Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Apr 20;174(7):676–689. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0382

Association of Sexual Health Interventions With Sexual Health Outcomes in Black Adolescents

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Reina Evans 1,, Laura Widman 1, McKenzie N Stokes 1, Hannah Javidi 1, Elan C Hope 1, Julia Brasileiro 1
PMCID: PMC7171582  PMID: 32310261

This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses whether sexual health interventions are associated with improved sexual health outcomes in black adolescents.

Key Points

Question

Are sexual health interventions associated with improved sexual health outcomes in black adolescents?

Findings

In this systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing results of 29 studies of 11 918 black adolescents, sexual health interventions were significantly associated with improved abstinence, condom use, sexual health intentions, sexual health knowledge, and sexual health self-efficacy compared with control conditions.

Meaning

The findings suggest that sexual health interventions are associated with improved sexual well-being among black adolescents.

Abstract

Importance

Black adolescents are at increased risk of contracting HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and experiencing unplanned pregnancy. Although sexual health interventions aimed at decreasing these risks exist, evidence of the association between sexual health interventions and the sexual behavior of black adolescents has not been synthesized to our knowledge.

Objective

To examine the associations between sexual health interventions and behavioral, biological, and psychological outcomes.

Data Sources

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, a systematic search was conducted of studies published through January 31, 2019, using the PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases and relevant review articles. The following key words were used: youth, adolesc* or teen*; sexual health or safe* sex or sexually transmitted disease or sexually transmitted infection or STD or STI or HIV or AIDS or pregnancy or reproductive health or condom* or contracept* or unprotected sex or abstinence; intervention or program or education or prevention or promotion or trial; latino* or latina* or latinx* or minorit* or ethnic* or hispanic or african american* or black* or race or racial or biracial.

Study Selection

Studies were included if they included a US-based sample of black adolescents, evaluated a sexual health intervention using experimental or quasi-experimental designs, included a behavioral outcome, and were published in English.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Standardized mean differences and 95% CIs were extracted and meta-analyzed using random-effects models.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Behavioral outcomes were abstinence, condom use, and number of sex partners. Biological outcomes were pregnancy and STI contraction. Psychological outcomes were sexual health intentions, knowledge, and self-efficacy.

Results

Across 29 studies including 11 918 black adolescents (weighted mean age, 12.43 years), there was a significant weighted mean association of sexual health interventions with improvements in abstinence (Cohen d = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.24) and condom use (Cohen d = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.39). No significant mean association of these interventions with number of sex partners, pregnancy, or STI contraction was found. Sexual health interventions were significantly associated with improvements in psychological outcomes: sexual health intentions (Cohen d = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.30), knowledge (Cohen d = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63), and self-efficacy (Cohen d = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28). Intervention effect sizes were consistent across factors, such as participant sex and age and intervention dose.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that sexual health interventions are associated with improvements in sexual well-being among black adolescents. There appears to be a need for wide-scale dissemination of these programs to address racial disparities in sexual health across the US.

Introduction

Black adolescents in the US are at increased risk for experiencing negative sexual health outcomes.1,2 Compared with white adolescents, black adolescents are twice as likely to become a parent before 20 years of age1 and more likely to contract sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV infection.2 Of importance, teen pregnancy is associated with negative life outcomes, such as high school dropout, incarceration, and unemployment,3 and costs approximately $21 billion each year in the US.4 In addition, long-term, untreated HIV infection and other STIs can result in infertility and death.5 With accurate information and skills and access to STI testing and birth control, black adolescents can be better equipped to avoid these negative outcomes.6,7

Ecological systems theory suggests that black adolescents may experience interpersonal, community-level, and systemic barriers to practicing healthy sexual behavior.8 Poverty,9 stress from discrimination and racism,10,11 and lack of access to health care differentially affect black adolescents12,13,14,15 and may be associated with poor general and reproductive health outcomes.15,16,17,18,19 Thus, it is critical to examine the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing sexual health disparities among this racial group.

The unique context of black adolescents’ sexual decision-making and experiences has guided the development of a number of interventions that have emerged during the past few decades. Many programs primarily target individual-level factors that affect black youth’s sexual health, such as knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-respect.20 A few programs target family-level factors, such as parental communication in black families.21,22,23 A community-level factor, cultural narratives on safe sex practices, was also the target for a sexual health program.24 Most of these programs have varied associations with sexual health outcomes. Intervention differences and other sources of clinical and methodologic heterogeneity may be responsible for these mixed results.21,25,26,27

Given the heterogeneity and discrepancies in study findings, the purpose of the current study was to synthesize the association of sexual health programs with sexual health outcomes among black adolescents and examine which intervention strategies are most beneficial. For the purpose of this study, sexual health interventions were defined as primary prevention programs that included some component aimed directly at encouraging abstinence or safer sexual behavior (eg, condom use) to reduce the risk of HIV infection, other STIs, and unplanned pregnancy. Several systematic reviews of sexual health interventions for black adolescents have helped to identify available interventions and the need for culturally tailored and accessible programs.28,29,30,31 Although there are several meta-analyses that evaluate the association of adolescent sexual health interventions with health outcomes and a few meta-analyses that evaluate this association among black individuals without a focus on adolescents,32,33,34 the unique barriers experienced by black adolescents in the US warrant an analysis of how current programming functions for these adolescents in particular. To our knowledge, there is no recent meta-analysis on sexual health interventions for black adolescents. Because of the wide racial disparities in sexual well-being, we sought to understand why some interventions are beneficial whereas others are not among black adolescents.

The first goal of this study was to systematically review the literature on sexual health interventions for black adolescents and conduct a meta-analysis of their overall association with 3 behavioral outcomes related to sexual health (abstinence, condom use, and number of sexual partners) and 2 biological outcomes (pregnancy and STI contraction).35,36 We also evaluated the association of interventions with 3 psychological outcomes related to sexual health behavior37,38 (sexual health intentions, sexual health knowledge, and sexual health self-efficacy).

The second goal was to identify components that contribute to the success of sexual health interventions in decreasing sexual risk behavior among black adolescents. We considered potential moderating variables of associations, including demographic (eg, sex and age), intervention (eg, cultural tailoring and dose), and methodologic (eg, length of follow-up) characteristics.

In this meta-analysis, we use the term black to refer to individuals in the US who are descendants of black racial/ethnicity groups of Africa, including descendants of enslaved Africans (although black is not capitalized throughout the manuscript, we are using this term as a proper noun to refer to a specific cultural group).39 When referring to specific empirical work, we use the terms of the original authors.

Methods

Search Strategy

In January 2019, for this systematic review and meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of the PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases to extract relevant studies published through January 31, 2019. We used the following keywords: youth, adolesc* or teen*; sexual health or safe* sex or sexually transmitted disease or sexually transmitted infection or STD or STI or HIV or AIDS or pregnancy or reproductive health or condom* or contracept* or unprotected sex or abstinence; intervention or program or education or prevention or promotion or trial; latino* or latina* or latinx* or minorit* or ethnic* or hispanic or african american* or black* or race or racial or biracial. Additional studies28,29,30,31,32,40,41,42,43 were located by examining prior reviews and meta-analyses and references of included articles. This initial search produced 3069 unique articles. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Selection Criteria

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) included a US-based sample; (2) sampled black adolescents (ie, at least 95% of the sample was black; mean sample age ≤18 years and no participant >24 years); (3) evaluated the effects of a primary prevention, sexual health intervention (studies with already pregnant youths or STI-positive youths were excluded because of their focus on secondary prevention)44,45; (4) evaluated program effects using an experimental or quasi-experimental design; (5) included at least 1 of our behavioral or biological outcome measures; (6) were published in English; and (7) provided sufficient statistics to calculate effect sizes. When a study had a sample with multiple racial/ethnic groups but included subgroup analyses that evaluated intervention effects among only black participants, the results of the subgroup analyses were included.20,46 For studies with multiple follow-up points, we used the longest follow-up with adequate data to calculate effect sizes as the most conservative estimate of treatment effects. When multiple studies reported findings using the same data, the study that reported results for the longest follow-up with adequate data to calculate effect sizes was included. All other studies using the same data were excluded.47,48 For studies with more than 1 intervention group, we selected the sexual health intervention that was most comprehensive. When studies included more than 1 indicator for an outcome (eg, multiple indicators of condom use), we used a random number generator to select 1 indicator to reduce possible bias associated with outcome selection.

These selection criteria resulted in a final sample of 29 articles (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). From these articles, we calculated 22 independent effect sizes for abstinence, 26 for condom use, 10 for number of sex partners, 4 for pregnancy, 4 for STI contraction, 14 for sexual health intentions, 11 for sexual health knowledge, and 15 for sexual health self-efficacy. More information about these outcome variables, including how they were evaluated in primary studies, is given in eTable 1 in the Supplement.

Data Extraction

Two of us (R.E., H.J., and/or M.N.S.) independently coded each of the primary studies. The following data were extracted: (1) demographic and sample characteristics, (2) intervention characteristics, and (3) methodologic characteristics. The mean percentage agreement across all coding categories was 92%. Discrepancies between coders were resolved through group discussion until a consensus was reached. Risk of bias was calculated for each primary study.49

Calculation of Effect Sizes

As the indicator of effect size, the standardized mean difference, Cohen d, was used. The Cohen d can be interpreted as small (0.20), medium (0.50), or large (0.80).50 When the Cohen d statistics and 95% CIs were not reported, other statistics that could be converted to Cohen d were calculated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 351 and the Practical Meta-Analysis Effect Size Calculator.52 Study authors were contacted and data were requested when no statistics in the study could be converted to a Cohen d. Higher values indicate that the sexual health intervention group performed better than the control group for abstinence, condom use, sexual health intentions, sexual health knowledge, and sexual health self-efficacy. Lower values indicate that the sexual health intervention group performed better than the control group for number of sex partners, pregnancy, and STI contraction.

Statistical Analysis

Random-effects meta-analytic procedures were used for the primary analyses across all independent effect sizes to allow for the possibility of differing variances across studies.53 To examine whether significant heterogeneity existed among effect sizes, we used the Q statistic and I2. For hypothesized categorical moderators, effect sizes and 95% CIs were calculated and then compared using the Qb statistic. Groups for categorical moderator variables must have included at least 2 studies to be considered in analyses. For categorical moderation analyses, mixed-effects models were used to allow for the possibility of differing variances across subgroups. Random-effects meta-regression was used to test continuous moderators. The Q model statistic was used to determine whether there was significant moderation for these models. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 3.51

Results

Study Characteristics

A summary of the studies included in this meta-analysis is presented in Table 1. A total of 11 918 black adolescents (weighted mean age, 12.43 years) were included across 29 studies.20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,46,52,54,55,56,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73 Studies identified participants as African American (26 studies) and black (3). Most studies targeted mixed-sex samples; however, 10 included only girls and 3 included only boys.

Table 1. Study Characteristics.

Source Youth samplea Intervention description Description of cultural tailoring Theory Outcomesb
Clark et al,26 2005 Seventh graders in a suburban town near a southeastern metropolitan area (N = 221); mean age (range), 12.6 (12-14) y; 221 (100%) female; 217 (98%) African American; 74 (33%) had vaginal sex 10 In-person, school-based sessions Exercises tailored to African American participants (eg, examples of African Americans who have left legacies); African American facilitators PST Abstinence; intentions
Dancy et al,25 2006 Low-income, African American, inner-city, female adolescents in Chicago, Illinois (N = 262); mean age (range), 12.4 (11-14) y 6 (2 h) In-person sessions taught in a community center by mothers to their daughters with homework activities and an abstinence agreement Intervention developed in collaboration with low-income African American mothers and daughters; focus groups with this population used to understand factors that leave African American female adolescents at risk for HIV infection SEM, BIM, COM Abstinence; intentions; knowledge; self-efficacy
Delamater et al,54 2000 African American males attending a municipal STI clinic (N = 562); mean age (range), 17.8 (15-19) y 1 (14 min) In-person, clinic-based session Program developed using formative interviews with public health workers and health care professionals at the local clinic, a discussion with black teen peer sex educators, and interviews and focus groups with black male adolescents attending the clinic; among other things, the intervention was culturally appropriate and addressed the misperception that African American youth are not at risk for STIs/AIDS; presented by a trained health educator and young African American woman SRM, SEM Condom; sex partners; intentions; knowledge; self-efficacy
DiClemente et al,55 2004 Sexually experienced African American girls from community health agencies in the southern US (N = 522); mean age (range), 16 (14-18) y; 522 (100%) had vaginal intercourse 4 (4 h) In-person, clinic-based sessions Collaborated with African American adolescent girls in the community to develop the program; first session emphasized ethnic pride (eg, acknowledging accomplishments of African American women; discussing joys and challenges of being an African American adolescent); implemented by African American female health educator and 2 African American female peer educators SCT, TGP Condom; pregnancy; STI; knowledge; self-efficacy
DiClemente et al,56 2009 African American adolescent females in Atlanta, Georgia (N = 715); mean age (range), 17.8 (15-21) y; 715 (100%) had vaginal intercourse 2 (4 h) In-person, clinic-based sessions and 4 follow-up telephone calls; participants given vouchers for their male sexual partners to access STI testing and treatment Program informed by qualitative research with adolescents from the study clinic; sessions fostered a sense of cultural pride and emphasized diverse factors contributing to STI/HIV risk (eg, sociocultural factors, structural factors); facilitated by trained African American women health educators SCT, TGP Condom; STI; knowledge; self-efficacy
DiClemente et al,27 2014 African American adolescent girls in juvenile detention in Atlanta, Georgia (N = 188); mean age (range), 15.3 (13-17) y; 188 (100%) had vaginal intercourse 3 (1.5 h) In-person counseling sessions in detention facility and participants’ homes Program adapted from existing curriculum that was culturally congruent; collaborated with Teen Advisory Board and Community Advisory Board to revise and pilot multiple drafts of the program; program addresses unique needs of African American detained girls; sessions foster cultural pride and emphasize diverse factors contributing to adolescents' HIV/STI risk CBT, TGSTM Condom; sex partners; STI; knowledge; self-efficacy
Dilorio et al,22 2006 Adolescents from Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta (N = 582); mean age (range), 12.2 (11-14) y; 230 (39.5%) female; 570 (98%) African American; 524 (90%) had vaginal intercourse 7 (2 h) In-person, sessions in a community center for mothers and daughters with videos and 7 take-home activities No tailoring reported SCT Abstinence; condom; intentions
Dilorio et al,21 2007 Adolescent boys from Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta (N = 277); mean age (range), 12.8 (11-14) y; 262/273 (96%) African American; 66 (24%) had sexual intercourse 6 (2 h) In-person sessions in a community center for fathers and 1 (2 h) session for teens and fathers with a participant manual and 6 take-home activities No tailoring reported SCT Abstinence; condom; intentions
Dixon et al,57 2000 African American female adolescents living in low-income neighborhoods in Durham, North Carolina (N = 65); mean age (range), 16.2 (14-19) y; 29 (45%) had sexual intercourse 13 (4 h) In-person sessions in a community center with field trips Program was designed to prevent pregnancy using an Afrocentric approach; it incorporates an exploration of culture (eg, field trips to African Museum of Art) and emphasizes cultural pride Not reported Abstinence; condom; pregnancy
Fang et al,58 1998 African American adolescents living in 3 different public housing facilities in a large Eastern city (N = 382); mean age (range), 11 (9-15) y; 141 (37%) had sexual intercourse 7 (1.5 h) In-person sessions in a community center, 1 daylong session at a rural campsite, and 6 (2.5 h) monthly booster sessions No tailoring reported SCT, PMT Abstinence; condom; intentions
Haggerty et al,59 2007 Eighth grade students in Seattle, Washington, public schools (N = 331); 161 (49%) female; mean age, 13.7 y; 163 (49%) African American; 168 (51%) whitec 7 (2-2.5 h) In-person, school-based sessions for parents and teens with take-home workbook activities and videotaped program for parents No tailoring reported SDM, SCRT, SLT, DAT Abstinence
Howard et al,60 1990 Eighth graders from an Atlanta hospital’s low-income patient population (N = 536); 530 (99%) black; 131 (25%) had sexual intercourse 5 In-person, school-based sessions; each session was the length of a classroom period No tailoring reported SIM Abstinence; pregnancy
Howard et al,61 2011 School age, African American, female teenagers who visited a family planning clinic (N = 254) 1 (5 min) Clinic-based presentation on a computer No tailoring reported Not reported Condom
Jemmott et al,62 1992 Black male teenagers in 10th-12th grades recruited from outpatients at a medical clinic in West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (N = 157); mean age, 14.6 y 1 (5 h) In-person, school-based session, including video tapes and exercises Program materials were pilot tested and selected to provide accurate information in ways that would be interesting to inner-city black male adolescents (eg, video narrated by black male and included multiethnic case); all materials were culturally appropriate TRA Abstinence; condom; sex partners; intentions; knowledge
Jemmott et al,63 1998 Young, inner-city African American sixth to seventh grade adolescents in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (N = 659); mean age, 11.8 y; 349 (53%) female; 166/659 (26%) had sexual intercourse 8 (1 h) In-person, school-based sessions Intervention activities developed using focus groups with participants who reflected the study population; the curriculum was designed to encourage participants to be proud of themselves and their community and was delivered by African American facilitators SCT, TRA, TPB Abstinence; condom; intentions; knowledge; self-efficacy
Jemmott et al,64 2010 African American middle school students from urban public schools in the Northeastern US (N = 662); mean age (range), 12 (10-15) y; 354 (53%) female; 153 (23%) had sexual intercourse 3 (4 h) In-person, school-based sessions No tailoring reported SCT, TRA, TPB Abstinence; condom; sex partners
Klein et al,65 2011 African American teenage females in the San Francisco Bay Area (N = 178); mean age (range), 15.8 (14-18) y; 93 (52%) had sex 2 (1 h) Computer sessions plus in-person discussions at a research facility Program was developed for African American female teenagers to enhance ethnic and gender pride and raise awareness of HIV risk factors prevalent among African American female teenagers; some activities included discussion of positive aspects of being an African American young woman and introductions to African American culture through art SCT, TGP Abstinence; condom; knowledge; self-efficacy
Kogan et al,23 2012 African American adolescents in rural counties in Georgia (N = 502); mean age (range), 16 (15-16) y; 261/502 (51%) female 5 In-person sessions for caregivers and 5 for youth, 5 family sessions, and an optional 20-min condom skills unit; all activities in a community center Program materials were developed for African American preadolescents and addressed unique risk factors that African American adolescents encounter; sexual health curriculum and condom skills unit were based on materials adapted from a program for African American adolescent women (Sisters Informing Healing Living and Empowering); program facilitated by African American group leaders Not reported Condom; self-efficacy
Li et al,66 2002 African American youth from recreation centers serving public housing communities in Baltimore, Maryland (N = 383); mean age (range), 11.3 (9-15) y; 170 (44%) female; 136 (36%) had sexual intercourse 8 (90 min) In-person sessions in a community center followed by 6 monthly boosters No tailoring reported PMT, SCT Abstinence; condom
Markham et al,20 2012 Predominantly African American and Hispanic seventh graders from urban middle schools (N = 1258); mean age, 12.6 y; 752 (60%) female; 494 (39%) African Americanc; 609 (48%) Hispanic; 153 (12%) other; 138 (12%) had any sex 24 (50 min) In-person, school-based sessions with computer activities and 6 homework assignments Most facilitators of the intervention were African American or Hispanic; otherwise, no tailoring was reported SCT, TPB Abstinence; condom; sex partners; intentions; knowledge; self-efficacy
Morrison et al,67 2007 Youths in a multicultural city, Seattle, Washington (N = 402); mean age (range), 12.7 (12-15) y; 253 (63%) female; 149 (37%) African Americanc; 56 (14%) Asian/Pacific Islander American; 64 (16%) mixed race; 36 (9%) white; 8 (2%) Latino; 12 (3%) other races/identities; 32 (8%) African immigrants; 20 (5%) Asian immigrants; 12 (3%) Latino immigrants; 8 (2%) immigrants of mixed backgrounds or from various backgrounds; 88 (22%) had vaginal sex 8 (2 h) In-person sessions in a community center and 1 (2 h) booster session Intervention adapted from program that was developed for African American youths; intervention was adapted using focus groups with young people from the target audience; as a result, some new topics were added and old topics dropped; the program aimed to be inclusive of diverse family types; facilitators were recruited from the community PMT Abstinence; condom; intentions; self-efficacy
Murry et al,68 2011 African American 11-y-old children residing in rural counties in Georgia (N = 332); mean age (range), 11.2 (11) y; 178 (54%) female 7 (2 h) In-person sessions in a community center—first hour of sessions just for teens and second hour for both teens and parents Program developed for rural African American families with diverse family structures using focus groups with African American community members; program targeted enhancement of family protective processes, such as adaptive racial socialization strategies and adaptive behaviors to use when encountering racism; all facilitators were African American and videos featured a famous African American actor SLT, PBT, CFT Abstinence; condom
Peskin et al,46 2015 Eighth graders from schools in a large, urban school district in southeast Texas (N = 1374); mean age, 14.3 y; 811 (59%) female; 238 (17%) African Americanc; 1012 (74%) Hispanic; 124 (9%) other race/ethnicity; 275 (20%) had vaginal, oral, or anal sex 13 (35-45 min) School-based, computer lessons No tailoring reported SCT, LSP Abstinence; condom; sex partners; intentions; knowledge; self-efficacy
Roye et al,69 2007 Black and Latina teenage women (N = 400); mean age (range), 18 (15-21) y; 180 (45%) blackc; 220 (55%) Latina; 400 (100%) had vaginal sex 1 (15-20 min) In-person clinic-based session; 2 videos (21 min total) Program informed by qualitative and quantitative studies with black and Latino teens from a similar neighborhood; 3 focus groups of minority adolescents informed final video editing so it reflected learning needs of the target population; the videos included HIV-infected Black and Latino youths SCT, TRA, HBM Condom
Shepherd et al,70 2017 African American adolescents in the southern US (N = 612); mean age (range), 12.9 (12-14) y; 309/612 (51%) female; 153 (25%) were sexually experienced 8 (90 min) In-person, school-based sessions Program designed to reduce risky sexual behaviors and improve safe-sex skills among African American adolescents with components such as AIDS and African Americans and Wrap-up—African proverb TPB Abstinence; condom; self-efficacy
St Lawrence et al,71 1995 African American adolescents (N = 246); mean age (range), 15.3 (14-18) y; 177 (72%) female 8 (90-120 min) In-person, clinic-based sessions No tailoring reported IMB, SLT Abstinence; condom; sex partners; knowledge; self-efficacy
Stanton et al,72 2004 African American youths from low-income, urban community sites (N = 817); median age (range), 14 (13-16) y; 472 (58%) female 8 (1.5 h) In-person sessions in a community center with homework and 4 (90 min) booster sessions for teens; 1 (20 min) video for parents No tailoring reported SCT, PMT Abstinence; condom; pregnancy
Sznitman et al,24 2011 African American adolescents in 2 northeastern and 2 southeastern mid-sized US cities (N = 1383); mean age (range), 15.2 (14-17) y; 791 (57%) female Media campaign (15 mo), including 3 (30 s) television advertisements and 8 (60 s) radio advertisements; a mean of 3 TV and 3 radio advertisements played per month Formative research included semistructured interviews with low-income African American adolescents in the cities where the intervention took place to create a culturally sensitive communication program and an adult community advisory board to make suggestions about media content; advertisements placed on channels and during programming hours that were popular among African American adolescents and all radio and television advertisements featured hip hop music and African American adolescent actors Not reported Condom; sex partners; STI; intentions; self-efficacy
Wechsberg et al,73 2017 Sexually active, substance-using African American females (N = 237); mean age (range), 17.6 (16-19) y; 237 (100%) had vaginal intercourse 3 Individual sessions, 1 group session, and 1-on-1 time with interventionist after sessions; all activities in-person and in a community center Used teen advisory board, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, pretesting and posttesting, community advisory board, and an expert panel to modify program content, format, and delivery; intervention tailored to experiences of female African American teens; program included brief stories from young African American women ETF, AAFT Condom; sex partners

Abbreviations: AAFT, African American feminist theory; BIM, behavioral-intentions model; CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; CFT, circular functioning theory; COM, community-other-mothers model; DAT, differential association theory; ETF, empowerment theoretical framework; HBM, health belief model; IMB, informational needs, motivational influences and behavior risk reduction model; LSP, life skills paradigm; PBT, problem behavior theory; PMT, protection motivation theory; PST, possible-selves theory; SCRT, social control theory; SCT, social cognitive theory; SDM, social development model; SEM, self-efficacy mechanism; SIM, social inoculation model; SLT, social learning theory; SRM, self-regulation model; STI, sexually transmitted infection; TGP, theory of gender and power; TGSTM, theory of goal setting and task motivation; TPB, theory of planned behavior; TRA, theory of reasoned action.

a

Basic demographic information for adolescents (ie, sex, age, race, percentage sexually active, and geographic location) is reported for all studies that included this information.

b

Outcomes are those reported by authors and synthesized in this meta-analysis: abstinence, abstinence/delayed sexual activity; condom, condom use; intentions, intentions to be abstinent/practice safer sex; knowledge, sexual health knowledge; pregnancy, incidence of pregnancy; self-efficacy, sexual health self-efficacy; sex partners, number of sexual intercourse partners; STI; and STI contraction.

c

Outcomes for subsample that included only black participants were used in all analyses in which this study was included.

Eighteen studies20,23,24,25,26,27,54,55,56,57,62,63,65,67,68,69,70,73 evaluated interventions with cultural tailoring. Twelve studies24,25,27,54,55,56,62,63,67,68,69,73 described using community-based participatory research methods to develop or adapt the programs. In addition, 9 programs included components aimed at promoting racial socialization (ie, messages about what it means to be black in today’s society).74 Only 1 program focused on abstinence only, whereas 27 programs were comprehensive. Intervention dose varied across studies, with 5 studies24,54,61,65,69 including less than 3 hours of training and 4 studies20,57,58,66 with more than 20 hours. Five studies54,61,65,69,71 specified that all participants received the full dose. Interventions were primarily delivered in schools (9 studies), community centers (11), or clinics (6). Many programs included partner sexual communication skills training (18) and condom use skills training (18). Eight programs included parents in intervention activities.

Risk of Bias

Risk of bias was calculated for each primary study (eTable 2 in the Supplement). Most studies (26 [90%]) had low risk of bias for random sequence generation, and 19 (67%) had low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data. However, risk of bias pertaining to selective reporting was unclear for many studies.21,22,23,24,26,27,54,55,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73

Behavioral Outcomes

Abstinence

Individual study effect sizes (Cohen d) for abstinence ranged from −0.48 (95% CI, −1.77 to 0.81) to 0.71 (95% CI, −0.02 to 1.44), with an overall weighted mean effect size across studies of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.05-0.24; P = .004), which indicated that sexual health interventions had a statistically significant association with abstinence among black adolescents (Figure 1 and Table 2). There would have to be 60 additional studies that were not statistically significant for the combined P value to exceed .05 (fail-safe N = 60).

Figure 1. Forest Plot for Abstinence Outcome.

Figure 1.

Forest plot displaying effect sizes and 95% CIs for abstinence. Positive effect sizes indicate that sexual activity was reduced in intervention participants compared with control individuals. Error bars indicate 95% CIs; diamond, overall effect size.

Table 2. Weighted Mean Effect Sizes of Sexual Health Interventions for Sexual Health Outcomes in Black Adolescentsa.
Outcome Studies, No. Cohen d (95% CI) P value
Behavioral outcomes
Abstinence 22 0.14 (0.05 to 0.24) .004
Condom use 26 0.25 (0.11 to 0.39) <.001
Number of sex partners 10 −0.06 (−0.25 to 0.13) .54
Biological outcomes
Pregnancy 4 −0.16 (−0.41 to 0.09) .20
STI contraction 4 −0.07 (−0.43 to 0.30) .73
Psychological outcomes
Sexual health intentions 14 0.17 (0.05 to 0.30) .007
Sexual health knowledge 11 0.46 (0.30 to 0.63) <.001
Sexual health self-efficacy 15 0.19 (0.09 to 0.28) <.001

Abbreviation: STI, sexually transmitted infection.

a

Higher values indicate the sexual health intervention group had improved outcomes compared with the control group for abstinence, condom use, sexual health intentions, sexual health knowledge, and sexual health self-efficacy. Lower values indicate that the sexual health intervention group had improved outcomes compared with the control group for number of sex partners, pregnancy, and STI contraction.

There was significant heterogeneity among studies for the abstinence outcome (Q = 34.90, df = 21, P = .03, I2 = 39.83); thus, we examined moderators of intervention success (Table 3 and eTable 3 in the Supplement). Intervention setting and study publication year moderated the association between sexual health interventions and abstinence. School-based interventions (Cohen d = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.39; P = .001) had a stronger association with improvements in abstinence than interventions in community centers (Cohen d = 0.04; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.16; P = .47). In addition, interventions reported in older studies had stronger associations with improvements in abstinence than interventions in studies published more recently (coefficient = −0.01; 95% CI, −0.03 to −0.001; P = .03).

Table 3. Weighted Mean Effect Sizes of Intervention for Abstinence and Condom Use .
Variable Abstinence Condom use
Studies, No. Cohen d (95% CI) P value Between groups Studies, No. Cohen d (95% CI) P value Between groups
Qb P value Qb P value
Sex
Female only 5 0.21 (−0.05 to 0.47) .12 0.38 .83 8 0.22 (−0.03 to 0.47) .08 2.31 .31
Male only 4 0.17 (−0.07 to 0.41) .17 3 0.57 (0.13 to 1.00) .01
Mixed 13 0.12 (−0.002 to 0.25) .05 15 0.21 (0.02 to 0.39) .03
Cultural tailoringa
Tailored 10 0.18 (0.02 to 0.35) .03 .34 .56 16 0.22 (0.04 to 0.39) .01 0.36 .55
Not tailored 12 0.12 (−0.003 to 0.25) .06 10 0.31 (0.07 to 0.54) .01
Racial socialization componentb
Included 5 0.15 (−0.07 to 0.37) .19 .004 .95 9 0.25 (0.01 to 0.48) .04 0.001 .97
Not included 17 0.14 (0.03 to 0.25) .01 17 0.25 (0.08 to 0.42) .004
Intervention completionc
Completed full intervention 2 0.29 (−0.11 to 0.69) .16 0.44 .51 5 0.33 (0.02 to 0.65) .04 0.34 .56
Did not complete full intervention 10 0.15 (0.02 to 0.27) .02 13 0.23 (0.04 to 0.41) .02
Partner communication skills training
Included 13 0.12 (−0.01 to 0.24) .07 0.35 .55 16 0.20 (0.02 to 0.37) .03 0.36 .55
Not included 8 0.18 (−0.002 to 0.37) .05 8 0.29 (0.03 to 0.56) .03
Condom skills training
Included 13 0.13 (−0.01 to 0.26) .06 0.27 .60 17 0.18 (0.01 to 0.36) .04 0.98 .32
Not included 8 0.19 (0.004 to 0.37) .05 7 0.36 (0.06 to 0.66) .02
Parental involvement
Parents involved 7 0.09 (−0.07 to 0.24) .27 0.77 .38 6 0.24 (−0.07 to 0.55) .13 0.01 .94
Parents not involved 15 0.18 (0.05 to 0.30) .005 20 0.25 (0.10 to 0.41) .002
Intervention dose, h
≤10 7 0.26 (0.06 to 0.46) .01 3.13 .21 12 0.26 (0.06 to 0.46) .01 0.07 .97
11-20 10 0.06 (−0.06 to 0.19) .32 10 0.22 (−0.02 to 0.47) .07
>20 5 0.20 (0.01 to 0.38) .04 4 0.27 (−0.12 to 0.65) .17
Setting
School 10 0.25 (0.10 to 0.39) .001 4.81 .03 6 0.29 (0.03 to 0.55) .03 0.42 .81
Community center 10 0.04 (−0.07 to 0.16) .47 10 0.24 (0.03 to 0.44) .02
Clinic 0 NA NA 6 0.34 (0.11 to 0.57) .004

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

Studies that included a description of substantial intervention components developed or adapted specifically for black adolescents were considered tailored for the cultural tailoring moderator.

b

Studies that included a description of program components aimed at sending messages to black adolescents about the meaning of their race in the context of society were coded as included for the racial socialization component moderator.74

c

Studies in which all participants completed all program components were coded as all completed for the intervention dose completion moderator.

Condom Use

Individual study effect sizes (Cohen d) for condom use ranged from −0.27 (95% CI, −1.04 to 0.51) to 0.82 (95% CI, 0.29-1.35), with an overall weighted mean effect size across studies of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.11-0.39; P < .001), which was statistically significant (Figure 2). On average, sexual health interventions had a statistically significant association with condom use among black adolescents (Table 2). There would have to be 292 additional studies that were not statistically significant for the combined P value to exceed .05 (fail-safe N = 292).

Figure 2. Forest Plot for Condom Use Outcome.

Figure 2.

Forest plot displaying effect size and 95% CIs for condom use. Positive effect sizes indicate that condom use was increased in intervention participants compared with control individuals. Error bars indicate 95% CIs; diamond, overall effect size.

There was significant heterogeneity among studies for the condom use outcome (Q = 104.14, df = 25, P < .001, I2 = 75.99); thus, we examined moderators of intervention success (Table 3 and eTable 3 in the Supplement). Publication year moderated the association such that interventions reported in older studies had stronger associations with improvements in condom use than those reported in studies published recently (coefficient = −0.02; 95% CI, −0.04 to −0.01; P = .01). No other statistically significant moderators were identified.

Number of Sex Partners

The overall weighted mean effect size (Cohen d) for number of sex partners across studies was −0.06 (95% CI, −0.25 to 0.13; P = .54), which was not statistically significant (Table 2 and eFigure 2 in the Supplement).

Biological Outcomes

Only 4 studies55,57,60,72 assessed pregnancy as intervention outcomes, and only 4 studies24,27,55,56 assessed STI contraction. The overall weighted mean effect size across studies was not statistically significant for both pregnancy (Cohen d = −0.16; 95% CI, −0.41 to 0.09; P = .20) and STI contraction (Cohen d = −0.07; 95% CI, −0.43 to 0.30; P = 73) (Table 2 and eFigure 3 and eFigure 4 in the Supplement).

Psychological Outcomes

Sexual health interventions were associated with improvement in 3 psychological outcomes: sexual health intentions (Cohen d = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.30; P = .007), sexual health knowledge (Cohen d = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P < .001), and sexual health self-efficacy (Cohen d = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28; P < .001). Effect sizes ranged from small to moderate.

Discussion

This meta-analysis synthesized almost 30 years of research on the effectiveness of sexual health interventions among black adolescents in the US. Overall, results from 29 studies of 11 918 black adolescents showed that these programs have been successful. Sexual health interventions were significantly associated with improvements in abstinence, condom use, sexual health intentions, sexual health knowledge, and sexual health self-efficacy. With rates of HIV infection, other STIs, and unplanned pregnancy especially high among black adolescents,1,2 there is an urgent need to address factors that may lead to improvements in sexual decision-making among this group. This meta-analysis shows that sexual health interventions are an important part of the solution to this health crisis because these programs can promote healthy sexual behavior and psychological outcomes among black adolescents. These findings were consistent across factors such as participant sex, age, and intervention dose.

We found that sexual health interventions for black adolescents were associated with improvements in sexual health intentions, sexual health knowledge, and sexual health self-efficacy, which are psychological outcomes associated with positive behavior change.37,38,75 Most of the studies26,27,55,56,61 that we included assessed behavior change after only 12 months (at most), at which point many adolescents may not have become sexually active, making behavior change in sexual situations more difficult to detect. However, if this association of interventions with psychological outcomes persists, it is expected based on health behavior theory that when adolescents start to become sexually active, this association may lead to healthier sexual decision-making.38

No significant association was found between sexual health interventions and pregnancy or STI contraction among black adolescents. However, with only 4 studies55,57,60,72 reporting on pregnancy as an outcome and only 4 studies24,27,55,56 reporting on STI contraction, caution is warranted in interpreting this finding. Although it is time and resource intensive to collect information on biological outcomes, such as pregnancy, HIV infection, and other STIs, additional work is needed to determine whether current intervention strategies are effective at preventing these outcomes.34,76 After more studies evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on biological outcomes, another meta-analysis will be warranted to evaluate the long-term success of primary prevention sexual health programs.

Significant variability was found in the association between sexual health interventions and adolescent abstinence and condom use. Two significant moderators were identified: intervention setting and study publication year. Programs delivered in schools had a stronger association with abstinence than those delivered in community centers. Adolescents spend most of their waking hours at school77; thus, school-based sexual health education programs can reach a large number of teens. Only 24 states require sex education to be taught in schools despite 96% of parents in the US supporting school-based sex education.78,79 Implementing evidence-based (eg, comprehensive) sexual health programming in more schools may promote abstinence and be associated with reduced racial disparities in sexual health outcomes.80

Interventions reported in older studies had a stronger association with improvements in condom use among black adolescents than those published in more recent years. It is possible that over time adolescents have become more likely to use forms of contraception other than condoms, particularly intrauterine devices, as their primary form of birth control.81,82 Alternate methods (eg, intrauterine devices, birth control pills, and injectables) have become more accessible and cost-effective within the past decade.83 Hormonal birth control use is effective at preventing pregnancy but associated with decreased condom use84,85—a behavior pattern that is problematic because hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine devices do not protect against HIV infection and other STIs.86 This finding suggests that future interventions should incorporate components aimed at increasing dual contraception use to prevent pregnancy as well as contraction of HIV infection and other STIs. In addition, future studies should consider evaluating the effect of hormonal contraceptive use on adolescents’ change in condom use in response to sexual health programming.

Limitations

This study has limitations. First, there was variability across studies in the measures used to evaluate sexual health outcomes. For example, in evaluating condom use, some studies55,56 asked about condom use exclusively during vaginal intercourse, whereas others24,55 asked about condom use during vaginal, oral, and anal sex. In addition, the time frame on which participants were asked to report varied. For example, in evaluating abstinence, some studies21,22 asked participants about lifetime sexual activity, whereas others26,58 asked whether participants had become sexually active after their participation in the intervention. Standardization of the methods used to assess adolescent sexual health outcomes may lead to more meaningful syntheses of research in the future.

Second, we hoped to more thoroughly report and analyze the participant characteristics that could influence intervention effectiveness. However, inconsistent and brief reporting of participant characteristics (eg, socioeconomic status and sexual orientation) across studies made this difficult. In addition, many of the studies87,88 that we reviewed for inclusion reported race with large “other” categories with no explanation of who was included in this group; thus, the racial composition of samples was difficult to determine. We encourage researchers to use online supplemental materials or spaces such as the open science framework or ClinicalTrials.gov to provide additional detail about their study design and participants. This approach would assist with data reproducibility and ensure thorough and high-quality synthesis of study characteristics and findings in future meta-analyses.

Third, many of the sexual health programs evaluated in this study demand adolescents’ time and resources; thus, only 5 of 29 evaluations reported that all adolescents received the full program dose. Emerging literature on intervention science highlights the importance of evaluating the appropriateness and feasibility of health programming to maximize the sustained success of evidence-based interventions.89 Although some studies included in this review evaluated fidelity,23,55,56,63 participant satisfaction,55,56,62,63,71 session attendance,21,46,67,90 and/or attrition,23,25,27,55,63,90 more comprehensive intervention evaluations are needed to understand why black adolescents may not receive the full program dose. We believe that researchers developing or implementing sexual health interventions for black adolescents should reduce barriers to activity or session attendance.

Fourth, technology-based interventions may aid in improving the accessibility and fidelity of sexual health programming.91,92,93 However, almost all of the interventions included in this meta-analysis were delivered primarily in person, with only 3 reaching adolescents through computer-based programming.46,61,65 This finding highlights an important avenue for future program development. If technology-based programs are developed, adolescents may be able to complete effective sexual health interventions on demand and at their convenience.

Fifth, although risk factors that affect health in black populations exist at all levels of the socioecological model,8,94 most interventions identified in this meta-analysis focused on affecting adolescent sexual health at the individual level. Individual-level variables (ie, knowledge, self-efficacy, and intentions) are important to the promotion of safer sexual decision-making; however, interpersonal,95 community-level,12,13,15 institutional,10,11 and structural9 barriers to the sexual health of black adolescents must also be addressed. Some studies had components aimed at increasing parental communication25,72 and challenging cultural narratives,24 which may be especially helpful.96 A few of the interventions in this meta-analysis were conducted with adolescents attending a clinic,54,55,56,61,69,71 and 2 programs provided short-term sexual health services (eg, an STI test)27,56; however, none of the interventions that we identified evaluated a component that facilitated adolescent access to long-term sexual health care services (eg, birth control counseling and regular STI testing). Programs that connect black adolescents to accessible sexual health services appear to be needed.

Conclusions

Results from this meta-analysis suggest that sexual health interventions are associated with increases in abstinence and condom use and improved sexual health knowledge, self-efficacy, and intentions. More thorough reporting of participant characteristics and details regarding intervention design and implementation may facilitate future research synthesis. These findings may inform important future directions for researchers, practitioners, and community members invested in improving the sexual health and well-being of black adolescents.

Supplement.

eTable 1. Definition and Example Variables from Primary Studies for each Behavioral, Biological, and Psychological Outcome

eTable 2. Risk of Bias Assessment

eTable 3. Meta-regression to Test Continuous Moderators of Association between Interventions and Abstinence and Condom Use

eFigure 1. Study Flow Diagram

eFigure 2. Forest Plot for Number of Sex Partners Outcome

eFigure 3. Forest Plot for Pregnancy Outcome

eFigure 4. Forest Plot for STI Contraction Outcome

References

  • 1.US Department of Health and Human Services Trends in Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing 2016. Accessed May 15, 2019. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/adolescent-development/reproductive-health-and-teen-pregnancy/teen-pregnancy-and-childbearing/trends/index.html
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STDs in Racial and Ethnic Minorities 2018. Accessed May 15, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/minorities.htm
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention About Teen Pregnancy 2017. Accessed May 15, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/about/index.htm
  • 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Evidence Summary: Prevent Unintended Pregnancy 2015. Accessed May 15, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/sixeighteen/docs/6-18-evidence-summary-pregnancy.pdf
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Information for Teens: Staying Healthy and Preventing STDs 2017. Accessed May 15, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-populations/YouthandSTDs-Dec-2017.pdf
  • 6.Gause NK, Brown JL, Welge J, Northern N. Meta-analyses of HIV prevention interventions targeting improved partner communication: effects on partner communication and condom use frequency outcomes. J Behav Med. 2018;41(4):423-440. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9916-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goodman M, Onwumere O, Milam L, Peipert JF. Reducing health disparities by removing cost, access, and knowledge barriers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):382.e1-382.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory In: Brofenbrenner U, ed. Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Sage Publications Ltd; 1995:106-173. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaiser Family Foundation Poverty Rate by Race/Ethnicity 2017. Accessed June 22, 2019. https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?currentTimeframe=0&selectedDistributions=white%E2%80%93black&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D
  • 10.Lanier Y, Sommers MS, Fletcher J, Sutton MY, Roberts DD. Examining racial discrimination frequency, racial discrimination stress, and psychological well-being among Black early adolescents. J Black Psychol. 2017;43(3):219-229. doi: 10.1177/0095798416638189 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jackson JS, Caldwell CH, Antonucci TC, Oyserman DR. National Survey of American Life–Adolescent Supplement (NSAL-A), 2001-2004. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leech TGJ, Irby-Shasanmi A, Mitchell AL. “Are you accepting new patients?” a pilot field experiment on telephone-based gatekeeping and Black patients’ access to pediatric care. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(suppl 1):234-242. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parekh N, Jarlenski M, Kelley D. Disparities in access to primary care and emergency department utilization in a large Medicaid program. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2018;11(4):1-13.32494510 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Adams SH, Park MJ, Twietmeyer L, Brindis CD, Irwin CE Jr. Association between adolescent preventive care and the role of the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(1):43-48. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haider S, Stoffel C, Donenberg G, Geller S. Reproductive health disparities: a focus on family planning and prevention among minority women and adolescents. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013;2(5):94-99. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):e60-e76. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Benner AD, Wang Y, Shen Y, Boyle AE, Polk R, Cheng YP. Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: a meta-analytic review. Am Psychol. 2018;73(7):855-883. doi: 10.1037/amp0000204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Crichton J, Hickman M, Campbell R, Batista-Ferrer H, Macleod J. Socioeconomic factors and other sources of variation in the prevalence of genital chlamydia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2069-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Penman-Aguilar A, Carter M, Snead MC, Kourtis AP. Socioeconomic disadvantage as a social determinant of teen childbearing in the U.S. Public Health Rep. 2013;128(suppl 1):5-22. doi: 10.1177/00333549131282S102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Markham CM, Tortolero SR, Peskin MF, et al. Sexual risk avoidance and sexual risk reduction interventions for middle school youth: a randomized controlled trial. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(3):279-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.07.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.DiIorio C, McCarty F, Resnicow K, Lehr S, Denzmore P. REAL men: a group-randomized trial of an HIV prevention intervention for adolescent boys. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1084-1089. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.073411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dilorio C, Resnicow K, McCarty F, et al. Keepin’ it R.E.A.L.!: results of a mother-adolescent HIV prevention program. Nurs Res. 2006;55(1):43-51. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200601000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kogan SM, Yu T, Brody GH, et al. Integrating condom skills into family-centered prevention: efficacy of the Strong African American Families-Teen program. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(2):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sznitman S, Stanton BF, Vanable PA, et al. Long term effects of community-based STI screening and mass media HIV prevention messages on sexual risk behaviors of African American adolescents. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(8):1755-1763. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9946-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dancy BL, Crittenden KS, Talashek ML. Mothers’ effectiveness as HIV risk reduction educators for adolescent daughters. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17(1):218-239. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2006.0012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clark LF, Miller KS, Nagy SS, et al. Adult identity mentoring: reducing sexual risk for African-American seventh grade students. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(4):337. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.DiClemente RJ, Davis TL, Swartzendruber A, et al. Efficacy of an HIV/STI sexual risk-reduction intervention for African American adolescent girls in juvenile detention centers: a randomized controlled trial. Women Health. 2014;54(8):726-749. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2014.932893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harris LW, Cheney MK. Positive youth development interventions impacting the sexual health of young minority adolescents: a systematic review. J Early Adolesc. 2018;38(1):74-117. doi: 10.1177/0272431615578693 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lauricella M, Valdez JK, Okamoto SK, Helm S, Zaremba C. Culturally grounded prevention for minority youth populations: a systematic review of the literature. J Prim Prev. 2016;37(1):11-32. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0414-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee YM, Cintron A, Kocher S. Factors related to risky sexual behaviors and effective STI/HIV and pregnancy intervention programs for African American adolescents. Public Health Nurs. 2014;31(5):414-427. doi: 10.1111/phn.12128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maness SB, Buhi ER. A systematic review of pregnancy prevention programs for minority youth in the US: a critical analysis and recommendations for improvement. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2013;6(2):91-106. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mon Kyaw Soe N, Bird Y, Schwandt M, Moraros J. STI health disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of preventive interventions in educational settings. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):E2819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mirzazadeh A, Biggs MA, Viitanen A, et al. Do school-based programs prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in adolescents? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Sci. 2018;19(4):490-506. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0830-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Morales A, Espada JP, Orgilés M, Escribano S, Johnson BT, Lightfoot M. Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: a meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jones J, Salazar LF, Crosby R. Contextual factors and sexual risk behaviors among young, black men. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(3):508-517. doi: 10.1177/1557988315617525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention How You Can Prevent Sexually Transmitted Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/std/prevention/default.htm.
  • 37.Bandura A. Social cognitive theory In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Sage Publishing; 2011:349-373. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Taylor & Francis; 2011. doi: 10.4324/9780203838020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.US Census Bureau Race. 2018. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html
  • 40.Cardoza VJ, Documét PI, Fryer CS, Gold MA, Butler J III. Sexual health behavior interventions for U.S. Latino adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(2):136-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee YM, Dancy B, Florez E, Holm K. Factors related to sexual practices and successful sexually transmitted infection/HIV intervention programs for Latino adolescents. Public Health Nurs. 2013;30(5):390-401. doi: 10.1111/phn.12039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Metzger I, Cooper SM, Zarrett N, Flory K. Culturally sensitive risk behavior prevention programs for African American adolescents: a systematic analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013;16(2):187-212. doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0133-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sutton MY, Lasswell SM, Lanier Y, Miller KS. Impact of parent-child communication interventions on sex behaviors and cognitive outcomes for black/African-American and Hispanic/Latino youth: a systematic review, 1988-2012. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(4):369-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thurman AR, Holden AE, Shain RN, Perdue S, Piper JM. Preventing recurrent sexually transmitted diseases in minority adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1417-1425. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318177143a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Smith PB, Weinman ML, Parrilli J. The role of condom motivation education in the reduction of new and reinfection rates of sexually transmitted diseases among inner-city female adolescents. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;31(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01009-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Peskin MF, Shegog R, Markham CM, et al. Efficacy of It’s Your Game-Tech: a computer-based sexual health education program for middle school youth. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(5):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stanton BF, Li X, Ricardo I, Galbraith J, Feigelman S, Kaljee L. A randomized, controlled effectiveness trial of an AIDS prevention program for low-income African-American youths. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(4):363-372. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170290029004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sznitman S, Vanable PA, Carey MP, et al. Using culturally sensitive media messages to reduce HIV-associated sexual behavior in high-risk African American adolescents: results from a randomized trial. J Adolesc Health. 2011;49(3):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. ; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group . The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155-159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2009. doi: 10.1002/9780470743386 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. 2018. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://campbellcollaboration.org/escalc/html/EffectSizeCalculator-SMD-main.php
  • 53.Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical Meta-analysis. Sage; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DeLamater J, Wagstaff DA, Havens KK. The impact of a culturally appropriate STD/AIDS education intervention on black male adolescents’ sexual and condom use behavior. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(4):454-470. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Harrington KF, et al. Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292(2):171-179. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Rose ES, et al. Efficacy of sexually transmitted disease/human immunodeficiency virus sexual risk-reduction intervention for African American adolescent females seeking sexual health services: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(12):1112-1121. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dixon AC, Schoonmaker CT, Philliber WW. A journey toward womanhood: effects of an Afrocentric approach to pregnancy prevention among African-American adolescent females. Adolescence. 2000;35(139):425-429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fang X, Stanton B, Li X, Feigelman S, Baldwin R. Similarities in sexual activity and condom use among friends within groups before and after a risk-reduction intervention. Youth Soc. 1998;29(4):431-450. doi: 10.1177/0044118X98029004002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Haggerty KP, Skinner ML, MacKenzie EP, Catalano RF. A randomized trial of Parents Who Care: effects on key outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Prev Sci. 2007;8(4):249-260. doi: 10.1007/s11121-007-0077-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Howard M, McCabe JB. Helping teenagers postpone sexual involvement. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990;22(1):21-26. doi: 10.2307/2135434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Howard MN, Davis JA, Mitchell ME. Improving low-income teen health behaviors with internet-linked clinic interventions. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2011;8(1):50-57. doi: 10.1007/s13178-011-0037-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jemmott JB III, Jemmott LS, Fong GT. Reductions in HIV risk-associated sexual behaviors among black male adolescents: effects of an AIDS prevention intervention. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(3):372-377. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.82.3.372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jemmott JB III, Jemmott LS, Fong GT. Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1529-1536. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jemmott JB III, Jemmott LS, Fong GT. Efficacy of a theory-based abstinence-only intervention over 24 months: a randomized controlled trial with young adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(2):152-159. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Klein CH, Card JJ. Preliminary efficacy of a computer-delivered HIV prevention intervention for African American teenage females. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011;23(6):564-576. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2011.23.6.564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li X, Stanton B, Feigelman S, Galbraith J. Unprotected sex among African-American adolescents: a three-year study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(9):789-796. doi. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Morrison DM, Hoppe MJ, Wells EA, et al. Replicating a teen HIV/STD preventive intervention in a multicultural city. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007;19(3):258-273. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.3.258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Murry VM, Berkel C, Chen YF, Brody GH, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Intervention induced changes on parenting practices, youth self-pride and sexual norms to reduce HIV-related behaviors among rural African American youths. J Youth Adolesc. 2011;40(9):1147-1163. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9642-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Roye C, Perlmutter Silverman P, Krauss B. A brief, low-cost, theory-based intervention to promote dual method use by black and Latina female adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(4):608-621. doi: 10.1177/1090198105284840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shepherd LM, Sly KF, Girard JM. Comparison of comprehensive and abstinence-only sexuality education in young African American adolescents. J Adolesc. 2017;61:50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.St Lawrence JS, Brasfield TL, Jefferson KW, Alleyne E, O’Bannon RE III, Shirley A. Cognitive-behavioral intervention to reduce African American adolescents’ risk for HIV infection. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63(2):221-237. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Stanton B, Cole M, Galbraith J, et al. Randomized trial of a parent intervention: parents can make a difference in long-term adolescent risk behaviors, perceptions, and knowledge. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(10):947-955. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.10.947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wechsberg WM, Browne FA, Zule WA, et al. Efficacy of the Young Women’s CoOp: an HIV risk-reduction intervention for substance-using African-American female adolescents in the South. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2017;26(3):205-218. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2016.1260511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hughes D, Rodriguez J, Smith EP, Johnson DJ, Stevenson HC, Spicer P. Parents’ ethnic-racial socialization practices: a review of research and directions for future study. Dev Psychol. 2006;42(5):747-770. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, et al. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2016;35(11):1178-1188. doi: 10.1037/hea0000387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Juras R, Tanner-Smith E, Kelsey M, Lipsey M, Layzer J. Adolescent pregnancy prevention: meta-analysis of federally funded program evaluations. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(4):e1-e8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Office of Adolescent Health A Day in the Life. 2018. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/facts-and-stats/day-in-the-life/index.html
  • 78.Guttmacher Institute Sex and HIV Education. 2019. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/sex-and-hiv-education
  • 79.Planned Parenthood. Parents and Teens Talk About Sexuality: A National Survey. 2014. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/2914/1322/5667/NationalPoll_09-14_V2_1.pdf
  • 80.Hall KS, McDermott Sales J, Komro KA, Santelli J. The state of sex education in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(6):595-597. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lindberg LD, Santelli JS, Desai S. Changing patterns of contraceptive use and the decline in rates of pregnancy and birth among U.S. adolescents, 2007-2014. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63(2):253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ross J, Stover J. Use of modern contraception increases when more methods become available: analysis of evidence from 1982-2009. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):203-212. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Becker NV, Polsky D. Women saw large decrease in out-of-pocket spending for contraceptives after ACA mandate removed cost sharing. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(7):1204-1211. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Steiner RJ, Liddon N, Swartzendruber AL, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception and condom use among female US high school students: implications for sexually transmitted infection prevention. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(5):428-434. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Brown JL, Hennessy M, Sales JM, et al. Multiple method contraception use among African American adolescents in four US cities. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:765917. doi: 10.1155/2011/765917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Reproductive Health: Contraception 2018. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/contraception/index.htm
  • 87.Causey K, Zuniga M, Bailer B, Ring L, Gil-Trejo L. Using theater arts to engage Latino families in dialogue about adolescent sexual health: the PATH -AT program. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(1):347-357. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Calderon Y, Cowan E, Leu CS, et al. A human immunodeficiency virus posttest video to increase condom use among adolescent emergency department patients. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jemmott JB III, Jemmott LS, Fong GT, Morales KH. Effectiveness of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for adolescents when implemented by community-based organizations: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(4):720-726. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Allison S, Bauermeister JA, Bull S, et al. The intersection of youth, technology, and new media with sexual health: moving the research agenda forward. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(3):207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE, Bauermeister J, Zhang C, LeGrand S. Youth, technology, and HIV: Recent advances and future directions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(4):500-515. doi: 10.1007/s11904-015-0280-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rapoff MA. E-health interventions in pediatrics. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2013;1(4):309-313. doi: 10.1037/cpp0000038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lightfoot MA, Milburn NG. HIV prevention and African American youth: examination of individual-level behaviour is not the only answer. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11(7):731-742. doi: 10.1080/13691050903078824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.van de Bongardt D, Reitz E, Sandfort T, Deković M. A meta-analysis of the relations between three types of peer norms and adolescent sexual behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015;19(3):203-234. doi: 10.1177/1088868314544223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Svanemyr J, Amin A, Robles OJ, Greene ME. Creating an enabling environment for adolescent sexual and reproductive health: a framework and promising approaches. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1)(suppl):S7-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eTable 1. Definition and Example Variables from Primary Studies for each Behavioral, Biological, and Psychological Outcome

eTable 2. Risk of Bias Assessment

eTable 3. Meta-regression to Test Continuous Moderators of Association between Interventions and Abstinence and Condom Use

eFigure 1. Study Flow Diagram

eFigure 2. Forest Plot for Number of Sex Partners Outcome

eFigure 3. Forest Plot for Pregnancy Outcome

eFigure 4. Forest Plot for STI Contraction Outcome


Articles from JAMA Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES