In the original article, there were errors in Equations (5) and (12) and the text.
In Equation (5) there was a typographical error in the numerator and we wrote
when it should be
In Equation (12) it was written that uncertainty is always less than zero:
This has been corrected to show that uncertainty sp is always more than zero:
Similarly, there was a miscalculation in the text preceding Equation (14). We wrote “We derived under β1 ≠ β2. Therefore, (α1 − α2)/(β1 + β2) < 0 it is the condition.” We actually derived “ under β1 ≠ β2” and the condition is “(α1 − α2)(β1 − β2) < 0.”
A correction has been made to the Model of Emotional Dimensions Elicited by A Novel Event section, subsection Interaction Effect of Uncertainty and Prediction Errors on Information Gain, paragraph 5.
“A condition where the two functions have an intersection is = . We derived under β1 ≠ β2. Therefore, (α1 − α2)(β1 − β2) < 0 is the condition. We found that this condition applies when the relationship between different uncertainties sp1 and sp2 and constant external noise sl is as follows:
The authors apologize for these errors, which does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
