Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2008 Jun 28;11(9):903–911. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.03.016

Emergency Medical Services Utilization during an Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and the Incidence of SARS‐associated Coronavirus Infection among Emergency Medical Technicians

Patrick Chow‐In Ko 1, Wen‐Jone Chen 1, Matthew Huei‐Ming Ma 1,✉, Wen‐Chu Chiang 1, Chan‐Ping Su 1, Chien‐Hua Huang 2, Tsung‐Chien Lu 1, Fuh‐Yuan Shih 1, Fang‐Yue Lin 1
PMCID: PMC7175936  PMID: 15347538

Abstract

Objectives: This was a study to evaluate the utilization of emergency medical services (EMS) systems during the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and to assess the incidence of infection among emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Methods:This was a prospective, observational study conducted in the EMS system of Taipei, Taiwan. Probable/suspect cases of SARS were defined by World Health Organization criteria. SARS‐related transports were categorized into 1) requests from hospitals for probable/suspect cases of SARS, 2) quarantined individuals, and 3) febrile persons. City ambulances were organized into teams A, B, and C for transports of different perceived risks. Data on the EMS volume, the transport category, the final SARS status of patients, and the EMT responsible for the transports were collected. The EMS projected volume was computed by previous years' data and compared with that collected. The SARS incidence among EMTs was assessed by investigating probable SARS (P‐SARS) and by surveying the seroprevalence of SARS‐associated coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) antibody. Results: From March 18 to June 19, 2003, there were 7,961 EMS transports, similar to the volume projected from previous years (7,506) (95% CI = 6,688 to 8,324). Of these, 1,760 (22.1%) were SARS‐related. When SARS‐related transports were excluded, there was a 12.2% decrease (95% CI = 11.4% to 12.9%) in EMS activities. Requests from hospitals, quarantined individuals, and febrile citizens accounted for 23%, 18%, and 59% of SARS‐related transports. Among the 397 P‐SARS cases in the city of 2.65 million people (incidence 0.01%, 95% CI = 0.01% to 0.02%), 138 (35%) required EMS transports. Two EMTs working in team C, the team with the lowest risk, developed P‐SARS. One of them died soon thereafter. The incidence of P‐SARS was 0.6% (95% CI = 0.2% to 2.2%), or 0.1% (95% CI = 0.03% to 0.4%) per transport. SARS‐CoV serology was available in 74.1% of EMTs who were alive. In addition to the surviving P‐SARS EMT, one EMT from team A, the team with the highest risk, was seropositive. Combining P‐SARS and the seropositive case, three EMTs were infected (incidence 1.3%, 95% CI = 0.4% to 3.6%). No patient transported by the infected EMTs developed SARS. The hospitals serving EMS by the infected EMTs had been involved in a clustered outbreak prior to the EMTs' infections. Conclusions: During the outbreak of SARS, the overall EMS volume did not change significantly, but the non‐SARS EMS activities decreased. Compared with the general population, EMS providers are at higher risk of contracting the SARS virus regardless of different perceived levels of risk. Standard protections and procedures for infection control should be strictly followed during transport and within the hospital environment.

Keywords: emergency medical services, severe acute respiratory syndrome, emergency medical technicians, utilization, incidence

References

  1. Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL et al Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003; 361:1319–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W et al Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1967–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benitez MA. Hong Kong bears brunt of latest outbreak [news]. Lancet. 2003; 361:1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Basic information about SARS, September 29, 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/factsheet.htm. Accessed Oct 10, 2003.
  5. SARS Investigative TeamCDC Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health‐care workers—Toronto, Canada, April 2003. JAMA. 2003; 289:2788–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A et al A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1986–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Booth CM, Matukas LM, Tomlinson GA et al Clinical features and short‐term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the Greater Toronto Area. JAMA. 2003; 289:2801–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Severe acute respiratory syndrome—Taiwan, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003; 52:461–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koh D, Lim MK, Chia SE. SARS: health care work can be hazardous to health. Occup Med. 2003; 53:241–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated interim guidance: pre‐hospital emergency medical care and ground transport of suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome patients. April 29, 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/emtguidance.htm. Accessed Dec 10, 2003.
  11. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva . 2003. Case definitions for surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Available at:http://www.who.int/csr/sars/casedefinition/en/. Accessed Oct 11, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Center for Disease Control, Department of Health, Taiwan, ROC. Medical professionals: SARS case definition—definition of Taiwan SARS cases, May 15, 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov.tw/sarsen/. Accessed Feb 14, 2004.
  13. Center for Disease Control. Department of Health, Taiwan, ROC. Latest information: SARS data analysis—Taiwan. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov.tw/sarsen/. Accessed Dec 10, 2003.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Use of quarantine to prevent transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome—Taiwan, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003; 52:680–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolyard, EA , Tablan, OC , Williams, WW , Pearson, ML , Shapiro, CN , Deitchmann, SD . Guideline for infection control in healthcare personnel, 1998. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998; 19:407–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva. 2003. Use of laboratory methods for SARS diagnosis. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/labmethods/en/. #lab Accessed Dec 29, 2003.
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fact sheet: SARS laboratory diagnostics. September 26, 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/labdiagnosis.htm. Accessed Oct 15, 2003.
  18. Li G, Chen X, Xu A. Profile of specific antibodies to the SARS‐associated coronavirus. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349:508–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fang LQ, Zhang PH, Yang BA et al The application of indirect immuno‐fluorescence assay in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003; 24:484–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerberding JL. Management of occupational exposures to blood‐borne viruses. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332:444–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prezant DJ, Kelly KJ, Mineo FP et al Tuberculin skin test conversion rates in New York City emergency medical service health care workers. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32:208–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva. 2003. Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. September 26, 2003. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2003_09_23/en/. Accessed Dec 29, 2003.
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated interim U.S. case definition for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). December 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/casedefinition.htm. Accessed Dec 29, 2003.
  24. Parry J. Asymptomatic animal traders prove positive for SARS virus [news]. BMJ. 2003; 327:582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan PK, Ip M, Ng KC et al Severe acute respiratory syndrome‐associated coronavirus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9:1453–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Xu G, Lu H, Li J et al Primary investigation on the changing mode of plasma specific IgG antibody in SARS patients and their physicians and nurses. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2003; 35(suppl):23–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu W, Wang J, Liu P et al A hospital outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Guangzhou, China. Chin Med J. 2003; 116:811–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li L, Cheng S, Gu J. SARS infection among health care workers in Beijing, China. JAMA. 2003; 290:2662–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Academic Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES