Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;25(5):1091. doi: 10.3390/molecules25051091

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The effects of drought stress on the physiological parameters in the sensitive (right) and tolerant (left) thyme plants: (a) the leaf water potential (MPa); (b) water content (%); (c) shoot dry weight (g); (d) net photosynthetic rate (µmol m2 s−1); (e) stomatal conductance (mmol m2 s−1). * p < 0.05 vs. day 0 of Droughted group; ** p < 0.01 vs. day 0 of Droughted group, *** p < 0.001 vs. day 0 of Droughted group, ## p < 0.01 vs. day 0 of Watered group; ### p < 0.001 vs. day 0 of Watered group; & p < 0.05 Droughted vs. Watered group; && p < 0.01 Droughted vs. Watered group; &&& p < 0.001 Droughted vs. Watered group. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA followed by the Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was executed.