Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2020 Apr 2;25(7):1636. doi: 10.3390/molecules25071636

An FMRFamide Neuropeptide in Cuttlefish Sepia pharaonis: Identification, Characterization, and Potential Function

Yang Zhu 1, Lian-lian Sun 1, Jun-hong Wu 1, Hui-hui Liu 1, Li-bing Zheng 1, Zhen-ming Lü 1, Chang-feng Chi 1,*
PMCID: PMC7180943  PMID: 32252312

Abstract

Neuropeptides are released by neurons that are involved in a wide range of brain functions, such as food intake, metabolism, reproduction, and learning and memory. A full-length cDNA sequence of an FMRFamide gene isolated from the cuttlefish Sepia pharaonis (designated as SpFMRFamide) was cloned. The predicted precursor protein contains one putative signal peptide and four FMRFamide-related peptides. Multiple amino acid and nucleotide sequence alignments showed that it shares 97% similarity with the precursor FMRFamides of Sepiella japonica and Sepia officinalis and shares 93% and 92% similarity with the SpFMRFamide gene of the two cuttlefish species, respectively. Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis also suggested that SpFMRFamide and FMRFamides from S. japonica and S. officinalis belong to the same sub-branch. Tissue expression analysis confirmed that SpFMRFamide was widely distributed among tissues and predominantly expressed in the brain at the three development stages. The combined effects of SpFMRFamide+SpGnRH and SpFLRFamide+SpGnRH showed a marked decrease in the level of the total proteins released in the CHO-K1 cells. This is the first report of SpFMRFamide in S. pharaonis and the results may contribute to future studies of neuropeptide evolution or may prove useful for the development of aquaculture methods for this cuttlefish species.

Keywords: neuropeptide, FMRFamide, Sepia pharaonis, cuttlefish

1. Introduction

Sepia pharaonis is an economically significant cephalopod that plays an important role in the marine ecosystem. It is famous for its delicacy and value meat; the species is also noted for its potential medicinal value [1]. However, S. pharaonis resources have declined since the 1980s due to overfishing, environmental damage, and habitat degradation. S. pharaonis is an endangered species [2]; because of this situation, our research group began to work on resource restoration. We found that the sexual maturity of artificially cultured cuttlefish starts earlier than that of the wild ones, and due to this phenomenon, the cultured cuttlefish is susceptible to precocious puberty [2]. The peptide under consideration here is known to be involved in reproduction and thus is closely related to the sexual maturity of these cephalopods. The recovery and utilization of cuttlefish resources rely on the continued studies of the reproductive characteristics of the species. Neuropeptides, widely distributed in both invertebrates and vertebrates, usually act as neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and neurohormones. FMRFamide-like peptides (FLPs), the largest and most diverse family of known neuropeptides [3], represented by the tetrapeptide FMRFamide (Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2; FMRFa), share high sequence similarity with FMRFamide and are sometimes also referred to as FMRFamide-related peptides (FaRPs).

FLPs are defined as peptides that end in Arg-Phe-NH2 [3]. FaRPs are defined as those that are evolutionarily related to FMRFa. However, it is difficult to elucidate the true evolutionary homology of FLPs and FMRFa, because diverse ranges of peptides across the animal kingdom share the C-terminal RFamide motif [4,5]. Following the identification of the founder FMRFamide sequence from the clam Macrocallista nimbosa [6], a number of researches on FLPs were carried out in metazoans [7]. In metazoans, different FLP types may exist in the same species, and the same FLP type may occur in various species [5]. FLPs could intimately take part in a broad pattern of biological processes, including feeding, cardiovascular function, and water homeostasis [4,5,8,9]. For instance, FMRFamide, FLRFamide, and two types of generalized FLPs (GDPFLRFa and GGKYMRFa) are present in annelids [10,11]. In cnidarians, GRFa peptides that are secreted by nerve cells contained within a nerve net [12] are likely to participate in metamorphosis, food capture, locomotion, and defense [13].

Nowadays, only generalized FLPs (GDPFLRFa and GGKYMRFa) have been identified in arthropods [14] and in insects [15,16], however, FLP types which are found in crustaceans with amino acid residues at N-terminals may be FLRFamides [5]. FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity has been detected in the central neurons of leeches (Hirudo medicinalis) [17], and physiological experiments showed that FLPs could regulate the cardiac function of leeches [18]. Reports of FLPs in nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans) have identified more than 70 types of FLPs from approximately 33 genes [19,20], and those FLPs might play vital roles in reproduction [21], feeding, and clustering activity [22]. Furthermore, Sa-112, which is highly homologous to SchistoFLRFamide [23], inhibited contraction of the locust oviduct, which is a typical activity of FMRFamide peptides.

At present, more than 40 types of FLPs from the five major mollusk classes (Cephalopoda, Scaphopoda, Bivalvia, Gastropoda, and Polyplacophora) have been isolated and characterized [5,24]. Furthermore, several physiological assays have demonstrated that these FLPs might be involved in food intake [25,26], reproduction [26,27], and heart activity [28]. Moreover, an FMRFamide expressed by a single gene in cephalopods was identified as a member of the FaRP subfamily [28,29]. Regarding vertebrates, just one peptide with FMRFamide or FLRFamide present at the C-terminal has been found in frogs [30], which suggests that the mechanisms of FLPs in vertebrates regulating the expression or the physiological systems are more complex than those of invertebrates. However, FLPs found in vertebrates also possess several physiological functions such as control of insulin secretion [31], daily food intake [32], regulation of the reproductive axis [33], and precipitation of opiate-withdrawal syndrome [34]. These data provided the evidence that the vertebrate cells were responding to these neuropeptides.

This study represents the first report describing the full-length sequence of an FMRFamide precursor in S. pharaonis (hereafter referred to as SpFMRFamide). Moreover, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and in vitro assay with CHO-K1 cells were used to assess the possible function of SpFMRFamide in S. pharaonis. These results will clarify the function and possible role of FMRFamide in the development of S. pharaonis individuals.

2. Results

2.1. Full-Length Transcript Sequence and Predicted Precursor Protein

We isolated, cloned, and sequenced the cDNA from S. pharaonis, and the gene was named SpFMRFamide. The whole sequence of SpFMRFamide cDNA was 1856 bp (GenBank accession No. KX000397), with a 996 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding protein precursor of 331 amino acid (aa) (Figure 1). The start codon ATG was located at nucleotides 335–337, and the stop codon TAA was located at 1328–1330. There were 334 base pairs of untranslated region (UTR) in the 5′ end as well as 526 base pairs of UTR in the 3′ end. The predicted precursor protein contained a putative signal peptide of 24 aa and four distinct FMRFamide-related peptides: thirteen tetrapeptide (one copy of FIRFamide, one copy of FLRFamide, and eleven copies of FMRFamide), and one decapeptide (ALSGDAFLRFamide). FaRPs ending with RF residues and being amidated post-translationally at the C-terminus, with a glycine immediately behind the RF motif, may be considered to be related to the post-translational amidation of arginine-phenylalanine. Lysine-arginine/lysine residues at the N-terminus and lysine-arginine or arginine/lysine at the C-terminus might serve as internal proteolytic cleavage sites for each FaRP during post-translational processing. The predicted entire precursor protein theoretical molecular weight (MW) was 35.91 kDa lacking signal peptide, and the estimated pI was 9.09. Blastn analysis showed that SpFMRFamide shared a 97% sequence similarity with SjFMRFamide (KJ933411) and a precursor FMRFamide from Sepia officinalis (P91889.1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of SpFMRFamide precursor. The initiation codon (ATG) and stop codon (TAA) are marked. The putative signal peptide is underlined in black and italic, and the predicted RFaRPs are marked in red. The basic cleavage sites are identified green color, and the glycines used for C-terminus amidation are marked in orange.

2.2. Blast Search and Phylogenetic Tree Construction

To reveal homologous amino acid sequences, the predicted SpFMRFamide precursor protein was aligned with those of the other species. The results indicated that the SpFMRFamide protein shared 97%, 97%, 92%, 92%, 84%, and 41% identity with the FMRFamide precursors of Sepiella japonica, S. officinalis, Doryteuthis pealeii, D. opalescens, Idiosepius notoides, and Lymnaea stagnalis, respectively (Figure 2A). Thus, it is seen that the primary structure of the SpFMRFamide precursor is highly conserved. Meanwhile, to reveal homologous nucleotide sequences and show any putative cis-acting elements involved in the expression of the precursor protein, the full nucleotide sequence of the SpFMRFamide gene was aligned with those of the other species, and the results indicated that the SpFMRFamide gene shared 93%, 92%, 83%, 77%, 72%, and 43% identity with the FMRFamide genes of S. japonica, S. officinalis, D. pealeii, L. stagnalis, D. opalescens, and I. notoides, respectively (Figure 2B). Thus, it is seen that the sequence conservation of the SpFMRFamide gene is relatively highly conserved and the similarity of the nucleotide sequences was lower than the amino acid one.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Multiple amino acid (A) and nucleotide (B) sequence alignment of the FMRFamide precursor of Doryteuthis opalescens (Q9GSL0.1, AF303160.1), D. pealeii (B6E465.1, FJ205479.1), Idiosepius notoides (ACP39631.1, FJ896403.1), Sepia officinalis (P91889.1, Y11246.1), Sepiella japonica (KJ933411, KJ933411.1), Lymnaea stagnalis (AAA63280.1, M87479.2), in comparison with S. pharaonis which was noted by ▲. Residues identical in all seven sequences are boxed in black. Conservative substitutions are boxed in gray. The red box represents the initiation codon and the blue box represents the termination codon.

In order to determine the evolutionary status of SpFMRFamide, we constructed a phylogenetic tree by the maximum likelihood method (MEGA 6.0) (Figure 3) that contains 45 types of known FLPs or FaRPs amino acid sequences from vertebrates, annelids, arthropods, and mollusks. This phylogenetic analysis indicated that the tree consists of two apparent branches, one was made up of vertebrate FLP sequences, and the other one was made up of invertebrate FLP sequences. The branch containing invertebrate FLP sequences included the FaRP subfamily and the LFRFamide subfamily. SpFMRFamide and FMRFamides from S. japonica and S. officinalis belonged to the same sub-branch, suggesting they are close relatives [35].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree constructed with SpFMRFamide which was noted by ▼ and 44 kinds of other identified RFamide precursors by the maximum likelihood method (MEGA 6.0). All protein sequences were obtained from GenBank of the US National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and the GenBank accession numbers are in parentheses. The topological stability of the tree was achieved by running 1000 bootstrapping replications. Bootstrap values (%) are indicated by numbers at the nodes. The scale for branch length is shown below the tree.

2.3. Quantitative Expression Analysis of SpFMRFamide

The relative expression of SpFMRFamide mRNA in the tissues was measured by qRT-PCR. We divided the development periods of the cuttlefish S. pharaonis into six stages based on the published articles [36,37]. The differential expression of SpFMRFamide transcripts at three different developmental stages for both male and female cuttlefish is shown in Figure 4. In each case, the expression level of the heart was regarded as the reference value. The data is normalized, and the expression level of SpFMRFamide in the heart was set to = 1. Tissue expression analysis confirmed that SpFMRFamide was widely distributed among tissues and predominantly expressed in the brain at the three development stages. In stage III, trace amounts of expressed SpFMRFamide were found in the optic lobe; however, in stage IV, the FMRFamide was significantly expressed in both the female and the male optic lobe of S. pharaonis (p < 0.05). In stage III, the relative expression in the brain was approximately more than 45 times, and the expression was significantly higher in the brain than in other tissues (p < 0.05). In stage IV, the expression in the brain of females and males was approximately 413 times and 323 times, respectively, and the expression in the optic lobes of females and males was 66 times and 73 times, respectively. The mRNA expression of SpFMRFamide in the brain was higher in the female cuttlefishes than in male cuttlefishes. The expression was significantly higher in the brain and optic lobes than those in other tissues (p < 0.05). In stage V, the expression in the brain of females and males was approximately 448 times and 723 times, and the expression in the optic lobes of females and males was 16 times and 173 times. The mRNA expression of SpFMRFamide in the brain was higher in the male cuttlefishes than in female cuttlefishes, which is opposite to the results of expression in stage IV. And the mRNA expression of SpFMRFamide in the optic lobe was significantly higher in the male cuttlefishes than in female cuttlefishes (p < 0.05).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Expression analysis of SpFMRFamide from various tissues in three different stages (III, IV, and V). In each case, the expression level of the heart was regarded as the reference value. Vertical bars represented the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). The analyses were conducted in eight/ten different tissues including the heart (HE), brain (BR), optic lobe (OL), muscle (MU), stomach (ST), liver (LI), gill (GI), sexual gland (SG, including testis and ovary), nidamental gland (NG), and accessory nidamental gland (AN). β-actin served as a reference gene and a, b, c, and d on the bars represent statistically significant differences among the tissues in the Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple comparison test of the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (p < 0.05).

2.4. Effects of SpFMRFamide and SpFLRFamide on the Total Protein Secretory Activity of CHO-K1 Cells

After neuroactive substances, namely SpFMRFamide, SpFLRFamide, or SpGnRH, were added to incubate with CHO-K1 cells, different effects were observed depending on the total protein secretion of the CHO-K1 cells; in addition, the combined effect of SpFMRFamide or SpFLRFamide with SpGnRH was also tested. The results showed that the 0.01 µM, 0.1 µM, 1 µM, 10.0 µM, and 100 µM final concentrations of both SpFMRFamide and SpFLRFamide had no significant inhibitory effect on the secretion of total protein in CHO-K1, respectively (p < 0.05). In contrast, when the dodecapeptide SpGnRH was used as a stimulating agent (final concentration of 100 µM), the total protein secretion of CHO-K1 cells increased significantly (p < 0.05). Finally, the combined effects of SpFMRFamide+SpGnRH and SpFLRFamide+SpGnRH showed a marked decrease in the level of total proteins released in the supernate and the treatment of 1.0 μM (final concentration of both peptides) showed the most obvious inhibition effect, possibly due to the presence of FMRFamide or FLRFamide (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The effect of SpFMRFamide, SpFLRFamide, or SpGnRH and the associated effect of SpFMRFamide+SpGnRH or SpFLRFamide+SpGnRH on protein secretion in CHO-K1. Statistical significance of results was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-tests. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are noted by ‘*’ over each concentration group compared to the control (phosphate buffer saline treated, PBS group).

3. Discussion

A growing body of research has uncovered that FMRFamide may play roles in the regulation, feeding, secretion, migration, invasion, and reproductive regulation and processes [30,38]. Moreover, FMRFamide plays a regulatory role in nerve cells. For example, the FMRFamide neuropeptide plays a vital role in S. officinalis pigment regulation. In addition, FMRFamide is involved in several physiological functions in other species [30,39], including insects, other mollusks, amphibians, birds, and mammals. Some studies have suggested that the SpFMRFamide neuropeptide might be similar in function to that of other cephalopods regarding life activities [40].

The results of the phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that the precursors of FMRFamide of S. pharaonis, S. japonica, and S. officinalis belong to the same clade, with the closest relationship as compared to other taxa, and the amino acid identity of the three species is up to 97%. Therefore, we speculated that utilizing the same living environment, exhibiting similar feeding habits, frequent distribution and exchange in common areas of the sea, and the long-term effects of environmental conditions might contribute to similar evolutionary trajectories. In addition, the precursors of FMRFamide of S. pharaonis, D. opalescens, D. pealeii, and I. notoides are in the same clade based on the high amino acid sequence similarity, indicating that the precursors of FMRFamide in cephalopods may have originated from a common ancestor. Secondly, S. pharaonis clustered with other mollusks, including A. californica and L. stagnalis. However, we know little about the FMRFamide polypeptides in cephalopods, thus, the evolution of the FMRFamide neuropeptide requires additional analysis.

The data analysis of qRT-PCR suggested that the SpFMRFamide transcripts were detected in both male and female S. pharaonis brains during the three developmental stages. Our results confirmed the conclusion that SpFMRFamide is expressed early in life, but whether they play roles during mollusk development and play different mechanisms in male and female cuttlefish needs confirmation with the following experiments.

In O. vulgaris, FMRFamide regulates sexual maturity by inhibiting gland activity [27]. In S. pharaonis, the action mechanisms of FMRFamide are not clear, but we could presume that SpFMRFamide might control spawning activity directly by regulating the transmission of oocytes in the oviduct. For example, FMRFamide and FLRFamide stimulate tubal contraction, while FIRFamide and ALSGDAFLRFamide weaken tonic contraction, intensity, and frequency [41]; the interactions and relations between neuropeptides and other hormones also deserve attention. Based on the results of this study, we concluded that SpFMRFamide might be involved in the regulation of reproductive activity and other activities. By observing FMRFamide and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) immunoreactivity that targeted the optic lobes of O. vulgaris, Di Cosmo and Di Cristo [42] found that there may be some relation between the two neuropeptides, indicating that the neuropeptides of cephalopods might exhibit cross-actions associated with physiological activities. In the paper, CHO-K1 was used for the in vitro incubation of neuropeptides. The experimental results showed that a certain dose range of SpFMRFamide and SpFLRFamide had no inhibitory effect on the total amount of protein secretion in CHO-K1, respectively (p < 0.05). Interestingly, when each of tetrapeptides with SpGnRH was tested on CHO-K1 cells, the treated samples showed a marked decrease in the amount of proteins released in the medium, possibly due to the presence of FMRFamide and FLRFamide. Inhibition of FMRFamide and FLRFamide does not seem to work unless they cooperate with other neuroactive substances [43,44]. According to this phenomenon, we intend to design the next series of experiments to explore the function of FMRFamide and FLRFamide in the signal pathway [42,45].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection

Healthy cuttlefish (S. pharaonis), representing three developmental stages (stage III, stage IV, and stage V that were divided based on the growth time and gonad appearance) [36,37] were collected from an aquaculture base (Shacheng, Fuding, Fujian Province, China). Cuttlefish representing the three stages were cultured in filtered seawater at approximately 25 °C with an artificial photoperiod of 14 h light and 10 h dark per day, and specimens were fed shrimp twice daily. All the in vivo tests were carried out at the School of Marine Science and Technology of Zhejiang Ocean University (Zhoushan, China), which obtained permission for performing the research protocols and all animal experiments conducted during the present study from the ethics committee of Zhejiang Ocean University. All experimental procedures were conducted under the oversight and approval of the Academy of Experimental Animal Center of Zhejiang Ocean University and in strict accordance with the NIH Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH, 2002).

4.2. RNA Extraction and cDNA Full-Length Amplification

The RNA extraction and cDNA full-length amplification were based on previously described methods [46]. The cuttlefish were anesthetized with ice for 1 min before dissection, and then tissues of muscle, heart, gill, stomach, liver, testis, nidamental gland, accessory nidamental gland, ovary, brain, and optic lobe were removed separately and saved with RNAlater (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, Co., Ltd., China) at −80 °C. Trizol lysis buffer (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to obtain total RNA from different tissues, and the RNA samples were reverse transcribed into first-strand cDNA with reverse transcriptase (Takara Bio Inc.). The first-strand cDNA of mature cuttlefish was used as the template.

According to the known conserved sequences of S. japonica (KJ933411), S. officinalis (Y11246.1), L. stagnalis (U03137.1), D. pealeii (FJ205479.1), D. opalescens (AF303160.1), and I. notoides (FJ896403.1), FMRF-F/FMRF-R degenerate primers (Table 1) were designed. The PCR amplification reaction was conducted with Takara Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio Inc.). The target band was purified from PCR products, then transferred to the p Ucm-T Vector (Bio Basic, Inc., Markham, ON, Canada), and sent to sequence determination. Once we got the core sequence of SpFMRFamide, gene-specific primers (FMRF-5′ outer and FMRF-5′ inner, FMRF-3′ outer and FMRF-3′ inner; Table 1) were designed to amplify the two ends. RACE reactions were conducted with the guidance of instructions of First Choice RLM RACE Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and then the RACE PCR products were transferred to the p Ucm-T Vector (Bio Basic, Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) in order to sequence determination.

Table 1.

Primers used in this study.

Primer Name Sequence (5′-3′) Positions
FMRF-F GCTGAAGATGAAYTGGAAGARGAC 1019–1042
FMRF-R TCATCRTCTTCACCKCCGCG 1235–1254
FMRF-5′outer GATGTCTCTAGCTTGCTTCC 1336–1355
FMRF-5′inner GATAGTGCTGAACAGAAAAAC 764–784
FMRF-3′outer GAAACCCTGAGGACCAAGAAGCTGACAA 1188–1215
FMRF-3′ inner GGCGGTGAAGACGATGACGTGAACT 1238–1262
RT-actin-F TGAGAGGGAGATTGTGCGTG 815–834
RT-actin-R GAACATAGATTCTGGAGCACGG 968–989
RT-FMRF-F CCTGAGGACCAAGAAGCTGA 1193–1212
RT-FMRF-R GCCAAAGAAGGAAGCAAGCT 1345–1364
FMRF-probeF CCCAAGCGTGATGCGTTGTTGGAGT 331–349
FMRF-probeR CCGGAACGTTTGCTTCTCAGTCCATC 515–534
Open in a new tab

4.3. Bioinformatics Analysis of SpFMRFamide

The bioinformatics analysis of SpFMRFamide cDNA sequence was analyzed with previously described methods [46] including the following aspects: amino acid coding region, the potential signal sequences, and the MW prediction, theoretical isoelectric point calculation (pI), multiple sequence alignments based on amino acid of the precursor proteins and nucleotide sequences of the genes, and phylogenetic tree analysis based on the sequence of the precursor proteins by the maximum likelihood method (MEGA 6.0). The software or websites used were Lasergene software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA), Scratch Protein Predictor, and Predict Protein websites, SignalP v3.0, Blastx and Blastn, ClustalW2, and ExPASy ProtParam online tool.

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR of SpFMRFamide in Different Tissues

qRT-PCR was performed to study the expression levels of SpFMRFamide in three development stages and various tissues of the cuttlefish on the basis of specific primers. The work was done and based on previously described methods [46] with the primers RT-FMRF-F, RT-FMRF-R, and 7500 real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, UK) and SYBR premix Ex TaqTM II kit (Perfect Real Time) (Takara Bio, Inc.). The β-actin gene (RT-actin-F and RT-actin-R; Table 1) was set as the internal reference. Three individuals were taken for each tissue, and each tissue was repeated three times. PCR specificity was analyzed on the basis of dissociation curve.

The mRNA expression level detected in the heart tissue was used as the reference value. The threshold and Ct (threshold cycle) values acquired via qRT-PCR were used to analyze SpFMRFamide mRNA levels according to the 2−ΔΔCt method. All data were normalized and are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). The data were subjected to the LSD multiple comparison test of SPSS. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05, and different letters on the bars represent statistically significant differences among the tissues.

4.5. Protein Secretion Activity of SpFMRFamide, SpFLRFamide, and SpGnRH in CHO-K1 Cells

The Chinese hamster ovary cell strain K1 (CHO-K1) was bought from Shanghai Institute of Cellular Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The peptides of SpFMRFamide, SpFLRFamide, and SpGnRH used in the experiment (Table 2) were manually synthesized by Shanghai bioengineering company with solid-phase peptide synthesis method. The purity of the peptide was checked by analytical reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) using a Beckman HPLC system (System Gold) coupled to a UV detector. The predicted mass of peptide used in this study was checked by an electrospray ionization mass spectrometer. The amino acid sequence of GnRH mature dodecapeptide is from S. pharaonis (GenBank accession number: MT211953).

Table 2.

Peptides used in the present study.

Peptide Sequence
SpFMRFamide FMRF-NH2
SpFLRFamide FLRF-NH2
SpGnRH pENYHFSNGWHPG-NH2
Open in a new tab

The cells were cultured in cell culture flasks until the logarithmic growth phase, then the medium was discarded, and cells were washed twice with PBS, and digested by trypsin. After the cells were adjusted to a cell suspension of 1 × 104/well, inoculated 180 μL/well to a 96-well plate, and incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h 20 μL peptide solution (final concentrations of 0.01 μΜ, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM, respectively, for both peptides) was mixed in the treatment groups, while PBS (excluding serum and double resistance) was as a blank group. The absorbance at 562 nm of the supernatant was measured after 24 h by an enzyme labeling apparatus, and the standard curve was made by BCA means to determine the concentration of secreted protein.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study represents the first report describing the full-length sequence SpFMRFamide. Moreover, the results of qRT-PCR and in vivo assay were used to assess the possible function of SpFMRFamide in S. pharaonis. The results of this study support cephalopod phylogeny. With the investigation of S. pharaonis, as with further species of cuttlefish, it contributes answers to open questions about the role of FMRF peptides in biological processes. Furthermore, the study could be of theoretical interest and practically useful for the renewal of marine resources. Further investigations are necessary to confirm the significance of FMRFamide in reproductive regulation and other activities, and the phylogenetic relations among FMRFamide precursors of cephalopod species.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lin Zeng and Guo-Ye Chen, National Engineering Research Center of Marine Facilities Aquaculture, Zhejiang Ocean University, for their kind help in cuttlefish samples collection.

Author Contributions

C.-f.C. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.Z., L.-l.S., and J.-h.W. performed the experiments. H.-h.L., L.-b.Z., and Z.-m.L. analyzed the data. C.-f.C. wrote the paper and contributed the reagents, materials, and analytical tools. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; No. 31872547), Science and Technology Program of Zhoushan (2016C41016), and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LY20C190007).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of the primers and synthetic matured peptides are available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Anil M.K., Andrews J., Unnikrishnan C. Growth, behavior, and mating of pharaoh cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis Ehrenberg) in captivity. Israeli J. Aquac. Bamidgeh. 2005;57:25–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen D.H., Zheng Y.L. The reproduction ethogram of cuttlefish sepia pharaonis. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2013;44:931–936. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Espinoza E., Carrigan M., Thomas S.G., Shaw G., Edison A.S. A statistical view of FMRFamide neuropeptide diversity. Mol. Neurobiol. 2000;21:35–56. doi: 10.1385/MN:21:1-2:035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krajniak K.G. Invertebrate FMRFamide related peptides. Protein Pept. Lett. 2013;20:647. doi: 10.2174/0929866511320060005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walker R.J., Papaioannou S., Holden-Dye L. A review of FMRFamide and RFamide-like peptides in metazoa. Invertebr. Neurosci. 2009;9:111–153. doi: 10.1007/s10158-010-0097-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Price D.A., Greenberg M.J. Purification and characterization of a cardioexcitatory neuropeptide from the central ganglia of a bivalve mollusc. Prep. Biochem. 1977;7:261. doi: 10.1080/00327487708061643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.López-Vera E., Aguilar M.B., Cotera E.P.H.D.L. FMRFamide and related peptides in the phylum mollusca. Peptides. 2008;29:310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dockray G.J. The expanding family of RFamide peptides and their effects on feeding behaviour. Exp. Physiol. 2004;89:229–235. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2004.027169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Salzet M., Bulet P., Wattez C., Malecha J. FMRFamide-related peptides in the sex segmental ganglia of the Pharyngobdellid leech Erpobdella octoculata. Identification and involvement in the control of hydric balance. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994;221:269–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18738.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baratte B., Grasmasse H., Ricart G., Bulet P., Dhainautcourtois N. Isolation and characterization of authentic Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2 and the novel Phe-Thr-Arg-Phe-NH2 peptide from Nereis diversicolor. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991;198:627–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Evans B.D., Pohl J., Kartsonis N.A., Calabrese R.L. Identification of RFamide neuropeptides in the medicinal leech. Peptides. 1991;12:897–908. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(91)90035-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grimmelikhuijzen C.J.P., Williamson M., Hansen G.N. Neuropeptides in cnidarians. Can. J. Zool. 2002;80:1690–1702. doi: 10.1139/z02-137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anderson P.A.V., Thompson L.F., Moneypenny C.G. Evidence for a common pattern of peptidergic innervation of cnidocytes. Biol. Bull. 2004;207:141–146. doi: 10.2307/1543588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maule A.G., Mousley A., Marks N.J., Day T.A., Thompson D.P., Geary T.G., Halton D.W. Neuropeptide signaling systems potential drug targets for parasite and pest control. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2002;2:733–758. doi: 10.2174/1568026023393697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nihei K.I., Kazuma K., Ando K., Konno K. Chemical and biological characterization of a novel neuropeptide in the venom of solitary digger wasp. Toxicon. 2012;60:95–248. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.04.097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Orchard I., Lange A.B., Bendena W.G. FMRFamide-related peptides: A multifunctional family of structurally related neuropeptides in insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 2001;28:267–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kuhlman J.R., Li C., Calabrese R.L. FMRF-amide-like substances in the leech. II. Bioactivity on the heartbeat system. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1985;5:2310. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-09-02310.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li C., Calabrese R.L. FMRFamide-like substances in the leech. III. Biochemical characterization and physiological effects. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1987;7:595–603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-02-00595.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoek R.M., Li K.W., Van M.J., Lodder J.C., De J.M., Smit A.B., van Kesteren R.E. LFRFamides: A novel family of parasitation-induced RFamide neuropeptides that inhibit the activity of neuroendocrine cells in Lymnaea stagnalis. J. Neurochem. 2005;92:1073–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim K., Li C. Expression and regulation of an FMRFamide-related neuropeptide gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004;475:540. doi: 10.1002/cne.20189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Keating C.D., Kriek N., Daniels M., Ashcroft N.R., Hopper N.A., Siney E.J., Holden-Dye L., Burke J.F. Whole-genome analysis of 60 G protein-coupled receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans by gene knockout with RNAi. Curr. Biol. Cb. 2003;13:1715. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coates J.C., De B.M. Antagonistic pathways in neurons exposed to body fluid regulate social feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2002;419:925. doi: 10.1038/nature01170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Holman G.M., Cook B.J., Nachman R.J. Isolation, primary structure and synthesis of leucomyosuppressin, an insect neuropeptide that inhibits spontaneous contractions of the cockroach hindgut. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Comp. Pharmacol. 1986;85:329–333. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(86)90202-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zatylnygaudin C., Favrel P. Diversity of the rfamide peptide family in mollusks. Front. Endocrinol. 2014;5:178. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bechtold D.A., Luckman S.M. The role of RFamide peptides in feeding. J. Endocrinol. 2007;192:3. doi: 10.1677/JOE-06-0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cao Z.H., Sun L.L., Chi C.F., Liu H.H., Zhou L.Q., Lv Z.M., Wu C.W. Molecular cloning, expression analysis and cellular localization of an LFRFamide gene in the cuttlefish Sepiella japonica. Peptides. 2015;80:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cristo C.D., Delli B.P., Cosmo A.D. Role of FMRFamide in the reproduction of Octopus vulgaris: Molecular analysis and effect on visual input. Peptides. 2003;24:1525. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Loi P.K., Tublitz N. Molecular analysis of FMRFamide- and FMRFamide-related peptides (FaRPS) in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. J. Exp. Biol. 1997;200:1483. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.10.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fisher T., Lin C.H., Kaczmarek L.K. The peptide FMRFa terminates a discharge in Aplysia bag cell neurons by modulating calcium, potassium, and chloride conductances. J. Neurophysiol. 1993;69:2164. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.6.2164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang L., Smyth A., Johnsen A.H., Zhou M., Chen T., Walker B., Shaw C. FMRFamide-related peptides (FaRPs): A new family of peptides from amphibian defensive skin secretions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;383:314. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Egido E.M., Hernández R., Leprince J., Chartrel N., Vaudry H., Marco J., Silvestre R.A. 26RFa, a novel orexigenic neuropeptide, inhibits insulin secretion in the rat pancreas. Peptides. 2007;28:725–730. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Primeaux S.D., Blackmon C., Barnes M.J., Braymer H.D., Bray G.A. Central administration of the rf-amide peptides, qrfp-26 and qrfp-43, increases high fat food intake in rats. Peptides. 2008;29:1994–2000. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kriegsfeld L.J. Driving reproduction: RFamide peptides behind the wheel. Horm. Behav. 2006;50:660–666. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Malin D.H., Lake J.R., Fowler D.E., Hammond M.V., Dougherty T.M. FMRF-NH2-like mammalian peptide precipitates opiate-withdrawal syndrome in the rat. Peptides. 1990;11:277–280. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(90)90082-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dong Z. Fauna Sinica (Mollusca Cephalopoda) Science Press; Beijing, China: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Luo J., Jiang X.-M., Liu M.-H., Tang F., Peng R.-B. Oogenesis and ovarian development in Sepia lycidas. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2014;38:1107–1116. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jiang X.M., Fang-Yao F.U., Zheng L.I., Feng X.D. Study on the oogenesis and ovarial development of Sepiella maindroni. J. Fish. China. 2007;31:607–617. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boycott B.B. The functional organization of the brain of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. 1961;153:503–534. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dockray G.J., Reeve J.R., Shively J., Gayton R.J., Barnard C.S. A novel active pentapeptide from chicken brain identified by antibodies to FMRFamide. Nature. 1983;305:328. doi: 10.1038/305328a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nagle G.T. The molluscan cardioactive neuropeptide FMRFamide: Subcellular localization in bivalve ganglia. J. Neurobiol. 1981;12:599–611. doi: 10.1002/neu.480120608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anctil M. Bioactivity of FMRFamide and related peptides on a contractile system of the coelenterate Renilla köllikeri. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 1987;157:31–38. doi: 10.1007/BF00702725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Di C.A., Di C.C. Neuropeptidergic control of the optic gland of Octopus vulgaris: FMRF-amide and GnRH immunoreactivity. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998;398:1–12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980817)398:1<1::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Di C.C., Di C.A. Neuropeptidergic control of Octopus oviducal gland. Peptides. 2007;28:163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rőszer T., Kiss-Tóth É., Petkó M., Szentmiklósi A.J., Bánfalvi G. Phe-met-arg-phe (FMRF) amide is a substrate source of NO synthase in the gastropod nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;325:567–575. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0185-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li M., Wang M., Wang W., Wang L., Liu Z., Sun J., Wang K., Song L. The immunomodulatory function of invertebrate specific neuropeptide FMRFamide in oyster Crassostrea gigas. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;88:480–488. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Y., Cao Z., Li H., Liu H., Lü Z., Chi C. Identification, characterization, and expression analysis of a fmrfamide-like peptide gene in the common chinese cuttlefish (Sepiella japonica) Molecules. 2018;23:742. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES