Abstract
The thymus is a primary lymphoid organ that plays an essential role in T lymphocyte maturation and selection during development of one arm of the mammalian adaptive immune response. Although transcriptional mechanisms have been well documented in thymocyte development, co-/post-transcriptional modifications are also important but have received less attention. Here we demonstrate that the RNA alternative splicing factor MBNL1, which is sequestered in nuclear RNA foci by C(C)UG microsatellite expansions in myotonic dystrophy (DM), is essential for normal thymus development and function. Mbnl1 129S1 knockout mice develop postnatal thymic hyperplasia with thymocyte accumulation. Transcriptome analysis indicates numerous gene expression and RNA mis-splicing events, including transcription factors from the TCF/LEF family. CNBP, the gene containing an intronic CCTG microsatellite expansion in DM type 2 (DM2), is coordinately expressed with MBNL1 in the developing thymus and DM2 CCTG expansions induce similar transcriptome alterations in DM2 blood, which thus serve as disease-specific biomarkers.
Subject terms: RNA splicing, Neurological disorders
The activity of the RNA splicing factor MBNL1 is altered in myotonic dystrophy (DM) patients. Here the authors characterize the thymic phenotype of Mbnl1 knockout mice, including developmental defects, transcriptome changes, and RNA mis-splicing of transcripts encoding thymic transcription factors.
Introduction
The thymus plays a crucial role in adaptive immunity by providing a conducive environment for T lymphocyte (T cell) differentiation1,2. As thymocytes mature, approximately 90–95% undergo apoptosis, either from lack of effective T-Cell Receptor (TCR) recombination and signaling, or alternatively, in response to negative selection to ablate high-affinity TCRs capable of recognizing self-antigens3. Defects in T cell selection and/or the loss of mature T cell populations, can result in a compromised immune state where cytotoxic CD8+ T cells are unable to exert cytotoxic functions against intracellular pathogens, or helper CD4+ T cells are unable to effectively provide B cell help to drive protective humoral immunity. While transcriptional regulation has been shown to play a vital role in both thymic organogenesis and T cell development4, co-/post-transcriptional events have also been implicated in thymocyte differentiation5,6. Indeed, alternative splicing (AS) adds another layer of complexity and diversity for developmental and tissue-restricted expression and splicing patterns for many gene transcripts that shift during development and aging7–9.
Due to the complexity of interactions between the RNA sequence elements and trans-acting splicing factors that control splicing and 3′-end cleavage/polyadenylation, RNA processing is particularly susceptible to mutations implicated in disease10,11. For example, the Muscleblind-like (MBNL) family of alternative splicing factors triggers the switch from fetal to adult splicing programs for its RNA targets and loss of MBNL1 activity is a major pathogenic factor in the multisystemic disease myotonic dystrophy (DM) type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2)12,13. DM1 and DM2 are autosomal dominant disorders caused by microsatellite, or short tandem repeat (STR), CTG and CCTG expansions (exp) encoded in either the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of DMPK (DM1) or the first intron of CNBP (DM2), respectively. In both DM types, transcription of these mutant STRs results in the expression of C(C)UGexp RNAs that are retained in the nucleus as RNA foci together with MBNL proteins14. This MBNL sequestration process results in downstream pre-mRNA misprocessing, including errors in AS and alternative 3′-end cleavage/polyadenylation (APA)15,16 that result in pathological manifestations17.
Although DM1 and DM2 are classified as a muscular dystrophy, the immune system is also affected and both DM types are characterized by a number of cellular and humoral abnormalities in peripheral blood. For example, although hypogammaglobulinemia and low lymphocyte counts occur in both DM types, they are especially prevalent in DM2 and are associated with an increased risk of autoimmune disease in DM218,19. In addition, thymic hyperplasia and thymoma, as well as increased risk for other cancer types, have been reported in DM20–23. Although the immune phenotype contributes to DM1 and DM2 complexity, the consequence of MBNL depletion on adaptive immunity has not been investigated.
The thymus is active in developing mice and highly active in the pre-pubescent period in humans, but subsequently undergoes progressive involution with reduced thymic output. In this study, we report that loss of MBNL1 expression in 129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 knockout (KO) mice results in postnatal thymic hyperplasia and thymocyte accumulation and we identify misprocessing of developmental splicing events critical for T lymphocyte maturation. Importantly, these splicing changes are also detectable in DM2, but not DM1, peripheral blood. Additionally, we provide evidence that the degree of splicing dysregulation is proportional to DM2 CCTG STR length and CNBP intron 1 retention level. Based on this analysis, we propose a set of AS events that are readily detectable in whole blood and serve as biomarkers for DM2 disease.
Results
MBNL1 loss leads to dysregulation of thymic gene expression
Our previous in situ hybridization study of Mbnl gene expression during mouse embryogenesis revealed that Mbnl1 is highly expressed in the thymus suggesting that the MBNL1 protein regulates RNA processing during thymic development24. To confirm this observation and extend our understanding of Mbnl1 developmental expression, we retrieved publicly available RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data of embryonic (E12.5-E18.5) and newborn (P0) mouse thymus25. Differential gene expression analysis confirmed that Mbnl1 expression increased during thymic organogenesis with 5.7-fold higher expression at P0 compared to E12.5, and Mbnl1 was in the 99.4 percentile of expressed genes at P0 with 14− and 8−fold higher expression than Mbnl2 and Mbnl3, respectively (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). In agreement with our prior in situ results, Dmpk expression level was very low in the developing thymus in striking contrast to Cnbp (Supplementary Fig. 1b).
During studies to assess genetic modifier effects on developmental regulation of RNA processing in the mouse Mbnl1 KO model of DM, B6.129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 mixed background mice were backcrossed to obtain either 129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 or B6-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 N10 congenic lines. For subsequent studies, we selected 129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 mice, hereafter referred to as 129-Mbnl1 KO mice, due to their shortened lifespan compared to B6-Mbnl1 KOs with a median survival of 22 and 37 weeks of age, respectively (Fig. 1b). To determine if MBNL1 loss caused RNA misprocessing, thymi were isolated from 9-week-old (P63) 129-Mbnl1 KO and wild type (WT) littermates (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Paired-end (PE) RNA-seq demonstrated that Mbnl1 was in the 99.6 percentile of expressed genes in thymus whereas Mbnl2 and Mbnl3 expression remained 18- and 12-fold lower, respectively (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). In agreement with previous studies on other cells and tissues, Mbnl2 expression increased 2-fold following MBNL1 loss (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Differential gene expression analysis revealed that ~5% of genes expressed in the 129-Mbnl1 KO thymus were mis-regulated (Fig. 1c). Of 1436 genes that showed expression changes in Mbnl1 KO thymus, 630 were upregulated while 806 were downregulated (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1e) and 54% of these corresponded to expression differences that occur during embryonic development (Supplementary Fig. 1f). Interestingly, variations in the immunoglobulin heavy (Ighv) and kappa (Igkv) clusters were among the most downregulated genes (Fig. 1d). Because the TCR beta variable (Tcrb-V) region also showed mis-regulation (Supplementary Fig. 1g), we assessed both the Tcrb and Tcra repertoires in our RNA-seq dataset. Surprisingly, 2 out of 3 129-Mbnl1 KO thymi showed altered clonotype frequencies for both Tcrb and Tcra transcripts suggesting clonal expansion of thymocytes (Fig. 1e–g and Supplementary Fig. 1h). Since these results demonstrated that MBNL1 loss led to aberrant thymic gene expression and TCR alterations, we next investigated potential effects of these changes on thymus and thymocyte development.
Thymic pathology in 129-Mbnl1 knockout mice
Analysis of 129-Mbnl1 KO mice revealed a time-dependent and striking enlargement of the thymus (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2a). Gross thymic morphology and weight in 129-Mbnl1 KOs were undetectable at 4–13 weeks of age, but by 19 weeks of age the KO thymus had significantly enlarged with normalized thymic wet mass weight increased from 3- to 88-fold (median 24-fold) compared to WT (Fig. 2b). Approximately 76% of males, and 40% of females, had an enlarged thymus characterized by lobulated or other irregular morphology. Histological assessment indicated massive thymocyte overgrowth especially in the thymic cortex (Fig. 2c) and viable thymocyte counts revealed 4- to 30-fold increased cellularity in 129-Mbnl1 KO enlarged thymi compared to WT (Fig. 2d). As expected, Mbnl1 expression was ~5-times higher in developing thymocytes compared to medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) (Supplementary Fig. 2b).
Mouse thymocytes progress from CD4−CD8−double negative (DN), through immature CD8+ single positive (ISP), to CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) developmental stages in the thymic cortex and become CD4+ or CD8+ single positive cells in the medulla26 (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Flow cytometry highlighted an increased ratio of DN and ISP and/or mature CD8+, as well as reduction of DP, cells (Fig. 2e, f and Supplementary Fig. 2d). Since ISP are larger than DP and mature CD8+ thymocytes26, we analyzed the size distribution of the CD8+ subpopulation. The forward angle light scatter (FSC) analysis revealed an age-related increase in relative cell size distribution in 129-Mbnl1 KO compare to WT indicating aberrant accumulation of ISP cells (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 2e). Interestingly, Notch1 regulates maturation of mouse thymocytes and is highly expressed at both DN and ISP stages, and we observed an increase in Notch1 RNA in 9-week-old 129-Mbnl1 KO thymi (Supplementary Fig. 2f)27–29. In agreement, significantly lower Cd4 expression was detected by RNA-seq (Supplementary Fig. 2f). Finally, to extend our 129-Mbnl1 KO characterization, we analyzed peripheral T cells in spleen, and noted an age-related change in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, possibly due to thymic dysfunction (Supplementary Fig. 2g, h).
Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in WT versus Mbnl1 KO thymi revealed enrichment in multiple categories in the KO, including regulation of cell population proliferation (168 genes, FDR = 3 × 10−10) and apoptotic process (124 genes; FDR = 4 × 10−3) (Supplementary Data 1; sheet 21). Apoptosis is a critical aspect of thymocyte development, and cells that respond inappropriately, either too sensitive or insensitive, to apoptotic signals can cause a block in thymocyte development and accumulation of thymocytes30. Therefore, we tested the possibility that apoptosis was altered between 4 and ~22 (20 ± 2) weeks of age. Interestingly, Mbnl1 KOs showed reduced sensitivity to dexamethasone-induced apoptosis with the greatest effect at 22 weeks of age (Supplementary Fig. 2i, j).
Cumulatively, these data suggested that aging 129-Mbnl1 KO thymocytes can be retained in the thymus possibly due to an abnormal developmental process, including defective proliferation and/or apoptotic signaling. Although gene expression changes were detectable as early as 9 weeks of age when thymi were in the normal size range, 42% of 129-Mbnl1 KOs did not develop enlarged thymi. Factors such as age, sex and genetic strain background impacted the penetrance of this phenotype.
Since MBNL1 is an RNA processing factor that regulates alternative splicing during postnatal development, we next examined the 129-Mbnl1 KO thymic transcriptome to test if RNA mis-splicing contributes to thymic pathology.
Altered RNA splicing in Mbnl1 knockout thymus
To investigate the impact of MBNL1 deficiency on thymic pre-mRNA processing we performed alternative splicing (AS) analysis using our RNA-seq dataset. We computed percent spliced in (PSI) for skipped exons (SE), mutually exclusive exons (MXE) and alternative 5′ and 3′ splice sites (A5SS and A3SS) as well as retained introns (RI)31. In total, 2% of detected AS events met our mis-splicing criteria (|ΔPSI | > 0.05, FDR < 0.05) (Fig. 3a). Among 866 changed AS events, SE was the most common outcome with mean 0.25 (0.05–1 range) |ΔPSI | value (Fig. 3b, c). Mis-splicing included MBNL1-regulated events that have been well documented in other tissues, including SE Clasp1 exon (E)20, A5SS Ncor2 E46 and MXE Dnm2 E10 and 11 (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 3). Moreover, 129-Mbnl1 KO mice also showed striking splicing alterations in several genes, including transcription factors implicated in thymocyte/T-cell development such as Lef1 E6 and Tcf7 E5 as well as Tcf7 E10 (Fig. 3d, e)32,33. To support our computational splicing analysis, we performed RT-PCR assays on 129-Mbnl1 KO and WT thymi as well as isolated thymocytes and confirmed significant changes in Lef1, Tcf7 and other transcripts (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Finally, we tested whether the AS events were also affected in B6-Mbnl1 and B6.129-Mbnl1 KO lines. We confirmed that thymic RNA misprocessing was independent of strain background since 129-Mbnl1 and B6-Mbnl1 congenics, as well as B6.129-Mbnl1 mixed background thymi, showed AS changes (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). In agreement with low Mbnl2 and Mbnl3 expression levels in thymus, neither Mbnl2ΔE2/ΔE2 nor Mbnl3ΔE2/Y KOs showed a thymic splicing defect (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 4e, f).
To test if mouse Lef1 E6 splicing was directly regulated by MBNL1, MBNL1-CLIP-seq clusters were identified near these SE events in publicly available data performed on mouse C2C12 myoblasts34 (Fig. 3h). CLIP-seq reads formed a cluster located 21 nucleotides downstream of Lef1 E6 and overlapped with nine YGCY/A (Y = pyrimidine) MBNL1 binding motifs predicted to be located mainly in bulges and stem-loops (Supplementary Fig. 4g, h). Compound knockdown of both Mbnl1 and Mbnl2 RNAs in C2C12 myoblasts resulted in Lef1 E6 skipping (Fig. 3h). To determine if MBNL proteins regulate splicing in human cells, MBNL paralog siRNA-mediated knockdown experiments were performed using human T lymphocyte (Jurkat) cells. As expected, MBNL1 siRNA knockdown also shifted splicing of human LEF1 E6 (Fig. 3i and Supplementary Fig. S4i). Finally, we performed similar analysis for Tcf7/TCF7 (Supplementary Fig. 4g and i, j). Therefore, MBNL1 loss in thymocytes caused pre-mRNA misprocessing and this developmental RNA processing factor directly regulated the alternative splicing of critical transcription factors required for normal T-cell development.
Thymic mis-splicing replicated in peripheral blood cells
The dysregulation of alternative splicing in Mbnl1 KO thymus led us to test if similar RNA misprocessing events were detectable in spleen, a secondary lymphoid and erythroid organ in the mouse35. We isolated spleens as well as splenocytes from 129-Mbnl1 KO and WT mice and assessed Lef1 E6, Tcf7 E5 and Tcf7 E10 splicing by RT-PCR (Supplementary Fig. 5a, c). As expected, tested AS events showed the same mis-splicing pattern as detected in Mbnl1 KO thymus. To determine if RNA mis-splicing identified in thymocytes and splenocytes might be detectable in blood lymphocytes, we harvested predominantly lymphoid in origin peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) along with other DM-relevant tissues from B6.129-Mbnl1 KOs and age-matched WT mice. Using RT-PCR, misprocessing of Lef1 E6 and Tcf7 E5, together with other previously reported MBNL-regulated AS events, was observed in PBMCs as well as other tissues (Fig. 4a, b and Supplementary Fig. 5d, e).
Recently, we identified CNBP CCUG expansion (CCUGexp) induced intron 1 retention (CNBP-IRexp) in DM2 tissues, including human PBMCs, and proposed this CNBP-IRexp event as an accessible and early-stage biomarker for DM236. CNBP, unlike DMPK, is expressed at a relatively high level in mouse thymus (Supplementary Fig. 1b) and human PBMCs where it is expressed 24-fold higher than DMPK (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 6a). The mis-splicing events detected in Mbnl1 KO thymus and PBMCs motivated us to test whether MBNL1 sequestration by CCUG expansion mutations might cause similar AS changes in DM2 peripheral blood. Human PBMCs were isolated from DM2 blood (previously characterized in ref. 36) with large >1000 CCTG repeats (DM2-LR) and short ~100 CCTG (DM2-SR) expansions together with DM1 and other controls followed by RNA-seq. Since DM2 and DM1 blood specimens were collected extramurally at DM patient conferences and shipped to our laboratory, the PBMC RNA-seq data revealed transcriptomic signatures characteristic of blood samples stored for prolonged periods, including previously reported changes in LEF1 E6 (Supplementary Fig. 6b-d)37. To overcome this difficulty, four MBNL1-dependent SE events were selected that were stable for at least 48 h at ambient temperature (Supplementary Fig. 6e)37. We observed significant AS changes in NCOR2 E47, MBNL1 E5 and two other transcripts only for DM2-LR, but not for DM2-SR, DM1, C9orf72-linked ALS/FTD (C9-ALS/FTD) and sporadic (s)ALS (Fig. 4d-f and Supplementary Fig. 6f). As expected, the severity of AS changes in DM2-LR and DM2-SR was associated with both CCTGexp size and CNBP-IRexp levels (Supplementary Fig. 6f-h).
Finally, we generated cDNA from a large cohort of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from DM2, DM1, as well as disease and unaffected controls, and tested LEF1 E6 and SPTAN1 E23 splicing profiles by RT-PCR (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 6i). As expected, significant changes were only detected for DM2. Collectively, these results showed that MBNL1-dependent pre-mRNA misprocessing is detectable in thymocytes, splenocytes, PBMCs, LCLs, and STR expansion-induced spliceopathy was detected primarily in DM2 cells expressing CNBP RNAs with long CCUG repeat expansions. However, the CNBP-IRexp level in DM2-SR was elevated but still significantly lower compared to DM2-LR36 (Supplementary Fig. 6h).
Blood RNA splicing biomarkers for DM2
To minimize the transcriptome artifacts induced by prolonged blood storage and/or processing, control and DM2 blood samples were directly collected into RNA/DNA preservation tubes (see Methods). All samples were screened for the CNBP-IRexp by RT-PCR and/or genomic blotting was performed to detect C(C)TGexp mutations (Fig. 5a). RNA-seq was performed using 6 samples for each group and CNBP-IRexp was detected in DM2 (Supplementary Fig. 7a). As expected, there was a strong correlation between CNBP-IRexp detection by RT-PCR and RNA-seq (Pearson’s r = 0.96) (Supplementary Fig. 7b).
Since CNBP, unlike DMPK, is expressed at a relatively high level in human whole blood and we failed to detect splicing changes in DM1 PBMCs, the DM2 transcriptome was compared to both unaffected and DM1 controls (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Differential gene expression analysis revealed only ~0.2% of genes detected in human whole blood were mis-regulated (Supplementary Fig. 7d) and of the 58 genes that showed expression changes in DM2, 36 were upregulated while 22 were downregulated (Supplementary Fig. 7e). Similarly, <0.2% of detected AS events were altered in DM2 blood (Fig. 5b). Among 202 changed AS events, SE was the most common mis-splicing outcome with mean 0.19 (0.05–0.61 range) |ΔPSI | value (Fig. 5c, d). To identify the key splicing events in blood that would serve as reliable DM2 biomarkers, we selected 37 AS events based on parametric (gene expression, ΔPSI, FDR) and nonparametric (gene structure complexity, wiggle plot distribution) criteria (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 8). Importantly, 70% (n = 26) of AS events overlapped with our Mbnl1 KO thymus results, including LEF1 E6 (Fig. 5e, f), and out of the 11 remaining AS events, 9 alternative exons were not identified in the mouse genome. For example, LGALS E5 is not present in mouse genome but was changed in Jurkat cells with MBNL1 knockdown, which indicated that these human AS exons are regulated by MBNL proteins (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). Since whole blood AS events differ between patients, we selected 14 readily testable RT-PCR AS events and analyzed them in a large cohort of whole blood samples from DM2, DM1, sALS and unaffected controls. We demonstrated that these AS events are changed in DM2 and not in disease control samples (Fig. 5g, h and Supplementary Fig. 9a-e).
DM2 is a late-onset and progressive disease so we next examined if the AS changes detected in DM2 blood could be confounded by splicing defects observed during aging. We retrieved publicly available RNA-seq data from 7 younger (26–32-year old) and 7 older (94 year-old) adult female PBMCs38. Out of 1,333 age-associated splicing events only 8 overlap with 202 AS events detected in DM2 (Supplementary Fig. 10a-e). Only MAP4K4 E20 was significantly changed in these 37 selected AS events. Finally, we tested whether DM2-specific AS changes reflect a developmental delay in splicing pattern transitions from undifferentiated cells in bone marrow to differentiated cells in PBMCs. Out of 6209 developmentally associated events, 38 overlap with 202 AS events detected in DM2, including LEF 1 E6 (Supplementary Fig. 10f-j).
Since we noticed Tcrb and Tcra repertoire mis-regulation in Mbnl1 KO mice, we next assessed both TCR alpha and beta chain transcript repertoires in the whole blood RNA-seq dataset (Fig. 5i and Supplementary Fig. 9d). Our results indicated a reduced number of clones in DM2 compared to unaffected controls that was associated with the degree of spliceopathy (Supplementary Fig. 9e).
Based on these results, we concluded that specific mis-splicing outcomes provide blood-based biomarkers for DM2, and rapid analysis of whole blood samples presents a significant diagnostic advantage to detect this likely under-reported disease.
Discussion
As thymocytes develop into functional T cells, approximately 90–95% are selectively deleted throughout the maturation process to ablate high affinity binding of self-antigens as well as promote recognition of non-self on antigen presenting cells (APCs)39. Transcriptional regulation has been shown to play a vital role in thymic organogenesis and thymocyte development40–42. For example, immune tolerance requires negative selection mediated by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs), which are characterized by promiscuous expression of tissue-specific antigens regulated by the AIRE gene and other factors to promote self-tolerance43,44. While AIRE facilitates global transcription for self-antigen expression, co-/post-transcriptional RNA alternative splicing during thymocyte education may also be crucial to create the diverse repertoire of self-epitopes that T cells encounter in the periphery. Surprisingly, only a few RNA splicing factors, including CELF2, HNRNPL, and SRSF2, have been implicated in thymic T cell development or thymopoiesis5,6,45,46.
Here, we demonstrate that loss of the developmentally regulated RNA alternative splicing factor MBNL1 leads to dysregulated gene expression and RNA mis-splicing in the thymus resulting in mis-expression of important thymic regulatory factors. RNA-seq analysis uncovered several thymocyte/lymphocyte transcripts mis-spliced in Mbnl1 KOs, including Lef1 and Tcf7. Both Tcf7 and Lef1 have been studied extensively in thymocyte development32,33,47. Tcf7-/- mice are characterized by disrupted thymocyte development, decreased thymic cellularity with decreased DP and SP thymocytes48,49 in relatively young mice (6–8 weeks of age) similar to the cell population effects observed in HNRNPL-deficient thymus5. However, when Tcf7-/- mice are aged, 50% develop enlarged thymi50. By contrast, Tcf7-/-; Lef1-/- double KO (DKO) mice have no detectable defects in thymocyte development but they die shortly after birth51. Interestingly, Tcf7; Lef1 DKO mice display increased T cell developmental disruption compared to single KO mice, suggesting functional redundancy between Tcf1 and Lef1 in thymic development52. Both Tcf7 and Lef1 alternative splicing is disrupted in Mbnl1 KO thymus. The Lef1 alternative exon altered by MBNL1 loss is located in the context dependent regulatory domain (CRD) and skipping of this exon reduces LEF1 binding affinity to the Tcra enhancer region resulting in decreased transcription and reduced TCR alpha chain53. Interestingly, prior studies have demonstrated that CELF2 promotes LEF1 E6 inclusion by interacting with sequences overlapping the MBNL1 CLIP-seq cluster (Supplementary Fig. 4g) indicating a possible compensatory role6,53. Additionally, Tcf7 regulates transcription of beta catenin dependent transcripts and can serve as a negative regulator of Lef154,55. The alternative exon included in Mbnl1 KO mice encodes a c-clamp domain containing the ‘CRARF’ sequence that stabilizes binding between TCF7 and DNA56,57. The combined alternative splicing of both Tcf7 and Lef1 pre-mRNAs with the increased expression of Lef1 suggests that TCR alpha chain production is compromised in the MBNL-deficient thymus.
DM1 and DM2 are both classified as myotonic dystrophies and a common pathomechanism for these diseases involves MBNL sequestration on C(C)UGexp RNAs. However, there are several molecular features that differentiate DM1 and DM2. While CNBP is expressed ubiquitously, and at a significantly higher level than DMPK, DM2 is generally considered less severe than DM1 with less muscle and brain RNA misprocessing. A potential reason for this discrepancy is that STR RNA toxicity is mitigated by RBFOX protein sequestration by CCUGexp, but not CUGexp, RNAs58. Interestingly, we demonstrated that this DM2 spliceopathy, other than CNBP-IRexp, occurs with large, but not with relatively small (~100 CCTGs), DM2 CCTG expansions nor in DM1 blood cells. Our results indicate that similar to DM1, the extent of misprocessing in DM2 correlates with CCTG expansion size as well as CNBP-IRexp level (Supplementary Fig. 11).
Another important aspect of this study is that only a few RNA binding proteins involved in splicing, translation and RNA decay have been shown to play regulatory roles in T cell development and activation45, so it is important to extend our knowledge of co-/post-transcriptional regulation of the immune system. The relatively high level of CNBP and MBNL1 expression in the thymus, and the inhibition of MBNL1 RNA processing activity in DM2 due to sequestration on CCUGexp RNAs, prompted us to determine if similar RNA mis-splicing events also occurred in DM2 PBMCs and whole blood. Our finding that specific RNA mis-splicing events in Mbnl1 KO thymus are also detectable in DM2 whole blood and PBMCs indicates that human T cell development may also be altered by CNBP CCTGexp mutations. While the molecular basis of immune system dysfunction in DM patients is currently unclear, previous studies have shown a decrease in peripheral T cell populations in DM1 proportional to expansion length59 and a high frequency of autoreactive T cell associated autoimmune disorders in DM218. This work suggests that RNA mis-splicing in the immune system may be a characteristic feature of other RNA-mediated diseases, and further examination of additional microsatellite repeat expansion diseases that lead to loss of RBP functions may uncover immune deficits previously overlooked.
Methods
Mbnl1 knockout mice
All relevant ethical regulations for animal testing and research were observed, and this study received ethical approval from the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Mice were housed under specific pathogen free conditions. All animal procedures and endpoints were in accordance with IACUC guidelines and animals were sacrificed in accordance to IACUC approved protocols. B6.129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3, Mbnl2ΔE2/ΔE2 and Mbnl3ΔE2/Y have been described60–62, and N10 congenic 129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 and B6-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 lines were derived from B6.129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 mixed background mice.
Immunoblotting
Dissected tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 0.1% Igepal CA-630 (Sigma), 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 5 μg/mL pepstatin A, 1 μg/mL chymostatin, 1 mM ε-aminocaproic acid, 1 mM p-aminobenzamidine, 1 μg/mL leupeptin, 2 μg/mL aprotinin) by disposable pestle followed by sonication on ice and centrifugation (16,100 × g, 15 min, 4°C). Protein lysates were quantitated using the DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Total proteins (50 μg/lane) were resolved on 12.5% SDS-acrylamide and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were blocked for 1 h in 5% non-fat dry milk in 1× PBS, 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma). Primary antibodies, anti-MBNL1 A2764 (a gift from Dr. Charles Thornton, 1:5,000) and anti-GAPDH 6c5 (Abcam, ab8245, 1:10,000) were used for immunoblotting either overnight, 4 °C or 2 h, room temperature (RT). Blots were washed 3-times 1× PBS, 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma), 10 min, RT prior to secondary antibody detection with anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse-IgG, conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (GE Healthcare, NA934V and NA931V, 1:5,000) in wash buffer. Secondary antibodies were incubated 1 h, RT in wash buffer. Membranes were washed, as described above, and developed in Western Lightning Plus ECL detection reagents (Perkin Elmer) and exposed to Biomax Film (Kodak). Uncropped and unprocessed scans of the blots are provided in the Source Data file.
Histology
Paraformaldehyde (4%) fixed thymi were paraffin embedded using an automatic processor (VIP6, Leica) with graded ethanol (70–100%) and xylene by the University of Florida Molecular Pathology Core. Coronal sections (5 μm) were cut on a rotary microtome (Microm International). Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanol (100-80%) prior to hematoxylin (RICCA Chemical) and eosin (Sigma) staining. Sections were dehydrated through graded ethanol (95–100%) and xylene prior to mounting with Cytoseal60 (Richard Allen Scientific). Histological tissue sections were scanned and saved as brightfield digital images using a whole slide scanner (Scanscope CS, Aperio, Leica, Vienna) and software (Aperio ImageScope 12.4).
Thymocyte and splenocyte harvests
Thymus and spleen were dissected into ice cold 1× PBS and connective tissue and fat removed. Single cell suspensions were made by mincing tissue through 100 μm cell strainers (BD Biosciences) into 1× PBS, pH 7.4. Cells were pelleted 400 × g, 10 min, RT and resuspended in 150 mM ammonium chloride, 1 mM potassium bicarbonate, 0.01 mM EDTA, pH 7.2 (Thermo Fisher) for red blood cell lysis. Cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 (Mediatech) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (cRPMI; Hyclone). Viable cells were enumerated using Trypan Blue exclusion dye (Sigma).
Flow cytometry
Thymocyte composition was analyzed using anti-CD4 (RM4-5)-PE-Cy7 (1:200) or -APC (1:200) and anti-CD8 (53-6.7)-Pacific Blue (1:100) or -PE-Cy5 (1:200) (BD Biosciences). Splenocytes were characterized using anti-CD3-Alexa700 (17A2, 1:200), anti-CD45/B220-Pacific Blue (RA3-6B2, 1:100), anti-CD4-PE-Cy7 (RM4-5, 1:200) and anti-CD8-PE-Cy5 (53-6.7, 1:200). Cells (2 × 106) were stained in 1× PBS, 0.5% BSA (FACS Buffer, Sigma) and analyzed using a BD LSR II (BD Biosciences). All cells analyzed were gated away from debris based on forward angle light scatter (FSC) and side angle light scatter (SSC) profiles and data were analyzed using FlowJo Data Analysis Software (Tree Star).
Apoptosis analysis
Thymocytes were plated in 24-well culture dishes (Corning) at 1.5 × 106 cells per well in cRPMI medium. Dexamethasone solubilized in DMSO (Sigma) was added to each well at final concentrations of 10−7 M and 0 M (vehicle only control) for each test sample. Cells were incubated 12 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a humidified chamber. Post treatment, cells were collected into 5 mL round bottom tubes and centrifuged 400 × g, 5 min, RT. Cells were resuspended in FACS Buffer and stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies. Post incubation 30 min, 4 °C, light safe, cells were washed in FACS Buffer and centrifuged as above. Apoptotic markers Annexin V and propidium iodide staining were completed using FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences, 556547) according to manufacturer’s protocol.
Blood samples
For blood isolation, mice (7 weeks of age) were terminally anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine based on the weight of the animal, then the posterior vena cava was severed, and blood collected by heparinized capillary (Fisherbrand) to BD Microtainer blood collection tubes with K2EDTA (BD) and additional tissues were isolated for RNA extraction. All relevant ethical regulations for work with human participants were complied with and patient blood samples were collected following written informed consent as approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB). Sampling age is included in Supplementary Data 1. Blood was collected into DNA/RNA Shield Blood Collection Tubes (Zymo Research) or BD Vacutainer Tubes, ACD A (BD Biosciences). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from the buffy coat of collected whole blood, followed by density gradient separation using Lympholyte-H according to manufacturer’s provided protocol (Cedarlane). Red blood cells were lysed and removed by using the RBC Lysis Buffer (Roche). PBMCs were washed with PBS and used for either genomic DNA isolation (Flexigene kit; Qiagen), total RNA extraction (TRIzol).
Cell culture and nucleofection
Jurkat cells (American Type Culture Collection; ATCC) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with GlutaMAX (Gibco), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (BioFluid) and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin (ThermoFisher). Cells were cultured in water-jacketed incubators at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Nucleofection of 2 × 106 cells were performed using Cell Line Nucleofector Kit V (Lonza) and Nucleofector II (Amaxa Biosystems) using program X-005. Jurkat cells were nucleofected with siRNA targeting MBNL1 (100 nM siMBNL1 and 100 nM control siRNA; Thermo Fisher Scientific), MBNL1 and MBNL2 (100 nM siMBNL1, 100 nM siMBNL2), or control siRNA (200 nM siRNA). Oligonucleotide sequences are included in Supplementary Data 1.
RNA isolation
Total RNA from DNA/RNA Shield Blood Collection Tubes was isolated by using Quick-DNA/RNA Blood Tube Kit with DNase treatment according to manufacturer’s provided protocol (Zymo Research). Total RNA was isolated by using TRIzol Reagent and the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Kit with DNase treatment according to manufacturer’s provided protocol (Zymo Research). Mouse tissues were homogenized in TRIzol (Ambion) with 1.5 mm zirconium beads in a Bead Ruptor 12 (OMNI International). Total RNA was isolated from thymus using PolyTron (Kinematica) homogenization in TRI Reagent (Sigma) followed by treatment with the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was quantitated on a Nanodrop, Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher) and/or Qubit RNA BR Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA quality was assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies).
Splicing analysis by RT-PCR
Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega), SuperScript II or SuperScript III (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with random primers according to manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was conducted using GoTaq G2 Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega). PCR products were resolved on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and gels visualized on an ImageQuant 400 (GE Healthcare) or Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS + (BioRad) and analyzed using Multi Gauge software (Version 3.0; FujiFilm) or Image Lab (Version 6.0.1; BioRad). All primers and PCR product sizes are listed in Supplementary Data 1 (sheet 2). Original gel photos are provided in the Source Data file.
RNA sequencing and computational analysis
Thymic RNA-seq (2 × 50 paired-end reads) were performed by The New York Genome Center from 9 weeks of age WT and 129S1-Mbnl1ΔE3/ΔE3 thymic total RNA. For human PBMC and whole blood strand-specific, rRNA- and globin- (only whole blood) depleted RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the KAPA Stranded RNA-seq Kit with RiboErase HMR Globin (Kapa Biosystems) per manufacturer’s instructions, except for the use of custom Illumina-compatible index primers to allow multiplexing. Library size distribution was assessed using the High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit (DNF-747) on a Fragment Analyzer (Agilent) and 2 × 76 paired-end sequencing was performed using an Illumina NextSeq 500.
Publicly available RNA-seq data were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and are listed in Supplementary Data 1. Reads were aligned to the human hg38 or mouse mm10 genomes. Salmon63 was used for transcript expression quantification and differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq264. MiXCR was used for repertoire analysis and Shannon’s equitability was computed65,66. For splicing analysis, reads were aligned using STAR67 followed by rMATS31 (Version 4) analysis. The IGV browser68 was used for data visualization and ggsashimi69 was used for Sashimi plot generation. CLIP-seq data were derived from DMseq.org70.
Statistical information and data visualization
Whole transcriptome statistical analysis for gene expression and alternative splicing were performed using DEseq2 and rMATS, respectively. Other statistical analyses, including survival analysis, were performed by using GraphPad Prism software (Version 8). The normal distribution was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test followed by parametric or nonparametric tests. For multiple comparison one-way ANOVA was followed post hoc test. Details are specified in the figure legends. Graphs where generated in GraphPad Prism software. Heat maps were generated in R using the ggplot2 package.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients and their families for their contributions to this study and members of the Center for NeuroGenetics for technical assistance. We would like to thank A. Cowsert and J. D. Cleary for help with blood collection and T. M. Brusko for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by grants from the National Institute of Health (NIH NS058901, NS098819 to M.S.S. and L.P.W.R.), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA546770 to Ł.J.S.; MDA480539 to M.S.S.), the University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute (to Ł.J.S.), the Polish National Science Centre (2017/24/C/NZ1/00112 to K.T.), and the Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation (to C.A.N.).
Source data
Author contributions
Ł.J.S, M.S.S., and M.M.S. designed the research; Ł.J.S, M.M.S., J.S., K.T., F.I., and C.A.N. performed the experiments; Ł.J.S, M.M.S., J.S., K.T., F.A., and M.S.S. analyzed the data; S.H.S. and L.P.W.R contributed human samples; Ł.J.S. performed the data visualization; Ł.J.S., M.M.S., and M.S.S. wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
The GEO accession numbers for all RNA-seq data used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 1 file (sheet 3 and 4). RNA-seq data generated during this study have been deposited in GEO under accession GSE138691. The source data underlying all Figures and Supplementary figures are provided as the Source Data and Supplementary Data 1 files. All data and biological materials are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
M.S.S. is a member of the scientific advisory boards of Locana Bio and Skyhawk Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks John Conboy and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Łukasz J. Sznajder, Marina M. Scotti
These authors jointly supervised this work: Łukasz J. Sznajder, Maurice S. Swanson.
Contributor Information
Łukasz J. Sznajder, Email: lukasz.j.sznajder@gmail.com
Maurice S. Swanson, Email: mswanson@ufl.edu
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-15962-x.
References
- 1.Takaba H, Takayanagi H. The mechanisms of T cell selection in the thymus. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:805–816. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kondo K, Takada K, Takahama Y. Antigen processing and presentation in the thymus: implications for T cell repertoire selection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2017;46:53–57. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2017.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anderson MS, Su MA. AIRE expands: new roles in immune tolerance and beyond. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:247–258. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hosokawa H, Rothenberg EV. Cytokines, transcription factors, and the initiation of T-Cell development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018;10:a028621. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gaudreau MC, Heyd F, Bastien R, Wilhelm B, Moroy T. Alternative splicing controlled by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L regulates development, proliferation, and migration of thymic pre-T cells. J. Immunol. 2012;188:5377–5388. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mallory, M. J. et al. Induced transcription and stability of CELF2 mRNA drives widespread alternative splicing during T-cell signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA112, E2139–2148 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Weyn-Vanhentenryck SM, et al. Precise temporal regulation of alternative splicing during neural development. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04559-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baralle FE, Giudice J. Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;18:437–451. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gruber AJ, Zavolan M. Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019;20:599–614. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0145-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scotti MM, Swanson MS. RNA mis-splicing in disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:19–32. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brinegar AE, Cooper TA. Roles for RNA-binding proteins in development and disease. Brain Res. 2016;1647:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee KY, et al. Compound loss of muscleblind-like function in myotonic dystrophy. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013;5:1887–1900. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201303275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thomas JD, Oliveira R, Sznajder LJ, Swanson MS. Myotonic dystrophy and developmental regulation of RNA Processing. Compr. Physiol. 2018;8:509–553. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sznajder ŁJ, et al. Mechanistic determinants of MBNL activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:10326–10342. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thomas JD, et al. Disrupted prenatal RNA processing and myogenesis in congenital myotonic dystrophy. Genes Dev. 2017;31:1122–1133. doi: 10.1101/gad.300590.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Batra R, et al. Loss of MBNL leads to disruption of developmentally regulated alternative polyadenylation in RNA-mediated disease. Mol. Cell. 2014;56:311–322. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sznajder LJ, Swanson MS. Short tandem repeat expansions and RNA-mediated pathogenesis in myotonic dystrophy. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3365. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tieleman AA, den Broeder AA, van de Logt AE, van Engelen BG. Strong association between myotonic dystrophy type 2 and autoimmune diseases. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2009;80:1293–1295. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.156562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Heatwole C, Johnson N, Goldberg B, Martens W, Moxley R., 3rd Laboratory abnormalities in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2. Arch. Neurol. 2011;68:1180–1184. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mignarri A, et al. Imaging of the thymus in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neurol. Sci. 2018;39:347–351. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3202-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Emparanza JI, et al. Cancer phenotype in myotonic dystrophy patients: results from a meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58:517–522. doi: 10.1002/mus.26194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ekmekci O, Karasoy H, Bademkiran F, Akkus DE, Yuceyar N. Myasthenia gravis and thymoma coexisting with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2014;24:40–42. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Feyma T, Carter GT, Weiss MD. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 coexisting with myasthenia gravis and thymoma. Muscle Nerve. 2008;38:916–920. doi: 10.1002/mus.21046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kanadia RN, et al. Developmental expression of mouse muscleblind genes Mbnl1, Mbnl2 and Mbnl3. Gene Expr. Patterns. 2003;3:459–462. doi: 10.1016/S1567-133X(03)00064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kernfeld EM, et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of thymus organogenesis resolves cell types and developmental maturation. Immunity. 2018;48:1258–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shortman K, Wilson A, Egerton M, Pearse M, Scollay R. Immature CD4- CD8+ murine thymocytes. Cell Immunol. 1988;113:462–479. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(88)90042-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Izon DJ, et al. Notch1 regulates maturation of CD4+ and CD8+ thymocytes by modulating TCR signal strength. Immunity. 2001;14:253–264. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00107-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garcia-Leon, M. J., Fuentes, P., de la Pompa, J. L. & Toribio, M. L. Dynamic regulation of NOTCH1 activation and Notch ligand expression in human thymus development. Development145, 10.1242/dev.165597 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Huang EY, Gallegos AM, Richards SM, Lehar SM, Bevan MJ. Surface expression of Notch1 on thymocytes: correlation with the double-negative to double-positive transition. J. Immunol. 2003;171:2296–2304. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.5.2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Daley SR, Teh C, Hu DY, Strasser A, Gray DHD. Cell death and thymic tolerance. Immunol. Rev. 2017;277:9–20. doi: 10.1111/imr.12532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shen S, et al. rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E5593–5601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419161111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weber BN, et al. A critical role for TCF-1 in T-lineage specification and differentiation. Nature. 2011;476:63–68. doi: 10.1038/nature10279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oosterwegel M, et al. Differential expression of the HMG box factors TCF-1 and LEF-1 during murine embryogenesis. Development. 1993;118:439–448. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.2.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang ET, et al. Transcriptome-wide regulation of pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA localization by muscleblind proteins. Cell. 2012;150:710–724. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Radtke F, MacDonald HR, Tacchini-Cottier F. Regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by Notch. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13:427–437. doi: 10.1038/nri3445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sznajder LJ, et al. Intron retention induced by microsatellite expansions as a disease biomarker. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:4234–4239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716617115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dvinge H, et al. Sample processing obscures cancer-specific alterations in leukemic transcriptomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:16802–16807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413374111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nevalainen T, et al. Aging-associated patterns in the expression of human endogenous retroviruses. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ladi E, Yin X, Chtanova T, Robey EA. Thymic microenvironments for T cell differentiation and selection. Nat. Immunol. 2006;7:338–343. doi: 10.1038/ni1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anderson G, Jenkinson EJ, Rodewald HR. A roadmap for thymic epithelial cell development. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009;39:1694–1699. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Carpenter AC, Bosselut R. Decision checkpoints in the thymus. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:666–673. doi: 10.1038/ni.1887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen L, Xiao S, Manley NR. Foxn1 is required to maintain the postnatal thymic microenvironment in a dosage-sensitive manner. Blood. 2009;113:567–574. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-156265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yano M, et al. Aire controls the differentiation program of thymic epithelial cells in the medulla for the establishment of self-tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:2827–2838. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tykocinski LO, et al. Epigenetic regulation of promiscuous gene expression in thymic medullary epithelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:19426–19431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009265107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kafasla P, Skliris A, Kontoyiannis DL. Post-transcriptional coordination of immunological responses by RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:492–502. doi: 10.1038/ni.2884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang HY, Xu X, Ding JH, Bermingham JR, Jr., Fu XD. SC35 plays a role in T cell development and alternative splicing of CD45. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:331–342. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00181-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van de Wetering M, Castrop J, Korinek V, Clevers H. Extensive alternative splicing and dual promoter usage generate Tcf-1 protein isoforms with differential transcription control properties. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996;16:745–752. doi: 10.1128/MCB.16.3.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schilham MW, et al. Critical involvement of Tcf-1 in expansion of thymocytes. J. Immunol. 1998;161:3984–3991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Verbeek S, et al. An HMG-box-containing T-cell factor required for thymocyte differentiation. Nature. 1995;374:70–74. doi: 10.1038/374070a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tiemessen MM, et al. The nuclear effector of Wnt-signaling, Tcf1, functions as a T-cell-specific tumor suppressor for development of lymphomas. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van Genderen C, et al. Development of several organs that require inductive epithelial-mesenchymal interactions is impaired in LEF-1-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2691–2703. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.22.2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Okamura RM, et al. Redundant regulation of T cell differentiation and TCRalpha gene expression by the transcription factors LEF-1 and TCF-1. Immunity. 1998;8:11–20. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80454-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mallory MJ, et al. Signal- and development-dependent alternative splicing of LEF1 in T cells is controlled by CELF2. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;31:2184–2195. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05170-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hoverter NP, et al. The TCF C-clamp DNA binding domain expands the Wnt transcriptome via alternative target recognition. Nucl. Acids Res. 2014;42:13615–13632. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yu S, et al. The TCF-1 and LEF-1 transcription factors have cooperative and opposing roles in T cell development and malignancy. Immunity. 2012;37:813–826. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Arce L, Yokoyama NN, Waterman ML. Diversity of LEF/TCF action in development and disease. Oncogene. 2006;25:7492–7504. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mao CD, Byers SW. Cell-context dependent TCF/LEF expression and function: alternative tales of repression, de-repression and activation potentials. Crit Rev Eukar. Gene. 2011;21:207–236. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v21.i3.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sellier C, et al. rbFOX1/MBNL1 competition for CCUG RNA repeats binding contributes to myotonic dystrophy type 1/type 2 differences. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2009. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04370-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nakamura A, Kojo T, Arahata K, Takeda S. Reduction of serum IgG level and peripheral T-cell counts are correlated with CTG repeat lengths in myotonic dystrophy patients. Neuromuscul. Disord. 1996;6:203–210. doi: 10.1016/0960-8966(96)00010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kanadia RN, et al. A muscleblind knockout model for myotonic dystrophy. Science. 2003;302:1978–1980. doi: 10.1126/science.1088583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Charizanis K, et al. Muscleblind-like 2-mediated alternative splicing in the developing brain and dysregulation in myotonic dystrophy. Neuron. 2012;75:437–450. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Poulos MG, et al. Progressive impairment of muscle regeneration in muscleblind-like 3 isoform knockout mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013;22:3547–3558. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bolotin DA, et al. MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:380–381. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bolotin DA, et al. Antigen receptor repertoire profiling from RNA-seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:908–911. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Robinson JT, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Garrido-Martin D, Palumbo E, Guigo R, Breschi A. ggsashimi: Sashimi plot revised for browser- and annotation-independent splicing visualization. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1006360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang ET, et al. Transcriptome alterations in myotonic dystrophy skeletal muscle and heart. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019;28:1312–1321. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The GEO accession numbers for all RNA-seq data used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 1 file (sheet 3 and 4). RNA-seq data generated during this study have been deposited in GEO under accession GSE138691. The source data underlying all Figures and Supplementary figures are provided as the Source Data and Supplementary Data 1 files. All data and biological materials are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.