Abstract
A study of broiler litter re-utilization potential was conducted with the goal of determining if storage of litter significantly reduced potential pathogens to levels safe for re-utilization. Litter from four broiler houses was separated into a fine fraction for fertilizer use and a coarse fraction for use as a supplement to wood shavings in growing subsequent flocks of birds. Fractions and whole litter were stored in indoor piles for four months with periodic analysis for culturable pathogenic and indicator bacteria. Significant reductions in microbial concentrations occurred in a majority of samples tested during four months of storage (in most cases to below detection limits of approximately 30 CFU/g dry weight). Poultry feed was found to be one possible source of litter contamination.
Key words: Bacteria, fractionation, indicators, letter, pathogens, poultry, storage
Footnotes
Primary Audience: Researchers, Broiler Producers, USDA Personnel
References and Notes
- 1.Merka, William C., Poultry Extension, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. Personal communication.
- 2.Srivastava S.K., Singh V., Singh N. Bacterial flora of poultry environment. Indian J. Microbiol. 1972;12(1):7–9. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Montrose M.S., Shane S., Harrington K. Role of litter in the transmission of Campylobacter jejuni. Avian Dis. 1985;29(2):392–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ogonowski K., Barnard M., ***Giesecke W. Bacteriological findings regarding the hygienic safety of poultry litter intended as an ingredient of feeds for ruminants. Onderspoort J. Vet. Res. 1984;51:249–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dijkstra, R.G., 1979. Listeria monocytogenes in intestinal contents and faeces from healthy broilers of different ages and its potential danger for other animals. Pages 289–294 in: Problems of Listeriosis - Proc. of the Seventh International Symposium, Varna, 1977. National Agroindustrial Union Center for Scientific Information, Sofia, Bulgaria.
- 6.Schefferle H.E. The microbiology of built up poultry litter. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1965;28(3):403–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1965.tb02170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Collins M.S., Gough R., Alexander D., Parsons D. Virus-like particles associated with a “wet litter” problem in chickens. Veterinary-Record. 1989;124(24):641. doi: 10.1136/vr.124.24.641-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kouwenhoven B., Vertommen M., Goren E. Investigations into the role of reovirus in the malabsorption syndrome. Avian Path. 1988;17(4):879–892. doi: 10.1080/03079458808436510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kang S.Y., Nagaraja K., Newman J. Electropherotypic analysis of rotaviruses isolated from turkeys. Avian Dis. 1986;30(4):794–801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meulemans G., Schricke E. Isolation of adenovirus type 1 (FAV-1) from turkeys with rhinotracheitis. Bulletin-de-l'Academie-Veterinarire-de-France. 1986;59(2):149–157. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Witter R.L., Johnson D. Epidemiology of reticuloendotheliosis virus in broiler breeder flocks. Avian Dis. 1985;29(4):1140–1154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gough R.F. Duck hepatitis type 2 associated with an astrovirus. Acute Virus Infections of Poultry, Current Topics in Vet. Med. and Anim. Sci. 1986;37:223–230. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beard C.W., Brugh M., Johnson D. Laboratory studies with the Pennsylvania avian influenza viruses (H5N2) Proc. U.S. Animal Health Assn. 1984;88:462–473. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mukiibi-Muka G., Jones G., Kibenge F. Serological response and virus shedding of chickens inoculated with reovirus via different routes. Res. in Vet. Sci. 1984;37(2):227–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kelley, T.R., 1992. Characterization, fate and environmental risk assessment of microbial, elemental and toxic components of fractionated broiler litter during storage and reutilization. Doctoral dissertation. The Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
- 16.American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 17th Edition. APHA, American Water Works Assn., Water Pollution Control Fed.; Washington, D.C.: 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 17.MPN Methods. Dilutions of 1.0, 0.1, and 0.01 mL of litter homogenates were tested, except in the case of Salmonella spp., in which case dilutions of 10, 1.0, and 0.1 mL of litter homogenates were used. Sterile 9-mL blanks of appropriate enrichment media were prepared and appropriate transfers performed to achieve desired dilutions using sterile disposable pipettes. Transfers to confirmatory media by streaking were made using a flamed platinum-iridium loop. The standard method [16] used for enumeration of Salmonella spp. was modified by using pre-enrichment of 1.0% buffered-peptone-water [18] for 24 hr incubated at 37°C followed by selective enrichment in tetrathionate-BG broth containing 1:100,000 brilliant green dye, again incubated at 37°C for 24 hr [16]. Presumptive confirmation was made by streaking onto a variety of media including bismuth sulfite, brilliant green with and without the addition of novobiocin [19], XLBG [20], XLT4 [21] (all incubated at 37°C for 24 hr), and modified semisolid Rappaport–Vassiliadis medium [22], incubated at 42°C for 24 hr. A more sensitive delayed secondary enrichment method was also employed when no Salmonella spp. were found initially [23]. However, none of these methods isolated any Salmonella from litter samples in this study. Final confirmation, while rarely necessary and never positive, was made by streaking onto triple sugar iron (TSI) agar and lysine iron agar (LIA) slants at 37°C incubated for 24 hr. Campylobacter jejuniStaphylococcus aureus were enumerated according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 17th Edition [16]. C. jejuni was isolated and enumerated using Oosterom's enrichment medium and Butzler's agar confirmatory medium [16]. S. aureus was isolated and enumerated using Staphylococcus enrichment broth and Lipovitellin-salt-mannitol agar confirmatory medium [16]. L. monocytogenes was isolated and enumerated using Listeria enrichment broth and Oxford formulation confirmatory agar medium, according to the method of Varabioff [24].
- 18.Thomason B.M., Dodd D., Cherry W. Increased recovery of Salmonelle from environmental samples enriched with buffered peptone water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977;34(3):270–273. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.3.270-273.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tate C.R., Miller R.G. Modification of brilliant green agar by addition of novobiocin to increase selectivity for Salmonella. The Maryland Poultryman, Cooperative Extension Service, The University of Maryland; 1990. p. 7. April. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hussong D., Enkiri N., Burge W. Modified agar medium for detecting environmental Salmonellae by the most-probable-number method. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984;48(5):1026–1030. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.5.1026-1030.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Miller R.G., Tate C.R. The Maryland Poultryman. Cooperative Extension Service, The University of Maryland; 1990. XLT4: A highly selective plating medium for the isolation of Salmonella. pp. 2–7. April. [Google Scholar]
- 22.DeSmedt J.M., Bolderdijk R., Rappold H., Lautenschlarger D. Rapid Salmonella detection in foods by motility enrichment on a modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. J. Food Prot. 1986;49:510–514. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-49.7.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wattman W.D., Home A., Pirkle C., Dickson T. Use of delayed secondary enrichment for the isolation of Salmonella in poultry and poultry environments. Avian Dis. 1991;35:88–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Varabloff Y. Incidence and recovery of Listeria from chicken with a pre-enrichment technique. J. Food Prot. 1990;53(7):555–557. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-53.7.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Membrane Filtration Methods. Either 0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 mL of appropriate dilutions of litter homogenates made in sterile 99-mL blanks of 0.1% buffered peptone-water (BPW) were filtered. Sterile 1.0 or 10.0 mL plastic disposable pipettes or micropipette tips were used for transfers and discarded between samples and replicates of samples. Aseptic technique was observed throughout the procedures. The filter apparatus was sterilized by autoclaying and rinsed with sterile buffer between duplicate samples and when necessary to insure even distribution of the microorganisms on the filter. Clostridium perfringens isolation was attempted using the method of Bisson and Cabelli [26]. However, C. perfringens isolation proved unsuccessful using this method. The method in Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examiantion of Foods. Second Edition [27] was then used (which also proved unsuccessful in isolating C. perfringens). The methods for enumeration of Yersinia enterocolitica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa yeasts and molds, fecal coliforms, and Klebsiella spp. were taken from Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th Edition [16]. Aeromonas hydrophila was enumerated using the method of Rippey and Cabelli [28] utilizing mA agar, with confirmation on mannitol agar. Total coliforms were enumerated using the method of Freier and Hartman [29] with m-TMM medium and allowed the enumeration of E. coli through that species' unique expression of fluorescence on this medium.
- 26.Bisson J.W., Cabelli V.J. Membrane filter enumeration method for Clostridium perfringens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979;37(1):55–56. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.1.55-66.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.American Public Health Association . In: Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 2nd Edition. Speck M.C., editor. Amer. Public Health Assn.; Washington, DC: 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rippey S.R., Cabelli V.J. Membrane filter procedure for enumeration of Aeromonas hydrophila in fresh waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979;26(1):106–113. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.1.108-113.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Freier T.A., Hartman P. Improved membrane filtration media for enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli from sewage and surface waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987;53(6):5–9. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.6.1246-1250.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]