Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Apr 23;6(6):927–929. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0571

Central Nervous System as Possible Site of Relapse in ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Long-term Results of Treatment With Trastuzumab and Lapatinib

Andrea Sartore-Bianchi 1,2, Sara Lonardi 3, Massimo Aglietta 4,5, Cosimo Martino 4, Fortunato Ciardiello 6, Silvia Marsoni 7, Salvatore Siena 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7180725  PMID: 32324210

Abstract

This secondary analysis of data from the HERACLES-A clinical trial examines long-term outcomes in 32 patients with colorectal cancer treated with trastuzumab and lapatinib.


In colorectal cancer, ERBB2 amplification occurs in 5% of RAS wild-type metastatic tumors.1 In the pivotal HERACLES-A trial, chemorefractory patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were treated with the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib,2 demonstrating the proof of concept that the dual ERBB2 blockade previously found actionable in preclinical models3 could be successfully translated to the clinic with remarkable clinical benefit. We also reported that ERBB2 copy number in plasma was associated with that detected in tumor tissue, identified a cutoff value associated with clinical response,4 and studied acquired resistance on therapeutic ERBB2 blockade by longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor DNA. Along this line, we documented that the onset of resistance was associated with emerging KRAS variant clones, BRAF amplification, and other molecular alterations already known in breast cancer, such as those of ERBB2, EGFR, PIK3CA, and PTEN.5

Herein we present long-term clinical results of the HERACLES-A trial in the extended population of 32 patients.

Methods

Inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening phase, treatment/dose schedules, and tumor assessments were previously described.2 Chemorefractory mCRC was treated with a dual vertical ERBB2 blockade through the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib. Tumor assessments were done at baseline and every 8 weeks thereafter until progression.

A total of 35 patients were treated between August 27, 2012, and March 15, 2016 (27 in the trial phase, 8 in an extension cohort). Of these, 3 were not evaluable for response (concomitant RAS mutation in 2 participants, absence of target lesions assessable by RECIST in 1 participant). Among the 32 evaluable patients, 28 were men and median (range) age was 62 (40-86) years. All patients provided written informed consent and the institutional review boards of the participating centers approved the study procedures. At the time of the end of study (May 15, 2019), the follow-up was 82 months (6.7 years). The Table shows RECIST objective response rates. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.1) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-15.8), respectively. One patient remained in complete response at 6 years continuing follow-up at the time of this report.

Table. RECIST Objective Responses to Treatment of 32 Patients Evaluable in HERACLES-A2.

Best response No. (%) [95% CI]
RECIST 1.1. by centralized imaging revision
No. 32
Objective response PR + CR% 9 (28) [14-47]
CR 1 (3)
PR 8 (25)
Stable disease, mo
≥4 9 (28) [14-47]
<4 4 (13) [4-29]
Disease controla 18 (56) [38-74]
Progressive disease 10 (31) [16-50]

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; PR, partial response.

a

Defined as complete plus partial responses plus stable disease of more than 4 months.

Results

Disease progression in the central nervous system (CNS) occurred in 6 of 32 (19%) evaluable patients (isolated CNS in 3, with other visceral organs in 3; bone and liver in 1; lymph nodes and lung in 1; and lung, liver, and lymph nodes in 1). Median time to progression in the CNS was 7.9 months, whereas median OS was 11.4 months. Treatments consisted of stereotactic brain radiation therapy (n = 2) and neurosurgery excision (n = 1), overall favorably associated with OS data in these patients as a whole. Owing to poor performance status, 2 remaining patients received best supportive care and 1 was lost at follow-up. The patient who underwent neurosurgery for a cerebellum metastasis manifested an 11.5-month PFS after treatment initiation and maintained ERBB2 positivity (IHC 3 positive) in the resected tumor specimen.

Discussion

Treatment-prolonged survival was associated with an unexpectedly high occurrence of CNS metastases. Several reasons might explain this finding (1) a biological tropism toward CNS of ERBB2-amplified cells; (2) a limitation of these drugs targeting ERBB2 to cross the blood-brain barrier; or (3) the increased risk, in patients with long survival outcomes, of developing involvement of rarer anatomic sites.

Updated analysis of HERACLES-A trial at 6.7 years of follow-up supports the use of trastuzumab and lapatinib as a treatment reference for KRAS wild-type, chemorefractory ERBB2-positive mCRC. Present data also indicate that the CNS may represent a sanctuary of CRC relapse in this setting, mirroring what occurs with ERBB2-targeted therapies in breast and gastric cancers. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying this observed tropism and to investigate the potential of next-generation TKIs with improved CNS activity, such as neratinib and tucatinib.6

References

  • 1.Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Marsoni S, et al. . Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene in colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(5):1108-1119. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sartore-Bianchi A, Trusolino L, Martino C, et al. . Dual-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib in treatment-refractory, KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (HERACLES): a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):738-746. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00150-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bertotti A, Migliardi G, Galimi F, et al. . A molecularly annotated platform of patient-derived xenografts (“xenopatients”) identifies HER2 as an effective therapeutic target in cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(6):508-523. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Siravegna G, Sartore-Bianchi A, Nagy RJ, et al. . Plasma HER2 (ERBB2) copy number predicts response to HER2-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siravegna G, Lazzari L, Crisafulli G, et al. . Radiologic and genomic evolution of individual metastases during HER2 blockade in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(1):148-162.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Strickler JH, Zemla T, Ou F-S, et al. . 527PDTrastuzumab and tucatinib for the treatment of HER2 amplified metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): initial results from the MOUNTAINEER trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(Supple 5). doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES