Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2020 Mar 16;16(3):e1008625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008625

A homozygous missense variant in CACNB4 encoding the auxiliary calcium channel beta4 subunit causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs channel and non-channel functions

Pierre Coste de Bagneaux 1,#, Leonie von Elsner 2,#, Tatjana Bierhals 2,#, Marta Campiglio 1, Jessika Johannsen 3, Gerald J Obermair 1,4, Maja Hempel 2, Bernhard E Flucher 1,‡,*, Kerstin Kutsche 2,‡,*
Editor: Ingo Helbig5
PMCID: PMC7176149  PMID: 32176688

Abstract

P/Q-type channels are the principal presynaptic calcium channels in brain functioning in neurotransmitter release. They are composed of the pore-forming CaV2.1 α1 subunit and the auxiliary α2δ-2 and β4 subunits. β4 is encoded by CACNB4, and its multiple splice variants serve isoform-specific functions as channel subunits and transcriptional regulators in the nucleus. In two siblings with intellectual disability, psychomotor retardation, blindness, epilepsy, movement disorder and cerebellar atrophy we identified rare homozygous variants in the genes LTBP1, EMILIN1, CACNB4, MINAR1, DHX38 and MYO15 by whole-exome sequencing. In silico tools, animal model, clinical, and genetic data suggest the p.(Leu126Pro) CACNB4 variant to be likely pathogenic. To investigate the functional consequences of the CACNB4 variant, we introduced the corresponding mutation L125P into rat β4b cDNA. Heterologously expressed wild-type β4b associated with GFP-CaV1.2 and accumulated in presynaptic boutons of cultured hippocampal neurons. In contrast, the β4b-L125P mutant failed to incorporate into calcium channel complexes and to cluster presynaptically. When co-expressed with CaV2.1 in tsA201 cells, β4b and β4b-L125P augmented the calcium current amplitudes, however, β4b-L125P failed to stably complex with α1 subunits. These results indicate that p.Leu125Pro disrupts the stable association of β4b with native calcium channel complexes, whereas membrane incorporation, modulation of current density and activation properties of heterologously expressed channels remained intact. Wildtype β4b was specifically targeted to the nuclei of quiescent excitatory cells. Importantly, the p.Leu125Pro mutation abolished nuclear targeting of β4b in cultured myotubes and hippocampal neurons. While binding of β4b to the known interaction partner PPP2R5D (B56δ) was not affected by the mutation, complex formation between β4b-L125P and the neuronal TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase (TNIK) seemed to be disturbed. In summary, our data suggest that the homozygous CACNB4 p.(Leu126Pro) variant underlies the severe neurological phenotype in the two siblings, most likely by impairing both channel and non-channel functions of β4b.

Author summary

Neurodevelopmental disorders encompass a broad spectrum of neurological and psychiatric conditions and are caused by mutations in many different genes. For example, mutations in genes encoding voltage-gated calcium channels have been linked to various diseases of the nervous system in humans and mice. Voltage-gated calcium channels are critical regulators of the synaptic communication between neurons, of processes involved in learning and memory, and of activity-dependent gene expression. Here we report a disease-associated mutation on both copies of the CACNB4 gene encoding an auxiliary β4 subunit of the chief presynaptic calcium channel in the brain. Two siblings with a severe neurodevelopmental disorder carry the homozygous CACNB4 mutation causing an amino acid substitution known to disrupt the folding of the calcium channel β4 subunit. We demonstrate that this amino acid change abolished the incorporation of the β4 subunit into channel complexes in the synapse, as well as β4’s ability to translocate into the cell nucleus, and to complex with α1 channel subunits and a neuronal scaffolding protein. The combined evidence from our genetic and functional analysis suggests that dysfunction of both β4 subunit channel and non-channel functions underlies the severe neurological phenotype in the two siblings. We therefore identified CACNB4 as a neurodevelopmental disease gene.

Introduction

P/Q-type channels are the principal presynaptic calcium channels functioning in rapid neurotransmitter release [13]. In brain, P/Q-type calcium channels are largely composed of the pore-forming CaV2.1 α1 and the auxiliary α2δ-2 and β4 subunits [46]. The auxiliary α2δ and β subunits regulate the amplitude, kinetics, and voltage-dependence of calcium currents by enhancing functional membrane expression and modulating gating properties of high-voltage-gated calcium channels [7]. Certain auxiliary α2δ and β isoforms have channel-independent functions in synapse formation and activity-dependent transcriptional regulation, respectively [811]. Mutations in genes encoding each of these subunits have been associated with neurological disease [10, 1215]. Similarly, loss-of-function mutations and knockout of CaV2.1, α2δ-2, or β4 in mice cause severe neurological phenotypes including migraine, epilepsy, and ataxia [1622]. The gene encoding β4, CACNB4, is primarily expressed in brain, and its expression levels increase during development [5, 2325]. CACNB4 undergoes extensive alternative splicing, and the resulting variants (β4a, β4b, β4c, β4e) partly display distinct subcellular localizations and functions [9, 26, 27]. In neurons, the β4e isoform is primarily presynaptic, whereas β4a and β4b play dual roles in channel modulation and gene regulation. In electrically inactive neurons β4b and, to a lesser extent β4a, are targeted to nuclei where they are involved in the regulation of gene transcription [26, 28]. The β4b variant has been reported to interact with the regulatory subunit of phosphatase 2A, Ppp2r5d (alternative name B56δ), and with the transcription factor thyroid receptor α [29], and heterologous overexpression of β4b caused differential expression of genes involved in cell proliferation [30]. Calcium channel β subunits contain a tandem src homology 3 (SH3) and guanylate kinase (GK) module [9, 31]. Amino acid changes disturbing the intramolecular SH3-GK interaction affect β’s roles in channel modulation, nuclear targeting, and its association with transcriptional regulators [29, 31, 32].

Consistent with the high expression of β4 in cerebellar Purkinje and granule cells, β4 null mutant mice (lethargic) display an autosomal recessive neurological disease [21] with ataxia, paroxysmal dyskinesia, and absence seizures [19, 33]. Neurons of lethargic mice show decreased P/Q-type calcium currents and excitatory synaptic transmission. On a network level, some of the defects in lethargic brains resembled those in CaV2.1-null mice, whereas others were specific to β4 null mice, suggesting that mechanisms other than deficient P/Q-type currents cause the severe motor deficits [34]. Thus, it has been suggested that the lack of specific channel-independent functions of β4 in activity-dependent gene regulation may be causal for the lethargic phenotype [26, 29, 34].

In humans, heterozygous variants in CACNB4 (MIM: 601949) have been associated with different neurological phenotypes: a female patient with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) had the nonsense variant c.1444C>T/p.(Arg482*) (MIM: 607682), two members of a family displaying idiopathic generalized epilepsy with rare generalized tonic-clonic seizures carried the non-synonymous CACNB4 variant c.311G>T/p.(Cys104Phe), and in another family five individuals affected by episodic ataxia (MIM: 613855) as well as two healthy family members showed the p.(Cys104Phe) variant [15]. The heterozygous CACNB4 variant c.1403G>A/p.(Arg468Gln) has been suggested to worsen the neurological disorder in a patient with a pathogenic SCN1A mutation by increasing calcium channel current densities [35].

Here we report two patients, a 15-year-old boy and his 22-year-old sister, with severe intellectual disability, seizures, visual impairment, and dystonic and athetoid movements, carrying the homozygous CACNB4 missense variant c.377T>C/p.(Leu126Pro). Functional analysis of mutant β4 employing heterologous and homologous expression systems revealed striking effects of the amino acid substitution on calcium channel complex formation and β4’s nuclear functions. Both of which, separately or together, could explain the severe neurological disease in brother and sister.

Results

Identification of the homozygous CACNB4 missense mutation c.377C>T/p.(Leu126Pro) in two siblings with a severe neurodevelopmental disorder

We performed trio or duo whole-exome sequencing (WES) in a total of 390 pediatric subjects with a neurodevelopmental disorder as described previously [36, 37]. Analysis of WES data was performed according to an X-linked, autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant inheritance model, the latter with a de novo mutation in the affected child. WES in a male patient (patient 1) and his first-degree consanguineous healthy parents identified a total of 12 rare homozygous variants [with a minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.1% in the population databases dbSNP138, 1000 Genomes Project, Exome Variant Server, ExAC and gnomAD browsers and no homozygotes in ExAC and gnomAD browsers]. WES did not detect a de novo variant in patient 1. Trio-WES data were not filtered for X-linked variants as patient 1 had a sister (patient 2) who was similarly affected (S1 Text and Table 1). The 15-year-old patient 1 and the 22-year-old patient 2 were affected by severe intellectual disability, seizures, visual impairment, dystonic and athetoid movements (S1 Text and Table 1). Brain imaging revealed atrophy of cerebellar vermis and hemispheres in patient 1 at the age of 3 years (Fig 1A–1F). Progression of cerebellar atrophy and mild ventricular enlargement were observed in patient 1 at the age of 14 years (Fig 1G–1L). In patient 2 brain MRI at the age of 6 months was normal but showed the same abnormalities as in her brother at the age of 8 years (S1 Text and Table 1).

Table 1. Clinical features of the siblings with the homozygous CACNB4 mutation p.(Leu126Pro).

Patient 1 Patient 2
Ethnicity Turkish Turkish
Sex Male Female
Family history Negative Negative
Pregnancy Uneventful Uneventful
Birth at Term Term
Measurements
Birth weight (g/z) 3840/0.7 3240/-0.2
Birth length (cm/z) 52/-0.1 52/0.4
OFC at birth (cm/z) 34/-1.1 34/-0.2
Age at last examination 15 years 22 years
Weight at last examination (kg/z) 30/-3.7 36.4/-4.1
Height at last examination (cm/z) 138/-3.8 151/-2.7
OFC at last examination (cm/z) 52.5/-2.1 53/-1.9
First clinical signs
Severe developmental delay, no eye contact Severe developmental delay, no eye contact
Neurological features
Global developmental delay ++ ++
Motor skills achieved
    - rolling over
    - sitting
    - walking

+
-
-

-
-
-
Truncal muscular hypotonia ++ ++
Spasticity - -
Athetoid-dystonic movements + +
Intellectual disability ++ ++
Speech impairment ++ ++
Seizures
Age of onset 3 years 6 months
Initial seizure type Focal Tonic
Current seizure type Focal Focal, tonic
EEG at last examination Multiregional sharp waves, structural deficiency, slowed background activity Multiregional sharp waves with secondary generalization, structural deficiency, slowed background activity
Response to treatment Seizure-free on monotherapy Intractable
Other
Feeding difficulties + +
Failure to thrive + +
Hearing Normal Normal
Eye contact Reduced None
Ophthalmologic examination (at age of) No optic atrophy, normal retina (15 years) No optic atrophy, normal retina (22 years)
Visual evoked potentials Absent Reduced
Cerebral MRI Severe cerebellar atrophy, mild ventricular enlargement Severe cerebellar atrophy, mild ventricular enlargement

EEG: electroencephalogram; OFC: occipital frontal circumference, ++: severe, +: present, -: absent

Fig 1. Brain imaging of patient 1 revealed cerebellar atrophy.

Fig 1

(A, C and E) Selected brain MRI scans of patient 1 at the age of 3 years in comparison to age-matched normal scans (B, D and F; all T2-weighted). T2-weighted sagittal section (A) and coronar section (C) show moderate cerebellar atrophy including the vermis and hemispheres (indicated by arrows). (E) T1-weighted transversal section showing no supratentorial abnormalities. (G, I and K) Selected MRI scans of patient 1 at the age of 14 years in comparison to age-matched normal scans (H, J and L; all T2-weighted). T2-weighted sagittal section (G) and coronar section (I) demonstrate severe cerebellar atrophy. (K) Mild ventricular enlargement is observed on T2-weighted transversal section.

Segregation analysis of the 12 rare homozygous variants in the two siblings and their parents excluded six to be associated with the patients’ phenotype, but six variants remained (S1 Table). Four of the six variants were absent in all population databases and affected the genes LTBP1, EMILIN1, CACNB4, and MINAR1 (S1 Table). CADD, REVEL, and M-CAP, the pathogenicity prediction programs combining previous pathogenicity scores, inconsistently predicted the variants in LTBP1, EMILIN1, and MINAR1 to have a damaging effect on protein function (S1 Table). The three genes have not yet been reported in the context of rare Mendelian disorders.

To further examine possible correlations of these genetic variants with the clinical features in the two patients, we checked the phenotype of the respective published mouse knockout model. Knockout of the long form of Ltbp1 (Ltbp1L) in mice caused early postnatal lethality. Ltbp1L-/- mice had developmental abnormalities of the heart outflow tract, including persistent truncus arteriosus and interrupted aortic arch, and hypoplastic endocardial cushions. These data demonstrate an essential role of Ltbp1L during heart organogenesis and valvulogenesis [38, 39]. Recently, LTBP1 has been reported as disease gene candidate for primary platelet secretion defects [40]. Emilin1 knockout mice showed defects of elastic fibers in aorta and skin suggesting that Emilin1 is implicated in elastogenesis and maintenance of blood vascular cell morphology [41]. The identification of a heterozygous missense variant in EMILIN1 in a proband with a connective disorder suggested this gene as a new disease gene for an autosomal-dominant connective tissue disorder [42]. To our knowledge, a mouse model for Minar1 (alternative names KIAA1024 and UBTOR) does not yet exist. First functional data suggest a role of MINAR1 in angiogenesis [43]. Recent data indicate UBTOR/KIAA1024 to regulate cellular growth and mTOR signaling. Homozygous ubtor zebrafish mutants had no gross developmental abnormalities. Behavioral tests showed enhanced fear-evoked freezing and compromised C-start responses in mutant fish, suggesting a possible role of ubtor in neurodevelopment [44]. However, KIAA1024/MINAR1/UBTOR has not been reported as candidate gene for intellectual disability in large whole-exome sequencing studies [4549]. Implication of Ltbp1 in heart development [50] and Emilin1 in skin homeostasis and blood pressure control [51] do not support any contribution of the variants in LTBP1 and EMILIN1 to the neurological anomalies in the two siblings. However, an effect of the MINAR1 variant p.(Ser855Tyr) on the patients’ phenotype cannot yet be excluded based on limited data from literature.

Two missense variants with a MAF of 0.0016% and 0.0012% were identified in known disease genes (S1 Table): c.889C>T/p.(Arg297Cys) in DHX38 (MIM: 605584) in which two other amino acid substitutions have been reported in individuals with autosomal recessively inherited early-onset retinitis pigmentosa (MIM: 268000) [52, 53] and c.5083C>A/p.(Pro1695Thr) in MYO15A (MIM: 602666) in which biallelic mutations cause autosomal-recessive, nonsyndromic deafness (DFNB3, MIM: 600316) [54, 55]. The MYO15A change c.5083C>A is no known disease-associated allele. Although three in silico tools predicted the variant to be pathogenic (S1 Table), neither one of the siblings had any hearing problems (S1 Text and Table 1), suggesting that this nucleotide change likely represents a rare polymorphism rather than a pathogenic mutation. The DHX38 variant p.(Arg297Cys) was predicted to be possibly damaging by two of three programs (S1 Table). In individuals with a pathogenic DHX38 variant, blindness is caused by retinitis pigmentosa and occurred between 7 and 8 years of age, and the majority of affected individuals developed cataract by the age of 19 years [52]. In contrast, the diagnosis of blindness in patients 1 and 2 described here was established within the first year of their life, and ophthalmologic examination at age 15 years and 22 years, respectively, did not reveal any signs of cataract and/or retinitis pigmentosa. Most likely cortical blindness accounted for visual loss in both individuals reported here (S1 Text). Together, these data suggest that the DHX38 c.889C>T change is a benign variant and not causative for visual impairment in the two siblings.

The homozygous variant c.377T>C/p.(Leu126Pro) in the disease-associated gene CACNB4 was predicted to be pathogenic by all three in silico tools with exceptional high scores (S1 Table). Heterozygous CACNB4 variants have been implicated in epilepsy and episodic ataxia [15], and the Cacnb4 knockout mice have a severe neurological phenotype [19, 21, 56]. The p.(Leu126Pro) amino acid change affects a highly conserved leucine in the SH3 domain of β4. In fact, equivalent substitutions in β1a and β2a disrupt the functionally critical tandem SH3-GK module of CaV β subunits, similarly to that in MAGUK proteins [31, 5759]. To obtain more evidence for a possible disease association of the CACNB4 variant p.(Leu126Pro), also in light of the other five homozygous variants identified in the two affected siblings, we first queried available genomic resources and large genome-wide sequencing studies for additional individuals with biallelic CACNB4 variants, including DECIPHER and the DDD study. We did not identify any homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in this gene [46, 47, 49, 6068]. Through GeneMatcher [69] we did not get a match reporting biallelic variants in CACNB4. The absence of further individuals with biallelic variants in this gene suggests the presence of an ultra-rare genetic disease in the two affected siblings.

We next compared the constraint score of the observed/expected (o/e) number of missense variants for the genes LTBP1, EMILIN1, CACNB4, MINAR1, DHX38 and MYO15 in gnomAD. The o/e score measures the tolerance of a gene to a certain class of variation. A low o/e value indicates that the gene is under stronger selection than a gene with a higher score. Among the six genes, CACNB4 has the lowest o/e score for missense variants (0.55) indicating that this gene is under selection and probably a Mendelian disease gene (S1 Table). In addition, we used the MetaDome web server, which provides profiles of genetic tolerance through aggregation of homologous human protein domains [70]. MetaDome predicted leucine 126 of CACNB4 to be highly intolerant, while the genetic tolerance of the amino acid residues affected in the other five genes ranges from neutral to intolerant (S1 Table). Together, by a combination of in silico tools, animal model, clinical, and genetic data, we suggest that the homozygous p.(Leu126Pro) amino acid substitution in CACNB4 is the likely variant to underlie the patients’ neurological disease, although there is still a degree of uncertainty.

The analogous Cacnb4 mutation in rat, p.Leu125Pro, impairs the association of β4b with calcium channel complexes and β4b nuclear targeting in muscle cells and neurons

In order to examine possible functional defects of the CACNB4 p.Leu126Pro mutation that might explain the neurological phenotype in the patients, we studied the effects of the amino acid substitution in muscle and nerve cells, two well-established and differentiated cellular expression systems for voltage-gated calcium channels [27, 28, 71]. Based on the functional defects described for an equivalent substitution in β2a [31], we hypothesized that the corresponding substitution of leucine 125 by proline in rat β4b might hamper its association with pore-forming CaV subunits. To test this, we first expressed V5-tagged β4b, β4b-L125P, and β1a together with the L-type calcium channel CaV1.2 in dysgenic (CaV1.1-null) myotubes. This expression system has been extensively used to study the structural and functional incorporation of calcium channels and associated proteins in a native signaling complex of a differentiated excitable cell [7276]. Fig 2A (left panel) shows that GFP-CaV1.2 and the skeletal muscle β1a isoform, labeled with anti-GFP and anti-V5, respectively, co-localize in clusters corresponding to sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)/plasma membrane and SR/T-tubule junctions, collectively referred to as triads. Because β subunits require binding to a CaV1 subunit for their incorporation in triads, this co-clustering is indicative of a stable CaV1.2/β1a interaction [74, 77]. Similarly to the skeletal muscle β1a isoform and in line with previous findings [28, 71], the wild-type neuronal β4b isoform co-clustered with CaV1.2 in the triads (Fig 2A, center panel), showing that it too associates with the channel. However, the mutant β4b-L125P failed to associate with CaV1.2 (Fig 2A, right panel). In contrast to β1a and β4b, no transfected myotubes showed co-clustering of β4b-L125P with CaV1.2 in triads. Instead, β4b-L125P remained diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm, while CaV1.2 was clustered in triads (Fig 2B). Thus, the p.Leu125Pro substitution disrupts the association of β4b with the CaV1.2 channel complex in myotubes.

Fig 2. The p.Leu125Pro mutation impairs co-clustering with CaV1.2 and nuclear targeting of β4b in skeletal myotubes.

Fig 2

(A) Representative double-immunofluorescence images of myotubes transfected with β1a-V5, β4b-V5, or β4b-L125P-V5 expression construct together with GFP-CaV1.2, labeled with anti-GFP and anti-V5. Scale bar: 10 μm. Color overlay of GFP-CaV1.2 (green) and CaVβ1a (red) staining; 4× magnification of regions indicated by blue rectangle. Scale bar, 2 μm. GFP-CaV1.2 was incorporated in triads (clusters) and both wildtype β1a and β4b subunits co-assembled with these calcium channel complexes. In addition, wildtype β4b specifically accumulated in the nuclei of the myotubes. In contrast, β4b-L125P failed to co-cluster with CaV1.2 in triads and failed to target into the nuclei. (B) Fraction of myotubes in which the transfected β subunit co-clustered with GFP-CaV1.2 (N = 4; n = 240). ANOVA: F(2,9) = 1182, P < 0.0001. (C) Fraction of myotubes showing nuclear targeting (N = 4; n = 240). ANOVA: F(2,6) = 41.25, P = 0.0003. (D) Nucleus/cytoplasm ratios of myotubes labeled with anti-V5 (N = 3; n = 60). ANOVA: F(2,177) = 47.75, P < 0.0001.

In addition to the clustered triad labeling, myotubes transfected with wildtype β4b displayed strong nuclear staining (Fig 2A). A similar nuclear localization was not observed with β1a and thus represents isoform-specific nuclear targeting of β4b that has previously been demonstrated [28]. Importantly, mutated β4b-L125P was excluded from the nuclei (Fig 2A). Quantitative analysis showed that 52.5±4.4% of the cells transfected with β4b displayed nuclear targeting, whereas no cells with nuclear staining were found for β4b-L125P (Fig 2C). Note that β4b nuclear targeting is negatively regulated by electrical activity [26, 28], and therefore a subset of, probably spontaneously active, myotubes displayed no nuclear targeting, even when transfected with wildtype β4b (Fig 2C). Compromised nuclear targeting of β4b-L125P was further corroborated by the significant difference of the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio of staining intensities (Fig 2D). Together, the co-expression experiments in the myotube model system indicate that the p.Leu125Pro mutation disrupts both, the association of β4b with the channel complex in the triad as well as β4b’s nuclear targeting property.

Because the parents of the two affected siblings, who are heterozygous carriers of the p.(Leu126Pro) variant, were healthy, we examined channel association and nuclear targeting of wild-type (β4b-GFP) and mutant β4b (L125P-V5) co-expressed together with Cav1.2 in dysgenic myotubes. As expected wild-type β4b-GFP displayed a clustered staining pattern, consistent with its normal incorporation into channel complexes. In contrast, in the same cells β4b-L125P-V5 remained diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm. Similarly, in cells that showed β4b-GFP nuclear targeting, mutant β4b-L125P-V5 were excluded from the nuclei (S1 Fig). These results demonstrate that in the presence of mutant β4b-L125P the wild-type β4b subunit still displays its normal association with calcium channel complexes as well as its nuclear targeting properties.

Next, we sought to determine whether the p.Leu125Pro mutation also affects the targeting properties of β4b in neurons. Previously, we demonstrated that β4b is strongly expressed in the somatodendritic compartment as well as the proximal and distal axon of cultured hippocampal neurons [27]. This was most evident when co-expressing V5 epitope-tagged β4b together with soluble eGFP in order to outline the dendritic and axonal branching pattern and imaging the arborization of individual transfected neurons (Fig 3A, left panel). It is important to note that blacklevel and contrast of these overview images were adjusted in a way to visualize also the weak staining in the distal axon. Hence, potential staining differences in the somata (cf. Fig 4) are not visible at these settings. β4b immunostaining was strong throughout the soma and the dendrites as well as the proximal parts of the axon (Fig 3A, left panel, arrows) and, importantly, β4b labeling was also found in the distal and fine axonal branches. Quantitative analysis of anti-V5 labeling intensity in the distal axon revealed a significant reduction of β4b-L125P-V5 compared with β4b-V5 (fluorescence intensity above background: 1.33±0.07 [β4b-V5, n = 14] and 1.03±0.05 [β4b-L125P-V5, n = 18], t(30) = 4.42, p<0.001). Where an axon contacted neighboring, non-transfected cells, this pattern appeared dotted, which is typical for an accumulation of β4b in presynaptic boutons (Fig 3A, left panel, arrowheads). In contrast, expression of the β4b-L125P mutant was largely restricted to the soma and dendrites (Fig 3A, right panel). Moreover, the proximal axon segments were only faintly labeled (Fig 3A, right panel, arrows) and a dotted pattern at axonal contact points with neighboring cells was entirely missing (Fig 3A, right panel, arrowheads).

Fig 3. Axonal and synaptic targeting of the β4b-L125P mutant fails in primary hippocampal neurons.

Fig 3

Cultured hippocampal neurons were transfected with eGFP and β4b-V5 or β4b-L125P-V5 on DIV6 and immunolabled with anti-V5 on DIV34. Nuclei were labeled with Hoechst dye (blue). (A) Overview images of the dendritic and axonal arborization (eGFP) and anti-V5 labeling (anti-V5) of neurons expressing β4b-V5 (left panel) or β4b-L125P-V5 (right panel). Arrows indicate segments of the proximal axons and arrowheads indicate exemplary axonal contact points with neighboring non-transfected cells typical for presynaptic boutons. (B) Presynaptic boutons were identified as eGFP-filled axonal varicosities contacting postsynaptic untransfected cell somata or dendrites. β4b-V5 accumulated in presynaptic boutons of transfected hippocampal neurons (arrowheads, left panel). In contrast, a distal axonal localization of β4b-L125P-V5 was missing and β4b-L125P-V5 failed to be incorporated in presynaptic boutons (arrowheads, right panel). Scale bars, 20 μm (A) and 10 μm (B). Representative images of three independent experiments are shown (see Results for statistics).

Fig 4. The p.Leu125Pro mutation impairs activity-regulated nuclear targeting of β4b in hippocampal neurons.

Fig 4

Cultured hippocampal neurons were transfected with eGFP and β4b-V5 or β4b-L125P-V5 on DIV6 and fixed and fluorescently labeled with anti-V5 (red) and Hoechst dye (blue) on DIV34 (control) or DIV35 (TTX). TTX treatment (1μM) was performed overnight (12h). (A) In untreated neurons (control) β4b-V5 was distributed throughout the soma, dendrites and axons (not visualized) and, to a low degree, also in the nucleus. In contrast, localization of β4b-L125P-V5 was more strongly restricted to the cell soma and largely excluded from the nucleus. (B) Nucleus/cytoplasm ratio of anti-V5 labeling intensity. (C) Overnight silencing of electrical activity with TTX induced a strong accumulation of β4b-V5 in the cell nuclei while β4b-L125P-V5 failed to localize to the nucleus. Note that wild-type β4b-V5 (but not β4b-L125P-V5) also accumulated in the axon hillock (arrowhead, see Results for statistics). (D) Nucleus/cytoplasm ratio of β4b-V5 and β4b-L125P-V5. Statistics (B and D), 2-way ANOVA: Transfection: F(1, 104) = 166, P < 0.001; treatment (control, TTX): F(1, 104) = 35, P < 0.001; transfection x treatment: F(1, 104) = 27, P < 0.001; Holm-Sidak posthoc analyses showed P < 0.001 (***) in all pairwise comparisons except for treatment (TTX, control) within β4b-L125P (P = 0.64). A total number of 108 cells (between 22 and 34 in each treatment group) from two separate culture preparations was analyzed. Scale bar, 10 μm.

β4b co-localizes with the P/Q-type calcium channel CaV2.1 in presynaptic nerve terminals of differentiated cultured hippocampal neurons [27]. Because our overview imaging suggested little to no axonal targeting of β4b-L125P (Fig 3A), we next performed high-resolution imaging of presynaptic boutons in order to test whether any detectable synaptic localization of the β4b mutant was retained (Fig 3B). To this end, we followed the eGFP-positive axon of transfected neurons to distal contact points with untransfected neighboring neurons. Whenever such axons contact non-transfected dendrites or cell somata they form axonal varicosities, which are typical hallmarks of presynaptic nerve terminals [27]. Such axonal varicosities were clearly visible after expression of diffusible eGFP in neurons (e.g. Fig 3B, eGFP). Wild-type β4b, which was abundant throughout the axons (see above), specifically localized in clusters coinciding with varicosities of the eGFP-labeled axons (Fig 3B, left panel, β4b + eGFP, examples indicated by arrowheads). Most importantly, β4b-L125P did not accumulate in presynaptic nerve terminals as identified by eGFP-positive varicosities lacking any corresponding anti-V5 staining (Fig 3B, right panel, examples indicated by arrowheads). Together, these observations indicate that the β4b-L125P mutant fails to be trafficked into the axon and to cluster in synaptic terminals in hippocampal neurons, suggesting that it cannot be incorporated into presynaptic calcium channel complexes.

To analyze the nuclear targeting properties of β4b and β4b-L125P in neurons, we focused our attention on the somata of hippocampal neurons (Fig 4). In untreated cultures, wild-type β4b showed a uniform pattern, with labeling of the subunit in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus (Fig 4A, left panel, anti-V5). In contrast, mutant β4b-L125P was excluded from the nuclei (Fig 4A, right panel, anti-V5). This difference was most evident when comparing the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio of the anti-V5 labeling intensity between β4b (0.99±0.16, mean±SD) and β4b-L125P (0.76±0.11, mean±SD), which was significantly different (Fig 4B). Previously, we demonstrated that β4b nuclear targeting is negatively regulated by electrical activity [26, 28]. Therefore, we blocked spontaneous neuronal activity by overnight application of a 1 μM concentration of the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX). As expected, in TTX-treated hippocampal neurons β4b strongly accumulated in the nuclei (Fig 4C, left panel, anti-V5), and the mean nucleus/cytoplasm ratio increased to 1.46±0.30 (mean±SD, compare Fig 4B and 4D). Nonetheless, β4b-L125P remained entirely cytoplasmic in TTX-treated neurons (Fig 4C, right panel, anti-V5) and consequentially the mean nucleus/cytoplasm ratio (0.79±0.16, mean±SD, Fig 4D) was indistinguishable from that of untreated control neurons (compare Fig 4B and 4D). These data indicate that the p.Leu125Pro mutation abolishes the basal and activity-dependent nuclear localization of β4b in neurons. Finally, wild-type β4b-expressing neurons showed a specific localization of β4b in the axon hillock (Fig 4C, left panel, anti-V5, arrowhead), as previously reported [27]. This distinctive localization was not observed in β4b-L125P-expressing neurons (fluorescence intensity above background: 5.07±0.66 [β4b-V5, n = 27] and 1.92±0.17 [β4b-L125P-V5, n = 21], t(46) = 4.15, p<0.001). Altogether, these results demonstrate that substitution of leucine 125 by proline inhibits (1) axonal trafficking and synaptic localization, (2) basal and activity-dependent nuclear targeting, and (3) the specific β4b accumulation in the axon hillock of cultured hippocampal neurons. This is likely caused by disrupting (1) the interaction of β4b with presynaptic calcium channel complexes, (2) the machinery responsible for β4b accumulation in the nuclei of quiescent neurons, and (3) the interaction with proteins of unknown nature in the axon hillock.

The p.Leu125Pro mutation does not abrogate complex formation of β4b with PPP2R5D (B56δ), but with the TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase (TNIK)

Rat β4 has previously been shown to form a protein complex with Ppp2r5d (B56δ), a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, that contributes to nuclear localization of β4. Consistent with previous findings [29] we demonstrated that substitution of leucine 125 by proline impairs nuclear targeting of β4b in cultured hippocampal neurons (Fig 4). To examine the consequence of the p.Leu125Pro mutation on the interaction of β4b with PPP2R5D, we immunoprecipitated endogenous PPP2R5D from HEK293T cells transfected with V5-tagged β4b wildtype or β4b-L125P and detected β4b in the precipitates by immunoblotting using anti-V5 or anti-β4 antibodies. V5-tagged β1a was used as negative control as this protein could not be co-precipitated with PPP2R5D (Fig 5A). In contrast, both wild-type β4b and the β4b-L125P mutant co-precipitated with endogenous PPP2R5D, as low amounts of β4b wildtype and mutant were detected in the immunoprecipitates by anti-V5 and anti-β4 antibodies (Fig 5A, right panel). These data demonstrate that the p.Leu125Pro mutation did not abrogate the modest complex formation between β4b and PPP2R5D in HEK293T cells.

Fig 5. The p.Leu125Pro mutation does not disrupt complex formation of β4b with PPP2R5D, but with TNIK.

Fig 5

(A and B) HEK293T cells were transfected with empty vector (EV), β1-V5, β4b-V5 or β4b-L125P-V5 expression construct as indicated. Endogenous PPP2R5D and TNIK were immunoprecipitated from cell extracts using an anti-PPP2R5D (A) and an anti-TNIK antibody (B), respectively, both coupled to magnetic protein G Dynabeads. For IgG control the cell lysate from cells transfected with the β4b-L125P-V5 mutant construct was incubated with an anti-normal rabbit IgG antibody coupled to Dynabeads. Co-precipitated β1-V5 and β4b-V5 proteins were detected by immunoblotting using anti-V5-HRP and anti-β4 antibody. A representative blot of four (A) or three (B) independent experiments each is shown.

Next, we examined whether the β4b-L125P mutant alters subcellular localization of endogenous PPP2R5D. Previous data suggested that expression of eGFP-tagged β4 in CHO-K1 cells causes an enrichment of PPP2R5D in the nucleoplasm [78]. We ectopically expressed V5-tagged wild-type β4b and β4b-L125P mutant in HEK293T cells and stained the cells for endogenous PPP2R5D and β4b using anti-PPP2R5D and anti-V5 antibodies, respectively. In HEK293T cells transfected with empty vector, PPP2R5D was diffusely located in the cytoplasm, but also showed some nuclear staining (Fig 6). As shown in myotubes (Fig 2) and primary hippocampal neurons before (Fig 4), V5-tagged β4b wildtype was also enriched in the nuclei of HEK293T cells (Fig 6). In contrast, β4b-L125P transfected cells exhibited a predominant cytoplasmic distribution, and β4b-L125P was excluded from the nucleus. Importantly, the cellular distribution of PPP2R5D did not change upon expression of β4b wildtype or β4b-L125P in HEK293T cells. Neither did we observe increased nuclear PPP2R5D staining with co-expressed β4b compared to control (empty vector), nor any change with β4b-L125P (Fig 6). Together, the data suggest that complex formation between PPP2R5D and β4b may not be necessary or sufficient for nuclear targeting of one or the other protein.

Fig 6. Subcellular localization of PPP2R5D is not affected by expression of β4b wildtype or the L125P mutant in HEK293T cells.

Fig 6

HEK293T cells were plated on collagen-coated glass slides and transiently transfected with the indicated constructs. β4b-V5 and β4b-L125P-V5 were stained by mouse anti-V5 antibody (green); endogenous PPP2R5D was visualized using rabbit anti-PPP2R5D antibody (red). Representative images of two independent experiments are shown. White boxes indicate magnified areas of specimen shown on the very right-hand side. Scale bars, 10 μm. EV: empty vector (control).

In search of alternative neuronal β4b binding partners, we screened the BioGRID database (https://thebiogrid.org) [79] for CACNB4/β4 and identified the TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase (TNIK) [80]. TNIK is expressed in the brain and has been suggested to be important for postsynaptic signaling, neurogenesis and cell proliferation [8183]. We found endogenous TNIK to be expressed in HEK293T cells (Fig 5B, left panel) and then aimed to study if TNIK is in complex with β4b. We expressed V5-tagged β4b wildtype in HEK293T cells, immunoprecipitated endogenous TNIK and detected β4b in the precipitates. β4b wildtype was efficiently co-precipitated with TNIK (Fig 5B, right panel). In contrast to wild-type β4b, we consistently failed to detect the β4b-L125P mutant in the immunoprecipitates by using anti-V5 or anti-β4 antibody (Fig 5B, right panel). These data demonstrate that the p.Leu125Pro mutation abrogates the capability of β4b to form a protein complex with neuronal TNIK.

The p.Leu125Pro mutation does not abolish the augmentation of calcium currents by β4b

The observed loss of β4b‘s stable association with calcium channel complexes in synapses and triads suggested that the ability of the β4b-L125P mutant to augment calcium currents may also be compromised. To examine this possibility, we heterologously co-expressed wild-type and mutant β4b subunits with GFP-tagged CaV2.1 plus the α2δ-1 subunit in tsA201 cells and analyzed whole cell barium currents using patch-clamp electrophysiology (Fig 7). When CaV2.1 and α2δ-1 were expressed without a β subunit in tsA201 cells, currents were below detectability in about 70% of the cells, and the analyzable cells showed currents of low amplitude (3.32 ±1.15pA/pF; mean ±SEM) (Fig 7A and 7B). Upon co-expression of wildtype β4b the peak current density increased >10-fold (36.79 ±7.25 pA/pF) (Fig 7A and 7B), consistent with the known function of β subunits in increasing functional expression of calcium channels in the membrane of heterologous cells [9, 84]. This significant increase in current amplitude was accompanied by a modest, but highly significant reduction of current inactivation. The residual fractional current at the end of the 200 ms test pulse increased from 48% to 77% (Fig 7E and 7F). Voltage-dependence of activation was not altered by co-expression of β4b (Fig 7C and 7D and S2 Table). Surprisingly, co-expression of the mutant β4b-L125P also caused a significant increase in current density (35.23 ±6.38 pA/pF), similar to that of the wildtype β4b (Fig 7A and 7B). Notably, however, the β effect on current inactivation was less pronounced with β4b-L125P compared to β4b. The mean size of the residual currents after 200 ms in cells co-expressing CaV2.1 with β4b-L125P (64%) was between the values recorded in cells expressing CaV2.1 with β4b and those without β, and this difference was significant relative to both conditions (Fig 7E and 7F). Thus, the β4b-L125P mutant retains the ability to augment CaV2.1 currents in tsA201 cells, whereas its effects on CaV2.1 current inactivation are slightly reduced by the single residue substitution.

Fig 7. Current properties of CaV2.1 calcium channels expressed in tsA201 cells with wild-type and the L125P mutant β4b subunit, plus α2δ-1.

Fig 7

tsA201 cells were transfected with GFP-CaV2.1, α2δ-1, and β4b-V5 (blue) or β4b-L125P-V5 (orange) expressing plasmid or without a β subunit (green). Two to three days after transfection whole cell barium (15 mM) currents were recorded in response to 200ms test potentials increasing in 10 mV increments from -50 mV to +80 mV. The I/V curve and the scatter plot of Ipeak (A, B) show that co-expression of β4b as well as β4b-L125P substantially increased current amplitudes. Fractional activation curves and scatter plot of the V1/2 (C, D) showed that the voltage sensitivity of the channel was not altered by co-expression of β4b or β4b-L125P. The current inactivation estimated from the decline of the current at the end of the 200ms voltage step (E, F) showed that co-expression of β4b reduced current inactivation and that the mutant β4b-L125P did so to a significantly lesser degree. Ipeak: ANOVA F(2, 43) = 6.291; Vhalf: ANOVA F(2, 36) = 0.0591; Inactivation: ANOVA F(2, 36) = 15.56. Significance was calculated with Tukey post hoc test; * P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01; *** P ≤ 0.001 **** P ≤ 0.0001. Current properties were analysed on 18 cells for both β4b and β4b-L125P. In the absence of a β subunit, the recorded currents were small (n = 10), restricting the analysis to only 3 cells. Results are expressed as Mean ± SEM.

Heterologously expressed P/Q-type CaV2.1 and L-type CaV1.2 channels do not efficiently co-precipitate with β4b-L125P

The severe effects on channel association and synaptic targeting in native cell systems (Figs 2 and 3) are only partially mirrored by defects in channel modulation and not at all in channel membrane trafficking in heterologous cells (Fig 7). Previously, it has been shown that a decrease in the affinity of the β/α1 subunit interaction affects calcium channel complex formation but not current modulation, the latter only requiring a high local concentration of β subunits [8587]. Hence, we hypothesized that functional membrane expression of CaV α1 subunits in tsA201 cells may be achieved by high ectopic expression of β4b-L125P which binds CaV2.1 with reduced affinity. In contrast, correct subcellular targeting and incorporation in native calcium channel complexes of differentiated nerve cells require a stable subunit interaction of wildtype β4b with pore-forming CaV α1 subunits. To test this possibility, we co-expressed wildtype β4b or β4b-L125P in HEK293T cells together with the auxiliary α2δ-1 subunit and the P/Q-type CaV2.1 or L-type CaV1.2 channel α1 subunit and immunoprecipitated the V5-tagged β4b subunit (Fig 8). As expected, both CaV2.1 and CaV1.2 were co-precipitated with wild-type β4b (Fig 8, left panel). In contrast, co-immunoprecipitation of CaV2.1 and CaV1.2 with the β4b-L125P mutant was drastically decreased (Fig 8), indicating reduced complex formation between the β4b-L125P mutant and the two α1 subunits. Together, the functional, structural, and biochemical data show that although β4b-L125P can still modulate the currents of heterologously expressed CaV2.1 channels, the mutation prevents formation of a stable complex between β4b and the α1 subunit.

Fig 8. The p.Leu125Pro mutation impairs complex formation of β4b with P/Q-type CaV2.1 and L-type CaV1.2 channels.

Fig 8

HEK293T cells were co-transfected with β4b-V5 or β4b-L125P-V5 expression construct, mouse α2δ-1 expression construct and GFP-Cav1.2 or GFP-Cav2.1 (α1 subunits) expression construct as indicated. β4b-V5 or β4b-L125P-V5 was immunoprecipitated with V5-coupled Protein G dynabeads. As control, lysates from cells only transfected with β4b-V5 or β4b-L125P-V5 construct were incubated with an anti-normal mouse IgG antibody coupled to Dynabeads. Co-precipitated GFP-tagged α1 subunit was detected by anti-GFP antibody. β4b-V5 proteins were detected by anti-V5-HRP or anti-β4 antibody. Ectopically expressed (mouse) and endogenous (human) α2δ-1 were detected by anti-α2δ-1 antibody (input, right panel). The band at ~55 kDa corresponds to the heavy chain of the IgG antibody and is marked by an asterisk in the immunoblots of the co-immunoprecipitation (IP V5; left panel). A representative blot of four (CaV1.2) and three (CaV2.1) independent experiments is shown.

Discussion

We report two siblings with severe intellectual disability lacking any language and motor development, seizures, visual impairment, and movement disorder who carry the homozygous p.(Leu126Pro) mutation in CACNB4 encoding the cytoplasmic β4 subunit of P/Q-type calcium channels. Functional analysis of the corresponding mutation in rat β4b (L125P) in a range of cellular model systems provides several lines of evidence supporting the notion that this mutation underlies the severe neurological phenotype in the patients: (1) The mutant β4b-L125P completely failed to associate with native calcium channel complexes in the cultured myotube model system; (2) in hippocampal neurons axonal targeting of β4b-L125P was severely compromised, resulting in the lack of β4b-L125P in presynaptic boutons; (3) the mutation completely abolished basal and activity-dependent nuclear targeting of β4b-L125P; (4) complex formation with the novel β4b interaction partner TNIK was disrupted in β4b-L125P; (5) when co-expressed with CaV2.1 in tsA201 cells β4b-L125P still supported functional membrane expression of the channels, however, complex formation with high-voltage activated calcium channels was strongly reduced.

The homozygous CACNB4 mutation p.Leu126Pro causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder

CACNB4 has previously been implicated in neurological disorders. To date, the nonsense variant p.(Arg482*) and the missense variant p.(Cys104Phe) in CACNB4, both in the heterozygous state, have been reported in patients with JME and episodic ataxia, respectively [15]. While the C-terminally truncated β4 subunit altered CaV2.1 channel kinetics, the β4-Cys104Phe mutant did not [15]. Genetic heterogeneity has been discussed to explain the absence of pathogenic CACNB4 variants in large cohorts of patients with episodic ataxia [88]. However, the lack of replication studies raises some doubts on whether the identified variants in CACNB4 have a major causal role in JME and/or episodic ataxia. The p.(Arg482*) variant is a rare nucleotide change and present in one individual of non-Finnish European descent in the gnomAD browser. The p.(Cys104Phe) variant has a minor allele frequency of 0.1% in the non-Finnish European population (131 in a total of 128,338 alleles in the gnomAD browser; no homozygotes). The o/e metrics in gnomAD indicate the CACNB4 gene to be slightly intolerant to both non-synonymous (o/e: 0.55) and loss-of-function variants (o/e: 0.27). The recent finding of identical frequencies of ultra-rare variants in CACNB4 in patients with a neurodevelopmental disorder with epilepsy compared with controls further suggests that heterozygous CACNB4 variants are not associated with epilepsy [63]. In line with this, the parents of the two affected siblings we report here carry the p.(Leu126Pro) mutation in the heterozygous state and are healthy. Similarly, heterozygous lethargic mice do not show any abnormalities [89], and our co-expression experiment shows that the presence of mutant β4b-L125P does not affect calcium channel association and nuclear targeting of wild-type β4b (S1 Fig). Taken together, combined evidence of exceptional high pathogenicity prediction scores for the p.Leu126Pro change, high conservation of leucine 126 within homologous protein domains, absence of the variant in population databases, and CACNB4 as a gene slightly intolerant to missense variants suggests that the p.(Leu126Pro) mutation on both CACNB4 alleles underlies the severe neurological phenotype in the two individuals reported here.

Evidence for distinct pathomechanisms underlying the homozygous p.Leu126Pro mutation

The p.Leu126Pro mutation impairs P/Q-type calcium channel functions

The primary role of β subunits is that of an auxiliary subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. The cytoplasmic β subunits bind to the pore-forming CaV α1 subunits, promote their functional membrane expression, and modulate the channel gating properties [9]. Thus, the lack or a compromised function of a calcium channel β subunit might affect the function of neuronal calcium channels. As β4 is prominently expressed throughout the brain, where it serves as the major β subunit partner of presynaptic P/Q-type calcium channels [5], defects in synaptic function and neuronal network activity would be expected as result of loss of β4 function. Our results demonstrate that, as opposed to wildtype β4b, stable association with CaV1.2 in the triads of dysgenic myotubes is abolished in the β4b-L125P mutant (Fig 2), its targeting and incorporation into presynaptic boutons of cultured hippocampal neurons is abrogated (Fig 3), and it fails to stably complex with heterologously expressed α1 subunits (Fig 8). Together, these defects indicate that the L125P mutation abolishes or severely decreases the incorporation of β4 into native calcium channel complexes, including the synaptic vesicle release machinery in CNS neurons. This finding is consistent with previous reports showing that the analogous amino acid substitution (L93P) in β2a disrupted the functionally important intra-molecular interaction between the SH3 and GK domains. When co-expressed with CaV1.2 in HEK cells mutated β2a-L93P displayed a loss of functional interaction and modulation of the L-type calcium channel [31]; whereas when co-expressed with CaV2.1 in oocytes the β2a-L93P mutant did not reduce P/Q-type currents but accelerated their inactivation at positive test potentials [32]. Similarly, we observed that the corresponding mutation in β4b had differential effects on membrane expression and modulation of its native channel partner CaV2.1. When co-expressed in tsA201 cells β4b-L125P still augmented functional membrane expression of CaV2.1, but the effects of β4b on slowing inactivation were significantly blunted by the L125P mutation (Fig 7). Nevertheless, in the heterologous expression system the pore-forming α1 subunit did not efficiently co-precipitate with β4b-L125P. Apparently, the L125P mutation weakens binding of β4b to the α1 subunit enough to abolish stable association and localization in native channel complexes, while a high protein concentration upon overexpression in heterologous cells is still sufficient to support β4b’s critical role in membrane trafficking [8587].

Despite the severe consequences of the mutation on channel membrane trafficking and complex formation it is uncertain whether the p.Leu126Pro mutation leads to reduced P/Q-type calcium currents in patient cells and whether this is the main pathophysiology of the disease. The association of calcium channel β subunits with pore-forming α1 subunits is highly promiscuous and neurons express multiple β isoforms [9, 27]. Therefore, it is possible that potential channel-dependent effects of the mutated β4 subunits are compensated by the presence of other endogenously expressed β subunits.

Of note, the lethargic mouse model displays an autosomal recessive complex neurological disease that recapitulates many neurological anomalies present in the two affected individuals. Beside severe intellectual disability without speech, sister and brother developed epilepsy and had a movement disorder with athetoid and dystonic movements (Table 1). Similarly, Cacnb4-deficient mice develop ataxic gait with intermittent attacks of motor dysfunction resembling paroxysmal dyskinesia [89, 90], and in EEG recordings they display generalized cortical spike-wave discharges related to absence seizures [56, 91]. Adolescent mice experience a critical period with reduced body weight, renal cysts, and immunological anomalies that lead to increased mortality. Both of our patients have reduced weight, but they do not have immunological problems or renal anomalies. The most striking similarities were the cerebellar abnormalities in lethargic mice and the sib ship. While juvenile mutant mice did not show any changes in cerebellar morphology, the width of the cerebellar cortex was significantly reduced in adult lethargic mice [34]. In the affected female with the homozygous p.Leu126Pro mutation, brain imaging was normal at the age of 6 months, but showed cerebellar atrophy at the age of 8 years (S1 Text). In the boy, similar atrophies were already apparent at the age of 3 years and progressed over time (Fig 1). These data support the importance of β4 for cerebellar development and maturation in mice and humans.

Finally, compound heterozygous mutations in the CACNA1A gene encoding the pore-forming α1A subunit of the CaV2.1 voltage-gated calcium channel have been reported to cause epileptic encephalopathy with progressive cerebral atrophy, optic nerve atrophy, hypotonia, and severe developmental delay [92]. This phenotype shows significant overlap with that of the lethargic mice, mice with a selective deletion of P/Q-type channels in cerebellar Purkinje cells [22], as well as with that of the siblings reported here.

The p.(Leu126Pro) mutation prevents activity-dependent nuclear targeting of β4

Apart from the role as channel subunit, the β4 splice variants β4b and β4a are involved in the activity-dependent regulation of gene expression [26, 28, 29]. Previously, the nuclear targeting defect of a β4 mutant lacking 38 C-terminal amino acid residues (β1–481) was attributed to cause juvenile myoclonic epilepsy [15, 29]. However, we observed normal nuclear targeting properties of the truncated β4(1–481) variant in three different cell systems [71]. In contrast, here we demonstrate that activity-dependent nuclear targeting of β4b-L125P is abolished in cultured myotubes, cultured hippocampal neurons, and HEK293T cells (Figs 2, 4 and 6), consistent with previous data showing a cytoplasmic localization of β4-L125P-EGFP [29]. Apparently, formation of a correct SH3-GK fold in β4 is not only important for stable association of β4 with the channel, but also for its import and retention in the nucleus. Because this nuclear targeting property is highly specific for particular β4 splice variants [26], a deficiency in nuclear targeting properties or in the interaction with the transcriptional regulation machinery cannot be compensated by other β isoforms.

The p.Leu126Pro mutation abolishes complex formation between β4 and TNIK

While at this point the downstream signaling mechanisms and binding proteins affected by the loss of nuclear β4b targeting are elusive, our ongoing screen revealed a novel neuronal binding partner of β4. Using co-immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that wild-type β4b is in complex with TNIK, while the β4b-L125P mutant could not be co-precipitated with TNIK (Fig 5B). TNIK is a neuronal serine-threonine kinase and scaffold protein that has been implicated in multiple neuronal processes including bidirectional glutamate receptor phosphorylation and the organization of nuclear complexes involved in the regulation of the neuronal transcription factor NeuroD1 [81]. As both β4 subunit and TNIK are involved in Wnt/β-catenin signaling and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms [81, 83, 93], interaction of both proteins may regulate the Wnt pathway in neuronal cells and in neurogenesis in particular. In CNS synapses Tnik is concentrated in the postsynaptic density [81]. However, decreases in the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents in Tnik-/- mice and Tnik’s ability to regulate the number of synapses in Caenorhabditis elegans suggest a role of Tnik in presynaptic processes [81, 94]. Therefore, a possible functional link between TNIK and presynaptic calcium channels commonly regulating neurotransmitter release may exist. Future analysis will need to expose the function(s) of the TNIK-β4b protein complex in the neuronal system. In any case, the recent identification of biallelic loss-of-function variants in TNIK in individuals with intellectual disability [95] suggests a direct link between abrogated complex formation between TNIK and the β4b-L125P mutant and impaired cognitive function in humans.

Conclusions

Taken together, our study provides compelling evidence for the pathogenicity of the homozygous CACNB4 missense mutation p.(Leu126Pro) and identifies three potential pathomechanisms which, separately or in combination, likely underlie the severe neurological disorder in the affected siblings. First, the p.Leu126Pro mutation impairs the formation of synaptic P/Q-type calcium channel complexes, second, it prevents activity-dependent nuclear targeting and thus β4-dependent nuclear functions, and third, it disturbs complex formation between β4b and the TRAF2 and NCK interacting kinase TNIK.

Material and methods

Study approval and ethics statement

All investigations were part of an ethically approved protocol (Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Chamber; PV3802). Written informed consent was obtained for both affected siblings.

Whole-exome sequencing and sequence data analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using standard procedures. We performed trio whole-exome sequencing (trio WES) with DNA samples of the male patient and both healthy parents as described before [36, 37]. Briefly, coding DNA fragments were enriched with a SureSelect Human All Exon 50Mb V5 Kit (Agilent), and captured libraries were then loaded and sequenced on a HiSeq2500 platform (Illumina). Reads were aligned to the human reference genome (UCSC GRCh37/hg19) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA, v.0.5.87.5), and detection of genetic variation was performed with SAMtools (v.0.1.18), PINDEL (v. 0.2.4t), and ExomeDepth (v.1.0.0). The functional impact of predicted amino acid substitutions was assessed by the pathogenicity prediction programs CADD (http://cadd.gs.washington.edu/score) [96], REVEL (https://sites.google.com/site/revelgenomics/downloads) [97], and M-CAP (http://bejerano.stanford.edu/MCAP/) [98].

Variant validation

Sequence validation and segregation analysis of all candidate variants in the two affected siblings and their parents were performed by Sanger-sequencing. Primer pairs designed to amplify selected coding exons of the candidate genes (S1 Table) and exon-intron boundaries and PCR conditions are available on request. Amplicons were directly sequenced using the ABI BigDye Terminator Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and an automated capillary sequencer (ABI 3500, Applied Biosystems). Sequence electropherograms were analyzed using the Sequence Pilot software (JSI Medical Systems).

Plasmid information and cloning procedures

Cloning procedures for GFP-CaV1.2 (rabbit cDNA; X15593), GFP-CaV2.1 (rabbit cDNA; NM_001101693), pβA-β1a-V5 (rabbit cDNA; M25514), pβA-α2δ-1 (mouse cDNA; NM_009784) and pβA-β4b-V5 (rat cDNA; L02315) were previously described [11, 27, 28, 99]. The L125P mutation was introduced by splicing by overlap extension (SOE) PCR. Briefly, nt 1–846 of β4b were PCR-amplified with overlapping primers introducing the point mutation T>C at nt position 374 in separate PCR reactions using pβA-β4b-V5 as template. The two PCR products were then used as templates for a final PCR reaction with flanking primers to connect the nucleotide sequences. This fragment was then HindIII/EcoRV digested and cloned into the respective sites of pβA-β4b-V5 yielding pβA-β4b-L125P-V5. Sequence integrity of the newly generated construct was confirmed by sequencing (MWG Biotech).

Cell culture and transfection

Skeletal myotubes of the homozygous dysgenic (mdg/mdg) cell line GLT [100] were cultured as previously described [100]. For immunofluorescence analysis the cells were plated on carbon/gelatin-coated coverslips in 35 mm dishes. At the onset of myoblast fusion, the cells were transfected with 1 μg of plasmid DNA using FuGeneHD (Promega), according to the manufacturer´s instructions.

Low-density cultures of hippocampal neurons were obtained from 16.5–18 day old embryonic BALB/c mice of either sex as described previously [101104]. Dissociated neurons were plated at a density of ~3500 cells/cm2 on 18 mm glass coverslips (No 1.5; GML, Innsbruck, Austria) coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) in 60 mm culture dishes. After allowing the neurons to attach for 3–4 h, coverslips were transferred neuron-side down into a 60 mm culture dish containing a glial feeder layer. Maintenance of neurons and glia was done in serum-free neurobasal medium supplemented with Glutamax and B-27 (NBKO, all ingredients from Thermo Fisher Scientific). Plasmids were introduced into neurons at 6 DIV with Lipofectamine 2000-mediated transfection (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described previously [103]. For co-transfection of pβA-eGFP plus pβA-β4b-V5 or pβA-β4b-L125P-V5 1 μg total DNA was used at a molar ratio of 1:1. Cells were processed for immunostaining experiments between 27–35 DIV. For analyzing the activity dependent nuclear targeting of β4b TTX (1 μM) was added to the culture medium and neurons were incubated overnight (12 h).

HEK293T and tsA201 cells were cultured in Dulbecco´s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Merck) and penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/ml and 100 μg/ml, respectively; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with 1 μg (immunocytochemistry) or 5 μg of plasmid DNA (co-immunoprecipitation) using TurboFect (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 6 h according to the protocol provided and cultured in DMEM overnight.

Immunocytochemistry

Dysgenic myotubes

Cells were immunostained at day 9–10, as described in [26, 77].

Cultured hippocampal neurons

Immunolabeling was performed as described previously [71, 103, 104]. Höchst 33342 dye (~5 μg/ml) was applied to the immunostained neurons for 30 sec in PBS/BSA/Triton to label the nuclei.

HEK293T cells

Coverslips were coated with 10 μg/ml collagen type I (Merck) in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Excess of collagen was removed, HEK293T cells were seeded on coverslips and transfected with expression constructs. Subsequently, cells were rinsed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Merck) in PBS and washed three times with PBS. After treatment with permeabilization/blocking solution (2% BSA, 3% goat serum, 0.5% Nonidet P40 in PBS), cells were incubated in antibody solution (3% goat serum and 0.1% Nonidet P40 in PBS) containing appropriate primary antibodies. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with Fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies in antibody solution. After extensive washing with PBS cells were embedded in ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on microscopic slides.

Antibodies

The following primary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for immunocytochemistry: mouse anti-V5 (1:400 –Figs 24; 1:300 –Fig 6; R960-25, Thermo Fisher Scientific), rabbit anti-PPP2R5D (1:500; A301-098A, Bethyl Laboratories Inc.) and rabbit anti-GFP (1:10,000; A6455, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used at 1:4,000 (Figs 24) or 1:1,000 (Fig 6): Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (A11001), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit (A11008), Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse (A11032), Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit (A11010) and Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-rabbit antibodies (A32733).

For immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation: mouse anti-CACNA2D1 (α2δ-1) (20A) antibody (1:500, MA3-921, Thermo Fisher Scientific), mouse anti-CaVβ4 calcium channel antibody (1:500; 75–054, NeuroMab), mouse anti-GFP antibody (1:5000; 902601, BioLegend), anti-normal mouse IgG (1:100; 12–371, Merck Millipore) and anti-normal rabbit IgG antibody (1:100; 12–370, Merck Millipore), rabbit anti-PPP2R5D antibody (IP 1:25; WB 1:2,500; A301-098A, Bethyl Laboratories Inc.), rabbit anti-TNIK antibody (IP 1:50; WB 1:1,000; 32712, Cell Signaling Technologies), mouse anti-V5 (1:125; R960-25, Thermo Fisher Scientific), mouse anti-V5 tag horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-coupled antibody (1:5,000; R961-25, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Secondary HRP-coupled anti-rabbit (1:5,000; NA934V) and anti-mouse (1:5,000; NA931V) antibodies were from GE Healthcare.

Microscopy

Preparations of dysgenic myotubes were analyzed on an Axioimager microscope (Carl Zeiss) using a 63x 1.4 NA objective. 14-bit images were acquired using Metamorph software (Universal Imaging) connected to a cooled CCD camera (SPOT, Diagnostic Instruments). Figures were arranged in Adobe Photoshop and, where necessary, linear adjustments were performed to correct black level and contrast. Immunostained hippocampal neurons were observed with a BX53 microscope (Olympus) using a 60× 1.42 NA oil-immersion objective lens and fourteen-bit gray-scale images were recorded with a cooled CCD camera (XM10, Olympus) using cellSens Dimension software (Olympus). Images were analyzed with MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices) or ImageJ/Fiji [105] as described below. Figures were assembled in Adobe Photoshop CS6 and linear adjustments were done to correct black level and contrast. HEK293T cells were examined in epifluorescence mode of an Olympus cell tool TIRFM system (Olympus) equipped with a 60x oil immersion objective lens, and pictures were taken of representative cells to visualize subcellular localization of endogenous PPP2R5D and V5-tagged proteins.

Quantification of neuronal β4b expression

Analysis of β4b wildtype and mutant expression was performed with ImageJ/Fiji [105] as follows. The axon initial segment was identified based on morphological criteria in the eGFP image, and a ~30 μm long line was traced along the axon hillock and a background region was selected near the axon hillock. Similarly, a ~30 μm long line was traced along the distal axon (> 250 μm from the cell soma) in the eGFP image, and a background region was selected accordingly. ROIs were transferred from the eGFP images to the corresponding anti-V5 images, and average eGFP and V5 intensities were automatically recorded. Average axon hillock and distal axon labeling intensity of each cell was divided by the corresponding average background intensity, and hence labeling intensities are expressed as fold-expression above background. Statistical analysis was performed using MS Excel.

Co-clustering and nuclear targeting analysis

Cultures labeled with anti-GFP (GFP-CaV1.2) and anti-V5 (β-V5) were systematically screened for transfected, well differentiated myotubes based on the clustered GFP staining of the calcium channel. After switching to the red channel, the co-clustering and the nuclear staining of the β subunits were analyzed. Nuclear targeting of the β subunit rated positive when the fluorescence intensity of any nuclei in the myotube was above that of the cytoplasm. The degree of nuclear targeting was determined by calculating the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio of the background substracted anti-V5 fluorescence intensity using Metamorph. The degree of nuclear targeting in cultured hippocampal neurons was analyzed employing a custom programmed Metamorph Journal as previously described [71]. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated. All data were organized in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using ANOVA or 2-way ANOVA in GraphPad or Sigmaplot. “N” refers to the number of independent experiments and “n” to the number of individual cells analyzed.

Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting

Co-immunoprecipitations were performed with magnetic Dynabeads Protein G (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Therefore, 2.5 μg of anti-PPP2R5D antibody (Fig 5A), anti-TNIK antibody (1:50 dilution; Fig 5B), or anti-V5 antibody (1:125 dilution; Fig 8) was bound to Dynabeads on a rotator for 10 min at room temperature followed by a washing step with co-immunoprecipitation buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P40; supplemented with complete Mini Protease Inhibitors (Roche) and PhosphoStop (Roche)]. Cells were lysed in 500 μl co-immunoprecipitation buffer for 10 min at 4°C, and cell debris was cleared by centrifugation for 10 min. After removing an aliquot (total cell lysate), 250 μl of the remaining supernatant was incubated with the antibody-bound Dynabeads for 2 h at 4°C on a rotator. Subsequently, the Dynabeads were pelleted and washed four times with co-immunoprecipitation buffer. The bound target proteins were eluted by resuspending the beads in 50 μl 1x sample buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE under denaturing conditions, and transferred to PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked followed by incubation with the indicated primary antibody overnight at 4°C and by HRP (horseradish peroxidase)-linked secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Chemiluminescent western blots were digitally imaged using a ChemiDoc MP (Bio-Rad).

Electrophysiology and data analysis

tsA201 cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate transfection method as previously described [106] with GFP-CaV2.1, α2δ-1 and either β4b-V5, β4b-L125P-V5 or no β subunit. 24h after the transfection, cells were replated on 35mm culture dishes coated with poly-L-lysine and kept in 5% CO2 at 30°C; electrophysiological recordings were performed during the following two days. Currents were recorded using the whole-cell patch clamp technique in voltage-clamp mode using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments). Patch pipettes (borosilicate glass; Sutter Instrument) had resistances between 1.8 and 3.5 MΩ and were filled with 144.5 mM Cs-Cl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM Cs-EGTA, and 4 mM Na2-ATP (pH 7.4 with Cs-OH). Bath solution contained 15 mM BaCl2, 150 mM choline chloride, 1mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4 with tetraethylammonium hydroxide). Data acquisition and command potentials were controlled by Clampex software (v10.6; Axon Instruments); analysis was performed using Clampfit 10.5 (Axon Instruments) and Sigma-Plot 8.0 (SPSS Science) software. The current-voltage relationships were obtained by applying a 200 ms-long square pulse from -50mV to +80mV in 10 mV steps, starting from a holding potential of -80 mV. The I/V curves were fitted according to I = Gmax ⋅(V−Vrev) / 1(1+exp (− (V−V0.5) / ka)), where Gmax is the maximum conductance of the slope conductance, Vrev is the extrapolated reversal potential of the calcium current, V0.5 is the potential for half maximal conductance, and ka is the slope factor. The conductance was calculated using G = (−I*1000) / (V−Vrev), and its voltage dependence was fitted according to a Boltzmann distribution: G = Gmax / (1+exp (− (V−V0.5) / ka)). Channel inactivation was quantified by calculating the ratio between residual current at the end of the 200ms sweep and at the maximum (Ires200). All quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc analysis, as indicated using GraphPad Prism. Significance was set to p < 0.05.

Supporting information

S1 Text. Clinical report of the patients.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Differential channel association and nuclear targeting of wildtype and L125P mutant β4b co-expressed in dysgenic myotubes.

Dysgenic (CaV1.1-null) muscle cells were transfected with CaV1.2 together with both β4b(wt)-GFP plus β4b-L125P-V5 to mimic the situation in heterozygous carriers of the CACNB4 variant, and immunolabeled with anti-GFP (green) and anti-V5 (red). (A) The β4b(wt)-GFP displayed the typical clustered distribution, resembling the β4b subunit incorporated into calcium channel complexes (examples indicated by arrow heads). In contrast, the co-expressed mutant β4b-L125P-V5 was evenly dispersed throughout the cytoplasm, indicating its failure to associate with the pore-forming CaV1.2 subunit. (B and C) In quiescent cells (immature myotubes (B) or myoblasts (C)) that displayed nuclear targeting of the wildtype β4b(wt)-GFP subunit, the mutant β4b-L125P-V5 failed to accumulate in the nuclei (examples indicated by arrows). N = 5. Scale bars, 10 μm.

(TIF)

S1 Table. In silico pathogenicity prediction, minor allele frequency, and associated OMIM phenotypes of shared biallelic variants in patients 1 and 2.

Trio-exome data were filtered for potentially pathogenic de novo variants absent in the general population (dbSNP138, 100 Genomes Project, Exome Variant Server, ExAC Browser, and gnomAD Browser) and rare biallelic variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.1% and no homozygous carriers in the aforementioned databases. MetaDome web server (https://stuart.radboudumc.nl/metadome) combines resources and information from genomics and proteomics to improve variant interpretation by transposing this variation to homologous protein domains. It visualizes meta-domain information and gene-wide profiles of genetic tolerance [70]. The constraint score shown in gnomAD is the ratio of the observed/expected (o/e) number of missense variants in that gene. The functional impact of the identified variants was predicted by the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) tool, the Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner (REVEL) scoring system, and the Mendelian Clinically Applicable Pathogenicity (M-CAP) Score. CADD is a framework that integrates multiple annotations in one metric by contrasting variants that survived natural selection with simulated mutations. Reported CADD scores are phred-like rank scores based on the rank of that variant’s score among all possible single nucleotide variants of hg19, with 10 corresponding to the top 10%, 20 at the top 1%, and 30 at the top 0.1%. The larger the score the more likely the variant has deleterious effects; the score range observed here is strongly supportive of pathogenicity, with all observed variants ranking above ~99% of all variants in a typical genome and scoring similarly to variants reported in ClinVar as pathogenic (~85% of which score >15) [96]. REVEL is an ensemble method predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants with a strength for distinguishing pathogenic from rare neutral variants with a score ranging from 0–1. The higher the score the more likely the variant is pathogenic [97]. M-CAP is a classifier for rare missense variants in the human genome, which combines previous pathogenicity scores (including SIFT, Polyphen-2, and CADD), amino acid conservation features and computed scores trained on mutations linked to Mendelian diseases. The recommended pathogenicity threshold is >0.025 [98]. Chr., chromosome; DFNB3: Deafness, autosomal recessive 3; EA5: Episodic ataxia, type 5; EIG9: Epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 9; EJM6: Epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic, susceptibility to, 6; MAF, minor allele frequency; RP84: Retinitis pigmentosa 84; –, not available.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Current parameters.

Data are expressed as mean value ± SEM.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the family for the participation in this study. We further thank R. Stanika, K. Heinz and M. Heitz at the Division of Physiology, Medical University Innsbruck, D. Zorndt at the Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, and the staff of the Microscopy Imaging Facility at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UMIF) for technical support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KU 1240/6-2) to KK, and grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) T855 to MC, F4415 to GJO, and P30402 and W1101 to BEF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Catterall WA, Few AP. Calcium channel regulation and presynaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2008;59(6):882–901. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wittemann S, Mark MD, Rettig J, Herlitze S. Synaptic localization and presynaptic function of calcium channel beta 4-subunits in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(48):37807–14. 10.1074/jbc.M004653200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Randall A, Tsien RW. Pharmacological dissection of multiple types of Ca2+ channel currents in rat cerebellar granule neurons. J Neurosci. 1995;15(4):2995–3012. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-02995.1995 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Catterall WA. Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(8):a003947 10.1101/cshperspect.a003947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schlick B, Flucher BE, Obermair GJ. Voltage-activated calcium channel expression profiles in mouse brain and cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience. 2010;167(3):786–98. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pagani R, Song M, McEnery M, Qin N, Tsien RW, Toro L, et al. Differential expression of alpha 1 and beta subunits of voltage dependent Ca2+ channel at the neuromuscular junction of normal and P/Q Ca2+ channel knockout mouse. Neuroscience. 2004;123(1):75–85. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.09.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arikkath J, Campbell KP. Auxiliary subunits: essential components of the voltage-gated calcium channel complex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13(3):298–307. 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00066-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campiglio M, Flucher BE. The role of auxiliary subunits for the functional diversity of voltage-gated calcium channels. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(9):2019–31. 10.1002/jcp.24998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buraei Z, Yang J. The ss subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(4):1461–506. 10.1152/physrev.00057.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geisler S, Schopf CL, Obermair GJ. Emerging evidence for specific neuronal functions of auxiliary calcium channel alpha(2)delta subunits. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2015;34(2):105–18. 10.4149/gpb_2014037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geisler S, Schopf CL, Stanika R, Kalb M, Campiglio M, Repetto D, et al. Presynaptic alpha2delta-2 Calcium Channel Subunits Regulate Postsynaptic GABAA Receptor Abundance and Axonal Wiring. J Neurosci. 2019;39(14):2581–605. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2234-18.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Imbrici P, Jaffe SL, Eunson LH, Davies NP, Herd C, Robertson R, et al. Dysfunction of the brain calcium channel CaV2.1 in absence epilepsy and episodic ataxia. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 12):2682–92. 10.1093/brain/awh301 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhuchenko O, Bailey J, Bonnen P, Ashizawa T, Stockton DW, Amos C, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6) associated with small polyglutamine expansions in the alpha 1A-voltage-dependent calcium channel. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):62–9. 10.1038/ng0197-62 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ophoff RA, Terwindt GM, Vergouwe MN, van Eijk R, Oefner PJ, Hoffman SM, et al. Familial hemiplegic migraine and episodic ataxia type-2 are caused by mutations in the Ca2+ channel gene CACNL1A4. Cell. 1996;87(3):543–52. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81373-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Escayg A, De Waard M, Lee DD, Bichet D, Wolf P, Mayer T, et al. Coding and noncoding variation of the human calcium-channel beta4-subunit gene CACNB4 in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy and episodic ataxia. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(5):1531–9. 10.1086/302909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barclay J, Balaguero N, Mione M, Ackerman SL, Letts VA, Brodbeck J, et al. Ducky mouse phenotype of epilepsy and ataxia is associated with mutations in the Cacna2d2 gene and decreased calcium channel current in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2001;21(16):6095–104. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-06095.2001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jun K, Piedras-Renteria ES, Smith SM, Wheeler DB, Lee SB, Lee TG, et al. Ablation of P/Q-type Ca(2+) channel currents, altered synaptic transmission, and progressive ataxia in mice lacking the alpha(1A)-subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(26):15245–50. 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fletcher CF, Tottene A, Lennon VA, Wilson SM, Dubel SJ, Paylor R, et al. Dystonia and cerebellar atrophy in Cacna1a null mice lacking P/Q calcium channel activity. FASEB J. 2001;15(7):1288–90. 10.1096/fj.00-0562fje . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khan Z, Jinnah HA. Paroxysmal dyskinesias in the lethargic mouse mutant. J Neurosci. 2002;22(18):8193–200. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-08193.2002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pietrobon D. Function and dysfunction of synaptic calcium channels: insights from mouse models. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15(3):257–65. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.05.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burgess DL, Jones JM, Meisler MH, Noebels JL. Mutation of the Ca2+ channel beta subunit gene Cchb4 is associated with ataxia and seizures in the lethargic (lh) mouse. Cell. 1997;88(3):385–92. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81877-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mark MD, Maejima T, Kuckelsberg D, Yoo JW, Hyde RA, Shah V, et al. Delayed postnatal loss of P/Q-type calcium channels recapitulates the absence epilepsy, dyskinesia, and ataxia phenotypes of genomic Cacna1a mutations. J Neurosci. 2011;31(11):4311–26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5342-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McEnery MW, Vance CL, Begg CM, Lee WL, Choi Y, Dubel SJ. Differential expression and association of calcium channel subunits in development and disease. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1998;30(4):409–18. 10.1023/a:1021997924473 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ludwig A, Flockerzi V, Hofmann F. Regional expression and cellular localization of the alpha1 and beta subunit of high voltage-activated calcium channels in rat brain. J Neurosci. 1997;17(4):1339–49. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01339.1997 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Castellano A, Wei X, Birnbaumer L, Perez-Reyes E. Cloning and expression of a neuronal calcium channel beta subunit. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(17):12359–66. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Etemad S, Obermair GJ, Bindreither D, Benedetti A, Stanika R, Di Biase V, et al. Differential neuronal targeting of a new and two known calcium channel beta4 subunit splice variants correlates with their regulation of gene expression. J Neurosci. 2014;34(4):1446–61. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3935-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Obermair GJ, Schlick B, Di Biase V, Subramanyam P, Gebhart M, Baumgartner S, et al. Reciprocal interactions regulate targeting of calcium channel beta subunits and membrane expression of alpha1 subunits in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(8):5776–91. 10.1074/jbc.M109.044271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Subramanyam P, Obermair GJ, Baumgartner S, Gebhart M, Striessnig J, Kaufmann WA, et al. Activity and calcium regulate nuclear targeting of the calcium channel beta4b subunit in nerve and muscle cells. Channels (Austin). 2009;3(5):343–55. 10.4161/chan.3.5.9696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tadmouri A, Kiyonaka S, Barbado M, Rousset M, Fablet K, Sawamura S, et al. Cacnb4 directly couples electrical activity to gene expression, a process defective in juvenile epilepsy. EMBO J. 2012;31(18):3730–44. 10.1038/emboj.2012.226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ronjat M, Kiyonaka S, Barbado M, De Waard M, Mori Y. Nuclear life of the voltage-gated Cacnb4 subunit and its role in gene transcription regulation. Channels (Austin). 2013;7(2):119–25. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3667881. 10.4161/chan.23895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takahashi SX, Miriyala J, Colecraft HM. Membrane-associated guanylate kinase-like properties of beta-subunits required for modulation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(18):7193–8. 10.1073/pnas.0306665101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McGee AW, Nunziato DA, Maltez JM, Prehoda KE, Pitt GS, Bredt DS. Calcium channel function regulated by the SH3-GK module in beta subunits. Neuron. 2004;42(1):89–99. 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00149-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hosford DA, Lin FH, Wang Y, Caddick SJ, Rees M, Parkinson NJ, et al. Studies of the lethargic (lh/lh) mouse model of absence seizures: regulatory mechanisms and identification of the lh gene. Adv Neurol. 1999;79:239–52. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Benedetti B, Benedetti A, Flucher BE. Loss of the calcium channel beta4 subunit impairs parallel fibre volley and Purkinje cell firing in cerebellum of adult ataxic mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;43(11):1486–98. 10.1111/ejn.13241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohmori I, Ouchida M, Miki T, Mimaki N, Kiyonaka S, Nishiki T, et al. A CACNB4 mutation shows that altered Ca(v)2.1 function may be a genetic modifier of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;32(3):349–54. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.07.017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harms FL, Kloth K, Bley A, Denecke J, Santer R, Lessel D, et al. Activating Mutations in PAK1, Encoding p21-Activated Kinase 1, Cause a Neurodevelopmental Disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103(4):579–91. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hempel M, Cremer K, Ockeloen CW, Lichtenbelt KD, Herkert JC, Denecke J, et al. De Novo Mutations in CHAMP1 Cause Intellectual Disability with Severe Speech Impairment. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(3):493–500. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Todorovic V, Finnegan E, Freyer L, Zilberberg L, Ota M, Rifkin DB. Long form of latent TGF-beta binding protein 1 (Ltbp1L) regulates cardiac valve development. Dev Dyn. 2011;240(1):176–87. 10.1002/dvdy.22521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Todorovic V, Frendewey D, Gutstein DE, Chen Y, Freyer L, Finnegan E, et al. Long form of latent TGF-beta binding protein 1 (Ltbp1L) is essential for cardiac outflow tract septation and remodeling. Development. 2007;134(20):3723–32. 10.1242/dev.008599 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gorski MM, Lecchi A, Femia EA, La Marca S, Cairo A, Pappalardo E, et al. Complications of whole-exome sequencing for causal gene discovery in primary platelet secretion defects. Haematologica. 2019;104(10):2084–90. 10.3324/haematol.2018.204990 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zanetti M, Braghetta P, Sabatelli P, Mura I, Doliana R, Colombatti A, et al. EMILIN-1 deficiency induces elastogenesis and vascular cell defects. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(2):638–50. 10.1128/MCB.24.2.638-650.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Capuano A, Bucciotti F, Farwell KD, Tippin Davis B, Mroske C, Hulick PJ, et al. Diagnostic Exome Sequencing Identifies a Novel Gene, EMILIN1, Associated with Autosomal-Dominant Hereditary Connective Tissue Disease. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(1):84–97. 10.1002/humu.22920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ho RX, Meyer RD, Chandler KB, Ersoy E, Park M, Bondzie PA, et al. MINAR1 is a Notch2-binding protein that inhibits angiogenesis and breast cancer growth. J Mol Cell Biol. 2018;10(3):195–204. 10.1093/jmcb/mjy002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang H, Zhang Q, Gao G, Wang X, Wang T, Kong Z, et al. UBTOR/KIAA1024 regulates neurite outgrowth and neoplasia through mTOR signaling. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(8):e1007583 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Deciphering Developmental Disorders S. Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature. 2017;542(7642):433–8. 10.1038/nature21062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lelieveld SH, Reijnders MR, Pfundt R, Yntema HG, Kamsteeg EJ, de Vries P, et al. Meta-analysis of 2,104 trios provides support for 10 new genes for intellectual disability. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19(9):1194–6. 10.1038/nn.4352 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vissers LE, Gilissen C, Veltman JA. Genetic studies in intellectual disability and related disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(1):9–18. 10.1038/nrg3999 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heyne HO, Singh T, Stamberger H, Abou Jamra R, Caglayan H, Craiu D, et al. De novo variants in neurodevelopmental disorders with epilepsy. Nat Genet. 2018;50(7):1048–53. 10.1038/s41588-018-0143-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reuter MS, Tawamie H, Buchert R, Hosny Gebril O, Froukh T, Thiel C, et al. Diagnostic Yield and Novel Candidate Genes by Exome Sequencing in 152 Consanguineous Families With Neurodevelopmental Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(3):293–9. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3798 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rifkin DB, Rifkin WJ, Zilberberg L. LTBPs in biology and medicine: LTBP diseases. Matrix Biol. 2018;71–72:90–9. 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Colombatti A, Spessotto P, Doliana R, Mongiat M, Bressan GM, Esposito G. The EMILIN/Multimerin family. Front Immunol. 2011;2:93 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Latif Z, Chakchouk I, Schrauwen I, Lee K, Santos-Cortez RLP, Abbe I, et al. Confirmation of the Role of DHX38 in the Etiology of Early-Onset Retinitis Pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(11):4552–7. 10.1167/iovs.18-23849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ajmal M, Khan MI, Neveling K, Khan YM, Azam M, Waheed NK, et al. A missense mutation in the splicing factor gene DHX38 is associated with early-onset retinitis pigmentosa with macular coloboma. J Med Genet. 2014;51(7):444–8. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102316 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rehman AU, Bird JE, Faridi R, Shahzad M, Shah S, Lee K, et al. Mutational Spectrum of MYO15A and the Molecular Mechanisms of DFNB3 Human Deafness. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(10):991–1003. 10.1002/humu.23042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang A, Liang Y, Fridell RA, Probst FJ, Wilcox ER, Touchman JW, et al. Association of unconventional myosin MYO15 mutations with human nonsyndromic deafness DFNB3. Science. 1998;280(5368):1447–51. 10.1126/science.280.5368.1447 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hosford DA, Wang Y. Utility of the lethargic (lh/lh) mouse model of absence seizures in predicting the effects of lamotrigine, vigabatrin, tiagabine, gabapentin, and topiramate against human absence seizures. Epilepsia. 1997;38(4):408–14. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01729.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.McGee AW, Dakoji SR, Olsen O, Bredt DS, Lim WA, Prehoda KE. Structure of the SH3-guanylate kinase module from PSD-95 suggests a mechanism for regulated assembly of MAGUK scaffolding proteins. Mol Cell. 2001;8(6):1291–301. 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00411-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shin H, Hsueh YP, Yang FC, Kim E, Sheng M. An intramolecular interaction between Src homology 3 domain and guanylate kinase-like domain required for channel clustering by postsynaptic density-95/SAP90. J Neurosci. 2000;20(10):3580–7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-10-03580.2000 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McGee AW, Bredt DS. Identification of an intramolecular interaction between the SH3 and guanylate kinase domains of PSD-95. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(25):17431–6. 10.1074/jbc.274.25.17431 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alazami AM, Patel N, Shamseldin HE, Anazi S, Al-Dosari MS, Alzahrani F, et al. Accelerating novel candidate gene discovery in neurogenetic disorders via whole-exome sequencing of prescreened multiplex consanguineous families. Cell Rep. 2015;10(2):148–61. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Anazi S, Maddirevula S, Salpietro V, Asi YT, Alsahli S, Alhashem A, et al. Expanding the genetic heterogeneity of intellectual disability. Hum Genet. 2017;136(11–12):1419–29. 10.1007/s00439-017-1843-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Firth HV, Richards SM, Bevan AP, Clayton S, Corpas M, Rajan D, et al. DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(4):524–33. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Heyne HO, Artomov M, Battke F, Bianchini C, Smith DR, Liebmann N, et al. Targeted gene sequencing in 6994 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorder with epilepsy. Genet Med. 2019;21(11):2496–2503. 10.1038/s41436-019-0531-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Heyne HO, Singh T, Stamberger H, Abou Jamra R, Caglayan H, Craiu D, et al. De novo variants in neurodevelopmental disorders with epilepsy. Nat Genet. 2018;50(7):1048–53. 10.1038/s41588-018-0143-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Karaca E, Harel T, Pehlivan D, Jhangiani SN, Gambin T, Coban Akdemir Z, et al. Genes that Affect Brain Structure and Function Identified by Rare Variant Analyses of Mendelian Neurologic Disease. Neuron. 2015;88(3):499–513. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Srivastava S, Cohen JS, Vernon H, Baranano K, McClellan R, Jamal L, et al. Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice. Ann Neurol. 2014;76(4):473–83. 10.1002/ana.24251 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Study DDD. Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature. 2017;542(7642):433–8. 10.1038/nature21062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hu H, Kahrizi K, Musante L, Fattahi Z, Herwig R, Hosseini M, et al. Genetics of intellectual disability in consanguineous families. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(7):1027–39. 10.1038/s41380-017-0012-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sobreira N, Schiettecatte F, Valle D, Hamosh A. GeneMatcher: a matching tool for connecting investigators with an interest in the same gene. Hum Mutat. 2015;36(10):928–30. 10.1002/humu.22844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wiel L, Baakman C, Gilissen D, Veltman JA, Vriend G, Gilissen C. MetaDome: Pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains. 2019;40(8):1030–1038. 10.1002/humu.23798 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Etemad S, Campiglio M, Obermair GJ, Flucher BE. The juvenile myoclonic epilepsy mutant of the calcium channel beta(4) subunit displays normal nuclear targeting in nerve and muscle cells. Channels (Austin). 2014;8(4):334–43. 10.4161/chan.29322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Campiglio M, Coste de Bagneaux P, Ortner NJ, Tuluc P, Van Petegem F, Flucher BE. STAC proteins associate to the IQ domain of CaV1.2 and inhibit calcium-dependent inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(6):1376–81. 10.1073/pnas.1715997115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tuluc P, Kern G, Obermair GJ, Flucher BE. Computer modeling of siRNA knockdown effects indicates an essential role of the Ca2+ channel alpha2delta-1 subunit in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(26):11091–6. 10.1073/pnas.0700577104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Neuhuber B, Gerster U, Doring F, Glossmann H, Tanabe T, Flucher BE. Association of calcium channel alpha1S and beta1a subunits is required for the targeting of beta1a but not of alpha1S into skeletal muscle triads. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(9):5015–20. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC20205. 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Flucher BE, Andrews SB, Fleischer S, Marks AR, Caswell A, Powell JA. Triad formation: organization and function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release channel and triadin in normal and dysgenic muscle in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1993;123(5):1161–74. 10.1083/jcb.123.5.1161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tanabe T, Beam KG, Powell JA, Numa S. Restoration of excitation-contraction coupling and slow calcium current in dysgenic muscle by dihydropyridine receptor complementary DNA. Nature. 1988;336(6195):134–9. 10.1038/336134a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Campiglio M, Di Biase V, Tuluc P, Flucher BE. Stable incorporation versus dynamic exchange of beta subunits in a native Ca2+ channel complex. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 9):2092–101. 10.1242/jcs.jcs124537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rima M, Daghsni M, De Waard S, Gaborit N, Fajloun Z, Ronjat M, et al. The beta4 subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel (Cacnb4) regulates the rate of cell proliferation in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2017;89:57–70. 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.05.032 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D535–9. 10.1093/nar/gkj109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li J, Zhang W, Yang H, Howrigan DP, Wilkinson B, Souaiaia T, et al. Spatiotemporal profile of postsynaptic interactomes integrates components of complex brain disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(8):1150–61. 10.1038/nn.4594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Coba MP, Komiyama NH, Nithianantharajah J, Kopanitsa MV, Indersmitten T, Skene NG, et al. TNiK is required for postsynaptic and nuclear signaling pathways and cognitive function. J Neurosci. 2012;32(40):13987–99. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2433-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shitashige M, Satow R, Jigami T, Aoki K, Honda K, Shibata T, et al. Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase is essential for Wnt signaling and colorectal cancer growth. Cancer Res. 2010;70(12):5024–33. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mahmoudi T, Li VS, Ng SS, Taouatas N, Vries RG, Mohammed S, et al. The kinase TNIK is an essential activator of Wnt target genes. EMBO J. 2009;28(21):3329–40. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2776109. 10.1038/emboj.2009.285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Stephens GJ, Page KM, Bogdanov Y, Dolphin AC. The alpha1B Ca2+ channel amino terminus contributes determinants for beta subunit-mediated voltage-dependent inactivation properties. J Physiol. 2000;525 Pt 2:377–90. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00377.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Butcher AJ, Leroy J, Richards MW, Pratt WS, Dolphin AC. The importance of occupancy rather than affinity of CaV(beta) subunits for the calcium channel I-II linker in relation to calcium channel function. J Physiol. 2006;574(Pt 2):387–98. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.109744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gerster U, Neuhuber B, Groschner K, Striessnig J, Flucher BE. Current modulation and membrane targeting of the calcium channel alpha1C subunit are independent functions of the beta subunit. J Physiol. 1999;517 (Pt 2):353–68. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0353t.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Neuhuber B, Gerster U, Mitterdorfer J, Glossmann H, Flucher BE. Differential effects of Ca2+ channel beta1a and beta2a subunits on complex formation with alpha1S and on current expression in tsA201 cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(15):9110–8. 10.1074/jbc.273.15.9110 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Graves TD, Hanna MG. Channeling into the epilepsies. Epilepsy Curr. 2008;8(2):37–8. 10.1111/j.1535-7511.2008.00229.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dickie MM. Lethargic (lh). Mouse News Lett. 1964;30:31. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sidman RL, Green MC, Appel SH. Catalog of the Neurological Mutants of the Mouse: Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1965. 34 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hosford DA, Clark S, Cao Z, Wilson WA Jr., Lin FH, Morrisett RA, et al. The role of GABAB receptor activation in absence seizures of lethargic (lh/lh) mice. Science. 1992;257(5068):398–401. 10.1126/science.1321503 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Reinson K, Oiglane-Shlik E, Talvik I, Vaher U, Ounapuu A, Ennok M, et al. Biallelic CACNA1A mutations cause early onset epileptic encephalopathy with progressive cerebral, cerebellar, and optic nerve atrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(8):2173–6. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37678 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rima M, Daghsni M, Lopez A, Fajloun Z, Lefrancois L, Dunach M, et al. Down-regulation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway by Cacnb4. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(25):3699–708. 10.1091/mbc.E17-01-0076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Chen X, Shibata AC, Hendi A, Kurashina M, Fortes E, Weilinger NL, et al. Rap2 and TNIK control Plexin-dependent tiled synaptic innervation in C. elegans. Elife. 2018;7 10.7554/eLife.38801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Anazi S, Shamseldin HE, AlNaqeb D, Abouelhoda M, Monies D, Salih MA, et al. A null mutation in TNIK defines a novel locus for intellectual disability. Hum Genet. 2016;135(7):773–8. 10.1007/s00439-016-1671-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O'Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):310–5. 10.1038/ng.2892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S, et al. REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99(4):877–85. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jagadeesh KA, Wenger AM, Berger MJ, Guturu H, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, et al. M-CAP eliminates a majority of variants of uncertain significance in clinical exomes at high sensitivity. Nat Genet. 2016;48(12):1581–6. 10.1038/ng.3703 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Grabner M, Dirksen RT, Beam KG. Tagging with green fluorescent protein reveals a distinct subcellular distribution of L-type and non-L-type Ca2+ channels expressed in dysgenic myotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(4):1903–8. 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Powell JA, Petherbridge L, Flucher BE. Formation of triads without the dihydropyridine receptor alpha subunits in cell lines from dysgenic skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1996;134(2):375–87. 10.1083/jcb.134.2.375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Folci A, Steinberger A, Lee B, Stanika R, Scheruebel S, Campiglio M, et al. Molecular mimicking of C-terminal phosphorylation tunes the surface dynamics of CaV1.2 calcium channels in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(3):1040–53. 10.1074/jbc.M117.799585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kaech S, Banker G. Culturing hippocampal neurons. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2406–15. 10.1038/nprot.2006.356 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Obermair GJ, Szabo Z, Bourinet E, Flucher BE. Differential targeting of the L-type Ca2+ channel alpha 1C (CaV1.2) to synaptic and extrasynaptic compartments in hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(8):2109–22. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03272.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Stanika R, Campiglio M, Pinggera A, Lee A, Striessnig J, Flucher BE, et al. Splice variants of the CaV1.3 L-type calcium channel regulate dendritic spine morphology. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34528 10.1038/srep34528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hitzl M, Striessnig J, Neuhuber B, Flucher BE. A mutation in the beta interaction domain of the Ca(2+) channel alpha(1C) subunit reduces the affinity of the (+)-[(3)H]isradipine binding site. FEBS Lett. 2002;524(1–3):188–92. 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03054-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory S Barsh, Ingo Helbig

11 Oct 2019

Dear Dr Kutsche,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'A homozygous missense variant in CACNB4 encoding the auxiliary calcium channel beta4 subunit causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs channel and non-channel functions' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the current manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time

We have received reviews on your submissions “A homozygous missense variant in CACNB4 encoding the auxiliary calcium channel beta4 subunit causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs channel and non-channel functions” that ranged from enthusiastic to skeptical and that are listed below.

While the functional studies are thorough and well executed, a general question raised by the reviewers was whether the homozygous variants in CACNB4 was in fact causative in the family reported in your study, given that it represents a missense variant in a consanguineous population that is not well represented in population databases.

While it is often impossible to provide independent genetic evidence for ultra-rare genetic diseases as identifying further individuals with bi-allelic changes in this genes may be impossible, this uncertainty may be addressed in the revised version and you and your team may consider querying available genomic resources (DDD, epilepsy/autism datasets in dbgap) whether additional individuals with bi-allelic CACNB4 variants have been identified.

Given the comments of the reviewers, we feel that your manuscript may require significant changes prior to acceptance and would ask you to submit a major revision.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Ingo Helbig, MD

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: review is uploaded as an attachment (5295 characters).

Reviewer #2: The authors provide a very nice article which solves a long debate about the role of variants in CACNB4 to cause disorders of the nervous system in humans. Although they only report about one family with two recessively affected sibs, their functional work is highly comprehensive and demonstrates the pathological role of the homozygous variant undoutedly. Interestingly, a simple expression in HEK or tsA201 cells of the mutant vs. WT subunit together with alpha1 and alpha2delta subunits would not have revealed this pathological role. But the extensive studies in neurons, myotubes and other cells including biochemistry and immunohistochemistry reveal the defective interaction of the mutant CACNB4 subunit with various other proteins disrupting both the electrophysiological function of the P/Q- or L-type Ca channel complex and the interaction with nuclear targeting and signaliing. These reeults are highly convincing and well performed. I have no critique or suggestions for changes.

The study is highly important, since it terminates a long debate about eventually disease-causing heterozygous variants which becomes very unlikely due to their study (although a smaller contribution of disease-modifying effects of het variants can still not - may be never - be excluded).

Reviewer #3: In this manuscript the authors describe a rare homozygyous variant in CACNB4 that is found in 2 siblings with a severe neurodevelopmental disorder. The clinical, genetic and functional data are of a high standard. The manuscript is generally well written although it could be tightened up a little—especially the discussion but also bits of the results. The authors provide strong evidence that the CACNB4 disrupts some physiological processes. However, I am not completely convinced that the leu126Pro is the cause of the severe neurodevelopmental phenotype seen in the siblings.

First, there are 6 candidate variants that could be responsible for disease. The authors systematically rule out those other than CACNB4 based on a combination of in silico, animal model and clinical data. The case for exclusion is not that strong in my opinion with each of the ‘exclusion methods’ frequently shown to be wanting. For example, in silico analysis is particularly fraught. While I accept that completing functional analysis on all is not practical it remains the best way of ruling out these variants (although even this approach has its issues).

The functional impact of the leu126Pro variant goes someway in arguing that it is potentially pathogenic. However, all the assays that showed differences relate to binding and/or trafficking. The biological consequences of these is not clear to me. It would be good to see a tractable output that had a biological relevance and point to a pathomechanism. The only assay the specifically looks at a functional output that is tractable is the electrophysiology in which the variant has no impact.

Perhaps the most compelling way to confirm pathogenicity is the engineering of a rodent model. With CRISPR technology this is no longer prohibitive.

In summary, although the manuscript contains very solid data it lacks compelling evidence that the studied CACNB4 leu126Pro variant is causing disease.

Reviewer #4: In this study, de Bagneaux and colleagues report a homozygous mutation in CACNB4 identified in two siblings with severe intellectual disability, blindness, epilepsy, movement disorder and cerebellar atrophy. They report functional analysis of the identified variant using the expression in cultured hippocampal neurons, tSA cells and cultured myotubes and suggest that the mutant beta 4 subunit shows reduced incorporation in the presynaptic calcium complexes, absence of nuclear targeting and abolished interaction with a neuronal kinase. However, coexpression of the mutant with the Cav2.1 in tsA201 cells affected the calcium currents in a similar way as the beta 4 wild type. The authors suggest that their data provide evidence for the pathogenicity of the detected variant and corroborate the role of CACNB4 in human disease.

This is a well written and structured manuscript providing elaborate analysis and some interesting insights into the function of the beta 4 subunit and its potential role in the severe neurodevelopmental disorders. The major concern in my view is that while L125P variant seems to affect localization and interactions of the beta 4 subunit with other proteins, there is no clear indication in this manuscript how this may lead to the severe disease seen in the two patients. This question can be addressed in several ways that could corroborate the conclusions of the study. Firstly, since the variant is present in unaffected parents, a comparison to the heterozygous expression would be a very useful control. Furthermore, given the discrepancy between expression in heterologous systems and neurons, a functional assay pointing at the altered neuronal/synaptic activity would be indicative of the underlying disease mechanism. Lastly, any insights into the changes of the gene expression resulting from the altered nuclear translocation or interaction with TNIK would be useful to understand the proposed effect of the variant.

The paper would also be improved by providing more consistent quantification of morphological and biochemical data. For instance, in Fig 3, have the authors considered neurite tracing and quantification? Also, axon hillock expression (Fig 4) should be quantified.

Fig 5 shows that the input lysates in both experiments had less mutant protein to start with. Is the reduced expression of the L126P part of the mechanism?

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: None

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Géza Berecki, PhD

Senior Research Fellow

Ion Channels and Human Diseases Laboratory

The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

The University of Melbourne VIC 3010

geza.berecki@florey.edu.au

geza.berecki@unimelb.edu.au

Reviewer #2: Yes: Holger Lerche

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Attachment

Submitted filename: PloS Genetics_reviewers comments.docx

Decision Letter 1

Gregory S Barsh, Ingo Helbig

23 Jan 2020

Dear Dr Kutsche,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "A homozygous missense variant in CACNB4 encoding the auxiliary calcium channel beta4 subunit causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs channel and non-channel functions" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Ingo Helbig, MD

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed all my comments and suggestions. The manuscript has been significantly improved by the revision.

Reviewer #3: The authors should be commended on the lengths they have gone to in order to find a plausible mechanism. Softening the conclusion is important in light of the lack of mechanism for excitability, which the authors have done.

Reviewer #4: This was a solid and thorough study to begin with, and the authors have now performed additional experiments and addressed the concerns raised by reviewers. While some critical questions remain to be answered in future, I do not have further concerns regarding this manuscript.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No: The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported should be provided as part of 'minimal data set'.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-19-01072R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory S Barsh, Ingo Helbig

4 Mar 2020

PGENETICS-D-19-01072R1

A homozygous missense variant in CACNB4 encoding the auxiliary calcium channel beta4 subunit causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs channel and non-channel functions

Dear Dr Kutsche,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "A homozygous missense variant in CACNB4 encoding the auxiliary calcium channel beta4 subunit causes a severe neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs channel and non-channel functions" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Kaitlin Butler

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Text. Clinical report of the patients.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Differential channel association and nuclear targeting of wildtype and L125P mutant β4b co-expressed in dysgenic myotubes.

    Dysgenic (CaV1.1-null) muscle cells were transfected with CaV1.2 together with both β4b(wt)-GFP plus β4b-L125P-V5 to mimic the situation in heterozygous carriers of the CACNB4 variant, and immunolabeled with anti-GFP (green) and anti-V5 (red). (A) The β4b(wt)-GFP displayed the typical clustered distribution, resembling the β4b subunit incorporated into calcium channel complexes (examples indicated by arrow heads). In contrast, the co-expressed mutant β4b-L125P-V5 was evenly dispersed throughout the cytoplasm, indicating its failure to associate with the pore-forming CaV1.2 subunit. (B and C) In quiescent cells (immature myotubes (B) or myoblasts (C)) that displayed nuclear targeting of the wildtype β4b(wt)-GFP subunit, the mutant β4b-L125P-V5 failed to accumulate in the nuclei (examples indicated by arrows). N = 5. Scale bars, 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. In silico pathogenicity prediction, minor allele frequency, and associated OMIM phenotypes of shared biallelic variants in patients 1 and 2.

    Trio-exome data were filtered for potentially pathogenic de novo variants absent in the general population (dbSNP138, 100 Genomes Project, Exome Variant Server, ExAC Browser, and gnomAD Browser) and rare biallelic variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.1% and no homozygous carriers in the aforementioned databases. MetaDome web server (https://stuart.radboudumc.nl/metadome) combines resources and information from genomics and proteomics to improve variant interpretation by transposing this variation to homologous protein domains. It visualizes meta-domain information and gene-wide profiles of genetic tolerance [70]. The constraint score shown in gnomAD is the ratio of the observed/expected (o/e) number of missense variants in that gene. The functional impact of the identified variants was predicted by the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) tool, the Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner (REVEL) scoring system, and the Mendelian Clinically Applicable Pathogenicity (M-CAP) Score. CADD is a framework that integrates multiple annotations in one metric by contrasting variants that survived natural selection with simulated mutations. Reported CADD scores are phred-like rank scores based on the rank of that variant’s score among all possible single nucleotide variants of hg19, with 10 corresponding to the top 10%, 20 at the top 1%, and 30 at the top 0.1%. The larger the score the more likely the variant has deleterious effects; the score range observed here is strongly supportive of pathogenicity, with all observed variants ranking above ~99% of all variants in a typical genome and scoring similarly to variants reported in ClinVar as pathogenic (~85% of which score >15) [96]. REVEL is an ensemble method predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants with a strength for distinguishing pathogenic from rare neutral variants with a score ranging from 0–1. The higher the score the more likely the variant is pathogenic [97]. M-CAP is a classifier for rare missense variants in the human genome, which combines previous pathogenicity scores (including SIFT, Polyphen-2, and CADD), amino acid conservation features and computed scores trained on mutations linked to Mendelian diseases. The recommended pathogenicity threshold is >0.025 [98]. Chr., chromosome; DFNB3: Deafness, autosomal recessive 3; EA5: Episodic ataxia, type 5; EIG9: Epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 9; EJM6: Epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic, susceptibility to, 6; MAF, minor allele frequency; RP84: Retinitis pigmentosa 84; –, not available.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Current parameters.

    Data are expressed as mean value ± SEM.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PloS Genetics_reviewers comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: CACNB4 Revision letter PLOS Genetics v4.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES