Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231495

Investigation of potential adverse central nervous system effects after long term oral administration of gadolinium in mice

Dominik Nörenberg 1,2,*,#, Felix Schmidt 3,4,#, Karin Schinke 3, Thomas Frenzel 5, Hubertus Pietsch 5, Armin Giese 3, Birgit Ertl-Wagner 2,6,, Johannes Levin 4,7,
Editor: Christoph Harms8
PMCID: PMC7179865  PMID: 32324769

Abstract

Objectives

To examine potential gadolinium (Gd) accumulation in the brain of healthy mice after long-term oral administration of Gd-containing food pellets and to investigate whether Gd leads to adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects, specifically focussing on locomotor impairment in Gd exposed compared to control animals.

Materials and methods

The local Animal Experimental Ethics Committee approved all procedures and applications. Fifteen female C57Bl/6 mice were orally exposed to a daily intake of 0.57 mmol Gd chloride/ kg body weight over a period of 90 weeks from the age of 4 weeks on. Gd-free, but otherwise equivalent experimental diets were given to the control group (N = 13). The animals were monitored daily by animal caretakers regarding any visible signs of distress and evaluated clinically every four weeks for the first 60 weeks and afterwards every two weeks for a better temporal resolution of potential long-term effects regarding impairment of motor performance and loss of body weight. The individual Gd content was measured using mass spectrometry in a sub-cohort of N = 6 mice.

Results

The absolute brain Gd levels of the Gd-exposed mice were significantly increased compared to control mice (0.033± 0.009 vs. 0.006± 0.002 nmol Gd/ g brain tissue). Long-term oral Gd exposure over almost the entire life-span did not lead to adverse CNS effects including locomotor changes (rotarod performance, p = 0.1467) in healthy mice throughout the study period. Gd-exposed mice showed less increased body weight compared to control mice during the study period (p = 0.0423). Histopathological alterations, such as hepatocellular vacuolization due to fatty change in the liver and a loss of nucleated cells in the red pulp of the spleen, were found in peripheral organs of both groups.

Conclusions

Low levels of intracerebral Gd caused by chronic oral exposure over almost the entire life span of mice did not lead to alterations in locomotor abilities in healthy mice throughout the normal aging process.

Introduction

Gadolinium (Gd) is a rare-earth lanthanides metal with strong paramagnetic properties. According to extensive application of Gd-containing agents in biomedical fields, it will enter the body through some administration routes such as oral or intravenous injections. Nowadays, Gd is widely utilized for various industrial and medical purposes, particularly as intrevanous contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [13]. Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are an essential tool in MRI diagnostics and, until recently, had been generally considered to have an excellent safety profile, aside from the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with end-stage renal failure and very infrequent cases of acute neurotoxicity [47]. The history of NSF and GBCAs is well documented [8]. Over recent years it has become apparent that exposure to GBCAs can potentially result in gadolinium deposition within different human tissues or organs (such as bone, liver, kidney) even in the presence of normal renal function [1, 912]. Additionally, several recent studies have linked an increase in signal on non-enhanced, T1-weighted MR images in certain areas of the brain to a prior history of GBCA-enhanced MR examinations. Furthermore, accumulation of Gd was observed in brain tissue of small animals and in autopsy studies of humans [10, 11, 1328]. This is a relatively new and growing field of research primarily driven by concerns regarding unknown and potentially harmful side effects of GBCAs due to brain accumulation. Currently, there is no clear evidence linking Gd and its known brain accumulation with central nervous system (CNS) toxicity or locomotor impairment [9].

Over the last few decades, rapid industrial development and the concomitant increase in the clinical use of GBCAs for medical diagnostics in MRI resulted in a considerable increase of the anthropogenic Gd content in aquatic ecosystems in industrialized regions, thus representing Gd as an emerging environmental contaminant [29, 30]. Prior studies investigating the biodistribution after oral ingestion of Gd-containing nanotubes in rodents found that gadolinium can accumulate in very low concentrations in a range of tissues and organs (skin, bone, liver, kidney, muscle and spleen) [31], however, its brain accumulation was not assessed. Of note, the uptake and distribution of intravenously administered GBCAs differs substantially from those observed after oral exposure to gadolinium salts, and there are no data available assessing brain accumulation after oral Gd exposure. Given the increasing environmental Gd contamination, studies investigating potential adverse CNS effects of intracerebral Gd accumulation after oral exposure are warranted. We therefore aimed to (i) measure the levels of gadolinium present in the brain of mice after life-long oral exposure and (ii) to investigate associated adverse CNS effects with focus on impairment of locomotor abilities due to chronic oral exposure.

Materials and methods

Animals and gadolinium administration

As part of a larger study, a cohort of 28 in-house bred female C57Bl/6 mice were used to investigate the effects of chronic oral Gd intake (N = 15) compared to reference diet (N = 13) on general health, as indicated by impact on gain of body weight, on locomotor activity in the rota rod motor performance test, and on histopathological alterations in the brain and peripheral organs, respectively. As mouse tissue was used for different analytical purposes in context of a larger study, histopathological analysis as well as measurements of Gd accumulation in the brain were performed on available subgroups of N = 9 or 8 mice (histopathological examination), and N = 6 per group (analysis of Gd brain levels). Analysis of progression of body weight, as well as motor performance was conducted based on the data of the whole group (N = 15 or 13) to strengthen the power of the statistical analysis. The Local Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the government of Upper Bavaria approved all procedures and applications (reference number: 55.2-1-54-2531-32-08). Mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) animal facility with free access to food and water, the light and dark cycle was 12 h/12 h and the temperature was kept constant at 22°C. At the age of 4 weeks mice were randomized into two groups. Over a study period of 90 weeks one group (N = 15) received food pellets containing 600 mg Gd-chloride/kg food (Ssniff, Soest, Germany) resulting in a daily intake of approximately 0.57 mmol/ kg body weight, whereas the age-matched control group (N = 13) received experimental diets low in metal ions containing only 60 mg Fe-chloride/ kg food to prevent adverse clinical effects caused by iron deprivation [32]. The animals were monitored daily by animal caretakers regarding any visible signs of distress and evaluated clinically every four weeks for the first 60 weeks and afterwards every two weeks for a better temporal resolution of potential long-term effects. According to approved protocols mice were sacrificed after reaching the maximum observation period of 90 weeks. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and subsequently submitted to histopathological examination.

Assessment of locomotor abilities

Beginning at 20 weeks of age until reaching the maximum observation period of 90 weeks, mice were additionally evaluated with standardized locomotor tests. For assessment of motor performance, a rota rod advanced V4.1.1 (TSE Systems, Chesterfield, MO, USA) was used as described previously [3335]. Briefly, two days prior to the rota rod performance test, mice were trained in three trial runs with an acceleration of the rod from 0 to 30 rpm over 180 s. On the third day, the test consisted of three runs with an acceleration from 0 to 50 rpm over 300 s. The latency between each trial run was at least 40 s. The average time on the rota rod and the best performance out of three runs were evaluated. Runs lasting less than 10 s were defined as invalid and repeated up to a maximum of three repeats per test day. Animals with a best run of less than 20 s would be considered terminally ill and sacrificed.

Tissue processing and histopathological assessment

For histopathological investigation, the right brain hemisphere as well as the spinal cord and peripheral organs (heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract) were fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin. 1 μm tissue sections were deparaffinized and stained with haemalum for 10 min (Chroma Waldeck, Muenster, Germany). GFAP-stainings were performed using a polyclonal rabbit antibody (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) 1:2000 for 32 min and a biotinylated secondary antibody swine-anti rabbit (Agilent) 1:150 for 20 min. Sections were washed in lukewarm Millipore water for 10 min, shortly incubated in 70% EtOH and stained in eosin for 2 min (Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). The left-brain hemisphere of every animal was natively snap-frozen over liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until further analysis.

H&E- and GFAP-stained sections of the right brain hemisphere and the spinal cord on five different heights as well as H&E-stained sections of all peripheral organs were used for histopathological examination. Assessment was performed by a single experienced rater blinded to the treatment of the individual animal using an Olympus BX 50 microscop and a UPlanFl 4x/0.13 objective (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany). The rating included appropriate grading of extent or severity of any neoplastic and non-neoplastic morphologic changes in the categories absent, mild, moderate, or severe. These categories were further translated to values ranging from 0 (no pathology) to 3 (severe pathology) to allow for analysis of group effects on histopathological alterations. Therefore, a composite score was calculated by summing up the individual values for histopathological alterations in all organs.

Measurement of intracerebral Gd-accumulation

Gd levels in the left brain hemisphere of 6 mice of both diet groups were determined by using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) randomized and blinded to the treatment group. The tissue samples were homogenized with a scalpel and 3 aliquots of 20 mg were mixed with 50 μl of a 100 nmol/ l solution of Zn(NO3)3 as internal standard. The samples were dried at 90°C under a laminar flow bench. To digest the tissue 50 μl nitric acid (65%) and 30 μl of hydrogen peroxide (25%) were added. The closed samples were heated in a microwave oven for 30 min at 120°C. The clear samples were then diluted with nitric acid (1%, containing 0.01% Triton-X 100). The measurement of Gd was performed on an ICP-MS (Agilent 7900, Agilent) using commercial calibration standards (Merck Suprapur, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) which all contained 5 nmol Tb/ l as internal standard. Blanks were positioned between the tissue samples to avoid carry over effects. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of this method is 0.1 nmol Gd/ l in the final solution which is equivalent to 0.005 nmol Gd/ g wet tissue.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were conducted by using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, USA) and statistical significance was set to p< 0.05.

Mean accumulation of Gd in brain tissue as well as mean composite score of histopathological alterations were analyzed using a two-tailed t-test. Survival of animals was analyzed using the Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Gain of body weight, as well as motor performance were analyzed using mixed-effect model analyses due to missing values for mice being sacrificed before the end of the study period, and corrected for multiple comparisons by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test.

Results

Gadolinium accumulates in the brain of healthy mice after long-term oral exposure of gadolinium chloride

Gd-exposed mice showed an average Gd-concentration in the brain of 0.033± 0.009 nmol Gd/ g compared to 0.006±0.002 nmol Gd/ g brain tissue in control mice (Fig 1; mean± SD of 6 brain hemispheres per group; two tailed t-test, p = 0.0016). Of note, all values in reference tissue were near (N = 3), or even below (N = 3) the limit of quantification (LOQ = 0.005 nmol/ g; see Table 1 for detailed individual information).

Fig 1. Accumulation of Gd in the brain.

Fig 1

Oral exposure to Gd led to detectable levels of Gd in the brain of treated animals (N = 6) compared to control mice (N = 6), where individual values were near or even below the LOQ (0.005 nmol/ g; dotted line) (A). Mean± SD of 3 replicate measurements per individual brain hemisphere of Gd-treated animals (B). Oral exposure to Gd lead to a significantly increased accumulation of 0.033± 0.009 nmol/ g brain tissue compared to 0.006± 0.002 nmol/ g brain tissue in control mice. Mean± SD of 6 brain hemispheres per group (two-tailed t-test, p = 0.0016; see Table 1 for detailed individual information).

Table 1. Summary of individual measured Gd concentration per gram wet brain tissue.

ID age [w] c (Gd) [nmol/g] SD remarks
Control 362 94.3 < 0.005 n.a. all 3 samples < LOQ
363 94.3 0.006 n.a. 2 of 3 samples < LOQ
364 94.3 0.005 n.a. 2 of 3 samples < LOQ
366 94.3 < 0.005 n.a. all 3 samples < LOQ
368 94.3 0.008 n.a. 2 of 3 samples < LOQ
476 94.9 < 0.005 n.a. all 3 samples < LOQ
mean 0.006 0.002   
Gd-exposure 393 94.3 0.046 0.015  
394 90.0 0.025 0.002  
396 94.3 0.022 0.001  
490 94.9 0.037 0.003  
491 94.9 0.038 0.009  
493 94.9 0.032 0.004  
mean 0.033 0.009  

Every value represents the average of three replicates. In three reference mice all replicates were below the limit of quantification (0.005 nmol Gd/ g brain tissue).

Gadolinium exposed animals reveal mild adverse health effects with a decrease in body weight gain, but do not reveal impairment in locomotor behavior throughout the study period

To analyze the effects of oral Gd exposure on clinical outcome we investigated the motor performance, gain of body weight, as well as the survival of Gd-treated compared to control mice.

The Gd-intake did not lead to motor impairment, as indicated by the best performance on the rota rod that was not significantly different in Gd exposed and control mice, respectively (Fig 2, p = 0.1467).

Fig 2. Motor performance.

Fig 2

Gd intake had no significant effect on the motor performance phenotype as indicated by the best performance on the rota rod over the study period compared to reference mice. Mean± SEM of 13 or 15 mice per group (mixed-effects analysis, p = 0.1467).

Regarding the gain of body weight as a marker for general condition, the Gd intake showed a significant effect: starting with an almost directly comparable average weight the Gd exposed group showed a decreased gain of body weight during the study period (Fig 3, p = 0.0423).

Fig 3. Reduced gain of body weight.

Fig 3

Mice orally exposed to Gd showed a significantly decreased gain of body weight over the study period compared to control mice. Mean± SEM of 13 or 15 mice per group (mixed-effects analysis, p = 0.0423).

Furthermore, the survival was not significantly affected by the Gd intake (Fig 4, p = 0.1451). However, two mice in the Gd exposed group died spontaneously after 86 weeks and 90 weeks. Although the overall survival of the group was not significantly reduced, this is of note.

Fig 4. Survival analysis.

Fig 4

Oral exposure to Gd did not lead to a significant decrease in survival of treated mice compared to reference mice (N = 13 or 15; Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox) test, p = 0.1451). However, two mice in the Gd-exposed group died spontaneously during the late stage of the study period.

Histopathological findings

Histopathological examination revealed no gross signs of cellular alterations or gliosis in the central nervous system of Gd-exposed and control animals as indicated by H&E and GFAP-stainings. Only one animal per group showed mild gliosis in the hippocampus (Fig 5A and 5B). Peripheral organs such as heart and gastrointestinal tract showed no pathological alterations, while cellular infiltrates could be found in lung and kidneys, however to a similar extent in Gd-exposed, as well as control mice. Severe histopathological alterations as indicated by hepatocellular vacuolization due to fatty changes in the liver and a loss of nucleated cells in the red pulp of the spleen could also be found in both groups (Fig 5A and 5B). There were no histopathological alterations within organs of the GI tract in both groups. Overall, fewer mice in the Gd-exposed group showed no histopathological alterations in peripheral organs compared to the control group, but analysis of a composite score over all histopathological alterations revealed no significant differences between both groups (Fig 5B and 5C; two-tailed t-test, p = 0.6687; see Table 2 for detailed individual information).

Fig 5. Histopathological findings.

Fig 5

Brain as well as peripheral organs such as lung, liver, spleen and kidneys showed pathological alterations to a different extent, absent (-), mild (+), moderate (++), or severe (+++); representative GFAP- and H&E-stainings, (A; see Table 2 for detailed information). All levels could be found in both groups of mice, Gd-exposed and control group, respectively. However, the number of animals without pathological alterations is reduced in Gd-treated mice (B). Analysis of a composite score over all pathological alterations showed no significant difference betwenn Gd-exposed (Gd) and control mice (Ctrl) (C) Mean± SEM of 9 and 6 mice per group, respectively (two-tailed t-test, p = 0.6687).

Table 2. Summary of histopathological findings in Gd-treated and control mice (N = 9 and 8, respectively).

ID age [w] Brain heart lung liver spleen kidney GIT
control 360 94,3 - - - vvv - - -
361 94,3 - - - Vvv - ii -
362 94,3 - - - Vv c i -
363 94,3 - - - Vv c vascular pathology ii -
364 94,3 - hemorrhage in 4th ventricle - i Vvv c ii -
366 94,3 - - - Vvv - ii -
367 94,3 - - - Vvv - - -
368 94,3 - - - Vvv - - -
476 94,9 - mild gliosis (GFAP) - ii Vv cc iii -
Gd-exposure 389 93,7 autolytic
393 94,3 - - - hemorrhage Vvv c i -
394 90,0 autolytic
395 94,3 - - - Vv c i -
396 94,3 - - - Vvv c - -
490 94,9 - - ii Vv ccc i -
491 94,9 - - ii tumor vv cellular inflitrates cc i -
493 94,9 - mild gliosis (GFAP) - ii Vv - - -

In general, mice did not show pathological alterations in heart or gastrointestinal tract (GIT). No gross cellular alterations could be found in the CNS, despite two mice (N = 1 within each group) showing mild gliosis in the hippocampus (g). Cellular infiltrates could be found in the lung and kidneys (i). The liver showed hepatocellular vacuolization due to fatty change (v). A loss of nucleated cells could be found in the red pulp of the spleen (c). All pathological alterations could be found to a mild, moderate, or severe extent, respectively (x, xx, xxx). Two mice died before the planned end point and could not be examined because of necrotic changes in nearly all organs due to autolysis.

Discussion

Our study confirms the presence of low amounts of gadolinium in the brain of healthy mice after chronic oral exposure of Gd containing food pellets without evidence of adverse CNS effects or locomotor impairment. Due to its paramagnetic properties, gadolinium is used in a variety of MRI contrast agents to enhance signal intensity. In order for gadolinium to be used as an MRI contrast agent, it is first bound within a chelating agent to inhibit direct toxicity from the free gadolinium ion. Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are administered intravenously (i.v.). Whereas, i.v. exposure to gadolinium salts in rodents appears to affect the liver [36, 37], i.v. administration of chelated GBCAs additionally affects bone and kidneys [38], outlining differing toxicological properties of the two forms of gadolinium. In terms of the administration route, the distribution and tissue availability of gadolinium from GBCAs administered intravenously differs markedly from those of gadolinium taken up after oral exposure. Chelating the gadolinium ion using multidentate organic ligands significantly reduces the interaction of the metal ion with the biological system, thereby dramatically decreasing the associated risk for gadolinium toxicity. To this point, the bone and kidneys appear to be the target organ of i.v. GBCA administration in rodents with normal renal function [38], while the liver appears to be primarily affected by oral exposures to gadolinium salts [3941]. This is mainly because Gd is expected to be poorly absorbed through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [42]. Therefore, it is expected that the bioavailability of gadolinium for uptake in the small intestine will be very limited and is, per se, not truly comparable to i.v. dosages. Once orally absorbed, Gd was shown to be deposited in bone, liver, kidney, and lungs [42]. For gadolinium trichloride, a water-soluble gadolinium compound, gadolinium accumulation was measured in different organs of rats repeatedly exposed via oral gavage to doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day for 28 days in total [40]. Gadolinium was reported to be accumulated in the liver, kidney, spleen and bone in a dose dependent manner. In accordance to our study, histopathological assessment showed no obvious toxicity to liver, kidney, spleen, lung, blood, and heart by oral administration, however, the potential brain accumulation after oral exposure was not assessed.

Gd related toxicity following i.v. exposure has been recognized for at least 10 years, with the initially described condition being nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) [43, 44]. In several recent studies, Gd was shown to accumulate in the brain of mice and humans after i.v. application of GBCAs irrespective of renal function and GBCAs stability class [9, 13, 20, 28]. Despite the increasing evidence of Gd accumulation in the brain following i.v. GBCA administration [11, 16, 25, 28, 45], knowledge about potential Gd associated CNS effects including locomotor alterations is very limited both in the animal model and in humans. In a recent study, Gd was retained in the brain of mice during postnatal development following GBCA administration to pregnant mice [46]. Due to perinatal exposure, the retained Gd was suspected to lead to impaired brain development in mice [46]. To date, no other recent study assessing Gd accumulation in the brain has been associated with any severe clinical symptoms or adverse health effects, especially in regard to brain toxicity. There is currently no clear evidence on mechanisms, by which Gd may affect brain tissue (e.g. protein synthesis, axonal transport, and neurotransmitter-related events).

Previous studies reported Gd levels of 0.2–4.0 nmol/ g brain tissue in healthy rats after repeated intravenous administration of linear GBCAs, resulting from a supraclinical dosing regimen [16]. In the clinical setting, Gd levels in postmortem human brain specimens are typically similar (up to 0.1–6.0 nmol/ g brain tissue) across a range of linear and macrocyclic GBCAs [11, 28, 45]. A recent study assessing brain accumulation of Gd and its partial clearance in rats after 20 weeks, did not detect any treatment-related histopathologic findings in rats over a study period of 20 weeks; the accumulation dose varied between 1.39± 0.20 nmol/ g brain tissue vs. 2.49± 0.30 nmol/ g brain tissue (mean± SD) dependent on the administered dose and was partially cleared in healthy rat brains up to 50% after 20 weeks, respectively [47]. Our study was performed to evaluate the long-term effects of Gd brain accumulation and potential effects of this metal on general condition, weight loss, motor performance, as well as survival in primarily healthy mice. We administered Gd-chloride via food pellets resulting in a daily intake of approximately 0.57 mmol/ kg body weight over a study period of 90 weeks in total to observe long-term effects of potential Gd associated toxicity over the almost entire lifespan of the investigated mice. Despite its low intracerebral accumulation, which cannot be fully compared to the i.v. administration studies above, the chronic oral intake of Gd did not result in significant adverse CNS effects on motor performance in our study. In contrast, there might be an impact on general health status, as indicated by a significantly decreased gain of body weight, however, histopathological examination revealed no significant cellular tissue alterations in peripheral organs including the gastrointestinal tract of Gd-exposed and control animals, respectively.

Interestingly, a prior study conducted by Haley et. al. [41] provides evidence for mild tissue changes in the spleen and liver after chronic oral Gd exposure. The only significant exposure related changes were perinuclear vacuolization of the parenchymal cells of the liver (which were found in both groups of our study cohort) and a coarse granularity of the their cytoplasm in rats exposed to 500 mg/kg-day body weight gadolinium chloride. Additionally, the most relevant study yielding information on distribution and accumulation after oral exposure is the repeated dose toxicity study for gadolinium trichloride in rats [40]. The effects of oral exposure of animals to Gd were additionally evaluated in another short-term-duration study by Ogawa et al. [39]. Here, Gadolinium exposure at 423 mg/kg-day resulted in concordance to our study in decreased body weight gain in both males and females and microscopic lesions were observed in the forestomach and submucosa of the stomach, consisting of hyperkeratosis and eosinophil infiltration, respectively. Similar findings were evaluated by Barnhart et al. [48] who intravenously injected gadolinium trichloride (at a dose of 100 μmol/kg, i.e. 26.36 mg/kg) in rats. After injection, gadolinium was found primarily in liver and spleen. The results of the study suggest that after gadolinium trichloride was injected it was subject to complexation with proteins and colloid formation. The biodistribution of gadolinium trichloride was hence mostly depending on uptake of the colloids by phagocytic cells of the reticuloendothelial system and consequent storage of the material in organs that are part of this system, such as liver and spleen. Although we did not assess Gd concentrations in peripheral organs, significant differences in tissue alterations were absent on histopathology between both groups, especially the GI tract did not show any remarkable tissue alterations. Of note, no prior study did focus on Gd brain accumulation and its potential adverse CNS effects after oral administration.

Although the oral exposure to Gd chloride resulted in low, but significant brain accumulation in healthy mice in our study group (up to 0.033± 0.009 nmol Gd/ g brain tissue) compared to the control group (0.006± 0.001 nmol Gd/ g brain tissue) we found no clinically visible adverse CNS effects (e.g. paralysis, seizures), impairment in locomotor activity, or gross cellular alterations in microglial activity (after GFAP stainings) in the brain of mice between both groups.

Further, although the survival of the Gd-treated group was not significantly different compared to the control group, two Gd-treated mice died spontaneously during the study even if relatively late in regard to the overall lifespan of mice (90.0 and 93.7 weeks of age, respectively). The lack of adverse CNS findings in the long-term setting of our study is in agreement with findings in a previous study in rats [47]. However, the levels of Gd/ g brain tissue in our study were markedly lower than those in previous rat and postmortem human studies after repeated i.v.-administration of GBCAs [11, 16, 28, 45, 47] and after partial clearance of Gd as assessed in rats after a time course of 20 weeks after repeated i.v.-administration of GBCAs [47].

It is worth mentioning, that the uptake and distribution of intravenously administered GBCAs differs substantially from those observed after oral exposure to gadolinium salts. In contrast to prior studies, our study includes a chronic exposure to Gd via food pellets during the almost entire life span of mice with proof of substantial brain accumulation and absence of adverse CNS effects or changes in locomotor abilities, even though Gd exposed mice show mild adverse health effects in the periphery as indicated by a less increase in body weight. These observation strengthens the assumption that substantial Gd accumulation within the body might not necessarily be related to CNS effects, even though the brain concentrations of Gd were fairly low. The assessment of adverse health effects due to a chronic oral exposure of Gd is especially highly relevant since Gd represents an emerging environmental contaminant due to the increasing use of GBCAs in medical imaging [29, 30], as there is still relatively little knowledge of the biogeochemical or anthropogenic cycles of Gd in the environment. Due to their high stability, Gd complexes (such as Gd-(DTPA)) were shown not be sufficiently removed by commonly used wastewater treatment technologies [30]. Although the measured concentrations of anthropogenic Gd (shown for concentrations in San Francisco Bay [30]) were well below the threshold of ecotoxicological effects, the increasing presence of anthropogenic Gd as environmental contaminant cannot be disregarded. Our study may contribute to a better understanding of potential adverse health effects after long-term oral exposure (e.g. due to uptake of contaminated water) without detectable CNS effects.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations that need to be taken into account when interpreting the data. First, the measured intracerebral Gd concentrations were comparatively low, since prior studies in rats and postmortem human studies after repeated intravenous GBCA injections reported higher intracerebral doses. Second, methodological limitations are present since no toxicological end points and peripheral Gd concentrations were evaluated, making the adverse significance of the decreased body weight gain difficult to interpret. Third, the distribution, bioavailability and potential harmful effects of Gd depend substantially on the route of administration, and the chemical form of Gd. Thus, the oral application of Gd as a chloride-salt cannot be fully compared to the intravenous injection of chelated Gd. Furthermore, our study did not investigate the location of Gd in the brain of mice. We measured Gd levels in the entire left cerebral hemisphere of each animal, which may underestimate potential peak concentrations, e.g. in the dentate nucleus [13, 14, 18, 20, 28]. Several recent studies did investigate local Gd distributions within the brain and the colocalization of Gd with other elements using ICP-MS. Importantly, these studies did not find obvious alterations of brain tissues which is in accordance with our study [4951]. Additionally, our study did not specifically assess neurotoxicity based on histopathology by using dedicated immunostainings. Although we did not detect any adverse CNS effects or gross cellular alterations of brain tissue in healthy mice, this can certainly not be automatically assumed to hold true for all species, including humans, or for subjects with underlying disorders. Last, the limited life-time of rodents is most likely not suitable to simulate all long-term toxicology effects in humans.

Further studies are required to explore whether a higher oral dose of administered Gd could induce adverse CNS effects or whether such effects may potentially occur in subjects with underlying diseases or genetic predispositions. Results should be supported by a further evaluation of biochemical parameters, including bioavailability and clearance of Gd at various dosage levels and for various exposure times. Whether higher doses of Gd potentially affect important biochemical pathways in the CNS, including enzymes or protein synthesis, remains to be elucidated.

Conclusion

Although the absorption and bioavailability of gadolinium after oral administration via food pellets is expected to be very limited, it accumulates in the brain of mice after chronic oral exposure to a low but significant amount. Our prospective study suggests that low levels of intracerebral Gd do not lead to detectable CNS effects, and in particular do not impair locomotor abilities in the healthy murine model, even over a very long exposure time. Gd exposure had mild adverse effects on gain of body weight, however, survival was not affected following life-long exposure in mice.

Supporting information

S1 Raw data

(XLSX)

S2 Raw data

(XLSX)

S3 Raw data

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gerda Mitteregger-Kretzschmar and Rigo Seemann representative for the whole team of the animal facility of the Center for Neuropathology and Catharina Prix for help with the behavioral tests. We thank Michael K. Schmidt for tissue processing and histological stainings and Dr. Klaus Hechenbichler for statistical advice.

Data Availability

All relevant raw data have been included as Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

T.F. and H.P. are employees of Bayer AG and contributed substantially to the methodology of intracerebral Gd measurements by ICP-MS. However, no commercial product or product-related applications have been tested in the study. The research is not financially supported by industry. Academic researchers [F.S., D.N., B.E.W., J.L., K.S., A.G.] had full control over the data and contributed substantially on conceptualization, data curation and all the analyses performed. J.L. and A.G. were responsible for supervision and funding acquisition of this research project. Conceptualization and funding were not related to industry. Funding was provided by academic grants in the form of research materials for authors [F.S. and J.L.], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. This study was funded by the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy, ID 390857198, grant recipient J.L.), by the Lüneburg foundation for Parkinson research [grant recipients A.G. and F.S.] and the “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Parkinson und Bewegungsstörungen” (DPG) (grant recipient J.L.). There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Hao D, Ai T, Goerner F, Hu X, Runge VM, Tweedle M. MRI contrast agents: basic chemistry and safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(5):1060–71. 10.1002/jmri.23725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adding LC, Bannenberg GL, Gustafsson LE. Basic experimental studies and clinical aspects of gadolinium salts and chelates. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2001;19(1):41–56. 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2001.tb00182.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shellock FG, Kanal E. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):477–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, Jost G, Frenzel T, Hutter J, Sieber MA. Long-term retention of gadolinium in the skin of rodents following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(6):1417–24. 10.1007/s00330-008-1259-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ersoy H, Rybicki FJ. Biochemical safety profiles of gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26(5):1190–7. 10.1002/jmri.21135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Birka M, Wentker KS, Lusmoller E, Arheilger B, Wehe CA, Sperling M, et al. Diagnosis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis by means of elemental bioimaging and speciation analysis. Anal Chem. 2015;87(6):3321–8. 10.1021/ac504488k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, Wentland AL, Garrett AL, Garrett RW, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology. 2007;243(1):148–57. 10.1148/radiol.2431062144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Idee JM, Fretellier N, Robic C, Corot C. The role of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: A critical update. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014;44(10):895–913. 10.3109/10408444.2014.955568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramalho M, Ramalho J, Burke LM, Semelka RC. Gadolinium Retention and Toxicity-An Update. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017;24(3):138–46. 10.1053/j.ackd.2017.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kanda T, Oba H, Toyoda K, Kitajima K, Furui S. Brain gadolinium deposition after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34(1):3–9. 10.1007/s11604-015-0503-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M, Toyoda K, Oba H, Kotoku J, et al. Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Accumulates in the Brain Even in Subjects without Severe Renal Dysfunction: Evaluation of Autopsy Brain Specimens with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy. Radiology. 2015;276(1):228–32. 10.1148/radiol.2015142690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bussi S, Fouillet X, Morisetti A. Toxicological assessment of gadolinium release from contrast media. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2007;58(5):323–30. 10.1016/j.etp.2006.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stojanov DA, Aracki-Trenkic A, Vojinovic S, Benedeto-Stojanov D, Ljubisavljevic S. Increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W magnetic resonance images in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: correlation with cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(3):807–15. 10.1007/s00330-015-3879-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roberts DR, Holden KR. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images in the pediatric brain exposed to multiple doses of gadolinium contrast. Brain Dev. 2016;38(3):331–6. 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cao Y, Huang DQ, Shih G, Prince MR. Signal Change in the Dentate Nucleus on T1-Weighted MR Images After Multiple Administrations of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Versus Gadobutrol. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(2):414–9. 10.2214/AJR.15.15327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Robert P, Violas X, Grand S, Lehericy S, Idee JM, Ballet S, et al. Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Are Associated With Brain Gadolinium Retention in Healthy Rats. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(2):73–82. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jost G, Lenhard DC, Sieber MA, Lohrke J, Frenzel T, Pietsch H. Signal Increase on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images in the Rat Brain After Repeated, Extended Doses of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Comparison of Linear and Macrocyclic Agents. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(2):83–9. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kanda T, Osawa M, Oba H, Toyoda K, Kotoku J, Haruyama T, et al. High Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Association with Linear versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate Administration. Radiology. 2015;275(3):803–9. 10.1148/radiol.14140364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Quattrocchi CC, Mallio CA, Errante Y, Cirimele V, Carideo L, Ax A, et al. Gadodiamide and Dentate Nucleus T1 Hyperintensity in Patients With Meningioma Evaluated by Multiple Follow-Up Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Examinations With No Systemic Interval Therapy. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(7):470–2. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Radbruch A, Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Eidel O, Burth S, Kickingereder P, et al. Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent. Radiology. 2015;275(3):783–91. 10.1148/radiol.2015150337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramalho J, Castillo M, AlObaidy M, Nunes RH, Ramalho M, Dale BM, et al. High Signal Intensity in Globus Pallidus and Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Evaluation of Two Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2015;276(3):836–44. 10.1148/radiol.2015150872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adin ME, Kleinberg L, Vaidya D, Zan E, Mirbagheri S, Yousem DM. Hyperintense Dentate Nuclei on T1-Weighted MRI: Relation to Repeat Gadolinium Administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(10):1859–65. 10.3174/ajnr.A4378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Kickingereder P, Wick W, Bendszus M, Schlemmer HP, et al. Increased Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images After Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(11):743–8. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller JH, Hu HH, Pokorney A, Cornejo P, Towbin R. MRI Brain Signal Intensity Changes of a Child During the Course of 35 Gadolinium Contrast Examinations. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):e1637–40. 10.1542/peds.2015-2222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Robert P, Lehericy S, Grand S, Violas X, Fretellier N, Idee JM, et al. T1-Weighted Hypersignal in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei After Repeated Administrations of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Healthy Rats: Difference Between Linear and Macrocyclic Agents. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(8):473–80. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014;270(3):834–41. 10.1148/radiol.13131669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA, Di Lazzaro V, Zobel BB, Quattrocchi CC. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patients with normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(10):685–90. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, et al. Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology. 2015;275(3):772–82. 10.1148/radiol.15150025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lawrence MG. Detection of anthropogenic gadolinium in the Brisbane River plume in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull. 2010;60(7):1113–6. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hatje V, Bruland KW, Flegal AR. Increases in Anthropogenic Gadolinium Anomalies and Rare Earth Element Concentrations in San Francisco Bay over a 20 Year Record. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(8):4159–68. 10.1021/acs.est.5b04322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu H, Jin Y, Ge K, Jia G, Li Z, Yang X, et al. Europium-Doped Gd2O3 Nanotubes Increase Bone Mineral Density in Vivo and Promote Mineralization in Vitro. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(7):5784–92. 10.1021/acsami.6b14682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chvedoff M, Clarke MR, Irisarri E, Faccini JM, Monro AM. Effects of housing conditions on food intake, body weight and spontaneous lesions in mice. A review of the literature and results of an 18-month study. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1980;18(5):517–22. 10.1016/0015-6264(80)90167-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Masliah E, Rockenstein E, Veinbergs I, Mallory M, Hashimoto M, Takeda A, et al. Dopaminergic loss and inclusion body formation in alpha-synuclein mice: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Science. 2000;287(5456):1265–9. 10.1126/science.287.5456.1265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wagner J, Ryazanov S, Leonov A, Levin J, Shi S, Schmidt F, et al. Anle138b: a novel oligomer modulator for disease-modifying therapy of neurodegenerative diseases such as prion and Parkinson's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(6):795–813. 10.1007/s00401-013-1114-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Levin J, Schmidt F, Boehm C, Prix C, Botzel K, Ryazanov S, et al. The oligomer modulator anle138b inhibits disease progression in a Parkinson mouse model even with treatment started after disease onset. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(5):779–80. 10.1007/s00401-014-1265-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Spencer A, Wilson S, Harpur E. Gadolinium chloride toxicity in the mouse. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1998;17(11):633–7. 10.1177/096032719801701108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spencer AJ, Wilson SA, Batchelor J, Reid A, Rees J, Harpur E. Gadolinium chloride toxicity in the rat. Toxicol Pathol. 1997;25(3):245–55. 10.1177/019262339702500301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kartamihardja AA, Nakajima T, Kameo S, Koyama H, Tsushima Y. Impact of Impaired Renal Function on Gadolinium Retention After Administration of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in a Mouse Model. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(10):655–60. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ogawa YS, S.; Naito K.; Saito M.; Kamata E;. Hirose A; Ono A; et al. Toxicity study of europium chloride in rats. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology. 1995;14(1):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ogawa YS, S.; Naito K.; Saito N.; Hirose A.; Kaneko T.; Kurokama Y. A 28-day repeated dose toxicity test of europium and gadolinium in Wistar rats in comparison with lanthanum and yttrium. Journal of Toxicological Sciences. 1992;17(4):331. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haley TR, K.; Komesu N.; Upham HC. Toxicological and pharmacological effects of gadolinium and samarium chlorides. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy. 1961;17:526–32. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1961.tb01139.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Leggett R, Ansoborlo E, Bailey M, Gregoratto D, Paquet F, Taylor D. Biokinetic data and models for occupational intake of lanthanoids. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90(11):996–1010. 10.3109/09553002.2014.887868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM, Su LD, Gupta S, LeBoit PE. Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet. 2000;356(9234):1000–1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02694-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grobner T. Gadolinium—a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(4):1104–8. 10.1093/ndt/gfk062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Murata N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Murata K, Fligner C, Dills R, Hippe D, et al. Macrocyclic and Other Non-Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue: Preliminary Results From 9 Patients With Normal Renal Function. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(7):447–53. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Khairinisa MA, Takatsuru Y, Amano I, Erdene K, Nakajima T, Kameo S, et al. The Effect of Perinatal Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents on Adult Mice Behavior. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(2):110–8. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Smith AP, Marino M, Roberts J, Crowder JM, Castle J, Lowery L, et al. Clearance of Gadolinium from the Brain with No Pathologic Effect after Repeated Administration of Gadodiamide in Healthy Rats: An Analytical and Histologic Study. Radiology. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barnhart JL, Kuhnert N, Bakan DA, Berk RN. Biodistribution of GdCl3 and Gd-DTPA and their influence on proton magnetic relaxation in rat tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 1987;5(3):221–31. 10.1016/0730-725x(87)90023-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.El-Khatib AH, Radbruch H, Trog S, Neumann B, Paul F, Koch A, et al. Gadolinium in human brain sections and colocalization with other elements. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019;6(1):e515 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fingerhut S, Sperling M, Holling M, Niederstadt T, Allkemper T, Radbruch A, et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agents induce gadolinium deposits in cerebral vessel walls, while the neuropil is not affected: an autopsy study. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(1):127–38. 10.1007/s00401-018-1857-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lohrke J, Frisk AL, Frenzel T, Schockel L, Rosenbruch M, Jost G, et al. Histology and Gadolinium Distribution in the Rodent Brain After the Administration of Cumulative High Doses of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Invest Radiol. 2017;52(6):324–33. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Raw data

(XLSX)

S2 Raw data

(XLSX)

S3 Raw data

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant raw data have been included as Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES