Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2020 Apr 15;8:319. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00319

Fruits By-Products – A Source of Valuable Active Principles. A Short Review

Radu C Fierascu 1,2, Elwira Sieniawska 3, Alina Ortan 1, Irina Fierascu 1,2,*, Jianbo Xiao 4
PMCID: PMC7174504  PMID: 32351951

Abstract

The growing demand for more sustainable, alternative processes leading to production of plant-derived preparations imposes the use of plants waste generated mainly by agri-food and pharmaceutical industries. These mostly unexploited but large quantities of plants waste also increase the interest in developing alternative approaches for sustainable production of therapeutic molecules. In order to reduce the amount of plant waste by further processing, different novel extraction techniques can be applied. Fruits and their industrial by-products are rich sources of different classes of compounds with therapeutic properties. The processed fruits waste can be reused and lead to novel pharmaceuticals, food supplements or functional foods. This review intends to briefly summarize recent aspects regarding the production of different active compounds from fruit by-products, and their therapeutic properties. The potential use of fruits by-products in different industries will be also discussed.

Keywords: fruits waste, fruits processing, active compounds, value added products, therapeutic properties, side streams

Introduction

According to the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization, the production of different fruits around the world exceeded one billion tones in 2017, which, depending on geographical areas, consumption and growing traditions, inevitably leads to the generation of large amounts of by-products and waste (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2017). Only Europe generates approximately 100 Mt of waste and by-products each year, being an outcome of drinks industry (26%), as well as fruits and vegetables companies (14.8%) (Marić et al., 2018). The management of by-products resulted from fruits processing is one of the major problems of agri-food industries. Large quantities of waste containing a rich composition of biological compounds can be considered hazardous as may cause phytotoxicity phenomena, including plant growth interference, contamination of the aqueous media, deterioration of drinking water quality, death of sensitive marine organisms, inhibition of seed germination, and intestinal disorders in fed animals (Klapa, 2015). Even if these large amounts of waste can lead to environmental issues, at the same time, with a proper treatment, they can represent a low-cost raw material, rich in potentially valuable components for other industries (Rabetafika et al., 2014). Applying various extraction and purification techniques and analytical methods, it is possible to recover important bioactive components from fruits waste and further transform them into added value products for other industries (Nile et al., 2019). Removal, proper disposal and bio-waste processing can lead to the closure of bio-economical value chains, providing the opportunity to reduce serious environmental concerns regarding food waste.

The most common fruits consumed worldwide are apples, grapes, and exotic fruits typical for the cultivation region. Apples are the most popular fruits that provide production of juice and cider production in over three million tons in Europe (Barreira et al., 2019) and about 5 million tons in United States each year (Niglio et al., 2019). The remaining residual material after processing is pomace, which consists of peels, skin, pulp, leftover flesh, core with seeds and stems, being rich in polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and phenolic acids (Coman et al., 2019). Apple pomace contains larger amounts of bioactive substances compared to the juices from the fruit itself (Michalska and Łysiak, 2014).

According to international statistics, grapes are world’s largest fruit crop, with an annual production of over 75 million of tons worldwide (International Organisation of Vine and Wine [OIV], 2017). In this context, grapes and products obtained, such as wine, grape juice, jams, have an obvious economic importance and a considerable impact on production of waste. The marc, peels and grape seeds resulting from wine industry remain deposited due to the lack of a proper management, thus being a source of contamination. On the other hand, grape waste represents a good source of vitamins, minerals, lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and polyphenolic compounds (especially phenolic acids, ellagitannins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols such as catechins and their isomers, anthocyanins, pro-anthocyanidins and the stilbene derivative, resveratrol) (Nowshehri et al., 2015). Grape wastes are not considered hazardous waste, but in large amounts they can contribute to the pollution, due to the high chemical and biological oxygen demand (Martinez et al., 2016).

Other fruits with a large production are the exotic fruits like coffee, macadamia, pineapple, papaya, and mango. They are rich in vitamins, carotenoids, phenolic compounds and dietary fiber distributed in different parts of the fruits (pericarp, peels or seeds) (Ayala-Zavala et al., 2011).

In this context, our short review intends to present a critical opinion on aspects regarding the production of active compounds from different fruits by-products, their therapeutic properties and the potential use of fruit by-products in different industries, being a link for researchers from different sciences: chemistry, pharmacology and medicine.

Production of Active Principles From Fruit By-Products

Scientific development registered in the last decades in the field of extraction of biologically active molecules enables the valorization and consequently utilization of fruit processing by-products. Thousands of valuable molecules generated from fruits waste can be used in food, cosmetic, or pharma industry (Mourtzinos and Goula, 2019). In order to obtain added-value products, extraction methods have to be elaborated for each side-product generated from agro-food industries (Bustamante et al., 2008). Traditional methods are still in use, even if they cause high consumption of energy and sometimes degradation of thermolabile compounds. Sustainable methods are continuously developed by improving and optimizing the existing processes following the principles of green chemistry (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Different classes of compounds extracted from fruit by-products and their potential industrial application.

Fruit Fruit by-product Active principle Extraction method Reference Industrial application Reference
Grape Grape marc, skin, pomace, seeds Polyphenols Supercritical fluid extraction; microwave extraction; ultrasound-assisted extraction; enzyme-aided extraction; pulsed electric fields processing; high voltage electrical discharges Kelly et al., 2019 Food industry Andrade et al., 2019
Wine less Polyphenols Classical extraction with microwave and ultrasounds as pre-treatments Romero-Díez et al., 2019 Pharmaceutic, cosmetic industry and biofuel production Banerjee et al., 2017
Grape marc Pectins Ultrasound-assisted extraction Minjares-Fuentes et al., 2014
Skin Phenolic compounds Natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) ultrasonic extraction Radosevic et al., 2016
Pomace Anthocyanins Solid liquid extraction using ionic liquid solutions Lima et al., 2017
Grape marc Monomeric anthocyanins, phenolic compounds Pressurized liquid extraction Pereira et al., 2019
Seeds Phenolic compounds, anthocyanins Ultrasound-assisted extraction Ghafoor et al., 2009
Pomace Phenolic compounds Enzymatic extraction process Meini et al., 2019 Beverage industry Reissner et al., 2019
Pomace Anthocyanins Enzymatic extraction process using brewery’s yeast biomass Stafussa et al., 2016
Winery grape waste Cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin Enzymatic extraction process Karpe et al., 2014
Pomace, seeds, skins and stems Phenolic compounds High voltage electrical discharges Boussetta et al., 2012
Pomace Pullulan Submerged fermentation Singh et al., 2019 Packaging materials Singh et al., 2019
Coffee Spent ground coffee Phenolic compounds High voltage electrical discharges Boussetta et al., 2012 Fructooligosaccharides production de la Rosa et al., 2019
Apple Pomace Phenolic compounds Supercritical fluid extraction Ferrentino et al., 2018 Production of microbial oils, application as biofuel Liu et al., 2019
Cosmetic industry Barreira et al., 2019
Bioethanol production Evcan and Tari, 2015
Mango Peels Carotenoids, phenolics and flavonoids Supercritical CO2 extraction followed by pressurized ethanol from the residue of the first stage Garcia-Mendoza et al., 2015 Food and pharmaceutical industry Ruiz-Montañez et al., 2014
Peels Phenolic compounds Pulsed electric fields; high voltage electrical discharges Parniakov et al., 2015
Orange Peels Essential oil, polyphenols and pectin Ultrasound and microwave extraction Boukroufa et al., 2015 Fructooligosaccharides production de la Rosa et al., 2019
Orange Peels Ferulic acid Solid liquid extraction using deep eutectic solvents Ozturk et al., 2018

The most common target compounds from fruit by-products are polyphenols present in skins, pulp, seeds, or pomace (Kelly et al., 2019). They are unstable in high temperatures, which significantly reduces their concentration levels, therefore extraction at elevated temperatures is not recommended for these compounds. Hence, classical solid-liquid extraction techniques should be replaced with the state-of-the-art techniques. However, in this case, equipment needed and optimization parameters are important issues for obtaining active compounds from by-products. The most suitable and frequently used for isolation of polyphenolic compounds from fruits by-products are extraction techniques involving pressure, microwave and ultrasounds. In order to increase the yield of bioactive compounds and decrease amount of solvents used, and energy consumption, extraction techniques usually involve some pre-treatment and post-treatment processes. Pre-treatment processes are typically applied to remove lignin, reduce cellulose crystallinity and increase cell porosity (Kumar et al., 2009). Polyphenols non-covalently interact with polysaccharides and become non-extractable by polar solvents (Pérez-Jiménez et al., 2013). Pre-treatment releases polyphenols from the matrix and determines higher yields. When Romero-Díez et al. (2019) performed conventional solid-liquid extraction preceded by microwaves (MW) and ultrasounds (US) pre-treatments, the yield of anthocyanins from wine lees was doubled.

As stated before, the application of modern extraction techniques results in increased yields of different active compounds (Minjares-Fuentes et al., 2014; Manna et al., 2015; Ferrentino et al., 2018; Zachová et al., 2018; Pereira et al., 2019). The advantages of pressurized liquid extraction (super and sub-critical fluid extraction) are low processing temperature (removing the possibility of thermal degradation of phytochemicals), the ease of separation with no solvent residue in the recovered substance, and the minimization of undesirable oxidation reactions. However, this technique presents a major disadvantage, as it can be applied only for isolation of compounds of low or medium polarity (Garcia-Salas et al., 2010). In microwave assisted techniques, electromagnetic radiation causes the rupture of cell walls in plant material in a short time. By applying a solvent that absorbs microwaves energy and has a good affinity with extracted compounds, an increased polyphenols yield can be easily obtained. The disadvantages of this method are the inflammability of the solvents and the multitude of parameters to be optimized (Garcia-Salas et al., 2010). Ultrasound assisted techniques are also advantageous, requiring lower temperatures, lower quantities of solvents, and favoring the solubilization of the targeted compounds. However, the formation of free radicals during extraction process is a drawback which should be mentioned (Ghafoor et al., 2009). The methods described above are also adequate to be used for recovery of compounds such as pigments (Garcia-Mendoza et al., 2015), essential oils or pectins (Boukroufa et al., 2015).

Other green extraction method includes the application of enzymes or acids. The main benefit of enzymatic extraction is the shorter processing time, minimization of organic solvent used, increased purity and larger quantity of bioactive components. This method is appropriate for increasing the extractability of polyphenols, covering usually non-extractable proanthocyanidins (Radenkovs et al., 2018). Meini et al. (2019) demonstrated the positive effect of pectinase, cellulase and tannase on the release of phenolics from grape pomace matrix, while Stafussa et al. (2016) investigated the possibility to inter-connect two food industry by-products, using brewery’s yeast biomass as biosorbent of the anthocyanins from grape pomace. Also, various fungi such as Trichoderma, Aspergillus, and Penicillium sp. have been reported as biomass degraders due to their property to generate an array of enzymes such as endo- and exo-glucanases, β-glucosidase, xylanases, arabinofuranosidases and pectinases, obtaining cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin (Karpe et al., 2014).

In the last decades, innovative technologies, like Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF), High Voltage Electrical Discharges (HVED) or Pulsed Ohmic Heating (POH) have been investigated, mostly for the recovery of phenolic compounds related to valorization of fruits wastes and by-products. PEF enabled to obtain high content of polyphenols from vine shoots (conventionally used as a heating source or left on the ground to rot) (Rajha et al., 2014). HVED provided the intensification of the extraction of total polyphenols from grape pomace, seeds, skins and stems, resulting in 7 times increased yield at both laboratory and pilot scale (Boussetta et al., 2012). The application of techniques involving electric energy allowed the selective recovery of valuable compounds from different fruits waste in a sustainable, economical, and environmentally friendly way (Parniakov et al., 2015).

The important challenge in the recovery of phenolic compounds from fruits waste is the choice of the solvent used, which must meet the REACH characteristics (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals regulation) (Renard, 2018). Bio-based solvents, subcritical liquids, ionic liquids or (natural) deep eutectic solvents are now often used (Radosevic et al., 2016; Lima et al., 2017; Ozturk et al., 2018). These modern solvents present some advantages such as non-flammability, low toxicity, biocompatibility and the possibility to be obtained from renewable materials. Their properties can be tuned by modifying the hydrogen bond acceptor/donor structures or by changing the molar ratio of their components (Ozturk et al., 2018). Using these solvents, the yield of recovery of phenolic compounds can be enhanced by increasing the operating temperature without damaging active principles, due to the increased solubility and diffusion coefficients of polyphenolic compounds in the solvents. Their polarity can be changed by modifying their composition, so they can be used to solubilize a wide variety of bioactive compounds (Benvenutti et al., 2019).

The economic feasibility of the extraction method depends on yield of recovery of active compounds. Due to the diversity of constituents present in fruit waste, a fractionation strategy would improve the efficiency and cost of the processes. When the process involves the recovery of several compounds from fruits by-products, a major concern to consider is the order of extraction. Due to mechanic processes like pressing, phenolic compounds may bind to cell wall, leading to decreased extraction yield. This interaction reduces also the extractability of pectins. Therefore, in any given process designed to obtain more than phenolic compounds, these should be extracted first. Moreover, the fact that the extraction process is time and solvent consuming, the order of extraction of the compounds can be the bottleneck of the entire biorefinery process (Perussello et al., 2017).

Therapeutic Properties of Active Compounds From Fruits By-Products

Therapeutic properties of bioactive compounds derived from fruits are widely described in the scientific literature. A number of reviews summarized anticancer, antidiabetic, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, or neuroprotective activity of plant secondary metabolites extracted from fruits, underlining their importance in the human diet (Banerjee et al., 2017; Yalcin and Çapar, 2017; Karasawa and Mohan, 2018; Marli et al., 2018; van Breda and de Kok, 2018; Fidelis et al., 2019). Scientific information related to biological activities of raw fruits by-products is focused mainly on food applications. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of seeds, flesh, peels, or pulp waste are investigated in order to design novel functional foods enhancing human health and well-being (Park et al., 2014; Chougui et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017; Zafra-Rojas et al., 2018; Saleem and Saeed, 2020). Since fruits by-products are mainly the outcome of food industry, the application of food waste within the same industry ensures circulation of the redundant food biomass and facilitates the waste management. Nevertheless, regardless the benefits which are obtained by processing fruits by-products within food industry, current preliminary scientific evidence confirms that fruits waste can be considered as a valuable source of phytoconstituents for medicinal applications. Anti-inflammatory potential of avocado peel and seed extracts was reported to suppress the release of tumor necrosis factor-α and generation of nitric oxide in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (Tremocoldi et al., 2018). Gastroprotective activity was reported for avocado seeds extract against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice (Athaydes et al., 2019). Polyphenols extracted from orange flesh and peel were shown to protect human leukocytes against oxidative DNA damage and HepG2 cells against peroxyl radical-induced oxidation in vitro (Park et al., 2014). Orange peel polyphenols had also the ability to inhibit the activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in murine macrophage cell line (Chen et al., 2017). Ellagitannins, ellagic acid and its metabolites (urolithin A and urolithin B) isolated from black raspberry seeds, a major waste product after winemaking, showed anti-cancer activities against HT-29 colon cancer cells. Investigated compounds arrested the cell cycle and induced extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways (Cho et al., 2015). Pomegranate peel extract prevented bone loss in a mice model of osteoporosis and stimulated osteoblastic differentiation in vitro (Spilmont et al., 2015). Aromatic glycosides obtained from Prunus tomentosa seed waste inhibited α-glucosidase at the concentration level comparable to positive control acarbose and exhibited significant protective effect against H2O2-induced HepG2 cells damage (Liu et al., 2018). Catechins present in the grape seeds showed potential to inhibit angiotensin-I-converting enzyme in vitro (Deolindo et al., 2019), while anti-inflammatory effect of grape seed extract in LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages was attributed to flavonoids (Harbeoui et al., 2019). Also, pomegranate seed oil positively influenced fatty acids profile and reduced the activity of desaturases in rat’s liver (Białek et al., 2017).

High biological potential of redundant fruit biomass can be utilized by pharmaceutical industry. However, processing of fruits waste for possible medicinal applications requires strict standardization of extracts or determination of purity of isolated compounds. What is more, before ingredients of fruits waste can be applied in a form of drugs, preliminary in vitro studies have to be confirmed not only in animal models, but also in clinical trials. Anyhow, standardized extracts or isolated active compounds incorporated into dietary supplements or functional cosmetics can also be a stream for fruits waste management. The re-utilization of food by-products is the easy way for sustainable production of active compounds and this idea gained recently a lot of interest. With the application of efficient extraction techniques fruits by-products can become a cheap source of active compounds.

Industrial Applications of Valuable Compounds Obtained From Fruits By-Products

Large amounts of wastes and by-products are produced at industrial levels, most of them containing highly valuable bioactive substances, which can be further used for different applications (Table 1). Hence, another scientific area is emerging within the large field of food science and technology – bio-residues valorization (Martins and Ferreira, 2017). Fruits waste can be used as such for some applications or for recovery of valuable compounds with therapeutic properties.

Several applications of compounds recovered from different industries are well known. Compounds recovered from fruits wastes find further applications as additives in food products to preserve and enhance quality, to prevent food oxidation and to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms (Andrade et al., 2019). Also, added-value products obtained from fruits wastes can be used as novel packaging materials due to their oxygen-impermeable properties (Singh and Kaur, 2015) or as functional co-products (Nagel et al., 2014). Fruits wastes can be used in food industry as a substitute of wheat flour (Struck et al., 2018), can be added in cakes (Tumbas Šaponjac et al., 2016) or can be used in beverage industry (Reissner et al., 2019). The interest in natural-based products was expanded also in cosmetic industry, which is a profitable solution to valorize disposable by-products. Search for new drugs and increased resistance of the actual ones led to finding new sources of antimicrobial agents, such as recovered bioactive compounds from fruits waste (Ruiz-Montañez et al., 2014). In the last decades, the interest in using biomass for the production of energy has become an important strategy aimed to reduce the negative environmental impact of fossil fuels. In this context, value added products can be produced by fermentation of different wastes by anaerobic bacteria, which can be integrated into a fed-batch or continuous system for lipid or biofuel production (Liu et al., 2019).

Due to rich composition in sucrose, inulin, maltose, glucose, fructose, starch, galactose, dextrose or lactose, fruits waste can be used as substrate for production of oligosaccharides or microbial polymers (Singh et al., 2019). Conventionally, polysaccharides are produced using sucrose as substrate, and enzymes such as β-fructofuranosidase and fructosyltransferase (de la Rosa et al., 2019). However, nowadays, more profitable processes involve fruits by-products and microorganisms such as Aspergillus versicolor (Dapper et al., 2016) or Aspergillus flavus (Ganaie et al., 2017). The agro industrial wastes which can be exploited for this purpose are those rich in sucrose: peels (agave mango, banana, pineapple, orange, etc.), leaves (banana, etc.), or pomaces (apple grape pomace) (Gnaneshwar Goud et al., 2013; Dapper et al., 2016). Fruits pomace can be also used to obtain pectin (used both in cosmetic and in food industry) (Barreira et al., 2019) or bioethanol, hydrogen or methane via anaerobic fermentation (Evcan and Tari, 2015). Most interesting applications of fruits waste are those which involve the cascade approaches of transforming recovered compounds into other different compounds. Compounds from fruits by-products (such as cellulose or hemicellulose) can be converted into sugars, further used for the production of biofuels and biochemicals or used for applications such as catalysis, chemical sensors and molecular separation (Banerjee et al., 2017).

Conclusion

Fruits by-products can be considered a rich source for the recovery and production of multiple co-products in an integrated biorefinery model where green methods can be combined in order to obtain added-value products. The method used for the recovery of active constituents and the selection of the appropriate solvent have a great influence on the extractability of the functional compounds, no unique extraction procedure being suitable for all samples and matrixes.

Valuable compounds can be directly formulated as nutraceuticals for their proven health benefits or can be used as raw materials for other industries. The concept of recovery of different compounds from these wastes opens new routes for the development of “green” industries, which have a tremendous potential, especially where the availability of fruits waste is abundant. The emphasis on frontier sciences has already attracted interest in developing and optimizing new ecological methods for the efficient use of the biomass, for closing the chain by returning nutrients and organic matter to the soil, when all other useful products have been recovered.

Author Contributions

RF, IF, and ES contributed to data collection and analysis, manuscript design and preparation. AO and JX revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. RF, IF, and AO gratefully acknowledge the support obtained through the project SusMAPWaste, SMIS 104323, Contract No. 89/09.09.2016, from the Operational Program Competitiveness 2014–2020, project co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund.

References

  1. Andrade M. A., Lima V., Silva A. S., Vilarinho F., Castilho M. C., Khwaldia K., et al. (2019). Pomegranate and grape by-products and their active compounds: are they a valuable source for food applications? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 86 68–84. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Athaydes B. R., Alves G. M., de Assis A. L. E. M., Gomes J. V. D., Rodrigues R. P., Campagnaro B. P., et al. (2019). Avocado seeds (Persea americana Mill.) prevents indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Food Res. Int. 119 751–760. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayala-Zavala J. F., Vega-Vega V., Rosas-Domínguez C., Palafox-Carlos H., Villa-Rodriguez J. A., Siddiqui W., et al. (2011). Agro-industrial potential of exotic fruit byproducts as a source of food additives. Food Res. Int. 44 1866–1874. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerjee J., Singh R., Vijayaraghavan R., MacFarlane D., Patti A. F., Arora A. (2017). Bioactives from fruit processing wastes: green approaches to valuable chemicals. Food Chem. 225 10–22. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barreira J. C. M., Arraibi A. A., Ferreira I. C. F. R. (2019). Bioactive and functional compounds in apple pomace from juice and cider manufacturing: potential use in dermal formulations. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 90 76–87. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.05.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benvenutti L., Zielinski A. A. F., Ferreira S. R. S. (2019). Which is the best food emerging solvent: IL, DES or NADES? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 90 133–146. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Białek A., Stawarska A., Bodecka J., Białek M., Tokarz A. (2017). Pomegranate seed oil influences the fatty acids profile and reduces the activity of desaturases in livers of Sprague-Dawley rats. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 131 9–16. 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2017.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boukroufa M., Boutekedjiret C., Petigny L., Rakotomanomana N., Chemat F. (2015). Bio-refinery of orange peels waste: a new concept based on integrated green and solvent free extraction processes using ultrasound and microwave techniques to obtain essential oil, polyphenols and pectin. Ultrason. Sonochem. 24 72–79. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boussetta N., Vorobiev E., Reess T., De Ferron A., Pecastaing L., Ruscassié R., et al. (2012). Scale-up of high voltage electrical discharges for polyphenols extraction from grape pomace: effect of the dynamic shock waves. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 16 129–136. 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.05.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bustamante M. A., Moral R., Paredes C., Perez-Espinosa A., Moreno-Caselles J., Perez-Murcia M. D. (2008). Agrochemical characterisation of the solid by-products and residues from the winery and distillery industry. Waste Manag. 28 372–380. 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen X. M., Tait A. M., Kitts D. D. (2017). Flavonoid composition of orange peel and its association with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Food Chem. 218 15–21. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cho H., Jung H., Lee H., Yi H. C., Kwak H. K., Hwang K. T. (2015). Chemopreventive activity of ellagitannins and their derivatives from black raspberry seeds on HT-29 colon cancer cells. Food Funct. 6 1675–1683. 10.1039/c5fo00274e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chougui N., Djerroud N., Naraoui F., Hadjal S., Aliane K., Zeroual B., et al. (2015). Physicochemical properties and storage stability of margarine containing Opuntia ficus-indica peel extract as antioxidant. Food Chem. 173 382–390. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coman V., Teleky B. E., Mitrea L., Martǎu G. A., Szabo K., Cãlinoiu L. F., et al. (2019). Bioactive potential of fruit and vegetable wastes. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 91 157–225. 10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dapper T. B., Arfelli V., Henn C., Simões M. R., dos Santos M. F., Torre C. L. D., et al. (2016). Fructofuranosidase production by Aspergillus versicolor isolated from Atlantic forest and grown on apple pomace. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 10 938–948. 10.5897/ajmr2016.8038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. de la Rosa O., Flores-Gallegos A. C., Muñíz-Marquez D., Nobre C., Contreras-Esquivel J. C., Aguilar C. N. (2019). Fructooligosaccharides production from agro-wastes as alternative low-cost source. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 91 139–146. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Deolindo C. T. P., Monteiro P. I., Santos J. S., Cruz A. G., Cristina da Silva M., Granato D. (2019). Phenolic-rich Petit Suisse cheese manufactured with organic Bordeaux grape juice, skin, and seed extract: technological, sensory, and functional properties. LWT 115:108493 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108493 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Evcan E., Tari C. (2015). Production of bioethanol from apple pomace by using cocultures: conversion of agro-industrial waste to value added product. Energy 88 775–782. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.090 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferrentino G., Morozova K., Mosibo O. K., Ramezani M., Scampicchio M. (2018). Biorecovery of antioxidants from apple pomace by supercritical fluid extraction. J. Clean. Prod. 186 253–261. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.165 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fidelis M., de Moura C., Kabbas Junior T., Pap N., Mattila P., Mäkinen S., et al. (2019). Fruit seeds as sources of bioactive compounds: sustainable production of high value-added ingredients from by-products within circular economy. Molecules 25 3854. 10.3390/molecules24213854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO] (2017). Crop Statistics. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC (accessed December 21, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  22. Ganaie M. A., Soni H., Naikoo G. A., Santos Oliveira L. T., Rawat H. K., Mehta P. K., et al. (2017). Screening of low cost agricultural wastes to maximize the fructosyltransferase production and its applicability in generation of fructooligosaccharides by solid state fermentation. Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 118 19–26. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garcia-Mendoza M. P., Paula J. T., Paviani L. C., Cabral F. A., Martinez-Correa H. A. (2015). Extracts from mango peel by-product obtained by supercritical CO2 and pressurized solvent processes. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 62 131–137. 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia-Salas P., Morales-Soto A., Segura-Carretero A., Fernández-Gutiérrez A. (2010). Phenolic-compound-extraction systems for fruit and vegetable samples. Molecules 15 8813–8826. 10.3390/molecules15128813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ghafoor K., Choi Y. H., Jeon J. Y., Jo I. H. (2009). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds, antioxidants, and anthocyanins from grape (Vitis vinifera) seeds. J. Agricult. Food Chem. 57 4988–4994. 10.1021/jf9001439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gnaneshwar Goud K., Chaitanya K., Reddy G. (2013). Enhanced production of β-d-fructofuranosidase by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using agro-industrial wastes as substrates. Biocatal. Agricult. Biotechnol. 2 385–392. 10.1016/j.bcab.2013.08.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harbeoui H., Hichami A., Wannes W. A., Lemput J., Tounsi M. S., Khan N. A. (2019). Anti-inflammatory effect of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seed extract through the downregulation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways in LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages. S. Afr. J. Bot. 125 1–8. 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.06.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. International Organisation of Vine and Wine [OIV] (2017). 2017 World Vitiviniculture Situation; OIV Statistical Report on World Vitiviniculture. Available at http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/5479/oiv-en-bilan-2017.pdf (accessed December 28, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  29. Karasawa M. M. G., Mohan C. (2018). Fruits as prospective reserves of bioactive compounds: a review. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 8 335–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Karpe A. V., Harding I. H., Palombo E. A. (2014). Comparative degradation of hydrothermal pretreated winery grape wastes by various fungi. Ind. Crops Prod. 59 228–233. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelly N. P., Kelly A. L., O’Mahony J. A. (2019). Strategies for enrichment and purification of polyphenols from fruit-based materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 83 248–258. [Google Scholar]
  32. Klapa O. (2015). Bioenergy and industrial applications of grape pomace from “Vinho Verde”. master’s thesis, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, PT. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumar P., Barrett D. M., Delwiche M. J., Stroeve P. (2009). Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 3713–3729. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lima A. S., Soares C. M. F., Paltram R., Halbwirth H., Bica K. (2017). Extraction and consecutive purification of anthocyanins from grape pomace using ionic liquid solutions. Fluid Phase Equil. 451 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu L., You Y., Deng H., Guo Y., Meng Y. (2019). Promoting hydrolysis of apple pomace by pectinase and cellulase to produce microbial oils using engineered Yarrowia lipolytica. Biomass Bioeng. 126 62–69. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu Q. B., Cheng Z. Y., Yan Z. Y., Wang D., Bai M., Huang X. X., et al. (2018). Prunus tomentosa seed waste as a source of aromatic glycosides: valuable phytochemicals with α-glucosidase inhibitory and hepatoprotective properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 111 590–596. [Google Scholar]
  37. Manna L., Agostino C., Banchero B. M. (2015). Valorization of hazelnut, coffee and grape wastes through supercritical fluid extraction of triglycerides and polyphenols. J. Supercrit. Fluids 104 204–211. [Google Scholar]
  38. Marić M., Grassino A. N., Zhu Z., Barba F. J., Brnčić M., Rimac Brnčić S. (2018). An overview of the traditional and innovative approaches for pectin extraction from plant food wastes and by-products: ultrasound-, microwaves-, and enzyme-assisted extraction. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 76 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  39. Marli M., Karasawa G., Mohan C. (2018). Fruits as prospective reserves of bioactive compounds: a review. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 8 335–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Martinez G. A., Rebecchi S., Decorti D., Domingos J. M. B., Natolino A., Del Rio D., et al. (2016). Towards multi-purpose biorefinery platforms for the valorisation of red grape pomace: production of polyphenols, volatile fatty acids, polyhydroxyalkanoates and biogas. Green Chem. 18 261–270. [Google Scholar]
  41. Martins N., Ferreira I. C. F. R. (2017). Wastes and by-products: upcoming sources of carotenoids for biotechnological purposes and health-related applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 62 33–48. [Google Scholar]
  42. Meini M. R., Cabezudo I., Boschettia C. E., Romanini D. (2019). Recovery of phenolic antioxidants from Syrah grape pomace through the optimization of an enzymatic extraction process. Food Chem. 283 257–264. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Michalska A., Łysiak G. (2014). Przydatność do suszenia owoców śliw uprawianych w, Polsce w aspekcie przemian związków bioaktywnych i tworzących siê produktów, reakcji Maillarda. Żywność Nauka Technologia Jakość 21 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  44. Minjares-Fuentes R., Femenia A., Garau M. C., Meza-Velázquez J. A., Simal S., Rosselló C. (2014). Ultrasound-assisted extraction of pectins from grape pomace using citric acid: a response surface methodology approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 106 179–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mourtzinos I., Goula A. (2019). “Polyphenols in agricultural byproducts and food waste,” in Polyphenols in Plants, ed. Watson R. R. (London: Academic Press; ), 23–44. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nagel A., Neidhart S., Anders T., Elstner P., Korhummel S., Sulzer T., et al. (2014). Improved processes for the conversion of mango peel into storable starting material for the recovery of functional co-products. Ind. Crops Prod. 61 92–105. [Google Scholar]
  47. Niglio S., Procentese A., Russo M. E., Piscitelli A., Marzocchella A. (2019). Integrated enzymatic pretreatment and hydrolysis of apple pomace in a bubble column bioreactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 150:107306 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107306 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nile S. H., Nile A., Liu J., Kim D. H., Kai G. (2019). Exploitation of apple pomace towards extraction of triterpenic acids, antioxidant potential, cytotoxic effects, and inhibition of clinically important enzymes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 131:110563. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nowshehri J. A., Bhat Z. A., Shah M. Y. (2015). Blessings in disguise: bio-functional benefits of grape seed extracts. Food Res. Int. 77 333–348. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ozturk B., Parkinson C., Gonzales-Miquel M. (2018). Extraction of polyphenolic antioxidants from orange peel waste using deep eutectic solvents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 206 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  51. Park J. H., Lee M., Park E. (2014). Antioxidant activity of orange flesh and peel extracted with various solvents prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 19 291–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Parniakov O., Barba F. J., Grimi N., Lebovka N., Vorobiev E. (2015). Extraction assisted by pulsed electric energy as a potential tool for green and sustainable recovery of nutritionally valuable compounds from mango peels. Food Chem. 196 842–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pereira D. T. V., Tarone A. G., Cazarin C. B. B., Barbero G. F., Martínez J. (2019). Pressurized liquid extraction of bioactive compounds from grape marc. J. Food Eng. 240 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pérez-Jiménez J., Díaz-Rubio M. E., Saura-Calixto F. (2013). Non-extractable polyphenols, a major dietary antioxidant: occurrence, metabolic fate and health effects. Nutr. Res. Rev. 26 118–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Perussello C. A., Zhang Z., Marzocchella A., Tiwari B. K. (2017). Valorization of apple pomace by extraction of valuable compounds. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 16 776–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rabetafika H. N., Bchir B., Blecker C., Richel A. (2014). Fractionation of apple by-products as source of new ingredients: current situation and perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 40 99–114. [Google Scholar]
  57. Radenkovs V., Juhnevica-Radenkova K., Górnaś P., Seglina D. (2018). Non-waste technology through the enzymatic hydrolysis of agro-industrial by-products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 77 64–76. [Google Scholar]
  58. Radosevic K., Curko N., Srcek V. G., Bubalo M. C., Tomasevic M., Ganic K. K., et al. (2016). Natural deep eutectic solvents as benefical extractants for enhancement of plant extracts bioactivity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 73 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rajha H. N., Boussetta N., Louka N., Maroun R. G., Vorobiev E. (2014). A comparative study of physical pretreatments for the extraction of polyphenols and proteins from vine shoots. Food Res. Int. 65 462–468. [Google Scholar]
  60. Reissner A. M., Al-Hamimi S., Quiles A., Schmidt C., Struck S., Hernando I., et al. (2019). Composition and physicochemical properties of dried berry pomace. J. Sci. Food Agricult. 99 1284–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Renard C. M. G. C. (2018). Extraction of bioactives from fruit and vegetables: state of the art and perspectives. LWT 93 390–395. [Google Scholar]
  62. Romero-Díez R., Matos M., Rodrigues L., Bronze M. R., Rodríguez-Rojo S., Cocero M. J., et al. (2019). Microwave and ultrasound pre-treatments to enhance anthocyanins extraction from different wine lees. Food Chem. 272 258–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ruiz-Montañez G., Ragazzo-Sánchez J. A., Calderón-Santoyo M., Velázquez-de la Cruz G., Ramírez de León J. A., Navarro-Ocaña A. (2014). Evaluation of extraction methods for preparative scale obtention of mangiferin and lupeol from mango peels (Mangifera indica L.). Food Chem. 159 267–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Saleem M., Saeed M. T. (2020). Potential application of waste fruit peels (orange, yellow lemon and banana) as wide range natural antimicrobial agent. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 32 805–810. [Google Scholar]
  65. Singh R. S., Kaur N. (2015). “Microbial biopolymers for edible film and coating applications,” in Advances in Biotechnology, eds Nawani N. N., Khetmalas M., Razdan P. N., Pandey A. (New Dehli: IK International Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.), 187–216. [Google Scholar]
  66. Singh R. S., Kaur N., Kennedy J. F. (2019). Pullulan production from agro-industrial waste and its applications in food industry: a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 217 46–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Spilmont M., Léotoing L., Davicco M. J., Lebecque P., Miot-Noirault R., Pilet P., et al. (2015). Pomegranate peel extract prevents bone loss in a preclinical model of osteoporosis and stimulates osteoblastic differentiation in vitro. Nutrients 7 9265–9284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Stafussa A. P., Maciel G. M., da Silva Anthero A. G., da Silva M. V., Zielinski A. A. F., Haminiuk C. H. I. (2016). Biosorption of anthocyanins from grape pomace extracts by waste yeast: kinetic and isotherm studies. J. Food Eng. 169 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  69. Struck S., Straube D., Zahn S., Rohm H. (2018). Interaction of wheat macromolecules and berry pomace in model dough: rheology and microstructure. J. Food Eng. 223 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tremocoldi M. A., Rosalen P. L., Franchin M., Massarioli A. P., Denny C., Daiuto É. R., et al. (2018). Exploration of avocado by-products as natural sources of bioactive compounds. PLoS One 13:0192577. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tumbas Šaponjac V., Ćetković G., Čanadanović-Brunet J., Pajin B., Djilas S., Petrović J., et al. (2016). Sour cherry pomace extract encapsulated in whey and soy proteins: incorporation in cookies. Food Chem. 207 27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. van Breda S. G. J., de Kok T. M. C. M. (2018). Smart combinations of bioactive compounds in fruits and vegetables may guide new strategies for personalized prevention of chronic diseases. Mol. Nutr. Food. Res. 62:1700597. 10.1002/mnfr.201700597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yalcin H., Çapar T. D. (2017). “Bioactive compounds of fruits and vegetables,” in Minimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits and Vegetables, eds Yildiz F., Wiley R. (Boston, MA: Springer; ), 723–745. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zachová Z., Tøíska J., Vrchotová N., Balík J., Sajfrtová M., Sovová H. (2018). Combining high-pressure methods for extraction of stilbenes from grape cane. J. Supercrit. Fluids 142 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zafra-Rojas Q., Cruz-Cansino N., Delgadillo-Ramírez A., Alanís-García E., Añorve-Morga J., Quintero-Lira A., et al. (2018). Organic acids, antioxidants, and dietary fiber of mexican blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) residues cv. Tupy. J. Food Qual. 2018:5950761 10.1155/2018/5950761 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES