Investigators, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Craig AS, Zell ER, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Fridkin SK. 2007. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1771. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.15.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Quarry JE, Isherwood KE, Michell SL, Diaper H, Titball RW, Oyston P. 2007. A Francisella tularensis subspecies novicida purF mutant, but not a purA mutant, induces protective immunity to tularemia in mice. Vaccine 25:2011–2018. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.11.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alcantara RB, Read RDA, Valderas MW, Brown TD, Roop RM II. 2004. Intact purine biosynthesis pathways are required for wild-type virulence of Brucella abortus 2308 in the BALB/c mouse model. Infect Immun 72:4911–4917. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4911-4917.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaffer CL, Zhang EW, Dudley AG, Dixon B, Guckes KR, Breland EJ, Floyd KA, Casella DP, Algood HMS, Clayton DB, Hadjifrangiskou M. 2016. Purine biosynthesis metabolically constrains intracellular survival of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 85:e00471-16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00471-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lan L, Cheng A, Dunman PM, Missiakas D, He C. 2010. Golden pigment production and virulence gene expression are affected by metabolisms in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 192:3068–3077. doi: 10.1128/JB.00928-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kofoed EM, Yan D, Katakam AK, Reichelt M, Lin B, Kim J, Park S, Date SV, Monk IR, Xu M, Austin CD, Maurer T, Tan M-W. 2016. De novo guanine biosynthesis but not the riboswitch-regulated purine salvage pathway is required for Staphylococcus aureus infection in vivo. J Bacteriol 198:2001–2015. doi: 10.1128/JB.00051-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li L, Abdelhady W, Donegan NP, Seidl K, Cheung A, Zhou Y-F, Yeaman MR, Bayer AS, Xiong YQ. 2018. Role of purine biosynthesis in persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. J Infect Dis 218:1367–1377. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goncheva MI, Flannagan RS, Sterling BE, Laakso HA, Friedrich NC, Kaiser JC, Watson DW, Wilson CH, Sheldon JR, McGavin MJ, Kiser PK, Heinrichs DE. 2019. Stress-induced inactivation of the Staphylococcus aureus purine biosynthesis repressor leads to hypervirulence. Nat Commun 10:775. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08724-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sause WE, Balasubramanian D, Irnov I, Copin R, Sullivan MJ, Sommerfield A, Chan R, Dhabaria A, Askenazi M, Ueberheide B, Shopsin B, van Bakel H, Torres VJ. 2019. The purine biosynthesis regulator PurR moonlights as a virulence regulator in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:13563–13572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904280116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grundmeier M, Hussain M, Becker P, Heilmann C, Peters G, Sinha B. 2004. Truncation of fibronectin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman leads to deficient adherence and host cell invasion due to loss of the cell wall anchor function. Infect Immun 72:7155–7163. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.12.7155-7163.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sinha B, François PP, Nüsse O, Foti M, Hartford OM, Vaudaux P, Foster TJ, Lew DP, Herrmann M, Krause KH. 1999. Fibronectin-binding protein acts as Staphylococcus aureus invasin via fibronectin bridging to integrin alpha5beta1. Cell Microbiol 1:101–117. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.1999.00011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Edwards AM, Potts JR, Josefsson E, Massey RC. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus host cell invasion and virulence in sepsis is facilitated by the multiple repeats within FnBPA. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000964. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fey PD, Endres JL, Yajjala VK, Widhelm TJ, Boissy RJ, Bose JL, Bayles KW. 2013. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio 4:e00537-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McAleese FM, Walsh EJ, Sieprawska M, Potempa J, Foster TJ. 2001. Loss of clumping factor B fibrinogen binding activity by Staphylococcus aureus involves cessation of transcription, shedding and cleavage by metalloprotease. J Biol Chem 276:29969–29978. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102389200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McGavin MJ, Zahradka C, Rice K, Scott JE. 1997. Modification of the Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin binding phenotype by V8 protease. Infect Immun 65:2621–2628. doi: 10.1128/IAI.65.7.2621-2628.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Flannagan RS, Heinrichs DE. 2018. A fluorescence based-proliferation assay for the identification of replicating bacteria within host cells. Front Microbiol 9:3084. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Indik Z, Kelly C, Chien P, Levinson AI, Schreiber AD. 1991. Human Fc gamma RII, in the absence of other Fc gamma receptors, mediates a phagocytic signal. J Clin Invest 88:1766–1771. doi: 10.1172/JCI115496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Surewaard BGJ, Deniset JF, Zemp FJ, Amrein M, Otto M, Conly J, Omri A, Yates RM, Kubes P. 2016. Identification and treatment of the Staphylococcus aureus reservoir in vivo. J Exp Med 213:1141–1151. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jorch SK, Surewaard BG, Hossain M, Peiseler M, Deppermann C, Deng J, Bogoslowski A, van der Wal F, Omri A, Hickey MJ, Kubes P. 2019. Peritoneal GATA6+ macrophages function as a portal for Staphylococcus aureus dissemination. J Clin Invest 129:4643–4656. doi: 10.1172/JCI127286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Flannagan RS, Heit B, Heinrichs DE. 2016. Intracellular replication of Staphylococcus aureus in mature phagolysosomes in macrophages precedes host cell death, and bacterial escape and dissemination. Cell Microbiol 18:514–535. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Connolly J, Boldock E, Prince LR, Renshaw SA, Whyte MK, Foster SJ. 2017. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus factors required for pathogenicity and growth in human blood. Infect Immun 85:e00337-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00337-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Flannagan RS, Kuiack RC, McGavin MJ, Heinrichs DE. 2018. Staphylococcus aureus uses the GraXRS regulatory system to sense and adapt to the acidified phagolysosome in macrophages. mBio 9:e01143-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01143-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Krauss JL, Roper PM, Ballard A, Shih C-C, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Cassat JE, Ng PY, Pavlos NJ, Veis DJ. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus infects osteoclasts and replicates intracellularly. mBio 10:e02447-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02447-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fuller JR, Vitko NP, Perkowski EF, Scott E, Khatri D, Spontak JS, Thurlow LR, Richardson AR. 2011. Identification of a lactate-quinone oxidoreductase in Staphylococcus aureus that is essential for virulence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 1:19. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2011.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Richardson AR, Libby SJ, Fang FC. 2008. A nitric oxide-inducible lactate dehydrogenase enables Staphylococcus aureus to resist innate immunity. Science 319:1672–1676. doi: 10.1126/science.1155207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gierok P, Harms M, Methling K, Hochgräfe F, Lalk M. 2016. Staphylococcus aureus infection reduces nutrition uptake and nucleotide biosynthesis in a human airway epithelial cell line. Metabolites 6:41. doi: 10.3390/metabo6040041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Truong QL, Cho Y, Barate AK, Kim S, Watarai M, Hahn T-W. 2015. Mutation of purD and purF genes further attenuates Brucella abortus strain RB51. Microb Pathog 79:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Valentino MD, Foulston L, Sadaka A, Kos VN, Villet RA, Santa Maria J, Lazinski DW, Camilli A, Walker S, Hooper DC, Gilmore MS. 2014. Genes contributing to Staphylococcus aureus fitness in abscess- and infection-related ecologies. mBio 5:e01729-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01729-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Samant S, Lee H, Ghassemi M, Chen J, Cook JL, Mankin AS, Neyfakh AA. 2008. Nucleotide biosynthesis is critical for growth of bacteria in human blood. PLoS Pathog 4:e37. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Monk IR, Shah IM, Xu M, Tan M-W, Foster TJ. 2012. Transforming the untransformable: application of direct transformation to manipulate genetically Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. mBio 3:e00277-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00277-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00104-20-s0001.pdf (294KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00104-20-s0002.pdf (6.7MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00104-20-s0003.pdf (17.4KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 4
IAI.00104-20-s0004.pdf (7.4MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 5
IAI.00104-20-s0005.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 6
IAI.00104-20-s0006.pdf (6.1MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 7
IAI.00104-20-s0007.pdf (7.6MB, pdf)

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES