Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2020 Mar 2;8(4):1987–1994. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1486

The physicochemical properties of chitosan prepared by microwave heating

Jiaqi Cheng 1,2, Huaping Zhu 3, Jianlian Huang 4,5, Jianxin Zhao 1,2, Bowen Yan 1,2, Shenyan Ma 1,2, Hao Zhang 1,2, Daming Fan 1,2,4,✉
PMCID: PMC7174223  PMID: 32328265

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties of chitosan prepared by microwave and water bath heating with an equivalent quantity of heat intake. The structure and physicochemical properties of the chitosan obtained by these two methods were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X‐ray diffractometry (XRD), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The FTIR and XRD patterns show that there was no significant difference in the structure of chitosan produced by the two heat sources. The results showed that chitosan with 73.86% deacetylation was successfully prepared by microwave heating within 60 min, while a longer time of 180 min was required for the preparation of chitosan with the same deacetylation degree (74.47%) using the conventional heating method under the same heating rate. Even under the same temperature conditions, microwave technology can greatly reduce the reaction time by approximately 1/3, while the chitosan produced by microwaves can obtain relatively low molecular weight and viscosity. These results showed that microwaves may efficiently promote complete chemical reactions by the friction heating mechanism generated by molecular vibration beyond a rapid heating source, turning into a more efficient, energy‐saving, and environmentally friendly method for the further use of rigid shrimp shells and highly crystalline crustacean materials.

Keywords: chitosan, deacetylation degree, microwave, physicochemical properties, water bath

The physicochemical properties of chitosan prepared by microwave and water bath heating were compared with an equivalent quantity of heat intake. There was no significant difference in the structure of chitosan produced by the two heat sources. Microwave technology can greatly reduce the reaction time by approximately 1/3, while the chitosan produced by microwaves can obtain relatively low molecular weight and viscosity.

graphic file with name FSN3-8-1987-g010.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Chitin, an important natural polysaccharide, is the most abundant natural polymer in nature after cellulose (Younes & Rinaudo, 2015). It is usually found in the exoskeletons of arthropods or in the cell walls of fungi and yeast, and its main commercial source is shrimp and crab shells (Croisier & Jérôme, 2013). Chitin is covalently bound to protein in the form of proteoglycan in shrimp and crab shells, accompanied by layers of calcium carbonate, and the quality of chitin extracted from shrimp and crabs at different growth stages by the same method is quite different (Omari, Besaw, & Kerton, 2012). The heterogeneity of chitin caused by differences in raw materials is a hindrance for the application of chitin and its derivatives.

Chitosan is a derivative of chitin formed by deacetylation under alkaline conditions; when the degree of deacetylation (DD) of chitin is above 50%, it is called chitosan and can be dissolved in acidic aqueous solutions (Rinaudo, 2008). However, 100% deacetylation cannot be achieved; therefore, chitosan is a copolymer of N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine which exhibits outstanding biocompatibility, biodegradability, and adsorbability.

At present, different methods have been proposed to prepare chitosan from chitin, mainly by using a chemical process, highly concentrated sodium hydroxide solution at high temperature (Mohammed, Williams, & Tverezovskaya, 2013), or the enzymatic deacetylation method (Jaworska & Roberts, 2016; Liu et al., 2019). Ma, Xin, and Tan (2015) have attempted to repeatedly immerse chitin in alkali solution due to difficulty of obtaining a high DD in one round of high‐temperature lye treatment. However, this method is time‐consuming and prone to cause environmental pollution. Thus, physical means have been introduced to promote deacetylation, such as high pressure (He et al., 2016), ultrasound (Zhu et al., 2019), and microwave (MW) (Sebastian, Rouissi, Brar, Hegde, & Verma, 2019). Knidri, Dahmani, Addaou, Laajeb, and Lahsini (2019) found that chitin deacetylation by MW irradiation was more efficient than the customary heating method, and a high DD can be obtained by utilizing MW for a few minutes. The principle of MW heating is by producing an electromagnetic field that causes vibration within the molecules of a material (Abeykoon, Kelly, Brown, & Coates, 2016), and it offers increased reaction rates and shorter reaction times; therefore, a higher DD can be obtained in a shorter time by using the rapid heating rate. Previous researchers improved the extraction rate of chitosan by setting a certain MW power to obtain rapid heating, reducing the extraction time from hours to minutes (Alishahi et al., 2011; Mahardika, Jumnahdi, & Widyaningrum, 2019), but whether electromagnetic heating will affect the quality of chitosan, except for the difference in the heating rate, has not been studied.

This work proposed to compare the physicochemical properties of chitosan prepared from chitin with MW technology and traditional methods at the same heating rate to provide the equivalent heat quantity by fitting the traditional water bath (WB) heating curve and matching the corresponding MW program while comparing the efficiency of the two methods.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Materials

Commercial chitin and chitosan (80% degree of deacetylation) were purchased from TCI. Sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, glacial acetic acid, and ammonium acetate were purchased from Sinopharm Group Co. Ltd. All of the reagents used were of analytical grade, and ultrapure water was used for preparation of all solutions (electrical conductivity: 1.51 × 10–4 S/m).

2.2. Methods

In this study, the superiority of MW heating in the extraction of chitosan was determined by comparing the quality of the final products produced by the two methods, which were controlled at the same heating rates. Conventional heating was compared with MW heating in all processes.

2.2.1. Preparation of chitosan

The traditional deacetylation conversion of chitin to chitosan was performed using the method suggested by Sarhan et al. with slight modification (Sarhan, Ayad, Badawy, & Monier, 2009). The parameters employed were as follows: a suspension of 1 g chitin in 30 ml 50% sodium hydroxide at 90°C WB under constant stirring for 4 hr. During the 4‐hr deacetylation process, in order to study the physicochemical properties of samples at different reaction stages sampling started after 10 min. After deacetylation, the solid was filtered on a 240‐mesh sifter and washed with water until the filtrate was neutral. Then, it was freeze‐dried for 48 hr.

The preparation of chitosan by MW irradiation was carried out using a MW reaction device (flexiWAVE, MILESTONE). The reaction parameters were consistent with the traditional method mentioned above, especially the heating rate. The temperature of WB heating measured by optical fiber was recorded; then, the data were sent to the MW equipment which adjusts the power to meet the corresponding temperature demand.

Chitosan produced under MW or WB heating is noted as chitosan MW and chitosan WB, respectively.

2.2.2. Characterization of chitin and chitosan

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

To obtain uniform samples, chitosan samples were dissolved in 1% acetic acid solution, dried into a film, neutralized with 0.1 m sodium hydroxide solution, washed, and dried again. The FTIR spectra of chitin, chitosan, and commercial samples were recorded at 4 cm−1 spectral resolution on a FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet Nexus 470, Thermo Electron) equipped with a horizontal attenuated total reflectance (HATR) accessory (Thermo Electron). An average of 32 scans was performed for each spectrum. The DD% of chitosan was determined by the absorption bands at 1,320 cm−1 (amide III band) and 1,420 cm−1 proposed by Brugnerotto et al. (2001), knowing that:

DD%=100-DA%

The DA% is the degree of acetylation calculated according to the following equation:

A1320/A1420=0.3822+0.0313DA (1)

where A 1320 and A 1420 are the absorbance at 1,320 cm−1 and 1,420 cm−1 with baselines drawn between the 1370–1280 cm−1 and 1490–1350 cm−1, respectively.

XRD

X‐ray diffractograms of the samples were obtained using a Bruker X‐ray diffractometer (D2 PHASER, Bruker AXS Inc.) with 40 kV and 30 mA Cu kα radiation at a scanning rate of 2°min−1 between 2θ angles from 5° to 40°. The crystallinity index ICR was calculated by the following equation (Ioelovich, 2014):

ICR%=I110-Iam/I110×100 (2)

where I am is the intensity of amorphous diffraction at 16°, and I 110 is the maximum intensity at 20°.

Molecular weight determination

The weight‐average molecular weight (MW) of chitosan was measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (Li & Xia, 2010). The GPC equipment (Wyatt) consisted of an Ultrahydrogel 2000 (7.8 mm × 300 mm) combined with an Ultrahydrogel 250 (7.8 mm × 300 mm), an RI 150 refractive index detector, and a Waters 600 Pump. The eluent was 0.2 M CH3COOH/0.15 M CH3COONH4. The temperature of the column and the flow rate were maintained at 303 K and 0.4 ml/min, respectively. Chitosan samples were prepared with the same acetate buffer at a concentration of 1 mg/ml, and dissolved samples were filtered through a 0.22‐μm filter. All data provided by the GPC system were collected and analyzed using the Waters Workstation software package.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

For the visual confirmation of the morphology and physical state of the samples, a Hitachi Regulus 8,100 SEM instrument was used. The freeze‐dried samples were glued to the sample stage with conductive adhesive. The images of the samples were taken at different magnifications and an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.

2.2.3. Determination of rheological properties

The rheological properties of chitosan solutions were measured by an AR 1,000 rheometer (TA Instrument Ltd.). The sample chitosan (1 g) was added into 1% acetic acid solution (100 ml) and then stirred until completely dissolved. The viscosity of the sample chitosan at different shear rates from 0.1 to 100 s−1 was measured with a 40‐mm parallel plate at a spacing of 1 mm (Li et al., 2019). TA Rheometer Data Analysis software (V1.0.74) was used to obtain the experimental data.

2.2.4. Statistical analysis

The experimental data are represented as the mean ± standard deviations. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc.). Multiple comparisons of mean values were conducted using Duncan's multiple range test. The p value >.05 indicated no significant differences between the mean values.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Fitting of heating rate curves

In previous studies, many researchers have used MW instead of WB heating in the conventional method of chitosan extraction and found that by setting high MW power, a better extraction effect can be achieved in a short time, but the temperature difference between the two methods was ignored (El Knidri, El Khalfaouy, Laajeb, Addaou, & Lahsini, 2016). In this study, a multistage MW heating program was used to simulate the heating curve of a WB in the process of deacetylation. The effects of WB and MW on the extraction of chitosan were compared under the same heating rate, and the heating curves of the two heating methods are shown in Figure 1. The correlation coefficient R 2 was used to evaluate the fitting degree of the two heating curves. The R 2 value calculated by Excel software for the deacetylation step is 0.9870. In this study, the value can represent the difference of the average temperature of MW and WB heating, so it can be seen that the heating curves obtained by the two heating methods had a high degree of fitting. This ensured the consistency of the heat quantity provided by the two heating methods and the comparability of the differences between chitosan MW and chitosan WB.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Heating curves for microwave heating and water bath heating

3.2. FTIR patterns and deacetylation degree analysis

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is an important tool to differentiate chitin and chitosan. During the reaction process, the chitosan MW and chitosan WB produced in different time periods were compared. Commercial chitin, commercial chitosan, and the chitosan produced by MW or WB in 10 min (initial deacetylation) and 240 min (completed deacetylation), denoted as CT, CO, MW10, WB10, MW240, and WB240, respectively, exhibit different FTIR spectra from 1,200 to 4,000 cm−1. In Figure 2, the bands at approximately 3,100 and 1,640 cm−1 were assigned to amide I (Kaya, Erdogan, Mol, & Baran, 2015), while those at 1,550 and 1,310 cm−1 were assigned to amides II and III, respectively, in CT (Kaya & Baran, 2015; Kaya, Baran, Erdoğan, et al., 2014). The absorption of these bands weakens or disappears in chitosan WB and chitosan MW in the progress of deacetylation, confirming the removal of the acetyl group. Corresponding to the NH stretching region (Chatterjee, Adhya, Guha, & Chatterjee, 2005) of chitosan, the absorption bands in the range of 3270–3290 cm−1 were observed in all samples, but their intensity in CT was relatively weaker. The peak at 1599 cm−1 of the amide II (‐NH2 tensions), which is the characteristic peaks for chitosan (Kaya, Baran, Mentes, et al., 2014), in the CO, MW240, and WB240 spectra was absent in the spectra of CT, MW10, and WB10. The FTIR results showed that the chitosan produced by MW and WB after deacetylation for 240 min had a structure similar to that of commercially available chitosan.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

FTIR patterns of commercial chitin CT, commercial chitosan CO, MW10, WB10, MW240, and WB240

The DD% was calculated using the ratio of the bands at 1,420 and 1,320 cm−1 according to the FTIR patterns (Figure 2), as described in Equation (1). The chitosan MW with 73.86% DD was successfully produced in 60 min, while 120 more minutes were required for the same DD% (74.47%) of the chitosan WB. Additionally, it can be seen from Figure 3 that the MW heating method basically completed the deacetylation reaction at 60 min, and the DD% value increased slightly with the extension of time, while the traditional method needed 3–4 hr to complete the reaction.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Deacetylation degree of chitosan produced by microwave heating and water bath heating

The solubility of chitosan in 1% acetic acid solution mainly depends on the DD% value and on the acetyl group distribution along the chains (Roy et al., 2017; Younes & Rinaudo, 2015). Chitin with a DD% above 55% can be solubilized gradually. Chitosan WB can be basically dissolved after 60 min, as shown in Figure 4, while chitosan MW can be basically dissolved after deacetylation for 30 min, which was consistent with the results of DD%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Digital photographs of chitosan WB and chitosan MW in the 1% acetic acid solution

3.3. XRD pattern analysis

The XRD patterns and ICR% of commercially available chitin and chitosan, the chitosan produced by MW or WB for 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min (denoted as MW10, WB10, MW30, WB30, and so on, respectively), are presented in Figure 5. The spectra of chitosan WB and chitosan MW have the same positions of peaks (2θ = 11.92–12.29° and 2θ = 20.01–20.56°) as the commercial chitosan, concurring with the results given by Yen, Yang, and Mau (2009 and Zhang et al. (2017), although one method took 240 min, while the other required 60 min.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

XRD patterns of commercial chitin, chitosan WB (a), commercial chitosan, and chitosan MW (b)

The crystallinity of chitosan has a high correlation with its DD. The molecular chain of nondeacetylated chitin is relatively uniform and has good regularity, so the crystallinity is high. Deacetylation causes heterogeneity of the molecular chain so that crystallinity decreases; however, as DD increases, the molecular chain tends to become homogenized, and its crystallinity also increases accordingly. With the progress of the deacetylation reaction, the change in the crystallinity of chitosan WB first decreased to 12.72% at 30 min and then rose gradually, corresponding to the molecular chain order changing to disorder and then to order, which was the same as chitosan MW, which dropped to 22.58% at 30 min and then rose to 27.71% at 60 min. In the reaction process, chitosan MW showed relatively high crystallinity, which corresponded to a more ordered molecular chain arrangement, indicating that MW could promote the uniformity and thoroughness of the deacetylation reaction.

3.4. Molecular weight and viscosity

MW determines the functional properties of chitosan as it considerably affects the physicochemical properties (Czechowska‐Biskup, Wach, Rosiak, & Ulański, 2018), so MW is one of the most important parameters of chitosan. Generally, deacetylation is accompanied by a decrease in MW because in high concentrations of alkali solution, in addition to the shedding of N‐acetyl groups on glucosamine, the β‐1,4 glycosidic bonds between the disaccharide units in the chitin chain are also broken (Berger et al., 2005).

The MW distribution corresponding to the elution volume of samples and LS signal intensity are shown in Figure 6. The LS signal intensity characterized the sample content distribution under different elution volumes. From a relative height, the peak of chitosan MW always maintained a higher signal intensity than that of chitosan WB, which proved that chitosan MW had better solubility than chitosan WB in the same solid–liquid solution. At the same time, the span of the molecular weight distribution can be learned from the width of the peak shape of the LS signal intensity and the trend of the MW dot pattern. The MW distribution span of both chitosan MW and chitosan WB gradually narrowed from 10 to 240 min because the shedding of the reaction started with the surface fibers of the chitin, resulting in MW distribution differences in the initial reaction stage.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

LS signal intensity and the molecular weight distribution corresponding to the elution volume for chitosan samples

The average MW of chitosan produced by the two methods is shown in Figure 7. The MW of both chitosan MW and chitosan WB presented a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, which was due to the average deacetylation degree of the chitin with high MW being relatively low in a short time, so it was difficult to dissolve. Some of the small molecules broken off of the chitin chain showed better solubility after rapid deacetylation, so they could enter the gel column and present their corresponding LS signals.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Molecular weight of chitosan produced by microwave heating and water bath heating

Generally, the difference in the Mw is caused by the difference in the deacetylation degree, the different sources of chitosan, and several factors in the preparation of chitosan. Chitosan MW and chitosan WB were produced under the same conditions and had a close degree of deacetylation after 240 min of reaction (MW240: 79.15% DD; WB240: 78.29% DD), but the Mw of MW240 (3.022 × 105 g/mol) was lower than that of WB240 (3.599 × 105 g/mol). This may be because MW heating through the mechanism of molecular vibration friction increases the contact between the alkali solution and chitin molecular chain, thus allowing the β‐1,4 glycosidic bonds to be more easily broken and reducing the molecular weight.

Viscosity is an important determinant for the applications of polymers, and the viscosity properties of chitosan produced by the two methods have also been studied. Since the deacetylation reaction required at least 60 min, the chitosan produced by the two methods could basically be dissolved in 1% acetic acid solution. Therefore, we investigated the rheological properties of chitosan that reacted for 60–240 min. All of the chitosan solutions present pseudoplastic fluid characteristics of shear thinning (Figure 8), which was due to the disassembly of macromolecular aggregation under external forces (Silva‐Weiss, Bifani, Ihl, Sobral, & Gómez‐Guillén, 2013). The configuration of the macromolecules then changed, and the molecules moved from disorder to order. The absence of the first Newtonian plateau in WB60 was due to the relatively higher MW and the lower DD. MW240 and WB240 had a similar DD, the difference in their viscosity was mainly determined by the MW. As the chitosan with larger MW had longer molecular chains, and the relative movement resistance between molecules was larger, the viscosity was generally higher (Wang, Guo, & Li, 2016), so the zero‐shear viscosity of MW240 was lower than that of WB240. In addition to the difference in MW and DD, the electromagnetic field of MW may change the distribution of charge in chitosan molecules, making the rotation radius of chitosan smaller, resulting in a more oriented product with a lower viscosity.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Effect of shear rates on the viscosity of chitosan produced by microwave heating and water bath heating

3.5. Scanning electronic microscopy

The morphology of chitosan produced by MW heating and WB heating was determined by SEM. The SEM photographs of the chitosan samples are shown in Figure 9. At the beginning of the reaction (10 min), deacetylation was carried out from the surface of the samples and then gradually extended into the interior. After a long time (240 min) of treatment with thermal aqueous alkali, the samples were basically deacetylated, the chitosan fibers were rearranged after swelling, the surface morphology showed a tight arrangement of fiber bundles, and the holes in the early stage disappeared as well. According to the SEM photographs after 10 min of reaction, MW significantly accelerated the rate of the deacetylation reaction based on the presence of more fiber breaks and holes, which was consistent with the trend of the DD value and verified the high efficiency of the special heating mechanism of MW for the deacetylation reaction.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

SEM photographs of chitosan produced by microwave heating and water bath heating at different reaction times

4. CONCLUSION

Chitosan was successfully produced using the MW and WB heating methods at the same heating rate for the first time. Chitosan production with MW heating reduced the time of deacetylation from 180 min to 60 min to reach the same DD% as the traditional method with the same quantity of heat (DD% chitosan MW = 73.86% and DD% chitosan WB = 74.47%). While the structure and morphology of chitosan MW were similar to those of chitosan WB, chitosan MW also proved to have higher crystallinity and lower MW and zero‐shear viscosity than chitosan WB. These results showed that the contact between the solid and liquid was enhanced by the molecular vibration in MW heating, which made the alkali solution more accessible to the chitin and promoted deacetylation. This study contributes to the better understanding of the differences in deacetylation process heated by MW and traditional heat source, as well as the selection of heat sources and heating procedures for the production of chitosan for different application requirements, which could improve the consistency of the product quality.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This study does not involve any human or animal testing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was financially supported by the National “Thirteenth Five‐Year” Plan for Science & Technology (2019YFD0902000, 2018YFD0400600), the Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Refrigeration and Conditioning Aquatic Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (KLRCAPP2018‐08), and the National First‐class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology (JUFSTR20180102).

Cheng J, Zhu H, Huang J, et al. The physicochemical properties of chitosan prepared by microwave heating. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8:1987–1994. 10.1002/fsn3.1486

REFERENCES

  1. Abeykoon, C. , Kelly, A. L. , Brown, E. C. , & Coates, P. D. (2016). The effect of materials, process settings and screw geometry on energy consumption and melt temperature in single screw extrusion. Applied Energy, 180, 880–894. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alishahi, A. , Mirvaghefi, A. , Tehrani, M. , Farahmand, H. , Shojaosadati, S. , Dorkoosh, F. , & Elsabee, M. Z. (2011). Enhancement and characterization of chitosan extraction from the wastes of shrimp packaging plants. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 19(3), 776–783. 10.1007/s10924-011-0321-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger, J. , Reist, M. , Chenite, A. , Felt‐Baeyens, O. , Mayer, J. , & Gurny, R. (2005). Erratum to “Pseudo‐thermosetting chitosan hydrogels for biomedical application”. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1(296), 162 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brugnerotto, J. , Lizardi, J. , Goycoolea, F. , Argüelles‐Monal, W. , Desbrieres, J. , & Rinaudo, M. (2001). An infrared investigation in relation with chitin and chitosan characterization. Polymer, 42(8), 3569–3580. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00713-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chatterjee, S. , Adhya, M. , Guha, A. , & Chatterjee, B. (2005). Chitosan from Mucor rouxii: Production and physico‐chemical characterization. Process Biochemistry, 40(1), 395–400. 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Croisier, F. , & Jérôme, C. (2013). Chitosan‐based biomaterials for tissue engineering. European Polymer Journal, 49(4), 780–792. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.12.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Czechowska‐Biskup, R. , Wach, R. A. , Rosiak, J. M. , & Ulański, P. (2018). Procedure for determination of the molecular weight of chitosan by viscometry. Progress on Chemistry and Application of Chitin and Its Derivatives, 23, 45–54. 10.15259/PCACD.23.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. El Knidri, H. , El Khalfaouy, R. , Laajeb, A. , Addaou, A. , & Lahsini, A. (2016). Eco‐friendly extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from the shrimp shell waste via microwave irradiation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 104, 395–405. 10.1016/j.psep.2016.09.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. He, X. , Li, K. , Xing, R. , Liu, S. , Hu, L. , & Li, P. (2016). The production of fully deacetylated chitosan by compression method. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 42(1), 75–81. 10.1016/j.ejar.2015.09.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ioelovich, M. (2014). Crystallinity and hydrophility of chitin and chitosan. Journal of Chemistry, 3(3), 7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaworska, M. M. , & Roberts, G. A. (2016). The influence of chitin structure on its enzymatic deacetylation. Chemical and Process Engineering, 37(2), 261–267. 10.1515/cpe-2016-0021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaya, M. , & Baran, T. (2015). Description of a new surface morphology for chitin extracted from wings of cockroach (Periplaneta americana). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 75, 7–12. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaya, M. , Baran, T. , Erdoğan, S. , Menteş, A. , Özüsağlam, M. A. , & Çakmak, Y. S. (2014). Physicochemical comparison of chitin and chitosan obtained from larvae and adult Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Materials Science and Engineering: C, 45, 72–81. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaya, M. , Baran, T. , Mentes, A. , Asaroglu, M. , Sezen, G. , & Tozak, K. O. (2014). Extraction and characterization of α‐chitin and chitosan from six different aquatic invertebrates. Food Biophysics, 9(2), 145–157. 10.1007/s11483-013-9327-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaya, M. , Erdogan, S. , Mol, A. , & Baran, T. (2015). Comparison of chitin structures isolated from seven Orthoptera species. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 72, 797–805. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Knidri, H. E. , Dahmani, J. , Addaou, A. , Laajeb, A. , & Lahsini, A. (2019). Rapid and efficient extraction of chitin and chitosan for scale‐up production: Effect of process parameters on deacetylation degree and molecular weight. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 139, 1092–1102. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, X. , & Xia, W. (2010). Effects of chitosan on the gel properties of salt‐soluble meat proteins from silver carp. Carbohydrate Polymers, 82(3), 958–964. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, X.‐M. , Xie, Q.‐T. , Zhu, J. , Pan, Y. I. , Meng, R. , Zhang, B. , … Jin, Z.‐Y. (2019). Chitosan hydrochloride/carboxymethyl starch complex nanogels as novel Pickering stabilizers: Physical stability and rheological properties. Food Hydrocolloids, 93, 215–225. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, W. , Ma, Y. , Ai, L. , Li, W. , Li, W. , Li, H. , … Luo, B. (2019). Enzymatic degradation of nanosized chitin whiskers with different degrees of deacetylation. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 5(10), 5316–5326. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma, J. , Xin, C. , & Tan, C. (2015). Preparation, physicochemical and pharmaceutical characterization of chitosan from Catharsius molossus residue. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 80, 547–556. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahardika, R. , Jumnahdi, M. , & Widyaningrum, Y. (2019). Chitin Deacetylation Shells of Portunus pelagicus L. Using Microwave Irradiation. Paper Presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 353(1), 012037. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohammed, M. H. , Williams, P. A. , & Tverezovskaya, O. (2013). Extraction of chitin from prawn shells and conversion to low molecular mass chitosan. Food Hydrocolloids, 31(2), 166–171. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.10.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Omari, K. W. , Besaw, J. E. , & Kerton, F. M. (2012). Hydrolysis of chitosan to yield levulinic acid and 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural in water under microwave irradiation. Green Chemistry, 14(5), 1480–1487. 10.1039/c2gc35048c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rinaudo, M. (2008). Main properties and current applications of some polysaccharides as biomaterials. Polymer International, 57(3), 397–430. 10.1002/pi.2378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roy, J. C. , Salaün, F. , Giraud, S. , Ferri, A. , Chen, G. , & Guan, J. (2017). Solubility of chitin: Solvents, solution behaviors and their related mechanisms Xu Z. (Ed.), Solubility of polysaccharides (pp. 109–127). Vienna, Austria: InTech. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sarhan, A. , Ayad, D. , Badawy, D. , & Monier, M. (2009). Phase transfer catalyzed heterogeneous N‐deacetylation of chitin in alkaline solution. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 69(6), 358–363. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2009.02.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sebastian, J. , Rouissi, T. , Brar, S. K. , Hegde, K. , & Verma, M. (2019). Microwave‐assisted extraction of chitosan from Rhizopus oryzae NRRL 1526 biomass. Carbohydrate Polymers, 219, 431–440. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Silva‐Weiss, A. , Bifani, V. , Ihl, M. , Sobral, P. , & Gómez‐Guillén, M. (2013). Structural properties of films and rheology of film‐forming solutions based on chitosan and chitosan‐starch blend enriched with murta leaf extract. Food Hydrocolloids, 31(2), 458–466. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, H. , Guo, T. , & Li, H. (2016). Evaluation of viscosity and printing quality of chitosan‐based flexographic inks: The effect of chitosan molecular weight. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133(39), 43997 10.1002/app.43997 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yen, M.‐T. , Yang, J.‐H. , & Mau, J.‐L. (2009). Physicochemical characterization of chitin and chitosan from crab shells. Carbohydrate Polymers, 75(1), 15–21. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Younes, I. , & Rinaudo, M. (2015). Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Marine Drugs, 13(3), 1133–1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, D. , Jiang, L. , Zong, J. , Chen, S. , Ma, C. , & Li, H. (2017). Incorporated α‐amylase and starch in an edible chitosan–procyanidin complex film increased the release amount of procyanidins. RSC Advances, 7(89), 56771–56778. 10.1039/C7RA11142H [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhu, L. F. , Chen, X. , Wu, Z. , Wang, G. , Ahmad, Z. , & Chang, M. W. (2019). Optimization conversion of chitosan from Ganoderma lucidum spore powder using ultrasound‐assisted deacetylation: Influence of processing parameters. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 44, e14297. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES